rating-battles

[floral dock]

Bruh what's the mastery bar for sheri... 5k dmg 2 kills and only a 2nd class

[orchid light]

What’s the lowest rank you can get and still get 20 fearless parts? Can’t find it. I grounded ratings once before and got 80, figured I might as well get the other 20

[floral dock]

31-40 is 25 parts, 41-50 is 15 parts https://na.wotblitz.com/en/content/rating-battles/

[abstract tiger]

is there a camo for reaching 4k rating points? if so, which camo is it?

[orchid light]

Ah thank you.

Good job today too

Also there were so many toxic players today... even the enemy lol I shot a grille and he starts calling me a nub for hitting him lmao

[slim cloud]

10k ping 10% loss and ages to get into a battle only to have a 5 people camp

[agile sphinx]

It seems like there is but it's a little bit vague

[slim cloud]

I don’t have 10% loss anymore

It’s 40% now

[lime sparrow]

we can probably assume what the bottom bullet means anyway

[lean spruce]

Хелоу

[crimson goblet]

@agile sphinx its basically scalling of base xp,but taking your current rating into account

[neat oriole]

I don't know why but each rating game feels to take a piece of your soul

[copper mauve]

this is why you must feast on the enemy’s souls

[neat oriole]

even if you win, you don't feel like you've won anything

[floral dock]

I feel ya, the thing is, they are most likely the nub lol. The fact they don’t check the leaderboards mean they most likely aren’t actually trying to do good in ratings. Then you have the other people who do look at the leaderboard and then tunnel you since your in the top.

[orchid light]

I can’t remember the names of everyone at the top. Besides I feel like it’s just counter productive to tunnel good players

[floral dock]

Ehh right now it’s not too hard to know who’s in the top since there’s not many people in the top, and I agree, tunneling good players isn’t worth it in the long run but it’s still annoying when you get tunneled the second you’re spotted

[ebon summit]

remove supremacy from ratings. it's cancer

[eternal vigil]

dont allow players who have below 4000 rating to play tier 10

[orchid light]

This is a horrible idea. This is a game and it’s first and foremost goal is to have fun. If you want to play against and with good players, just play ratings. Not to mention the wait times would be horrible.

[floral dock]

I mean a rule like that would most likely get more players into ratings lmao

[regal cosmos]

Being below 4k rating doesnt always mean that youre a bad player

[burnt skiff]

Dont allow players who have below 50% wr to play rating

[agile sphinx]

Dont allow players who have below 60% wr to play rating

(Cmon someone come in here with 70% next)

[floral dock]

Pshh only 60%? I think you meant to type 100% wr with 5k avg damage

[eternal vigil]

I am just playing ratings to stay away from noobs but it doesnt work too, I cant have fun when a player dies in 15 second in a tier 10 game, ratings shouldnt be open to everyone

[ornate spoke]

called top notch

[floral dock]

I can agree with that, but I dont think the bar should be a rating score. I'd honestly just say that you cant enter ratings if you have chat disabled, and you cant enter ratings if you are below a 40% WR. Because having the bar be a rating score isnt fair for players like me who dont want to deal with the premium spam at tier 8.

[ebon summit]

You know that you have to grind to 4k rating? not everyone get calibrated in 4k league which means u have to play broken t8 prems or either shitty tech tree ones to get up before ur allowed to use t9 and 10..

[floral dock]

God I’m thinking I should just avoid ratings for the first couple hours after it opens, every day teams start out dog poop. All it takes is that 1 guy in 3k among a team of 4-5k players and the games basically lost if that 3k player is truly an idiot.

[covert wind]

Look straight at the sun until u unlock dark vision to win 100% of your ratting battles.

[eternal vigil]

you all getting me wrong here , I understood, I was trying to say that after 4k rating there should not be new players who have just get a tier 10 and jumped to battle to play rating, I mean rating needs to be really rating, it should have some requirements like at least 10k battles, wr above 50, ave dmg , sth like that, I dont wanna play with a 44 wr 3k battle 800 ave dmg player who know nothing about the map and tactics, shooting a 50 hp tank with fv183

[native marten]

because having 10k battles suddenly makes the player all the more skilled
i mean don't get me wrong while they do get more experience if they suck at the game they're just gonna suck at the game, whether they have 2k battles or 12k battles they're probably gonna play at more or less the same skill level

[eternal vigil]

when they have 2k battles ,they would see e100 10 times , but after 10k matches , they would see e100 100 times probably, then they would know how to pen e100, otherwise they ll just look around and try to examine the tanks and map. This game ,in my opinion , is completely a team work game, but if there would be no team work, you would get raped, I ll suggest developers to make a mode which every player would be alone in the game, no wr, no nothing, highest dmg should be the key to victory, by doing that, people might need to make teamwork by their own will, not by force, I dont wanna team up with a newbie, I dont wanna loose the match because of someones fault, or the opposite , I dont want anyone to loose a match because of me

[ebon summit]

not enough players

[covert wind]

If u mean me I was just making a joke lmao

[native marten]

making it based off of damage is MOST DEFINITELY not the way to make a gamemode good, all it does is encourage even less teamplay

I tested it out yesterday (in pubs, yes my stats dropped really hard)
these are my stats from playing extremely selfishly and making it as difficult to win as possible by not HP sharing at all

yes, your damage goes up. but playing PURELY for damage only makes you lose a lot more than you should (which seems like what you're trying to promote, stating that everyone going for damage will cause teamplay as a side product which I can guarantee you is definitely not the case)

and this is just 1 player (me) who's playing as selfishly as possible. now imagine that complete lack of teamwork among 7 people, you'll literally win like none of your matches

basically point of showing the stats is that

going for damage =/= going for the win/playing for the team

[floral dock]

Wow nice mm that game @orchid light y’all had 3 5ks and my team only had me

[orchid light]

Oof ya that kinda sucked

[ebon summit]

yeah keep those retarded out of ratings
i rather get a fair game but wait longer in the queque than that

[floral dock]

Like I honestly don’t even know why this guy plays the game AT ALL. It can’t be fun to win 36% of your games can it? Like are you just a d-bag and like ruining other people’s fun? Like yea it’s a game and your supposed to have fun, but how is it fun doing 0 damage and having a 36% WR?!?!

Speak of the devil, just had him in another game this time on Rockfield and this time in a t22 medium. Guess what he did? He yoloed straight into the enemy! We some how managed to win since he at least distracted everyone if nothing else.

[potent surge]

👀

[orchid light]

Maybe instead of calibration battles just make 3k rating or something the default? And after 20 battles, wherever you are point wise, that is your starting point? If that makes sense.

[warm charm]

You do start at 3k rating in calibration, and in those 10 battles you lose/gain around 3x more rating than you usually do. It just doesn't show, but you can see your rating while in calibration in blitzstars.

[orchid light]

Oh I didn’t know that lol

[eternal vigil]

I told you so 🙂

[topaz isle]

Goollldd

[chrome plinth]

EU top 1.🥰

[midnight lark]

Bad

[floral dock]

Lol by 1 point

[topaz isle]

Woah there's rewards

[supple narwhal]

Is it possible to make Ratings Battles only one tier for one season to test how it does? Such as Ratings only encompassing tier 8 tanks only or tier 9 tanks only.

[ornate spoke]

if they implemented that @supple narwhal it would be tier 10 only. and that's how it should be. Tier 8 is full of premium spamming muppets that dont understand the game yet and spent $10 on a tank

[regal cosmos]

Iirc they did have ratings limited to one tier before

[floral dock]

Lmao ur one to talk about premium spamming in tier 8 👀

Tier 10 is where most the 5k players are, which means queue times are usually shorter. Only downside is that every game is basically the exact same matchmaking with like a 1 or 2 player difference lol.

I mean I know that the top 10 in NA right now are tier 10 mains

[ornate spoke]

i tried tier 10 only yesterday and i liked it better. when i went back to tier 8 there were just nubs everywhere

nah its about 50 50 in terms of the 5k players

[floral dock]

Only people in 5k I’ve never seen are #15, #16 and #18

As I guessed they don’t play tier 10, instead they grind premiums at tier 8

In tier 8 ratings if your not playing a premium tank or an emil 1 your playing wrong

[regal cosmos]

Or a T28

[outer spruce]

or an anihilator

[queen lichen]

Or a smasher

[agile sphinx]

Eh there's quite a few very competitive tech tree tanks at tier 8 like the ru, fv301, P44, T-34-2, isu, JPII, AT15, tiger 2, IS3 and VK100. There are a lot of bad options but there's definitely enough choices to do really well.

[orchid light]

Hell ya, tier X is where the men play B)

[floral dock]

Ratings honestly should be tier 10 only, lets be honest, you shouldnt be playing ratings if you arent confident enough in how you perform in tier 10 vehicles. Nor should you be in ratings if you dont have at least 1 tech tree tier 10.

[queen lichen]

Here’s the thing, at least for me. I am 100% confident with my skills at T10, well actually about 80%, but you get the idea. But for me at least I get a lot more points out of playing something like the Smasher over something like the STB. It’s just because I’m bottom tier and I can still fight really really well without running into top clans left right and center

[ornate spoke]

1 is too low. needs to be like 3 at least. you can have a tier 10 within 500 games

[ebon summit]

see even meh players can get top 1...
Appho gonna get 1# later anyways

[outer spruce]

let's be honest, no one wants to spam t10 in ratings and have an economy worse than USSR

[agile sphinx]

With the added bonus credits you get in ratings, making credits at tier 10 isn't hard...

[potent surge]

I kick premium tanks with my Ru and Rhm lol

[floral dock]

If your playing well you don’t lose creds even on a loss when you have full provisions

And gg @potent surge for becoming #1

[honest dust]

Tell that to basically all the asian tanks.

[potent surge]

Thank you!

[orchid light]

Broo all I want to do is to get my 100 points for the day but wotb won’t open... -_-
Just says my wifi is bad when it obviously isn’t bad

[lime sparrow]

The Asian tanks aren’t even that bad when it comes to credits. The e5 is legitimately less economical than the 113 even if we don’t factor provisions and etc

[native marten]

if you factor in provisions it becomes even worse (even if you run the same exact provisions, the improved engine boost and reactive armor both cost more than normal consumables)

[slim cloud]

40% loss whenever I try to play ratings :/

[velvet ginkgo]

How to play properly in wotb:
Step 1: have brain

[mystic burrow]

people have brain but they dont use it

[velvet ginkgo]

Ironic fact 😔

@ornate spoke what? You get roasted? You offended? Now let me ask you something, **can you play a game-**oh wait not that i mean, can you do anything if you don't have brain? you can't and that's the fact, why you get offended with common fact like that?

[ornate spoke]

good point, and first of all if you're losing cred at tier 10 you probably aren't being useful in battles, and also, ratings should be limited to players with actual credit supply who are actually good at the game. Most bad players don't have a backup credit supply (trust me, I used to be a bad player) and that's why they complain about bleeding credits in tier 10.

[floral dock]

same, yesterday i averaged 2.5k with a 48% wr. tho i was still able to push up 100 points at 5k+

[ornate spoke]

When will WG make rating battles measure skill? In every game I’ve played you’d be rewarded for winning the battle. In blitz there’s some average damage contest with whoever survives, benefits the most. Would be nice if ratings focused on developing skills like teamplay and strategic thinking. Maybe even with some bo3 system, a bit like tournaments so rating is more accurate.

[floral dock]

It's never gonna happen, for coordination like that blitz would need to basically implement a voice chat feature (which won't ever happen lmao). As it is the only true team "gamemode" is tournaments, and it will most likely stay that way forever. It's just how the game currently works. Personally as soon as I realize that the game is basically unwinnable due to conditions out of my control (like idiots pushing the wrong way, camping super heavies etc...) my mind almost immediately shifts to: "What can I do from this point forward in this game to minimize the amount of points I'm going to lose from this battle." (which is usually: preserve my hitpoints and farm damage instead of trying to remove low hp targets). Sure its a selfish way to play and think but what am I supposed to do? Take shots for teammates that don't know how to play the game? Like sure if I know 100% that the person I'm gonna be taking shots for is someone who is competent and knows how to play the game (like someone else in diamond), then yea, I'll take shots for them if they are low and I'll be a team player. But what I'm not gonna do is bleed my hitpoints for some 8 year old with his mommy's credit card.

[floral dock]

Completely agree. I only play tier 10 ratings and even though my winrate for the past few days has been below 50%, I haven't lost credits at all. Yesterday I was able to make 1m credits from a 48% WR while running full provisions. Day before that, I made 870k credits. If you are a good player (which you honestly should be in ratings) you won't be losing credits, quite the opposite. Another thing is, if you are playing ratings you most likely aren't grinding down a line, you are most likely playing ratings to try and get a good rating (or your one of the idiots who are just in ratings for the win 3 mission) and if you aren't grinding a line then you really have no need for credits anyway. If your excuse for not playing tier 10 ratings is because of credits, you most likely shouldn't be in ratings at all.

[ornate spoke]

well said

[ornate spoke]

Well for example league of legends doesn’t have voice chat, yet high and even mid tiers like diamond are so much more coordinated and competitive than in blitz.
Teammates don’t know what to do, because the game doesn’t require them to know that to get higher leagues. No needs = no progress.
For me it’s weird when in the highest league (diamond) the best strategy is all med side and trade. If you don’t go med side you get insulted, though I have chat off anyway.

[floral dock]

LoL is a bad example. The whole matchmaking and everything about LoL is different. LoL as far as I know (and kind remember, yea I used to play LoL) has true SBMM for ranked, it works because there’s a lot more players ofc. Another thing that is extremely different is the skill cap in LoL. LoL is a game that requires a lot more skill and in LoL you are actually encouraged to nurture that skill and improve where as in WoTB it’s quite the opposite. With LoL rating, it’s truly not fun to play if you aren’t good because you just end up getting stomped on by people who are good. You end up spending upwards of 30 minutes per game to have a horrible KDA. Comparing WoTB to LoL is like comparing a house to a penny, horrible comparison that just doesn’t work.

Unlike blitz LoL has 9 different “leagues” if you will, and each of the “leagues” is split into 4 different divisions. For example there’s Gold I, Gold II, Gold III, and gold IV. Also the amount of MMR you go up or down has a factor which looks at the opponents MMR (if your opponents have a higher MMR you will go up more on a win and go down less on a loss where if your opponents have a lower MMR you will go down less on a win and go down more on a loss). Another huge difference is that you don’t just rank up on 1 win, once you get to 100 MMR in your division there’s a series of “promotion games” which are like final trials that are there to prove that you should actually be moving up. Also LoL has requirements that you must meet to enter ratings (your account must be level 30 and you must own 20 or more champions). I personally think that LoL has a great machmaker and proof of that is less than 1% of the total LoL player base is in the top league (which is champion), for perspective there’s over 10 million players in LoL. And of course blitz is a much smaller game with a much smaller player base. I could go further into how LoL rating is so different and how it’s much better but I’ll leave it at that.

[ornate spoke]

if you aren’t good you get stomped should be the case in rating mode anyway
That’s why I’m not happy with current rating system.

[floral dock]

The current rating system won’t change. In order for it to change the player base that plays rating would need to increase exponentially, because of how small the rating base is the matchmaker sucks (I said I’d stop comparing to LoL but LoL just has such a good system.) in LoL if you are in champion per say (if you didn’t read my previous paragraph champion is the highest league) you won’t be matched up against people who are still in iron or silver (iron and silver are the lowest leagues). Where as in WoTB if you are at 10k points (very extreme but it proves my point) you would still be matched up with people below 3k points which honestly shouldn’t be happening, but there’s nothing that Wargaming can do about it (that’s a lie, what Wargaming can do is add things that make more people want to play and do good in ratings).

[native marten]

^he has a point

even in something like chess (or anything with an mmr) you play with people around the same skill level based on mmr/elo (quite literally match making rating)

slogosniper is generally correct in saying that people in higher leagues won't face people in lower leagues, unless it's with the exception that someone in a lower league is playing with a much higher mmr

[floral dock]

But in LoL they have limits on it, you can only party with someone for ratings who is AT MOST 2 (or 1, i cant exactly remember) leagues above you, so a silver can at most only party with a platinum. And as for WoTB you can't even toon in ratings. What's even more is (don't quote me on this but I think this is correct) LoL doesn't award points based on performance in the game, it only awards or deducts points based on a win or a loss. (This part I know is true) It scales the points gained or lossed by an algorithm upon which the matchmaker looks at the player and makes a decision on who is more likely to win. If the matchmaker is right and the person who it said was more likely to win does win, that person will gain less points. And if that person ends up losing in an "upset" that person will go down a hefty amount of points where the person the matchmaker said was more likely to lose will go up a hefty amount of points. And because LoL doesn't award points on performance, it promotes working as a team instead of farming damage or kill stealing to improve your own stats.

