#rating-battles
1 messages · Page 44 of 1
That is what the totally necessary heavy buff did
Heavy meta 😎
Dumb heavy buffs
Lol i mean i dont mind cos i use the t34 in rating
Before heavies could actually be played carefully, but not anymore because you can afford to take too many hits
So the buff was completely unnecessary?
They made heavies OP
So I lost two games after calibration then won two so now im at 4k. Gonna leave it there for now, really dont feel like testing my luck anymore lmao
honestly playing early on in the season if you don’t have to is pain because if people get a bad calibration or something the teams in terms of average ratings are gonna be close but the skill level gap is huge
I personally got very bad calibration but my teams are amazing right now
these unbalanced early calibration teams are working in my favour so much lol. Wonder how long that will last
Rating time finished here 4044 rating as if now. Will try to go top this time. Last time i quit at 5114 20 days earlier. Should have pushed and would have gotten some 80 parts
like reaching 4K is very nice on the first day.
@dim heron don’t think of the following as of something offensive, but I have doubts about that- the higher you are in rating, the less you gain per game. When you hit ~5700 it becomes VERY difiicult to gain more than 7 points per match, even a very good one.
I will have to try.
Punished severely
@median wagon personally I feel like playing more actively and spotting enemies bring you a lot more points in the region 3500-4500. After that you either use a fast heavy or a semi-armored medium
I never understood why noobs go in ratings
for missions
And to explore a new game mode
and most importantly to grind credits
I really enjoy having professional teams, especially losing 7-0
Damn ratings today is worser than ever
its the end of the school year
all the younger players are out
🤔
Ik. Even public matches are unbearable.
No, pubs are 100% better
I honestly don’t know. I’m always getting paired with “NUB TEAM” spammers and the afkers.
And the YOLOers who go into infested areas with a block of ice shoved up their cracks.
I somehow see less of that in Ratings
Or the camping smashers
it's not bad players, just unintentional features lmao
MM is bad these days
Man I hope today I can make it to 5k some today I am at 4600
Tier 1 only ratings would be epic
It would be chaos
It would be more balanced, because every single tier 1 is the same
imagine ratings but everyone is driving pre-nerf Ke-ni otsu
i wish bronze players couldnt get into gold games
id rather have longer que and better battles
some players are different
also it allows u to have more farming opportunity
🥶
Oof
Ahahahahhaaaaa
ratings on fire today
20 mins before ratings became unavailable I played 2 games and lost both. I definitely do not regret playing lol
I think I'm gonna call it a day after climbing 700
@pallid arch whats your rating at
The low value of 3638
and you couldn't be proud of with that, it seems im going to start with mid 2000, i lose 2 matches of 5 so tomorrow will be difficult for me,
Heh heh, I'm salty af, stopping before I explode
Now queue going take min now
I have a question. If I play a tank in ratings like the T6 Dracula or the Smasher, where I can't add a cammo, what happens? If I play 50+ games but can't fit a camo, does it just not work? Or can I use it for another tank?
@ornate spoke Credits compensation if I'm not mistaken
Oh, well then thanks for the answer :)
Seriously. I’m normally 3000 + in ratings I just ended up 2300. Top 3 every battle. But the teams were awful. It takes the fun out of it. It really does. The matchmaking is all over the place.
oh yeah, share the results!@pine falcon
Lucky that teams meds went the town route because the lemmings insisted on going the river route even though the enemy team had more meds!
It helps to look at the enemy team 1st BEFORE making decisions!
Why don’t you go with him?
You literally said "The enemy team have faster tanks" when the lineups were almost the same. Secondly, you said and I quote "We lose"
We had a chimera, a Pantera and a T49 for meds/lights. They had a T44/Ru251 and progetto. So mediums were literally on par in the mobility aspect. As heavies they had two 252, a vk100. We had 2 252s, a defender (in which I would oneclip the TD which they had) and a T34. So yeah, pretty balanced in terms of mobility I would say. So yeah, saying that we should go to town seems pretty unreasonable
Also going town never works, C has the high ground and town has no hull down cover, so regardless of what mobility ur team has u always go C
@pine falcon funny how I scored more than you, now how did that happen!? Also the T49 has weak armour & the shells bounce off most frontal armour so would have been fairly useless going over the river, which is why he didn’t, go figure!
Have fun all 😁👋
The t49 would destroy the ru and can pen the t44 and the progetto frontally lmao
Stevo on your team = auto win, dont complain
I got 5 shots that penned (with one heat shell fired). You had 4 shots. Also the difference is 24 damage. + I spotted one enemy.
nice nice. Lets see if you can get to 4K this season
Never started before losing 5 in row in rating
From 4044 straight to 4004
3990 6 lose in row. Exciting
Question to any devs that may see this - what’s the point of ratings battles when clans can do count ins during calibration with six players in game? Kinda defeats the purpose doesn’t it?
theres nothing wrong with count ins or count downs unless you rig it
i would think
otherwise it would be stupid if 3+ people can get banned or chat banned or whatever purely because they're in the same game and have the same clan tag
ik you asked a dev but it is highly unlikely a dev will see that
@final bloom
@dim heron same thing happened to me. Hit 4.1k, immediately lost 3 in a row lol
@worldly anvil I’ve had 3 friends from 3 clans get bans in the last month for ratings count-ins and they did nothing more than what I saw yesterday
In general, I see nothing wrong with count-ins, but 1) they need to be consistent with how they handle these situations and 2) if ratings are supposed to show “skill” (which we know isn’t really true), then it kinda defeats the purpose when people can do count-ins
@final bloom oh i think there is a thread on a wotb discussion page that had a similar situation. I cant find it, but basically what happened was they did count ins, and people sent a ticket for rigging since most of the time one team won heavily. I think they sent an appeal or something with proof they weren’t rigging, and their ban got shortened, but a message from the thread’s author was its best not to do count ins in ratings
It would be good if this statement is factual, but unfortunately it’s not! ‘Perform well in battle but if the team we’ve put you with don’t then you’ll still lose points, haha’ , would be more appropriate!
You can still gain points if you actually perform well
Its funny how the 60 winrate are getting carried by 50 winrate in rating battles all the time every battle. Proves they got 0 skills
Because winrate can so easily be inflated
@cosmic cypress Take a shower.
@sonic sedge Shall we create a new channel just for your whining about ratings?
Its funny how the 60 winrate are getting carried by 50 winrate in rating battles all the time every battle. Proves they got 0 skills
@dim heron lol wut so the 60% is a fake 60% then
That 100wr is from like 1 match
The rest of that 1k battles are rating battles
@dim heron u ping me why?
Nah. Sorry
wait i want to see that ngl @muted shuttle
Funny how 40% wr players get to the diamond league playing expensive premium tanks...
Do it please
Do it
Throw in Cancracker as well
Quality entertainment
What’s wrong with this tank?
Bruh you’ll be downtiered, just play tier 8
why are you playing tier 7 in ratings
For x2 exp and other bonuses. I don’t care about the rating.
Currently at 3.5k with only my e75
@bleak crest "I don't care about the rating" I should probably pin this one ))
very soon! NO? YES?
Why should I care? It gets reset, it’s just the same as random so no need to worry about it.
@bleak crest "I don't care about the rating" I should probably pin this one ))
Do it
Dew it
its not like he and stevo both constantly whine about how "bad" rating is made 😂
I wonder if it really is rating that’s “bad”😂
🤣 excellent
Funny how 40% wr players get to the diamond league playing expensive premium tanks...
@bleak crest and funny how you, a 60% can't get to diamond.
literally anybody who loses a match: well okay that sucks
cancracker and stevo: BrUh RiGgEd MaTcHmAkInG
i love it when ppl think rating is about what tanks you play or how good you are...its just about how much you can play it, e.g. the more games the higher you get, being good just makes it easier, i really miss the competitive aspect of ratings
If you want to get to diamond just spam 1000-2000 battles within the season. Nothing more
The trash I have to put up with in ratings... smh(yeah I rushed though, bad play from me)
Don’t we all know that camping in a heavy while capping on encounter is the best thing to do?🤡
What equipment should I buy for my 75 btw
LOL
@crimson goblet it gets really competitive once you reach over 6k. Then you loose the same amount of points you gain by winning.
yea but its just soo teamdepended that it just really is how many more battles than others can you spam
Ratings is trash
Noobs play it because they don’t realise they’re noobs and they want to have the fearless
Spam battle really important in later stages of rating but in early it important just to wins
ive never been blocked more often than in ranked im a turretless td and people always drive in front of me even other tds so i cant use my 4200 dpm even if there are enemys
I’ve never been called a “bot” this many times until I played ratings, it is pure toxic in ratings
I receive hate because apparently I was camping in 252u when I was holding a hill
havent been called a bot in a long time
Have you been called other things then?
noob thats it
@crimson goblet it isn’t at all. I’ve been there last season and once you reach over 6k the amount of battles means absolutely nothing. It’s all about how much you can do to help your team win.
Hey how can i craft Door in minecraft ?
