#overclocking
1 messages · Page 70 of 1
What the fclk at? 1833?
yep
Run OCCT memory test and see if you get errors at that speed
Default settings are fine
ran it and no errors
Good, then yes you're probably stuck with fclk at 1833.
Running memory faster than 3666 will actually reduce performance unless you get into ridiculous high speeds like 4600+
oh damn. i thought i could go for atleast 3800
With some tuning you could probably get down to 3666c12
c12 as in tightening timings right?
Yes that refers to CAS latency, the first of the primary timings
ah i see
idk that much about tightening timings
is there like a software or something which can give me the best timings?'
Not really one that will max it out like tuning it manually
Ryzen DRAM Calculator won't push the voltage as high as you can do safely on b-die memory
so ill just stick to 3666 then?
I would. Going any faster will give you a net loss in performance.
The extra money on fast RAM isn't wasted though, a high rated set like yours will tighten timings really well and give great results.
I'm running my set rated 4133c19 at 3800c14
If I push the voltage higher I could probably get it to 12
what cpu you got?
5800X
ah thats why
I'd help tune it since I love doing that, but I can't today. Need to get ready for a nice dinner with the wife.
no worries mate i was about to ask you for help on that
but take your time
whenever your free, just ping me or dm me
Never seen someone daily cl12 on ddr4, c13 is doable though, not hard
Bios update so scary was convinced power was gotta go out or something lol
what do y'all like to run when tweaking a new gpu oc? heaven stopped on a specific frame or something else?
3d mark timespy or haven benchmark
heaven is 💩 for anything newer than 2016
Timespy or another 3d mark benchmark then?
time or superpos
is there something good for stressing for stability while I tweak the numbers or is it better to just change numbers, run benchmark, repeat
Change then run
UPS exists

Not a thing in Ireland because it's very rare for power to go out
Because I'm paranoid/anxious
Furmark, adjust while running the stress test. Once it crashes, back off a couple steps, then test with time spy.
Safe oc for 9600k?
Silicon lottery
i looked at their page and turns out they're selling 11600k for $25 under MSRP 
Sounds right. Intel is the only one not having inventory issues lol.
Occt is good too
how to "air" cool low tdp chips when you only have a d15
Well if the peltier plates are also cooled by air I guess it technically counts...
Should do a 4c decently well
I will be amazed if that has effect sensor works well
The tolerances have to be so precise
I'm open now
Sure no prob
@sudden torrent you free?
Yup
Let's start with the basic specs
I already know your CPU but what's your motherboard?
Strix X570E
Not bad
is there a better mobo than that one? because my friend reccommended to me saying its the most premium motheroard available now
No it'll do quite nicely
Grab this program and screenshot the timings
Ok head to BIOS
Yes, you can get there from the advanced restart menu. Shift+click on restart, from the menu hit advanced, uefi options
Set DRAM voltage to 1.5
hold up i gotta install discord on my phone then
Right I'm in
DRAM voltage is at 1.4 now
I'll change it to 1.5
Anything else?
1.15 SoC
1.0 VDDP
1.05 vddg iod
10.5 vddg ccd
There should be an overclocking tab are you in that or just the memory tab?
I'm in Ai tweaker tab
That sounds right
I'm guessing this is the overclocking tab
You might need to set voltage to manual mode instead of auto or offset
Where do I set that?
You have the mouse hovering on it in the picture, the control mode
There should be a version number on the white sticker on the memory sticks, what does that say? I guess that those sticks could be b-die or rev e
4.31
It's B-die
You have 4 sticks though? That'll limit timings a bit
There's no reason I'd see for the BIOS to stop you from setting voltage as high as 1.7v if you wanted
Sometimes the bios requires you to use the + and - keys to change things
Disable but that won't affect it right now
I see there's a + and - sign
But after i enter a plus sign
It just automatically goes to auto if i click on something else
Pressing enter on my keyboard doesn't work. Is that normal?
Yeah many boards don't really use enter much with the click bios
So what shall i do?
You might need to update the bios or something, I've never heard of it being stuck on auto.
I think i need to do a cmos reset
It just shows an orange light
And doesn't boot
Seems like a good idea
Doing it rn. My gpu is in the way so it's taking some time
@sudden torrent i fixed it
Ok see if you can set the voltages now
I'm able to change it now
Did you mean 1.05 vddg ccd?
This should be all right?
Is it the CLDO VDDP voltage?
I believe that's what they call it on asus
Should I enable DOCP or should i keep it at manual?
