#vehicles-discussion
1 messages Ā· Page 15 of 1
If ISU is S tier what does that make the SU-130pm?
So when is WT clan event happening???? It was mentioned and WG forgot about it.
I think Alexandria said next month
I wait for snowglobe
next month, this month is all about Halloween stuff
What happened?
https://youtube.com/shorts/cpbpw9jW2ys?feature=share
why do you keep posting shorts
Cuz it easier to make than normal VDO
are you making them just for the purpose of posting videos here
or are you promoting your channel here
Just promoting VDO about WoT, WoTB
By the way, can you tell me what happened?
Idk if self promotion is allowed
And there are some random bugs that send tanks flying, it's nothing new
Yea, but I never see tank fly this high
And it kinda stuck there the whole game
aka the 121B
how much do you get from selling the nightmare tank?
You can always check that after you click sell, and the confirmation will let you know what you'll get back.
Anyways, 250 gold
Lol free Nightmare
Thanks to @dusky otter for making my tonk come to life (Iām u/57mmShin-Maru on reddit)!
Iāll be working on stats for it and my other tank proposals soon.
Practically yes but in tier VIII, not entirely new since theres the Chieftain/T95 and Mk.6 that has the same playstyle.
and next month is black friday !?
Black Friday is 1 day, Halloween is spooky season
i have no idea
Hey guys is the M6A2 exp good? I have the vk168, is5, action x,and some others
I have really been wanting the T2020 but now that thees guys are on I don't know which ones will be more fun two play. Do y'all know?
they are neat tanks, although I'm not quite sure what the general community thinks about them
both the Mutant and EXP and super tall, the EXP was good frontal armor, although people can and will hit your cheeks, and unless you are directly facing them frontally you can get penned through the front tracks like the M6 but worse
The M6 Mutants are meh. I own both. They have good armor for their tier, but the cheeks are easy to pen so donāt expose yourself too much. Also the tanks have terrible side armor. Any 151+mm gun can overmatch you.
the Exp works pretty good against noobs in city maps
It was free originally
Yh the IS 3 is bad i can't play with it it fully upgraded its a pain, the whole IS line is a headache i don't know why people recommend that
Itās not hard to hulldown
I tried but couldn't because up till now i only played front line heavy so that might explain why im bad with the Is 3, its just not for me that tank
I will try to practice in lower tier with some hulldown tanks and when i get good i will give the Is 3 try again
You can hulldown on the frontlineā¦
Guys do you think that the Titan HN is going to be on the auction this Christmas??????
We need new higher tier collectables and less premiums, not tier X collectables, just VII VIII and IX
Something like.. more fake yet realistic tanks, like an American adaptation of the IS or something
Surprised it didn't already happen, all it takes is an abandoned tank to be drivin by an American
WG has stuck with zero collector tanks in tier 8, for whatever reason
@plucky summit How about SMV-CC-67?
What?
The Italian premium tank destroyer.
Yeah, premium tank destroyer
Is the side and rear gun dep for m48 getting better or worse with the new model?
I think just the rear gets worse
There's effectively no difference between collectable and premium in this game. I think the reason they made tier 10s as collectables was just because there was a "there are no premiums in tier 9 or 10, so tier 8 is the best tier to farm credits" kinda rule in wot PC and they just decided to stick with it
I'm not sure why you're asking for tier 8 collectables, it would most likely just make less credits
There are plenty of "fake but realistic tanks" already marked as premiums, like IS-2Sh and Keiler
Collectables are fun because they just feel like an accomplishment to own
Not really, because you probably paid for it the same way you paid for a premium
The only tanks that kinda feel that way are the collab tanks and some of the really rare low tier ones, like Pz IV hydro
Any tier 8+ tank that is good and they sell outside of crates is going to be way too popular to feel like owning one is an accomplishment
Like the seal clubbing tanks?
No?
Idk, theres an absolute ton of seal clubbing tanks at low tier
IS-2Sh is an actual blueprint concept though. But i have no idea about the Kelier, im guessing that one is fake.
One example of fake but realistic prem tanks are the 59 Patton.
Marder II
PZ II J
PZ II G
Grobtraktƶr
SU-76I
SU-76
Pz sfl
PZB2
Light VIC
Tetrarch
Way more than the ones I just named, the ones I've seen be the most common
Oh yeah and they casually gave out the Ke-Ni
What does seal clubbing have to do with anything
The fact that most experienced players see playing lower tiers in strong tanks or just playing lower tiers is sealclubbing
From Tanks Encyclopedia about the IS-2 and its variants

"Way too popular to feel like owning one is an accomplishment"
"Like seal clubbing tanks?"
"No"
"Idk, theres a lot of seal clubbing tanks"
still have no idea what you're talking about
You mentioned that owning one wouldn't feel like an accomplishment, I mentioned seal clubbing collectables, due to how many there are
low tier collectables are far more "collection-worthy" than tier 10 ones
it doesn't have to do with seal clubbing
Seeing a bright blue name feels much better than seeing yellow
I think that's just you being picky for no reason
and I disagree, the yellow is cooler
Being picky means specifically wanting something over the other, while collectables at higher tier would make it feel more diverse instead of just "yellow white" and constantly seeing the same tanks over and over again
huh
What about green?
Collectables could just be.. like a collect em all container or something, like the KPZ 50
Uh.. what would green even mean?
Players
if your complaint is that you see the same tanks over and over again, that's likely due to a balancing problem and those tanks are overpowered. Adding collectibles won't fix that
I just want more diversity, saying that as long as collectables are rare but add more to a battle, it would be okay with me
but when you load into a battle you can't even see which tanks are white, yellow, or blue lmao
I want that update, to see which tanks are which, to know which ones are premium or collectable
and you're asking for something that isn't defined by the collectible status in game
Collectables are meant to add more to a battle, like premiums but more rare and special in a way
low tier Collectable are just useful for gold š
except WG doesn't utilize them that way currently and they will continue to not do so if they add them to tier 8
@misty wing Simple solution: Play other tank games or WoT PC if you want variety
I want to move to WOTC
the only collectibles that actually feel rare and cool are 1. the collabs and 2. low tier stuff like the Pz IV Hydro (which has 1 player in the past month btw), as I previously mentioned
and no they're not cool because you seal club in them, they're cool because they're rare, like you asked for
so don't go off topic on that again
I didn't say they were cool for seal clubbing, I'm just calling them seal clubbing tanks
well they're not because they're pretty mediocre
good luck seal clubbing in a below average tank
PZ II J is pretty good, very armored for a tier III
If you played it you'd know it's not good at all
I got a mastery in it
that probably means it's bad or not played by many people
And mastery is not even a good measure of how good the tank is
I guess I just know how to play it well
It's not that hard to seal club...
It's not bots anymore for me so if I get surrounded it's a challenge
It's still called seal clubbing for a reason
Also takes 2 minutes in matchmaking so I dont play often, I only use the collectables in training rooms half of the time
the problem with your proposal of adding rare tanks to "diversify the matchmaking" is that in order to make a tank rare at high tier, they have to either make it really bad so no one plays it, or really hard to obtain (in which case people will cry about pay to win)
Really? Pay to win? I stopped crying about that after I learned how to counter most of the more rare tanks
every time I bust out my 268/4 people cry š¤·āāļø
Bruh people dont know how to flank I'm assuming
people will cry about any prem/collector that is even half decent
I can counter tier IX's in a tiger II and win and people cry about premiums?
well good for you, but it's impossible for WG to make a rare tank without doing something weird like making it super terrible
Just make it.. uncommon
how, limit the amount available like in an auction?
Like uncommon to see in a game, like the M6A2E1 EXP
and how do you suppose they made it uncommon
Limit it by like.. "get now, only 100 left or something"
Make the chance very low like the AE
If you want to have "rare" tanks then buy battlepasses.
They are only available for a month and after that you can only get some of them through operation containers.
No, it's uncommon because it's ugly, it sucks, and it doesn't sell very well
why do you want WG to make more tanks like that
It also has a .05% chance of getting it
I'm talking about the M6 EXP
Oh, well yeah its ugly but that's why people play it, its funny looking
Not because it has good frontal armor?
but people don't play it, considering that you said it's uncommon to see
Weak turret cheeks, cant sidescrape, it's good at 2 things and thats mobility and frontal hull armor, also low DPM
@misty wing
People do play it, its uncommon to see, meaning people dont play it often
people don't play it often because it's not as enjoyable as other tanks
so why would WG want to add tanks that are less enjoyable
Yeah, it could use a slight buff..