@ivory pike you need roughly 1000 rating battles to craft one
@ivory pike You first need to get 2 blocks of the same type of wood. After which, convert the two blocks into wooden planks. You should get 8 wooden planks. You only need 6 wooden planks for the job, so you get throw away the other 2. Go into a crafting table and fill the first and second column of the 9 box crafting table menu with the wood. The door item icon should appear and all you have to do is click it. (yes, I know it is a meme)
You should place them horizontally
After of which you should buy Gold from Wotb shop and buy a tier X and jump into a couple of rating games
No consumables, only HE,no provisions and no equips
Drive backwards to bounce more shots, and go frontline
So that so true
Once you reached your goal (dying within the 1st min of the game), trashtalk your teammates until the end of the battle (hopefully a loss, you won’t get to 30% wr that easily)
I started higher than I usually start at, so I hope I will reach diamond
Count in on ratings battles!
Stevo out here with the 1k dmg games 😳
Man not a lot of people of playing today man can’t get too match
For what be facing on enemy team he not do terrible
Why I didn't receive parts of IS-6 ? I was in Diamond league
did u finish in diamond league
If have diamond league avatar then take pic
To play ratings you not only should have a 100 crew but also some amount of battles in your tank, like I dunno 200-300 so people that are lacking in skill don't just buy a premium and then think they are good enough to play ratings
200-300 is a lot for a single tank, why not 50?
Cause 200-300 isn't that much
I dunno I've racked up around 2k battles this month almost, 200-300 seems generous
Jesus you do 4 battles an hour, assuming you sleep 8 hours, non stop for 30 days
Thats not much
I racked up around 80-90 hours in two week on csgo and unturned once, but in actuality they need to add something that at least helps ratings keep out bad players
Id like ratings to you know, split the ranks like you know, it's more rating based rather than just being mm but I get the playerbase isn't big enough for that
Cause ratings is the same as mm, but I'd argue worse at times
cool
A lot of chances could be made if the playerbase was bigger
Time to attempt to convince people to try out blitz
lmao just go on twitter or something and be like "in july of 2020 only those who are playing on the NA server of world of tanks blitz will be deemed worthy to live"
Lmao
200 battles is a ton for me i havent got a single tank with even 270 battles 😅
Bruuuuh How? Are you serious you don't have a single tank over 270 battles?
nope highest is 262
Meanwhile I have 2400+ battles in leo 1 (mostly due to it being my first tier 10 and trying to repair its stats)
thats like 1/4 of my total battles
well that kind of explains why you don't have tanks with more than 270 battles
i hate playing tanks a lot xD
At 4999
Nice, mate
I have 2300 in an ru 251 and 1600 in an fv215b 😆
5007
Jesus you do 4 battles an hour, assuming you sleep 8 hours, non stop for 30 days
@ornate spoke
I have 700 battles on rudy, t-54mod1 and cdc
Why is closed ranked battles on nights?
It because they guys most likely play more single year in game
Ok so basically T34 and AX are beast in rating
No, AX
I use t49
Raitings has basically become a heavy brawl
Gg wp, I need 50 parts to get the fearless but there is no option to get 50 part, why did you put 50 parts option last season then?
Only option is to get to top 5 which means all the grind from last 2 months wasn’t worth it.
Otherwise I have to play next month too to get fearless if I don’t get in top 5.
Just wow. Wp to who decided to do this. Literally could have done 6-10 gets 50 parts.
Consider changing it or keep ruining game for me.
You’re not entitled
is6 my boi is not worth months of effort. but it may be fun in the journey to get it rather than reward itself
It's the Asia server... Top 5 is ez
@cursive geyser Lol it’s hard to get exactly 100 parts which forces u to play even more or wait to get those last 5 parts WG sneaky bois
@pastel timber hahaha no the journey is awful other than making a few big brain buddies everything else is toxic
hello how to play because I don't know what's going on anymore
ty WG for Players like this in my team !!!!
RIPPER_TSS[BG1]- Todor#3518 has been warned.
stop crying and just play better....jesus christ man
i cant stand people like you, who instead of looking what went wrong move it from themselves onto either the team, or wargaming, get some senses into your brain please, its getting annoying. if you want to cry go to your mother.
I had a good ratings day today, advanced to platinum
gz
Man ratings is the most toxic part of wotb
dont forget the gamemodes, but when they are off i fully agree
People who get upset about the game modes which don’t change stats are stupid
@narrow isle except he literally has 70% wr
RIPPER_TSS[BG1]- Todor#3518 has been warned.
Bruh
wonder what he wrote, i missed it :c
He said you had a poor wr
can you explane me how to play when we playing with players with 600 battles
lol, cool stuff, 26k games 70% but "poor wr" lul
just play better than them, how else u think i got to 70%?
i see no fun to play and loose with players like this that i post
Then quit
Enemy players might be having the same luck as you
ok i see that you still doing nothing
This isn't the #cry-about-matchmaking-channel
i actually enjoy it more when my team is bad,coz im able to influence the battle way more than if we just win straight 7:0 after 2 mins
and what chanel it is ?
not for crybabys,so please leave :)
@crimson goblet be nice
unless u want to join in and become friends with stevo and can😂
im trying lul
and were i cant show all players with what players your good matchmaker put me to play ???
I'm gonna need that in English please
coz its naming and shaming,which isnt allowed
he wants to show the "bad players" the mm gave him
that i understand but tell me what you will do to not playing with Players that have no idea how to play normal battles .
Complain about it on another server
we arent admins, spartacus is just a mod and i am a youtuber
whatever
Just a mod... How hurtful 😢
want to see you in rating battle
compared to admin i meant,you possess great power spartacus❤️
Ah shucks
i dont need to proove my point, my stats show that for themselves :p
and what is your real ingame name yourtuber ?
3very_Good_Name_Is_Taken, have fun being envious whilst seeing my stats ;)
“real” lmao did I miss a fake one
probably xD
3800 rating nice
thats this season,what u want, i got to 6.2k in february ._.
not good for him for sure
didnt understand question, sorry my English its not good!
i want to tell that i am not happy WG to put in rating battles teams players that have 600 battles and have no idea are they playing gta ot wotb ... thats it! I am over!!!! 10x again !!!!
It's matchmaking. That happens to everybody. You aren't special just because you had a few dunces on your team.
Don't be a Stevo
Trust every get bad teams once rating yesterday I got 6 lost in rows.
I like how 3very is standing above all of us like a god with his 70% wr and feeding us his knowledge and giving us his thoughts
waiting for battle is a bit boring
Dont play tier 7
Rating battle queue take time
@vivid shore Why do you yolo so much
Yeah, it’s not possible to play some tier 7 tanks because of the waiting time.
Is it possible to try for 1 season to not allow premium tanks?
I would say this then battles would become even more 1 side then they are now
At tier 8 at least
Ive just played with a 17 battles player with T34 doing 0 dmg
Thats why i would like to have a season with no premiums or at least try
What a noob
That bad rng or your playing in right position
Impossible to play ratings on sunday
Most got in losing streak so far 6 in row
Ratings battle is a waste of your time 😉
I call getting a fancy tier 8 out of it not a waste of time
Definitely a waste of your time
Work at mcD's for 3 hours and buy an is6
U can buy an is6 but can't buy an is6 fearless thou
^
How long is this season?
A month
2 months
Any idea how long next season will be lmao
1 month
imagine 45wr ppl playing ratings and thinking they can carry,jeez
@inner jackal MM's fault 😉
ah yes,MM sarcasm
@ornate spoke This is an international server. Using english is mandatory here.
@ornate spoke Это английский сервер. Для русский иди сюда: https://discord.gg/VV8ggDm
@ornate spoke Где?
@ornate spoke Ага, ты должен немного подождать. Я думаю
@ornate spoke PM пожалуйста
Well, won 7 ratings battles in a row then on the 8th on the vines map I had silent players, typed ‘no town’ as the enemy had better heavies...guess where most of my err ‘team of randoms’ went?! 🙄🤣 Time to stop for a while after that. lol
The salty profanities are still being flung around too, think maybe any swearing/abuse from players & they should be banned from ratings for a week!
Perhaps then that would stop.
But how else would I let the atgmers know how I feel?
@sonic sedge Feel free to report them
I do, quite regularly.
Quick question. Like you guys know that there is an awaiting players counter, aka the white counter, not the green one. Yeah. Well I just had that counter get stuck on 0 so I had to reload the game but by that time we pretty much had dominated. Anyone else experienced something like that?
I sometimes do. As soon as I see the counter staying at 0 for several sec I restart the game and hopefully don’t come too late in battle
when you want grind on raiting battles but...
F for u mate
That little manoeuver is gonna cost us 51 years @vivid shore
hah
Just wondering when the JgTig 8.8 spam in battles is going to stop 😂😂 Why players think this is gonna be a good tank to play (camp/snipe) in ratings I don’t know 😆
And? Some players use the 183 in T10 ratings. They are just dumb, that’s it. Expecting smart choices from most players is too much. Some just understand that a tank is bad, even worse for ratings.
ive seen arianagrande someone from LOCA dominating with 183 in ratings
Good players can do well in any tank, but it isn’t a vehicle most people would use in ratings imo.
exactly,its never about the tank,but the player in it, i mean i played the sp1c last season the for the camo and won most of my games in it, coz i actually now how to use my tank effectively
^ Good job in ratings btw 3very. If you see some experienced players using tanks you rarely see in ratings, it’s most likely to get the camos on those and/or just for the more challenging drive.
