#Videography & Photography đ·đ„
1 messages · Page 6 of 1
hi everyone i'm new to kpop :3

hii im glad your ok! Those scenes - i hope things like this influence energy companies & governments to turn to more economical earth friendly forms of energy. But glad your ok bro - byw your pictures are always stunning , loving the sillhouites đ
Happy to see my bike trail at the lake and critters there seem to be alright post-storm
wildlife photography as well !
Yeah i feel for all the wildlife
I saw the video with all the birds dropping out the sky so crazy
I wish we lived more harmoniously with nature
I just came here to post that my creative side has been drop bottom .. but i might make something really random and weird just to do something - it might be rubbish but .. whatever
might end up like some weird art
School movie

I mean that would be pretty
Cool
I like weird art school stuff
canon teasing new lenses
think the big one is the 70-200 internal zoom, hoping the smaller ones are the wide primes that have been rumored
24 1.4 and 50 1.4, both with IS is the rumor
Fuji Xm5 đ
50 1.4 with is sounds nice
comet from the back yard tonight
might drive out to the coast to get a better view this weekend
Wait holy
If it's 50 1.4 with is I'll go for that
I hadn't even considered that
My biggest issue with the 50 1.2 right now is it feels dated lmao
Yeah my friend linked that earlier and I was like oh yeah 70-200 z 2.8 is obvious because there's already images out there of people using it
Looks like an exact copy of the 24-105 2.8
But yeah the 50 1.2 right now is great but no dual nano usm motors feels bad. Like even the 50 1.8 I was testing focused faster lol
Like once you use dual nano usm it's so hard to go back to lenses without it unless you're using a camera with LPE19 batteries and even then the throughput isn't always enough
Like the 50 1.2 focused the exact same on my r3 as it did on my r5
Well ok if it is a 50 1.4 and it releases over 2k then nvm lmao
I saw a RF 50 1.2 for 1350 a few days ago
Likely around the 1500 or less mark like the 35
You wouldnât have survived the dslr days if you donât like the RF 1.2. The EF version was half the speed and was only accurate with focus maybe 1/3rd of the time.
Yeah the cameras with the LPE19 batteries I don't mind the focus speed on those. I used those with the fast glass lenses like 400 2.8 even the one from 1999 and it was fine. The 50 1.2 is just so slow

But it feels bad looking at Sony and theirs is so much faster because it has dual motors
So I'm definitely expecting it from Canon atp
But yeah 1500 I'd absolutely buy that if it has dual motors
Actually idk of the 35 1.4 does I forget
Oh it might be whatever this vcm is huh
Idk like my r5 and 100-300 I would get like 85% of photos in focus or 90% with the two motos
With r3 it's just full turn my brain off lmao
Don't even know the amount of times I had photos out of focus with lenses with dual usm and the r3. Arguably the biggest reason I don't want the r5ii 
Would loveeeee more dual usm motor lenses
The 35 has VCM dual focus yeah
Curious what modes you're using for focusing if you're having issues with RF system, it's been insanely accurate and fast for me across the line from the cheap 16mm 2.8 up
I use zone focus with servo on shutter button, eye tracking on rear button
the interior of the 35 is wild, especially since they kept it relatively compact at 1.4
I mostly just had problems with the R5 that I had and when they updated it to the new af in the R3 and all cameras after just got too used to that lmao
uhhhhh let me
go get my r3 and r5c out lmao
idk the zone names off the top of my head but
I use back button af a lot
The biggest problem I had with the R5 even using the 100-300 was it would randomly just stop tracking whoever i was shooting
my god the amount of times the R5 focused on an idol's hand instead of their face is infuriating for me like it happens like idk 1/3 of the time when I'm in korea lol
idol like puts their hand up near their face and it's like yep let me focus on their hand instead
R3 I never had that problem
would just be doing a series of burst and suddenly it focuses their hand instead
I lost so many shots cause of dumb shit like that
also yeah doing run and gun like actually following the idols there was just some lenses I straight up couldn't use because they weren't reliable and every time I had to do that I didn't even reach for my r5 
was funny my friend up to even had the same experience in korea. I took photos of the same idol as another person and we both sent the photos to my friend. I was using r3 and 100-300 and the other guy was using r5 and 70-200
he up to messages me like a day later and he's like
"... bro you have so many more photos in focus than the other guy I got photos from"

and we were both using relatively the same settings since it was bright as shit outside so our shutter speed was really high
Not uncommon to be at like 1/2000 at music bank if not more
When I had my 28-70 f2 jesus I did not trust that lens on my r5 whatsoever because it was just slow lens and not enough power from the r5 to keep up with moving subjects. Definitely really good for studio work or people stationary, but usually that's not what i'm shooting
not to mention too short for me like in korea 200mm is not enough for a lot of things so 28-70 definitely isn't unless you're going to like the airport or something for idols arriving lmao
oop adhd kicking my ass almost forgot ok yep af points
Shot a lot of weddings with the r5 and 50 1.2 combo and never felt it was slow, same with using it on the r6 at concerts. I can share my AF settings, I did customize the subject switching sensitivity and all
oh the 50 1.2 I don't have enough experience with to have an opinion on it
I did own it initially... and then covid happened lmao
so then I ended up like getting rid of my gear and wading that out
I just rented it again in like late july with the 24-105 2.8 because I didn't wanna just be shooting everything at 2.8 even though shooting wide open on the 50 1.2 is prob not a great idea in kpop lol
gonna end up getting one eye in focus or something

but was considering it to add some variance
Same with the 28-70 though, never heard it called slow by people that use it for 90% of event work like weddings, it has a pretty great reputation all around aside from weight
but yeah it was when I was renting it that I was like "this focuses considerably slower than I remember"
Yeah I feel like for weddings that lens makes a lot of sense
I don't blame people for using it at all
I miss the f2 for sure 
When I used it on my R3 it had a much higher hit rate
Did you ever play with the eye controlled AF? I hear mixed things from itâs amazing to it just doesnât work at all lol
yeah it's trash