I'm mentioning things that are uncommon to see, they're collectables but they're limited in the shop, like imagine they're on the shop and they all get bought out, let's say those tanks dont come out for a very long time, but get replaced by another limited tank
yeah but that's gonna create issues when it comes to pricing and WG's income
anyway you're thinking too much about the what and not enough about the why
Wargaming has millions of dollars and they're on the other side of the world
Why have this come to EXP buff when you guys were talking about collector tanks and their "Exclusivity"
Fortnite does a daily shop, they make good revenue.. what if wargaming did that?
Ew Fortnite
Wg have weekly deals nowadays, they sell premiums way more frequent than it used to.
That's true, but if they limited it yet made the shop options go by faster, it would be more appealing and smoother, like show certain camos from past premium passes, put those on the shop
Like this
Daily shop:
2 tanks
5 camos
3 attachments
5 different types of crates
And then of course premium days and gold
While i agree previous bp camos should be sold it may be too much if they go offer different premium tanks daily
Epic games and their players can handle it, they make more than twice as much as wargaming a month
pretty sure no one likes the daily shop mechanic in any game that it exists in
Because their games have been more mainstream the past years (esp. Fortnite)?
Wow, who would've thought that Epic games, a variety games maker, would reach out to a larger populace than WG, a war games maker.
Hasn't fortnite been around since 2016? 6 years ago now?
2018 I think
nope 2017 july
Almost 6
Closer to 5
anyway it doesn't matter, your example is pretty irrelevant
Didn't epic games make multiple war based games, fortnite once even had tanks in it?
having guns and machines doesn't make a game a war game
Doesnt change the fact that wargaming mostly focuses on wargames (excluding that World of Bowling game)
Unlike WG, Epic Games have way more variety on their game genres
Military grade war machines and guns, fighting each other, yeah sure just another day in Detroit lol
Actually Detroit isnt that far off
No way they made a BOWLING game?
a war game is a game that targets people who are into history and its wars specifically
Fortnite is targeted for the masses, and for the record its guns look like toys and not military grade stuff
Yeah lol, see the games released by wg on the app/play store
So.. 40k universe?
Wow, almost as if variety games can include war games.
^
Exactly
I donāt see your point
I dont see yours either
My point is that epic games making over twice what WG does isnāt surprising, and is actually expected
Anyways back to the thing earlier, daily premium tank offers may be too much since there would be more premium tanks that would be offered on a short amount of time. And having the current weekly deals are nice since you have 7-14 days or longer to buy a bundle you want.
Oh you were talking about finance, oh yeah I'm just saying if wargaming adapted to some more popular things they would most likely make more money
So 2 tanks every 2 days? 2 Ć 3 = 6, so that means they'd have to push a 3rd tank into the shop at the 7th day of the week
But then that would have them alot of work since they have to start from scratch, unlike WoWs, WoT, WoWp, and others which shares some features.
what exactly is having 1 or 2 day deals going to do with regards to making rare tanks
I dont know anymore I got sidetracked
Yes, I was talking about finance, thatās why I responded to your message talking about finance š¤¦āāļø
Should we go back to the first topic? Imo i dont think theres a need to have more "exclusive" tanks, although i understand some people like to have special tanks which few only have.
Everybody just wants an exclusive tank so they can feel special
I just hate the lack of diversity
Diversity on what
What kind of tank would you add to increase the diversity?
I keep fighting the same tanks over and over again, nothing special
What tier are you playing? I played quite a few games today and each game a pretty nice amount of tanks
VIII
Tier 8 is literally the most diverse tier.
Can I have your matchmaking? I saw a chimera 5 times in a row through different rounds
Well theres already alot of tanks ingame, its mainly the games' meta (or trend) are indicates the most used tanks on that tier.
Just play the game. Chimera is pretty common, but thereās 13 other tanks in the match.
I play it every single day, not once have I seen a tank I haven't fought before
@opaque flicker Is this not diverse yet for you?
I've seen almost every one of those in my time playing
Have you thought that perhaps the fact that there is a limited amount of tanks in the game means that you will see all of them at one point or another?
if you've played a lot then naturally you're gonna see all of them eventually lmao
They're all common though, I want a challenge when playing this game, it's the first reason I started playing was to challenge myself
^
this isn't some exploration simulator where you might discover a new type of alien or undersea life every month
Subnautica
Next update will have the new italian td lines, you would have atleast 6 new tanks to face against.
Try ratings, thatās a challenge
About time
Not much of a ratings person, played it before and it felt like normal but with more autoloaders
Itās normal, except you get to deal with more people yelling at you
That's just gaming
Also everyone is sweating, so playing it casually is actually hilarious
Nevermind it's just xbox lol
Mitsu > BDR š§
The thing is its normal to feel bored on a game over time, at first it would be challenging but you would feel the gameplay are more "stale & boring" after you get to play most of it
By far mitsu is better than BDR
I'm lost for words
Except for the fact that the mitsu is as big as a tog
The old gang, Japanese edition
BDR gets a more reliable gun, better armor profile, and better mobility
Eh Mitsu is just fun to play with its 280 damage gun
worse forward speed and but faster rotation. Mitsu has superior gun handling on both guns
You're using equipment on the Mistu but not the BDR, BDR has better gun handling, better penetration, and better gun angles
yeah just noticed mb. Weirdly enough it still felt more accurate. I played 10 games on both today
I used 160dmg gun. It's probably the aim time advantage
BDR also has better traverse, 24 compared to 20
AMX M4 49
Tiger II
Chi-Se
Best one on the list?
Chi-Se imo
I gotta go AMX for its mobility, Tiger II for its ability to fight tier IX's, and chi-se for armor
The only problem with AMX winning mobility is that Chi-Se gets the suspension equipment
I prefer AMX, it still looks good
Finally out of mute jail for stating the truth, anyway, have a pic of the luckiest Rheinmettal-Borsig Waffentragger player
Alright, what was your ātruthā?
APAC being APAC, which of course, meant a lot of toxicity, very high ping and packet loss and oh, the matchmaking being err...not so good
Well, I guess I wonāt ask you for the specifics, as to avoid a secondary punishment š
I've got a long list tbh, but I'm just gonna keep my mouth shut so I don't get muted again š
Matchmaking random, matchmaking is literally never able to be equal, so it can at least be fair
And by high ping...I meant....
Epic, you got the Lƶwe
Yeah, it's a credit grinding beast, but useless when the ping is...you know, gives you the ability to drive into the buildings and obstacles
You live in the APAC area, I assume?
Yeeeeeep
Unfortunate
What is the truth
Letās not š
Hahahahahaha
Is the 40TP Habicha a good tank? I'm looking forwards to purchasing it
Read my previous messages for the basics lol
One of the best Tier VI heavies, good armor and mobility with 225 Alpha and 156 pen, better than the 131 and Vk 36.01 (H)
Better than the 131 maybe, but I would say vk 36 is possibly the best
Probably because of its thicker upper plate than the two other mentioned, but not in terms of firepower or DPM
Firepower is the same in terms of alpha, 225. And yes dpm isnāt the best, but I thought itās close to the 40 TP? 131 has the best gun out of them, good dpm
No, 36.01(H) has only 220, and yeah, I agree that the 131 has the best among them, but in exchange for a paper hull
Ok but 220/225 isnāt a massive difference, would affect Dpm mostly but the actual alpha isnāt that important. And yeah I donāt think 131 is very good
bruh
Tier 7 m6?
Yes
i just got 5,899 damage on is7
Feel like WG missing it chance to correct T110E5 model, as real life counterpart frontal armour is M60-like rather than M48-like
I feel like I should add the SuperPershing WoT Blitz version with the external armor plating in front of the gun mantlet, also yes, I replaced the 90mm gun with the gun 8,8cm KwK 43 L/71
This rather gives me Hellcat vibes than Pershing
It's because I'm using the Tiger II hull which sort of makes this hybrid look like a massive Hellcat instead
Come to think of it, I probably should make another hybrid, an M18 Hellcat Ć Panther G hybrid would do >:3
Once ping make my IS ability to fly in normal game mode
Is Grille 15 worth it?
