#tank-balance-discussion
1 messages · Page 158 of 1
yea but 10 is a lot so maybe they will listen to us this time
Bro im not even joking bro he is the number 1 Maus player bro. He really is really good bro I’m not even joking. Player_8008135 is really good at maus bro and he says that maushcen is better so I would suggest listening to him because he’s the number 1 maus player in the Milky Way galaxy bro
Rip hes about to cry. Edit it's an amazing tank already for tournaments . U want 77 kmh maus
It’s ok man we will sign the petition and buff maus and it will be a great tank
And people wonder why blitz player base is toxic
This guy admitted to trolling earlier lmao
Stop feeding the trolls
Can u not troll @flint wasp thx. This is for real or good suggestions of what should be changed to make the game balanced.
It's funny to see the chaos he causes even though I blocked him a while ago
It's great to see the results without having to see the actual whining
That's what we call a reroll⬇️
You guys are saying that he’s a 30% like guy he’s actually really good bro seriously I checked his blitz stars bro 💀 (not fake) (actually real)
Omg he’s rlly good guys he’s the best maus player u believe him and stop trolling plz
Explain this pls wheres the maus/ any t8 t9 or t10
On his other account that he gave away (ignoring the fact that this is not allowed)
@warped crest He has been failtooning in the comet. That’s how he ends up seeing the mauschen.
@winged barn um actually he has over 100000 battles so like that’s not even a reroll bro
Omg can u teach me how to play side because when I play my@side facing enemy it doesn’t do anything so can u teach me later how to drive
Can you guys like, stop feeding the troll?
He clearly has nothing better to do
Just forget about him, he's irrelevant
T34 needs to get buffed (heavy btw)
Where ,reload, armor , gun depression, aim time ,gun dispersion?
@fair socket come back with a tank that actually needs a buff. The t34 does not.
T34 is pretty well off right now imo. It’s better than the T32 and is actually a pretty fun tank to play. The gun is good, the armour is great, and it’s not even too slow. It is very good on ridge lines and there is no reason to buff it at all.
Maybe I’m just bad Lol
no u
T34 doesnt need a buff.
Its got ridgeline capacity, a decent gun packing high pen for a heavy tank, and it also received the HP buff. Its in a pretty good place as a tier 8 heavy
Warning logged for ☺☻☺#9950. They were not warned.
@flint wasp Maus is actually good but there is no doubt that it has some weird weakspots on the tracks. For me Maus is kinda working with all these hull down mediums and etc
Even without angling, Maus can't be penned at all frontally by meds without use of pramo and for same tier heavies it's a 50/50 chance with standard ap
Nope, using CS on my E50M I go through the lower plate with APCR consistently.
Give e4 some watermelon
Bruh did this man create 1 account for each tank in the game?
Just shoot maus fuel tanks, and the sides can be penned by t10 meds
Nice try dyno 😎
@vale sun the warning is still on your record. Doesn't matter if you see it or not
I'm aware, it's still funny though
@odd tendon maus IS penable by the meds
Lower plate is between 250-260 if there is NO angling. With CS, meds can't reliably pen it with standard apcr.
I can pen unangled maus turret cheeks consistently with fv4202 standards with CS
Within the current heavy meta I tend to run CS on my meds and without too much angling, I can consistently pen a Maus’ lower plate with APCR, using an E50 M/STB.
Non-angled maus lower plate is pretty much pennable by any med with standard rounds. Penning the turret cheeks and an angled lower plate will require heat
It's around 235mm/254mm for the LFP of Maus depending on Enhanced Armor for AP, I should include the shell type lol
244mm/263mm vs APCR rounds
Could I make the game matchmaking more fair all day I get noobs and unfair tanks and I always loose and get nothing
@cobalt harness read the channel pinned messages
just win more
Carry harder
- the mf who actually carried his way up to 55-60 % wr
Please buff the t32. At least make the penetration better.
Let's buff it 2mm to make it 200mm
No, 210 ._. So y'all can use Cali shells and have the pen of an is tank.... Which still isn't that much tbh but meh it's something
Maybe better aiming time but honestly it’s pretty fine where it is rn
Please buff 252u! I am getting peened so easily
The 252 is fine how it is all you need to do is hid the lower plate and wiggle
You've been baited
Make 250 fold like 200 or 300k credits
Bro what did I just read... a dude w his average tier being t7 wants the Maus to be buffed...?
@tawny roost He fail toons in a comet a lot. That’s why he struggles
Oooo lol
The VK 45.01 A has atrocious balancing. The very worst tier 8 heavy in my opinion. The tank can’t do anything well, not even mobility wise, it’s a disgrace
Play it to bully mediums
Vk 72.01 needs a frontal armor buff !1!1!1!!!!!
🤡
bullying mediums is all fun and games until a panther 2 comes along and bullys you instead
Panther 2 still a medium
cough not like the average t8 heavy has enough pen to get rid of a panther 2
@rich delta idk man kv4 is up there with vk45
KV-4 at least has noob proof armor if you angle it well
Is it possible to angle with the smasher or the kv 2 seems like it has papaer thin armour :/
Kv5 is useless
@unique scaffold Theres not much point to angling those tanks. They don't have much armour, and most tanks will easily go through your hull.
Yes your right
It's the only good part about them
@coarse harness kv4 does not have noob proof armor, there are weak spots, that you cant hide, everywhere that anything with more pen than a t32 can exploit
It’s gonna get buffed tho so we should see what it can do after the buff
lmao I want more side armor
Give a weak spot to fcking vk90
lower plate and turret cheeks...
Cupola shouldn't be 300 tho, all the other german heavies have much weaker turrets that also require angling to work
If you’re having issues against the VK90, you’re doing something wrong...
Fact 98% of people who own vk90 are below 50%
**Fact **98% of statistics are 50% made up
Fact Stop making fact that just consumes time
And yet u continue to do it
He didn’t even state a fact, he asked them to stop doing something
Fact stevo
Stop, this is getting annoying.
Fact Too bad
@odd tendon I mean if you play against noobs (regular battles) and you know how to angle the tank it'll bounce a lot even on flat ground
All you have to do is bait shots at your sides
Angling won't get rid of the cupola or cheeks which is where the majority of shots go
Kv4 copula is annoyingly right on the center of the turret
yes, there is no way you can hide it. vk100 can wiggle it around or cover it with a wall when sidescraping and old e5 could turn the turret. kv4 you just have to sit there and take it
kv4 cupola is so troll for some reason. I don't know why
It’s a small spot to hit but it’s pretty weak when you do hit
^that is how weak points should work
Try taking on a kv4 in a tier 7 med
i wonder how they'll "buff" the armor
It's either going to be a useless buff, or it will break the tank. That's my bet
Make it broken probably
Tiger II 2.0
At least Tiger can hit shots
^^^^^
kv4 turret is just horrific
that thing is what needs buffed
nerf mauschen. Maus but shreds t8s but less hp
Mauschen has a cupola though
200mm side armor plz
Mauschen is garbage
Yup.
Why it is hard to penetrate t29 hull with low pen tanks , it is hulldown tank it should get nerf or buff t 34 heavy hull and make it tier 7 tanks can’t pen it
Because there low pen guns? Its fine as it is low pen guns should not be able to pen heavies frontally , they have speed
Cause bad game balance
T29 has wayyyy too much frontal hull armor for that armor profile. Then you can also equip reactive armor because it's viable in tier 7+hp buff. Definitely one of the most op tier 7s.
It’s literally got more hull armor than the T34 despite being a tier lower, c’mon WG...
2036 vs 2064 DPM, the latter being T29’s 😂
Why not give sheridan an alternative gun
Good idea but... Wich shells will this gun use, what will be the caliber and the damages inflicted ?
Changed--Sheridan alternative gun--
1. 152mm caliber
2. No missiles
3. Same reload as Sheridan
4. Only has 2 shell types, HEAT and HE:
- HEAT: Base Average Penetration = 225mm and Avg Damage = 490 HP (Range from 368 HP - 613 HP )
- HE: Pen = Base Average Penetration = 130mm and Avg Damage = 780 HP (Range from 585HP - 975HP)]
--
so basically you want it to be useless
if they gave it that and on top of it the speed nerf
then congratulations it is useless and even worse than the deathstar
@oblique parrot well T49 is hell of a fun tank but it is at tier 8
big difference
the upcoming nerf i think is too much for the sheridan
it is a light after all
i agree they should remove missiles
also your alternative gun ain't bad but make the avg damage for the standard shell 560, 490 is a bit too low
the HE pen could be 90 not 130mm because that is crazy and it can at least keep a little bit of its speed like nerf the HorsePower but not too much
Well its basically a T49 at tier 10 hahaha and the T49 is fun, a lot of people play it and do good in it
The HE pen is that of the FV215b and the HEAT pen is similar to its current apcr pen
I just want a Sheridan to shoot me with a missile and then I want to HE him for 900
This is a very good idea my dear friend, but WG will never realise it... The truth is sad.
so basically you want it to be useless
if they gave it that and on top of it the speed nerf
then congratulations it is useless and even worse than the deathstar@oblique parrot well T49 is hell of a fun tank but it is at tier 8
big difference
the upcoming nerf i think is too much for the sheridan
it is a light after all
i agree they should remove missiles
also your alternative gun ain't bad but make the avg damage for the standard shell 560, 490 is a bit too low
the HE pen could be 90 not 130mm because that is crazy and it can at least keep a little bit of its speed like nerf the HorsePower but not too much
@frail silo I agree, I do not like the idea of nerfing its mobility
I think WG knows the missiles is a stupid concept but does not want to admit it so they rather nerf the tank in other ways so that it becomes obsolete and no one plays it anymore and no one complains about missiles but they can still say it was a success
Sheridan alternative gun
1. 152mm caliber
2. No missiles
3. Same reload as Sheridan
4. Only has 2 shell types, HEAT and HE:
- HEAT: Base Average Penetration = 225mm and Avg Damage = 560 HP (Range from 420 HP - 700 HP )
- HE: Pen = Base Average Penetration = 105mm and Avg Damage = 780 HP (Range from 585HP - 975HP)
@frail silo something like this ^^^
The HE should be appealing to use
But without the upcoming mobility nerf
well yeah i can get behind that lol
Seems like a t49 gun at tier 10. its only has better pen
Yeah thats the idea
When are you gonna fix this WG... This is the lowest pen tank in t8. This weakspot means you can't angle a superheavy. It has no armour because this spot is so huge, and the tank so slow that nobody will miss it. Just buff this plate, it'll still be a worse vk100 but maybe then people will consider buying it.
That’s the side armor.
Also buffing the T29 hull was a dumb move. Stop spoonfeeding little children and maybe make them realize that they should work on working with the turret.
Lark do not give them more ideas
Did I hear buff all heavies?
There are tanks that seem pretty bad like the Pershing or amx 50 120, but through good play, they are able to work. Any tank can do the except the t28, the thing has nothing going for it. Slower than an at15, armor is useless against same teir tanks, gun is mediocre and sides can be over matched. How has this tank not been buffed yet?!
Probably for the same reasons tanks like the black prince and t29 are continually getting buffed
Dont buff all heavys remember obj 252 and actionX are heavys and will be even more broke lol
I don’t see how 252u is broken
Bc ppl can’t aim
They see red and say it’s OP
"I see red people."
50 120 is perfectly fine as is
I had a t49 bounce two times of my rear, that’s how it’s op. An is3 would have died in that situation.
sounds like me >.>
Obj 252 isnt broken but if they add more armor to it
252u is far from OP, and if a T49 is not penetrating with its Low pen HEAT which is also extremely sensitive to angles mind you, and isn't overly accurate, I must say that calling 252u in a situation where a tank that would struggle to normally without HE fight it makes it OP, then that is a very specific argument.
Algum brasileiro?
english only @wide swan
252u far from op
that thing has the same armor profile as the is7
Not at all
lol
let's play guess the tank then
Lower one is is7 and upper one is 252u ez, now go on bud we all know 252u is broken and sht
I love facing IS-7s in my Comet : )
Wow same I love facing them with my ho ri type 1
Also pz II J needs a pen nerf and armor buff!
Lol I like how 252 has a steeper pike nose than is7
Lol I like how people completely ignore the massive lower plate
Or the IS-6 cupolas
I own the 252u, and it's not op. It's only op when rng guides your shots. For most people, they have to get close, but then the weakspots(massive lower plate and top of turret) become easy pens.
brawling with a 252 is also pretty easy. Shoot the driver's sights or cupolas
idk what mango lloyds you're seeing then because brawling with a 252 is a nightmare. The upper side armor is the same as the IS-7's 200+mm. The upper pike plates is even stronger than the IS-7's pike nose. The cupolas are so flush with the roof that I didn't even know they existed until I facehugged a 252 in a Jg88. The driver's port is 250mm which is beyond the range of most T8 guns. Any 252 driver with 3 brain cells knows how to keep pushing their tank into yours to hide the lower plate.
Shoot the middle side armor, and stay away from it because it requires a victim to hug
there it is, the answer to countering every tank: no
it has good straightline speed
252 also doesn't sacrifice much speed for that heavy armor. The closest tanks that have an impenetrable upper plate and thick sides would be the German superheavies and those are slow as molasses.
Ah yes, shoot the autobounce part of the side.
This is your daily reminder that pershing, at15, cent, t28, and vk45 exist in the same tier as 252u, action x, wz120ft, and tiger 2
The middle part of 252U's side armor (vertically) is the flat spot... not an auto-bounce...
same as an is7 then
252 weighs the same as the e5 but somehow has a minimum of 90-100mm of armor everywhere. How did weegee make this happen? Is there a tank of helium in the 252 that made the 252 lighter?
armor does not equal weight, there are other factors
armor does equal weight ._.
but yes, there are other components
such as profits per unit sold
Are you sure that the big steel slabs surrounding the crew and internals aren't responsible for at least some of the weight?
