#pc-specs
1 messages ยท Page 65 of 1
Same
its broken af
I never crash anywhere Else
just barely got out of there yesterday repairing gear and stashing equipment lmao
i crash if I get hit by a certain grav anomaly ever since patch 1.1.2 or 1.1.3
otherwise no crashes outside the rostok thing
I dont have this issue
Only Rostock crash for me and sometimes my fps goes down to like 10 and I have to restart my game
But game is still very fun๐
yeah i dont get that memory leak, i have a friend that still gets that
I see
for me its like a 7/10 at best tbh
Hmmmmm I really like the exploration and the atmosphere
you'll eventually realize there is very, very, little good or unique gear to find exploring. vast majority of locations just have sausages, medkits, and ammo
like 95% of locations or more
like quite frankly anomaly had a much better gameplay loop
this game also has only like 3 actual large sidequests
Such is life in the Zone
Are nights meant to beโฆ idk, bright? Iโm on HDR and I was expecting them to be pretty much pitch black, but instead it just feels like evening. Contrast is at 50, brightness 50, gamma at 45 (tho gamma doesnโt change anything when hdr is enabled)
on OLED i cant see shit at night lol
does anyone else notic aim sensitivety out of control on steam deck oled to the point it hurts your eyes
weird... what are your display settings? contrast / brightness etc
no idea i just tuned it with slider until the last image was barely visible
When you have HDR on, stalker 2โs gamma setting only affects the HUD - has no impact on the game. If itโs too dark try these settings;
Contrast 50
Brightness 50
And then HDR brightness 30
or just turn off and never use HDR anymore lol
I paid for these nits I must get my moneyโs worth
Reason: Bad word usage
i can't even really use hdr, the higher brightness is uncomfortable for me
its all good tho cause this is a very mid monitor for hdr, i didnt buy it for that
racism
lol even that my monitor is HDR i never turn it on. games looks really washed out and ugly with it on ๐ฆ
wait i thought the hdr actually dims the screen and it is not lit enough then
my last monitor was a samsung w/HDR; I couldn't get many games looking very good with it despite endless tinkering
HDR really is almost never worth it imo. Especially with all the tinkering and shit you'd have to do
Barely makes a difference to me, all it does is just make you fiddle with settings for little to no difference
All it does is just add more problems and makes everything look weird
ive watched videos on HDR and it seems that for video games if the devs havent implemented it properly then it'll look meh.
i feel the same, too much effort to set up and most games don't have a good enough implementation to be worth that effort
with oled games already look more than good enough in sdr
i tried HDR a couple times and to me it just looks weird
damn no clue why but now in Rostok 1% lows are so bad
Eh, with a decent display it can look really good, but stalker 2 is either impossibly dark everywhere or too light in the nighttime
This is what you get for using lumen
@tawny thicket tbh I have tried a lot of fixes to see how to fix on 1.1.3 the failed shaders but since I deleted them game runs even worse now than on launch and 1.1.2
They're likely failing or skipping compilation again, and being created/loaded as you go, atleast that seemed to be their hotfix prior to the holidays
I don't understand how the game now refuses to load it if it was running fine before
Whenever I restart my game it sets the graphics quality to EPIC, is this happening to any of y'all?
I been running all settings on epic since 1.0.0 and had no issues
now I get those weird lag spikes due to vram and all the other issues because of shaders
gonna try a fix someone on reddit said
Iโm not sure either, game booted up and runs fine for me throughout every patch, but Iโve also done my very best to not touch/change anything in terms of settings since 1.0, as thatโll likely upset it for me and cause issues
I understand, but when I make a specific configuration by decreasing certain settings (and saving of course) when I close and open the game again the settings are set to EPIC
GPU Nvidia?
AMD
hm..
now I read someone said to wipe both DX shaders and folder in steamapps under shaders twice and that apparently fixes it
In Nvidia software there is an option to return the VRAM memory to the system RAM. I enabled it now to test
if anyone is curious I can tell what I did but now am wondering if compile will work
nope still fails
I might as well revert to 1.1.2 at this point
as that was far better than 1.1.3
@coral token have you done the clear shader cache in the driver?
Real chads wait till the game is fully patched. I haven't touched it in a month and never proceeded far in the story
Im gonna have such a good time playing when its taken care of
what a weird feature (unless your talking about resizable BAR)
Its gonna make things worse if you have 16gb ram
I have 32gb
I played for almost 1 hour without any problems, but I won't say whether this Nvidia option helped or not, it's too early for that.
Gaming with Ram instead of Vram is gonna be ass
From what I understand, in extreme cases where the VRAM reaches its limit, a little is sent to the RAM until it stabilizes, just to avoid crashes or the game closing.
It seems to help in Stalker 2, the game suffers from memory leaks...
have cleared cache both in steamapps folder dx shaders and in gpu drivers
did the 1.1 patch break shader compilation for you and if so wich brand?
10
24
4
NO no problems here
my recent experiences with shader compile, useful for those who have the GOG version on Linux (there's dozens of us! dozens!!):
the default location of the VKD3D shader cache is, apparently, in the same folder as the main executable ๐ (who woulda known)
in my case it's 2 files, the names
vkd3d-proton.cache
vkd3d-proton.cache.write
deleted these, the shader comp started from the beginning and completed successfully, I even quit the game and started up again like 3 times and it's fine every time
a bit of extra fun:
the stupid Setting up profile thing that the GOG version does for like 30 seconds then you have to press Esc to dismiss the warning? here's how to get rid of it:
- in the folder
<path-to-stalker2-folder-inside-wine-prefix>/Stalker2/Plugins/OnlineSubsystemGOG/Source/ThirdParty/GalaxySDK/Libraries/there is a file calledGalaxy64.dll - rename this file or move it away
- start the game as normal, the warning won't be there anymore ๐
now, it may freak you out at first, because it will look like your saves are gone! ๐ฎ
but fear not! the un-GOG-ed version expects them in a different location, that's all
original location:
<path-to-wine-prefix>/drive_c/users/<username>/AppData/Local/Stalker2/Saved/GOG/SaveGames/
new location is one folder up!
<path-to-wine-prefix>/drive_c/users/<username>/AppData/Local/Stalker2/Saved/SaveGames/
so you can just copy the whole SaveGames folder and paste it in the Saved folder, next to the folders Config, Crashes, Logs etc.
start the game again, revel in the lack of profile setup ๐คฃ , watch the beautiful shader compile ๐ , and enjoy!
So true
maybe try disabling the shader compile?
I don't have shaders on my pc anymore maybe you can send over yours
or someone else who runs similar gpu as me
what GPU do you have?
i'm not sure it would work
RX6800XT
i havean RX 6600
and i dont think shaders work in such a way where you can just send the other the entire thing
im reaching constant 90-100fps but after some time it stutters like crazy and goes down to 5-20fps... i press ESC and sometimes it goes back to 90-100fps.. how do i fix this stuttering?
what GPU ? as if its 8gb or less..........
RTX 4060
then i'm afraid its to be expected but FG might also be causing some problems i've heard
especially at high or epic
i dont use FG, i set DLSS to native (DLAA) its mostly fine but like after an hour or so (not all the time) it stutters like crazy
medium might work a bit better
I just skip the shader cache by reloading it because it always freezes before it finishes and then i get incredible lag spike for 5 minutes then fin then it repeats anyone know how to fix that?
Do you play between 90-100 FPS on an rtx 4060? At what resolution?
without using Frame Generation?
yes i dont like the input lag so i have it off.. i have DLSS set to DLAA though
๐ค
it was fine in the previous update, now its stuttering at some point, and goes back to performing smoothly lol
idk what is causing it
Dude, are you sure you're not using any frame generator? Because I have an rtx4060ti and I can't get those FPS so high without using the FG
i mean i can show u a screenshot of it ๐ i doubt performance solely relies on GPU
maybe you have FSR 3.1 (AKA : FG) enabled @sinful fog
give me a sec to boot it up so i can show a screenie
it used to be called FSR frame gen but they changed it with 1.1
why? i have NO idea
if you are GPU limited....it very much so does
Dude... it could be engine.ini disabling some things and making his FPS go up so much, because on my rtx4060ti with the game without any modifications I'm not able to get past 70 FPS without FG
good point
I even used some engine.ini that increased the FPS a lot but left the quality of the game very ugly, because of that I reinstalled the game leaving it original
I wil be sending the screenies now, sorry the compiling of shaders took long
it goes down from that to like 87-90 and goes back up to 100
idk how else to prove the performance i get ๐.
i only have a 75hz monitor so its not like i benefit from that
but my monitor has the gsync thing and im running 128gb of 6000mhz ram if that helps (on am5 platform)
same issue I have but I have 16gb GPU
how well does game run for you so?
i have these weird crashing issues in i also get this issue sometimes
you have DLSS-FG set to auto......... try maybe there are other options with it
its OK
far better than ARK SMEAR ascended
well now I've reset shaders on driver on dx and on game itself
if that all doesn't solve this idek maybe reinstall the game
Or look for way to install 1.1.2
these shader compiles make even RX6800XT shit the bed
I just saw it go from 400fps avg to 5 with 250ms frame time
While it loads normal frame time is 2ms
thats how shader compile is soppused to be
i think even a 4090 would do that
ah yes crash
and actually..... shader compile doesnt even run on the GPU
LowLevelFatalError [File:D:\STALKER2\s2editor\Engine\Source\Runtime\RenderCore\Private\RenderingThread.cpp] [Line: 1273] GameThread timed out waiting for RenderThread after 120.00 secs
so you are on LINUX correct?
no win 10
oooooooooohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
i thought you said something like : ARCH linux
could have just been my dr... i mean halu...i mean nothing
well...... i guess it needs to be patched
hence GPU can't handle most stuff with people anymore
I just skip the shader cache by reloading it because it always freezes before it finishes and then i get incredible lag spike for 5 minutes then fin then it repeats anyone know how to fix that?
