#overclocking
1 messages · Page 83 of 1
Probably accurate, but use hwinfo64 instead
Yeah no idea, sounds like a ghost
So I know ya'll like Aorus boards... maybe you can help me. How do I enable Intel Virtualization Technology & VT-x in BIOS? Also, what does IA/SA VR Config Enable do?
So I know ya'll like Aorus boards
uhhh
okay maybe not then haha
My bad this is for the z590 for the 10900K board
vt-d
oh alright I got that enabled
vmx?
so f9 then type in vt
The reason I'm trying to is because I can't get Core isolation, Security processor, etc. to show up in Device Security
F9 doesn't do anything lol
I would google your mobo model and virtualization
Is there a USB setting that stops my Corsair keyboard from letting me change colors using function-F[x]?
sorry this is really specific annoying crap isn't it?
I wouldn't take the time to give advice if I didn't want to
I appreciate it
What's a Block Sid?
ah to heck with it I'll just enable SA IA VR & see what happens
oh wait nvm now all this crazy loadline current limit stuf came up
what does raiding CPU Base Clock do?
Turns out I'm 2 BIOS updates behind. Flashing now which is mildly terrifying since the last time I did a BIOS update I bricked an MSI board
oc? i heard of oc ram before
3200mhz goes niceley at 3600?
3600? to hmm
or 4400mhz. oc too? um theres not much with some brands don't make ram beyond 3600mhz
Genuine question, are you high?
Usually, it depends, and when you up those freqs you also have to increase latency
No it's not
That'd actually be really interesting though
Set 1.2v or so and it does what ever clocks it can by the boost table
Wouldn't be practical but would be interesting
It enables or disables the advanced configuration for those rails
Auto is enabled, and you want it enabled
Nice ram buying for overclocking guide
https://youtu.be/JT2184c63Tg
The list: https://buildzoid.blogspot.com/2021/07/july-2021-ram-shopping-list.html
My Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/buildzoid
Teespring: https://teespring.com/stores/actually-hardcore-overclocking
The Twitch:https://www.twitch.tv/buildzoid
The Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/actuallyhardcoreoverclocking
#RAM #DDR4 #Overclocking
Dude just buy B die or Crucial
Like I don’t recc anything else for normal people, DJR included
fair enough just thought it was kinda nice showing which ones have b die basically
Find Samsung B-Die DDR 4 memory kits on Amazon, Newegg and many more.
Ohh didn't realize that was a thing lol
now you do
Reason: Bad word usage
B-Die finder is garbage
It's kinda stale
as in not updated?
Last passing build was in March, last build of any sort was in April
thanks for letting me know
Depends on how new the chip is
Newer chips can do 4.4ghz+ whilst some older ones can't hit 4.05
An example of how B-die finder can be bad, my kit isn't listed even though it's definitely b-die with a XMP voltage of 1.45v at 4133 speed rating. (Spectrix D40 is listed but not my 4133 2x8 kit)
That's less of the issue
The bigger part of the issue is there are many kits that can be not B-Die
And the person who runs it knows that, but they refuse to change it
wdym bye chip?
the batch the chip is in
earlier ones does worse
while later ones does better
chip is the cpu itself if you're asking about that
so would the chip b the 5 3600 or the 6 core or 12 threads?
on average
So then what did he mean by if the chip is new or older?
Mine is pretty late for a 3600 and a bit under average
don't have to be pedantic :p
How do I tell if mine is new or old
well
You'd have to take the thermal paste off if it's used
there's probably a way but i dunno
Which most of the time isn't worth it
Why do you need to tell? Bench it and see what it does
There's smthn on the front of the chip that says it
What I was about to say lol
I don’t know how to bench and that’s why am asking because the dude said don’t venture if it’s late
bench
Cinebench works or timespy on steam
I would use occt
That’s why I came here because I don’t know how to benchmark or overclock anything
Benching is easy I figured it out without any help for cinebench
Nothing wrong with that
I highly recommend this software https://benchmate.org/
anyhow, older batch of chips generally does worse, but not always ofc
Just download cinebench off of Google or Microsoft store, open it, and you can run multi core and single core benches
I'd go with forks reccomendation
What does benchmarking her overclocking even do?
They prolly know more than me
that's why silicon lottery is a word
Honestly, use occt for this use case
benchmarking is testing your performance
But it doesn’t like boost stuff in games?
uh
Don’t make fun of me I never really paid attention to overclocking
benchmarking is a test
you check your performance through scores basically
Just don't use CTR - clock tuner for ryzen or DRAM calculator for ryzen, both are 
For example, a while back when I had slow ram my 3600 was on par with a 7700k, with faster ram it's only slightly under an 8700k/3600
how do I know if their good scores?
