#overclocking

1 messages · Page 33 of 1

sudden torrent
#

Well that does impact how low tRFC can go so it's good to find out

#

FCLK 2133 will be ideal for you at 6400

abstract wedge
#

cant u just figure out a/m die from cpuz spd tab

#

look at manu date

kind walrus
#

Ye or try booting via frequency

#

Post high, A, post low, M

sudden torrent
steady lance
#

@sudden torrent 4.5 hours no issues with Y-Cruncher VST3.

#

Just got back home

steady lance
#

I can't seem to find tCWL.

sudden torrent
#

If it's not in the main overclocking menu you can find it in the advanced AMD Overclocking menu

#

Run a search

steady lance
#

Is tCWL locked maybe?

sudden torrent
#

Don't worry about it then

#

Auto seems to have it set correctly as is

steady lance
#

So just configure tCL then move onto FCLK? @sudden torrent

sudden torrent
#

Sure

steady lance
#

I hope 28 works

#

@sudden torrent it posted!

sudden torrent
#

I'll bet it did, but did you lose any performance?

#

Run VT3 again and see, it was really stable at 1.46 before

sudden torrent
#

1.46*10^10 b/s

#

Can be simplified to 1.46e^10

steady lance
#

Is 1.46e the number that Y-C wad calculating?

sudden torrent
#

That's the speed at which it was calculating, which is heavily influenced by RAM

steady lance
#

Ohhh okay

#

Is 1.46 good or average for the time it takes to calculate something?

sudden torrent
#

It's decent for your CPU

steady lance
#

Also it just finished the first test at 1.41 * (10^10)

sudden torrent
#

1.53 would be a massive improvement

#

1.41 is regression

steady lance
#

Well f

#

Ok

#

So cl28 caused regression

steady lance
#

Tried tCL 26 just for the fun of it. It did not post.

#

Trying tCL 30 now.

#

tCL 30 has shown even more performance regression than tCL 28.

#

@sudden torrent do I use the same test for FCLK?

#

Also I haven't tried honing in tRFC fully yet. Should I just keep lowering it as much as I can without temps hitting over 60c and no errors?

#

Trying tCL 34 just in case to see if maybe my performance was regressing at the xmp of 32.

#

34 is definitely much slower.

#

Decided to let tCL32 have a few runs

#

It seems to have stabilized at 1.45

#

I am going to try the 7800 post test.

steady lance
#

FCLK 2,133 posted.

#

I am currently testing performance uplift in Y-C (VST3).

steady lance
#

@sudden torrent I am stable at 1.49 with occasional drops to 1.48 with FCLK at 2133

sudden torrent
steady lance
#

Also @sudden torrent is 1.46 to 1.49 a good improvement?

sudden torrent
#

Yep, as long as it's not going backwards it's an improvement

#

If you want to test to be sure you can do fclk 2100 and see the result

steady lance
#

FCLK 2,200 does not seem to post.

Also 7800 all auto and UCLK/2 did not post @sudden torrent

sudden torrent
#

Sounds like you have M die then

#

2200 no post is no surprise

steady lance
steady lance
#

tRFC 400 posted.

steady lance
#

Going to bed.

#

I will leave Y-Ctuncher VST3 Profile running over night.

#

Btw I am now solidly scoring 1.49 in VST3.

sudden torrent
steady lance
#

Anything else I can do to speed up my ram?

#

I am gonna run it through PCBdestroyer as well now while I am away.

steady lance
#

Passed 2 rounds of PCBdestroyer

#

max temperature of 45c.

steady lance
#

btw no whea errors.

#

@sudden torrent do you think I should consider the ram tuned or is there anything else I can do for it? I plan to tune the CPU next.

sudden torrent
#

Looks good to me, I'd move on at this point

steady lance
#

@sudden torrent I am about to eat dinner, after I am done with dinner I think I will start tuning the CPU. What software do you recommend me using and with what profiles? IIRC for my 7950x3D I will be doing PBO with Curve Optimizer yes?

steady lance
#

@sudden torrent I figured out what was causing my pc to not always boot when exiting bios. I had left the CPU SoC on Auto. When I changed it to Manual 1.3V booting now appears to be working again

#

Does my config for CoreCycler look good?

#

gonna leave Core Cycler running over night

steady lance
#

Am I doing something wrong?

#

I left Core Cycler running over night and it never even finished the first iteration

sudden torrent
steady lance
#

@sudden torrent HOLY, is increasing the PBO override by +200mhz supposed to make this big of a difference?

sudden torrent
#

That's 10^9 not 10^10

steady lance
#

ahh rip.

#

I missed that

#

9.57 * (10^10) / 60

#

Am I doing the formula right?

sudden torrent
#

No it's simpler than that, just a multiple of ten off

#

So before you were running at 14.9 * 10^9

#

And now it's down to 9.57

steady lance
#

1.49 * 10^10

#

I am not sure why it's now 10^9

sudden torrent
#

Which indicates that it's throttling or getting lots of errors and correcting them, which slows it down

#

Did you increase your power limit when you enabled pbo

steady lance
#

btw I thought higher was better?

steady lance
sudden torrent
#

300W on what

#

There's 3 different limits

steady lance
#

PPT I think was the name

#

Is there a way I can check from Windows?

sudden torrent
#

Ryzen Master
Ok PPT you can set to 1000W

#

TDC maybe 180A

#

EDC 250A

#

Start with that

steady lance
#

I am on a MSI X670 Pro WiFi board.

sudden torrent
#

Yes and those are the settings my motherboard defaults to when I set "motherboard limits" so yours should do them too with a slightly better VRM layout

steady lance
#

btw 9.69 in CoreCycler rn

#

gotcha

#

btw why did it change to 10^9 from 10^10?

#

If it errors the program stops I assume.

sudden torrent
#

Because you lost a lot of performance to where it had to drop you down a factor of 10

steady lance
#

Gotcha.

#

Alright I will restart and apply those settings. brb

steady lance
#

@sudden torrent just got back. Any idea why it is not posting with those settings?

steady lance
#

Clearing the cmos and enabled context restore fixed the issue

#

The score is still 10^9

#

Looking at HWinfo it is not hitting the TDC/EDC or Power limits.

sudden torrent
#

Of course it's not, you don't want it to hit the limits

#

The point is that the frequency is determined by an algorithm that includes what power budget is available, so giving it way more than it needs can increase the frequency.

#

(not always)

steady lance
#

now*

sudden torrent
#

Better

steady lance
#

For some reason setting the power limit to 500 caused it not to boot or that's just bad luck

sudden torrent
#

The power limits are something you can definitely play around with to find the sweet spot

steady lance
#

any idea why my performance went down?