What is wrong with you
totally nothing
FG Auto = Enabled.
If I'm wrong, correct me, I think FG doubles the FPS, so if with FG active the game is at 100 FPS it's because your game is at 50 FPS.
Somebody help me
i didnt see it
Nah, you are right at least for fsr framegen it doubles your framerate dunno about the DLSS one
I finally got a 9800X3D, I'm now ready for this game
bad idea
You're right, back to Stalker mods instead
They both do the same thing lol
what was your specs before that?
7800X3D, so not a necessary upgrade, but not an expensive one since I don't need anything else and can sell off the 7800X3D
no clue why you did that tbh
I mean if he can why not
It does make a noticeable improvement in some games, S2 actually is one of them
Yeah 9800x3d is on avg 11% faster than 7800x3d up to 20% in some games/scenarios
So no, not worth tbh, but if you can why not
I probably would have waited for Zen 6 x3d but not my money. If you want it go ahead
Yeah Iโll chillin with my 7800x3d for now
I'm just chilling on 5800x3d
Me with an i5 11400 ๐
yeah one of my friends chillin with a 12400f
Might not even upgrade my CPU till the next AMD platform at this point not a big reason to yet
are u guys also having huge frame drops in certain areas of the map?
Do the standard undervolt and PBO boosts and enjoy
Hello is your game blocked on shader compilation ?
Iโm still waiting on mine, arrives January 7th
My Microcenter had almost none since launch, then today all of a sudden 25+ in stock 
That happened to me once or twice, trying again fixed it. Worst case scenario maybe validate game files?
Normal batch system guess it took a while before they got it
I turned it off and it's still above 70 playing around 80-90 now
bro has DLSS 4.......
but like seriously HOW do you have that much FPS on a 4060???????????????????????,
I'm using the gameplay balance mod and a few ui/hud mods
The uh anti stutter one
That's it really
i think thats the reason (maybe)
as for me that mod didnt really do ANYthing
but you could be lucky and it works for you
I'm ngl I thought it would kill the stutters it did 0 shit lol I only installed it this patch
you are on an 8gb card..Like me!
It's probably some engine.ini that he installed in his game that improves performance
why do I have an rtx4060ti 8gb and it's not getting all this FPS without FG in version 1.1.3 of the game..
Can you share the mod links?
I'm yet to do that lol (tempting because of the stutters). I wld know because most of those mods slightly lowers the image quality which won't do for me since I make cinematics. I'll send the links of the mods I use in a bit, just doing something else irl
Reason: Bad word usage
Woops. the f word can't be used but anyways I upscale my videos to 4k so anything lower than high have a noticeable decrease in quality
I see. Do you have a YouTube channel?
cant post links i'll just list the names lol:
SolidShadow's Toggleable HUD
Simple ModLoader and Console Enabler
Petey's Clean UI
Ultimate Engine Tweaks (Anti-Stutters - More Performance - Lower Latency - Better Clarity - Lossless)
STALKER 2 OMEGA - Modular Enhanced Zone Experience
Clean Button Prompts - MinUI Suite
and i do have a youtube channel but its more so a storage for the clips I take than an actual channel ๐
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EJ7kQYpbx3E
I just skip the shader cache by reloading it because it always freezes before it finishes and then i get incredible lag spike for 5 minutes then fine then it repeats anyone know how to fix that?
You cant
Guess ill just wait it out then
They must be low on time and money to make you pay 80 bucks and have bugs like that
I have an rx 6600 i5 13400 and 16 gigs of ram and while i get decent fps my game is very stuttery and even freezes sometimes why is that? I've seen people with similiar specs run the game rather smoothly , am I doing something wrong?
Have you try engine tweak mod? https://www.nexusmods.com/stalker2heartofchornobyl/mods/7
Blessed by the Microlith
Saw that my local shop had a handful in stock at their supplier, ordered one on the 23rd, got confirmation two days ago it would arrive the 7th of Jan
the game is getting fixed because the real chads who plays the game gives the data to devs about the issues of the game. if not for such chads who kind of playtests the game, you would never get the patches at all or it would take MUCH longer than it will in this case. so you should be thankful for the real chads who plays the game NOW.
i installed the game on my laptop with 2070 gpu ๐ for it to not to explode now
I have a 4060 and I get 60-80 fps on medium/high settings with dlss quality no FG
Very rarely drops into 50s but I also have only made it to garbage & lesser zone so
you all are wizards ( or NVIDIA is secretly beta testing DLSS 4)
๐ค
that is based
https://tenor.com/view/gigabyte-psu-explodes-gamers-nexus-power-supply-gif-23202345 that is what will happen
Sadly I donโt get performance issues only saw missing texture that I reported
Well the hole game is a performance issue but u guys get what I am saying
what settings? and what res? (prolly 1080p)
instead of s2 they are playing hogwarts legacy lol
most likely, sadly. didnt play it yet, soon will.
i9 12900k 32gb of ram and a 3080ti. game runs well until it crashes (LowLevelFatalError [File:D:\STALKER2\s2editor\Engine\Source\Runtime\D3D12RHI\Private\D3D12Util.cpp] [Line: 880] CurrentQueue.Device->GetDevice()->GetDeviceRemovedReason() failed at D:\STALKER2\s2editor\Engine\Source\Runtime\D3D12RHI\Private\D3D12Submission.cpp:910 with error DXGI_ERROR_DEVICE_REMOVED) It always crashes after an hour and 30 to an hour and 40 minutes of constant game play. i already did a clean install of my drivers and verified integrity of the game files. i haven't tried increasing the virtual ram. anyone with a similar build have this problem and fixed it?
gamers has someone tried out all the performance improvement engine.ini tweaks out and can tell me which one is the best?
I really can't understand why my frames are so bad in ahrophrom, like there's not even npcs around or anything :S
i tested all that i could find for performance : http://pastie.org/p/0vkx9hxV8UEdvZgqcY7ecl
and i also have some VRAM usage data but i am not 100% confident in the results : http://pastie.org/p/0NsdtOv5pa53l6xxb7wBAw
you are a godsend thank you so much
i havent gotten there yet though........
it could have something to do with VRAM ...
VRAM is fine, I'm at around 10gb max with my 12gb 3080, it's just my i7-10700k that struggles
is qmqz anti-stutter mod the "engine.ini file no1" mods?
i do not think so
okay because the names don't really match the mods at the start of the pastie ๐
engine.ini file NO 1 is most definitly not the anti stutter mod
okay ๐
I really don't understand why I have 20ms of input lag while not using framegen
could be that you still somehow have the "mouse smoothing" thing enabled but i dont really know
no that's enabled in qmqzs engine ini too, I just reset my engine ini and will look how it is with default values
huh I actually get less input lag with FrameGen on
WUT
yup I don't understand it, I updated my DLSS and FSR files but I have no clue what's going on
like i've seen that happen to hardware unboxed when they were originally testing FSR FG on an AMD card
but it thought that didnt/couldnt happen on NVIDIA
I have no idea, I'm running DLSS + Framegen on a 3080
framegen splits my input lag by basically exactly half
even at getting 100fps total with it enabled
hhhhhmmmmmm maybe turning FG on forces NVIDIA Reflex
ah I might have disabled that in the nvidia inspector, let me check
i also think one of the mods i tested has been deleted
Medium preset basically with fg
my 2070+i7 10750h laptop takes much longer to compile shaders than my 3070+i7 12700k standalone. standalone takes only 1-2 minutes but the laptop takes 10-15 min or smth..
the shader compile takes way longer the first time you do it
it does
well i know that DL-FG does but i havent seen FSR FG do that yet
Oh
i know. but it got stuck on very end of the process god damn it... still didnt start the game yet...
im really glad my standalone doesnt have this issue
ahh
i see
task manager says stalker is not responding. nice...
i expected to be problematic with performance on my laptop but i was hoping for the game at least to start lol
Go f yourself
Meanwhile on my PC took less than 1min do take your L yourself
someone forgot their medicine today ๐
after restart ive got the warning about the compiling failure and it just went straight for the menu. i joined the compile failure club i guess and im even more lucky that my standalone doesnt have these issues.