There'll be a website online with the scores
Check the pins
Idk about the bench fork linked
Benchmarking basically tests how well your cpu can run, for performance improvements that's where overclocking or precision boost overdrive (pbo)(ryzen 3000 and up) will come in to play
so should I overclock anr5 3600?
If you want
For gaming if you want some extra performance enable precision boost overdrive in the bios
For me it didn't really do anything, hell I've gotten higher scores without pbo than with it, but I think that's just my chips silicon
Tho tbf scores on cinebench don't always dictate gaming performance
Single core is better with pbo but all core would be worse than an oc afaik so
I was talking about single
Was it a specific cinebench single core run?
Nah multiple
And I made sure to close background tasks
Well actually when I had pbo enabled I had conflicting ram dies
The higher score was from after I fixed that
So maybe that lowered the score
I mean specifically cb single core and not the multi core run?
That would do it
Slower speed on ryzen bleh
I think HWiNFO is broken on Windows 11
damn bro insane overclock
nice oc
haha you think I need to reinstall since I did a BIOS update or something/
I mean wth it's so far off
I thought it was rgb software messing it up
but I reverted to an earlier version of the rgb software that never had issues & it's still goofy
has to be windows 11
Wouldn't surprise me
I wonder why it says this...
could running testmem5 under wine cause issues
like make it not run properly, cause i use linux and testmem5 isnt on there
Yes
doesnt run anyways
I doubt PBO did that for you lol
My 5900x is never gonna show 4,600mhz+ running CB is it? 😭
well 1.369v but yeah it's steve what do you expect
In his discord he was telling people to run 1.4V into zen 2
literally thinks 1.4V is safe for everything afaik
is afaik as far as I know?
How can I find out the bin number for 5900x? Is 4,582.9/core on CB crappy?
depends on what is getting 1.45v, the clock speed, load, temps, etc
I use 1.45 on my RAM
stock is supposed to be 1.40
I forgot to change it after I gave up my overclocking RAM crusade
rlly need to see how far i can push my ram cause i could feel the speed increase in general usage alone
if you run 1.45v into most modern cpu's you are going to have a very bad day, but almost all ddr4 ram can take it
zen+ moment
whats safe for cpu
If you run 1.45 under load right? idle I think 5900x hits like 1.48+
depends on what cpu
atthlon 3000g
Fair lol 1.35v is too high for zen 3
5900x CB ya
Lol
Prime95 it's like 1.15
like mid 1.3's
Thats the voltage you should use
You can pass a full cinebench all core test and crash completely while opening task manager
I should use 1.15v? How do I tell PBO to change its mind?
Voltage offsets
p sure ive ran it at 1.4 quite often
1.25
its the only way to get 4ghz stable iirc
ya but then I'll barely tough like 4.4ghz/core without crashing
do yall know linux stress tests
And set pbo to auto everything
Sorry I'm a little confused as to whom which statement is directed
Auto everything? like TDC/EDC/PPT?
All my statements are directed to you
Yep
Prime95 test?
I thought only like LLC & Scalar will alter PBO's defaults?
And prime95 small ffts for 30 mins while testing keep hwinfo open
You can use curve optimiser
And per core voltage offsets
(if I frustrate you because I sound stupid, it's because when it comes to all this--I admit--I'm pretty stupid) isn't Curve optimizer for voltage offsets?
Yes
but as of right now only like 3-4 cores (can't remember exactly) are already magnitude -30
I'm sorry let me say that again
only 3-4 cores are NOT at -30
I see
I would still test p95 again to make sure what voltages you have selected is what you want
I've spent at least like 30 hours and made like 4 spreadsheets working on this
yeah nah i need a ram stress test for linux
There is a chance that 1.3v+ can degrade zen3 over time
ive never gotten my ram to go 3333 and its working all of a sudden
no way its stable
(again ignorance) I haven't really actively selected voltages... have I?
I mean like rn in CB it'll hold between 1.300-1.306 for most of the render
most it'll hit is 1.313 (when actually loaded, not between renders)
You can pass a cinebench test and have the entire pc crash while opening task manager
Cinebench is a light workload
I think maybe my EDC is too high. Temps never exceed 83 but I'm running 164 amps
You sayin u used it for FIT testing as well
but I can't get past 4575
gn steve also degraded a zen 2 chip from 1.4v and blamed the board 🤦♂️
Oof i don’t remember this
If easily possible could you link me this vid?
it happened in his discord server
okay rn running small fft I'm 1.163v, 4,426mhz, & max temp 83.8
Keep observing for 30 mins or so
Voltage will keep fluctuating for a while
When it completely settles down then what it settles down at is the FIT voltage for ur cpu
1.181 is max rn
U dont want max or min
You want to see what it stops fluctuating at
what does FIT stand for?
