#vehicles-discussion
1 messages · Page 281 of 1
Oh, the S35 and B2 I did figure out were not German. They’re French.
yet the amx pak 40 is german but has the french flag
yeah but those arent in game
no thats romanian
If Pz 38(t) isn’t German then why is it listed under Germany on TE? Though it looks like some of them were made by others under German supervision. Not sure. Need to read.
@solid gate Pz 38t is a Czech vehicle, but as we know, when it was produced, Germany ruled over Czechoslovakia, so they employed large numbers of them in the Wehrmacht
But pz 38 t from Czechoslovakia in ww2 german start invading and capture all of it include 35t 38t na and t25
@feral basin noice
If Czechoslovakia produced the tank then China couldn’t have made or owned it first.
money says otherwise
Chinese Pz 38(t) as far as I’m concerned is made up or was sold to them.
Yeah, the 38t really has no business being in the Chinese tech tree.
CZ 38(t) is basically recolored Pz 38(t).
and vickers
Vickers? Basically a recolored British tank right?
not really vickers tanks were basicly a subway samwich you pick and choose what you want how you want it
there were an insane amount of choices that could even be 1 or 2 turrets
Hmmm. Interesting. Still I don’t know why they removed the other Chinese tank and gave them the Pz 38(t) with Chinese coloring.
Anyway I want M4 Improved and the uh AGF’s Improved Medium in Blitz. Also T71 should be renamed T71 DA and the T71 CMCD added as a premium or whatever.
Chinese line to grind? Uh not sure yet. Probably TDs or heavies. Except the IS-2. It’s worse than the Russian IS-1 and IS-2.
the T-34-1 is a phenomenal tank.
Well mediums may be alright choice too.
They probably have different stats though.
One is a medium and the other a heavy after all.
WZ-110 looks like a great heavy. Not sure about the one after that.
WZ-111-5A?
I think that’s the name.
That’ll be cool. Anyway I’m gonna go. See ya.
Best way/advice to playing the T-54 ltwt?
Pray u dont get hit and throw phone when point blank range u shells bounce from side armour of is 3 5 and 6 side
IS-6 doesnt even have troll armor but ok
For a ltwt it does
Man i have bad experience agains their sides
you can pen the IS-3 side with a 122mm that has 175 pen
Im talking about t54 ltwt
@foggy sandal ltwt has 175 pen
It's that stupid bounces that should not really happen
it can pen the is-3 side easy if you take 1 sec to actually aim
I mean just shoot the drive wheel
Like only the gun is annoying rest of its characteristics are good like u are immune from +800 he frontally ur turret is bouncy but fragial and speed and handling are epic
Overall ull have fun w it but dont expect over 2k damige
I think its role is more of light tank hunter and recon(i dont like spotting mechanics as sometimes they make no sence)
Should the skorp. G cost money?
@solid gate i already know.
@stark owl why wouldn't it
@tulip sail so normie ad watchers can have the tank too.
But then they cant make as much money or act like there giving a bigger deal
All I want is you guys to make tier 13 of modern tanks like M1A2C Abrams and others
M1A2c is still being tested and classified @sullen depot nice try
Add the mbt70 as a t10 researchable medium/ heavy for america, ot cpuld have atgms and branch off from the t9 atgm light tank as an uparmored but slower Sheridan
Why wouldn't it be t9
It could but there would be complaints about it having that much armor with an atgm
The mbt is almost identical to the kpz
Yeah iirc the difference is a different engine
Yeah kpz has 1500 HP mbt has 1470
But if they add the mbt70 with atgms I'd be at the least annoyed if the kpz didn't get them as a premium ammo
Kpfz 70 should be a tier 10
From what I've heard it's a mediocre t9
It is
It’s garbage
It would destroy any tank in this game with no problem
If they made it how it really is
It would still make a balanced T10 as well
I wouldn't say the kpz is garbage since it's the 4th highest t9 heavy
Its alright
I own it and have near 9? Aces on it and it sucks so much
The poor gun dep makes it feel like your wearing a dog cone from the vet the gun feels like a knock off that misses and low rolls more often than you’d like and the speed is so useless it’s no point in driving
And you cant shoot behind you easily
wb leopard 2
No
kpz evo
No thanks for the leo2
Leo 2 would be tier 11
why t11
Bc it's way to good for t10
Its an mbt with a smoothbore gun with 340mm of pen and 650mm of heat pen
Leo 2 is very modern for wotb
Doesnt it uses the l1a1 120mm gun like most NATO tanks?
How mad you guys be if they made tier 11
What? @placid crown
Not very mad
The L1 is from the Cold War era the leopard 2 series tanks use L44/L55
Not mad but wg would be if they did
Doesnt it use that? Or am i thinking of the 2a4
No German tanks never used british guns
its only 49 years old
The L1A1 is the one on the 215B I think
Except butepanzers
so young
What does it use? The L/55?
L55 is the newest one on the leopard 2s
Ah
L44 is the one you are talking about
T64*
T80 maybe
But the t70 iirc only had a small mg
Oh yeah
M1A2 SEP wb that tank
Noooo
I'm thinking of the t40
:(((((
That tank is 90% classified
No smooth barrel
Maybe 98%
challenger 2?
Also classified
t 90?
Same issue
Nope
South korea? tanks?
Only tanks i could see would be t64b m1/xm1 and Leo 2
Anything currently used by first world countries is a no
no?
Merkava would be cool if they added mbts
Probably never
why?
So many problems
They are, slow, good gun
good gun
L m a o
Basically never is when.
thanks
Never is when they get larger maps.
Two updates before arty
They said they will most likely not add the jap heavies since they are absolutely massive at tier 6 and up as well as maps being small and the 2014 phone thing too.
.o.
if they come they will come with weaker armour
@solid gate Agreed but that is a big if.
I'd rather tank destroyers
I saw y’all were talking about MBTs and tier 11 being added. Well any (more or less) retired MBTs maybe if they ever wanted to but those currently in use or being tested for future use are definitely not a go. You guys stated why very well. Classified information and all that.
So do we still use M1A1s? Do British still use Challenger Is?
I dont think we do but I'm sure a ton is still classified
Hmmmm. I’d say that’s odd but maybe they have their reasons for keeping it classified until it’s way too outdated.
Is the original M1 Abrams even completely declassified? Because I may have my doubts on that too.
It's a simple reason they still use some of it
Ok then. Now what’s the XM1?
The original original abrams
There is Two XM1 models that of GM General Motors and Chrysler
Yeah. As in the standard M1 and not the A1 or A2 or any others with added anything on them.
It’s different from the first m1 in a few ways
I see. What did it look like?
The XM1 that is.
I will find photos but it will take a bit here’s the GM XM1
@solid gate
Here’s what the Chrysler xm1 looks like
This the Chrysler one?
Yeah that’s the Chrysler one chosen for a good reason
Yeah the other one had related images including that one.
I see. What reason is that?
Visual differences alone you can tell how the abrams came from that
Mhmm
The GM1 is not that appealing/ bad design vs Chrysler’s design and advantage of a turbine engine
I see.
Though to me the GM one’s turret looked more like the Abrams’ turret than the Chrysler one’s.
The Chrysler ones is more inspired off the MBT 70 where GMs is brand new
I see. Anyway I doubt Wargaming adds tier 11 or anything above that anytime soon. Just not enough retired declassified tanks to choose from and perhaps other reasons.
Also honestly the Abrams is a cool looking tank except some of the necessary equipment that juts out of the turret. Looks funky. Still I have known about it for some time and it’s been a cool tank to me at times. Challenger II I like as well. Though the best looking MBT is probably the Black Panther one. Though there are contenders for that position and if you disagree that is fine.
i like the Russian MBTs look more
The K2 turret and the abrams hull would be a amazing combo
Which one? The T-90 or the T14 (or is it T-14) Armata?