it works for me, but I've never had a scenario where I thought it would have helped me
once I found out I would have to recalibrate it every time I went to a new lighting scenario I just gave up
haven't touched it in like 3 years now
only took the r6 last night and wanted a tighter shot sometimes, crop mode to punch in at 1.6x at 200mm worked great. Cuts the file down to 7mp, but those 7mp still look great and more than usable.
you're more brave than I am 
I hate using crop mode on anything but the r5
I like shooting lower resolution for the cleaner noise performance. Actually another reason I've been put off of the r5ii
but 20mp is about the limit for me where I don't feel like going under that regarding resolution well even though 12mp is still 4k but
well hey I did think initially I needed 45mp and then I ended up liking less resolution anyways so who knows maybe eventually i'll get to that point lmao
My first dslr was 8mp and my first full frame was 12mp and I was doing large prints for clients with those. 7mp of a modern full frame will still look great on screens. And you can always use super resolution in Lightroom if a larger file is needed, big part of why Iâm not scared of using it so much.
I always preferred the lower megapixel FF too, going back to the original 5D vs the 5D II/III and the Nikon 750 vs the 850.
And Iâve always paired it with a crop sensor body to get more versatility from primes and long lenses.
Yeah I remember kitzen in here talking about the c70 having a certain look and that's when I started realizing what it was specifically and that it was just that I didn't like the look of high resolution. It's nice if I need to crop but otherwise I don't really like the look because like kitzen said it just looks too digital
Idk I'm one of those people I'm like
Fuck cropping

I try to never do it
thats why i shoot crop mode when I want tighter instead of cropping in post even though it's functionally the same. composing in camera is always much better IMO. I crop a lot though for different aspect ratios to fit the scene
some panos at 50mm with a smoque diffusion filter this afternoon. really like the effect it gives but you have to be careful with the angle of the sun
Sick
kin-kon
oo cool
they're all official, only surprise is the internal 70-200 coming in white or black
24 is the best performing wide angle canon has ever made, and for under $1500 that's really something
Oh yeah forgot about these released already lmao gonna go look up videos see what people say about the 50mm at least
70-200 not so interesting to me lmao literally just the 24-105 2.8 but itâs 70-200 instead
I prefer the external zoom design because itâs so compact. Best lens Iâve ever used.
holy shit lol
i got these two asus portable monitors cause i'm an idiot
well the 2nd one was me being stupid, the first one was completely reasonable for travel
but they come with 3 month adobe subscriptions
I was like oh it's just gonna be one app or something
whole suite is $60 a month 
not even like some sort of terms besides i'm sure you should cancel your sub at the 3 month mark but
$180 kinda wild
realistically since i'm back on pc I should just be sailing the 7 seas though
oh shit I can redeem this offer until aug 1 2025 yep i'm keeping this to the side
Join the 7 seas
I joined it on both mac and pc
I did for davinci last night at least 
The only thing iâm wondering is about presets on ipad
Actually that would be the pain in the ass part lmao
Since most of my photo editing I do on my ipad these days anyways
Itâs not hard, just import them via DNGs
Oh yeah I ended up finding it lmao
thinking on saving up for a leicaq2 or q3
seen amazing pics with em
but the price đ
Iâve been getting really tempted by hasselblad digital medium format bodies but the price of a decent lens combo alone would pay for the canon r1 and c80 I plan on getting for work
kinda disappointed with rf 50 1.2 af lmao
another case of canon primes being way too slow for kpop
image quality is great when they are in focus but it just cannot keep up with moving subjects at all
but I guess i'm not too surprised like moving subjects coming towards you is just really difficult for lenses
going to the airport today gonna try it out there again
might just be too spoiled by my 24-105 and 100-300 2.8s
literally every photo on those lenses is sharp and high hit rate lmao
gave my 50 1.2 to my friend for tripleS daily fan manager and even there on a r5ii didn't look as sharp as we were expecting it to look so yep idk what's up with that
I shoot a lot of shows with it in both kpop and rock. No issues with tracking
If yours is slow and not accurate Iâd send it in to CPS and get it checked
Some shots from Babymetal this week on it
Shooting Becky G tonight and will probably do 90% on the 50 since sheâs a soloist, and a few on the 24-70 and 300.
Iâm sure if someone is on the same plane of field itâs probably fine
This is the same struggle I had with the 28-70 f2 though
But kpop doesnât have a lot of scenarios like that in korea in the chances you actually get to use the lens cause in korea basically anything under 200mm never gets used 95% of the time youâre here 
Basically can only use this lens at birthday cafes, airports, and the off chance that idol actually does daily fan manager or something
Iâm certain itâs just a limitation of older motor design which started changing with dual nano usm
At least in regards of having a higher hit rate
Not in a sense of âoh how did we ever survive without this in the pastâ

