#off-topic-discussions
1 messages · Page 26 of 1
but when im looking at films, i want the most bleak ending xd
but not just bad, i want it to be bad because its logical, not just "it happen"
It's an obvious one, but have you seen The Myst?
oh yeah
i loved that one
im not a fan of horror but damn the ending really got me good
and from what i was told, its even better than the book
Yeah book ending IIRC is more vague in tone, King supposedly prefers the movie ending.
I saw a cut of it once that was done in black+white and it actually adds quite a lot to the build-up.
So many people bring that game up and just....I just can't.
why not ?
I played it all the way through, I fully understood the ending (and let's be honest, I've seen Apocalypse Now, it's not exactly unique)
but just the game itself did that thing that games like that do, something that I feel is better done in movies due to the lack of direct agency given to the viewer/player.
yeah i see what you mean, but i feel that since most fps players love to just run in guns blazing, it has a good effect on them, making them doubt that approach
like when undertale subverted the rpg tropes to make us regret killing monsters
it could be a movie, but the game add the "i know how you act and i'm gonna punish you for it"
I read Terry Pracchett growing up, Undertale doing it felt a little light
never read pratchett, but i know lot of people love thoses books
RIP Sir Terry, I hope you have your sword now.
if you want a good intro to his style (but heavily diluted, although still close enough) go watch Good Omens.
oh i did, love it entirely
it was actually a book that he co-wrote with Neil Gaiman.
honestly, both of them are to blame there.
and how much fun was it when people who had blinders on to their obvious relationship in the first one where the showrunner went "screw it!" and just made them kiss lol.
"they look like very good freinds" energy haha
somebody to love -queen starts playing over the radio as he's searching for his "good friend".
"omg, roommates!"
tbh aziraphale and crowley both have their issues, but in the end, crowley was right, he didnt do it properly, but he had the right idea, where aziraphale was completely wrong
azi just let him down
Aziraphale could've seen from his perspective, but Crowley was also too stubborn to even try a different way, he didn't even directly rebel in the first place.
"i just fell in with a bad crowd"
yeah, but he still was in the truth
like, he didnt intended to be there, but he saw the truth, and that matter
where azi just keep his eyes closed
Agree to disagree there. It's certainly intended to come across as both of them.
prob yeah, but i think it depends on how you look at the world you end up on a side or another
crowley is def anti establishment
where azi is more of a reformist
they both see a problem but react differently
and in the end their differences where inreconciliable
Crowley is less anti-government and more anti everyone but him and Azi'.
remember he talked about going off to another planet, just them two.
I don't think they're unable to reconcile, I'd say it's more a case that it's going to take time to work out the end goal and path to get there, and that'll be in Season 3 assuming it happens.
oh yeah, hope it happens too
but idk about crowley, he talk about running away together, but in the end, that wouldnt work, azi wouldnt let them get hurt, and crowley would feel bad anyway if they left them to their doom
he didnt want to bring armageddon
and made everything to cancel it
he aint saving humans to get on azi good side, he actually cares about them, but as a whole, not personnaly
Oh I meant after the problem was solved.
Actually here's a suggestion. Have you ever seen the show "Dead Like Me" ?
yes, and i was sad when i saw it cancelled :(
so i went to see 6 feet under and man, that was so good
I tried it, not for me.
Dead Like Me though was pretty much for me.
right now im watching counterpart, which is pretty good tbh, might have too much the "everybody is a spy" trope tho
but its pretty good and get me some adrenaline going sometimes
I'm refusing to watch the movie that got made out of it though, feels kinda "wrong"
didnt even know there was a movie made
2009, so a few years later.
they couldn't get Mandy Patinkin back, so what's even the point.
oh, yeah, bad call
I think he was actually quite sick at the time which is fair enough, but at that stage just delay or cancel it.
It's like that one cop in Psych had a stroke so they made the entire 2nd movie about him getting better, which was just straight-up adorable.
the fact that it was a TV series decades before the movie series is making my eye twitch reading that lol
hahahaha
its the same with battlestar galactica, i know there is an older show, but the new one was duing my childhood, so i watched this one
my parents were so mad xd
I actually had planned to watch the reboot of Battlestar' myself, but literally an hour before it started: the entire neighbourhood lost power.
rofl
same thing happened during the Athens opening ceremony and I was stuck sleeping in a car until 3am.
u know, it happen to me too when i wanted to watch matrix 1 the first time on tv
im glad i forced and watched it some other way
There's a franchise that could've used a script advisor.
well, 2 and 3 had their pb, but they are still pretty good in themselves
the last one tho, people got mad xd
Have not seen it yet, but as for the best one, I know 1 is likely better overall, but the Animatrix was something special.
not all the animatrix are great, some are mid, but some are def exceptionnal
It is funny just how much of 1 was filmed in Sydney.
but if you ever watch matrix 4 be warned, it's unapologeticly spitting in your face xd
I sat through Wrath of the Titans in 3D, nothing is going to cause more physical pain that that movie did.
oooooof i feel you
wait I tell a lie, "the knowing" I actually walked out on.
and I watched all of Elektra.
hold on im trying to find a movie as awful or even worse, but its french (therefore its worse)
VIDOCQ
its so awful and its possible to get the 3d version which is even worse
its a visual puking-nator
It's not the worst thing I've ever seen, I meant that it caused physical pain due to the 3D being kinda "broken" at the cinema I was at.
Anything John Waters kind of feels like it's going to be worse off for feeling sick, at least the weirder stuff he did.
If you know the name of the movie I'm referring to, don't type it here. Save people from it.
Never see it plz
I genuinely fell asleep less than halfway through
Looks like can't use any gifs here
Probably don't have the required perms for it
:<
😔
how can you say that when its better than 90% of whats being made today
Furiosa and alien Romulus I enjoyed a lot
Resurrections is just ass
I will say the white rabbit trailer made it look 20 times better
Ohhh I see
Free guy did a number on how I watch
wym
Layering or sly rhythms I can't tell if it was overall vivid

In of first hour too just wrote verbally right
i have no idea what you're talking about
cool that buttery orifice orphan
u ok bud ?
