#V0.2 Bad IS
337 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
voron cube on the way prints fine just noisy graph 🙂
Ebb 36 is mounted on the back of the white piece on the “tool head”
👋
Please ping me or reply to this message once u are comfortable that everything in the guidelines is provided
No rush, take your time
Belts is showing your belts are not evenly tensioned.
The cubes are showing pa issues and other issues,but not sure as pa is off
How are you measuring belt tension and what value are you setting them at
when they are at 150mm distance
What tool are you using to measure belt tension
guitar tuner app
on my phone 🙁
it works ok though i get good results
It is not working okay
Use the gates app. However it is highly recommended to get a pf tension tool. West 3d sells them
i keep getting a a host overload issue
so i cant even run belt test now
Are you running a cb1?
A btt pi
its a known issue, they are pretty weak performance wise.
it was a okayish replacement while raspberry pis were hard to get and very expensive, back during COVID.
but nowadays a pi4 is easy to get and will crush any btt pi
Ya I just have it because im now using can bus with it and it came with my kit
I’m using the u2c with the btt pi the one that module that goes on top of it
i see. that wont work with a raspberry pi, but there are maaaaaaaany alternatives which do the same thing.
CAN hat for pis or a normal U2C
What if I do a manta with a cb1?
Or I have an extra pi 3b can I put it in as more computing power somehow?
If that’s possible?
CB1 or 2 is the same thing 🙂
pretty weak
CM4 or CM5 from raspberry pi
if the manta has a CAN port, yes that will work
What if I run my btt pi with the raspberry pi can I do that run them together?
I don’t understand
Why would u want to run both?
The get the computing power till I replace the board
Im sure there is a way but i wouldnt do that honestly
I just need sum till I get the new board
Anyway to get it to compute it it’s shake n tune compare belts and it has done it before but now it dosent like it
I feel like it shouldn’t be that hard to run
@iron jewel i dont think this is right lol
does this mean it wants belt a tighter or looser?
your opinion on the new graph?
Did you fully loosen and retighten them?
Also before you touch them can you run input shaper please
ya and tune them still something is funny
i already touched them and got them a bit closer
Let’s see input shaper please
idk i keep getting this intermittently when trying to do belts it happens more then it dosent and my pi isnt seeing 100% load at all \
so ill try to get one last belt graph then run is
no, it does not weigh enough to make much of a difference. If you were using a nozzle probe maybe.
@iron jewel watched your vid on belt tuning but still this one has me stumped looking a little different now
since that graph i tightened belt be and it went to this imo graph looks better but similarity went down?
Were you belts the same length when you put them on?
yes
i tightened belt b some more and got this
@iron jewel i feel like this is just wild it wants belt b tighter but then dosent?
it looks like you have a toolhead issue (the 125hz) can you make sure all screws are secure
so idk where else to go
@stark jacinth got any idea's
A video will always be hard to determine how much force was applied/needed to cause wiggle.
So with that in mind, the back/front wiggle looks a lot to me. Similar as if the rail carriage is bad and wiggles.
Can u see the carriage move from the side while pushing it back and forth? @worn rivet
Wouldnt be the first bad carriage we have encountered
nope just flex im putting alot of force into it
A V0 is sensitive to bad ones
its just flexing the printed part
Hm interesting
its twisting the rail before the carriage has play
Wait what? The rail twists?
like gantry roll im really yanking lol
Ok haha
One thing i would check is if the printed x carriage is tight by removing DB and inspecting the x carriage. Make sure it has no cracks and all screws are tight - careful, dont over tighten them
my thing is i get good is graphs
i thought the same and did it they are good i can check again but i checked yesterday
Ok. No need to double check
Only thing thats coming to my mind is that the toolhead board mount is bad and causes the spikes
idk why i get like '"solid" is graphs like good accels but bad belt tension
I have never seen that one
thought the same replaced it with the one you see and same thing 🙁
Hmm
i had a big tal;l one that i didnt like the one you see is crazy ridgid
Chance u have another adxl for the front of DB?
ya i have a usb one laying around
just so you know its yavoth 🙂
i can mount it to the nozzle
Oh u are right. I was focused on the wiggle instead of the toolhead itself
Im also running yavoth, shame on me 
Nozzle or front would be good to give us a second measurement to compare
let me hook that up really quick have to find my accelerometer from ender 3 days
Im really curious how it moves so easily.
well im yanking on it im not being gentle
That’s likely the spike we see at 125hz
now can i show how much force im putting?