Canon primes are just such awful run and gun lenses until they use dual nano usm though I guess cause sonyâs uses their equivalent of that tech and you can see it in videos it focuses in the same scenarios more than twice as fast
This was a photo he took on it
Actually could be a case of resolving power too
Actually jk these look fine on his camera guess I didnât remember correctly lmao
But that is a scenario where theyâre walking slow as shit so iâd hope any sort of modern lens could keep up there
Nah. The RF primes are fast and accurate and great for run and gun use. I use them daily for photo and video and even for a full wedding day or fast action I have no problem relying on them for pro work. If they were slow or awful at anything they wouldnât be used.
This is it tracking my dog running at 1.2 in very low light (12,500 iso) and it nailed all 3
If you have issues with those focusing quickly or tracking youâre doing something wrong
rose might just be too used to the zoom zoom game
Yeah itâs naturally easier to nail focus if you just isolate the subject with zoom but that doesnât mean the wider lenses arenât capable. Just gotta know how to use focus zones and tracking settings.
the real mother
Maybe I should actually bother choosing what pics I like enough to edit so I can post them 
Wait but thatâs not true
Dual nano usm is objectively faster
And more accurate
If thereâs some scope for comparison the lenses with dual nano motors are going to beat out the primes every time in hit rate and especially focus speed
Like focus speed itâs not even close weâre talking like milliseconds to like a half a second to even a full second for the primes to focus
Especially when you get into cameras using lpe19 batteries even canon themselves says those cameras focus dual nano faster than those without it
Itâs called dual power auto focus
Itâs probably less noticeable on cameras using lpe6nh but itâs night and day on lpe19 cameras
These probably arenât the greatest examples, but if anything this just kind of fits the uselessness of primes in korea because the only way to get closer would be like getting into space thatâs controversial kek, but that being said these are not the levels of sharpness iâd expect out of a lens like this
Ok those photos didnât wanna send what the heck discord
Iâm not saying other lens designs arenât faster, Iâm saying youâre splitting hairs about specs and wrong about them being awful for run and gun or slow. Plenty of pros use them in demanding situations without issue. The RF L primes are some of the best performing lenses ever made and that includes autofocus performance. People walking around is not a scenario where you should struggle with them at all. Even going from minimum focus distance to infinity doesnât take a full second. Theyâre also sharper than zooms so no clue why youâre having trouble.
I mean even that argument hasn't been true for the last decade or so with modern lens designs. Well it has, but thats also splitting hairs too saying they're sharper. We're talking like less than 1% differences primes vs zooms in regards to sharpness. Even the 50 1.8 I couldn't tell a difference between the 1.2 and 1.8 stopped down. I'm not saying they're not good, I'm saying they're overstated their performance
Like my friend sent a photo some days ago at 52k iso on his A1 and 135 1.8 and it was still sharper than some photos I've seen from the rf 50 1.2 like the ones above
And that's even with factoring in that past 6400 iso the A1 shouldn't be sharper at those values
Because the other two lenses I have are considerably sharper and more reliable
Yeah itâs splitting hairs re:sharpness but Iâm not saying zooms are awful because of those minor differences.
It's still a cool lens. I just expected better
Just comes off as pixel peeping instead of learning how to use the gear properly, thatâs the road to never being happy.
I only zoom in 1:1 on Lightroom I'm not trying to count eyelashes
but I also feel like personally that breeds complacency in not keeping up with the competition. Like idk maybe the 50 1.4 that just released fixed this problem
What problem? Thatâs my point lol
I'm not looking at mtf charts I'm actually using the gear and it's behind what they currently released recently
The problem that it is not good for moving subjects changing plane of field
I'm not talking about focus distance or anything like that
Well ok let me reiterate
It's fine, but it's not as good as dual nano usm
Like I shouldn't have subjects I shot at 1/800 or 1/1000 just walking be not sharp
Yeah youâre right about that. Idk what focus settings youâre using but that is not normal. Thatâs why I said you might want to get your lens checked
Or if it is sharp then it's kinda crazy that this would be an acceptance standard is I guess what I'm getting at
god I love 8k
even though this is just a thumbnail lmao but still
aint anything to write home about, but i'm still happy af about the quality from a screen grab
Lmao two daeris here have r1
Came out yesterday
Guy next to me has it and let me hold it

And then you ran away with it :^)
Nah it's only good if you're a daeri
No point in upgrading otherwise
Getting 25% more photos since they sell photos in bulk plus 1/400 with flash is big for them
But yep I don't do any of that
You're fancammer rose now after all 
Exactly r1 doesn't do 8k60 yep pointless
Oh yeah ended up seeing another r1 at baemon lmao
Yep all the daeris upgrading
Oh huh the eos r1 manual says you only get the 1/400 while in crop mode
a1 mark 2 announcement tonight
in 30 minutes
well I guess it's morning in america lmao
Be ready for the announcement of special event for new Alpha 1 II
November 19th, 9:00 EST / 14:00 GMT / 23:00 JST

competition lets goooooooooo
stream up
aight yep incremental upgrade year
well the camera was boring but sony's 28-70 f2 yep full pound lighter than the canon one and isn't single focusing system
hopefully canon refreshes it and gets 24-70 f2 or something or makes the 28-70 f2 with dual focusing motors smaller or something
keeping the same sensor as the a 1 was a bold choice lol
I got not qualms with it a1 was already an insane camera
but gerald undone video was pretty spot on
same exact argument with people with r3's as the a1's
just no real reason to get these cameras because the change was so incremental
Youtube camera people donât really have valuable insight about gear for people actually working with it daily. Theyâre workhorse cameras for working pros that have worn out the prev models. itâs definitely time to upgrade and the improvements are significant for them. Precapture alone is worth it for a lot of people that will make use of these cameras in a working environment.
Iâm on my third r6 body (well II now) and I know a guy with an r3 where the top shutter button doesnât work anymore after 500k shots so he fires it with his pinky on the portrait shutter lol
Yeah this 50mm is getting axed when I get back
The scenarios I'm using it in are just way too difficult for it
Until they refresh this lens it's just not meeting my expectations 
I have more sharp photos on my r5c that doesn't even have stabilization in it
Which I guess makes sense considering it's not made for the scenarios I'm using it in kek
You know lenses aside my god
Iâm such an adaptive presets simp now
I hope this didnât exist like 2 years ago and I just didnât know about it
Cause I never could get presets to work for kpop lmao but now some that do
Also incorporating an ipad into my work flow instead of sending them to my phone and letting my phone throttle
Just rate in camera, transfer with canon app and filter by rated photos and import only those and then just bring them straight into lightroom
Make sure exposures are correct or just make a slight edit and add on the adaptive preset and itâs done. Had photos out in like 20 minutes the other day. Was fucking amazing
adaptive presets have been around at least two years
the AI versions have only been around for a year and a half though
Oh yeah the ai ones is what I'm using rn
Normal presets are just like
Generally not that useful here lmao
I mean I guess you could technically though
Lmao gonna go through and make a preset for each fansign venue
Welp better late than never to discover that these are a thing
Morning everyone! The lens's PRICE is lower than first expected: $1,399 in the US, and ÂŁ1539 in the UK.
Here's a preview of a beta copy of this exciting...and expensive new 50mm lens from Canon. I put as much infoz in as I could. Enjoy!
All pictures taken by me on Canon EOS R5 and R5 II cameras.
Support me on Patreon! https://www.patreon.com...
Forgot to look this up lmao
Yeah thatâs
Way more what I was expecting
Iâll happily give up a third of a stop for af that fast
Iâve tried that exact scene out with the 50 1.2 and it takes like a full second itâs just way too slow
Idk why he said in the video itâs 1800 pounds. Almost had a stroke lol
Idk maybe it is in the UK. If so yikes
More from Twice, Amazon Music production was sick in person but I hear the stream quality was terrible lol
Made it from LA to Tampa for this one, walked in the venue 2 mins before show started. Was sweating on the whole flight.
and the theater was terrible for shooting, but great show from them as always
Dropped my camera tonight like 3 feet and didnât break yep iâm a 1 line believer now
No scuffs or anything lens fine cause I was using a lens hood