Instituted grain moore
@full swallow You're starting to lean into the trolling rule a bit too far, tone it down.
im not even sure thoses messages are within discord tos
also block youtube ads
and basically almost every ad
it doesnt block twitch but other mods do
@random skiff Some work
Ta, although no need to call it work.
I see people call it like that, I'll skip it
And it can be used on Firefox mobile. Another reason to use firefox
PM Modmail with proof and the mod team can act on it.
oh i dm'd you sorry lol
Shotgun is the best weapon type
There is so much ammo types that you can use
And its very easy to operate
im not sure how accurate this is irl but shotguns in semi realism video games like tarkov and ABI dont go through good armor
its gonna hurt like hell being hit by one while wearing a good plate but afaik they dont go through armor very well
Even with flechette?
in video games where flechettes have effects on armor they seem to only work up to a certain point,though maybe its for balancing purpose
like in ABI they can only penetrate level 3 body armor which seems to be metal
Huh, i think i need to look up some vid on yt because i dont belive that nobody would do a test of penetration
I dont expect it to be a .50cal or something but it still interesting
you’d think that if it just rips through kevlar law enforcement would prefer them over standard rifles and SMGs
but then again im not a cop so idk
who's talentless freak ?
apparently everyone who didn’t like the game according to one of the devs on twitter
guess who’s talentless now
also guess who’s about to be jobless
imagine spending 8 years on an overwatch ripoff
from what i know, game isnt bad, its just the same as the others
40 dollars btw
overwatch was 40$
now its free
and devs dont decide the price
didn’t help with that attitude tbh
i saw devs litterally insult players on other games, they didnt care, they still play
people play games they like, they dont care about what devs say
obviously not enough of people like it
nobody played it, they sure wont like it xd
there’s this stupid game about squirrel with a gun
it had more concurrent player than concord
yeah, its not the same genre
for concord the pb is oversaturated market, no com, no marketing, no feature that says "im different"
single player game vs live service
and 40$ obv for a genre where its f2p usually
thats a colossal failure in my books
yeah it is a failure, it couldnt go any other way
even if the game was fabulous it woudl have failed
i saw the trailer for the game
if there was not the name for it, i wouldnt be able to tell you what looter shooter it is
the trailer is so generic
the devs that worked on it also worked on destiny so
helldivers 2 trailer in comparison was all you want a trailer to be : define your game, fun, full of references, packed with action, etc
its basically destiny pvp if the playerbase dont have stockholm syndrome lmao
unlucky, both are bad
the studio i mean
the layoffs at bungie were insane
i mean would there be a difference lmao
they’re working on a mobile destiny game
they learned NOTHING from the past round of layoffs and TFS
i cant wait for bungie to be dissolved into sony
nah, let it die, they got too big now they dont do what they used to
let other studio do their thing but better
same fate in my eyes
destiny era bungie started by wanting to stand on their own
now they will go down being a puppet
but now, aside from very few title like div 2, i mostly play indie games, cause im tired of the same old formula the big studio have
i want new stuff
i want undertale like type of new
fk my mind
im just not interested in gaming rn until they either announce the next battlefield or ghost recon
which is like,5 years minimum until i can get my hands on them
yea but like
but i dont know if it will be good
never buy a battlefield game at launch
its not just 2042
4,5,1 launched like shit
like the first month the game is flat out unplayable with all the issues around them
DICE standard
i mean, thats for most live service games
there is an old saying : patch day no play
and then you wait like 2 years for them to fill the game up to a playable state
and look div today xd
then EA drops it and move on
i actually enjoyed 2042 more than 4 and 1
4 maps are meh people only play locker
i played 2042 and i saw the horrible state of the balance
every bf game had horrible balance tbh
like anti tank class was unable to kill a tank, assault class could kill tanks, planes/helicopters are broken, etc
not to this degree
2042 balance is the worst i saw in decades
like you ever seen that clip of a bf5 bomber doing a mere 42 damage on a direct hit on a tank
fym assault can kill tanks
they have 2 c4s vs engies having 3
or 5 rockets
or 2 tv rockets+3 c4
im talking vs engies rockets
oh you mean they overtuned vehicles?
i tried killing a lone tank as engeneer, i used ALL my ammo, the tank was still operating and functionnal
and then assault can just put c4 and dip out and tank is gone if its a light one
heavy ones just dont die at all
remind me how much rocket does it take to nuke a tank in past titles
depending where you hit, 2 shots could be enough
im not sure which patch you played it on cuz i dont feel like tanks are as bad
i cant think of a current assault setup that can solo a tank
idk i played when it was on sale, i asked for a refund like 1h later after that debacle
maybe now its changed and they cant do that
i think i know what you’re talking about now
they nerfed vehicles a bit and also assault
but yea i wasn’t there fair nuf
it was too late tbh, everyobdy already stopped playing
idk i just feel like its one of the more enjoyable bf games ive played
there is no update coming to 2042 now cause not enough players
they moved on like…any other game
4 1 5 i dun get your point here
which sucks but its the status quo forever now
i think 5 is arguably the best one if servers aren’t filled with hackers
it sucks for me cause i like the post apo setting, i wanted the game to be good, i would have played it endlessly
yea they had such a good setting
but they decided to do the worst thing possible : multiplayer only, no campaing, no maps, no balance, no story, nothing
even the trailer was good, like real good not like concord
like genuinely i last played bf5 a year ago and every lobby i joined has an aimbot wallhacker
they winked at the playerbase doing trickshots, they were saying "we got you fam"
in their defense story has never been bf’s strong point
i disagree
4 sucked,1 is ok
bf1 and 5 story were awesome
5 is meh
nah, bf5 story were perfect
the only good part of bf5 campaign was the last panzer
yeah this part was great
the other parts are so lame
also ww2 game with no soviets is criminal
i think they’re just not as great
not as great isnt the same as lame
my 2nd favorite is the one with the black soldiers in the french army
that i agree
its still kinda lame cuz i hardly care bout them
and then i play last panzer and my mind was blown
yeah, its very close to the truth with what really happenned back then
like they put 110% effort into it
african soldiers were treated like shit back then
it so good they made it not sanitized
tfw they just cropped the parts with the black soldiers in it
irl they did worse, they just took them apart before doing a picture
and sent them to die
💀
thoses who rebelled and asked for pay after got executed
even the civilians in africa under french rule who were celebrating the end of the war got killed
cause they were doing too much noise
not a great time
but i think this is closing the border of subjets we cant talk about in this discord
cause politics
yup
anywho i was saying that 5 wasn’t really clicking the entire time
it was boring until the 2 final story
nah the panzer is the last one no?
