#overclocking
1 messages ยท Page 103 of 1
Yeah. Let it run while I was at home depot. No errors. Thank you guys
Nice , what mem oc have you gone too?
Gonna try ocing later and see how it goes. Just wanted to make sure there were no errors already before I started
Just at xmp 1 oc.
So 3200
4k could be possible in gear 1 maybe not tho
Heh you remember what ram I have huh?
Anyways, just got back from home depot. So I'm gonna go build my computer stand
Ballistix 3200 right?
What do you guys use to clone your OS drive?
Macrium reflect is a common program to use
mac and cheese reflect
im using a 3080 lhr on nicehash. are these OC settings good or are they too high?
tf oc software is that
Usually you want negative on the core, and you can probably go higher on memory unless you got unlucky with binning
300W is a bit high too but your ideal power draw will vary
alr
excavator
its the only one that works with nicehash
and how much higher should the mem go
or could it go
Depends on stock frequency and luck, some will do 1200, others 1500
i can do 1500 on my 3060 ti
you should be able to do 1250+
tho as fal said it depends on your bin
i got lucky with mine, so it can oc pretty well
would it be pushing it to go 1750?
very much so
id be surprised if 1600 was stable
lol
30 series doesn't crash if it's too high, you'll get bad/lost shares or reduced hash rate
ah alr
atleast for desktop lol
my 3050 ti crashes at 650 lmao
i dont actually mine on it
was just curious what itd do
Laptops are a whole other animal
mm
Well that's too high then lol
no way
i thought i could fix it by doubling it
lol
also what would happen if i left my max power draw at 370
not doing it but im curious
would it like
just kill the gpu
Nah it'll just get hotter and use more power. If it gets too hot it might crash.
The idea is to get the best hashes per Watt you can. LHR cards can usually get 300 KH/W or better.
ah
That way it maximizes your profit. You have to account for power costs.
what about without power costs
It's still better to keep it cooler
Ideally you'll want video memory at or below 100C, core temp under 60C
thats not too bad
If you've got a good cooler and thermal pads then yeah, it's not too bad
can unlocking the max core voltage hurt the gpu
ye i gots
Doesn't work on the 30 series
ah
Nvidia locked voltage control years ago
why?
My gigabyte gpu has surprisingly good cooling
same
"It's for your own protection" is their main reason
Core stays at or below 50 with 65% on fans 55% pl -502 core +1250 mem
lmao
That's LHR kicking in
oof
It'll take some time to find your ideal LHR settings, it's an automatic process and you can set it manually once it's dialed in
You'll use that to set it once it finds your ideal settings
Chances are it'll settle to around a ratio of 70-74
ah alr
im just curious
could like
wayyyyy overclocking
straight up kill the gpu
Voltage and hard modding is the only way really
Not any more than gaming for 6 hours a day would. Since it's using less power, the capacitors and such aren't as stressed.
The fans might die but those are easily replaced
ye
Just keep it clean and it shouldn't be an issue for a couple years at least
except for my 3080 that never sees reduced hash rate and just crashes my entire computer instead
There's exceptions to every rule and if you follow best practices for overclocking that doesn't happen ๐
finally found the perfect settings
Alright. TM5 test for 3800mhz 16 19 19 36
Gear 2
Wouldn't post gear 1
Oh gear 2 isn't good is it?
Nah, the ECC on my 3080 is straight up broken. It's the only card I know of (including another 2 I tested myself) that does this. ECC doesn't work, error(s) eventually happen, and the driver irrecoverably crashes, requiring a hard reset.
It isn't even this bad on other cards without ECC (another 2x 3070s I tested at some point), those eventually crash games/programs, maybe a driver crash, but it recovers. This 3080 is cursed
It's not ideal
Ok I'm gonna try gear 1 again
ok Posted with 3800 16 19 19 36 gear 1
time to run test
Oof. 10 seconds blue screen
lets goooooooooo
Reason: Bad word usage
bruh
@sudden torrent do you by chance know why even though in bios I set 16 19 16 36.. when I open HWiNFO it shows it as 16 19 19 36
?
Either hwinfo isn't reading it right or it's being overridden by the board or cpu
Or you're looking at the wrong timings
Tcas
Trcd
Trp
Tras
Right?
There's RCDWR and RCDRD
The timings get abbreviated since normally they're the same
So 16-19-16-36 is actually 16-19-19-16-36
Screenshot that section of hwinfo and we'll see
Use zentimings or astc
Sorry for late reply. Company showed up.
See what astc says
Can I download that while running tm5?
I'm an hour in and don't wanna mess anything up.
I don't even know what asct is.
so close
What board? You want 4.0.13 for z690
Looks like the mag tomahawk z690
wat dat
Shows your ram timings in windows
my 1070 hardly makes anything anymore
Yeah after electricity you'd be at about 60 cents a day right?
