#Make all trainable troops free to build

80 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

placid bloom
#

Whales when they have veterans level 1

rancid thunder
#

Understandable. People have spent so much on premium units they can’t afford to lose them. I just suggested this so there isn’t too much of a divide between free and those who pay. I guess there will have to be a divide for competitions between those who pay and those who are free to play.

fair plank
#

In a broad sense, it does suck that there are premium units that are just better than FTP ones and it's very obviously a predatory practice meant to milk player's wallets. This game is ruddled with bad business practices, and I think most of us would be happy if they changed that.

But that's an enormous undertaking and also would screw with people who put money into the game. Potentially taking content away from players is almost never an acceptable solution and they're very hesitant to do so. Not to mention it'd just be a LOT of busywork and revamping to do, and there's almost certainly going to be cracks and oversights left over, making the game unstable.

#

Much as I don't like it, I'd rather keep the basic foundation of the game as is, but offer tweaks and solutions to players openly so that if you're willing to pay money you can get more/better stuff faster, but methods of getting premium currency are available for everyone so FTPs aren't ever completely left out.

#

In an ideal world the game wouldn't have an innately predatory fremium economy, but we don't live in that world and probably never will.

sharp apex
rancid thunder
sharp apex
rancid thunder
# sharp apex bro we already have great changes that have been suggested. check those out. wha...

I’ve read the thread about balancing and i found it coincidentally you want to compare to warframe. I love warframe and hold it dear to my heart. The thread really hasn’t got any ideas that everyone agrees on either

. My suggestions typically want those who use money to get a head start but everyone in the end would still use and access the same troops. Sure melancholy for the old battle nations is there but how to say it was ill , rather greedy, power dependent. The story line and gameplay was the good thing. Changes need to be made and I can’t see any idea that would make it fair for everyone while nanopod units are mostly exclusive to those who pay. Instead of balancing why not suggest more ways of getting nanopods for free.

sharp apex
#

there are a whole bunch of threads

#

I agree that old bn had a bad system. if you read all the suggestions that are nested there we address all of it

rancid thunder
# sharp apex click the linked threads in that thread

I got a bit dizzy reading all that. lol. Yes you have been addressing each issue discussing it, even suggesting alternate way to get old units back into end game.
Frankly I think battles need a point system. Each unit whether nanopod or free has a value and you can bring whatever unit you have unlocked as many as long as it doesn’t exceed the points limit.

sharp apex
#

I think its overkill

#

if you pair the new battle maps with my higher levels suggestion you could really create fun challenging content without touching the rest of the game

#

and make it extremely balanced

rancid thunder
#

So lots of grinding to level up old units plus new battle maps.

sharp apex
#

yup

#

content out the ass

rancid thunder
#

I wanted my suggestion about teaming units and human wave tactics but yours seems more popular. Though it doesn’t really address how to balance artillery. It will still be ignored mostly.

sharp apex
#

well its kinda implied that new levels brings new unit concepts- in the past I have suggested a shield unit that can defend against artillery, requiring precision fire to target and destroy

#

essentially the idea is to just leave the game open for all types of new content to address lots of these old issues

gusty rain
rancid thunder
#

Artillery sucks already and you want to give a unit to defend against it. Well if artillery ever gets a fix then yeah it might be useful. Still wish my suggestion about grouping was accepted. Artillery would be useful, grenadiers, flame throwers anything with a aoe attack would be more useful. But whatever.

sharp apex
#

units need to be balanced around the level you get them at sp level 1

#

a r1 veteran should never compete with a r1 trooper that would be ridiculous

#

however a rank 25 trooper vs a rank 6 veteran? now were talkin

gusty rain
#

Well yeah the suggestion includes “allow you to use nanopods to bypass level restrictions

#

Because plasma tanks at level 1 are sooooo balanced and definitely wouldn’t make the game P2W slop

sharp apex
#

yeah the suggestion in the op is bad imo

#

even if it was limited to only a few levels over your current level it would ruin the game

rancid thunder
#

That is only if there isnt premium troops.

lean cipher
#

I guess technically the building to make plasma tanks wouldn't be a premium thing

gusty rain
#

Why would buying a level 70 unit at level 1 ever be balanced lmao

lean cipher
#

it's not like mega tanks are any different anyway if you're fighting troopers

#

lol

rancid thunder
#

Same as having legendary units at low levels can’t be balanced

gusty rain
#

Okay fine plasma artillery at level 1 would be really balanced right?

#

There you go, a F2P unit

sharp apex
rancid thunder
#

You are talking about PvP right.

lean cipher
#

it ruins everything

sharp apex
#

level 15 LSW lmao

lean cipher
#

not just pvp aspects

sharp apex
#

LSW shouldnt even be a thought in peoples minds until level 90

gusty rain
#

Tfw you can spend money to bypass the entire game

rancid thunder
#

If in campaign it’s optional whether you want to make it easy for yourself or just use the unit to assist or make the game easier.

gusty rain
#

“Helps decrease the gap between P2W and F2P btw”

rancid thunder
#

Yes. Since all player would get the unit in time earlier or later

gusty rain
gusty rain
rancid thunder
#

I’m unorthodox

gusty rain
#

Got it, I heard all I need to hear

lean cipher
#

I mean adding a clearly best option that trivializes the entire game is bad game design

rancid thunder
#

Would you want to ruin the game by buying the unit? It’s optional you can follow the campaign normally or if you just want to cheese it then go buy the nanos for an advanced level unit.

lean cipher
#

I also want to play optimally

#

I just don't want the optimal play to be the most boring thing ever

#

adding a win button never makes the games better

gusty rain
#

Win button costing money too xd

lean cipher
#

yeah xd

gusty rain
#

Not P2W btw, you can choose to suffer and make things harder on yourself by not clicking it!

olive wraith
sharp apex
#

'fix ptw by making the game more ptw' this wasnt thought through

rancid thunder
#

I will just ignore hiKari since she has heard everything.

gusty rain
#

I’m just gonna downvote and move on lmao

#

Not in the mood to get ragebaited tonight

rancid thunder
#

It isn’t pay to win. You can progress normally.

olive wraith
#

Absolute rage bait

lean cipher
#

it's not pay to win, it's win by paying. completely different thing

#

you guys just don't get it

rancid thunder
#

Yes but you don’t have access to all troops without spending money

olive wraith
#

Don't reply to that

gusty rain
rancid thunder
#

Ruby I understand. I mean if they want to cheat then it’s up to them. Or they can just try the new unit

gusty rain
#

Next thing you’re gonna hear is that a screen nuke that costs 5.99 isn’t P2W because you can ignore it xd