#lore-and-universe
1 messages · Page 557 of 1
I mean, that defense doesn’t work after being willfully ignorant of multiple people giving an explanation of it.
So whats the status of the Prometheans as of late?
Are they just sorta mia like Warden Eternal?
Don’t think we’ve heard anything on their current state
The guardians all shut down when Cortana bit it but I doubt the same would happen to all the prometheans
The Prometheans are still around, along with those human AI who took up some as bodies as their own. They are just without leadership from Cortana, and due to that, can not control the guardians anymore
Man, they really shouldn't have dropped the created from the story so quickly....
I mean sure H5 didn't give them the best introduction, but it probably isn't the best call to make in the long term to throw out another faction right after their first appearance
I've toyed with the idea that they should have let 5 set up the created and then have 6 wrap up the "Reclaimer Trilogy" and then properly introduce the created, cue Halo Infinite or whatever.
I think there will be more with them, but I think they have to sort out the Domain before the Created can really rejoin the story proper.
it didn't help that the few novels they had set during the Created conflict didn't really do much themselves to help flesh out the current setting of the universe
very, they react to heavily to fan critisism
Heck, the Didact was met to be "Chief's nemesis" throughout the "Reclaimer trilogy." With even Primordium hinting at that, with Chakas telling the modern humans such conflict may be everlasting
I don't even know what the "Reclaimer trilogy" is anymore by Infinite.
Long gone
I figure they really should have held off the didact till a later game, not right at the opening
Have h4 with Jul's Covenant being the main focus, have them manage to activate a mcguffin that still forces Cortana to give her life. Than have the didact appear in halo 5
The Didact was such a good villain in 4 and his origin was a great mirror to Chief's. Its a shame they they threw him into the void of vaguely possible-return
That is one way of having it done for sure, imo I think it would of been solid for Gek to be leading the Covenant fleet on Requiem when Chief wakes up, and us getting a taste of the state things from there, with Spartan Ops where Jul is properly introduced after being hinted at in the campaign
I think it'd be better if the Storm Covenant leaned more into the whole "Civil War on Sanghilos" angle a bit more
indeed
They need to stick to their guns and not throw stuff under the carpet
Totally
It’s a lose lose situation cause if they do that then people complain that they don’t listen to the community
I don’t envy game devs
Stick to their guns but build off of the stories. The under the carpet hasn’t been going that well
Not to mention that they've been throwing things under the rug for the past 10 years
20*
343i has been in control for about 10 years give or take
Dumb question probably, but why did the UNSC stop making Spartan 2s?
And why did they move on to spartan 3s then 4s
Yes. Bungie was doing the same thing lore-wise that 343 does lol
People like to forget that.
2's have a high failure rate (~50%)
Ahh I see
3's still used child soldiers, which is banned both in the real world and Halo universe
Ah, weren’t 3s sort of brainwashed into it too?
3s were actually less brainwashed than 2s, and 2s weren't brainwashed in the literal sense.
They were raised to fight, and never told anything different. That doesn't really qualify as brainwashing, as that would imply that they were trained and raised for different things and then unwittingly programmed to fight.
2s and 3s were technically volunteers by the strictest sense, but due to age and lack of parental consent it was still illegal and morally wrong.
I thought 2s were like kidnapped
How are 2s als- yeah
Kidnapped from their families, not necessarily taken against their will. But this is very shaky because 6 year olds can't really make major decisions like that.
not necessarily taken against their will.
?
They were taken while asleep, napped off the street, etc
After having conversations with their kidnappers. John wasn't the only one Halsey talked to. I'm not saying it was okay, but it's just not as clear cut either direction.
That was until lore people decided that Halsey's war crimes outpaced the Spartans saving humanity innumerable times. 🤷♂️
That was a while before the kidnapping, and him being taken from his family by her was never discussed?
It has been discussed many times, in the books, in animated mini series, comics, and even I think at the front end of Halo 4 or 5?
Nope
The tv show was really the only media that showed Halsey chatting with john’s parents
In the main timeline, Halsey spied on John while he was playing king of the hill with other kids
And she noted he was an ideal candidate
I never said she spoke with the parents.
I specifically said the opposite. She spoke with the children and NOT the parents.
Either way, the kids never knew they were going to be kidnapped, unless you have a source saying so
She had him flip a coin a bunch of times, it’s not like she described the program to him during that convo
That is correct. Have you ever talked to a military recruiter? Her conversation was only slightly more simplified. Once again, since everyone here would rather argue than understand, at no point am I saying it was okay.