Or should i go for the czech medium t10
Im at the WT PZIV
And for the czechs im at the stock t8
Czech medium t10š
Okay thanks
The stock vtu isn't that good but when maxed, it's pretty good, it has mobility and a nice gun
Is it right, or am wrong that those pbr tanks' models origin from WoT pc?
You ain't wrong
Why cold war Soviet tanks have s*** ton of reactive armor and western tanks don't example like leopard 2
Western tanks do have reactive armor, itās just more NERA, or composite armor. ERA isnāt really seen on western tanks because they work a lot more closely with infantry, and when ERA goes off there is a high chance of collateral damage to anyone standing around.
Seem reasonable
Did I miss anything on the coming soon channel?
Itās a prem tank that was put in testing like a year ago, tanks blitz (the new game for the Ru server) gave it to their players apparently, hasnāt been released for wotb though (other servers) afaik. The guy you saw might be a tester, check his profile after battle and youāll see if heās got tanks like the carro 45t, Minotaur etc.
No wonder why I didn't see any of those so called Pasta TDs on the tech tree or store
Yeah lol, only testers get them. Iāve seen both the Minotaur and carro 45t in battle though
Ok š
no that tank has been given out as a gift to russian players from what it seems
both on tanks blitz and those who transferred to eu
Oh, well someone the other day was asking if they could have it and I think they transferred? Probably a mistake
I want to test those tonk but I'm in Asia server TT
and the game had to update again so i lost thr replay š¦
So guys, if you ever want to make vehicle concepts, hereās how you should calculate DPM.
DPM = (60/Reload) x Alpha
In action:
DPM = (60/7.3) x 200
DPM = (8.2) x 200
DPM = 1640
Yeah, that's what i did with my X1A2 proposal
Now that you tell me that...I'm probably gonna do that with one of my vehicle concepts soon
For autoloaders:
DPM = 60/(reload + (interclip * (magazine size - 1)) * alpha
And then autoreloaders are a whole mess
Yeah :(
For me I just calculate DPM as if they used the gun just like an autoloader, but for my concept sheets, I avoid autoreloders mostly
They also missed a chance to give us the m48a5 from pc
We do have the A5 though, it has the 105mm gun
It's an M48A1 with the cupola removed and an upgraded gun
The biggest difference between them is the 105mm. Seeing as it has that, itās essential the same as an A5
But isn't that basically M48A5 is? M48A1 and A3 upgraded?
Hey guys is the bundle with both of the M6s a good deal?
I have seen them on for 6.5k but they do have the attachments with them.
What are y'alls thoughts?
A lot of good players really like them so, I'm trying to decide to get them or not.
the M6 mutants aren't super great and a bit hard to play being super tall and having terrible side armor
I would say just save your gold for the upcoming Black Friday
yeah, T49s or tanks with high HE pen love the sides of the M6Ms
Have you seen the m48 on PC
I have, itās basically the same thing but with a raised engine deck
A raised engine deck and more importantly, the searchlight and other stuff attached to the turret
Thatās just PC models, if they made it a true A5 in blitz it would just be the raised engine deck
When they make tanks PBR in blitz its usually just porting over the "PC model" lol
So like I said, it's a missed opportunity
Your standard 122 mm gun also likes to HE them, itās super weak
Autoreloaders should be calculated as the maximum possible DPM (i.e firing as a single shooter on the shell with the fastest reload)
The A5 is the 105mm upgrade (well with the old M60 turret) but itās pretty much that already in blitz itās a weird hybrid
Is that how theyāre done in blitz? I would have thought itād be reloading the entire clip, then shooting
Thatās at least how it ought to be done, since DPM is really measuring a theoretical performance ceiling for a tank
I think that's burst damage
Right, Iāll check, should be easy to find out how they do it. Also if itās a theoretical performance ceiling then shouldnāt it be whichever way the dpm is the highest?
@balmy compass no, thatās how much damage you can give in a short time. Iām talking about what the damage would be per minute if you did that repeatedly. Burst damage is one clip
Correct. Which is always by firing as a single shooter on the shell with the quickest reload
well then it wouldn't be as much as shooting on the fastest reload
Ah ok, well I didnāt know that, but makes sense. Although if you add in the initial reload then that complicates things, however youāve always got time at the beginning of a battle so practically doesnāt matter. Things like mino though might be a different story, with a 20 secs first shell reload you may be in battle before the clips fully loaded
š didnāt think through it properly
Initial reload isnāt factored into DPM.
Itās best to think of DPM as a long run average. If you were farming an infinite number of tanks, how much damage would you deal on average?
An autoreloders technical Max damage per minute would be firing on the shell with the shortest reload until the end, where it would then burst out its entire clip before time ran out. Granted this ruins the dpm for the next minute, but š¤·āāļø
The āminuteā part of DPM is arbitrary. Again, DPM is at the core, a measurement of average maximum performance
I think we should measure dps instead of dpm
DPS doesnāt really make much sense for tanks given the slow rates of fire
No, but I like things that donāt make sense
Yes, but that would include the initial reload, although over a long enough period the affect on dpm would be minimal
See, the key phrase here is āover a long enough periodā
7 minutes long enough for you?
Yeah, well I would think of it as for the duration of a battle as an acceptable time to calculate DPM? Iām just pointing out that you shouldnāt take the top shell reload to calculate dpm, you have to reload all the rest to get there, which as I mentioned in the case of Minotaur may affect it in reality, no? Also I presume the intershell reload is calculated into it cause that has to happen before the last shell is reloaded again after firing
Carius are you still in summer break or something
does anyone know why the US jumped from 26 to 46 for the pershing to the patton
this looks like fun
They probably had designs and ideas for others tanks before the Patton, but after the Pershing, like the T29, T30, T31 ect
Probably just a bunch of other vehicles in between
^^^ pretty much this
Another Chinese heavy? Premium?
That gun looks interesting for sure
tech tree
Kinda goofy to see the T29, T30, T32 and T34 so you wonder what is the T31
Boy is that thing cursed
T33 š
New line?
yeah
they're all like modern-looking tanks with derp guns
with a rocket booster mechanic
And broken turrets with gun depression
My dreams for a plank (plane-tank) are close at hand!
damn so 2 new lines coming up
no, it's just that one?
italian tds?
they're already out on wot PC, which is what we're talking about if it wasn't clear
The next blitz line will be Chinese lights after the mino
oh alr, i thought u were talking abt wot blitz. my bad
me getting depresion cuz i am t7 and my enemies are ix
So youāre failtooning then?
He meant he was uptier for the first time in ages apparently. Not failtooning
how can T7 facing T9 normally? I must miss WG putting back +-2MM then
They haven't lol, not sure if the guy was trolling or just confused but seems he didn't really mean that
IX is 9 right? How can he mistype VIII to IX?
As I say I don't know what he meant
what tank is this?
Astron Rex 105
lovely how I cant type the name in caps like it's supposed to be
+-2mm is still a thing in the game altho it's very very rare
Does anyone here have the t2020? I would like to fight it and test the army of it.
I do
It's only possible with a split tier platoon, and then it's only "+2-0" for the lower tier tank because it matches based off the highest tier tank in the platoon with ±1
Are you in NA server? If so can I fight you in it to test the armor and side scraping ability?
I just saw that you are would you mind helping me out with it sometime? I can wait till the weekend too.
sure
add me in game @_Nilou_Nyaa
alright
You typing their user with the @? š
something like that probably
Pls donāt nerf this any more. I love this baby.
Balance shouldnāt be based on the userās enjoyment š¤
This tank is my turn off brain tank and charge in tank.
Hence it should be nerfed
Lol yep I was well I'm hear.
I knowā¦but it feels so good clapping mediums. That game I trapped an E50M in a corner, and the poor guy just pointed his gun up.
