#graphics-cards
1 messages · Page 37 of 1
Insane how it's like half the weight of my old GPU and at least 50% better
Just gotta get used to AMD overclocking cause it's different than afterburner
Indeed
I have a thread that might be worth some reading if you are willing to put the hours in
One sec
I'd love to! Overclocking is super fun
Last updates:
15/03/23 - EVC - Hardware mod to "Raise the limits..." section added to OP
11/03/23 - AMDVBFLASH Information v5.0.567 section added to OP
09/03/23 - My OC tips for Navi31 daily use, stability testing and bench added to OP
-=XFX=- RX 7900 XT/XTX Merc Owners Club -=Force=-...
Incredibly useful thread. Overwhelming amounts of RDNA 3 info
Not sure if I'm crazy also; is there more sensors in this than previous cards? There's like 1500 for power that I don't remember before
Too many....
My XTX had like a whole page I sorted through
It's really not
People underestimate it a lot with RDNA 3
But all things noted it's quite the improvement
Using fsr/rsr makes it on par with nvidia unless you wanna go crazy with like ultra ray tracing where it barely changes
The market is to blame for a lot of this tho
4000 series also improved but they've priced it so what you pay for scales almost perfectly with the performance
I was really considering a 4070TI but the markups on the partner cards along with similar performance but just greedy nvidia I went with the XT
Can't deny the strength of a 4090 though. Those things are inhuman(?)
I don't even blame it, the only caveats of the XT are RT, VR and blender
And even then VR isn't disgusting
I've heard people complain about VR, haven't tried it but will have to just to see
Doubt it's as bad as some reviews said. Someone gave it like 1 star and returned because vr was "unplayable"
Some have called it pretty bad
I haven't really touched VR with mine yet either so can't really give any positive affirmations here lol
I do wonder; what's the point of 20GB of vram if most games don't even use 10? I'm at 1440P so that might be why, but even cyberpunk was around 8-10. Could also be for production I'm not sure
It seemed super overkill
Definitely nicer than 12 on the 4070Ti
GCD hotspot maximum is around 94C under OCCT power, average is like 90
That sounds fine
As long as sub 110 it's no issue, but sub 100 is ideal
Gives some room to breathe
Spikes
Mine spikes to 550+
Nyooo dun give me ur covid

I'll be stuck if I got covid

Glue me to forks

I demand 1 5995wx for solvent
Is the radeon software the best OC tool for 7000 series?
Are there even any others?
There's one other tool
MoreClockTool
It's like Adrenalin but simpler
Some people have better results/affinity to it
In your experience does fast timing actually do anything? Seems useless from everyone else I've seen mention it lol
Interesting
And for min frequency; I've seen conflicting ideas about it. Does setting it actually matter?
Mins and maxes I've had conflicting results
Often it will ignore them but for some people they have
*helped
The main three are power, vram and voltage
Work out the best vram clocks then start undervolting the voltage until it's lower but still stable
It'll boost higher with lower voltage
A lot of this stuff should be in the thread I linked
I'm not sure about XT but XTX a lot of people end up in the 2740-2810 region for vram
Rarely lower
Yeah I’ve been trying to OC but keep running into an issue where screen just turns full black, I hear like a click and it’s off 😪
Gotta find the right area IG
Only in furmark though
Yeah it’s like the SECOND furmark opens there’s a click and it turns off
Sounds like not enough power from psu
It runs every 3dmark test fine.. weird
Gonna try and log with heinfo and gpu z
Hm..
I have an igpu but it's disabled
So not sure what this could mean 😭
And it’s only in the 1440p benchmark preset
I wouldn't opt for furmark anyway, it's just a power virus, not a good stability test these days
If you wanna see big power number and temps go brr? Sure, but that's about all it's good for lol
At the same time, if it's crashing in furmark there's either an issue with the GPU or the PSU isn't up to snuff
There's a pretty quick spike in power when it starts so it's possible a transient load trips it
I've never run furmark on the XTX
And tbh with the power profile it has I wouldn't be surprised if it straight up has issues
I see no better way to test a psu or the cooling capacities
Furmark with prime 95+linpack seems best way to test worst case scenario for a psu
And keep clicking the space button
Or just occt power
That's not long enough
For a GPU it's plenty long enough
Neither are stability tests for a gpu, you'll work out what's thermally stable ±5C in under 30 minutes
Occt power is worse than both furmark and p95 smallffts iirc
Furmark just works its magic as a power virus
Iirc I got it to draw like 10w more with furmark+p95 smallffts compared to occt, tracked with hwinfo64
Although that was a while ago
But even then, OCCT 3D isn't as bad and still more than what you should see in daily gaming use
It's way better for stability testing
Although I like just running 3dmark ts
Quicker results ime
TS stress test or tse loop yeah
I do that then +30-50mv on amd
Somehow my ocs often don't trip occt's 3d test in half an hour and crashes in time spy in the first minute
You can change the length it runs for
Yeah they won't
Dunno why that happens but meh
Cos occt 3d is a static load whereas TS is dynamic
They do have a dynamic load setting iirc
On occt my system was drawing 750 from the wall 💀
Have to pay tho
No you dont for power
But yea I just like ts over occt when applicable
I like all the unigen benchmarks but I haven't used them in forever since I always have 3dmark downloaded and forget to download them
I mean TS is fairly solid
Heaven for testing vram though
I always add margin onto it and I'm generally fine
And superposition is an added layer to ensure stability
Ye
Hearing a click is telling of the psu btw
None of those power tests are good at finding transient issues tbh
But yeah I wouldn't stress, I would rather disregard it tbh if occt runs
Cos occt is already extreme
The beginning of furmark is a spike
Furmark spikes pretty hard
Mhm
It's not like spiking over and over but if it'll trip, furmark is probably going to trip it
Clicking space rerenders the donuts creating a spike
Ah that I didn't know you could do
I would call that extreme of extremes lol
@cyan vault what cpu, how many psu cables are plugged in and what wattage is the psu
Also what PSU?
