Yet another “statistically accurate” rolled game…
#Definitely a fair roll…
still edge
quaint scroll
Yet another “statistically accurate” rolled game…
First one was bad. This one will discredit complaints tho. It’s not good, but it’s within a reasonable variance
The only reason to complain about #2 is if you have card stack dice on
still edge
First one was bad. This one will discredit complaints tho. It’s not good, but it...
Yeah possible, but I have never played a game where 11 is the second most rolled number. Although it does show a trend of poorly coded dice rolls.
And as long as I’m complaining, here is another one from a few minutes ago.
It is at least a little more spread out and probable. Well except rolling 7s half the time.
quaint scroll
It is at least a little more spread out and probable. Well except rolling 7s ha...
This one is even more balanced than #2. I mean the sample size is under 100 so it looks about right. 24 is over represented, but it’s just about 1/4 instead of 1/6. this distribution is pretty dang good for truly random dice
#1 is pretty bad. Mostly though, these show the problem of using randomized dice for such a core mechanic, primarily in a competitive game. They illustrate why we should have less random results (good card stack dice by default). They don’t demonstrate a problem with the dice code.