T-14 looks nice but T-90 looks more unique imo
as it basically isnt a boring matchbox like every NATO MBT ever
That’s a bold claim @frigid compass
I see. Heh. Wonder if any tank novice or uneducated person would think Stingray is an MTB.
Considering every Russian tank is a copy off of each other compared to nato tanks
well on looks Russian tanks just look well russian while nato mbts is just box
Abrams
abrams is just a curvy box
Aren’t all tanks a box on the hull? Unless you mean the turret.
Idk it doesn’t really look like a box compared to the armata
with the sideskirts and desert camo it looks like a cardboard box
Side skirts have a use and in deserts you want a desert camo.
T-14 does look boxy yeah but the T-XX series of russian MBTs doesnt look boxy
They don’t look boxy I agree on that they just look as if the second war never ended and dragged out for ever
That’s why for my made up tanks I wanted to use trapezoid front hull and other odd designs. Make em look unique. Now sides and rears of tanks usually look somewhat boxy even now. It’s just the way it is.
Sides would be hard to curve and definitely cannot do other shapes really. Rear I guess could have a curve or you could just do what I call a reverse slope.
It’s referred to as raised engine deck
I’m not well educated on the terms. Basically what I was going at was the seeming slightly inward slope thing as you go down toward the ground you see on the back of some tanks in Blitz or even in images of the real things.
Though I did it even more so on this quick thing I ended up making:
Cursed jp2
Actually I decided to get rid of that. Though I do need to work on my own tank designs.
Uh is that panther?
Yes and no
Ohho i see UwU
It was something I made on the fly. It’s kinda like a Panther but not.
WZ5A coming soon? :O
Sloping does nothing to Stop APFSDS though, it doesn’t really care about how much slope you have, it’ll punch through
It just depends on armor material and total thickness
Wasn’t saying the tank would face those that fired APFSDS or anything like that. But it’s an unnamed and unclassified tank.
Now I need to try to draw up some designs of tanks I intend to keep soon.
Tier 7?
What’s the russian version of the t30? Can we get a bigger is7 turret and gun on an st1 hull?
That pic above is pretty much the nightmare,
how is mounting a 105mm gun on a StuG III chassis the same as mounting a 150mm gun on a Panzer IV chassis with a large casemate
because they’re both assault guns
they're both different tanks, mounted on different chassis
I know they perform the same role, it's that they're still different tanks and their characteristics are pretty different as well
ATGM gang
can we have a starship gang
It will be a subclass if ATGM gang so I will allow it
@feral basin oh sweet! I really hope it's researchable.
Lol
Don't you mean jagdtilda
Xd
would i be stupid to buy the collection containers?
yes
@twilit willow You have only 3% - 5% chance to drop. You can try your luck but I think it's worthless and you'll lose 20$
Matilda is so bad when fight against tier V and VI :/
matilda ? or u mean matilda bp or matilda iv??
tech tree matilda, i guess
play in platoon, when your platmate is 1 tier higher, and get into a tier6 match
"toaster vs smasher" is possible due to this.....
it have not happend to me🙂
lucky fella
failtoons are kind of dumb
in the other side i have 60% team that like drunk
Buff the GuP tanks.
Gup tanks are fine
Just balanced
The Hetzer Kame is not balanced.
Kame SP is fine
dem cupolas doe
Says it was like the biggest operational tank at it’s time.
Took a crew of 12 I think.
That looks silly.
want to see the normal cannon?
Sure
Ah
Kinda reminds me of Germans 88mm (which supposedly was meant to be a flak gun) that they used to destroy tanks. But that one is bigger of course.
the 203 is a really big boi '
Mhmm
203 mm howitzer M1931 (B-4) was a 203 mm Soviet high-power heavy howitzer. During the Second World War, it was under the command of the Stavka's strategic reserve. It was nicknamed "Stalin's sledgehammer" by German soldiers. These guns were used with success against Finnish pillboxes at the Mannerheim Line, heavy German fortifications and in urban combat for destroying protected buildings and bunkers. This weapon was used until the end of the war in the Battle of Berlin where the Red Army would bring these guns up at point blank range to smash German fortifications with their heavy 203mm shells. In the spring of 1944, a KV-1s tank chassis was used to create a self-propelled variant, the S-51. The heavy recoil from the muzzle blast threw the crew off their seats and damaged the transmission, and so it was cancelled.
Someone should make a scenario of the Pershing entering the war a lot sooner if not American heavy tanks like T29.
oh
Yep. Though I did see footage of a Pershing easily disabling a Panther after the Panther knocked out a Sherman.
The Sherman crew sustained injury and one may have died. Can’t remember. However, the entire Panther crew bailed out unscathed though the tank was not going anywhere.
If you're talking about the cologne panther, one of the panther crew most likely died, most likely the gunner
As far as I remember the video said the entire Panther crew go away. Still even if one did die the rest weren’t hurt while the Sherman crew wasn’t as well off. Sherman was a good tank but the Germans just had better guns. Pershing though in that footage made Panther look like a not so tough target.
Afaik panther crew thought pershing was another panther cuz guns and didnt fire
the panther had rounded the corner, exposing its side armour straight to the M26. According to the tank commander, he had assumed that the M26 was a German tank due to its rarity
Cuz pershings are rare
And you can see in the video, a tank crewman tried to climb out of the commander's cupola after the commander, who was most likely the gunner since the loader could exit by the rear hatch. At that point, the M26 shot the Panther right in the turret, and the crewman can be seen slumping back into the turret
Oh, ok. I guess I was wrong. What was the crew count for a Panther?
I think it’s the standard 5 man crew. Commander, loader, gunner in the turret; driver and radio operator in the front hull
Huh. I guess somebody made a mistake when they uploaded that video I saw years ago about the Cologne Panther. And uh I messed up about the Sherman too. All I know is the Sherman Commander sustained injury to his leg/knee when the Panther knocked it out. Then the Pershing rolled up and hit the Panther in the side as the other guy(s) said.
It was most likely sorta correct since iirc one crew member was killed in that panther
Well I think the video I saw said 7 men ran away from the destroyed Panther. That makes no sense. The other videos you can find now have it more accurate though hard to read the text as they flash it too fast.
Though never understand Germans shifting to quality over quantity in their tank doctrine. Meanwhile Russia churned out T-34s and the Allies had a lot of Shermans. Doesn’t matter how good one tank is if the enemy has overwhelming numbers.
Germany should have dropped the Tiger tanks and built more Panthers and Pz IVs. Even the Pz IV could knock out a Sherman.
probably a tier 10, with that massive railgun it has
@solid gate the reason why was because they knew pz 4s were already inferior and mass producing them would be a waste instead they chose the most logical option which was to make powerful giant tanks instead of multiple weaker ones
Well obviously the entire german industry was on the wrong footing. What is the point of using the best radio created by specialists that would last few years when the tank is destroyed the next day in a battle? Meanwhile soviets analyzed how long the tank was likely to survive and put components that would not outlast the average tank life span.
Mmm, i wonder if WG doesn't buff Kpfpz 70 because even they want to add ATGMs to it once they update the game with that mechanics?
They buffed it several times
They did buff Kpf?
@solid gate Well the Panther was the best of those. Sure even it had field issues but Tiger I and II were probably worse about that. Pz IV was inferior sure but surely it still had it’s uses and was cheaper than building Tiger tanks. But I said use Pz IVs AND PANTHERS and drop the ridiculously heavy Tiger tanks.
@solid gate even then the panther took too long to build
True but if they focused on 1 tank instead of 3 plus prototypes that would have saved time and resources.
But really taking Pz IV Gs and Hs and giving them sloped armor would have been a better idea. But apparently they didn’t want to do that or think of it.