Ye
Sorry, out rn! 7700X, it has two power cables 1 8 pin 1 4 pin but I don’t have a 4 pin
PSU is enermax d.f. Revolution 850W
Ok I doubt the psu itself is defective or overwhelmed by the specs
It's probably just tripping from OCP
How is the GPU connected?
Uhhh it just said pcie on them not sure
I can't remember if it's 2 connectors on one rail or all on separate 12v rails
Ooo if it's multi rail that could explain it
Ye so how exactly it's connected might matter
It'll def matter
Means it has separate trip points for each rail, which means it'll trip if a single rail goes over ocp trip point and not just if it'll trip based off everything combined together
If it's like 2 connectors on one rail, one on the other, best to spread the load out
Lemme try to draw where they’re connected afaik
Looking at it now it has a really interesting setup
2 of the 12v rails are rated for 40a, 2 of them are rated for 25a
Maybe try shuffling the pcie connectors around
Here's how the rails are arranged for reference
12V1 and 12V2 are 25A, 12V3 and 12V4 are 40A
Ok so put the CPU on the separate one, and the two GPU in the bottom pcie?
I might have one on the top pcie
In which case it would be sharing with 12V3
I don’t remember I’ll check tomorrow
It's better to have one in each rail isn't it
Oh maybe it’s on the bottom then
No clue
Ok I’ll make sure they’re all on their own
Cos 40Ax12V is 480W
Which would make sense then if you're tripping the psu with furmark
It's tripping one rail
Granted somewhat over 480W
I think the max I saw was around 450 in other benchmarks
So I’ll check that and make sure
If you have one in each rail it'd be a technical 960W of headroom (it wouldn't but it'd be higher than 480W+10%)
It would be going higher than that during a spike
Ye
trying to keep my GPU from getting so hot but even when I lower power limit on MSI Afterburner the HWMonitor still shows that whatever the hot spot is got over 101 C . I guess I'll have to take it to a repair shop
Have you tried ramping up the fan curve so more air blows into the case?
And or a custom gpu fan curve
Finally figured it out, and the way my GPU drops frequency is a bit strange:
<40C 2085mhz
40C & <47C 2070mhz
47C & <57C 2055mhz
57C & <62C 2040mhz
62C & <72C 2025mhz
72C 2010mhz
2010nhz at 72c sounds high you probably got some oc applied?
What is the fan speed % at
It maxes out a 65C
I made my own curve to make the GPU as silent as possible, my GPU doesn't run really hot, I was able to get 72C+ by slowing down the fans a bit, else my GPU usually runs like 62C max at 90% fan speed
At what power consumption
What was the aib model
215 only in benchmarks and stress tests
Also your room ambient
Gigabyte windforce 3x non oc
20C
Yeah I know
That's the Nvidia boost table in play, its core temp dependent and will boost less as the temp goes higher
I know, I just wanted to figure out when the 15mhz drops occurred, because most card start from 50C and drop every +5C, but as you can see mine starts from 40 and drops every 7, 10 or 5C
I've tried, but it still peaks at 100+. Is it not high enough?
I've also tried lowering power limit
It'll be written to the vbios. Whether it's a deviation from standard turing I'm not sure, but that's definitely very normal
I haven't played enough with turing specifically to tell you where the freq drops start
One stepping of frequency isn't much anyway
Wouldn't notice it in a blind test that's for sure
Of course, 15mhz would barely mean one single FPS drop probably
Ye
With Nvidia as well, the better your undervolt curve the better you can manage to offset the boost drop as it's working faster with less voltage
You can't avoid the boost table but you can def fine tune a curve to run better if not already
I do it a lot with 3dmark synthetics
Even at higher voltages/power playing a better curve is still meta at ambient
I was able to get my 2080 to boost at 2085mhz at 0.981v (it basically never gets to this frequency as it drops after 40C) and 2070mhz at 0.968v
So my 2080 never ever exceeds 1v
Ye, for my 3090 it would run like, 2070, 2085 at the start of synthetics but boost would drop down at least a bin or two as the card warmed up to near 50C
this is the curve i use
3080 did it too but at like, 2140 or something
That's a good curve
That's the proper way to do it
what voltages were you able to get for those frequencies?
