#Commander changes

4 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

muted dune
#

If a player has invested into a commander and they decide to change the entire use case for that commander including skills and skill trees then we should be compensated appropriately.

I believe that we should be refunded all heads /stars invested into that commander and that we should be given the choice to reinvest if we like the changes.

Same principles apply if they changed stats on equipment, imagine youve made a full set of gear and they just removed the set bonuses. Or changed an armaments inscription to do something completely different.

Im happy for lilith to make changes to improve the game. But the player should always get a choice as to whether that investment is still right for them.

cosmic sun
#

They only changed cheok and bertrand, litteraly nobody used them before and they probably became better now.

muted dune
# cosmic sun They only changed cheok and bertrand, litteraly nobody used them before and they...

It's not the point that they 'improved' them. It's the fact that they have changed something that somebody invested in, there should be compensation. What's to stop them from using this same system to nerf something? We get compensation when they take the game down for an hour. Why wouldn't we for investing 700gold heads in a commander they've just decided to change to fit the vision of the game. If he's that much of an improvement people will probably just reinvest anyway.

muted dune
#

Thanks for your wonderful input