[native marten]

it's not so much about if you're duoq or queuing with more people (or in wotb terms platooning)

but basically the matchmaker puts players together based on mmr, not rank (such as silver, gold, plat, etc). so if your mmr is high enough you can have some odd games where you see someone with a much lower rank in a game full of higher ranks even if they aren't duoq (which is how streamers tell if someone is smurfing; if they see someone like, say, silver 3, but the entire game is filled with platinum players, then it's likely the silver 3 is smurfing because their they have a platinum mmr while they keep their lp low through something like dodging)

how this would translate to wotb is like:
lets say if you lose points for leaving during the time when everyone's loading in, your rating points drops, but since mmr remains unaffected, you'll still be playing with the same players, just at lower rating points

but yes, generally speaking you're right :)

[floral dock]

Thanks, its been a while since I played LoL

[wet sonnet]

No hablan español?

[native marten]

I think what you're thinking of above is LP

Good example of this was MagiFelix. Out of the top 10 spots by LP (league points or essentially rating points) on EUW, he held 5 accounts in there, and had an account 300 LP higher than the 2nd place, which really broke the LP system by making it pretty much impossible to climb because of these "upsets" you're mentioning (even at high ranks, 60% win rate is considered pretty good. then people were winning 10 lp on a win and losing 30 on a loss, and even with a 60% win rate you were pretty much constantly going down)

we would only run into that sort of same issue if rating points were given out based on how much other people had, and say #1 spot had over 7k points while 2nd place had like 6.5k, you'd basically only constantly be losing points

[floral dock]

I think I might be confusing LP and MMR

[native marten]

yeah maybe, generally speaking they're tied pretty close together so for the most part you were right lol

it's hard but I think it's possible to make an mmr system for wotb (main thing is games like league have stuff like how well you farm, how well you make picks, take objectives all sorts of stuff) while wotb is just like damage, kills, idk

lp is basically ratings points which is just basically already done

[ruby rune]

Got an tips for playing ratings in it? I feel like the biggest damage magnet when playing it

[potent surge]

Si

[floral dock]

I swear if I lose another game to some 45% brain dead ape

I honestly don’t care how long the queue is, someone in 5.3k SHOULD NOT be in the same game as someone below 3.5k.

[oblique sentinel]

@floral dock
Agree with u

[floral dock]

Ahh I love being called a nub. Yes I’m the nub. That’s why I have 2k more points than you and did double your damage. Holy, people are honestly so dumb.

[floral dock]

I swear teams get 10x worse during the week than they are on the weekends. It makes no sense as well since all the 8 year olds should have school during the week

[copper mauve]

@floral dock worse in the UK as not only are we in lockdown, but also all the kids in school on half term break

[floral dock]

I like how I go down 12 on a loss doing 1k and only go up 7 on a win with 5k dmg

[frosty tundra]

I've only noticed this today after player complained in global chat: Apparently, Platinum battles are being run by clan members of at least 2 or 3 players from the same clan (I'm not complaining but see it interesting that players can time the MM perfectly). Soon after, I took into consideration of the clan tags and realised it was happening more often than not.

[rose path]

Remember when I had my tinfoil hat on at the time I warned about this? Yeeeeeeah

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QxZtqKHEGuo&feature=youtu.be

[floral dock]

That’s due to low player base, since the player base is low it exponentially increases your chance to get into the same game as someone if you hit battle at the same time and are of similar rating. Makes it very easy to rig games from 3k to low 5k

[hazy bronze]

Asking for na rating has getting top 20 or top 40 got less grind now asking because have not played blitz in months?

[rapid pumice]

Tragicomic fact

[inner haven]

H

[sacred verge]

All I want WG to do is to ban 2 tanks from Ratings. Smasher and Annihilator

[iron orbit]

I find action x the most annoying one tbh, I can do well against Anni and smasher if I'm using a heavy tank (I'm op at angling armor that's why) but not action x spamming apcr, they just hull down and wait for you to come, than the machine gun starts (3secondes reload)

[wind light]

@sacred verge just remove all premiums and collectors, they all ruin rating battles

[ornate spoke]

just remove all tier 7 8 and 9 from ratings and make the rewards better. anything not tier 10 is just premium spamming and not skillbased

[floral dock]

I’d rather them ban the t22. The fact you are running into tanks like annhi or smasher most likely says you, yourself are most likely spamming some other premium tank in tier 8 or 7

Wargaming never will though. Wargaming is too greedy. If they banned premium and collector vehicles which are objectively better than tech tree vehicles then their sales would go down, and oh boy, you know Wargaming can’t stand to lose any sales.

[ornate spoke]

Who is Appho? 😕

[midnight lark]

A player in a pretty good clan?

[covert wind]

Search there YouTube

[viscid ravine]

Bruh, that's the cis server smh, and that's a op dude from a good clan. Facepalm

[true ridge]

Tiger II and Emil 1 if they removed prems:

😉 hello there

[rose path]

5months*, nothing special just someone who spams battles 24/7 and my python tool was able to gauge his sleep/play schedule for a while at roughly GMT+3

[potent surge]

Wargaming should fix this mode, 5 minutes looking for a match when 20+ players are looking too? Bruh

[viscid ravine]

Daddy dreadddd, agreed @potent surge

Luv wargaming btw

[orchid light]

The mode needs more of an incentive to play. Only the players that are good and also have a lot of time on their hands can get rewards worth anything. They need to make it so that not only the top 40 get a useful reward.

[potent surge]

It'd be great, a more competitive more would make players train their skills and also get motivated by better rewards.

[latent vault]

Ratings are just awful, i got 10 camos that were in Diamond leagus, and now they are platinum... im not wasting my time on this

[sacred verge]

@floral dock I want Diamond L camo for Emil I. So that's why I'm spamming tier 8.

[floral dock]

I've gotten 12 minute queues just to get into a game and get absolutely screwed over by some guy camping in an e100 or some med that just yolos. If you're gonna give me bad teams matchmaker, at least don't make me wait 12 fricken minutes to give me them.

[potent surge]

But Diamond camo is pretty good

[latent vault]

Ye but, all the sweat for previous diamond camos... now they are irrelevant @potent surge

[potent surge]

Well, that's true, but In my opinion previous camos weren't as good as the current one (Diamond)

[frank widget]

Appho is the guy who always get 1st in rating at the end of the month

[ruby rune]

What is the most points you've gotten from a loss this season? I got 25 today but i feel like i've done a few points better in another game

[frank widget]

My record is 23

[ornate spoke]

all rewards are for diamond other give usless camos and others junks !! usless lose time for no reward !! and spend gold ammo - use my team for spoting is no my way to play !!

[worldly anvil]

git gud

[ornate spoke]

same idiots as in random but more on head without brain ! and worst are no callibrate - they drawn you down !! always platinum and circle - hate circle when i was >>flankers (nobs) + pro followers and is over

[worldly anvil]

could you repeat that please, i didnt understand

[native marten]

something about people who flank being noobs

[limber ermine]

I’m getting like 5 minute quenus for a game only for it to litterly be the exact team from last game.

[viscid ravine]

@worldly anvil yeah Adam, I didn't understand a single word he said lmao

[worldly anvil]

he sounds like the average blitz player

[viscid ravine]

Fax tho

[modest ember]

XD

[ruby rune]

I'm gain points faster with my Emil I only getting 47% for some reason and in the 252u I'm +60% but gaining points slower

[glossy raptor]

@ripe belfry Just because u sent it everywhere

[covert wind]

@ripe belfry

[potent surge]

@floral dock what happened to u, u were in the 2nd place

[floral dock]

yea i dont wanna talk about it, went up to 5550 decently quick and then i just lost like every battle until i dropped to 5450. 21 wins yesterday with 60 games played averaging 2.2k damage. gonna see if teams are better today and try to get to 5600

The saddest thing is, I can guess the outcome of a game after the first 30 some seconds and be correct about it 80% of the time. I think yesterday the team I was on had some sort of disadvantage more than 60% of the time, wether it be my team having less average points, to my team having less meds/lights on maps that are heavily dependent on them, and even games where I’ve had both

[floral dock]

If I don’t push to 5600 today I’m most likely gonna fall out of top 5 :/

[copper mauve]

@wicked kettle cover the names

[wicked kettle]

@copper mauve Why?

[copper mauve]

@wicked kettle name and shame= bad

[floral dock]

It’s bad, but ngl some people really deserve to be named and shamed

[regal cosmos]

... to the customer support team who can actually ban them if needed rather than players who can’t ban them

[potent surge]

Yeah, it's easy to know when battle starts if you're gonna get a defeat

[floral dock]

Think I can stay in top 5 with only 50 points a day?

[floral dock]

Coincidence? I think not. Column B is my teams avg points, column C is enemy teams avg points, column D is the outcome of the game, and column E is what my guess was for the outcome of the game (Green means I got it right, red means I got it wrong).

[wind whale]

Any plans about reworking this stupid thing?

[orchid light]

Lmao I’m scared I haven’t lost once yet today... I’m scared that my losing streak is coming

And Lulu, it’s working fine you only lost 5 points

[floral dock]

System does need a rework. From my ss above, out of 18 games my team had the disadvantage on average rating 13 of the games. And well yea, some of the differences were small like only 50 points or so, most of them were differences of over 100

[willow hemlock]

um idk

[frank widget]

I dont understand why you lose points if you have biggest damage from both teams when losing, they should make it so you lose nothing if you are the best of both teams

[native marten]

Honestly they should just lose points on a loss (because the point of the game is to win) or at the very most just make it so you don’t drop points

[regal cosmos]

Top player in the whole battle and top player in just the losing team seems the same to me for such an answer. Players still prioritize damage points over the win

[frank widget]

What i said and what that question says are two completely different things

[regal cosmos]

I might be wrong but if you do sufficient damage you already get points instead of losing them for a loss. So if you somehow have more damage than the top player on winning team you can lose very little or even gain a small amount. But if you’ve done only just a little more than the enemy team that shouldn’t just give you points like you won that battle

[muted shuttle]

@frank widget If you are the top player on losing team, you already lose very small amount compared to other team members. I think that is actually fair.

[frank widget]

Yeah it really doesnt make that big of a difference

[muted shuttle]

If keep losing many games in a row, while still being the top player, you will lose small amount of points, something like other team mates lose in one game only. And being top player has to bring you victories in the long run.

[ruby rune]

I got 25 points for losing with 4k dmg on the emil I

[wind whale]

It has to be a balance. Being top 1 damage, ok. Doing more damage than all my team combined is totally different and really far from just being top 1

[regal cosmos]

If you do enough damage you get points already. It isnt hard to gain points. Some others have already shown that you can get points from simply spamming battles. And as End said above, if youre that good, you get enough wins and enough points already.

[lucid lily]

I got 4k rating points now, how to get reward?

[wind whale]

Check my printscreen above

[regal cosmos]

Good damage but thats not massive enough. Even if you get very high damage, a loss is a loss. Ribble already said that their intention is for ratings to be about wins not about damage

[floral dock]

I wonder how many points you would go up if you did 14k damage with 7 kills and 7 spots

[regal cosmos]

Depends on the rating too. Higher rating gains less

[small token]

Shouldnt ratings put you with players with simillar ratings (like +300 -300) and not get 1 bronze, 2 silvers, 2 gold, and 2 platinum on each team?

[agile sphinx]

As far as we know there's no rule for that in the matchmaker, it just looks to get the average rating to be very close together. It would be better if you were only put with people within ±1k points or less but it just makes queue times much much much longer especially at the top. Finding 13 other people between 5k and 7k rating, at the same tier at the same time if day with it possible to balance the average rating while keeping in line with having teams with similar compositions, is almost impossible

[regal cosmos]

There was a rule at the start of ratings, but I think they might’ve removed it because of small queues, or it may still be there but only for when the queues are big enough. WG would have to encourage more people to play ratings, to get rules like those to work

[muted shuttle]

@wind whale That was one game. If you are that good and consistent over time I'm pretty sure you'll have no issues gaining points

[floral dock]

It should be +- 1 league, not a set amount of points. So for example someone in diamond no matter how high in diamond can only face 4K+

[sonic sedge]

The system needs reworking to bring it into the 21st century, if you top scored out of both teams YOUR points shouldn’t drop just because the rest of your team capitulated or there was an afk which will also affect results! The scoring system is flawed !
But hey, for some reason WG doesn’t want to make it fair for all, it’s like being in school,if one or two people (players) are bad then the whole class (team) gets punished regardless! This as you can see is draconian!

[queen lichen]

:0 stevo is here

[floral dock]

I can agree with that, but implementing an algorithm that decides wether the loss is because you had an afk or bad teammates would be hard. It would honestly be at the point of needing an AI that is constantly monitoring the current game meta for certain maps on certain regions and determining if someone called out a certain direction in the chat. It would be super nice if something like that was implemented so that those of us who do well and play well aren’t punished by having 45% yoloers on the team. One thing the matchmaker could do, is that if the team has a player who did 0 damage then the people who did do something during the game lose less points than normal, and if some how the team wins with someone doing 0 damage then the other players are rewarded with more points than normal. I personally feel that if you do 0 damage from shooting someone (basically so that if someone rams you when your afk it doesn’t count) then you should lose points regardless of the outcome.

[agile sphinx]

I have repeated this so many times I give up. If you want to understand why go look at my message history here. If you can go up points on a loss you need to be able to go down points on a win. If you lose then you lose, you didn't do enough. The easier you make it to gain points, the more you focus rating on battle spamming rather than actual skill, and that is definitely the wrong way to go.

[floral dock]

Thing is, in my post I said that you should be going down points on a win if you do 0 damage

[orchid light]

A player by the name of Alphablitzer on the NA server is purposely AFKing and has stated this in chat. Beware

And before some says don’t name and shame, WG rules don’t protect players who break the rules. In this case, Alphablitzer has broken the rules.

[queen lichen]

Then go report it to WG with replays

[slim cloud]

30% wr in ratings today dosnt matter how good I do :/

[sleek sun]

After 3 days of nolifing

[dark ferry]

This things should be ban https://prnt.sc/102shk8

[midnight lark]

In rating?

[regal cosmos]

Yeah has to be. Queues are too big in regular queue to get this

[sturdy needle]

As long as they are not rigging the match (i.e letting one player farm damage while the rest sit back), it won't bring up a red flag. However, I do agree that counting down in ratings should be prohibited.

[orchid light]

How would you be able to know who is counting down and when it is just chance? I’ve been accused many times of doing countdowns but I’ve never done one in ratings

[ornate spoke]

Idk what is the chance for 5 of the same clan to randomly be on the same team?

[agile sphinx]

I don't think I've ever met four clanmates in battle but three I definitely have by chance, and not many people play ratings especially not when I play. If you have a big clan that's active in ratings then 4 or 5 or maybe even more is possible. It's also more than possible to rig ratings with people outside the clan as well.

[floral dock]

Apart from the fact of all the same clan, the matchmaking of just what tanks are there is very messed up too... double e100, double kran, and double prog, seems fair to me

[brave night]

Hmm

[midnight lark]

@quasi moon uhhmm you don't play fair? Is this a mod?
*Edit you played also bad

[floral dock]

First off, it’s not a mod. He just took a screenshot of the wn8s on blitz stars then cropped them and put them next to people’s names. For the top bar he just put the numbers in a calculator and then made a colored text box and put them there. Secondly, ratings battles doesn’t look at anything other than the players rating score. It doesn’t care what your winrate is or your average damage. Though that really sucks, they have a higher average rating points and a much higher average wn8. Yes, you didn’t play the best but in a 7:0 stomp like that you usually don’t perform too well as your team falls apart quickly and you are unable to get many shots out.

[covert wind]

All u see here are bad games. I think from now on I will post one average game per day on this server to try and fight the selection Bias.

[floral dock]

Next rating season I might make a comprehensive list of 100 or so games which details specifics like, how many 5k players a team has, how many under 3.5k players a team has, team composition (who has more meds/lights, heavies, and TDs), the map the game was played on, how many kills each team got, how much damage each team did, anyone doing under 1k damage, etc

[agile sphinx]

This is how it is balanced 🤦‍♀️
And it may have been a fast game but three shots of damage is plenty easy enough unless you make big mistakes early on...

[quasi moon]

1. Its not mode. Made in Photoshop.
2. Map: Fort Despair. Whole team rush C except IS-7 which was afking on the spawn half time of the battle.
3. Yeah. I had so much chances to face rush of 2 medium tanks + light
4. If i would do the same as IS-7 and even dont move from the spawn i would have more dmg so yeah youre right. Sorry i tried to use my brain.