I never bothered changing the lower frequencies or trying to undervolt them because it'd take so long and its probably not worth it
For ampere? Oh the voltages were quite different iirc
3090 I think was around 1.05(?)
My 4090 does 1.15 locked
3080 I don't remember at all nor the 1650
yeah but a 4090 also has much higher boost frequencies
And I haven't touched the 1080 in a long time lol
Ye but ampere and turing are also dramatically different architectures, not really apples to apples
i do have a 1080 in my 2nd build but i never took the time to undervolt it properly, i did some to get rid of the annoying coil whine and it worked
This stuff falls under Nvidia boost 3.0/4.0 behaviour btw with what you're curious about
with 20c ambient ngl i think temps could be lower then 65c
It'll read core and will downbin until it throttles at the core max
Think of it like, thermal velocity boost
Same principle but hardcoded
if youre talking abt my 2080, nah, I guess is's fine and also I tried 100% fan speed and i cant go lower than 61C
4070ti owners flexing their giant coolers on us
btw my 2080 is just a 2 slot card with a relatively smll cooler, even if it is a 3 fan card
if my room was at 20c i could aim for sub 60c at 250w usage
it'll depend on many things
fan size, speed, (cfm), cooler dimensions, other heat producing components on the card pcb that also affect the overall temp...
you can't just say 250w should do <60C temperatures
yeah but he won't always be right
that's another issue
currently idling at 27c in a 25c room
wooo idle temps low
Skill issue
effectively meaningless
same for my 2080, idles 23C with 40% fan speed
Idle same as ambient when
using 40% cuz they're really quiet
oh the fans arent spinning
oooo idlleeee
Mine don't either
under load is what truly matters
Depends
Mobile is usually up to 100C
But pascal and ampere iirc throttle at 85 and 83-91
(adjusted ofc)
That's for desktop
I can't remember ada, one sec
my 2080 barely touches 28C with fans not spinning and few applications open (ds, hwinfo, afterburner...)
of course heat will build up after some time so the card will get slowly hotter
laptop gpus 🔥
140W 4060 brrrr
I once undervolted my cousin's 1050ti mobile and was able to get it from 88 to 58C max
Pascal has some renowned good scaling
I wouldn't mind dailying a 1080 again. It was nice
have a strix 1070ti lying around
silence, then suddenly WHRRRRRRRRR
i think 10% within perf of a 1080
nah, it's quiet til 80%
oh that's nice
but then it gets pretty loud i'd say
The stepped curves are good for fan stop but if you don'tike sudden ramping it can get annoying lol
but i think it is just a way you see the graph, i'm not sure if it affects how it ramps up
It does
ohh
It's an instant jump from say 40 to 60
Instead of gradual
That's what I mean by sudden ramping
brah why does it even exist
I mean, if you tune it well it can work quite nicely
Better to use the regular curve tho imo
i think it's better too
use the profiles with static fan %
I should lower my case fan speeds cuz they're a bit loud with gpu under load
just toggle the game profile on when playing a game
yeah it's not a laptop
you really don't need to do that
takes out a whole hotkey from you
for what could be achieved using the fan curve
you can set a hotkey to each profile?
or are you really going to go and open afterburner, click on it, and then minimize it again
more steps for a result that could just be achieved automatically
you always have 5 profiles available on ab
yeah
yeah but you have to click on them to use them
precision has more iirc
or you can set each one to a specific hotkey
why do that, when curve does fan speed for you?
that's literally my entire point
if it is blue it means it's being applied (curve/offset/power limits...)
it'll depend on the type of gui u use in afterburner tho
i know how it works lol
i'm just saying if you're using it just for a fan curve, there's no point
i set my undervolt overclock to my first profile because that's all I'll ever be using, and I set my fan curve from there so I don't have to swap off of it when I'm done gaming
isn't the fan curve the same for each profile?
ok thx for the idea got macros for days here
fan curves still better though
literal set and forget
boop fan curve once, and you're set until you're unhappy with it
thicc spacebar
i'm probably the only one using a dell oem keyboard on a 1k build
actually, wait i take that back
tomorrow i'm finally ordering the 5600x :]
nice cpu
why does it keep changing : ) into 🙂
nah
it's a discord thing
where do i disable it
i remember you could do it somehow, right?
i just cant find where
found it, i'm blind
:)
:(
shee
Like if I don't already have 4 64gb cards and 2 32gb ones
I also had a 128gb I bought for 12€ but i lost it
What's your fan curve look like in afterburner?
Ah make it go to 100% at 70c imo
Because it throttles at 83 so that way even if you have to max fans it shouldn't hit 83
I found out why my 15mhz drops didn't look right the other day, I was looking at them while playing beamng drive, and using MSI afterburner (actually rtss) in game overlay but the sensor I chose for the frequency doesn't report correctly or doesn't report the actual one the GPU is running at
Gotta change that
I also discovered my GPU overclock/undervolt isn't stable in beamng (2055mhz crashes)
:'(
You should also reduce that fan speed update period
2-3000 would already be better
Yeah I had them on the same rail, moved it and it's good now!
Still an unstable OC but it doesn't turn off my pc lol
Ooo what was the last card
It was also a defect in the model I had which is more likely lol
Well, no use thinking about the spilt milk 
I have noticed a little bit of coil whine(?) when loading into graphically intense games
Not sure what it sounds like but its kinda like "tss tss tss"
Yeah that could be coil whine
You can eliminate it with a frame cap if needed
(may/may not work)
It’s only been when loading up one game never like during gameplay
Oh fair
Not really a problem though, 7900 XT runs insanely quiet
Ah yeah the loading screen hits like 500 FPS sometimes
is this better?
Yes
The RTX 3060 Ti is one of the most competitively priced GPUs from Nvidia, but in the current market, the RX 6700 XT from AMD still undercuts it in pricing. But how do they stack up in the newest games, on the latest drivers, ray tracing on and off, FSR and DLSS on and off, 1080p, and 1440p, and even in Unreal Engine 5.1 using Lumen, Nanite, and ...
Impressive tbh. Especially the Fortnite with HW RT enabled.
6700XT is matching the 3060 Ti with better 1% lows
But then beating it at high instead of epic.