#

Should I keep messing with the power limit?

sudden torrent
#

My guess is error correction, or an automatic frequency limiter of some kind was triggered

#

Yeah you can play around with it

#

Watch core frequency too

steady lance
#

alright. I will try bumping it up to 400 to see if it makes a difference.

sudden torrent
#

If the frequency goes down it's hitting a limiter, but if frequency goes up and speed goes down, that's error correction

steady lance
steady lance
#

Changes in the hundreds?

sudden torrent
#

100MHz can be run to run variance, more like 500

#

That or higher would be cause for concern

steady lance
#

gotcha.

#

I am seeing changes within 100mhz or less.

#

@sudden torrent would you recommend I use Y-Cruncher VST3 or Core Cycler to test the frequency and performance?

sudden torrent
#

y-cruncher

#

core cycler uses different algorithms

steady lance
#

I am using the config you sent earlier..

sudden torrent
#

and also only one core at a time

#

a single active core isn't likely to hit any kind of limit

#

if you wanted you could also run y-cruncher in benchmark mode instead of stress test, so you get an easier to work with number

steady lance
#

does that affect the test itself?

sudden torrent
#

yes, basically it calculates X digits of pi and stops

#

then scores you based on how long it took

steady lance
#

Then I assume use CoreCycler for the stability test?

sudden torrent
#

CC is good for testing CO settings mostly

#

Plus fclk to a point

#

If you do it right then you should have your settings dialed in by next week

steady lance
#

So I should use:

  • YC (For frequency test)
  • CC (For CO Stability test)
sudden torrent
#

In this case yes

#

yc gives you an idea of how the processor as a whole is doing, cc tests the max that a single core can do

steady lance
#

Understood. Also you were talking about a frequency limit.

#

So I should look for increases and decreases in the all-core frequency in HWinfo?

sudden torrent
#

Basically yes. If something is wrong it should be pretty apparent.

steady lance
#

k.

#

I am gonna try booting with 400W PPT limit.

#

Should I increase EDC and TDC?

sudden torrent
#

One at a time I'd say

#

So if you get reverse scaling you know which one caused it

#

Drop that in the y-cruncher folder if you want to run the benchmark. It'll calculate 10 billion digits of pi, and near the end it'll say "total computation time," that's the one to look at right now.

#

That will also put a bit of load on your memory, too. It should use a bit over 43GB of it if my math is correct.

steady lance
#

Aight thank you.

#

@sudden torrent any idea why it seems as though if I don't clear CMOS before booting that I can't back into my tuned settings?

sudden torrent
#

memory context restore

steady lance
#

Enable it disable it?

sudden torrent
#

disable

steady lance
#

Disabled. Going to try and boot with 1000W PPT.

steady lance
steady lance
sudden torrent
#

yes

steady lance
#

ty

#

I am seeing all-core clocks up to 5.35Ghz

#

averaging around 4.625Ghz under sustained load.

#

@sudden torrent TDC and EDC respectively hit 139 and 144 amps.

#

peak of 150w

#

The increase in power limit did it! I took a test in Stresss Test mode, I am back to 1.48-1.49!

steady lance
#

changed the PPT to 3,000. I am averaging 1.48-1.49 from 1.46-1.48

#

Is it risky to increase my TDC/EDC from 180/250 to something higher?

sudden torrent
#

The CPU will only use what it needs

#

This is just the motherboard acting as bartender. "How many drinks can I have tonight?"

#

If the customer (cpu) decides it's had enough before that limit, that's all they take.

steady lance
#

gotcha

#

so onto CO then.

#

-20 posted on Core 0.

steady lance
#

-35 posted on Core 0.

sudden torrent
#

The question with CO isn't "does it post," the question is "is it stable at max frequency and load" which is what corecycler is supposed to figure out.

#

Maybe start with -30 all core, run corecycler for 3 loops, see what cores reported errors. Back off on those cores by 5, ones that didn't crash go down -5 more. Repeat until you get tired of it. It helps to keep a spreadsheet.

#

If you get a blue screen... well you can't do -30 all core then for sure

#

It's normal for some cores to end up needing a positive offset to remain stable since you're at +200

steady lance
#

This is with a -35 CO

steady lance
#

-45 CO posted on core 0.

steady lance
#

-45 crashed

#

trying -40

steady lance
#

@sudden torrent Core 0 is stable at -40 CO!

#

passed both YC tests

#

testing -40 CO on Core 1

steady lance
#

Passed CC (3 Iterations)

#

passed YC VST3 and Bench.

steady lance
#

-50 CO on core 1 unfortunately crashed.

#

Going to try -45 on core 1 now.

steady lance
#

-45 wasn't stable. Moved onto Core 2. -40 on Core 2 did not post however -30 did.

#

What does this error mean?

#

It should have access to plenty of power unless it means something else.

steady lance
#

welp I am gonna go to sleep folks. I plan to leave Core Cycler on overnight. These are the tunings thus far

faint tangle
#

Im sorry I've absolutely no clue

sudden torrent
steady lance
steady lance
#

Reduced the CO on cores 1/2 down to -38/-28

steady lance
#

@sudden torrent cores 1 and 2 have each passed 20 rounds of Core Cycler or 5 iterations since I did it as 1,1,1,1,2,2,2,2.

steady lance
#

Uhm @sudden torrent so I changed my thermal throttle limit from auto to 95 and it did this to Ryzen Master.

#

Also all my cores now appear to be able to maintain higher clocks for longer.

sudden torrent
#

95 should be above what's possible to set, which is probably why it bugged out

steady lance
steady lance
#

@sudden torrent, @faint tangle, the TG Contact Frame, TG PTM Sheets, and SN850X 4TB just arrived!

steady lance
#

@sudden torrent I left the CPU running overnight and my performance uplift is huge!!!

