#overclocking
1 messages ยท Page 105 of 1

Ahhh I see so as long as I run 3 cycles without error then I'm good to go to the next timing?
Uh in one go without stopping yes
Ie you will want the popup saying tm5 has finished

Emote fail
yep
well at least that assures me that I can leave it for 4.5hrs without checking up on it
Also I plan on using my laptop with the backup OS on my 2nd SSD just for general use. Is it possible for me to wipe the main OS after ram tuning is done and stability is achieved and clone my backup OS over to ensure that there's no file corruption?@zenith palm
my bad for the pings
its just that I never get a reply if I dont sometimes lol
I feel ya
@zenith palm @lavish tundra

Ye i recommend just doing ram tuning on a new version of Windows instead and not touching my version of Windows as i did that once and boom windows bootloader gone
Welp I already nuked my previous windows yesterday from ram tuning and the backup too bc I was a dum dum and didnt understand that C drive is always the OS you boot from
but tbf
im enjoying this fresh installation of windows
Howd you nuke windows from ram tuning?
it corrupts the OS
Ok
hence why I have a backup
Not ok
Why
Why not
welp i gotta abandon this test for the greater good
Saying a random OK is not you trying to overclock.
and ill try running it as a normie to see if that allows it to run 3 cycles without stopping
also correct me if im wrong but 3 cycles should take approx. 4.5hrs for 32gb right?
It was explained to me that it depends on the speed of ram
well I've already tightened the timings for them to 4/4/16
tRRDS, tRRDL, and tFAW iirc
Thats to advanced for me.
I just know the basic 4 timings lol
That all looks like to much work/time
Well this tuning, adjusting the main "4" is not. Avionix some of those seem pretty drastic changes so don't be surprised by a challenge. Trfc (560) can probably be dropped to 520ish perhaps. I was on ddr3 a long time so idk for sure.
Unstable ram corrupts os like hell
Stuck again?
Entirely depends on speed and timings, 4.5hrs sounds pretty slow for 32gb
Tfaw makes a huge difference tho
nope someone from the PCMR said that it has breaks inbetween and he was right lok
yep I understand but I needa test this current set for stability. MemTestHelper has written that my IC can go down to 360ns so that'll be my next tweek after I've achieved stability for 3600MHz and tRRDS, tRRDL, and tFAW
I mean most of the time spent on RAM OC is literally leaving your computer to do stability testing from my observation
Just more time away from your PC and letting the mem tests do their thing
There is a program that tells you what you can get to stable??
Also yeah I lowered it but the memtesthelp said tfaw depends on the lowest value out of tRRDS/tRRDL multiplied by 4 so its the lowest I can set it already unless I can lower tRRDS/tRRDL further ๐
literally this running for 3 cycles lil
@digital dirge https://github.com/integralfx/MemTestHelper/blob/oc-guide/DDR4 OC Guide.md just read this a couple times until it clicks
Pretty much
Yeah the min value of tfaw is 16
danm hahaha
so have I met the minimum standard for stability when the counter reaches 3 cycles or do I have to wait for that 3rd cycle to complete in order for it to be deemed stable?
@sterile flame this i think
yeah you right. I just looked at the cycles in the cfg file and it states 3 lol
Ye
Also, I believe someone had said they use pcbdestroyer instead of extreme1 because it tends to detect errors faster
oh?
I'll see if I can find who said it
aight
Here. Sorry mushy
Id read that whole little area. It has a lot of info about running the tests as well as what mushroom does for his ultimate stability testing.
This plus whats right above are the .cfg files
pcbdestroyer is good but running long tests is still better as you wana see if changes in heat can cause a memory error
Right which leads to what I "replied" to above
Pcbdestroyer is 7 cycles i believe
Maybe 5
Took longer than extreme iirc
I've heard that someone did 64 cycles on pcb and detected an error at 50
wouldnt have picked it up if he had ran it at 32
Idk tbh.. thats just mushies way of doing it.. which is better than any way I'd have thought of doing it lol
when the memory mangers dont start is that an error related to the ram or the application?@zenith palm
does it really mean anything if I dont run it as admin?
It keeps giving me fatal errors when I do lol
App, you'll see num of errors in the box on the right in red
yeah someone fixed the issue in the oc server
you reckon I should run a 3d stress test on my GPU using OCCT as I test tRFC in order to generate heat to see if the ram errors?
Ok
what's the average time for pcb destroyer to run through 32 cycles?
Depends on memory size and speed, it's hard to estimate
what about for 32gb at 3600MHz with tRRD_S/L both set to 4 and tFAW at 16
No idea. It varies too much.
fair enough
is 2hrs a sign of stability?