But people keep misunderstanding Spartans on fundamental levels based off of assumptions from this exact part of their induction.
It was pretty clear cut a bad thing
Bad thing with good results. Yes, that is the original grey area that made the UNSC so complex.
If you’re a utilitarian, sure
That's a very important part of the lore, yes.
That is correct. Have you ever talked to a military recruiter? Her conversation was only slightly more simplified.
Their talk was literally only about the coin game. Like, that was it, and then she left. And once all the kids were at Reach, that's she told them they can't go back home.
Are you trying to imply that I said they weren't kidnapped? Because you're employing a lot of semantics to try to imply that. The kids were fine with it once they acclimated. I don't have to like it to accept it (keeping in mind it's all fiction), but what you do by this line of logic is rob the Spartan-IIs of their dignity for choosing to make the best of a bad situation, whether that situation was within their control or not. They don't fight because the government programmed them to, they fight because they want to save people and help humanity. That's the big deal.
Help the UEG*
Because initially Spartans were trained to kill rebels
It was a happy accident that they were around to fight the covenant
Yes, that is what adds flavor to the whole thing. Had the Covenant not shown up and they had to deal with the Insurrection, we would have a different story on our hands that wouldn't be Halo 🤷♂️
You were saying things like "not necessarily taken against their will" and "[getting taken by ONI/Halsey] has been discussed [between child and kidnapper] many times in the media"?
Yes...?
I was saying that didn't seem correct based on the sources...?
And I provided the reasons why it was, based on the sources. Also, the lore has been tweaked since around Halo 4 to make things out to be a little more stark and a little less interesting. They ignore a lot of pieces that were laid out in The Fall of Reach that helped make Halo top-tier scifi
It literally hasn't been touched at all with regards to the Spartan origins
If anything it's done the opposite with having a book being based around a dad being radicalized into the insurrection after his daughter was kidnapped to be a spartan.
They've also been exploring that grey area by actually having Halsey get faced by a millitary tribunal over the ethics of the Spartan program itself. That was the literal opening cutscene of Halo 4.
You're starting to make my point for me, keep going.
😬
What point? Is your point that characters being challeneged on extremely poor ethics is somehow bad?
And you still haven't really said how the kids weren't "taken against their will"
My point that poor ethics makes for good story.
And poor ethics leads to obvious consequences sometimes.
Yes but poor ethics that go un-countered do not.
Have I objected to said consequences at all? There's a reason that 2's, 3's, and 4's are all different, and that question is what started this whole discussion.
Like would it somehow be more compelling if history just sang the praises of Halsey for the rest of time and ignore the part where she kidnapped like 100 kids and murdered several dozen of them?
No, but they paint her as a psychopath instead of utilitarian. That distinction takes away from the character rather than adding to it.
She kidnapped children to stop farmers from having rights
She clearly demonstrates that she cares about the Spartans throughout the whole process, and that is thrown out the window in later portrayals. Which is a whole different discussion.
Please explain to me how that is rational
Once again, a whole different discussion.
Even ONI was like "Jesus Christ Halsey, why did you kidnap kids for this?"
The point is that the UNSC was never 100% right, they were just necessary.
Though that was scapegoating in their case, since they were all for it and even cared less if even more children died from it
Right, the same ONI that turned around and sponsored the Spartan III program lol
Contrarian is inaccurate. Halsey's need for control was the cause. IIIs were like IIs with all of the advantage of years of study into the ways things went wrong with IIs its also REALLY hard to kidnap 150 for regular waves.
IIIs were like IIs but without Halsey, and without her overbearing pressure to not send them on suicide missions.
IVs was the program brought to full production grade for post-pubescent candidates.
ONI also used the time between II and IV to solidify their control over the mjolnir market.
In short, the process was refined to what you get with IIs.
Were spartan 4s volunteers then?
Yes
Correct
Incorrect, IIIs were markedly sub-par to IIs, particularly in the area of augmentations.
Actually no. They had all the same stuff. Just bad armor.
3s and 4s were strictly volunteers, but in the case of 3s it doesn't really count.
And spartan 4s were less effective because they didn’t really grow with their augments or something?
Yeah, though the armor makes up for it
Actually the iii’s augmentations represented several advancements compared to the ii’s, which led to high success rates
I would not call child grooming volunteers.