Because the rt in fortnite is super lite anything heavy rt related it still takes a bit of a dump
6700xt still the stronger raster card tho
3060ti has console like rt and dlss 2 going for it
Buyer has to weigh in their pros and cons at this point
Fortnite isn't hardware RT, it's software based
Or did they make that a toggle? Because it's a toggle in UE5
There is a toggle for hardware based rt which makes the rt more accurate
That's where the Nvidia cards make some ground
I see, so they did end up enabling that as an option. I don't play so I'm a little behind.
#imagine hail with rain
what manufacturers are good for gpus
Gigabyte, ASUS, PNY, PowerColor, MSI, are probably some of the better ones. XFX, ASROCK, ZOTAC Sapphire are all good brands, too
is $570 too much for a 3070
Yes
I wouldn't pay more than $500 for a new 3070
If you want to consider AMD, you can get a 6750xt for $410 right now or a 6800 for $500 which both can be comparable or even outperform in some cases the performance of a 3070. 6800 being a little better. If you're set on NVIDIA don't pay more than MSRP or look into the used market.
good?
And with full warranty, renewed doesn't
Would shared video memory make a difference
Instead of it being 3gb would it work better than that because of the 8gb basically would it run games better
Shared memory is a BS marketing thing, it's drastically slower than having the 6GB
Not just that but the 3GB model is actually slower than the 6GB by about 10%
Infinetly slower when runs out of vram in any relatively modern game 
Yeah when I had my 1060 3GB I was running out of memory in fallout 4 on 1080p medium (no mods)
It would start artifacting really badly
Oh you actually can't even launch halo infinite on cards less then 4gb vram anymore
Missing textures etc
So basically a 4gb card or over go for
6gb will atleast launch every game still not ideal
So a gtx1660 super or above
If at a good price pretty much yea
Most modern games require a 1660 minimum for 1080p 60Hz yeah
The a750 dropped to like 230$ in the US iirc
Yeah that would be a decent option now that it's mostly fixed
Now it's in the price bracket of the slower 6600
I will take the faster card even tho the perf range could still use some work
what other gpu that you can find cheap on facebook would be able to go with that pc and also what should i offer on it since its listed at 299 i can show you the pc pictures if you want to see it.
I have a t3060 TI - some good gaming monitor
HUB again? I just started the video
Hmmmmm
This is why I have been recommending gigabyte lol
It doesn't apply to all games though, naturally
Gigglebyte superiority
very much soo looks like broken rebar on intel
could test with rebar on in the intel system and black list horizon from rebar in profile inspector
Help!
I upgraded to a 3070 ti and for some reason the frames for CSGO have gotten worse. I can barely pull 200fps. I have a i7-10700KF processor with 32GB of ram. Any suggestions are welcome
From what gpu did you upgrade from?
This sounds like the cpu becoming the bottleneck from the gpu being too fast
I'm just making early speculations
Anyway it can just be that you might have to run ddu and reinstall gpu drivers
Is this because of the better XMP on Gigabyte boards?
What is Rebar?
Resizable BAR
Also called SAM on AMD
It lets the CPU have direct access to the GPU memory. It has a couple percent gain in some games, a couple percent loss in others.
Or in the case of LGA1700, a 15-20% loss apparently
Oh geez.
Playing at 1080p using a 5600xt is more dependent on the cpu than gpu right
Also depends on the game in question
like persona 5 royal on pc
Lol they removed hzd from rebar whitelist in the new studio drivers
For thermal paste should I get Arctic Silver 5 or MX 4? Also does anyone have recommendations for thermal pads?
Mx4
Gc extreme thermal pads iirc are good, nice and squishy
Remember to measure 3 times before ordering the exact thickness you need
No mx5 was discontinued
4 is better cos it doesn't separate
And MX6 is better than both
New Game Ready Driver for Diablo IV Beta, The Last of Us Part I, Smalland: Survive the Wild, Deceive Inc., Resident Evil 4, Cyberpunk 2077’s Ray Tracing: Overdrive Mode, and the arrival of DLSS 3 support for Forza Horizon 5!
For those on Nvidia
Frame generation adoption rate is soo much faster then dlss 2 initially is crazy
Well those doing Dlss2 are more then likely not doing too much extra work for dlss3 frame gen (afaik at least). Now that Dlss in general has been out for a long time and 2/3 are pretty usable the adoption rates should be pretty good.
Is gc a specific brand of thermal pad?
Intel® Game On Driver support on Intel® Arc™ A-series Graphics for: Resident Evil 4 Remake Performance optimizations on Intel® Arc™ A-series Graphics for: Marvel’s Guardians of the Galaxy D5 Render Blender in Material Preview viewport mode Counter Strike Global Offensive on Intel® Arc™ Graphics for Laptops
everyone on top of their game for re lol
Is there a way to find out how thick the thermal pads are on my GPU without disassembling it? Also if I can't get the pads in the thickness I need, should I layer thinner ones together?
You can try to find out if someone has disassembled your exact model of GPU and reported the pad thickness, but odds are slim.
Layering pads makes them transfer heat much worse.
What should I upgrade my rx 5700 xt to? My budget is $450
You could get a new 6750 XT for that. Probably won't need to upgrade your power supply that way. https://pcpartpicker.com/products/compare/GDvdnQ,RbYmP6/
ASRock Challenger Pro OC Radeon RX 6750 XT 12 GB Video Card vs. Gigabyte GAMING OC Radeon RX 6750 XT 12 GB Video Card
Or if your PSU has enough oomph you can get a used 6800 XT
Or a new 6800
Cheapest one of those I saw was $464 though, a little out of budget
And honestly not much better than the 6750 to warrant the $90 extra cost
that's an amazing buy
That works I guess, didn't see that earlier
And sometimes referral links but yeah. Metadata in general.
