#micron+ 180 strange resonance issues (source found)

138 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

terse rampart
#

okay micron+ 180,
dual shear ldo nema 14's on a/b,
6mm belts
teeny bfi and bzi
live idlers on x joints
beserker linear rails and bearings
-mgn9c on x
printed gantry
printed anthead (could use nh36 supportbracket)

umbilical setup sucks but doubt its the main issue

i have a beacon on this printer as well as sensorless homing running on kalico

both accel chips are in working order and can be used for comparison

so i've got a fresh built micron 180. everything has seemed to go rather well and i even managed to solve a bit of binding on the x rail , its printing so i decided to finally feed it IS , and its been strange to say the least, was recommended 27k accels on y, and 3,800 on x.. yeah that's not right lol, i double checked axes mapping, yeah so i went through the process of getting shake tune running on the little guy and whacky graphs to say the least lol, i can post pictures of a voron cube, but it does have infill, if it has to be 0 infill i can reprint.

i have rebuilt the entire x axis, ad nothing screamed problem, i put screws in all the preloaded nuts to hold them in place, and it wasn't untill i fed it 200 aph that the graph cleaned up. from what i hear thats insane to feed a printed gantry , im new to this lol
so uh yeah, im not sure where to even look so heres a few of the graphs thanks!

#

my internet is fairly slow, i will be uploading detailed pictures of everything in question as well as the actual arifiacts that exist on the prints , current accel values are like 10k with a 200mm limit on speed, so quick but not crazy, the x rail was really tight , but i loosened it up some, cleaned it really well, regreased with ep2 and rebuilt it and it didnt really seem to make a difference unfortunutely belt tention has been done by ear , and the actual tests ( aside the 200 aph) where generally really quiet nothing sounded loose

#

these tests where 200aph

#

ill fire it up to get a belt comparison grapgh, i have one, but not on my laptop

#

ive just ordered a new carriage because its lke $8 because i have another one that feels great on the rail but wont work for this printer

#

that seems to be most of everything requested, if i need to alter anything or provde more specifics, fell free to let me know , thanks in advance!

#

oh also , no tmc autotune, ab motors are on 5160 drivers, z is on 2209 , all 24v, interpolate is on, and printer and all part have around 2 hrs on them total

terse rampart
#

just going through the pictures, just did another complete gantry deracking, and zip tied the z chain out of the way, built in is results look better, getting ST graph now

#

yeah same issues, man what a head scratcher lol, this is 100aph

#

175 aph

south bolt
#

your high ApH (200hz) is probably masking issues.
What is your belt tension at?
How are you measuring it?
your belts do not look like they have equal tension.
Are they the same length?
Are both belts the same length on the left hand side of the toolhead.
Are both belts the same length on the right hand side of the toolhead? (left and right hand side can be different lengths)
From your x-axis it looks like you might be racked.
Make sure you use NH36 for this testing.
Run all test at an ApH of 75-100

terse rampart
#

Okay that's a handful, let's see,
belt tention is by ear, and as equal as I can get it, double checked by a printed gauge,( it's not very accurate)
I loosed up the entire gantry and verified that the belts where identical to the tooth in length,
squared the ab brackets, tightened them, and tentioned the belts both equally then tightened the x axis back all the way,
These didn't seem to affect the graph much at all.
But my gantry doesn't feel or look racked without the belts on, so I sincerely doubt that I am
The tention may have been unequal for most of those graphs, but I'm not terribly sure if it changed much
I will use the nh Accel chip here on out
And as for 75-100, do you want a spread? Or just to add a fresh 75 and 100, thanks!

#

Now when it comes to the live idlers, I'm not familiar with live idlers. But it's one of those parts that spin when x is moving so it's in the problematic area. I have one side that the pully can spin on the shaft and one that cannot ,if there's a problem with these pullys it's gotta be here

#

One of the pictures shows it pretty decently, but my b motor bracket was crooked. Since fixed, (didn't change anything lol) I've pulled apart the rail and rebuilt and greased it, (nada, unless my ski is bad, I have a new one on the way) I took all the panels off, back ones next, and even ruled out the z chain from the bigger issues

#

I'm just at a loss here tbh, I do have a 350 V2 and never had this issue, so I don't know where to look

#

But I'm all ears man, you know what I suspect, and now I await your knowledge lol thanks!