[agile sphinx]

I mean if you are planning on taking on a Vickers, STB and E50M solo because you aren't looking at your minimap and team then there's your first problem...

[quasi moon]

No. The point is that there was no way to do something. Whole team on C, just stay and waiting them to flank us....

[quasi moon]

Hard to do someting when your team is squeezed into 30 m². Anyway sorry i didnt keep replay.

1. Push AMX and VK
2. Flank AMX and VK towards to Ho ri covered by Super Conq
3. Rotate ahead to 3 flanking meds
4. Camp with IS-7 on the spawn and shoot flanking meds during they killing whole team in C

[floral dock]

You're honestly being too critical about it. It's clear that his team was considerably worse than the enemy team. Putting wn8 aside, his team still had a 100 point deficit and not to mention the enemy team had 3 meds/lights while his team only had 2. You need to realize that the matchmaker isnt perfect (far from it) and that there are games that are basically unwinnable just based off of the teams.

[orchid light]

Anyone have an idea of what the next ratings tank will be? Personally I hope it’s a completely new tank that is exclusive to ratings for like a year. If that’s not possible then maybe take another tank and give it the “Fearless” camo

[floral dock]

I personally want it to be the Object 260 that’s currently being tested, but it won’t happen since you know how Wargaming loves every opportunity to make a quick buck off crates. It would be nice if they didn’t just take an already existing tank and just reskin it, and it would be even better if the tank was at a tier that actually means something (tier 10).

[regal cosmos]

Ratings doesn’t have a minimum requirement

[desert valley]

Explain to me why you were in the same battle as him then

[keen moon]

CarryMeMorePlz [VIBES] cz#0948 has been warned.

[desert valley]

Oop I guess the message was deleted cos he showed a player’s username

[slim cloud]

How many days left on this ratings season?

[daring loom]

Well it ends on March the 1st

[scenic torrent]

Im god

[agile sphinx]

@floral dock I've had games with me and three other superunis who were from top 16 clans that have been lost against just average players. It's possible to win any game. 100 points is nothing, and the reds had a calibrating player as well iirc. Amount of meds/lights just changes how you play, it doesn't give you a specific advantage or disadvantage. The matchmaker is fine apart from the range of ratings it looks at to get a team, and that can't be changed with the current playerbase. Either way, 600 damage means he was part of the problem...

@quasi moon Hard yes, impossible no. You could have gone C and helped to try and win that quicker. But instead you played predictably and made mistakes positioning so you were an easy kill. Your IS7 may have been an easy kill too, as well as the rest of your team, but that sure doesn't make you some high and mighty person who can complain about others when you played just as badly.

[untold violet]

Rating ends on march 1st? Time to nolife even more. Almost 4.4k (started at 3.3k)

[stuck vortex]

5k is ez

[daring loom]

It just depends on how much free time you have

[stuck vortex]

i did it in 3 days lol

[floral dock]

i dont get why people still play ratings for the top 5 if they already have the fearless :/

[copper mauve]

gold

[floral dock]

Oh wow! 5k gold if you get #1. Thing is, most of the people who take the top spots aren't free to plays lmao. 5k gold for a months worth of ratings, totally worth it.

[lime sparrow]

5k gold is 5k gold
if u can get top ez, u must be a bum to not get a free 5k gold

[ornate spoke]

most people aren’t f2p

[regal cosmos]

Blitz being a free game would have more f2p players

[wind light]

it just make no sence so much bots do 0 dmg this cant be real people

[agile sphinx]

Getting to the top isn't easy at all (time wise) and the rewards are laughable when you look at how many battles you have to play. EUs first place currently has 500 battles which will probably get to 750+ by the end of the season. A very conservative 500 battles at 3 minutes average is 25 hours ignoring all queue times, which works out to be about 52€ on Bulgaria's minimum wage which is one of the lowest in the EU, which works out as about enough to buy the 17500 gold bundle, which is 3.5x as much as the reward for first place...

[red igloo]

hmm 268 isnt OP, also, id say play tier 8 if you have defender mk1, action X or emil

[late mural]

These loss streaks happen so often it's just ridiculous.

Can't win in even the most OP tank. Suuuuuurely not rigged - HA HA HA.

[ornate spoke]

I wouldn’t want a tier X for top 5 in ratings tbh, and if they ever did it would be a most likely a horrible tank, @regal cosmos I honestly don’t see what’s wrong with reskin prems, it’s not that bad if anything it’s rather nice.

[regal cosmos]

Would’ve been nicer if the tank isn’t a reskin of an existing premium

[agile sphinx]

Don't be afraid to show the xp or we'll just have to guess from the -30 or so points that you aren't using your tank to its full extent 👀

[blazing prawn]

hm 🧐

[floral dock]

maybe its because you are spamming an op tank? maybe matchmaker knows you are spamming a broken tank and it wants you to lose?

[untold violet]

AFK should lose at least 100 pts and be banned for 5min. Ruining ratings

[untold axle]

ranked = 2 emil at least, 1 or 2 progetto, obj 252u, annihilator, i've seen 4 per game (not a big problem when playing rating t8, who plays t7 in ranked ?), that's what u get in almost everygame of ranked, and sadly u must play one of them if u want to be competitive

[orchid light]

Then play tier X. It’s better balanced.

@floral dock unfortunately I won’t be able to catch you today, I probably won’t be able to play today.... tomorrow maybe 😛

[floral dock]

You won’t be able to catch me, but the real question is will I end up catching you... (me ending up losing and going down points)

It happened to me like 4 days ago, pushed from 5500 to 5550 then ended up falling to 5450 in the same day... I only want to push 50 points a day, but I fear that won’t be enough to stay top 5. The top right now is very close together :/

[orchid light]

Lmao that’d be sad

[wind light]

pure blitz?

[last axle]

Oof

[late mural]

If WG wants to give an impression that the matchmaker in ratings is rigged, they are succeeding very well indeed. These insane loss/win streaks are happening much more often than anyone could expect in a system that converges to a 50% winrate.

After my 10 battle loss streak in the afternoon, I managed to gain over 550 points in about 30-40 battles. Certainly did not play any better myself, but my teammates did.

Like someone flipping a switch in the MM engine room.

[severe finch]

@wind light i can fell that big pain in my heart

[white spruce]

Loss streaks do happen an unbelievable amount compared to randoms...

[snow rock]

It’s not rigged lmao🤡. It sorts players so that the total team rating is equal to the other teams rating

[snow surge]

Yes, but the problem is rating isn't how good a person is.

80% is a good way to represent how 1-sided ratings are.

80% of the time, the final score is a 7-2 or 7-1, or vice versa.
80% of the time, you have at least 3 wins or losses in a row(winstreak losstreak) and only 20% off and on winning.

The point is, is that good and bad players aren't spread proportionately(3 unicum, 2 average, 2 noob) on both sides, with 6 unicum, 4 average, and 4 noob. This rough team layout is what happens about; say, 20% of the time.

And this, here is what happens in rating battles 80% of the time. Taking the same amount of skill-based players(6 uni, 4 average, 4 newbie with a total of 14), we can represent what teams more commonly look like. For our winning team, we have 5 unicum, 1 average, and 1 noob. And the losing team will get 1 unicum(screaming his head off at the end of the battle, remember him?), 3 average, and 3 noobs.

Ratings don't = Good players

[warm nacelle]

ok

[floral dock]

The main problem with ratings is in deed the teams. I’m actually averaging higher damage in ratings than I am in regular yet my winrate in ratings is currently struggling to be 50% where as my 30 day winrate in regular is at 60%. What seems to happen is you end up going against better players but your own team isn’t scaling with that and the people on your team are just worse than the people on the enemy team.

[heady merlin]

question regarding rating battles... What is the minimum rating to be considered 'good'

[quasi trellis]

just me talking about my opinion on ratings and what I like about it For me rating battles are kinda weird, I get on and have a loss streak of 3-10 games then get off and come back later then win like 6-15 games. I’ve also just recently started playing ratings cuz before I did I never thought i’d ever be able to make it that far up, but turns out im in the top 3 😳 surprisingly. I enjoy ratings more than regular because most teams will actually listen to where I tell them to go although most already know exactly where to go not always and I get lots more respect in this gamemode. I happen to win more battles in ratings when people do listen to me. I’m also curious why people play ratings other than just to get the IS-6 fearless? I am personally trying to stay in the top 3 for the gold and + everything else🌚 what about you guys?

[floral dock]

Honestly at high rating games the win or the loss just comes down to which team has more players that are worse. In almost all my matches it doesn’t really matter how well I personally perform as I’m winning games with like 1.6k damage and losing games with 5k+ damage. It seems that winning and losing are much more team dependent, as in rating just having 1 person who ignores the team and goes the wrong way or just 1 person who gets nuked straight off the bat basically makes the game unwinnable unless the enemy team also has that 1 guy who’s not too smart. Where as in regular battles you can still win some games that are like that. I also find that in rating there are a lot more 7:0, 7:1, and 7:2 outcomes where 1 team just gets steam rolled and because of that it doesn’t matter what you as an individual do as your team just sucks. In games where the out come is a steam roll the fact you did low damage doesn’t really matter because even if you did 3k damage you still wouldn’t win a game that was a 7:0 outcome. I feel the matchmaker needs to do a better job in creating games that are actually close in the end and therefore fun. I don’t mind losing a game when it was a close battle where the end result was 7:5 or 7:6, but when the result is just an absolute steam roll, A: it’s not fun winning those games because the enemy team didn’t put up a fight, B: it’s not fun losing those games because there’s nothing you could have done to change the outcome. I enjoy it when I lose a game and reflect on it and think if I had just done that or just done this then maybe my team could have won because at least then I’m improving as a player, but when my team gets steam rolled there’s nothing to learn from that battle and improve on. Yes it’s a team game but I feel that there are currently too many players who aren’t playing rating battles too achieve a high rating and too many players who just troll in ratings because ratings doesn’t effect your stats.

I personally feel that once you reach 5k it becomes less of who’s better and more of who ends up getting better teammates because honestly the people in the top all play very similarly and obviously know how to play the game but beyond that it becomes up to the players team to do more than 0 damage. And it doesn’t matter how good you are, when you are up against other good players and you have 2 people on your team who do 0 damage, you really can’t win the game. As if your opponents are good (which they should be if you are in a high rating) they will realize that they have already cleared 2 of your tanks and know they now have the advantage and can basically just push and you really aren’t gonna win a 5 on 7.

[quasi trellis]

100% agree

[worldly anvil]

ngl you’re just wasting time typing all that
its not going to change anything, unless it helped you let off steam

[slim cloud]

I lost 150 points goodbye getting to diamond

[lime sparrow]

u have 5 days dingus
just gain 30 a day

[snow surge]

Erm...a good rating would be 3000+ and great would be 4000+

[slim cloud]

Why do I breathe

[agile sphinx]

Aaaaaaaaannnddd how many calibrating players were there?

[slim cloud]

1 in one and 3 in another

[solemn niche]

Fix this rankeds animals are out from zoo and cant play

[fathom python]

rip

[dusty kelp]

Lol

[slender kelp]

only when I play rating someone just go to die

[floral dock]

So we have 1 med yoloing, 1 med in town with heavies, and 1 light camping, seems like a 10/10 team to me

[ornate spoke]

Nice

[agile sphinx]

The light is in a better position than the player in that screenshot lol

They have actually noticed that the team has mostly gone to the far side of the city and is staying passive in a position where they can spot without exposing, and have a nice covered route to safety if the reds are spotted there. The player is being very agressive on a flank with next to no support for no apparent reason, and any retreat from that position would be exposed to shots under the bridge and then in the open over the top, as well as it being much further forwards and so it's much less likely you'd be able to reset your camo for moving between sector 8 and 9...

[rose path]

Wonder if colour minimap mod still works

[floral dock]

Considering the location of the 1 yoloing med, I think the player could easily run without getting shot at all if they ran before the yoloer died

[ornate spoke]

Appho 4 times 1. Place how

[regal cosmos]

spam battles

[agile sphinx]

Unless he stays totally passive and doesn't shoot the next focus is going to be straight onto him and the reds will know they are in a 7v6 so will be much more likely to be agressive. It's possible to get away without being shot but you would have to run basically immediately and sacrifice anything useful you could have done there so you have just wasted a minute or more of the game

[floral dock]

Considering you also have the 1 heavy thats further back than the TD on their team, I don't think their team as a whole was that great. Looking at the location of the enemy team they already have a much better positioning even if you disregard the fact someone is yoloing. The only person who is in an odd spot is the 1 medium who is to the right of the spotted TD. The game looks like it would have been hard to win even if that 1 med didn't yolo. Just from the map positioning I'm almost certain the enemy team was just straight up better than that guys team, maybe they could have won if they capped the base and forced the enemy team to start playing recklessly to reset cap?

[agile sphinx]

Nah city is viable unless you overextend on the opposite side like the player did there. The light is probably extending too much as well and should be closer to the city to be more useful but because it's a light it can rotate just about well enough. You have the TD who can hit the reds as they push across the open and then the rest of the team who can hold in the middle and push round whichever flank was less focused on by the reds and get them in awkward positions. It's pretty hard to push into the city from the side the reds are on and so it tends to force people into further back positions which can be cross fired from the spawns. It's definitely winnable in a 7v7 and in a 6v7 I wouldn't discount that team at all especially if the light farmed well and rotated at the right time

[floral dock]

Depending on the tanks pushing into city from med side is great, you get so many hull down positions for pushing to city wether it be the center bridge or off to the side. If you have great hull down tanks you can really slap

[ornate spoke]

Lowkey trying to keep top 20, but I keep playing because I feel like people are gonna throw me below 😂

[floral dock]

5400+ should be pretty safe for guaranteed top 20

[agile sphinx]

There's hulldown positions for holding but pushing means exposing through the river normally which is pretty open. If you are in the city then you don't have to expose because you have most of the map control and can crossfire from spawns which you mostly control, and so you can just wait for the reds to try and push

@ebon summit Considering that everyone here is just a player or PR, your best bet is through support where you are actually meant to report things.

[glossy raptor]

Its pure fact tho

[cursive geyser]

Does anyone got diamond camo on 50b, send the picture here if possible

[keen moon]

LowFade#7050 was muted

[quasi moon]

Definately not rigged...

[lime sparrow]

countdowns!

[queen socket]

Yep definitely not rigged. Nothing wrong there

[lime sparrow]

so how do u prove they were rigging 😏

[queen socket]

If they fought regularly then its fine

[next gull]

@heady merlin tell us what you think 'good' is, we can answer you.
Basically, the median rating is around 2900.
You will find below the distribution of rating relative to the player base. Pick your limit

[heady merlin]

I woulda thought good is around a gold rating..

[snow rock]

A good rating is like 4K +

[next gull]

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/485151244105809930/770700825042354246/h3MWETp.png

[mental kiln]

@rose path in the official server? UWU

[rose path]

Oh yes, more graphs and tangible statistics

[snow rock]

@next gull that’s the average not what is deemed good

[next gull]

😜 🤓
Good can be a personnal view @snow rock
Some are happy to be better than half the playerbase, some feel they need to be in the top 10. ¯_(ツ)_/¯

[snow rock]

2900 it’s like doing 1000 dmg a game and losing 80%of 10 games calibration. If that what players deem good then I’m 💀

[rapid pumice]

Imagine still think that mm is riggered in 2021 pffffft

[next gull]

This was the distribution at the end of the season. Obviously some only calibrated, some played 1k games. Difficult to compare.
Still, this is the state of the ranking. This is a game, every one has his own objectives.

Funny enough, object3 has a rating below 4k. Do we think he is a bad player ? (hope this is not seen as naming and shaming).

[quasi moon]

Yeah. Because playing discord countdown and revealing allies position is not rigging

[snow rock]

@next gull no comp player thinks ratings determine your skill. The more u play the more ur rating climbs it’s just about who plays the most in the end

[ornate spoke]

4000 pretty easy to get to. 3000 is mediocre, 4k is average, 5k means you played a good number of games

[rose path]

@next gull You able to do a more statistically sound/refined version of the stats that are posted in #devs-answers ?

[next gull]

@rose path nah, and Jylpah is doing it so well and with a large database on blitzanalysiz.com that it would be pointless for me to try it.

[final oyster]

So can anyone answer how this action x got this high of point total in a rating battle....does xp boosters help in rating battles? Please ping me when you answer

[native marten]

last calibration battle probably

and no, xp boosters don't from what I know

[final oyster]

Thanks. May be right

[finite dagger]

yeah!yeah!yeah!