someone told me that shorter testing times means instability
That depends, how stable do you need it to be? Gaming stable or server/workstation stable?
Just run it overnight
just gaming stable
i dont store anything on my OS lol
anything important that is
yeah i run pcbdestroyer128 overnight
Sure, but your time is certainly worth something
And some stable vs borderline oc isn't worth a few fps in practicality
wdym by some stable and borderline oc?
some stable being enough stability for overclocked ram with tight timings?
Not what I meant
Not worth the pain of stabilising I think is what's meant
ahhh fair enough
I meant might as well target something on the conservative side for a daily use case
Just depends on your tolerance for reinstalling or repairing the OS
yeah makes sense ๐
is 3600 still conservative given that I have a non-K alderlake cpu?
My cpu is a 12700F
3600 mhz? ddr4 gear 1?
yep
Just depends what the cpu/board/sticks can do - find the limits, and figure out what's reliable
hmm I see
well I've been dialing in the tight numbers for my ballistix 16gb sticks on memtesthelper with no issue
ahh yes I got the rev E die
I was being pretty conservative with my tuning sticking closely to the guidelines detailed in the memtesthelper if that's a reliable source for my particular die.
Looks like the B1 PCB too if I'm reading that right, which is great

@sudden torrent At the end of the day after tightening timings and finding stability, will raising the voltage from 1.40 to 1.45 add an additional layer of stability? Or will it completely mess up the findings and require an additional stability test.
If it's stable at 1.4v there's no point in raising it. If anything it'll run hotter and may be less stable.
ahhh fair enough
Especially in the case of b-die, not as much for your rev.e
yeah
it doesn't feel that hot lol but idk if fondling my ram is a good way to measure its temperature

@modern walrus
looks pretty good
You could probably do better but that'll require more voltage. Rev.e scales pretty well with voltage.
As it is that's good for 1.4v
if you do become unstable, I'd suspect those tRDWRs being at 10
hello Mr. @sudden torrent. hope you are well
Im kinda scared of stability lol
also tWRRD_dg at 22 is pretty darn low
that's the timing I put at 28
there is better, I've seen it but I got a feeling its gonna be more unstable and haunt me for a food few months
I'm doing pretty well, just up late preparing the next dungeon for my D&D game.
cuz it affects tWTR_S
that was still on auto lol
nice
that game is so complex lol
well damn I'm suprised it sets it that low