I dont pay for electricity rn since I've been at college but yea pretty much
Ah nice, so $1 a day lol

Hey that's still 365$ extra a year
@sudden torrent sorry man, I had been up 24 hours when you sent that. I couldn't even download it when you linked the program, I had to go lay down and pass the heck out lol
shhh
ah
When you guys use afterburner to oc your gpu.. do you guys set the fans back to auto once you find a good oc?
Yes and kind of, i always use a custom fan curve
is that so you don't hear it ramping up and down?
If you're finding an oc for daily, just find a fan speed you're happy with and keep working with it
I do like 54% because it's the highest speed that's inaudible to me
Yes and usually stock ones are blehh
this evga 1650 super fans..
like
I can hear them at 100% with my panel off
but with it on I can't hear them
If you can't hear the sound at all, just leave it to auto
but I don't want to run it at 100% all the time
ok yeah that's what I was thinkikng'
nope. i always have my fans at 100. doesnโt matter either way i always blast my music
that isnt good for the fans
whenever my fans go over 75% now they rattle, and i have to replace one of them
i wouldn't even run them at 85% for an extended period of time
as long as your temps arent too high, id just leave them at auto
Obviously different gpu for me, but I just keep it under around 75 & 40% fan is the highest I've needed. 
ah
who made it
like
gigabyte
or someone else
If it's the strix in his name then it's Asus
nicknames dont show up for me lol
this new 2021 macbook pro strix is really lit
i prefer the 2023 13600k version
honestly i understand that viewpoint but you're wrong
fair
You have a nick here, haha. Anyways yea, Asus Strix 1080. The one w/ vram at "11gbps" instead of 10. ๐ค

i saw something on the nvidia forum saying that you can trick a gpu into mining without lhr if you run a game at the same time
im not genius but that sounds a little off
can anyone confirm/deny
The end result would be the same, any game using enough power to do that would reduce your hashrate anyway
Just run them on a fan curve, no need to put unnecessary wear and tear on them
alr
ight cool
is there any way to get around lhr?
other than using lhr ratio and intensity
No
The ones that claim to bypass lhr so far have been scams
oof
You could mine two coins, that gets you more profitability, but not getting around lhr
ah cool
ty
For 5.1 should I increase voltage or nah @sudden torrent
See if it'll do it without changing voltage; if it doesn't, change voltage.
You focus on one at a time, increase clocks until unstable, increase voltage to stabilize, increase clocks, increase voltage to stabilize...
Uhhh my system froze no blue screen when I tried p95 LOL
Usually it just blue screens this is interesting
I was already in mode 3, trying 1.3
And the reason I asked earlier was your bet on if it'd crash on 1.28 lol
Holy crap 30 watts on idle now lol
Hard crash at 1.3? Odd...
Bump SA?
That's a lot of voltage for 5.1 considering I can do 5 at 1.255
LOL
Falcie I'll fry SA
It's kinda really high for my dram already
Ah yeah having memory overclocked will limit your cpu a little, but not much
mem oc still more than worth it
I am NOT raising it
I have 4000 mhz cl16 on 4 sticks
I'm not sacrificing that either LOL
Point of diminishing returns has been found
Lol the point of diminishing returns is starting the overclocking in general tbh
Oh crap
I still have power limits on
At 180 to prevent throttling on my old cooler
Lemme go ahead and make that limit 4000 watts
There we go that might've been doing it
Yeah so my SA is already at 1.25, do I risk raising that anymore?
Nah see if the power limit does anything first
1.25 is already high like you said
It was .01 above what was stable (1.24)
I did that so I wouldn't run into problems
I tend to do that
Smart. It'll degrade a little over time so nice to have that cushion.
Okay so
The crash is really weird
It runs for like 10 seconds
Then core temp freezes
Then mouse freezes 10 seconds after and nothing works
Trying 1.305
If it doesn't work by 1.31 I'm yeeting pcore OC and going to ecore
Windows then mouse froze again
5.1 isn't worth it over 1.31 imo
Not worth that 100 MHz at all
but the frames
You mean the 2 frames in a game where you're already getting 400? lol
Actually it would be 20 for a 5% increase smh
Wait bad may
Math*
It's 2%
8 frames!!!!
Except it's not linear like that
Gotta overclock that cache to make it linear
I'm not sure, haven't messed with 12th gen much personally
Considering you're probably at, what, 200W by now?
224 according to core temp
Sheeee
Apparently stock voltage for 12600k is 1.22-1.25
I can't even cool 170
No I hard crashed again QwQ
Intel: I only guaranteed 5
YOU GET ONLY 5
It went above 230 before it crashed
230 watts on an i5
That poor thing is probably screaming
Wouldn't I have to mess with the block size-
Also yeah WTF
I had heard 12th gen are some really bad overclockers
I wonder what Intel's yields are
That's because they're already pushed to the wall so they can put big number on chart above red
They can't be good with how hard they're pushing them
The yields on these must be really bad
Like 3090ti bad
5800X3D bad?
Not that bad
You see the report that their yields were under 30% for that CPU?