@nimble zodiac apparently it doesn't as you have discovered
Understand that a 300mm plate is as effective as a 150mm plate angled at 60 degrees, both reaching the same height, weigh the same, it's interesting
@nimble zodiac the 252u obviously has a more efficient design. the armor is more sloped and the profile is lower and compact. You can't just look at armor and think that directly translates to total weight.
252u also has to carry 122mm rounds
but in WG land, rounds weigh around 5gs each
Even 122mm rounds aren't that heavy all things considered
I think you guys are on different pages
Tiger means effective armour doesn't translate to weight
While chicken means the actual armour does translate to weight
So both are correct? Idk
@crystal spoke also note soviet 122s are all two piece ammo so even lighter
Actually, having flat plates is more efficient than having angled ones if retaining the same weight, as the angled ones are given a disadvantage due to shell normalization, as it won't affect a flat plate
False, they weigh the same since the sloped armor has to be longer to reach the same vertical height the flat armor achieves
Take this example, imagine a thick stick as tall as the ceiling. Now make the stick angled 60 degrees from the vertical, and try to make it touch the ceiling. You can't. You'd have to make it twice as long and therefore twice as heavy, making it equal the weight of the thicker, vertical stick, assuming the thick stick is simply twice as heavy as the "sloped" stick when it isn't doubled in length.
yes but 180mm of flat armor will most likely weigh a lot more than thinner sloped armor angled to 180 effective
Take this fun little thing as reference, the values of the sides are related to the side opposite of the 30 degree angle, noting how the 60 degree angled plate is 2x vs the “flat” plate being x.
I still believe armor (yes, not effective armor) directly affects the weight
Clearly this game neglects that in some aspects but that's how it would work, lookin at you T1 Heavy
@ornate shuttle my point except the influence of shell normalization against the angled plate, which is countered by the extra deck armor the flat plate adds
yea I agree with your armor angling math but your original point was armor = weight
@ornate shuttle ? how would 130mm plate (252u front angled to 420 effective) weigh the same as 420mm plate?
It doesnt matter if its angled or not, a 200mm effective plate really sloped covering the same area from the same view point has the exact same weight of a flat 200mm base plate
Because thats how physics and math works Lmao, when its 420mm effective, keep the same view point, the part that got this mm is pretty small, replace it with a flat 420mm facing you and its the same weight.
its not like a 130mm plate super sloped with huge surface area covering the whole tank's front and half engine deck is light lol
The angled plate, if it wants to remain 2m tall vertically, has to double the length (and therefore the weight) of itself to stay that tall, and 60 degrees would be twice as effective as a flat plate if it was half the width of the flat plate. If you compare them vertically the angled plate would be twice as tall given it’s angled at 60 degrees
didnt rly need geo to prove the 252 is op but appreciated
it isn't OP
@unique scaffold they don't directly nerf prems (besides 5.5). no you said they don't nerf prems. they do.
Idk what ya all are tryna accomplish. They don’t nerf premiums. Deal with it like u do with the wz. Maybe don’t focus it or shoot he at it @dense walrus thats what I said. They don’t. If they wanted to change something with it they can’t. They are nerfing collectibles secretly such as t22 armor on its sides @round bluff ur tank is tall for a reason
so a 252's best strategy against a vk45a is to fight it. But for the vk45a, its best strategy is to shoot HE?
Shoot the cupolas...
@unique scaffold ok that is a nerf no? @round bluff maybe hit the big honking lower plate
@nimble zodiac I thought that as well, but actually, sloping does reduce weight.
In essence, using your "ceiling and stick" example, flat armour would count as both the ceiling and the wall.
Hopefully the diagram does explain it.
Ah, I see. I missed that.
Sloped armour is worse for crew comfort, but in this game, crew can be revived with the press of a button so being in a cramped space shouldn't be too much of an issue.
Yes, I did mention the extra deck armor, though it also provides OH SO LOVELY SPACE for your crew. Also flat plates, again, don’t get affected by normalization, so flat mechanically works better unless the angled plate is VERY extremely, say, 70 degrees (though angling the tank itself would help make plates able to auto-bounce)
Now I’m not capable of calculating the benefits of a little extra weight because of the normalization mechanic being unable to work (given no tank angling) but flat looks good to me
So um... the theme of all this is that WG should calculate the weight of all of their tanks >:)
Oh and also angled plates look nice
Ah yes, the 3 pixel tall copulas and the "large" lower plate. Very feasible for an outdated paper heavy to go against.
It's as large as the Lowe's lower frontal plate, and since the pike situation has it extend upwards in the middle, that could complicate it further
VK A is tall enough to shoot the cupolas which are rather easy to hit in a hug, it should win the DPM war if RNG doesn't stray far
Those cupolas are almost nonexistent. Even my jg88 could barely hit them in a facehug.
That's because that tank is shorter than VK A...
Well I did say "tank is shorter" I mean the vertical positioning of the gun
My point being it's not that they're super small, it's the fact they're positioned on the back with little inclination of the turret roof, so for short tanks in close distance fights, it can be hard to hit the cupolas just because of the position of the gun
Foch cupola fix sometime soon? Literally no shots go in when shooting it
Sheridan alternative gun
1. 152mm caliber
2. No missiles
3. Same reload as Sheridan
4. Only has 2 shell types, HEAT and HE:
- HEAT: Base Average Penetration = 225mm and Avg Damage = 560 HP (Range from 420 HP - 700 HP )
- HE: Pen = Base Average Penetration = 105mm and Avg Damage = 780 HP (Range from 585HP - 975HP)
@full dewyou need to aim at the dead center and low. The two long sides are not hitbox
Also you may need parmo to pen it's quite strong when angled
The vk45a is a medium, change my mind
Exactly. Run it with your meds and all will be fine.
Why my tank is buggy
Lol that's the stop-gap solution to all the bad tanks right now. Is6, superpershing, and vk45a suck? Just go med side. Problem is, you'll end up having to deal with heavies at some point or another, and then you'll start to feel how inferior your vehicle is.
Well yes, but actually no. If you go to the meds side with a VK45.02 A, it’s literally because the tank is a medium. It’s got like 17,5 hp/ton acceleration and 50 degrees of traverse. If you don’t play it like a medium then you probably understood very little of the tank. I rarely struggle with heavies neither, as it’s easy to outdpm or outmanoever them.
@round bluff You should use the tanks characteristics to determine your best positions.
right. Action X has great turret armor and great gun depression, so it belongs in the hills and ridges. Caernarvon, the same tank with less turret armor and a worse gun, belongs in the garage.
im happy with my caernavon since it has the tokyo drift consumable
ok so ur turd can go zoom zoom.
it's still a turd
My turd can get into position faster
And get killed out of that position faster
But wait, turn the turret at all and we'll take 10 seconds off of your lifetime, free!
Sheridan dont need speed nerf just nerf the missile and buff the deathstar
I hope blitz doesnt become PC,AX might be the start of a domino effect where premiums are completely better than tech trees
Make the tech tree Caernarvon have the same reload as Black prince and give it extra pen,now the tech tree has a chance
Atm AX is P2WM-Pay 2 Win More
NO DO NOT GIVE IT BP RELOAD, BP already has 3k DPM, and for tier 8 heavy meta, a reload buff that excessive would be broken, I suggest a small speed buff and maybe some more turret armor
Black prince is damn broken also deathstar cannot be balanced with such a high alpha
Deathstar sucks
That would also be outrageously expensive if you compared it to the temporary enrichments as well
Why not? Carnarvon doesnt have anything that the Black prince has. BP has DPM,which is the most overrated stat in the game,which can be easily be cancelled out by hit and run and trading.
Arent you the same guys that cry about premium spam in Ratings? Why not make the Caernarvon better than its counterpart for once,one update,I'd like to see more OP tech tree that are better than the premiums because that's how it should be.
Let's just give the Cearnavon something over its brother idc,just give it something
You mean like how the vk100 was and everyone started complaining about how it was op and too good
I don't care about premiums honestly, also Tiger II vibin.
wat
Tiger 2 what?
he be vibin, making people shell out credits
@slate marsh
if action x kill t8 balance, lets wait for its brother super conq
he be vibin, making people shell out credits
@nimble zodiac not many people try to shoot cupola
Petition for Wargaming to add custom zoom
Like the one in PC version
Buff the vk45.03 it’s a mediocre tank now
It's nothing but a worse Tiger I
what, 25horse powers more ??? what does it changes ?
it is not even half a provision wtf ? (improved fuel brings about 65hp more to a tank with natively ~700horse power)
Doesn't matter
The new light will demolish the BC even more
It will demolish leopard 1 too.
Wargaming seems to enjoy heavily armored light tanks these days.
The action x is cool but I need Apcr in tier 8/9 battles and it’s really expensive
Aim
You have 225 standard pen. Just aim
Action x has good accuracy and its pen is on the higher end of tier 8 heavies, just like the caernarvon
There is several tanks in the game that sucks and it needs buff such as tortoise and firdinand and 183 and AT1 5 and the tire 7 french light
Speaking of balance
AT15 and tortoise and firdinand need armor buff because they get penned easy in the main armor
183 maybe more view range or give it 30mm of armor at the front to get some troll bounces and maybe better turret armor for E100 because the upcoming eu tree heavy have unpennaple turret even with gold
And about the amx it needs mobility
if anything the amx 13 90 would need a buff over the amx 13 75
amx 13 75 is completely fine
Do
Not
Buff
183
Simple
Stupid camper’s tank
Nobody's talking about the mid-tier French tds these days?
Another person recklessly asking for a 183 buff... Guys, it’s a T10 KV-2. Literally nothing more. And it is meant to be as useless, having pretty much nothing but the alpha going for it. With all those stupid memes, isn’t the 183 supposed to be a « fun » tank? If yes, then play it for the fun not expecting great results. If you want consistency, then just sell your 183 and play a better tank, as there are plenty of them (maybe because the 183 is the worst T10).
I feel like the 183 is actually underrated @regal grove
Buff the vk45.03 it’s a mediocre tank now
@shrewd spear its not even mediocre
cough cough not like the average person who complains about the 183 needing a buff is also the guy who's first tier 10 was either the 183 or the wz 113 G ft
What’s wrong with the wz 113g ft apart from the fact it’s trash
nerf the 183!!!
No, @sly mauve.
@delicate moth, why so negative⁉️
Just decrease the HESH dmg to ≈1100 and give it better P/W ratio in return
The 113 g ft isnt trash.... dude its a chinese 268
What’s the point of it, also the frontal shoulders of the superstructure are only 70mm
It is slower, has a huge lower plate, and worse gun handling
Boxy, large sides are easy to HESH too
Actually they're 80mm, and for some reason there's no main armor right below the superstructure, it's only spaced armor according to BlitzHangar anyways
Those cheeks should be around 120mm IMO
113 FT takes the worst traits of 268 and T110E3 and combines them into one tank
It needs some buffs
the same way tortoise combines the worst traits of the su12254 and jagtiger, while somehow having worse dpm than both
centurion 7/1 needs a slight reload buff if vickers CR gets 8 second reload
Vickers ain't getting premium hesh
Why buff the Cent if the Vickers CR is too strong? Why not nerf the Vickers CR?
@vernal dock your point?
buff the is3 defender
@vernal dock the existence of a patent ≠ that item being in use.
If matchmaking was broken, then how come the good players have such high WRs? I wouldn't account it to luck since most legitimate 60%+ers are very skilled, and should have made their influence to their wins that way. Dealing with it is the solution. And well... yes some tanks players use to boost their stats are... better than most... but wanting matchmaking to change is like claiming that you can't deal with the problems that pressing the battle button gives you.
Oh and about that Leo 1, it's not that bad in comparison to Vickers Light, it still has accuracy, penetration, and DPM (though lacking HESH). And their top speeds are exactly the same forwards and backwards which I think is hilarious
vickers having armor and light tank camo will absolutely bury the leopard
why do we have to pay for converting elite xp? it’s a funnel for money. if you could exchange it for free at a fourth of the rate it’d be more fair. like for every 4 elite xp you earn ou can convert it to 1 free xp. i just don’t see how paying to convert something you earn is fair.
or you could just play more battles to grind out the combat xp, which gives you I think 10% of all combat xp earned back as free xp
@oblique obsidian The point of it is precisely to be a funnel for money. Free XP conversion is one of the most common uses for gold that people do, and removing that would just shoot WG in the foot for no reason.
If people could get mass amounts of free XP for free, that would remove a huge chunk of revenue from WG. It's the same reason why the game has stock grinds, and research costs in the first place
@vernal dock did you make that up on your own? Did you even read the entire patent?
Because if you did there is no possible way you would have written what you wrote.
😂
The closest aspect to ‘rigging’ would be this section
However for Blitz they do not do that (and I believe WoT dropped it too).
Additionally this isn’t a MM rant channel for the Mad because Bad. This is tank/game balance which despite the tinfoil claims to the contrary has nothing to do with MM
Look at these games and tell me mm isn’t lopsided
just git gud
It’s a rng, ofc you will have lopsided battles. It just takes skill to push the battle in your favor
Be quiet purple and look at these lopsided battles in a 66% player
He's saying battles will be lopsided, you tell him to be quiet, and proceed to give examples of lopsided battles
=/
Guys should e100 have a armor buff?
No it already had enough buffs
Yeah maybe it’s turret is a little weak unless you angle it so maybe buff the turret
Enough buffs? It's turret is sooo weak. And also the hull of the E75 feels stronger than the one on the e100
Tier for tier it is, but the turret is E100's real issue, press 2 and it's usually done, angles around 340mm
run extra armour equipment, angle turret away from enemy between reload, don't sit out in the open. tier X meds running calibrated shells can pen unangled maus turret cheeks, you will have to get used to this german heavy playstyle.