@tall pelican @sudden torrent
IT'S FINALLY RUNNING
IT'S RUNNING AT THAT VOLTAGE FINALLY
Damn it took a lot of time
you only need to enable docp if you're doing manual overclocks and its not applying (or you're trying to run docp)
check with zentimings that its running at the right speed and timings
Ah so i don't need to enable docp for now is it?
I haven't adjusted the timings yet
Just the voltage has been changed
I have to tune it to 3666 now and then i have to see if it goes above that
For running at 3666 i did have DOCP
then leave docp on
some asus and gigabyte boards need docp/xmp to be on when you're running above auto clocks
Right
What is the max clock i can go now?
I have it at 3666 now
And it's stable
I was only able to get it at 3733
That is one level higher than 3666
Your max clock is going to be whatever your fclk is stable at
Then you tighten timings after
I ran it at 3733 and fclk at 1866
Then when i increased it, it reset itself
It did boot though
Should i try increasing it to 3800?
Or just leave it there?
One step at a time. Make sure it's stable at each level before you go up.
OCCT will reveal any errors that come up. You said you tested 1833 fclk already, test it again at 1866, and if it's still stable try 1900. It's rare but it happens that a 3000 chip can hit that.
So should i increase the fclk first and then memory frequency?
Like increase fclk, restart it, then increase memory frequency and then restart?
Yeah that way you know for sure if it's the fclk throwing errors
You can just change fclk and leave memory alone for now
Right. I'll run the fclk at 1900 now and see
It's running at fclk 1900
Now I'll increase the memory frequency to 3800 and see if it's running?
It's running at 3800 memory frequency and 1900 fclk
Test with the OCCT memory test to see if there's errors
Shouldn't i tighten the timings?
There's a very high chance that the fclk isn't stable at that speed anyway
Or should i do it after the occt test?
Timings are later
Oh ok I'll do it now
The voltages we changed give you the best chance at a stable fclk but there's still a lot of 3000 chips that have trouble over 1800
For the OCCT test, what should i set the instruction set?
avx2
and threads is auto or fixed?
auto should be fine
Got it thanks
The test says it takes about an hour
So I'll get back to ya after that
I guess you're one of the lucky ones that can run 1900 fclk
Set memory speed to 3800 if you didn't already
Good. Now we can work on timings.
Save your bios profile before we continue so it's easy to reset
how do i do that?
It varies by bios, but it's usually named something to do with profiles
ah so ill restart it and see
Bruh
I saved it
Just to be double sure, i saved it on my motherboard and on a USB
Now for the timings
@sudden torrent
you should use this guide to tune the timings
Damn it has a lot of technical stuff in it
I will read it for sure. It helps
But how important is tightening timings?
Like i got 32GB of RAM running at 3800Mhz. So how much of a performance gain would i get by tightening timings?
you'll get a good bit by tightening primaries and tRFC
if you've come this far after buying such a fancy kit, it's worth doing the timings
Right
With b-die I expect you to be able to do cas 14 easy
It's best to adjust a couple timings at a time so if it fails you can narrow down which one it didn't like easier
got it G thanks a lot for your help
Hello all. First time OC today. I finally got my RTX3060 stable (ostensibly) at +735 mem clock & +210 core clock. I've seen people claiming +1000 on the mem. Perhaps I lost the silicone lottery or maybe the card just doesn't handle it (ASUS RUF-RTX3060-O12G on MSI MPG Z490 w/ Afterburner). That aside, I've been trying to OC my CPU now & I have a few basic questions: (1) is +52 too ambitious for i9 10900K? & if not, (2) is the correct procedure when the system goes unstable to slightly increase voltage? I've gone up in .005 increments from 1.305-50. Btw was stable at +51@1.310v. Anyone willing to deal w/ helping the FNG? Thanks
Also, 360 Coolermaster Silver AIO, 3x120mm pull/2x200mm Thermaltake Triio push
aRGB is set to show system temp. Seen a little violet but no red yet. Still unstable
Benchmark on Cinebench R23
- No, not too ambitious at all.
- instead of trying to increase voltage if the system is unstable, you should set your voltage to the maximum "safe" level. For a 10900k I'd say that's about 1.4V (some people say more is fine, it might depend). Set a moderate LLC (don't use highest LLC), and then run stability tests on increasing frequency values until it goes unstable
As for stability, cinebench is not a good stability test. It is good as a benchmark though
You should use OCCT for stability testing
Also I'd make sure vCore droops under 1.35V under all core load
okay I'm gonna try & figure this out
I watched this video where dude said you need to disable Multi-core Enhancement
He was using ASUS BIOS tho so I don't even know if that's a thing on MSI
is +53 possible? just out of curiousity?