And that takes like 30 mins or so
& that's what I want the max voltage to be under load, including CB load?
Im not too sure myself as to what the fullform is. I dont think there is a fullform and it just means fit tho
where's tjmax on 5900x? 90 or 100?
Max voltage doesnt matter
Btw ur watching the svi2 tfn sensor yeah?
yes SV12 TFN
Like 1 min or so
oh that's an I you're right
That voltage that you get is what you want ur cpu running at max for an all core oc
oh but I'm doing PBO not all core
I was just saying what all the cores read during CB
Yeah but you can still set a static voltage im pretty sure
oh really for PBO you can? I didn't know that
ya no worries I don't have anything to do lol
I can set an offset tho
Yee
Ask someone like sips about help with curve optimiser tbh
Im not very knowledgeable
Never used curve optimiser myself
Or even pbo for that matter… its bad for my cpu
co is amazing
I have a degraded 3600x
zen 2 doesn't do co
Yep
Cant use it even if i wanted to
I don’t even run pbo
Static 4.3 all core at 1.225V
Does anyone know where to find bin statistics on 5900x?
silicon lottery maybe, no on really does it though
silicon lottery hasn't done zen 3
No point really, CO is just so strong
well... just wanted to know if I should be doing better than 4,575 generally
if I look through forums there seem to be a decent amount of people getting like 4700+
but it's also the internet so people lie lol
like I've only gotten 23k+ on CB a handfull of times
other times I'm getting like 21k which is wack
ccx oc?
what's that?
Look at this clown: https://www.techpowerup.com/review/amd-ryzen-9-5900x/21.html
"increasing voltage ot 1.5 V pushed heat levels too high" come on man
lmao
it must be nice to be one of those youtube clowns who get free stuff
then you can do things like run 1.5v & not care
"pound that like button" I hate youtube
I dont trust anyone with overclocking advice except some people on here
There's so much variation. I always come here because people know their stuff & advice is pretty consistent
Exactly. people know their stuff
you start googling & hitting up youtube you'll end up with utter nonsense
Like right now I'm reading a 5900x review on pcgamer.com & this dude doesn't even know PBO exists
overclocking yt guides for ryzen are about as painful to watch as the verge build guide
Manual overclocking to 4.6GHz at 1.3V produced the biggest uplift in Cinebench R20, with a score of 9,062, which is even faster than 16-core, 32-thread 3950X manages . . . [u]nfortunately the single core performance still suffers under this overclocking regime, and the performance dropped by seven percent to 594. Perhaps per CCX or per core overclocking will change this after the fact. But, for now, it just isn't worth overclocking these chips.
how do you not know about PBO & write for pcgamer? where's the update to the article?
Trying to overclock with yt/website advice is worthless
oh wow prime95 is up to 1.194 & 90.3 degrees
c die probably
what are your primaries?
wdym c die? and my primaries?
the physical chips of storage that make up ur ram stick
c die
my water temp is up to 33.4. Usually it's around 28
2400mts and 3600mts
is it safe to keep it at this?
probably
might be slower than 3200 tho
depending on primaries
get into bios and send me pics of all ur timings
ram timings
its the same cl
i used "memory try it"
msi board? l
yeah
still do this?
yes
Inb4 crash while opening task manager
huh? lol
linux, and it ran a stress test for a couple of mins fine
what happens if you increase bus clock? Bus*multiplier=frequency right?
is there a reason my bus clock shows 98.9mhz? shouldn't it be 100?
well... CMOS clearing time
LOLLL rip
no it's good. I'm back
lol
changing blck from 100 to 100.5 raised bus clock from 98.9 to 99.2... I'm thinking of gambling another .25 or something
nvm I'm putting it back to default
BCLK also affects PCIE communication, so be aware of that (PCIE will be your stability limiter)
Assuming you're talking about your AMD system
Does SB Clock Spread Spectrum affect bus clock?
Intel separates the two, I'm less familiar with that
yes amd
I've also read turning off SVM can bring back your 2mhz of bus clock]
but I don't think disabling virtualization is a good idea...
I wouldn't bother, it doesn't do anything
isn't it one of those windows requirements?
(going for the 0.2 MHz bus clock)
2mhz not .2 lol
It's like 0.2 on the bus. It shows up as ~2 MHz on effective clocks
If you're actually getting 98 MHz bus clock, you've touched something in BIOS
well bus is at 98.9... wouldn't getting that extra 1.1 increase clocks?
