#vehicles-discussion
1 messages · Page 392 of 1
I think ur bullet hit the top and not the lower plate, or thee lower plate got angled last second
perhaps
Yes
Men I'm getting tired of seeing crates in the store and no even a single decent tank in the store
I better save that gold when something cool comes
the m4 rev popup is a great deal if you got that
👀
3 second aiming time???
1950 HP?
Feels necessary for the autoloader
Tier 8 heavy :3
Tier 8 that can't be penned with below 240 mm even on lower plate??
There’s a spot under 220mm
max hp a t8 heavy has is like 1900 and thats vk 100 i think
nope vk 168 has 1950
but vk 168 doesnt have 2400 dpm
I mean the vk 100 lower plate can be penned with 175mm
If you’re gonna be picky for a tier 8 LFP see VK 72.01 K.png
Anyways I balanced it to the regard of it being just released in a line, later to be tuned out
only real problem i have with it is it sorta makes the emil 1 irrelevant, compared to this only advantage emil 1 has is better dep angle
And an extra shot in the clip
And more effective turret armor
Also I don’t balance tanks as if they have any OP consumables
you're better than WG already
I uh, s u r e
:)
bruh it has like 30 degree tank turn rate
for a fat heavy
What, the hp pool is too small? Just make them spend credits on sandbags
There will also be no OP provisions
Oh and if you wanted a balanced tank, then here
Hmmm
oh so you are making troll op tanks
Nah someone had requested a blatantly OP tank, this is my first
I c
vipAP
🤣
😉
vipAP cost irl money
As I was drawing this, I was constantly thinking about a script along the lines of the MS-10 video
“It’d be unfair if we gave it 2.3 seconds of reload time, the Churchill I’s stock gun has only 2.2!”
“Why use lower plates? Just make it more tracks, more tracks, the more mobility it gets!”
“C’mon, every tank in the game that has a cupola has been destroyed, they shouldn’t have one, so this won’t!”
@plucky summit but what is the reverse speed?
Enough.
It’s 30
does anyone else think the batchat should get a buff to its reverse speed. Especially since you should reverse out of cover in the batchat thanks to its rear mounted turret
Pls buff Foch armor. It has two easy to hit hatches. Gun is meh as none are scared of it. Hull trev is meh, meds can easily circle you. Camping is not really great as you only have a 460 alpha. Overall, bad or just extremely hard to use
Armor is not the issue, the 560 AP alpha is the issue
460 Foch tier 9. Wait you meant alpha as in max roll?
The armor is fine
I really dislike the armor. Everyone spams gold at me, regardless.
@lyric oriole the point is that I'm taking damage I can't afford. Since I onyl have 1500 HP.
Why are you not playing long range
It's trash sitting in the back with 460 alpha trying to snipe.
with an 8 second reload
@pliant lodge alpha is the damage value before armor penetration and damage is calculated
I think 😭
It would be different if it had 640 alpha. THEN I would feel better camping.
@lyric oriole fine. Average damage.
It's a med support
you have an 8 second reload man
6.9 even with rammer and provisions
Meh. I just get circled when my meds die. And everything goes through my hatches.
yeah it is kinda weird why foch 155 does not have a usual 150-152mm alpha
@kindred thorn would be kinda broke with a higher alpha?? Idk
Why are you frontlining
I said support
Not yolo
I don't yolo. But I just can't get effective due to the low damage per shot.
Sure I can shoot from someones mistake, but most people know that I am there and avoid me.
only due to low damage per shot?
@plucky summit If the Foch got more armor that I can confidently rely on. Then I wouldn't feel need for higher alpha. But because it has no sidearmor and 2 easy to hit weakspots. The gun sorta disappoints me
Dang like every other tank, two obvs weakspots
@plucky summit a massive hammer head, and a 2nd head.
The hammer head baits shots at least
They still focus it. Which is the issue. They'll eventually pen me. It's not a reliable bait
Just second line smh
The only baiting move I can do in Foch is frontscraping. Hoping they'll shoot the mantlet.
Hey, Obj. 268 has a similar issue
268 has alpha tho
I also have issues with the bad sidearmor. Most shots that hits my tracks goes straight into my hull even if I angle ever so slightly. So angling is close to impossible
Yeah but not as advantageous in tier 10 as Foch in tier 9
Hmmm but it is a fear factor
7 second interclip is a setback
268 doesn’t have a 7 sec interclip last time I checked
They mean Foch 155
I c
which foch are you talking about? 120 or 155
Which Foch has a 7 sec interclip @kindred thorn
Foch - IX
Foch 155 - X
155
I know what it is I was just answering your question with a question
@brave night I said 155 .-.
This confused me
I never mentioned Obj 268.
Read this @pliant lodge I was replying to @plucky summit
@pliant lodge
Foch does 400 average damage
Foch 155 does 545 average damage
At least around 540, mm
560*
Yeah, that
I meant this. I thought you meant that Foch 155 had a fear factor
I mean it kinda does
I said that the 7 sec interclip is a setback t Fcoh 155
A setback from being cracked 😏
Meh maybe a buff to 5 sec
5s would make it pretty damn strong
Hmmmm but not broken as the size, armor, and no turret still hold it back
Foch 155 can push because of a 1200 clip
1120*
Foch 120 can't. Because it does the same amount of damage as most tier 8 heavy tanks does. Nothing is scary about Foch 120
I also dislike the amount of HP it has. The tank is big and has miserable amounts of HP.
@pliant lodge nothing scary about Conway then, huh?
Jag tiger sucks then
Foch 120 has about 3.5k dpm without adrenaline
Your point being?
Thats enough to gun down anything in your sight
@plucky summit never said that
Hi
Oh, my point was that Conway has a measly 400 alpha
@plucky summit 540 with the top gun...And 670 with HESH.
Foch tier 9 is pretty fun as a sniper, since it can shred things down with the DPM, and at range, it's quite tough to pen
600
Foch gets 5.8 secs reload with adrenaline has about 300mm upper plate goes 50kmh and is heavy
Great assault tank.
@static harness great for shreding tier 8 tanks. Until tier 10 tanks comes.
Foch = tweaked autoloading Obj. 268, change my mind
It's basically the same as a foch 155 just with penable weakspots
Foch 120 is great against tier 8 tanks. But terrible against tier 10 tanks.
Wow, that's kinda how tier 9s are supposed to work
That's kinda how the game works
Some tanks are just worse to use against tier 10 tanks. For me it's the Foch
Mmk
yeah because it can actually hit things, not like the 155
@static harness for a miserable 400 damage
And 7 secs reload
Like many other tanks? (400 damage)
You rarely get good damage in Foch @static harness doesn't help. You'll have to find someone whos going alone
guys su 122 54 is not good at all its trash 😢 only 420 AP alpha
What the hell are you saying
You can literally win 1 vs 3s in that thing just because of the combination of speed armor and dpm
@kindred thorn way better DPM than Foch. Better mobility. Smaller.
😂 he's joking guys, chill
Foch has some DPM. Period. That's it
3475 DPM is very solid, ok?
Alright
I'm out
@plucky summit how often can you even use that DPM? Almost never
Alike SU-122-44
Y'know, that's a problem on all tanks
@plucky summit SU has speed. Can get around faster than Foch can. It can helps meds way better than what a Foch can do.
Foch has some extra armor, and an extra degree of gun depression
Indeed it does, but it faces more of a challenge bouncing shells vs Foch, as well as requiring a more dangerous nature to use its DPM efficiently
@wise moth. It has no good role
If I camp I get little damage. If I push with meds/heavies I die but I might get good damage.
Secondline support OP
Foch obviously is not the best tank in the class, but it can still be pretty fun. Here's a fairly typical game I just played in mine today, which more or less shows its best use on the field. Sniper at first, and then it can push stuff later
Meh. Needs HP buff
The fact this mans unironically played a Foch game today.