I guess I'd never hit that considering the instability at 52
It is possible
LLC is Lite Load Control?
I know it's not Limited Liability Corporation. That's all I knew LLC was before like 5 minutes ago lol
I'm sorry in advance for being a total noob & understand if you don't feel like dealing with my questions accordingly
Damn I read every option like 3x & I don't see load line calibration or vdroop anywhere
maybe I should just resign myself to letting Dragoncenter do the OC-ing haha
vdroop is more of the phenomenon that is affected by llc
what LLC does at higher levels is force the voltage up to what you set it, and does not let it 'droop'
ah okay I think I get it. I was an electrician for 5 years so that's about my only reference on this haha
Higher LLC levels tend lead to higher heat and higher temps.
oh I found something mentioning LLC in a sub-menu ("DigitALL Power")
It just says Mode 2 which is what MSI's website said to se it at
but they also put the offset at +51 & called it a day. They're not very ambitious apparently
Hmm there's 8 Modes. "The CPU voltage will decrease proportionally according to CPU loading. Higher [LLC] . . . higher voltage . . . good [OC]."
Mode 1 increases w/ load. Mode 2 stays flat. Mode 3-8 increasingly drop w/ load.
Current setting is #2.
eh let's see what #3 does & I'll put voltage at 1.35v so it drops below that level under heavy load
I'm not too familiar with the specifics with Intel OC, never messed with them, I just know the underlying principles behind it, so you probably want someone else to help with specific settings xD
Doesn't Ryzen have lower tolerance for OC/it's powerful enough stock that it doesn't really warrant messing w/ anyway?
My next build I wanna do Ryzen 9
Threadripper would be great but a $3k CPU is crazy talk
Ryzen just doesn't scale well with manual OC, PBO can basically do what most people can do, but better.
AMD squeezes the majority of the performance of their processors at stock (since Zen2)
So manual overclocks don't do much, and can even reduce performance in single threaded loads because single cores can boost higher
You don't want to use mode 1 or 2. You actually want vdroop. It's generally better to run higher set voltage and have it droop lower under load, than to set a low, relatively constant voltage
That Multi-core enhancement thing is apparently called Enhanced Turbo on MSI
You could get away with setting 1.425 or more at lower LLC
Reason: Bad word usage
oh shoot bad words sorry
I am going to disable that feature
okay I'll drop it to Mode 4 then
voltage 1.425
hmm that's lit up red like it's a bad idea lol
As long as you have a lower LLC it should be fine
Also I believe MCE doesn't matter for a manual OC
oh okay. the video said if you don't disable it the default settings could overwrite values you enter or something like that
someone said it on a video so it must be true right?
okay I moved it to mode 5, which is approximately a 67.5 degree angle
of decrease relative to load
(halfway between 90 & 45 degree)
alright well I'm gonna F10 & get ready for liftoff then
btw can you set vdroop on GPU too?
will download OCCT btw instead of Cinebench
It overwrites some settings, but I don't remember everything it does other than power limits
Does it matter if I have like an OSD on to see temps during tests?
Also you should use hwinfo and monitor your system. Particularly vCore under load
Might affect benchmark scores, shouldn't affect stability
okay cool I'll look for that. I was gonna use CPU-Z or just watch in Afterburner
I'll look for that now
installer or portable?
You can choose portable or installer, depending on if you want to run temporarily or have it available all the time
alright I'll do installer
I have it installed because I use it frequently
I believe on Intel, the most accurate metric for vCore is VR VOUT
oh alright I'll get that instead then
Forks or @tall pelican can confirm
apparently VR VOUT measures actual voltage going into core
Vcore no bueno apparently
Yeah so VR VOUT is the important one
You should also overclock your ring bus
After you stabilize your core
I saw that. No idea what it is but I saw it
Ring bus affects inter core communications, and I believe the memory subsystem as well
There should be a multiplier in your BIOS somewhere indicating ring bus speed
Haven't touched an intel BIOS in years though
Ryzen is that much better?
I wanted to do Ryzen with this build but the 9s where nowhere to be found
I don't upgrade often and ryzen was the best choice for me at the time(s)
ah I finally found the vcore
Yeah they're tough to get ahold of. Although stock has just gotten better. I grabbed a 5800X initially and upgraded to a 5900X when I got one
Ignore the listed vCore. You should monitor VR VOUT
More importantly, how much that drops down to under load
oh shoot that's right
You should be fine if it's 1.35 or less under load. If it's more, consider dropping your set voltage, or your LLC
I see.
