Existing Gameplay Changes by Duck

[dense mauve]

Welcome @lucid sigil! Any feedback from the community will show up here.
Please note that this thread discussion is not shared with SMG.
It is solely for the RISK Community to discuss ideas & provide constructive feedback!

[thin pagoda]

agree with the kick idea disagree with the chat idea

[lucid sigil]

sorry i meant to separate those
now people will vote no because of that

also why disagree with chat btw?

as i play 1v1s mostly i have had times where i go against the same guy a lot of times i would like to exchange some words with him after playing xD

[lucid lichen]

ban idea is great

no in-game chat should be implemented

[lucid sigil]

why
i just want a why 🤣

[lucid lichen]

because if it was then Risk wouldn't really be a game for all ages

[lucid sigil]

ah you see it from a player interaction perspective which could be potentially nefarious
i get it

[muted adder]

it also changes the game in a pretty fundamental way

[spice kraken]

maybe, in my experience not being able to ban a player has never ruined a single game for me.

I do see that technically we should have a ban feature and it would be a improvement but I believe other changes should take priority over lobby bans.

Sometimes I do make fantastic allies and I really want to befriend them post-game; if players could link their steam account to their profile when you click on it as a friend, it may be a good alternative to adding a chat in-game. Also one could argue SMG is liable for what is said in-game, but it's not SMG's problem what people say out of game.