#vehicles-discussion
1 messages · Page 455 of 1
vk72 is by no means bad, not when you factor in the busted frontal armor with basically the thickest lower plate in tier 10 plus a great hulldown profile and its one of the best facehuggers in the game
But has is got gun dep
yeah thats exactly how you should play the jag, except when you sidescrape with it you always take damage because your superstructure cheeks are always exposed before and after you peek, so the whole point of outtrading enemies with your alpha is null, not to mention the jag reverses so slowly that by the time you can get your gun on target, the enemy has already retreated behind cover
Ok then calm down it’s just a funny deep tank to bounce noobs…
Is the AMX 50 100 and the T69 worth it? Asking before it's all too late.
7 degrees is perfectly workable
Ok do that then I don’t wanna get an ok tank if I can have 60tp etc (which I don’t already have)
yeah but he asked for the VK72 or the Jag, not the 60TP
i agree with you in that the 60TP is better than both, but he wasnt asking about the 60TP
With who I can talk to?
huh
do you mean who you can ask for help or something?
I’m here if you need advice
No
I don't know with who I can speak
you can talk to anyone here
Okay
well its maybe a little bit offtopic but tbh. I would like to see a remodel of the IS-8 in T-10 here 🙂
It's not offtopic really
vehicles discussion should be more than just stats
agree
Under average TD but with high alpha and pen > heavy with the lowest DPM in the tier 10, but at least "works well in facehug"
i can pull 3.2k+ consistently with my vk72 despite the dpm being like 2300, so idk what ur talking about
this is like saying the kran is bad because it has bad dpm
Well, highly skilled players will do well in anything even if the gun is actually extremely bad for a heavy, that's what they do after all
lemme rephrase it for you
“underaverage TD that shoots itself in the foot because it cant trade consistently due to poor aim time, bad gun arc, and bad armor profile < heavy tank with great all round armor that can hulldown, sidescrape, and brawl and still do well despite the low dpm because it has arguably the thickest frontal armor in tier 10”
Rhm borsig has all of those yet it performs so well for me
If you're going for a trade in Jagdpanzer E100 you're already doing it all wrong, go just close enough to resolve the bad aim bloom, but not too close. If you know that the armor is bad, then you know that it's not made for trading
Im not a 3d modeler, but i made a really rough model of what such vehicle's frontal armor may looks like in my head
Here is the front view at ground level, and then the side view
It’s my top damage dealer and top tank to go to for fun. Never fails me 👍👍
The bottom one looks like a paper airplane
As for the Vk, good luck trying to sidescrale. The turret makes a circle shape on the hull. All we need if it's there
how would you play the jag then? if you go in close you get murdered because you only have 2k HP, poor traverse, and huge drive sprockets that anyone can track and deal damage through
Ima call this fictional vehicle the "prot. model-021"
point is, the jag has zero place in this game as it is now because all the supposed advantages it has are negated in practice, whereas you can actually rely on the vk72 more
What about the E100? It has similar weak spots that are massive and easy to aim at
It’s hull is also more or less the same as the jag
jag cant brawl, it cant snipe, it cant trade, it cant do anything
Support line, not too far away neither too close. Either watch out for popular areas and shot unprepared players or support heavies using them as sponge. The armor can't be trusted, but it blocks one or two shots if you get lucky
What it can do, is bring fun
As like if there was only 3 roles in the game
you take one shot and people know where you are then avoid you like the plague
You overestimate the players in this game
As a jagd E100 player, i can't deny the tank is absolutely garbage
But i played it so many times cause the tank is very fun to play
yeah but the E100 has 800 more HP and a fully traversable turret
Not that garbage, but if anyone wants a TD in tier 10, there's way better options
Grille
T110E3 does everything that Jageroo does, but you can be much more agressive and actually take place in the frontline
Exactly, it's a bad tank if we compare it to many others. But i played that tank more cause it's way more fun
So what kind of buff does Jag need to be powerful again
None. Not every tank needs to be strong, they just need to fill their purpose. Jageroo fills its purpose very well even if it's bad.
Big 17cm gun with high dpm and decent aim time, really heavy good to ram in modes etc.
Not used for competitive, fun machine only
What about the Death Star is it still fun to use?
Who actually plays competitive on this game aside from the people who receive money from the game and tryharders?
The only reason I don’t grind for the Death Star is cuz all the tech tree tanks in its line are trash and painful to use
you just described the problems with the jag
its a support vehicle that cant even support itself
tanks with carry potential are inherently more powerful in this game because they have some aspect that allows you to still be competitive even without teammates
what happens when your heavies die or you get flanked and counterpushed, or enemy TD fire locks you out of a position? the jag is bad because is has neither a role in the game nor does it have the capacity to support itself; you rely on your team and the enemy team to do well in it. every time you press battle in the jag, you roll the dice because you HAVE to get either a good team or bad enemies, oftentimes both, just to come out with a victory
a few hours later, sussybaka stills texting all angry about how a stupid TD is one of the most horrible tanks in tier 10
rlly gonna make fun of me for arguing a point after you come in over half an hour after the original convo ended but go on ¯_(ツ)_/¯
I think they should buff the Death Star line so that tanks like At7 and tortoise will be like their tier 5 counterpart, the AT 2 which is extremely hard to penetrate for tier 4 and 5 tanks from the front, the only spots you can pen are it’s hatch which is trollish and maybe the tracks if they’re angled too much.
I think At7, At8, At15 and tortoise should be more like At2
Not much tanks can support itself after all, mostly support tanks. If it's meant to support someone, it's because you're not supposed to go alone. It's a team game after all lmao
if you think teams are something you can rely on in this game, keep dreaming
Well, that's what support tanks exist for, complain to wg, not me
The At2 has some obvious weaknesses, you can easily flank it even if you’re a heavy tank. But the armour is almost invincible on the front against tier 4s and 5s. Tier 6s can penetrate you only with premium ammunition.
But the rest of the line are not like At2, they have so many easy weak spots
im not gonna complain to wg because i like the jag
he asked whether he should get the vk72 or the jag, and i said the vk72 because the vk can at least be self sufficient, unlike the jag which cracks nearly instantly under any sort of pressure from enemies
This is why I prefer glass cannon TDs. They’re silent and hard to spot if you use it right.
Also why I play rhm borsig a lot.
“Heavy” TDs like jag just aren’t my thing
Don't think that Vk 72 is self sufficient too, with fewer targets on the front, the enemies will only look to your painful lower plate. It have got a painful reload too
u realize that ur only helping my argument more right
i already have t29 and almost buying t32, should i still keep on grinding t110e5?
._ .
vk 72 has a base reload of 17.74 at 100% crew with no equipment or provisions while the jag has a base reload of 17.04, so its not like the jag is magically better because it outreloads the vk72 by 7 tenths of a second
not to mention that the VK72 has literally the thickest frontal armor out of any tier 10 heavy tank with a consistent 240mm across the entire frontal hull, compared to the jag's 150mm lower plate
and forcing the enemies to try and look for your lower plate is a GOOD thing because it means youre exercising some degree of control over them and forcing them to make decisions, at which point you exploit that by hiding your lower plate, maybe behind some hard cover or by sidescraping or even just by going on a downslope to generate artificial angles and turn it red
vk 72 LFP is by no means "painful," not when literally every other heavy in the game has to load gold and kill their DPM by 10-20% just to pen it reliably
yes, the E5 is a good tank
But here's a funny thing, comparing the Jageroo E100 armor to Vk 72 isn't actually trustworthy. One is meant to be played like a heavy, the other isn't by no way. One really needs high armor values and fails to prammo, other doesn't really need much armor because you're going to just support
so the jag doesnt need armor because its a "support tank," yet it has the armor for some reason, which only kills the mobility and reduces your ability to react to sudden situations
this is exactly my point, the jag is a bad tank because it does not fill any meta role in the game, it falls behind other tanks in the "support" role, nor does it have the capacity to support itself if its caught off guard or become isolated or left alone
I personally love the jag for what it is, although the armor isn’t perfect its good, but I do play front line with it so it depends on how you play it
not to mention the "armor" youre talking about rarely works because its a huge metal box with massive tracks, a massive side profile, a massive lower plate, and huge cheeks that are so obvious hellen keller could see them
Yes, it has armor because you're going for a heavy lane, somewhere that blocking two or three shots can mean half of your HP. You don't need to trust the armor, but not on the same way you don't trust the Grille's armor.
You also just described the Maus and the E 100
reasons why the jag is bad
-
you can't support yourself in the even of a sudden change in the battle (flank, your team folds, etc)
-
other tanks do your "support" job better and are better for getting out damage consistently (see grille 15 and object 268) or just do your job flat out better (T110E3)
-
you have no role in this game because you dont have the necessary traits to compete with other tanks in youll be facing if you did try to play those roles. You try to frontline? get screwed because you cant reliably trade with other heavies, especially since going heavy route means youre facing multiple enemies who are going to be breathing down your neck. You try to snipe? Grille does your job better, not to mention the jag has poor traverse, poor bloom, and bad aim time, meaning you cant snap shots or track fast moving targets at range. You play as a "support?" Other tanks do your job better (see 268). More or less the same effective penetration but with a more consistent gun and infinitely better mobility, not to mention much better camo rating, so you can actually sit in spots and exploit them for damage without being spotted and locked out of positions by enemy tanks.
this shouldnt even be an argument
Also, since when support tanks can support itself when caught offguard? What does the support TD do when caught off guard?