@pliant lodge nah, heavies need HP nerf ;)
When I first got Foch I thought It looked like the perfect brawling tank. It is in a 1v1. But as soon as it's a 1v2. Forget it
What
You don't play fochs daily?
Wish they could just give the 120 better alpha damage.
It already has normal 120 damage
It's a pain to constantly peek, while having a chance of getting shot.
Personally I'd just buff tanks like 252u progetto 46 etc
Sure? Obj 252u kinda outdated ._.
252u is the best of the is3 copies
Facts. Gun could be better though. It's best for facehugging and sidehugging. Where disperion and aim time doesn't matter that much
Now I'm certain that he's trolling
No.
I mean that Foch is bad.
T-2020 is nice, pre-buff too ;)
And I mean that you are trolling
In what way?
Foch has no main role that it does well in.
Main role be secondline support
Yeah. Too bad it performs meh at it
Must be too bogged down by tier 10s
I love the Foch at tier 8. When you can trust your frontal armor more than in tier 10. I need to play super careful at tier 10. Compared to tier 8
Like most tanks ._.
Laughs in AMX 100 50
AMX 50 100 or AMX 50 120?
50 100 and 50 120
Foch at tier 9 is decent. It's when it hits tier 10 I get nervous. It's okay at tier 9 and tier 8. It's just that it doesn't perform too good in tier 10 battles.
Ah yes, no need to worry about armor at tier 7, 8, and 9 because there is none xD
Meh, Foch armor at tier 10 is not really the reliable part of it
Pretty sure all tier 9s lose their armor flex in tier 10
So that makes tier 9 vs tier 10 unfair? 🤔 Like more than just being a tier lower
Well no, it's necessary to let armor lose its effectiveness as tiers go up with the same tank
@plucky summit You're not wrong with the fact that tanks chance by a lot when they go from tier 9 to tier 10. Like tier 4 to tier 5
Like tier n to tier n + 1 ._.
Like tier 0 to 1
When u get 11 out of 12 matches with t10s as a t9 (me rn) it sucks af
Low tiers are a mess compared to high tier
Like tier 10 to 11
Tortorise to 183, Su-122-54 to obj 263, Foch to 155, IS-8 to IS-7, Tier 9 Patton to tier 10. And ect ect. Big difference
Big TonkTonk
This "big" difference is relatively needed to keep tier 10 as the top dogs
It would be a middle finger to WG if the professional teams on streams won against a full tier 10 team with one or two tier 9 tanks
Implying balance defects, hence the tiers stay separated substantially
You think implementing a BR system like in War Thunder would make things better???
I don't even mind it anymore (being low tier)
It would just be nice for our toptiers to have a brain at least
Too complicated, and balance shifts would devastate the game
As well as having to change the whole system of tiers in the first place
Would be kinda nice tho. Like a BR system with a -1 +1 MM
That’s just basematchmaker
Would probably be better than what we currently have?
Sadly, not so
No? 1+1 is perfect the game used to use 2+2 which was an utter nightmare for older beginners
@solid gate Oh. I meant like tier 1 -1,3 - 1,5 - 1,7 - 2. Like that for example Idk
What’s the point of making a bunch of a separate tier classes for few tanks if the games meant for a mobile player base
not like that's gonna take up 1GB of your space.
However, I think that system would be better before the 5.5 update. Because there were more tanks.
Yeah there's probably not enough tanks to split into subtiers
Ya, anyways imma continue to try to play Foch. I'll save it when I have a toon m8 probably...
Mmk
Space isn’t even what I’m referring to
I’m saying the game both has no time for that and that is not a time efficient match maker at all
Did I miss the nameless this month? I'm on a mission to collect the mixed nation tanks
Pc player coming through
Hi! I have a question, what do you all think about T-2020?
not the best tank
but the worst either(bruh why 30s slow mode)
For flooding i guess
men crates again
Good upper plate and the turret is good against standard rounds but suffers again the prem over all prob a is5 level heavy
well hope see something cool coming into the store
@safe token I love my T-2020, pre-buff, scored a 5k kolobanovs
Hmm more hp or enchanced armor on the STB-1?
HP, there's almost no benefit from armor
HP
hmm I might experiment around a bit, but thanks for the advice
I was just watching Movies Clips of Company of Heroes and I bumped into this tank. I really don't like how it looks tbh. But Ik that germany captured other tanks.
Isn't that the Hungarian or Romanian version of the Jagdpanzer 38 (t)?
But is it an adaption of the Jagdpanzer 38 (t)?
ugh a harsh night
What
i should take a break until i dont see crates often
😑
kinda loose motivation just by seein crates and tthe event of the wz doesnt help much
Panzerkampgwagen Ausf. T-34-85?
I would like to come back on the comparison e100 / Maus, I don't think maus is better than e100. Ok armor is really good and that is impressive how much you can bounce, but can a tank only rely on its armor ?
The e100 has far enough armor if you want to sidescrap. The mobility on maus is bullshit. And what about the gun? I think this is why I prefer the e100 to the maus. The maus has a impressively bad gun while the e100 has a really better gun and has a incredible alpha damage for a heavy tank. To conclude maus has good armor but gun and mobility are so bad compared to e100
If you’re going to try to phrase your argument in a philosophical form do it better, you implicitly imply that the maus is unable to sidescrape when it is able to, and is its primary strategy, and when you state the reasons for having a better gun you fail to prove why the e100 has a better gun and instead just push forward the statement that “e100 gun good”, and the statement that the maus has terrible mobility is true, but the e100’s mobility isn’t any better either. Furthermore, you phrase everything in Denying the Antecedent, which is an invalid argument form.
If A then B
Not A.
Therefore not B
If maus has good gun, maus good
maus bad gun
Therefore maus not good
it’s an invalid argument form because you can’t assume the fact that the tank is bad purely on the gun alone, when it has other abilities that allow you to consider it better than the e100, it has a shorter reload, more hp, better turret and smaller lower plate, and the fact that tournament players use the maus instead of an e100 should already make it clear that it is more meta
I think you didn't understand what I said. I didn't say maus was bad, I said that according to me e100 was better. I didn't say maus was not able to sidescrape, I said e100 has far enough armor. The mobility is 20 km/h for maus and 30 km/h for e100, there is a real difference And the e100 gun is good because of two things; the alpha and the pen ( compared to maus) . Maus is not bad. I compare that is all.
So don't go too fast, I prefer e100 and I explain why.
Please let this discussion be calm. I remind you we are talking of a game.
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/502018644193181706/777868596995031061/IMG_20200323_160056.jpg
idk mate, you can bounce pretty good
Maus has a much less vulnerable turret because you can angle them better plus has smaller cheeks and lower plate. The gun is what holds the maus back. As well as the 25 top speed but therefore it gets to that top speed quicker
Also I think e100 p/w ratio is worse
Preference is placed solely on opinion. If you want a better gun on a super heavy then ofc your fav would be e100. There isn’t much room for discussion if it’s why you prefer but maus is doing better statistically
Chaffee most underrated tier 6 lt yes or no?
Honestly for how much armour and HP the maus gets, the mobility isn’t totally bad
in fact if the maus wasn't that slow it would be odd
121b burns too fricking often
Yeah it is a shame for a premium X tank
Any tips when it comes to Jagdtiger?
Dpm use shoot gun aim shoot again aim shoot again get pramo spammed at you
British heavy, trades armor for dpm
.
is the AMX CDC available to buy?