I am now scoring 1.79 * (10^10) in VST3! Used to get 1.48

All I did was:

  • install TG's AM5 contact frame
  • Reseat the CPU
  • Apply the new TG PTM Thermal Pad.
sudden torrent
#

Not bad at all. Your peak temps look slightly better than mine and I have 4 less cores.

steady lance
#

As for stability I got my first 4 X3D cores very stable in at:

  • 0 = -40 CO
  • 1 = -38 CO
  • 2 = -28 CO
  • 3 = -28 CO
    @sudden torrent
kind walrus
#

Please tell me you're only using ryzen master for hwmonitor

sudden torrent
#

yeah all the tweaks are in bios afaik

steady lance
kind walrus
#

Would've gone postal if we were still suggesting ryzen master in 2024

sudden torrent
#

Yeah that's just to show the curve in screenshots

steady lance
#

@sudden torrent I am back to tuning the CPU again, and I noticed the PBO Scaler. What does that do again?

sudden torrent
#

It's not something to touch for a daily, it makes the CPU care less about killing itself in exchange for holding boost clocks slightly longer, like milliseconds.

sudden torrent
#

right

steady lance
#

Is VST3 a good way to measure a CPU's performance?

sudden torrent
#

It's consistent enough but not the absolute best way

#

It's pulling double duty as a benchmark and stress test

steady lance
#

I am trying to figure out if my score of 1.8 is very good or not because I noticed that a 14900K with 8800mhz ram is only scoring around 1.18-1.26 on average

sudden torrent
#

Intel uses a different algorithm since they don't use AVX-512

steady lance
#

So it has a bias then?

sudden torrent
#

No it's an entirely different set of results

#

It's like comparing time spy to speed way

steady lance
#

Oh so even the test is different is what you are saying?

sudden torrent
#

It's an entirely different algorithm that happens to have the same result

steady lance
#

How much does a 7950x3D typically score in VT3? I tried google but didn't find any results.

sudden torrent
#

It's not a commonly run benchmark, maybe try cinebench r23/r24

#

That's not as good as a stress test but it's good for comparing to other CPUs

steady lance
#

gotcha

#

I am hoping the rest of my cores can do -30 to -40 like the first 4 cores have

sudden torrent
#

X3D cores tend to undervolt better because the frequency isn't as high

steady lance
#

I am loving this SN850X!!!

#

It is so much faster to move files around now

steady lance
#

K, I am beginning to work on CO again. Was organizing my drives.

#

-40 CO posted on Core 4.

steady lance
#

Unfortunately -40 was not stable.

#

Trying -35

steady lance
#

@sudden torrent how many runs of CoreCycler should I give a core before calling it stable in CC and moving onto my overnight VST3 test?

sudden torrent
#

I do 3 loops per core I'm testing for the initial test, and I do another test of the whole CPU for 48 hours when I'm done with all the cores

steady lance
sudden torrent
#

I just let it run through all the cores for 48 total hours

steady lance
#

I have been doing 4 runs of CC then 12hrs of VST3 to catch those random errors that pop up once in a blue moon

#

or 250 iterations of VST3

steady lance
#

the overnight test with YC so far has done the best job of detecting those little pesky random errors from what I can tell.

steady lance
#

@sudden torrent so far it appears I am stable on cores 0-5:

  • -40
  • -38
  • -28
  • -28
  • -30
  • -35
#

cores 4-5 that I have been working on today have passed over a dozen rounds of CC and YC.

steady lance
#

Core 5 had to get nudged down to 33. testing it for stability

faint tangle
#

Anyone around for 13th gen voltage questions?

#

Just wondering what voltage/voltages I'm supposed to change to undervolt in bios, or if its just "cpu core voltage"

#

And im wondering if 1.14v is smart

#

Actually nvm ill just update bios and let it deal with itself

#

I'm due an update anyways

sudden torrent
steady lance
#

@sudden torrent would you consider this many runs of CC enough to call a core very stable?

sudden torrent
#

At least for that workload, yes

steady lance
steady lance
#

welp good night folks.

Gonna run CC on cores 6 and 7 with -38 and -35 CO.

steady lance
#

@sudden torrent it seems my 7950x3D can't clock beyond 5.7ghz without a serious undervolt that isn't stable. Should I overcolt the frequency ccd for higher clocks or continue with an undervolt?

sudden torrent
#

It's not worth the risk imo. There's going to be very little real benefit.

kind walrus
#

Basically 0 benefit

#

If anything regression

#

Cos clock stretching ≠ effective clock

steady lance
sudden torrent
#

Correct

#

Though undervolts can cause clock stretching as well

#

But you'd notice your corecycler speed go down in that case

steady lance
#

@sudden torrent how is core 9 failing when it has a curve offset of 0???

#

Y-Cruncher VST3

sudden torrent
steady lance
#

that is why I am so confused

sudden torrent
#

I guess that core is just unlucky then

#

That kind of processor would be borderline QC fail. This is a heavier than normal workload but you shouldn't need positive CO for anything at +0

steady lance
#

This is with +5 CO on core 9.

#

I am extremely confused and frustrated with this core.

sudden torrent
#

Unlucky almost to the point where I'd consider getting a RMA

#

This is the equivalent of crashing at stock settings

#

The RMA would be accepted too, if you just tell them that the processor is failing a stability test at stock settings

#

No need for more detail than that but if they ask you could tell them the program you used

#

My worst core did -20 CO at +200. Needing +CO at +0 is unacceptable to me.

steady lance
#

Is it possible that the negative co on the other cores is causing core 9 to fail?

#

I just changed PBO from Manual (Advaned) to just Enabled

#

time to see if it still happens

sudden torrent
sudden torrent
steady lance
#

How is it AMD has screwed up twice

#

🤦‍♂️

sudden torrent
#

You're just unlucky

steady lance
#

I doubt it can be from degration could it?

sudden torrent
#

That's possible but unlikely on X3D because the voltage is reduced out of the box

steady lance
#

@sudden torrent now I am very confused.

#

So I decided to run VST3

#

this time with PBO set to Enabled rather than manual.

#

It's now passing the test with flying colors.

#

and to confirm that it didn't reduce boost clock, HWinfo shows all the cores on CCD1 hitting 5.75Ghz

#

Any thoughts?

sudden torrent
#

Could be a power delivery issue since you had tweaked the limits a lot

steady lance
#

Means it is just user error

#

not a hardware issue

sudden torrent
#

Potentially yes

steady lance
#

I seriously don't want to deal with AMD's Customer Support for a RMA again....

#

Took a month and a half to get my replacement and so many days of back and fourth

steady lance
sudden torrent
#

So it's faster too? lol

steady lance
#

at 10*10

sudden torrent
#

Ah right, the latest screenshots threw me off

steady lance
#

btw I assume 1.79-1.8 is very good for a 7950x3D?

#

if PBO without tuning ram got me 1.45 on average

kind walrus
steady lance
kind walrus
#

More positive to all yes

steady lance
#

gotcha.