I just got the game yesterday and its probably crashed on me 3-4 times. I have a i9-14900K and a Nvidia RTX 3090 Ti with 64GB of DDR5 Ram
on my standalone ive got 40+ crashes or smth in 80h gameplay. but never crashed while compiling thank god for that at least.
Oh i meant to mention in the game not while compiling
ill run around and just crashes every so often with the UE Crash report
have they done any big optimizations changes yet? or is the game still running bad?
None of the patches so far have been performance focused
all gameplay/progression bug fixes for the most part
lolll
one patch increased performance in settlements by 10fps (for me anyways) (at least when CPU limited)
3070ti 12700,, 48gigs of raM,, 30 TO 40 Frames if im lucky,, since launch,, lol,, they need to fix their game man
40????? on a 3070 TIE?????
jupppp
1440p? epic?
on anything more than 1080 i get like 20 frames,, slideshow
i'm gonna look up some calming medicine
yeah well known memory leak issue
HOW
you tell me,, thats why im asking if they fixed stuff
what settings?
everything low,, dlss give me 10 more frames,, honestly it doesnt even change if go higher settings,, only if i go higher res
horribly optimised is what it is
use FSR, without it its unplayable indeed
im on nvidia,, shouldnt i be using dlss
*DLSS + FSR FG is what i think you mean
with fsr you should be getting more fps. my 3070 runs 100 fps on 2k resolution medium/high settings with fsr on of course.
@oblique cypress what is your GPU usage?
i think he is upset because i reacted ๐ฉ when he wrote that he owns amd cpu or smth like that xD
Dude keeps spamming my messages
i know FSR runs a bit better (on 30 series) but....still its like 2fps
so the reason you reacted with uhh ๐ฉ was because he has an AMD CPU ????
you definitely not using fsr then. i tried playing with fsr off and the gpu utilization was really unstable just like fps too. with fsr on gpu usage is always 98-99 perc and getting 80-100 and sometimes much more fps no problem.
It's why I dislike this guy
ill try it out
at what settings?
i really dont like amd stuff ๐ but i dont think this is enough to say such toxic stuff what he started writing here tho. mods sleeping i guess.
Meanwhile on 1440p with fsr all epic I get 130+
fsr gives some input lag tho, but without fsr the game as you see is unplayable
I mean zen architecture is overall better than Intel lol
oh i see so you were talking FG
it is
well i guess buy the 285K then..... i wont judge
now the funny thing is that with both 2070 and 3070 gpus the DLSS frame generator is greyed out in the settings and after turning hardware gpu acceleration on windows settings which really helped with stalker 2 performance but that FG setting dissapeared, i cant see it in options menu at all anymore. with both 2070 and 3070
of course you dont
i dont need to buy anything, i am really happy with both laptop and standalone which both haves intel + nvidia combination
BC its only supported on the 40 series!!! and even those sometimes dont have the power to really do DL-FG
well another funny thing is that internet gives different information about this, some say that only 40xx supports some say the opposite, but the most interesting thing that one mod here on this discord said that he owns 3070ti and he is able to use this setting. but who knows, maybe it was a bug in his case ..
but im okay with dlss + fsr, they need to fix the input lag and crashing and thats it lol
so yeah try turning gpu hardware acceleration setting on windows too if you didnt yet.
I dont exactly uuhhhh care what people say ..... NVIDIA litarally says on their website that DL-FG is only supported on 40 series https://www.nvidia.com/en-eu/geforce/technologies/dlss/ SOOOOOOOOO
Lol L for Nvidia ig
okay then. most likely it was a bug in that mod's case then.
Spends 800+ usd for gpu doesn't get all the same features buy another 800+ next generation for it 
yeah they locked it to 40 series even though the 30 series has the hardware to do it too to be honest if the 40 series is struggling with it...........
It's just so weird about nvidia honestly meanwhile their CEO buys another expensive af leather jacket
haahh !!!!๐๐คฃ Jensen is probably like : is this some peasent joke i'm TOO RICH to understand ?
Yes lmao
40 "series" encompasses a very wide range of performance.
true
if ignoring the compiling shaders failure, my 2070 runs the game on 1080p with fsr on and dlss "quality" pretty well - 80-100 fps
PLS when you are talking about FSR-FG please put the FG part there tooo
im just using the names that i see in the game settings mate ๐
Can't be using FSR and DLSS so what you wrote is confusing
Exactly
dlss on quality and fsr all turned on in my case ๐ค
If you're using DLSS for upscaling, what you're likely referring to as FSR is is actually FSR 3 Frame Generation
FSR itself is also an upscaling method and can't be selected at the same time as DLSS
Hold up you are upscaling to 1080p and running FG for that?
yeah thats pretty much what i resorted too...
I can run 1080p native higher somehow
Besides the issues I have ran with shaders and me deleting them all ruining stalker 2 far more
"somehow" you have a 6800 XT meanwhile i have an RX 6600
And that guy keeps saying AMD bad lol
i think AMD is great
He probably has dreams of running something by Cyrix :V
I'm mostly on the fps per dollar scale
so am i
Using QMQZ's peak mod (with a few tweaks to make it look better) on my GTX-1660 and Ryzen 5 3600, I can get well over 50+ fps out in the Zone, sometimes even maintaining 60 fps depending on what's out there. And I don't use FSR Frame Gen as I can't keep a consistent 60 fps anyways and it just causes more memory leaks with my potato 6gb GPU. ๐
Inside Settlements, it can be around 40 to 50 fps. Still experience the occasional "leak" where FPS drops to 5-10 fps but that's usually after playing over an hour out in the zone, and then returning to a large Settlement (Slag Heap, Rostok, etc). Usually, I can just go into the pause menu and wait about 10 to 15 seconds and it clears up. Or else, save, exit the game, then restart it and no issues at that point. Usually do this before major cut scenes. Uploaded a video showing my in-game settings, along with in the description what I changed in QMQZ's mod which was mainly to make the dynamic lighting a bit better, otherwise it was pretty much turned off in the Peak mod. His Base mod doesn't really help me much on my GTX-1660 which is fine.
Overall, it looks okay. Not anything close to what those with 4090's etc. can get. But, for me, based on my setup, I care more about the gameplay, and with what I have, the game is very enjoyable. It may not look the best, but it's not the worst I've seen in games. Overall, I can see what I need to see, whether it is enemies, etc, and when in combat, it's well over 45 fps so it's not terrible and I do just fine, especially with mouse and keyboard.
The video below is me at Wild Island, so if you're not there and don't want to know anything, you might want to skip. Really, no spoilers as I don't do any quests, but just walk around inside and out to show the performance I get with QMQZ's Peak mod and a few other tweaks I've done. I just wish YouTube wouldn't compress the videos so much as it can make it looks worse than it really is.
now i can see what you have been typing for 10 minutes...... HOLY
Set the video to Premier ๐
im not experienced with amd cpus but had really bad time with gpu tho. never going back to amd at least gpu considered. now about fsr part, i understand the confusion my bad , but yall got the point.
just finished reading ๐ i'm gonna take a look at the video now
may want to give it a bit, still only available in a crispy 360p
also youtube normally doesnt compress my videos this much
is it finished processing?
oh thats why it looks so great
i'll wait a bit
AMD used to dominate Intel back in late 1990s early 2k and since Zen 2 has been doing it again now looking at even server side of CPUs Intel is taking Ls
some are lucky with AMD GPU's some arent... but in my 6 years of playing on AMD i havent had any issues that A : werent my fault B : didnt get fixed by a restart or C : werent from the iGPU i was gaming on being trash
it also depends on when it is that you tried AMD GPU's
it was 5 years ago or smth
bc i've heard that the 5k series drivers were really bad
yeah that lines up with 5k series ( IIRC)
yeah drivers used to be pain in the ass
yeah IDK i didnt have a dGPU back then
its a bit of a meme now dealing with beginners that say "I heard the drivers were bad"
I get a chuckle. everyones "heard" that
yeah LOL
if you do everything right then you are very unlikly to have issues
I try to keep one of each running at all times to stay up to date. My RX6600 though is a little long in the tooth, looking to swap it for B580 to tinker
once I can find one at MSRP
i also want an upgrade.... the RX 6600 is just not enough anymore
I've got it hooked up to a 3440x1440 display lol
too weak
yeah, but that rig primarily functions as a youtube player/game guide/map lookup tool lol
Tinker with gaming on it just to see what can really be done with lower end cards these days
i imagine you are constantly on FSR P
if you game on it that is
Oh my S2 testing was rough, yeah. FSR Ultra Performance + FG getting like 30-40
I think it was High preset, though this was only like 30 minutes of tinkering like two weeks ago
i got waaaaaaaaaaaaaay more than that
i think i got about the same perf with FSR P at 1440p as i did at 1080p W FSR Q
like 40-60
withouth FG
correction : major
now it looks great!