Kinda terrifying
It's bad enough where AMD was like
you are NOT allowed to OC this
It's barely stable already
Yeah the tolerances they needed to keep the same Z height were insane, sanded down to the bare metal no shielding
KS are pre-binned so you already know what to expect at least
X3D having normal overclocking with multiplier and PBO advanced locked... you're stuck with bclk
I saw one person get 5.013 GHz on the 5800X3D
binning 5800x3d would be kinda silly
I meant bin for 12900ks and produce for 5800x3D
Intel been making a lot of 12900K maybe they're more successful with their endeavor
Ecores are at 38. I'mma bump voltage to 1.285 and then see when ecores fail
I think some guys have run really aggressive bclk to get over 5ghz on the x3d
Trying 40 on ecore and praying
Hwbot validated frequency record is currently 4778.69 
Yeah, but since there are so few subs, not many will bother to sub that category since it isn't anywhere close to competitive for globals
But there's only 2 subs yeah
It's decent on ycruncher, x265, 7zip globals though
I mean they only shaved the CCD down like 30%, that's not a big deal right? 
4.1 ecore chance? LOL
Low chance, but possible
Here's data, only really gained on geeks, x265, ycruncher, 7zip https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1J5t5Tm7Q1S2Ot4EOEB2V0coT6Efc9RnVgE5ulgSK2Ms/edit#gid=0
6 minutes into p95 no errors on 4.1ghz ecores
You mean to tell me that pcore can only get 100mhz but I can get +400 on the ecores?
Should be able to do 5.3 pcores 4.2 ecores 4.4 cache on water
Maybe 5.2 core if you have a bad chip
Don't have to be stable to pass cinebench
LOL
And you'll run out of thermal headroom on a heatkiller iv before you hurt the chip
1.34V pulling almost 240 watts I was only at 90ยฐ on highest core
Thermals headroom still there
And that was on p95
Sounds like an aio, arctic AIOs don't work well on intel 12th gen btw
Package power isn't accurate
You'd really need to read the vrm sensors in hwinfo, or use a PMD
Much better than my dark rock 4
Ive heard of cinebench passing but opening task manager crashed pc
Is it a bad cpu oc if the pc locks up for several seconds when closing a program? This happens maybe once a day/every other day.
Possibly that or ram imo
Yes I agree bad oc on cpu and/or ram.
Could also be windows corruption
There's a much easier way to test this, just run some occt large avx2, if that's stable and you still have the issue, it's clearly something wrong elsewhere.
Run the sfc/dism stuff and see if that fixes it.
Besides 1900 fclk, what should I work on next? I can't get 1900 stable on this bios version.
can maybe do gear down mode off
I can probably do 5-10 ns lower trfc too but that's the last thing.
I'll see if gdm off cooperates.
can't do 1833/1867?
Did you try 3733mhz ram?
Yeah, I couldn't get that stable either. GDM off isn't training, it's been trying this whole time.
You soc voltage looks a little low tbh I'd try up that a bit unless there's a load of dropoff
I thought so too but it's 100% stable like that so ๐คทโโ๏ธ
Might bring it up to try GDM off though, good point
Try proc 40 and clkdvr 60 and setups 63 to try help
Yep if you might be able to get 3733
With this bios version I can't do above 3600
I'd roll it back but MSI only keeps the latest beta bios on the page, and the latest non beta doesn't support 5000
I'd try bit higher vddp and vddg if needed
X470 problems
gg
Thats odd. My i5 is 5.2 pcores 4.0 ecores 1.32v running 198-201w 100% load max temp 79c with LFII 360
Might be a different bench/test or they're reading package power instead of the cores
Round 2 $5 gpu competition
https://oc-esports.io/#!/round/CheapaChipsR2
https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/ati-rv710.g69
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/662740657819090974/969939992677842944/22001-HWBOT-CheapazChips2-A02-4K.jpg
lhr 3080 is the GOAT
my 3060 ti fhr makes 2.5 a day
at 61.5mh/s
theres currently a spike on eth
so estimated proitabilities are off
my 3080 makes 2.80 on a normal day
youll make closer to 3.5 a day
Depends purely on the bin of your gpu
It's unlikely to crash, but the hashrate will start to scale negatively when when hit your limit
lol
when does round two start for the other competitions?
crap just saw you replied. ya challenger
Nice hash per day thing is very temperamental
Only way you'd be making that much is if that screenshot was a year ago
nicehash profitability calculator is not reliable
yeah but iโm curious as to what caused it to go so high for that long
Weird fluctuations in market value can cause that, their calc in client is pretty weird, their web calc is decent
ah
I finally tried out an actual undervolt guide. Usual peak at 2000ish MHz & 1.05v-ish was 200w-ish. 20% (peak) power savings for 5% lower clock is pretty beast. I also checked a 900mv setup & even that still beat stock boost too. 
Yeah undervolting+ oc is great
got a "driver overran stack buffer" bsod, is that oc related? never seen it before and it's not in that list of bsod causes
haven't updated drivers recently
Buffer errors are usually memory overclock yes
is it possible to be cpu cache?