#

I will try that when I have time later.

steady lance
kind walrus
#

I have no idea

#

I don't look at those numbers cos I don't tune the cores to an inch of their life lol

steady lance
#

Am I mixing people up? Thought you did LN2

steady lance
steady lance
kind walrus
kind walrus
steady lance
#

I want to tune my 7950x3D as much as I can while maintaining diamond solid stability for when I upgrade the GPU

kind walrus
#

I see it all the time

kind walrus
#

That point is going to have removed redundancy

#

When it comes to daily settings, you don't run them close to the limit, you always add a degree of tolerance in case something causes problems later

kind walrus
#

It always happens without fail

#

I always add redundancy now

steady lance
kind walrus
#

Not saying don't tune the way you want but I've seen way too many people do this and being too aggressive always causes issues

#

And then they're like "Oh it's fine I just changed such and such we're good now" and they lose like a week every month of their spare time

steady lance
#

this is truly strange though. For some reason that core is the one that is listed as the error but if I just switch to standard PBO it doesn't throw the error

kind walrus
#

Yes because you're adding an undervolt

steady lance
#

I even did a positive co on it

kind walrus
#

Even if it's not on that core

#

It's on the cluster

steady lance
kind walrus
steady lance
#

So even if that one isn't directly the source of the error, if another core on that CCD (Cluster) is unstable it will cause that core to error?

#

Like a chain effect

kind walrus
#

Yes or scheduling

#

You're basically asking the mobo to droop more per core, which as with any undervolt has a limit

steady lance
#

so in other words, try doing that CCD again from scratch and really make sure that each core on their is fully stable

#

I admittedly rushed CCD1 by primarily just using CoreCycler

#

well what do you know

#

I removed all offsets on CCD1 and now it even booted without having to deal with finicky powering up issues

#

core 8 threw an error

#

yargh

#

@kind walrus can having to much of a offset on CCD0 cause CCD1 to be unstable?

kind walrus
#

Unlikely but not impossible

#

Too much on ccd1 is likely to affect all ccd1 tho

steady lance
#

Hmm okay.

#

Why I ask is

#

Currently CCD0 has a heavy offset while CCD1 has no offsets.

#

I do not have boostclock override enabled

#

So it's set to stock speed

kind walrus
#

If you've been tuning to no clock override then your settings will work to that

#

Adding clock override after can introduce issues

#

You do that before not after

#

Depending on the behaviour of the silicon, removing the override can improve stability but not always

steady lance
#

Specifically always with Cores 9 and 8 in VST3

kind walrus
#

You can add global clock limits for specific cores

steady lance
#

Oh so if I know x core is only stable at x clock I can tell it not to go beyond that?

kind walrus
#

Your pbo rules should have a menu for that

steady lance
#

Gotcha.

#

I will definitely check that out.

#

But unfortunately it doesn't solve the current issue.

#

Cores 8 and 9 continue to throw an error despite CCD1 having no offsets.

Power limits:
PPT: 4000W
TDC: 180A
EDC: 250A

kind walrus
#

Stock clock limit?

steady lance
#

Currently yes

kind walrus
#

What board is this

steady lance
#

MSI X670 Pro WiFi

#

I just updated the bios about 10 days ago

kind walrus
#

Ah

#

Do you have an option for core voltage

#

Between die sense and socket sense

steady lance
kind walrus
#

No

#

Core voltage

#

Vcore

steady lance
#

I will need to double check in a sec.

kind walrus
#

Below LLC settings

#

Which btw have a huge impact on cores

steady lance
#

I remember working with Fal and having set the LLC to mode 3.

kind walrus
#

Setting what LLC

#

There's two

steady lance
#

I believe for the SoC I will confirm in a couple minutes once I am back at the pc

kind walrus
#

Ok speaking from experience you should never set SoC LLC

#

Unless he has a better source for that

steady lance
#

We were tuning my ram at the time.

kind walrus
#

I'm saying in general

steady lance
#

Understood.

#

My CPU is running 1.29-1.3V SoC because it was not very stable below that unless I turned my ram down to below 6000mhz

#

Currently running 6400mhz for the ram

kind walrus
#

Adding any LLC is a trigger for droop which yes will cause that sort of thing

#

And given MSI's usual LLC behaviour I'm not surprised

steady lance
#

So LLC is the cause?

kind walrus
#

Could be

steady lance
#

Should I try removing it or tightening it?

kind walrus
#

Your boards switching behaviour and droop could be the cause

#

Which is why I'm inquiring about vcore rn

steady lance
#

Give me about 2m to get to the PC then I will get an answer for you

#

Check it in bios or heingo?

#

Hwinfo?

#

@kind walrus k I am at the pc

steady lance
#

CPU LLC = mode 3
CPU NB/SoC LLC = mode 3

#

Where do I find vcore

kind walrus
#

Below it

#

Like next entry literally

#

It'll say like advanced dram config

#

Llc settings

#

Vcore settings

steady lance
kind walrus
#

It's not there for a reason then

#

Well I normally run mode 4 for msi but you've started with 3 so 4 won't work

#

Go into digi all power

steady lance
#

What other names might it be under?

kind walrus
#

Set the vcore switching frequency

#

Change it to something else, anything else

steady lance
kind walrus
#

Yep cpu switching frequency set it to say, 2nd highest speed

#

Try running the test again

steady lance
#

So 900KHz

kind walrus
#

I was expecting 500

#

Try 500

steady lance
#

I can set it to 1,000KHz as well surprisingly

#

500KHz is my lowest setting

kind walrus
#

Interesting

#

I was expecting that to be 125 lmao

steady lance
#

Is higher better?

kind walrus
#

Ok try idk, 750

#

Not always

steady lance
#

My options are:
Auto
500
600
700
800
900
1,000

kind walrus
#

700

steady lance
#

K

#

Should I up LLC to 4 or leave it at 3?

kind walrus
#

Leave at 3 unless you want to redo every single core

steady lance
#

...

#

3 it is

#

There is CPU NB/SoC Switching Frequency as well

kind walrus
#

You should fix that later but not now

steady lance
#

What I just set is CPU Switching Frequency

kind walrus
#

Yep

#

Switching freq can make a big difference in droop behaviour

steady lance
#

Just confirmed clock override is indeed disabled

#

So all should be stock speed

kind walrus
#

The other alternative is you switch to mode 2 cpu llc

#

Iirc 2 is higher

#

So less droop

steady lance
#

My board goes from 1-8 with 8 being the highest

kind walrus
#

Is it 8 being the highest?

steady lance
#

At least according to the info thing on the side

kind walrus
#

So 4 goes higher?

steady lance
#

Yes

kind walrus
#

If it does then you could try 4

#

If you start terribly crashing then it's likely the core offsets more directly

#

But I would assume different ccd would have a rather minimal impact

steady lance
#

Hmm the info thing for LLC is different on this bios version

#

Should I assume 2 is higher then?

kind walrus
#

If it is then don't touch it and just try playing with switch freq

#

If you keep failing trying a bunch of them, then yes dial back the undervolt on ccd0

steady lance
#

Understood. Leaving LLC at 3 then.