Yea i see that on the MF connector but imo thats too much play
*molex
i dont know how to show how much force im using
ya im not being gentle
@stark jacinth here are the is graphs i would say y is sus but x isnt CRAZY
Was this via nozzle adxl?
Nope ebb 36 I can’t find my adxl im still trying to
And what changed from here #1435053263828422696 message to this now?
Its quite a significant change
Belt tension
That’s it
And I took belts off squared the gantry again and re tensioned and here we are
Im going to bed but one thing u can try, install the bowden tube and use a zip tie to connect the CAN cables to it. Leave some slack so there is strain relief. Start with one zip tie and add a second one after a test run
Thankyou sleep well!
@iron jewel any better?
some how my mechanical health is excellent
?
Have you done many printing hours? I tried to chase out a similar outlier equalizing belt tensions with the phond app and decided to follow the advice, get some print time in to see how the machine "breaks in" or if other issues become apparent. Get it good enough and press on, tuning is iterative.
i have like 5 printing hours on it but pa is being weird so i figured it might be to do with the belts / is
This does look like it wants some strain relief
Try reducing tension by say 1/2 knub on a
im going to put on some hours and see let the belts strech and move a little ill put on about 12 hours and try again
idk any more
all i did was loosen b a bit and tighten a a bit like 1/4 of a turn
i didnt change anything and this is what i got
@chilly berry any ideas?
I’ve got no clue for most resonance things honestly. I always defer to @iron jewel
nothing has changed between these 3 graphs
@iron jewel any ideas? any recomendations would be greatly apreciated
thanks, How is the zip tie action going?
I zip tied it up ran the printer for 3 hours using the entire build plate to stretch belts a bit and the graphs above are what’s going on nothing has change among them
Just ran back to back to back
Kinda stuck here might have to just go for it build a tulip gantry?
and how is input shaper looking?
did u do 2 runs as i requested?
1 zip tie
2 zip ties
I will run it now it didn’t really clean up I don’t think still looked the same
Only 1 ziptie it is giving plenty of strain relief
its not about strain relief 🙂 its about reducing umbilical vibration
two separate things
thats with ptfe
idk where the vibration is coming from
should i get a metal toolhead carrage? @stark jacinth
so this is with 1 zip tie, correct?
can u add a second one 2 fingers above the first one and run another test please
yup!
do you want both or just y?
@stark jacinth not much change sadly
i may be on to it
im getting rid of the little ceramic piece
it is going ape shit at 87 hz so its time to go
reth said it probably isnt the problem but its going to go
@stark jacinth thats with ceramic removed and another ziptie added so 3 zipties
can it be somewhere else on the printer not the tool head?
check all bearings can spin freely and have no binding.
check that pushing the toolhead, while at the front middle, with a single finger its not binding or blocking at a certain point
there is a spot where the belts like to sit (the middle of the bed) because thats where the machine gets powered off but it isnt crazy
its like if you had a small flatspot on a tire it just likes to sit there but will get past it
okay and the bearings as i mentioned?
Are u still using an app to tension the belts?
In the US u have the luxurious privilege to get the pf tension meter pretty easy. A lot of vendors sell it. #west3d-🇺🇸-🌐-🌎-🌍 for example
Highly recommend to get it
i have to order the tensioner the bearings are all good and roll well no resdistance the gantry is square and all feels good and i am using a app but i feel like it shouldnt be so far out a and b i feel like if its tension i shouldnt get diffrent graphs without changing anything yk?
im ordering one soon
should i just do tulip gantry hope it goes away?
as i said before, its your printer, u decide.
i would buy the tension tool and check if belts are good.
u will need that tool anyways
then u can install tulip if it didnt help
@stark jacinth got tulip installed with cnc aluminum tool head mount and a cb2 with mp5 and well
No cigar
Also for whatever reason the cb2 can make a vibration profile but not a belt comparison belts are tensioned together to same spec using pf meter
it got more extreme
Check your belt path - make sure no belts are riding on besrings
i dont see any belts riding up or rubbing
can you provide a picture of the printer as it currently stands please
make sure to get the entire umbilical in the frame
Are you wires hitting the belts?