yea the 2 last one are the French stuff and panzer
ok well then i played them all
nah, 5 is mid, 7 is good
you know what is awful tho?
battlefield 4 “story”
yeah we dont talk about that
xd
tbh, aside from stuff like titanfall 2, or spec ops the line, shooters with a good story as rare af
finally someone made a US vs China themed story and it sucked like why
cause politics
i think what bf stories struggle with is that they will always have a cool setting
people want to shoot stuff, but they dont want to know why
and then fumble it by having a story hardly anyone gives a shit
its not even because muh politics the story structure was awful
you dont know whats the grander narrative is half the time
yeah but thats because politics, you cant have war without politics
war dont happen in the void
like in fallout, its different factions fighting for power
the mcguffin isn’t even shown until the very last 15 minutes of the story
we dont even know who or whats the mcguffin
it ended so abruptly i audibly yelled THATS IT?
yeah, its always the same, you fight for something nobody cares about, you fight people nobody know who theya re or why they fight, etc
cause if you think, then you need to udnerstand who you're fighting
nah like the story is just not coherent
and why you're fighting
it cant be coherent when there is none xd
for something inherently political you at least understand what the story is about
like og modern warfare was aggressively anti russian
and they had a good enough story imo,especially 3
at least i can remember it
its like for the division, the story is fine, and they go into actual conversation about who's actually in power, and how they deserve power or not, but thats just so rare/buried into everything, its not interesting
modern warfare is a different story, its mostly cause of respawn
i mean the devs that quit to made respawn
they made titanfall
McManus has no authority nor is he recognized by anyone other than his fanclub
if anything he’s a terrorist
yeah but thats not how politics work, anyone can be the president if you kill your opponents
by the chains of command he’s like nest to the bottom of the succession line
its never even elaborated on why he has power
there is no definition for terrorist in the world actually, so by default, you can call anyone you dont like a terrorist
why isn’t he manipulated by Nat like Ellis did
ok how bout criminals
he ain’t a president tho
doesnt matter, he needs someone to become president, like nat, and she can pardon him instantly
thats why isac doesnt let us kill ellis
no way dn is blacklisted
Okay this is #off-topic-discussions, move along.
bye
Hey does anyone know if name changes to twitch accounts are automatic on third party platforms like PlayStation?
I love seeing Ubisoft stock crashes after star wars outlaws 
Losers they are haha
Is it actually going down?
Well, that's what they got for keeping making meh games. And the "game jornalists Reviews" are just another factor
Imo its was around 2018 when things dipped and they stopped caring
Every year it gets worse
They even tried to silencer the "haters" on the outlaws subreddit (the mods there, not the devs)
tbh, ubisoft games arent that bad, but they clearly chew more than they could bite
they clearly are better at doing smaller games with heavy creatives idea
instead of triple/quadruple a that are boring
Ubi creates the games of all times
i mean, have you seen the haters ? very bigoted for most of them
"muh women in my vidya game"
im tired of them
Look at wildlands, its a very basic ass game and its even objectively less involved than the previous game, yet a lot of people still play it and look back at it fondly, because even though its just basic ubisoft open world game, its good
yeah but they always go for bigger
Haters by their definition, not mine 
when they jsut cant
Its not even the fault of the devs its the executives who don’t know anything about game development
The old days were better ngl.
oh dont get me wrong i dont blame the dev, i def blame the execs that are doing all the mistakes every exec does in gaming
they always ask for more
and devs just cant do what they dream cause execs dream of piles of money
Breakpoint
Respawn is a good example of that, angel on devil's hands basically.
respawn isnt what they used to be
the devs that founded respawn arent there anymore
thats why now its apex, a generic hero shooter battle royale
I mean jedi fallen order and survivor are both great games so they CAN make good games
which is a good game, but generic
fallen order is pretty cool, but its different, its a game made by people that love starwars, AND, without execs asking for more shit
they said "make something good", then didnt care
for apex, they did care, they said "bring money or else"
I love how dead space remake came out, was amazing, and now they aren’t making dead space 2 remake
they still had leeway like they can do whatever they want, but it has to bring money, it cant flop
The thing is, they cancelled TF3 to make apex but EA wasn't planning to make apex in the first place. I wonder who gave the order at respawn HQ.
vince did iirc
im fine with apex existing, its not a pb, its just a game, and its not bad
but yeah tf3 not happenning is sad
but apex got too big for respawn
now they resort to all the other big studio methods, cause money
Apex was a good choice but on the Short run, battle royale hype and that kinda of stuff
yeah prob
but still im kinda sad
live service games are usually bad/not as good
i played apex, and div, but its just too time consuming, or money grabbing
Is even more sad seeing that from the 100 million members the ADV network has, less than 5000 are active, even on weekends (Playstation I mean)
adv ?