And proud of it
have you set tWR?
should i start increasing the timings instead of lowering by 1?
I am too. Mtg and survival quest
what's your XMP?
nope its just a loose timing atm iirc
okay just making sure
The most complicated part is always character creation. That's the first thing you do and it scares so many off lol.
cuz you wanna aim for like 14 or below
also, that tRFC, did you set that?
nvm
I think I ran 601 on tRFC but that was at 4800c16
I find that tREFI & tRFC are better set last
the guide has you do them like halfway thru
it works out to be 320ns
yeah
i was wondering why since thermals would affect it
but yeah I just set it to smth high
they're really susceptible to differences in temperatures & temps go up when you start tightening other timings
There's my b-die with primary and secondary tuning for reference. The main differences between b-die and rev.e are going to be the primaries and tRFC.
yeah hence why i set them higher than what was recommended for rev b
so you might cheat yourself on timings that give you better performance thinking they're the culprit
oh this is rev b not e?
nope mine is rev e
damn this is super tight for rev e
fal is just giving me his sample so I can refer off of what his ones can run
Ballistix?
you're at like bdie except for SCLs lol
wait i thought you were talking about mine lol
his is rev b
Nah that's b-die, I was pointing out the differences between them
ah okay I was talking about yours but then commented on his OC
lol all good
ah okay. if that's bdie then SCLs at 2 lol
basic ballistix
probably will need more SOC or DRAM tho
what's your XMP?
cuz my Rev E is by far the best frequency clocking RAM I have
and idk what the timing is
I got 5400 to POST on one stick
yeah I heard they can clock above 5000
Prob c16
smth around that
Can't go higher on DRAM without active cooling, gets unstable fast. It's not the best binned b-die, SCLs won't go lower.
ya that's true
yeah that's right actually
Is probably the same as mine only i have 2x16
definitely true with bdie
a little fan goes a long way for sure
I have a DR set that I even put a waterblock on
if DIMMs hit 48C, even if running completely fine before
instant BSOD
Yeah b-die is the only one that it makes sense to waterblock
I also don't have a temp sensor โ ๏ธ
How do you check temp? Infrared thermometer?
ya some of mine don't have one either
I guess based on stability lol
it's annoying
what's your DRAM voltage rn?
1.4
wow I think tWTR_S isn't even a timing on 12th gen lol
I believe pato said our kit could push 1.43v
I mean, not that Pato is wrong--he's much smarter computer-wise than I am--but my rev E keeps scaling up to like 1.7v
I'm surprised you don't have it at 4000c16 tbh
it's one of those ymmv things
rev e can go really high
i'm VCCSA capped
well that depends
At 1.4v for me it scales up to 1.43
what timings did you set when you tried to push it higher than 3600?
Oh?
Yeah I've seen rev.e scale up to about 1.7 doing 4800 c16
3700 and it wont work
How are you capped?
i'll just boot up and it'll give me 2666
Gets crazy high frequencies too with looser cas
3733 doesn't post at all
Like is it a mobo thing?
Probably the voltage
So you can't up your vccsa?
nope I have a non-K
I'd be surprised if you could do higher than 3700 c16 at 1.4v
lol id be too
You should be able to do up to around 4000 without messing with SA
sounds like more long days of stability testing
I had to mess with vccsa to get above 3600
this was stable on 5600g before I installed AMD drivers & had to share SOC voltage with igpu
It just would not post anything above that.
On 12th gen?
Yeah
Oof
But luckily vccsa for 12th gen is ok to go up to 1.45 daily.
I mean... ask someone familiar with 12th gen but 10th & 11th gen you can run like 1.4 for SA
ya that was conservative
yeah smth like that according to the guide
I've done 1.49 for daily lol
GDM disabled and everything. Your fclk was stable synced like that? Nice
lol
Could push 1.5, but that seems like pushing it
I can't change it so it's not really a concern for me lmao
ya 5600g doesn't have IOD die so FCLK is amazing compared to like 5900x
Sorry lmao
oh so you're stuck with board's setting for SA?
I wonder if buying the K OEM would work on my B660M lmao
yep
it's locked for non-K cpus
& it won't do more than 1.2?
oh damn that's frustrating
yeah lol
I don't think there's an LLC for SA either lol
not sure
when you tried 3733 or 3800, did you have any timings set?
yep the loose timings
cuz tRAS is kinda crazy on Rev E
18-22-22-42 or smth
like the XMP on mine is 4400c19-19-19-46
danm
which on bdie would be like 4400c19-19-19-39
so it felt really off when I first started messing with it
Yeah my XMP is really weird too. 4133 19-23-23. The only thing that gave it away as b-die is 1.45v
so just increase sg/dg?
or leave it as what it is
bc i've been testing with those values
if you wanna try higher frequency, try c19-21-21-48
Hm try c19-22-22-48
almost at the end of this oc
Mine wouldn't post below 22
well
alright well in the future if you decide to try it, just make sure your tRAS is really loose
but as for now... hmm definitely tWR needs help
lol fair
those are the auto settings?
yeah
ya if the board is training those & you're passing TM5, just leave them
lock em in and lower tRDWR?
I say leave them auto & drop tWR first
alright
just so you know they're not affecting tWR
imma drop em to 12
another thing... can you get command rate 1T?
I suspect your primaries can get a a lot tighter but best to wait until your secondaries/tertiaries are set I think
1T is usually harder to get stable for sure
especially since 2x16 sticks
forget 1T for now actually lol
Ok
on dual rank it's gonna be hard to pull off, especially since you're in gear 1
which by the way, if you set it to gear 2, you might get higher frequency easily but you're better off in gear 1 for daily
yeah I was just following the guide tweaking, testing, benchmarking as I go
Yeah someone said gear 2 is like basically running half speed or something like that.
ahhh thats what theyre for
higher freq balance out looser timings
what benchmark(s) are you running between timings changes?
IMLC
He was still board capped at 3600 gear 2. It's just a wall lol
ah okay that makes total sense then
forgot about that lol
I couldn't get 4000mhz on gear 1 earlier so I gave up & went back to gear 2 lol
I don't know what good values are for rev E but I'm pretty sure the secondaries can drop lower
You got any suggestions ggood?
needs a higher voltage
thats all