So at a fundamental level, instability is just overpowering the core & shutting down/green screen of fun is core protecting itself from damage?
That would be thermal instability, which you should not be getting close to. If your temperatures exceed 90-95C under AVX load you'll have to scale back your OC
Your cooling should be fine though, so the instability you will more likely see is crashes/errors during load
Those happen if you force your CPU to go too fast
Generally, more voltage will allow you to go faster, but of course you don't want voltage too high because that will degrade your processor over time
darn I cannot find this VROUT thing
I set the AVX offset to -9
I see it's like when a motor spins too fast & exceeds its redline type deal
Forgot about this question until now. GPU power delivery is much more locked off in general. I'm pretty sure they droop automatically, but there's not much you can do (without physical modding) since it's all pretty closed off. GPUs typically run up to a power limit and try to stay within that power limkt
You think CPU System Agent voltage or CPU I/O voltage is a good stand in?
Can you send a screenshot of what you see on hwinfo?
No, that's completely separate
I wasn't aware I could send screenshots on here
I hid every value except voltages to try to make it easier
Once your name turns green you're past level 3, so you can send pics
you might have enough level to send it now? but that's ok, you can DM
I wish I knew. I'm in the process of figuring this all out
Here's a clearer version
For what it's worth, this computer is running fine (the OC one) before I hit the stress test
can you show everything (don't hide anything) and take another set of screenshots?
I think it's under the section you have collapsed
question answered? (dont want to read through chat)
ok let me look
yeah
also while you're here
only some boards have it though
max safe voltage under load for 10900k?
oh interesting
what's your next best reading?
1.42v and/or 255A
vcore, and just know it'll be higher than actual
looking at other screenshots, I think it should be under this section (if it exists)
if it was there, that would be the place, or it will be fan speeds and mobo temp readings
guess you don't have it then
you'll have to use vcore as a gauge, and just know it's a bit higher than actual core voltage
lol
did you stability test yet?
not yet I've been trying to figure out where the heck this sensor is hiding
that one. VR VOUT
well gaming carbon wifi ftw
ah to heck with it. I'm gonna run the test
load type variable or steady?
Not sure tbh. Go with steady for now
Or whatever the default is
I'd go up to 1.45V set and try 5.3+
If your vCore 1.42 or less under load, you should be fine
hell why not haha
And temperatures under 95
I'll reset now
Stability test for 10+ minutes. If no errors, keep bumping up the frequency
start at 53?
Yeah give it a try
You can see the ring ratio there. That's what you want to adjust after you finalize your core frequency
I'm set at 5
LLC looks reasonable
Will do
Alright cool I'll save & go for it
Guess I didn't install OCCT fully yet. How anticlimactic
green screen as soon as I opened it
let's try some more vdroop I guess
even more anticlimactic
lol green screen on log in screen
bruh
whats the difference b/t dynamic & fixed CPU ratio mode?
Dynamic is automatic boosting. Fixed is static (manual) CPU speed
think switching to fixed would do anything?
Also increasing vdroop will only reduce stability. You'd want to reduce vdroop (increase voltage under load)
You should already be in fixed mode?
Yeah idk what it means specifically then
this is getting bananas
I'll pop it in fixed mode. why not at this point? looking like I'm gonna be hitting that restore default settings sometime soon lol
Hopefully not :p
Unfortunately I don't have much more to offer you at this point other than to try and maximize frequency while making sure your vCore reading is less than 1.42V. you might want to go to LLC3 (don't go any higher than that)
And then try your ring ratio
no worries
you've taught me a ton of stuff actually
don't mess with ring ratio until after initial OC?
btw does it matter that I OC my GPU first? like are they mutually exclusive or could the GPU OC be messin up the CPU somehow?
Something I just remembered: try non-AVX tests first, stabilize that, and then adjust the AVX offset to stabilize AVX tests
Should I set that to some crazy high number to avoid it?
or where do I find non-AVX tests?
Yeah core OC is more important, you should leave ring OC for later
Doesn't matter as long as they're stable
OCCT should have AVX and non AVX stress options for CPU
P95 is also non AVX
okay I got it to boot
well it opened
I don't see AVX option only CPU: OCCT or CPU: LINPACK
Hmm I'll have to check OCCT myself later, could have sworn there was an option
okay well I started nonetheless
wamp
green screen
heck
well... should I drop the voltage? I running out of ideas
hmm I wonder why if any voltage 1.36+ is red
Because that's technically in the "danger zone" for voltage. If you have decent cooling and control your LLC you should be fine though
You could try 1.4 with LLC2, just for testing
I see.