Yep canon just go ahead and ship me a r1
Now if only I could get this detail all the time
Actually jk
This level of detail is on the more unflattering side
Could only imagine if I had shot this with a r5 or something good lord
Yep might actually finally go through my backlog
I loathe photo editing lmao
So much
I donât mind video editing but then again iâm not doing anything crazy so that would make sense
Adaptive presets single handedly making me not loathe photo editing anymore
How are you using them?
Only use Iâve found for them is for background blur to handle big ugly LCD screens on stage
LOL yeah thatâs one of them I have because.. too many fans around. Actually unironically one of the reasons I ended up getting a 1.2 for those scenarios because I hated having distractions in photos in some of those cases. Like god the other day I took a photo of an izna member and thereâs just some guy with his finger in his ear in the background lolâŠ
But I think the ones I have are just generally more for portraits.. studio work etc
I actually went and looked at the mask and itâs just what I was originally doing anyways and itâs just like masking the skin on their face and then lowering the texture and clarity slightly
Detects teeth and eyes separately and will like slightly raise exposure and lower saturation to get rid of yellows stuff like that
It just gets me like.. 90% of the way there which is good enough for me. I fucking love it lol
Ah yeah, I use adaptive enhance portrait for headshots at 60% but disable the iris mask
I actually completely forgot you can have presets applied on import. Trying to figure out how to make this work right now lmao
Turned it on but for some reason like all the masks are making me go through on the photos and manually update them 
God if I can get this to work holy shit
Big workflow efficiency increase
Might just work better on pc lmao
Mobile might be a little fucky
Huh weird even the adobe default presets arenât working on import. Welp good to know itâs not something with the actual presets. Wonder why this is happening
woah so crisp
and colors so nice
đ
i hope their fixed lens med format is closer to 50mm fov than 28mm
50mm would make me consider it, 28 would be no go
no i mean the fixed lens med format they have coming next year
Ah
I slept all day but yep do it
#notfinancialadvice
Friend ordered his and it shipped next day so doesn't seem to be any wait
Dropped my r3 a few days ago with my 50 1.2 on it and was wondering why the lens hood didn't go back on properly. Apparently some front part of it snapped out of place. Yep just hit that corner of the lens against the corner of my desk and popped it back into place. Good as new 
Yep works
Lmao these fucking gitzo tripods
I just bought one cause 50% off on cyber monday*
Cracked deal
Things are so dumb
soo smart tv then?
Nono no the smeary AI smoothing shit
The usual AI smoothing thing is doing frame interpolation, but the one on my tv is frame rearrangement
Eww. Can you disable it? Ours always turns the frame rate smoothing back on every few weeks, I hate it.
Placed my order, bank put a hold on my card for fraud protection, b&h closed for Jewish holiday. Missed out on open box and cash back combo which was about $1400 savings combined 
But might force me to do the more sensible thing atm and order a c80
I did
But again it's NOT frame rate smoothing I am talking about here
This one actually retains cinematic frame rate
Yeah I gotcha. Just saying I hate that one too
Eh?
Okay because that one I actually turned it on
Because it eliminates judder
Which is a good thing actually
the one that makes things look like fake 60 fps?
nononon
that's frame interpolation
You know when 24fps cinematic get encoded to 30fps and gets like.... soapy or sumn
Yeah that's judder
Unjuddering is when we want to retain it back to 24fps
Completely different from the smoothing with generating new frames
this just rearranging frames
Look at the video I linked in the reply
yeah, im saying our TV does the fake 60 fps and I hate it, but it turns it back on randomly
Think it's back because you triggered HDR
Kinda have to turn it off for every picture profile exists
that's part of the annoyance, can't disable HDR on things like Hulu/Netflix on the TV! Completely greys out the option lol
I'll be honest, that's the first time I've heard it be called 'judder'
I've heard it be called telecine, 2:3 pulldown, etc.
but judder is a first lol
and to reverse it you get reverse telecine/inverse telecine, 3:2 pulldown, and a little bit of deinterlacing
isn't 2:3 pulldown for NTSC to PAL?
yes but the concept you describe applies the same
Not exactly
24 -> 30 and back 30 -> 24
Judder is an encoding artifact
Aka preferable you don't want this
I know, if done actually properly there'd be the motion blur applied atop if it
it's using the same algorithms that converted between PAL and NTSC or between cinematic films and NTSC
That one I know
My point was **this is not one of those
It's literally "put 24 on 30 timeline and hit encode"
This is an editing mistake
well if you use click and encode GUI software, sure
it's not always an editing mistake, but reversing it requires the same process as inverse telecine
Reapplying a 30p into 24op timeline doesn't fix it alwatys
that's why you don't do that
you have to reverse the process that converted it in the first place
recreating the frames that were lost
and removing the extra frames that were created
now if the start and end product are both progressive then ... well it won't be pretty to convert
this is what I hate about youtube, people upload interlaced footage and youtube automatically makes them progressive
and it's basically nigh impossible to properly convert them back
Unless you're....me
you lost a lot of data
Can affirm, manually did it and I lost like a second of sync
But
Apparently that lost data can be avoided if you.....like actually rearrange the frames ONE by ONE
This is what I am noticing my new TV set does
well those hardware encoders and renderers are pretty good at what they do
I'm a big fan of Hybrid as far as generally good known open source algorithms go for encoding
but it does have a bit of a learning curve
otherwise there are a ton of real time renderers and filters and associated algorithms you can put on MPV or MPC for TV-like experience if your graphics card can handle it
⊠I aint gonna lie⊠that shit is calling my name lol. I will probably just buy one in line a year when it drops in price but god the more I look into it the more I want one 
Also bruh wait HUHHHHH there was an open box r1 ?!
đż
Actually you know what I guess that makes sense the more I think about it
Someone prob buying it and then being like jk I donât need this and returning it lmao
yeah, big releases like that will have a lot of open boxes that go fast, just gotta get lucky with F5ing the site
Damn. I actually never thought of this
Seems so obvious
Guess it's one of those things you just don't think of until you see it lmao
Smart af
Check out https://brilliant.org/StuffMadeHere/ for a free 30-day trial and 20% off your annual premium subscription!
Help support these projects on Patreon: https://patreon.com/stuffmadehere
Be sure to subscribe if you like this kind of stuff! https://tinyurl.com/sub2smh
Sources used in video:
- Thomas the tank image by http://www.hitnewsonline...
madness
kpop idols their contacts be like
lmao
I really hate this trend of tiered paid firmware feature updates
when Sony originally introduced this like a decade and a half ago with their mirrorless lineup and PlayMemories Apps or whatever they were called, people cried foul
but now this is becoming normal as the big three are all doing it.
Canon be doing some dumb shit lately iâm ngl
There was one day at music bank i took photos of an idol and my friend was like oh can I have the photos Iâm like yeah sure ofc iâm not gonna do anything with them
He saw the photos really liked them
He whips out his ipad and a usb c cable and iâm like oh yeah I wonder if this works iâve never tried before
plugs in
nothing happens
Heâs like oh is your camera on and I said yeah
Came to find out that just like
This isnât a thing with canon 
Image transfer from camera to another device
whaaat
I was like welp iâve never tried this Iâve always done it through bluetooth
you can't use the USB to transfer images?
You cannot
You can on later cameras theyâve released but so if you donât have those cameras
You have to pay a fucking subscription to their image transfer app to do it
now that's some bullshit
digital cameras using USB's media transfer protocol has been standard for a long time
Like imagine my face when I had my r3 and couldnât transfer photos to my computer but my friend with his fucking r10 was able to
I was like are you fucking serious canon
I think when they introduced mirrorless they took it away
wow
Thankfully on the r5ii and r1 itâs a thing again
Because my friend was doing it but I was like
This is fucking dumb
Haha just gotta
Spend several thousand dollars if I want to do that !!!
mindblowingly stupid and greedy of them
Clearly me buying the previous flagship wasnât enough
I bet they could add it with a simple firmware update
But whatâs even more stupid is Iâm surprised this isnât even something theyâre advertising like ok itâs being a little unfair to them because putting them into a lose-lose situation, but at the same time they also put themselves into this situation in the first place so not gonna praise them for bringing back a feature they initially took away in the first place
I guess taking away such a normal, expected feature and then returning it isn't exactly something to celebrate
already had it happen enough with world of warcraft
I always have small type c card reader with my whenever I'm using my camera
does canon support CFexpress Type B or Type A?
Type b yeah
Type a is like just a sony thing iirc
Think they developed the technology
I could be wrong on both of those fronts though someone correct me if iâm wrong
I don't know tbh, I just have a Type A for my Sony and mostly SD cards otherwise
there's also XQD that some cameras like Nikon uses, and Sony's video cameras ...
why are they doing the format wars thing again đ
Hot: EOS R1 Available for $5799 via Street Price ($500 Savings) https://t.co/zsMQBwn5uA
Guess this is mostly for boshi atp lmao
If I didnât have a r3 yep mightâve humored this
hmmm
$500 off no tax free shipping
Probably through camera canada or w/e
Same store I got my r6âs, 24-105 2.8 and 100-300 2.8 from
Seemingly who they get stuff from all the time
I wish I was the market for the r1 but it just doesnât make sense for me logistically or financially lmao
Otherwise yep iâd be gunning for that deal
If I was a working professional yeah iâd be on that
B&H DealZone: 2-Pack of ProGrade Digital 2TB CFexpress 2.0 $739 https://t.co/rcZerjAYXH
Aight lad fuck off
LMAO
I was looking at a single 2tb card for months
Iâm not buying this shit now because I only need one extra 2tb card
But thatâs cringe
Story of my fuckin life
Ah yeah bought from them before too. Donât remember if theyâre grey market or not?
Nah Canada falls under the same warranty as US iirc
idk definitely would look it up though just to be safe
get a second opinion because I dont' know for 100% lmao
I'm not familiar with LumaFusion
@night mulch https://blog.adobe.com/en/publish/2024/12/12/removing-window-reflections-adobe-camera-raw
:^)
Yep trapped myself
Still a section and a half not extended lmao
Gonna be dumb af taking this with me next time