#

Switching frequency set to 700KHz. Now booting

steady lance
#

In windows now

#

Errored again

#

Same 2 cores

#

8 and 9

kind walrus
#

Ok try 500

kind walrus
#

Try 500 and LLC 2

#

Cpu

#

Not soc

steady lance
#

Understood

#

Loading into bios

#

So:
CPU LLC = 2
CPU Switching Frequency = 500KHz

kind walrus
#

Mhm

steady lance
#

K

#

Booting up

sudden torrent
#

Interesting. Something I just noticed in the corecycler files is the PBO2Tuner app. It will let you change PBO settings from inside Windows, including CO, PPT, TDC, EDC, Fmax, and scalar.
It's in the "tools" folder.

steady lance
#

Want the good news

#

Or the bad news first

sudden torrent
#

Hoo boy

#

Bad ig

kind walrus
#

It was other cores failing wasn't it

steady lance
#

Yes/no

#

Core 9 and 8 didn't fail but core 12 did

#

Still CCD1

kind walrus
#

💀

steady lance
#

Ran another run

#

Core 9 fail

kind walrus
#

Ok try LLC 3 again

steady lance
#

Wtf?

#

Ran again

#

Now core 4 threw an error

kind walrus
#

Yes

steady lance
#

LLC?

kind walrus
#

This is the impact of being on the limit

#

Llc 3

#

After that, if I'm right it should throw only 8 and 9 again

sudden torrent
#

Load Line Calibration. It controls how much the voltage droops when under load.

kind walrus
#

So LLC 4

steady lance
#

So I have run VST3 4 times here are the problem children.

  • 4
  • 9
  • 12
kind walrus
#

Stop running

#

Lol

#

LLC 3

steady lance
#

K

kind walrus
#

You know why it happened

#

Cos mode 2 is lower

#

Not higher

steady lance
#

Oh okay

kind walrus
#

LLC 3 will likely be 8 and 9 again

#

Or just 9

#

Which means LLC4 could clear the issue

steady lance
#

So now we know. MSI X670 the higher number LLC is indeed higher

sudden torrent
kind walrus
#

It's inversed

kind walrus
steady lance
#

So set CPU LLC to 4?

kind walrus
#

3

steady lance
#

3 k

kind walrus
#

We changed switching freq. So we can't jump to 4

steady lance
#

Set

#

Booting up

#

I am starting to dislike how long my password is

#

....

#

@kind walrus @sudden torrent well this time it didn't immediately error

#

Core 4 from CCD0 did error though

kind walrus
#

Mmmm

#

LLC 4 switching freq back to auto

#

So it doesn't like 500

steady lance
#

So:
CPU LLC = 4
Switch Frequency= auto

kind walrus
#

Yep

#

You could keep messing with the freq

#

I'm guessing like 900 is probably what it does in fact like

#

But auto was consistent so better not to bother

#

LLC 4 would likely stop all the immediate errors

#

Which would mean you need to dial back your CO numbers definitely

steady lance
#

Should I just set it to 1,000 and give it a test?

kind walrus
#

Not really necessary

steady lance
#

What does switch frequency do?

kind walrus
#

I was testing for consistency

kind walrus
#

Some settings are bad

steady lance
#

So try CPU LLC = 4

kind walrus
#

But this board seems ok for consistency

#

Mhm

steady lance
#

Just set CPU LLC to mode 4

kind walrus
#

And switching auto

steady lance
#

F I forgot

#

One sec

#

Lesson learned

#

Don't try doing 3 things at the same time

#

Booting up

#

CPU LLC = 4
Switch Frequency= auto

#

Errored again

kind walrus
#

Which

steady lance
#

Cores that errored:

  • 13
  • 5
  • 8
kind walrus
#

Ooo maybe the LLC is unstable

#

Go back to 3 auto

steady lance
#

Okay

#

I am starting to think that this instability is caused by the Co on CCD0

kind walrus
#

On the contrary

steady lance
#

Set CPU LLC to 3

kind walrus
#

Notice how 8 always fails

steady lance
#

Yes, oh so you think it's because of LLC because when we change those 8 isn't the only failing core

kind walrus
#

I think 8 is always the failing core rn

#

Whatever it's set to

steady lance
#

Brb

#

Core 4 errores

#

Errors

kind walrus
#

Only 4?

steady lance
#

It seems Core 4 is pretty consistently an erroring core on CCD0 and Cores 8/9 error on CCD1 which has no offsets

steady lance
kind walrus
#

Try something a bit more aggressive

#

Add +5 to all co

steady lance
kind walrus
#

Bios

steady lance
#

I ran VST3 again, cores 9 and 4 errored

kind walrus
#

8 & 9 are same core

#

Add +5 co to all cores

steady lance
kind walrus
#

Ik

steady lance
#

I gotta go. Will you be available later?

sudden torrent
steady lance
#

Also thank you for your help.

#

Leaving VST3 on

#

So far no errors

kind walrus
#

So if +5 fixes it then definitely at least one core isn't stable

steady lance
#

Just left the house. Right before I left ai noticed an error.

#

Shut the PC down in the meantime

kind walrus
#

Still could be the CO settings

#

No immediate error is a sign

steady lance
#

What we also know is that with PBO set to Enabled vs Manual (Advanced) that it won't error in VST3

steady lance
#

@kind walrus, @sudden torrent any chance you guys are still on?

sudden torrent
#

I'm up, playing a game

steady lance
#

Gotcha. I was hoping you might be able to help me in a moment.

#

What game are you playing if I may ask?

sudden torrent
#

Skyrim rn

#

But I'm probably going to stop soon since I've been fighting a bugged script that disabled all my interaction (anything with E key doesn't work)

steady lance
# sudden torrent Skyrim rn

Fun but buggy game for certain. I remember having watched TheWaffleGalaxy when he made his Skyrim series. That was very entertaining

#

@sudden torrent to you think I should restart my core tuning and change my testing methods to focus on VST3 since that appears to be a much harder thing to pass?

#

It's evident I think that it has something to do with the CO because just running with PBO enabled without offsets it works fine

sudden torrent
#

That's up to you. Generally speaking I don't call it stable until I've done at least 3 different kinds of stress test, but one is good enough for basic testing until I get a rough outline.

steady lance
#

I will run them back to back for each core

sudden torrent
#

Depends on the flavor of the week, but some combination of corecycler, prime95, linpack, OCCT, and I'll throw a memory test in for good measure because CO can mess with RAM OC.

steady lance
#

I think my best bet is to remove all co offsets except 0-3 because we know those cores passed with flying colors having scored 1.79-1.8

sudden torrent
#

One option yes

#

It does it differently from a full test, doing one core at a time

#

Which is good for dialing in problem cores but I also want to know if it's all core stable

steady lance
#

I will be right back.

