#vehicles-discussion
1 messages ¡ Page 51 of 1
t67 was given for free some time ago if i remember right
I wanted that so bad
I consistently get 2k dm in a leo
any suggestions on how to play as AT25 (Tier 7 American TD, next to Jackson)? Feels difficult especially the gun's not rotatable
Anyone?
just try to abuse your gun depression and frontal armor
it's kinda an all rounder as far as TDs go
yeah the T25 AT is pretty much an American jadgpanther
Any ideas how to play the WZ-131 (Tier 7 one). I've just fully upgraded it and I'm rocking a 30-something % winrate in it. Just can't find anything good it does and constantly facing tier 8s doesn't help at all.
Should I save my gold up for something like a tier 10 prem or buy this
How about wait....
Blitz birthday is around the corner...
ughh wtf
It's so hard trying to adjust with unrotatable turrets, I can't just find out how I position myself
I got allies as cover but like, I don't have side shooting as options
Hills? I can't even point the gun down.
You have 10 degrees of gun depression...
Bro rip players who bought before sale
still wouldn't be enough to snipe even to the less steep hills, and I think T25 AT only have 5 degrees
It has 10, which is considered very good. Only a handful of tanks at higher tiers have more that
Or so what I remember, but still. either my crosshair just go all the way up when shooting at hills or I have troubles adjusting from jackson to this tank
It sounds like you haven't played turreted TDs before. Have you maxed the tank out?
Stick it out until you get the top gun. It might be inflexible (by your standards, anyway), but by then it will make up for that with raw firepower.
I don't really mind using it, but feels like I've been pushed back to training camp again with the turret lol
I played turretless tanks before turreted ones (my first tier 4 was Hetzer), so it was like the opposite reaction for me
Every trick I used with rotatables isn't useable to it now
oh.. đ
Really, I just wanna know the tricks again
It's honestly not that hard to find spots where you can shoot the enemy while facing them directly. If you can't, the only solution is to camp until the numbers drop and you can just yolo in
If you want, you can pull up an image of a map from https://map.wotinspector.com/en/?platform=blitz and I can show you some good spots
Interactive world of tanks maps. Upload your replays and check details for every shot. Draw your strategies and share with friends.
don't think t67 was ever given away after update 5.5
Save
One of my best games. Period. Is there anything I could still do here to improve my gameplay?
finally found my effort, when T28 was named the "free box of damage" cuz it had no armor whatsoever
Damn, 5k
Nostalgia photo.
Ok why is it so easy to get a mastery in the t28
I just had an average 2.7k game and got a mastery???
cuz the tank is bad and will forever be, even tho they pretty much buffed the armor and gave it good stuff
the tier 8 T28 tank destroyer is kinda a frontal wall only to light and medium tanks with a good gun but easily flanked and super slow
^^ back then, frontal wall was meant as a joke, since everyone could just use normal ammo and it would butter through the cheeks near the gun
113 or vz 55 for comp
279
What the hell is this abomination?
The tank?
looks like a pershing, but the turret is too fat
@misty wing
Most the italiens are fake, but standard isn't lol.
That's why I singled it out, they had to put a German (or mostly german) tank into the tree because the Italians didn't have enough lol
Looks a bit like chaffee
but thats a pershing hull
Looks like an M47 Patton with the M46/Pershing Mantlet.
It literally is German itâs the B prototype of the leopard why wg made it Italian is a mystery
but the turret sides makes it look like they ate too much burgers
Want me to list every fake french tank?
I can bet Lorraine 50T is on there
I feel like French tanks are usually better looking the more real/in production they are
Well yeah, because french army has strict requirments
âZe enemy must think zat le tank est very beautiful , oui oui?â
Yes
Oh no
How long is this gonna be
ARL 44 with the stock turret
If we go by that logic, then most tanks are fake
TD- magically they are all real. Albeit tier 7-10 are actually the exact same tank. The Sau40, arl v36, and AMX-50 foch were all built. All tanks have an incorrect configuration except argueably foch
heavy- bdr is fake, AMX-50 100 and AMX-50 120 have the wrong turrets, AMX m4 54 is an incorrect interprĂŠtation (fake) tcb was only to be mounted on lowered hull, however it's completely plausible and likely that the AMX-50 (100) would be used as a test bed for the tcb turret. ARL stock turret is from FCM super heavy.
Mediums: AMX-40, bourrasque, and char futur 4 are fake. Lorraine & AMX-30 1er are incorrectly represented
Lights: AMX-13 57 and batchat 25t ap is fake, Batchat is missing it's 90mm gun, elc and 12t are missing their historique top guns, and AMX-13 90 is missing it's heat.
FCM 50T is real? And the AMX 65T?
BDR ainât fake. It was part of the G1 program.
AMX-40 was a real project pre-war.
Char Futur were blueprints that eventually lead to the Leclerc.
AMX-13-75 is the early version of the tank prior to the usage of the 90mm F3.
BC-25t AP was designed by FAMH, so itâs only named improperly.
He means the duck amx 40 surely
Oh I read post war mb
Fixed, I meant 57.
No, that was a real design too.
Also, here are some blueprints of the duck.
G1B hull blueprint
The supposed documents relating to the 57 are Ă single, vague,, undated, sketch which is regarded as fake.
Char futur is fake to my knowledge.
Char Futur
These supposed blueprints are very questionable to me, as they seem cropped and incomplete
Source?
Why was the AMX 50 chosen over the Somua and Lorraine projects
Damn is this being good to math will take you?? These drawings?
All of these are supposed to be in French archives
it wasn't, none of them were choses due mostly to price and the fact France recieved thousands of free M47s.
The lack of complete pages hurts the reliability a lot
Theyâre likely cropped for the purpose of focusing on certain things
If ever su100y offer pops up on store is it worth it? Same as tog II?
I want a Somua with a larger turret now đ
If you could post a full page, including numbers, names, and dates, that would be much better
I can try
if its gonna be your first ever premium tank, yes
also derp go bonk
maus sized td
So su100y not tog II?
both of them are gimmicky and fun
Hereâs your duck
My problem with "duck" is that it wasn't considered by french military.
I mean it's feasible. you should see tank companies somua, it's hideous. Not to mention this abomination.
What was the history of ARL V39
French tank destroyer/assualt tank, moustache man invades development stopped, used as basis for ARL-44 in sekret.
Hereâs a better quality image of the blueprint
I need to choose 1 sadly
It was, along with the SAu 40, designed to be an assault gun
AMX 50 120 hull, Lorraine turret, and the 90mm DCA 45. Itâs like AI was told to make up a generic French postwar tank
Actually that's the 120mm gun...
I do kinda hate how WG makes assault tanks into TDs
Why? Many were used as such IRL.
This image makes me want to puke 𤢠đ¤Ž
O wait you right. It just looks so skinny I got confused lol
TDs and assault tanks have different roles. TDs are a defensive weapon, assault tanks are more so like heavy tanks
Well they are tds what u mean? And if ur saying they should be heavy then its not gonna work imagine fighting a heavium or any tank has turret yea.. no thanks nightmare.
Foch was to fulfill the exact same rĂ´le as AMX-50 120. They aren't really truely separate tanks with unique roles.
StuG III, FerdinandâŚ
Those assault tds shoud be better support front line heavy on second line
Early heavy tanks and assault tanks served the same purpose, while TDs were by doctrine a defensive weapon
Many assault guns were used as TDs and vice versa. That was my point.
I wish the AMC CDC went into production
Same it was enough to repel me from tank company, along with their fake, garbage AMX-50 surbaissĂŠ.