1- Cry and accept it's fate
2- Try to shot until die (which probably will happen)
3- Pray for an allie come on time
4- All of the above at the same time
Yes, I do agree with you and I'm not disagreeing about the "other tanks do this role better" as i can say exactly the same for Vk 72
You seem to be looking for a nearly perfect tank, I just play tanks I like for fun
I've made the rear side
I've realised the hull is becoming a hybrid of IS-6 with t22 medium, but more angled
bro I don't think anyone's paying attention to that through their argument lol, maybe post that later
so then why are you here arguing? the point is that the jag has absolutely NOTHING going for it, whereas the VK72 does have some stuff going for it
Oh, i thought the chat died
he asked which one he should grind for, and i suggested the vk72 for the exact reason i just posted above
I’d like to think that the Jpz is merely an alternative to the 183 with better armour, a reliable gun, but at the lack of a turret
Apparently not lol
Alr i'll came back later, hopefully with the turret
Jag is the classic "You want to play that tank for fun", meanwhile almost none plays the Vk 72 or even remember it's existence for a reason
i dont see how this supports what youre saying
"the jag is better because more people play it, which means the vk 72 is bad because less people play it"
maybe consider the fact that half the playerbase is 9 year olds who go for the E100/183 because "hurr durr big gun," ofc theyre going to be attracted the the jagdpanzer over the vk72
I play the vk 72, it's pretty fun, and I ground it over the maus and e100
Not much people play the Vk 72, because if they wanted to, everyone knows that there's better options
A lot of people plays Jagdpanzer E100 because it's a better 183. There's better options, but you want it merely for the alpha
You got it now?
Whats the reload with 100% crew and crew rations
15.6 with rammer
Dear lord, Vk 72 enjoyer, I though that this creature was extinct
I also have a vk90 but I play the vk72 over it
For the same reason that "Jagdpanzer is bad because a T110E3 can do better on the match", 60TP does better than Vk 72, it works for both tanks
Ok, sorry uf it offends you, but that's a quite weird taste
i can agree with that, but youre missing the point
in the original question, he asked whether he should grind the jag or the vk72, and i said the vk72 because its an objectively more consistent tank that can support itself better than the jag can, because thats how i judge tanks, by comparing their performance, not their "fun factor"
if he wanted a tank with fun factor then i would have immediately said the jag because the jag's playstyle is the same as the 183: sit at the back and eat chips while you press left click every 20 seconds or so and laugh as some poor soul loses a third of their HP in one shot, whereas with the vk72 you have to actually apply brainpower when you play it, which some people arent into
he just asked which one he should grind and i put out my opinion thats not even an opinion but is basically just objective fact, and you come in here rambo style half an hour after i finish talking and then throw some underhanded comments when i try to defend my point
he never clarified what he was looking for when he asked which one to grind, so i assumed for him
I can say the same, but for the other side
trying to compare the E3 to the JPz isn’t what I’d do
the Jpz is there to deal massive damage, but still retain the armour to take a few hits
It shares more in common with the 183 rather than the E3 imo
again, I see the Jpz as the 183 that lost some alpha, HESH, and a turret for
better accuracy, actual prammo, and armour to take some shots
both have their merits when compared to each other
so then why are you even arguing with me in the first place?
Because I have nothing else to do, that's what I do i this server since when I left the game
i judge tanks based on their performance in battle and you dont, but you still try to debate it with me when our standards arent even the same and theres no basis on which we can debate vk72 vs jag
I judge tanks based on their role, comparing rawlly a support tank with a heavy is weird in the first place
then next time say that first so we dont waste an hour of our time going back and forth over something that we werent on the same page on to begin with
I feel like they should reduce vk72's weight by like 10-15 tons to make it more mobile
it really shouldn't weight 120 tons the way it is
Meh, cool then
120 tons is kinda of an enormous weight trully
@scarlet kernel Decided to make a tank based off your Prot. Model-021
55 kph top speed on the road, though abysmal p/w (Around 13 iirc). 120mm gun able to penetrate 212mm of armor (Though guns in Sprocket are heavily underpowered so I'd compare it to maybe a modern-ish IS-4 gun)
seems balanced to me
The perfect tank for all your side scraping dreams, with very angled plates meant to deflect shells while having minimal nominal armor. This does however lead to a rather underpowered engine, leading to mobility issues despite the ability to reach a high top speed due to thin tracks
It’s actually one of the more balanced tanks that I’ve made. Gun depression is 6.5 degrees, which is rather nice should you want to get your upper plate and turret a bit more angled
Just imagine peeking over a ridge and seeing this
bruh if thats one of your more balanced tanks then i dread to see your other balanced tanks
I have some tanks that are rather… overpowered to say the least coughcough200mmOfFrontalArmorWith25DegreesOfGunDepressioncoughcough
I’ve also made some more MBT like tanks which would break the meta
Kpfpz-70 with 69 kmph max speed: 👀
The MBT-70 we have in game is a bit disappointing tbh
I know how it feels. I rarely use that tank than 50TP Prototyp.
I want a tank with 500mm of frontal armor but 1mm of side and rear armor with a 100% chance of being set on fire if hit there
MY go to tier 9 is the 30 1er Proto
@misty wing If only sprocket let you have more than 200mm of armor
E5 is easy to ignite its engine
thats normal
oh wow, that's great
idk if i should be happy or in fear that this actually looks like what wg can put in
It might need a bit of rebalancing to be put in. Also thank you for the inspiration for it
i am messing around with the idea aswell, somehow it just turned out as if the maus engineers learned how armor angling works and decided to put it all in
vk 72, reliably block?
press 2 and pen the lowerplate
if you are patient enough shoot the cheeks and two weakspots on the hull.
a worse e100 gun too.
at least jag got that big algha gun for it
im not hashing this over again
maybe read the conversation between brazilian and i before you ping me
already did, you are over selling the vk72 and trashing the jag for no reason.
jag is actually very playable and it got actual gun handling, unlike the 183 which has no armor or gun handling at all. jag can 2nd line very well. and it hits very hard.
im not gonna waste another hour of my time here
youre entitled to your opinion and i have mine
ehh fair enough, i just saw the overconfidence in your assessment and couldn't stop myself :P
Doesn’t VK have the same gun as the E100?
gets worse reload
The other parameters such as pen and damage are still the same tho?
yes but you get a 1 second more reload for no reason
1 second is much
So basically am m6 exp
Yep, you know it has lacking armor on the side/back when it’s the subject of getting HESH slapped by a random T49 (although an M-V-Yoh’s HEAT round can butter the front plates easily)
i like sheridan
I like FT 17
Imagine if they add modern tanks into wotb
The leopard 2 (modern one of course)
Abrams
T14 armata
Type 99
Never
console yes
Stb 1 worth it?
yes
y tho we have leopard 1 and thats great
Jageroo > Vk that none actually cares
is the ru 251 worth getting?
It’s a good tank + it leads to the Leopard 1 which is great if you can play paper mediums well
i see
Leopard 2 looks ugly imo the leopard 1 looks way better
Leo 2 turret is just 💀
Bruh Leo 2 turret is awesome
It's so ugly
The edges are so clean though
Whatd the best heavy tank line rn for tier 10
60TP or IS-7
Unless you’re asking strictly for the line and not just the tier 10, to which I would then argue that the E5 has the best overall heavy tank line
I Have Guestion
What tank points to hit with high-explosive shells and is the Soviet IS tank a good idea?
Usually you can use HE shells on tanks with low armor values, or the rears of some tanks. Also the Soviet IS line is good, I’d recommend going down it
yes, particularly the IS-7 line first before you go down the IS-4 line, it'll make your life extremely easier
Don’t make the mistake many of us made of doing the IS-4 line first
actually you were right I do not regret it@rigid thunder
hope it stays that way
I also have the Comet, Vk 2 and at8 lines
I fought 3 at once and they couldn't destroy me, I destroyed one tank of 1200 hp with one shot
Is Is very good and strong tank
I think so too
I also want got Maus but First I go to Is Line
The maus ain't exactly new player friendly so yea
gg well played
Is Maus good?
Yes
depends on the player
The thing is just so dang survivable
Still want WG to add a Shell Ejection System to French Light and and Russian Medium Tanks.
Another succesed win
Please buff the Type 61
animation when firing simultaneously takes the empty shell out from turret
doesn't the t-2020 have something like that
when
please buff the is5’s gun
when
now
no, I meant when
what
when did i ask
What
how about you ask for deez nuts
when
deez nuts starts in about 1 minute
why are WG so unwilling to let a medium have high pen
imo it would be cool to have a medium with average or below average armor/mobility in exchange for having pre-nerf pen (260-270 APCR, 330 heat)
122 TM was a penetration demon with some major drawbacks on PC, but of course they had to take that away for blitz as well
Also tanks like the kanonenjagdpanzer and AMX CDA 105 should have pre-nerf med pen as well, they are TDs after all. The SU-100M1 is also a TD with a medium tank gun, and it retains the 330 heat
Don’t they?
oh wait the CDA does, but the kanonen has the same nerfed pen as the leo 1
250/300
CDA threw me off because french meds already had low pen to begin with
impressive.
Have they? I don’t seem to struggle with the 30b (which has the same gun as the cda afaik)
I was looking at PC numbers for the pre-nerf values, and 30b has quite bad pen there, comparable to blitz
So uhhhh
250 pen isn't good enough for tier 8? Really?
imagine Leo 1 pen buff
would be hilarious
I don't want "good enough", I want overkill.
Why look at pc numbers when talking about blitz smh they’re straight up different games
people will always find something to complain about
Don’t play meds then. Get an obj 268 only gold
didn't I just tell you? because PC values are identical or close to what the meds had before the nerf in blitz
I want a med with penetration as its gimmick. There are meds with really good armor, really good mobility, high alpha, etc. But none of them has penetration, and I think a med like that would provide good variety for the game
yall are so quick to clown on anything that brings up PC lmfao
No one's complaining lol
we aren't clowing on pc, just saying that the game already has high pen meds
Unnecessary changes are unnecessary changes. Weegee can barely balance the game as is. They don't need more thinks to fail miserably at.
I'd rather have them try than not. Inept devs >>> lazy devs
I really like this idea of a sub class of mediuma more focused in firepower than precision, like a 121 but a bit more into the cannon.
Mediums whose "perks" are being actual medium-like glass cannons
in tier 10, it really doesn't
all the meds basically have the same pen, and many of them have nearly the same gun entirely
Imagine the M4 Ravioli, but make it become a whole line
again
imagine Leo pen buff to 270/320
I think you guys are mistaking my statements as "meds don't have enough pen", when in reality I am saying "there should be a med with penetration as its gimmick"
Exactly, all guns (aside from only 121 with a 122mm gun) from mediums in that tier follow the same aspects
- Satisfying precision
- Very fast fire rate
- 100-110mm guns
- Worst penetration possible
#MakeAM4RevLikeLine
By the way, historical accuracy is by no means an excuse to make it impossible as we have TVP and 60TP mostly made up
ikr?