? is after ref=
Unleash the power of the world’s No.1 memory flash drive brand since 2003. Samsung 980 PRO PCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD for next-level computing delivers twice the data transfer rate of PCIe 3.0, while maintaining compatibility with PCIe 3.0. Experience SSD performance with read speeds of up to 7,000 MB/s² ...
Except for Canada Computers: www.canadacomputers.com/product_info.php?cPath=4_64_1969&item_id=183432
Also those who want a 4080 class product
whoooaaahhhh
yooooo


lol
Well technically it was a prosiphon elite but that one had the metadata stripped already
So that was the first link on that page
a future where game devs has more excuse to optimize games less?
the tech is cool in theory, but the practice is instead the result we don't desire
Yep we're already seeing too many examples of that. Can't get 60 fps with a high end GPU? Just enable DLSS!
we're at a never seen before rate of games getting heavier within a year
all thanks to these technologies existing
even non rt titles suffers from this
Well if you're buying sure x)
so: i'm not gonna be able to get a 3060 for a long time, i've got this silly intel graphics at the moment.
i was thinking about buying an RX 6400 so i can enjoy some diablo 3 and a few other not too demanding games
is this a good idea?
it's cheaper by a lot than the GTX 1650 and offers pretty similar performance.
cheaper by a lot.
I'd highly recommend buying used instead
You can get like 1060 6gbs for under 100$ now if you're in the us
Wdym?
i bought an HP and i'm living with it.
Ah no pcie power?
That complicates things:/
so the card i was going to buy is actually a close equivalent to a 3060, the RTX Quadro A2000. but I can't buy that right now, not for a long time.
Yeah hmm probably 6400 then
they've got these SATA to 6pin/8pin adapters
What price are they used btw?
but i still don't think the power supply will work
Never convert sata
they're $127 where I looked for a nice not too large powercolor
Molex is ehh but sata is rated for maybe like 25w iirc
lol @ that
Used?
Hmm because you can get them for 134 new lol
where
Maybe you can use that to leverage price a little more down?
hmmm i'll be damned.
i can't get it lower because the $127 seller is a refurb on amazon
i don't really think of refurbs/used as being different
because used is used, and refurb is rarely much work
A used 1650 is feasible tho
I would yeah I'd say refurb is way closed to new and because it's from an actual retailer
why do i choose the 1650 over an RX 6400
But 1650 low profile is hard to get anyway
oh i don't need low profile
6400 is about the same performance iirc
the card i was looking at is just the "ITX" but not low profile.
you suggested the 1650. I was wondering what about it makes it somehow a better idea
that's all
of course, brand loyalty isn't a factor for me
there's no brand royalty
1650 offers similar perf and is older, thus is generally cheaper used
ah
i found the RX 6400 i want on amazon for $99.99 but it's a low profile refurb and i'm not sure if it has the regular full length bracket

99.99 gonna blow your pc up 
it's an RX 6400, most used ones go for about $125-130
Is it possible to put a gpu in my lenovo flex 5
nope
I mean it doesn't matter if it does or not tbh
it does
you need to have a bracket that fits
low profile does not fit my PC
i don't want to go through the whole
contact manufacturer
pay them more money
wait 6-7y business weeks
the problem is, it's advertised as low profile and as a renewed product it is likely a refurb
which means, it probably was sent back with whatever bracket the user used and not the other
which means, it likely has a low profile bracket installed and is missing the standard one
Is 8GB of VRAM enough? In some recent games, the answer is a clear NO. I began by testing out Resident Evil 4 Remake, and noticing that the RTX 3070 Ti cannot even run the game without crashing unless turning down textures to control VRAM, which is a shame because it clearly has enough performance to run the game maxed out, but is just running o...
funny how a 6700xt and 6800 can actually play the game at those settings despite being cheaper
i think this is mostly because AMD is just throwing raw specs out whereas nvidia is focusing on their unique technologies a bit more
i don't think either way is better or worse, but in the end the end-user should get the thing that suits their usage patterns most
Found a 3060 12gb (inno 3d) for 170€ near me, should I pick it up?
Sounds a bit too good to be real 
The only thing is you won't be able to screw into the case as long as you don't shake the pc around it'll be fine
It would be a good deal if not broke or something
i don't want to ghetto rig anything like that. i'll pay the extra $25.

Up to you but it really won't make much of a diff
yeah i'm fine with the thing i'm gettijng
Would it be worth buying a 7900xtx? Currently have a 3090 and 5900x.
If not 4k, then no
Imo the only worthwhile upgrade is 4090
And that's only if you play at 4k 144hz and have money burning a hole in your pocket, or if you do workstation tasks that require gpu power like machine learning
Im looking at getting a 7900 xt for my desktop and was hoping someone has found a good vertical mount
Also open to recommended upgrades to go with it. Ryzen 9 5900x, MSI MPG X570 Gaming Plus, 32 GB (2x16) 3600 Mhz and 16 gb (1x16) 3200Mhz ram, EVGA 650W 80+ gold power supply
Probably just the psu depending on the model
For vertical mount look up cooler master vertical gpu mount v3
When you say model what do you mean? The graphics card would be a MSI Gaming 7900 xt Gaming Trio Classic 20G. The PSU I think I labelled correctly but its also been 7 years since I originally built this thing
Considering the power profile of the cpu and gpu I would think a particularly good evga psu like a g6 could (probably) handle those two in the system
Also btw the classic is a bit of a meme card, 10$, 20$ more for a different variant will get you an actual performance gain between XT's
It runs the lowest possible power of all RDNA 3, less than even the AMD reference cards lol
So ye, depending on the psu I would say yay or nay on still using it
The PSU is a supernova NEX650G according to the box lol. In terms of graphics card im just looking for something under $1k and will hold its own for year to come. The classic was just 850 so it caught my eye
When did you buy this psu?