It's like a clan system on Titanfall 2, ADV is the default one that every player gets, after connecting the first time on the multiplayer.
ah advocate network
Yup
yeah tf2 bombed at launch cause time of release
few days before and it would have crushed everything
and actual marketing too
but whatever, its over now, tf is dead
Heroes don't die, they just become legends in our memories...
i wish
Bruh
Did they confirm 2 was never coming
iirc dead space remake people are now on the battlefield team
i honestly still think that 2042 not having a campaign isn't that big of a problem
its just drawing resources away from the multiplayer which is where 90% of people are at
sure they didnt have one because it was made in less than 2 years but generally bf campaigns have been meh
you can only list a few segments that are good
yall remember bf4?me neither
at least bf2025 has a dedicated team for campaign so no resource is actually being drawn away from multiplayer
but then again they could've just ignore that and give us ds2 remake(please EA)
thats not a valid point, a game can have low player count and still be a blast to play
also bf 1/5 campaings were great
you dont need a perfect campaing, but thats just empty
also multiplayer is supposed to have lore
but ingame lore is "world is bad, now kill"
if they cant write a compelling story or make a memorable campaign outside of like 2 segments per campaign then yeaaaaaaa i dont think they should really focus on it
you know its kinda basic logic
do what you do best
I really liked 3 but I never played any of the rest
I also remember it feeling very similar to MOH warfighter
I can't recall if it was 3 or 4, but it had the exact same premise as that game "Black", with a solider being interrogated after a mission was done, but the enemy didn't really die and you had to end things.
Yeah I think 3s campaign was a whole memory recollection kinda deal and the prologue/ending was the only stuff happening in real time
Okay so 3 then.
Still a solid game if you can get your hands on it. To this day, probably the loudest guns I've ever fired in a game.
That one I can't get behind, mostly due to the name.
And I even like the song that was tied into it.
For those who haven't had the pleasure, you start Black with the loudest pistol in all of video-games.
thats 3 and it ends with you stopping a nuke from going off in New York or something
i honestly do not remember it
something something evil terrorist guy
you work with this Russian to stop ww3(which it happens anyway because bf4)
It won't beat that Battlefield that starts with the Bonnie Tyler song, so I'm kinda indifferent.
4, that's it.
hi y'all how's everyone doing?
Doing good.
good to know
But what they do best was bad so what's your point ?
its still(shocking i know) better than the last 3 battlefield stories
like it has tidbits that are good whatever theres good in every bad thing
but i dont see people post shit bout “how bf campaigns are underrated” or look at them as fondly as something like an older cod campaign
they just simply cant cook thats all
like they’d always have this really cool premise/setting
and then fumble it harder than your bro fumbling the baddie he saw at the bar
Slightly creepy analogy aside, some people like them, some don't. It's all subjective.
yea but its not wrong to say that they’re in the minority
also i read that as creepy analog for a second
div2 is also niche, how many people enjoy something doesn't mean that thing is any less enjoyable to the people who like it.
Let people enjoy things, there's no need to punch-down, there's already enough hate out there.
then look better, we talked about bf 1/5 and how their camping were great
critics also acclaimed thoses campaings
compare it to cod campaings that are downright awful
saying they cant cook is a blatant lie
especially when they made us feel sympathy for german soldiers doing bad stuff in ww2
like for real remember cod infinte campaing ?
you gonna tell me its better than any bf ?
Okay this is getting too heated, you're both just arguing across an arbitrary line.
Play nice.
I'm just curious, did you feel offended by that joke I made on general chat because you're a storyteller? Or because you thought I was roasting ryan?
how dare you roast ryan gosling my beloved
I wasn't, that's the thing 
yeah you better
ryan gosling is the best thing that ever happen on earth
we should have a special holiday in his honor
I literally can't think of Ryan gosling as anything other than the driver
I only remember it because you shoot your superior in one level
That was a pretty memorable moment
He's pretty good in The Nice Guys, although obvious props to Barbie.
@ everyone, Linkin Park has a New Vocalist, and they released a New Song! https://youtu.be/SRXH9AbT280?si=9V1X3tkw_5U2GZTa
RIP Chester
Name of the new vocalist is someone called Emily Armstrong, apparently she had a band called "Dead Sara".
Oh the people that did weatherman
Okay she's got a solid voice, I'm still unsold on LP continuing without Chester+Rob, but if this is the direction they have to take, I'll give them a fair go.
To me he is Ken now
Recently started my semi-annual rewatch of Supernatural.
it's aged shockingly well so far.
thats the show where dean dies at some point ?
That very much does not narrow it down lol.
these characters die more than red-shirts from Star Trek.
Ryan Gostling being Ken is kinda kino
yeah that was the joke xd
?
Looks like Division 3 is starting development soon
Id gladly buy it for $70, $90, $120 😀
is this the new way of kids saying "no cap" ?
I stopped learning slang some time around wallet-chains.
no cap is like no shit
as in no shit sherlock
cap is like lies n shit
Kino is a German word iirc
Isn't that a diet?
yes, actually, it was pretty fun
could choose your own loadout, optional side missions, spaceship combat was pretty fun, secret unlockable weapons, looked great, plot was eh alright
overall solid
i think claiming any battlefield campaign as generally good is controversial at best
like sure cod is shit but they have a few more good story on their belts right
Keto I believe
This
Infinite warfare's campaign is my favourite in the entire franchise
Plot was kinda weak but the characters were great and everything else was super solid
if only the multiplayer wasn't p2w bollocks, IW would be remembered as a great CoD or at least generally good CoD
That and it being released as the third advanced movement game in a row
Hello, anyone here can help me with the login problems? Looks like my accounts has been blocked with new updates and im trynna log since yesterday, cant reach to support cause i cant logg, any way i can fix this?
thats not controversial, bf 1 and 5 campaing are criticlly acclaimed ?
you not liking it doesnt make it controversial
5 had like 2 good parts and the rest are extremely mid we had this discussion earlier
and i have never seen anyone talk about bf1 campaign and even if its good its lighting in a bottle
lets do a head count
2,3,4,5,bc,bc2,1942,2142
so thats…1 and a half game(im giving you bf1 and 2 stories of bf5 as ,5)
out of 8 games
right
the controversy around 2042 not having a campaign stems from DICe claiming that they want to focus on multiplayer more
Has the internet lied to me back in the day everyone told me to stay away from the division yet i tried it recently its quite enjoyable?