@solid gate the pz 4 chassis was basically maxed out the side skirts themselves were already too much and caused issues
Well whatever. Germany wasn’t gonna win anyway no matter what tanks or whatever they came up with.
Just didn’t have the logistics to win. Especially once Russia started pushing them back and America entered the war and the Allies got second wind. Couldn’t fight a 2 front war.
@solid gate The quality over quantity doctrine actually made sense for Germany. Germany was never going to outproduce the Soviets AND the Americans, and they have a smaller population of young men to draw from too.
What building better tanks allowed them to do was take full advantage of the quality of the men they put into their machines. You plop an ace German tank crew into a StuG III, and they might destroy 6, 7, maybe 8 enemy vehicles before being killed. You put the butts of that same ace crew into a Tiger I, and they'll rack up 20, 30, 40 vehicle kills.
Also note that tanks like Tiger I were never meant to outright replace tanks like Panzer IV. Panther I was though (and it was only ~30% more expensive to produce than a Panzer IV, and given the capabilities of the Panther, if the war had gone on longer, it was a good decision)
Ah, ok. But despite the quality over quantity thing they were screwed since Blitzkreig was no longer in use really. Those tactics ground to a halt and Germany started being put on the defensive more and more. Despite the quality of their tanks you have a numbers game too.
Well, when Panther I and Tiger I were being developed, in 1942 and 1941 respectively, Germany was still more or less on the offensive.
And sure there's a numbers game, but look at it this way. If you're playing Blitz, would you rather have a team of 7 40%ers in Panzer IVs and StuG IIIs, or a team of 4 40%ers in Panzer IVs/StuG IIIs and 1 60%er in a Tiger I
Hmmmm. The latter seems better. However, the Germans had to deal with Allied Artillery and Tank Destroyers too. Which speaking of that according to something I found there was a guy who was one of the reasons the Pershing project was delayed. He advocated for using lightly armored fast tank destroyers to take out tanks rather than building a tank for taking out enemy tanks.
Now if only the Panther was as good in Blitz as it was in real life. But it’s going up against even post war tanks in the game so it kinda sucks. So much for quality.
Also why did Wargaming give the Hellcat the 90mm M3 gun? It actually used a 76(.2)mm gun and the Jackson got the 90mm.
Well, WWII air power is not actually that good at taking out tanks. Allied pilots routinely vastly overestimated the number of kills they managed to achieve. They'd come back claiming like ~50 tank kills or something, and the German stats would show like 2 mildly damaged tanks
@solid gate the super hellcat hellcat was expected a 90mm but the war ended and no longer needed a use
Only one was made and photographed
@solid gate Basically for the same reason that the Panther has a 7.5cm L/100 gun as an option. "Balance"
And the Pershing project was delayed because the original tank it was going to be kept getting changed in its requirements
Well that’s true too. Too many changes and arguments among leaders delayed the project.
And despite that L/100 gun I still hate the in game Panther.
As for allied tank destroyers, US TD doctrine was that TDs were a purely defensive weapon, often attached to things like infantry or artillery units. Basically, they were kept in the rear, so that when the Germans attacked, they would be able to rush into position to deal with them
Oh, I see. Anyway the Panther in game feels mistiered. Arguably the Panther II is as well.
Soviet TDs weren't really TDs, they were designed to destroy things like concrete bunkers, but when the opportunity presented itself, they would be used as impromptu anti-tank guns
Artillery of course is always a problem, but if your tanks keep moving, it's hard to dial in artillery shells on top of them
Ok then. Too bad there aren’t any tanks to plug the gap if you moved them down a tier in game. Panther I and II that is. Also what about T20 with 90mm? Does have even make any sense?
T20 with a 90mm? Ohh
Most likely still testing the M3 for the Pershing
In game it has but if you look at TE and stuff it says it used a 76mm like T23(E3).
@wise moth what about SU-85 and SU-100
T20 with 90mm gun is also fantasy.
The only way it's justified is that the T20 project led to the Pershing project, which did have a 90mm
SU-100 with 122mm should change the name to SU-122.
SU-122 is a howitzer tank
@frigid compass Stopgap solutions to the Tiger I until the T-34-85 became a thing
Yeah that stupid gun looks goofy and wouldn’t be effective in Blitz.
what about SU-100 considering it has a bigger gun
More or less the same idea
I’m sure I could find blueprints of the SU-100 but I doubt any show one with a 122mm. Probably was meant for another vehicle.
but SU-100 was made after T-34-85
@solid gate That's because it's designated SU-122 (with the 122mm derp, not sure if it's still in game)
The 122mm D-25t gun though on SU-100 is fantasy
I think SU-100’s 100mm needs buffing. It feels not much more accurate than the buffed 122mm in battle and it’s frustrating considering it has 280 alpha.
@frigid compass Call it bureaucratic delays
They did try to make T-43 tank but decided to scrap that and up gun the T-34/76 to make the T-34-85. To deal with Panthers and Tiger Is I guess?
Basically
Man I need to find time to read about it more. Just I have issues with reading nowadays. Find it boring and uh sometimes get interrupted by fam when trying to read too.
I wonder how I can draw a side view of my own tank designs. I usually end up doing a top down view plus side view combo thing I think.
Should I get the gun, engine, or turret first for my m46 patton?
I'll use free xp for most of it, but I would like to know which will help ease the grind the most.
@bright folio gun for sure
Thx
Participó
Don't sell em.Makes life easier @hollow mango
Welcome to the club. I want my MS1 back but life doesn’t work out.
@feral basin nice thanks for the picture.
Looks almost like the nightmare.
@hollow mango I wouldn’t sell any tank you can never tell when it might get a buff.
They both got a buff.
T28 Prot - is it the worst tank in blitz? I thought the SAu 40 was much better than this stinking pile
Edit: yes, sure is. 480hp from an Emil through the front turret while hull down and not even able to bring the gun to bear.
Anybody know if the WZ 5A will be tech tree or another prem :0
No one knows, but I’m willing to bet it’s going to be some Blitz Fair crate crap
Another crate tank...at T10? There's already 8 T10 prems/ collectables right now...
Just another reason to hate Blitzfair
Crates are stupid. People need to quit wasting their money on them. But if they didn’t exist Wargaming would probably jack the prices up more and not lower them as quickly.
The problem with crates is you get more junk out of them than good stuff.
I'm just getting bored and tired of all these T10 prems. I was really looking forward to the Badger and Vk.90.01. There's even spots in the tech tree open for them but as you can see they'er both crate tanks. Now, I'm really looking forward for the WZ 5A, but atlas it's going to be a crate tank. ~even tho it can branch off the T9 wz and then there will be a second option~
Yes WG is a company they need to make money somehow but still, I wish they didn't allow people with 38 battles ~I'm looking at that t22 driver I saw a few weeks ago~ to buy T10s as soon as they downloaded the game. It would be more fun to grind to a T10 then to just buy it.
Hey that's just my opinion so yeet
Kranvagn is good.. :)
Better that AMX 50 🅱
The Kranvagn have better armor and a bit lower... Pls vote to Kranvagn.. I was Potato.. See you next time!
which tank is the helsing shape based on?
hate and sorrow
The hull is mostly after o47
In my opinion
Helsing was a made up tank. I don’t think it was based on anything. And the O47 looks a little similar but I doubt it’s based any bit on that.
Hellcat with double gun
Should I get the Foch 155 or the Obj 263?
I have the tier 9 for both but idk which one to get first
The Foch before they nerf the auto loader. 😉
Foch is better right now but may get nerfed
263 is great though
Definitely get both
wg... what the f*ck is this tank
(sry i have it in cz)
Looks like a German super heavy
this tank have Average 500 dmg
@velvet leaf so does maus
i saw if i buy from him
but that armor, on side bad but front armor. Anythyng looks like to superpershing
@velvet leaf super Pershing only has add on armor the VK 90 doesn’t
They are also two completely different tanks
The hull armor is the same as the others tx super heavys
@solid gate his front is very strong but side you can pen with HE on any tanks
They should definitely add more tier 10 tech tree tanks to make it like the T-62A and Object 140. You got 2 options so you can go for one or both.