I put the back plate on the back of the printer and route the umbilical and wiring through it
they arent hitting the belts
not statically, but maybe when it i running
I would move that zip tie. When these belts move they can hit it
yes
ok its running rn
results are better
still peeks but
now i need to find those little things
well i guess its the same thing just mitigated a bit
im posive everything is i have went over it like 100 times
I would try to make the umbilical/bowden as it is in the manual and see what that does
give that a whirl
Ok
If you have the nut behind that extrusion the motors mount to installed there’s also a zip tie mount for the umbilical there.
i have it there it is ziptied
Ah. I just can’t see it in that pic. 😅
that pic was prior!
Gotcha.
I’m like 90% certain I loaded that nut in mine… I’m gonna hate myself in like 2 months if I didn’t.
lmao jsut tear it all apart and reasemble lmao
got side tracked let me go back and upload graphs lol
No. I’ll be drilling a 1/4in hole in the extrusion slot to fit it. I am not going to disassemble this thing fully for an eighth time.

my bottom acrylic panel is going haywire lmfao
i would say its a graph issue but it is at like 125hz and well the x spike falls outside of that
If I were you. I’d do a print with the current recommendations in the graphs and see how it comes out
What does belts look like
Remove ziptie closest to toolhead
You need to add a part in the rear where the umbilical goes down to hold it there
If I compare to say my Trident 250. High. You have a build area that is 1/4 of mine. Once you solve whatever is going on. You’ll be there.
Yup that one between Bowden and umbilical
when you get a chance send over the belts graph
get this my cb2 can make is graph vibration profiles but it refuses to do a belt graph it will just throw a ttc
use klippers
ok its removed i will do y axis IS again
test custom axis is klippers built in belt tester
It’s a lot less load on the cb2
Run klippers version. If it works then it’s the cb2.
Reth is a god after all.
was that becasue of the zip tie removal?
what does x look like
running it now
I’m watching this mainly for my rebuild that’s coming soon. I wanna be able to fix issues. Lol
i used silicone flimsy ass wire to specifically mitigate this
this is helping me learn alot lol
after looking at the big things: belt path, binding, etc. , it generally comes down to stupid shit. Like a zip tie
reth i watched your yt but idk
to many zip ties, not enough zip ties, zip tie in the wrong spot, etc.
Dang it… now I gotta go play with zip ties on the microwave. 
the real secret is looking at graph's all day and screwing up till you guess the one thing that works
lmfao i guess so bc i it is safe to say you know your shit lol
not to good
but y wants mzv
This is similar to awd and an umbalanced toolhead.
you can't get o vibr% on shaketune
im doing belts now
They can be different
[input_shaper]
shaper_type_x: smooth_ei
smoother_freq_x: 111
shaper_type_y: smooth_mzv
smoother_freq_y: 73.6
But replace smoother with shaper. This is from my printer.
The deck panel? The ends of a zip tie work great
ya its driving me nuts
Zip ties. We love em. And we hate em. 🤣
Hot glue will melt in the chamber. Just a heads up. My zip ties must be thinner than yours then. Lol
trying to put the new scanner away so i have more desk space
trying to find this belt png
i cant find it lol\
its lost
Using WinSCP going to the /tmp folder.
It’s all the back at the start of the root
its not there lol
It should be… unless the command failed anyways. Both the csv files are there though right?
i mean the first peak is there
100%
2nd peak ehhh
@iron jewel i got it eventually
isnt it 1st peak that matters
or is it both and im just dumb
@chilly berry what do you thinki
On this graph your goal is just to have both belts resonate equally. Not for one peak.
yes but alsong as the first peak is close the 2nd peak dosent have much play does it?
like the 2nd peak isnt as important as the 1st
You want blue and yellow to be as close as possible. I can’t remember which belt is which for that graph though.
yellow is b
Then you either need to tighten A belt by 1/6 turn or loosen B belt by 1/6 turn and test again. This is a trial and error testing process.
I am heading to bed so I wish you good luck in testing that trial and error fun!
based upon your new input shaper graphs I would leave everything alone and do a test print. Setting both shapers to EI and make sure you include damping ratio
ok thankyou
That’s the print
Looks like PA needs a little adjusting. Other than that it looks good 👍
I agree with the above
Even though graphs dont look perfect, i will mark this post as SOLVED since prints come out good 👍🏻
For print tuning we have #slicers_and_print_help