depends on your definition of back in the day
like 2016 back in the day or 2019 back in the day?
div1 launch was kinda messy
Around launch time
For the div 1
Everyone kept telling me after that fiasco that div 2 was more or less the same
Also the manny guy sounds like the rainbow six beginning of round announcer
no, we didnt
you just stated your opinion as if it was facts, but it isnt
just cause you dont see people tlaking about it doesnt mean its bad
especially when at the time it came out, it was huge, people were talking about it a lot and about how realistic it was
and also bigoted people didnt like the fact you could play black people lol
yeah i know they didnt want to do a campaing to focus on multiplayer, and that was a bad decision : they could do good campaing, they did bad multiplayer
just cause they did bad campaing for 20 years prior doesnt mean they cant do a good one after, bf 1 and 5 proved it
so if they can do good stuff, they should do it, not focus on the garbage stuff they did
its a widely accepted opinion that bf5 was aggressively mid,just look up any gameplay footage of bf5 without the panzer part.
and yea bigoted people is also a part of it but with most cases they’re a loud obnoxious minority.
the game looked visually stunning that is true,but whats being addressed here is the overall quality of it,which is kinda meh given the mostly lackluster story and generic gameplay(also braindead bots that makes CoD bots look like skynet lol)
you cant say "its widely accepted" out of the void man
they used it as a bs excuse to not do a campaign because 2042 had less than 2 years of development,making a campaign would just add unnecessary bloat to the workload.
you think launch 2042 was bad?imagine if they had to pull even more resources into making a half ass singleplayer mode thats gonna be another 6/10 like bf4 or 80% of bf5
i kinda can if i just do a quick google search about it,look it on reddit or read comments on youtube
yeah but no, youtube and reddit are not "the people"
especially when reddit is so bigoted
oh so who’s “the people” then in your opinion
and no bigotry isn’t a point people liked black characters before
that would be insane to say that
people like the black guy from bf4 too does that sound like bigotry to you
im talking about bigots on reddit in general, they really are the scum of the earth
i got so many death threats there
find me another platform that lets people express their opinion on a product
oh damn
that already a much better place
like reddit is so bad if i looked only at that for games i would play 0 games ever
last subreddit i was in, helldivers 2 was complaining so much you'd think the game is so bad nobody is playing it
no, 5 is mid
and i already took bf1 being good as a given
yea right cuz critics are totally worth listening to
yes, they are
not just bf btw critics for most video games are eh
thats the entire point of critics
yea right like the same critics that gave Wukong a 7 lol?
it doesnt mean you will like the game, it mean its critically acclaimed
so ?
IGN is a critic too and they gave alien isolation a 5
also they gave wukong 81 not 7
point is critics are usually not as reliable as the actual players
players gave it 7.9
not IGN i was referring to whatever page that listed “not enough DEI” in it
so you'd say critics are bad for saying its better than players think it is ?
actually?yea
why
you just said 2s before they are bad for saying its not good enough
now you say they are bad for syaing its good enough
make up your mind man
from my pov, you are unreliable
you say whatever is good for you in the moment even if it contradicts you 2s later
they’re people after all and its not like there’s a certificate for ranking video games
im using that to reference how critics are unreliable
so are gamers
but they arent, thats the point, you are the one unreliable
you said critics are wrong on a game and when i prove you they arent, you say "thats the point"
so the people that actually buy and play the games are less reliable than this “critic” who has no certificate or anything that qualifies them as one?
IGN gave concord an 8 btw
and ?
concord isnt bad
it flopped cause there was no marketing + oversaturated genre
doesnt mean the game is bad
commercial succes never meant good game
it kinda is when you actually watch reviews from people that play it for more than 3 hours
saturated market doesn’t help that the game is straight up awful from a gameplay design standpoint
deadlock isn’t even released yet and it had 100k players
source ?
yeah and ?
commercial success doesnt mean good game
i said it before, no correlation between both
literally watch any review by people who actually played the game extensively?
i can recommend skill up
so, a critic then ?
sounds like you defend them after all
commercial success means people actually like the game for it to yknow “succeed”?
not even close
most of the critics barely play the game past 3 hours thats le point
like, its so far from the truth
source for that claim too ?
concord being an 8
like you keep asking for source when you can just look it up dude
yeah but i did looked it up, and it gave me the opposite of what you said
and when i showed it to you, you were like "oh damn"
and acted as if it was what you meant
thats why i say you make shit up and are unreliable
why should i listen to someone who has no background whatsoever in reviewing video games when i can watch someone who actually does a deep dive into it? https://youtu.be/vRrWp_MVAxU?si=Q6WVpEh5G0GWpT1N
"wukong got a 7/10" when players say its 10/10"
no it didnt, it got a 8+ from critics and 7.9 from players
see, you cant stop
"critics are good when i like what they say"
"critics that disagree with me are bad"
dude you just said reddit is a toxic cesspool and that you got death threats from it and i said “oh damn” to that message before explaining that you CANNOT dismiss an entire platform because a chunk of them are toxic
if anything you’re the one making shit up right here
i will completely dismiss them and i proved to you why
i aint making shit up, i proved my points
you didnt, you just said "one critic agree with me"
i proved my points with data and facts
not "one guy on youtube said stuff i agree"
you still havent proved bf 1/5 are bad or that players said its bad
i did proved its not the case
so stop amking shit up and accept facts as they are presented
on that note, im going back to sleep its late
dont forget its triple xp week you gotta farm that juicy shd lvl
ok i was saying that it was given a 7 by a “critic”
which i had to look it up(its screenrant)
and its a 3/5 so uh,gg?
it was less of a claim and more of a talking point
what if i post multiple different critic reviews for this game up that happens to contradicts your critic’s review?