#

Oh, I need to run a new belt comparison, as it should be better after fixing the rear brackets and. Tentioning with calipers to track where I'm at, comparing and adjusting with that printed gauge

south bolt
#

in the live idlers is the gear fixed to the shafy?
Can you swap out the live idlers for regular xy joint idlers? If so I think I would do that

#

By ear is not a very good way to measure belt tension. This is my order of belt tension devices
PF makes tension tool -> phone app -> digital capiper style -> ear -> touch

terse rampart
#

The micron seems to have a press fit assembly, it was assembled in an odd manner and the x axis was actually crooked so I replaced them with pullys with bearings, only to find out I just killed the live bearing, well ff I went to fix them back into live idlers after seeing my is results and one of them is significantly looser but kinda locked in when compressed

terse rampart
#

Oh, I should mention I got this micron on trade and I'm finishing it, so there are a large amount of unknowns

south bolt
#

As a starting point I am thinking it is also xy joints.

terse rampart
#

I'll try and find the files for the standard idlers /xy joints

south bolt
#

however, do me a flaor and check your z-joints. Make sure they are snug to the y-extrusions

terse rampart
#

I fought them in my 350 V2, and went CNC just to quit messing with the joints lol

terse rampart
#

Assuming is why it took me several weeks to get can working, dumb 120ohm resistor lmao

south bolt
#

okay. Then lets swap out the xy joints for the standard ones. When you have the xy joints removed, make sure the x-axis is square and not twisted. If this is second hand don't take anything for gratned.

terse rampart
#

This was the first time I pulled it apart lol

south bolt
#

what can be happening with the live idler is that the part with the plastic is rubbing causing friction. Same could be happening with the top

terse rampart
#

I'll look into it more and see what is/isn't supposed to be in that stack, and find the files for the normal x joints a

#

This last time I pulled it apart, I actually sanded down those spacers so that the overall height of the stack was 25mm

terse rampart
#

Well I'm attempting to get the x joints sorted, I'm having trouble trying to figure out just what parts I need to make it work, I'll update this thread with new graphs when I finally get them swapped out

terse rampart
terse rampart
south bolt
#

It is okay if the xy joint toothed idlers move up and down.

south bolt
#

Take a look at vitalii3d website he has aluminum spacers which might fit

terse rampart
#

It really wouldn't take much effort on the spacer, but yeah I noticed the top belt was dragging on the left idler and spinning it, upon closer inspection the whole idler was able to move up and down in place. When up, it didn't drag, when down it dragged on the bearings flange

terse rampart
#

welp, that seems to have been it

#

the washer and fine tuning the plastic spacer seemed to have solved the weird devide in graphs, its still not perfect but its ALOT better, i suppose this means im due for a few new parts on the gantry lol

south bolt
#

You can try printing another cube, setting both to EI. Or you can rerun these test with sweeping on. If things are still rubbing that might show up in the graphs

terse rampart
#

I went through and fixed a lot of small issues last night, reran the umbilical, recrimpes my hot end thermister ,LEDs, and beacon wires, moved the USB plugs around Based on some reccomendations saying some toolhead board experience a random disconnect/ data issues on the 3.0 ports, so I corrected just about anything and everything I ran across

terse rampart
#

alright ei shaper applied, damping ratio applied, limited to 8275 accel 300mm/s letting it run another cube

terse rampart
#

Seems to have moved away from the great majority of ringing, it does however have lots of faint vfa lines lol more so on x

#

I'm going to rerun the graphs with a sweeping period and see what happens

south bolt
#

It looks more like belts in these pictures

#

Can you run vibrations profile please.
Also did you run input shaper with sweeping on

terse rampart
#

im trying to figure out how to make it use sweeping lol

#

i cant seem to find a good value for the sweeping period, and i just have it set to 0

#

tried commenting it out but shakentune doesnt seem to use that section.

south bolt
#

just comment out the entire line for sweeping and klipper will internally default to it

terse rampart
#

gotcha i thought so, but im assuming that means everything sweeping related not just the period

#

running vibration profile now

#

at defaults

#

shakentune still didnt run with sweeping...

#

lol i had to track down the defaults and force a sweeping period of 1.2

#

sweeping on for x

#

sweeping on for Y

south bolt
#

Doesn’t look like any dynamic issue.