Not rn
if you have a nintendo switch it is
Dang WG likes to troll anyone
lol
Well save gold again so something coo can come to the store
How good are both the American hts?
e5 is a good heavy for starters, t57 has bad armor but does like 1200 damage in like a few seconds with its autoloader, so its a bit harder to play
Go for E5, it's a good heavy but it's actually a medium
heavium
E5 is a slug. Not nearly medium mobility
A heavium as in armour or mobility?
yeah but it has decent speed like is8/7
Only when it drops the super consumable, otherwise it has poor mobility
IS-7 always has that superior mobility
E5 only does that on the improved speed boost
If a tank has a weak ammorack, which one is a better equipment for it, improved modules or defense system?
I use defense system, but improved modules might work better against the big guns
How to play fv215b?
Assort yourself into situations where you can use your DPM, and not get shot back, like near teammates when a brawl breaks out, reactive armor to preserve yourself
I use gun rammer, that's it for me, I gotta buy more stuff xD
Why buy equipments when you need credits to buy more tanks. It would take prob 10 million to equip my garage.
Well yeah
Except for the reload equipment, that is a must for every tank, and the camo when the tank could become invisible by it.
Vstab is a very important piece of equipment, and I highly recommend getting it on as many tanks as you can
mmmmmm a yolo BC comes at me in Foch and reks me.
@winter rover don’t be hesitant to go with your meds.
It has the mobility and DPM to do it. The armour will fare better against medium tanks as well
Majic
it's a test tank right now, it will be a new tech tree line in 8.0
Bruh
They be testers
Man these things look worse every time I see them
what
It really op
They're strong alright
But more ugly than I am
And that's something
Ehhhh, I shot through it front using Kranvagn
well yea it's probably going to get nerfed pre release and then an update or two later
I penned it so it's not OP
Ha, but no it did clip me afterwards, made me angry I got to half health that quickly
ok imo su 100 is just kinda hot garbage
i killed a yoh its balanced
ok, I almost killed one, but then an enemy IS 8 shot me
Guys
I penned a is4
It obviously needs a buff!
Ok
only yoh i encountered had droodles driving it
Did you die?
Also 900 dmg in 1.5 secs with 265 pen and American gun handling and turret
Go home t57
Who needs you
T 57 is good because it has weird armour and quick burst.
yeah first time i saw it ig
The only armor you have is upper turret
Would would I play 57 if I can play yoh
oof
i lost against a 168 it needs a nerf
Please buff Obj 140s turret. Got golded twice by a AMX 30 B. Close to my mantlet and one on the top of my turret.
That what gold can do.
I just want my AMX 50 B to have better armour
It’s a French tank it doesn’t have any
Uhhh...
@static harness yeah, my entire turret becomes useless as soon as gold is aimed at me
wow its not like thats like what pramo does
Angery foch noises
But the Foch 155 and the AMX M4 45 mle. BDR G1 B, ARL 44, AMX 40 and AMX M4 54 mle.
@brave night almost the entire turret You tihnk T-62As turret is easy to pen with gold? No
m4 54 got armor
Bat chat has armor
A bit
The amount of shells I bounced in my BC
I could play maus and get less dmg blocked
Those are separate if you bothered to even look or read into the Lorraine or AMX 50 or Bat chattlione family vehicles you’d know they were not meant to have armor nor could they hold it
is this image real? a guy sent me saying that at the end of 2018 they had them in the game
it's not real and never will be
It’s fake because you can see actual sunlight reflecting off the back of the turret...
got it, thanks for answering
looks too good for blitz
If WG needs money we will get the type as a t10 collectors tank
Just wait -.-
@icy scroll edited. Can see the texture
Plus they said Jap heavies "too good" for this game
their too big not too good
Yes.
Type 5 Heavy wouldn't really be broke. It only has 2 HE shells. One with high penetration and one with low penetration. It also features a long reload with slow mobility
they are bigger
They never said “too good” they said too big
Oh ok
@bright robin don't refer to them as "Japs" it's a no-no here
But is quicker for typing, and it not really that wrong
I got it, thanks
it can be received in the wrong way
Is Korean now bad to say?
Everything can
Just look at twitter
Just don't in the future, not everyone knows and that's why I told you
i mean during ww2 it was used in a pretty racist way
True. But it was used before the Americans used it to harass
Nice one
Yikes
Had it coming
just dont say it
I mean
The game is basically pg12
But the rules are for 0 and below
But dont worry, that was not my most evil joke, I got tons dark jokes
That is a statment, dont warn me
Don't.
you better not
And there are tons of other places where you can tell them, here is not one of them.
Huh, good job, nice counter
Mayo OP
@lyric oriole not like there's a rule against that :v
Care to elaborate?
What people see as nothing, others sees it different.
Yeah, but
Ok
Fun Fact: The P.1500 monster was another German Wonder Weapon
So basically
Depending on the person
Good luck surviving
I also have a question
Do any of you think the P.1000 Ratte of the P.1500 Monster would be good if it was used?
they wouldnt be able to even run
@bright robin not really. Allied forces had air superiority. So a bomb would be the end to it
Yeah because they have no legs
dad joke op
But the P.1500 Monster was to have amazing range, so it could have fired from heavily defended areas
at what time would it be introduced?
Early on in the war, this is a big "if" question
WEll germany lost the war the moment they started it imo
But at that rate why not use gustav/dora instead
gustav has more range lol
@bright robin Idk if you saw my message. But the allied forces had a big bomb called "Tall Boy". A pretty solid bomb for smashing bunkers. The P.1500 and the Ratte would suffer from low speed. Making it an easy target for allied bomber planes.
if they invaded russia maybe they would be sitting on like half of europe
@bright robin don't go into touchy subjects please
Ok
anyways it was impossible for germany to win ww2 after september 1st 1939 imo
But the P.1500 Monster would be behind heavily defended axis areas, with AA guns
The first mistake was the failed capture of Stalingard and that Itler decided to go for the rich oil fields instead of focusing on the city.
@bright robin Only one bomb and the tank is knocked down.
Oh
the first mistake was starting the war without proper resources, manpower, or industry to effectively beat the allies and the soviets
Allied could also jsut fly higher than the AA could hit. @bright robin
Least the P.1500 had the Gustav Cannon mounted on it
if the german high command listened to their logistics officers they wouldve never invaded the ussr
Now if it were american aircraft, it wouldn't do so hot, the genius engineers reinforced the armor on the planes on the parts that planes that returned had been damaged like the wings and all the non-essential parts
@pliant lodge can you stop talking about "him"
Yeah, except that the uhh guy had wrote and spoken about how horrible the ussr was before, and how he wanted to invade it as a primary goal, and how he wanted lebensraum
Fun facts with Google
How many different types of cones are in the eye?
The rods are more numerous, some 120 million, and are more sensitive than the cones. However, they are not sensitive to color. The 6 to 7 million cones provide the eye's color sensitivity and they are much more concentrated in the central yellow spot known as the macula.
@lyric oriole yes I can but I don't see the issue
I like how people always talk about Staling. When he was responsible for over 25 million deaths during WW2.
look there are sensitive people with families that died because of him ok are you now seeing some sort of problem
the German Jets were also introduced into the war at a too late time
@brave night cough cough Stalin
@bright robin The guy wanted it to be a bomber. So the jetplane was now a jetbomber not smort
Oof
He’s not allowed either here incase you didn’t know majority of political figures are not
But still, if the jets were made a little sooner in the war, they could have had a greater chance of winning
Putin is a good Prime Minister
Ima see what comments are made here
theres no #politics channel for a reason
@bright robin yeah. The British would be overwhelmed
If the jets were made sooner than they would have been just as bad as they were if not even worse
Or the so called wonderweapons
But the Jets were far better than the american and british planes at the time
The Germans had lots of wonderweapons
yeah tell me where you get the oil and experienced crews to use them
@bright robin V1 and V2
The V2 rocket was funny
uhh how
Funny? 🤔
The V-2, with the technical name Aggregat 4, was the world's first long-range guided ballistic missile.