I've been reading forums where the consensus seems to be that you have to be "lucky" to get 52+. I might just set it to 51 for now & do some more homework on it
The frustrating thing is I haven't been able to find anyone talking specifically about MSI bios
So whatever random stuff they throw on there to get their numbers up for marketing isn't easily identifiable
gamernexus has a long video about how motherboard manufacturers basically OC without OC
Seems like nonsense but you'd probably understand it better than I would
well better than I did rather
I mean even at +51 it's been a pretty productive day. I got my GPU OC & my CPU
Can't thank you enough for your help btw
I learned a lot even if mostly trial & error
meaning like I don't know how to control the machine yet but I know what a lot more of the buttons & levers do now
OC is mostly trial and error 😛
haha ya I kinda learned that with the GPU but there you're really only worried about 2 variables
CPU its 10 variables + a bunch of mystery settings
Plus the bios doesn't explain those settings very well, "xyz level setting affects xyz level"
totally. Half the explanations leave you with more questions than answers
others are completely worthless &/or obvious. "changes CPU mode from 'fixed' to 'dynamic'"
like oh thanks
do y'all use User Benchmark at all? I swear I have so many problems with that thing. I like that it gives you the online comparison when it works but half the time I get some error about sequential writes on my SSDs
UBM is garbage
I wonder if I can overclock the GTX 1660 Ti in my SurfaceBook? 🤔🤔
ya I agree
ever use 3dmark? I got it off Steam
I guess my next mission is OC my RAM haha
3dmark is good
Ya I used it a bunch of times today. I was so proud cuz I got up from like 9400 to 10001
Normally you can't overclock laptop model gpu
They're very precise about what wattage is available
I like the surfacebook but that thing gets hot
super hot
same with the surface go
Cooling pad?
which is cool to have but Android/iPad tablets are way more versitile
at least for little crap like paying app type games
I got one of those ones you put on your lap with a fan in it
it works alright
the thing is with the surface book, most of the computer except for like an extra battery & the nVIDIA GPU is in the screen half of the laptop
cuz it has to standalone when you detatch it
detach
Yeah I could see that being a problem still then
I've never even tried to use it outside or anything. I bet that would not go well
The most recent firmware update kinda fixed it tho. It doesn't get nearly as hot
you can read about people having the thing get super hot & making the screen bulge & crack
It's a cool concept when it works right tho
Are you supposed to get +1000mHz OC on a 3060? what's wrong with mine? lol
On the memory? Possible, but not expected
alright cool. I'm good with my +725 then
why don't more people do this? I thought it was clever
Probably because the extra airflow doesn't amount to much. Most of us have 3 intake and 3 exhaust already in cases that already have good airflow.
it does
VRAM cooling is very needed when using it to 100% or mining
cheaper to hook up a fan to the back than repad
Didn't know he was mining.
??
Not quite 120mh on the 3090, however i could turn off my screens and close discord
You must have pads and a fan on the back of that X)
Whats your vram temp@tired cypress
thats not your temp
go to HwInfo
"memory junction temperature"
unless you're waterlooped thats core
🌶️
Imo it's much more comfortable than it was before mods
That's a lot better than 110 lol
+150 core/+1000 mem brings my 3070's time spy score from 13626 to 14823
people say they get upwards of 2100-2150MHz with lower oc boosts but mine seems to peak around 2080, is that silicon lottery or should I just keep pushing
silicon lottery + cooling
Anyone here brought a 3060ti over +500 on memory?
I have mine on
+105
+500
Maxed voltage n temp
Max temp I've ever seen is 63c whilst gaming
I did +750 and it crashed after like 40ish minutes
I have my non-ti 3060 at +1400 mining
Maybe I'm doing something wrong then
Or you're just unlucky, or the temps are too high.
Mine sits around 42C on a bad day.