IT'S FINEEEEE
The logistics going into this shit
Thereâs actually no fucking way to bring everything these cammers bring to events around the country without a car lmao

Ladder still required 
Just bring one of those little carts :^)
Add "rent Suzuki Hijet" for every event moving forward
Last time I was in Japan actually not that expensive
Per day
Honestly there is an argument to be had there
It's something I'll consider lmao
Atp the rental price is prob gonna cost near how much the ktx was anyways lmao
the hoops i'm having to jump through for this shit is insane
I have two versions of this think tank bag and one can hold a 600 and my 100-300 the other can't but i've ran into problems with that bigger bag on planes before like an a319
turns out that was just a united thing though so yep just avoid united planes and we good
but
yeah uhhh not trying to like take busses and shit with all of this + ladder lmao
all these cammers using 600s and 200-800s
pretty much atp just using the bag to substitute the cart
idk this is all puzzle solving right now
can't just turn my brain off and throw everything in a car
oh that's a good point
Last time ETC costs were like
Dayumn
Wasn't expecting that high of a toll
I mean can you drive stick
actually pause
is there even manual kei cars in SK?
It's Korea, like all your rentals Hyundai and Kia sedans and hatchbacks
I can drive manual yeah
I need a ball head for the gitzo and two magic arms
... and then probably a ball head for that too
Lmao someone on fancammer forum drew a mock-up of like
How to properly setup a fancammer setup

I need to find that drawing again
Had to carry about 200 lbs of gear a mile into the woods for a production yesterday. 3 person crew was not enough
Some stills from it
Rare action shot
sickk
the idea of vlogging gives me a deep anxiety 
here's one of the songs though, final vid will be a 3 song set from what we recorded. concept was Tiny Desk but no audience and a bit more produced
Sick
Xiaomi 14T with Leica Authentic processing
Mood
@floral idol you know what this actually feels like a good time to ask you given all the shooting you did above. You said you use a c70 right? You're on the more professional side so I'd trust your opinion more. I assume you shoot xfavc right? I'm looking into the different codecs right now and looking at some videos and there was some comparisons and the xfavc in a lot of scenarios actually looks better than the canon raw lite so I was curious if you ever messed with any of this
Some people were saying the raw looks more noisy which makes sense I guess lmao
I've noticed that but... it's raw so.. did you also know the sky is blue

I didn't even know this, but in one video this guy was like yeah you have to use this canon proprietary software
Like you have to run the canon raw through it first and like then it appears better than xfavc
Yeah, raw is noisier since it has no baked in reduction and almost never used or requested except for really high end graphics work.
Depending on client and use Iâll do intra or long GOP XFAVC since theyâre indecipherable for web use
Davinci handles canon raw fine in my experience but again, never needed to use it and itâs just more work for every stage
like
I hope I'm understanding this correctly
is xfavc like somewhere between like mp4 and raw or something? lol
I didn't even know about it until this year when I was looking into cine line
and it seems like people swear by it so it's kinda interesting. Wondering if I should mess with it more
Obviously this is just a hobby
but it would be cool to learn
yeah, xfavc is the highest quality wrapper for mp4 but still compressed, but still gives the option for higher and lower bit rate for space savings
its somewhere btween raw lite and hevc on the c70, but that quality limits frame rates to 30 for the full sensor read out higher bitrate
Thatâs what Iâm shooting 90% of the time.