They should expand the Japanese tech tree
yeah japanese td line
They are, next year summer 2020
Too bad Japanese heavies aren’t gonna be a thing in Blitz. Unless in the far far future if the game is still around then and hasn’t died by then.
^
I don't think it's bad at all.
It's not 'too bad', they are just unbalanced and people who have common sense don't want them in the game at all
We have enough low skill ceiling tanks in Blitz already. There is no reason to add even more (Japanese heavies).
Japanese heavies would be super annoying and boring to play against and with
Add tanks like Emil line, or 430U line, that would be good
430U won’t totally kill the game
Maybe make meds great again🤷
Nah. Too many mediums. Need more light tanks.
And what low skill ceiling tanks? Even IS tanks need care when playing.
Anyway the main reason I wanted Japanese heavies was because the Japanese only have one line at the moment. They shouldn’t have removed the light tanks from Japanese tech tree. But I guess can settle for Japanese TDs.
add is-3m or is-3a or something as tier 8(not prem), obj 705 at tier 9, and obj 705a at tier 10.
How about no?
How about mabye?
Right, because this game needs more bland hull down Soviet heavies
Should add Pz VII as another tank the VK 45.02 B leads to alongside the VK 72.
@marble shuttle You like Huskies?
Ah. I like some dog types but others are ugly to me. As for cats slick hair black cats are my favorite.
#off-topic-discussion folks
I see. Right. Back to tanks.
The turret
I haven’t played it so I don’t know.
That’s a known weakspot
Honestly the turret of the VK 72 sucks so hard, any med can smack through it
They’re pretty accurate from the blueprints
E 100 was never completed either.
Any of yous winning tanks from containers?
I gave up armor inspector because cannot get all the features without paying money and I didn’t have any at the time.
blitzhangar works fine if you need tier 9 and 10 data
I’ve noticed a trend of the most common tier X drop, the badger
I got IS-6 which I already had and 1 or 2 other tanks I already had.
The gun depression and pen makes it unenjoyable for me(SU 122 44)
I wanted Badger, Helsing, and uh T-22 I think. There are a couple of others in the sets I don’t have.
Who are you to tell me what to spend my money on?
I only bought the 1 time offer sets. I don’t do beyond that as waste of money.
Well, I do agree that the containers smaller rewards other than the main prize sucks badly. They should either make the small prizes better
The limited ones. You get 1 purchase of them then they disappear. Got some gold and credits out of it so not bad. Plus boosters aren’t completely useless to me as still grinding lines.
I don’t agree with increasing the chance for the main prize though, it’s the one which reduces the population of them
Already heard about noobs getting tier X first container from a relatively cheap bundle
They won’t quit crates because some are stupid enough to buy them many times over and waste hundreds on them.
Crazy gamblers
It’s like gambling but one person had a counter argument saying it’s not true gambling. You do get something out of it but usually it’s low use stuff.
That’s their loss, there’s no guarantee
Oh lord who would’ve spent that much at once though? No appreciation for the value of money??
Crates just suck. They should give you more gold out of them or give you other tanks if you don’t get the main prize. Just something worth more than a few boosters.
They should have like a system where when you open enough containers, there’s a guaranteed prize
I honestly didn’t like the Ke Ni Otsu entitlement, it remained basically same except for pen
If your enemies are unable to focus
That’s worse than Chi-Nu Kai having “OP” credit earning. The Chi-Nu Kai itself probably isn’t that great a tank.
Chi Nu Kai is a nerfed Chi Nu
with a broken credit coefficient lmao
its the second highest coefficient in the game. That thing prints money
And Chi-Nu itself sucks. Slow, no armor, and slowish reload.
Id only have the Chi Nu Kai to show off in training rooms, not one I’ve seen in a while
I don’t often see Chi-Nu Kai often either.
I don’t play below tier 7
Chi-Nu needs buffing. Probably to speed and/or reload.
Chi-To
chinu kai is 5
so does tech tree chi-nu
So @marble shuttle , what class was it
both chi-nu and chi-nu-kai are tier5 meds
The entire japanese line needs buffing, the only good (and op one actually) is STB
chi-to is med too
I don’t think that exists whatever you’re talking about @marble shuttle
Type 61 supposedly had reload buff but it needs the cupola removed.
the only light in that line is the starter Ha-go
I still have Ke-Ni and Ke-Ho.
Im at an early stage in the Japanese line, I’d like to go for STB but I need a lot of free Xp, I refuse to play low tiers
I was gonna say that but that’s a tier 5
Shinobi is Chi-Nu Kai with a camo I heard.
Chi-To is actually a bit faster than Chi-Nu and has a slightly better gun but it still sucks tier for tier. Just the Japanese mediums have nothing going for them. Except maybe STB but I haven’t reached that.
@solid gate @marble shuttle
back in the early days of Blitz, there were no legendary camos, only the regulars, and a very few prems with fixed paintjob. Chi-Nu-Kai Shinobi was one of them.
Then the Legendary Camo update kicked in, making "Shinobi" a legendary camo, while also allowing the players to replace it with regular camos...
Lol remember when tanks with any camo allowed suddenly turned locked, like the SU 122s. Some players have it stuck on their old camo lol
I know. I was there when we didn’t have legendary camos.
Heck I think I was around when we didn’t have a camo tab at all. An appearance tab we didn’t have at all.
Camos were not there at the beginning?
correct.
Not the rare and common ones. Think only tanks like Shinobi had camos.
well, the common camos were the first, then nationally unique camos, then legendary camos came, eventually rare camos
Some rare camos look ridiculous on any tank and others look good only on certain tanks. Plus I don’t like that common ones and many rare ones don’t change the color of the track wheels.
There was shinobi and chi nu Kai
Iirc the shinobi was the first and chi nu Kai was different then they decided to make the shinobi a camo
problem with common and rare camos are:
- they are just flat textures stretched all over the regular tanks, unaffecting anything that is a separate mesh
- they mix with each tanks' individual "mask", therefore a specific camo looks pale on a german tank, while on a french tank this specific camo is bright and covers the main model 100%
- certain tanks have legendary camos, but in the rare category, because these are also just a stretched fexture
no, shinobi and kai are the same
The textures are also repeating.. which I dislike
Well that explains why some camos allow you to see splotches of the base color of the tank still. It looks odd.
What do you mean by iirc?
german tanks: around the edges the mask overlays the camo, while in general pales it out
french tanks: no mask at all, therefore no paling and camo overlaying
edit: mask is less noticable, while not blends with the camo
I see.
Is Wargaming still against all mods? Even camouflage ones and stuff like that?
no
camo and sound mods as far as i know is fine
i dont remember all the allowed mods
I didn’t even realise I was talking in #vehicles-discussion , no wonder why the conversation was so slow! I thought I was in #general-blitz-discussion hahah
another terrible case of the camos:
"spooky web" is literally a repeating decal with transparent background
(you could see the M49's original color under the camo)
This is just a partial covering camo
while "thunderbolt".....
just STUPIDLY made transparent
It reminds me of the white and grey checkered background of background-less images
Well I want more environment based camos. Like desert ones, mountain ones, forest ones, plains ones, snowy biome ones, and any others you can think of.
my personal favourite: the artist of the Tiger 1's leg camo did a TERRIBLE job
(keep in mind, this is the HD textrure on HD model)
Oh god
Huh.
im looking forward to the On The Edge camo
At least they tried. Wargaming’s people seem to just do basic overlay and call it a day without touching up clipping or whatever.
also Tiger 1:
if you dont notice, ||each side of the tracks are connecting to the hull though the front gear alone||
What was that beautiful one that can be bought for credits
Tiger 1 tracks is only connected on the drive wheel
Huh
Don’t really see what’s the problem
Wait what’s Pershing’s armor in game again?