I sorta doubt it's cooling but it could be, my card never reports higher than like 65, 75 hotspot
cooler fat because it's the same one from their 3080 design lul
Yeah I've got the 3 fan, overbuilt tuf oc model 3060. Maxing everything out overclocking and doing furmark it doesn't hit 70 with the fan at 50% lol
@agile flame is it by chance a gigaturd 3060ti?
bruh i have a 3090 and i get like 100mh
could you pass me your settings or anything?
i use nicehash quick miner
Mem clock up, core clock down, power limit to 65 or so, fans to 70%
yea but like i was asking for values
Well, each card will be different
Numbers for theirs may not work for yours
Take the core down 200 mhz to start and the memory up until you lose MH/s efficiency
Then take the core down until MH/s is affected
Then test power limit for the same
It's just like overclocking, what works for one card may not work for others
ah i see
i thought of like having that as a template
and then work around with that preseet values that he has
Try -200 core, +1000 mem and 65 power limit, fans at 70%
adding thermal pads to your backplate will help also
Since you have GDDR6X
Might not be able to OC ram as far due to heat without them
i dont have thermal pads as of now, but i am planning to purchase them. I only mine on my free time say like when im sleeping or something
will changing those stuff affect my gameplay performance?
Possibly
Game will run but with less FPS, possibly artifacting from memory overclock
most of us use MSI Afterburner with a Game and Mining profile
oh wait i can do that as well lol i forgot about different profiles
i use the asus one
unsure I have a gigabyte something something
Mine peaked at 150core but i could push mem to like +1150 before artifacts iirc
Doubt it's a gigabyte problem i get +1300 stable on my 3070 while mining
at least 3
Pads/cooling
Nonexistent on gigaturd
Depends on the card? what model? Googling site:reddit.com (model) thermal pads should find some thread with info
Strix 3090
Norbert the Great is a counterculture blog covering technology, crypto, gpu mining, weed, politics, philosophy, activism, and whatever else comes to mind.
Costs a little extra to mod, but the gains are well worth it
Also, @SlimShady , refer to this brief guide (You will need Afterburner) - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=isXErQpXBtg
gotcha thanks mate
do you have the name of the fan that hes using>
?
i cant seem to find one in amazon.ca
Ik but i still get +1300 on my gigabyte 3070
@zenith palm the 3060ti v2 is realy bad i have heard
Ohh fair
They removed the heatsink from it
good morning. Can anyone tell me where OC temps are too high? 80+? I'm running OCCT (w/o AVX Capable Linpack checked) & seeing jumps up to 86. I can't understand why it gets so high only running at 51. Is my AIO just mediocre or should I redo the thermal paste?
yikes just hit 87 on Core 4
it's like that for less than 2 about 2 seconds tho
Voltage is max 1.35 & average 1.323
You can always make your fan curve more aggressive
Wouldn't worry about the temps but it's a meh aio
But what does the rest of your curve look like
It's push/pull w/ the 3 stock 120s pulling & 2 200mm Thermaltake Riing Trios pushing
I think 10.68 volts at 65 degrees
Can you just show the fan curve?
ya let me cancel this test & restart
Okay
it shows 12V at 75
they're not pwm so I have to set volts
12 is max
I'll drop them to 100% at what? 65?
That's a bit confusing of a graph but I'd do something like this i think
Can you not just do percentages with dc fans? That's what i can do, weird
It looks like they aren't spinning til 50c tho no?
Or is it just the graph being weird
40
Ahh okay
I would make it so the fans spin about 30% from 0-30c if possible
Alright thank you
Just helps if they don't have to keep turning on and off longevity wise afaik
2 of the 200mms don't show because ttrgb controls them
I see
what do you think 100% by like 55 degrees? or lower?
You think the fan curves are the problem? i.e. why I'm hitting such high temps?
I think I need to flip the top 200mms to be exhaust fans
I usually do 100% at like 70 or 80
Ohh yeah if you have the top fans as intake that would help switching them
I just dunno why it's so darn hot at 51
the CPU ratio I mean
I read where people are getting 52-53 no problem
Shouldn't the voltage be fixed? i.e. HWiNFO shows minimum voltage as my input 1.325 but maximum at 1.405. Shouldn't the max & minimum be the same/
I would push with the 3 stock fans. Pull really doesnt do much for an aio
then the problem would be I couldn't use the 2 200s
You dont have to use every fan you have in a pc
Also what voltages are you running the chip at in the bios?
Just pushing with stock fans will make a big difference tbh
Dont use the 200s anywhere on the rad
at 52
I'm starting at 1.300
also what is your LLC on?
also what mobo?
MSI MPG gaming carbon wifi
what?
chipset?
10900K
490 or 590
chipset not cpu
sorry ya 490
ok 1 sec
okay
check what ur load line calibration is on once
okay it's mode 2 which basically doesn't droop at all
Ok nice
sorry not 52, 53
I'm thinking it's a mistake to be on Windows Insider. I have preview build but it seems to make things worse
darn really? that's no good
maybe I should be happy I was almost stable at 52
problem was I was at 1.36v. Is that too high? it was red when I input it lol
I would set voltage to 1.4V to begin with and then get the core multiplier as high as I could go while maintaining stability
ohh
see I was setting the multiplier then tweaking voltage
i.e. the opposite approach
1.4 for 10900k is complete;y fine daily driver
the other issue is should the voltage be completely fixed
If you hit thermal limits reduce voltage slightly and try again
nope
okay nvm on that then
It will fluctuate. You are just setting the maximum limit
that's strange then.