120mm on Leo 1 when for funni
I like what PC did a few years ago when they rebalanced the mediums tbh, with the leo having higher alpha and whatnot
higher alpha and pen
along side the fact that in PC the Leo can actually play in its designated role as a second line sniper
in blitz, you barely can, as people see a leopard, they don’t see a 3.6k dpm tank, they see 1.9k free damage
meds are too similar to each other in blitz imo
I have like 3-4 meds in tier X and feel almost zero motivation to grind or buy any more of them, since they're all so similar
yeah
same old hulldown, meh pen
The WZ, TVP, 4202, and Leo at least mix it up
and progetto I guess
The reason our mt doesn't have high penetration, is because it doesn't need to
As the tanks was given it's own role in battle
Light tank focuses on speed and spotting, hence they mostly have the lowest penetration values, they can easily outrun and circle their target and shoot their most vulnerable areas
Heavy tanks are mostly armored, and if they don't they compensate it with the gun. As in the game heavy tanks are made to fight other heavy most of the time, they of course needed a gun that need to be able to penetrate them
Medium tanks are the in beetween, they are fast and most of the time also brings armor. They can out maneuver ht, and they are put to fight lights and other meds. So they basically doesn't need higher pen values
meds and lights have more or less the same pen though
^ 3/4 of the tier X lights have the same pen as a tier X MT
and yes, meds usually don't need more pen, but again that's ignoring the main focus of my statement
Asian server: no one cares about roles
every server*
Wg do, and you can see that the maps are sliced in two
Mt side and ht side
But what i play in that server destroyer in first line (spoting), heavy on second line, medium + light tank camper
Ik just to put out there why meds doesn't have more pen
Since at first you asked "why wg don't want to put more pens to meds" Or somethin
wording can be a bit confusing, but my statement was more related to "why can't WG let even one or a few meds to have higher pen"
This was mainly a response to the 122 TM having decidedly average or even below average pen for a tier 8 med, despite having incredible pen in PC
I'm not saying "meds have bad pen, WG should buff them all"
Allow me to use real life as example because that's where WG take the best ideas for perks in tanks (even the 20secs spotting is somewhat based irl)
In USA in latewar indeed used Shermans with the obsolete 75mm M3, but as you may suppose, they weren't required to tank battles anymore, instead of those early versions, Shermans, Hellcats or Jacksons were sent to tank combats as for the prototypes of Pershings.
Obsolete shermans didn't need better cannons as they were mostly used for supporting infantrymen and destroying light armored cars or bunkers, meanwhile shermans with more firepower were sent to escort heavier tanks and direct tank combat
What we are talking about is a medium tank somehow meant to be escorting the heavies ans supporting them with fire. TDs can do it, but not on the same agility that a medium can do.
If you wanna say that, just say
"Would be cool if wg add a med that have the highest on penetration"
But we technically have it, the t95 medium tank. Wg put it as a heavy
that's nowhere near mobile enough to actually play as a med, and the gun handling on the move is atrocious
That's why it's a heavy in-game, not a medium
I'd be so down to have an american med with the 120mm 258/340 pen though tbh
In real life, before heavier battalions reach the frontline there's the shocktroops already acting in order to spot major targets and preparing the battlefield for more troops. That's what a medium tank with actual penetration would do, spotting enemy heavies and actually helping allied heavies with fire and agility
you're probably right, I have this very weird habit of wording things in a way that questions someone's mentality
maybe it's because I'm taking a course in psychology
i would love if WG would rebalance leo 1 like it did in PC.
i am amazed by PC leo 1. and also the PTA.
but i am not sure what would that do to balance in Blitz.
I think 380 alpha like the concept and maybe 10mm more pen on the standard and pramo would be good for it
and a reload nerf to compensate
no don't touch the leo 1's beautiful dpm
I hate how slowly blitz is moving towards PBR
I looked at a PC post from a few years ago when they were still moving to HD, and they updated like 20 tanks in one update
I know blitz updates probably can't be too large because mobile, but I would like to see them double the rate at least
I'd probably chalk it down to a difference in the size of the development teams, wotb most definitely has a smaller one than wotpc
but for the most part they're not exactly designing new models, as they typically reuse PC models, so the smaller team also has less work cut out for them
at least I think they should, but I'm no expert at programming
It’s worth to point out this happened near the engine change for pc and Blitz uses a wildly complicated and ancient engine that very few of the Blitz team know how to work with
that would make sense
engine update when
It's also just a priority type of thing, the more time spent updating the tanks is the less time they spend on other changes
And I don't mind the rate it's going at tbh. In a years time the newer updated tanks will probably be more geometrically complex than ones added in now simply due to ppl having access to better phones.
um.. no, that's not how it works
the tanks updated to PBR in a year will not be any better quality than say the IS-7 or 60TP that already have PBR
But I swear I saw it in shop
They can change their standards whenever they feel like it, if in a year's time they feel that they were being conservative in their approach they can raise their polygon budget for the tanks. Currently tanks with simple shapes generally have more geometric complexity in terms of detail, they often have 3d wheels and anything else that adds detail rather than relying on a texture. Maybe the game's engine is better optimized in a year and can run higher fidelity tanks more efficiently. Not to mention people upgrading their devices. Anything already in the game will be there for the long haul and anything new will take advantage of the advancements. They of course will not surpass the pc ones in quality but they will be closer.
What year was this filmed?
Except they're using models from PC, and are almost certainly too lazy or don't have enough resources to make significant changes to those models
And PC's HD models are pretty consistent in quality from what I can tell
They should add a skin to the T95 and make it the T95 turtle
Is IS-2 Berlin the Blitz version of WOT PC's IS-2M?
Not to be confused with IS-M which is IS-2Sh in Blitz.
Voting for centurion action x to replace FV4202
When you make models in quads instead of Tris to save on the number of faces
If I wanted to make a tank model it's literally two circles 20 cylinders and 2-10 cubes
Oh. Got it
Iirc the Is-2 Berlin used to be called simply IS-2 in blitz as well
Oh. Tell me more about it. I know IS-2M has 10.66~~10.7 seconds for a 390 avg damage and 100% crew training.
It got over 100% in PC like mine at 102% at most.
I just got the AMX 50 120, what play style should I go with
Support heavy tank
IS-2M and the premium IS-2 are nearly the same, with the exception of the different tank model which may affect the overall armor
I'll check it on tanks.gg
IS-2M also has marginally better gun handling but also marginally worse mobility due to increased weight
Also higher ammo capacity
I should've gotten the T-103 TBH but I got the IS-2M instead during trade-in
The shoulders would be around 235mm effective in a sidescraping position against AP shells, only effective against mid to low-end standard shells
#buffIS2Sh
Maybe remove the 110mm deck though, it's a bit obnoxious
Or base on IS-M from PC
nah keep it for funni
M6A2E1 EXP with 191mm deck:
I am so definitely glad they're doing nothing about it in 8.8
This is insanity if they go for WOT PC's IS-M. The front corners are rounded which makes them weaker but it is still excellent for side-scraping.
Truly.
They should give sympathy to the IS-2Sh owners. This should be one of the good side-scraping tanks since this is the tank I know that is rear-turreted.
Too bad Chrysler K exists
Why did I forget about that tank again?!
Chonky STG I guess
<@&481447501690568709> ^
We need a russian one
can you buff TD hp? not fair that you can get 3 shotted at t10
any updates on the type 71?
But most td at tier X can 1-5 shot tanks
I know that they are using the PC models, but if it's not obvious they simplify the tank geometry to run better on mobile devices, hence why some things aren't 'truly' round or they just rely on a texture to show detail rather than being actually modeled. As I stated earlier, it obviously will not surpass the quality of the PC tanks. But they can make the decision to not downgrade them as much and flesh out more detail than they do now.
I think the blitz PBR models are close enough to the PC models as is, there's not a whole lot they can improve without matching or surpassing the PC ones
So I'm not too concerned about graphics "powercreep" over the years once everything is PBR
Opinion on jpanther 2?
Good
Any tips?
Angle
tips for the t100LT's playstyle on blitz?
Spam prammo or hit the sides of tanks
i dont get the thing with prammo
What’s not to get? Press 2, pen enemy
Prammo - premium ammo
I think they mean that they don’t understand what the point of it is 🤡
Like what it’s main function is
Can't wait for WG to paste the armor profile of the Chieftan Mk6 from PC to blitz - it's gonna be such a fun tank to play hulldown (I'm talking to you, Ho-Ri lovers)
it has more or less the same armor on PC as blitz though
actually, I think it has better armor in blitz after taking a closer look
@molten imp
Actually, in PC the turret is 350-600 millimeters hulldown, in blitz it's 200-390
Look again on blitz inspector
Nah, the PC turret is 215-250 on the lower part, 140 on the middle part, 57 on the roof and 60 on the cupola
on blitz it's 230-250 on the lower part, 140 on the middle part, and 76 on the roof and cupola
additionally, the blitz mk6 has more armor on the frontal hull and frontal part of the sides
the difference is marginal, but the blitz one is ultimately more resistant to HE
I'm referring to base armor values not counting angling, but that should translate the same way since the models are more or less the same
if you're talking about the t95/fv4201 unless that's raw armor values I find that thickness hard to believe
He's talking about the chieftain mk6
Yes those are the same tanks. In blitz it's called the Chieftan Mk6, in PC it's called the T95/FV4201
No lol
PC has a chieftain mk6 6 and a t95/fv4201 chieftain
Blitz only has the mk6
They're different tanks
No, PC actually doesn't have a tank called the Chieftan Mk6
The tank in PC is called the T95/FV4201 Chieftain
Lol you must be trolling
The t95/fv4201 looks nothing like the mk6. It has that name for a reason, because it's a fake tank that's a mix of the chieftain and American t95
Go look at tanks.gg or search it up on YouTube, PC does have a mk6 that's very similar to the one on blitz
afaik it's not available, but it's still in the game
It’s not fake the project was real it failed for obvious reasons (training crew for multiple guns and turrets is a horrific idea)
if you browse tanks.gg there's another unimplemented (to my knowledge) tank called the T95/Chieftain, and I'd like to imagine that if the project succeeded, it would've looked more like that one than the T95/FV4201 Chieftain
There is an article on it for Tanks encyclopedia that lists the 95/4201 being one of the candidates although it might be an article marked for updating
seems a fair bit stronger than 210mm unless you're talking about raw armor
even if it might've been a project for consideration, I think the other design would've come out on top, as the 95/fv4201 just looks super impractical in comparison
I'm referring to base armor values not counting angling, but that should translate the same way since the models are more or less the same
I was indeed referring to raw armor
Oh hey I'm blind as hell
nice to know
although im not sure why you would use raw armor as a stat in a conversation about how strong armor is, effective armor is much more relevant
they're the same tank model though so comparing raw armor is easier
and the turret is a really weird shape so it's hard to compare the effective value at the exact same spot
My bad, for some reason wotinspector was not showing the other chieftans, it only showed the 4201
Wot inspector probably doesn't show tanks that are in testing/aren't available yet
That would be fun.