that alone is enough to disprove your point about critics being reliable
you claiming that im making things up when your “source and statistics” is a single website that can contradict with other multiple critics is…,an interesting logic to say the least
what makes your critic more reliable than another critic?
its almost as if people have different opinions on things and that alone nullifies the idea that critics are equal
watch the concord review by ign and see how many people disagree with that
look up how the game actually plays instead of instantly dismissing all criticism as bigotry and “saturated market” when its just a really meh game,ive seen uglier games that has more concurrent players
“stop making shit up” yea someone’s gotta take their own word in
gg see you later
not stoked til dlc
they can quadruple my xp and im still not logging on
ok new topic
destiny player count has fallen to a new low
[insert image of Kratos offering his life to Ares]
SONY
DESTROY BUNGIE AND MY WALLET IS YOURS
i remember they put out a trailer for bf1 showcasing that one with the tank, calling in artillery on themselves. the comments were saying, it was so tragic and dramatic, and shitting on cod iw.
then the game comes out, turns out the tank survived undercutting any sense of drama in that scene
and cod iw did drama and death pretty well especially in comparison
I feel bad for bungie
They dug themselves into this hole
I blame Sony, but then again that's a good blanket statement for most things.
Whats the worst is that the most recent paid dlc was probably the best thing they’ve released since halo and it undersold lightfall
Nah sony isn’t to blame at all
If anything sony is getting hurt by purchasing bungie
They did it to combat xbox buying activision
And they spent way too much money for essentially empty promises
The story is never as simple as it sounds, I'm sure in 10-20 years we'll find out that there was something else going on.
The ceo of bungie was buying expensive vintage cars before a 200 person layoff

Thats just one of the more recent examples
Concord is GONE!
That's legitimate to do. His money, His choices of spending.
thats not what critic being reliable mean, critics arent a single shared brain man, they have different tastes and likings
air cooled 911 > studio workers
my critic isnt 1 critic, thats the point, its the ensemble
The issue here is not that he's spending his money, it's that he was still receiving that money during severe company downtime.
Spending $2.4 million on cars whilst the company laid off almost 1/4 of it's workforce is the problem.
ceo shouldnt have millions of dollar of salary
It also comes across as he probably got a cut of their newly freed up salaries, implying that part of the reason they were let go was to increase his own.
tbh nobody should, we shouldnt have people starving in the street while some dude buy his third golden toilet
thats just not how the world works
"such are the heady joys of consumer capitalism" or some sh_t- lester gta 5
It's kind of amazing that some people miss that the GTA series is satire.
I mean, it started out as a british studio, of course it's snarky.
i mean some people think starship troopers and helldivers arent satire and they praise military
at some point you just cant make it more obvious
The issue with the former of those is that the original book wasn't.
Don’t forget he invited a bunch of workers to view his cars and some of which proceeded to get let off a few days after
same with the boys recently
i should play more ST:Extermination
but it's probably still unstable asf
I'm going to step away from this conversation. The subtleties of satire are too complex for sound bites.
eh
its the same as jokes/comedy
not really, you dont need to study/learn to make jokes
you do need it for satire
thats why people nowadays say satire is dead, cause you can present the most obvious satire ever, making fun of a group of bad people, and thoses people will be like "damn thats funny they make fun of the other guys"
make jokes that work? yea. Anyone can come up with something random but It wont actually land
you can joke about anything, its not hard, better jokes need context/information/literracy but basic jokes can work
doesnt mean they are like awesome, but they work
satire is much more complex
its aimed at a certain group, not everyone, and if that group doesnt get it, then its bad
"Satire requires a clarity of purpose and target lest it be mistaken for and contribute to that which it intends to criticize"
I have found the greatest name of all time. The almighty "Shabingles"
I mean basic saitre also exists that most people understand. I find saitre mainly doesnt work not becuase of media literacy but because people become immediately offended when its about them. Less about literacy more about fragile feelings.
jokes kinda do the same thing. A "joke" can be bad because you dont like it same way saitre can be
yeah but people better be offended when its about them, thats the point of satire
litterrally
satire that doesnt offend people in power isnt satire its just bad
when people become offended they take it at face value, which isnt the point of saitre
it doesnt matter, they should be offended, thats the point of satire, they should feel bad for what they do
satire mocks people of power
bad people
not like everyday joe
but do people? no they get mad at the other side
when satire exist its made to criticize bad people, if they get mad at the other side, its because they get called out
its like a bully in school is mad at the guy he bullied cause he said he got bullied
yeah ofc he will get mad, he aint a good person
the point is to call him out
satire doesnt exist to shit on oppressed people, its the opposite
Yes, the reason people dont recognize it isnt because of illiteracy its because of emotions was my point
yeah, but as i said, its not the point of satire at all
we dont care about them
im talking about the rest of thoses not targeted by it
who still dont understand that its satire
also people dont recognize it not cause of emotions, they like it, cause they think its true, and not cause they udnerstand its satire
Its not always that deep but I get you
its not deep, thats litterally what satire is
look at the boys, after season 4 people didnt like the way things were going cause it wasz making fun of them the entire time but they never get it, until season 4 when they made it so obvious even they couldnt miss it
before that, they saw bad stuff happen and thought "wow so true lol"
instead of understanding the show saying its bad
thats why satire is dead
I havent watched the boys but these are mainly children
Cling on to anything radical
the people who reacted with "wow so true" are mostly children
no, they are mostly conservative men
30+
kids dont understand the concepts of the boys
or whats the satire about
tbh ive never seen anyone confirmably over the age of 15 take the boys at complete face value
and i woudlnt blame children for not having media litteracy, cause they are children
you def didnt see the rest, cause trust me, they're here, and they are a problem
they are the kind of people that say stuff i cant repeat on here cause like 40% of it is considered hate speech and 90% of it wouldnt pass tos of discord or rules of this server
i get regular death threat from them, cause im not like them
Theres probably alot more to that not just the boys related stuff
but its the internet
im not talking just the internet
and the boys is just one show, there are many more of them that dont even watch it
thoses guys are very much real
and very much a menace
if you dont interact with them thats great, like i envy you
but unfortunately i have to interact with them on a regular basis and they hold my future in their hands and trust me i do not like that
so yeah, satire is made to mock them
and lately even they dont understand it
Idk what this is about but I can say the boys shouldn't be taken at face value
wym ?
