#Ranked by SnapCat!
teal ruinBOT
Welcome @ancient sky! Any feedback from the community will show up here.
Please note that this thread discussion is not shared with SMG.
It is solely for the RISK Community to discuss ideas & provide constructive feedback!
plucky latch
A different solution to the problem could be to time cap the games, and whoever has more troops or territory once the timer runs out wins the game.
For example, games could be set to 1hr time limits in the match settings.
echo quail
round limit is one that the team have looked into before, maybe a bit more feasible as a long term solution - as negating rank changes in a game could be a little more tricky for points etc (if you do come out 1st, do you really want to only gain rank from 6th because 2nd-5th soft surrendered?)
ancient sky
round limit is one that the team have looked into before, maybe a bit more feasi...
perhaps the ranks could be worked out so that in that kind of situation the winner still gets sufficient rank points... idk?
ancient sky
For example, games could be set to 1hr time limits in the match settings.
yeah, that could be an option for sure. I don't like the idea of games HAVING to be limited, bc sometimes everyone is fine with stuff dragging on... but an option for it would definitely be good!
dark steppe
Maybe an draw option like chess where everyone who is left has to agree. Wins losses and draws are tracked and if you get in the last three and draw you split the rank points type of thing or a more complex version of that because different Elos. Other rules could apply like at least ten or fifteen rounds for example.
More like 30 I would think because it makes people still play the game and not farm draws.