I would love to see a Pan-Middle Eastern tech tree sometime, with everything from Egyptian Sherman mods to Israeli Centurions and ending with the Merkava prototype or the earliest version of the production tank. The T-34-122 could be a TD.
are these supposed to be scaled to represent the size of the tank accurately if so im pretty sure these two are literally the same size
no, the sizing is really bad on those silhouettes
Yeah the icons there make the fume extractor on the T110E5 crazy massive
is the T10 chinese MT similar to the T-62A?
No, 121 is a lot worse than T-62A, and its complete inability to snapshot and massive size makes it unable to play like a typical medium
xd
only by looks, it plays a lot differently and is not a typical boring hull down med
But it can slap around all the other meds at the tier
still a bad 113 with the pathetic pen it has
Oh hell yea
I finally got my hands on some nitro
Free nitro,is nice
The good dlscordi nitro
Guys why is discord cras
aye uh is the Leopard PT A good?
It’s decent but really held back by 6 degrees of gun depression
Over the grind I learned to progressively enjoy it more but please, make yourself a favor and free exp the gun before playing it.
Once fully upgraded the gun is more than adequate and it’s got nice mobility too
It's not decent it's garbage
I guess the gun is ok but it has practically no armor and not fast
No screw it I checked the gun is practically trash
It’s decently fast if you‘re not using the stock engine
Are you looking at the stock one?💀
It is fast lol
^ man must be looking at stock tank stats from the tech tree preview
practically trash gun sounds like that person has quite high standards for T9 mediums firepower
Gun is okay
I dont see much leo ptas, and if I ever see them they either die within seconds or not do much against me
Anecdotal evidence does not equate to how good the tank actually is
^ the average player has about 48% wr so facing a tank does not equal an objective assessment of how good said vehicle is
even more so in lightly armored vehicles which tend to be more unforgiving
its still like the easiest medium in tier 9 to deal with
M46, T54E1, and Type 61 moment
T54E1 definitely should get a fourth shell in its clip
Give it HE shells💀
how is the 121 a bad 113
am i missing something? because both tanks don't play the same at all
not with the huge difference in armor and mobility
LMAO pathetic pen? 245 AP of wz121 is the BEST pen of any medium tank
290 heat
Mhm
And still cant deal with any heavy frontally.
The best pen out of garbage is still garbage
My problem with 121 is that the super long profile and center mount turret make it awkward to play with, then you’re forced to sit still to hit shots with the fairly weak turret
do you recommend LTTB or LTG? I hesitate a lot ^^
Guys,should I grind WZ 121 or WZ 113?
Lttb
113
add my favorite tank into blitz 😡😡😡
NOPE
You’re funny
thanks 🙂
Fortunately your favorite tank will never be added to blitz!
thank god i would never play again. i didn’t even 3 mark it smh
Bruh, wish WoT added the new Modern day Stuart, with many improved characteristics, such as better engine, better tracks, better durability and better gun. I'd love to see it as a tier 7-8 Premium American light tank, with a punchy 90mm gun and some decent speed and durable turret armor (but not impenetrable)
LTTB:
It’s a Stuart what armor can it even have
Ah, the brazilian project on Stuart. Nice idea btw...
They should add the kv6
Brazil efforts to make a tank
but that wasn't their only attempt
i have a pic of a more interesting tank like an actual MBT they built
How about a cursed Lee?
this one
How about Indian tanks
EE-T1 Osório
imma send
The Arjun (pronounced [ɐɽˈdʑʊn]) is a third generation main battle tank developed by the Combat Vehicles Research and Development Establishment (CVRDE) of the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO), for the Indian Army. The tank is named after Arjuna, the archer prince who is the main protagonist of the Indian epic poem Mahabharata...
It looks pretty cool ngl
their best tank so far looks like a hybrid between chieftain and Russian tanks
does anyone know the first ever tank of the us army?
based on the research i had i found this thing to be it but i have some doubts
The CLB 75 Tank was a U.S.-produced, prototype armoured fighting vehicle built by C. L. Best's Traction Company of San Leandro, California. Best was a rival of the Holt Manufacturing Company in producing caterpillar tracked vehicles. Among Best's products was the CLB 75 hp (56 kW) 'Tracklayer'
The tank was developed by putting an armoured hull...
Y'all ever seen the "Tiger III" concept that was changed to the E-100?
E100 was called "Tiger-Maus" at some point iirc
Ngl, if the E-100 had the same turret as the one above the Tiger II, but with the same 150mm, it'd be a way different vehicle.
i would rather have the tiger 3 turret cuz e100 at its current state is really ez to pen with all the gold shells but tiger 3 turret seems to be more narrow and have smaller weak spots
or you could learn how to angle it around a corner
Same with the Maus... The fact that 2 of the heaviest tanks in the game are so easy to pen, it's unfair
armour meta and hulldown meta is boring ngl
Even when angling, Gold still goes through regardless
Especially when TDs load Gold and butter directly through the front plate of the Maus or E-100... Those tanks need armor buffs to the front and sides, just enough so if it's angled, then gold won't butter through them. And maybe rework the way penetration angles work...
Also, imagine Jagdpanther with the E-50 Hull
thats cursed dont give wg ideas
The Bob Semple tank was a tank designed by New Zealand Minister of Works Bob Semple during World War II. Originating out of the need to build military hardware from available materials, the tank was built from corrugated iron on a tractor base. Designed and built during a period of uncertainty in which New Zealand feared having to defend itself...
There's also the E-55
E-79 is a thing as well
Wish STA-2 was also added as a first Japanese tier 8 premium
Hopefully, it will come with the new Japanese Heavies (not the type series unfortunately)
Ngl, I think I just fell in love with the Tiger 3
That just looks like a german fcm
I had an idea for the longest time that the german TD branch should be split with the JP II leading to the jagdpanzer E50 and jagdpanzer E50M, whereas the ferdinand leads to jagdtiger and jp e100
cursed 💯
No no no
The E 100 didn‘t evolve from the Tiger III, the Tiger III is pure fiction. Neither the E 55 nor the E 79 ever existed
talk about the Lowe and Maus xd
Even the Löwe and VK 72/ VK 90 are hot takes by Wargaming
Funnily enough the VK 72 and VK 90 both seem to build up on the same project of the „Schwerer Löwe“
nah, the vk72 was a real concept. VK 90 seems made up by wargaming but it is unrelated to the Lowe project
The Lowe project was done by krupp (hence the "K" at the end of VK 72) whereas the vk 90 was "supposedly" done by porsche, hence the "P" at the end, and it looks the part tbh
The VK 72 was nothing more than a drawing board concept. Not even blueprints, just some wild ideas thrown together. Nobody even knows for sure how these looked
a drawing board concept is not quite a "hot take by wargaming", which is what the vk90 is
The VK 90 is more plausible than the VK 72 or Löwe looking at German armour production
an impractical proposal is still more likely to be produced than one that never existed
There are also practically no sources for these drawing board studies so it‘s still a hot take to take them as a basis
In fact, it‘s more likely that the VK 72 looked like the VK 90 than like the VK 72 we have
"A project for further development of the VK 45.02 (P) Ausf. B after the proposal for the latter was rejected. However, the project was abandoned in favor of the Maus project. No prototypes were produced."
this is what I would come up with as a fake history for the VK 90 if I were WG lol
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panzer_VII_Löwe read it urself
I already know all of that
The VK 72 in game seems heavily inspired by this drawing. So no, I don't think a real lowe would've looked like the vk 90
And where is this drawing from?
It's shown in basically every article on the Lowe I can find, so idk about the original source
To be honest I think it‘s a post-war ‚artists interpretation‘ that sells as truth now
You don‘t find this picture in German sites either (or at least I don‘t)
you can argue about the vk 72's historical-ness all you want, but the vk90 is undeniably even more unhistorical, not to mention the fact that it's not even supposed to be a related tank based on the company designation
Tbh I wouldn’t understand why Germany would want to build a 300mm turret after they already built a 240mm turret Maus
a certain man’s expectations and ambitions
An Austrian painter, one might say
vk 90 is only called that in blitz though
it has a k designation in PC
yeah I know
It looks more like a porsche tank to me though, and the blitz one came out first
is-4 worth it?
Its armor is pretty solid
Yes
I love the frontal turret armor of Tiger III ausf. L. It's more angled than E 100's E 100 turm turret.
Is7 apcr needs a little buff
no
y
Ah yes, buff one of the top 3 met tanks by covering one of it's only weakpoints
I'm having trouble with the mt25, advice?
And that "weakpoint" can currently still cut through tanks if aiming good enough
Best tanks for Tier 6 torneys
Just play passive and don't use your armour under any circumstance
the mt25 is so fun lol use the gun that has 8 shells not 4. More dpm at a cost for penetration is definitely the way to go. Especially since in a light tank you're gonna be flanking therefore weak armor at the back. Don't brawl with mediums or heavies up close. Bad idea.
support your mediums as a backline, or midflank.
arl44, and only the arl44.