definitely tWR & try to lower tWTR_L but otherwise secondaries look pretty good
you can try lower tCWL but I've also been told tCWL isn't a very important timing
and we got a no post lol
yep
Ye 16
if that doesn't work, 18. if it does, you can try 14 but it probably won't let you lol
lol i was gonna try that next
On rev e?
Hm. For me to get it to post.. 4000 18-22-22-46
trying 14
Lol
I honestly don't remember what I set it to
it was kinda like eh let me try... nvm forget it lol
I should do a comparison tho
Do it
I'm at 4600c16-17-17-37 rn on gear 2... should see if like 3933c14 or something runs better
no post at 14
ya I think 16 is probably your spot
And that is faster than 4000c18?
Even though gear 2?
tWR can do an odd number so you can try 15 but I doubt it's worth your time

tbh, I'm not exactly sure cuz I've only messed with gear 2
that's why I wanna try comparing
it's funny cuz I was complaining about my 10900K not running higher than 4200 unless I run IO over 1.35v
without realizing 11th gen doesn't like to run higher than like 4000mhz with 1:1
hmm I wonder why
imma try 18 lol
now it's showing a value for tWTR_S
I think ther emight be some instability somewhere
also why is tFAW at 28 now?
tRRD_L is up to 7
lemmie try raising tWR back to 20
tFAW should be 4x tRRD_L or tRRD_S (whichever is lower)
do you have tWRRD_dg & tWRRD_sg set?
nope
otherwise when you set tWTR_L/S it'll change the values for tWRRD_dg & tWRRD_sg & those can get unstable pretty easy
try 28 _dg/34 _sg
cuz look how tWTR_L/S are at 12/0
fair enough
I've had those timings mess me up countless times. I'm really surprised TM5 ran okay with 0/12 tbh
oh you did? see what auto does if you leave just tWRRDs set
cuz 28/34 is 4/10 on every board I've used
I mean maybe 12th gen is different
I used to haaaate tWTR_L/S cuz I'd always make a mess with them lol
I like how every screenshot the gigglebit is refusing to acknowledge you've kept it at 3600MT/s when you save and exit
yep
exactly lol
I rushed it bc I just took the tight timing and set them based on what that worked out to be
rushing tWTR_L/S can be headache central
hahaha wouldve been
I've done it before where I had tWRRDs at like 22/24 & couldn't figure out why I couldn't get anything stable later
yeah
you could try dropping sg by 2 & see if 4/8 runs but it might be more of a headache than it's worth
well not at all if it's unstable obviously but it might make a tiny difference in benchmarks but not one worth dedicating more than like 20 minutes to lol
if you pass TM5 with that then leave it. that's definitely a normal setting for those
fair enough
I might play it too safe with tWTR just cuz I've had so many headaches from it before
full cycles for TM5?
do you have benchmate downloaded?
nope
ah okay well ya you could do TM5 or see if it'll pass ycruncher 2.5b
2.5b is one of many benchmarks in benchmate
yes
did I need the complete installation?
this is taking a while to install lol
also nothing on the progress bar
oh forgot to authenticate