#

Turn off sweeping, and then run vibrations profile please

terse rampart
#

That vibration profile above was before sweeping and as it sits

#

I can rerun if you'd like though

south bolt
#

Sorry didn’t see it

#

Can you post images of the slicer speeds and access you are using

terse rampart
#

access? im using orca

#

this is a very basic untuned baseline

#

printer is currently limited to 5k accels. 300mm/s speed, 50% cruise ratio (whatever that means lol) and scv of 5

#

the slicer was configured rather quickly and just isnt set up all the way, im making theprinter limit itself currently

#

also need to move to the floor or a better table before turning it up like at all lol

south bolt
#

Drop normal printing to 5000 accel

#

based upon your speeds can you rerun vibrations profile to 350 mm/s please

terse rampart
#

sorry for the wait, life has been hectic latley this is with 10k limits on the machine , and the 350mm/s speed

south bolt
#

can you install tmc_autotune and rerun vibrations profile please

terse rampart
#

Absolutely

#

Just gotta figure out what specific motors I'm running lol

terse rampart
#

350 again, on the adxl345 with autotune installed and running

south bolt
#

For ext/int perimeters try 130, or 180.

terse rampart
south bolt
terse rampart
#

awesome ill swap that over and see how it likes a cube

terse rampart
#

set it to 180 . would it track to use multiples that allign with those speeds if that works? or is that a further testing situation to find specifis speeds?

terse rampart
#

ill send pictures, but the vfa doesnt seem to have improved im running 2 walls 3 top/bottoms on this cube at 180mm/s 5k accel

#

its not finished printing

#

it failed XD i have half a cube

terse rampart
south bolt
#

Okay try 250 at 8k

terse rampart
#

okay so i actually stayed up pretty late and played with it some, i currently have it at 250 8.5k, cruise disabled same IS settings, its helped a ton, i did a light PA tune and its close but its like 0.042 and its direct drive so ill revisit

#

i havent printed a cube yet on these settings but i did do a couple little test prints

#

That goldish color is hard to get good pictures of, it's very shiny lol

#

The benchy was just disabling cruise, the vfa tower I physically chose 200-250 ish because it was the best on the worst looking material, then I did a half baked PA tune to try and clean up the physical results

#

would you like another cube as it sits?\

south bolt
#

This is basically the same process I would use

terse rampart
#

XD really?

#

ive just been tinkering

south bolt
#

You use the vibration graph to get close, then do test prints, and adjust as necessary

terse rampart
#

huh, i guess i was just so distraught that the graphs didnt just hand me the awnser i assumed i was doing something wrong

south bolt
#

Then you redo pa/em at the new higher speeds, and keep going around the circle until you get the results you like

#

Think of the graphs as a good starting point.

terse rampart
#

i still havent done flow, and a handful of others i really should have it was just already close enough

south bolt
#

Also if you do the speed vfa test print do not use the 30 and 60 angles.
The best you can hope for is the 0, 90, 45, 135 look good

terse rampart
#

oh they all looked pretty decent around 220-250

#

it dips down in the 130+ 180 range too, just not as good in the graphs as the real world

south bolt
#

The vibration graphs are using an adxl on the toolhead. What would be better is something measuring the motor itself

terse rampart
south bolt
#

The goal of vibrations is to actually measure motor vibrations, the toolhead adxl (sensor on the end of a stick) is the closest we have right now

terse rampart
#

30+60° respectively, finger around that 220-250 range

#

I don't even wanna know what a solution for that would involve, you'd have to build custom motors, or have a sensor that can be installed on the shaft and be careful about where you test

south bolt
#

It is being looked into. No real solutions yet

terse rampart
#

I look forward to stuff like that, I mean heck input shaping is still kinda black box magic

#

So I know you have plenty of others to help besides me and I don't wanna keep you caught up with all kinds of questions, you just want me to keep looping through calibration routines a few more times ? I can always check in if I genuinely get stuck

#

I think my x graphs will continue to get better as I print, the tolerances on that beserker rails are really tight, I had to grease it and run it back and forth for like 40 mins to get it where it is lol

south bolt
#

The general circle is PA -> em - > belts -> input shaper -> vibrations -> PA (if this is the first time; other times if necessary) -> EM (if this is the first time only need to do once really) -> belts (if mechanical issues) -> print -> input shaper -> (if changing things) -> vibrations -> (print)
something like this

terse rampart
#

Lol awesome, now em what is em

#

Ahh, okay flow

#

Well thanks reth, I'll have at it and check back in with good news or more questions lol

terse rampart
#

Tracked it down finally in-between life and all the other projects I've taken on, seems to be the combination of a less than perfect carriage and grease the rail didn't like 🤦‍♂️ I have some room to improve, but so far these are the results of 250mm/s at 8k mm/s² accels. Very happy, all stuff I know how to fix