Hi, do you know the pages with a complete description of tanks and buffs?
I think Blitzhangar has it
Thx
Сдаточные испытания после двухлетней реставрации машины.
Ngl it kinda sounds and looks like a toy to me lol, idk why
<@&481447501690568709> nitor
<@&481447501690568709>
takes T-2020 out to battle for the first time ever, after getting unlucky with some crate or christmas globe at some point and getting it, realises how terrible it actually is, lets it gather dust again forever more with a 0% win ratio
What now
Pike-nose tanks are not for every one. It takes some practice and skill.
It's a decent tank for t8
lads. it's one of, if not THE worst tier 8 heavy lmao. I have the majority of the T8 premiums, and I can assure you that there are very few that play as bad as the T-2020
It's not even the worst IS style tank
either way. I think I'll just be sticking to my Action X and E 75 TS for my heavy needs at T8 lmao. For tier 10 it'll be my T-22 medium
Tiger III is not fiction, it was a scrapped prototype idea, before the E-100 design was a thing. E-55 and 79 on the other hand, probably.
That's why I will buy it the next time I see it. T-2020 being the most underplayed heavy, means Ace Tanker is easier to get, which would help a lot in Mastery Events or Orders. Same with the entire Valkyria Chronicles collection that I am also anticipating.
The Tiger III is pure fiction
That is a good idea, but you are quite probably not realising quite how bad the tank really is. I’ll admit I’m not the best with like nose tanks. However, it is a remarkably bad tank to begin with. Imo, just stick with the 252U if you want a Russian pike nose T8 heavy. Atleast that thing is good lol
brrruh
AX is probably worse overall than the T-2020 tbh
This would be true if the Somua, EXP, IS-5, IS-2Sh, VK45.02 A, KV-4, and KV-5 didn’t exist
Is there a good tactic for playing with this tank? normally I end up dying when some enemy gets close
You have a pretty good gun, try to find a slight incline to make your armor more effective
See, the majority of those tanks, barring the vk and IS-5, are decent imo. You just gotta know how to use them. The T-2020 gets penned by everything, unless you can get hull down.
Somua you just drive like a slow medium, it doesn’t have reliable armour but it can bounce. Exp just poke over a ridge line to shoot then back into cover again. Is-2Sh side scraping king, KV-4 and KV-5 good side scrapers, but turrets can be penned by gold
T-2020 just didn’t have anywhere that worked for it lmao. Side scraping both facing the enemy, and reverse side scraping and got me penned.
I’ll admit, it’s quite probable that I played it wrong. However it just doesn’t seem like a good tank. Any time I face it, it’s an easy pen. essentially a free kill. And it felt that way when playing it too
The problem is all of the tanks I listed are objectively worse than the T-2020. They may be better situationally, but in general the T-2020 can outperform all of them
EXP i can see. IS-2Sh is nowhere near the side scraping king, KV’s both have a ton of easy to hit weak points
Also, why are you side scraping in a pike nose tank? You hull down lmao, the thing has an insane turret
They should base the IS-2Sh on WOT PC's IS-M and you can totally side-scrape with with it. KV-5 is good as it is and the armor and DPM buff is worth the wait. They should add 122 mm D-25TS for KV-4 even though the 107 mm ZiS-24 gun is also good at penning Somua SM's turret (Yes. The turret is so easy to pen with a high pen gun).
IS-2Sh has always been a decent tank to play for me. Feels solid. Side scraping works in most tanks. Pike noses need to be hidden if you can’t go hull down, so side scraping works for that
The KV-5 does not have good armor, it has 3 big weak points, namely the two R2D2s and the flat turret front. KV-4 has severe mobility issues.
Have you played the KV-5 since it had the armour buff? It’s a lot stronger than it used to be. It’s not gonna be tanking shots like a maus, but it bounces far more than it used to
Yo. It's gooood. Side-scraping in a tier 8-9 match and you're laughing at enemy tier 9s.
It still has very large and easy to hit weak points, the buff didn’t really do a whole lot other than make it a bit better
The problem with the KV-4 for me was never the mobility or armor. It was the gun. It’s horribly inaccurate and has way too slow of a reload. Many people I know prefer to use the 122 with the extra DPM and alpha even though the pen is total crap.
They should add the 122 mm D-25TS
The fact is that the T-2020 is nowhere near the worst heavy in tier 8
Stock isu makes me want to jump
Not the worst tank at tier 8, but close to being the worst heavy tier 8 I’d say. The other T8’s just tend to bring far more to the battle, and perform better
@violet timber i agree
I’ve named almost half the heavies in tier 8, and they are all, or almost all, worse than the T-2020.
I finally bought the God darn tiger for 1.39 million credits
So true. Worst heavy is probably something like the…actually no Tier 8 heavy is really terrible atm.
I had T2020 for a while, Better than IS3, my opinion
See, I found the IS-3 better than the T-2020 personally
Somua, EXP, IS-5, IS-2Sh, VK45.02 A, KV-4, and KV-5
The IS-3 is better, people just don’t know how to play it
VK 45.02 A and IS-5 are pretty terrible, and no one can fight that
What i should name this lagendary camo? I want to try to ask wg to make this lagendary camo
I also got SU130 PM and WZ 111-2 premiums from the 500 free Gold and the PZ S35, soldi for 1200. So i bought the 3 collect em all containers
@glacial kiln post on #blitz-art
It not done yet
Imo the best T8 heavy is the action X. It performs best for me, because of the high DPM and good gun depression. I like tanks that can work ridge lines effectively
This is art that’s related to blitz. Even if it’s not finished, it’s supposed to go in the #blitz-art channel, lmao. It looks good though, you’re a good artist
Ok and thank
The AX is way overrated
it's a good hulldown tank I think
It is, but low alpha damage. Really low alpha damage.
doesn't it have good dpm tho? like, isn't it dpm that matters, not alpha.
Dpm can be completely negated by using cover. Unless you are farming bots the low alpha really hurts it.
Alpha is usually better than dpm because you can trade, then hide. You’ll take 190, the AX will take 400, then his dpm is useless because you have a rock or something
and here i thought dpm mattered in hulldown.
You don’t take mid-long range hulldown fights in a Caern. You close the distance, and take a very aggressive hulldown where the enemy can’t really get away.
An enemy in the open is dead against any tank. The AX just farms idiots better than most tanks. It cannot fight against competent players though making it extremely limited
if the AX only works when it uses it's dpm, doesn't that make it one of the worst tanks in practice then?
I mean, EXP fairly decent in proper urban biomes, all you need to do is shake that turret and save about 2 or 3 seconds as the enemy will aim much more cautiously
I sold comet and IS and bought IS 3
Yea, with a lower plate bigger than the side of a barn, Nah. T-2020 is not as bad as people think it is, cuz I do remember it getting a buff that made it decent enough to work. It used to be total paper, now it at least can troll bounce.
E-75 "Commando" or "King" are best bets
Leaning more towards "King", cuz this was the original Tiger II camo that was dubbed "King"
And the E-75 one reminds me a little of it
🫂
The problem is that as soon as any of your side is available, it’s a penetration
Guys which heavy you recommend to play at tx?
Okay,I am missing 130k xp for is7 so soon I will get it,I was wondering which next to get
Since I am playing on phone and I am newbie,so I will go with heavys first.But thanks for advice
ofc
Your three meta tanks are 60TP, IS-7, and Yoh. There’s also the 1B is you have that
yoh and 1b soft meta but ye
Yoh is not soft meta, it is one of the top tanks right now lol
depends. yoh farms with hulldown capabilities but a decent player will pen it hull down. t57 can brawl much better. and yes yoh is soft meta because of its lack of brawling capabilities if it isn’t hull down. other than that it’s great @violet timber
You either get a 3k dpm auto loader or a more versatile 183 with all of it problems fixed, nothing soft meta about that at all
how in the world does it compare to a 183? if you are playing the 2 shot yoh like a 183 you have more issues than that
You get 900 damage in less than 2 seconds. If you haven’t heard the 183 comparison, I don’t know where you’ve been
Am I going to do wrong if I pick t57 over Yoh ?
not really. they both r good i would say yoh is better but if you wanna brawl get a t57 also no if you have 2 2shot yohs then yes it is like a 183
you don’t camp in a yoh like a 183
Not really, the T57 is good for farming, it just doesn’t have the same abilities.
Also, why do you need 2? One does the same amount of damage in almost the same amount of time
900>1800??? thats what u want?
Since when could the 183 do 1800 damage?
The max roll for 183 is 1625 what are you on? 😂
did i say that? i’m just saying 2 shot yoh is only extremely effective if you have two of them tbh. if you run a 3 shot yoh you don’t need 2 yohs and you can put out enough damage to only need one
I was saying that the 2 shot yoh was comparable to the 183 due to damage output though
It’s compared to the 183 because of its ability to output 900 damage quickly like 183 can output 930
idk i never said that this guy just put words in my mouth bruh lmao
^ and then you add on the armor and mobility the Yoh has over the 183
@polar gull You brought in a topic that was completely irrelevant to my point
and that is? i’m just saying that yoh is soft meta it can be outclassed by an is7/60tp therefore it is soft meta. it’s very close to strong don’t get me wrong tho
It’s not just “very close to strong”, it’s broken. No other tank in tier 10 can reload 900 damage in 13 seconds, or deal 900 damage in 1.7 seconds, as well as have the ability to hull down rather well. Oh, it’s also tagtet mobile, and can’t be tracked either
(Technically 900 in 19 seconds)
20.7 to be exact. for me it’s just that it can be penned hull down and it can’t brawl
I mean the 3 shot :l
(Still a lot of dpm)
It has more than enough dpm with the 3 shot to brawl.
both tanks as in the 60tp(which has two tiny cupolas) and the is7 have better hulldown capabilities and can both brawl. that is the current meta rn. yoh fits the soft meta bc it’s the best farming tank. also you need armor to brawl yoh only has turret armor
60TP has one cupola…?
it has a small hatch on the opposite side you can hit i was doing testing on it i hit it like 1/20 tries lol
You can easily just look up with the Yoh and make yourself near invulnerable, as well as the ability to not be tracked on a ridge line
🤨
that’s not accurate. that looks like a hamburger
Provide me the clip of you penning it on the other side and I’d totally believe you
okay i don’t have a clip but i can make one later. do u own a 60? i can go in a training room
I do, guess I won’t pay attention my my Calculus B class :p
bc calc is fun… lol
Room name + pass?
i haven’t made it yet.. i’m busy i’ll ping/dm u
The fact is the Yoh is not just soft meta, it’s one of the three best tanks in the game right now. I mean, who wants to push on it and take 900 damage only for it to happen again 13 seconds later?