Is it actually at 98.9 under load?
Sometimes I see 99.8, are you sure you're reading it correctly
That's what HWiNFO says
let me boot back up & I'll show you
I was perusing BIOS to see if I messed with something
but outside PBO, fans, & enabling resizeable BAR, I don't mess with much
oh & TPM
that's about it
Now it's showing 99
Check what it does under load
same thing w/ CB right now
I wouldn't really worry about bus clock too much anyways
that .1 brought the /core mhz up from 4575 to 4586 in this test
I haven't really messed with it myself, but it's really not relevant for CPU overclocking
but you're saying if I mess with it it can mess up PCIe communication?
more like 4575 to 4578 btw lol
Yes, the PCIE bus timings are controlled by BCLK, so you'd be limited by your PCIE interfaces/devices
so even a .2 change is pretty significant?
Nah, that much shouldn't matter
adding 2mhz put me into clear CMOS territory
Why bother? It doesn't do anything
Only worth pursuing if you're trying to squeeze every drop out of your memory overclock. It doesn't do anything for your CPU
oh I thought it might if bus*ratio=effective clock
lol I threw in the towel on memory overclock
It is, but your CPU is almost unaffected by BCLK
Any idea why the bus clock goes down anyway?
And I'm pretty sure if your BCLK is low enough, the CPU will just up the ratio to compensate. Never really tested that though
Idk why BCLK sometimes goes down, it drops to 99.8 sometimes for me as well but I don't really worry about it
Seems like it's random every time I boot.
Every PC does that, it's hard for it to hold an exact number
okay I'm not going to mess with it. More of a headache than it's worth
That's how you get weird readings like 3798.6 MHz
"ASUS Performance Enhancement: allows CPU to maintain boost frequencies longer, resulting in higher performance"
that's just scalar isn't it?
Sounds like it, plus power limits maybe
I know my board has its own set of power limits
this thing will put EDC at 190A if I set board limits
lol ya & tj max
I doubt there's an automatic setting that touches thermal limit
CPU Core Current Telemetry: Offsets the current read by the processor for VCore in miliAmps. May add boost frequencies if adjust downwards but affects accurate power readings
so set motherboard to lie to CPU?
at 166 amps I get in the lower 80s on prime95
with 16mm OD PETG cooling
& and 18w like 1230 liters per hour pump
That's a setting that I haven't heard of, sounds dangerous
ya not touching that either
well let's see what performance enhancement does for us
yup
put amp limit to 180
overrode my 165
I love when the descriptors for settings are placeholders in my bios. A lot of the memory timings just say things like "tRTP help"
ya I have those but instead they just say, "no help string."
well... I'm turning this off
there are BIOS settings that the manual just skips over
like uh don't mess with this. It's here but don't mess with it
That's really common too. The manual only covers the essentials and trusts "experts" to know what things do and accept risks.
There's no descriptor for scalar at all in my bios
Lovely. Curve optimizer just says "curve optimizer" like that's supposed to be obvious what that is and how it works
Yes and no. It'll degrade your cpu faster but we're talking 5 year life instead of 7.
SoC/Uncore OC Mode: forces Infinity Fabric, memory, & integrated graphics to run at max specified frequency at all times. may improve performance at the expense of idle power savings
5 years? I hope I've gotten like 2 new computers by then
at least one
how much can this realistically improve performance?
Scalar? It just holds boost clocks longer
I mean I can put my fans at full blast all the time and it might improve cooling
oh I meant this SoC/Uncore OC Mode
Oh, what that helps with is negating the time to switch from idle to performance mode, improving response time
IOMMU is mostly used by Linux operating systems, you can leave it off of you're just doing windows and it's optional for Linux
I'm not familiar with TSME but I can give it a Google
I'm trying to find any little setting that'll give me that last 200mHz I need to have 4,600mhz/core during CB
wait jk not 200
like 30mhz
5900x
What temp do you hit in CB?
Not bad but could be better.
I could reduce EDC & get almost identical frequencies but 2-4 degress less
well ya maybe it could be better but I dunno how I can possibly improve my cooling without finding a way to get sub ambient
I've dunked my radiator in an ice bucket before during hot tests, it dropped me from 70C to 24C real quick
No but it's effective
update, 3600 was indeed, not stable
rn hottest core during CB is 78.1 on 10 yet only 65.6 on 0
would 14cl 2400 be faster than like, 3200 tho at cl 16?