I set the max at 1.360 & HWiNFO was showing the max at 1.44 or something like that
What value you changing to change the cpu vltage?
What's really awful is I gotta re-enter Bitlocker code on every reset
all 40 digits
1.300 right now
should I up it you think?
just bumped to 1.350
meh 1.4. wouldn't boot
what's considered "too high?"
booted. now shows min 1.404, max 1.485. 1.485 seems pretty high no?
jeez now showing max voltage at 1.535. That has to be for sure too high
What value you changing?
voltage
What value under voltage...
CPU Vcore?
1.535?
I know that's not where I change voltage I was just showing you what everything is reading because it actually got past log-in screen
say goodbye to your cpu soon
ya way too high huh?
Vcore is 1.4
you should never overclock on auto voltage
NEVER
first of all what cooling setup do you have
i was seeing thermal throttling on all 8 cores of a 10700K with a 360mm AIO, 5 fans, mesh case, and no gpu
at 1.35V
10900K at auto voltage 5.3ghz will probably recreate chernobyl
did you change up the fan mounting on the rad like vintage and I suggested btw?
that I awesomely got from the newegg shuffle I might add
hold on i need to remember how MSI does LLC
I'd have to remove front case fans for that
okay msi llc is lower number = lower vdroop
I'm on Mode 2
JESUS
which is basically no vdroop
How do I turn off Auto voltage?
type manual override voltage into bios
It's on Override
1.35v mode 4
start at 5ghz
I had it stable at 5.2 lol
no offense but considering what i'm reading here
I got overly ambitious
1.4 is safe for 10900k as well right?
i would bet a 10900K you don't know what stable means
maybe if you have sub-ambient cooling
okay fair enough
i also run a much heavier load than occt
I read its fine daily with a decent aio
well i was seeing thermal throttling with less cores and less voltage lol
I personally run stress tests and use the profile for a full day or 2 before calling it stable
Ah makes sense
I am going to follow orders to the T here
start at mode 4 and see how vdroop handles it
iirc mode 3 and lower actually causes increased voltage under load
which might be why you were seeing such insane voltages if you really put an override voltage
you should keep ring ratio oced to 300mhz below core ratio
ring ratio is very important for performance
now go put 1.35v in override voltage
the latter
alright
dang
next step is report that youtube video
that person is a nonredeemable idiot and should never be allowed to own a computer ever again
just give them a macbook
change it back to 1.35v
okay
it's 3800 18-22-22-42 that's not exactly 1.5v material
i use 1.5v to run 3800 14-12/18-18-34
your auto SA/IO look really high
So basically with the stuff you were doing before snail showed up, you would have fried ur pc faster than a gigabyte P-GM power supply
but i wonder if that's just because dram was set to 1.5v for some reason
They're Trident Z Neo 32x2 (also newegg 😄 )
oh yeah absolutely your cpu would probably be dead before the month ended
go ahead and boot
copy that
Oh btw lemme tell you a secret... no one here really buys stuff from newegg
see what it reports for VCCSA/VCCIO in hwinfo64
i do
i've spent way too much money on newegg
I do, when it’s out of stock on Amazon
amazon first tho
same
spent like 20k on newegg this year
i built my pc on newegg
oh one caveat i will avoid b&h
will gladly pay a bit more to buy from somewhere that's not b&h
I use amazon a lot just cuz it arrives so much faster
why tho?
racist company
thats understandable
WOAH
vccio/vccsa are really high still
then again, maybe that's needed to run 2x32gb
oh just to make sure your ram's xmp is rated for 1.35v right? or is it higher
maybe because they're aRGB?
nah that has nothing to do with it
no
Bruhhh
I know that slows down NVMes
ram rgb can have some impact on extreme ram overclocking
but anyway
they're rated 3800. They're set at 3866
see if it ded
Go with what they are rated for mate
I wouldnt overclock em further
not after running em at 1.5V for how many days?
okay I'll change that
raising the speed without touching anything else can cause the mobo to train worse secondary/tertiary timings to boot
like
i don't overclock too much cos i'm afraid of frying something with things that are more out of stock recently
you have the highest tRFC i've ever seen
I changed them yesterday and now they're back. COmputer was off overnight
so maybe like 8-10 hours?