A phenomenally crap amount
these wheels have no physical contact with the hull at all
Well in real life it was like 102mm on the hull right?
Are they meant to?
of course the are meant to...you cannot have a 20 wheeled tank to be suspended only on the frontmost pair...
Lol
otherwise it would drag itself on the ground 24/7
Yeah. It would. Because the Tiger is heavy.
Did you notice the T23E3 tracks are asymmetrical
@lost valve
"What was that beautiful one that can be bought for credits"
I'd say this
T23E3 has torsion bar system right?
waddaya mean by assymmetrical?
in what way?
Not mirrored of the other
?
@solid gate yes
Thanks. Is it better to have many smaller road wheels or fewer bigger ones?
I cannot explain this very well, check the T23E3’s tracks in game and compare to each side
i dont see any difference
Is it better to have many smaller road wheels or fewer bigger ones?
Look at the spacing
Each side of the T23E3 has a gap though the wheels, and they’re not parallel wheels lol
@solid gate Somewhere in the middle. If the wheels are too big, they’re too heavy and hard to do in-field maintenance on. If they’re too small and you need too many of them, you need more spare parts and have increased complexity, so logistical support for the vehicle is harder
oh lol now i see 😄
See, the gaps on each side are in different locations ahha
Betcha never noticed this
I just randomly remembered a guy talking about someone shooting through that gap and it made him a little annoyed
@dapper panther oh no, lol
What an oddity
returning for the camo and the tanks's mask, Panther m10 is the worst of all
just look at that how much of the mask overlaps the camo
What camo is that?
Why do people get bothered by such small things 😂
bottom left corner
It looks like it’s just been doused in dirt
Tbh I don't even notice them
@solid gate it was just a fun fact i pointed out
@solid gate maybe because WG has put some effort into the cosmetics, let's not just walk by without pinpointing their mistakes
Is this WG’s mess up model or this is a feature of the real life one too? Of the T23E3
Bruh
the two tanks that camos come out the best on are the T-54 ltwt and the IS-5
I really like that the Blue comes out on French tanks.
VK 72 also makes the camo as least transparent as possible
"Tbh the camos look worst on French tanks"
I disagree
Camos on French tanks just look so much more vibrant
@wise moth that's cuz as I already explained above, french tanks has the best tank masks
the mask not overlaying and blending with the camo
Well I gotta go guys. But I will have a question about tank wheel systems when I come back.
Man, the missile rack just makes it look so ugly. It looks so good without the missiles too.
Also, they need to add the 13 105 so they can #MakeBatChatA4Shell350AlphaMediun
Is the STA-Rin still for sale? If not, when was it?
It's a legendary camouflage for the sta it should be up for sale
afaik Rin is permanently obtainable
OMG nerf obj 140 5 BONCES with AMX 30B on WHITE ARMOR and I didn’t?t event tracked him! Wtf is this meta? PLZ CREATE A DECENT GAME. At least add a 1v1 or 3v3 mode coz your WR depends f your team and if they are morons you just lost
My games fine
3v3 exists
Fcm 50T is probably the only one that shows camo decently
^^^^^^^
@dreamy plinth 😆
@solid gate take a long break
@wise moth the missile rack is just ATGMs
So, grinding to the E-100. Is it worth it?
@violet stream slow and heavy. Yes it works.
Mini bunker with artillery for a main battery
E100 is quite meh in todays meta, and you need to understand things like turret angling and different ammo usage to do well in it, but it can work I guess
wish e 100 got a turret side buff
Yes
Maybe it should, and I advocate for that, but that would make Maus obsolete. See, the turret armour is one of it's only advantages over E100..
wha
bro the e100 turret side armor is 150mm, maus has 210mm, e 100 just needs a minor buff to its side armor of the turret
the buff wouldn't be significant enough for the e100 to powercreep the maus
If the turret side is to mean anything, it's gonna need 380 effective when angled perfectly, so that calibrated heavy HEAT just doesn't meme pen it everywhere without aiming. Now it gets 330mm
heat would punch through the turret frontal armor just fine though
Yeah, but not when angled like it should be
When playing E100, the only things you are bouncing are AP if you have a proper position and medium tank HEAT, everything else goes through the turret ez, without even aiming
yeah and you only have two choices, to either wiggle and hope heat hits the mantlet or angle ridiculously
What do I research on the ISU-152 bone stock with 75% crew
Tracks
Why is it completely stock? Did you not research the 122mm guns on the SU-152?
122mm guns should never ever ever be used in ISU. The 275mm HEAT with stock 152mm is enough
Now, it's true that you should have them to speed up the grind for BL10, as they are before it, but you should never use them
What is the point of buffing the sides of e100 turret?
To make it stronger
Not like they can be penned anyways unless you over angle the turret
The point is to make E100 not be meme penned by HEAT heavies at T10 without even aiming when angled perfectly
Just buff the turret cheeks then...
The point is to make it a bit more competetive, but with an added skill layer of angling the turret properly. I think side buff would be better bcause of this
Skill is what most people don't have, most people never even angle the turret at all in e100 and they get destroyed
Buffing the turret sides will mean nothing for most players
If the turret cheeks were to be buffed, they'd at least get some bounces as they never even angle the turret and wouldn't be completely useless
Yeah, that is the point. Reward good players
Good players already know how to play it well
But not even the best can prevent heavy HEAT without even aiming even when angling perfectly
Well the turret cheeks buff would do the same thing
Only even more
You wouldn't get noobs in e100 who die in 1st minute and screw up the game for everyone
Still would, the only difference would be perhaps TD AP wouldn't pen it as often, I don't think that would change anything for the noobs.
And turret side buff is more subtle, less people will be screaming about how the wrong tank is buffed and it will do the job
Hey guys when are the doing an update for the track suspension because now the tracks just don’t move they are just rolling
Wasn’t it always like that?
XD
Why does E100 have to grind 64k for its gun and FV4202 has to grind 100k? Most tier X don’t have any grind and it’s not really fair...
What?
That's 100...
Its 100. Bc has to grind 65k i believe
Lmao. Yeah, the FV4202 is flat 100
FV4202 isn’t 100k for the HESH gun. It’s just 100 XP. As for E100 Wargaming did that because whatever. E100 was planned to use either the Maus gun or the 15cm in real life. There is one other tank you have to grind for the gun on. Bat Chat.
Is AMX 13 105 another tier 10 French light?
yeah in PC. won’t come to Blitz
Good
Pfft. I’d like for it to.
Many more tanks to add to Blitz but Wargaming won’t add some because excuses. Can kinda understand the Japanese heavy reasoning but most of the others are just excuses. Though Object 279 might not be a good idea either.
there’s already 350+ tanks in Blitz
Nah they will. It’s just they gonna come all in crates
Yet theres still not enough Sherman variants
Lycan VS 183HE, the rumours are true, internal modules are invincible/nonexistent
@dapper panther They’re not just rumors, there’s literally a block of 1000mm thick armor on the inside protecting them
Im pretty sure that it's only because the modules have more hp than the tank does but ok
@dapper panther @frank berry
O
even if that were the case, damaging any module by any amount, it should get yellow indication
which never happens for Lycan
@dapper panther first off, you need to do >50% of the modules hitpoints in damage first to turn it yellow, and second, 1000mm is going to soak any HE splash
i see....still, that 1000mm internal layer sound dumb
It sounds dumb, but that’s how it really works 🤷♂️
@plain hollow it’s armor inspector
Also online at wotinspector.com
@plain hollow didn't we already talk about that profile pic?