You'd be surprised, most of the mess I made was confined to a towel I laid the rad on after
No
maybe I'll put a AC wall unit behind the computer & take the side window off
oh wow enabling that SoC/Uncore OC thing has me holding at 4599.3 rn
it's mocking me
If you're on AMD higher frequency helps the most due to faster fclk, if you're on intel focus on timings
amd
but wow I am staying at 459x
linux doesnt have any real stress test tools for ram so im
playing games to test if oc is stable
:V
can you do like mem test or whatever that runs in DOS when you restart
Oof that's unreliable
form like a jump drive?
wdym
i mean it has stress tests like stress/stress-ng,
Memtest would work but it's very slow at picking up errors
but they arent targetting ram specifically
wow the other thing I did was set a negative voltage offset
of like .040
maybe I can drop it lower?
what a difference
Yeah I've got a small negative offset too, it really does help
& it's keeping SVI2 at or below 1.300 under load so far
oh wow so .04 was kinda ambitious
You have a different chip than me
this raised the clocks for sure
Every one will react differently
I guess there's a bell curve effect to it
either that or I'll just drop stability
or will PBO just adjust clocks to remain stable? hmm
It'll drop clocks long before it's unstable
VID wants 1.419 & I'm giving it 1.288
heck maybe I can get to 4,700
getting greedy haha
heck I'm saving that profile in BIOS
I'm trying .06
Idle voltage is like 1.4 something so it should be fine at idle I think
maybe I will do that 180 amp EDC
crash
Well now you know where the floor is
I'm gonna try it one more time with EDC bumped from 166 to 175
probably won't help but gonna try anyway
cuz I noticed with higher EDC, I could set higher offsets per core on optimizer
but maybe that was a coincidence or something
No that makes sense, if it's allowed to draw more power it can hold higher clocks
ah okay well if this crashes I'll try the full 180
that's the motherboard max
is that too high? I dunno
It really depends on your VRM but I think we already checked and they were good before
180 is no sweat then
lowest per core it's hitting is 4592 but that's like the highest it was hitting before
maaan I should've listened to you before about the voltage offset
I tried a small one then just said to heck with it
probably cuz I was at like 135 for EDC
alright well I'm gonna bump to 180 & see what's up with a .055 offset haha
Volts x Amps = Watts
thermals are all sub-80 so chillin
haha yes I learned that in journeyman class before I threw it all away to go try to be a lawyer again
Sounds about right
you know what's freaking crazy? how amperage is lower on a on a three-phase system than a single phase system at the same voltage
So with a max amount of Watts set (by the bios for protection) if you lower the voltage you can add more amperage and get the same Watts
because w=av on single phase is watts = 120v x amps but on three phase it's w=120v x (amps x square root of 3)
if I remember correctly
The official letters are different but that's the gist
Mmm pie
ya that sounds fire rn
Don't forget resistance, because why not complicate it more?
I=E/R
oh wait I had a -.06250 offset
hmm 7 or bust?
I wish I did engineering in college instead of being an idiot drunk
You can try it and see how it reacts
the increments are .00625
Yeah I think mine are too, weird number to pick
Dang now you're making me want to play with the settings on my chip
I wonder if it crashes, if I increase magnitudes by like 1 (i.e. -30 to -29) if that fine tunes it more than the .00625 increments
I guess it's a good time to redo my OC anyway, I just updated bios
oh ya it's time
did your profiles survive update?
My Aorus update from F2 to F4 lost everything
Maybe I should've done F3 firs tor something
had to redo gosh darn fan curves
pain in my
No it automatically clears settings before it goes into flash mode
Or do you mean if the saved profiles could still load? Because I'm not risking that
saved profiles
Wait jk
my profiles stayed
but my fan thing (even tho saved to BIOS) disappeared
My agesa version changed so some core things changed, like I was able to overclock my memory even more than before.
I really gotta do memory overclock
it's just crappy on my ASUS board because I have to reset CMOS everytime
the Aorus board resets fine
I shouldn't have installed windows 11 tho because things start acting up easily
It makes a huge difference in games, way better frame stability and better 1% lows
I had it from 3200 16-18-18-38 to like 3400 16-19-19-42
if I remember correctly
then HWiNFO started showing crazy numbers
and I thought it was the memory OC so I went back to XMP
but it still does it
Not bad, sounds like an OK but not great die, like c-die
wish this was for real lol
it's hynix or something
that 30,775.7Mhz core clock thooo
Djr?
It's the system clock that threw everything off
A hynix memory die type
thought it was the my RGB software update
nothing
I reverted to older version
but ya HWiNFO is completely bananas & I have no idea why
Maybe a bug with the system HPET
this .07500 offset is giving me great voltage (won't exceed 1.275) but the clocks are slightly lower
I think I ran into the same phenomena you did
bell curve
Sounds like you found the basement under that floor
ya I'm on the fence here. keeping the slightly lower frequency with the really nice voltage is tempting I mean I'm looking at like 1.237-1.275 under CB load
It's up to you in the end. Undervolting won't hurt it like overvolting will.
