Settings and Modifiers by Silent Legend

[stiff crest]

Welcome @wide olive! Any feedback from the community will show up here.
Please note that this thread discussion is not shared with SMG.
It is solely for the RISK Community to discuss ideas & provide constructive feedback!

[wide olive]

It is interesting to see people downvote an optional mode, which would solve a very popular issue. I'm curious, as to what would be the reason for that?

[proud agate]

yeah, i'm always wondering why people would do that

[thorn dragon]

I'm not a no vote, but definitely neutral. It is a solution to very specific issue which lasts for a finite period of time in a game with a particular setting. I don't know if everyone really sees it as big of an issue.

I could see expanding the idea to a full fledge card setting being a better idea. The special element of pulling a wild should happen in intervals across the entire game. The Wild card setting would focus more on wilds which would still be less common than other cards. What could holding 3 wilds give players?

[wide olive]

This very specific issue affects 90% of all competitive games. I thought that would be big enough of an issue.

I only want to make that particular crucial moment of the game more "balanced". For the rest of the game, everything you do is a game of odds and a result of your decisions before. So no need to make the cards more balanced further into the game.

[glossy sparrow]

If you kill a player for 4 cards in the 2nd round of trades, do you get their super joker, or does that get replaced with a normal card?

[wide olive]

Ha, good question!

I haven't thought about that yet honestly.

I guess you would get their joker.
That makes the most sense.

[latent steeple]

This would solve ALLLLLLL my issues

That said... I agree.. for what possible reason could this get downvoted lol

[wide olive]

People don't like change if it doesn't directly benefit them I suppose.