What test method do you suggest I go with test by test? I wish to tune the cores as much as I can while maintaining solid stability

sudden torrent
#

Find what you think is the limit and back off by 5 if you're not 100% certain it's stable

#

If that's followed then stability should be easier to achieve

#

Especially since over time the CPU will degrade slightly and require slightly more voltage to run the same clocks, eventually becoming unstable if you're running on the razor's edge

steady lance
#

Back

steady lance
sudden torrent
#

Depends on a lot of factors but generally very slowly, over the course of years

steady lance
#

Also CO will keep my cou alive for longer correct?

#

Negative co

sudden torrent
#

Yes but also no

#

Yes the voltage is slightly lower but the frequency is also higher more often

steady lance
#

I get what you mean now

#

Even though it's using less voltage it is however running under full load more often

#

So it balances itself

#

For PPT, TDC, EDC should I keep them on manual or set it to the option called Motherboard

sudden torrent
#

I set mine to motherboard limits

steady lance
#

Is that better or?

sudden torrent
#

It's just what the motherboard vendor has proven works with your VRM

steady lance
#

Gotcha

#

So the bottom line is that it's safer

sudden torrent
#

Eh, no not really lol

steady lance
#

Really?

#

Well I just removed co offsets from all cores except 0-4

#

0-3 I know are rock solid

#

And ai re-enabled the 200mhz override

#

For PBO limits I set it to motherboard since I am betting that is what PBO enabled uses

sudden torrent
#

Motherboard limits for me sets 1000W PPT, 180A TDC, and 250A EDC. Way more than I'll ever come close to using. So it's not really "safer" in that sense.

#

It might be called "safer" in that it's validated to work with your VRM

steady lance
#

Safe for the board I mean

sudden torrent
#

Nah the board will be fine

steady lance
#

Pray

#

FAL

#

pray

#

Running vst3

#

My gosh I am sweating

#

Literally

sudden torrent
#

You've probably got at least 10x 50A power stages, possibly more or higher power, so even if you were pushing 400W it would be totally safe for the board.

steady lance
#

Please work!!!

#

YES!

#

It flipping cussin worked!

#

Man that feels good to see

#

For the better part of a 4 days I am been sweating this and messing my my co values on CCD1

#

So the problem child appears to have been the CO on some core between 5-7

#

I am scoring 1.49 which is about the same as last time. For some reason when I scored 1.8 my chip kept getting faster? It started at 1.49 last time and overnight creeped up to 1.8 till it stabilized there

sudden torrent
steady lance
#

It's passed 3 entire rounds!!!

steady lance
sudden torrent
#

So the board will be fine no matter what settings you use

steady lance
#

And motherboard pbo limits applies whatever msi deemed to work on this board correct?

sudden torrent
steady lance
#

Which based on what you said I assume to be way more than any Ryzen chip will ever use

#

Passed 4 rounds!

#

Averaging 1.49 * 10^10

sudden torrent
#

Waaaaaay more than will be used

steady lance
#

By the way Fal I heard a disturbing noise that sounded like splashing water from my AIO when I was booting up

sudden torrent
#

Air bubbles

#

Safe to ignore

steady lance
#

Understood

sudden torrent
#

As long as it's not actually leaking that is

steady lance
#

No leaks thankfully I packaged my PC like a psycho who's overly protective of their baby

#

But my gosh the damage to the box and foam and everything was terrifying when I opened up the pc

#

4 inches thick of bubble wrap was the right call

sudden torrent
#

The packaging damage would be validating to me. It would mean my paranoia paid off.

steady lance
#

Layered between hard packaging

#

I did wrap, cardboard, peanuts/foam frame, wrap

#

You know the extremely tough foam that the fractal comes with?

#

Well that was shattered to bits

#

This side wasn't so bad

#

But the other side was turned to crumbs

#

Hmm PC crashed

#

Oh f.

#

Nvm

#

🤦‍♂️ my screen turned off

#

And like an idiot I pressed the power button

sudden torrent
#

tbf the foam the cases ship in isn't meant to support the weight of a fully built system, just the case itself

steady lance
#

But I get what you mean

#

At least it made it with minimal damage

#

CO Values:
40
38
28
28
25

#

All negative

#

So run CoreCycler, VST3, OCCT, and Prime95?

#

@sudden torrent what is the site ai download P95 from?

sudden torrent
steady lance
#

Ty

#

Any profiles or etc so should run?

#

Also for testing how my chip compares to others do I install Cinebench R23 or R24?

sudden torrent
#

I do small fft avx-512 enabled for a few hours then switch to large fft

#

Cinebench is just a download and run deal, no install needed

#

Benefit to using benchmate is it includes tons of different programs you can compare/test with

steady lance
#

Oh awesome

sudden torrent
steady lance
#

The benchmate install

#

Is that just mass installing different programs?

sudden torrent
#

Basically yes but it's also a frontend program to easily and securely launch the programs

#

It includes anti tamper features that are important for validating scores

steady lance
#

Wondering because I already have things like OCCT, Y-Cruncher, CoreCycler, and etc installed

sudden torrent
#

It doesn't have any of those

#

Except y-cruncher

#

And it does install cutom settings for that

steady lance
#

Gotcha so it's still worth indtalling

#

OCCT and P95 have been reinstalled

#

No longer running on a year+ old version

steady lance
#

Interesting, seems having set board limits it's gone up way higher than what I had set manually.

steady lance
#

Ran CB24 from Benchmate. I scored an average of 2,085 in it.

#

Also I ran two rounds of OCCT one CPU and one CPU+RAM both with settings optimized to increase CPU strain.

steady lance
#

@sudden torrent I am confused by this GUI. How do I know if an error occurs?

steady lance
#

been running P95, and some other programs at the same time for about an hour now.

#

temps are staying steady at about 60c

steady lance
#

so two hours later the cores are averaging about 55c on CCD1 and 62c on CCD0. @kind walrus is that good?