Then the americans took all their plans, the rockets, the jets, the guns
hi where do you get leopards from ??
which leopard
German Tech Tree. All leopards are in the german tech tree
not sure seen in battle looks good
@mossy schooner not the best med tank but not the worst
@mossy schooner don't expose yourself for too long. Leopards are dependent on people who stay still and don't retreat in time.
Shhhh
I want to clip tier 4s
t5 leopard or t10 leopard?
not sure
@kindred thorn Since he/she mentioned Cursader it has to be Leopard tier 5
cool thanks
t5 leoaprd has bad pen
Yes
Also, Crusader is broke. So Idk what's the problem
They were better if they worked yet with the lack of crews and the jets being incredibly complicated to produce even if adopted earlier in the war (not to mention being even less of a developed technology) they wouldn't be able to be produced in any meaningful number to matter outside particular situations
Also apparently people forgot the waffles were basically dead by 1945
But im saying if they made the jets sooner the luftwaffe would had air superiority, and might had even won the war
not really they didnt have the production or fuel
Im saying if it was made early on in the war, like in 1940
if thats true the allies would have also had it earlier in the war
And all that is just a what if we all know that advance would be impossible for 1940 and they lost in reality anyways
Are you trying to say how the world be if they won or something because we all know what they believed in and did
but if they won uhhh mass genocide
There's a massive problem with that already - German jets weren't properly ready until '44. Not to mention a massive lack of materials was killing their potential already, and logistics were always a problem with such a fast-moving army
Germany was having supply issues even in the early war they wouldn't be able to support jets even if they magic couldn't have mass produced them
Andyroo_88#5119 has been warned.
money
Wait lemme rephrase cuz i forgot swear words are censored: what is up with smasher and annihilator being so op?
money
Dunno
Kv-2 2
And something included with an actual Band's music video, likely pressure against nerfing
but still most other prems arent as stupidly op for their tier and tank type
still, money
isnt it just a bit too op tho
money
but this tank have so big body bruh
is it worth it to get the t9 tracks on the masuchen or nah?
or the engine too but for 50-55kxp (forgot the exact cost)
The engine is needed. Without it gonna be pain. But the tracks arent needed cuz u turn so slow that u dont recognize a slightly difference on the battlefield @valid cedar
Ah ok, tysm!
actually 5 degrees of traverse difference is quite substantial
you're dealing with 15.9 degrees of traverse in most terrain which is dirt/medium without tracks and 21.06 with tracks
why dont you have the engine equipped
i just wanted to show the + stats
i just bought the engine too
you're banned from giving advice ever again
@valid cedar yes the tracks do matter, and its quite a substantial and very noticeable difference
even just 4.4 degrees/s turret rotation speed and 0.1 aiming time for 22k xp?
you are increasing your traverse speed by like 33%, and this is really important for such a fat slow tank like the mauschen
What is crossing capacity exactly and how does it work?
I haven't looked into to too much but as far as I can tell, a higher percentage means you can be more mobile on that type of ground
@valid cedar It can be though of as how easy the tank can move on the type of ground
Ah i see, thanks. What % of crossing capacity is considered good for each terrain then?
Well, I guess 80% or higher
hmm well the capacity seems to look alr on the mauschen without the tracks so far
83 and 91
Is it just me, or is tier 9 > tier 10 when tier for tier?
Because WG (rightly) tries to balance tier 10, whereas tier 9 doesnt matter as much and has a lot of tanks that are more op?
terrain resistance. think of it as function of your engine power. the higher it is, the better
its basically how they make tanks faster on roads and slower on mud/grass. "crossing capacity" is just a terribly google translated term for friction/traction
What are the worst tier X tanks?
Think m48 patton maybe? Idk
Badger, 183
VK 72 imo, M48 patton is also pretty low there
I personally love 183, if you know how to position and aim, you got it good
Patton does kinda come at the lower end of the spectrum. I do enjoy playing it tho
I’d say M48 is a low-end when compared to other MTs however it’s still not garbage
183 literally has nothing going for it apart from the gun which is why I like it
I need answer
Can a 10mm of pen from ZiS-5 76mm HE, Penetrate a Tiger I????
Ty!
Some tips for the Emil 1 will be appreciated. Can't seem to do well in it.
I want this is game wg, then IS-7 can catch fv183 shell before it hits its hull with giant crab arm
Play hulldown, clip everyone, use your special consumables, get the top gun if you don't have it
should i use the t8 or t9 gun on the Ho ri?
cuz the dpm, aiming time and dispersion gets even worse n the t9 only for more pen and a bit of alpha
Use the 120
You can at least force trades
Plus insta pen
Your crew is only at 75% ish and you don't have the tracks or any accuracy equipment
is it worth it getting any accuracy equipment + the t9 gun then, or is the t9 gun as u said enough
damn all 3 then huh. I hate this tank cuz i find it worse than the t7 and the aiming time makes me sad
It's stock
What do you expect
Also here's the difference with and without the tracks
The tracks are extremely significant on this tank
Np, it's generally a good idea to get all the modules on tanks anyhow. Engine is in about 90% of the cases lowest priority because it only effects traverse a little and slightly improved P/W by a little
for my mauschen its engine>tracks rip
@valid cedar actually that's not true
Hang on
I messed that up
Wait no that's right
should i still get the tracks for the mauschen tho
The tracks are more helpful so definitely
Unless you like 4° less hull traver and worse dispersion on the move
yay all modules earned on mauschen less go
Get another food for 3rd provision slot, get rid of speed boost and use adrenaline
Unless you enjoy being out traded by tanks that you cant pen which are also faster and have more hp, get the top gun
Hey now that a vet is here, is speed boost even worth a consumable slot lol
Depends on the tank, usually adrenaline and another repair kit are more worthwhile
Double repair is always useful
Ye I run that, double repair and adrenaline
And also, is adrenaline worth a slot for tanks like Sheridan with a big reload
because it's only effective for one reload
The only time I see speed boost as useful is if it is the improved boost
is it worth getting camo too or?
Yes. Very much. Especially if you run into another Sheridan
Camo is always worth it
IGHT thanks!
also, should i use standard, improved or no fuel for provisions? i sometimes lose credits each match which is oof but i have a prem tank so idk
Always. If you have free camos somewhere i.e. Professional Blue lying around just put it on
Improved fuel and double food are usually my go to
@sweet dove Not everyone is a tourney master to have that camo 😂
You dont need to be a master to have that
IK, exaggerated a bit
are camos only worth it on lts and tds, i have a mauschen and jap med and i dont think camos are worth there tho idk
Always run double food provisions and the last one is up to you, you can use fuel or the protection kit
@valid cedar if you have free ones lying around, just put it on
i dont have free ones sadly, need 2.5k credits for each
There’s the camos at the bottom of the tab that are pretty cheap for credits
Ok just TDs and lights for now
Then go for the normal ones
They barely cost anything and even a little bit of camo can be useful in situations
ight then thanks!
I’m telling you everything from a maximum performance standpoint, not from economics lol
^^
I don't care abt my creds while playing tbh
A few matches in prem tanks and they're back
Think about it this way, the better your tank the more games you win and more XP you get. So to get to tier 9, you dont have to play as many games. Thats where you might save credits, by not having to fund ammo, consumables etc for more games
Well, and the fact that a maxed out tank is more fun to play. Theres few things worse than getting outclassed because someone properly equipped their tank and you didn’t
I'm good on losing with Emil I and T49
ooof, I had that thing at like a 60% winrate lol
Ooof I just skipped to the Emil 2 as soon as the tanks came out
Love the emil 1. Probably because how ridiculous it is when put in the right scenarios.
The nerf it got literally did nothing
I got lucky with Emil 1951 crates so I never felt the need to get the Emil 1
I mean yeah ig 1951 is close enough to the thing.