Early StuGs weâre assault tanks, late StuGs weâre TDs
@safe cedar what about the Canon d'Assaut 105
True, Hellcat was primarily used as an Assualt gun lol.
Yea but the game is like.. hmm yea remember theres heaviums in this game. Those are your nightmare if your turretless assault td is designated as a heavy tank. Also most of them are sluggish easy to poke weakzpots
The in game tank system is pretty messed up
Literally AMX-30 without Ă turret.
Was it historical though? I can't find anything
Yes like Lorraine cda.
Sorry its for the better. Tbh wg did a great job because playing a heavy turretless tank, while enemy has fully turret heavies are defeat foreshadow.
Well, the intended role of the tank is indicated by the name.
StuG just means âassault gunâ
Jagdpanzer is âarmor hunterâ, or TD
Then what british tds are?? Are they tds too? Or heavies?
assault tanks
Well their were also more "Assualtish" version of the Stug like Stiug 33 and Stug.
What is that a different tank class?
The Canon dâassaut 105 was built or just a blueprint?
The StuG was named as such because it was made quite early in the war and was actually effective in the assault role. As the war progressed, anti-tank guns became better and more prevalent and so the StuG was used for its mobility as a tank destroyer
nope, just another term to describe it
its like a turretless heavy - its just a td
Blueprint
Blueprint
Probably made up
Tbh i want turtle mk1.
No, itâs real.
turtle mk 1 isn't too great
also the AMX-50, Lorraine 40t, Batchat and AMX-50 120 have their autoloaders modeled incorrectly, yet for some reason souma's isnt.
I as well couldnât find any sort of information on the tank. But it does make sense that they would consider building a tank destroyer on the chassis of the AMX-30. Either for simplifying production in order to produce more tanks for their own military or also for export purposes.
It sucks though.
Exactly thats why i want it
@onyx raven @dapper violet
Why would you want a bad premium?
I dunno i liked the turtle mk.1
I love british tanks and probably one of my favorite is the turtle mk.1
I dunno why i like it.
don't hurt yourself
never ends well, already tried getting bad tanks
I wonder what the "realest" nation is
Probably US or USSR
Bruuh nah i kinda want this.. I'm not sure why but i want to do it. Hmm maybe this is the way i improve my game.
it isn't - the tank doesn't teach anything
That's pretty hard, probably the Russians. However the original Japanese line was probably the most real tbh.
germany is in the running for least real nation
Hybrid is the least real nation
Bruh well like i said . I have no idea why im doing this but ,i dont mind it anyway.
Germany is pretty real actually. Might be more so than US
it has only one real t10
as in non-blueprint
Maus, E100, Leopard 1.
oh wait, yeah
e100 was 50% built
Maus prototype was built
And blueprint counts as real, if they were drawn up by actual contemporary designers. "Fake" means completely made up by wargaming, like the Annihilator or something
Don't complain and create another again just because you have bad RNG
Arguably the E-50 & E-75 were real, because they were simply modifications for mass production.
Most of the time i do that when i buy a bundle i dont like. I never delete a account because of tech tree line.
The fake German tanks I can think of off the top of my head are E75 TS, Jagdpanzer/WT E100, and JPanther II.
that's... unhealthy
I only have one account
But hey im tired of tanks give you advantage maybe this way will improve my game skills since its harder tank. More knowledge to get @thorny smelt
Yeah, generally WG covers their tracks very well.
Not sure about this one but Krupp 38d seems quite fake as well
I have 13 account, dont worry i delete them because just knowing that i dont delete them makes my blood boil and mad.
keep them
E-100 is more real than you think. A team of like 3 guys managed to build the chassis before the British captured it
The hull is the only one that is completed
the WT e100 and jagdpanzer e100 isn't
No. If that account is done or making me mad its gone despite the progress. Im not afraid to start over again, like im doing it or 13 timesđ @dapper violet
Itâs the E-100 variants that are questionable at best
stop for your mental health
when I have a bad run I just close the game and go do something else or ---
switch tanks to a new tank đ
I'm aware, it's just the TD variations which are sketchy enough for me to consider fake. Or at least, the rear-turreted jageroo is completely up to WG's interpretation
peeps thinking E-100 would have been mass produced
Wow I literally just typed the same thing
ah yes reasonable cost defensive tank
just tape big steel sheets to giant slow chasis
This is my only game on my tablet. And besides this game is fun, been playing since post 5.5
nooooooo those accounts could get birthday rewards
đ¨
supposedly the E-100s partially built hull is still in a scrap yard as the dude never got around to breaking it down.
They're deleted and gone haha . And i don't care to those accounts much better i get rid of them.. đ
Probably it is ended up as scrap
seems pretty neat, but I doubt that would still be put in some museum lol
I love british armor , but the thing they've done to e100 is not funny.
They can but it's no use without at least a prototype turret
no use without tracks either imo
Overall the Britâs have very few fake tanks in the tech tree
the entire fv215b 183 line:
it's just a massive pile of rust, lol.
Or the planned Maybach HL234 engine that I also wish they would do it as an upgrade for the E 100 in this game.
Most of them at least have designs drawn up, though I canât speak as to the numbering
Is real
please no
E 100 is already overbuffed as it is
As for the Americans to my knowledge,
- T110E4 and E5 are poor and misnamed interpretations.
- T92E1 was never mounted with Sheridan turret iirc
- T71 is a Frankenstein tank, although split up in PC
- Astron Rex is possibly fake
- T28's model is erroneous
- T28 Prototype is fake to my knowledge
- T25 TD variants seem fake
The entire T110 thing is a mess
I only see the tortoise
LOL A German ramming machine with the top speed of 40 kmph
E3 and E5. E4 is fake
If anything, they would be T110A3, A4, and A5, not E
The ATs were all designs that led to the Tortoise
If itâs a T, itâll be an E.
I know, but the legitimacy is strange - do you have a link to blueprints
I remember reading this very in depth article about how the T25 AT was incredibly fake
Not necessarily
1 sec
M6A2E1 EXP should be a fake as well
Actually they did try putting a larger turret on the M6, though Iâm not sure if the 120mm was ever considered for that
It had the prototype turret of the T29, so, 105mm
what about the massive thick frontal plate instead of the odd round thing
Yes the 105mm is real enough, but the 120mm configuration is questionable
They already did...
That as real too.
Itâs entirely plausible that a 120mm couldâve been tried, though I havenât seen any evidence of it actually happening
The Yoh line of course is subject to heavy interpretation from WG, especially in armament
me looking at the M-V-Yoh and thinking: "where ammorack?"
Thatâs the only change made to the Yohs. Otherwise, theyâre real as seen.
The Yohs are questionable
Where is it in this game?
Designs were made, though how detailed said designs were isnât really known. They were mainly used as a sort of proof of concept for the reserve tracks
So a very well-documented set of tanks are âquestionableâ?
Itâs their interpretation there was prints for a 170 mm e100 project discovered in bombed out factories but the majority of it was destroyed in the destruction itâs speculated it probably would have a jag tiger design rather than all the weight in the rear
like yeah, they were documents, but would they actually have been built
WGs interpretation of said âwell documentedâ tanks is questionable
AE Phase 1 and Concept 1b are extremely sketchy as well
The E-100 develops 1200 horsepower+ in-game. It wouldn't even make half that irl.
Concept exists albeit itâs just what it is a concept the gun caliber is an odd choice and the unmanned turret design wouldnât be tested until 20 years later
Theyâre real tooâŚ
show blueprint links!!!
its so hard to find!