Yo does the game have a playable framrate now?
I would really like to play but i couldnt make it actually work
well not great but veiwable
depends.....i cant play at epic 1080 native but it is playable for me on my RX6600
Im on a 6600 how much framrate do you get and what setting
(i'm gonna put my benchmark results on my laptop but i'm gonna take a look at them now (i keep forgetting))
allg thanks for the help i want to reinstall it but idk if it is worth it
and ignore the one that i put "temporary" in front off
thanks it doesn't seem like your getting 60 fps constantly
without FG i dont but with i do
FG?
though there is some stutering
thats a in game setting right?
and its not in the upscaler selection
Alr cool i will install it and try it again thanks
i didnt "hear". i did experience issues.
I think there is some differences i'm seeing from people's screenshots or videos. I see this for FSR FG. https://i.imgur.com/hfT7dvW.png
for me it just says 3.1
nothing else last time i checked
Same it says fsr 3.1
same. and im pretty sure everyone sees the same settings..
They should've left it at FSR frame generation
hoooollld ooonnn how can you see DL-FG on a 6600?? or is that a different PC?
ABSOLUTLY
these are just two screenshots taken from two places. neither are my PC's
OHHHHHHHHHHHH got it
Which amd gpu did you run tbh
the system I actually played the game on (finished it in 115 hours) has an Nvidia GPU.
i'd guess RX 5700 XT
ah i see....... but which one?
I mean I had RX5600XT before 6800XT since mid 2020 I remember got it since my old gpu died and had no issues with it at all
Still wild that I got 6800xt for only 100 euro more than 5600xt 3 years before
4090
Did you get new psu for it or just adapter for 3.1?
BRUH
Initially, the included adapter, then a custom cable. No new PSU needed
Not sure why laugh since there's 1200-1600w psus for over 10 years before ATX3.1 bs pcie
I run HX1200i and that PSU is a beast still not even planning to replace it anytime soon
Well, new PSU after a few months as it went into a new build but that new PSU didn't have a 12VHPWR connector either.
So it's not 3.1
No, why?
Because ATX3.1 comes with 12VHPWR
Sure, just wondering why you're asking
Mostly wondering about the psu side since you run 4090
What I do know that Nvidia adapter can kill your GPU since is limited use
If you don't know how to plug in a cable fully, sure. Never been a concern of mine.
GamersNexus had a lot of videos about it and even why that was happening
Nah there's only certain amount of times you can use that adapter
I followed that situation closely, watched all those videos.
I mean I bet I can get 12VHPWR cable for my psu even tho it's old
Currently using a custom cable from MODDIY
Nice
Which psu you do have tbh?
What I know a lot of well known brands have good aftermarket support
3.1 actually comes with 12V-2x6. That's just backwards compatible with the 12VHPWR. ATX 3 is 12VHPWR only
Originally ran it in my old system with a Corsair SF750 Plat, then a Superflower Leadex 1000W SE Plat
I mean that's what I misremembered I knew there was something about 3.1 that solved 3.0 issue
SuperFlower is really good ngl
The system + my display while playing a heavy game like Indiana Jones (which i'm playing now) is pulling roughly 575W from the wall.
yup, it's something that'll be useful for 5000 series. Different sensing and conductor terminals but the cables function the same
I'm running a C1500, which is overkill, but I am going to the 5090 which is expected to have higher power limits. The power efficiency curve on it is nice
That's not even too bad my system with monitor is around 500w which is in that sweet power efficiency curve being at 94% efficient I can't complain lol
As my PSU loves 25-50% load a lot
also why in gods name is NVIDIA sticking to that GARBAGE connector? so stupid
I have a seperate UPS for just my PC lol (I really didn't feel like going for commercial grade rack UPS)
I'm very happy with the Cyberpower unit in the pic above. Even talks with HWiNFO
I'd run both monitor and system just because it's then self encapsulated station
Monitor is on a different UPS. My peak power load for just PC alone could stress the UPS as is
It's a 1000w UPS, which is basically the highest you can get on consumer grade
But then again I don't experience power cuts at all really my own at home stupidity overloaded a 240v 16a breaker
yeah, the florida power grid just kinda sucks
So you're on 120v
yup
worse power delivery, less likely to electrocute ๐
Electrocution is based on amperage not voltage
(it's the main reason for US being 120 inside vs 240)
Tryign to figure out what this has to do with anything lol
I'd say US is on 120 because of old infrastructure tbh
yeah, that's fair
Basically 120v to 12v dc is less efficient than 240v
yeah, I know. Either way, my PC and monitor are the only thing I have on that specific circuit
The downside of residential UPS systems is that I have gotten the power overload beeping alert in games where they uncap menus occasionally and it's very annoying
Worth it since then if power cuts you can finish what you doing and power down properly instead of having a chance to electrically damage your PC
On a 1000W unit? The only time I've seen that is when I mistakenly tried to play games on two PC's at once connected to one and overloaded it.
Yes
It's one of the reasons I moved the monitor to another UPS
Reason: Bad word usage
On a single 4090PC with stock power limits the most I've ever seen is like 600-650W. If it was a 13/14th Gen i9 and loaded up a CPU benchmark at the same time, that might do it lol
huh what went happened?
I have a 4090 that I use the max power limit on lol
Damnit was saying in Ireland one bad electrician forced a brownout by shorting electrical radiator
Wrecked my PSU and GPU
I've seen no reason to go past 100% with this card. They work differently than Ampere. I ran my 3090 with a maxed power limit slider and no matter what, it would sit on that power limit cap. These Ada cards don't seem to work that way.
yeah, my old 3090 would sit that high. It's generally transients or game bugs with uncapped frames that cause it to stay that high
Its got a stock cap of 450W and I've never ever seen over 425 in actual operation.
And that's rare. Often its in the 300W-350W range depending on the game. Or lower.
Depends on a lot also your background heat
background heat?
do you mean ambient temperature?
But no, these cards just work a little differently. You can watch the performance limiters in HWiNFO or GPU-Z and with the old cards, it was always power. (if being fully utilized). With Ada, its rarely ever power limited.
At least with 4090
just set a global fps limit in that nvidia control thingy maybe? 120fps for 120hz screen, 144fps for 144hz etc. more fps than hz wont be displayed anyways
I have multiple monitor at different hz, it's not a big deal
it very rarely gets pushed that high. Like I said, it's generally bugs that cause it, and I'll cap on specific games when I see it
on my 144, I cap at 141 generally
Yeah I cap everything at 117. (LG C2 120hz GSync)
I don't cap anything myself
then you set the global fps limit as it fits your main monitor. "wasting" some frames on.. idk, youtube or whatever is on the other screens doesnt hurt.
why 141fps for a 144hz screen? just curious
yeah, I have a CX48 that I'll cap at 117, and a 1440pUW that I cap at 141
capping 3 below is significantly better for g-sync latency
The secondary monitor is used for certain games, not youtube or anything like that. It's a 48 inch OLED lol
If you cap at your refresh rate, you're not accounting for limiter overshoot and you'll routinely be stepping out of VRR range
Blurbusters has a whole section on this in more detail
of course, only in titles where you're sitting on the cap
(not a huge issue in this recent crop of AAA titles lol...)
ah, good to know. i never used g-sync tho.. just went with a global limit and called it a day
yeah, my main monitor actually has a g-sync module so I'm gonna use it at it's full power
I'm running a aw3423dw as my primary monitor. it really makes my powerpoints pop ๐
โค๏ธ OLED
every single screen in my house is OLED
My main TV is showing it's age now. It's a C8
my tech habit still remains cheaper than a cocaine habit
Building a new rig for Stalker and Elden Ring tomorrow! ๐
LG's are just robust. I know people over in /r/OLED_Gaming with 25k+ hours on their early models and no burn-in. Just need to do your due-diligence
oh, I have no burn-in at all. It's more the newer panels are much nicer in lighter rooms
the higher brightness and the newer coatings do wonders
It's wild how far OLED tech has come. I was at CES during one of the early unveilings in 2008
For sure. Just wish they'd do MLA on the C-series.