1951 just lacks turret armor, but the speed is pretty nice
It doesn't get special consumables tho right? And provisions
No it doesn’t, but the super speed boost might make it absolutely broken
True, we don't want a unnerfable emil 1 now do we
I mean, I wouldn’t mind it, but that’s only because I own the tank
Besides, we basically already have an unnerfable Emil 1 called the annihilator
Bruh why the Churchill 1 so bad...
Emil 1 isn't really OP though.
It was at the highest WR for the heavies for so many updates since it’s introduction
Still is, it has always overperformed compared to its peers by a large margin
All you need to do is remember which tanks have enough pen to damage you and peek accordingly. And it simply performs
I missed the days of 6 emils and on light in tourneys
Bruh how
Lost 6 game in a row in Maus. I feel great. I just want the b-day extra creds. How much more does WG want from me?
I don't believe it's a high performing tank
@pliant lodge losing streaks happen, jus don’t play for a while, cool down, then try again
@plucky summit I guess I should've stopped when I got ammo racked full HP in Maus by a 268 ._.
but If WG says MM is random I shouldn't get big lose nor big win streaks? Then why does it happen??
So I'll keep playing
Its random. Sometimes you get lucky. Sometimes you get unlucky.
Some games you play awful and keep losing.
Other games you play awful and keep winning (which happened to me the other day lol)
Luck and random are two words that doesn't go together well.
Random necessitates luck to generate its outcome 👀
= RIgged
That’s really not rigging 😂
Well what I am experiencing now It feels like it
If a player gets peeved at the game, I believe it affects their skill a lot. The more they play with this irritation, the more irritation they’ll get due to less coherent skill, and the less skill they’ll have then
It fits me personally, I make more mistakes when I’m angry, and I’ve seen good players get mad at some RNG blessing for the enemy and proceed to lose the game and rage about it.
I notice how the less skilled players are much more likely to complain about matchmaking, it’s very well similar to other games, their random matchmakers
@plucky summit true. but this shouldn't go into like 7 losses. You should eventually win despite having less skill mized with the game
That’s kinda just luck 😅
How can you lose so many times and still tell it's just bad luck or just luck?
Sometimes i get those as well.
Yesterday i lost 2% of my WR then regained it with a win streak right after.
It is just random, and the battles i lost weren't all that terrible.
There is an extent to which you can call something luck or not.
@strange thicket If MM was random you'd still be maybe half way there. Doesn't give sense that you get a win streak the day after
When I say luck, I mean by convenience, not some supernatural determining factor of games. It could be that you happened to have less than optimal teammates
No it wasn't the day after
It was literally right after it
Yes, MM isn't completely random. But I just get so annoyed when I know WG could put me into a team with some experience.
Based on tanks n toons, not skill 😅
You can technically rig the game
And that probably has happened and you don't notice.
Platoons are OP, find a good one, many professional players do it
By playing 2 Smashers or Annihilator in a toon
You don’t even need OP tanks, skilled players are just as OP
@strange thicket not in a lose streak.
@plucky summit depends. If you're an extremely good player and your team is bots. And the enemy is filled with average players. Your most likely gonna lose. Not every time, but most times
I’d toon if I wasn’t NA 😋
Just play the game as you see fit
If I lose 🤔 KV-2 IS thE ANSwer
KV-2 is a bit more team reliant than most others ._.
Yo. KV-2 has been my stress ball @plucky summit.
I'm doing nothing but losing in the Emil 1. Most of the teams were nubs but I admit I wasn't doing particularly well either.
if I'm upset I just spam KV-2 explains why I got 1,2k games in it
@onyx sluice unfortunate teams
I love KV-2 too, but it is quite team reliant 😅
Just aim and yolo shoot :D '
I aim, fire, and wait behind cover, rinse, repeat
I got frustrated and started grinding the T57 heavy line. I will come back to the Emil though, would love to try the auto reloaders.
That’s so wholesome
“I’m mad so I did something else productive”
@onyx sluice If you wanna try autoreloaders I suggest Progretto line
Emil 1 is an autoloader
@kindred wren He said autoreloader?? Not autoloader
Lol, that’s what I get for not reading the entire chat
Or am I mixing things up?? 🙃 🤔
He meant Emil II and Kranvagn I guess
That's what I get for missing a message
I was unintentionally skipping some parts of the chat because of weird scrolling so I thought you referred to his statement saying that he has issues winning in the Emil 1
So? The fact that this happens is enough to prove it is random.
You get all kinds of possible scenarios
When my team is bots I just out-bot them so I’m still the best in my team in regards to what everyone wants to achieve
Sadly, we still somehow win most of the time so we all seem to be very bad at being bots... feels bad
Judging the fairness of matchmaking by the skill of the players in battle contradicts the point of battling.
The difference in skill and tanks determines which team wins, why judge a matchmaker for having that?
Just get XVM and alt+F4 in case of emergency
and alt+f4 irl too
😳
Sledge hammer your pc
The lasting alt+F4 option
@strange thicket and yet the outcome is either lose or win. So that you get a lose streak or a win streak doesn't give sense if there are so many different scenarios and it still leads to a win streak or a lose streak outcome.
Permanent enrichment of your life
@plucky summit + 50% stonks
@pliant lodge understand that most, if not all players go through streaks every once in a while
Doesn't happen, i am talking from personal experience btw.
I get average days where i make no difference in my wr and some days it's just a massive win streak and some days it is just a massive lose streak that i feel like the game is truly unfair. But i just quit then.
The argument of rigging depends on the fact it is only them taking these losing streaks, which isn’t true
It's pretty two sided
Most of the time I have good days
Nitpicking scenarios, disregarding variables. And not considering other's experiences is being biased towards your own opinion
@strange thicket the fact is tho that in the long term you do improve
A good day is a 50%+ day
It's just rubbish when you get lose streaks that doesn't suit your level of skill
Hey, they get less and less the more skilled you get.
It depends on how hard you carry lol.
Lol
@strange thicket what's carrying again? :v
I think WG wants you to have the satisfaction of carrying teams 😊
Carrying is the act of convincing a 70%+ player to platoon with you
It's not so satisfying when you do top damage and it's a loss despite doing an insane carry.
I think carrying is based on winning, cuz carry harder
It’s not a carry if you lose
By then you have just been out maneuvered by the enemy.
Strategic overview
Reason why I always stay in spawn with my Maus so I can coordinate my team
General Lux in the command bunker to lead his team to victory
Backseat gaming
Can't have the general dead.
Must put him in a maus!
:*D
Me? How do I win my battles?
I play T-2020
Everyone aches in pain when they lay eyes on that monster
@kindred wren too bad we don't see re-roll with 100% WR only played in Regular. It's impossible to win every game, no matter how skilled you are. Losing a game doesn't mean that you failed.
I only play smasher and annihilator. I can't even get 55% in other tanks
Excellent approach to get a totally legit winrate! Cheers
You gotta play tanks that fit your playstyle ya know
T-2020-2
I am generally not to blame. Either my team was too bad, or the enemy team was too bad at being bad
Facts
Nah we want T-2021
Would buy, as fast as I grabbed T-2020 for 50
But why
Understandable, have a nice day.
At first cuz I thought it was cool, at second because it was rare so I could flex it, at third so I could prove it wasn't garbage
It used to be garbage
And at fourth?
Would garbage do THIS?
You can do 5k in any tank (at upper tiers) no matter how bad but the t2020 is solid after buff
Yes. Garbage is really good at making people slip. They slip, they fall, they break their neck and boom you get 1k damage. Fast forward four tanks and one who got lucky and bam
Pre buff 2020 was trash. That is a fact. Worthless armor, cloned gun, meh mobility.