Roughly 7 years ago lol. Its been running this poor rig the entire time. The PSU, RAM, GPU, and case are all from the original build 7 years ago roughly
Will be lol. I have a slow 16gb right now and was told to get higher speed and match it to the Graphic card. Figured may as well leave the original 16gb in there when I throw 2 more faster 16gbs in lol
Nah sell the 16gb then go with the 2x16
You'll be slowing all the ram down by mixing kits
32gb is fine
But 32gb as a set, mixing is where ram gets really slow
Part List - Radeon RX 7900 XT
I thought as long as they were 2 seperate channels it would be fine?
Nah man
Mixing is mixing, it trains the ram to slower timings
There's a good 30+ unique timings in ram set that a board sets up to run the ram at a certain speed so it's fast, and by mixing kits it has to run a set of timings that works for both different sets, which is often much slower
For the XT I picked, it has one of the best pcb's and best power limits for the GPU so you'll get the maximum 7900XT performance
And the PSU is solid, it'll handle the crazy power behaviour of rdna 3
Only 50$ more than just the classic MSI too lol
The ram is all from Corsair. Im trying to find out what the actual speed of it is. I couldnt find that XT when I was looking but I also wasnt looking at brands I havent used before.
It all being from corsair almost guarantees both sets are unique and built different underneath
Lol
They use a literal lottery of chips, it's extremely inconsistent
Ive basically only used MSI, Gigabtye and Asus
Asrock is a sub brand of asus, they're quite good with amd stuff
Ill have to check what speed its running because I remember over building the ram lol. Ill look at the ASRock stuff but ive mainly been on Newegg because it all has to make it to Japan
Oh i definetly dont have good ram lol. Task manager shows 2133 lol
I cant squeeze RGB sadly. I only have 40mm of clearance
nope its sitting in the cart with the classic right now
I see
yeah they are all lpx because it fit before
Alr one moment
It seems if I throw an extra 200 at it I can get an XTX which leads me to an entire new arena lol
Honestly at this point if raising the limit to 1250 is what it takes to make a future proof build for just the GPU then its a possibility. I just want to be able to run it for 7 years like I am doing with my poor 1060 6gb right now lol
https://pcpartpicker.com/list/P3Vc8r @gilded crystal
Part List - 2 x Radeon RX 7900 XT
If I were to choose between xtx and xt rn? Xt is better value
Xtx represents 16% more performance for 20% more cash
But if you want to go XTX, the same asrock model is yet again one of the best and it's msrp (999)
Is it worth the extra cash to get the Taichi over the Phantom? All these make no sense to me lol. My 1060 was self explanatory with its name
The best rdna 3 cards are liquid devil, nitro+, merc310, asrock phantom/taichi, asrock aqua, gigabyte elite
Same card just different aesthetics
Oh ok then lol. Neither of them fit the build color anyways so it doesnt much matter to me lol. As long as they are them same then the cheaper is my option
Oh well what colour is the build?
I was originally going for white because it didnt use to be as common but then realized that those parts are ridiculous. Want to stick with white and blue as much as possible since its in a case that was DCed in 2017
What about black white and blue?
Its not really a big thing for me. The case only has one small Plexiglass window on it that looks directly at the Ram and CPU so the graphics card is kind of hidden
It wont get scene so the black is probably the best otion
alr
then yeah the asrock phantom gaming
Thats the side view of the case lol. You cant see much in them
ahh I feel like I recognise it
Maybe. It seemed to be one of the largest you could buy for a while. I remember getting it and seeing that it could fit a 300mm Graphics card and just losing my mind at how small my 1060 looked
340mm correction
oh ok 340 fits
safe

Alright here's the list
https://pcpartpicker.com/list/WwMvXy
Part List - Radeon RX 7900 XT, Radeon RX 7900 XTX
I put both the XT and XTX in
Yeah sent myself into panic there. I could alway remove some hard drive bays to fit it though lol. It only has like 15 HDD drive slots lol
both will work with that psu
damn that's hella traditional
oh yeah lol.
Last of us part 1 comes out tomorrow. It says i need a 7900xt to get 4k. I have 6800xt with 5600 non x and 32 gigs ram i should be able to run the game at 4k right?
Yes lol
If it actually needs that powerfull of a card just to be playable in 4k that's an issue
apparently it was launched in 2013 and discontinued in 2016 or 2017. Ive asked AZZA about the case and they had even forgotten about this giant hunk of steel
lmao
AZZA has wild designs anyway
i used to buy apevia and raidmax cases back in the early 2000s
like the first half or so
the Antec 900 was the best t hing at the time
but I couldn't afford it
I think I mainly chose this case because it was cheap and large enough for a 340mm graphics card. By the time i remembered that I needed a case my entire budget was already spent on the other parts lol
yeah, fair
the cable management isn't bad either
nor is the construction
people just immediately dismiss cases like that these days because it looks silly or whatever
Looks very similar to my circa 2008 CM RC690 in some ways, then cranked up to 11 in size
I started to clear the old paste and pads when I noticed one of these matte black rectangular pieces is missing. Should I be concerned?
alrighty
Having one VRAM slot unoccupied is pretty common
Even 2 on some cards obviously(mine). Does that one above have 11GB or what?