Tanks like Centurion I or 59-Patton ? xD
I think we need more downvotes, or a better tier progression system that only allows you to buy premiums that are at or below your current tier. Also adjust the tiers to make it so you could only progress to the next tier after showing some proof of skill in that tier, like a winrate/wn8 minimum.
@lean zenith Being only allowed to buy a premium tank of the tier where you already have a tech tree tank would indeed be better for the game. But don’t expect WG to do it anytime soon. It would significantly decrease their incomes.
Probably not just an opinion
A fact ? Maybe ...
Or just put a battle minimum on ratings, either account wide, or for each tier, like you must play 100 games at t10 before being able to play a t10 in ratings.
rating points should be given according to the damages you dealt during the battle, not for a victory or a defeat
(sorry for my broken english lmao)
Or they should base it off your wn8 performance vs your overall wn8 or wn8 of players at the same tier/tank. WN8 relies more on damage, kills, and spots, and less on wins, so I think it would be a better measure.
it's a great idea
Ratings based on WN8 would indeed be a better fit since for now it’s all about how many battles you spam.
Good afternoon
How
@median wagon always like that, RNG needed
I shot a Skorpion just between the turret and hull, full gray but nothing happened. No feedback, nothing. And he was stationary before and after the shot.
Maybe shot the barrel
Either the track or the barrel.
Here we go..4 lightly armoured tanks on my side! 👌🤦♂️ You just know when the system doesn’t want you to win!
Oh Stevo, never change
@desert kite woah there, you insulting my use of the 183?
183 best ratings tank
salt machine
stop trying to ruin people’s days
The missile tanks ruin my day, they don't seem to care, therefore I will not care.
Always a coincidence when the broken AX appears on the enemy team
@median wagon HE pen the turret
Well it’s possible but there’s no point wasting your time trying, I just don’t see the point
If you miss you do splash damage. After they get HE penned, they tend to back off
AX has a BS gun and armour
I completely agree that they are bs, but I also see you in a 252
And I don’t like to play tier X in ratings because rocket spam
Apart from the fact that 252u is actually balanced, large weak lower plate, trash gun and cupolas
I spam type 59 and waffle. Occasionally I go 268 if I'm feeling overwhelmingly positive
Even WZ 112 2 is better than 252u
Sure :)
I spam is3d, prog46, and 252u
252u just withers and dies the moment it becomes isolated
Wz 112 2 is 100% better
what's that
All these wz tanks are confusing to remember
Tier 8 Chinese premium heavy, not the glacial
I'm still liking my is3d. It somehow still works really well even after all the new premiums
Oh the one that has the Celestial camo?
Yeah, i think it’s OP because reverse speed of 20km/h
Having this reverse speed on a heavy tank is insane
I love the dumb 120mm squares on the front of the armor. It even screws up experienced players
Squares?
Rectangles*
Oh this, the extra tracks
But there aren't even tracks there
Wz 112 2 is basically IS-4 but tier 8
I don’t like the IS3 def. anymore & rarely play it & I’ve had it since it was 1st play to win a tank, it definitely needs a buff now.
Lol, most of the time you reload faster than heavies with lower alpha, and you have really troll armor
@pallid arch those are track strips on the front, I’m certain
Lol, they even have the corners of the rectangles marked
Defender has invisible tracks there
The is3 (which has tracks there) does not benefit from extra armor
Yup, and it's really trollish
That explains a lot
Also on 252u’s side there is a 600mm effectiveness plate, even looking at it head on
When I remove the spaced armor I see this. The armor model looks a bit broken
It’s trying to be a V shape hull
But it has an extra plate there for some random reason
I really hate it when I shoot (and hit)here but it fails to pen
Tracks are annoyingly thick too
My ap shells should easily go through 120mm worth of armor, but no
Bruh have you bounced off the 252u’s rear
Rarely, the rear is a far more consistent pen than the sides. The sides I bounce way more than should be possible.
This is another completely bs piece if armor
This is my only problem with this tank. If it did not have this I would be perfectly fine fighting death wedges
Why play tier 8 when you can drive a sheridan.
Progetto 46’s turret though, it’s a bit troll
Meh, prog armor is fine, it's the gun that is broken
Also check out the o47's armor profile without spaced armor
Looks normal
...
yikes
with a name like that what did you really expect
ᖴEᗩᖇᒪESS#2079 has been warned.
play tier 8
Ratings at tier 10 comes to luck on your line up vs the enemy and map
is the reason people grind credits in rating because it doesn't affect win rate. Is there something im missing?
Yes, you are correct. You aren't missing anything
Isn't there a boost of credits as well? Or xp only
there is a boost in credits
Yeah there is a boost to creds and xp based on the tier you play at, so slap on boosters and prem time on your mk6 and make 100k creds a win
His queue in rating base on at least in 5k
Hit 4.1k today, I hope tomorrow I won’t fall
How
I only had a calibration of 3.6k this season
Playing is 4 but was in queue for least 7 mins rating is 5077
Bruh you’re at 5k already?
Yeah been theirs since yesterday
The amount of time people have
Did under 100 games
What did you calibrate at
4300
Bruh
Why is that shocking
I never get such good luck
Won 9 out of 10 but average at least 3,5 more or less
I probably lost most of my games
Calibration is nothing but luck really
A lot of noobs, I’d have to gamble my luck and hope the enemy has more noobs
I never understood why noobs try to get the IS-6 fearless, noobs don’t realise they’re noobs I guess..
Trust I worst I seen when get match on supremacy one your teammates happen to t28
Haha, or one of your teammates go FCM
Yo... I got to 5k only using fcm last season
I will take a fcm over a Spersh any day
True that fcm is better because on ratings armor does not not exist
@haughty schooner thanks for the winstreak
@haughty schooner thanks for the winstreak
@pallid arch Did i play against you in these or something?
This was instantly after out games
our*?
Nice
Remeber when this was diamond camo and i grinded for it and now every noob can get it doing 4000 in ranked🤦♂️
remember when the tiger looking one
It was stated pretty clearly that the camos would be rotated
wah wah wah
yes
It was stated pretty clearly that the camos would be rotated
@calm quail just because it's stated doesn't mean it's lame
@neat wind A bigger issue with the camos is that the diamond one is like, really ugly right now
You still got the camo before everyone else, at least. Similar to how WG will sell the is6 fearless in a year. :-]
Is it E100 a rating tank?
Nope
thats on the tech tree 
Is 4
Apparently u can't accept the fact that they are good so they win more truth hurts
I’m big sed I’ve been doing 2.8k average damage for 21 games and yet I’ve won only 6. About 8 7-0 defeats in total lmao
stop playing for 30+ minutes and get back when you get a god streak?
Yeah a lot of 7-0 in rating will happen in rating
Bruh that oxygen style of writing...
Its similar to --RNG's nickname style
Reeeeeeeee
I’ll be expecting lots of Caernarvon action X today
All 5k points players will receive IS-6 fearless parts?
Noo it just depend your position in ratings
Yeah lots of Caernarvon X around today, easily despatched, not a lot better than the tech-tree caernarvon, which isn’t too bad anyway, but for 15k gold when the OBJ252u was cheaper...the obj is far better.
AX just has 10 degrees of gd and good turret as well as i think a better caern gun, not that much better if you can't find ridges
Can you play ratings if your e100 has 100 percent crew but the stock gun?
probably not
@ornate spoke two things:
1st) You want to play the E100 with the stock gun because you like it more. If that is the case then I don't know what you are doing
OR
2nd) You want to grind xp for the gun in ratings Which you should not do
@pine falcon wrong ping
apologies
Yes I want to grind it in ratings
If you want to grind, don't do it in ratings. Please
I prefer to not use some of my gold to free xp it. It’s my tank I can do what I want with it. Im also not that bad that I can’t perform with the stock gun.
then I hope you wouldn't be able to play the stock E100 in rating
Well I hope I can
im pretty sure u can play stock bc (with 100% crew) in ratings
for some reason
at least last season u could
@pine falcon I hope u understand I’m not gonna play e100 stock in pubs and ruin my 30 day when I could easily grind it in ratings without using my gold
And I am not waiting to build up 65k free xp
you could just wait for an event @ornate spoke
Grind it when the next gamemode comes. For exmaple I have a Jageroo and a T57 waiting for their crew to get to 100%
I need to use it for tournaments
As you saw Maus and IS4 are way more viable in tournaments currently
Maybe for your region. Every region has a different kind of meta
We saw it all in the streams for spring season....
In NA, lots of teams like to use e100....
I play my is8 in ratings to grind xp for it
Let’s just say it doesn’t preform very well
yeah is8 isnt a great tank
and then you wonder why the NA rating player base is complaining. Yeah... wow....
e50m is great for ratings rn
any farming med with lots of carrying capability is nice in ratings
too bad mine is still at 93% crew
The way I see ratings is a way to grind xp on tanks that I don’t like and a way to play when I ain’t focused enough to play normal matches so my wr doesn’t suffer, and get a camo meanwhile.