E100 is a strong tank right now because it simply has so much health; you can damage it, but you're going to need to sacrifice much more to kill it away
Superheavys are not made to do dmg, but rather to block dmg. Focus more on blocking and less on doing dmg. Also meds without cal shells can pen unangled maus cheeks
Meh, e100 sort of just sucks up the damage. Sure, it does end up working in practice but no one likes to take damage for a living.
I find mausing very enjoyable
@orchid grove so what you’re saying is that world of wallet warriors is still in light? to me i feel like you can’t have genuine fun without spending money. i’ve been playing for 4 years, granted i did take a break for a couple months, and i haven’t had genuine fun since around the tankenstein era. just seems silly to have something in the game that makes it less playable
When I'm playing my maus I just feel well protected since I know how to use the maus. But the E100 doesn't give me this feeling. Sure the dpm and alpha is higher. But Blocking shots even angled with e100 is almost inpossible against people with premium shells. In the maus I'm still easily able to block premium shells. I'm not saying e100 should be like the maus. But I feel like e100 just gets easily outclassed by almost all other heavies atm.
I agree. Massive lowerplate and weak turret face since everyone shoots gold at tier 10. WG should at least buff the turret
Agreed@wet wharf
The entire AT line (including the 183 'Death Star') should be removed from the British tech tree and turned into blue collector's tanks - they no longer fit the Blitz meta with so many light tanks around.
No more ATs or Death Star for new players, please.
(Existing owners should be able to keep them or sell them for gold.)
Superheavys are not made to do dmg, but rather to block dmg. Focus more on blocking and less on doing dmg. Also meds without cal shells can pen unangled maus cheeks
@final warren i mean if it is gonna be like that
Then award players for their blocked damage
Or else it is useless if your tank priority is just blocking
The entire AT line (including the 183 'Death Star') should be removed from the British tech tree and turned into blue collector's tanks - they no longer fit the Blitz meta with so many light tanks around.
No more ATs or Death Star for new players, please.
(Existing owners should be able to keep them or sell them for gold.)
I’m fine witht the Deathstar in it’s current state. It’s nothing but free damage. Can stay as it is, driven by derpthirsty newbies and getting farmed doing very little for their team.
@haughty jewel The irony of your name is overwhelming.
I’m fine witht the Deathstar in it’s current state. It’s nothing but free damage. Can stay as it is, driven by derpthirsty newbies and getting farmed doing very little for their team.
@compact nymph
In that case, I hope the 183's end up more green than red from your perspective!
Never said that was a bad thing. It means I can get more damage by myself. @fiery turtle
Sheridan has a got a well deserved nerf to missiles. BUT passing is medium speed from 51 to 43 is too much! Sheridan has no armor, so it needs to go fast! Will we get info about that?
We haven't got any explanation why do his speed got nerfed, no one was complaining about Sheridan speed, people were only complaining about missiles and spaced armor.
No we were complained about maniability too
@ionic portal speed was part of the issue. The ability to pop a missile and then outrun everyone was very much a problem. The horse power needed to be nerfed for the missiles to stay.
Yes but at the point making B-C faster than Sheridan it is a big problem. Sheridan was already being rekt by B-Cs but now? It is terrible almost impossible to survive against a B-C..
Uh no sheridans destroy bcs Everytime I play in a bc
🤡
Before at least. Now 1vs1 a Sheridan you'll see @median socket
This game isn't about 1v1 and should not be balanced as such.
If you screwed up your positioning that much in a Sheridan to get run down by a Batchat then that is a you problem.
It's equal now
The Sheridan never should have had the ability to pop a missile and then out accelerate any other tank in the match.
Boy E3 flies now
This game isn't about 1v1 and should not be balanced as such.
@unique scaffold then why people still rant about Tiger 2 being "OP" and "too strong"?
Because people like to rant
Cuz it's broken
Because people believe 1v1s matter in overall balancing
@unique scaffold I agree, but I’m afraid the engine nerf will mean that there’s only 1 (maybe 2?) tanks that can beat it in acceleration since the nerf is pretty small.
The Sheridan nerf was useless. Missiles are still broken as (insert word of your choice)
Nah, I'm gonna continue to give salt. If other people dont like me raging about them, that's their problem.
One or two is better than zero
Pretty sure missiles are here to stay. Time to adapt to them.
Is there anything worth buying in the shop?
Vickers is answer to Missile tanks.
Wai
So did wg introduce light tanks or mediums?
Both.
Haha don't worry about 3000 hp heavies and leopards with turret armor, m48 can beat them all with skill
Sheridan nerf was nothing cant tell the difference
I’m going to continue arguing for this so,the armor on the predator UM definitely needs a buff as well as a penetration buff
Players have to deal with the atrocious lack of gun depression limiting already where they can go on the map, increasing the frontal armor from 130 to 145mm and increase the thickness of the front vision ports from 75 mm to 90mm and the penetration from 165mm to 170mm base AP also improve dispersion on the gun. I had to deal with missing 2 out of 3 shots missing completely from a stationary target
Can we nerf the tiger 2
E100 need turret buff jusf 20mm-30mm please
And t 34 3 need gun depression
The APCR on American lights is the problem, it's better a standard HEAT round with slightly less pen on Sheridan, and heavy pen nerf to T92E1. It's not possible I go hull down in the WZ-111G FT and he manages to pen me frontally easily and run away. That APCR is too much powerful, while a standard HEAT round would show continuity with the T49
This was the same thing I said when missiles came out initially but everyone was saying HEAT round would make it impossible to play. Showing that they probably never played the T49 or played it well.
Dude that APCR your talking about cant pen any tire 9 10 meds frontal plate that looks like T62A such as T54 and WZ 120 and WZ 121 etc he got lucky maybe hit cupulla or shot your side Atgms has one of worst pen in terms of standerd shell after the nerf @unique scaffold im playing ATGMs everyday and when T62 or even E50 comes and pushes to me im just screwd
The T92E1 I see are almost uncaring of my armor, and I am not totally oblivious of angling or positions. My opinion of T92E1 particularly is, that APCR should be replaced with a HEAT with same alpha and less pen, just like with T49, almost unplayable with its HEAT pen (in fact most users spam HE in it) but I don't find it difficult to play at all
Buff T22
Can we nerf the tiger 2
@nocturne mauve after they nerf Is3 Defender :)))
imo sheridan is now uselles. and btw there are still many tanks that need buff in the game 🙂
@forest heath you told it many times... predator is bullshit we all know it. but don t you think there are worse tanks? something like vk 45 02 A, vk 30 02 D, sta 1, kw 4 or is 6?
Like the predator UM the armor on the predator UM definitely needs a buff as well as a penetration buff
Players have to deal with the atrocious lack of gun depression limiting already where they can go on the map, increasing the frontal armor from 130 to 150mm and increase the thickness of the front vision ports from 75 mm to 95mm and the penetration from 165mm to 173mm base AP also improve dispersion on the gun. I had to deal with missing 2 out of 3 shots missing completely from a stationary target. It’s depressing that it struggles to pen tier VI heavy tanks now, and nearly every map has too much hills to make the thing useful and it’s too big and slow to flank, KV-4 and IS-6 are far from bad, the KV-4 is really good even. The vk 45 is also good if you play it like the tiger I used to play
All the above mentioned tanks have either armor or mobility on their side, the predator has neither. The fact that it sees tier VIII in this state is criminal
hahaha is 6 and kw 4 good? well maybe they aren t that bad but still when you have tiger 2 or obj 252u to play why do do you need kw 4 or is 6? about vk... it doesn t have armor and mobility as well. only gun is not that bad but still worse than the tiger 2 gun
@nocturne mauve but it isn t. it s just a tank that tier 7 can easly pen in upper plate or turret without even using gold
IS-6 should be the IS-4 of tier 8, but no
is-6 and kv-4 ARE getting buffed so chill
Pershing haha
@noble siren Why does the IS3 Def. need a nerf? It’s gotten weaker over the years with all the other tanks added in. It’s also a premium tank so good luck getting that removed
Is6 is getting buffed?
@unique scaffold #devs-answers
That's really good Is6 is 1 tank I really enjoy playing in. I have what most players would consider better tier 8 premium but that Is6 always been my go to fun tank.
That’s wholesome
Both guns will stay as bad as they are so I doubt I will consider it as a dangerous tank, even after an armor buff.
its a premium, it shouldnt get a buff, infact only thing they shouldve gave it was preferential mm 🤷♂️
@unique scaffold the t92s APCR round literally has 210mm base pen
Sheridan and t92 have utter garbage pen smh, but oOoOOozo mIsSiLeS
snowflakes
I think the Japanese t9-10 tds need an avg dmg buff
No, they're capable
They’re perfectly fine
Is it just me or does the tier 9 Japanese td have better armor with the sloped front
They need a higher HE damage
True, 640 is too low
Wait you guys are firing shells that aren't prammo in your ho ris?
Come on, the HE is depressing
Just load full skill rounds, literally nothing can stop your shells
Wow my credits and wallet can
I thing the obj 140 needs a buff
Nope
Well obj 140 has always been about the extra mobility and the 1 degree extra gun depression, I say give it 100 more hp and 8 degrees of gun dep so it actually has something over the t62a
7 is plenty
😌
140 a better brawler imo and what i have seen. 140 also has better frontal armor which is irrelevant in most cases but is still better
The 140 is better for dealing with low pen guns
Wargaming can you freakin fix the armor on Sheridan??? It bounces things sideways for no reason it has no armor... I think that spaced armor makes it glitchy
buff the KpfPz 70, improved reload, maybe decrease 3-5 seconds, I understand since this tank have an autoloader so it's okay to be un-historical.
Ho Ri the tier 10 should get a better alfa for the HE shell cause the current alfa sucks
I mean, Conway has 670 premium hesh...., Sheridan and t92 have 680, I say give em all 780 like the t49
Why does the kranvagn have a turret stronger than even russians without using gun depression wargaming why does it have very good hull armor too in PC it doesnt pls stop powercreeping the Auto loader heavies
It’s in test. These are changeable stats that you are treating like final stats. The purpose of testing is to try and make the tank more balanced
@full token i know all the information now is subject to change i also know wargaming dont learn their lesson i am just freaking out cuz they know that armor is broken why even start at 500mm turret armor what is that insanity i know they will screw it up like they did with sheridan and the armor on vickers hull down
it even has enough hull armor to bounce your standard ammo the kranvagn on the pike nose in PC it doesnt have even close enough to bounce with hull
its faster than the 57 heavy sure longer interclip but the armor is better on the turret than even the russians
not even HO-RI with 5 degrees normalization premium ammo can pen the turret except the small hatches
If you raise the gun up the hatches will be placed down and hidden
@scarlet fjord Just because they messed up other test tanks doesn’t always mean they will mess up this one too. I think the Ho Ri ended up fine after the release. Didn’t seem that broken. They also have a number of months before they add it, since they just added a new line. They might go through two tests for the tank where they change it up once and then let the testers test the second version.
Kranvagn kinda has strong frontal armor but kinda paper all over the tank. As long as it has reduced enough mobility it should be fine.
yea you can't move that turret at all because the angles are all straight up. although it does have more hull armor than I expected, enough to annoy mediums
The firepower also seems a lot worse compared to other auto loaders
7.06 for 1200 burst, compared to 6 for 50b and 5 for t57. it is an autoreloader though
I say give it a 45mm side hull smh
@full token i dont mind the HO-RI its completely balanced
the armor mobility and autoreloading system are broken for that tank
The kranvagn i mean
i love how wg nearly always messes up new tier 9s in the tech tree
theyre either strong or broken
idk why its an autoreloader
well it wouldn't be enough to simply to better than the 50b; the Kranvagn has to straight-up crucify 50b drivers on release.
The kranvagn has 3.5 sec intraclip as well as over 30 sec of clip reload, making it an autorealoder is a nice way to make sure its damage potential isn't too good with its awful reload, but also to make sure it won't be left behind in gameplay
^
are mediums going to get a slight buff somewhere soon? 10% higher time-to-death of heavys comparing to mediums is somewhat significant. if you bring a medium against a heavy nowadays the heavy tanks will have about 15% higher time to death (comparing heavy DPM vs medium HP against medium DPM vs heavy HP).
the armor on the predator UM definitely needs a buff as well as a penetration buff
Players have to deal with the atrocious lack of gun depression limiting already where they can go on the map, increasing the frontal armor from 130 to 150mm and increase the thickness of the front vision ports from 75 mm to 95mm and the penetration from 165mm to 173mm base AP also improve dispersion on the gun. I had to deal with missing 2 out of 3 shots missing completely from a stationary target. The fact that it sees tier VIII is criminal
You guys are looking at Kranvagn all wrong. The mistake y’all are making is comparing KRV to tanks like T57 or 50B. What you’re really missing is that KRV is more aptly compared to tanks like IS-4
And when you compare it to IS-4, the brokenness of KRV’s current stats is clear
KRV is faster, has more gun depression, accuracy, and the same pen, with an invincible turret, and on the last shell, it also has the same DPM. However, KRV also has the flexibility of having the autoreloader.
There’s literally no reason to ever play an IS-4 when you can play a KRV
yay
wait it's autoreloader? that's weird
That 2200 dpm is actually over 3K if you start with a full clip burst
With that much frontal armor it should have paper sides like the 50B
It will be nerfed during testing
not unless everyone throws and gets a 0 average damage in the kran during testing
Kran looks really good ngl. I'll go down the line 100%. [Polish heavies are coming when?😭 😭]
Wad r ur thoughts on a leo 1 aim time or dispersion on the move buff
I like it
give the T82 and the hetzer the old 105mm they had
Give the tanks back
Drop the KV-2 damage on secondary Cannon from 690 to 540 and decrease the Penetration from 110 to 75
@mental hemlock Why it already sucks. It didn’t even need its original nerf. I mean it’s not that hard to avoid getting hit by it. Like it’s dispersion is so bad and it’s so slow and it’s reload takes ages
I get killed by the KV-2 and the Smasher more than any other tank I come up against, and that includes the Maus when I play Tier X, even includes the T92E1 too, the fact that a Tier VI tank like the KV-2 does 400-690 damage on average and can one shot light and medium tanks on Crits is obscene. It does the damage of the Sheridan, which is a Tier X tank, that and it's intense armour and constant protection from it's team because THEY KNOW it's overpowered, makes it extremely hard to combat, you basically have to be running a team of Leapord going in circles around them to kill it. I'd HARDLY say that's a fair tank. Especially not when it hits your M6 and does more than 75% of it's health. Leaving basically one-shot to any tank that comes along, if not then Two-Shot. It's like fighting a Darksouls Area 5 boss amongst a team of average Area 2 mob enemies. @karmic portal .
are you complaining about the kv2? You literally have to sit in front of it for at least 5 seconds before it can hit you. It just punishes mistakes, severely.