Gotta pony up for G-series for that, but not available in 42".
stream it if can
Speaking of, LG announced a new line of 5120x2160 ultrawide OLED's today. two 45", one of them bendable, and one 39". The static models are 800r though so its turning some people off. https://www.lgnewsroom.com/2024/12/lg-unveils-worlds-first-bendable-5k2k-gaming-monitor-winner-of-three-awards-at-ces-2025/
I'll probably go for the G-series for the next one
I'm gonna ride this current curved OLED for at least another couple of years, and we'll see where panel tech is then
I'd love to get back to 21:9 so I'll be watching those closely. If they do the same glossy coating as the TV's... sold
but my primary TV needs an upgrade in a year or so
Do u guys get huge frame drops while entering populated areas/bases?
Many people do
Is there something I could do about it? It really is frustrating, can't do a thing in the bases walking on a powerpoint presentation
This is why Ive had enough of series X and I'm building a PC lol
Best you can do is what everyone is doing. Custom Engine.ini's and settings tweaks. I don't have drastic drops in settlements, personally. Average drops by 8-10fps ish but that's about it.
What CPU do you have?
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
that didn't narrow it down lol (edit: now it did)
Yeah i pressed enter by mistake XD
It's a laptop btw so that could impact it, but when I leave the settlements i get 80-90 fps
It's like these bases/setllements are cursed with the frame drop curse or smthng
Yeah you have some settings a bit too high. What's the GPU in the laptop
What are your settings
Yeah 800R isnโt bad for gaming, but bad if you wanna do anything else
Everything on medium (most of the graphical settings), upscaling mode on DLSS/quality, DLSS frame gen on and fsr disabled, environment quality is epic all of them (I heard that it has so substantial difference if its on epic or medium), light shafts also enabled and sharpness at 20%. The only settings that impact the performace (speaking from experience) i think are shadows and post proccessing which i have put at medium and low
And these are WOLED, eww
Iโll wait for my 5K2K QD-OLED
No issues with latest gen WOLED here, but it'll come down to coating for me.
Yeah Iโll stick with QD personally, and I want glossy coating
LG's shown they can do a curved glossy OLED with the LG Flex. Better not disappoint here.
Or at least semi-gloss
I look forward to reviews of those though from Monitors Unboxed
yeah, my monitor is QD-OLED
I don't think you are going to be able to prevent the drop with that. the laptop doesn't have enough juice to overcome some optimization issues. you've already turned down hair a bit which is one of the bigger things. You could potentially try some enginetweaks mods, but that's gonna be around it
Yeah, im gonna try something with vortex I know people release some mods for the optimisation of the game so ill give it a try
does anyone get really bad frame rate when thunderstorms happen in the game? Mine dips to like 10 fps and i get bad stutters. gpu is 4070
My frames actual go up during storms believe it or not lol
Been like that since the game released for me too, my fps always goes up during storms
what's your frame like in zalissya? i know my cpu is bad, so i expect it to be that way with all the npcs
it stutters when I first walk into town but then smooths out and dips to about 90-100 fps
i dropped my resolution down to 1440p with dlss dlaa on, i need to test it now. FG off because the screen tearing is terrible
Yeah that's what I'm on, 3440x1440 DLSS DLAA, All Epic Settings
what gpu?
4090
i think my cpu is the problem, its an i7-7700. but i haven't had problems playing other games in 4k with dlss
Def on the older side but it's this game tbh, still need some optimization and the current version of UE5 is rough on CPUs, the newer versions of UE5 like 5.4 help with this issue
it's an 8 year old CPU in a game that is moderately CPU heavy and not the most optimized
also, is it the k or non-k version
i know. i kept the cpu because im use to playing games in 4k and the frame rate being low 45-60
Yeah cause you know that @4k cpu don't matter as much as gpu
and always gpu bound, non-k
i was planning on upgrading it to the latest i7, but i dont really wanna do that yet, just for 1 game
Yeah
Either wait for game to get more optimized, try to optimize things yourself, or buy new CPU
It's less important than GPU but still pretty important for lows. I will say that this game is more CPU intensive than average. going from a 5900x to a 9800x3d got me an average increase of over 20 frames, and much better lows
Correct
it's likely gonna be a lot of games coming out soon at this point unfortunately since it's only a quad core CPU
i dont really play games anymore, especially modern games. this game is the first modern game i've played since elden ring. if i can make it to the next generation of cpus and get by even if im cpu bound in some games, that would be better for me. hopefully i can survive the frame rate tanking to 20 fps in cities. FG doubles it to 40, but i cant take the screen tearing when i leave zalissya so i keep it off
yeah, FG isn't really designed to be used much below 60 FPS without adding massive visual issues and latency unfortunately
failed to load shaders
Well, my frames fixed since i put all my environmental graphics to medium which is weird, i dont get any frame drops in settlements which i got previously
really weird i can't really explain it 
this is some bullsh** whenever i plan to play this game some bug happens , mine gets stuck at loading shaders and then it says failed to load shaders
the newest patch should skip it on next load
Hmm that's really interesting what ur pc specs?
my game doesnt show any new update on steam
it's 1.1.3, so it's not "new", just the newest
core i7 9th gen rtx 3060
like my steam is just showing play not update
did u update ur drivers? (edit: ah that's another issue)
the update was a week ago
Try verifying the integrity of files, launching the game as admin, clear the system cache
ok, looking at your post history: are you still installed on a HDD and not a SSD?
That could be also one of the problems, the game loads and runs smoother on an ssd rather than HDD
It's a minimum requirement lol
Ah really? Lol i guess an SSD is the standard for these times XD
yup, it's literally on the requirements listed as SSD. Most games at this point require a SSD since even consoles are SSD and have fast load stuff
Yep, consoles also use SSDs so its basically a minimun requirement for games
Became my standard in 2009 ๐
I mean an SSD beats out the HDD in all aspects no? Except for the fact that HDD's are cheaper
In all but capacity per $
the problem is my ssd is only 222gb but its c drive so idk how to free up space in it its 70gb free
Determining what's using space and what you can move/life without. Disk Cleanup that's built a given, then using the systems built in Storage section in Settings to help identify what's what, then moving to 3rd party tools like WizTree
dude i am phuccd lol
(though even an older NVME is way better than a SATA one)
I would recommend a program called TreeSize, it shows a detailed sight into what takes up space on ur disk, it helped me clean up some of the storage
You need space for page file, so you can't fully fill up that windows drive
The fastest to scan by far is WizTree but yeah, all of these do the same thing. Just not WinDirStat, its incredibly slow.
yeah, I'll just say though that I don't think a 250gb SSD really...holds up in 2024
Surely not considering that the game takes up 150 gb ๐
Nice to have a 250-500gb for only the OS then a separate game drive.
Best option would be to uninstall the game and reinistall then, rather than trying to patch it if disk space is an issue.
yup, I do a 250gb partition for OS
He's currently got the game on a HDD. It's really not a wonder he's running into issues
That's what I have. Just a normal 250GB SATA SSD as my boot drive. My 2TB M.2 NVME is my game drive.
When I need more space I'm just gonna buy a u.2 drive instead of a m.2
I have 2 4TB NVMEs, one 2 TB NVME, one 1TB NVME in a U.2 case to SAS link, and another 1TB I turned into an external
1 TB SSD's also became more cheaper as games became more storage heavy so I would think of investing in at least 1TB ssd, it's like 100e at most
I've still got 2x M.2 slots to fill, the other two are in use. I just don't need any more space ๐
oh, and 2 500gb SATA SSDs
I bought most of my drives when the NAnd crash happened 35$ per tb for SATA SSDs sign me up put them into software raid
my mobo allows for 5 NVME, but going above 3 limits CPU pipeline so I didn't
I still have a Asus hyper m.2 I got laying around I should probably put it to use
Some of them are just through the chipset which, unless you're working in something that's hitting multiple of them all at once heavily, really shouldn't be much of an issue day to day.
so if i uninstall the game a nd reinstall it how much gb will it be ?
3 goes through chipset. It's the other 2 that go on CPU
Would be nice to get more pcie lanes on consumer CPUs. Best of both worlds but it won't happen for so long
The game is around 150GBs.
Yeah so three of them will share a single x4 link to the CPU which... eh, not that big of a deal for a gaming PC. Now, if they all kept large 4k footage for an editing machine and you're asking for files from multiple drives through the chipset, yeah then you might run into issues.
yeah, it shuts down the primary PCI lanes on mine, not the secondary. Using the secondary PCI also cuts my 1st slot down
3 NVME + 1 SAS link is enough for me for now
Man I wish Asus and MSI would figure out how to put block diagrams in their manuals. Asrock and Gigabyte have it figured out.