Wow, lots of 252 buff requests out today
ratings is just a way to grind xp for your next t10
Yeah a lot of 7-0 in rating will happen in rating
@hazy bronze man, the level is so low. I did 3.6k dmg on two battles. Got killed in the middle of the battle. Even winning, i ended on top dmg both my team and enemy team.
Maybe for your region. Every region has a different kind of meta
@ornate spoke meta of NA was always noobs.
Every server meta is trash
Bruh
5.4k wont win you 1st this season
6 jokes of a team to start a horrible rating day
@ornate spoke lmao you are right
@hazy bronze We are 2 then
@blissful portal that we are.
Playing missle tank give 10 percent higher chance to win because those tank too powerful for light tank.
Agreed
Rating nothing but luck unless you play missle tank
@hazy bronze action X spamming at tier VII, VIII and IX. Sadly.
@ornate spoke sadly I don’t have action x or missle tank
@ornate spoke sadly I don’t have action x or missle tank
@hazy bronze me either.
@ornate spoke I hear violet the anime is very good what is you rating on it
@ornate spoke I hear violet the anime is very good what is you rating on it
@hazy bronze the anime is awesome. I loved it. My rating is 3,465 at the moment. Went unlucky on calibrating battles.
@ornate spoke calibration come down to luck or less since most people will get around 3600 or less
My First two battles i got a First class. Then, only lose. I should've stopped at the first loss.
Dont even bother to play ratings today... 13 battles only 2 wins
I was thinking to play it. Thanks for the advice.> Dont even bother to play ratings today... 13 battles only 2 wins
@blissful portal
well to that result add other 5 lost battles
This is just amazing... i was at 4.6k and bot teams got me down 300 points
Your rating battles can suck it
Lol
8 straight loses with a consistent at least 3.5k damage and all I’m doing is losing. Fix your matchmaking
Lol
@heavy pendant I dont see you whining about mm being unfair when you win 8 in a row
That’s because I don’t win 8 in a row. All I do is lose in rating
0% win rate? Show me
If you have anywhere near 50% and you carry your weight you will climb in ratings.
If you didn’t know a one man show doesn’t work out very well in this game. I can pull a mastery and I’ll still lose
Wow, so can I. You are neglecting all the times you get carried
Yup, I am pointing out the parts that you are completely ignoring
How exactly do you get carried when you pull your own weight?
mAtCh MaKiNg iS UnFaIr
So you are telling me that you are the perfect player that has never done 0 damage?
When did I say that! I just told you I’ve done at least 3.5k damage for at least 8 battles and no one else on the team couldn’t pull their weight those 8 battles! I’m talking about the last eight battles stop changing the conversation.
Hence again why I say I’m talking to a brick wall. You can’t see that things need to be fixed, you just say ** do better**, youve never been carried. Just all irrelevant info
I shouldn’t have to do 6k damage every single game for my rating to go up
Is your winrate in ratings 0%?
The entire reason I’m here is because I don’t get big win streaks. Matchmaking throws people under the bus constantly
Oh my lord.
Alright, I'll start whining about every loss streak I get
Good luck to you. One day you’ll learn. 5 years and still the same stuff
Matchmaking complaints... Same thing different day.
^^^^^^^^^
Cute is debatable but each to their own lmao
Successful day of ratings. You can lose points really quickly when you try
Oh yea ur the dude who yolos in his 140
And sherry
Not my problem
Sad
ratings battles needs to be changed. it’s called a PERSONAL rating, so why does it go up or down for a win or loss? winning and losing shouldn’t affect your rating because it’s not your fault if your team is awful is it? it’s not fair that you can have a decent game and still lose loads just because your team sucked.
^ kinda stupid/ironical to have your « personal » rating to depend on 6 other players each game
exactly my point. it’s. it fair and makes no sense
I’m not one for complaining about matchmaking, but omg I’ve never experienced such bad teams in ratings. My 30 day stats at tier 10 in normal games are about ~3000 average damage and 70% winrate (This is just for reference). Combined between today and yesterday I’ve done 45 rating battles, with an abysmal 35.6% winrate. Literally half my winrate of normal games. I’m top of the team in damage maybe 30+ of these games. If I don’t pull off a major carry, I simply don’t win. Now for the season overall I’m at only 46% winrate. Was at 57% not too long ago. I’d say 65% of games I have 2 team mates dead within a minute or 70 seconds. Sorry for the rant, but this is ridiculous now. Like I said I’m not one for complaining about matchmaking, in fact very much the opposite. But today and yesterday honestly I just don’t know.
Edit: Forgot to say I would estimate that 30% of my losses are 7-0. I don’t think I won 7-0 once in those 45
☝️ Where are the mods, you see it’s not just me who wants the ratings system changed for the better & fair for all! I’ve been mentioning this before this discord app. was a thing too! #Not my personal rating!
Either make the rating depend mostly on the player's performance, or replace "personal rating" by "my bot team's rating"
Last battle it took me almost 15mins to enter into rating battle 😦
this is the most personal rating system that this game has ever had
the old system was pretty cool when you lost 24 points if you lost
This is my point exactly, ‘my rating’ still goes down because of the rest of the random players!
no matter what you did afterall this is a teamgame for a win
Stevo the difference is that he's an actual good player 😂 and you proved yourself to be not that good several times with bad decisions or going for the wrong flank and stuff
Stevo if u hate the system then stop playing rating, play regular instead
Of course it is a teamgame. But in my 200 battles in ranked I had teammembers with 400 or 500 Avg in my team and the red team had 4 players with over 1.500 Avg. With this stupid MM I cannot win. So what is happend?
This was the immediate next battle! 🙄
you not winning the games doesnt mean the system is bad something else might be
But something is still wrong in ratings if I only get teams like this.
It’s a total joke, they say the points depend on your performance. So please WG explain how is it that being afk and doing 0 damage in a win results in 4 points gained while being afk and losing results in -40 points. In both cases nothing was done in terms of performance and there is a 54 point difference. So again, it’s clearly the team that matters just like in random. The rest is just empty talk.
3049 is the enemy team's rating. But the guy with the lowest rating has 3300 points, no calibrations too
This game is freaking rigged
This is their statement, which just isn’t true!
Oh yeah, more points ofc. Almost the same rating. One dude did 900 dmg and died, i did 4k dmg and died. He lost 19 points, i lost 37 points. This game is stoopid
Folks this needs to stay civil
Idk, im going mad when i think about WG's rating calculations
@bleak crest
cancracker 06/06/2020 For x2 exp and other bonuses. I don’t care about the rating.
https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/551376189089120256/720246015180931112/Screenshot_2020-06-10_at_2.49.33_PM.png
that isn't even a ratings battle. @karmic ridge
Btw, low damage = those troll bounces i got after shooting those tanks
@ornate spoke nono, but some dude was complaining about the mm
That's all he ever complains about
Bruh u just deleted a screenshot that was perfectly edited -_-
@karmic ridge bruh you just posted a normal match in #rating-battles
Ahhh, wait a minute ill get the ratings one too
You really don't need to. I don't want or need to see every match where some player feels slighted by WG.
:/
The ratings were not so different, tons of obj 252us, action Xs, some tanks like the progetto 46, skorp.. the game is literally polluted now. On top of that the points calculation is totally stoopid that i get more negative than the rest of the team for doing a decent performance
It seems like you have never player a truly broken gamemode ranked on PC. The only tanks you see are EBRs, 279s, the op Fv-Chieftan tank, 430u, 907 and 268v4.
The point is ratings is broken as it is and they reset it so I get games with noobs again. Why can’t we have a game mode without noobs? Why must there always be someone like that who loses us the battle?
@bleak crest Shut up. You yourself said you don't care about rating so just shut up and stick your head up your ass somewhere else https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/551376189089120256/720246015180931112/Screenshot_2020-06-10_at_2.49.33_PM.png
@pine falcon grand battles? Soon™
When replying to cancracker I will always use the screenshot.
Grand battles were the 30 vs 30 right? I have turned them off as they are just too boring as at least one third of the team camps
Please wg, we don't need those 200 avg dmg clowns who gets calibrated at 600 points, raise it to a max of 1100. Everyone knows that they wont get the is-6 fearless so y don't they freaking get out of those levels?
How much rating points does a tank need to earn in a tier to unlock rating ace camo? Or how many wins if it's based on win count?
its not about gained points,also i dont get why u ask this here, its displayed ingame and explains it fully how u get the rating camos
What's wrong asking in here when the channel topic is about ratings? And the reason behind asking this precisely is I have a lt as tier ace on tier 7 for last season which didn't got the camo when my tier 8, 9 and 10 did receive it.
u need to play 50 games in a tier, how many points u gain or games u win doesnt matter
but u need to be above 4k/5k
50 ratings played on a tier for the season or in total in ratings?
for the season
you can play 50 games in any tier (total 200 if you do all 4) which maxes out your camos, meaning you get 1 camo per tier,if you reach 4k +
If I play 200 rating games in total and score +4k in rating, but not really have 50 games played in each tier specifically but do have 4 tanks in all the 4 tiers, would it still unlock the rating camo on all 4 of the tanks? Or the 50 games on each tier is a must?