Yeah I did see the blueprints for Concept
Ironically enough it had the abrams hull design before abrams was even a thing
is the T95E6 real? đ
you guys are so nerdy, I thought I knew stuff about tanks
Sorry. I'm a little bit confused
@balmy compass Yes. As part of the T95 medium tank series.
:/
The chassis and I think the turret are real, the armament is fake though I think
So the T95E2 in tier 8 is real
what
I'm being serious, genuine question here, I always thought most of the tier VIII-X tanks in blitz were fake
Technically, T95E6 is a medium tank with 120 mm gun.
Most of them are real ngl
Yes the E6 is real
tell me Lansen C is real
The AE in game is dramatically different looking from any blueprints I could find. Certainly a fake interpretation
Shout out to the Us for struggling to develop a tank so badly you get stuck with 90mm m48s for years , ditch every single gun project you have and use a lended version on your tank
Itâs real
It depends on your definition of fake:
completely made up, generally no.
blue prints, yes
Prototypes, sometimes
production model: extremely rare.
We live in a simulation so itâs not real
Only the European lines and Chinese tend to be on the extreme end of fake
WG does alot of "mix and match"
Shout out to the Us for struggling to develop a tank so badly you get stuck with 90mm m48s for years , ditch every single gun project you have and use a lended version on your tank
well I always assumed apart from "well known" (Panzer's, Sherman's, T-34's) tanks they weren't put into production, and I saw alot of people say most tanks didn't exist, and you can probably already tell, I don't do much research :|
I don't do any research lol
Yeah, a lot of people donât know what theyâre talking about lol
yet you know nearly everything about French vehicles
The biggest victim of that mentality is Russia, almost all the high tier Russian tanks are real yet the community complains about more Russian tanks being added and that WG made them up
I thought the T-100 LT was fake đ
I thought LT-432 was fake too until I saw someone post blueprints or documents
I mean most of them are though for instance they named the 279E as the 279s âprototypeâ when in reality it was a almost 10 year old project that wasnât even related to it
The LT-432 is arguably fake
Because I'm from Saumur and I know/related to some people who worked on such tanks.
Their naming can be pretty bad but a lot of those tanks had actual prototypes made
The T-100 is really Object 795
I'm still convinced it's impossible to actually get inside it.
I know all of the tanks in the Obj. 268 line are real, but I don't remember seeing anything on the 268 itself anywhere, but I assume there are some blueprints of it somewhere since it's based on one of the pike nosed hulls
There was a real prototype of the 268 made
The LT-432 is a very weird take on the object 432
Obj 268 actually got incredibly close to production.
which hull is it based on, IS-7?
@balmy compass IS-8/T-10
IS-8
IS-8/T-10
laughs in object 775
well then I'm not surprised
the Russians did make alot of casemates with spare hulls/guns
The 268 Version 4 is real as well, although no photos of a prototype exist
Most countries did
đ
Considering it was never built, yeah.
not really?
mostly Germany and Russia were the countries that actaully went and built casemated tanks, America did try it out too but not as much, I don't remember any other country (except Sweden) that built more then 2 models of casemates
I'm not talking about blueprints, talking about produced models
If stalin has lived longer it would have been almost certainly produced.
Isn't Object 432 the prototype of the T-64?
WG also makes the frankly absurd point that the LT-432 was supposed to carry extra troops
It was a blueprint only
This is one of my personal favorites.
I saw that, I think it's funny
Yeah, not possible.
Yes, and WG turned it into a light tank
What about artys?
Uralmash-1/SU-101
Supposedly they are going to restore it soon.
oh, well, I guess that counts then
I didn't do research on arty tanks before :|
just did a paper on casemated vehicles (mostly SPGs) countries made
Grille
Considering how cramped JS-4 is, I can only imagine. I'm not very tall and I could barely get out of it.
is there a tier X tank that is completely made up
I thought Type 71 was based off of something
Not really
Mino, Chinese TD, Type, Jageroo, FV215b, Prog, TVP 50/51
I thought Jageroo was based off of something WG found but made their own model
Itâs a beefed up stb1 if you knew the history STB spent so much time in development as soon as it was finished the JSDF immediately began work on type 90
I'm 6'4, so i think i couldn't fit in most soviet tanks
Not really. No E100 td variants were being considered since the E100 itself was never fully built
They played around with geometry tool and type 74
There was I said earlier there was plans discovered for a 17 cm case mate e100 with differing proposals within bombed factories a lot of important prints were destroyed tank encyclopedia went over it
I'm about a solid "foot" shorter
The only blueprints found were of a 150mm mount
TVP and Prog are real and the Jageroo is based in some reality.
WG has admitted that the Progetto is something they made up and I have found nothing on the TVP 50/51
60tp and vz55? Vickers?
Theyâve never said the Prog is fake.
I completely forgot about the 60TP, Vz isn't in the game yet but yes, and the Vickers is actually somewhat based in reality
The Vickers is not based on anything real and the 60TP has some basis from cadet designs in the Warsaw Technical academy.
VK 90 might be completely made up as well
They have, and any slight amount of research shows that the Progetto is clearly a fake
The cadet designs didnât exist
I have found some evidence that itâs based on a late design of the LĂśwe
The Vickers design is clearly based on post war british light tanks
That isnât answering my question.
There wasn't a question there
đ i dont see a ?
Oh wait. I didnât send it.
I meant to ask if you could show me the statement.
The statement was in a livestream
They made up the prog based on a book written by an Italian General in 1946 which outlined what he believed the future Italian armor should look like
Thatâs the Progetto 46.
The same goes for the Prog 65
WG themselves said it was made up...
"The Progetto 65 is based off a vehicle described and drawn by agent Guido Gianettini in an article from an Italian specialized defence magazine, perhaps based off information he gained as a secret agent. He proposed spaced armour, a gun of intermediate calibre between 105mm to 120mm, and a carousel autoloader. The tank was never considered by the Italian military." From WGs website
Ehhhh... that's from WG. Any other reliable source?
There quite literally isn't another source because WG made it up
kek
Hereâs the image from the Magazine
"The Progetto M40 mod. 65 is an Italian tier 10 medium tank.
In 1969, the Italian military delegation visited Germany to discuss the purchase of Leopard tanks. However, not all members of the delegation agreed with the acquisition of foreign vehicles. The Italian military experts and engineers specified the main requirements for the future tank: the slope angle of armor plates, the cast turret and gun mantlet, as well as the powerful engine from Mitsubishi that allowed production of a small, light, maneuverable, but perfectly-armored vehicle. The British and Soviet design plans collected by SIFAR-SID were taken into account. Development of the project was discontinued at the drafting and modelling stage.
The Progetto M40 mod. 65 marks the end of its Italian medium line."
Alright then. Still, it is an odd parallel.
What about the vk 45.02 b
Real
Hmm okay
well yes, it is an excellent forgery, infact I dare say it is a more practical design than the actual german super heavies.
No, I mean it parallels an actual design
you know its partially real when the explanation is quite lengthy
That being?
WG does make some rather convincing fake tanks
A later 90-ton design for the LĂśwe
Most of that is comparing it to in-game stats, but yeah, I agree itâs real
Well the issue is itâs called the VK75 on pc
AMX m4 54 is probably one of their best fakes imo, as it is legitimately possible, even likely it would have exsists at some point had the tcb turret been made.
Just a variant of the Porsche version of Tiger II
I think the FV301 was a real prototype, wasn't it?
and it sucks really badly too, can never hit anything
Yes
I see, thanks
Nearly built, but it wasnât.