[slim cloud]

30% wr in ratings across the last week for me
why
why
why
Somehow I’m still at the same score
Can’t get to diamond though

[ornate spoke]

I dunno, I kept losing in teir 8 ratings, seems like bitz dosent let you win after you win too many ratings

[floral dock]

when ever you go on a winning streak, its a bad sign. winning streaks = even larger losing streaks if you dont stop

[crisp fable]

going on a lose streak is also bad for your mental health

[quasi trellis]

anyone else just see the timer for rating battles to begin jump like 4 more hours?

[honest dust]

Nice, rating battles are skill based matchmaking. Then how is it possible i have a 4k rating and get Matched with 2500 rating players that yolo into the enemy and get killed in 30 seconds? How am i supposed to carry a Team if it consists of 3 decent players and only noobs otherwise? WG pls Do something about ratings. Its supposed to be PVP for the best players and somehow i see some many 40%ers that use ratings to Grind their tank or credits in Premiums. Ratings should Not give XP or credits but seasonal coins that players can exchange for cosmetic items or Mark of excellences etc and NOT to be abused for noobs to Grind the game. You also have to rework the point System as it is simply unfair for the losing Team. Even if i Do 80% of my teams damage i lose 20 points if the Match only lasts 2.5 Minutes. The points attributed should be rewarded for the relative position in the team XP, Not based on Overall XP

[queen socket]

I do agree with most besides xp and credit removal. If the games are going to add battles we should be able to have xp because its basically a regular battle with point base. Also the reason why your getting placed with players not your skill level is because of no one playing ratings. I'm sure if more played mm would be much better. And tbf if you do top damage or over 2k you should automatically get no point reduction and add points.

[honest dust]

Why? You Do ratings for He rating points and the rewards you get for the rating you have. Im just sick of people absuing ratings to Grind XP and credits only bc it doenst affect their winrate. That is Not how it should work. I would also remove tier7 from ratings as the most broken tanks are tier 7s.

[ornate spoke]

If you think the enemy bottom tier tanks make you lose, you know.. maybe ratings isn't where you belong.
Sidenote, ratings is just a damage farm simulator. If you're top2 in your team, you're getting 3-4 times the points for a win than what you lose in a loss.

[floral dock]

I completely agree, I agree that xp should be removed, however with credits I think it should be a set amount no matter what tank your in or what consumables you use. For credits it should be like if you win the battle, it doesn’t matter if you’re in a premium or tech tank, you only gain like 10k creds (10k after repairs, restocking provisions, restocking ammo, restocking consumables, and restocking camos) and if you lose the battle then no matter what you end up losing like 10k credits. XP I feel should be completely removed other than crew XP for further training crew skills. And you think it’s bad that you’re being matched with 2k players in 4k? Try being matched with 2k players at 5.7k. I also agree though that the points you gain or lose should better reflect how you did compared to others on your team. The problem with 40%ers won’t ever be fixed unless Wargaming implements a winrate requirement to queue for ratings which they won’t do.

Also @queen socket 2k damage is too low of a bar for automatic no points lost. It should be at 3.5k minimum. When you do damage at like 4.5k but still end up going down points (even if not many), that’s when you shouldn’t be losing points but not necessarily gaining any points. I personally think that you shouldn’t be able to go up points on a loss and at best you should only be able to not go down any points.

[floral dock]

Honestly all tiers should be removed except tier 10. Let’s be honest, I’ve said this before and I’ll say it again. You shouldn’t be playing ratings if, A: You don’t have at least 1 non premium/non collector tier 10, and B: If you aren’t confident enough in your performance and skill at tier 10. What would be even better is if ratings became tier 10 only with ALL premium and collector tanks banned.

[honest dust]

Then it would just be is4s and e5s, matchmaking would take forever and it would be boring.

[floral dock]

Tier 10 is actually quite diverse, at least on NA. Yes there are a good number of e5s and is4s but I honestly see a lot of different tanks. I’ve never had a game where a team has had more than 2 of a specific tank (don’t know if that’s something that matchmaker does or what) but not everyone spams e5s or is4s. I honestly see more t22s than e5s or is4s which is the real problem. I’d rather see any tech tree vehicle spam over premium tank spam because at least then it’s who plays the tank better instead of who has the better tank.

[honest dust]

Who said i think that? I would remove them to concentrate the remaining players in the higher Tiers. If you first Grind tier 7 you are defo Not ready to play ratings, so why include it in the first place?
Also i think if you Do 80% of Team damage but cannot Do more bc the team just Fell apart after one Minute you should Not Lose points, no matter what your damage is.

[floral dock]

The thing is, there’s currently A LOT that could be, and should be done to improve ratings. Honestly enough to write a whole English Essay on. The only thing is, Wargaming doesn’t give 2 flying fricks about the Rating gamemode. If Wargaming did care about Rating then they would have actually done things to get more players into rating and then improve the rating matchmaker a long time ago.

[quasi trellis]

honestly I think the lower tiers are fine but one way WG can prevent newer players who know nothing about the game that come into ratings thinking its just another fun gamemode is just make it to where you must have a certain amount of battles in regular in order to participate in ratings i’d say maybe 8k-15k or maybe make it to where an account must be at least a year old unless the stats on the account are unicum or above? cuz that would obviously mean the person is a skilled player and im sure no beginner would come into this game and win the first battle then just straight up spend money on a tier 7-10 tank when not even knowing if it is worth spending money on then again im unsure and this may not be the best solution

[native marten]

Unicum is technically 2450 WN8, which isn't developed by WG (calculation for WN8)

[sonic sedge]

Totally agree, I’ve been banging on about the rubbish points scoring system for nearly as long as ratings was a thing,but WG won’t do anything about it.
Why? Perhaps they like being in control of what & how much players win. Currently ratings is just the same as normal encounter battles in disguise.

[winged orchid]

have you seen anyone with <1999 rating?

I think it is impossible to get to under 2k

[daring loom]

I feel like I have

[queen socket]

I've seen 900 and 1,2k

[normal garnet]

I’ve seen a 0 rating player, was some 20%er troll so

[floral dock]

If I ever saw someone under 2k rating I would lose it. It's bad enough that I'm at 5.7k+ and I still get people in 2-3k, but less than 2k? That would be shameful on Wargaming's matchmaker.

To get under 2k from calli, you would legit need to try and make your team lose. Like do more than just yolo into the enemy team. You would need to actively troll your team by blocking them and pushing them out into the open. Which I wouldn't recommend as you will probably get a few people making some tickets on you

[winged orchid]

i want to do some testing, if it is possible to get under 2k straight from those first 10/10

[snow rock]

@winged orchid it’s ez just wait for the red to get spotted by teammates then rush to them and let them kill u. By doing this u have gained 0 exp

[next gull]

@winged orchid I have seen players at 1k actually
Ok screenshot without names are banned now. Weird, no need to scroll up far to see screenshots with names.

[floral dock]

wanna cover the names buddy?

[keen moon]

kr0p#5164 has been warned.

[ornate spoke]

on your wish

what happened,why?

[ornate spoke]

Dude we all know there are bad players. You don't need to post a picture of every one that you find

[next gull]

There was a (rethorical) question about being impossible to be below 2k. I was wondering myself if below 1k was possible.
In this thread we mostly know that there are good players : it is good to remember that average rating does not start at 4k.

[tall berry]

@normal garnet hey pro bro whats your rating

[haughty gale]

@next gull what was ur highest rank

[normal garnet]

@tall berry hey pro bro my rating is 3786

[ornate spoke]

And where is this channel,please?
Just fed up to play 90% of battles in the lowest tier, spend gold ammo for nothing and being insulted. No more money from me till it changes...

[agile sphinx]

Play tier 10 and then you are never bottom tier 🤷‍♀️

[glossy raptor]

No need for such channel since it gives you nothing but wasted time of writing

[pallid arch]

all tier 10 match

[undone pulsar]

You can create your own server and complain by yourself on it!

[covert wind]

Hey,
I have noticed that to so I asked myself what the aim of any game is. I soon came to realize that the reason is to be profitable and to have fun with it. Since WoTB sure is profitable the only thing left is having fun. If u don't have fun feel free to delete the game and search your luck elsewhere.

TLDR; we don't wanna hear u cry

[fathom briar]

there will always be people complaining about and blaming matchmaking no matter what they do to it

[next gull]

@haughty gale dunno really. Like 4.2k . Happy you are interested in knowing.

[haughty gale]

@next gull still better than mine. My highest was 3.6k

[floral dock]

I honestly don’t get why the gold avatar is a thing lol. Why would anyone want to advertise the fact they couldn’t even manage to reach 4K rating... people reach 4K off calibration lol

[heavy sierra]

ratings games shouldnt count to overall played games stats.. its confusing, fun mode games dont count but ratings do?!? at least it shows wrong stats, i did round 3k battles in ratings without effecting my wr, average damage, etc. dont make any sense to me.. all games which have no effect on stats should not be counted or all should count.. would be nice 🤓

[round furnace]

modern problems require modern solutions, iraik genius 👏

[iron orbit]

From gold rating to bronze! Why are these teams so bad!?!

[glossy raptor]

Getting to bronze seems more like its on u, not the teams

[iron orbit]

I didn't reach it yet but I'm close
And no it's not my fault that half teams die in 40 secondes+ I'm doing top damage everytime

[wind light]

why a 5k player only with noobs in 2 and 3k

[floral dock]

Apart from the fact no one in that game is in 2k... and theres 2 5k players, a 4.6k player and 2 3.6k players idk why you are complaining. Maybe show the enemy team as well instead of just complaining about your team. Or are you too scared since both teams were actually fair and it would mean you lost the game because you didn't perform well? The fact you went down 10 points in diamond means you clearly didn't too great. Maybe show other stats like damage. I can see you got top of the team, but it's unclear on what exactly that was and by how much. For all I know you could have done 900 damage, #2 did 890 damage, and everyone else did like 500 damage. Show all the games stats when complaining about the team, that is unless you're too scared since you know that you will be called out for performing poorly.

[regal cosmos]

not enough players in queue to split them up

[floral dock]

This guy must really be scared that they lost because he didn't perform well. He turned the sort feature to sort by rating score to make it look like he did the top damage LOL. The guy in 4.7k went down 6 points while he went down 10, you can't complain about teams when you didn't even do top on the team LOLOLOLOL

[ornate spoke]

I feel like ratings do need more attention in blitz so if you made ratings give you like 25% more credits than normal matches I feel like more people would play them this will also improve the player base a little bit

[floral dock]

No, just no. Making it so that rating becomes a gamemode where people can grind and not affect their stats (anymore than it already is) is a bad idea. It will become like a fun gamemode where no one cares if they win or lose because they are making XP and credits, without ruining their stats.

[regal cosmos]

Why play ratings if the teams can be better but you get no other benefit to really make you play it over regular mode? The credits should stay

[floral dock]

Yes, you should be making some credits so you aren't losing credits every game wether you win or not, but the appeal of Ratings shouldn't be that you can grind credits without affecting your stats and therefore just play like it's gravity mode or something. XP should be removed from ratings apart from Crew XP to train all the crew skills. You need to remove the factors that make rating no different from Gravity in the sense that you can grind your tanks without ruining your stats. With removing those factors of course Wargaming would actually need to implement different incentives like a unique tank for 1-5 thats not just a reskin of some tier 8 premium.

[covert wind]

I would wonder what happens when they remove EXP entirely from ratings. U can't really remove credits otherwise everybody would spam HESH tanks but just removing EXP might be a good idea. Then only players who are intrested in rating points will play.
@floral dock same thought process lmao

[wind light]

@floral dock i did 1k dmg lol

[floral dock]

Wow I wasn't far off the mark saying 900 dmg, think I should become a psychic

[wind light]

haha u always can try 😛

[daring flower]

If they remove exp from rating then we wont be able to get any mastery class

[white spruce]

A) nobody there is 2k
B) you have one of the best players in EU based off of profile background
C) 1k damage is atrocious

[floral dock]

So? Why should you be able to get Mastery Badges without actually affecting your stats in the first place? I don’t see why you can get Mastery Badges in rating but rating doesn’t affect any stats.

[queen socket]

True. If your going to get badges is has to affect stats.

[next gull]

We are all aware that if rating were affecting career stats, no good player who cares about his stats would play this mode.

On another hand, imo, there is need of a distributed reward for playing this mode, otherwise not many would play this mode. Why would you play once it is obvious you will not get the final reward ? Since rating gain/loss is based on exp, it feels reasonnable to award them to the player, together with the credits associated with.

[junior root]

@next gull its possible to go below 500

[indigo arrow]

if you were doing top damage, you wouldn't be bronze, it's only your fault. I hit> 5050 and I don't see any problem

[iron orbit]

I'm in gold rating again (never had bronze rating), and no doing top damage isn't as good as winning a battle, most the time you loose your rating even if you done top damage

[indigo arrow]

if it's doing a top damage, you just CANNOT fall into the bronze league, with top dmg u can t lose all battles

[iron orbit]

I already said I never falled to bronze, (minimum one was 2500), but I was really annoyed by teams that rush and die with 0 damage

[wind light]

@white spruce not in that battle no

[floral dock]

If you end up almost falling from >3000 to <1000 then it is 100% your fault. As the current rating system works it is almost impossible to actually go down points. You could have a 30% winrate averaging 2k dmg and still go up points from 3k-4.5k. In lower leagues, going down points is no ones fault but your own. In diamond however, that's where the team means more. When you're in 5400+ the people you go against will also contain good players 100% of the time. When that happens the result of the battle depends more on the bad people in the game than the good. 80% of the games in 5400+ are decided not by the 5k players, but the 3k or below players. In 5400+ which ever team has the worse 3k player will lose the game (which ever teams 3k player performs worse). 80% of the games I lose in 5750+, my team always has some 3k rating, 40% WR, below 1k damage delt bot. And the enemy teams 3k player did better than my teams.

You honestly have no right to complain about teams when you yourself are not even in 4.5k+.

[iron orbit]

It's from 3010 to 2500 (you guys don't want to understand that I didn't reach bronze), so it wasn't that bad, and nope teams have a big Importance even on lower leagues, you can't win a rating battle alone especially when the red team has good players
I'm at 3018 now

[floral dock]

So then your whole story is 100% messed up? You said you almost got to bronze yet now you say it was only 2500? You seem like all the typical gold players who complain about teams being bad when they themselves are the problem. Also, maybe read my post. I said "almost falling". And if the enemy team has good players then your team will also have good players. If theres a 5k+ on 1 team, then there is almost always a 5k+ on the other team. And if there isnt then that means on average your teams players are better than the enemy team because to balance out the 5k, the rest of his team will be 3k while your team will be all 4k.

[dark ferry]

guys is ISU-152 a good tank for ratings ?

[floral dock]

I wouldn't suggest playing tank destroyers at all, unless you can frontline in them like a bager or e3 because TDs that cant frontline are too team dependent, and you never want to depend on teams.

[dark ferry]

ok thx
what tank you sugest on the tech tree tank to play on ratings ?

[floral dock]

Depends on the tier, tier 8 I'd suggest emil 1 and tier 10 I'd suggest e5, is4, kran

[potent surge]

I prefer my paper Rhm for ratings instead of ISU

[ornate spoke]

@floral dock wat why you give me lucky player 😢

[floral dock]

Cuz ur very lucky

[ornate spoke]

yes you are correct

[quasi trellis]

Feels good when you lose top 3 because of a rigged colluded game

[sleek sun]

The higher you are in ratings, the lower your team, the teams are based on the avarage amound of rating points of your whole team. You will never get 3 Diamond players in one team

[agile sphinx]

Play at peak times near the end of a season and you can get teams with 5k average, I think I had a 5.4k average team once?