50 games in a tier is a must
Alright, thank you.
This keeps happening to me every single season. When I'm 1 win away from diamond, i lose many times in a row
Allmighty stevo. The screenshots you posted show you lost a combined 7 points in 2 games with an average damage of like 2500. The ratings point system seems to be working just fine as you did lose both games. You’re making it seem like you’re doing crazy amounts of damage, still losing, and losing crazy amounts of points. 2500 damage is not that much, and you barely lost any points
@karmic ridge People play ratings because it gives more XP and does not effect their stats. They don't care whether they lose, win or whether you're on their team. People with lower WR and worse stats play the game because they're bored or just because it is fun so don't expect everyone to have 70WR. Also just because you lose multiple games in a row, doesn't mean the MM is not working. MM is working as intended, you can't create a team a 14SUs when there are 2 in the queue. After all your skill will get you where you belong, or do you think that people with above 6k rating are "rigging" the game?
Everyone comes here just to vent out and cry about their teams, but I don't think I have seen anyone crying about the enemy team when they had multiple wins streak
Well, ratings are supposed to see how good u are, at least, when it came out. If WG did some minimum requirements for ratings, would be nice, at least for keeping the high level of the battles.
I remember well, WG said that ratings are supposed to be high level battles.
@muted shuttle well, thats totally correct, i agree with you but i don't understand the reason y i lose so many points for doing some decent matches.. its like, whatever i do,im supposed to lose more than the others
This was the immediate next battle! 🙄
@sonic sedge Dont try and tell WG that the matchmaking is bad. They won't admit it. Every REAL person is saying that MM is soooo bad...
Well, ratings are supposed to see how good u are, at least, when it came out. If WG did some minimum requirements for ratings, would be nice, at least for keeping the high level of the battles.
@ornate spokeand THAT is the correct solution to our problems....
@karmic ridge Because your "decent" is not considered decent by the system. I'll tell you something, do you know who ended up being first in the previous season with little over 7k points? Trapmelon from my clan... He realized that when you want to progress fast you need much DMG that's why he used to immediately start to flank at the start of the battle and just farm, by doing this he always ended up having the most damages and not losing much. That's all, you just have to do more than now if you don't want to lose that many points. But if you think that you shouldn't be losing and that you are so good that you should win every game, then just play a bit later, you can't be losing forever after all )
Well yea, but plot twist, i did 4k dmg, Got -37, a dude did 900 dmg, -19. Almost the same rating
XP counts in this case not damage
Moreover u know that im a super bot 😂, but i did change so much after learning the ways of wot pc, i still don't understand the reason y i get the most negative even when im in the middle of the team leaderboard xd
Ahhhh i don't think i earn so much of xp Even after farming and getting kills
Look, I understand your frustration but when someone's good enough, they will progress on over the time no matter if they lost some games before or not. Some people here struggle to get into diamond league and cry when they lose. I think the cause of that is often between the chair and a screen
No offense to anyone
No offense to anyone
@muted shuttle None taken. But i think that you miss the point of what we've been saying. Between OUR chair and OUR screen aka Dmg and XP is fine. Why the rest of the (randomly?) selected team is doing nothing at the battle? And that is we are saying. The frustration is that while we are doing our best, the rest are doing absolutely nothing. And End, no offense.
@lavish walrus But look, why do you expect them to do something? When I was a noob back then, I didn't care whether I won or not, it was so much fun and I was having a great time without realizing I'm a muppet. You must keep that in mind and don't rely on your teammates, they are playing it because they are having fun, that's all.
A lot of new players don't even know what WR is, or when to use some other type of ammunition, they are just having a great time while you take it very seriously.
The game was fun back then. But what the hell is this now? 1 tech tree tank with 13 premiums where the other team mates are considered as free food for the enemy fishes. But the new comers who doesn't even know what wr is can use their mom's credit card for those high tier premium tonks.
MM is often way off...if only happy go lucky players were evenly split on both teams...i find often they r not..imo
Because there is more to playing as a part of a team then damage and xp. Ratings are about doing your best, working with your team, and generating a win. These players that you guys are constantly complaining about are something that every single player has to deal with. It's how you deal with the cards that you've been dealt that set you apart from the rest. Players who climb the ratings do so because they are skilled enough to cover the deficiencies that their team mates bring while at the same time they are aware enough to use their teammates to their strengths.
Meh
@ornate spoke No the MM is rigged
So tired of the "it's all my teams fault" mentality.
^
:D
@muted shuttle "rigged" against players who can't adapt.
@lavish walrus But look, why do you expect them to do something? When I was a noob back then, I didn't care whether I won or not, it was so much fun and I was having a great time without realizing I'm a muppet. You must keep that in mind and don't rely on your teammates, they are playing it because they are having fun, that's all.
@muted shuttle My dear End, i understand what you are saying, but i don't buy that answer, because its NOT a normal battle for FUN, but Rating Battles with Prizes. Fun yes for me because i am always in Top 3, but you've (not you personally) got to DO Something to FIX the Matchmaking process. It is not good enough, and we are disappointed from the poor teams... I hope that WR understands this.
So tired of the "it's all my teams fault" mentality.
@ornate spoke Then you must be the best player in the universe, having fun in rating battles ALL ALONE.
@lavish walrus You want to magically turn every 40WR into a 60WR player and assign them to your team only or?
Never said I was but I'm a flexible player who can adapt to a changing situation.
@lavish walrus it sounds to me like you need to find a nice single player game.
No just split the HGL players more evenly
I am playing the very same game, I'm playing with the same players yet I am able to understand that MM has nothing to do with how I play
WR is irrelevant yet some people want WR based MM, same as WN7 or WN8
It amazes me how we can all be playing the same game with the same players and some people can use their teammates and some complain about them
i got more points than the others in the current season cuz i helped my team mates to not get foched. thank you WG
It's so much easier to blame the team then it is to go back, watch your replays, and find areas where you could have done better.
yea i should have used HESH, but i thought y cuz the jags cheeks can be penned by AP easily, yea sure, 3 AP didnt do anything
@lavish walrus You want to magically turn every 40WR into a 60WR player and assign them to your team only or?
@muted shuttle Did i say that? I just hope that WR makes a more decent MM that is currently using. Stop the players that don't know how to play and let the more experienced ones to play rating. Even if they are less than 150 people.
@karmic ridge dude you did 2k in a tank that is solely there to put down damage... What are you expecting?
@lavish walrus and then when 60%ers play with each other they will become 50%ers and when 50%ers play with each other they become 45%ers
@ornate spoke i was busy saving my team mates cuz they were all in bad positions cuz i thought that would give me some points cuz i was being a team player.. but, no the shells bounce even when it could pen
You didn't kill a tank. How were you saving anyone?
It's so much easier to blame the team then it is to go back, watch your replays, and find areas where you could have done better.
@ornate spoke And still you don't get it. What can i do alone, if the whole team is destroyed in seconds? i can still get 3 but win is a no no
i HE;ed a badger for 1.45k straight so that the fv215b could survive from that situation
@lavish walrus no team is destroyed in seconds. Hell most teams don't even leave spawn in seconds.
@lavish walrus no team is destroyed in seconds. Hell most teams don't even leave spawn in seconds.
@ornate spoke Do you want to make a bet?
@ornate spoke whats the rule of ratings, higher the points, the more you lose in a defeat or the less u lose in a defeat?
There is some algorithm but I don't know the details.
@lavish walrus I have over 30 thousand games. Sorry but you don't get to make false claims that can't be backed up. Teams don't get destroyed in seconds anyway near often enough to be a valid concern.
@lavish walrus no team is destroyed in seconds. Hell most teams don't even leave spawn in seconds.
@ornate spoke And all i have to do, is play a random rating battle and send you the video, to prove my point.
when i finally got good team mates but they did the biggest brainded play in the history of tier 10 matches, as usual i played, this time so many shots not doing anything. but 100% accuracy. whats the use? i still get almost the most amount of points for defending a side and absorbing tons of shots
Dude
when i finally got good team mates but they did the biggest brainded play in the history of tier 10 matches, as usual i played, this time so many shots not doing anything. but 100% accuracy. whats the use? i still get almost the most amount of points for defending a side and absorbing tons of shots
@karmic ridge correct
and yes i mean it. that match was so brainded that i got blackouts looking at my team mates
most points, hell yeah\
This is a lost cause.
You're posting tier X games that I'd be ashamed to have in tier VII wondering why you aren't getting points. I don't even know what to say at this point.
the situation was so good, ngl.. i didnt want to post such a bad game, but after bouncing all the shots that i fired, this is what i got
Wow.
@ornate spoke i wish that you were less ironic. We are trying to make you understand that rating battles are not fun anymore and playing as hard we can don't make results. You could have 150.000 battles and still you are coming off as ironic and high as you are.
You’re bouncing all your shots then what are you complaining about @karmic ridge
i was just saying about the results, but i posted it to clarify if u get higher rating, will u lose more or lose less@cosmic cypress
Yes, lower ratings move more
If you aren't having fun why bother?