it installs a lot of crap but it's useful crap lol
my laptop ($1300 mp3 player) is covering the hotbar
lol I only use my laptop for school
yeah
im using my backup OS on my laptop
so I dont watch TM5 flicker numbers all day
i got ycruncher launched
run it?
cant delete text
there should be a drop down thing
pi-2.5b
alright running
it's only like 2 minutes but if it says "coefficient error" something is unstable lol
spot check: good through 2,500,000,000
i wasnt looking at it but I dont see coefficient error
hopefully that works
it takes an awful long time to power down whenever I put in numbers that dont work lol
oh
powering on again
posted
or does that control tRAS on some boards... I forget but it mentions it in the guide
like WxxPRE or something like that
oh wow I didn't realize they updated the guide
so ya I guess set tWR to auto then control it there
32-16-4 is 12. You can try it but that might be low
lol it boots
well what the heck
did you set tWR to auto?

yes
it just wont go below 20 for some reason
bc I dont want tWRPRE to sneak up on me at night
I really cannot make sense of that tbh
well damn I hope not cuz you don't want instability
oh I was talking about changing those values
oh alright nvm
I set them that low lol
weren't they auto before & still that low?
I think the guide says to set them all the same
yep which is why I set them all to 10 lol
mmm alright
& all set the same besides the dds yes
what do values do you have on tRDWR?
@hard goblet free nitro lol
ya for sure
having it that low
you could also leave them auto & drop tCWL by 2 to see where they go from there
is that how you find stable values for them?
267ms
doesnt look like it makes a difference having it that low lol
well not necessarily but if they're actually running that tight, you might as well go for lower tCWL
or set them all to 14 cuz that's what the dr one is set at
but the guide doesn't really explain why you set them all the same
or whether it's beneficial somehow
it did too
Avi
yes folic
Lol
:kek-1:
how high
I usually write like 9999999 so it maxes out to like 65xxx but I'm not sure if that'll work at 3600

maybe try like 40k or now
I would stay conservative on trefi for daily
Ye
could try max but I kinda doubt it
mmm
usually higher tREFI is easier at higher frequency
imma see if 14 changes the tWTR_S back to 4
it would probably be tWRRD_dg to 26 that would bump it back up to 4
still at 2
hmm maybe 28 then? that's what gives me 4
the only problem with bumping both is you leave it a mystery as to which one raised it
gotta isolate variables as much as possible
yeah
but then again, it may not even matter which one did it I guess
mmm
still have to raise the other right?
no you can do 4/8
as long as it passes TM5 ultimately
if TM5 errors I'd start there
oh?
ya or 10 but I think 8 is fine
4/10 is what I typically set
fair enough
dd is just 1?
lowest is 4
weird 11th gen does that too
I have them set to 4 since lowest but really you can leave them auto cuz it doesn't make any difference
fair
did someone really tag me at overclocking lol
yes
where
only because there was one of those free nitro clowns
oh its gone
ow i thik someone take care of them
& because you're generally a cool person & we enjoy your company
lol your board has its own agenda
I'd surprised if it POSTed 1T tbh
lol
since you're using dual rank
wont try that then
I think it's pretty unlikely tho lol
lol I've had mixed results with my Gigglebyte boards
Z590 Ultra generally works well except the other day when it wouldn't reset CMOS for like 3 days or POST
Well that's a big up
B550 Master does well except random usb errors sometimes
& this Z590 Pro AX isn't bad but I've only used it for like 2 days now
Oh yeah but 12th gen and gigabyte is just meh *except tachyon sometimes
Luckily 12700f so doesn't really matter
I don't actively seek gb boards
just end up with them somehow lol

like B550 Master, I didn't really even want it but it was only $130 on ebay
looks pretty good. I really with tWR would stop with this nonsense

Z590 Ultra was great when I first got it
that 20 is staring right at our souls laughing at our helpless efforts
I couldn't get 51x on 10900K with the MSI board I had before that one