[floral dock]

Nah it's just cause ervin played the heck out of yesterday and went up like 150 points

[quasi trellis]

Nah.... There was this game where someone on MY TEAM (I assume it was a friend of his, based off of how they communicated) drove straight into the enemy spawn after telling ervin exactly where to meet, in order to give him extra damage, and a win. That is the reason why he took my place, it was a rigged, colluded, cheap bs game. He did 4k only because of that guy and I lost points which could have been the opposite if that never happened. I also do have the replay and screenshots of it.🤡
Ohh and the reason was because I took top #3 back... and he did take #3 after that game and it was honestly just before ratings closed

[floral dock]

Send me the replay? I'd like to watch that myself lol. So this ervin guy comes back after not playing for the past 2 days and rigs games with his friends to jump up from 5700 to 5830 in 1 day. If that's true, that means there are 2 people this season in the top 5 who did countdowns to rig games... how petty can some people be just for a tier 8 premium tank and some gold. Also you report it to WG? They might penalize him if what you say actually happened

[outer raven]

hii

[strange spire]

@floral dock It was ONE time and ONLY ONE time, we’ve known each other for awhile now and since it was the last day of ratings I said, “why not” to myself and gave him the free dmg, we’ve been playing ratings for very long now and it hasnt been fun with all the toxicity, we’ve never rigged more than once, that was the first time in 5 years i’ve ever done something like that

[floral dock]

Yesterday wasn’t the last day of ratings. Ratings should still be open today from 3pm EST to 7pm EST. Also it doesn’t matter how many times you do it, it just matters that you did it. It’s like saying just cause you robbed a bank once or you only killed 1 person then it’s ok and you shouldn’t get in trouble.

[strange spire]

Have you seen PNCR and other top clans rigg? No you haven’t because you haven’t been playing ratings long enough to see, they rigged but no one cared because no one cared, ratings is already so toxic that no one cares, we come out to have fun not be whiny and report people for a ONE time thing, you also cannot compare something as serious as a bank robbery to a video game, that has no comparison whatsoever

[floral dock]

The comparison stands as breaking a rule. Rules are rules, no matter how “severe” or not “severe” something is doesn’t change the fact that it’s a rule

[ornate spoke]

yeah but why would you want to lose points for yourself?

[floral dock]

Because he realized he couldn’t push up into the next reward bracket most likely. It doesn’t matter if you get 30 or 21 you still get 30 pieces, same as it doesn’t matter if you get 20 or 11, you still only get 40 pieces

Countdowns and rigging are different lmao. If you countdown but everyone still tries and doesn’t throw the game on purpose like you did, then there’s nothing wrong with it @strange spire

[strange spire]

Well we lost the game so u tell me

[ornate spoke]

@strange spire yes he is correct. countdowns are fine (though i think they should still be illegal) as long as you actually intend to fight your clanmates

[quasi trellis]

There is no proof of them rigging that game, it could just be a coincidence and they all just happened to be playing ratings at the same time?

[strange spire]

lol what a “coincidence” you find 5 pro players in a PUB game, countdowns are still rigging, as slogo said, breaking a rule means breaking a rule, but no one reported it? 🤔, ye because WE DONT CARE, well we lost so u tell me?

[floral dock]

Ok so what? They did a countdown. As long as you actually fight everyone like normal and dont purposely throw the game to benefit 1 team, then countdowns are fine. Countdowns are only rigging if you intend to purposely play worse than normal or throw the game to benefit someone on the enemy team. And how does saying you lost change anything?? What you think just because you had 3 PNCR members it should have been impossible for you to lose? And how do you know that no one reported it? Most likely someone did report it but Wargaming denied it because there was no proof of PNCR purposely trying to lose the game.

[ornate spoke]

countdowns are not rigging
what he said

[strange spire]

you know that invincible, hockey, and yaro faced each other 4-5 times that day because I was on those teams when they did, all those times, invincible and hockey underperformed when faced against yaro, they fed yaro tons of points. Invincible and hockey were also in 4K range while yaro was top 5, its not bull, its true, you can still throw while not being obvious, maybe dont be so snowflake and report a 1 time thing, others do it but we respect them, we know they dont abuse it

[floral dock]

And do you have proof of this? Or are you just spitting bull crap? The fact you are trying to justify the fact you had to rig a game for someone when both of you are in top clans, suggests that maybe neither of you actually belong in top clans. And what? Just because someone else did it makes it ok for you to do?

Lmao I dont even know anyone in PNCR. And PNCR has definitely gone down and although they are still a good clan, you dont see them that much anymore in any professional tournament.

[still crater]

ur just d riding pncr

[strange spire]

As long as no ones abusing it we dont report simple, i mean we respect PNCR, so none of us reported it, they dont abuse it every game, if we reported pncr, then who would we watch for a pro tourney, there would be no one good to represent the comp scene, lol im saying is respect nd not report someone for a one time thing

[ornate spoke]

Wow why y’all mad about boosting points it’s not it’s the first time

[floral dock]

I'm assuming you're Ervin and if so, unlike you I dont feel like I need to be in a top clan to be considered good at the game. Lmao you said I'm d riding pncr, well just look at your friend @strange spire here sucking up to PNCR like no tomorrow

[strange spire]

Fraxures so scared of losing top 3 he only cares abt himself, how serious is losing one game enough for u to report? Just edit off ur old post, I only threw ONCE for fun not every game slogo, I dont throw every game for ervin u know that right? Lol wtv u say, it was once so ion really care, clearly u cant have fun in a game, ima just hop back to semi-pro scene on PUBG, since fraxure wants to be a snowflake

[floral dock]

I honestly dont care what place in top 5 I get as long as I stay top 5. But its extremely shameful that people in top clans need to rig in order to gain points in the top. If you're in a top clan, you should have the skill to gain points without having to use dirty methods. The fact that you need to use dirty methods suggests that you dont belong in STORM or -JJ. I realize you dont constantly throw but the fact you did it even if only just once is still extremely shameful behavior for someone in a supposedly top clan. You might have had fun that game throwing for your friend, but its extremely selfish and shameful. You might have had fun, but at the expense of other people's fun. Sure you had fun, but you just ruined a game for 6 other players on your team.

[strange spire]

Your just making WOTB worse for yourself by getting rid of good players, 1 time is 1 time, not life changing, the point of a game is to have fun but clearly u cant understand, ratings is already toxic, what fun is there when u get berated and yelled at 24/7

[ornate spoke]

Oh my a rare creditciller has come

[floral dock]

You're supposed to have fun yes. But in a multiplayer game you shouldnt be having fun at the expense of other players fun. That is selfish and shameful. As I said, sure YOU had fun, but the other 6 people on your team? I dont think they had fun. If you have fun ruining other people's fun, then that says something about who you are as a person.

And if you think ratings are that bad, then why are you playing ratings in the first place?

[strange spire]

its one gameeeeee, like how serious can it be? You can click battle for 8 more hours in ratings

[floral dock]

AIt's not how many times that counts, it's the moral behind the action that counts.

@ornate spoke So then why play ratings in the first place if you are only playing to have fun? Your whole argument makes 0 sense now.

[ornate spoke]

Sorry to tell you bud there is no fun in ratings… toxicity only so even if he won no one would be having fun

[ornate spoke]

its fun if you’re a skilled player

[still crater]

it’s not fun in general

[ornate spoke]

yes it is

[ornate spoke]

Seems players like you and me are never going to have fun in ratings then what a shame

[still crater]

https://tenor.com/view/yawnface-gif-4425271

[ornate spoke]

i always have fun in ratings lol

[white spruce]

Is next season 2 months?

[ornate spoke]

actually i think ratings is quite fun, when you get to know some of the players. ive become friends with some of the normal ratings players just bc of the sheer battle number ive played with them. Toxicity goes down when you are in high point/league ratings because you know everyone is good at the game and is going to try their hardest. and if they screwed up, they know they screwed up and they dont need you t rage at them

[floral dock]

^^^

Dang just needed 6 more points for #4

[ornate spoke]

pog

How long is it till parts come

usually about 2 days

[quasi trellis]

gg’s to all this month, was fun🌞

[floral dock]

So glad I don’t need to try hard anymore in my e5 or sheri. Prolly just gonna play some random tank next season that I want to get better in, like the batchat

[restive badge]

yo, did not get the 40 fearless tokens from ratings? anyone know whats up?

[desert valley]

Give it a while, have patience

[latent vault]

Ratings are so trash

[orchid light]

Was this your first ratings season? Also good job on number 5 🙂

I probably could’ve gotten a higher score but I was tired of grinding lol

And I really hope the obj907 is going to be the new reward tank

PS: Sorry to anyone I raged at this month lol

[rose path]

God knows how bad teams will be if a tierX replaced the Fearless

[desert valley]

They’ll just sell the obj 907 for $80 and reskin some other tier 8 tank if anything. Makes them more money.

[lime sparrow]

usually around the time next season starts

[ornate spoke]

Pog, Also sad, I want my fearless

[floral dock]

No, last season was the first season I actually tried in and got like #22. I played 2 seasons before that but wasn’t really serious about it and didn’t even push to diamond. And ty. And I agree, I want the 907 to become the reward tank, but it most likely won’t. They will most likely put the 907 in crates or even wait till the next xmas event and have it as the tier 10 there. I do have hope though that the new tank will actually be a NEW tank and not just another reskin.

It would also be nice if they didn’t reset the leaderboards instantly right after ratings closes on the last day :/

[still crater]

also would be nice if people didn’t report other people just cause they aren’t good at the game😮

[restive badge]

@still crater

[next gull]

Is there a way of knowing which tank you got the rating camo for ? Apart from scanning through all your tanks and camos to see if it happens to be there.

[crisp granite]

Go to your rating stats and it'll show your most played tank which will get the camo

[placid shard]

just check to most played tanks at the ratings tab

[ornate spoke]

907 isn't going to be sold and it's not a reward tank. going to be another broken crate tank.

[quasi trellis]

From what i’ve heard the 907 isn’t going to be broken but can be really strong depending on where you position it, then again im unsure cuz i’ve only heard this from someone else and hadn’t seen it perform yet...

[floral dock]

I’ve seen it in game and it’s armor is meh. Front on its armor is irrelevant

[quasi trellis]

I thought so

[ornate spoke]

i have heard it will powercreep t22m, which is why they sold t22

[blazing prawn]

is this the rating camouflage?

[regal cosmos]

yep

[queen lichen]

First time I got to platinum, personally I’m proud of myself, I never really bothered with ratings but when I did I’d always perform really poorly, I wanna shoot for maybe 4.5 next season and see where that takes me

[blazing prawn]

same, i finished with 4.2k rating score and stopped when i got the camo on LTTB and 13 90

[wind light]

I finished with 5224 and only want the diamond camo on my t57 heavy 🙂 so 1 month more

[quasi trellis]

My very first time ever trying in ratings I made it to 3rd surprisingly

[still crater]

would’ve been 4th but u reported ervin😃

[quasi trellis]

Your facts are incorrect, and I am not going to repeat my self any more for you to atleast try to comprehend why and what happened. That is in the past now. Even if he were still playing Im sure I would’ve taken 3rd back, if the game were to never had been colluded. your false response to my achievement that I worked for means nothing.”😃”

[still crater]

frax ur not good @floral dock this isn’t ervin sped...crazy how ya both think ya are good💀 i should stop frax might report me too🤔

[floral dock]

How weird of you to talk about yourself in the third person

Yea sure it isn’t. And if it truly isn’t then suck up to Ervin more, guys too scared to come talk in chat himself he needs to send some simp of his?

I never said I was good lmao. I know that I’m still not the best player and can still improve a lot. That said, I’m definitely better than the average player.

[quasi trellis]

Drop your IGN rn if you’re feeling that confident telling me im not good at the game🤡

[still crater]

ur literally irrelevant💀i’ve seen u play and yikes just quit

[floral dock]

I’d be willing to bet this is DerpyNarwhals alt account so he can be more toxic without being associated with STORM

[still crater]

na keep dreaming🥷🏽

[ornate spoke]

i mean you dont play enough tier x in pubs where people could really say you're good, bc you know anything not tier 10 is sealclubbing.
and slogo doesnt play enough tier 10 either. Like seriously what is up with you people and tier 8, can't you just leave the seals to play among themselves?

[ornate spoke]

Tier 8 makes people strong 😂

[floral dock]

Huh? I main tier 10. Legit the only reason I play tanks not in tier 10 is cause I’m still grinding lines

[quasi trellis]

^
Another reason why I do play low tiers not often is because i’d be helping others grind tanks in platoon, like my dad who is currently grinding tier 7-8 tanks and learning the game again. In my opinion 8-10 isn’t seal clubbing you’ll find many pros at tier 8 every now and then, and sometimes even 6...I do main 10 but im just saying, its okay to play other tiers besides 10 every now and then no specific tier means I am good or bad unless all my battles are 7 and below in my opinion..then, i’d consider that seal clubbing. Tier 8 is a hard tier to get to for the seals, but as you can see in my stats most battles I have are 8-10 but mostly 10 nowadays which isn’t in my stats, and the reason why I have more battles in 8 than 10 is because my account was made in 2015 and it should be obvious that when you’re a seal your self who never spent a single penny on the game till after 4 years of having the game... you will be stuck on certain tanks for a while... I learned the game lots by playing 8 I also had more tier 8’s than 10 only about 2-4 tier X mostly for 3 years and in the past 2 years i’ve been playing alot more tier X and the main reason why is because I’ve gotten more tier X tanks during the past 2 years, i’ve also started spending money on the game, I got my first ever premium tier 8 tank 2 years ago.
and it was only one premium, i hardly ever spend money on this game because of personal things. This is why I have most battles in 8. My account isn’t for the best stats it is not a reroll account @ornate spoke

[vague oracle]

There is nothing wrong in being a reroll except if one is toxic

[placid shard]

when will we receive the IS-6 fearless parts?

[hard palm]

When new season starts I think, so in few days, same with gold if u were in top 10. On Friday to be exact

[ornate spoke]

@vague oracle so you join a random discussion to spew total BS about me? Interesting.
@floral dock @quasi trellis "You'll find many pros at tier 8 now and then" lmao who, me, because I've never seen a single pro at tier 8 unless it was testing a tank. And both of you guys have like 100 tier X games a month lloloolol, I don't think that's "maining tier 10". I literally have like 850 tier 10 games a month and I still have to grind other tier 7-9s in pubs. Also you guys mistake my account's purpose, which was originally to figure out how many games an average player could get a tier 10 with completely F2P. I never spent a cent on my account, and now my goal is to grind every tier 10 in the game F2P. So no. Just because I have premiums on my account doesn't mean I spent money on the game. And no, I'm not a "toxic reroll". I just don't like when I get blamed for every single thing that my idiot teammates do wrong. Yesterday I had a game in which our 183 gets deleted within 60 seconds of the game start, and guess what he says. "WtF mEdS!1!1!" Meanwhile my toonmate and I are both super unicums in mediums and we are doing our jobs, so don't you think you would get a little PO'ed about that? So yes, after a long day of people raging at me IN PUBS for "not doing my job" I finally couldn't keep that in. And this is why I don't play pubs; people think they are always right and they don't analyse their mistakes and grow from them, which I find ratings players actually do. Actually good players in this game don't just blame their team for all their problems.

[floral dock]

The thing is, I just don't have that many games at all. And I never said, "You'll find many pros at tier 8 now and then". Tier 10 makes up 66% of my games. My only problem is that I just haven't been playing pubs that much at all the past week. Also if you didn't know I'm a free to play. I haven't spent a dime on the game and all the premiums I have are from events. You should be looking at the ratio of tier 10 games compared to other games, not just how many tier 10 battles.

[vague oracle]

Oof i didnt say anything bad about u. I meant the ones who brag about stats. Also my mistake of not adding if. My english fk

[ornate spoke]

fraxure implied that I was an actual reroll, which is a paying account. I noticed that you have few pubs games in 30days
@vague oracle ok sry

[vague oracle]

Yeah my mistake . i saw it now and it meant like u are a toxic person. Where in i meant anyone who is toxic

[ornate spoke]

ok

[sturdy needle]

Muppet is a muppet (:

[floral dock]

big facts

[quasi trellis]

I didn’t say you’re a reroll, I said MY account isn’t a reroll account because of how you look at it “not being a good player because I have more battles in 8” I was basically adding that my account has no purpose other than playing for fun I was also trying to add an excuse onto my account being more than 5 years old meaning there is no purpose to my account... I also dont play this game 24-7 as you can see in my stats, I have about 23k battles on an account that is 5 years old and probably almost 6, i’ve been playing on this account since I first ever started the game, so you cant say im a noob for playing 8’s for the majority of MY PAST BATTLES Plus, I definitely never played OP tier 8’s either... plusss no one gave a single sh#t about stats back then, and that was my preferred tier becausee I was still learning the game. I ofc was a noob when I first started, no one knows everything about a game they’ve never seen or played before so I really didn’t care about my stats just like the rest of people who were playing in 2014 to about 2017 i’ve always played just for fun and still do to this day, I don’t consider my self the best, but I do not consider my self bad either I am not the best with words but yeah, I dont mean any offense towards you i am simply trying to get you to understand why my stats are poor to you lmao

[floral dock]

I'd have to defiantly agree with Fraxure. Yes tier 10 is where it really matters, however I also agree that as long as your average tier is above like 8.5 for 30 day then it's fine. Tier 8 isn't all that bad as long as you aren't spamming some OP premium tank (don't think I need to list what tanks those are). Anything below 8 though is where it starts to get a bit sketchy. Tier 7 and below is honestly where you start to enter seal cubbing territory for any competent player who knows how to play the game. I'm not saying you shouldn't be able to play tier 6 and have fun in a Kv-2 or run around in a Bulldog at tier 7, but if the majority of someone's games aren't at tier 8+, then their stats in my opinion are irrelevant. I also think someones stats are irrelevant if they have more games in premium/collector tanks than tech tree tanks. Cause let's be honest, someone with 5k games in a t22 with a 65% WR and 10k games in a Chimera with a 70% WR isn't great. Yea those are nice WR numbers but it's really just irrelevant.