@ornate spoke And that's why i don't see the point of playing that game more seriously....
@lavish walrus and the term your looking for is "sarcastic". I'm being sarcastic. Ironic would be posting a tier X game where you did 1400 dmg and then blamed the team for the loss...
@lavish walrus and the term your looking for is "sarcastic". I'm being sarcastic. Ironic would be posting a tier X game where you did 1400 dmg and then blamed the team for the loss...
@ornate spoke I am Greek. I think i know what Sarcastic and Ironic means...
well no, i didnt want to talk about the teams, sry for going offtopic, it was to clarify the calculations.
Obviously...
could be photoshopped
Nope it isn’t
Trust me it is real. He sended the replay too
I have a another which a guy lost 149 points. It is not fake
I had to reset the pic cuz i didn’t delete the name with dark
Top damage. Most likely he had a good amount of assisted damage in the mix as well.
during calibration all games and points are x3 the last game usually has this high points if u win/lose as the 10th games points gotten/lost are shown
The last one I felt like was always a normal one since I always got like 30 or 40 points there despite doing quite well
depends on how high you already are,as the higher u go the less points u get in general
Yeah i somehow got a +66 for doing 1.5k damage and 2 kills in the type 59 for my 10th calibration game. It's weird
Smh so many people complaining about MM everyday
Maybe have a "WG Pls" megathread where we post our most voted complaints
Pretty sure the EU forums has a massive matchmaking thread. It is truly a sight
Na has one as well
I have never actually checked the mm thread, but it has thousands of replies if I remember right. I can already imagine what the majority of the replies are sort of like
Asia dosent have one right hopefully
Oh a forum where we post our favorite brain dead complaints
Hehehehehe
tbh you can’t get a bad team, and do low damage and then say “well you can’t say anything you only did x amount of damage” what do you expect? him to pull off a 1v5?
Everyone is going to have a bad game, but this is a game of averages for good reason. You are not going to have a horrid team where you can’t do anything every round. Its the players that make the most of every situation they’re placed in that do the best and while sometimes you just can’t do anything, most of the time you can do something to win the game
Carry harder hahah
^^^
Oh no, here come's Stevo pulling off a Stevo again in 3
2
1
aw i scared him away :(((
Rip
Loool
Oh nvm here he comes
Cmon cmon cmon cmon
We are like sharks, waiting for the divers cage to break
Lolll
I carried, destroyed two tanks on my own (which means the team were 6 vs 5 ) & ‘we’ still lost 🤣
U didn’t even do top damage and u killed a med and a light in a superheavy
if you call 2.3K damage a carry then haha Also we can observe again. YOU ARE IN THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION OF YOUR TEAM
not far off
2.3k dmg really is a carry
Destroying two enemy tanks single handedly is though
I’m almost more impressed u managed to lose that much health to those two tanks
You were facing a type 59 and a bulldog
That's not really that bad in a 252
The battle on oasis palms, you went alone to the heavy area. On the battle on Port Bay, you went flanking in a 252u. ANd now you are in the exact opposite direction of your team. I am beginning to see a pattern
Still won against them though & the rest of the players should have won with those odds but didn’t, what does that tell you!?
If you went with your team probably could of steamrolled them and dealt with meds with ur team
Maybe that flank fell because there was not a top tier super good heavy tank not be there to suck up the damage for his weaker armored allies....
No no why would u do that when u can lose all ur health and kill two mediums that can barely pen u
You rolled the dice, and went on a flank from the rest of your team. If the whole enemy team went your flank you would have been rolled on and this conversation wouldnt be happening right now. You just got lucky you only had to fight 1 tier 8 and 1 tier 7 medium as a top tier heavy
You shouldnt be depending on luck to 'carry'
@cosmic cypress its like, why be fronline in a an IS4 and try to be the damage sponge when you can just sit and farm lets say a Type 61 and a bat chat who can barely pen you when you angle even with prammo
Wait I don't get how he lost so much HP to a Type59 who has 175mm pen and a bulldog that can only AP the bottom part of a 252U's back
@undone vortex not a type 59, a type 62. NVM I am dumb.
@pine falcon exactly that’s a much smarter idea
He barely survived as well, and he is showing it off as an achievement. All the screenshot shows is that he isnt a team player
And why go alone and not with ur team anyways kek
So do the math for me. I lose 73 points in all with 14 victories out of 52 games.
Stevo reminds me of people who yolo into 6 tanks and then complain why their team didn't help
@heavy pendant how about win more then
How about get an actual argument
Stevo reminds me of people who yolo into 6 tanks and then complain why their team didn't help
Pretty common sight smh
What do you want to argue about? MM?
Beating a dead horse softens the meat inside
Stevo is my entertainment for the car ride I’m on now lol
I havent played ratings since the first day. I just have this feeling I am gonna go on a loss streak 😆
im just gonna push to plat then just stop from there
already went diamond last season, no energy for that again this time
@lavish walrus And again who do you consider skilled enough?
I don’t get why some people like to rant so much about ratings. Yeah, I had a bad start in calibration. Just get over it and do your best. Even in a Löwe (not really what you would call a meta/ideal for ra(n)tings tank) I pulled out 65% wr over ~20 games in it, farming a good chunk of credits. Ofc you will always occasionally get some steamrolls, but it happens in pubs too. Just do what you can (concerning stevo, avoid going alone when all your teammates are driving in the opposite direction).
Hi
Ah yes stevo from ftc, ye i met him before, that was fun too 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Rip waw
hey guys the chosen one is speaking yet again
Didnt you send a picture a few hours ago where you did the same thing and went the opposite way from your team?
stevo really do be using his galaxy brain to employ the biggest and baddest of all tactics known to mankind lmao
@lavish walrus And again who do you consider skilled enough?
@muted shuttle Wouldn't be ideal to have WG pick players with REAL accounts with REAL WR to play rating battles?
bruh are you suggesting FAKE win rate is a thing
@lavish walrus Again, why do you think that WR is relevant?
stevo1100r#2917 has been warned.
@lavish walrus Again, why do you think that WR is relevant?
@muted shuttle i don't know how the algorithm works but i'll be glad to learn. Pls tell me just how exactly the rating MM works.
bruh are you suggesting FAKE win rate is a thing
@native marten And you really don't have an idea?
@native marten like this.
Nice
nice.
Stop typing in all caps
@native marten Play one battle, have 100WR and play rankeds only after, boom you've got a super unicum
@lavish walrus What algorithm, you've suggested to use WR no?
What is going on with the credit coeff in ratings ?
You can’t play ranked after one battle
You gain 30% more credits in plat
60% more in Diamond
From what I heard
This I know. But this season I am nearly losing creds every battle, no matter what
Play more premiums
I could. But I am playing same tanks and losing creds when I was earning last season
Can you check too ?
premium account? repair/provision costs? pramo usage?
Yes obviously, but I am just comparing this season to last, with same tanks same gameplay (more or less).
Maybe it’s modular damage
Try to take less damage, and shoot less prammo as well as don't spam your consumables.
Is the 49 good in ratings?
Eh
Makes ratings a little less painful
Get gud
Git gud*
I think I got it : I have unlocked recently the last equipment slot that reduces the cooldown time of the consumables. At least that's the correlation I see.
@lavish walrus What algorithm, you've suggested to use WR no?
@muted shuttle I suggested that WG better find a way to put mediocre or better players in the game than players who play rating battle without a clue how to play the game entirely. Its simple actually. If you don't get this End, I'm better off with the sarcastic dude 😉
@lavish walrus I get that but you do not seem to realize what are you actually proposing ) So please explain to us, how would you distinguish between a good and a bad player. That is all )
@lavish walrus I get that but you do not seem to realize what are you actually proposing ) So please explain to us, how would you distinguish between a good and a bad player. That is all )
@muted shuttle Oh, i get it now. Nice played. You are the ironic and the other one is the sarcastic. I guess a good player is one who goes where the WHOLE team is going, and actually shoots the enemy, while covering also... (i too can become BOTH sarcastic AND ironic as you can see)...
@lavish walrus I am not being ironic, I am simply asking you to explain your thoughts
I mean if you want really skilled mm on both sides just go play tournaments
@lavish walrus I am not being ironic, I am simply asking you to explain your thoughts
@muted shuttle Ok. Point taken. Right, lets see. I was only suggesting that must be a way, for experienced players, to get a proper evaluation that ratings gives, without the frustration and the agony, that lower experienced players are causing. Is that hard to grasp?
@lavish walrus Mate come on, stop posting the same message, move on from this point, I would like to hear something more about it, you are proposing a fictional situation but I am not really sure whether you understand that the system we currently have is the best one at the moment.
"must be a way" - Explain what you think would be the best or is this all?
"must be a way" - Explain what you think would be the best or is this all?
@muted shuttle End, with all due respect, then you must pay me the same salary a developer makes. Picture this: I am a customer, who is informing the company, who makes a product, that has some points who needs.... re adjusting. And the representative of that company is saying to the client, that he must cut that crap and move on. I am suggesting that to hold your customers you must innovate and YOU must move on and you are telling me to cut the crap.... be MORE resourceful, like the GRAVITY battles, which in my opinion the guy who thought about it must receive a thick raise, a company car, and a place in the most brilliant ideas EVER. So, do something like that with the Ratings, and believe me, i am not the only one that is nagging but i am the only one that talks openly about it....