Totally nothing wrong with that
Well he had rammer so 300mm of heat pen isnāt doing anything against Typeās 340mm+ frontal armor.
how do you even know whether he has rammer or cali
I think he has rammer because he was shooting fast.
it's like 0.5 seconds difference, pretty hard to just eyeball
Even if he had cali, 330mm of heat pen wouldnāt even pen the turret weakspots of 340mm.
in a facehug he should be able to go through the cupola easily
Well, he bounced all of his HEAT shells since he tried to shoot my cheeks.
probably not the best of players then
I just realized that the type 71 is now my least played tier 10 in my garage despite the fact that I free xp'd and spammed it on launch
just goes to show how boring it is
Itās one of my most played T10 because itās super fun to steamroll enemy meds.
I think it's less of that and more that you have a fetish for Japanese heavies
Nah, just like good heaviums.
more like he has no brain and must play tanks that compensate
Nah, my favorite med is the FV4202 because HESH.
oh look the medium that got buffed to be braindead
No. It can be penned easily because the cheeks are still weak. Get your facts straight.
why should i talk to someone who plays brainless tanks and makes dumb suggestions like a poorly built idea machine
FV4202 kept getting buffed in its weaknesses (top speed, turret armor) so yes it is becoming more and more braindead
It still requires a bit of skill because the turret can be penned in the cheeks with standard and the turret is weak to any gold ammo. Plus HESH can only be used on weakspots.
You think the upper plate of the prog is a weakspot?
I donāt see them that often, and I face armored mediums more often.
may as well make the leo 1 more and more irrelevant right?
Having 210mm of HE pen is more then enough to go through just weakspots š
You can go through the lower plate of the E 50 M if its not angling
Most meds show their turrets, so I have to wait for them to shoot at someone else so they can show the sides.
Okay
Sounds normal
He was just an unskilled player
Thatās not so easy to hit unless you sat there still. And if the Type didnāt use enough gun depression
he said he was pushing the e50m into a corner so I assume they were hard facehugging
in which case it's rather easy to go through the type's cupola
Complicated to deal with, especially when it has tons more HP
all I'm saying is that the E50M shouldn't have just sat there pointing his gun up
Yeah, even less shoot the cheeks instead
Anyone know if the T69 is worth using? Trying to get to the T57 Heavy but the T69 doesnāt seem super great after trying it. Might be a skill issue lol
Itās meh. The armor isnāt great, and the gun has mediocre pen. Itās mid tier.
I think decent but not meta at all. Probably worth playing
What about the T57 Heavy, is it worth the grind? Saw it in action when I was using my T-54, killed most of our team.
Itās a good clipper. Good DPM and burst potential. Somewhat troll armor can bounce a few shells. Though IMO M-6-Yoh is better.
The Yohās look weird but perform so well
Donāt judge something by its looks. The Yoh has stronger turret armor, which is why I personally think itās better than the T57 heavy.
The side armor is terrible
It is so donāt overexpose yourself.
Far from it, but decent in its tier š
Not really. A T10 heavy with premium can pen you.
To most tier 8 meds
Yoh feels pointless to play. T57 >>>
And T69 is actually quite good
Tier nines using prammo will be able to pen with a bit of aiming, tier eight tds using prammo can pen. Some TDs won't have to load prammo. Tier ten meds loading prammo will pen it fairly easily. It depends on the angle you're at, above or below, skill of the enemy, how long you peek for
I feel the extra turret armor of the Yoh makes it a better hulldown heavy and can be more aggressive.
Then some tanks like T10 TDs only have to click and pen you.
That's why I said some TDs don't even have to load prammo.
The T57ās 400 dmg with a 2.5 sec reload between 3 shots on the magazine will really add up if you hit all the shots
Itās more of a passive heavy since your armor is unreliable. YOH if you want to play a bit more aggressively.
Yoh's armor isn't very reliable either. And going hull down isn't aggressive play tbh
Hull down is basically trench warfare, can get very stalemate-y
Itās reliable if you wiggle your turret armor upwards to hide the hatches.
Oh wow now I can't shoot back at my enemies
Well you do that after you shoot and have to pull back.
I donāt see people playing Yohās a ton
Ho-Ri Type III: n o
Another thing, it's got really nice mobility and reverse speed for a casemate, but I don't use it a lot, idk why even though it's one of the best TDs
Problem with the yoh is just
Why would you play an autoloader that doesn't have high clip damage, and has to deal with having either worst-in-tier alpha, or horrible dpm
The hull armor is much worse now after 9.1 too
Every other autoloader feels so rewarding when you get a full clip off, the yoh not so much
But a 1.7 sec intershell with 900 clip alpha, made even smaller with shell boost. That's interesting enough Imo, and you can run the dpm gun to get an incredibly solid tank
I doubt you can aim in very well with the 120mm and shell reload boost
Just pointing out the gimmicks
Most people run the dpm gun, which has amazing accuracy, great Dpm, good intershell, and decent enough Clip alpha
I just think both guns defeat the purpose of being a clipper and/or a heavy tank, while making up for it in other areas. The T57 with its objectively better gun but worse armor feels much more solidified in its role
Well different roles, t 57 is more of a true autoloader yes
Yoh with the 105mm just feels so stupid when you're not getting your full clip off, it's just like yeah, I'm hitting for less than a Russian med
The Vipera is pumpable š¤Ø
13 second mag reload is fast tho
Yeah but clippers are more fun when you're putting more eggs in one basket
This tank kinda decent
It's basically an ISU-130 but with a turret
i can never play well with 130pm, whats the playstyle
No, it's a smaller skorpion with a worse gun and limited turret traverse
In short, HE magnet
the upper plate is autobounce and HE resistant tho
It's got slightly more troll armor, and an extra degree of gun depression, but I rate the skorp higher
PBR and looks seals the deal tbh
I wish Skorp wasn't so square looking but I'll take it because it's German
Its turret is technically less square than the SU's
yes but then you look at the hull
and then there are extra blocks on the sides for the turret ring or something
ISU-130 is most like a tier 8 SU-100Y, there's basically nothing like it
yeah, it's shiny that's why
excepts you almost can't see that it's an anicamo as a result
the animation part is hard to see
Finally finished with my Tiger Pershing concept, now to wait for my cooldown to finish
Nvm, I think I can post it now
it looks obviously animated to me with and without PBR
it looks kinda like a jackson from the side profile
Itās smaller, faster, and has a much better camo value
It's because of the Tiger II's thiccc hull and the T26E4's turret silhouette
it's not really faster
worse top speed, worse effective p/w on hard and soft, slightly better on medium, better traverse
you can argue that it's faster where it matters, but on paper they trade blows evenly
Better in hard, worse only on soft
oh I misread
still, the p/w on medium is pretty similar
True, but the camo value is what really sets it apart
Still HE magnets
no one said they weren't and it doesn't matter
yeah I actually can't enjoy the cent 5/1 at all
alpha is just pitiful
the dumb autobounce ufp and smaller profile is what sells the 130pm for me
I prefer tanks with a taller profile so I can intimidate my opponents
It causes a really weird metallic effect
You can see it really shine if you choose the blue rank camo on any PBR
KV-5: Hiiii
@robust orchid you forgot to reduce the damage of the 88mm gun on your tank
The name itself is funny
yet he able
I know, my bad š
š
and get shot
So I will get the panther 2
huh
check out the latest monstrosity I've created
Uh huh.
Canāt even turn the turret much because
- The sideskirt jammed it
- The log prevents it from passing that angle
0 degrees to the left, 45 degrees to the right ez
which tanks are very strong but don't look the part, and which ones look more intimidating than they really are
I knowā¦the Grille looks very deadly, but itās actually very mediocre.
For me it's vindicator
It's gun look like 300mm gun
But it actually only 155mm
T26E5 is better than it looks and Object 260 looks scarier than it actually is imo
260 seems scarier than it looks to me lol, soft stats are good but hard stats aren't fantastic
it's pretty big and looks well-armed, with the dual machine guns in the turret front
Vickers light is probably scarier than it looks
conqueror and m103 look scarier than they are
Its accuracy stats are...š
Its hull is as paper as the STB-1, but with a pike š
300mm pen + 600 alpha + 0.288 dispersion + Nice mobility + nice camo + 10 sec reload + hard to hit at distance
And a lot more and you saying its mediocre? That tank only needs skill and it becomes dangerous af
pretty strange pricing to get the tank fully equipped is cheaper than the non equipped one š
@nocturne bronze yeah but still looks a bit silly they could at least fully equip the other version as well
Dude the whole package is 22k gold worth so obviously you're getting the equipment
Well no one complains about the HUGE discount of the bundle and it can be tempting to someone who wants a tier 8 premium for a lesser price.