[ornate spoke]

tiers 1-9 = sealclubbing

[sturdy needle]

Lol ok

[regal cosmos]

Add tier 10 as well

[floral dock]

only tier thats not seal clubbing is tier 11

[sturdy needle]

So we're just gonna leave tier 0 out?

[floral dock]

big brain, you cant be seal clubbing if you dont even play the game 🤯

[floral dock]

Oof my 100 fearless pieces just came in

[vivid shore]

Noice

[ornate spoke]

tier 0 exists thou

[craggy flicker]

ratings is screwed in my opinion mainly because the lack of players you are supposed to be fighting for the top spot but you end up playing players that are in sivler or bronze when you are at 6k in diamond league I experienced this for 3 months grinding for the is 6 fearless which I got but so many battles were lost because there isn't enough players so is there a solution I think so just send people into normal battles like usual but grade there performance of that battle you get the rating points from playing and you just play normal with the bonus of earning ratings points on the side

[ornate spoke]

dumb. The entire point of ratings is to be a special gamemode that people can choose to play or not play. The way wargaming needs to fill queues up in ratings is by putting actually useful prizes in. And achievable prizes, not just a reskinned tier 8 premium that you need to nolife for a month to get

[warm charm]

lol u guys are still writing paragraphs about ratings

[ornate spoke]

if you think 3 sentences is a paragraph are you in grade 3?

[regal cosmos]

paragraphs can have 3 sentences

[native marten]

technically a paragraph can be 1 sentence long as well

[ornate spoke]

.

[lime sparrow]

Look at these monologues!

[ornate spoke]

LOL

[viscid ravine]

Bruh, ppl still hardcoring for fearless lmao, I got it the 1st season, I got it 3 times actually but I just sold it for creds, kinda funny ngl

[worldly anvil]

i thought people gave up on the fearless months ago

[viscid ravine]

I thought they gave up like a long time ago, cuz ratings ruin ur nerve system after u keep losing

[queen lichen]

Some have, some haven’t. Personally I don’t think it’s worth it anymore

[still carbon]

Ban the annilator and smasher from ratings like the Sheridan missles. So tired of those broke tanks.

[quasi trellis]

I played ratings cuz I never gave it a chance b4 never really cared about the Fearless tbh at first I just wanted the camos but went ahead and made my way to the top 3 cuz y not

[shut rock]

lol

[rapid pumice]

play amx 13 75, wz112-2 or obj252u for spawn in a good league after calibration

[forest frost]

Is3 got me from 3k to 4k without problems, after the 4k it start being less efficient due to the emil spams eee

[graceful galleon]

Best tank to pass ratings?

[rustic wagon]

WT, vickers cr cuz they op to tier

[gilded harbor]

Arl 44, T110e5, tiger2, Jpanther...

[graceful galleon]

Uhh okay but how arl 44 it's t6?!

[gilded harbor]

Its best in t6, you can also fight against t7. You can up your rating only with arl if you want play in t6-7. And about t10, I play with t110e5 and jg.pz.e100 - best tanks for me.

[glossy raptor]

Rating is limited to tier 7 and above, so you can’t play the arl

[ornate spoke]

Hallo guyp

[graceful galleon]

That was what i was talking about. @gilded harbor is new to ratings ig😂

[gilded harbor]

Ooooh you mean that😅 Sorry my english not the best. I would recommend T29.

[ornate spoke]

if you play tier 7 you only play broken tanks. Black Prince, smasher, anni, drac, 201 a45. Dont play tier 7-9 as you will have long queues. Good players are at tier X

[thin surge]

spic

[woven merlin]

when am i gonna see mad games in this category of text channels

[worldly anvil]

a45? op? seems legit

[ornate spoke]

its just a slightly worse BP so i would say so
but its not way worse at all @worldly anvil its just never played by anyone

[worldly anvil]

way worse, but okay

[dreamy wind]

autoloaders and autoreloaders are best for ratings

[vivid pewter]

who can play

[flat basalt]

yay i am good player XD

[ornate spoke]

yes

[vivid pewter]

algien ke hable español

[still crater]

yes sporting we know

[next glade]

Why don’t keep the other modes open forever?

[ornate spoke]

because then they wouldnt be fun modes. also because WG's potato servers wouldn't be able to handle

[ornate spoke]

wg no say !! parts of certificat is 6 (reward) give only diamond players others take sht !!

[zinc ravine]

It’s not that hard to make it to diamond lmao
All it requires is time, patience, and mental health if u hadn’t already lost it

[azure shard]

Yeah actually diamond = spam battles if u aren’t the best player but yeah patience is mendatory and mental because idk why but all of us have loses or wins streak
So notice that if u are in lose streak : stay alive maximum time and do max damages

At 5 k most of the players stop rating here so maybe you pass 5 k and you are top 300 but just go up to 5200 you reach 200 places it’s very easy to get IS-6 ... it just takes 4 months.....

[viscid ravine]

Wow 4 months

[azure shard]

If u just reach top 100 every months ... you become able to collect x30 Is-6 tokens and you need 100 to claim the tank tha’ts why it need 4 months

[covert wind]

Another typo of yours, buddy its not "others take sht" its "those who don't make it are sht" :)

[true ridge]

I lost all that 😔

[molten spire]

Emil 1 is the best tank

For rating

[flat basalt]

wg! skip this one day plz XD

[pale topaz]

yes

[ornate spoke]

yes

[ripe prism]

sziasztok

[ornate spoke]

6 ASTRA wtf👀

[livid estuary]

does it bother you?

[ornate spoke]

Relax. He's just pointing out that 6 of you made it into top 10

[livid estuary]

I got it bro. he wrote more wtf. that's a bad word

[gilded harbor]

Wow, good clan👍

[echo agate]

Make rating battles better then you will get more players in them and less people complaining about MM in regular battles. Leave regular MM as it is. Change rating battles, e.g. fully researched tech tree tanks only, at least 100 battles in the tank, same tier not +/-1, +/- 500 rating only, better rewards, etc.

[livid estuary]

thx

[ornate spoke]

totally agree

[ornate spoke]

Not 👀 It doesn’t mean you are good, it just means you play more than others

[sharp path]

@echo agate good idea,but i wiuld say a max difference of 250 between best and worst ratings should be the way to go

[zinc ravine]

That would make a already dead game mode with long queue times have even longer queue times

[brisk jungle]

I got bored of the rating battles, do you get anything special?

[zinc ravine]

I got the fearless and a couple of top notch camos but that’s about it

[strange spire]

Simple, if you can't win your pub games, don't play ratings.

[gilded harbor]

This is also an argument that they can play well.

[eager sparrow]

You just have to be not utterly braindead and spam battles. It has very little correlation to skill

[mental mural]

Really...-76 for 4k?? Surely that’s broken

[regal cosmos]

Was that your last calibration battle?

[bold panther]

exactly

[ornate spoke]

+1 -1 should stay the rest should change

[normal garnet]

Hhmm, I don’t wanna have to play 100 games in a tank to be able to play it in ratings

[glossy raptor]

Then buy 100 crew for gold

[daring flower]

Rating mode is unplayable, everyone camping☹️

[sharp path]

@daring flower not camping,just being not very bright in terms of teamplay

[quaint thunder]

@livid estuary what tanks did you use?

[normal garnet]

It doesn’t matter what tanks u use, as long as u can actually perform well in anything you’ll do fine

[livid estuary]

Vickers stb 1 wt

[flat basalt]

i use fv215b 183 😂

[quaint thunder]

Lol. STB-1 is my favorite tier 10. Its just hard to explain why when you get penned frontally through the turret😒

[dreamy wind]

ur turret isnt invincible fyi, u can go right through the front if u aim

[quaint thunder]

I know. Even STB-1 occasionally penns an STB-1 turret. Its armor is not that reliable. But because most of it is at extreme angles its very nice to run

[spring silo]

Hi

[honest dust]

So its this time again. 43%ers playing rating and getting Matched with 4kers just bc they are doing calibration battles? WG when the heck will you Do something against that? Ratings is Not to Grind credits or New tanks or to learn how to play a Premium Tank. Ratings is supposed to be the end game of Blitz, where, as you so elegantly put it in your messages, the Best of the Best try to win the fearless. How is it the Best of the Best if players cannot even Master one tank, but still are allowed to play in ratings? How is it good for the game if players can grind New tanks and credits in ratings without losing winrate but dragging the entire Team down? How is it fair if i Do 80-90 % of the team damage, but still reveive a -30 point result? Should I carry 6 noobs on my back into the goal? Sure, will Do. And while im on my way, i will bounce every enemy shot and do your taxes, bc apparently nothing is too much. Do you even think about the climate Being so toxic because good players have to put up With Shit like that where players with 1.8k rating get Matched with a 4k Player? I try to evaluate my Actions in a game, where i could have done Things differently. But slowly im coming to the Conclusion that your System is just utterly and totally BS. HOW IS THAT SKILL BASED MATCHMAKING? Oh, and while we are on the subject, thanks for giving New players now a free Premium Tank after the Tutorials. So that they can grind credits and the Tiers even faster. Thank you so much. You introduce New lines into the game, New stuff, New tanks, how about you finally fix some of the issues that have been bugging players since 19-ALWAYS? Sincerely, a Player who is fed up With your BS

[quaint thunder]

Its good and honest but very likely to be removed once the snowflake mods see this😩

[floral dock]

I agree with this however your argument is weakened a lot by saying you’re only 4k. Try being at 5.8k and still being matched with people around 43%

[honest dust]

I know. I can also understand the Frustration if a 6ker is Matched with a 4ker, however i think there the difference in skill isnt as big. I know i am a decent Player, but i have still much to learn and 4k isnt even that high, with an OP tank a lot of people can easily reach that. When i know im up against very good opponents, i try my Best and to He and asset to the team. The people im playing with right now just drive alone into the enemy spawn. And then complain about the team. How is that allowed? How is that good for the game climate? I dont mind Bad teammates in fun modes, but ratings should be Reserved for good players.

[ornate spoke]

Ever thought that there are are not enough players in ratings so the 6kers will match the 4kers in order to get in a match

[honest dust]

There should however be enough Players to Match maybe between +-1k. And Not - 2k from my rating. Also, a Player like i have right now Here: 27k battles, 37.76% WR, 350 Average damage, 304 average exp. SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO PLAY A FREAKING LEOPARD 1 IN RATINGS.

[ornate spoke]

Why not? aren't these players the same who give money to this game?also what's ur rating 4k?so u want to tell me u are matching with 2kers?

[honest dust]

It should Not be allowed imho. There should be an entry Barriere. Average career damage of 100*tier you want to play Minimum. And at least a third class medal in the tier below. That way you can ensure a decent skill Level, there is less Frustration. Ratings should be Reserved for good players, simple as that.

[floral dock]

For tier 10 I’d say if you aren’t able to even average 1.5k you shouldn’t be playing. But wargaming won’t ever add anything like that because it’s the people who aren’t good at the game who spend the most money on crates trying to get an overpowered tank that will “make” them better.

[ornate spoke]

How u could ensure that the account isnt used by multiple users or bought?Also u get what u deserve doesn't matter what tank u take doesn't matter if u have noobs in ur team if u know what u are doing u will increase

[honest dust]

You know how easy it is to actually find out if an Account is used by multiple people? Also that rarely occurs. It would just be easier to make a New Account. Secondly, of course i will increase over the long term, however its still frustrating that people who clearly have nothing to Do in ratings are abusing it to Grind credits or XP basically for free.

[ornate spoke]

In my opinion the only thing is wrong about ratings is the prizes.They should be higher N1:10k gold etc.Ye cosmetic items would be nice

[honest dust]

About the prices: imho ratings should Not give credits or XP for battles, it should give something like the seasonal coins that players can spend on cosmetic items

[ornate spoke]

or just coins that you can trade for research discounts/credits/gold

[native marten]

the most optimal solution is literally:
get more players into the gamemode somehow
if there could be an actual match, with say, only diamond players are relatively the same skill level, then it's more competitive instead of just having 2-4 really good players and everyone else just yoloing and trolling and stuff

but imho I feel like the ratings gamemode is just extremely neglected by WG as a whole and it lost more of "this is a competitive gamemode" feel and more of a "it's like playing pubs except you get some more credits and a camo"

[primal dune]

You gotta be kidding me. It's 8pm and ratings ended already?

I already resent being asked to complete ratings missions. Being asked to win in a game mode that so many treat as a consequence-free place to AFK or just jerk around.

Starting the game after dinner, I get 30 minutes to roll the dice and hope for 3 wins? Just makes me hate ratings even more.

[strange spire]

@honest dust if u just calibrated wait a few days, ur obv going to get people that just starting to calibrate on your team

[lime sparrow]

That’s a lot of paragraphs that I just can’t be bothered to read

[terse timber]

Another reason I don't like ratings. Why can't they do what CoD mobile does. Have a 3 month rating open 24/7. I mean if they are only going to do it for 30 Days might as well have it stay open for 24/7

[hoary hedge]

People can rig the games if its open 24/7

[floral dock]

Having it open all day is a horrible idea. It would spread the player base out throughout the whole day instead of just the 8 hours (from 3pm EST to 11pm EST) it’s open for now. Having ratings open 24 hours would considerably increase queue time, especially as you get into diamond. Right now queue times in diamond are pretty bad because if you’re a top player the matchmaker tries to give the enemy team a top player, and if there’s no other top player in queue then you basically sit in queue until a top player enters queue. Now imagine doing that except now it’s over a 24 hour period which means at any given time it’s less likely for a top player or be on.

[candid jacinth]

u can get against 2k if u have 4k

[oblique sentinel]

In all honesty, I would like to talk about my experience today with rating battles
I understand many players who do not want their wins to go down, but not at the expense of being bad at playing rating matches. I understand that MM is bad and will not be fixed, but it is not reasonable that from 10 matches MM is out of balance with 8 of them I understand very much the afk problems, but it is not a good idea to put players at the mercy of phone errors, bad pings and bad servers What I enjoy most about this game is the ranked because I find in it the elite players .. WG please rearrange the rating and fix it

[steep mulch]

WG please do something against this.
It is really annoying when from the 7 enemies you have 5 from the same clan and expecially in rating battles!!!!

[primal dune]

I believe count-ins are allowed in Random but not in Ratings. Report and in theory they’ll at least get a warning.

[muted shuttle]

@steep mulch As long as they are playing fair play, there's nothing wrong with it.

[steep mulch]

@Энд yes, but if they are playing with voice chat (and that is very probably) it would be in my opinion not fair at all

[quaint thunder]

This is something that is know. Its called countdown. You disable same control mode, set a tier and count down and at 0 you all press the battle button. Then its seeing who got especially bad or especially good internet so who loads into battle first

[kindred forum]

How did they even do that?

[zinc ravine]

Just look at the message right above yours

[unreal kernel]

Can u please change it so that people have to have a certain amout of battles or something, I'm really tired of some idiot strolling up into ratings with a t8 and having less than 100 battles with a low wr and avg dmg, it really makes ratings not fun. People with less than 1k battles is pretty annoying to deal with, especially if they dont even know the basics like sidescraping, hull down, and how to actually aim

[faint hull]

Anyone want to run tier 8 rating battles

[keen moon]

Youwin_Python#7645 has been warned.

[still crater]

imagine^

[unreal kernel]

Sorry, didnt know that that was a thing, but as stated, most people in ratings dont appreciate people have really minimal and questionable experience in wot blitz, it simply makes it harder and takes the whole idea of "ratings" right into the dumps.

[bronze nexus]

I play ratings.

[covert wind]

Thats valid

[honest dust]

That is called count ins and is forbidden in ratings bc its basically platooning which was disabled in ratings bc it gives you a definite advantage. Pls take the Screenshot and write a ticket to WG about that. Those people need to be banned for this, i had the same Thing and wrote a ticket. I dont Know the penalty they got, but they did get one.