its a satire of the superhero genre
but then people started taking it too seriously and calls it "realistic"
which then go on to diss traditional superhero media or morally good characters like superman
because they mistake pessimism with realism
"superman isn't real no one with that much power would be so good" thats why he's the symbol of hope dummy
its literally superman vs the elites all over again
thats also why the starman edit goes so hard ong
def not talking about that satire
also the old phrase "power corrupt people" is such a lie
it really needs to die
along with the "we only use 10% of our brain"
god i hate it
yea so fake
I only use 2%
average redditor
Has somebody played the black ops 6 beta? Even if you're not a cod player.
It's good
Just they gotta fix the ttk then it's golden
My roommate did
its very broken rn but thats kinda to be expected
Gr Wildands is much better than breakpoint
It feels more alive
Not as empty as Breakpoint is
And when Unidad is after you, they show they dont play around and really give a challenge
But Wolfes? A little better Sentinel
I liked both, although was not a fan of the DLC for Wildlands taking all your stuff.
Have you guys noticed that Keener says "see you soon" every time he was speaking to the sheriff, this is the equivalent of Shepard saying"I should go" after each conversation in ME trilogy 
"im aaron keener and this gun is my favorite of the white house"
We need a scene where Keener has to practice different ways of saying "see you soon".
Citadel was the best.
Yeah, let's hope that Mass effect 5 will be all the fans are expecting from BioWare. But after Andromeda and anthem (the EA's concord
) I'm not so sure about it.
Give credit to Anthem, it lasted a fairly long amount of time.
I'm one of the 7 people who liked Anthem, it just needed some love.
Yeah, but you are noticing a pattern here right? Like: a company launched a couple of good games like 10 years ago, then they launch a bad game, and then they create a hype for the "next game" that is gonna be good as the old ones.
On MSV case it was: the div1, 2 then heartland got cancelled and outlaws is a s**t open world game.
On BioWare case, I already said
And Ubisoft as a whole, well, just look at it's other franchise launches, watch dogs, Assassin Creed, far cry... Anyway you get the idea.
mass effect 5 isnt a thing tho ?
they dont do mass effect anymore
that doesnt make any sense
Dragon Age The Veilguard is almost out, then they're set to work on another ME, which already has a teaser trailer.
studio dont do bad games on purpose
BioWare is working in a new Mass effect, some people called ME Andromeda, ME4, so the number on title thing kinda stick.
I'm curious to see how 5 will work actually, if it follows on from Andromeda or picks a canon ending to 3.
the problem with bioware is that the devs who made mass effect at the start arent there anymore
the dev team changed over the years
and the crunch didnt help
so we might have a good game, but it will def be different
or it will be bad, nobody can tell
The problem with all this is that as an extremely long term fan of Bioware, since the literal 90's, I'm going to play the games anyway, no matter how negative people like to be.
Exactly, more than 10 years studio teams change is wild.
doesnt mean the game will be good or bad
respawn team changed too, from titanfall 1 to apex, its not the same devs, yet game is still good
People endlessly complained about Dragon Age 2 and Inquisition when it dropped as well, I loved both.
I liked ME3, I quite liked parts of Andromeda and the story itself was solid enough for a spin-off.
Hard disagree on that one.
disagree that its bad or rushed ?
oh and ME3's MP is still the best CoOp horde shooter.
didnt play mp but i heard good stuff about it
Hard to make a choice mechanic in the game that really makes any difference at the end, just like cyberpunk or Deus ex. Detroit I'm not gonna consider bcs the choices are its gameplay core.
Shame they didn't add MP to the trilogy remaster.
the pb was the reaper motivation, it was revealed in me3 but it just make 0 sense, and then the ending make even less sense
there was so much to say, so much to create, and they just went "we just harvest people for no reason"
"also you can rpess this button and it stops"
ME3 development was rushed, they didn't have time to make a plausible ending for the reapers thing.
Okay as someone who actually knows an embarrasingly large amount about the franchise, I'm biting my tongue here.
come on riven, i love me, but you cant defend that
there is so much good stuff in that franchise
but this is not part of the good stuff
I expected this when the franchise was brought up, people who don't know think they know, but they don't know.
I should say, best wave based horde shooter.
There was actually plans to, but I guess the focus was all put on Veilguard and starting devwork for 5, so I can't even fault that.
Fun fact: Anthem being killed off was actually a big part of DA4 going ahead.
They spoke about how moving forward, they plan to work on bigger impact, long-term projects, instead of shorter ones to solely make money quicker.
Think more Elden Ring and less CoD.
@outer tapir sorry but I find mad max too absurd for my liking
Wym absurd ?
It's prob one of the most realistic post apo movie, it litterally created the post apo genre on film
Uh hol up, no it's not.
It's not meant to be realistic.
and it certainly didn't invent the genre.
It's not meant to be, but it kinda is
Didn't invent the genre as à whole, but created it on film
This is the movie where the raiders chase a fuel truck while burning fuel for theatrics right?
Im talking about the old ones, this one is a sequel
With Mel gibson
As someone who grew up watching the first 2 movies on repeat (2 more than 1) no they are not meant to be realistic or taken that seriously. The action is grounded, but the movies themselves are not.
They're actually very Australian in their humour, which makes sense since Miller is from here.
Yes but the réalism is from the humans, not the situation
People turning on each others
Lord Humungus: a bastion of realism.
Tbh I’m not that fluent in mad max lore so I’ll prob have to first watch the movies before even thinking about playing the game first. I remember the first one where the protagonist like handcuffs a guy to burning car right?