Soo...since war thunder is adding the BT-42, does this mean wargaming will?
To keep up and all? It could be a tier 4 light and do like 320-ish
No
WG should add more Finnish tank
Like BT-42
Ho Ri is that but way better. Also nice camo? It has one of the worst camo ratings for a T10 TD. Plus HEAT pen on the Grille is a joke.
Grille has a massive mobility advantage over Ho-ri
Grille has 29% camo rating. Even T110e3 has better camo at 31%.
Not really. Hi Ri can go 45 km forward and 20km in reverse while the Grille can go 47 km in forward and 15km backwards. Plus the hull traverse on the Ho Ri is 8 degrees per second better.
6 extra effective p/w isnāt massive?
Balanced out by the better reverse speed and traverse speed of the Ho Ri. Overall mobility is roughly equal.
Not even close lol. And the traverse speed on the Ho-ri is negated by bad gun angles, something the grille gets over it
Not really since the Grille can be circled by other tanks easily because the turret is not fully rotatable.
The Ho-ri even more so, seeing it doesnāt even have a turret
Iām not trying to say the Ho-Ri isnāt better, but saying itās way better is an overstatement
Both Grille and Ho Ri kinda trash rn
Iād say the Grille is in decent tier. Not bad, but itās not particularly great. Ho Ri is in the good category because of better camo, pen, and troll armor.
Ho-Ris mobility just lets it down too much
The gun on the Grille should have 350mm of HEAT pen, not the current 334 mm of pen.
I wouldnāt call Ho Ri good. Rear mounted gun with no turret, poor mobility, and a relative lack of armor
What are you shooting where 334 pen isn't enough?
Still has good camo and a good gun. Plus the armor is pretty troll with its traverse speed.
@thick trout An IS4ās upper plate is 340mm thick unangled. Thatās one thing it canāt pen.
It is, in fact, not 340mm unangled.
Well in game, you canāt pen it frontally with 330mm of HEAT from an E100. Thatās 314mm against AP.
pretty sure it shows pen values against HEAT
you can definitely pen that with 330mm of heat from an E100
the armor is even weaker since you are taller than an IS4
so unless the IS4 is on a hill you can def pen lol
Armor inspector shows effective vs HEAT. Blitz hangar shows effective vs AP.
Hereās effective vs AP. I just put the gun elevation up 5 degrees to simulate the normalization.
Hmm, okay then!
Ty positive, I wish I could see tier 10 but Iām a bit broke
Spent it all on crates
blitzhangar shows HEAT too, only using the pen function of armor inspector allows you to calculate with AP by using the AP shell of a tank
Or, of course, doing the math yourself š
Ew math
Jk I like math, but just using armor inspector is easier for me š¤·āāļø

I love math, it let me solidify my discovery of 3CRB and it helps me explain to people how they somehow failed to pen their shells š
I think grille should get 700/600/1050 alpha, 370 heat pen and 90 HE pen, better camo, and a massive nerf to the DPM in exchange
oh and fix the gun angles and remove spall
wdym by fix gun angles
give it the same depression/elevation no matter where you point the turret (it's not like the WT where the hull blocks it at certain points)
I see
buff top speed back to 50 too?
Man do you know how much HP tier IVs have? That would be the ultimate Seal Clubber, worse than the ARL-44!
Well with the the BT-7 being a tier 3, it seemed like a good fit...
Just because thatās a silly concept, make it have only 30mm pen HE
Okk....I'd be fine with that, most tier 4 HE is useless anyway.
So I donāt know if I posted it here before, but Iāve been working on an improved European TTā¦
Except for when it's at angles where both 2cr/3cr are applied, the pen is enough and it doesn't pen, or it pens but it hits a part of the armor that doesn't take damage, like spaced armor or some non-attached visual armor u can seemingly pen/hit š¤
I am yet to see such a case
Looks complicated
Then I can just tell them that as an explanation, no?
The trick with maths is to just keep going until you donāt understand what youāre saying yourself anymore
I think I've done the math some time ago, and it seems to have worked with halved 2CR as Lux has brought up when 3CRB occurs
Guess i played myself š
š
Grille 15 sides
And any tank with oddly shaped armor
Can you give a specific example? A replay would solve the case right then and there, if you got that
I do not have a replay but i however remember there being a case where i saw a toonmate shoot a grille 15 before PBR(when some hit boxes were fixed) on the side from behind, the shot mark was registered on the side as a bounce at an angle of less than 70-85 degrees where all shells bounce, and the shot seemingly hit but bounced, even though it should've applied 3/2cr, however that works and ensured the pen on the side
Was it the upper or lower side?
Lower side, well more like the middle point between both
Iām pondering that it was merely a miss through the tracks
Dear God this is bad
I had a stroke reading th
yes, 268/4 is OP
I can't believe it's in the Soviet tech tree in PC šæšæ
TS-5 is OP? LOL
TS-5 is ugly that's what
Round T28
I'm pretty sure it's actually the historical T110
Top Speed - 5
Really hard to beat when you forgor how to drive
Plz berf ts5
It's literally unkillable when my gun is disabled š
It is one of the proposal for project which T110 is part for in case M103 is a failure, so yes?
Not sure if this is sarcasm or not, but 268/4 is pretty bad
268/4 is OP, unless your objective is to win the match
Still really annoy fighting it early in the match thought, I give them that
what? It's better in the late game rather than early
It's annoying to play, with or against. It doesn't even contribute much to a win unless the enemy is really dumb. It turns out to be a complete joke if you kill its team first
(yes it was sarcasm)
yeah it does suck
I mean late game in APAC is either you team got wipe, in which case V4 or not still suck. Or red team got wipe then anyone can flank it for days
if it's late game like 3v3 or so it can isolate its fights better
also regions don't mean anything in casual play for basically any game, idk why people always bring it up
Because our match tend to result in a wipe out? And if it is 3vs3 here you better pray your team have a sense to support you, because 1vs3 doesn't favour V4 much
but how do you know it tends to be a wipe out more often than in other regions
I guess it's more of a "speak for yourself" deal
They don't know about other servers, so they speak for the server that they experience it in.
then they should say "from my experience", not "here in X server"
bringing up regions always implies that whatever you're saying is more so the case if not exclusive to your region, which most people have no way of confirming
I don't think 268/4 is OP because sure, it's a great brawler, but its gun fails against heavy tanks that use their armor, or its armor fails against TDs.
It boils down to being a low-HP turretless heavy that can just hit hard
its armor also fails against cali T57s which are extremely common
We tend to have, let say, "different mentality" here. I (and some clan mates) find the team have a tendency to focus just one flank (for better or worse). In such case, V4 is can be useful leading the spearhead. And because match tend to start with a huge 7vs7 in a tight spot, any late game movement is mostly chasing a few survivors
You're ignoring my question of how do you know that other servers aren't like that as well
I said in APAC because it is the server I play? As for experience in other server, I only get mostly from HRF stream
the way you word things sounds like you're just trying to convince yourself and others that APAC is a special region
It is special in a sense CIS/EU/NA server is special: how the local player base expect other to react and the reaction themselves
and even then your experience doesn't reflect your whole servers'
You're right that every server is kind of "special" in their own way, but the way you worded things implied that NA/EU/CIS has style A and APAC has style B, which you have no way of proving and is also way overgeneralized
if that makes any sense
I sure hope after 10k battle I get some sense how the normal/casual players doing thing
You're right, I did that because I want to clarify how my playtime in this server causing I to value V4 early game (hope it take the charge, not sniping) more than late game (not at all).
is fun playing the panther 2 in mad games
What would you guys suggest me to go for after Yoh?
FV4005 ~~ (WT E100)~~
What type of tank you're going for?
Whats better? E50m or Leopard 1?