Possibly. Anything connected to a buffer.
i increased cache by 5mV and it hasn't happened again
i passed extreme1, anta x arshia, and 4 hours of linpack xtreme so idk
i was hoping it wasn't the ram oc
If you wanna test cache, p95 small fft it 
I did 4 hours of linpack
p95 makes intel laptop do a bit of thermal throttling
not sure if it's useful for undervolt testing
Oh right you where on laptop nvm
well I'll try it anyways
time to shower while it's running and hope it doesn't burn down my house
currently thermal throttling from 4.6ghz to 3.6ghz
this is fine
wait I forgot to disable avx512 LOL
gonna run avx2
That's just L2 cache though, maybe set a custom size and watch main memory read bandwidth in hwinfo to test L3
well prime95 is finding hardware errors
guess linpack doesn't work very well for testing an undervolt on a laptop with thermal throttling
think i need to redo cpu lm? or this is fine
bouncing between 3.9-4.0ghz all core in small ffts avx2
Ahh alright i thought it used l3 as well... Good to know thanks
You're welcome :)
Just depends on the fft size, iirc smallis meant to fit entirely within L2
I think p95 tries to guess based on your chip - or maybe reads L2 size like cpuz does
Why not get it to span across l2 and l3?
4900mhz all-core on CB R23 with 10900K is not the stock setting, right?
single-core R23 runs about 5230mhz. I think I remember that 10900K boosts up to 5300mhz on single core but that all-core seems really high
(for stock)
Not the result I was expecting... https://hwbot.org/submission/4989595
I think you broke it
Your actual score is the GPU score not the overall
So 4285
The other submissions are using the overall score.
They're not supposed to, report them
That's a GPU benchmark so only the GPU score counts
All someone would have to do to top the charts is use a better CPU than the other guy if overall was allowed
If it goes by GPU/Graphcis score only than more than half the submissions for many GPUs on the leaderboards for Timespy scores are wrong because they are all submitted with overall scores. There is a separate ranking for GPU score only. I looked at the rules and it shows both a 3DMark Timespy and a 3DMark Timespy (GPU). I submitted mine just for timespy and not timespy (GPU).
Here is the separate Timespy GPU score https://hwbot.org/submission/4989617
You're right I misread it. I thought it was the GPU score category.
I was a bit confused because if its GPU scores only, many submissions would need to be removed.
The hwbot site is really terrible on mobile. Half the page is cut off.
When I look at the site on my phone, I end up turning the phone sideways to view the rest of the page.
For some reason if I do that on my phone the keyboard pops up and blocks most of the screen
In fact this keyboard just likes to pop up and say hi a lot
one of my VRMs likes to get pretty hot, about 82 degrees when I'm running PBO
any solution for this?
What's your vrms at?
whenever they hit 83, it throttles
MSI a320mA pro vrms get to 110-120 ๐ฅถ
Using PBO in my bios and now only half my cores are turboing to about 4.6 and the other half are at 4.1
tf
If you're reading in bios that makes sense lol
no It's in ryzen master
Oh yeah don't use ryzen master and bios, they conflict, I'd recommend just bios thi
Don't say I didn't warn you #old-cooling message
They seem to be blind to reading their vrm temps lol
What vssca/vssio would be recommended maximum daily for 12th gen? I have ballistix 3200c16 32gb kit e-rev that I can't seem to get better than 3600 16-19-16-36
for me Ryzen Master was affecting my settings even after I uninstalled it lol
This finally got rid of it: https://www.amd.com/en/support/kb/faq/gpu-601?msclkid=8bb30c26ce7011ec8ec16a145bb78bc8
says it's for graphics drivers but worked for me for Master
World's fastest 2060 https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/75048531
I think my mount wasn't great, only gained ~30 mhz over stock volts 1.3 vs 1.09
Also, that 22k cpu score
sweet
That's only 5% short of my 3060 overclocked on air, very nice
https://www.3dmark.com/compare/spy/28034451/spy/12275976# (what's up w/ these clocks on the 1080? Pretty sus). I just felt like looking up highest gfx score from a 1080. That 2060 sure is a moderate amount higher than my 1080 doing 8400ish
That's odd
XTU did it too
Why is the 1080 average clock only 1500
My effi on the time spy run isn't great, might be Windows 11 or lack of a good os tune, unsure
Yea idk, lol. I'll post my own run later & the average clock iirc was 1950+ MHz.
What does overclocking do exactly?
Makes clock speeds higher mostly, which can make other numbers go higher like benchmark scores and fps
So makes computer better?