It was, only it was called vickers cruiser mk.1, and later the vickers mbt./mk.1
The Vickers MBT would actually fit in game, at least the early models
There was two prototypes of it and many variants
No. The FV 301 and Vickers Medium Cruiser were similar but ultimately different projects that were never built. The photos youâll often see referred to as a prototype of the MC Mk.1 were actually just of a Full-Scale Mock-up.
No, no prototypes were built. However, many variants were proposed.
I was referring to the vickers mbt, lol not the wooden mock-up.
The FV300 had two prototypes
No, no FV 300-series prototypes were built.
It could, but it would be kinda difficult to make it interesting.
Give an proof then.
I think the Bernardini X1 series of lts would have a slight chance of being added, slight
True, but using something like the Mk3 with a 120mm could be kind of interesting
I would Honestly just add the mk.3 for athesthic reasons.
Give me proof they were built.
It just looks so good, even if the armor isnât actually as good as it looks
So what if the armour isn't good? Just sprinkle alittle Wargaming balance magic on it.
(50b getting its hull armour tripled and turret armour doubled, 30b getting its mantle thickness improved 6 fold)
Honestly making it something like a tier 9 chieftain would be nice
For that you have the chief proto
nah, I would give it an extremely powerful engine to make up for the low top speed and a super entertaining/interesting gun to boot.
Make it go 50kph, but with dracula acceleration lol
Chief proto doesnât look anywhere near as good
Well, it's a prototype, so, appearance isn't guaranteed to be good
The mk.3 isn't a prototype?
I love how the chieftain look, but the proto is so deformed I just canât like it
I mean the chief prototype, not the Vick MBT
British tanks In general look way better irl. Fv4004 actually looks sick irl.
Well the Mk.3(I) got a new engine and gearbox, allowing it to get up to 59kph
Thereâs also the Mk. 3 (M)
Ooh.
Btw how would you feel about say a Fv4004 RAAC? Or a cheiftan without side skirts.
why would you remove skirts
they make tanks look cooler
A 4004 RAAC would be kinda interesting
Also chief without the side skirts is cursed
The issue with the Mk.3 (M) is that it has ERA, meaning WG wonât add it
It's always interesting to see how engineers make a heavy thing go way faster than it should, like the IS-7, or the Iowas
What in gods name is that monstrosity
if WG adds a Chieftain without skirts, WG would just make a legendary camo that has skirts
Skoda T56 moment
E4 camo
BatChat runner and Rhm Waffle got skirts too
140mm cheiftan
Talking about E4, i didn't remember its Combat Star camo had the Snoopy
Thatâs⌠brilliant
imo, cheiftan just looks better without the sideskirts.
I hate that so much
please no đ
give the skirts back
Give it ARL-esc skirts
I also love the look of stillbrew chiefs
Ew
Conqueror looks rather weird without its skirts
Conq is such a good looking tank though
There are suspension types that don't deserve to be used without skirts, like Maus
Arl doesn't have side skirts?
I can't find anything regarding about the Lansen C irl đ˘
Yeah, maus without side skirts is just wrong.
Its mid
In terms of the looks of the last heavy tanks, imo it goes Conq > 50 super bias > T-10 > M103
I mean that weird plate covering the track's empty space
Bro m103 doesn't look that good
Thatâs why itâs in last đ
I love the M103 a lot, but god does it look terrible compared to the other heavies
I'd say look wise best looking tank is Japanese tier 10 ht I forgot the name
50 super bias?
Thing is that its skirts are part of the suspension's structure, isn't it?
bruh
STB looks better then Type 71
It's all personal opinion
Surbaisse, aka super bias in war Thunder
No, the side skirts are literally part of the hull armour, they aren't separate.
yeah lol
even in-game you can penetrate main armor through the tracks
50b is seggsy
đ
warthunder refusing to give it back it's reverse speed and apcr round
- the provence camo simply looks too good in french tanks with pbr
Shhhhh, the 120 still slaps
50 go brrrt
look at that beast đ
Tbf french did many great looking designs, like the Lerclerc, the Richelieu, the FT17
now give it ERA
that looks better irl then in-game
when you see tiger II then you see this monster it gives a sense of scale tbh.
wait ARL actaully used the bigger turret irl? :|
Seggsy to heđ
Amx were really popular tanks I hear
Wdym with bigger turret?
The stock turret of blitz ARL is from WW1 design,
stock turret
time to get nerded on :|
?
Irl amx tanks were sold to many countries I think back in the days
All French autoloaders actually can be loaded like single shots with the shells in the back of the turret excluding AMX-13 and AMX-50.
Only the AMX-13
I don't know the model but it was amx
bruh I still cant get used to how the arl is bout the same size as the amx 50b
ARL is huge, it's actually abit bigger
that just brings up the point... who and how and why did they build the arl44 to be that large?
Honestly they just wanted to build something as fast as possible to try and regain Frances position as a world power.
(They failed)
I mean... it does fit the phrase "bigger is better"
Bigger is beggar
is 50b taller then the Maus
Not sure
It's not
I don't think so, but im sure since WT is "historically accurate" a size comparison there may work
is it close
No
better question, is the arl44 bigger than the maus
doubtful
However the AMX-50 120 is taller than maus
HUH
interesting
The 4005 is prob taller than Maus by a little bit
french crews in 50 120... huh? rock where
Yes this variant is freakishly tall.
With that huge cupola, I think I would fit inside the turret
You would, remember AMX-50 was made for swedes and Germans to also use.
I donât think it was
The plan was to export it, Germany refused to buy it and that killed the project.
Source on that?
The Amx 50 series was ultimately supposed to be an export tank for Europe but it didnât really entice the Germans hence 30B
You can find the swedish report in it.
@safe cedar you know what i find funny?
the AMX30B's HEAT shell IS the Obus-G
which is a massive insult tbh.
one of the best heat shells has slightly below average heat pen just as in insult. It should have had a symbolic 305mm imo.
personally would give it 320 HEAT, and also give the Leo 1 320 HEAT
Honestly leopard shouldn't have heat, it should have a premium apcr shells imo.
I have a question which tank is generally more useful the 60tp or maus
nah, imo 270 AP, 320 HEAT
with lowered DPM once it gets 380/320/450 alpha
Bad change
Oh wait this is vehicles discussion not wot blitz vehicles
I mean, you can talk about Blitz vehicles
Nah dpm should stay the same just adjust the RoF and alpha
Oh k
still no, the main reason for me wanting the DPM to be lowered after a pen and alpha buff is to
1: It won't be as easy to abuse for good players, and offers a different playstyle
2: The AMX 30B will still be kinda... trash?
2a: You could then turn the 30B into the DPM monster
60TP, Maus has not been relevant since 2020
Oh that's good cuz i was going for the 60tp but saw the maus had more hull armor
I would give it 265+ ap, 310-330 apcr.
OrâŚ. You could just turn 30 B into a DPM monster right now with like 3900 DPM, strip away the turret armor, and nerf the accuracy slightly more. Make it the âclose combatâ version of the Leo
Thatâs kinda the point leopard suffers from penetration 30 B gets the luxury of hard angles and safer peeking something that if leopard had would make it broken
except even with this theoretical Leo 1, people still yolo through it anyways
and half the time it cant it back
That would screw it over tbh. The accuracy is already mid.