E50M
depends
If you want an armoured medium with reasonable gun and mobility, go e50m. If you want a fast tank with a great gun and dpm, go leopard
version 4 can be dealt with using tier 9 heavies, its not as absurdly strong as people say
t110e3 is borderline braindead though
I like bullying v4's on my Jageroo, either of their cheeks go grey when they slightly angle
ive beaten some version 4s in a 50tp prototyp
It doesn't depend, E50M is just better
leopard has a completely different playstyle
Light tank playstyle
A playstyle that's obsolete and hard to carry with
Also you can literally play an E50M like a leopard and be 90% as effective
It's 100x more flexible
then again it depends on the player and the situation
an e50 will never outrun or outgun a leopard 1, and vice versa for the armour
the "problem" with the leopard 1 is that it sacrifices a lot for it's gun and mobility
leopard has one of the highest DPM values of any tank i tier 10
A bad player will do better in the E50M, an average player will do better in the E50M, a good player will do better in the E50M
e50m has a lower skill floor and lower skill ceiling
leopard has a high skill floor and an extremely high skill ceiling
that's how the two tanks are different
Stop trying to use the fact that they have different playstyles as an argument, I can comfortably say the T57 heavy is better than the object 260, because it just is
Also the E50M has higher dpm with HE so technically it has the higher ceiling
saying that e50m has a higher skill ceiling because it has higher DPM with HE is right, until you look at all of the other gun and mobility aspects
The ceiling of any tank is farming the rear of some poor French tank with HE hitting every shot
usually a player improves by removing human error
think of the survivability onion and the doctrine that leopard was designed around
Anyway, the Leo 1 isn't going to be performing at its ceiling as much as the E50M is, and even if it is, with AP it is only dealing 12% more dpm. The E50M is easily going to be better on average
then again, E50M has a larger margin for error
What?
you can make mistakes in e50m and not get punished extremely hard
So it has a lower margin for error then
in other words: you have more breathing room when playing e50m
Which is worth more than doing 12% more dpm at your (kind of) peak
lets think about it this way:
E50M: Jack of all trades, master of none
Leopard 1: sacrifices all armour and survivability for agility and firepower
one is easier to play, the other is more annoying if you play it well
neither tank is objectively bad, it mostly depends on the player
Neither is bad, but if you add up all the E50M's advantages it outweighs the Leo's
Also it's the master of ramming and beating other meds in dogfights
e50m is better at exploiting mistakes of others more often
let's think of it this way, if person A is better at task A by 50%, and person B is better at task B by 10%, then person A is overall better than person B assuming both tasks are equally important
Even though they trade advantages, the magnitude of one is much larger than the other
the fact that leo's DPM actually drops behind a lot of other meds if given the opportunity to farm with HE is actually a huge setback, considering its playstyle encourages it to get to the sides and rear of enemy tanks frequently
Lol
Huge setback
When the HE cant even pen the sides of most tier 10s
yeah there's that too
Sustained HE dpm is completely useless when you won't get a 2nd shot in.
This goes for practically every tier 10 med
Less for 4202
i got 4202 researched but somehow i didnt buy it since months lol
I gotta be honest... IS-6 is really fun to play. Last match i played with it, it was on Fort Despair, and I was able to use a wall that was low enough to hide my hull behind at the lowest part, while I was able to pick at the mile high cupola of the Vk-168 I was dueling. Heck, I even blocked a few shots from that Vk when we first got into the duel before we took our side of the wall. Great armor, great gun, and overall fun in the high tiers.
Itās okay IMO. The gun is Derpy with terrible DPM, and the armor only works against guns with less than 220mm of pen.
True. But if you can play it smart and go for the weak spots on tanks such as the Vk.168's cupola and glacis plate, it can be good. I also find with it's higher-than-usual-for-heavy's speed, you can do some cheeky flanks
True dat. Itās a good heavy, but itās nothing extraordinary.
Im not saying it's extraordinary, im just saying it's fun to play in my viewing, especially with the right strats
252u is better imo
True. Better overall armor and a punchier gun.
yes
I can see that. But im trying not to spend any more money and save for more important stuff, so I'll stick with the IS-6 for now as my go to
In the right position the 168 is a monster tho, sidescraping in a way youāre able to hide your lower plate and cupola
Yeah, I have had situations like that, and that's why I tend to keep my distance and maybe a building to hide behind. I really only go close quarters if the cover there allows it, or I have a team behind me
VK 168 is pointless when the VK 100.01 exists.
You saving up for Black Friday/Blitz Fair?
The only tank I would really go for if I had the chance to buy it would be the M60. Im a big sucker for cold war tanks, and i don't really have the time to try and grind the M48
How about the Chieftain or something like the Bobject?
pretty hot tank
Damn right it is. If only we had night battles for night vision to work on, so that IR spotlight up top isn't just for show lol
Also, for Black Friday, are all the tanks gonna be buyable? Or just a select few?
there's really no other tanks that use or can use nv
Not sure.
AMX 30 has that spotlight-looking box on the mantlet, so that could be another one
but you would have matches filled with m60s and 30b's, and possibly t62s and progettos
I want to get the Chieftain.
Well tbh, it can all depend on what cosmetic kit ya got. The IS-6 normally doesn't have an IR spotlight, but the kit that came in the Legend crate does add such a spotlight onto it. I can see why wargaming chose to keep that out. It would be pretty confusing to get that to work, having the game detect whether or not your tank is equipped with an NVD on stock or having it on with a cosmetic kit
And yes, I believe that i know the main reason why night battles aren't a thing.
gravity mode favours the 168
turret armour is a lie, it is not completely 350mm frontally in all areas on the front
I am able to draw a disgusted face using some of Chieftain Mk 6 weakspots on the front, not counting cupola
okay maybe this is better
Itās pretty easy to hide from mid range.
It looks sad
put the turret armour against some heavies and tank destroyers and the turret could get penetrated on the front
there are better heavies with more reliable turret armour
T62A, a mt, literally has a stronger frontal turret and the turret armor are more uniformed than the Mk. 6
We hope the pbr version of the Chieftain mk. 6 would give it a better turret armor profile.
When is the Chieftain getting PBR?
they don't seem to be prioritizing tier 10 premiums for PBR
What tanks have been getting PBR lately?
mostly popular tier 8s and tier 10 tech trees
Gotcha. So not a lot of premiums?
I mean they just did the dracula/helsing/lycan
but they're clearly just going for the ultra popular ones
I wouldn't be surprised at all if they do the action x for 9.5
Or the Annihilator or Smasher since theyāre everywhere.
like they already did the chimera, t54e2, object 252u, skorpion
I hope instead of giving PBR, they nerf the anni's graphics
that way I can hate it more
idk about you guys but I find games more fun when there's something stupid to complain about
like there can't be heroes without villains ya know
stuff like the anni and 183 do that for me in blitz
I suppose. Though Annihilators/Smashers annoy me the most when it comes to tanks. MM gets me infuriated, and ghost shells make me question my sanity.
Ben türküm
the MM is fine, casual modes are supposed to have very loose matchmaking for the sake of increased randomness (and thus replayability) and fast time to find a match
???
@misty wing I play fairly late so MM is pretty terrible.
İm tukish
no we don't speak turkish here
I no speak english
use a translator or find a turkish speaking server, nothing we can really do
hmmmm
Fat vk 90 turret
Grind for is7 or ussr mt line
Is7
For tourney tanks probably
Or for just good
I would prefer if WG put a hard limit of max 2 td per match
what type of shells should i use on my isu-152 and when
i have the last turret
Use the dpm gun, itās actually pretty good
Ok well ISU has no turret i think you mean gun so take that ammo with bl 10
10 ap
4 apcr
6 he
btw also use calli-shels
hmm thanks
Cali on ISU is actually trolling
If you use calibrated you wonāt miss as much š§ (because the rof is worse)
Rammer isn't all that helpful on a tank that cannot put out sustained fire
Thereās always those moments when a tank just gets behind cover .2 seconds before you can fire and thatās avoided going rammer over cali
Rammer takes almost a second off the reload š¤·āāļø
is it a good idea to use calibrated shells for all autoloaders?
Yes
Just don't use it on AMX
There are some where using vents gives you great dpm, such as the T69, but for most cases Cali is better
I use vents on autoloaders that benefit from things like accuracy and traverse buffs. So something like a 50 b benefits a lot more from vents than cali, whereas I run cali on something like a 57
and would you choose gun rammer or calibrated shells for big guns like 152mm guns?