It can, done properly
Modern hardware you can squeeze about 5-10% more fps out of it without doing anything too crazy
More 2060 pics https://i.imgur.com/jig6Br6.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/YY6bep7.jpg
I think the memory got too cold, was doing +1500 last session, only +1200 this time for 2050 mhz true clock
suffering from success
I have this 32gb 3200 c14 and someone told me i can push it to 4000mhz if i pushed the voltage to 1.5
Ive been doing a lot of tweaking in the bios and nothing seems to be working
it wouldnt surprise me fi you could get 3600c14 or 4000c16, depending on the kit
Check this out on @Newegg: HP V10 RGB 32GB (16GBx2) Gaming RAM 3200 MHz DDR4 CL14 1.35V Desktop Computer LED Memory Kit - 48U45AA#ABC https://www.newegg.com/hp-32gb-288-pin-ddr4-sdram/p/0RN-000Z-00P47?Item=9SIARDJGJ84632&Source=socialshare&cm_mmc=snc-social-_-sr-_-9SIARDJGJ84632-_-04282022
It was this kit specifically
Its bdie so it should be fine
hp (derogatory)
Yeah ik i had my suspicions at first
im not the best in ram ocing but you should be able to get it pretty high
what cpu?
12700k
With a tuf z690
It even advertised it in the description to manage to get 4000 c14 but im not sure what coltage
Maybe it isnt enough
Even though 1.5 should do get the job done
you prob just need extra vccsa vccio and such
Im lost
Basically adding more power to the memory controller
Try 1.2v vccsa/vccio
With b die, you could push the voltage on the dimms to 1.55v and even a bit more if you think you can cool it
How do i cool ram without removing the heatspreaders
Fan
System Agent is VCCSA
Do t see that either
Asus has to be different and call XMP DOCP too ๐
Asus might call vccio as vtt?
Yeah
1.2 right?
yea, try 1.2 to start
And you'll prob want to look around for vccio/vtt, it should be there somewhere, unless it has another name
I mean, to start, do like 16-20-20-40 and then pull down from there
Take it slow until you know it's stable
give it like 2 min in case memory training is taking a while
Restartingโฆ
Training
should still be tcl trcd trp tras
Yes but they call them differently, the order should be the same
Probably correct
Ye i dont think this is workin out
Hard to tell without seeing the left side
You can always drop to 3800, 4000 might be too hard for those sticks
they should be able to do it with looser timings at least
and I'd try to find vccio
decently important when you're pushing higher clocks
Still 1.55v?
Dram voltage? Could back down to 1.5v for now if you want
But I'd try to get vccio to 1.2
Have no idea what its caled in this bios version
Intead of making speeds higher what if i just lower the latency
1.4 c12 3200
C12 is extremely hard to do on DDR4
Nvm then

need more system agent than 1.2, try 1.35 for 4000 maybe, though 12700K imc is usually worse than 12900K one, and not even all of those can do 4000
Also you chose gear 1 right, the 1:1 option right above dram frequency
also also, as you increase frequency latency goes down, since the timings are in clock cycles, but yes it may be worth trying to do like 3600c14 as an easy oc
ever wondered what all those random voltages in BIOS are? https://hardwaresecrets.com/understanding-all-voltage-configurations-from-the-motherboard/6/ I still don't know but this helps
Confused about what each voltage configuration on the motherboard setup really means? Learn all about them in this updated tutorial.
You seem to know about the 12th gen cpus, I had asked a question yesterday about what I could run the 12600k at vssca/vssio for daily use. I'm trying to oc my ballistix to 4000mhz, but am having trouble and it was suggested I up those values.
Do you by chance know what the max i could set those too for daily?
vccio doesn't exist on 12th gen
Ah ok.
but i mean, there isn't really an official value, it's kinda up to how brave you are, but up to 1.4v should be pretty fine
Ok cool. I just want to be able to get 4000/4200 out of the ram.
so would increasing VCC18 PCH voltage help CPU or RAM overclocks? no idea but dammit
something to keep in mind is that some memtest (especially TM5) seem to not care about sa at all, so you should run y-cruncher 2.5b as well to validate that your SA is high enough
You lost me, but I'll do some research.
TM5 is the most common free memory stress testing software (can get it here https://www.overclock.net/threads/memory-testing-with-testmem5-tm5-with-custom-configs.1751608/
y-cruncher is another stress test/benchmark (you can get it bundled here in an easy launcher: https://benchmate.org/ , or individually here http://www.numberworld.org/y-cruncher/#Download)
Ah yeah I know about the programs. I was meaning you lost me about the SA
VCCSA, like if you don't set it high enough, you'll pass tm5 fine, but instacrash in y-cruncher
Only on amd boards cuz they don't wanna pay the 5c fee 
whats the increment for mem for rtx 3000 series? 25 right?
Mem is increments of 5 iirc
12900k on ln2 https://www.twitch.tv/beardedhardware
Lol, still loses to my 6800xt on air
Quoth the CPU, "stop making me do degrading things!"
i'm really not sure if i degraded it or not
my other cores are all decent it's just core 0
core 7 is handling -30 at +100 fmax
so is core 5
RIP the one core it needs to run stable the most on POST
core 5 can do -30 at +150 fmax but core 7 is my most important core
so i'm focusing on where my core 7 can do -30
CPPC labels my core 0 as my best core but it's actually by far my worst core lol
it's the only core incapable of hitting 4.7
Why is that?