Hmm. Got off work and I'm reading more now and kinda seeing answers all over the place. I saw this more than once but people said you shouldn't use xfavc for moving water?
Then another person said years ago they would do xfavc because h264 was easier on their computer, but now that they have better hardware they do h265
And then "raw is just the best quality" which.. Yeah obviously lmao
Gonna have to read up on this
But professionals definitely seems like yeah y'all swear by xfavc
Ahaha

Gonna get my r5c out and set it up on the tripod and see what it looks like
A friend of mine got a r5ii and he doesn't use xfavc because he's like "well it's probably better but maybe like 5% better, but h265 already works for me"
The more I thought I was gonna use 8k I ended up just using crop modes instead because I could lmao
yeah the modern m chips have made that choice a lot easier. used to record to prores raw on the atomos just because the mac chips could handle that easy since it was apples codec. other option was to make proxy files in 720 which took forever
the moving water thing is if you're doing long gop instead of intraframe. GOP does a compression where it picks key frames and fills in the ones around it which is bad for motion like water or sports, but intra is a full sensor read out each frame so you dont have to worry about it. the c70 has both options depending on file size needs
its like old tv's with interlaced vs progressive scan
Which is where we got 1080p vs 1080i
I'm gonna have to test it more when I get home tonight but god denoise in davinci brought my computer to a stand still on the footage I was trying lmao.
So I'm gonna have to see if that canon cinema raw development software does it faster. Usually I get real time playback in 8k60 raw in davinci so I didn't have to record proxies. Denoise and then... 2fps LOL
otherwise yeah xfavc might make more sense
Punching into that 8k footage is just so nice though
đźâđš
Okay I do quick edits for gifs in Capcut but Capcut decided to add watermarks in their shit and I gotta pay to use the "pro" version to not have a watermark. fuck you capcut
I downloaded free Davinci 19 resolve like 2-3 weeks ago and I stopped cause it was stressing me out cause i can't seem to have audio in my timeline
Now I tried learning again and I can't seem still to have audio in my media
where's the media from?
from youtube using yt-dlp,
i read somewhere that davinci doesn't really have webm encoding, yt-dlp usually download the videos in webm first.
so i just need to set the sort to mp4 first instead of webm
but even when i use mp4 files, there's still no audio
gonna davinci a try once more
think these are the only areas i see where i can check track audio on the timeline tab
do the converted mp4 videos have audio when you play them in like windows or vlc
Yea they play normally in other media players

i am so dumb
it was set to ASIO in I/O Engine, i was pretty sure i set this to system audio before 
gotta test it
it worked ...
wait maybe the webm encoding is not real i gotta test that as well
no audio in webm files 
rip, guess gotta convert files first then
yea 
oh boi am i excited
picked up the DJI action cam 5 today
very excited to test it out on snowy terrain
tried searching a way for yt-dlp to download the videos in mp4,
there is a way but it will only download 1080p as any further up in resolution will only result to webm format as it is the best format for such resolutions
so i guess i'll have to download the videos in webm for best resolution and use a converter like handbrake
W
So apparently the R1 has a triple base (gain?) iso at least according to Jared's video today. Kinda interesting
I think he said it was 400, 1600, and 12800? I know 1600 and 12800 were two of them I just forget the first one
in clog2
yeah not surprising given the low light sensitivity on the R1 and the c80/400 sensor tech being the same triple. super easy to test in video mode, just zoom in at 10x and flip through each iso, when you hit the new base level the noise will drop even though you went up in ISO. normal base is 800 for clog2 on all EOS bodies so far
i would assume its 800 3200 12800 like the cinema line
still surprised they put clog2 in both bodies though, expected them to gatekeep that, esp in the r5 ii
Some recent clog2 grading, love the colors I get from it
It's interesting like I feel like stuff like that is actually relatively important
Or maybe important isn't the word
or like hey you can once again transfer files from your camera to an external device lmao
The movie trailer with English subtitles for "Persona: A Strange Girl" í넎ìë: ìŽìí ìŹì (2025), brought to you by EonTalk.
Receive 49% off an annual plan for ExpressVPN đ https://www.expressvpn.com/eontalk
Starring: Park Ho San (ë°ížì°), Jeon Hye Yeon (ì íì°), Bang Eun Hee (ë°©ìíŹ), Jung Hyung Seok (ì íì)
Release Date: February 2025
#PersonaAStrangeGirl #í넎...
This looks like it's one of those "shot on iPhone" movies
And yet got these awards
ofc its not always about equipment
it doesnt matter which expensive gear you use, if u cant bring a message across itll fail no matter what
YOOOOOOOOO
Security trynna snag dem whole rig prolly cuz that fansite went overboard (or she trying to enforce no photos)
5k down the drain boi
Ehh own fault
This in Indonesia
@floral idol do you ever apply denoise or anything?
Like iâm sure maybe you kinda do
I was looking tonight and I guess iâm kinda not really understanding like do you know if noise reduction in the render process is more of a cpu or gpu task?
I was under the impression itâs more of a gpu bound task, but then I look online at puget bench and kinda seems itâs⊠not that way? Lmfao
The r5c footage is pretty great it just has a decent amount of noise in raw which makes sense
But uhhh yeah denoise is pretty harsh on computers 
Didnât know you can apply temporal noise reduction in camera on the r5c under custom picture profiles
Fucking cinema side
Currently at a crossroads of considering going back to mac or staying on my current computer, but if I am going to be using denoise and it is a primarily gpu bound task then it begs the question of like if mac is correct given how much better nvidia gpuâs would be in that category (being on a 4090 right now)
But then I guess thereâs an argument of if you can just do it in camera then macbook probably makes more sense but then if the render part is primarily cpu and the GPU was just for previewing in davinci then.. yeah idk. Kinda hard to find concise answers online lol
Yep computers ted talk
I shoot base at 800 and 3200 but the noise in the shadows is pretty perceivable sometimes so I feel like denoise is going to be kind of unavoidable in some situations
Yeah always denoise for raw as the first node in davinci (or second after any CST). Iirc GPU is used more for noise reduction and vram is the biggest factor there.
My m3 pro mac with the 14 core gpu handles denoise really well, whereas my mid tier pc canât really handle raw + denoise in 4k at all lol
I'm actually just gonna go to apple and buy a m4 max and test it and return it and see how much better it is because pugetbench is showing it's kinda clapping my current computer in davinci in literally everything except the gpu and it's like marginally worse, but it doesn't really like specify what each breakdown is
Not gonna keep it but if it is better then I'll swap sometime down the line lmaon
Oh damn
ESPECIALLY if it's vram that would make a ton of sense because my laptop GPU's vram is 16gb and it's always at 15gb during that shit lol
MacBook unified memory would make a ton of sense there
Huh appreciate the insight 
The annoying thing with the M4's is having to pay a million dollars to have more than 16gb ram :(
10x the price Apple upgrade tax strikes again đ
Yeah no kidding
The m4 Mac mini is crazy good value
But the upgrades 
Base model best
Lmao told the worker I'm gonna just end up returning it he's like yep no worries
no stickers no polishing cloth in the box smh yep #returned
Yeah the 4090 laptop is handling playback better than this m4 max but I mean like
I can just fix that with proxies so lmao
whichhhhhhhhh I already do
welp hopefully the render is substantially faster
yeah the uhhhh
my 4090 laptop is kinda smacking this m4 max lol
like it's not even really close either
no perceivable difference with 8k arguments aside usually when I do these renders on my laptop I get like 27fps out of davinci
no denoise or anything
.......... yeah i'm getting 5 with the m4 max