Depends on the penetration
Rammer for the vast majority
what tanks would you run calibrated for those big guns
Pretty much just FV 183 for the memes
hesh guns?
question I currently have a few t9's that sound interesting for me to buy (or at least the t10 does xd) the vickers cr, wz120, m103 and jagdtiger the other ones that I am not really interested are the 704, t54 (for 140) and the vkb. Which one would you get first and why? Or maybe someone is nice and ranks them for me xd
Vickers, JagdTiger, or T-54 would be my choices
Is the 140 really worth it? I have the e50m, m48, stb, t62 and t100 for mediums or "mobile" tanks
But thanks I think I will go with the vickers ^^
149 is a good pseudo light
You mean a t100 with better gun basically xd
Pretty much
And I guess it's also a bit of a smaller Leo with a little bit of armor right
At least that's how I see the 140
What's the most annoying t10 tank (per "type") to play against in your opinion? For me:
Lt: sheri
Mt: tvp
Ht: ig concept 1b but the type is also annoying
Td: 268/4 but the je100 and 4005 also have a special place
t100lt, tvp, type 71, 268/4
nothing
My tier 10 tank
t 49 is so bad now the gun is trash
The tank hasn't change much at all other than the PBR model
I run rammer on my jag and E100, and the 113G FT, but when it comes to something like a 60tp, i use cali
Only actual difference afaik was losing -10 gun dep over the rear, hardly something you would even notice in the majority of your battles.
T-62A or Obj. 140?
Object 140
Is obj 752 expected to return to the store?
yes
Bruh why gunrammer on jag š„
That hurts my heart
Dpm, since the pen is good enough
And how you wanna fight a E3 without calli?
Simple, weakspots
I doubt cali makes a difference on an E3 lmao
cali on basically any TD except the 183 hurts my heart
Why cali when 2 hurt enemy anyways? š³
What was the price of Obj 752 last time ?
like 17.5k or something
Are we going to get Sabaton camo and crew voice lines for this?
You donāt need Cali on a Jgpz to pen an E3
Badger in PC can have 5.2k DPM with the right equipment lol.
I did not sped the last hour coming up with an independent Swedish tree with a Unique MT line, PC-inspired (but not entirely copied) TD line, and new low-tier tanks.
What?! How?! (Iām tired of using it to get the euro T6s)
fast speed and very nice gun depression for a medium tank
Yes, then you get to the excruciating grind with a gun that quite frankly makes me want to disappear from this plane of existence
Is that the tier 5? Imo it is one of the least enjoyable tanks in the game
It is
Yes. Yes it is.
Make the jager00 has 420mm HEAT pen, compete with Hori
It really doesnāt need it
huh
It doesn't need, that true, nevertheless it would be funny to have 462 pen
You'd actually be throwing to run calibrated shells on a jag with 420 heat
hence I said funny, as I image there would be a nerf to DPM if WG do that (no chance it happen thought)
I don't see why they would nerf the DPM, the tank is already pretty bad
Then what would WG nerf if they want to give 420 HEAT pen though?
nothing, because it doesn't need one
Didn't I say no chance that happen?
why bring up hypotheticals in the first place if you're gonna kill off the discussion by saying it won't happen
There is hardly a discussion to kill in the first place
what you're saying makes absolutely zero sense
if they buff the jageroo's heat pen, they might nerf the DPM
no, they wont
then what will they nerf?
nothing, because it wouldn't need one
but there's no chance it'll happen
I like to think when I said there is no chance it won't happen, I basically agree with your premier that Jag doesn't need HEAT pen buff, but I want to know what in your hypothetical scenario WG decided they know better and go for it, what would they take away (if they even brother to take away one at all)
I'm saying if WG decides to approve the idea of buffing jag's heat pen, they won't take away something as a trade off
So we are just going in circle because a misunderstanding?
Why t-34-2 have 200mm turret armor
To block shells
Fair enough
language
15/17.5
iām gonna save gold for the auction and iām either getting the helsing or the drac and idk which one, help pls
Why do you want two tanks that are 6 years old and overshadowed?
because im trying to actually get an enjoyable tank
Just get a better one. Dracula is one of the sold-out tanks for those who buy to think it's worth the price.
wdym get a better one?
Dracula is not worth the 12.5K(?) gold in Auctions
yeah i guess, there are good tier x for that price
why do 60TP get ammo racked easiy?, played 24x today and got ammo racked 8x. That's more than i ever get ammo racked in my entire playthrough
because yes
so it wasnt just me?, i feels like i played it so wrong
rng issue
i have never get ammo racked more than 4x on all of my tanks
š
The ammo rack has the same health as Soviet mediums and the IS-7. Also, the rack is on the floor, and in the hull cheek, so it's in spots that are commonly hit
may i know where exactly that place is?
oh wow... Thank you very much
I think i finished my X1A2 proposal, and gave it a bit more horsepower, since 300 hp and a p/w ratio of 15 isn't that good for a lt
Is this only for the left side or both sides of the tank? I just got the 50TP and curretly working my way towards 60TP. Hoping to learn more about the weakness of this tank.
Look at the yellow boxes in the image closely
Yes both sides
What about KV-2 in battlepass with slightly increased statistics or a captured German-modification KV-2 754(r)?
is worth grinding the maus
Some will say yes some will say no, personally I liked the grind of the Maus. The tier 8 is good
well lets say i can buy the tier 6 tank from that line anytime
Whatās the tier 6 again
I think I skipped it lol
It's the 30.01 P
I skipped it
I didn't skip it, but i was dumb and never researched the 88mm on it
E5 got remodel a bit, on wotpc it's bow shape at front, in blitz they make it egg shape. What is the difference between both hull?
should i skip it
Youre choice
If you realy want it then jes but its up to you
No Jeffery
Ofc E 50 is a pain
Well that case I skip it
How should I play the FV215b
E50 upgraded is extremely good
Whoās he dressed up as?
Please just change it and letās move on
Before I was asking, now Iām telling you. Change it
Play hulldown, and then when the opportunity arises, pop reactive/adrenaline and steamroll people with raw DPM
āTry not to get shot anywhere because something will probably break, someone dies or youāre on fireā
@balmy burrow last chance
Velo#8670 was banned
Lmao
Is the Japanese heavy line worth it?
Yes
How do I play t49 with derp gun?
Itās just a KV-2
Itās different to be more cohesive to the Sphinx, and the gun + mantlet gives it away as a KV-2
Bt-42 also does not have external fuel tanks
When does it get better cuz the chi-he is a pain to play
Tier 6-7
Mitsu sucks apparently (I skipped it so I donāt know lol) but after 6 I liked all of them
Oh okay thanks for the advice i will see if i can skip that one as well
Youāre welcome
i kinda... fxp'd my way to tier 8
chi-se was pretty broken upon release, type 68 is decent, and type 71 is a beast
I kinda free xp'd my way to tier 10 and then stopped playing it after 40 games lmao
The t6 really suffers on the pen department, but itās main strength is dpm, if you typically struggle in low pen tanks run cali but if you donāt rammer makes you a dpm machine
type 71 borrowed some stalinium i think lmao
T69 is so underrated
I'm soon going to get the T110E4 and E100, advice I should use for them?
E100 is straight up better š
I know, I'm asking for advice, I'm getting both
E100 is pretty brain dead, you can just trade and you'll do fine
E4 just remember that you're a TD with low HP and not a heavy
Yeah figured the E100 was easy to play, angle the turret, sidescrape, stuff like that?
I'm assuming I stick with my team on the E4
Also angle my turret due to weak gun mantle, wiggle the hull to avoid being penned on the lower plate
Assuming this is correct?