Yeah but people roasted pre-buff so hard it would make it seem impossible to nail 5k kolobanovs
Even the wz111 was better
Yeah, it got a lot more hate than it deserved. I was kind of surprised by the player opinion
I will admit I had some great accuracy RNG with it
I'm surprised of the player opinion of the is5, and the 2020 was a flat out worse one
It was just another copy and paste IS-spam tank, but it was still useable
Took me a while to find this, but just another is spam tank, only bad
Well let's see if I can make into 20k of gold
I guess people just expected too much of it
Well, I guess at least it isn't that way anymore
Don’t get me wrong, I too think it was really bad but people just pointlessly hated on it
Ping no ping
Yeh, Lux respected u and set it not to ping
You can turn off pings in replies
Lol, I’m the nice guy who always disables the ping
How dare you turn off ping
Hi
♥️
I am the bad guy who doesn’t even ping you when replying to you, hoping you wouldn’t notice my response
._.
😛
How to win arguments 101 - roast the absolute Foch out of someone and don't ping them so they never hit you with a comeback
Silent kill: +100 points
I am the bad guy who doesn’t even ping you when replying to you, hoping you wouldn’t notice my response
@kindred wren This is definitely real and the quotes system is still in discord
What I’ve been doing here for years
I think 😭
I am actually unhappy that the reply function replaced it in the message menu and didn’t complement it
F
So anyways for some hilarious reason my team has designated T-2020 as comp
Only set one and put a space behind it to have it for one paragraph, or put three arrows for the entire message to appear as quoted
They know something we don’t
Oh I know everything
😱
If the armor was terrible, why do people spam prammo at me?
if the difference between ap and apcr/heat is negligible enough theres no real reason not to load all apcr in comp
People spam prammo in comp?
EW I'LL KEEP MY DAMAGE THANKS
I don’t shoot any prammo at all - even in competitive gameplay
Ho-Ri: Did i hear prammo spam???
15 average dmg loss, from 310 AP pen to 380 prem AP pen
My team never noticed so far 👀
I use prammo when the peer pressure is too much 😭
until they calculate your shell velocity frame by frame and realize that you're not spamming pramo
Oof
Use prammo. Use prammo. Use prammo.
You wanna know how to assert absolute dominance?
Call your 183 HESH standard and AP as prammo
If ur ho ri and dont use prammo at least 1x a match thats just pain
Ho-Ri trash, can't pen VK 168
Omg wtf ur right ho ri sucks 😭🤮😡
Smh Ho-Ri needs pen buff
^
Simple THReE CaLIBeR RUle, If Ho-Ri's AP pen is only 399, and not 168 x 3, then useless
Eh. Yes
What do you think is sillier?
Super Conqueror not comp
T-2020 comp
Using E50M in comps
I don’t know what to say. Both are possible but questionable
To be fair the heavy spam + 1 light/med strat can be countered that way since E 50 M bodies 1v1s
Yup, the E 50 M is a good choice if you want to run an alternative strategy
Gun breach must be underwater for the timer to start
I lied to you, there's no water on Castilla, you should know better
v39 looks in envy
Wow. I never thought you’d fool me like that!
I am the trickster, the deep diver, the waddler, all in one tank
How can you be a deep diver if there is no water though?
Abort, ABORT!
CRAP
lmao
how should i be playing the t7 Chi-Ri? My first impression of it rn (stock) is having rly weak armour, moderate mobility and idk how good the dpm or pen is tbh but the alpha is kinda low for my standards at t7
the gun (specifically the burst damage and ROF) is pretty much all the tank is. the pen is rather poor but if you can get opportunities to shoot more lightly armored targets while taking minimal hits yourself, it can really inflict a lot of damage.
is the chi ri good before i get the burst gun, im stock rn
no, since the gun is the main strength of the tank, it's pretty bad stock. you have a pew pew tier 6 gun on a worse platform.
Be warned it’s still pretty bad fully upgraded*
how should i play the chi-ri with the burst gun then: go with the hts or sniping spots with the tds or
med support and that's about it
im guessing that means going behind the hts then
no, it means go with the meds and support them
as I said before it has poor pen so you have to pick out distracted or poorly armored tanks to engage. you also have poor armor so you can't really take many aggressive engagements
oof, sounds like a pretty wierd tank for me, guess ill use as much free xp as i can with it, thanks for the tips!
Do the t8s and t9s get any better or are they still pretty underwhelming too by any chance?
they are similarly very gun-based tanks, the Type 61 in particular has such a great gun that it offers a lot of potential, but the rest of the tank makes it challenging to play
oof alright then, but the t10 would make it worth it from what i heard is that right? iirc the t10 playstyle was hulldown or smth cuz of good turret armour though i cant compltely remember
yep the tier 10 is very much worth it, it has a low profile and good turret combination that is sorely lacking on the previous tanks. Solid gun and mobility as well.
great to hear!
the pain of playing the t6 and t7 rn almost makes me wanna switch to the t62-A which i heard is also good, is the line and t10 there better by any chance or
the 62a is a great tank and the line is very solid, both the light branch and the med branch are a good amount better than the STB line
yeah idk whether to reconsider and change to the 62a, when i discussed about it with some ppl in this channel last week they said the t62a has a taller hull so requires more perfect play to hulldown well, though has higher dpm and accuracy
but ty for your advice
Tall hull is just a comment it’s hull is average sized the turret is just short along with the gun depression you need to awkwardly position to use it sometimes
Why 62a when you can object 140
You can tell Alexandra to do an event with BT-7 artillery
And honestly I would go on obj 140
yes 140 playstyle cool 62a is just generic hulldown
Which one has better turret armour: the stb or the 62a?
So in your view T-2020 is more fun to play than Obj. 252U
I haven't played either so I can't really tell you
I believe T-62A
Oh then idk im feeling the t62a is better than the stb rn
It seems the 62a has better aiming time, dispersion and turret armour ngl
Only thing better abt the stb is the better depression and slightly higher turret over hull but still weaker turret armour
stb better at working ridgelines due to gun dep, also has higher alpha if you care about that at all
What are ridgelines?
crest of a hill/upward slope
Ah i see, yeah the gun dep is nice, i rly dont know which one i should go for at this point. People said the stb is better if ur a beginner tho the damage and armour stats on the stb look better so ifk
At least the 140 has the better gun
:_(
x_(
Alpha is king
If only 183 didn't throw so much dirt on that statement
And it has better ammo. AP>>>>apcr and apcr>>>>HEAT
The rest of the tank is trash see yoh
Imagine using prammo
ap > apcr
Won't have to with ap standard
We've established this.
Mfw when Leo has better pen and a bigger caliber then both of them and still doesn’t make much of a difference
It would if Leo had the armor profile of em
Or the actually good aim time*
Leo? It doesn't slap for 420
Was responding to this in basically the same way as master, won't have to use prammo as much since ap has normalization
Aye, but still, I rarely ever find problems with penetration
Not neccesarily heat shells often have better pen than apcr variants(215b vs e5) and they do far better against sharply angled armor plates because they dont autobounce until 85 degrees
We're comparing them as if they had the same penetration
You can't compare ammo with vastly different pen numbers.374 apcr is always better than 374 heat
Still my point stands about penning sharply angled tanks
4005 bounces a surprising bit with APCR
Even with sharply angled plates, HEAT simply doesn't often have the penetration capacity to penetrate an angled plate past 70 degrees anyway
@solid gate 4005 sad accuracy without consumable
Yes, but it doesn't overmatch either
Or effectively deal with spaced armor ;)
Overmatching is an over rated feature though rarely does it actually prove useful and clips of batchats and TVPS bouncing 183s like nothing shows it lol
Hori: best prammo
T110e3/4 2nd best
Heat tds after that
Overmatch has far less occurence than autobouncing
Think prog upper plate if you have apcr pramo good luck penning the upper plate unless your at a higher angle making the upper plate not autobounce bit with heat you cheese right through
The pen number doesnt matter because it's an autobounce
I've never really dug into the T110E3/4 guns
Imagine shooting Prog's upper plate without leverage
It's kinda big
For how small the tank is
I’ve played with the E4 gun quite a bit with rammer and CS. With CS you butter through pretty much everything but you’ll sacrifice a lot for it with little benefit
I'm curious, so Ima ask a question I've always wondered about
Would you pick a 200mm plate
Or a 100mm plate angled at 60 degrees?