That really does take the interclip out of the argument ._.
ikr. yoh can be hard meta if you want but it’s just my opinion on it idk why he is getting so angry lol
He ain't angry lol
he is very defensive..like okay i get it..sheesh
I'd defend the arguments I make 🤷♂️
i do too but i’m not saying it’s not meta lol like chill.. there isn’t a huge difference between soft and hard meta anyways
I’m not angry lol, just pointing out how strong the yoh is
If you’re telling me to chill I’m gonna guess you haven’t been in many arguments
i’m going into prelaw to become a defense attorney but sure. you can assume what you want
You have not seen some #tank-balance-discussion arguments 😂
🤷♂️ just saying observations as I see them
oh lord
Ad Hominem is a common waste of balance discussions
What we just had is more of a discussion over tea compared to those
telling someone to chill and assuming that is a weird observation but u do u
The thing is I’ve been chill this entire time, so you were assuming I wasn’t chill 🤔 seems a bit hypocritical, don’t you think?
that doesn’t make me hypocritical i was curious why you were defending it so hard like it was life or death like it was j my opinion and you had a spasm at the fact i said it was soft meta
Sorry that I bring in facts and statistics to my argument?
But doesn't it look like to much? To me why don't choose the really good name easy to know what it means
Like wildder or hunters
But that still cool name for E75 legendary camo
Cuz those names are already taken by "Leopard 1 Wild" and "ISU-152 Hunter"
i know that
spall liner should be nerfed
honestly i would like that vehicles which equip spall liner sees an increase in ramming damage received
Spall liner shouldn't exist*
Spall liner should be on all tanks by default without the need to use a provision slot
that's one way to nerf he
No 🥲
I still want to bully brain dead Vk 90 Players with my E-100 HE
laughs in 183 deathstar
Meeh i’ll prefer in that Case still my E-100
E100 doesn’t have more than 100mm of HE pen…
Just HE the side of an Vk 90.01 P with it and tell me what your results are
I mean you can’t penetrate, might as well load some AP and do more than splash
Sure load AP have fun
Load HEAT and hit those cheeks, you’ll do more damage
Also hitting right under the turret cheeks with HE would do more damage, because you can hit the engine deck from there
Ah yes using HEAT and wasting gold ammo on an Vk 90.01 when it’s easy to HE it
Ah yes, clearing the tank faster because you’re smart
Not if you rely on RNG to penetrate.
wasting gold ammo?
so using gold ammo for its intended purpose is a waste?
besides that, you do kinda have a point. those cheeks aren't exactly big or easy to hit
You have a good portion of cheek you can penetrate with the E100
E100
all they have to do is wiggle and you can mitigate the E100's heat
That and again, hit the engine deck
Don’t you see the gun in front of there ?
I’ll rather prefer to track an Vk 90 and let it stay where it is, instead giving him the chance to backup even when it’s slow he can go away, secondly i can annoy that guy with HE and might damage, the loader, driver or the commander as well more modules
So i stick to my HE
or you shouldn't really be engaging him head on
If they’re a good player, then yes I’m using HE. But we’re talking about a bad VK90 player, so I’d prefer more consistent damage personally
That’s up to you, i’ll have to agree tho
But my luck with HEAT in derp gun is in most cases, not good at all which is again a reason, that i rather use HE instead of HEAT sometimes it works sometimes it won’t
HEAT shells is the best type of ammo for premium rounds for penetrating on top tier
The legendary is expensive but I can take it if discounts leaves at 750 gold
Debatable
prammo AP is the best
^ I want my 5 degrees of normalization
and my first argument is that if you shoot the Ho-Ri prammo at a prog front plate it will richochet
meanwhile with Wz 121 or TVP HEAT (the lowest pen of HEAT at tier X) it wont bounce
Ho-Ri caliber is 14.9 cm it can't overmatch the prog
Is the Chinese tank destroyer line worth the grind? I'm at tier 7 ATM.
Game counts it as a 150
grille as well, and it bounce
False. You need gun caliber to be >150mm to triple overmatch. Ho Ri will still ricochet. Same as Grille
Oh? I thought 3 Cali rule only had to be times 3, not greater than 3
The thing is, unlike Grille, Ho Ri doesn’t have HEAT ammunition so it’s actually one of only 2 TDs that cannot pen the prog upper plate (other one being 263)
So there is one tank in which HEAT is better than AP
And the British 123mm armed TDs forgot about those
Dang 123mm seems kinda small for a tier 10 td
The British 123mm guns do 460, and it’s on the Badger, and the 4005
literally a 130mm gun in terms of damage
and 120mm in gun handling
Seems odd that you have 122mm guns doing 420, then 123-130mm guns doing 460
What about Jageroo ? 413 heat ?
Overmatch ?
wg pulls a random alpha of 690 out of nowhere for the object 268v4 when it has a 152mm gun
Also, one other good use case for HEAT ammo is that it’s good for dealing with sidescraping nubs. When you have a fat HEAT shell, like the old JgPz 420 HEAT, you can pen very sharp sidescraping angles and/or very thick sides where AP shells would ricochet
I forgot the AMX M4 54's alpha. Is it 480 for a 130 mm caliber gun?
Thank you for your Service Sir
o7
Overmatch is based on caliber, not penetration
like how they pulled 480/490 (forgot) for the M4 54
why tho?
460 is fine?
Hmm soo.. E4 might penetrate ?
wg balancing
NVM. It's 480
like why does it get a 20 alpha advantage
like what??
how does that make sense?
E4 would slam right through prog upper plate because it’s a 155
It's 480/400/620
You would know
Ask weegee.
Progetto 65 does a funny and uses Enhanced Armor 😳
@violet timber ofc I do, I'm a nerd
Hmm good to know, i’ll shall use E4 more then
i honestly have never seen a progetto without EA
That’s the only reason I use EA on the Prog
iirc enhanced armor doesn’t affect overmatch mechanics. I don’t think I’ve ever ricocheted any prog with my E4
And I play a lot of E4
Well the situation is apparently too specific for most of the playerbase, so they may not just use it
I believe it does
268 had a bad day with a Pz. III 😉
My guess is because wot PC has an alpha increase for 130mm guns for high tier tanks, like 105 and 122mm guns do (they go from 490 to 560 usually), and blitz devs decided they wanted to go that direction for the m4 54
I personally would like the other tier 10 460s to get higher alpha as well
But it should be 530 and not 480 tbh
That’s because Pz III upper plate is 54mm, not 50
Before homo changes
Well I mean maybe they did change 3CR after that, maybe it's time for another test
I think it's 390 for 122 mm gun in PC at lower tiers
Yeah, it is. Blitz 122s are 400/420. PC is 390/440. Blitz 105s are 310/350 and PCs are 320/390
Kpf 50t with 320:
i don't think so though, 263 has a 130mm gun and does 460 but the mle 54 does 480 with the same caliber so this is probably blitz devs giving it more alpha for no reason
Honestly I like the addition, rolling over 500 with that gun is so oddly satisfying
then you will enjoy the bobject
Bobject? Which one? The 263 or 268 v4?
Nah I think Jageroo will have spoiled it for me
V4, since it has 690
the 268v4 with funni 690 alpha
84
PC 130s are kinda inconsistent now, the lower tier ones are still 490 but they go to 550 for the 263, 530 for the E100, and 560 for the jagdtiger
If you think about it it's just the Obj. 67
the 263 was never called the bobject
14.9: Why???!!!!
russian tanks get special treatment
I still like the 263 for its mobility.
hot take, i enjoyed playing the foch 155 over the 263
263 drives so weird to me
My hot takes are old
So I'm just gonna weep over my Lowe when RT comes out
lmao
imagine they release the pzkpw VII in tier 8
263 rebalance made it worse and nothing will change my mind
Löwe?
Vk 72, basically
the armour buff wasn't enough to make up for the absolutely atrocious gun nerf
It’s hard to be aggressive with a turretless vehicle with a rear mounted gun, atrocious gun arc, and atrocious gun depression. I used to like it as a sort of DPM sniper, but that option has just been completely removed
this thing
Again I say, basically a VK 72 xD
took the worst possible traits and shoved it into one tank
I'm glad that I didn't bought the Somua SM. The turret is still weak.
I kinda wish they replaced VK-72 with Pz 7, but just give it more DPM (unlike the atrocious PC DPM) and have it be a sort of “super heavy sniper”. That could be an interesting take on the gameplay
Jg. Pz E100, done.
A VK 72.01 K with 12,8 cm gun instead of 15 cm gun. A FaiLöwe.