Don't answer hastly
Read first ;)
I mean if you want really skilled mm on both sides just go play tournaments
@undone vortex Then there is no need for Rating Battles, is there Sherlock.
@lavish walrus 🙂 Look, you want something to improve, and I would like that too. That is all well and good but what I keep telling you is, that this current MM is the best we have ever had. Winrate is irrelevant so you cannot base a new MM upon that, same goes for the WN7/8 etc.
Read first ;)
@undone vortex Then there is no need for Rating Battles, is there Sherlock.
@lavish walrus you expect rating battles to be 14 60% then? What we have now is workable
That is all, you came here: "I want this and this improved.... etc etc" so I wanted to ask you what would you change, you failed to prove that )
And if people complain about teams being bad at 3-4k ratings which is the norm then that's just weird cause those rating numbers are of the average players
With all the respect I see zero reason why you think you lose too much @lavish walrus
That is all, you came here: "I want this and this improved.... etc etc" so I wanted to ask you what would you change, you failed to prove that )
@muted shuttle I see your point, but i am not a developer my dear End. You are telling me that WR is no way a measure of being an average or a good enough player for the Rating system, to qualify for the games. And you want me to "find" the way and give it to you, so you can make that happen. I am pointing things that in MY opinion should change, i giving you ideas, and you keep saying that i fail to prove, what exactly?
@lavish walrusWhat ideas?
With all the respect I see zero reason why you think you lose too much @lavish walrus
@muted shuttle I never said that i lose so much. That is a lie.
Sorry then, everybody does only that in here
@lavish walrusWhat ideas?
@muted shuttle read above
mAtCh MaKiNg iS RiGgEd
@lavish walrus There are none concrete ideas, just random thoughts )
With all the respect I see zero reason why you think you lose too much @lavish walrus
@muted shuttle And i am more or less happy with my rating. It's not Super but i am content.
@lavish walrus We could take this to PM and not flood it in here )
What I want to see happen is have ratings matchmaking ONLY for all players for a week as an experiment
@lavish walrus There are none concrete ideas, just random thoughts )
@muted shuttle Lol End. You made me spill my coffe right now...
Okay then, have a nice day
@lavish walrus We could take this to PM and not flood it in here )
@muted shuttle Ah, there is no need mate. Although this is making better with English writing, we should better, leave it alone (not because of chatting with you). But we would never gonna make anything out of an atermon discussion.. so lets leave it...
As you wish, when you come up with something concrete we can discuss that further! )
Thanks for your time
The ideas of how mm is not good enough
The ideas of how mm is not good enough
@undone vortex i think that you got it wrong, mate.
Then what are you mad about?
As you wish, when you come up with something concrete we can discuss that further! )
@muted shuttle Sure End
Then what are you mad about?
@undone vortex Excuse me, but i never implied that i was mad about it. And really now, i am not gonna start this over, just to prove my point...
Me and End, closed the matter (at least between us).
I mean your best bet is to make it so that you need a certain amount of in game hours before you can play ratings like for say 50h cause MM will never change since it's already as good as it gets
I mean your best bet is to make it so that you need a certain amount of in game hours before you can play ratings like for say 50h cause MM will never change since it's already as good as it gets
@undone vortex i see your point. If the MM the best that the game has then i better play with what i have. Sure.
hi
bob the man oof
A lot of players who complain about MM don’t seem to understand the fact that it works in your favour too. The reason MM is good is because it’s always fair. While sometimes you get bad teams, you’ll also get terrible enemy teams too, and you’ll end up 7-0 steamrolling them. We just never remember that because our brains are wired for negativity bias. Imagine if MM was heavily based on a skill metric, such as WR or WN7/8. You, if you’re a unicum, would instantly have your stats decrease because instead of being the best in your team, you’ll be average, or sometimes even the worst player, on your team. Imagine being matched with superunis and top players every single game. If you’re not one of them, or don’t play at their level consistently, your WR will undoubtedly drop to 40-50%. Imagine trying to ace a tank with a team full of players better than you. Good luck, with that.
As much as I would like to complain about bad teams, I at least remember the times MM was in my favour, giving me 30, 40, 50-game win streaks. Just be thankful we unicums get to come up against players we can easily outplay. Most PvP games aren’t like this.
I have an idea, which I’ve mentioned before, don’t let players play ratings until they have over a certain amount of battles (over 2000 maybe) & perhaps have at least one tier 10 vehicle, also let them calibrate in normal battles & not in ratings!Or if they have to calibrate in ratings keep them in the lowest league & don’t put them with players that are actually calibrated in a higher league!
Calibration is useless, and should be eliminated totally.
how else are you supposed to be put into leagues then based on your skill
if you calibrate well it saves so much time and effort
But the big dirty problem in ratings are the OP premium tanks. Every team seems to have 5-7 prem tanks, especially the better premiums. Try fighting in a poor tech-tree tank against the P2W gold noobs!
Of course greedy WG cares only about $$$$$, not about having a fair competitive game. Disgusting P2W greed.
Play tier 10 then
I mean, they're a business, they want to make money. All their balance changes and things are to make people give them more money and to make the game more fun, not necessarily balanced.
GREED = BAD business. A good business would make a fair game, which also would make better money in the long run.
No, they look at the populations. They notice that there are very few skilled players and a lot of newer players that are entering the game. So they prey on the newer and worse players with tantalizing offers of premium tanks and crates. A strategy that works really well and these newer players who are barely past tier 2 already have like 4 different tier 10 premium/collector tanks as well as other high tier non-tech tree premiums. This is why you have so many people with less than 1000 battles, but already have like 20 different rare premiums.
in my opinion calibration is a bit useless just let everyone start at 3k and apply the same rule that is active rn for the first 10 battles so the + is x3 and you loose 3x more (for the first 10 battles)
according to some random guy a long time ago you start at 3k, its just not shown
I dont care if they sell 100 premium tanks to everyone. Just dont make them OP. It's the expensive OP tanks that are the problem. GREED, evil greed.
Oh, you think no OP premiums at tier 10? LOL.
There isnt
Then there are those stupid rockets too. Another POS feature in Blitz.
Yes, there aren’t any OP premiums at tier 10. The t22, which i think you’re thinking of, only has troll armour. Vk 90 is extremely rare, and when you do meet it, get to its side.
Rocket tanks can’t be helped as of now, and theyre not premium.
Update is coming nerf is coming anything more to say?
Every tank is OP until you learn its weakspots, which is pretty much always skill rounds. Either way, find a teammate and use them to distract said OP tank while you flank around.
The only tank that are currently broken imo are the Sheridan and T92 because you know why. Tanks like T22, or AX etc. are extremely good but they are by no means broken.
WG says Realistic battles with only tech tree tanks. Ok, now i ask you: it's that hard to allow only tech tree tanks on Rating battles?
T-22, just don't shoot the tracks
AX: force it to reveal its hull
T92: Memey front angle
Sheridan: Very memey spaced armor
One is realistic while the other is a “more skill based” classic battles
@ornate spoke where have they said it will be for tech tree only tanks? Just asking
The only tank that are currently broken imo are the Sheridan and T92 because you know why. Tanks like T22, or AX etc. are extremely good but they are by no means broken.
@pine falcon The question is the spamming. On tier VIII (i believe u saw this too), only two or three tanks are tech tree tanks
@ornate spoke where have they said it will be for tech tree only tanks? Just asking
@pine falcon in the news.
They send it at the Realistic Batttles rule's.
Yeah. The only currently meta tier 8s tech tree tanks are probably the Tiger II, and high pen TD as lets face it, the current meta is the heavy one.
Tiger 2 is as it is, a strong heavy tank. Sides are fairly easy to pen as is the turret, you just need to learn how to confront it.
And how do you confront a tiger 2 exactly? It has an excellent gun and amazing traverse speed, allowing it to mostly keep his front toward you
I was able to CoD a tiger in my type 61. You have to stay as close to the tiger as possible, the farther out you are, the easier it is for the tiger to turn his front to you.
The only premium I’m maining this season is Type 59 and it’s by no means an op premium
yeah type is very powercreeped
have fun fighting a Tiger 2 in mediums for example Type 59 or T-44 they cant even pen the front with prammo
get the side
its not that easy
Get the sides, they say. Yet they keep forgetting how fast that thing turns
Just shoot the cupola. It’s legit so easy to shoot. I never miss. If u miss, u just can’t aim
Why complain that you can't fight a heavy frontally in a medium when you can try other things to win the game? that's kind of the point of heavy class.
Also german heavies are helpless if you sidehug them in your russian mediums. tracking shot even if no dmg helps.
i have no problem to 1 v 1 a Tiger II but they arent alone in a rating match, sniping the cupola of a Tiger II in a Type 59 or T-44 is just pure RNG and they wont stay out in the open they usually have some kind of obstacle around them so if you side hug they either pen your cupola or just use the obstacle to get you away
also you dont have the chance to flank all the time if the Tiger II uses a good position you cant just run to a different flank since the time it takes you to get there your team just melts away and im not entirely sure but i think Tiger II even has more dpm than Type 59 and T-44
laughs in t-34-2 being able to completely side hug any heavy at its tier
Im maining the e75
Löwe/E50 M here
I wouldnt say the cupola is easy to shoot.