did they add the video encoder to the 4090s
av1 yeah
havent tried any of the cards that have that
I heard that the m3 got it, but I don't see it in davinci as an option under codecs
like so I'm wondering if that was something else
idk maybe I have a setting off on here. Not gonna just be like yep that's it lmao
I expected this to be closer than this though. Kinda wild
Uhhh i think I accidentally won the silicon lottery
This MacBook is beating other scores on pugetbench by a decent amount
Just recorded the 3rd highest recorded score for m4 max on davinci lmao
... not sure if I wanna return this now
And idk if I was mistaken and my memory was bad but they did perform about evenly. Anything using Nvidia as the encoder beat out the MacBook though. Everything else the MacBook won which I suppose makes sense
i'm not sure how it translates to davinci but i know in general GPU encoding is faster while CPU encoding is slower but can do higher quality while also delivering a smaller file size because its more efficient
i think production side gpu encoding is only used for livestreaming
Yeah you're right because I know a lot of streamers were happy for av1
really interesting stuff, especially that they shot in the most compressed version of the RAW codec because they were doing really long takes and could see no quality difference
Honestly I started wondering that at one point because I know there's been a lot of debate on craw vs raw and people said raw was only better if you were pulling shadows otherwise it was pointless
Started wondering if that applied to video too
I just shoot compressed raw on my r3 now for video
So yep validated even though it's Sony
ive shot in craw since moving to RF and never regretted it either. business partner always shot regular raw on his r5 and we couldn't see any differences
kinda like dynamic range extremes in video, if you're shooting in good light ideally that wont matter and anything over ~10 stops is plenty of range
I guess some animals struggle to see pink
Apparently most animals have a lot of issues seeing red, making it a very muted color. Pink being a combination of red and white basically makes it difficult to see for a lot of animals and it can blend into the background pretty well
oh I forgot so
actually this is kinda annoying because if you look online on think tank's website they say for their airport international v3 you can't fit a 600 f4 in there
says max 500 f4 iirc and they say you need the security version for that
the security bag is bigger though and i've read people having problems with it as well as having my own problems on planes like united has smaller overhead bins
one time coming back I used that bag and it didn't fit
I got stupid lucky that the flight attendant just closed the overhead bin even after I put my bag sideways and that it was not a full plane, but if the attendant wanted to be a dick he could've just made me check my bag
yeah well uhh
.... this is the think tank international bag... the smaller one lol
.... the one that they state this lens doesn't fit

fucking logistics transporting gear
lol just did the same juggling to fit everything in a pelican case
r6, r7, c70
24-70, 70-200, 50, and 16 all in there
and a sennheiser mkh 416 i swapped out with the deity
gotta put the rest of audio in my backpack
debating throwing the 300 in there too but prob not worth the weight
@night mulch your next step up is the think tank production manager lol
lol wait is that a 1510

I had those same dividers for the pelican case I had
I just... don't wanna be checking anything on flights lmao
i've just been throwing lens hoods and tripods into my suitcase now
Yep, about 12 years old and going strong
Only had an issue with it as carry on once, itâs technically under the dimensions but right at the line
Shooting a jazz festival tomorrow then rushing over to shoot the TripleS show 
Any fun artists at the festival?
It is led by the multi-GRAMMYÂź and 53-time DOWNBEATÂź, and 24-time GLOBAL MUSICÂź Award Winning multi-instrumentalist Dr. JosĂ© Valentino Ruiz and EMMYÂź Award Nominated artist Brandon L. Robertson. It features GRAMMYÂź and 8-time GLOBAL GENIUSÂź Award Winner Derris Lee and Floridaâs formidable jazz pianist Dr. Zachary Bartholomew.
no names im familiar with
but i might be shooting the Anthony Jackson benefit show next month and that has victor wooten, ron carter, dennis chambers, and a lot of other big big names
I would kill to just have everything in one place like man I don't wanna carry 3 different bags with me to this shit 
That 1510 was great, but I ended up not using it much once I started trying to transport around like a laptop and bigger lenses. I was able to get a decent amount in it but that was the point I was like yeah... need something wider
like this 
Could probably make it work now but yep too late now
cooking something up
Not really a fan of that this cover doesn't cover the collar though lmao
Might have to go the Larry Chen strat and just gaffer's tape the shit out of it
Yep this isn't sus at all
lol
Actual camjussi setup
Actually this one was pretty cool though. Looked for a while for a video head for the pd tripod that would match how compact it was and found this online
Added the adapter and then this
Works perfectly
Iâm surprised that magic arm can hold that weight
Yeah rated for 19 lbs
I'm probably never doing that though because shit was so sus