Yeah, but Jgpz doesn’t have accuracy or a turret
VK.... 90?
blitz devs do poorly balancing tanks that move up tiers
I feel people will complain about heavy snipers, even if it's purposed that way. If it's heavily armored, people will always have that "go use your armor" argument
its a guarantee considering, well its a heavy
blitz devs do poorly making meaningless changes
cough cough IS-8 speed nerf
Hey how can I tell if my armor is angels
Angle is correct like so I don’t get one shoted by a SU
For most tanks, angle at 30 degrees and wiggle. But angling is mostly just a last ditch tactic and won’t save you from much. Rely on hiding your hull instead
Yeah my whole team has been constantly wiped out by go full force with no plan
Do damage faster. The faster you deal damage, the more likely your team will be able to do something other than get annihilated
that's as good a plan as telling someone to clean their clean room
Become a british tank
Not really. If you are just sitting back at the start of the game an then only getting damage after the game is a set loss and enemies are just swarming you without care to their hp, you are doing useless damage. Its actually fairly easy to get in 2 183 shots in that situation. The result page sure looks nice, but it doesn't show that a player did nothing when it actually mattered.
concept 1b without raised engine deck. yay or nay
wut
What if fv4005 stage 2 183 mm gun was added as an alternative, switchable gun. Not the 3 shot gun
No.
if you are looking for tier X the Yoh line
for the tanks itself, the t29 is way better than the M-VII-YOH
i chose the yoh, as ill get the t30 and it looks similar (a huge part of games is looks :/ )
M6 is worst heavy prove me wrong
ok I will prove you wrong
i can prove you wrong
the KV-2 is the worst tier 6 heavy
^ this
to be fair, some tier 6 heavies can't take on the ARL 44 very effectively.
no, the worst T6 heavy is the arl (stock)
lol
vk 36 CAN
never said it can't
but not all tier 6 heavies are doing so hot
and you could probably do something against an ARL
but you either don't shoot prammo or aim at the turret weakspots
the hull can be penned with APCR
stock KV-2 with 30mm of pen says hello
now i know i may have first said this from like well over an hour ago now but i’m bringing it up again because the elapsed time has helped to reshape my shifting perspective during the break i’ve taken
i don’t think i ever truly, fully, or sufficiently appreciated a good gun until i started playing the obj 84 lol
and i’ve changed my mind on the pt a for one, not to mention the waffle, vickers cr, t92 and 25t ap after grinding all of them extensively, in successive turn
i can finally say with confidence that it’s the tier where i have the most vehicles which i absolutely love, and it would also be my favourite overall, except that the number of tanks at that level is simply insufficient, i’m sad to say
Nice ghost ping @slim phoenix
Hope u achieved the "troll"
defender mk1 is worst tank in game!! 😢
Ru 251.
I think it's pretty cool LT (3900 (HE + adrenaline) DPM) with good speed and 102 mm HE pen
my first X is Leo 1 and i think it's nice vehicle
So you like a bunch of broken tanks and light tanks, lol. Play something like the Leo PT A, object 704, tortoise, or T54E1 and you will hate tier 9
i suppose you’re right. my vantage point consists mostly of lights and mediums at tier 9 while i’m hoping to get the t54 soon. obviously my experience isn’t as complete as yours lol, but i feel like the recent balancing changes were effective in helping smooth things out more evenly, at least around the edges, don’t you think so too?
I think most of the changes were pretty good, IS-8 received an undeserved nerf though
that’s strange, is8 was already painful to play in, back when i first got it. but then again, between the kv1s and is7 i didn’t enjoy any of them
I had a lot of good tanks that i felt i wanna keep in tier 9
Conqueror, waffle, the pre-nerf IS-8 (i actually enjoyed it cause of the speed and gun)
Isn't conqueror kinda bad
the gun is great, i started with german and french so i don't really mind low armor as long as they're agile
Hi guys,what about 60tp lew. Is it worth ?
Yes @ornate oak
Thanks,what also more from tx you recommend?
Is7,Yoh,t100lt(only if you are really good)
Well I am f2p player,playing on phone and beginner,so I will go probably Yoh,is7 I am on the way
@wet prism thanks for help and info
Np
tbf arl 44 is a very op t6 heavy.....
Turret cheeks are easy to hit
Yes, but also rather easy to deal with
Hi guys, what are your thoughts on the AMX 30 1er prot / AMX CDC ?
i use AMX 30 i don't regret buying it its fun and i like it
So... MT-25 or T34-85?
mt25 line
Thx.
How i spotted?
The top of the turret has a spotting node which was within view range of you, causing you to be spotted
Turret is not seeing me already
There are spotting nodes simply at the top of tanks
Look at the surface its already behind of the hill
I think I could better explain it with a clip of the event
<@&481447501690568709> Nitero?
Just when we thought it couldn’t be done, weegee has outdone themselves
Here’s the rest of the stats, for those interested
🗿
The famous "Hull Down heavy N° 819"
We kinda of need more heavies with the main weakspot being the turret cheeks around a strong mantlet, so it teaches proper turret wiggling to players, like an M6 EXP
Or a japanese super heavy
@violet timber do we have a gimmick yet? Or did they get cucked out?
Japanese super heavies don't fit on Blitz
Neither does the maus.
Maus does. Japanese super heavy doesn't.
They had to downsize the maus because it was big. Simply downsize the type 5 and you're good to go
WG actually tried Type 5 heavy before in a super test much years ago. It literally was canceled because it's size was too big for blitz and caused camera problems.
Also, something with that much armor and a 150mm+ gun doesn't combine well on the game
They downsized a majority of the tanks so they could fit, especially the german super heavies. Very few tanks are dimensionally accurate so they can fit. Downsizing the japanese super heavies is as much of a hassle as it was for the german super heavies, or even the tog
As for it's stats, WG never cared about balance in the first place. Why do you think smasher and anni exist?
The difference is no one cares about tier 7
The only two differences between Type 5 Heavy and E100 are size and armor. If you decrease the size and the armor to make it balanced, then you simply can play E100 instead
Also, WG doesn't care about balance when they can milk money from it*
Ok, so what about the yoh or 60tp? Or tier 8 with the polish heavy, t54 ltw?
@hollow moth i never said they would try to balance it. I said that all they could do was downsize it and throw it into blitz.
60tp, aside from the special consumables, is balanced. As for the tier 8 polish heavy and t54 ltw, I never had problems with those
That much armor + big cannon = unbalanced tank. It stills a bad idea.
It's even more total armor than Maus and basically an E100 gun. In smaller maps like what we have on Blitz, what do you think that other tanks are supposed to to when seeing it?
60tp moment
Same thing they do for a hulldown yoh, kran, or chieftain
That's where we get funky, 60TP doesn't have that much total armor, it have a barely decent hull armor and extremely weak sides. Only the turret is useful.
Hull down tanks can't march furiously to your direction. A Type 5 can.
: )
60tp can definetly drive forward at you with little consequences assuming you know what you're doing
If a Kranvagn takes the frontline, it'll die quickly because frontlines rarely have good hulldown spots, with some exceptions on a few maps like Himmels.
A Type 5 does block shots simply by existing.
Then it's not doing because the armor is Type 5 like in numbers. It's doing because it's abusing enemies mistakes.
Every single tank can abuse the mistakes from others, but a Type 5 could march unstopably because it's a mobile cover for allies and have an exceptional flat armor.
Advance because enemies are not paying attencion =/= Advance because enemy heavies with actual good guns still struggle to penetrate you.
"Oh but then you can also nerf the armor"
With smaller size and worse armor, why you still asking for a Type 5 instead of grinding for E100?
At any rate, i wonder if the type 71 will have a gimmick?
I don't know the translation of gimmick, tell me examples of gimmicks, please
Russian light tracers, yoh reserve tracks
Ah yes, I'd call it as perks.
I'd call what you just said WG ass kissing
What? It is what it is.
I didn't understand why you called me WG ass kissing
Perhaps because I'm the only living soul that likes T28 HTC
This must be the reason
I've never played it, so idk
I don't recommend tho
Who want tank image?
Sure
Not today.
That's cool
All it takes is an idea and enough legos
So anyways, @hollow moth do you think the type 71 will have a "perk"?
I suppose something related to the cannon, usually japanese tanks have great cannons.
WG has a weird hatred for Japanese Tanks, but I'm hoping some mercy will be shed this time
There's HoRi tho, it's an interesting line the only interesting line among the only two
A decent line, but all it has is the penetration.
They have a troll armor too, mostly the tier 9
Anyways, i gtg. I'll leave with saying the armor is troll to mediums, but against heavies and prammo, forget about it.
🤷♂️
dracuraptor#4326 has been warned.
2 questions: are those stock stats or are equipment and provisions in play with those stats. And i asked this already but I'm reiterating, is there a gimmick yet?
I am not sure, I believe they are the stats with 100% crew, no equipment, and no provisions. Also, no gimmick as far as I know, only your above average hull down heavy
How good is 2500 dpm for tier 10 heavies?
T95E6 has 2,503 dpm base, so 2,581 base is rather good
Armor and speed look good at least. This will most likely be my first tier 10 heavy, simply due to it being Japanese.
You’re probably looking at around 3k dpm when fully equipped for it, which is completely, 100%, totally fair and balanced, especially when matched with that armor profile
I haven't compared the stats yet, but it seems like an is-7 without the pike nose
The thing that might kill it is the p/w, as it seems a bit low. However, we don’t know about it’s terrain resistances yet so it could be rather nice
Japan usually has lackluster engines anyway, so I'm not surprised.
It may not be able to reach its top speed unless going down hill, but they probably won’t matter anyways
Do you think it'll be equal to IS-7?
From what I can tell, it’s probably be a replacement for the 60TP if you need a bit more dpm, though I could see it replacing the IS-7 as well. It’ll just be a higher dpm hull down heavy than what we currently have
I've got hopes for it. Seems a potential meta tank, though it might depend if it gets a gimmick.
Actually it might just straight up replace the Yoh as dpm for a team
Well, I'm glad they didn't decide to punish us for asking for Japanese heavies for 5-6 years.
I’m a bit worried with how heavy the meta is getting, especially when these heavies are mobile and have good armor
It'll be the first meta tank i get.
At this point, I've given up on hoping for something good to happen for the sidescrapers
world of heavys, thats why i think WG is giving us a bigger map because then meds and lts will work more. (however we have fast heavys so it wont work.....)
A
😂
tvp t 50/51 so good
It’s very team dependent
4 ammo clip, ave dmg about 310 dmg, strong med
i think they should make "MBT" as another classification, rn they are putting it either as medium or heavy tank
This game is more centered around inter-war and ww2 so I doubt they would do that despite having mbts
MBT-70: Why am I a heavy?