I think I'm gonna see what the .06875 does
CB scores are still blah. All core OC at 4.7 got me 23193. This lands me at 22505
meh
The issue with the all core is that it won't boost higher than that for single core like gaming
yaa I know. I think it'll hit over 5000 with PBO
PBO is better
less exciting but better
For gaming definitely
If you were doing some sort of real time blender render where every second mattered, the all core oc could be useful
sucks I can't offset per core on 10900K. I have to find one size fits all voltage
so core 4 ends up like 8 degrees hotter than others
There's always that one core... And there's no way around that either, it's just physics
what's weird with the offset is CCD1 runs slightly faster than CCD2
CCD1 is better then
as little as .3 and as much as 2mhz
I think I'm gonna stay with this. 1.281-1.288v & 4600mhz +/- like 3
That'll do all right. Check your single core boosting too while you're at it.
I have it at +175... I wonder if I should redo it for +200
might not even be that difficult with 180 amps available
I just meant run the single core CB test and watch the boost clocks
oh ya I was just thinking tho since this is my first breakthrough with OC in like weeks
might as well go for the gold
I'll run it here in a minute
kinda mediocre. 4,909-27
kinda wanting those 25mHz rn
shouldn't it max at like 5050?
might be limited by voltage offset
should it be north of 1.406 on single core?
One way to find out
I'm headed to bed, good luck to you. You're on the right track.
thanks slepe well
It's 1pm here i just thought you were up early ;-;
It's 8 here
am
where is it 1pm? I'm in Miami, FL
well just north in Hollywood but close enough
Ireland
Erin Go bragh
boil em, mash em, put em in a stew
tfw tm5 run doesnt detect error but then windows poops so you run tm5 again and get error 
Is anyone available to help with overclocking my CPu?
@zenith palm Should I try General ?
Worth a shot
A 3700x? Enable pbo
They trying to find it in the msi bios, cant seem to find the options to tweak like +200 etc
Zen2 doesn't have it
how long should i run testmem5 for
until it finishes
depends
like bleach's oced 2x8gb 3866c14 can do it in around 40 minutes
my 2x16 3600c16 kit does it around 3 hours
going on 54 minutes now
2x8gb 3466c16
gonna test 3600 after
after 3600 the oc options for "memory try it" go to cl 18 so i know it cant do cl 16 for those
i explictly remember 3333 not being stable a while ago so idk how 3600/3466 is stable now but
im not complaining.
should i run 3200 cl 14 14 14 14 34 or 3466/3600 16-18-18-18-36
amd
3600c16 more likely to be more perf, but do testing
confirmed 3600 is not stable
a barely stable oc is very likely to perform worse than stock
so 3466 cl 16 18..36 or 3200 cl 14...34
running anta777 for testing
3600 is not stable at all
yes
bleach had an OC that was stable that passed anta777 that performed worse than 2133 jedec
just do some testing on performance
funny you mention me right as i look here
yes
yes you must always test performance with each change
Reason: Bad word usage
what cpu do you have that 3600 isn't stable?
I don't know any specifics on anyone else's oc :p
it's possible you can get 3600 stable if you just change some variables
3000g
have you determined the IC?
IC?
what chips are under the heatspreader
download thaiphoon burner, it has a decent success rate of figuring that out
not 100% though
i had known at some point but i forgor so ill do that
different chips have different overclocking properties so it's important to know what you have before overclocking
most importantly, different chips have different safe voltage levels
some start to die above 1.35v
some can daily 1.7v if you strap a fan to it
ruh roh.
some can daily 1.6v without extra cooling
ive been running 1.45
yeah that's gonna be safe on most ICs but not all
hence why you need to figure out what yours is
i personally daily 1.52v without extra cooling
micron rev. e
extra cooling as in more fans or as in like, literally strapping a fan to the ram
M-die
hynix MFR?
yeah it's hynix mfr then
whats that mean
a die
i mean like, for the oc
it's pretty bottom tier
i've oced hynix mfr before
trying to remember if max safe is 1.4 or 1.45
i know i was running mine at 1.4
i really highly doubt that mfr will do 3200 with flat 14 primaries
you sure that was stable?