CoolerGamer1510#7423 has been warned.
Rn I’m having trouble with M6, I need another 45k research and I hate it and don’t know if T29 is worth it, 2 things 1: Is T29 a different playstyle? 2: should I free XP to T29?
T29 is a very different playstyle, and generally it isnt worth researching a new tank with free xp
With the T29 you want to go hull down everywhere possible, and also try and use your depression
Any advice for the M6?
I try to play it as a side scraper but they always pen anyway
(I am a Churchill fan so idk if there is a difference in armor or angle)
M6's entire lower part of the hull is 40mm, so you can't sidescrape
So in other words it has bad front and can’t side scrape, so useless in flat maps
So pure opposite of churchill
🤔 explains why I was having trouble, I thought it’s armor could side scrape
The IS-5 can reverse sidescrape so well
WZ-112-2 can do both sidescrape and reverse sidescrape
it's amazing, how many shells you bounce...
I just had another game, only 1600 dealt but I blocked 4200 in a T8/9 game
as it has a flat simple plate with the same effective thickness as IS-5's pike nose
Is M6 just a weak hull down tank?
M6 is not weak hulldown tbh. It's super strong rn in the meta
ARL-44 is stronger
I can’t seem to do crap with it
well, meta no. But it's armor is really strong right now
And yes i am aware that arl is stronger...still...
My Churchill VII always beat M6
CoolerGamer1510#7423 was banned
.-.
If anything needs nerfing, it's clear it's the standard b
Heh. My first game in T29 this time around I couldn’t hull down it right as another heavy pushed in and I went in to help. But we won. Enemy didn’t push as hard as they should have and died.
But I’m gonna leave that tank for now and go focus on ones that are closer to having the XP to unlock the next tank in line. Like AT 7, P43 ter, T71, and then IS-2. Then I’ll come back to T29 and T25/2.
I see.
How Good Is P44 Pantera ?
insanely
Tank is broken. It's an autoloader that can also trade hits
Whole line is like that tier 8+
and people say this tank is bad or something
meanwhile i gotta put more battles into my Drac and T57 lol
Lol T-34-2 is Actually good but the Module and Crew is Easy to Damaged or injured
run Defense System and Protective Kit
personally, i only run Defense because it doesn’t seem to be an issue for me so far
What is better now? 121 or WZ-113?
both are nuts good right now, and can't be compared seeing as they have totally different roles. However, I would say the WZ-121 is stronger in it's role than the WZ-113 is in it's
Just my opinion though
Thanks
yeah, probably the 121
Should I grind for the Grill or Jp E100
both @sinful current
@solid gate Because they gave it the fastest forwards speed of any T8-10 heavy, if I recall correctly (Discluding premiums and the AMXes)
Bruh that's like banned on this discord
@solid gate
arievac#7153 was banned
Thanks
Lul
no prob. Kinda figured you don't particularly like that around here...
Acc selling in general is just as bad as spending money on a very expensive tank
Except the seller is profiting, not wargaming
I searched for the 2 accs, but could not find them on the blitz page
Guess it was a troll
One of them is on EU. I didn't catch none on the other. But if it's same stats, it's bad
6 tier 10s with a peak of 1300 wn8 on them
Now I know where the majority of my teammates come from haha
I wonder if the game accounts get banned as well, or only dicord
I'd love wg being more strict when it comes to bots
But back to topic, what should I buy? Löwe or T34? I mainly want a good credit maker. Löwe has higher credit coefficient, T34 is doing statistically better.
What tanks do you find success in?
I do fine in most kinds, both low dmg high dpm and high dmg low dpm
Both tanks have good gun dep
Is your blitzstars same as your discord name?
Yep
I can tell you what a good tank is for you if I can see what tanks you've succeeded in.
Give me a min or two to check it out
BTW wait till black friday to buy, good sales
Yeah, I will wait for the discounts, should be coming in a few days
If the M 41 90 Kpfpz (Cruel Twist) comes out, you will likely love it
Wonder if the T92E1 will be researched through either the Engine or Tracks
It's a mix between Walker Bulldog and RU-251
I do enjoy lights, not sure about the credit coeff on it
T8 German Light. Built like a bulldog, speed of a light, and gun of the RU - laser beams with insane pen and HEP. It's also a great cred grinder yes
It is 170%, but the ammo is really cheap, because your AP penetrates everything, and your HE actually is insanely strong, and repair costs are low. With premium and credit boosters, I easily get 100k a win
And your HEAT...well...
Only load 2-5 of that. You won't need it almost ever
275mm of HEAT pen, 191 on AP and 112 on HE
On blitzstars it has the second lowest dmg per game average of all t8 prems
You like fast DPM tanks, right?
Comet, M41 Walker Bulldog, etc.
I like lights a lot in general yeah
I just wonder if Löwe or T34 is a mre safe choice because of enough pen to pen everything frontally
191pen will struggle against heavies frontally
If you are worried about penning stuff...
Load HEAT
It's 275mm with calibrated shells
Also, it's a light. If you play lights like I think you do, you will never see the front of a heavy tank. Lol.
Hopefully not :p
If you NEED one of those two slow, beefy heavies, the Lowe is higher skill cap than the T34, but looking at your stats you can probably handle it
https://blitzhangar.com/en/tank/lekpz-m-41-90-mm
This will let you look at all it's numbers
It plays exactly like an M41 Bulldog, which seems to be your favoured tank right now, with almost 5k wn8
I play bulldog with the autoloader tho :p with all the goldammo flying around it could be to choose something not relying on armor
Could be good to*
^
Yep, you played the bulldog EXACTLY like me. Let me guess:
Look at enemy team. Decide: What way are reds going? Will they split, will they stay together? Go the one way they will not go, get into the red base, and just start blasting
Am I right?
I love my iekpz
Or, if they look like they're splitting up, play at safe. Go solo, but stay at a range. Use stellar spotting range and camouflage to outspot enemies, and take shots where you can.
What is your opinion about SU-122-44?
I expect there won't be a better discount on it than the current one. I loved it in WoT, but here it hasnt got high dpm, just average t7 td one.
It's super good, honestly. It's like a slightly less broken WZ-120-1G FT
Very mobile, super trolly frontal armor, and a wonderful gun, to be more descriptive
Yeah, always trying to find an opening to flank some reds, pump out the 480dmg and get out
Exactly. Now imagine doing that, but instead of firing 3 shells for 480 in six seconds, fire one shell with crazy aimtime for 300+ into almost anything, because your HE is insanely good
And there you get the Cruel Twist
I wish the intraclip reload was 1,5 sec like on Strv 74A2 tho. Funny how a t6 med has a much better gun than a t7 light
yeah, it is a bit stronger, but at the same time the bulldog has really crazy mobility
also... Premium tank things, so...
Other tanks that you would probably like would be the Amx 30 1er/30B, the AMX CDC, T-55A (Which hasn't been sold for a while so may come out in black friday)
But going further would go into russian meds or russian knockoff meds with no gun depression
I got the IS-5, but the gun handling is terrible on it, armor is not reliable against t8s either. T34 AND löwe both seem to do much better
I just got my IS-5, and am really enjoying it. Reverse sidescrape on it absolutely slays. And if you can deal with russian gun things, then you can deal with that tank
Amxes were on sale now, but too expensively
yeah, I know.
I MAY have gotten the 30 1er, and it MAY be the tank I am best in, but...
T55a is also like 15k-20k gold
I have about 7k gold to spend nowon a good prem
Hoping that if Black friday comes i could still get SU-122-44 and a t8
When is-5 gets a buff?
why does it need one
other than the gun handling being meh why does it need a buff
That's russian gun things though
It's a premium for 1500. They can't make it too strong
I would suggest continue saving gold until black friday, or buy a smaller pack
well i never tried the IS-5 gun but the gun handling seems similar to WZ-112-2 gun handling but a little tiny bit worse so i dont think it would be that bad
Yeah, I doubt they would ever buff it. People would not buy the overpriced other prems then. At least not as many.