@mental hemlock and then it's welcome to get rushed and obliterated for 20 seconds
"Only the comp players use" Sir, comp players use higher tiers
Never said you weren't comp, it's just KV-2 isn't that hard to use, and it's needed for KV-3 unless fXP so many normal players use it
They don't miss man, because it's a tank only the Comp players use. So no matter what, whenever you come up against one you're dead. There's nothing you can do about it because for some reason Randoms is decked full of Competetive players, and here I was thinking Ratings was for the Competetive players. But no, you reach V+ and everyone yells at you for being a casual player who just wants to have fun for once. So yes, I'm complaining, because it's an overpowered tank used by players who know how to absolutely abuse it. And I hate to go against it at all. I had to get the TOG II to even begin to combat it's obscene firepower. Not to mention if it sees you first and you don't see it, it can still hit you on the move anyway, so what's the point of even trying to fight it if you're not going to abuse the OP tanks?
I have High tier tanks dude, I'm no Comp player, I just like the high tier tanks because they look cool
I'm just saying debuff it by a little bit, so that it's not going to absolutely decide the fate of the Battle depending on the team it's on
It's basically an Arty with better armor. Point and click
OBJ, insults now? If I was joking you'd know.
@mental hemlock Oh I thought you were being serious lol. gg
Chicken he is clearly joking
Also even comp players don't hit every shot they fire in the KV-2 (when they ever play it) because of the inaccuracy the gun presents. Most hit more shots than one would expect because they make sure it's a very viable shot before firing, due to the 20+ second reload, making it count as much as RNG allows them. It's not overpowered, and tournament players prefer heavies like ARL 44, many teams spamming a good 3-5 of them in battle
The STOCK NON-autoloading gun for the Foch 155 should have it's 640 alpha back. It will provide a competition between the two guns.
@nimble zodiac dude he is clearly just messing around. I mean he made it obvious
@mental hemlock actually bro I see your point. The kv2 does need a nerf now that you mention it. You know what tank really needs a nerf though? They kv4. That tank has way too much frontal armor and is a beast sidescraping. It’s turret is also really strong so it can go hull down. It needs a nerf fast and they say that it’s gonna be buffed, so sad
@karmic portal STFU, I may be casual but I'm not messing. I genuinely want to just have a fun time, and the fact that I come across a KV-2 in almost every game and always seem to die to it ruins my fun. It's not a fair tank when the player you're up against just wants to have fun, because you're punishing them for playing the game for fun and leaving it to players who are willing to abuse OP tanks or are comp players. You're killing them off before they get a chance to play or even mess around.
Omg 😭 😭
Shouldn't... every tank you fight kill you for having fun? Because it seems like 'having fun' is defined as making mistakes here.
Chicken he is right, the kv2 does need a nerf. The idea that it can one shot tanks already makes it op. It’s pen should be severely reduced
@stiff edge haven’t you guys learned by now that when someone says something ridiculous they are trolling. I mean the idea that comp players play the kv2 is what pretty much confirms it.
literally everything is bad about the tank except the alpha and maybe the hp pool
its like the 183, except it has potential to one shot tanks
but is much, much more inaccurate
if theyre trolling then ok
and yes it is quite ridiculous
no clue why someone would find making people type a couple of sentences amusing
Will you both shut it, I'm not here to troll I'm genuinely having a bad time against the KV-2
Dude I'm not trolling, and I don't have time to "get good" I have a job that tanks more than 60 hours a week from me.
@mental hemlock Bro if you are gonna troll at least make it funny. No one wants to hear an annoying troll. And if you aren’t well then get good. Play the kv2 and see for yourself how much it sucks. If you are driving a light or medium tank just either bait its shot or go around it. And if it shoots don’t be a coward and just rush it cause it has a 24 second reload.
You really the type of troll tries to takes up people’s time? Like if you gonna troll try to make others mad or something entertaining. Anyways I ain’t responding anymore cause you don’t even try to be funny.
Buddy just don't get in front of a kv2, problem solved.... Also get a grip and realize the kv2 doesn't have 690 alpha or whatever, it's 640.... Also the fact that you need to use something like a t37, Chaffee, type 64 and some really light things in order for a kv2 to reliable pen you frontally ffs
When was LTTB armour nerfed?it doesnt have 150mm anymore ?
That was QUITE a while back
Kv2 might not need a nerf, but there is no reason the smasher should be as potent and disgusting as it is.
Honestly, I don’t see how anyone can defend the KV-2 and especially the smasher. Sure KV-2 accuracy is bad, but did we all forget about the fact that A. It literally ONE SHOTS things, B. It has more DPM than many same tier meds while also having 4x the alpha and C. It has a turret
These 3 features combined make the tank inherently overpowered, even with bad accuracy, mobility and armor.
And even if it weren’t OP, there wouldn’t be any really issues with nerfing it to discourage derp spammers
@orchid grove because its a crutch and god forbid anyone ever point it out to harm kv2 and smasher owners fragile egos and their incompetence
same
T32 NEED Buff pen and buff traverse, slow and bad pen for heavy tank tier 8
Congrats, you have ignored everything that makes the t32 amazing
Kv2 can only do something when actually hitting smh, 80% of the time you'll miss everything except for a single shot which most likely was he splash
A good tactic that works with kv2s is meatshielding. I wait for some idiot to get shot by it, and only then do I peek it. If you are complaining about it being op, I have a feeling you are the type of player I use as a meatshield.
Yes people at tier 6 must be very skilled
I don't trust WG with the Kvgn, I feel they will overcook it
the armor on the predator UM definitely needs a buff as well as a penetration buff
Players have to deal with the atrocious lack of gun depression limiting already where they can go on the map, increasing the frontal armor from 130 to 150mm and increase the thickness of the front vision ports from 75 mm to 95mm and the penetration from 165mm to 173mm base AP also improve dispersion on the gun. I had to deal with missing 2 out of 3 shots missing completely from a stationary target. The fact that it sees tier VIII is criminal
Buff the t-2020 if you actually want to sell it. It has no armour whatsoever, the turret is paper, the front is paper, it doesn't have spaced sides like every other russian heavy so those are paper too. It's also slow, and the gun is bad (as usual for this type of tank)
Just buff it...
How can you justify armour as shockingly bad as this on a tank with less mobility than the is5, but the same gun.
Didn’t WG say they took the IS5 and improved it or something? This looks worse
It has nothing good about it, it's just awful
I reccomend not getting the t2020 it's a pile of hot garbage, has 0 armor on hull and turret
Man i hope WG looses money on this shit
It's such a garbage tank
I'll better stick with IS-5 than with this "toned up" tank for the better
Nice
At least it should have some downsides as well
Here is a picture of the t-2020 just to try and make sure no one goes and wastes there money on it, trying to help out the community here, this was taken with me using the obj 252u and you can easily pen the turret and hull armor with standard ammunition
If anyone thinks the price of the t-2020 is way too high or think the tank needs a buff, please respond to this with a thumbs up
If the price is too high just don't buy it🤨 💁♂️
Tbh I really like its look but I'll wait till I can get it for 7k
All they need to do is massively buff the armour, then it will at least be usable, if still generic
Something is wrong here.
This gun in cent I should be available for comet.
Same for the gun in cent 7/1 line should be available for cent I.
Did WG say they were planning on buffing the is6
the bulldog doesnt need a mobility buff tho
@final warren yes it will get an armor buff in the “near future”
I mean the tank is called T-2020, it has to be bad
Lol
@nimble zodiac damn guess it bad
Sorry @outer blade =(
Aside that, it really is kinda bad, the accuracy is tolerable, and the speed is very nice for a heavy, but the armor is only troll to HEAT-spammers, even then, pen when hitting the hull
But it has nice RNG, and it bounces quite a lot when hulldown
@nimble zodiac the mobility is terrible when you compare it to the is5, which also has more armour.
And as soon as people all learn you can just pen straight through the middle of the turret, you won't bounce anything. At the moment it's new so people don't know how to deal with it yet.
You could wiggle though
That is just generic advice, not a strong point of the tank
I'm just gonna drop a nuke
Is4 is garbage
If the Is4 is garbage, what do you consider to be a good tier ten heavy tank?
Vk72
T-2020 is a cool looking IS-3
Yes it is lacking speed and some armor vs IS-5 but at least it's gun dynamics, aiming time, and dispersion on movement is better
It's so fractional with the gun that it makes no difference. The armour is utterly junk and it's much slower. We are comparing a £50 tank to a £5 tank, let's not forget.
In truth... Win8 has become a more important stat than WR now that winning depends on how many players you have to carry (nubs). I think WG needs to start posting player WIN8 as the ranking system
Read pinned messages
Buff the 252u its are currently the worst tank
Proof it needs a buff
@full token Wdym, I killed them all, I just got stuck which sucked
Yes I agree. The player in the picture needs a buff to avoid that
nerf the t2020!
Dude it's awful, what are you on about@sly mauve
They probably bounced it once and went crazy
What about the new T-2020 tank? Would it be possible to receive an armour buff? At least the turret? I made a mistake believe that it will be a good tank - it has an ST-1 turret and characteristic of an IS-5. In reality is the worst premium tank..... that WOT video is so misleading .... word REFUND is in my mind..... DO NOT BUY THAT TANK !!!! At least not now ....
@devout tapir see my response in #vehicles-discussion
Thoughts on whether Leo should get like gun depression or aim time or dispersion on the move or acceleration buff
Please buff the obj 252 wg, it's lp should be buffed to 300mm, it's very weak compared to the is3
With all the balance changes and new additions at tier 6, I think the Churchill GC would probably preform a little better if it had higher alpha damage maybe 300-350 instead of 250 but keep the reload the same, it would be more rewarding to the players who still own it.
sooo is the hole buff 252u a joke or for real?
Def a joke
Does anyone have IS-6 stats for update 7.1?
I wanna see the armour changes
Nothing yet, although 7.1 open test is supposedly beginning soon so there should be details soon
@nimble zodiac k cause if people wanted it then they must be a masochist
What are you talking about. Ofc the 252u needs a buff
yea 252u need more armor, currently it cannot bounce the bl10 all the time yet, you know what while you are at it why not buff the speed of the tank, make it on par with a dracula because the tank is so slow, also buff the gun I think it will perform a little better in its tier with a 183 mm gun
Give the BDR and T1 a bigger lp. Make Excelsior have a weak lower plate and better sides. Make AT-2 front 152mm, and cupola 76mm. Make kv-1 front 90mm on up. Remove side behind track weak spots from Tiger P.
Nerf those two tier 5 heavies, but don't mess with the rest, maybe tick the KV-1 up a bit again, but that's it.
Nerf T1 and BDR, maybe KV1 too but however the T1 and the BDR is just too op i know they are meant to be heavy tanks but i can penerate a tiger I with VK 30.01 D but i cant penerate a T1 heavy with hetzer?
@pastel cairn Last thing CGC needs is another gun buff. It already has one of the best guns at tier 6
Make CGC have 1500 engine power and 60km/h top speed
AT-2 is the worst. the only weakspot is the hatch, and its really difficult to nail. Even a total braindead moron can survive for ages in it
Drive wheel on front, if he stops looking at you for juuuuust a little it's an autopen
@lone warren I beg too differ
Nerf T1 and BDR, maybe KV1 too but however the T1 and the BDR is just too op i know they are meant to be heavy tanks but i can penerate a tiger I with VK 30.01 D but i cant penerate a T1 heavy with hetzer?
@unique scaffold why would you nerf the kv1 again???
its side armor was destroyed not too long ago. And why nerf BDR of all things?
1: KV1 is hard to penerate with tier IV-V light and medium tanks.
2:BDR is just too op, the fact that if you see a BDR with a light tank/medium tank OR even heavy tank you cant penerate some certain sides especially the front is hard to.
from when has the BDR had good frontal armor?
@unique scaffold ??? That is a you problem
Also the kv-1 armor is supposed to be hard to penetrate not an easy pen
Infact anyone can go through the flat areas in the front so what is your point?
Bdr is not as overcooked as t1. But it still has a lot of armour, except for tiny weakspots it is just as red as t1 to mediums frontally. It can still effectively sidescrape at around 30 degrees. All this with a hard hitting 90mm gun.
wait when did it get buffed?
One or two updates ago along with the second t1 buff
I seem to have gotten out of touch
How do I paint my tank
Mods
i got tagged?
Erm he was just asking and he already got muted, totally fair mods
Buff T-2020 turret
And the hull. It's so much worse than the is5 hull. Weaker front, no spaced armour on the side (so it's not troll at all, it's just weak), and a 15mm deck plate which means anyone who shoots your turret with HE does masses of splash damage. Fix this wg please
This cool ejecting shell mechanism needs to be added to other tanks, especially like the T-62A
They should give it a very high credit coefficient and not a buff in my opinion. Then it would be worth it. It should make like more credits than a Lowe
@nocturne mauve that would be very unrealistic....then again that hasn't stopped WG before 🤔
@drifting depot If it’s the ‘paint my tank’ guy, he sent that message in the #703192336691101707 channel as well. It’s a mute for sending messages there since it’s closed
@shadow topaz the hatch on the back of the t62a turret is for ejecting shells
Oh, did not know that lol, Cheers
Well bruh but no need to ping smh
Give the original 155mm stats and alpha back to the stock non-autoloading gun of the Foch 155
^
Sry I do pings because I don’t feel that just the message would make it clear who it is intended for
The t-2020 is incredibly underpowered, And putting a price of 50$ is very unrealistic. It needs a complete armor overhaul. The pike-nose is practically ineffective against tds. How to fix the tank: make it a medium or armor buff. Give the thing some speed and a lower caliber and you got a t-22 medium at tier 8.