I want to full x16 pcie lanes for gen 4 rather than a single gen 5
These are so nice to have! https://i.imgur.com/GxiNHuP.png
I'll rant and rant about the uselessness of Gen5 on mainstream consumer platforms
I'm running only gen 4 NVME since it wasn't worth the extra heat for a gen5
the two 4TB drives are 990 pros
They could theoretically add switches to expand say, x4 lanes of Gen5 to x8 lanes of Gen4 but that adds cost
since I'm going 5090, and I'll likely need to get another vertical riser, I wanted to make sure I left things at full just in case
I know it's unlikely to be saturated, but it's more for down the road
Man I'm waiting patiently to see how much over $2k it ends up being
I wonder how big a 5090 would be
GPUs don't need gen 5 but having a m.2 card with bifurcation to have 4 more slots is much better
I said it before, it's still cheaper than a cocaine habit
This is what people don't get. Gotta look at it with perspective. Top end custom gaming PC's are still cheaper than say having a track car
I'm at the director level in corporate, am late 30s with a wife that works as well, and I have no kids. I gotta spend on something
If you want something cheaper get a console
pc master race, change my mind 
Amen.
Could be into cars.. or boats.. or planes!. Now you want to talk expensive. Makes buying the latest flagship Nvidia GPU every two years seem like nothing.
exactly
I do halo cards every 2 years, and full rebuilds every 4. All old parts go to good homes
even if you had a console you wouldn't get the privilege to get mods which are like the life source of Soc and the other series, even after the release of stalker 2 i saw people already pumping out mods for it not even a month after its release:D
And this is without mod tools lol imagine once GSC releases mod tools
Lol, i can't even start to comprehend what the game is going to look like in the future (with the mods)
think you'll be hard pressed to find anyone here that disagrees with you lol
yeah, I've been building computers for above 25 years
I almost want to start a new playthrough as I'm salty I didn't make a manual save before the point of no return
but I've gotta work on this backlog
yeah I've just been playing slowly
S2 was my personal game of the year but I jumped right into Indiana Jones afterwards which i'm playing now and man.. decision became much harder.
well i have a tiny ssd so i guess imma have to uninstall stalker 2
oh, I haven't been playing much else. the downside of having the money to buy all the nice builds is the work time that it takes to do it lol
cause its just buggy as hell
yes, you are playing on a computer below the minimum specs. You are going to need to get another SSD tbh
Easy, just need ignore your social responsibilities/wife. Boom, all the time in the world ๐คฃ
instructions unclear, lost half my assets
Gonna feel nice to get out of college and make money
You can still game with only half
Same, esp for AIB models, Iโm expecting to pay around $2300-2500 for an ASUS STRIX model
i figured out that setting Hair to medium and/or setting it windowed full screen resolves the tanking of FPS in cities, and other random instances like when you reload. but i think im gonna wait for them to optimize the game more, and use this opportunity to play the original games. i really have no idea what's going on in the story and only played like 5 hrs of shadows of chornobyl like over 10 years ago, so I feel like im missing a lot
Yk at this point pcs, even top tier hardware, is pure trash lol
See, in early 2000s, consoles dominated the scene. The ps2 was so unholy strong, governments used it as servers. It ate pcs Alive
Then pcs dominated the ps4 era. The ps4 was insanely bottlenecked by literally one of the slowest 8 core CPUs ever created. Its so incredibly bad. Ps4 pro actually had decent gpu power .
Nowadays its a mix of both. Both console and PCs are Just weak and overpriced. My thoughts? A crash is probably Happening soon, probably a few years after gta 6 release. Yes, gta 6 is such a era defining title
meh i think for pc a big part of the problem is games not being properly optimised (or finished) anymore, with too much reliance on upscaling and frame generation
though nvidia does take the piss with their pricing
governments did not use the ps2 as a server. You are thinking of the PS3 and the cell super computers, which still weren't as great as regular supercomputers
The first high-profile PS2 supercomputer cluster, using 70 PS2 consoles, was built by the US National Centre for Supercomputing Applications at the University of Illinois in Urbana-Champaign, in 2003
They make the biggest bank on AI research. Us gamers don't pay 1% of that. I wouldn't worry about pricing because the 50 series is gonna have some crazy AI fumble thats a game changer
no doubt
the PS2 cluster wasn't a particularly strong supercomputer, and the NCSA is a partnership not fully governmental. The PS3 one was the big one used by the government. They did run it off the emotion engine, but it's not really what people think of when they think of the Playstation cluster
the PS3 one was the military one that was actually wild at the time
like for comparison, the airforce one was 1,760 PS3s
The PS2 one was neat, but it was a clear testbed
Just looking for some advance, currently running a 4070ti super with an i9-9900k on ultrawide 1440p display would the cpu be the bottleneck if so what would be the right cpu to buy
it'll likely depend on the game and how much you've been able to OC it. It's a 6 year old CPU
If you are running at full bandwidth, it's likely still generally ok
but if you it in anything below a PCI-E 3 x16, I think it does
i don't think z390 had PCI-E 4, but I could be wrong (and I'm assuming that's what you are on, not an older mobo chipset)
yeah youre absoluetly right, currently trying to get stalker 2 to run smoothly but still cant get consistant performance had a look online and thought the i7 14700k may be an upgrade?
but then am i also looking at a new motherboard
yeah, you are end of life on that mobo
and tbh, at that point you are also looking at new ram, probably some newer SSDs
9th gen also had the meltdown and other fixes for security that also impacted performance
Being that it's a DDR4 platform; upgrading the board/cpu/mem should be considered at this point before anything else
it's not just DDR4, it's old DDR4. It was limited up to 2666, so can't even re-use the ram without causing some big bottlenecks
I was using similar setup up until last year, going from ddr4 3000 to ddr5 6000 and 9900k to 12900k was very significant
also, if you've never repasted the CPU it's potentially throttling as well
wow okay so its gunna be pricey
I mean if you just want a newer platform it can be gotten for as little as 300$ pre tax. For a 7600x mobo and 16gb of ddr5 but closer to 450 for a 8core and more ram
anyone elses game freeze if they hit printscreen button
My game crashes when I hit the power button
In theory, in two weeks we will be able to properly run the game with a RTX 5090 ๐
Seems it will be longer until the 5090 is for sale
couldn't tell you, don't have one ๐
Me neither. It was today I discovered it's the snipping tool that causes the crash, and trying to find out what windows 11 hotkey for actually just print screen wash, was a bit of a nightmare
Working now!
still runs like ass because the problem is cpu load
You know its funny, I was going to comment that a 5090 isn't going to fix most people's problems with the CPU's we see often
yeah i know i'll be laughing very hard if someone actually upgrades to a 50 series card and then complains that the game doesn't run any better lol
CPU load concerns with this title here with a 7800x3D playing at 4K with a 4090
so yeah, its a problem
eh i think the cpu is the issue
4070 super seems to handle everything on ultra at least at 1440p
ah i see others mentioned the exact same thing
anyone else still have issues with the game crashing every 20-30 minutes or so? its driving me nuts i just wanna play lol
I run on a pretty low end system, 16gb ram, rtx 3050 and a ryzen 5500 and honestly the game doesnt run too bad
idk for someone like me i dont think even 60fps runs good
higher fps feels sooo much better. even 70 fps is a huge jump from 60
and there are places like rostok where you're lucky if you can get 60
true true
For me i consider like 30 fps good as long as its smooth and doesn't stutter
I do use a preformance mod too though
after all the update i mean why it still trash on optimization ?
cause its only unreal 5.1
probably. 5.5 is way better perf wise. gpu perf seems fine imo.
i dont understand why its so insanely cpu bottlenecked tho. but im pretty sure its mainly a 5.1 limitation
more power to you really. 30fps is unplayable for me. like legit unplayable
https://youtu.be/29ZZTlJt9K8 - a video from Digital Foundry on Unreal Engine 5.4
https://youtu.be/BcmUZpdChhA - another video on 5.5
yup really big gains
if gsc wants to spend the time/resources/money to update to 5.5 or even 5.4 it'd be suuuuper helpful
I want that noise reduction algorithm
but its a big task obviously
Yeah I'm sure it's been talked about in their meetings
really in general you'd think more games used cpus better but its so much harder programming wise to use multiple threads and cores
but its desperately needed and in this in particular its an issue. shouldn't need a 9800x3d or whatever to get 70 fps in rostok
https://youtu.be/BcmUZpdChhA?si=mXoj8HPNL-p8z8TE&t=547 the noise reduction is amazing (skipped to 9:07)
maybe, but considering how much content they're missing idk
the list of cut shit must be enormous. NVGs, probably the majority of the non story quests.
outside the story its such a barebones game
I found it interesting how much better 9800X3D performs in this game compared to 7800X3D
like gameplay wise you may as well just play modded Anomaly
cause its the same thing but way better basically
it'll be interesting to see what they add outside of dlc. ideally they really should fill up the map with more content outside of dlcs but idk, I'm not betting on it.
https://youtu.be/VN2_g_uzAA8?si=apswoV-0mHMR-Hzu&t=325 video on 7800X3D vs 9800X3D in Stalker 2
Well on avg its only 11% faster than 7800X3D
but seems to have big gains in Stalker 2
oh you referring to anomaly lol my b
yeah its interesting. the architecture improvements from 5800x3d to 7800x3d to 9800x3d is really noticeable in this game
hell i think this is one of the very few games where I've ever wanted anything stronger than a 5800x3d
Lol yeah I didn't want a 9800x3d but now I kinda do
Reason: Bad word usage
I definitely don't need one tho
also the gameplay is so freakin casual. this game basically needs mods
you arent having issues with crashing? idk wyf is going on but i constantly get the shipping crash
you can just casually spam medkits through every encounter in this game almost
Yeah I need more hardcore game and more itemization so I'm fully modded
if im lucky 30-40 minute begore a crash
i have some mods plus mhm's consumable thing. and man having medkits slowly heal is such a huuuuge improvement
tbh i should have just waited and played with mods lmao.