#

P95 small FFTs with avx512

#

oh btw the issue was indeed an issue with a core on CCD0 i decided to go back to th cores I knew for certain had a rock solid CO and work my way back down

kind walrus
steady lance
kind walrus
#

So it was a CO issue then

#

I would like to take this opportunity btw, adding the +5 like we did, I would do that anyway once you're done. Reason is synthetics are still not a perfect guarantee, and as you saw, that kind of "what's unstable???" event happens a lot to people who daily on their tested limits

#

I see it constantly

#

@short blade had episodes like this a lot with ram stability

#

Just adding that redundancy does so much to keep things stable

steady lance
#

So far I have tested the current co's and all passed with:

CO (negatives with +200 override from core 0-15)

  • 40
  • 38
  • 28
  • 28
  • 25

Tests:

  • Y-Cruncher VST3 (overnight +200 iterations)
  • OCCT CPU and CPU/RAM test with settings on extreme
  • Prime95
  • Cinebench R24 Single and Multicore
  • CoreCycler about 100 iterations (running it overnight just incase)
kind walrus
#

There's common phrases such as "bench tune" or "daily tune" and daily tunes stretch beyond just synthetics imo, cos you will never get perfect coverage, not with how complex programs are now

steady lance
#

true

kind walrus
#

Adding that little bit of extra buffer does a huge amount

#

Saves you from that random program unleashing mayhem

steady lance
#

I have found that Fortnite is shockingly a great test for CO because of DirectX 12 I think

kind walrus
#

Yes I believe that's true

#

The free to play cod also is good

#

Forgot the name

#

Battle royale one

steady lance
#

it's one of the few games that I have noticed actually uses all the cores because I see the load on the cores in HWinfo

steady lance
#

because the game itself now isn't very stable

kind walrus
#

All the more reason it's a good test lol

steady lance
#

so you never know if it's the pc or the game itself

kind walrus
#

Maybe stock is unstablederpyBlob

#

Maybe you borked your windows from testing

#

Though I don't disagree, I'm just always skeptical about everything

steady lance
steady lance
kind walrus
short blade
#

i've been dailying 4200 stable these days

kind walrus
#

It could be, meant it more in like

#

I'd tell you to dial back and you kept not giving up DogKek

#

Not judging your work quality in that measure but more the amount of trouble you had

#

Lol

short blade
#

i think i just made it sound like more work than it actually was

#

basically just starting tests while doing work/sleeping

#

after changing 1 thing

kind walrus
#

It did come up a lot tho

#

We barely see it from anyone else by comparison

#

Well

#

@steady lance

#

But very rare here

#

Very common in OC servers

#

Way more common really, but most are just benching instead of daily

#

I used to do it a fair bit too

short blade
#

yeah it wouldn't have taken that long if i was only benching it

kind walrus
#

Yea cos then it's a burner install and bigger number better

wheat lintel
#

What you don't daily a stripped windows?

kind walrus
#

I didn't say that

steady lance
#

So far:

  • -40
  • -38
  • -28
  • -28
  • -25
  • -30 are very stable
abstract wedge
sudden torrent
#

It's super weird whatever the cause is because Intel prefers multiples of 133, so you'd think it would like 4133 (31*133)

short blade
#

i've seen a lot of people daily 4133 on the same model so could be some quirk with my specific board

#

and the previous owner of this ram kit dailied 4133 15-15-15

#

still dailying 4200 problem free

steady lance
#

ello,

here to update the progress on re-tuning the cores

short blade
#

for context on my previous chip 4133 15-15-15 would be stable with every test under the sun

#

then within a few days of dailying that it would randomly be so unstable that it would bsod on boot or sometimes even fail post

#

then I'd get it back to being stable with every test under the sun

#

rinse and repeat

steady lance
#

From cores 0-16, listed numbers are stable negative CO values.

  • -40
  • -38
  • -28
  • -28
  • -25
  • -30
  • -35
short blade
#

settled on 4000 daily on that old chip, had similar 4133 behavior on the new chip to a lesser degree but new chip can do 4200 perfectly stable

steady lance
#

Testing using P95, Y-Cruncher VST, and CoreCycler

steady lance
#

except it was on all stock and below stock settings

short blade
#

instead of bsod on boot or fail post I'd get a bsod after a few hours of normal use then run karhu and see an error at 700%

#

so idk could be my board has an issue with 4133

steady lance
#

My guess would be the board. I had similar issues on my 5700G when ramm tuning

#

certain frequencies just didn't wanna work

short blade
steady lance
#

yikes

short blade
#

and that thing never exceeded 1.4v since the day I got it

#

my daily settled at 1.28 under load

steady lance
#

guess we are all bound to run into some bad apples

short blade
#

also not one of the batches with oxidation issues

#

and wasn't running any of the other voltages in danger zones either

#

so yeah I got no clue

#

new 13700k is a way better sample and I'm on newest microcode with a hefty undervolt so hopefully it does not explode

steady lance
#

hmm also I will be right back. I am going to see if I can push core 6 from 0-15 a bit more on the co

steady lance
short blade
#

old 13700k needed 1.32v for 5.5p/4.9r/4.3e, 1.26v sa for 4000g1, 4200 didn't post

new 13700k needs 1.21v for 5.5p/4.9r/4.3e, 1.295v sa for 4200g1

#

looks good to me but I only tried one 7800x3d no 7950x3d

#

dunno how different the CO would be with the higher boost freqs

#

I was building it for someone else so I just did a lazy -25 all core and it tested stable so I left it at that

#

something was unstable at -30 all, probably could have seen some benefit from per-core but didn't want to spend that much time or ride that close to the edge for someone else's build

#

I remember my old 5800x one of the cores couldn't even do -1 with +0 fmax

steady lance
#

Correction, Core 6 had an offset of -33 not -35

#

I just applied -38 to core 6

short blade
#

and needed +5 for 200 fmax lmao

#

found my whole curve I still have it saved even though that 5800x is long gone

steady lance
#

my last 7950x3D the offsets it did while it functioned were around -20 for CCD0 and -10 for CCD1

short blade
#

Fmax: +200
PPT: 160
TDC: 140
EDC: 140
Core 0: +5
Core 1: -18
Core 2: -23
Core 3: -13
Core 4: -23
Core 5: -15
Core 6: -18
Core 7: -16

#

lmao

#

the +5 is hilarious

steady lance
short blade
#

yeah

steady lance
#

all my cores on CCD0 do 5.25GHz

short blade
#

stock boost was 4.85 on the 5800x

#

I did observe some of the better cores doing 4.95-4.975 under single core load so the +200 fmax was doing something I guess

#

core 0 never exceeded 4.775 though lmao

#

that core 0 was trying its best I guess

#

going to bed now gn

steady lance
#

Good night.

steady lance
#

@sudden torrent are you available?

sudden torrent
#

Just for a few minutes

steady lance
#

So I have been working on cores 5 and 6

#

I noticed after I changed the offset from -33 to -38 it appears my scores dropped?

sudden torrent
#

Regression means it's error correcting so it's not stable

steady lance
#

Gotcha

#

thank you.

#

So I need to work the offsets down till there is no regression

sudden torrent
#

Yep one more thing to add to the list of things to watch for

steady lance
#

CO that pass VST3.

  • 40
  • 38
  • 28
  • 28
  • 25
  • 30
  • 38
#

Using this as a notekeeper for the moment

#

went back to the same co and thermal throttle limit I had set when I was scoring 1.8 in vst

#

let's see what my baseline is right now

steady lance
#

Something weird is going on

#

At the same settings my scores are around 1.44

#

@sudden torrent is there anything I can use to find out why my CPU is not performing as well?