[tulip wedge]

Rating battles with Realistic mode 💯

[covert wind]

Its not forbidden when they played like they would normally. If they however teamed for example its forbidden.

[honest dust]

Dude, they are in the same Team. If it was 2 players in opposite teams, okay. However this? 5 players in the same Team? That is definitely unfair

[covert wind]

No it isn't. If they play like normal there's no rule preventing ppl to press the battle button at the same time. You can't prove they did it on purpose.

[honest dust]

Mate, i will repeat it: they are in the same Team, 5 players! And there is definitely a rule that says count ins for ratings are forbidden. It is influencing the game in an unfair way. Its a banable offense, WG has defo punished players for it in the past. It is definitely unfair.

[covert wind]

Ok then u can show me two things.
One. If these players played unfair. If they left kills for each other. If they let there teammates die ETC.
Second. Show me an example of a case where players from the same clan played normally and got banned.
Extra points when u can show me the rule from a WG Website. @Dr__Trax#0433

[regal cosmos]

Ive heard of someone getting a ban for counting down in ratings. Dont know if they were proven to have rigged or just counting in

[ornate spoke]

@covert wind
@covert wind

[covert wind]

@ornate spoke @ornate spoke
@ornate spoke

[limber ermine]

aight

[deep grotto]

pog

[livid estuary]

👍

[deep grotto]

I lost my spot lmao

[autumn wolf]

Great job, sensei

[still crater]

gold

[keen moon]

PenguinStudios#1032 has been warned.

[snow surge]

What
Why does Dyno block spoilers

[median zenith]

#rules

[wicked comet]

How many players now?

[tender cargo]

e

[latent vault]

1v4, killed 3 but didn’t have enough time to kill full t54e1, he won on caps, if I would have like 10 extra seconds I’d win lol

[viscid ravine]

Rip, does rating count in blitzstars? @latent vaultm

[latent vault]

no

[viscid ravine]

Ahh rip

[ornate spoke]

Comrade why atgm? WE need Back the MS1

[viscid ravine]

For sure

[ornate spoke]

We never forget you smoll comrade

[latent vault]

no one cares about ms1!

[zinc ravine]

That’s a first

[junior notch]

Yeah

[midnight hare]

@unreal kernel

[unreal kernel]

?

[ornate spoke]

Yes

[ornate spoke]

Why rattings are more imba than normal games

[midnight lark]

Imba?

[viscid ravine]

imbalanced....

[lime sparrow]

Sounds like you’re just not gud

[wicked comet]

a special mode rating battle tier 1 would be so much fun

[wicked comet]

how many points a player can earn from after the first rank till the end of the season?

[fringe flicker]

What are all the rewards for ratings? And what’s the Max number of points you can earn?

[zinc ravine]

The rewards are parts for the IS-6 Fearless, A camouflage for any vehicle that can use camos as long as it has 50 battles at the certain tier and is in either platinum or diamond league, a avatar depending on either you being in gold, platinum, or diamond and the max amount of points all depends on how other players do.

[fringe flicker]

Ah thank you 🙏

[latent vault]

Are u all really playing ratings for fearless lol , its a trash tank

[rich light]

Best rating tank?

[latent vault]

Kranvagn

[hollow night]

IS-7

[rich light]

Wrong answer. The correct one is E5

[rapid pumice]

not balanced tank at t8 like wz112-2 and 252u

[hollow night]

E5 is gross. I hate that thing

[ember halo]

I see you are a man of culture as well

[rich light]

E5 is like one of the best T10 heavy bruh

[wicked comet]

Emil 1 and e75 bests tank, I came from 3400 to 4350 with only those tanks

[hollow night]

@rich light
E5 is either an IS-4 that can't tank shells, or a 113 that can't deal damage.

400 alpha with just 2800 DPM (only 200 more than an IS-4) just gives it incredibly anemic damage output.

Moreover the armor isn't that great either. He can only deal with one enemy at a time, since even the slightest turret angle will expose the massive, soft, turret cheeks, and even then, HEAT shells will make mincemeat of the turret roof. And let's not even talk about the hull

On top of this, the thing that is supposedly making E5 a "meta" tank is the consumables. There's just one problem. Having great consumables on a tank that takes unbelievable amounts of module damage is incredibly painful, since it means giving up a repair kit, which between the ammo rack, track, and crew damage, is a huge sacrifice.

[rich light]

I bounce tons

[wicked comet]

On front line, e5 is better bec its frontal armor can't be pen if he hide the lower plate, but is4 is better on a moving ground

[rich light]

@hollow night I have to agree with those points. IS-4 is capable of a lot more damage blocking than E5 overall. But if you can get into hull positions, you will bounce a lot.

[steady magnet]

I hate this mode so god damn much... Absolutely f-ing hate it. All the unicums sit there, grinding broken tanks, spamming gold, constantly focusing and bum rushing regardless if they die in the process or not

[midnight lark]

Spamming gold??
Thats the point of the game. If you cant pen somebody, load prammo.

[steady magnet]

Yea, spam gold at the side of a Leopard 1? Spam gold at the rear of a T57? One guy legit didn't fire a single normal shell or HE shell, all gold. How is his wallet not filled with holes after each battle? Unless he's got a billion credits. No, it bothers me, cuz that reminds me about my crappy credit situation. I keep saving up to like 3Mil-4Mil credits, but I keep buying new tanks to grind, such as my Recent BC-25t. (Answer to the comment below)

[sick leaf]

Why does that bother you tho? Are you paying for his credits?

[midnight lark]

So where's the problem?

[steady magnet]

It's annoying to get by gold, when it's completely unnecessary. I understand, gold to the front of heavy armor, but gold to the side of paper armor? Just... Why?

[regal cosmos]

Why does that even bother you. Often the prammo is heat, which can be blocked by tracks. It also does lower damage, so it’s overall only good for you. You only get an advantage from them using it to the sides

[midnight lark]

Yep

[ornate spoke]

Haha i though i got platinum this time using SU152 but no i just got gold on 😦

[tender cargo]

Mad games

[distant fiber]

yo guys

[floral dock]

Honestly yall say the is4 has great armor and all but I never have any problems going right through the upper plate of an is4

[tender cargo]

Lol rating

[steady magnet]

When you play TDs with massive amounts of pen and maybe a few of those extra high pen heavies, then yea, armor is overrated.

[silver kite]

fix the matchmaking. i shouldn’t be coming up against diamond league players with no life while i’m only in gold league

[regal cosmos]

Not enough players to do that and also keep queue times short enough

[harsh relic]

Any general advice for raising glasses in clasificatory? Thank you 🙂

[keen moon]

TTawol Haxyi (Михаил который)#0059 has been warned.

[orchid jacinth]

Why am i playing with apes who havent calibrated yet? IM in High Plat almost diamond and i keep getting those unranked players w 44%wr and 300 avg. I didnt know "Calibration" was a league.

[normal garnet]

I mean u get ur rating somehow 🤷‍♂️

[floral dock]

I’d rather losing knowing I’m going up against good players instead of losing because my own teammates don’t have a braincell.

[ember halo]

^^

[native marten]

ratings is such a meme gamemode that people are trying to hit 0 rating and honestly i respect that

like what are you gonna about it? wargaming themselves, like, in all honesty, to be blunt they don't care and probably never will

might as well rename it to "credits and xp gamemode, while you're at it here's a free camo and avatar"

[rustic wagon]

E5>is4>113

[ornate spoke]

Is4 IS stronger

[rapid pumice]

E5 is different from is4, not better

[rustic wagon]

Not better as tank they made of different role. But as a rating tank

[silver kite]

gold league players should NOT be coming up against players like this. wargaming, try making ratings actually ranked.

[minor dust]

so you would rather wait 20 min for a match?

[dusty kelp]

Yes

[normal garnet]

Bruh

[ornate spoke]

once i do if i no even shot in calibration and in end i was in bronze leage 1900 and after 2 weaks i go to my platinum 4500-4200 when my calibration ally drawn me and diamond use me for dmg - no even help me - use me and i decide if i use my team for dmg is honor to be diamond ? is be best or have good heart and try help my team ! and decide to never again play this trash - gold spam mode !!

[sterile ginkgo]

Morning 🌞 is best time for rating battles

[dreamy wind]

you know you dont have to play the game

[steady magnet]

I need to, for missions. Normally, I absolutely never play

[dreamy wind]

thats great

[wet sonnet]

Hi I'm new

[ornate spoke]

Hello new

[olive bolt]

first tank on display

[ornate spoke]

random have better MM as ratting battle ??

[floral dock]

Wow it’s usually the other way around. First time I’ve heard a bad player complaining about being matched with good players. I’ve always just seen good players complaining about being matched with bad players

[deep grotto]

already do.

[zinc ravine]

Good as it will later prove useful when WG bring back key streams

[deep grotto]

the time i’ve waited has resulted in me losing 2nd place

[sonic sedge]

War Gaming, sort your rubbish unfair scoring system out. Highest score out of both ‘teams’ that YOU put together & my points go up only +9 😡

[lone thistle]

I ain’t one for complaining about teams, but my god.....
1 win in the last 13 ratings battles. Kinda ridiculous. Somehow I’ve only managed to lose 13 points from what I was on before these 13 battles. Kinda getting tiring real quick......
Btw my 30 day is 73% WR and 4300 WN8 so I’m not a bad player

[regal cosmos]

When you want to gain from points from losing but 9 points arent enough. You want to gain points like youve won the battle when youve not done enough to win it

[junior notch]

Some tanks get you class 3 medals at 500 damage (wrong channel)

[minor radish]

You literally lost the battle, and want more points. Honestly, you should be glad your rating went up instead of down.

[late mural]

Stevo, no. The problem is that people who camp in a heavy tank get too MANY points if they happen to score high damage but contribute nothing else.

[sonic sedge]

No ‘I’ didn’t ’lose the battle’, as my score shows, that’s my point! 🙄

[glossy raptor]

But your team lost and is far as I know, you belong to your team and therefore you also lost. Sure, you did the most dmg but you still didn’t manage to bring your team to victory. Now you will say “I did way more than the others so not my fault we didn’t win”, maybe not but you still lost and next time carry harder :)

Be happy you went some profit and didn’t lose anything

[regal cosmos]

Then did the SU12244 lose the battle with that logic?

[ornate spoke]

dont give them any ideas.... u have to hyper angle it, wiggle wiggle makes it troll af

[floral dock]

ehh just wait till they over angle then shoot the track wheel, or you just pop on speed boost in ur e5 and zoom to the side of it

[regal cosmos]

Not everyone drives E5s though

[ornate spoke]

there is a weak part right where the bottom hull ends which makes the is4 very vulnerable in side scraping, go to wot blitz
armor insepctor, u can see a very weak streak of armor under the tracks

[midnight lark]

That's the big brain spot

[reef parrot]

Hello, want to say the matchmaking is broken. The RNG too. Tank who should have precision didn’t have it and tank who shouldn’t have it. Also, matchmaking is broken. There are too many games where all player who are above 60% wr are at one side and other player having less than 50% wr are the other side. Please fix it. It’s really anoying

[midnight lark]

The Rng can't be broken.
The mm in normal battles isn't broken, but in rating the mm is kinda meh.

[median zenith]

.mute 507830277427691540 3d inappropriate discussion

[keen moon]

I can't find user 507830277427691540.

El demonio de español#2469 was banned

[still crater]

imagine^

[round fiber]

Less players = dead, dont ask them fix

[glossy raptor]

Youre playing Annihilator so you kind of deserve it 🙂 and you only got one tech tree tank in your team, so the rest is not grinding xp

[regal cosmos]

Only 3 out of 14 players are playing for xp, and 2 of them are in the enemy team..

[midnight lark]

@slender kelp are you crying ;(
Dont play broken tank and you will get good teams

[slender kelp]

in this battle not many but its not only about that and why is it not a good tank? I got most damage and look at OBJ. not nice to fight alone and team easy diying

[midnight lark]

Annihilator is the most broken tank in the game@slender kelp .
Aka 0 skill tank

[keen moon]

Malek#1889 has been warned.

[slender kelp]

ok what is this warning for?

[tight vortex]

I feel like rating battles are bad, i always lose but in regular i have a higher chance to win

[worldly anvil]

then its doing its job

[lime sparrow]

get gud

[crisp fable]

just run lol

[keen moon]

LoctopusJr#4242 has been warned.

[pulsar ether]

Ola

[ornate spoke]

Anni aint broken at all lmao

Smasher is 10 times better

[regal cosmos]

Why do you think it isnt a broken tank?

[midnight lark]

Did you ever checked the Stats how it performs by some players? It has the average of some t9s. So why are you telling me, this isn't broken??

[ornate spoke]

I never played against a good anni player

I raped all the anni with my smasher

[regal cosmos]

Doesnt change how strong it is

[lunar moon]

what are rating battles

[covert wind]

U get points for winning and lose points for losing and those who get a good amount of points can get rewards for an IS6

[vast yacht]

Anyone Plat?

[brave night]

um is this the last season to get the Fearless?
What tank will come next?

[normal garnet]

@brave night I doubt wargaming is planning on making another tank available like this. And for now is6 fearless is staying

[compact wedge]

I’ve seen 40%ers average 60% in it and 50%ers avg 70%

[midnight lark]

Ok but you played not that great. If you did 3k, you wouldn't lose that much points.

[lime sparrow]

none of those games look like you contributing

[red hawk]

Jesus loves you soo much he died on the cross to save you

[zinc ravine]

Not on topic at all but ok

[lunar moon]

big fax senor

[round fiber]

Dont ask them fix, less players and bad matchmaking = d e a d game

[latent vault]

Ratings are so easy when u are not trying

[round fiber]

Easy countdown :)

[echo sphinx]

😂

[elfin burrow]

nice one🤩 🥳 👏 👍

[unkempt kernel]

nice

[sly locust]

why is everyone i get put with in rating always brain dead but then when i go into normal games everyones dumb sweaty

[round fiber]

unpopular game and less players, many bot players

[sly locust]

i know but in rating people wth t9/10 should atleast know how to aim everysingle ranked game has 2 people doing under 500 damage its annoying when t10/9

[rotund geode]

same

[agile sphinx]

Is this not a good enough reason? You are about at the rating everyone starts with before calibration... If you expect good teammates and reds then there's a big issue somewhere...

[sly locust]

I know but i cant get higher if no one can play the game right im at top of leaderboard nearly everygame cause no one can aim on my team atleast

[agile sphinx]

Stop going for damage and start playing for the win. People won't at exactly how you want them to, and you can't change that. You still have to work around your team and do the best you can in that situation. What you think of as playing the game right may be completely different to what someone else thinks

[stuck path]

I think rating battles should not be thrust upon anyone who is not interested in rating status.

I only play it, as I MUST, otherwise this would hamper me towards the battle pass and personal criteria ... red box.

[glossy raptor]

You know you can get the level 80 in BP even though you dont complete every mission everday?

[stuck path]

Hmmm - ok, did not want to risk missing any in-completes and failing at the last hurdle. Cheers for the info.

[brave night]

I heard this is the last month of giving away the Is6 fearless

[glossy raptor]

Where did u hear that?

[topaz chasm]

Ribble said A new prize tank would be announced in advance by WG, and there is still more than enough time to get the IS6F, so I don’t think that is true

[normal garnet]

Stevo still going at it 💀

[latent vault]

Ratings are so easy, I’m not even trying

[agile sphinx]

Worse teammates => worse reds => easier damage to farm 🤦‍♀️

[ornate spoke]

Bruh, after an year i would expect stevo to forget about ratings. But apparently not.

[round fiber]

Less players and dead, rating in this game is less than other

[midnight lark]

Im just grinding to 4k, to get 4 camos._.

[crude belfry]

is it difficult to get 5k? I placed 3.5k and am at 4k rn trying to decide whether I should push or not

[muted shuttle]

Depends on how good of a player you are.

[crude belfry]

I’m Unicum in average of T8 which isn’t too good.I only have 4K battles

[muted shuttle]

Then you are definitely not an unicum) I am not sure whether you can make it

@crude belfry

[crude belfry]

Yeah I know I was just playing T8/9 for T10 grinds. I’m probably not gonna waste my time to do it and just stay at 4k

[muted shuttle]

Great idea, it isn't really worth it @crude belfry

[midnight lark]

4k is always a nice goal for Unicums and Kinda below. You have to grind, but not that much.

[sacred sentinel]

If I have 50 battles on 2 tanks in T8 with 5k will I get the camo for both tanks?