Core 0 is the one that the system uses to initialize. That's why when you're doing extreme overclocking and going for frequency records, you can disable all the cores except core 0.
Funny enough, at one point Ryzen Master let you disable core 0. If you did that, the system would fail post ๐
My best core is actually core 0 so if I ever go for records I'd have a leg up. It overclocks a dream.
Oh right i misread as core 5 was most important, was still half asleep x)
did he push 550mHz on the clock speed?
Looks that way, +550 over reference

Time spy page reports a peak of 2570 and average 2535
on the 11th i will push my 6750XT to its limits on air
am hyped
havent done hwbot in a while
That's Forks for you. His 3080 and 6800XT both beat my 3080 ti by 1000+ points

oh btw falcie do u know about how timespy scales with ram?
i wonder how far i can push this
more but slower or less but faster better?
Less but faster. Dual rank best.
im talking 32 gb dr 3600c16 ballistix xmp vs tuned 16 gb 3800c14 highly tuned stuff
32GB dual rank I should say
Probably, no idea how high
yeah it doesnt say on there lol
look at the timings i am forced to run because 4 sticks:(
the drv str timimngs there are necessary for stability
Yeah those are often needed for 4 sticks
what're str timings meant to be?
Mine are 24-20-20-20
Doing 3800 14-13-13-28
I got so lucky with this CPU and motherboard
also voltage scales negatively past 1.47 or so
Higher can be good for stability, especially with more sticks or higher clocks
2 sticks was sooooo much easier
Indeed, and if it's between 2 sticks or 4 for time spy I'd do 2 with better timings
2x16 dual rank is ideal
Of course you can always do both and just submit the better score
true
Have you tried tuning to 3600cl14 or even 15?
yes
Big shame :(
imagine leaving 16gb gang
that just looks like xmp timings lol
are you sure?
did you try a VTT offset?
my rev. e scales to 1.7v and possibly beyond
haven't benched anything higher
Tis
Dont have setting
Same thing isnt stable at 1.5v
might just be because of VTT
I've never seen a rev. e kit not scale past 1.5
since you have a 3200c16 kit
have you tried tRCD 19 at 3600-3800?
I wouldn't expect tRCD 18 to be stable at 3600 on a 3200c16 kit
otherwise why would they bin it as a 3200c16 kit
tRCD has 0 voltage scaling on rev. e
It is
how much stability testing did you do
3200c16 binned rev. e usually needs tRCD 19 at 3600
pato's does
I've had some errors intermittent enough to show up 18 hours into testing
anyways I need to study
bye for now
Hey hey!
I needs me some help overclocking a 12700k with a z690 tomahawk.
I think I got it. Nvm.
My heart just skipped a beat when I saved the settings and the PC just went, ๐
Only downside is that my PC is 2ยฐC hotter.
Thatโs not bad
Ye. It's thanks to it currently being open air case.
might be doing something wrong, but getting 5.2ghz
At less than 1v VID no less
Question. The memory I have (G-Skill Ripjaws V) is 3600MHz. But apparently my motherboard (Gigabyte Z690 UD AX DDR4) can only support 3200MHz max.
The XMP profile only has the 3600MHz clock, and my system very much doesn't like the XMP being set for that reason.
Is there any way to get to the 3200 clock with manual settings so I can run faster than the current (2666MHz per the BIOS)? BIOS has been updated, but no indication from looking at Gigabyte info that the update will help me in this case.
your motherboard can do 3600
just enable xmp and you should be good
I had tried thar already, and I kept getting blue screen after blue screen in Windows. Didn't stop til I disabled XMP.
might need to mess around with some voltages
Hm. Any advice on that? This'll be my first time messing around with things like that.
i mean it could be a bad kit from g skill but i am not really sure on safe voltage range for 12th gen but iirc you want to mess with vssca and vsscio
Any way I can tell if it's just a bad kit, before I go batching voltages up? Heh.
That's Greek to me. Heh.
vccio doesn't exist on 12th gen and up to 1.4v vccsa should be fine for daily.
I'm assuming this is a voltage change on the memory? And is this with or without XMP enabled?
mem voltage will change with enabling xmp
no way to tell without tuning your memory controller voltage
Hmm... Okay. That's not ideal, but... What's my play then? Activate XMP, see what happens, then if things go awry, adjust that voltage you talked about up towards the 1.4v?
Could you inform me on the 100x memory multiplier vs 133x?
activate xmp and set vccsa 1.35v to start
do you mean like the bus clock?
Bus clock oc also ocs like the cpu and ram
Think you're thinking of something different or not phrasing your question in a way that i can understand ๐
Does VCCSA go by any other names?
Because I activated XMP, then tried to find the VCCSA to adjust it... But the only thing I found was an Internal VCCSA setting that was locked to Auto.
Op. Scratch that.
BIOS has a mouse interface, but it only adjusts off the keyboard. Weird.
Anyway. Trying that.
Yeah internal vccsa is right
Can you send a pic?
What's the best test to stress this and see how it goes?