I do have Gigabyte moments like this tho
should I yolo and increase tREFI?
ya tREFI helps
aight
Then run pcbdestroyer
yep
And maybe check your base benchmarks because by now you should have progress
lol considerable progress from your baseline for sure
Ya more faster more betterer lol
plus you can still probably get some of those primaries to drop
at 3600, you should be able to get tCL 15 if not 14
try like 37750 or something then
Kek
one time I apparently screwed up Gigabyte BIOS so bad it changed languages


how many cycle?
im about to call it a night
gonna run big fat test
Ye just do a full cycle if you haven't at least done it with 1T yet
Then you can check your benchmarks
1T breaks my bios lol
loll
Oh yeah there it is 2T
the 3rd there were green pixels and language swaps
I wasn't reading lol
lol allgood
ya 1T not easy
tCWL dropped to 14
maybe from RDWRs raised
well if it fails TM5 start with raising tWRRD_sg by 2
oh wait no WTRL looks okay
nah its manually set
you manually set tWTR_L/S?
yep
does your board have an option for dynamic v. fixed timings?
yeah
is it on fixed or dynamic?
try fixed
try setting tWR to 18 too lol
just isolating the variables
that's so you can change timings inside windows if you so dare
ya memory enhancement
those are the only two options?
yep
yep
okay
I think rank interleaving on auto is enabled
definitely want that with 16x2
ah okay so just go with that then
it may not do anything but I always enable it cuz someone told me I should lol
Lol
what does it the homepage on tweaker look like?
oh
oh not really so you can change anything I was wondering
smth like rhis
really taking a while to loosen a timing lol
booted
16/4 now

what's advanced voltage settings look like (if you happen to be there anyway)
16/4? wth lol
nope they dont
Lol
this board is so weird
no wonder why it was on sale for 199
reverted it to 20 btw
damn there aren't Z690s for $200?
AUD not USD

if you really wanna go down a rabbit hole, you can try to find your RTTs cuz those reduce voltage requirements
still 16/4
but it's just basically a crap shoot
Reason: Bad word usage
ive been saving it
pain in the ass but not a huge deal
so thats why its been taking so long
no CMOS headache
clear it?
make sure fast boot is disabled
yeah its disabled
change auto to disable fast boot or something like that
but says xmp enabled & everything like before?
yeah
maybe load optimized & boot then restart & try again
or change back to dynamic timings
dunno why that would help but it seemed to have coincided with this
press F1
& it'll show you what different F keys do
I think it's F7
ya F7
and thus
the headache begins

it didnt power down on switching from fixed to dynamic
tCWL
no post too
i think ill leave that on auto for now
overclocking is like asking someone why'd you jump out of a fully functional plane
and I have a feeling I broke my most functional save

or maybe not
Try switching it off then reset cmos that way
you cleared CMOS?
try leaving your timings as is & lower frequency to 3200
mmm
then ramp it up from there like 3200, 3400, 3600
ok
Ye sometimes you need to train at a more stable frequency then ramp so it trains better
ggood broke it
lol ya like remind the motherboard that it has the ability
sounds like a good idea
restore its confidence
Remind it that jumping out of the plane is ok
restore the eagle's confidence in me
I think
I have to step all my timings up individually

it doesnt want to load them
nope
not even xmp?
maybe try turning it off then take the battery out
wont that wipe the saves?
now its not posting lol
oh no its back on
maybe forks was right
this is pain beyond many levels
still JEDEC
alr
so timings too
indeed but it'll tell you more than just no post
yep
I wouldn't test just post and see
ok sure
so it doesn't like something now
if you get it all back just pcbdestroyer it and see if it's stable still
yeah
imma leave it over night
already 1hr overtime lol
JEDEC again
maybe I went too fast
last known good seems to work
looks like it prefers if I make no more than 4 mods in one save
otherwise it just breaks
which timing did it revert to JEDEC with?
or which 4
also, try tRTP 11 or 12
Oh I didn't think of this, if SA is autoing to 1V-ish, maybe it's not doing that anymore

that would be an interesting cope

damn imagine what H motherboards don't let you mess with
must be like laptop BIOS on those things
damn it's like the board wants to run tight timings on everything but tWR


