I will mention also that when I first assembled the printer I don’t think it was so low but at that time it was on the floor with no panels installed. It’s on a table but the table is screwed to a concrete wall on one side so I think it’s sturdy. The only thing that isn’t that sturdy is the side panels are on just at the corners I didn’t print the middle hold downs for them.
#Help with belt graph
copper canyon
humble radish
@copper canyon once you get the toolhead together and back on the printer go ahead and run all the test and post the pictures here please
It is hard to diagnose issues without the information
copper canyon
Will do. I redid the belts to make sure they are both equal just to be sure
copper canyon
Ok I got it back together. The results actually seem worse. The similarity which I assume is the frequency similarity is better but the peaks are more mismatched now than before and still 5 peaks although now one is small enough it says only 4
copper canyon
I have one of those digital caliper belt tension devices and this was at -6.4, I loosened it to -5 and the peaks were very well matched but much lower amplitude (8 on the 1e5 scale). I then tightened it to -5.5 and once again biggest peak was 20% off in amplitude but higher in amplitude than when it was at -5
humble radish
Can you run input shaper please
copper canyon
I am not sure how it figures out the max accel but these seem really really bad
these were taken with the tension that had the belt graph 98.4% similarity
west acorn
I am not sure how it figures out the max accel but these seem really really bad
u have sweeping enabeld
please disable it and rerun all tests
west acorn
ok I figured it out will rerun
Great 🙂
could u also follow the remaining things mentioned in the guidelines please?
"how to post here"
west acorn
ok I figured it out will rerun
to give u an idea of how your post should look like --> #1348739505997217845 message