Ah I see
No, they changed parts of the process to lower the failure rate in addition to the armor. That's why 3s are smaller.
The reason the iii’s were considered expendable was the cheap armor
IVs were normal adult military veterans not raised exclusively from childhood.
Did 3s have different augments to 2s?
Yes.
Making them less powerful basically
Not really
I’m pretty rusty on my halo lore lmao
They weren't any less powerful, no.
The processes were different but the end results were the same
It's okay, some of these guys are too lol
Why are 2s bigger than 3s then
Older
Ah
2s got pituitary implants
3s were drawn from the refugees of glassed worlds
Augmentations and armor were different.
And 3s were orphans?
Yes.
Yes
Were they orphans whos parents were killed by insurrectionists?
No
Ah ok
Orphaned by covenant
Ah I see
Each of the three waves of IIIs were given different augmentations as the science advanced.
I don't think the insurrection usually had it out for civillians anyways.
Which wave was noble 6
Beta iirc
Beta
Alpha company and beta company were the same
That's revisionist, given their wide use of terrorist tactics.
Gamma was different
You heard it here first folks. Noble 6 was a beta.
He was given Mjolnir armour right?
They got extra drugs
Gamma got the berzerker mods
He and other IIIs that survived their suicide missions pretty much lol
Yes
Yes
Yep.
Right
"Make the units better with new technology. Make more of them. And make them cheaper."
— Colonel James Ackerson
Sorry for asking so many basic questions, just getting back into halo
That was for the mission of 3s
Ugh, now Ackerson is a character they really should have brought out more.
The UNSC literally lit that power keg by literally killing civillians in outer colonies for wanting to be left alone. But as far as I know they usually just tried to keep the UNSC away.
Insurrectionist propaganda 😛 But I do think that particular dynamic is one that helped add a lot of depth to the Halo universe.
You were right! They had to limit to 300 candidates rather than the planned 1000 due to a reduced gene pool. That's probably what drove a lot of increased candidate expanding advancements for IVs
To disable the ping/tag when replying, please click or tap the "on" button at the right hand side of the chat box in order to turn it off.
For users on PC, if you hold Shift while clicking reply the tag will be automatically turned off.
i believed the united earth government doesn’t want humanity to split and create more factions. being one is easier and better
There's an upper limit to how far you can manage a unified governance
And also the answer is still not to start shooting at civilians who haven't actually started open conflict yet
The more you tighten your grip, Tarkin, the more star systems will slip through your fingers.
they need to explore the interplanetary wars especially operation trebuchet and Charlemagne
imagine a series about preston J cole
from fighting insurrectionist to his last battle at Psi serpentis
against the covenant armada
I guess the far isle insurrection never happened?
The unsc didn't care about civilian casualties either
Although the insurrectionists also nuked a planet
im very interested on the 22nd-23rd century warfare when the UNSC curbed the freidan and Kosloviks
at sol system at that time
i expect the expanse would fit the timeline
Then again, what a lot of people don't think about is that there's numerous Innie factions, each with their own actions and ideals. While there's only one UNSC. So while some Innie factions are fine with nuking civilians, others don't. But there's only one UNSC, and they did indeed nuke civilians.
yep
Many of the main insurrectionist factions didn't care about human lives
Still part of the same government
Some were willing to guide the covenant into human space and planets
as of silent storm
although many were against it
At the time of the book it made sense, since the Covenant's motive of "Kill all humans no matter what" wasn't fully known.
They knew the covenant were planet wipers
Nah, this was really early
So basically nothing was known about them. And what was known was suspect, since ONI are known manipulators.
they were looking for the chip that would lead to the inner colonies and possibly earth
which spartan group grey team was sent behind enemy lines to destroy any remaining data
Oh yeah, I think other Innies' rationale at the time was "Obviously the Covenant have it out for the UNSC specifically. We'll show that we're not the enemy to focus on by giving them access to the heart of the UEG/UNSC. And they'll leave us alone."
that could lead to the innies
Innies just want out
The one system that wanted out the most, was the one that would most rival Sol for supremacy. So while loosening their grip on the less developed and more distant colonies, they made Reach the center of the Unsc putting the most weapons closest to the innies.
What's the name of the rank of this Brute I'm torturing with the Sniper?
Think that's just a brute warlord with a rocket launcher