Test mem5 extreme anta77 profile
Op. Just blue-screened.
If you get one error it's a fail tho and it'll take about 2hrs
Oof
Try 1.4v i guess
Wait
Is the kit in slots 2 and 4 from left to right?
Yes. DDR4_A2 and B2.
And you're certain the mobo can handle this memory at 3600, even though everything I've seen says it only maxes at 3200?
It does, 3200cl22 is the minimum a motherboard/cpu has to be stable on otherwise it's considered defective
As XMP is technically an oc
Maybe try updating bios
I think there are plenty of boards that can't run the highest jdec spec (3200c22) e.g. a 2700x on b450 with 4x8 b-die or similar
Yes but their board is z690
it says 2933mhz maximum on the 2700x spec sheet
so yeah, it's the highest jedec profile the cpu lists support for, not necessarily 3200c22
but yeah anything that can slot into z690 is officially rated for ddr4-3200
Latest run yesterday was after a BIOS update.
I need help with my USB Miner build. I have recently purchased 4 GekkoScience Compac USB bitcoin miners and to overclock them at max capacity I need 3A of current supplied to each of them. Thus I need a powerful USB Hub. The problem is that this is a tricky search and I have had no luck in finding the right product on either Amazon, Aliexpress or even Newegg. The left side sort option simply does not have a field to select "max power output per port". Can you guys help?
Maybe try manually changing it to gear 2 like forks said
So XMP and change the BIOS setting to Gear 2?
Yeah
Alrighty. Stand by.
I haven't even really tried overclocking my 12900K yet.
That sucker runs 80-90C at stock under load.
On a custom loop.
@zenith palm What were you saying about cache voltage with the 12900K?
I got the core voltage set, but MSI BIOS kinda weird.
Trying out TestMem5 with the Extreme Anta777 config.
Balls. Already reported an error. Can't read it, but something popped up in the Error status and the text block.
2 errors so far. But this configuration seems a bit more stable than before. Haven't BSOD'd immediately.
12 minutes in, 3 errors, but no crashes.
you should just stop it as soon as you see an error
can you find VCCIO setting?
I think I've run across it before, yeah.
would try 1.15 vccsa 1.15 vccio
sometimes higher vccsa than needed can be harmful to stability
pato recommended 1.35 vccsa which is kind of a ridiculous amount for 3600 xmp
i run 3600 gear 1 on my laptop with 1.15 vccsa works like a charm
gets angry with anything lower though
haven't tried higher, no need
Alright, so... XMP with Gear 2, and set those 2 voltages?
Hmm. Okay, I guess I was wrong... Can't immediately find VCCIO... Got the VCCSA set to 1.15. Any thoughts?
if it's 12th gen.. there is no VCCIO.
Got it. So it'd just be VCCSA then.
For uv you want to match cache and core voltage iirc q
I totally don't see that setting.
Maybe it's not a setting on desktop then idk only ever done it with my laptop
interesting, didn't know that
my laptop disagrees
core stable at -55
cache can't drop below -0 at all
Interesting, throttlestop guide says 1:1 drop
on my laptop it's running -100mv cache and core
idk why my cache is clocked so low
Yeah I was a bit confused about it as well at first.. also.. I totally only wrote this so I could ping you. ;)
I guess I didn't really ping you though huh..
@short blade
There 

Might try overclocking my 6600, I've noticed its only drawing some 100 watts of power
Probably won't see a huge difference but eh
Probably will help the few games that need a small preformance bump in 1440p
why run 1440p on a 6600 anyways
id rather save $100 on a monitor and spend that $100 more on a gpu
I play mostly older titles
And the newer titles I even play still run fine at high
Worst preforming game still sits at the 50s and 60s at high
And its RDR2
Which is fine at 60
(Plus I wanted a larger screen and 1080p at 27 inch sounds gross)
So yuh
Only 100w of power? That sounds low
Sounds like somethings wrong
Nah, the swft runs low
Every Yt video I've seen about the swft shows that
Around 100 watts of usage
Good to undervolt
What are you using to test it?
3d mark timespy (3d mark's demo on steam)
Eh probably a good 15%
I have a few games that reach the 165fps mark
But miss slightly
So maybe an OC can help get to it
time for vbios modding
I have this card https://www.asus.com/Motherboards-Components/Graphics-Cards/Turbo/TURBO-RTX2070S-8G-EVO/ and these are my OC settings https://drive.google.com/file/d/17JzXavuYazWbQwwSzvxeT1S9GFFuEcds/view?usp=sharing, not pictured but the target temp is set to 83 C how much more do y'all think I could push the OC?
Ocs are specific to your exact card
One 2070 super might be able to do +160 on core while another might only be able to do 90
The best way to test is to download 3dmark timespy demo on steam/from the link in the pins in this channel, and run one. After each successful run turn core clock up by 15 until it crashes
Turn it down to the last successful offset, and then do memory by 50s
And turn power limit to the highest it can go
Best part is, because of factory overclocks and boost curves, even doing +160 on the same model card may result in completely different clocks and performance
Just like CPUs. When you simply adjust the boost behavior using PBO or XTU, depending on the burned in v/f curve you might get 2 very different results with 2 of the same chips.