Could be 2080 ti or 1080 ti
That's what my pre-edit asked too.
-- it's like if we ask someone if they drive a ford Chevy or dodge & just answer yes, lol.
The RTX 3070 launched at a lower price than the RX 6800, but now in the 2023 market the 6800 actually costs significantly less for double the VRAM. But how do they perform in the latest games, with the latest drivers, with the latest upscaling technologies like DLSS and FSR2, with and without ray tracing? Let's find out!
Buy an RTX 3070: https:/...
for anyone wondering its pretty one sided battle
I've found 2 used gpus online but I'm not too sure which one to choose...:
Evga SC 1080ti 11gb (220€)
And Asus dual 2070 super (200€)
Which one should I get? The main benefit I'd probably get from the 1080 is the 11gb vram but not much else, as it is has higher tdp (this model in particular is apparently a bit loud), and overall slightly worse FPS, I didn't find much about that 2070s model but I guess it'd be better... Right?
It's also a bit more difficult for a 2070s to pop it at this price so I think it'll be worth it even more, 1080tis sometimes come out for 200/220 but they're also older cards and less features
Should I go 2070 then?
2070 super
If the 1080 ti were like 30+ euro cheaper than the 2070 super, then sure, but especially with the 1080 ti more expensive the 2070 super is the better buy. It has dlss, rtx though that's meh, longer driver support, and better performance
Extra vram won't help a card of that tier in 95% of scenarios, and unless you do video editing, virtual machines, machine learning, or some other obscure uses, you are not in that 5%
Oh is that where the RAM is on a GPU? I had thought the extra length of the 1080 compared to the 1060 was where the RAM was stored. Kind of weird, I guess, that they built the card to hold 12 but when they wanted it to just be an 11 GB card they just only put in 11. I had always been frustrated with how we can get more RAM but to get more VRAM we have to buy a whole new part
There's more to a gpu design than empty solder spots being left for higher end models
Like extra circuitry that enables the use of SLI (dead tech now but utilized with 1080 and such to enable multi gpu technology) or extra power regulation and management circuitry
VRAM, or Video RAM is closely tied to the vbios and the sku of the product itself
The amount has a limit to its usefulness, cause different types and standards of VRAM are configurated accordingly to cost, specifications of the core itself and segmentation
It's like how a 3060 having 12 gigs of vram isn't faster than a 3080 with 10
There's only very rare cases where having excessive amount of vram on a gpu that couldn't correctly utilize the extra available memory would be faster than a faster gpu but with less vram
Of course there's also unreasonable, or unorthodox configurations that comes out sometimes
cough nvidia's 40 series pricing
Best graphics card under $250 tell me. Urgent
rx 6600xt
assuming you're in the us
No bro. I am india
Check how much a 6600xt or a 6600 costs in flipkart or India mart
Maybe an rx 6600 or rtx 2060 or something
looks like 6600 starts at 24500inr (300$) and 3060 starts at 27300inr (330$)
which sites?
https://elitehubs.com/sapphire-radeon-rx-6600-gaming-8gb-gddr6-gaming-graphics-card/
https://mdcomputers.in/inno3d-rtx-3060-twin-x2-lhr-8gb-gddr6-n30602-08d6-11902130.html
Shop for Sapphire Radeon RX 6600 Gaming 8GB Gaming GPU at the best prices in India on EliteHubs.com! Best prices for Graphic Card and PC products.
3060 looks like the clear cut winner in this situation
oh its the 8gb 3060
💀
i would get the 6600 then for sure
Where the heck did the 8gb 3060 come from...?? I've never heard of that lol
They silent launched it
I mean isn't 12gb of vram just better than 8
It depends
Ehh sorta, it's like having extra ram.
8 gigs 3060 is not just cut down in amount
Bus width is more important at that class of card
No point in having more ram if the app can't use it all.
I see
What they pointed out as well.
Also remember that the bus being small was one of the main complaints against the 3060 to begin with
The RE Remakes graphics menu I guess spoiled me for knowing which settings add what amount of data
Should have called it a 3050 super or something
But no, they didn't learn from the 4080 fiasco and decided to be deceptive again
Another thing to point out is the 3060 ti, which has 8GB of VRAM but a larger bus, getting a peak of 448 GB/s over the 3060 which has 360GB/s.
Then there's the G6X variant of 3060 ti that has 608 GB/s but that matters less at this class
hi. any suggestions for Graphic card under $550?
US?
yes sir, thanks
Just to be sure it will worj with Intel right? i see it says AMD RDNA 2
Yes you can mix and match GPU and CPU as you like
How much is the 4070 gonna cost?
Nvidia doesn't even know what the price is until the day it's announced. Literally. That's what happened with the 3080 ti.
does the tuf rtx 4080 on newegg have global warranty?
Anything you buy should come with some degree of a warranty
ok yes I meant for repair if it becomes needed
I think they do refunds if I face a problem but I'm not sure about international repair
nah they don't have international warranty
what about the protection plan?
ok
I think it was 1440p?