my kit can't do that and i daily 3800c14
i'm pretty sure only b-die can do that
i mean it did anta just fine and i used it for months without issue
granted it couldve been cl 16
im not sure
16 makes much more sense
i actually ran anta 3 times
i don't trust anta by itself
to make absolutely sure
i've had an oc past 9 cycles tm5 anta777, 1 hour occt avx, 1 hour occt sse, 3 hours linpack xtreme and still be unstable
also on the cpu, is it worth going from 4.0 to like, 4.025 or 4.050
well if you can do it might as well
then what should i do to benchmark it
what do u suggest i run the ram at
1.4 3200 cl 16?
im testing 45 cl 16 3466 rn
but from what u said i assume thats not likely to be stable
i'd recommend starting ram oc by setting ram speed to the highest you can boot, fclk to whatever makes that 1:1, 16-20-20-40 primaries, rest auto, 1.4 vdimm, and then running occt cpu test with avx2 instructions, variable load, extreme preset
stabilize uncore before touching ram
oh almost forgot- 1.1vsoc, 1.05 cldo vddp, vddg ccd, vddg iod to start with
uncore = the parts of the cpu that are not the cores basically
the reason why i recommend starting with uncore
why set it to the highest i can boot
you mean highest i can boot with cl 16?
was because i got a ram oc that was not throwing ram errors
but was causing my gpu to crash due to i/o die instability
ive ran cl 16 18 18 18 36
took me a while to figure it out
loosen them, see if 3600 works
and see if it's performant
i can do 4000c14 with 2000fclk coupled mode but performance is bad
so i daily 3800c14
3600 died 5 mins into anta777 with 16 18 18 18 36
if you can get a higher fclk that's not performing poorly, it's worth loosening timings for
yeah 16-18-18-18-36 looks a bit tight for mfr
try 16-20-20-20-40?
i ran my mfr at 2666 12-16-16-16-35
with the other stuff u said?
bought a used cpu was degraded and the memory controller could not boot above 2666
yeah it was for a cheap flip so w/e
customer is happy
i was not cause i had to do a manual ram oc instead of setting xmp lol
xmp wouldn't boot
but yeah try the stuff i typed as a baseline
https://github.com/integralfx/MemTestHelper/blob/master/DDR4 OC Guide.md this is where i learned almost everything
but i add stability testing uncore first
so by uncore you just mean the cpu oc right
no
uncore name is actually exactly what it sounds like
cpu minus cores
i.e. i/o die which handles interconnect to everything
that's why my gpu was crashing when i had unstable uncore
i was changing my vsoc and vddp/vddg until i got stable uncore
thaiphoon burner reported hynix m-die didn't it?
that's hynix mfr
oh right haha yeah
"Terrible ICs unable to reliably attain even the highest standard of the base JEDEC Specification."
:(
if nothing else, the fact that you've been running it at 1.45 means it's not one of the dies that has negative scaling above 1.35v
don't worry i've had much worse than hynix mfr
my laptop has samsung a-die sodimms
negative scaling above 1.25v
jedec won't even boot at 1.35v
offies
i ended up tightening it from 2933 21-21-21-47 @ 1.2v to 2933 17-19-19-39 @ 1.25v
best i could do
where do i find this value in bios
uncore is a couple variables
like i said
start by trying 1.1 vsoc, 1.05 cldo vddp and vddg ccd/iod
ight
numbers might be different on zen 1
its under cpu or ram?
also, isn't 3000g zen+?
wikichips being high
i can only think of one intel cpu that doesn't have a starting number matching the architecture
8809G - kaby lake
amd cpus are kind of all over the place
with 5500U and 5700U being zen 2
laptops as a whole before 5000 as well
apus being weird
it's just a big mess
ye
the just "vddp" is what you want for fclk shenanigans
ok thanks
yup
had to make a dedicated windows drive for this
boots 3666 16 20 20 20 20 40 @short blade
anything higher and it starts restart looping and cutting itself off
that's impressive
now see if it's stable
if it passes the cpu test in the configuration i said
i'd run anta777 extreme1 3 cycles and then occt sse 1 hr
if those all pass then you have your baseline and can start tightening timings from there
i wonder if thaiphoon misread your die, maybe it's hynix cjr/djr
mfr doing 3666c16 is really surprising
thaiphoon is not 100% accurate
maybe i just have the godliest mfr in the world
how long do i run the occt extreme preset avx2 for
1hr
alr
make sure you select variable load
what should i pick for threads
so,
Data set: large
Mode: Extreme
load: variable
start at cycle: 1
IS: avx2
threads: ?
so the same test but sse instead of avx2?
ah for occt sse i'm referring to the memory test
memory test, sse instructions, leave everything else auto
i dont remember seeing a memory test option in occt
ig i wasnt looking hard enough
the one that has gpu? 