1023 tRFC
did you run that 1hr of occt with the ram voltage at 1.5V?
my cheap laptop ram is running 462 tRFC
Thats not good
thats very not nice
yeowch
?
lower tRFC is better
lower everything except voltage and clock better in pcs
462 tRFC @ 2933 MT/s = 315ns
1023 tRFC @ 3866 MT/s = 529ns
ouch
ram upgrade time yet?
nah
lol
lol this RAM was new in February
ram overclocking is only for the few enthusiasts that really care about it
xmp is fine
@modern walrus
he has a 3060 he's gonna be hard gpu bottlenecked anyways
Laughs in overclocked 3600 mhz ram
okay so far CPU:LINPACK with AVX Capable Linpack box checked, max temp is 70
I only trust prime95 for stability
agreed
should I switch to that?
when I was testing my laptop
For mem I prefer extreme anta
I tried occt 1 hour
it passed the whole hour with no errors
then didn't boot anymore
lol
clearly not stable if it can't boot and requires a hard reset
but it passed 1 hour occt large dataset
so wait, how are people getting 5.3gHz & I'm approaching critical mass at Chernobyl?
OCCT (generally) good enough for gaming
claims I've seen...
Because they know what they doing and also better bin maybe
or not truly stable
i have seen prime95 damage cpus, intel doesn't reccomend it for stress tests apparently
MSI has this little video where they tell you to set it at 51 Mode 2
a lot of idiots online that think their cpu is stable when they stability tested it with maplestory
then wonder why they get a bsod once a week
what s BSOD?
blue screen of death
again noob. sorry everyone
Like my 3600x is 100% stable at 4.4ghz all core at 1.27V
if prime95 damaged your cpu that's your fault
on a 510r because my case proportions are dumb
sooo... I shouldn't go for 5.1?
you have to try really hard to damage a cpu
don't run prime95 at 1.5v
& 5.2 is a heck no
you can try going further if 5ghz is stable
but you need to start from a lower baseline
dont run anything at 1.5V
you don't approach overclocking by throwing on 5.3 and hoping it works
well in my defense, I've been trying to do this for about 20 hours or so now
if 5 is stable and your cooling can handle it by all means try higher
20 hours is not that long for oc tuning
well heck
ram overclock takes me 3 days of tuning and that's while knowing what i'm doing
cpu overclock is easier though
alright well I'm just gonna take RAM off the table for now... xmp it is lol
yeah very few people actually do ram overclocking
there are a lot more variables
cpu overclocking has core frequency, ring frequency, vcore, llc, and that's about it
My GPU overclock was successful before I tried this CPU thing
ram overclocking has all of the timings in that picture, dram voltage, vccsa, vccio
and yeah you need to stress test after each and every change
the ram is capable of 3800c14 but my garbage 5600x isn't
Early samples generally bad
gonna wait till next year to buy stuff
Havent bothered doing tertiaries at all yet
okay my max temp is 73. Is that good?
except procodt everything do be auto
73C in prime95 small ffts avx?
oh crap I'm still doing OCCT
what would you say I should slap it down to?
will switch to prime now sorry
my 10700K @ 1.35V instantly slammed into the 100C barrier in prime95 small ffts avx lol
can't comment without knowing what ICs
okay small or smallest?
Ive hit 105 degrees
yanked the power cord instantly
tRC generally can try tRP + tRAS + 2 iirc
samsung c die
B>C>A right
it won't even boot at jedec with 1.4v
yeah i'm not surprised
throttled 2
is the clock speed lowering?
You are the one with the crappy bios voltage thing right
Like it doesnt have the 1.25 option
dumb
okay well what should I use as an alternative?
or should I just kick the crap out of my CPU here lol
nothing
i cannot comment on the efficacy of tests that i don't use
prime95 best cpu stability test
most of my overclocking is done for customers so i must ensure the highest standard of stability
sooo do it & disregard the throttling?
otherwise i am going to have to drive over to their home to fix my own mistakes if it's not stable
i have heard people using realbench avx.. you can try it
i personally trust prime95 the most
like the massive temps don't matter as long as it doesn't bsod?
see if it's dropping below 5ghz too
cpus will not be damaged by heat
built in protection against that
okay the butt kicking will commence shortly
my laptop cooling could handle prime95
TBH prime95 puts wayy more stress on the cpu than any real use case. Just because prime 95 is going to 100 doesnt mean it will while you do everyday tasks