Did it more as a joke. Probably only 24-105 ever going on there
Left my monopod at home
Arm is dead after holding up the 300 for most of this concert
Naky â€ïž
apparently those sold out before they opened doors to non-vip
i saw someone carrying one, were they all signed?
Too tired to actually edit but hereâs a few that stood out in import
Only 5k to go through đ€Šââïž
fire pics
I have no clue if they're signed or not lel
I just need it for my vinyl collection :P
I saw one that was signed
Shooting NYC and Houston too if anyone is going
I wish :(
God
This is such a nuts deal on r5ii
I'm in the market for it but.. no credit card sub to hit lmao
Unlucky
Gotta wait until like September
6th ave is one of the scammers
Theyâll sell it then never ship and jerk you around and try to get you to buy a new one
I donât know how eBay lets them stay around
Oh huh my friend just told me about them being weird
It's interesting because I bought from them before but that was 2019 and didn't have a problem lmao
I think they do a lot of legit sales on normal items but do the bait and switch on big ticket stuff like that
It's funny because I wonder where an eos r in 2019 falls because that's what I bought from them
It was a 24-70 for me, they listed an open box for 1500, then said it was OOS and tried to sell me a new (grey market) for 1900 lol
Dang shooting Aespa tomorrow
Good time to shoot the 600 f4 prob
Itâs gonna be 99% winter pics 
đ€
$175 for studio license instead of $300
Sheesh
Actually don't mind buying this since black magic aren't a greedy company like adobe 
Alright yep iâm a chasing birds glazer now
They donât have ef 600 f4 mark 2 covers on their listings in solid black but only for the rf one
Just dmâd them and was like hey I just bought from yall and theyâre amazing but I didnât see this is an option.. is this possible
Was just expecting a âsorry itâs not possibleâ
Actually best feeling lens covers iâve ever used like iâm kinda tilted I didnât get these sooner
The ones I got from lenscoat and rolanpro were so dogshit
The one from lenscoat I had to go and cut the fabric myself because they made it too long for the barrel on my 100-300 like it was gripping the non moving part of the lens
So it made the barrel extremely difficult to turn I was like what the fuck dude
The one chasing birds made has the numbers only visible and they didnât have it grip that part nearly as tightly so while there is a small amount of resistance itâs not anything near what the lenscoat one was + having the numbers visible
Just felt like thereâs way more thought put into it
Yep copped
Iâm actually so surprised like I expected this to be a little burdensome but super cool theyâre willing to do it
Cool ass lens
I was almost triggered when I woke up this morning and saw but then I realized it was only for Sony lmao
Not sure if happy it's not for Sony or happy because it means I don't miss out on anything
FROPACK4 is HERE with 14 all-new custom Lightroom presets!!! Check it out
https://froknowsphoto.com/fropack4/ (40% OFF)
This is a hands-on first look at the Sigma 300-600mm f4 DG OS Lens. This is a revolutionary and MASSIVE lens that I consider to be affordable due to the fact that 600mm f4 primes go for $13,000. I will be taking this lens out...
Wild af
If I had been on Sony...
I would have definitely gotten this lens 
Cool af
Canon patented a 150 1.8L, that would be killer
probably similar to their 135mm 1.8L formula
Canon where's my 70-200 f2 
I had no idea the 100-300 2.8 has such swirly bokeh.
The 300 prime is so straight
can't say I've noticed it myself but I'm also not shooting on backgrounds like that so it would make sense if I never noticed it
Yep kinda curious now
Lmao the one from Lenscoat they just give you a piece of neoprene fabric and they're just like here cut it off if you want to cover the middle section where the plate is that says what kind of lens it is
Chasing birds actually gave me a complete piece for that section to cover it up
Oh yeah and the switches under section 4 you can actually just pull it back and mess with the switches and then put it back with a piece of velcro
Yep I'm writing them a review. These are too good
US vs. Canada right now
Oh I was going to say are these your photos lol
Holy fuck
Those photos lag my phone
LMAO

wowie
what magic arm was this btw? I need something to hold C70, 24-70, big sennheiser mic, and an audio recorder. it's about 8lbs total
Crap lol I literally just left my house for work
Let me take a look real quick I think it's on my Amazon account it's either on there or b&h photo
I will say though my only real complaint I had was that they are a little bit.. I don't know it's my first time using a cine arm like I thought it was going to be longer? It's still long enough from my needs though but yeah it's extremely sturdy but yeah let me go look real quick
There you go that was the one that I bought
thanks, that looks way more sturdy than what i was finding
Goodbye to your wallet
Only bought some film for the tour Iâm shooting atm. Real tempted by an r5ii they had on discount lol
God I would love to stop by there one of these days
saw someone do this before lmfao
I guess two fans does give faster turnaround time on the r5ii but really quite a pain in the ass
the run time numbers online are fucking everywhere
i'm not sure how gerald undone got 50 minutes in 8k60 on his tests
.....
Why'd these mirrorless bodies try to crank Panavision resolutions but struggles to maintain it for like 20mins?
Iongetit
idk my r5c literally just goes forever as long as you have storage and battery to feed it
lmao this grip does literally nothing
I took the fan and grip off and just am letting it run without both and i'm at another 5 minutes of 8k60
I'm actually a bit confused why canon even made this product
Nah I mean the Sony's
And some Canons
I know the RP ran like lava
I mean I dunno probably because I am more video than photo
but if you gonn strain your mirrorless to get hours of content and needing temp breaks you might as well get a Red
Of course more resolution is better but
yep that's why we got the r5c
dedicated video camera
I don't do photo much anymore
Just got the r5ii as a middle ground in the cases I did want to
really just not a fan of this whole jumping through hoops finding solutions ideology though
when the r5c is just hit record and you're good to go
I guess it makes sense though since it's not a dedicated video camera
Small rig just put out a clip on heatsink fan attachment that apparently works well for the r5
MV shoot today. Meant to get more bts for you @night mulch 
C70 frames there but shot in clog3 to match other cameras, worked fine since the dynamic range was so controlled
Yo sick
My next upgrade is a van for it all lol
California's Northern Coast is home to the tallest trees on Earth- but their height has been more of a curse than a blessing. I spent a snowy week in the Redwoods exploring this forest and its history.
đ” Music I use for my videos (first month of an individual subscription free with code AIDIN): http://share.mscbd.fm/aidinrobbinsplaylist
đ§...
Holyshit this guy is my new favourite cinematographic vlogger
Good stuff
Wild
these shots are so good!
Hereâs the full recap gallery
Some fav individuals
thank you for sharing!!!
Love it
also inspires me to pick up my camera again
Uh oh, itâs a few blocks from the venue and my hotel and I have a lot of free time
just remember they're closed on Saturdays