In the first one it's not even post apocalypse, it's in the middle of it..
Yeah first one apocalypse is on the way
But you can see society crumbling down
From the second and oward it's def post apo
Well, 3 is about rebuilding, so only really 2 is pure "no civilisation"
Tbh desert wasteland isn’t my type. I prefer urban wasteland
Sorry outback but I love me city apocalypse
the Fallout TV show is good for that.
Yeah I loved the tv show
Yeah the new série is pretty good
I love p much everything fallout
The only thing holding me back from min maxing 4 is my pc lol
The Mad Max game though is fine, but it's definitely a "get it for $5" kinda deal.
And the fact they actually stay True to the material is incredibly satisfying
They didn't change to say capitalism good
Well they kinda do, but they also change stuff and now the changes are canon, which is rather unique for an adaptation.
I mean the score message
Yeah nv/railroad fans weren’t happy lol
Core*
The core message is "50's music is cheaper to licence".
Smart move tho since I love 50s music
Core message is "guns fun"
Core message is liberty prime nuff said
Yes I would go for BOS route in fo4 how did you know
"dogs look adorable in bandanas".
“Post apocalyptic dogs collectively have one braincell”
"because Dogmeat took the rest and might've used it to become immortal, we're not 100% sure"
Can’t imagine. I play fallout 76
Cya
The story was insanely meh but the gameplay was pretty good and the world design and graphics look so good
the only memorable parts for me were the airport the intro and the ending
It was kinda fun seeing the tie-in stuff to Fury Road, even if it didn't make a whole lot of sense.
and a use of the Arkham-style combat where it was actually killing stuff does make Batman using it look even sillier.
I don't understand how batman doesn't kill with that fighting style
Just because video game
Wouldn’t be as fun if it was toned down
I'm having a flashback to that bit in Arkham Knight where he uses the spinning tyre to scare the thug.
Fair enough
thats every batman media ever
he wont kill you but the hospital bills will
he once beat Jason(his adopted son btw) so hard he crushed his helmet
but he wont send joker to jail
Oh red hood right
Smh
because killing Joker means that they’d have to invent a new villain
oh but Harley got whitewashed to become a hero
yonow despite being as much as a scumbag as Joker
saying “im sorry it happened pls gimme another chance :3” doesn’t work when you’d probably committed 50 war crimes
(yes they committed warcrimes,see batman endgame)
How did she go from psychiatrist to maniac anyway
joker rizz
tbf jason is a bish 
from his PoV Bruce lost his adopted son and immediately get a replacement
i'd say he's pretty justified
red hood is edgy and lame
but i kinda agree with him tho
i’m sorry but i can literally never see that edgelord in a positive light
i just hate batman's no killing bs
like whenever you bring that up to batman fans they immediately think that i want to see batman execute people for petty crimes
im saying some of them are too far gone and needs to be put down
i think Peacemaker(from the tv show) presented that point pretty well
Batman doesn't kill because he's a coward
jason kills everyone because edge
i mean it depends on the continuity sometimes batman just sorta does straight up kill people
the tim burton one and dark knight come to mind
best Jason by far is the under the red hood one because he actually made a point about it
other iterations are just "i kill now"
also vigilante justice is just shagged in general, if batman villains deserve to die, the responsibility falls to the state
joker bombs gotham like 20 times a month
he genuinely should not get to choose who lives and dies and it’s good that he doesn’t
that’s not how the US justice system or justice in general functions
if they cant do anything about it other than pls save us batman thats a problem
its not like Metropolis when Doomsday show up now n then
nah this is just an insane clown terrorist
Bruce Wayne could easily fund all the social programs in the city and reduce crime, but he likes punching Joker so here we are.
Bruce Wayne does also do that though
The problem with applying modern logic to a comic idea that was created in the 30's is that they aren't compatible.
If I had to pick, I'll take aware of itself Batman over Miller.
have you seen the new animated series ?
people be saying its great
Not yet, but I saw most of TAS in the day and it's on the list.
I have an issue with that story not for jason but for batman
The argument of “if I kill I’ll never go back” has always been just a dumb excuse for not killing and its sad that it gets more common because of that story
tbf it means he’s afraid of snapping
but it just confirms that he’s a coward
if he cant do it let someone else do it
Jason had more of a moral high ground here
imagine if the people of Gotham knew that the red hood tried to kill joker and batman stopped him
like who do you think they will side on
the guy who almost ended the most diabolical murderer in the city or some guy in a spandex who’s afraid to get blood on his hand?
batman is right not to kill tho
thats a parralel for death penalty in the real world
people of gotham should sign a petition if they care that much, obviously they don’t
and we know by now that its a bad thing to do that
logic in my comic book?
preposterous
look some people just really deserve the axe alright
jason did some kinda bad stuff, and batman carries 10x the trauma and 50x the threat so i’d say that’s relatively reasonable for him to be afraid of what he could do
you see it in arkham knight for example
turn the batmobile into an unkillable tank and start genociding thugs?
average battlefield lobby
but then it implies that he has no restraint and would just start killing anyone for the pettiest of crimes(like injustice superman)
or more like kira
which is exactly what red hood does
he kills crime bosses i’d say he did alright
he kills muggers and etc too
more than Batman ever did cuz somehow the Penguin is still a thing
i dont think he did but yea it definitely depends on the continuity
i was mostly referring to under the red hood
the others one are eh
i also like battle of the cowl
screw nightwing alright he sucks at being batman
The reason he doesn’t is he because he genuinely feels like giving people a chance for redemption, people deserve a chance to fix their lives
but some just really dont
like you can make an example of both points
Harley and Ivy came to mind for sorta “redeemed” characters
in some continuity even two face and killer croc got around
yes, thats the point of not support death penalty
im pretty sure most of his villains redeemed themselves in some continuity
like every can redeem themselves
and then there’s the Joker which is consistently evil
doesnt mean everyone will, but it mean they need to have the opportunity