So much is at play, normalization, the same effectiveness without it, autobounce capability, what's your take?
That's actually a tough question....
It makes me happy that a simple minded nerd like me could devise such a debate
It depends on the tank, and where the armor plate is located
I feel that’s an example of panther and tiger
Thicker plate was flatter and was less effective thinner plate was angled and was more protective
Depends at which 60° it is.
Heh heh
Upper or lower plate
They weigh the same, though the flat plate given crew space while adding a bit more weight to compensate for more deck armor
This is a tiger 2 with its upper side plate at 60 degrees and 100mm
That's like 59.7 degrees or sumn, at a perfect 60 degrees it's twice as effective
Yeah that seems about right
But the 200mm plate won't be affected by normalization, while the 100mm plate can, though the effectiveness exponentially increasing with angles can counter that
Honestly it depends on if the tanks can angle those plates because the 200mm plate becomes a lot more effective when you angle than the 100mm plate already angled
Oh but there is angling past 70 degrees for that 60 degree plate
If the tank has gun depression and we are talking the upper plate, angled all the way
^
I dont think there is a correct answer to this question it depends on the tank and the situation the tank is in
List Time:
200mm Flat: Countered normalization, extra crew space
100mm angled: Autobounce manuevering capability, aerodynamics, slightly lighter, probably more cool looking
Ah yes, aerodynamics
Well I guess it would push down, not sure if traction is worth the "weight"
Kv4 is a solid example of your 200mm flat armor
Chimera as well
203mm flat on the turret on a tank that seems to work best hulldown
Ngl sorry to interrupt but the FV4005 claps so good
Good point. That shows just how bad 200mm flat is in tier 8
200mm plate would need solid side armor to simply angle effectively
100mm plate would need solid side armor to angle itself to autobounce
And there is the is6 driver hatch as a 100mm example
Well that counts in enemy shell penetration
Starts bringing the bias xD
Or eh... kind of
Oi chicken, that your ign?
Looking at the chimera straight on the upper frontal plate is 114mm but is slightly Less effective armor (195mm) than the 203mm torrent angled at no degrees, and with normalization it's not even close the turret is better, but when your hulldown at max gun depression the turret gets like 213mm but the hull is an autobounce
I've realized the Kv4 is more of a meme machine than a actual useful tank, it doesn't really succeed in any certain field, where the Tiger 2 is maneuverable, quick, fast reload, (could be better damage) and good armor against tier 8 and 7. 9 it begins to play like a medium more than a heavy.
Indeed it is
KV-4 is pretty iconic in requiring raw minimum penetration, if you don't have a solid 190mm of penetration, fighting it frontally is a no-go, no weakspots in view
I find your lack of battles in the kran disappointing
Got addicted to 183, Kran is for my tournaments
Ew 183
Sorry, I have a bias for high damage per shot tanks, hence I also play AMX M4 mle 54 with it
Yes, but the only tier 8 that people still play that I've noticed that has less than 190mm of pen is the Pershing and the T49.
Even with 190mm of penetration, you have next to nothing to aim at, it almost makes it a Tiger II against meds
Also for my bias for mle 54, it could do much more often what my IS-7 would uncommonly do:
Roll over 500
I need your skonk
183 is pog
T54 ltwt 😔
W u t
Oh Super COnq
Lower plate has never really been a problem to me in the Kv4, along with the top mini turret. Usually those lower pen guns are highly accurate, so it defeats the purpose. And for the T54 ltwt, you can just flank it and face no issue
Skonk
Yeah the low battle count makes very good stats, if I ever proceed to play them, the stats will plummet 😅
Sconq*
Tragically my clan doesn't think Skonk is comp so I can't play it unless it's an ez clap team in tournaments, so I must use the boring IS-4 😪
And I don't understand how people can play more than 500 matches in a lowe. Just so slowe
Speed doesn't affect me, if I get a position, I often don't need to move for a while, so I don't find it hurting me too much, also DEM CREDITZZ FOR 183, and I love the gun and armor
Gotta spam the OG premiums
Lel, I only got Drac from snow globes for that list
Got skorp from globes
My is6 was gifted to me back when I was free to play. I made decent use of it
Op
From globes I got Dracula, Gravedigger (compensated), Action X (compensated), WZ 120-1 FT, Chieftain Mk. 6, and Super Conqueror
._.
I got the t22 garbage instead
Ew, I already have T-62A why get a more despisable one
I didn't have a choice, I wanted the skonk, but still didn't even get it
I like to think of it as a DPM IS-4 with a larger lower plate and about the same solid turret
You missed the key part I want, gun depression
kanonenjagdpanzer 105 good anyone?
ity=s meh
You really need to know how to position in it and take advantage of bushes, it's often good at taking less traveled flanks, like town on Vineyards, to flank the enemy
its alright i guess
I've only played one battle in it (I have other tanks I like playing), and landed 3.3k damage with that strat above
nice
its good but not as good as pre nerf
when your in the kv2 and theres a hellcat and your shot is a track crit
@analog glen
100 mm at 60 degrees is usually better
because its easier to angle for a 70 degree autobounce with it. then it doesn't matter what pen they have on AP/APCR. case in point, Progetto 65
i got a lot of gold i need to wait whats coming to the store
dont buy that lmao
i got the snowstorm jagdtiger and well some other premiuns
......
there's nothing in the store and im waiting for a tank be there for gold
Just dont get the superpershing, for that price atleast.
just wait for a 5k gold tank sale
i waiting for the action x hope comes with two bundles to choose cuz aint like the morpho camo
it'll prolly be in crates, it's a good tank
The other time was sold for gold
Likely will be going to be sold for real money just like the revaloise again WG likes mocks on f2p people
Well that means no money of them anymore if they ever dare make me sick of the game because there's crates
I ain't gonna spend on crates seeing my luck is bad I wouldn't risk
Again I hate how this game is hostile to the poors, I live in mexico if you ask me the economic situation isn't making my family wealthy so yeah I won't spend a penny on crates I rather on gold even if is in low quantities but that's how I do like spend money
Well let's see how much far I can make I wish they improve for beneficial of both sides
I know the devs have even stay awake to make this game work well and is cool they need appreciation it wouldn't be possible without the talented people sorry for such sentences but I'm kind of tired I need something to do
Or give the tanks for skilled players via events
As well giving something for new players like the lunar flame event where people could get the t-34-3 or the type 64 in the best scenario both tanks
action x feels a little clunky
Well just me complaining about how I feel about recently
i might try action a bit in the upcoming patch
i have 16k not sure too
i once paid in a different game i briefly played and people said to me " so... this is your hobby?"
Lol people dislike t22? Facing them yeah, but that thing is infamously strong in tier 10, everyone knows that
Because it has troll armour everywhere on the hull and has a strong turret. It also has good mobility, and not a bad gun
Yea but some people I know call it trash. When there's nothing wrong with it. It's literally a better T-62A
More like a better 140, the play style is completely different from a T-62A
Idk, I played the T-22 Med like the T-62A with more armor and like a is4 side armor and it rocks
It’s literally a brawler like the 140, that’s where the armour comes into its own
I've never liked the 140. It doesn't play the same to me at all.