bump it down to 3600 and try again
p sure that'll die too cause it died early in anta
worth a shot now that you set uncore voltages manually
let's face it you wouldn't be doing manual ram oc if you valued your time
for 9.0.2, should look like this
i dont remember seeing memory but ig im blind lmfao
I had 8.0.1 and had to update occt lol
crap my shortcut still gives me 8.0.1 even after I downloaded 9.0.2
sad
but haven't had a reason to test my personal rig in a long time
:(
lol nice
looks like u might be right its getting further
hope it works
If it makes you feel any better, when I first downloaded OCCT in early May, I was using 4.4.1 cuz I didn't know any better
check if you got a whea error maybe?
a wha
go into event viewer
the ram should be set to 1 cr right
eh, 1t might work, might need 2t
you can try 2t
1t gdm is usually good enough for stability
2t diminishes performance latency-wise but if it helps you stabilize a higher fclk it's still worth it
should prob make a filter for whea logger
damn I kinda wanna join the RAM oc party but with windows 11 already showing crazy numbers on HWiNFO I dunno how high my chance of success is. The alternative is trying to do it on the 5900x but even raising it 33mhz lead me to clear CMOS land & doing that constantly is a pain
can RAM OC increase my 5900x CB score? lol
3dmark?
yes absolutely
well now we're talkin
the same 3070 saw 20% higher graphics score with 3733c14 vs 2666c12
from 12.3k to 15.3k
same GPU settings
comes up with nothing
aight, no whea errors then
maybe just rerun the test?
ram oc is the most important oc for real performance
if something crashed according to the test, should do something to try and make it more stable, one way is to enable gdm in bios, or go 2t for cr if you want
or could loosen timings or smth
you can try messing with uncore voltages again or trying 2t
gdm?
or 1t with gear down mode on if you currently have it off
where do i find gear down mode
should be alongside other memory settings
i started at 1.1vsoc with 1.05 other stuff but actually landed on 1.025 vsoc with 0.975 other stuff
I still don't think I'll get any movement at all on my 3800mhz 18-22-22-48 64gb without dropping from 1T to 2T
yeah it'll be somewhere around there
possible you could drop it to c16 with more voltage
gdm is like a 1.5t cr
with gdm on
depends on what ICs you have really
i've seen people daily 64gb 3800c14
Stronk imc
Did you check 042 code or whatever it's called?
I think that was with the 32gb set
well
64gb 3800c18 xmp bin
could be hynix djr or something
which is a pretty decent die
should be able to do 3800c16 on cjr/djr
wait i have Soc/Uncore oc mode and it was disabled
it should be automatically enabled as soon as you manually set any uncore voltages
but if not you can try enabling it
I have two so I confuse everyone. Both are G.Skill, both are Hynix, one set is 64gb, etc (from picture) & it's with the 5900x & the other is 3200 16-18-18-38 on the 10900K
& yes I'm an idiot and wasted too much money building computers cuz it was fun & I missed building stuff
lol
you talking to someone that has like 6 pcs sitting around at home rn
i hear you
tbh I should probably try to sell the 10900K computer but I'll probably get like 60% of what I paid for it. Plus I've taken the liberty of cutting some holes & splicing a few wires so it's not exactly "like new"
i'm going to sell the rig i'm using right now in one piece
my new rig is gonna be ready to become my main rig tomorrow
do you have cr at 1t or 2t
lol I'm sitting next to the 5900x, 10900K, two monitors (two more arrive 8/4--stooookeddd), a SurfaceGo2, a SurfaceBook3 15", an old HP laptop, & an old ROG laptop
gdm is only available with cr 1t
it was at auto but it autos to 1
big spender
but once I get the MSI board I replaced with the AORUS on the 10900K RMAed I wanna build another one because I have an AIO, tons of fans, the motherboard, & a 750w power supply just begging to destroy my wallet
bigger spender
the hardware i have lying at home right now-
5600x + 3733c14 + 3070 + 1tb gen3 full build
5800x + 3800c14 + 3080 + 1tb gen4 + 2tb gen3 full build
xeon e3-1241v3 + 1600c10 + no gpu + 500gb sata full build minus case
delidded i7-4770K + 2133c11 + no gpu + 500gb sata full build minus case
i7-10750H + 2933c17 + 3070M + 512gb gen3 laptop
also just sold a build with i7-8700K + 2666c12 + 3070 + 1tb gen3
someone stop me from buying more lol
jesus
I used to build electrical services & power big machines 5 days a week. I miss building stuff
i bought the 4770K and 8700K specifically so i could try delidding
if i had that kind of money id probably have an almost identical build, i dont like having more than i need
neither am I