If the Tiger II is moving back and forth, then even for accurate guns hitting the cupola will be challenging.
the cupola's easy to shoot if they aren't moving, but unfortunately most players, even the unskilled ones, have somewhat mastered the ability of moving so actually it's not that easy to hit
Yeah, in tanks like a Löwe I can hit the cupola of a wiggling/moving Tiger II at mid-close range but it’s not guaranteed.
You shouldn’t even be in a situation where you’re fighting a tiger 2 frontally in a med. If it’s late game, you should have enough room to maneuver to flank him
Why are so many clanless players in ratings?
Cause they want the is6 fearless
What does clanless have to do with anything? Rn in NA a clanless player is ranked one of the highest rn
Thank you very much for OP prem tanks, GREEDY WG.
Rip my ratings day just started
Sadly the only way to win in ratings is a prem. almost all prems are better than tech counterparts
not really, its just sad seeing all these false claims in this chat keep appearing, why even play a pershing in ratings? its one of the weakest t8s even for tech trees,makes no bloody sense
P44 better med for ratings
that has nothing to do with anything i just said
Well ok :/
maybe he wants the camo on pershing?
well then he shouldnt complain
he does 1.2k average dmg in a tier 8, i dont honestly think that getting a decent result was possible with those stats
yeah nah
i calibrated on 3.1k using 215b while having 3.1k avrg dmg
loat 6 out of 10 tho
im not talking about you tho
Exactly the point: why play poor tech tree tanks. You must play expensive P2W premium tanks to get anywhere in rating.
GREEDY WG.
nah in saying that sometimes its impossible to do good due to bad teams
no, you are just bad at the game if you do 1.2k and dont even with half your games,sorry but thats just straight facts,even if you had a prem i dont think you wouldve done any better
like my 4 last games i harcore carry 5k or 6k dmg but still was a lose for me
big sed
wr affects so much :/
wr doesnt get affected and doesnt affect rating whatsoever
the 10 battles affects
your own results still matter the most,as u still can get points even when loosing
then why did i calibrated on 3.1k
umm idk
weird
wrong channel @lavish walrus
ok, where do you want me to put that?
no where, go on other servers if you want to cry about teams, everyone has them,also dealing just 1k yourself doesnt really give you any permission to complain tbh
even so, jag has amazing dpm
Is this still going on?
yes it has
even so, jag has amazing dpm
@crimson goblet Lol yes it has
yes it is spart,sorry mate, but it seems that ppl cant stop complaining even if you logically respond
RynnivaTykki#7484 has been warned.
reaching diamond is not hard,its all about spamming games
playing a pershing in rating is an outstanding move
i played the sp1c in ratings,got to 5k and got my camo on it, i didnt complain,as i know how to play 😄
What if I told you the Pershing is a perfectly capable medium if played correctly?
What if I told you the Pershing is a perfectly capable medium if played correctly?
@ornate spoke i have it and i agree
Ok now come the WG lackeys with their censorship.
GG again.
@late mural they dont even get paid what are you on about?
@late mural if you can't make a point without insulting someone that is on you.
I don’t think I have the energy to spam to diamond
I know that I don't
Im perfectly fine sitting at plat and finishing there.
tryhars in every battles
or spam it alot
otherwise u will end up on losing your last rate
@crimson goblet maybe you can play the sp 1 c all the time in ratings after the buffs 😆
all i am doing it rating lately is farming camos in ratings, i dont care about rating enough otherwise,unless wg does another RB...
I dont really care about the camos if I am honest
Just do more deletes, poor mod. That's all you can contribute to this discussion.
im a camo junkie, i got 42 different camos on my hellcat (excluding the common once) i wish t6 rating was a thing
i can bet you my account he is way better ingame, and doesnt need to do so anyway,as i am already here to disproof all of your points
A lot of the tanks in my garage I have had there for a few years, so I racked up a lot of camos on them, that I do really like a lot. Triumph camo, the blitz birthday orange camo or even the ole ole ole camo lol
i wish i had the old ones, i am missing most of them (started playing end 2017 but collecting just this year) aswell as some Halloween camos etc
Some of the old ones are really good. I do hope they bring them back at some point
@late mural keep your comments civil and they won't be deleted 🤯
Big brain
How can you play rating battles if at the beginning of a battle ask what is callibration...
So we have the 40% players and the players who doesnt even know what the game mode is about...
that's not Rating battle anymore
that's basically a fun room
It was an absolute honour to meet stevo himself
the man the myth the stevo
send battle results
Damn guys, stevo is now close to almost 3.8K. Damn he really has made an improvement
Holy s***, 829 dmg
That must be some kind of record
@crimson goblet dang i thought i was world's first for diamond camo in sp 1c
Do it with St Emil
st emil has a decent gun; the only thing i really remember is that i was in a 1v3 and then i ran out of ammo in a 1v1 jajaja
T28 with diamond lol
@median wagon I made the mistake of getting to 5k before deciding I wanted to get the camo so I ended up with huge waiting times and getting focused a lot 😂
Bruh
Get it with sp I c
get it with amx m4 45
You’re in the 4.6 —> 5.6k range. You generally lose and gain less points
Why is even a thing rating
i always go for. platuim rating
because the diamond is just going to become the platinum in the future
Stonks 5k fighting with 800 🤣
lol
i dont quite understand why this screenshot in here, anyone got a clue?
No )
People like to ignore channel guidelines in this server
It just shows the E5 and 263 carried their respective teams
ıs 3 tank THE KING ❤️
My Ratings grew only 200 points yesterday. 😔 I can't even complain, lol. Was farming money for new tanks.
Ratings aren’t bad if you are willing to farm credits
why not take a break and comeback later, or tomorrow...
It’s not bad
@dim heron is that a sign that you should stop and come back in 30mins?
What tier and tank are you playing
Also I lost like 6 in a row but gained back those points in the next 2 match
I mean it's not that hard to climb up you know
I feel suspense when the queue time is long
Wew that's gonna take a lot of work then
I mean I went to 6500+ last season so ye I guess so?
so i didn't try ratings after calibration, I'm in asia too. how's sheridan and t92 spam?
Diamond gets 5 and top 5 gets 100 ye
I’m at 4.2k atm
Uh Asia eh idk but shldnt really matter just pick a decent tier X to "spam"
@dim heron I mean don't ask me I ain't wg still at least it makes the tank harder to get idm
I don't even want diamond, the plat camo is better
@dim heron what if you get top 5 then Smh instead of complaining
I got up to nearly 4k rating points then the yoyo took full effect & I start getting poor team players, then you get all the abuse just because you’re still in the battle!
Surprised I’ve not ran out of support tickets yet..reporting all the online abuse, surely abusive players can be banned from playing ratings for a few days, perhaps that will curtail their abuse!
yoyo effect?
bruh
Yeah, you go up then you get put back down again!Got back up but then got put back down...’yoyo effect’! 🤣
It's almost like, you don't know when you're on a losing streak, so you go on to lose all your rating
Venator#5269 has been warned.
Also I want to add, that using emojis (which you do a lot) to express your emotions just means you are incapable of expressing it with word.
Also nice, the bot send you your deleted message in DMs. If anyone wants it, I can give it to them. It is a documentary-style message on you know who
@weak dagger Had a small amount of battles and got 6k
@muted shuttle bruh. Herrmroz is OP. Like what are you supposed to do against him or like object3.
Did you read the matchmaking patent filed by wargaming in the US, @worldly anvil ? The yo-yo effect is well documented there.
HerrMroz plays on PC, of course he wins more.
bruh... you still need a shit ton of skill to keep 80% wr, that is even if you play in platoon all the time
imagine claiming that HerrMroz and Object3 are just good because they use a certain device
soo beeing good on phone = no life and beeing good with less time = PC user and thats sooo much easier than phone stop blaming anyone but your own awful performance
Really how many times will players complain about MM is it normal losing 10 battles in a row? Bots just destroy you good rating
Full of bots Obj.252, Progettos, Action X...
Because MM is very random and you get win streaks as well as losing streaks. We just don't notice the win streaks because we focus on the negative
My point is that why are the streaks there in the first place, win or lose. Some of the streaks seem too long to be random (I have no real evidence, the streaks just feel unusual)
Progetto is the most annoying rating tank
@lean zenith You call streak to 5 wins? vs more than 10 loses?
Just finished a battle where we had a bot Type 62 drowning in castilla...
In rating ?
good on phone = no life and beeing good with less time = PC user and thats sooo much easier than phone stop blaming anyone but your own awful performance
Mobile has the better auto-aim system.
PC feel's better in other fields but I'm trying to figure out why, since i play both platforms
Manual zoom and multitasking pc advantages
Manual Zoom I actually never used. The jumps in magnification are a lil wack
Its always max when using anyway
Manual zoom is best for Long shots to the moving target
@bleak crest ok