Lol
I'd say 15-20 bucks are enough for that tank, but we all know any new tanks are gonna be 50 bucks anyway.... at least high enough tier ones
@rotund skiff never mind TDs, most of the tanks at tier 8 can pen it with standard rounds, even some meds and the new British light
I mean, making the turret stronger is the only thing it'll need to get in a good spot in tier 8, like leaving only the cupolas as weakspots, not to mention it isn't really the ST-I turret, let alone the very nerfed armor if it was
The is5 already has a great turret, but is also faster and has a much stronger hull all round. If this tank is to be slower, it should have more armour.@nimble zodiac
That's... what I'm asking for...
Well at least let's praise wargaming for not releasing another broken premium among us
That’s new
WG probably won’t ever buff it
The T54E1 needs an armor buff, even the Vickers Light a light tank has more armor | I would agree but the hull is butter and the T54E1’s turret is only troll
I disagree with that statement you must wiggle the tank (T54E1) to make the armor work but it’s still effective as is
Well...i mean....its a autoloading medium tank....not exactly the tank to rely on armor
Except T26E4
Yeah it just sucks that I have a 15 second reload but I have no armor to protect myself with
HackersRCowards#5562 has been warned.
@unique storm ever heard of the T49?
The Churchill GC would preform a little better in battle if it had a slightly improved traverse rate
Just like every turretless td cough e100 and jag e100 engine buff when? 1200 just won't cut it.....
@unique storm Pretty much all autoloaders pay for the luxury of an autoloader by having no armor
Or accuracy, or shell velocity, or speed, or 2 mixed into one tank, or all mixed into one tank smh🤝
Pls remove Sheridan my balls is broken
Bruh jg e100 is great as is
Thats every turretless td
as long as you don't get circled by the average brainlet rushing you
plz buff a little bit VK90.01P side armor, it is too much difficult to bounce shot, we need to oversize to make Medium ap bounce...
Godzilla had a stroke trying to read that
@drifting depot try to speak french and we will see... It is not easy to speak english
Excuse me, but why does the kranvagn get 9 degrees of gun depression!?
Why does this guy ping me to say something weird 🤝
Also, bAlAncInG PuRpOsEs
j'aime les hamburgers
I have some suggestions for the game:
1: a good buff to pen on the comet since the pen seems underwhelming to me. Sure I can do a good job in the ways of damage with it but I feel like I struggle more than I should with pen. I literally can’t pen the upper hull of a p43 term with it
2: more measures toward command spamming cuz if I see someone spamming help one more time, I will not be as merciful in chat than K have been. And it’s not like they spam it because they genuinely need help, they spam it to get people to follow them and it drives me insane. I thought give the help command a longer recharge than other commands or make there be a limit to how many times you can use it tin a time and then lock up the commands for a short while like you do with command spammers.
These are just suggestions and you don’t have to buff the comet’s pen but, please, sort out help spammers
Buff the Kpf Dpm to 2500, and buff it gun depression to -8
🤣
Allow 1 Vehicle Restoration Ticket per 3 months or just double the credit/gold value a sold vehicle has to re-buy it. 1 year imo just to reclaim 1 sold tank is pretty long.
They got rid of that months ago @tulip imp you can now restore as many as you want
I find the Comet's penetration quite sufficient against the tanks I meet, so I doubt the Comet needs a pen buff.
Well it's mounting a 17 pounder not the proper one tho, but yeah the comet has the mobility to circle around tanks and work with its current pen values
Why does the Brits call them pounders instead of centimeters or millimeters @thick rover lmao
Quarter pounder
I think it's because back then they refer them according to the weight of the projectile they fired.
hi this slow mode is for everyone or just me?
Everyone has it. Only the Moderators dont, as they have special permissions that mean they don’t have it
The Brits do everything different
They are the inventors of the tank anyway
^ debatable
I think they should buff the ap on jp E100 to 700-1000 cuz low rolls come do hard
Well it’s just rng, more bad luck really.
Lol comet pen is hilarious. Zoom into sniper mode while aiming at the front of a tiger, and its 100% red. Panther 1 ftw.
T8 is filled with heavies so T7 meds have a hard time in bottom tier especially after the heavy HP buff
@long sand comet has very high speed of reloading for and it has good penetration and speed
« good penetration » not really. I agree with the mobility and reload being good. But not the pen. 148mm at T7 isn’t what I’d call good.
‘Decent’
@compact nymph then use calibrated shells, it would wreck other tanks if it had any more pen
Comet is just panther but sad. Comets not so fast once you realize the top speed is only 52km/h
^ A Panther with less armor and 50mm less pen
More depression
T54E1 is fast until you realize it’s top speed is only 50 kpm
More dpm, better acceleration
I’ll take the panthers upper plate and laser accuracy + pen over the comet’s gun depression any day
So question. How much is the is6's armor getting buffed in 7.1? I want to have an idea so i dont buy an underpowered tank that stays underpowered.
its not underpowered. Its just average
Nobody knows. WG only mentioned the buff, nothing specific
Even prebuff it's still a good tank especially if used against lights and meds with the dpm gun
I treat IS-6 like a soldier destined to die in battle, a cost expended in order to win, a lot like other russian heavies. It's not outstanding, and I'm definitely for an armor buff, I hope it's not too crazy or useless of one
It might become op after a buff tho...
Buff the emil
It needs a top speed buff at least. 26 is laughable
Or more Armor, this tank is so bad even if it has à monstruous gun
No, it definitely needs a speed buff
The engine is for tanks like UE 57 😂
Tiger 131 needs some MAJOR changes. I mean, its a literal tiger tank, why is it tier 6? The armor is paper. The upper plate on a regular tiger 1 is impenetrable while the one on this is paper, the reload time is also worse being at 7 whole seconds while I think the regular tigers is about 6 or less. WHY IS IT A TIER 6?!?!?! It should be a tier 7 collector version of the tiger. IT NEEDS SOME MAJOR CHANGES WARGAMING!!!!!!!!
Honestly you guys at wargaming did a really crappy job of replicating an iconic historical vehicle and I'm very upset about it. For those of you who don't know Tiger 131 was an actual tank that exists in real life today and if you went to the bovington tank museum in the U.K. you would be able to visit it. I'm very upset about the crappy job wargaming did of putting it in-game. It was MUCH more powerful in real life than it is in-game, honestly the armor is a joke and I want it buffed.
Damn someone is salty
You do know it actually faces the tanks it was supposed to face ingame unlike the tier 7 tiger 1? and btw they didn’t attempt to replicate its history by balance and they still did it its a tank for you to collect not use kuro mori mine exists for that reason and everyone knows tiger 131s history your not special
I still think Tiger 131 could use an armor and reload buff tho.
And a serious mobility nerf while they are at it
You know... if they wanted it "historical"
Lmaoo
For real. Tiger 131 needs buffs. I have it and it is seriously underpowered. Every other heavy tank has better armor and reload speed. It at least needs to be on even playing field with other tier 6 heavies. Although @unique scaffold makes a good point about it facing historically accurate opponents.
It looks nothing like the real one
@rare topaz The thing is that Tiger 131 has the historical armor/armament setup, but it’s facing upgunned and uparmored tanks at closer ranges, like how the tier V M4 Sherman has the 76mm main gun
T-2020 sucks. If you bought it, and you're sad, then research before you buy.
There are already so many premium tier 8 heavies, of course some of them are going to be irrelevant (cough vk 168)
You play WoT for the arcade fun
not because you want a history lesson
^
Wotb has some fun battles but historically accurate....notsomuch
I mean it has very side scrapable sides, and a decentish gun. And unlike the arl it has a decently strong turret (sort of?). Because the highlighting shows the mantlet as pennable, lots of average-low skilled players shoot it when in actuality it's not exactly pennable. I mean the fact ur complaining about the armor just sounds like ur driving out into the open expecting bounces rather than sidescraping and using hulldown cover. @rare topaz. The reload buff is meh, it's suppose to be there sort of to just absorb hits not exactly be a damage dealing heavy
@rare topaz Tiger 131? Bad? I’d say go deal with it, the tank already has a magnificent gun for its tier along with bearable armor, We slightly older players had to go through a 100mm tier 7 tiger 1 that got penned by anything, ow you’re crying for a tier 6, deal with it, 100mm is enough to angle with, its gun is good for 7 seconds of reload with a higher alpha of 200, the tier 5 kv has the same alpha but has a slower reload by almost 3 seconds, its mobility is still good aswell, the tank is not the best but its still good.
ARL 44 will love fighting it ;)
ARL 44 is a T6 Tiger II
Balance? Hmmm talent show
At least ARL has a decently weak turret and track weakspots
You play WoT for the arcade fun
not because you want a history lesson
@jagged crescent historical lessons are in War Thunder. Or for extreme historical lesson, craft a time machine and Go back to WWII onwards
buff kv1 a bit
pls nerf T1 Heavy. it is just to OP
It is not OP.....It is BROKEN
While we are at it nerf bdr as well. It is nearly as broken as t1
Bdr still has way too much armour for a tier 5.
dude just shoot through its tracks, easy peasy pen
Dude you need to aim fully for that tracks and if your shell doesn’t have good pen it is still not pen
Even the t1 heavy can be penned frontally in the lowerplate, and through the drivewheel. Doesn't stop it from being absolutely broken because of the armour elsewhere.
t1 heavy>every heavy tank in V
^ just too broken and too spammable, so many rerolls with like 5k games in a t1 heavy out of 6k games bragging about their higher win rate, it's annoying
Had my first post buff bdr encounter in the p43ann yesterday. That armor scares me.
Almost completely unpennable turret, just like the t1 heavy ah yes
Me: loads gold for a tier 5 while driving a tier 6
stays red
^🤝
I hated the tech tree P43 bis, but the anniversary is a whole lot of fun. Dunno what the difference is...
Armor
Faster
it's got p43 ter mobility on a p43 bis chassis
It’s a P43 Ter chassis, the wheels
I am pretty sure this is not the place to mention this but i voiced my request at #vehicles-discussion...I wasnt sure if there were any devs there.
@devs can I get some sort of compensation for this...I mean this is just sitting there and doing nothing and most probably will not do anything in the future. it’s not doing me any good either. My username in wot blitz is CAPTAIN_REX_501st_
Make the 183 premium HESH do less damage and give it some armour or something
No
@solid elm They’ve had offers in the past that allow you to get the remaining parts to get the tank. That probably costs lesser than the tank, so allows you to get a discount and also get rid of these parts
Oh I wasnt aware
What if you already have the tank tho
I got the action X from a crate and I’ve still got like 7 parts for the certificate
Rework the HE shells on the vk leo because its useless other than giving out free CH medals to enemy team
@distant dew if u already have the tank if u somehow get it again youll get credits as compensation
I am posting my daily #GiveKranvagn12 protest message. Kranvagn deserves 12 degrees of gun depression, not a whimpy 9.
I really don’t care so i’m going to shut up
imagine calling out the kranvagn's stats when technically it's not even in the game yet
It’s already crazy good lookin
Wdym kranvagn has around 380 mm of turret thickness and an impenetrable hull
290mm is impenetrable now?
Smh my hand, not like every heavy is meant to bounce off the upper plate without angling unless it's a 215b an is4 or something like that
@drifting depot lol IS-7, literally meant not to angle. Also Kran can just look upwards to hide the top weakspots
Chop the e4's copula off and give badger 15 degrees of gun arc to each side
@dense walrus it's autobounce on the flat, so all AP and APCR will bounce unless you're able to shoot down on it
@atomic hound fair enough. I don’t have that pen mode (free version of armorinspector) so looked pretty deceiving just seeing the armor layout
T-2020 sucks. If you bought it, and you're sad, then research before you buy.
There are already so many premium tier 8 heavies, of course some of them are going to be irrelevant (cough vk 168)
Just ST-I first turret with spaced-armor, IS-5 hull (in worse), and the same gun as IS-6 (Just the name changes, not the stats. D-30A => IS-6. D-30B => T-2020). They sell dream but the only good point of the tank : The reload animation. Only that. ONLY. So, I agree with you, T-2020 sucks
And the accuracy, also it’s not even designed like ST-I, it’s more rounded, though the rest appear quite similar, speaking of the turret anyways
I know it’s the stock turret, but the front isn’t as much the same, let alone the decreased armor
It's the stock turret of the st1
Yep.
Isn’t it a weakened stock ST-1 turret? from what I see the T-2020 has 140mm on the cheeks and 100mm on the rest of the front, while the ST-1 has 170mm over the whole turret front with it’s stock turret
can 183 get a small gun handling buff :< . That thing is just a fat target for people to shoot with a gambling addicted player driving it.
I think 183 is accurate enough for its caliber. These are very similar, but T-2020 could at least be 170 on the front, it just doesn’t work, why can’t the cupolas be the weakspots?
@harsh oriole the 183 doesn’t need any buffs @drifting depot the best change you can bring for the 183, yeah. Despite the fact it’s so bad and so many people ask for it to be buffed, it remains the 5th most played tank over the past 90 days. If it had to get any form of buff, T10 would be even more spammed with 183s, making gameplay a lot more campy/passive/overall boring. So yeah, either keep it as a dead weight/free dmg (depends on the team) or remove it.
remove it
replace w badger
Badger could’ve replaced it and been a good fit
Indeed, rip
I bought the badger for gold, but won't mind if they made the badger researchable and removed the 183. It just means I got the badger without having to grind through the brit tds.