Yep same, I'm using all MHM modules basically, even less loot, full tier detectors, mutant loot, etc
got so bored idk if I will even finish my first playthrough.
No luckily I haven't had issues with crashing
Yeah I started a fresh playthrough with these mods
Yeah I get that
performance is okay but i can not fix the crashing. ive given up at this point i dunno what to do to be able to play
yeah rn its a mess. i have novichok mutant, novichok ai, maklanes gunfight ai, mhms consumable, better ballistics 1.4 for guns.
which sucks cuz i love the game an all i wannd do is play but it ruins the game to constantly crash
might wait for mhm 2.0 and run just that plus ai mods
cause too many separate mods is questionable balance wise and im kind of ocd
what type of crash
exception acces violation then it says shipping over and over
could try manually cleaning shader cache
https://imgur.com/a/jU8JKBC my mod list lol
im not sure of the exact code it gives tho
verify game files. ddu and reinstall gpu drivers. idk
if its an oodle related crash its an intel cpu issue
i did those. went as far as reinstalling the game no mods no nothing on the lowest settings and literally no change lol
im just stuck. benchmark my pc is fine. its just not meant to be i guess idk LOL
ddu and reinstall gpu driver?
isnt MHM not updated for 1.1.3 or does it not matter?
no ddu but did reinstall gpu drivers
i would ddu so you know its 100% clean tbh
Idk if all the values are "adjusted" so to speak for balancing purposes but otherwise it's working fine for me
also if your overclock is unstable it could be an issue
nah no overclock at all
i think ima just wait. cause mhm 2.0 is around the corner.
what cpu do you have
any other unreal games crash on you?
ryzen 7 3800x
Oh did Ani say that in Groks discord?
an nah not really
they're working on it rn basically. cause they were on vacation or something and just got back. so it'll be a little bit but should be coming im hoping this week
and yeah that's fair, I don't mind starting over again when that drops
yeah idk whats up then, def not a cpu issue since your're ryzen
looking into a new pc currently but i dont think the specs are the real reason for the crashes cuz my pc isnt that outdated. ryzen 7 3800x 2080ti and 32gb of ram
they broke a lot of stuff last patch it seems so hopefully next patch it works for you
yeha have seen this. been hopeful but not sure how long that patch will take an maaaan i wann play lool
i need a mod to reskin the tourist suit
i hate it, it looks terrible in first person imo.
Just read up in Grok discord, looks like Ani is trying to have MHM2.0 out by New Years day
Looks to be almost done
yeah I saw that but you how it is with mods haha
i said my tree mod for fallout 4 2.0 would prob come out in a month 6 months ago ๐ ofc he seems to have way more energy for modding than me but anything can happen
Yeah lol, fingers crossed tho, looks like some exciting changes
Zen 6 is rumoured to have more cores and the 9800x3d is the best of the best CPU so theoretically games dont design for x3d CPUs but unfortunately yk
found a way to remove 1.1.3 update myself tbh
jeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeezzzzzzzzzz
damn that's a list

holding off, I know it'll feel cool to get and install then nothing will actually change in day to day from 7800x3D lol
Basically lol
If we get 12-core CCD's with Zen6 though
Wait for it to be $330
Ikr
12-core single CCD x3D is the dream
Then 16-core single ccd X3D
lol well that's a pipedream lol

12-core CCD's would bring us 24-core chips though which would be monsters
Yeah
Need one of those NV Link Spines but for X3D chips
Connect like 72 X3D chips together
im wondering : can they put V-cache onto C cores? bc then they could get alt least 12 cores / CCD
C cores?
What you mean by that lmao
Zen4c/Zen5c
some people call them AMD's E-cores but they have the exact same architecure as regular cores but they are smaller
There are Epyc models along with some of the 8000 series APU's that use cut down Zen cores that are physically smaller
So lesser cores that are used on APUs?
Effective L3 cache per core is reduced to save space but the IPC is the same as its big brothers.
and server, they have the exact same IPC but lower clocks
https://www.phoronix.com/review/amd-zen4-zen4c-scaling found this honestly seems like not really worth it unless a lot cheaper compared
But considering what X3D is segmented for doubtful we will see V cache on those chips
But what I have researched Zen5c is on 3nm not on 5nm like Zen5
But the fact Zen5c will be on same IPC but lower voltage and smaller die size and hence possibly also higher clocks since is on 3nm @tawny thicket
true, my vram seems to overload after 1,5h of game and i have to restart it
this 1.13 patch is trash
Dear lord

found a potential solution
Classic jensen, you know
Gotta love em tbh lol the way he explains things is top tier
only way I resolved the whole shader crashing was deleting all my existing mods for now
Yeah his way of handling conferences is amazing, you know
Remember, the more you buy, the more you save
imagine having 2 miles worth of wires connecting your 72 GPUs
should i try Stalker 2 on my laptop W a 5300U and VEGA 6?
2
4
Having issues running on my pc, getting crashes for seemingly no reason every 30 or less minutes;
Specs are Ryzen 5700x3D with a 6650 XT, 32 Gigs of DDR4 at 2400 Mhz and installed on an 970 Evo SSD;
Machine is on a fresh install of Windows 11
Error is LowLevelFatalError [File:D:\ (directory) ] [Line: 880] CurrentQueue.Device->GetDevice()->GetDeviceRemovedReason() failed at D:\STALKER2\s2editor\Engine\Source\Runtime\D3D12RHI\Private\D3D12Submission.cpp:910 with error 887A0006
Stalker2_Win64_Shipping
(x6)
kernel32
ntdll
I've tried with framegen on an off and crashes still happen
The crash is always at the same line
I have pretty much the same exact issue with similar specs and also a pretty fresh windows install. I can not figure out anything to fix it man
What specs do you have? I have a hunch surrounding the CPU.
I have a ryzen 7 3600x rtx2080ti 32gb ddr4 and the same ssd
So your cpu is better. Could be the CPU Iโve thought the same
Nevermind, hunch out the window;
I was wondering if it might have had something to do with the X3D's greater cache size, but it shouldn't;
Technically this is @plain elm 's machine.
She has failure on compilation often as well.
My personal machine is a 7900X, RX 6800, and 32 GB DDR5 at 5200 Mhz;
I have had hardly any issues; Couple of crashes at most while in game and a couple of crashes compiling but that's it.
I don't think it's AMD CPU related broadly speaking but I could be wrong.
I know nothing about PC stuff so Crash is doing the troubleshooting on my behalf
What speed does your RAM run at? Do you have AMD EXPO on?
I donโt think itโs AMD related either tbh. An if I remember right I run at 3200 and donโt believe I have EXPO on
I remember that some sort of Adrenaline driver update really messed up Stalker 2
I reverted drivers from this point and it seems to only do it every 30 mins or so;
Prior to this when I updated to latest driver it was about every 2 minutes (I timed it)
lol I gotchu that makes sense
Yeah I donโt remember how I fixed it but I had been crashing the second I opened the game. Now itโs the same, about every 30 minutes
Sometimes shorter, some times I almost get an hour before a crash lol an Iโve left the game paused for a while not using my pc an the game still crashes after a bit
The compilation errors:
LowLevelFatalError [File:D:\STALKER2\s2editor\Engine\Source\Runtime\RenderCore\Private\RenderingThread.cpp] [Line: 1273] GameThread timed out waiting for RenderThread after 120.00 secs
Seem to be an issue with how they've written the multithreading code for the game and one thread doesn't return some sort of result and because of it, it times out waiting for the thread to finish and it just never does.