Like for some reason my 5800X is +50MHz from the factory
They're all +50 for 5800xs (might be all of zen3) due to "target clock" shenanigans
I wasn't aware of that, why even specify one thing if you're going to completely ignore it at the factory level anyway?
Which of course this makes my +150 PBO effectively a +200 over spec
how does the mv slider work in the AMD software? And why is it at max by default?
I also have the top spot in time spy
https://www.3dmark.com/search#advanced?test=spy P&cpuId=2316&gpuId=1391&gpuCount=0&gpuType=ALL&deviceType=ALL&storageModel=ALL&memoryChannels=0&country=&scoreType=overallScore&hofMode=true&showInvalidResults=false&freeParams=&minGpuCoreClock=&maxGpuCoreClock=&minGpuMemClock=&maxGpuMemClock=&minCpuClock=&maxCpuClock=
https://www.3dmark.com/spy/11620794 your cpu score is really low for a 2700x
Whats a high juntion temp for a 6900XT?
100C
GDDR6 spec lists that as the limit and that's generally where it'll start throttling the power to the card
@digital dirge
What is the benefit of that? So.. at a certain freq your card is only pulling certain amount of voltage?
Or other way around?
yessir
Maybe I'm to tired.. does the card run hot so you have to do that??
card doesnt run too hot, power draw is just too high for the freq
Ah so you are doing more so for the efficieny?
mhm
as i get higher perf with less voltage and therefore power
200w vs 150w
same perf
Oh ok
slightly higher currently
I'm gonna need to know all this when I get either the 3080ti or 6950xt.
make sure you get a "good" 6900xt, some have different dies than the others that lack voltage control
There's a reason that chips perform better at lower temps too. Circuits are more electrically efficient at lower temps, and consume less power to do the same work as it would at higher temps.
i and a couple others call them "XTK" models
I was thinking of going with nitro+ , but I also want to get one that can be watercooled.
mhm, less resistance
Whatever gpu I get.. I plan on using it for a long while and I plan on doing a custom loop once the 13900 comes out.
Idk.. I can't wait to take a week vacation to finally get my pc oced perfectly.
I still have to mess with my ram
here's mine. peaked w/ 32% fan, 66c, running 950mv. Sometimes it'll do 1974 instead of 2000MHz but doesnt matter. 164w peak in apex. maxed gfx excL cpu at 1080p. definitely much nicer than 200w or more.
ram is a boring and week long adventure
I saw today that the MSI Gaming Z 3080 with the triple 8 pin is on sale on amazon and gamestop for $850. I'd love to pick that up and slap the 450W EVGA vbios on it.
I'm thinking of trying someone else's oc and see if that works for me. Hopefully:P. Yes I do know oc is different for everyone.
a 3090ti would be a very very fun investment for me
at least one of the good ones
investment?
or like an asus 3080 strix, cause those have the same pcb as 3090s
mining but also oc fun
GL w/ mining less and less profitable.
3090 has the toasty backside vram, idk.
I guess with the new memory modules it would be better at mining
But yeah that's not exactly a safe investment right now
Yes, the more dense modules though
which is nice
Micron
all above 3070 is gddr6x afaik, yes. 3090 ti is denser ram so none on backside
I wanted to get into mining, but from the time I started my pc adventure 4 months ago til now.. it has like plummeted crazy
the + part is what i was wondering
G6X is micron, G6+ is samsung
G6+ isn't out yet, still in sampling stage
heat
Oh right
kaby lake sucks
intel toothpaste sucks even harder
i need 1.42v for 5.1 and 1.45 5.5 post, 1.42 is just pushing the safe limits of kaby
I yolo'd 1.4v into my ryzen 2700, it survived and I set several ๐ records
1.4 is the safe limit of kaby lake
ive also read 1.42 is fine
im not taking anything less than 5ghz as an aswer after delid
i hold a record for 570s lol
just because new category on hwbot
theres tons of 570s that beat me but arent submitted
https://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/ryzen_7_2700/
All of the ๐บ๐ธ are me, I've also got several silvers
Totally crushed it on ycruncher
do you daily a 2700?
Nah 5800X
2700 was my old chip. And yes, it was painful. When I upgraded from a 1060 3gb to a 2070, the cpu couldn't keep up.
All the artifacting I got on Fallout 4 agrees lol
I've never had anything other than this 1650s
Which has only been about a month and a half.
YIKES
Is artifacting things like.. you can see gaps of void in between things?
Oh ok
gaps of void is just the game
I had a lot of "missing texture so I see random garbage instead" kinds of artifacts
Missing textures being caused, of course, by video memory being full
That was really the first game I played that tried to use more than the 3gb vram at 1080p
I just downloaded Assassins Creed Valhalla yesterday... so I'm hoping I can play it at least in mid. Minimum req says 3gb while recommended says 8gb