#

Temps are more than fine

#

55c under load

steady lance
#

Fixed!

#

I am back to scoring an average of 1.49

#

I played around with the thermal throttle limit and it seems my system like 95c

#

as a result of the change allowing for higher sustained boost clocks my load temps have also gone up by about 3c

steady lance
#

Ahh, I found the cause.

#

@sudden torrent it's due to how much memory vst3 is using.

#

The more memory vst3 uses the lower my score whereas if it's using a small amount then my score is through the roof.

#

I simulated this by booting up vst3 while there was little available ram causing the program to only allocate a 3rd of my total ram and now it's completing tests extremely fast at a score of 1.73 average

steady lance
#

I am standardizing my tests to only when VST3 is using 1.65-1.66GiB of ram

#

For consistency in results

short blade
#

clock stretching is a thing when you're pushing CO

steady lance
#

@short blade, @sudden torrent do you guys have any experience with Curve Shaper? My board has the option for it.

sudden torrent
#

That's exclusive to 9000 series

steady lance
#

by the way, @sudden torrent I ran P95 for 7 hours right after a overnight run of VST3. Max temps recorded are 71.4c with an average temp across all sensors of 60c.

proven canopy
#

Just post pics of the screenshot with zentimings and relevant hwinfo tabs visible

steady lance
#

@sudden torrent check this out! 4.725-4.7GHz all core on CCD0. Till now both my previous and current one have never been able to maintain beyond 4.6GHz on CCD0 consistently.

#

Also my current CO offsets on CCD0 are:

  • -40
  • -38
  • -28
  • -28
  • -23
  • -28
  • -20
  • -25
steady lance
#

hmm

#

getting errors since applying a co to core 7

#

I think we found the problem child

steady lance
#

@sudden torrent, @kind walrus I finally found the problem child

#

It's been core 7 this whole time.

#

For some reason when core 7 of 0-7 from CCD0 has a negative offset applied it causes the entire CCD to go into this hyper boost mode of some sort where every core on the CCD not only clocks a solid +100-150mhz faster in all core loads but also causes the whea errors and somehow resulting in CCD1 being unstable

steady lance
#

Found a co value that core 7 likes!

#

now all cores on CCD0 can do 4.75GHz all core as the new norm from 4.6Ghz

steady lance
#

welp seems core 7 needs more adjustments

#

I am gonna go to bed. have a good one folks.

steady lance
#

I changed the CO to -10 on core 7 right before zi went to sleep.

#

It has passed 11h30m of P95

steady lance
#

@sudden torrent I am scoring 1.51 10*10^2 on average in VST3!!! Also passed 11h30m of P95 small ffts.

steady lance
#

I am going to start working on CCD1

#

CO values on CCD0:
Negative Values

  • 40
  • 38
  • 28
  • 28
  • 20
  • 28
  • 23
  • 10 (the finicky one)

Average score of 1.51 * 10*10^2 in Y-Cruncher VST3 from 1.45 average prior to CO tuning

sudden torrent
#

You can simplify 10^10 as e10, so it would be 1.51e10

steady lance
#

Ahh thank you.

sudden torrent
#

Just to save you a few button presses

steady lance
#

How are the results so far?

#

I have put these cores through hell and back

#

P95, CC, Y-C VST3, CR24, Gaming (various)

sudden torrent
#

Looking pretty good so far yeah

steady lance
#

Highest temperature by far was CR24 at 81c

#

using the CPU tclk measuremant in HWinfo

sudden torrent
#

About where I'd expect it

steady lance
#

@sudden torrent I somewhat feel tempted to opt for non RGB fans and use led add-ons for lighting. thoughts? So I can get lighting while having high performance fans

sudden torrent
#

If you get the right fans that's not a compromise you need to make

#

That's only an issue on super low budget ones

#

Like $3 a fan budget

steady lance
#

Currently are there any genuinely good argb fans? I would like to mod them later on by adding in a fan cover that has crystals on it for Project Geode.

#

I will just save up enough to get the fans

sudden torrent
#

The thermalright C12 series is good for lower budget, $6-7 a fan and they're about as good as arctic P12

steady lance
#

something like the how the fan in the top right corner is covered

#

I plan to make some fan covers that look like that and add over the fan for decoration

sudden torrent
steady lance
#

are there any fans better than the arctics while having lots of lighting?

#

I was prepared to hear you say I'd need to save up $300 for 10 fans or so

sudden torrent
#

I would never recommend fans that cost $30 each

#

That's just wasteful

steady lance
#

definitely a brand tax

#

or something is going on

#

When I was considering no rgb I thought about the Alphacool Stealth fans

#

the 3000rpm ones

sudden torrent
#

If you're referring to the Corsair and Lian Li fans for the brand tax, they blow, and not in the good way you want a fan to

sudden torrent
#

Oh that's the one with reversible fan blades

#

It's a gimmick

#

They're not great

steady lance
#

welp they're out then.

#

i thought the concept was cool

sudden torrent
#

Yeah it's a cool idea but they compromised too much to make it happen

#

https://hwbusters.com/cooling/thermaltake-swafan-ex-12-argb-sync-fan-review/10/

The performance of the SWAFAN EX 12 ARGB Sync didn’t impress me. You should look elsewhere if you want a fan with strong airflow and decent static pressure in the below 30 dBA range. For example, at 25 dBA, the Phanteks T30-120 achieves the highest airflow at 54.14 CFM, with the XPG Nidec Vento Pro 120 following.

Hardware Busters - Thermaltake SWAFAN EX 12 ARGB Sync Fan Review - Cooling

steady lance
#

Isn't the T30 no argb?

sudden torrent
#

T30 is an older model but still really good. Mostly because it's thicker than the usual 25mm fan.

#

Correct no rgb

sudden torrent
#

Seems like they're slightly worse than their T30

#

But slightly worse still puts them near the top

steady lance
#

hmm and I assume beats the arctics?

#

I am not ecstatic about the idea of getting more arctics since I had 6 fans essentially die on me in the last 2 years.

#

1 actually dead, all with bearing damage.

sudden torrent
#

Easily beats them, but you do need to plan for the thicker fans

steady lance
sudden torrent
#

How thick were the 180s again? Because I can fit my 180s below my ATX mobo

#

But it's a VERY tight fit

#

No room for cable management

steady lance
#

38mm @sudden torrent assuming the rgb version

sudden torrent
#

Should be the same for both rgb and non

#

That should leave you plenty of room for cabling still then

steady lance
#

same