I would rather 30b get 66/46 top speeds.
imo that doesnt address a key issue for the 30B in the fact that its a half-hearted in-between of the Leo 1 and STB, and personally my solution would be to change the Leo 1 to above, and change the 30B into a DPM monster, who knows, maybe the 3.9k DPM suggested by Posit1ve would be a good idea
I think 30b should just be removed from the leopard-STB scale entirely.
its just unavoidable because the Leo and 30B come from the same thinkbox
I also really feel like they should actually give the 30B a distinct role
30b has some clear differences, WG should emphasize its insane reverse speed.
honestly if it just had a good heat round and better mobility it wouldn't need anything else really.
tanks shouldnt be balanced around their prammo
Prammo is just one part of a tank. Look at Fv4202 or ho-ri
But like in how many days or month
It has a distinct role, it's just one that most people are not good enough to use or see, so they default to the playstyles of the 30b and Leo because it has some similar characteristics
We donât know
đŠ Iâll wait
People just assume because asthetics they are the same even though 30b is a proper scout and leopard Ă sniper. Don't know why 30b has 295 vs 300 heat pen, but It doesn't matter tbh.
I only wish 30b had better top + reverse speed for fun reasons.
maus
@lucid idol FYI the su-5 could mount a 76, a 122 and a 152.
AMX 30 needs some loving
well i don't say it could only hold 5mm
should i get progetto 46?
i got 8.6k gold and idk whether i should get progetto 46 or save up for tier 10 premium
If you know how to play it then go for it
k
how do I exactly find a good place to camp as TDs?
Behind a bush
Just experiment with different spots. When playing other classes, note the locations where tds are and see if they work. But remember, just because you are a triangle doesn't mean that you should sit in one position at the back of the map the whole game
Can I ask how good the t95 is compared to the t28?
a lot better
because tbh I'm kind of tired of leaving my life in the hands of my meds/hevs, especially on weekends
Depends on the TD and map.
Wdym the Leo has good pen for a med
loving trying to play the t28 when all the bad heavy players are on
weekend matchmaking is a blast
What country has the best tank destroyers?
T-10M slaps imo
Unfortunately the non-PBR model in blitz looks horrendously ugly
Donât listen to the haters. youâre correct
It does. So do several tanks in game like Strv K imo, then the legendary camo ruins it by adding side skirts
what if they added normal armed cars or tanks with machine guns?
No
No
honestly germany jag line
just a nice all rounded line
hello i have a question how to use the full capabilities of the lĂśwe premium tank?
Well idk, I'm currently playing as T25 AT and I can't even recognize what a good camp spot is
Get ur team to push with you. LĂśwe has a good damage and a wonderful front armor but it has weak sides and back and isnt fast you wont stand long alone. Due to the front position of the turret you can back angle in city maps and it works fairly good
anyone tips for leo 1?
i recently got it and it isnt going well lol
- i die fast
2.or average camping/passive battle, 1.5k-2k dmg
i am used to play with t62a with 3k and now i cant play with the leo 1 đ and it's such a fun tank
t62a is easy tho, u have turret armor and hull armor, leo 1 is you have no armor, just speed and gun
i thought i was a skilled player doing well in my t62a, now i see how much i suck, for some reason it's very hard for me doing 3k dmg and much easier with the 62a
I mean if you want to challenge yourself while still having like the 62a, try playing the obj 140
im already happy with my leo (the gun and dpm is amazing), need just some advice
@pale mauve maybe u can help me?
its really dependent on the scenario and matchup
if alone, play defensive, if you find an opportunity, take it
try to snap a shot at everything, if you know you can hit, chances are, you will hit
Snipe
Which should i get?
Dont go brawl in Leo 1
none
None.
none
none
@wise moth you're famous
đ
Neither. Tier V premiums are never worth it.
Ok what the hell js #france_vehicles
french tanks
I feel that emil 1 stock is one of the most painful.
i got him
@tulip knot
#NoSideSkirtGang
How... much did you spend on AMX-30?
Ayo thatâs so much for an average performing medium tank
I wanna buy FCM 50T whenever it hits the shop
Save yourself from the pain
And save your gold as well, itâs going to be a painful tank to play
It's my highest performing tier 8 med rn lol
I think mine is astron rex
AP AMX 30 is seriously underrated rn. Fast, -10 gun depression, and actually pretty decent armor
Worth the price or should I wait until the second release?
I'm saving for the 777 II personally
So
Lansen C but French
Probably not at the current price point, but it's honestly a great tank
Unfortunately it's so ugly đ
I would say itâs unique and not like other mediums
Mainly because of the incredibly high standard penetration and usable armor
It seems to me like a M4 Rev but trades firepower for armor
Or French Lansen
The hull looks sweet, but the turret is such a sore spot
#quirky
#notlikeothertanks
What is the standard pen
I'm streaming it in general chat if y'all wanna see it
218
218/262
Thatâs pretty nice
chokes on cigarette
@safe cedar what do you think of the AMX 50 100 Basher camo
It makes me want to bash my brains out
Ouch
Amaunet said it was very much like a tier 8 Amx 30 prot
chokes on le gauloise
Cassoulet
How did you know?
AMX Armor Piercing
le french
Batignolles-Châtillon 25T Armour Piercing
M1937, 122mm, hence "37-122". This gun is used by China and is actually the base design for the D-25T (like a lot of Soviet late-war tank guns, they're all vehicle-mounted versions of existing artillery). However Chinese IS-2s are the same as the Soviet ones and they never change the gun.
Dude, that message was nearly 3 years old
it was đł the dedication
9 battles in and I donât even have the big alpha gun, this tank is cracked
đ¤
Funny guy
Isn't that just amx 30 1er but worse?
30 1er (an extremely overrated tank, fight me) is a tier higher. AltProto also has better alpha and pen tier for tier, and I believe a more troll hull as well
Nah, love the 301er.
It might be lacking in dpm, but it can use its gun the entire time. It has speed and gun depression to get into annoying positions quickly and it has the turret armor, gun depression, and acceleration to peek with relative safety.
What are you gonna do, push it? Nah, it's already zooming away
Beautiful tank for harassing enemies
And even if it doesn't seem like it the front plate does occasionally bounce if you use ur gun dep and saves your life, or during movement
Gotta love stupidly angled plates on a flat tank
Like I've won matches because they shot apcr/heat, pramo at my tank thinking it's gonna be end game and poof, magically bounced it
Yeah, like even with 3CR in effect it sometimes gets these illogical bounces 
I get that people want firepower to brute force fights quickly, but the 301er is perfect for extended fights drawing attention.
Indeed, it's a good tank to bait shots, like a perfect paper made tank that will cut you if you try to touch it
And just to reply to you, honestly like I said, it's the same tank on paper but worse, don't mention anything about wr since as you can see one has 961 players(90 days) and the other has testers only(90day period so probably when the tank was better before release).
@misty wing tier for tier amx 30 alt proto isn't that better off also, since quite a few tanks below it and on the same tier have a higher alpha with a similar dpm and better pen 
T8-5 meds just aren't that different/good overall
I think I'd rather play any tier 8 med than the 30 1er ngl
tbh I don't understand why you're so obsessed with comparing the altproto to a tank of a different tier, and they don't even look that similar despite both being AMX 30s supposedly
and tier for tier the AP is much better than the 30 1er when it comes to the gun. The alpha and penetration are both strong points, whereas the 30 1er has both lowest in class DPM and alpha for a single shot med, which is just unacceptable. It also lacks premium pen compared to everything except the M46 and HESH Centurion. The chassis does not make up for these shortcomings, especially when the mobility is only marginally better than other meds, so it really only has gun depression and a trollish turret going for it
Like, the rest of the tier 9 meds have an average eHP/T on medium terrain of 18.9, and the 30 1er has only 21.7. It needs to have a much larger advantage than that in order to make the argument that the platform makes up for the abysmal gun.
