Help with 2.4 Machine vibrations is it good or bad?

[ornate chasm]

I don't know if this is a bad graph or not so i was wondering how high the graph usually goes and what's considered bad on a 350mm 2.4. And if my graph is bad if any one can se what usually causes the high spikes in those regions.

My current setup is a Anthead with stealthchanger tap, stiff Z joints, BFI otherwise its a stock formbot kit. I am also using TMC auto tune on it.

The belts are tensioned to around 2.0-2.1 using the GT2 belt tensioner on the X and Y axis and 2.2-2.3 on Z axis.

[quick monolith]

👋

[bleak crane]

The belts could be better tensioned

[quick monolith]

Are u looking just for a YES/NO answer to your question (good, not good)? Or do u want further help regarding improvements, whats going on etc.?

[ornate chasm]

I would like a yes or no answer but i would also want further help to improve the graphs

[quick monolith]

Ok then please provide the remaining things from the „how to post here“ post and let us know when u are comfortable everything is provided so we can get started

[ornate chasm]

I am currently doing a small print job i saw i needed more to get help so i was planning on printing the cube after it was finished and posting my settings for it

[quick monolith]

Sounds good.

For the next time u create a post here, please collect everything before creating your post, thats also why we have the „how to“ post, this way u know up front whats required and can take your time to collect and double check 🙂

[dry topaz]

@ornate chasm can you increase to 32 microsteps and rerun vibrations please

[ornate chasm]

Picture of the calibration cube

Pictures of the printer

And my orca print settings

[ornate chasm]

I will try as i understand that will give finner control over te movments

[dry topaz]

@leaden copper this better.
I am sure your complaints to Discord are the reason they took away the markup feature

[leaden copper]

https://tenor.com/view/arnold-schwarzenegger-thats-better-better-ooh-gif-4890836

https://tenor.com/view/kiss-heart-shape-muah-love-wink-gif-25051971

aw you deleted it lol

[dry topaz]

@leaden copper you never know if someone will take the wrong way. I thought it might be to harsh. It wasn't in my brain, but I do not know about yours. Which is really mine, where you are living rent free

[leaden copper]

oh all good i dont take it wrong

[dry topaz]

by the way...my therapist says you need to move out after RMRRF. She says you have been freeloading in my mind for to long

[leaden copper]

i cant afford to move

[dry topaz]

I am sorry, but you hurt me with your discord changes, and now it is time you stand in side your own mind

[ornate chasm]

That cube was from before increasing the steps this is the new graph when using 32 steps but what i understand my biggest issue is my PA or SCV

I will try running a new cube with SCV is already 5 in klipper as i understand jerk in orca is scv but shoulkdent that be clamped to 5 then so the issue would be PA

And checking the sliced file the green areas you marked is when its slowing down

[dry topaz]

No, the values in klipper are defaults that can be overridden by slicer

Might want to drop run current to 0.8

[ornate chasm]

I will start 1 step at a time but i guess lowering the motor current could reduce the vibrations

Or i am stupid i could run a vibrations test before running a new print

[dry topaz]

Yes you can

[ornate chasm]

I meant i am stupid i just didn't think of it first

[dry topaz]

Nah you were just zoning

[ornate chasm]

I would say this is a little better now because the vibrations aren't as spread out even though the scale went from 1e7 to 1e8 it still similar in the peaks

[dry topaz]

What is the current rating on the motor

[ornate chasm]

Here is the motor specs they are rated for up to 2A

[dry topaz]

Try 140mm/s at 8k accel for outer and inner perimeters

[ornate chasm]

Wouldnet that high accel cause more vibrations as its outside of my input shapers target on Y?

[dry topaz]

Shit I was looking at x not y

Set shaper to ei on x and y and accel to 3500

[ornate chasm]

Put i am actually pretty happy now with the finish of the prints i have bin working on it the whole morning changing the PWM to 45hz with 0.9A have neted me the best results i also tuned of accel_to_deaccel and set the cruse ratio to 0 just need to do some PA tunning. But what made the biggest different was you telling me to go from 16 to 32 steps Thanks for the help.