Angling the turret is not recommended unless somethingās covering your turret side
So slight angle, lock the turret in place, and wiggle
the E4 is way too slow to make wiggling/angling any use tbh
If the T28 Prot can do it
Its slow wiggle but I've bounced shots like that before
you probably bounced the shot because the enemy didn't have very good pen or aim, and not because your wiggle threw them off
From a chimera
T28 prototype doesn't have bad armor, it's best used at range behind a bush, the buff it needs is turret and side armor
Otherwise it's not a durable tank, but it's not as bad as people make it out to be, the only issue is people complain about being penned by any tank with high penetration, but that's mostly other tank destroyers or heavies using premium shells
It has pros and cons of course like every other tank, but the main reason the prototype has worse armor overall is because wargaming gave it a turret
Which now that I think about it, it doesn't exactly need a huge buff because if it got buffed, nobody would really play the regular T28 anymore and the Prototype would become much more popular
no one wants to play either tank, they're just there to grind for the tier 10s
Yeah let's be honest the only great T28 is the HTC
HTC is meh
T28 Defender is the best one
I prefer the HTC just because of it's insane ability to hide weakspots
Hi
I would say the HTC is superior in its tier to the T 28 Defender in its tier.
I would say the HTC is one of the worst vehicles in the game for being so ugly
HTC isn't too bad of a TD imo
I don't think it looks ugly at all, it just looks different because of its pivoting gun
Why the heck has the marder 2, panzer 4A had their reloads nerfed horrifyingly?
And why cant the T40 and T82 have their 105s back? Their now suffering tanks and theres no fun in them
Thatās the point, they donāt want you playing low tier tanks
Bruh thats stupid.. i want to go back to the fun tanks. not the meta ones
I have lots of fun with tanks like Skoda T27, Lƶwe, and I remember liking T-2020 before the steroids
But thats not fun because your not one shot deleting tanks with a 105 at tier 3 or 4
You know what else is fun? Totally getting one shot by a seal clubbing rat while youāre just trying to learn the game
Why play a tank thats horrible or would you rather have so much fun one shotting tanks
Exactly. T82 was removed cause nobody played it.. not because it was overpowered
What?! T82 was literally the tier 3 seal clubbing tank
But still. wargaming said it was not overpowered..
They removed some branch tanks cause they were uncontributing to the grind.. now its easier
there's a lot of things that are more fun than that
They did it to reduce seal clubbing and streamline tech tree lines so new players didn't need to learn about so many different tanks. Or get one shot and learn nothing
Because they removed the tank.. They have it a snub 75 WHICH SUCKS
GOOD.
but snub 75s are fun too
But its not satisfying
Itās satisfying to carry with a tank that isnāt broken š
Also.. why am i waiting TWELVE SECONDS.. for a 75 to be loaded
go play high tier if you don't like it
Does it remind you of one of the tier 6 British TDs in WoT PC?
Just sit in cover while you reload 4head
Yeah.. with your entire team..
And no @misty wing high tier is just bad now. bad players everywhere while the enemy team is completely god like.. and im topscoring
And yes. tanks like the marder did need a nerf cause... pak 40 at tier 3.. come on. thats broken
yup because tier 3 players with 100 battles are going to be much better
At least its not so sweaty
This is still strong.. i dont know how but its just amazing
Even if it helped new players, WG shouldnāt have just removed any point at all to playing lower tiers. I mean thereās 1-10, why not make them all usable. Even though I love high tiers myself, I know thereās plenty of people who used to enjoy lower tiers before 5.5
im one of those enjoyers.. high tiers was meh but T82 was just ke ni otsu remover
Satisfication 9000 as removes 400 HP in one shot
i need to ask wargaming a question but their not open
high tier is far better than low tier and it always has been
more sweats.. more power creep more prammo spam
are these "sweats" you talk about just people who are more skilled than you
low tier isnāt sweaty because youāre literally up against players with 50 battles who just installed the game
do you also enjoy going to a karate tournament for 8 year olds and very surprisingly beating everyone up?
certainly
if you do more damage/healing yeah
high explosive shell magnet š§²
don't play it, use another tank
even IS 5 would do better
Yet i havent recieved a single HE
beginners don't know how to use he
@@solid gate grow up and play tier 10
why grind the british lights if your idea of fun is big damage
Cause why not have large HE pen in a light tank, i can be annoying
Why not go for FV4202?
so being annoying is your idea of fun
what a great person you must be
just played a game with you lmao @solid gate
idk why your profile is asia when you're playing on NA
Yeah you cant have 2
What are yāallās opinion on the object 260?
It's like a 113 but with less DPM and less armor
Side note; is your PFP from Galaxy On Fire?
Yes w you for knowing that game
I honestly thought no one would ever remember that game but as I see there are still people which do!
The game is goated. Too bad they never made a proper sequel
Yeah galaxy on fire 3 dissapointed the entire community
u mean 3? nvm
Yeah lol
Did u had the DLC? That was pretty fun. Honestly galaxy on fire 2 has a very good lore probaly even one of the best lores.
Yeah, I redownloaded it last year. I was just a kid when I played it originally, so I didn't have the DLC, but I've just bought the DLC this year
Nice
I think T28 Defender become very deadly in burning game
T54E2 is a medium
Change my mind
Probably the worst tier 10 heavy
How good is the t110e5?
Type 71 is a good tank?
Nope, Yoh feels completely different itās more like a heavier Chieftain Mk6
No? It feels either like a heavy auto loading 183, or a heavy bat-chat
U dumb? T110E5 has a singe shot gun itās like chieftain but with less dpm and mobility
You said the yoh feels like a heavier chieftain my dude
Nope I mean yoh feels completely different and that the T110E5 feels like a heavier Chieftain
Use commas and periods. What you said means that the yoh feels like a heavier chieftain
Hell na omg
āYoh feels completely different itās more like a heavier chieftain mk6ā. Youāre literally saying the yoh feels like a heavier mk6
Yeah, itās disorienting to use context without a clear indicator of when youāre using it
Talking about the E5 though, itās literally a big med now with how good the gun handling is
Lost as hell it feels more like a heavy than a med because the bad mobility. There are many heavyās with a lasergun which do there job better than this one on E5
My english is not perfekt sry for that
It doesnāt have poor mobility though, itās decent enough. And itās gun handling is literally almost on par with the M48
Crazy accurate for a heavy
Yea decent⦠like on a heavy. There are also enough other heavyās with a better gun. I got myself every single Tier X only the new German med left therefore I saw it by my own
I think only the chieftain and yoh have accuracy on par with this for a heavy
Nah T95E6, Fv too
Yea but if you play the tanks E6 for example feels more accurate than e5 trust
Just because it Fels sāmore accurate doesnāt mean it is more accurate
Okay bob
I could say the 183 feels more accurate, but itās not, is it?
Kidshooters gunhandling is doggy
Ah forgot about Fv, and didn't know the E6 was that accurate. Although it's not as accurate as the E5. There's still only 3 other heavies that are on par, and only one tech tree.
WG be like: Buff e5 hull and make him become broken tank like type 71 šæ
Okay bob
Kidshooters gunhandling is doggy
What does all this even mean lmao
Kidshooter = Fv 183
Bob = someone who takes everything too seriously
it's pretty normal to be serious when there's a disagreement about something + your grammar made some stuff unclear
Iām not really taking this seriously, its just another day on the official discord š¤·āāļø
Yea Iām from Rumania and Germany :3
Tmm
Bro the Italian CC 56 load the first shell take 21.73 seconds, you can make a cup of tea while waiting it reload
Tier 9 Italian TD has 13° of gun depression omegalul
Should I grind the Hori to counter Italian TDs?
All of them look so cracked bruh, just judging from stats on the tier 7 it looks like the turret is a hard thing to crack
Can we get much higher? (Higherrr) so highhh
The tier 8ās āstockā gun is cracked
2.9k base dpm
Itās a heavy that traded HP for much more DPM
Just imagine with modules and provisions combined with 11° of gun depression
Itās not base DPM, provisions are already given
Huh so it's not? Well it's 2.9k still which is still cracked especially since it's gonna frontline
Yeah. The limited turret may present some concerns, though
Can get flanked but honestly I can just see the thing dominating a ridge line with the 11° so unless you drive it out into the open and alone then you'll be pretty fine
The cupolas are also absolutely tiny to the point that I doubt they even exist on the tier 8
well... finally got my first Tier 9 today (M46 Patton) and so far... 2 wins, and 6 losses... high tier is such a joke...
Itās stock, isnāt it?
yep
Two words
Free xp
if its his first tier 9, he won't have a lot of free xp
Then, uh
Good luck with your tier 9 pershing
at least it has PBR