I found the screenshot but not the original convo
Here
It spikes to 740+W, it's basically transients which are mostly ignored
That's at 1.1V too, so nominal power would look more like around 500W on average
This is specifically with overwatch 2. Haven't tried it myself (dunno if I will tbh
What the heck is this rtx 4090....
Would a Ryzen 3 4100 pair well with an Arc a380? I dont really know about its backward compatibility with Cpus
In general the GPU doesn't care what CPU you use. In the case of Arc you want a platform that has ReBAR which that CPU and at least a B450 board would have.
Thank you so much this really helps since my friend really didnt want to spend a lot.
Might actually be perf/$ regression from 3080-10. I dont think even Turing ever had perf/$ regression when comparing an older higher tier to newer lower tier GPU.
My perf estimates for 4070 are just above 3080-10 given Ada spec to perf curve. Hopefully Nvidia prices it well and my estimation is incorrect, but idk about that.
Wtf 💀
Oh that’s in pesos
But $5500 is still insane
Ikr.
Great card, not worth more than 1700 usd
Better.
Is that 175k or $175 and 971 cents
The former, because some places like to mixup comma & period for numbers. Note the currency symbol at the end.
The dot and comma being swapped annoys me because it doesn't make any sense lol
.x Implies x is less than 1
Yeah literally
and commas are meant to just be separators for visual/ease of reading purposes
..do their numpads have a comma instead of a dot/period/decimal?
Afaik no
Why do I experience frame drops in like every game
There are many pissivke causes
Possible
Could you make a pcpartpicker.com list of your build?
anyone know a 230$ pc build😅
if so please dm me
a used optiplex
Random used Xeon desktop from a recycler with an A380
You can get a chromebook for that price
performance gets crippled tho without rebar
X99 has rebar
And you can always use this on any UEFI board https://github.com/xCuri0/ReBarUEFI
Older then 10th gen known to have buggy rebar iirc
Better than nothing. And that package has worked as far back as the 2500k apparently.
Nzxt 4090?
The all new nzxt hot box now with even less airflow 😁
it looks pretty but probably not the best
all white designs like that are gorgeous, i've always thought
but, computers are not about looks
it's about what is best functionality-wise, otherwise you sacrifice some of that functionality for something prettier
Its the 31st kangaroo man


Sleepy tim flex
Part List - AMD Ryzen 5 7600, GeForce RTX 4090, Fractal Design Focus 2 RGB ATX Mid Tower
was just making a build out of curiosity
and when the a620 comes could probably cut the board cost even more
that is 6 cores which far outpace a 13400f and 12600k
i still don't like having 6 cores in the long run lol
fair
but i think of it like the 1600 and you get the last 600 something chip which was the 5600 for am4
can always upgrade once something like 7800x3d drops i suppose
since that mobo do be cheap
thanks to am5's insane standards even an hdv is decent
I'd do 7700 with a 4090
If you wanted AM5
That or x3d
Can also do a cheaper cooler like ag620 or even ag400
And then put that towards a better ssd
I also think 10$ more gets you a better ddr5 kit iirc
Oops
Wrong cpu
Part List - AMD Ryzen 7 7700, GeForce RTX 4090, Fractal Design Focus 2 RGB ATX Mid Tower
There we go
I would do this instead
Iirc the jump from 5600 to 6000 is more noticeable right?
No, the sub timings are just as big if not bigger
Also any decent hynix kit should straight up do 6000 anyway lol
And the cooler seems good enough as all the non x chips are 65w targeted
Yep
You can technically run all am5 just fine on a single tower if you're smart about it
But more importantly 7700 scales a bit better
That's sorta where I draw the line, like a 12700K, it's just barely there for a 4090 imo
And even then, I feel like there's benefits to pushing harder
Ideally, X3D or 13600K+
i mean if you use the 4090 at the res people recommend it for
Meh, I'm still in that camp of taking the 8 core
Only 30$ more for a 1kw and if you 4090 money you can afford it, technically you could do 850w but i just can't recommend buying an 850w for it
If you're gonna do zen do the best zen for games
i like intel but lga 1700 straight up seems dead at this point
It is dead but amd have only promised basically 2 more gens on am5
I'd just go straight to x3d if you're considering an upgrade like this
Most people won't go from a 7000 to a 9000 series for gaming unless amd make some massive jumps in the next 2 gens
X3D is likely going to match next-gen anyway
Depends on the games tbh
ofc if you have the money for it
Did you watch the ltt x3d vid felix?
If you have 4090 money you def have x3d money
the point of the build was ultimate min maxed am5 build
Yes
X3d is still minmax lol
Yeah i mean x3d is fine but at current pricing (like 800$ for the x3d and the 900x3d doesn't make much sense cuz 6 cores just wait for 7800x3d)
Well I am saying 7800x3d
I guess I'm not being super clear about it
PICKIE DA 8 CORE FASS BOI
Whens that's supposed to come out I thought it was end of march ie now?

Maybe now idk
it seems promising
No reviews from usual sources yet
official amd chart but still
You can never trust those
Let's go post in r/AMD that we have one and see when they tell us the release date
Cherry picked
i expect perf to be in line with 7950x3d one ccd disabled
7900x3d is a silly billy
except a lot cooler overall on a better platform then a 13900k
Kinda makies no senses
If you need multi core get the 50x3d if you don't get the 50x3d or just wait til 800x3d
Sure but you sacrifice a fair bit in production workloads
Like CAD zen 4 falls off a cliff
Absolutely no contest to 13th gen
e cores go brrr ig