[zinc ravine]

You will only get a camo for one of the tier 8s that has the highest battles

[brave night]

There are so many Asia tryhards tryba get the top 5 in Asia. At least 3 members said this is the last season for IS6 fearless

[round fiber]

Asia is easiest, worst server in this game, most are 40wr 30wr

[true ridge]

I hope the next Ratings tank isn’t the Souma SM

[ornate spoke]

if this is really the last season I will be very sadge

[desert valley]

My strategy - play my 10 calibration battles. Get into gold. Don’t play anymore.

[hollow berry]

lol

[real galleon]

Ranked Battles do not affect the average damage and win percentage statistics

[burnt skiff]

That is the point

[burnt skiff]

Nice, ty for message deleted

[lone thistle]

Come at me scrubs 🤣
Ace on the T28 to get into Diamond League

[latent vault]

Asian server is so easy

[lime sparrow]

Debatable

[round fiber]

it's facts because most are bots, newbies in this game

[latent vault]

There’s no debate, Asian server full of bots

[lime sparrow]

Bots on your team, bots on their team.

[latent vault]

And then there’s u, if u are good u can carry

[lone thistle]

All servers are full of bots, and having played both NA and EU before Asia is the hardest of the 3 even with my ping being just a quarter of my EU and NA ping. EU is by far the easiest I will say.

[round fiber]

Asia is easiest, no toxic, they only call you "Animal" sometimes

[lone thistle]

Asia isn't toxic?
Funniest thing I heard all day lmao

[round fiber]

NA EU RU is most toxic, Asia only call you "d o g", "p i g", i played for a while, problem is Asia more bots, 40 30wr, even below 500 damage, that's why Asia server is easiest

[lone thistle]

You clearly have never played ratings on Asia lol
Other servers you can farm damage much more easily and same for winrate as they have significantly more 'bots' due to having much bigger server population than Asia. On Asia it is hard to go more than a battle or two without getting 60%+ players on the enemy team due to low player quantity on the server.

[round fiber]

more bots you can farm damage, that's facts, i played NA, they always put bad players on your team, good players in enemy team, but Asia is full bots, so you can play with bots and against enemy bots, it's easier

[lone thistle]

That first part you said is true, the more bots, the more you can farm damage. Which is why all other servers are easier than Asia (Although NA is only slightly easier). The reason is the other servers have significantly more players, meaning significantly more 'bots' in the queue. I can play on EU as an example and easily get 5-10% higher stats all round (Despite having 250 ping) than what I have on Asia.

[round fiber]

I can get 60wr easy in Asia server

[covert wind]

But u guys had a TD :trollface:

[topaz chasm]

Yes it does work. All your meds/light just completely failed in doing anything impactful.
I’d also be interested to know what map it was

[sonic sedge]

New Bay.

[neat wind]

this is not a channel to complain about teams/MM

[slender kelp]

ok I have 5600 and Im trying to get 6000 but waiting for more than 5 minutes to get into a battle

[slender kelp]

alright now waiting more than 10 minutes rly annoying Im out

[glossy raptor]

10 minutes are rookie numbers

[glacial moth]

So just connect to an Asian server?

[marsh path]

People in ratings are not friendly in Asia server and also play like noobs

[elfin burrow]

Lorraine OP!!😁

[tough breach]

It would be useful if developers stopped uncalibrated players entering ranking in the last week. Makes a mockery of it.

[ornate spoke]

Isu 122s op great pen always go against tier 8 great dpm

[gilded edge]

why? even while in their 10 calibrated games WG gives you a rating already (you can see that in blitzstars even before you hit your 10 games)

[sharp path]

There should defenetly be some adjustments to the rankes system. Rn it only Matters if you have time or not to get into Diamond league,it should atleast be skillbased in some way

[gloomy mesa]

can we have individual rating points plzzz ?

[lime sparrow]

That’s called a personal score genius

[sonic sedge]

Well the new update mentions ‘mode changes’, hopefully this mode (ratings battles ) will be changed because it’s long overdue an overhaul !

[dusty cypress]

You don't farm in ratings you play to win¿

[ornate spoke]

I’m finally gonna be able to play rating for the first time, anyone got tips? (I use the Tiger 1)

[dusty cypress]

Wait until you get a t8, t7 will always be bottom tier and you will be coming up against broken top tier premiums

[slender kelp]

me tier 8 and Vickers tier 9 just go and rush and die alone. how is this fair in rating? thanks wargaming

[flat basalt]

at least you are surrounded by honest players.

[serene sun]

these are probably the ugliest and least creative avatars I've ever seen, whenever the previous ones didn't need to be replaced, I just hope we don't add them to the game 😀

[regal cosmos]

They aren’t replacing anything. They just are new, and add to any other ratings avatars that already exist

[glossy raptor]

I wonder, will the current won rating battles count to receive the avatars?

[ornate spoke]

the current ones look way better now, i agree

[granite rapids]

I was at 3500 rating points 3 days ago and then when I bought my kran back I gained 900 rating points. It's actually crazy, I'm at 4400 rating points rn and continuing to increase

[late mural]

Trying to get into ratings just freezes the game. Anyone else?

[ornate spoke]

is the rating battle working??
i cant enter any battles.

[split pewter]

The same problem

[cloud geyser]

110 million creds :o

[tender meteor]

Problem with rating Battle on european serveur only 🥲

[ionic flower]

Rating isn't working, do something pls!

[stuck vortex]

😂

[hushed stump]

brush

[cobalt quarry]

ratings broken

[late mural]

now stuck in queue!

[tidal terrace]

am i the only one with this problem?? i can play normal battles

[glossy raptor]

Yes u are

Perhaps scroll up a little

[split pewter]

The same problem actually

[daring flower]

Me too cant play rating mode

[ornate spoke]

Rating is broken

[spare mist]

well when the game is updating, I don't think you should be able to play the game

[pliant bronze]

What Can I get for bronze league

[rough eagle]

I am having trouble joining ratings battles. Keeps hanging on iOS (iPad Pro). Then I have to rejoin, no issue with regular battles though

[warm otter]

same ,rating is crashed

[burnt hazel]

Hello there

[terse zenith]

My rating battles works as they should

[ornate spoke]

YAY one day off from the slavery of ratings battles

[hollow python]

oke

[tough breach]

@gilded edge IMO these late calibrators unbalance the team. Especially when they’re 60% or sub 40 WR.

[latent vault]

The update didn’t come on NA server yet?

[ripe prism]

hello

[limpid field]

Wassup

[hollow python]

ah dammit they close rating when i need only 30 poiunts to 5k

[twin goblet]

See in #737243639863967805

[elfin burrow]

How am supposed to complete ratings mission (win 3 ratings battles) with ratings closed??? Nice one 😅👇

[late mural]

You are supposed to complain here 3 times about ratings being closed.

[junior flax]

True

[marble timber]

@late mural lol ur the guy who was toxic af lmao

[rose path]

Sooooo with these new avatars that wont disappear anymore, will current veterans have to start over again or do I have to suffer ranked once more just for them 😅

[marble timber]

Yeah, not wins count before 7.8

[rose path]

I already have a Fearless, WG can you give us avatar haha

[plush idol]

LOL....seems that someone forgot to set the availability timer of rating battles properly 😉

[regal cosmos]

LOL... seems that someone didn’t bother to read #game-status-upd despite it having an unread notification 😉

[rose path]

Can someone explain how the accumaltives work? If I wanted that 3rd apex diamond one does that mean I have to grind more than one season?

[rose path]

Was this officially said? Considering the current legendary avs says "All victories since your account creation are counted"

[marble timber]

I cant find where i saw it

But i would be happy to get my avatars without having to get the battles all over again

[regal cosmos]

The game mode avatars didn’t count any of the past battles when they were added. So it would be the same for this one too

[plush idol]

I did read...but nevertheless the timer now says that rating battles will start today at 23h00 CET.....seems that someone (you) did not check the timer in game

[marble timber]

Since ratings are closed until 23:00(normal close time) we wont be able to play it after 23:00 either right? Only tomorrow

[desert valley]

ew imagine playing rating battles

[marble timber]

Imagine being a bot

[rose path]

Yeah but like Ratings is a permanent game mode tho

Idk if you look at your accumalative legendary avs list they're counting all victories

[marble timber]

It would depend on how many battles each one require

[ornate spoke]

wg pls fix this its not fair all of players in my team have less than 1k avg

[honest dust]

And you?

[ornate spoke]

1200 but i had more skill than others man rly thats not fair

[half badge]

more skill than the others but halfway down the team list 🤔

[ornate spoke]

my team left me when we were pushing full team one side in desert all left me without no reason i got flanked by enemies and my team went to cap

[honest dust]

Well, looking at your blitzstars Page... What Do you expect to Happen when wg fixes it? Bc, lets be honest Here, you are also Not the Best Player. Otherwise you would have done much better, especially in an OP like the Defender Mk 1. There is nothing to fix there. The matchmaking isnt the reason you lost. Its you. Very simple.

Edit: so you got isolated in an Autoloader with 2k DPM. Do you See the discrepancies Here?

[half badge]

then go with the team, if they're all on one side and you're alone, of course they're gonna shoot you first lmao, you, as a player have to adapt to the situation, not just hope your team does something useful

[ornate spoke]

there people on joking of others its useless

[honest dust]

We are Not joking. Its just that there is nothing to fix. You can complain about the matchmaking all you want. Truth is, you cant win them all, and secondly you didnt Do your best to win the Match either. We all know its easier to complain that the game actually wants you to Lose than to admit that you didnt Do well and that thats the reason you lost. Realizing what you did wrong will make you a much better Player than complaining to WG that they should fix stuff that is Not in need of a fix.

[ornate spoke]

mm is literally need to fix and u know that

[marble timber]

U wanted to send a game like this didnt you?

[ornate spoke]

lol

i no spend tons off time to be in platinum leage and give fck AVATAR !!

[honest dust]

It doenst need a fix. I would rather Not have noobs like you all over the rating battles. You try to find an excuse for your loss, you think its the matchmaking, when you did a mistake in the Match, got killed, and lost. Its your mistake, no one elses. At least be so self critical and admit you made a mistake.

[ornate spoke]

we don't deal with it anymore but sometimes the teams are really useless I admit that I'm not the best but also not the worst

[marble timber]

At least dig up a screen where you did good dmg and then complain

[ornate spoke]

ok bye good night btw this happend 30 mins ago

[midnight lark]

Ok who cares? I mean that's good, but that can do everybody.

[rose path]

@honest dust Oh hi lmao, you were in my ranked mm a few games

[ornate spoke]

yes but the guy wanted game where have been good dmg

[midnight lark]

Look your average, mate. That's important. If you do one time 4k but 100 times 1.5k, that's just a way too hard grind for you.

[honest dust]

Hey 🙂 did we Lose and i was salty? 😄

[ornate spoke]

for me its ez to do 50 games 3k dmg but when i play these games i have good team what cover me so i can push and win it

[midnight lark]

Sorry, but don't be a wannabe. I mean that's not 3k average. Not even 2k on tier 10.

And nope that isn't shaming. It's criticism

[ornate spoke]

Activate ranked battle again already

[honest dust]

Dude, Look at your rating and your stats. You dont easily Do 50 games 3k. Not in ratings. Not in normal. Most likely Not even in uprising. Until that point you didnt even admit that you made a mistake by getting isolated. Yeah i can Show you games where i did over 80 Ranking points. So what? Today i increased my Overall rating by 100 points. I had some Matches where we won bc the team Played well, some bc i think i did good decisions, but some we also lost bc i did Bad decisions. The key to Being good is Not to complain about WG when you Lose a match but to admit when you made mistakes or what you could have done better. Also, consistency is key. I lost games, but won rating points bc i still did well even if the team Was Bad. When you can be consistently good, you will realize that the MM is Not broken. I had a Guy in a match today, 69% wr, 1.7k average damage. He said He lost 18 out of 20 battles. Wanna know what He did in his FCM 50t? He camped in TD Spots, didnt want to Do his role, etc and still complained. Should I complain that i lost even though i had a 69%er on my team? Also, wanna know what that dude didnt do: admit He Played poorly.

[rose path]

@honest dust We're both disappointed in tonights mm lol

[ornate spoke]

How guys even play ranked rn ? Its disabled for me
@honest dust what if I switch server from log in section?

[honest dust]

On EU its disabled rn due to night time, on other Servers i dont Know.

[ornate spoke]

ok so i'm the worst player in the world thanks good night and i have so many battles on stb because it tossed me between 3,700 to 3,800 points 6 days at a time so i couldn't get out of there this is my worst ranked season of all and never I didn't have a problem with it every day I scored 100 points plus but now it's changed in the teams and it's quite recognizable I've never had such a problem with it as now, I didn't have it and now I'm not really writing off for the next thing, good night

[honest dust]

We didnt say you are the worst Player in the world. But you are also Not the Best. So assuming you lost bc the MM needs fixing is just hilariously cringy. I had seasons where i climbed to 4.5k easily. Now i struggle at 4.3. So what? There are So many variables that play into this. Your ability, your tank selection, Team mates, enemies, maps, etc. Its simply Not correct to assume that bc you have a lot of games in the STB 1 and you had better seasons before, that you will have the same results in the current season.

Edit: also your child like behavior Here Shows very well what kind of Player you are. Everyone Else makes a mistake except you. When you Lose, its the teams fault, Not yours. Stop Being like this, its becoming boring.

[covert wind]

Dude stop making 10000 excuses. We can accept that your not the best player and want more supportive teams but we want you to start and admit that your not that good of a player and definitely not as good as you advertised yourself.

Good TLDR; of my part Trax

[warm charm]

why can this be a thing

[midnight lark]

Holdy

[honest dust]

Imagine how long that Vickers Player was stuck in the queue until the MM was out of options and just yeeted him in any Match 😂

[covert wind]

Ppl lose points according to there current rating.

[ornate spoke]

Ranked disabled now I cant complete the daily mission and I cant get to the 200 gold last level in battle pass

[honest dust]

Buy the Level, it costs 250 Gold, you get 200 back and the Profile background.

[ornate spoke]

Its free battle pass . @honest dust Yeah but ranked is disabled and the mission is to win 3 ranked games . Timer says its availible again in morning so Im going to try it in the free lesson . Unless it goes on a 8 hour timer again which makes no sense

[honest dust]

Until the missions reset, you can fulfill them.

[warm otter]

now, as u said. it become 8hr again
then how the 3 win rating mission done

[warm charm]

rip bronze to diamond, just to show that blaming teams for your bad rating isnt a valid excuse 🙂

[silver peak]

Wait what's the exact time rating battles start and end in either pst/est timezone

[limber ermine]

I don’t know, but I think the time will go back to 3PM EST to 11 PM EST. I think it’s weird for today since in the announcements they said it was stopped today or somthing

[ornate spoke]

lmao synfs competetor doing it again

[marble timber]

Lmao, good job dude

[ornate spoke]

I have a question, could anyone advise me what equipment to choose for the T49 tank? to all levels?

[marble timber]

@ornate spoke

[ornate spoke]

oooooo thank you very much and thanks all😁🤯

[marble timber]

u can get rammer too if you want, i just use calib to have a better chance at penning

[marble timber]

lmfao

[spice thicket]

Where is bronze avatar???

[covert wind]

Oh cmon seriously ppl who bragg about Bronze rating might aswell delete the game.

[spice thicket]

True collector wants them all 🙂 But it might be more difficult to get it then the Diamond one :))

[covert wind]

Well if there's no avatar your not missing out on anything

[rapid pumice]

nah, i suggest to put all the opposite in the left column, except for cal shells, if u want to combat at close range

[marble timber]

i only use scharger since i hate slow shells, that my own preference, as i said u can use something else if you want

[spice thicket]

Winning a Rating battle earns you a victory for both your current league avatar and the avatars for all preceding leagues.

Didn't read this. Then it's to easy...

[onyx owl]

The crusader autoloader but it seems like the penetration got less i cant seem to pen t34

[warped anvil]

With everything that’s wrong with ratings and WG spend their time on avatars 😂😂😂😂😂 what a f’ing joke. Seriously WG, look in the mirror, give your heads a shake and tell the 🤡 looking back at you to do some proper work.

[tough geyser]

will you keep this avatars for ever?

[vivid shore]

Yes

[gilded edge]

Why so many bad players spam WT now? Because they heard good players do good with it in ratings? Stop pls.

[river sky]

If I get more than 200 wins in ratings (which awards you the max medal at the moment), will those wins accumulate for the next levels of medals when they get introduced in the future??

[ornate spoke]

Whoever writes to it will get 20 psc duch#7126

[ebon thicket]

why are bad players allowed in ratings??? I thought it was a competitive game mode