Yeah, badger should’ve been tech tree
Was the Blitz 183 added before the Badger got added to Wot PC?
What
I’d say buff the Kran’s dpm slightly it’s dpm is the worst in its tier and it needs a buff
The fv 183 needs a buff, u get spotted so fast and u die so fast due to the new lights, u cant even be in a bush when there is a vickers 300 m away from u without getting spotted
Any buff to the 183 will make it op, and in the current state it is meh. Not a good tank to drive but there is no way to balance it. It doesn’t need camo to not be spotted so then u just get derped for 1.3k
Yes lets not buff the e3 its perfect” slow, low hp, weak compoler, great gun. Why take the compoler off of the e5 and patton but not the e4? Or just buff it a little...
E4 is just a e100 with better pen and medium tank armor
only almost 1k hp diffrence
Make vk4502 a ufp stronger, it is easy pen even angled. And make turret face 220mm or something. Then, make the tiger ii lfp an actual weak spot, and the cupola.
I hadn’t any problems with the VK 45.02 A’s armor. The best buff you can give to the tank is to teach the players it’s a heavium and must be played accordingly.
I fear the purpose of this channel is to discuss vehicles balance, not to rant about the matchmaking.
Pinned messages
Grille needs on the move/ stationary camo buff, why is it hard to understand?
Why are removed tanks being buffed? Unless of course, they are being brought back?? @lusty silo
bruh what
🥳
Send me link
Anyone able to do a complete comparison on 7.1 vs 5.5
Seriously? IS-6 frontal armour only buffed by 10mm
Yes😂 and the turret will remain as weak
And that is enough to make u aim to pen hull in most tanks
You know the Luchs was sad when it’s gonna get the DPM almost doubled 😂
Is6 needs a turret buff
it doesn’t seem to be getting one though
10mm is plenty
Haha, normalization go scooty scooty, assuming the angle fired on isn’t more than 63 degrees, it won’t be much more effective than 210mm unless it exposes the side frontal plates more. 10mm does next to nothing. I’d be fine with it being 130mm, leaving the hatch as a weakspot and the lower glacis plate as another. It won’t turn into 252U
T-15 no longer has Meme tier APCR
IS-6 10mm of armor only? Wargaming please open your eyes it has a worthless gun at least make its armor competitive its mobility isnt that impressive either please for the love of god buff the hull sides and front by more and touch the turret a little bit even
And what’s even more fair is that IS-6 gets a slower reload for the exact same gun, and it’s not like the others, it doesn’t have troll sides, no strong turret or strong hull
Why are you using the high pen gun anyway? Use the dpm gun+rammer
dpm gun + rammer makes it fun in T9 battles
130 would make its frontal glacis broken, go to blitz Hangar and do the math. I do agree on a turret buff though @nimble zodiac
Can we please just get 5° of gun depression on the WZ-120 please? I feel that it's long overdue at this point, especially since the WZ-121 received 6° not too long ago.
While we’re at it, give the Stürer Emil at least a 34 kmph top speed. 26 is just not enough and although the gun and gun depression are excellent, it remains frustrating to race at the same speed as a Maus, without the armor.
Sturer emil is in the same tier as smasher
Fv201 bounces more shot than centurion I, cent I is so under performing do something about it
Is it? I think it’s quite a decent tank already. The FV301 also has HEable armor on the sides and front though turret is bouncy at times. Cent isn’t really HEable from front and sides and I’d rely more on the Cent turret than FV301.
No point playing cent when there’s an OP mk1 defender
I mean ones free to it has that advantage
It's funny how the Centurion I is regarded for having an amazing gun, yet WG introduces a light tank with the exact same gun that can go 65kph (Cent only goes 40kph) and has light tank camo. It's just absurd.
balance
Fv actually has a better gun 😬
If the only advantage the Cent has over fv301 is better side armor, cent is clearly outdated
Cent needs better top speed
45 km/h would be fine but still not great so the tank wouldn't be OP for sure
Honestly just buff the top speed to 50kph and increase the turret armor so it's equal to the Defender's armor.
It’s needs front upper plate armor, literally can’t even go hull down without talking shot on hull and better dpm.
It has worst dpm than caenarvan.
Thxs man that was so helpful.
I don’t think you understand what hull down is.
@dusky cedar the act of going hull down means hiding your hull. If you are hull down and still get penned through your hull you are doing something wrong.
I don’t think he knows the English well
DPM buff for the second gun on SP I C? Only the top gun buffed now according to the blitzhangers.
It is happening
What is the point of buffing the deleted tanks?
It shares a gun with another buffed tank
Which tank also uses 37mm Browning Semiautomatic Gun? Cannot find it.
Maybe all those tank will be coming back! That’s a thought.
@lucid jetty good point, I can’t find that either. Positive said it earlier and I was too lazy to validate it
@storm hatch uhh, math says it would make the upper plate around 245mm against AP shells
How much against APCR
Around 268mm, with the 130mm plate I’m suggesting, and this is the area around the hatch, the angle is from the IS-6 looking straight at the viewpoint, +0/-0 degrees
50 hp/ton? Wtf
Hey WG what would it take to make the T67 competitive again. Y'all have nerfed this thing way too hard. It has less HP than a AMX ELC bis, the gun is incredibly inaccurate, and it has basically no armor. I get that it is a collector's tank but it used to be in the tech tree and it was far better than what it is now.
It will be in 7.1
Ok I see that now on Blitz hangar. Is there a chance that its health will be bumped up too (maybe in the next update, if not this one)? Currently, it is sitting at 583 with Improved Assembly which is really low. How are we supposed to play this tank as a front line td if it doesn't have enough hp to make it to the front line?
atm WG doesn't care at all about collector tanks, especially lower tier ones. You were given the chance to play it and obtain it, and they won't touch it unless it's a blanket change or they're planning on selling it again.
Ok that is understandable. Thanks for the explanation.
Why does Mk1 defender have 76mm plates of spaced armour
Buff Maus Pen for APCR
Lol Is7 has 303 and maus has 311 without calibrated shells
Maus needs buffed speed, armor, and pen for all shells
Maus needs autoreloader
Maus needs jet engine, wet sock fetish lol I remember u ur name kinda stands out
Maus need 50 degree traverse speed
Maus needs
All Maus needs is 65 km top speed and nothing else.
@warped condor I agree. The t67 needs a buff I’ve played since the game was released and it was so good before the nerf that it didn’t deserve
Slow down the reload animation for the T-2020. Give it the actual ST-I turret armor. With slowing down the reload animation also convert it into either two or three shot autoreloader.
They should make the reload animation happen 2s after firing
WG, better don't touch BT-7 art., please
Why did you bring it up then? You silly goose
That’s it, ChaNGE ThE aP sHEllS
I miss the T67, I remember playing it a lot on my old account
christopher yuri#0985 was banned
The hammer strikes again
Hi, have you tricks for leopard pta?
Maus needs dual 183 mm guns
183 literally needs it's armor back
atleast make it's front hull armor 152mm again, side armor is 100mm, and the front turret armor 210mm, to compensate for it's seriously annoying inaccuracy, so it can go frontline and resist some medium caliber tank shells. It sucks in 11/10 of battles.
183 is perfect where it's at
nope, it's far from being perfect where it's at. Light years away.
There needs to be a worse tank in each category. I think the 183 is the perfect tank for that spot.
^ also, remember it's the 5th most played tank. Any kind of buff would make it be even more spammed at T10, therefore rendering battles more boring and campy
Thxs for buffing kv4 now more people will go for broken is4
mate, i don't even see anymore much 183s at this point. 1-2/10 battles there would be a 183 to appear. Being on top 5 most played doesn't matter because it was because of the game before the nerf update on 183. Now it isn't even close to 1/4 of numbers of 183 appearing in battles compared to before. Top 5 on most played tanks, maybe, but it is 100% surely on Top 5 worst tanks to play.
EDIT: maybe the combined number of battles in every server, but in Asia, i rarely see it. Don't get me wrong, but that's my experience in playing the 183, and seeing 183s in my server, which is Asia.
@urban owl It's 5th most played in the last 90 days🤦♀️
Your memory is definitely not perfect, and everyone's experience is different. It is the 5th most played tank, the stats do not lie
The days of when every tier ten game had 4 Death Stars
Even if it's the worst T10, it remains the 5th most played tank over the past 90 days as started above. Just play your 183 as it is now, or sell it before playing better and funnier tanks.
Edit: for the second time, no. Any form of buff would make the tank even more popular/overplayed than it already is.
Fine, i'll admit that i'm wrong in that point, but it doesn't change the fact that the tank does need some buffs to atleast compete with Tank Destroyers, and i believe no memory is perfect. I know there are people with Photographic memories, but it's not a perfect thing either.
EDIT: and no, i don't want to sell my 183 to just play a better and funnier tank, i don't want to grind 6 million credits to just buy it again when i want to.
EDIT 2: not even the Gun handling? i literally missed 2 shots of HESH in less than 150 meters, with the tank being so a clear shot, not even moving, and i literally waited for my dispersion circle to get smaller. I wasn't even moving at that point. Shell just went off above the cupola when i was targeting the lower turret part of the 4202, and for the second shot it was the AMX 30 being in 100 meters range and it was moving a little bit to wiggle off, and the shot just went off above the front armor.
To make things worse, it happens to me in 3.5/5 shots in 10 battles.
I say this every time the buff death star conversation comes up. With the alpha it packs, the tank will always be a balancing issue. It will either be too strong, like it was before it’s accuracy and camo got nerfed, or too weak - a state it is in right now. I prefer the latter and not have deathstar spam all over again.
Relative to the Caliber of the gun, the accuracy is actually not bad at all, but it was far too good in the past and we don’t need that nerf reverted. It shouldn’t be very reliable to be able to knock off 1000+ HP from a target.
Buffing 183 doesn't mean that it won't be worst tank any more @_@
Gun handling, not the dispersion, and kindly explain to me why i only dealt 756 damage to the Sheridan, with AP ofc. I didn't say revert it back to what it was before, but it's basically so sh*t i would prefer getting a tier 7 premium tank rather than playing it 10 times in a row. Improving it's Gun handling will make it atleast be somewhat more useful into the battle.
What it really wants is absolutely awful shell velocity if WG refuse to remove it's HESH, then maybe a small camo and armour buff
The 183 brings campy and extremely slow paced battles, as no one wants to take the risk of eating 1300 dmg in a single hit. I already on average meet 2-4 of them in battle. I don’t need to see more of them. The tank does it’s job perfectly, which is to be a dead weight/free dmg pool (depending on the team). The best buff it can receive is to be removed from the game.
It would have been nice to see the badger replace the deathstar, but obviously they decided not to go that route
Then there would be almost twice the number of idiots rushing in to the enemy base and die instantly. That's the purpose of the 183, to let the enemy team know to be more careful, and take one for the team to kill it. It's Teamwork, but that rarely exists in battles now. If it's not Gun handling you want to be improved, then atleast buff it's damned camo. There's always a heavy that will take the AP for you, or HESH if the 183 player decides to use one. It's just that people are too cowardly to take a hit from a 183 and too dumb to survive after getting shot by it.
Really? Does that mean you are not afraid/you enjoy taking a hit from a 183? In any medium/light or TD, a single AP from the 183 will take away a half of your hit points, not going to mention the HESH. You want it’s camo buffed? Sure, now when it will clap a tank for up to 1600 dmg, it won’t get spotted and his opponents will be unable to shoot back. Horribly wrong idea. Just play a jageroo if you are that addicted to high alpha guns, or pretty much any other tank since they will all be better.
Then what's the point of adding it into the game? If you want it removed, then what will happen to the players who own it? and Yes, i'm not afraid to take a hit from 183, that said, when i'm only using a heavy tank. If you are careful enough on playing a medium tank when there's an enemy 183, then you can try and distract it and let other people target it while it shot you and missed/bounced, or carefully hide and spot it from bushes to bushes. I never had any problems in killing tanks with good camo when i'm using a medium tank, because i'm not an idiot who wholeheartly exposes my tank.
I'm no masochist either.
I'll take the point if it's camo was made better, then be more careful. That's what i always do. I'm not careless. I always check my ground if it's clear to engage or not.
Thing is, more than 60% of people aren't careful, and then getting free hit by TDs, then complain afterwards. It's not the 183's fault it penetrated a clear shot. It's that people are afraid to take risks, or people who are very careless.
EDIT: At this point i didn't even play it since the update.
To correct what you're saying that i'm addicted to high alpha guns, no, and i didn't grind much at all. I used free exp that i kept to grind and then research it, and to collect it.
If the tank is so bad, then why are you playing it? there are plenty of better and funnier tanks. The Jageroo does it’s job better better anyways. Most 183 players must probably enjoy pain as they purposely grind one of the worse tech tree lines, filled with bad to mediocre tanks, in order to get the worst T10 in the game. If you are going through all that pain, then you probably are really addicted to high alpha guns and so on don’t even care about a tank being good or not.
All 183 players need to do in a tier 10 game is pen 2 to 3 AP shots and they would have had a good game
yeah and i rarely get 3 shots off.
183’s premium HESH should do less damage than the standard HE
Just like the 183 doesn’t need any more buffs, it definitely doesn’t need any more nerfs. The HESH is the one good thing about the tank
Second that, imagine if we were pre nerf on the 183. It was everyone’s complaint. So why start that again. It’s fine as is.
I can't speak for the 183, I don't have it, but I'm just reading through all these comments and it strikes me that as the game gets updated there are more complaints of this tank doesn't do this or that. Players do rarely play as a team and the tanks are designed to assist each other. On their own they lack certain features or abilities, I for one hardly make any money if any at all with the larger tier tanks any more. In fact I've stopped going for the larger tiers now as when the game gets updated you just lose more credits. As a balance discussion of how the matchmaking works I think sooty's magic wand is being used, as the last 20 fights I've just had shows that either your side wins massively or the other. There are no more close and well fought matches any more.