Before I upgraded my PC, my first build never crashed, but that was on v1.0
^ it was also with a i5-7600K on Windows 10
My build is currently on Windows 10 as well, so it's not impossible for it to be weird driver errors with Win 11
Iโm on windows 10
Hm, this certainly makes things more interesting
Only thing really in common here is the AMD processor. Iโd have to look at my crash log or wait for a crash to happen when I get home to see if itโs the same thing happening but I believe it was
i have the latest drivers and it works perfectly fine
have you cleared the shader cache?
in my 115 hour playthrough, I saw two or three system memory leak issues that resulted in a hard crash with a UE crash screen like that. That's it though. Thoroughly enjoyed the game otherwise.
But I monitor many system stats in realtime on another display so I can always link what's happening in game to something happening stat wise with the system.
I have not, will try that
though i'm on win-dowes 11
and my install is broken sooo half the driver features dont work
but i think thats just OS related (reinstalled my drivers 50 times at this point)
(R5 5600 G ) EXPO on @3200MHz CL 16 its fine so i dont think thats it either ( and i have an RX 6600)
@keen hemlock I also found this looking up the error code: https://www.reddit.com/r/stalker/comments/1h4x0km/possible_fix_for_game_crashes/
AMD cards below the RX 7700 XT dont have acces to that

and no RX 6000 card has acces to it
Lucky man I have a lot of fun while playing but in 18 hours of play time Iโve barely gotten past needle in a haystack lol a like 5 other side quest. The constant crashing makes it hard to wanna play
Maybe I should try doing this to more accurately see whatโs causing it
Damn.
HAGS?
Witches?
lol
I'm not in front of either of my PC's right now but I wasn't aware hardware accelerated GPU scheduling wasn't available below a certain GPU tier, unless i'm misunderstanding what was being said
this game has been well optimized from the start. i have no idea what some people were on about
yeah man my 10090 Ti and 10800X3D were running it just fine, dunno why people complained
Yeah
or well the post from IDK when said so
i dont know either
"this game has performance issues" Nah that sound like a boatload of malarky to me on my TOTALLY Ryzen 6 6600 AND PTX 5600 G
PTX
PTX 5090
I WANT i know it may or may not cost an arm and a leg + a kidney + another one + some honey NO WAIT THATS TOO SWEET + gasoline yeah thats thats not too sweet but i am sure it would be worth it
I love older women
(?
how do you think a 3060ti and amd ryzen 5 fairs now after the patches
๐
I haven't played in a week or two but if we're still on 1.1.3, performance hasn't really changed much.
the patches weren't directly addressing it for the most part
Yep, the performance is about the same as release (maybe a little bit more stable for me)
happy new years stalkers
happy new year for you, and everyone in you time zone!
which RYZEN 5 ?
depends for all we know it could be a 1600 or it could be a 9600X
but the GPU should suffice
Whoops 5600
for me on a fairly similar 5600 G (has less cache) the updates made the settlements run about 10Fps better
(the 5600 G's CPU part is the same as the 5500)
when is it for you?
now am returning to the zone hopefully the shaders load again fine
11:37 PM
ah just few more minutes so here they kept sending it even earlier tbh
I mean fireworks
ooohhh YEAH they did that here too
stupid shaders failed again
2-1 hours ago
well at least they are set
i thought that deleting your mods fixed it๐ค
has it finished the compile once?
it has
time to install that mod that removes shader warmup
hmmm
do that
i kinda like DIY'd the shader compile mod
if only vortex would cooperate and show stalker 2
i never use vortex
i always just go to the manual download
I mean I will go back to manual myself as well
well happy new years eve for everyone in my timezone!๐ฅณ ๐ฅณ๐ฅณ๐ฅณ๐ฅณ
happy new years to you too
I'm assuming the answer is yes but we've had others here say no: you are installed on a SSD right?
Ofc am
Just making sure. We've had some people on hdd
Happy new year gamers!
you too! ๐ฅณ๐ฅณ๐ฅณ๐ฅณ
Ey No matter how good your PC is you will aways ask. Can it run S.t.u.t.t.e.r. 2: Lag of Chornobyl?
๐๐๐๐๐โน๏ธโน๏ธ๐ฃ๐๐ซ๐ญ๐ญ๐ญ๐ญ๐ญ๐ญ๐ญ๐ค๐ค๐ก๐คฌ๐คฌ๐คฌ๐คฌ๐คฌ๐คฌ๐ช ๐ฉธ๐โ ๏ธ๐ป
I think this game gonna be for the next Years a game where you test new GPUs.
Like how much less worse the game will run
GPUs be like when they are forced to run the game :
๐๐๐๐๐โน๏ธโน๏ธ๐ฃ๐๐ซ๐ญ๐ญ๐ญ๐ญ๐ญ๐ญ๐ญ๐ค๐ค๐ก๐คฌ๐คฌ๐คฌ๐คฌ๐คฌ๐คฌ๐ช ๐ฉธ๐โ ๏ธ๐ป
GPUs be like:
๐ ๐ ...... Unreal Engine Crash
CPUs : ๐๐๐๐๐โน๏ธโน๏ธ๐ฃ๐ค๐ค๐ก๐คฌ๐คฌ๐คฌ๐คฌ๐คฌ๐คฌ๐ช ๐ฉธ๐โ ๏ธ๐ป
8GB Vram:
๐ ๐ โน๏ธ ๐จ๐ผโ๐ฆฝ
๐คฌ๐ช๐จ๐ผโ๐ฆฝ ๐ฉธ๐โ ๏ธ๐ป
I purchased cyberpunk 2077 today and I am amazed by how well it runs with my 4060. Ultra settings + ultra ray tracing (no path tracing) with dlss quality 60-100 fps no frame gen.
Compared to this game where I can only run medium/high settings and get 60-80 fps with dlss quality no frame gen. (Both at 1080p)
UE5 in both games why such a big difference
8K?
Yea Like i said Stutter 2 Lag of chernobyl
They probably will since 8k TVs are more common place
cyberpunk does not run off ue5
that's the difference lol
๐คฌ๐ก๐คฌ๐คฌ๐ก๐ก๐ก๐คฌ๐คฌ๐คฌ๐คฌ๐คฌ๐คฌ๐คฌ๐คฌ๐คฌ๐คฌ๐บ๐บ๐บ๐บ๐บ๐บ๐บ๐ช๐ช๐ช๐ช๐ช๐ช๐ฉธ๐ฉธ๐ฉธ๐ฉธ๐ฉธ๐ฉธ๐โ ๏ธ๐ป
I think AMD did it only with the 7900XTX
I read they didnโt use red engine and used ue5 instead
Nah
(im fine ๐ )
they will be switching to ue5 for future games, cyberpunk used their in house engine
makes me worried but i'm sure cdpr will make sure it's polished
What the heck an article I read said they planned red engine for cyberpunk but went with ue5
might be talking about the cyberpunk sequel
Witcher 4 will be ue5? I hope not
like cyberpunk ??????๐๐คฃ
well, after cyberpunk i would hope they take their time haha
My favoured Game at the momend is Gohst of tsushima what runs more than 2x Faster Looks really good and you could play that game with a 5 3600 at 60. What you cant do in Stalker2
I was blown away with Tsushima when I upgraded from 1070 to 4060
They are working on UE5 to make it better for Gaming less stuttery
ghost of tsushima was incredible even on PS5, gorgeous game
I want to install red dead 2 again just to test graphics on this pc
Its ass that so many big Game maker swich to UE5 what is a shame
Red Dead 2 runs also 2X better on my PC and looks better
yeah i hope they get rid of that STUPID word partiotioning system
thats why UE5 games are so stuttery
my favorite thing to do is revisit old intensive games with new hardware, metro exodus is always a pleasure
The only ue5 game I have played lately that runs well for me is marvel rivals 
indiana jones doesn't run that bad for how good it looks
The thing is Star citizen Runs better than UE5 games but uses Cry engine and also looks better
Ooo I have that also it didnโt run so well on 1070. Was playable 45-60 fps but it would look amazing on my new system
well star citizen's performance is also highly dependent on where you are, depending on hardware i'd say it's pretty close to how bad stalker 2 gets
Oh yeah I forgot Indiana jones. Sucks I canโt even launch the game unless itโs on low textures. Technically medium too but not worth it with 8gb vram
its basicly like minecrafts chunk system BUT the chunks are GIGANTIC with 10000000X more detail and the whole thing gets loaded in ALL AT ONCE you pass a border/line
I think indi works good cus they used Vulkan and thus worked more on making the game run on that
Also For me Vulkan is much better than DX12. Like games like R6 with Vulkan was just soo good and now with DX12 it runs like stalker=Stutter.