K-91 was worth all of the gold i spent on it
Dont have it, but it seems great on paper
it's insane now. They overcooked it.
Well, considering how much its been winning since those buffs...
That, and 40 alpha on a 3-shell autoloader is actually a 120 alpha buff, technically speaking
Note the common trend with autoloaders:
Light armor, decent mobility
Add the bit alpha, give it armor AND mobility. Then look at it
Nerf tiger
If it is at all, how much of a step up from the Standard B is the Progetto?
K-91 got what it deserves tbh.
Are they going to add CVR-T? The British need a high tier light tank.
What strong tank in Russia?
Lada
I noticed the bagelpanzer was a light German tank that can be implemented, starting from the SPIC, just an idea.
We need Char 2C in this game
@solid gate yeah the Dev shoul nerf the Lower Glacis on Tiger II
@solid gate begleitpanzer is basically an autocannon tank unless they also implement the atgm on it
autocannons at tier 10 isnt going to do jack against a heavy unless you get to the sides
Any Tips For P.43 Ter ?
I still feel somewhat sluggish when Turning
Any tips for amx elc bis? I still couldn't survive
Hey @everyone
I have a question. A.t.m. I own 5 tier 10 vehicles (T-22 medium, AMX 30 B, Maus, E 100 and FV215b 183), and I'm looking to add one more to my collection. On the list of possible vehicles are: FV215b, IS-4, IS-7, E 50 M, VK72.01K, M48 patton, T110E5 and T110E4. Which of these do you guys reccomend?
I really like maus, but currently T-22 and AMX 30B are lovable to
@deep ivy 215b, is4, e50m and e5
^^^^^^
Is this enough proof to show that the pershing needs a buff or do I have to scare you with its stats of pen and reload
give it the best viewrange amongst the other meds, all that is needed
If the pershing gets a buff, what with the fcm which is already worse than it
Pershing is gucci, the turret is very respectable for a med
@solid gate the FCM 50 t is way better than a pershing. Fcm has great armor and a gun that punches through everything. No need to buff it
Pershing and T26E5 both need a buff though. Im with @vague adder on that flank
LMAO great armor? its literally paper except half bouncy turret
Pershing really doesn't need a buff. There Super Pershing could use some gun handling love but that's really all it needs.
@short flame why then it bounces T49 missiles and ISU152 shells?
There is a reason it is classified as a heavy on the full game
@deep ivy because t49 has no missiles and if isu152 bounces over fcm is because of lucky autobounce angles, so the enemy is a stupid noob
Diablo really, it needs "gun handling" or something. No it needs better penetration better aiming time and then its fine. Or even dispersion buff over aiming time would be better. Have you played the tank yourself?? Its so bad
Cant even accurately shoot an Ru 251 at 200 meters if hes hard cover peaking
@vague adder Better gun handling does translate into better aiming time.. Also, pershing has excellent turret for a med and good APCR, the tank definitely doesn't need a buff
Seriously the turret isnt so good the type 59 and T 54 Lw have good turrets this one hasnt
Its easy to pen
@narrow shadow
Try hitting that when the Pershing moving. It's obviously not impervious, but most shells will hit the mantlet unless you play super close range
Well just to show you that the pershing is just bad anyway
Lmao, try to perfectly face an enemy's gun barrel while moving, otherwise 2 degrees are enough to paper out the turret
do you actually want the t26e5 buffed? it is such an amazing tank if used correctly..
Pershing is fine
Super Pershing isn't.
The only problem the Pershing has is that players don't know how to play it. It is a strong medium if played correctly.
Diablo can you come up with some valid points for once instead of just saying "its fine" the tank is bad really bad it has a 46 average winrate with, 960 damage average
It does a good job of ridge fighting and can hull down well. It is flexible and mobile enough to get what needs to be done. It has a poor win rate because players don't know how to play it. If you play it like a Soviet heavy you are going to lose.
I play it like its suppost to be played but the pen is so bad you cant even pen an IS 3
Hell it was one of the first lines I failed my way up and I've managed to keep a 56% wr.
The T20 is much better anyway because the pen is atleast average for a tier 7
If memory serves the APCR pen of the Pershing is best in class
180 pen..
The tank really doesn't need a buff. Players need to learn how to play it
268 pen on apcr
That is more than enough to get the job done
I tried and did I play it quite good tbh but still the damage and pen just lack and also the normal rounds should be more not the apcr that only does 160
If you can't make 268 pen work in a tier VIII medium you shouldn't be playing a tier VIII medium ¯_(ツ)_/¯
160 damage 6.5 reload at tier VIII
Don't get me wrong I'd love if they buffed it. But I don't think it's necessary at all.
Its just bad jusy compare it to the other meds
Alpha is 190 on apcr. If you are going to make an argument please bring real numbers to the party.
Tanks should not have to rely on goldammo and expensive consumables to be decent. Just give Super Peeshing's pen to Pershing. It is supposed to be the same tank with added armor plates.
I am having a pretty bad time with Chrioteer and it seems I would have to spend 40-50k credits a battle on food, consumables and goldammo to make up for all the frustrating downsides
@vague adder you’re saying you are playing it correctly but i fail to believe so if u r saying the tank is bad, it has good mobility and good prammo pen, u wont be able to pen places where other meds also aren’t really able to pen, in that case the 268 mm of pen on APCR is great, makes most heavies gray. Turret is a very hard pen if u keep moving constantly on the ridges
Bingo. This guy gets it
Play the Pershing right and it's one hell of a medium.
I mean it's one of the worse meds, because it's not too versatile I think to be fair, but definitely not the worst and very playable. The cherry on top is that he said T20 is good. Dude, T20 is tier for tier far far worse than Pershing.. it's pretty much the tank without any kind od armour, not even very good turret like Pershing, and better pen tier for tier in exchange..
@narrow shadow I actually quite like the T20
Wait since when was the persh bad? I love that thing it's a super reliable ridge liner and occasional flanker
Of the med t8s I have played the only one I'd say even needed a buff would be the t-44-100 (although I have few battles in it so I cant really judge it too harshly) and maybe the cent its good but I feel something Is slightly lacking
T44-100 should get a gun depression buff So it's the same as T44. It'll still be slower, but with side skirts to prevent HE from the side
That would be wonderful
@solid gate in hull down yes
@solid gate it depends on your playing style. You can use ELC as a mobile TD or a pesky light tank that is always moving.
ELC's 160dmg in tier5 is like 640dmg in tier8
Pls dont just camp in elc
Its a light tank use it as one. Only thing it misses is fully rotational turret
And it has like godike mobility so that doesnt really matter
Well I can't play the running around like crazy well. Not to mention ELC turning radius is quite large. So I use it as a spotter and a mobile TD. Shoot sideways on the move. And I never camp.
@dapper panther you drunk mate? A t5 heavy has about 680hp. You need 4.25x160dmg for that. 4,25x640 is 2720. Which t8 heavy has 2.7k hp? Most t10s dont have that much lol. Your comparison is bs. No, 160dmg at t5 is not like 640dmg at t8. If ELC did about 290dmg instead of 160, then it would be like 640 at t8.
Fond memories of T20 but none of Pershing. Anyway last night someone was suggesting we shouldn’t add more tanks. But they are already doing that still. Chimera is coming along with Progetto 46 and Caernarvon Action X. Then there is the Japanese TDs. I don’t mind more tanks to come. More tanks for people to grind. Especially the older players who are running out of new tanks to play. Of course those guys will want something more unique but any tank is fine by me. Well except Japanese heavies I can forget about and Object 279.
There’s also the Sheridan and the WZ 111 5A
Mhmm
And VK90.01
Yeah. Loads more tanks to come.