183 used to be a useful tank. Then it got nerfed and now it basically is useless. No camo means that you get spotted from across the map. The bad traverse and mobility means it takes you forever to reposition. All in all it now is more often than not a liability. When it first was released I could easily do 5-6000dmg in a game. Now you struggle to get a single shot in. I simply do not use it anymore. WG seems to have changed something in the accuracy algorythms of tds, as most snapshots in tds now go wild. That plus the nerf makes 183 useless.
Wg can u just buff only the missiles accracy agn?
Jomo...that sounds just like my t10 foch
Wargaming IS-6 needs more than 10mm buff it has nothing going for it JUST for the love of god BUFF more
Tip: IS-5 is cheaper, just play it instead
IS-5s gun is even worse less gun depression and even longer aim time its arguably trash if we dont value them based on price
IS5 is still better than T2020
I think the Vickers CR needs a damage nerf. The pen seems to be pretty good(Never used it but I've been hit by it a couple of times). I once got 501 damage from one shot by the Vickers and the reload speed is pretty fast , so.
183 is at its best when its completely pointless and not fun to play 🙂
I jus love hitting dem juicy HESH shells, and that’s all I need to enjoy it
183 is at its best when its completely pointless and not fun to play 🙂
it makes it fun for the enemy team, why would you not enjoy free damage?
There’s nothing wrong with it if you are facing one low health tier 9 that you can HESH and one shot, otherwise the moment you shoot, you have everyone shooting at you.
Even though how bad 183 is, it’s still unbalanced because you can cripple anything with 1 shot
The heavy buffs is another story, why did they give stupid amounts of HP to unneeded tanks, only some heavies were deserving of this buff, and VK 100 was 100% overbuffed because it has like 500 extra HP from before, meaning it has 2k HP in tier 8
@nocturne mauve false. With recent buffs, you take about half the HP from a same tier heavy. Far from crippling
Seeing a 183 makes me happy even though it’s because I know I’m going to bully that tank
Half your health is still pretty crippling...
It changes the way that you'll play the entire rest of the match
Losing that amount of HP normally leads you to playing a supporting role for your teammates as you are less able to make an aggressive play.
Can the standard B get a speed buff?
Coming from the pantera with it being a really mobile tank, I got used to a certain playstyle that the standard B does not follow. If someone rushes me, I cannot run and often leads to a certain death for me. After 6 battles that all turned out losses, I realized that the standard is another playstyle I am not used to because I grinded a fast tank
@obsidian hearth Unless you are playing it stock which is a stupid thing to complain about you have 2hp/t difference which is very little, and the rest of it is amazing it needs a nerf fairly badly not a buff
IS-5s gun is even worse less gun depression and even longer aim time its arguably trash if we dont value them based on price
@scarlet fjord nah it is not trash
It is a budget obj 252u
Literally
It is very good hulldown too and is quite mobile for a heavy
Perfect for bullying meds also the reload is good on it
Although i agree the accuracy is not great
Pz b2 is unbalanced, horrible armor and pen, forcing me to go full prammo, when the dpm already suck
Platoon anyone?
pz b2 is only good for bullying lower tiers and noob meds, its completely useless against actual tier 4 heavies like matilda or b1
Well it can’t fight tier Vs if queued alone so
No seriously, it has preferential matchmaking
Same with valentine 2
Is it because they have tier II guns?
Trying to fight a tier 5 with one... that would be laughable
Unless it was a crusader then it would have a chance at best
@unique scaffold @abstract marsh Can you buff the is7 armour because 25/27 tier 10 tanks can penetrate the strongest part of its hull despite it being a heavy. Can you please buff it.
why would you ping them 4head
5head*
Forgot to mention with gold 😅
You don’t angle the pike nose.
Gold turns a lot of things to butter anyways
183 deserves to be bad. Derp tanks should not be viable, deal with it.
all tanks should be viable
Kv2 shouldn’t have been nerfed, I am being serious on this. Only people who aren’t paying attention get one shotted by it and litterally every time you shoot Rng determines whether you hit or not. The tank cannot compete with tier 7 heavy tanks at all and struggles against tier 6 heavys as well. The kv2 was never op so there is no reason it’s he had to be nerfed. The only people who complained about it are those dumb enough to sit in front of it or aren’t paying attention
one shotting tanks can never be balanced
I expect a T2020 buff
@hearty steeple And why not? That’s like saying ammo racks can never be balanced. One shotting a tank in a kv2 and ammoracking someone is very similar, both are dependent on rng and some aiming.
And it’s not like one shotting tanks was that common anyways. And the kv2 doesn’t promote a camping play style like the fv183 did
Ammo racking isnt balanced. I honestly don't know why its in the game. Yeah tanks in real life get ammo racked, but blitz isn't realistic. The only thing ammo racks contribute to blitz are random, complete shutdowns through no fault of the victim
Kv2 shouldn’t have been nerfed
You already have no credibility with that username aswell
@unique scaffold Dude, my username is obviously a joke. You can’t handle sarcasm? Yeah I mess around sometimes but I ain’t doing that now. And why should it have been nerfed? Any real reason besides some people with no awareness complaining about it? Like it’s not that hard to avoid getting shot by it. I don’t think anyone considered the kv2 to be op, and having good he pen made the tank really fun.
I don’t play it. I just wished that it would be a bit better. Personally I almost never have gotten wrecked by a kv2 so I don’t really fear it when going against it. And some variability in the game is nice, no one wants every tank to have 310 alpha and be the same. I just think that the way it was was perfectly fine. I mean other than doing big he damage the kv2 has no point. Doing 640 with ap isn’t bad but it’s not the same
The kv2 is the definition of a slot machine that was a crutch for players the ability to one shot everything within its tiers is already dumb enough and frankly imagine just getting your T5 and getting uptiered and then meeting a kv2 and getting wiped out instantly and don’t try to pull the “just be aware of it and you won’t get shot by it” you’ll get shot by it no matter what theres nothing redeemable of kv2 for it to be buffed or reversed and of course if the tank has garbage stats and accuracy then why play it? What’s so great about it?
What’s so great about it
Nothing but the alpha. If you want an IS-4, just research the KV-3 by playing the KV-1s. KV-2 is supposed to be a "fun" slot machine you play because it sometimes works and 1shots tanks. You don't play it because it's a good tank.
give CGC 200mm of frontal hull armor!
Why don’t you crawl back to whatever micro-organism cesspool you came from, and try not to breath any of our oxygen on the way there
UMMM WHY IS THERE THE T1 CUNNINGHAM? @sharp sedge
1st) tagging everyone doesn't work.
2nd) because why not
Someone mentioned that these tanks share guns with other tanks that are being buffed
oh dqng .
T1 in store for 10€
Please make anyting that destroyed-able a.k.a decoration on the map can go throught shells
@developers But seriously the is7 NEEDS to be buffed many people agree. Its pretty much trash rn. It NEEDS to be buffed. You HAVE to buff the armour. 25/27 tier x tanks have no problem penetrating it
is7 is fine, grille needs a buff, and its getting one
The IS-7 just got a 450hp buff a couple months ago. Being a heavy doesn’t means you are going to bounce every single shell fired at your front just by sitting in the open. If you find the armor that bad anyways, why aren’t you playing the IS-4?
@compact nymph that explains why the IS-4 probably needs a nerf.
Wai does the IS-4 need a nerf
The fact the IS-4 (weighing 60,8 tons) also gets more HP’s than the VK 72.01 K (a 122,4 tons superheavy). Seeing the current use (some might call it spam) of the IS-4 in tournaments, the fact it needed so much hp’s as a buff a couple months ago is debatable. Edit: the VK 100.01 P gets 2k hp’s but is a superheavy weighing a whole 120 tons, the mobility going along with it. It’s also got both a tall cupola and big/extremely weak lower plate. The IS-4’s lower plate is pretty tiny to be honest.
And why does VK 100, a tier 8 heavy have 2k HP?
Is4 probably deserves a hp nerf
Is4 needs penetration&armor nerf
Maus needs armour nerf
I think the IS-3 could use a bit attention and Buffs,its rather Weak in the Current Tier 8 META and its easier in my Experience to Brawl against an E-100 or Maus or other Tier 10s in the IS-3 than to try and Brawl against some other Tier 8s
Seriously? IS-3 is a hulldown god, any gun depression or accuracy buff would flip the whole dang tank
Is 7 should have more hit points that is 4 tbh
Maus needs armour nerf
@olive sorrel Lmao sure
@noble siren lmao
Then give proper explanation and reasons why Maus should be nerf, and with what Maus is Over Performing the other tier 10 heavy tanks :))))) @olive sorrel
@plucky laurel you mean IS-6, the IS-3 can take on an IS-6 and IS-5’s in 1v1’s and win. Definitely doesn’t need to be buffed...
IS-6 even with its 10mm of armour buff in 7.1 still won’t be useful since 10mm is barely anything, wont really make a difference when attacking the tank
121B should have more Armor on turet
İs 7 needs an frontel armor buff or hitpoint buf
I’d be fine with a better gun
Slap a 252u turret on the is6 and call it good
give IS-7 slightly better accuracy or dpm, nothing big
Yes thats work to
IS-7 needs something to keep people from rushing its position, cuz it holds solid until its team crumbles or the enemy team rushes over
🇬🇧?
still no answer lol\
....
the T-2020 needs a buff it just isnt whatbit should be
As people said it's reflection of this terrible year
And if wg aren’t buffing it, the year won’t become any better
Oh yea T-2020 is a downer. The Reload animation isn’t enough to redeem it. Just another weak 122 heavy
Atleast they can still balance this tank, unlike the OP premiums they won’t nerf for whatever reasons they have
If an OP premium is released people will complain
If it's average they will still complain
If it's bad they still will complain anyways
Is 5 is super balanced and no-one cries about it
People don’t like the gun handling
Which is something T-2020 has
Bring back the t1 light tank and the t82
T28 is still a garbage, buff the armor from side and front and more hp than other tds.
Engine also easily catches fire.
It should be like even if it’s left behind, it should take a while to for enemies to take it out.
Hi
The FV4202 needs to become a heavy tank.
The sloped frontal hull armour has 280mm of armour, as seen in blitzhanger's armour inspecter.
It's actual armour could be about 250-60mm though, still insane.
This gave me an idea how the FV4202 should get.a turret buff of 50 mm, but nerf the reload rate to 9 seconds, and limit the speed to 40 km. This would make the FV4202 a heavy medium that can't shoot often and has poor side armour. Pretty fun tank if mixed with hesh.
It should be given an action x turret
That would be hilarious
@fair socket T82 is still in the game, get it back for 50 gold...
What do people hate more, ATGMs or the wheeled vehicles in PC
ATGM.
it has 3k HP lol, lower glacis that can't be penetrated by tier X meds and sometimes heavies, 128mm gun IIRC and height which can help it get to weakspots accessible by certain tanks more easily
lolllllololol
remove ATGMs
👍
Yes
@olive sorrel no
It is really slow and big
You can penetrate the cheeks and lfp easily with prammo
And its gun is very mediocre
Nobody is complaining about the maus it is fairly strong but not op at all
Idk about you guys but I'd much rather face ATGM tanks than some tiny wheeled tank that goes 95 kp/h and can't be tracked
then i don't see why IS4 is op either, it doesn't have that kind of big alpha gun and the lower glacis and upper glacis for some is also easily penetrable by prammo, it also doesn't have that kind of HP
Fairly fast
And invincible turret
Good gun(better than maus)
Also it is not so darn slow
While for the maus you can cod that thing or out maneuver it easily
Also seriously dude 128mm is not so big 460hp avg role for maus and 420hp avg role for is4
Maus is not a problem against prammo btw
Anyway i don't actually think that is4 is broken @olive sorrel
They're both good tanks.
The Maus is just an absolute wall, especially if u wriggle and angle.
The IS4 is that to a lesser extent but its more versatile.
Panzer 3/4 needs a buff.
Of course their armor isn't as good if you're a pramspammer
stop they player with 40-49% on tier 8-10
@olive sorrel Lmao it seems you need to spend more time in tier10...
like people said, buff the IS-7. Either the Dpm, the gun accuracy, or Front Hull armor.
The Fv4202 however, is fine as it is. Though turning it into a heavy tank is not a bad idea, it is however not a good idea either. If you're turning it into a heavy tank, then it should have it's original gun, the same 120mm the FV215B has, with the HESH, then buff the turret armor up to 235mm with the Action X design, then reduce it's mobility having the turret traverse as 25 deg/sec, while the hull traverse is 30 deg/sec, and top speed is the typical 35 km/hr in British and US heavy tanks.
I think the IS-7 could use some sort of penetration buff on its APCR rounds. 303mm is decent, but something like 315 to 320mm would be better. You could use calibrated shells, but that doesn't fix the issue imo. You shouldn't need calibrated shells to make something decent.
I do think the FV4202 could use a buff though. I just don't know where to buff it. My first instinct is to improve the turret armor, but that would almost just make it a better M48 Patton. IDK, after looking at the stats of the tank, it looks like it'd be pretty nice to drive. I think it comes down to the playerbase simply not playing the tank correctly.
It's godly when you HESH other MTs and they penetrate. They would instantly back down. HESH damage also reach up to 510+, that's what makes it damn good.
The HESH also helps you survive. i have more than 70% survival rate on it for the past 30 days. Though only if you use it properly and effectively.
the is7 doesnt need a buff, it is a good tank, the fv also doesnt need a buff. @urban owl I have 527 games in it i think I know the tank. No offense but you seem like a bad player. The buffs you are talking about would make the is7 completely op. The lower plate is the weakspot so buffing that would be stupid, it has a high alpha for heavies so it cant have an accurate gun. Heavy tanks arent supposed to have good dpm and the pen if fine as it is.