On the other hand the AMX 30b at tier 10 has 32.7 p/w on medium compared to the rest's average of 25.8. This is a much larger gap than the 30 1er to its own competition.
yet people always lament about the 30b being weak while praising the 30 1er like it's god's gift to earth
The only reason people like the 1er more is the almost complete lack of a cupola compared to what the 30b has
The 30b does have about twice the DPM deficit compared to other single shot guns than the 30 1er has, however, I still think the 30b gun is better tier for tier because it meets the par for accuracy and premium penetration, unlike the 1er which has shockingly poor accuracy for a 310 alpha
turret armour on amx 30 1st prototype? more like mantlet armour on amx 30 1st prototype
Opinions on the WZ-122 TM? On paper is a good tank, but I've got already T-34-3, Chimera and Sherman M4A1 Rev. The play style should be the same, but it is worth 8500 gold or should I spare that amount for another tank?
budget chimera they said
front armor is good, side very weak even against 90mm, slow reload. idk about gun handling though.
It's a good tank if you're bored of the Chimera dominating things
Your forgetting due to lower hp/t 30 1er's effective gun handling is actually better than 30b, It can snap shots on the move very well.
Furthermore the dpm gap is much , much small. The highest dpm tier IX med only having like 200-300 more dpm vs leopard 1 out-dpming 30b with heat.
Visited tank museum in Kubinka today. Damn, now I want this tank (obj. 770) to be in wotb, itâs so freaking magnificentđľâđŤ
which p2 vitality equipment is better for t25 AT - more HP or more armor?
what is essentially the Obj.770 is coming soon
The Obj. 777 II
I prefer the obj 277.
This one?
Yes
guys, obj 252u, type 57 or t56?
T56 > Type > 252
Skoda > 252 > Type
Type-T56-252U
Always run more HP
I already acknowledged the 30b having roughly double the DPM gap compared to its peers, but it's still easily the better tank tier for tier. That and the cupola are the only disadvantages it has
I got the type 57 and have 4k average damage so far
how much is the bc 25t runner?
Think it's 6500 unfortunately
i have a question, what abilities do obj 268/4 and badger have in mad games?
thanks
How much does the high score tank sell for?
250 gold
Rate my lansen gameplay
C tier
Iâd rate it 4/10 for this match
Pretty good 8/10 from me
Your positioning at the beginning at the A point was alright, but you definitely took the opportunity to create crossfires once you went mid, great job
Although I will say you could have used adrenaline several times, as you never used it the whole match
True, Iâm not good at using adrenaline at all because almost every time I do wind up using it in a non premium I get like no money from the round
Mfw my heavies go town
But tbh I wouldâve done a lot better that round of I didnât have to deal with your whole team on hill
The funny part was that Iâd just watched the replay you posted here before that match, and I was really tempted to say something in chat.
t10 30b is crap though. its just a leo that has a bit more armor in exchange for worse everything else
is ammo rack damage also rng? Like on top of the 33% chance of damaging it is there +- 25% damage roll as well?
27% base chance to damage the ammo rack, then it's subjected to the normal module damage system
No? Armour is better on a good chunk of tanks, mostly heavies and tds, even some mediums
Right yes, but is module damage random or is it exactly the same damage every time if it hits?
It is random
HP is better on the majority of tanks
Thank you sire
With extra armour say, on the Minotauro or the Cent 5/1, i have a slight higher chance to bounce a shot from say, a Obj84, and that extra bounce is worth 300 hp compared to the 85 health ill get from extra HP, worth it if you know what your doing
Is that Russian Churchill 3 worth a buy for those 1500 gold ?
Never. Keep your gold for tier 8 or further
What does this symbol mean and how do you get it?
badger or 268v4?
its ranks. it has no effect whatsoever other than showing you have played your elite 100% crewed tank (often premiums) a lot. You can find it in the tech tab of any relevant vehicle
I have a 100% crew IS tank and i dont see any rank icon
FV217 Badger
You need elite status too, with the next tank researched
Ranks useless I donât even know why they got added
for people who basically cant use credit furthers because theyve grund the entire tree
Thanks
guys t29 is nerfed?đ it cant avoid so many shells n players always boomin my tankđ
Sad i didnt finish the event because of school. Oh well, hi guys is the su100y offers pops in store?
Both of those tanks have so much armor that running EA on them has no substantial buff. Running it because you may encounter one tank of a different tier just isnât worth it.
Is it worth selling this for 1200 gold? Or should i keep it (if yes then for what?)
You can restore it if you want it back after you sold it. Costs exactly as much as selling it gets, so you donât lose anything
Given that and the fact that tier three is super boring, Iâd say you can sell it without worrying. Unless you really enjoy playing the tank
Got it, just a quick question: what is the elite battle exp for? I dont fully understand its use
You can use it for crew skills, or if you pay gold you can convert it to free xp (not recommended)
Basically use it to boost crew skills, thatâs the best use
Ok now i understand, last question: will the exp on that tier 3 disappear if i sell it? (I guess yes?)
No, it remains (just like the stats)

Obj or Badger
Badger
any advice for rating battles? already lost 5/10 of my cali matches, yet I still don't have an idea how players play at that mode
When the 59 patton and wz 122 tm offer will go out of store ?
Guys is su100y offers worth? ( i want the the tank)
Itâs literally the same as a normal match, you just get a funny number on your profile. Get good.
guys what do you think about this
Eh, one tank is good and one is terrible
lmao i suppose the amx is the terrible one ?
Yes, the Somua is bad
The SOMUA is awful but the Spaghetto is great
đ¤Łđ¤Łđ¤Ł
I would disagree
Souma has good armour and great mobility which make up for its lacklustre gun. Even then the gun is only really bad in its handling, the dispersion is typical of the tier and the guns raw characteristics (vĂŠlocitĂŠ, pen, shell drop off, alpha) are all great.
It has a massive cupola. That coupled with its massive bloom that forces it to sit still to aim makes itâs armor kind of worthless. It also has a massive clip reload
The bloom is similar to virtually every other tanks of the tier.
But it also accelerates relatively fast, which increases the bloom, and has poor aim time, meaning it has to sit still longer. That combined with the size of the cupola lead to a rather weak armor profile in practice
is Maus or E100 better?
E100
E3 E4 or E5
E5 > E4 > E3
Best tier 10 in your opinion
All of them
e4 better in new update
Hello would u give me some tips for my 4 new tanks ?
It is finally MINE (a good use for the 5k gold lucky ball of the previous event)
VK 90.01 (P) is like the proper successor of VK 45.02 (P) B. You can sidescrape with it unlike VK 72.01 (K).
Nah
Wait until he learns that the v4 is an overhyped trash heap
@misty wing @onyx raven whatever, I'll enjoy playing it anyway, regardless of its effectiveness, which is not the average in any case. For me it was a free tank (well, I just sold AMX 30 B, I rarely use it)
T28 prototype is the worst destoyer in the game. discuss.
im very much regretting going the american destroyer route. Should have gone Russia or Britain.
Its getting an armor buff and velocity buff on 10.0 so it wont be that bad after that
Honestly, right now youâre not wrong, but it is getting a buff in 10.0 PC (mobility/side armor/HP), but the T30 and E4 are pretty nice
i would deal with the lack of armor if it only moved a little faster.
E3 is better than E4 for winning, but E4 is more fun
Based
We all know youâre biased towards the E4
E4 is quite good right now, and is becoming possibly meta next update
Meta TD?! 