Judging by the current stats, the Progetto 46 seems to be a bit OP...
It have good DPM, good gun handling, good speed...
It’s only flaw is probably its armor.
Judging by current stats, all the autoreloaders other than the sherman are a bit OP
Hi guys I just got my vk4502B. I found the previous one (A) decent, got a 55% WR. What should I expect with this one??
An E75 but worse in everything. It's quite trash
@narrow shadow ewww
You would expect it to be good sidescraper right?
Well, HEAT will meme pen u even at AP autobounce angle, so yeah..
@narrow shadow I will check game plays 😊
Prammo usually ruins any sort of maneuvers.
I get using it for when you need to guarantee pen but those who spam prammo need to be shot up and killed. They are so annoying. No matter what vehicle you are driving then just keep penning you even though they do lower rolls.
Anyway I loved VK 45.02 A. Everyone was against me saying Tiger II was better but I felt differently. Even stock the VK was getting bounces I didn’t expect while Tiger II was just how Bushka said it was. Before the armor buff Tiger II was more or less hit points only for armor. It could try to hide that lower plate and side scrape but it was so touchy. If you didn’t do it just right you got penned. VK though I wasn’t even afraid to face an IS-6 at close range in. Granted that IS-6 may have been using the old gun but couldn’t be sure. But that was last time I played the tank. We’ll see how it holds up now.
nah 4502a is so easy to pen, but 4502b is a monster
I haven’t played B and A isn’t that easy to pen if he knows what he is doing. Anyway no map is good for AT 7 and AT 8. They are such jokes. Assault guns my foot. Can’t see anything that is above or below them.
The at7 is only useful if you have a roommate that's in a vc with you as a personal guard
It's only ok in everything else
When will wg finally fix T-49 ammos? 4800credits for HE is bs.
Most of the times it does 200-350dmg... The only rare occasion it works is if you find a paper td or a peper butt on a tank. HEAT just diesappears in the tracks of any enemy shot 90deg in the side.
Ammo choices should be similar to how it is in WoT.
HE, premium HE with higher dmg, HEAT
Well I’m done with AT 7. Leaving it on the stupid 47% or whatever slightly below 50% it has. Moving on to Comet then Chinese tier 7s then back to P43 ter.
Finally got to 50% WR in the T28 Proto. What a dreadful tank. Sold, never to be played again 😥 Now I can move on to something more fun in tier IX.
So what's the current flavor of the month OP tank
P44 panthera
WZ-120-1-FT. Same as every month.
I heard the tiger 2 buff was a bit overboard
It is
I haven't seen enough in game to really reach an opinion myself but yeah those are some beefy stats
Its just the front armor got rly thicc
Yeah I'm aware
Tiger 2 best tier 8 med
People seem to say lower plate nerf is a good idea and I'd be inclined to agree given lower plates take skill to hide when possible and it's a great thing when skill can cover for the weaknesses of a tank
I really can't say much given I've never bothered grinding that line to tier 8 though lol
So it is OP?
T49 HE needs to be un-premium-ized but WG won't do it because they want the dolla
people are already complaining that pantera is op. I mean look at those stats 😂
We could maybe compare it to a tank that isn't being played by under 100 players
Like I get they're both auto reloaders but still
The point is to show how op the progetto is, not pantera...
I doubt WG's gonna be touching it somehow sadly
Eh another episode of powercreep, heck yes
I was a bit confused on what you were trying to imply there and was thinking you were using that image to mock those complaining about the Pantera
Which I would totally agree with
I wish we wouldn't get so many premiums that are just better
I mean in WoT it's the same thing, progetto just outclasses the pantera
Yep
Because that's how you make more money
I mean in WoT there's also the IS-3A, aka defender but better
Is3a is just stupid
The idea that it gains dpm as you empty is super dumb
Reverse autoreloader on Is3... What can go wrong
Thankfully at least we were spared from that abomination
Same as progetto 65 and standard b in blitz tbh, there ain't much skill if you just shoot whenever you are loaded
for now 😂
Yeah it's a bit whack
I finally started playing blitz again after like a year off and just jumped into tier 7-8 to try and get back into practice before stepping up again and I've been on 65% so I guess I haven't gotten completely awful lol
Well most of the playerbase has gotten completely awful
Fair enough enemies seem a lot worse somehow
Was alone on a corner in the IS-6 against 5 enemies and only the T49 thinks maybe pushing is a good idea lol
Someone said that Japanese tds are coming out soon. Is that true?
affirmative
Cool
Japanese tank destroyers will come soon to World of Tanks Blitz. Starting summer of 2020, you will be able to drive a cross between the Object 263 and JgPz E...
^^^
t49 with premium HE is good otherwise we would see to many of em
t49 are light but they still eat literally 90% of my hp, then ram into me and i die miserably...
I think T49 has the worst camo rating among light tanks because it gets that big gun. Surely it’s not that much bigger than M41 if at all. It’s just got such a low camo rating for a light tank. That’s what I don’t like about it even without playing it.
Also “soon” means middle of next year. So not really soon but more like soonish.
yea more like ''we dont really know if they even will release it'' cuz sometimes wargaming changes their plans
What are we discussing here Emma?
Churchill mk VI or churchill VII (be leaderboard)
how is the church mk vi?
WZ111 any good?
decent
Is t57 heavy still good?
Can I have 19? My admin name is stary666 Serb Asia
19 what
T95E2 any good?
no
If used right then yes however some people struggle
Tell, what are the downsides to a Lycan?
incredibly bad gun accuracy, weak lower plate are what stand out to me
for feeling, it's kinda identical to IS-2's gun, both for alpha, both for unreliability, both for reload
How's cromwell B? Should I buy it, or wait for some discount for type62? Want to have a fun, fast tank
Cromwell B is one of the best Tier 6’s
Type 62, if sold again, will likely be priced much higher
Which of those tier 8 tanks in the store is the best buy?
I seriously don't know
I can't find any info on the internet etc.
Lowë or M6 EXP, Lowë is still a pain to fight against and EXP has a very powerful front plating, like the Tiger II, and very good gun, from what I have experienced durings fights against it, it needs to be Nerfed.
T54 mod 1 @quiet forge
thank you @eager pine
@quiet forge Mod 1 is the best out of the bunch, but that doesn't mean it's a good buy. It can only fight same or lower tier medium tanks in a brawl, otherwise it's very slow for a med and has tragic gun with the crazy low DPM.. Tbh none of the current deals are rly worth it
Will there come out any other tanks in the black friday events?
These tanks cover the entire span of the black friday event/deal until 2 december....so....who knows if other tanks will be sold
Bc I really want that m4 of the black friday event
Hey guys, is the t-34 2 need a buff or no
Will there come out any other tanks in the black friday events?
Yes, on 29th
@subtle mason do you know which?
No
u think I can purchase the fl10 after the event ends with gold
Don't think so actually
well in other events once the thing ends u get a day to purchase the stuff ur missing with gold. are you sure it won't work?
we will see
I'll ask a wg staff then first ig
Why should there be additional tanks on offer on 29th?
How is IS2 (1945) and T28 HTC? Which is more worth the gold?
HTC worths, IS2 doesnt
IS-2 45 is pretty close to IS with the 122, slightly better Hull IMO, HTC isn't that great
So tier 8, if I already have Löwe and mod 1 which one ti choose. And thank you for all the response
HTC's frontal armor is kinda OP on mid-to-long range
IS2 however, feels paper on any distance
HTC has numerous weakspots that stretch to each side, the turret, and both the mini-MG turrets, it's also an assault Vehicle and doesn't perform well at long range
If IS2 same as IS then it's a slow medium, right?
IS-2 45 actually plays like a heavy Because the hull armor is better
Oh, okay. So sidescraping?