The fv is great if you drive it right it just has an odd playstyle so most people suck in it. If it got buffed it would have way too high a skill cap. The IS7 is also fine, it's easy to play but difficult to play well in, but heavies really don't need any more buffs right now
IS-7 does need a buff on either one of the following: Gun accuracy, Penetration/Damage per minute, or Lower plate buff. Do you even have it? or had atleast 200+ battles on it?
EDIT: can say the same i have already passed atleast 550+ battles on it.
EDIT 2: I never said that it wasn't a good tank to play, but nowadays it doesn't the job much like before everything else without hull down, plus i only included the suggestion of buffing the lower plate if everything else is denied, but it seems that you targeted that first.
Not 200+ battles but I'm pretty sure I've got the hang of it so far seeing as that's almost all solo and including grinding from 75% crew. It can do what you want in it if you use it right, if you try and use it like an IS4 then obviously it isn't going to work well. It has speed, alpha and decent armour especially against meds, buffing the gun just makes its unnecessarily better and buffing the lower plate makes it too good against meds. It's fine how it is.
How about buffing then the traverse speed of the hull/turret? That would seem like a better choice rather than the other suggestions i had placed here.
Even if it is a good tank when i said it myself, it only becomes really good when people doesn't know where to shoot and would rather shoot other tanks that are available in their sight, or when RNG loves you in that tank. The traverse overall i feel is kind of lacking for a monstrous semi electric engine for a 69 ton tank, but the top speed is great.
A penetration buff would seem like the best choice here. to atleast 330mm with calibrated shells equipment.
If you say it is a good tank then why are you suggesting a buff. That does not make sense to me. All of the tier 10 heavy except the vk72 are very good at the moment. I targeted the lower plate first because its the worst suggestion of them all. No, dont buff it at all, it is a good tank like you said yourself
Imo IS7 could benefit from minor armour buff OR drivewheel improvement, idk the specifics tho OR gun handling and DPM minor buff?
FV4202 change could be
I) replace with cent ax and you please both camps...good turret, and it won't be op with good hull armour
II) Leave it as it is, it's current state is fine...only thing is the non Hesh gun is kinda useless, other tanks will be able to perform better
If we have Avatars, now even having profile backgrounds...
How about "Custom Quick Commands" ?
What I mean by it is If we could have more Quick Commands that we could swap out from the "NORMAL" ones, I have some suggestions for the optional quick commands:
"Charge"
"Retreat/Fall Back"
"Battle Cry" (Well based of the Nation the tank is from)
"Take Cover"
"Nice/Good One" (The Affirmative is already used in this way so... maybe we don't need this one)
I'd like the old "Reloading. X seconds left," to be added back too.
then i don't see why IS4 is op either, it doesn't have that kind of big alpha gun and the lower glacis and upper glacis for some is also easily penetrable by prammo, it also doesn't have that kind of HP
IS-4 has IS-7 hp with the HP Boost (IS-7 : 2650 with HP boost) . It has the IS-8 great gun, with great accuracy, good alpha and HEAT, wich is rare to found on Russian Tanks. IS-4 armor is very good, and he's pretty mobile for It's weight
i give up last few days ive had tanks shoot me through buildings, through tanks. throught the ground
I was on a match the game just ignored my shot and I died
Buff At 15 armor to make it at least a little competitive
They buffed the AT-8 and AT-7 so yeah
They should make the line enjoyable when your reward in the end is a pile of crap
They buffed the AT-8 and AT-7 so yeah
They should make the line enjoyable when your reward in the end is a pile of crap
I played this line, this is PURE crap. Slow, only good reload, worse in everything except Reload
I love those
If they could deal more damages, It'll be... Amazing, and OP
I played this line, this is PURE crap. Slow, only good reload, worse in everything except Reload
Not crap but pretty mediocre
Did you guys catch in the stream yesterday Alexandra said an M48 buff is coming in 7.1
M48 ? What is this? Did she said that IS-6 will get a buff ?
Edit : IS-6 has good armor. He needs more pen and less dispersion
IS-6’s buff is nothing
Is6 needs gun handling help. Not armor
IS-6 and good armor has nothing to do with each other atm lol
It's armor is only usable agains T7s and ≈175mm pen T8s
That 10mm buff is not much, +20mm would be okay imo
It’s okay armor wise
The gun is the issue to me
Use the dpm gun, and you have garbage pen
Use the pen gun, and you have worse dpm than any other 400 alpha heavy in tier 8
The accuracy and bloom isn’t great either
The is5 is for sure better
The gun is the issue to me
For me too. Garbage pen, It's like T49 pen. You can't even pen another IS-6 or EVEN an Tiger 1 front armor. DPM is not very good but it pass, and he SERIOUSLY need a Dispersion buff.
Yo is anyone ever gonna do something about the AMX 13 90 and 75? Also T - 44 - 100 is very unpopular
13 75 is getting a mobility buff in 7.1
Uh 10 mm is pretty big for the is6. That's more like 15 to 20 mm with actual effective armor
the 13 75s that I've gone up against are too lucky for their own good I swear
@twilit crystal ???? The tank still remains bad lol
And the armor didn't see much improvement either
@frail silo did you look at meadsy's video? , He showed a T34 which has 250 AP Pen which is one of the most overkill tanks which is now no longer overkill. you will now easily bounce all the APCR IS tanks and most tanks with 200ish pen, I think perhaps they should increase the mantlet size to cover the right cheek of the tank but after that its fine.
Anyone wanna talk about how the chimera is a straight upgrade of the t34-3? Same "big alpha medium" playstyle, but the chimera has gun depression and actual penetration.
WG and their new premiums smh
It's not like freshly new made tank afterall @round bluff just a copy pasta + different stats
I don't care for an APCR buff for the IS-7, I barely use them, though I would like the mobility to stick out more
And LOL T34 will still drill through IS-6 after the buff
Watching IS-7s and IS-8s being ammo racked is pure satisfaction
I want to see the is6 lose a second on the reload of its dpm gun, and gain some shell capacity. Makes its playstyle really stand out for being unique
Buff st. Emils engine
Chi ri needs more camo or faster engine
is-7 is fine as it is in my opinion. Just because a tank isn't the best of the best doesn't mean it's a bad tank.
I love the IS-7 :P
I love the is-7 too but still kinda underwhelming
Like haha is-7 go zooooom but then u turn and u hear the titanic behind u
I've been considering using the speed boost consumable on my IS-7, but I worry that I'll need the repair kit at some key point in battle.
Well you do. It has lots of module problems, plus I don’t think engine boost is so useful for IS-7
Chi ri needs camo or faster engine if not take the tank out of the tree
where do i post my drawing?
I have to play chi ri like a td. It's only good at snipeing very far away. Remove this tank or fix it its broken. Might as well remove the Japanese meds this has me fed up
I like chirey (that's how I call chi-ri). Just it's mega slow that's its only problem
I like the Chi-Ri. Gets good gun depression and dpm, slapping between 450-500dmg within 2 sec before disappearing again. Pretty accurate too, and mediocre to average mobility along with poor armor are known features of the Japanese mediums. The Chi-Ri remains my 2nd favourite in the line after the STB (a tank worth the grind).
a maus could sidehug it though
Why does the fv215b have such low HP its not the best dpm heavy anymore and armour is not the best ?
It’s still got the second highest dpm, laser accuracy, consumables, mobility and a good turret. The FV has been meta for a while and since a couple updates ago it can be good to see some changes. Having 200 less hp than most other heavies (given you don’t use the consumables) doesn’t means the tank is bad.
Chi-Ri could use a stronger engine tho
Looking at T7 meds
-It's huge and paper
-Has the worst prammo pen
-Worst top speed
-Worst p/w ratio
So in T8 battles you hardly pen or flank anything
@compact nymph that sucks so other heavies get free more hp and fv has to pay in order to win ,hoping it might change one day
Why would you play T10 tech tree tanks to make credits anyways? T10 is far from that purpose really.
Fv also fits pretty good in the hull down meta
The 215b has the same hp pool at the conqueror. I find it funny the hp balancing path that the 215 has taken.
1 given provisions that increase hp
2 nerf base hp
3 slightly buff base hp nerf compared to other heavies
This tank was a case of "if it ain't broke, dont fix it"
It’s back to being a 2nd line heavium 😔
Now it's back to IS4's and e5's
Funnily enough this is pretty much exactly the same thing as what everyone said would happen to it,but hey at least it got plenty of tournament spam out of it...
The new brits may be the most balanced tanks WG made, the tier 8 one is lit by far
Awwww man you kidding me?
Gotta love RNG
Atgms are still comlete cancer, got mines and tried doing something in my T57 heavy.
Thru the game an enemy sheridan spammed atgms over the hill, causing the team to loose.
Ofc they are
Reacting to the comment below
Why? The Sheridan runs too fast anyway... and that’s why I’d like to see ATGMs on a different tank type, because then it’d be less effective
I mean, you could just rush the Sheridan
Thats throwing the game
@wet hornet I don't know in what world you live in but you can't rush a tank with an entire team behind it
bruv its a joke
i hope
That dude has suggested so many unironic ideas in consumables he’s sad to read
Fyi in that match the sheridan had a 268, grill15, is4 and a t57 behind it...so yeah try to rush it I dare you. Instant deletion
Or just get close to the ridge where the sheridan is shooting, with the missile arc nerf it would hardly hit anything. @unique scaffold is satire ;-;
About the atgm, I think that the kpf.pz70 might be a tank that coukd utilize the missike wjthout it being broken, and maybe the hulldown american heavies (would have to implement that after shooting a missile your reload is increased maybe)
Also they would have a disadvantage of shooting the missile facing the turret to the back of the tank, as it woukd reveal their very weak parts
They should definitely give it to the KPF, and then the tank will be popular for once and I don’t think it’ll be OP if it has ATGMs
It has just bellow 15s reload with a dpm build, and not 10 gun depresion but 6. The armor is okay, but the weakspots are very big. Its also not even close to the speed of a light, or a med
Kpf has big weakspots? Ok
Last time I checked the turret was pretty solid
It does, the whole tank is a weakspot
Stop trying to suggest ATGMs for the kpz 70 if you knew how the tank works you would know giving it ATGMs would further harm its performance even more stop it already
@unique scaffold Go look in #news-discussion
Tbh I'd rather have a better pen HEAT atgm, then the heat the kpf.pz70 has atm. That heat cant pen anything, and it struggles to pen the lower plate of is7s and e100s. Annoying enough that i have to switch to prammo to pen weakspots of t10s
i wish kpz either gets dmp buff or atgm
I believe there are huge gaps between the mobile and pc versions of the game i believe it would be a more memorable experience if you caught the mobile up with the pc version like adding wheeled tanks and spg's
How about no
Kpz would be better with more gun depression
Sorry not spg's I was thinking bout another game but I think u get the idea
How about we don’t add any new things and just focus on keeping the game stable and running. I would rather much have the servers fixed and an actual tutorial than any new consumables or modifications to tanks
kpf is fine tbh
What is the consensus on the new jagtiger? The armour seems very strong
@unique scaffold delete it, it's irrelevant
Also Jagd is really strong and I like how it fits
Better mm is so needed, tier 10 is hell because everyone there has no idea how to play the game
Can someone explain how matchmaker works, because in my eyes that thing has a breakdown atm, didnt even won 1 single match in my last hour i played. I always did top damage but our heavy’s dont know what their doing, our meds are camping like a TD, i have to play as a med in my 268 if we dont want to get flanked and i dont get a single soul of help
Either buff kpz 70 to 1000hp and 50kmh max speed. Or give it missiles
@crystal halo oh hey mste didnt know you were on this server
Better mm is so needed, tier 10 is hell because everyone there has no idea how to play the game
@crystal halo i have the same problem man, it sucks tier 10. I need to do 5K dmg to win
I want 183mm in FV4005
The FV 4005 is fine as it is.
Nerf the god damn T1 heavy, I just lost to a god damn window licker because he was using that over powered as hell tank. Literally, what idiot gave it that much armour? It's a bloody tier 5 heavy. In what world does a tier 5 heavy get 140mm armour? This 44% winrate player just got 5 kills and 2k damage just because of being in that bloody tank. Jesus christ. Sorry for the rage.
What does window licker mean im still trying to understand wotb insults
Not a WoTB insult. It's a general term which just means an idiot, noob, simpleton, moron, etc. Basically this guy had no idea what he was doing. Made no effective use of camo, cover, angling or anything. And he won and killed me with 2k damage and 5 kills, just because his tank has completely overpowered armour, and none of us could damage him.
#tank-balance-discussion hey Wargaming, loving the new update, but wow please please fix MM. Your thoughtfulness in putting seven ‘broken’ tanks against a rag tag team is getting a little tiresome, battle after battle after battle...
Kpfz doesn't have armor LMAO
Man please for my sanity, give amx 13 75 gun elevation buff. I can't even hit something that really close because no elevation
It's stupid that missiles can penetrate front armour of most heavy tanks.... you could change the ammo type give sheridan AP >>> APCR >>> HE missiles with low pen that can't penetrate heavy armoured tanks or just delete missiles at all... now because engine power is reduced more and more sheri tanks camping behind covers with missiles
@peak mica It's prammo. Prammo has high pen. Prammo can go through heavy tanks. What do you expect to happen???
ya'll here talking about apcr and he missiles
but you missin the hellcat
Even when i sidescraping trying to put my tank in optimal position them rockets pen me most of time so just change prammo to normal rounds so sheri can be balanced at tier 10 and be able to pen and make rockets 3rd kind of ammo with low pen like HE shells for example it wont be worth hitting from behind cover heavy tanks for 100 hp
@peak mica bruh the ATGM can't pen the frontal armor of heavy tanks, it can only if u attack from high angle