Impossible
Well a few TDs are actually quite close right now
*meta heavy
For all intents and purposes, WG is making it into a heavy
Without HP sure
Well itâll have 2.1k with assembly, and then you give it a ton of dpm on top to compensate
*With HP. Itâs getting like some nonsense 300 or 400 HP buff
Literally just a heavy tank with a triangle icon
Jag has more I think
By how much? 150?
Jag will have 150 more base, but it will lack the dpm and more importantly, the turret
Yay
Another TD that doesnât have a horrendous HP pool
The funniest part to me is the mobility buff
I actually really dislike the E4 changes, it's headed deeper into "worse E100" territory
And they didn't touch the 3 things I dislike most about the tank
I thought it was funny that they decided to buff the cupola
Ig I need to spam HEAT at it in my Kpz 70 now
Is the CS-52 a good tank ?
Yes
What is the "turret's barbette" of the E4 that is getting buffed
VK 90.01 (P) or FV217?
The turret ring
you can most likely still pen it in the lower half with standard on most tanks
yeah 187mm at that angle is gonna be like 220-230mm
?
It might be close to 300
I said the lower half lol
Itâs almost the same...
It won't be close to 300
With this shape on the cupola, the lower half is clearly much weaker
Also I still can't get over how genuinely awful wotinspector is compared to PC sites that are free
Looks like the wot pc model to me
If the blitz model isn't the same right now, it will be when it eventually gets PBR
I'm not very concerned with the cupola becoming strong, frankly
I think the blitz one is weaker towards the centre because it angles inwards more
T110e4 has tons of weak spots anyway
Thats the point. Keep the weaknesses, remove the main strength.
what? that would equate to a nerf, and this is clearly not that
They replace major strengths for new ones.
Penetration and accuracy vs armour + hp
it has such a big and weak cupola
that one's actually not one of the 3 things
okay and itâs something for me
VK 90.01 (P) or FV217?
then you're playing the tank wrong
which honestly might not be your fault, given my comment on the CCs
Let me guess. Turret turning factor, gun depression, and reverse speed?
gun depression and reverse speed yes
the 3rd one is lack of PBR >:)
Honestly if WG had toned down the dispersion Nerf it would have been fine tbh.
yeah reverse speed is really wack.
imo it should've gotten 14 reverse speed, 7.5 degrees of gun depression, and 680 alpha with a sizeable DPM nerf (0.5 seconds slower than E3 reload) instead of all this armor nonsense
the 640 alpha low rolls too much imo
i keep seeing 53_ or 550~ in the e4, and also upwards of 750.
well, i think it is my fault because i just play frontline TD
Itâs more fun and get more damage out
Medium risk high reward
I would have taken a different route.
I'm normally against buffing weaknesses, but the E4 should be an all rounder with flexibility, as opposed to an extremist like the grille, nor is it supposed to be a pseudoheavy
What do you mean by "weaknesses"?
the reverse speed, gun depression and cupola armor in this case
the tank has no business being a DPM monster imo, that should be left to tanks like Badger
I'm also a big proponent of tanks that are supposed to have the same gun, actually having the same gun
sadly they've moved away from that recently
I would have made it so the gun depression was better on the sides, but worse on the front. I would have also increased the shell velocity, and forward dispersion modifier.
and when they did follow that philosophy, it resulted in the AMX M4 45 being inadvertently nerfed
They tossed out that philosophy a long time ago.
Sometimes they change the name of the gun, for example the T110E3âs gun used to be the T7 and now itâs the T7A that has higher damage
Yeah unfortunate, I really liked that you could "feel" the overlap in tank development through the sharing of guns, and look at the guy next to you and be like "hey, we're like half the same" and unfortunately that's never the case anymore
Well all (well most) of the western 120mm are still pretty similar.
not even the M62-T2 (probably my favorite looking gun tbh) is consistent anymore
Well it is fairly consistent
at least they're making the french one consistent too by bringing down the AMX 50 120 alpha :)
Wouldn't that be making it less consistent? Since it's the same gun as on the m103?
Consistent with the 50b though, which actually has the same gun
Yes, but the 120mm l/60 (T122) is the same gun across the board Regardless of national designation.
They should make an "AMX 50 120 (scuffed version)" at tier 8 with a 2-shot 380 alpha gun. Like a T77 but french
Ew, no. just make a proper surblindĂŠ version with a 5-6s intra clip.
Thats why I think the 50b alpha change was dumb to begin with
Yeah, the Foch velocity change was also pretty stupid because it changed an integral characteristic of the gun.
Sublinde as tier 9 CR tank when
yeah foch makes me wanna kms sometimes with the gun handling
FCM F1 when
most reliable fr*nch gun:
I also love it when my AP rolls for 430, then I switch to heat and it rolls for 560
personally enjoy the single shot more, but it still feels rather lacking
just a worse Ho-Ri at that point, with the only advantage being forward speed
Honestly the single shot turns me off because it looks too thin to be a 155mm
it irks me more because the guns have the exact same shell velocity
despite physics saying otherwise and that the longer gun should have like Grille levels of shell velocity
I miss an average of 1.5 clips everytime I do over 5k damage in 50b, lol.
50b is strangely easy to ace, only takes like 4.4k for me
Weird, for me 50b aces always take like 5.5k+, I've even done 6k and no ace, but that's probably because I never spot in 50b.
Ngl it would be funny if they gave the Foch 155 an 850x3 autoloader like it had on PC a decade ago
What was the interclip on it?
5s IIRC
Yeah it was
I believe originally it was 8s.
Nah I just watched a super old video, it's 5. Unless it was 8 at first and they buffed it to 5, which seems weird
Honestly I don't know, it was so long ago.
What do you think of giving the tier 9 Foch a 130mm from the m4 54
đ
No. Do whatever you want to the tier 10 tho.
Better than the 2 shot 120 it currently has
Yes, but to remove the 120mm it to remove the entire purpose of foch. It would be like putting the tigers gun in the jagdtiger.
Foch just needs its old single shot back and better reverse speed.
Also that is a naval cannon if I'm not wrong (Possibly rebored) they use a 155mm cannon model on pc.
They should replace the tier 9 Foch with AMX AC mle. 51, and then the tier 10 is just called Foch with 120, 130, and 155mm gun options
I don't think the 130mm is necessary.
Add a 127mm to the list as well
Tbf I find cool when a tank has a naval gun, even if it isn't that large.
cough cough British 102mm
I know the French had 138mm on their destroyers, would be cool to see it as a tank caliber
cough Jagdtiger 8.8 cough
Yus, 139mm, like the japanese and the brits in some ships.
But we have the Conway with that calibre.
I mean lowkey half the guns in the game were formerly naval guns
cough 8.8, 10.5, 12.8, 100, 130,⌠cough
I bet even the 85 is a derivate of a naval gun repurposed FlaK repurposed tank gun
Fortunately we don't have 102mm guns, I find that calibre rather breh.
It wouldn't be 138mm in-game since they were almost universally bored out to 142mm (for land use).
They could do that, and buff foch to a "realistic" state and leave it be.
They could and I would love the hell out of it.
premium SU-152, but tier 8.
I think the CA Lorraine would be a interesting downtiered version of the Kanonen or the CDA.
No armor, but great mobility and a nice 100mm gun.
They would probably find some way to give it less than 640 alpha
That thing looks really ugly ngl, like an AC 46 but the back slopes down and no rangefinders
Watch them give it 630 alpha?
What about 639 alpha?
Like an art
No, the 85 was based on a purpose-built AA gun.
đ
Am I lucky?
Got this comrade from the free neonscape event
Did I play the tank right?
