Other by TacoBellCat

[raven tapir]

Welcome @sleek marsh! Any feedback from the community will show up here.
Please note that this thread discussion is not shared with SMG.
It is solely for the RISK Community to discuss ideas & provide constructive feedback!

[heady geyser]

There's no real theory in Risk like there is in Chess.
What would this be based on?

[lime solar]

Lucy analyzes every single game, and will give helpful tips

[short vale]

^

[sleek marsh]

Uh
The skill parts of Risk

[short vale]

Whether or not I personally think how they played was lame

[heady geyser]

There's skill in risk? 🤨

[sleek marsh]

Cardblocking is a skill

[heady geyser]

Isn't that already what "AI Advisor" is? 😃

[lime solar]

Dangit you're right

[heady geyser]

Always am

[sleek marsh]

AI Advisor is dumb

[heady geyser]

It's just far too advanced for you to understand.

[coarse apex]

This just doesn't make any sense. As Silent mentioned there is no real theory in Risk like Chess. Also a particular troop placement could work in one game and not the other. Diplomacy and dice outcomes makes this way too complicated for this to be worth exploring in my opinion.

Works for Chess. Not worth it for Risk.

[drifting valve]

The issue with game review is there isn't an engine like in chess to point of mistakes

It would have to be a simple analysis feature where YOU are the person analysing the game. Maybe an ability to share the game for others to look at too

I'm sure some nerd out there somewhere COULD code a risk so that learns how to play risk 1v1s using machine learning and ai

But with more than a 1v1 you can't really make that AI coded, it would be way too complicated

Honestly I do hope some nerd figured out optimal 1v1 strategy using only machine learning