I have an M7 IV atm and it gets 1200-1700 hit points in battle but the next one the V is worst, I can upgrade but it seems like a poor choice
60TP is an amazing helluva tank. But I feel and maybe you do that a mix of hulldown, a high alpha gun, and good speed, is bad 4 the game
I also finally understand why ppl say E5 and 215b sucks now. When I first tried 60TP I applied all the lessons I got from earlier experiences, but I personally feel that I have yet to put full effort in the tank to do anything. On the other hand, I feel like I have to put a lot of effort in T110E5 to do damage, and the armor isnt very forgiving even hulldown
Should I chose a different tank line, I have enough experience to get a IV in any tank line
Keep going through M6 all the tanks there are good
k
I researched the M4, it’s dpm is lower so I’m going to play the M7 until it’s higher
It’s also much slower
That’s because it has a stock gun, you must upgrade it, and playing M7 does not affect M4’s DPM
Sorry, should have been more clear, I’m going to play with the M7 to earn combat XP to upgrade the M4 so the dpm is better
you don't use credits to upgrade tanks in this game
Yeah it's not like WoT
Does tank level affect how much Xp or credits you earn?
From what I can find, the vast majority of tanks are late WW2 and early Cold War. There used to be a lot more early war and prewar vehicles in the tech trees before 5.5.
kinda, you get exp and credits mostly with the more damage you dealt. The higher the tiers the higher the hp pool and damage
Alright, thank you
Question
Go on
Why does the ram ll take so long to get in a match with
Not quite sure, were you in a platoon?
No
I suppose it's just slim queue population, then
i wonder if the historical modules type 95 heavy downtiered and pmm would make a balanced tank?
Wat?
it's a WoT japanese tier 4 heavy that's considered the second worst tank in the game, beaten only by it's tier 3 brother, the Type 91 heavy
Ahhhh..... British heavy not longer to be high DPM any more
Speaking of british heavy
I saw a fv215b visibly camp at the bush in yamato harbor
You solve ur dpm problem by being another problem? It seems
Imagine if anyone spends 75k gold on collect them all boxes
I Mean Fv215B is slow but the type 71 is fast like is 7 and high DPM so maybe they Will be annoying because he can hide and run + keep shooting
Not really it cannot hold against premium sheels
The p/w and traverse should limit it. It's got the top speed of a medium, but everything else is usual heavy mobility.
Maybe not for type 71 because what i see that STB but more heavy
Nah. If it was a more heavy stb, it'd be a heavium. It's a typical nato hulldown heavy. I've talked with some of the more knowledgeable people here and they say it looks like an alternative to the 60TP or even IS-7.
Another generic hulldown heavy
It's just a japanese hulldown heavy. Nothing else. I still think WG will shaft it like they always shaft the japanese tech trees.
Hmmm i feeling maybe the hull is strong like Hori type have extrme angle armor
How do you play the ARL 44, it's turret is literally paper
Hulldown for me mostly.
The arl44 is purely gun focused. Just outgun your enemies and meatshield your allies
Did you see what the armor profile looked like?
Got u
Thanks @hollow notch
Personally, i prefer alpha dpm over reload dpm, but it works for me.
The hull I just gonna laugh off everything while using depression, but the cheeks and hatch are still gonna be there
Because ofc they gave it a tumor.
@hollow notch do you think they'll give it a gimmick?
What line came after the Ho Ri? For some reason i keep thinking it was the Yohs
vickers (then kran, tvp, yoh, 60tp and t100)
Type 5 Heavy: I'm proud of my cousin
We've yet to see it in action. But this super heavy git may need some hulldown braincells?
bro why do you keep going on about this, the Japanese are pretty good in blitz imo
if any nation gets shafted it's the british, french, or chinese
Jap line is best for experienced players tbh
British get shafted too. I feel bad for them.
French, idk. I think they do pretty good with the speed and autoloading fascination.
Chinese, well i can't really call basing all of your indigenous tanks on a single russian tank being shafted.
Japan on the other hand gets a multipurpose medium that's beaten by the russians, a TD that has only penetration. And it took 5 to 6 years for us to ask for Japanese heavies, only to get a regular hulldown heavy. Don't worry, i haven't gotten to the japanese on wows or wowp yet.
I'm pretty sure no one but you was asking for japanese heavies in blitz lol, no one wants more superheavy derps in the game. The devs knew that, and took the time to create a different branch that would fit in the game more
I'm pretty sure you haven't looked hard enough for those people. Some of us kid, sure, but there are those that I've come across that do want them. It's more pleasing than the hulldown mess we've been getting. To WG's credit, no company becomes successful by neglecting its major fanbase, who likes the hulldown style.
Also just because the majority of chinese designs were based on soviet ones, doesn't mean they deserve to be left behind
Like how the leopard 1 and amx 30 were based off each other (at least that's how history makes it seem to me)?
How is the STB-1 compared to the T-62A?
not really, France and Germany made some efforts to collaborate but ultimately they resorted to doing their own thing
Hi evetone . Guys what do you think about this line
At least WoTB hasn't gone down the rabbit whole yet. You want a game that has, play war robots. On the leo 1 and amx 30, i was kinda close.
@wanton fjord neither one are the best at anything, but they can do most jobs well enough. Stb is more second line while the t62 can afford to take a hit or two, but otherwise the playstyle is similar
Okay
As for the french, the batchat line has clearly been left behind by the other lights. The AMX 50b is pretty decent, but they made the 50 100 worse and the 50 120 has always been somewhat mediocre. The Foch 155 had its moment of brilliance, but that was well in the past, and the tier 6, 7, and 8 in the TD line have been god awful for as long as I can remember
French td weren't really anything to write home about anyways. Really more of a fun tank than a competitive tank like 183. I seem to run into a lot of decent batchat players then, because they eat sheris for breakfast. I do admit though, speed and autoloaders don't win everything.
to be honest I think the sheridan probably has the least competent playerbase out of any tech tree tier 10
If you thought a lumbering derp tank was bad, sheris are worse.
probably just a bunch of kids who rushed to it for the missiles, only to have them removed later on
Honestly, sheris on blitz are more braindead than any Japanese heavy I've seen on PC
And i had to watch an O-Ni crush a Black Prince.
to be honest I don't think WG plays favorites at all with nations, people talk about russian bias all the time but there are plenty of crap russian tanks too
I think WG tries to avoid playing favorites, but sometimes they jack up a vehicle so bad, it's almost looks like nation bias
Object 263 was kinda butchered with the rework and the rest of its line is pretty garbage, one of the IS-7, IS-4, obj 140, and t-62 are seemingly always in the shadow of their counterpart, and there are lots of trash russian prems too like t-44-100 and t-2020
You got a lot of russian prems to choose from, there's gotta be a dumpster fire in there somewhere.
But japan has very few tanks that can be called good, let alone meta. STB only fits because it can hulldown, but so can the T-62a or obj 140. The Japanese hulldown heavies will change that no doubt, but there's historical japanese tanks to make prems out of too, and some pretty dope ones too. Ji-Ro, Ka-Mi, hell, give Ro-Go pmm, and I'd get it.
I think the entire Ho-Ri line is quite strong, it definitely doesn't "only have pen"
Ok it's got troll armor too, but that's about it.
it's also got decent mobility with great reverse speed, and the gun stats apart from the pen are also pretty fantastic
Good
It's mobility is not that good. It ain't a medium tank by any stretch. Hell it barely passes as a heavy tank in speed (average speed. we all know it's faster than a maus and E 100). The reload counters the pen, and the gun handling works. It's average in most of those regards, and the low alpha plus low hp don't help it's case. I can't tell if it's a sniper or a support because it has the armor, gun handling, and maneuverability of a support, but it has low hp and high pen gun of a sniper
Tbh, ho ri is badly overrated, and so is the stb. They're both above average, but they aren't fabulous in any way besides pen (in the case of stb, that pen applies only in the prammo)
it's not a medium but most TDs get really slow at the high tiers (look at the americans and jageroo), so it's definitely pretty good in that regards. The dispersion values and accuracy are well above average, and the DPM is higher than most 150mms in its tier
the only real disadvantage it has with regards to firepower is the alpha, but it's still higher than most heavies and meds, so it's not like you lose your fear/trading factor
I like how you used the slower td to defend the Ho Ri's speed. But what about the 268 or the 263? or WZ-113 FT?
pretty big number of people wanted it
ever wonder why there was an official response from wg about it? can't be because of a literal 1 one guy
^
I used the slower TDs to show you that the amount of mobility the Ho-Ri has is an asset, not a liability. In a world where TDs usually get downgraded mobility when they reach tier 10, the Ho-Ri is instead the most mobile tank of its line
I find many of your statements to be extremely pessimistic ngl
when you see the one nation you decided to stick to get shafted in any historical war game, it gets overbearing sooner or later. if you want to convince me the Ho-Ri has good mobility, why don't you compare it to tanks of equal or better maneuverability, to show how small a difference it is. like compare it to the 263, 268 or WZ-113 FT
showing someone how a tank is faster than a slow tank and calling that tank fast does not make the tank fast. The E5 is faster than the E100, but everyone knows it's no speed demon
Well you're pretty clearly implying that the Ho-Ri's mobility is one of its downsides, when it really isn't
Average power to weight with good traverse and very good top speed and excellent reverse.
its mobility is in a pretty similar class to the 268 tbh, worse power/weight but better traverse and reverse
i'm saying the exact opposite actually. i'm saying it's mobility isn't an advantage, and that's not considering the fact it's a td.
Right, and the 268 is pretty darn quick. i've seen it go myself.
@thick trout show me it's terrain resistance. Ho ri maneuverability feels more like the ARL 44 than even the pre-mobility buff Chi-Ri the Ho-Ri is supposed to be based off of
That's including its terrain resistances
The Ho-Ri has more armor than the Chi-Ri so naturally it's gonna be a bit slower, like how the 268 v4 is slower than the IS-8
I preach my love for Japanese heavies, but I'm not that braindead. ofc it's gonna be slower. Btw, Ho Ri isn't the fastest td in the line.
I guess you can make an argument for the tier 8 being faster? But the tier 10 is way faster than the tier 9, and I see its overall mobility as pretty good
I think everyone knows the tier 9 is the snail in the line. It's also possible to make a case for the tier 7 as well