Iâve been trying to get the hang of playing frontline in this tank
Iâd like to hear any suggestions on how I can improve
You must be trolling
how does the polish hts armor compare to soviet hts?
depends on if it's the IS-7 or IS-4 line
.is7?
45 TP >= IS
53TP > IS-3
50TP > IS-8
IS-7 > 60TP
in terms of armor
can someone tell me whether i should get the FV4202 or the sheridan
Depends. You like meds or lights more?
Sheri has no solid armor whatsoever (although spaced armor can stop most HE) and has mediocre gun handling/pen coupled with a semi-painfully long reload
FV has less mobility for semi-decent armor and relies on HESH to do more damage than AP
which oneâs your preference?
not sure. if this helps, the tank i main is the leopard 1
Sheridan is flat out broken right now whereas 4202 is mid, so if you care about meta, go for the former
i prefer tanks that are more fun to play
If you find slapping people for 560 from variable range fun, go for the Sheridan
I'm done with IS3 ,innacurate af
Idk what did you expect
Its a soviet 122mm on a soviet heavy
im trying to get the boss challenge, but was thinking which tank is easier to get wins with? lower tier battles are normally shorter, so i was thinking between mathilda and ac1 sentinal, which one should i pick? or are there other better low tier tanks for this callenge?
Bro why it sucked, yet the 274A is one of the best tanks i have
Like, id say its better then Chim and even tbe centurion 5/1 its so reliable
Play in a tank that you are most confortable in going into battle
Not really because the IS3 & 8 have bad frontal armor and trollish sides, the opposite of the polish tanks.
I'd say the 50TP armor is more comparable to the ST-I.
And the 53TP is more akin to something like the T32.
The 53TP is closer to any tier 8 IS clones than the T32
Hey can anyone tell me how to play skoda t56? Like is it a hulldown tank, frontline, and whatnot
The only thing that I can do is facehugging and oh yeah, should I angle or not for this tanks? Like what is the best position to tanking enemy shells when u can't hide
And powercrepting IS3 as some people said
Not in terms of armour.
Angling on a tank with a pike nose is the dumbest possible move. What you should do is find cover to put between the enemy and your lower front plate.
Meh, I never angle on that one, just want to know tho
Oh, the lower front is a bit of weak part I see
Reverse angling, using obstacles to hide your hull and show only your turret.
And facehug only isolated enemy's
And at what range I should engage the enemy? Mid range?
Honestly I would say it's very similar to the french AMX m4 54.
27.5k of gold for the 268v4 are WG being serious or is this a prank?
It is lol
It doesnât have the pike nose or thick side armour that the IS-3 does
Not all of the IS clones have Pike noses. Things like the celestial exist
It also has the same, if not better side armor than the IS-3
What would y'all prefer avre or assault gun
rly need another sale tbh
back after like 9 months.... got the Semovente M41.... can't afford to skip it... what do I upgrade first?
just grind it and the Bassotto out
save exp for the CC 56, 64, and CC.1
that's what I intend but I wanna know which terrible aspect of this td is the thing I want to grind out first đ
Itâs a good Tier 5 ngl
it feels pretty rough stock though
The M41 is meh, the Bassotto is good
I am shocked about how slow it is tbh but the front armor feels... okay
The M41 imo is really the best of the line. You can actually frontline unscathed and have better speed that all other TDs
Itâs definitely not the best of the line lol
Tier for Tier, the best is 100% the Vipera
Smv 64 > Bassotto > Smv 56 > Mino > M41 > CC mk1
In the m41 you can just recklessly ram poor tier V noobs which is as heartbreaking as devastating
on a non-italian topic.... does the M4 Ravioli still play basically like a TD?
imagine playing the ravioli like a td, what a shame
I don't think it wolfpacks well given the pretty terrible reload, and the nonexistent armor.... sooo yeah... I assumed you TD with it but like.... more like a mobile TD than a pure sniper and definitely not like an assault gun
ohmylord.... KV2 is still being KV2 I see
came around the corner and got sent back to the garage from my next battle lol
the t54e1 is just so good for some reason
Itâs really not
by good you mean bad right?
nah its good as hell
Clearly you haven't played the Ĺ koda T50
sadly i have not
The M41 90?
yes, is the bundle worth it?
i know the tank isnât that good, but it still has some good stuff in the bundle (30 days prem and stuff)
It's basically better in every way imaginable.
It's not even a bad tank. Think it's worth it as long as you like lights
chamber of thighs
ong
drop mod name plz
check dms @shrewd turret
Yo, is T1 and M6 good?
Teach me how to change your garage
Rammer or Boosted shells on lekepz?
rammer
K
this AT-8 is disgusting, you can't penetrate it, but it will do constant 200 damage no matter what your tank is
skill issue, thereâs the huge cupola dumbo
Already shot at it
"Ricochet"đ
seems like rng ainât blessing u
if u canât pen just circle it bruh shoot the butt.
I just straight hate this pyramid
Normally i met one that will always camping and remained undetected , the speedy tanks isn't spotting yk
Maus sucks ass, bye
ok
then avoid its view then clear all its teammates, then you can gang up on it
đ¤
no wonders why someone got mastery on maus by just deal 3k đ
What, just that much?
yea.
maus users are quite bad you know
Maus itself is bad. I'd rather drive the titanic cause that thing turns quicker
I played it before, seems like the whole purpose is just being the highest quality meatshield and deal some dmg ngl
Pretty much. Mäuschen is the same, and it nearly drove me crazy
i feel like the M36 needs a buff on the speed, and gun handling
i'd say the gun handling almost the same as the hellcat
armor decrease is fine, but atleast give it back its 42kmh top speed and more acceleration.
oh, maybe a slightly faster reload
mauschen can atleast bully lower tier, my average dmg in mauschen is higher than maus lol
since maus have to face overpowered TDs such as badger and 268v4 or type71 more tho
268/4 is not even close to overpowered
One message removed from a suspended account.
M48 amazing
to a maus, it is.
also v4 users usually rush, which pretty much just make their weakness exposed, if it were a better player it would be hard to fight against it
No It wouldn't, too many easy to abuse weakspots
the cupola is very easy to pen when the tank is relatively still, which it has to be in order to not expose the even easier to hit cheek weakspots
wonder why I actually eat half of a v4âs HP with action X while playing war room
war room?
Any guide?
Oh no
Spot, hit and run/flank
I just got conway should i go for the engine first or the track first?
the gun
actually whatever makes the mobility better, according to the stats it gives you
Get the gun first for Conway because đ ąď¸ESH
Dont know why everyone loves the mauschen, hated it more then the maus
Thanks
Is the T26E3 Eagle 7 a good tank?
no
Okay thanks
268 or the jgpz e100 in terms of performance and competitiveness?
depends, do u wanna have less damage no armour but some speed, or heavy tank armour, slightly faster, with better armour and a better gun
German biased players or smth?
Is T1 and m6 good?
50/50, but not op

hi, i love ru251, should i buy lekpz m41? or should i save up for kpz70. im looking for a fun tank, was eyeing on m41d but its t7 so i didnt buy it. also does kpz70 ever go on sale for gold
Depends. What would you prefer? Dpm and mobility or dps and armour
mr mcgill im leaning towards dpm but its getting boring, im ok with more alpha but not ok with too low of a dpm. something that feels nice to shoot is okay too
Kpz has ok dpm and a good dps so it sounds like you should go with the kpz
Pong
thanks. when was the last time it went on sale, is 10k gold enough?
I think it was like, 8~9k last time I remember
thanks again. war thunder wont let me get it...they look so cool, just as other cold war tanks
Pung
Any tips for Progetto M35 mod. 46? I always die with it by few seconds