T-62A has the best gun out of all three tanks, it's the best sniper, but I prefer T-22, it's so good at yoloing into everyone and bouncing everything
If you know how to play it, it's an Annihilator of tier 10 (btw got T-22 from a free snowglobe this year while everyone paid 20000 gold for it)
Now looking at tank compare I saw how much better T-62A's gun is
meanwhile I just want the K-91 and its line of really flat soviet support mediums
I'm currently pushing for a heavy tank, td and med tank line, and i may be interested to push for a light tank line next: What are the sheridan, B-C 25 and Vickers Light like?
Vickers - really good guns, solid turret armor, normal light tank mobility, I sometimes play them like fast unamrmored mediums
Sheri - large, sluggish for lights with huge guns that fire heavy 650 damage (and very expensive) shells and are very innaccurate
B-C 25t - good flankers, only autoloading line for now although they need a lot of skill to play right
oh wait bc is autoloading?
on bliz hanger it doesnt look like bc is autoloading (I.e. comparing its gun stats to progetto, prog has 'time to load next shell' while the bc doesnt
Sheridan is great imo, it has a great line, great gun letting you outtrade everything apart from TDs, you have great mobility, and spaced armor everywhere so you usually won't be penned
that's a stat for an auto reloader
BatChat has a 3 shell autoloader
2.8s intraclip
Prog is autoREloader
whats the difference between autoloader and autoreloader again
reloader loads shells one by one
autoreloader loads shells one by one
(whatever, we wrote the same)
Nah, you will be penned most of the times
The bounces are only trolls
@valid cedar Think of autoloaders as a gun where you have to reload the entire clip if you want to reload one bullet
Autoreloaders are guns which when you fire one bullet, the next one loads in the barrel and after that, the first one starts loading back
autoloader reloads a "drum" of 3 shells
i see, damn autoreloading sounds nice. Is the dmg on the bc good in practise tho?
bc is a TVP but more flexible with less damage per clip
Autoreloaders end up being extremely flexible tanks. The enemies will almost never know how many shells you are holding. Definitely recommend experiencing them on the progetto line
Autoreloader is a traditional gun but also an autoloader at the same time
^^
Prog 65 is amazing
You can just play thinking you're at 2k damage but you're at 4k or something
Because dumping an entire mag and then shooting like a single shot gun is super pog
autoreloaders are really comfortable to play. Sadly I'm only on the P.44 so I can't say for the standard and progetto
Which tank is the least RNG and team dependent out of these:
- FV4005
- progetto 65
- T110E5
Just asking because my RNG is so bad lately that I shoot someone into tracks even though I shoot the frontal hull
also maybe Obj 268
if im an autloader and have 1 shell left in my magazine is there a way to reload without using up my last shell or?
If you are on touch, double tap the ammo selection. Otherwise press c
does the time to reload 2 of the shells take as long as it would to take all 3 (I.e. if i idd shoot my last shell)? or would it only take 2/3 as long
it takes the same amount of time
Whats the most used and useful tanks in tournaments nowadays?
that's why you need to think if you want to reload your clip
can i not shoot during the reload time at all im assuming
T110E5, IS-4, Kranvagn, Vickers Light
Whats E5 doing there? And can IS-7 be used instead of IS-4?
It's flexible, has some OP consumables, is fast, armoured on the turret, has a good gun
No, IS-7 is way different, you have way worse armour, worse gun
E5
Damn, so whats IS-7 used for then
why vickers over sheridan or bc?
Ok, thanks. Just grinded FV183 and i'm getting destroyed all the time
it's not really too good
@valid cedar good armour for a light, and great view range
Progetto is also a solid choice, though the RNG is kind of bad for a 105mm
The FV4005 is just straight out very team and skill dependent
I'll go for E5, almost got M103
which t10 light tank is best to go for someone who has never played a light tank before: sheridan, vickers or bc?
I would go for sheridan, that's my favourite, but I know most of players would grind Vickers
I just like big guns or DPM kings
Depends on what you want; if you just want an easy entry point that feels like a medium play Vickers, if you want some fun running around and shooting people then Sheridan is for you, if you want ‘true’ light gameplay of scouting, gunning and running then the Bat. Chat. Is the right choice (but definitely not the most newbie-friendly choice)
why would you say that bc needs a lot of skill to play tho?
well it does. the french lights need skill in both PC and Blitz. They can't forgive mistakes
They require you to have good overview over the battlefield and an understanding of how you can exploit situations
yeah thing i dont like abt the sheridan is the relatively sad aiming time and dispersion and pretty low 230 pen
It looks super inaccurate on paper, but it actually hits the target more often than not. That shouldn’t hold you back
that's why you run calibrated shells
but couldnt u say the same for the vickers and sheridan, or are mistakes punished even worse on the bchat
much much worse on the bat
BC is just hard to play, no gun depression or elevation, low damage per shot etc.
By the way, some people argue that if you want ‘true’ light gameplay you can also play the Object 140
Leopard 1 is also kind of light, less camo and view range, but great gun
hmm then sheridan or vickers it is for me, id like to be a like that can add pressure and poke the enemy, especially when they dont expect it because as a heavy or td those lights which poke at the unexpecting enemy are my nightmare
The Leopard 1 is too much about damage farming and too little about active or passive scouting to count as a light, in my opinion
With both of these tanks use your HE, Vickers has great HE pen, while sheridan good HE pen and great module damage
In that case I think the Sheridan is the best choice for you
is the sheridan good for scouting and poking despite a big dispersion and aiming time?
@stiff basin why HE over AP
No, don't HE over AP, use both
Use all the shells you can have, just sheridan's HE is great
Good at scouting... Technically all tanks are good at scouting. In Blitz it’s very rare that you outspot and enemy. But the Sheridan is really good at poking with the massive alpha that really hurts
ooh sounds nice, yeah the alpha seems cool, is the sheridan pretty beginner friendly too?
not too much, it's a light, lights aren't really too easy to play
If you want to have great stats it’s probably not the most beginner friendly, but it is a lot of fun and if you have fun skill comes by itself
Also you can try ammoracking people with your HE because it has way more module damage than other shells
(Try progetto on a turret)
Akshualy, HE doesn’t have more module damage, it’s just the fragmentation that creates a lot more impacts on the modules and thus a lot more potential damage
Whatever, I meant burst radius, it's better than 183's HESH
The whole line is really fun, keep the T49, it's not good, but really fun. Bulldog has great DPM, T92E1 is a sheridan with some armor and less mobility
T49 is fun because it has 780 HE damage, while normally it would have 680 as Sheridan has
i think for now ill just stick with my ht td and mt lines, and when im nearly done with them ill watch gameplay of lights and consider which one, tysm for your help @stiff basin and @kindred wren !
You’re welcome
How to be annoying in this tank despite it's bad penetration?
Shoot HE
flank, get close, shoot, run away
they really need to give it some sort of not as expensive high explosive, slinging heat 24/7 drains credits and penetrations are rare
It’s heat is the cheaper round because making the round that can actually penetrate be premium rather than the round that’s supposed to be anti light and splash cheaper is a good decision...
Imagine if this thing had prammo
It has prammo, the HE is the prammo
I meant normal prammo, with higher pen
nope
As if t92 wasn’t painful enough to deal with
T49 is fine how it is
Imo it should get a dispersion buff or pen buff even if it would cost reload time
That's why you even play with this thing
It doesn't need DPM, nerf reload by a second and buff aim time by 1 second and dispersion by 0.060 or something like this.
That’s literally making a tier 8 T92 god no it’s fine how it is
T49 is for memes, not for winning
Petition for wargaming to bring back the MS-1, T1 Cunningham, and Leichttraktor as collectibles that can only be used in training rooms.
what are the big differences between the IS-7 and IS-4?