#history
1 messages ¡ Page 221 of 1
why that give me though
What
starfighter?
TSR-2
idk i was listening to "God, King and Fatherland"seing this image

Vale asked for more pics
oh
Hi Vale
Its the British version of Arrow copium

Bro that planes on the other end of the museum

I cannot be fucked
I gotta go back that way to leave

So snap a pic
There's a corsair but it's privately owned and flyable so i couldn't access it
There was a French P-36

But for 39-40 it was alright
Soviet P-36 is better
It's last major combat was early 42 when it was massacred by the Japanese
Oh the Chinese also used them idk when they withdrew them from service



I know a guy who flys with the Perth biplanes club
They used to do formation flying pm Australia day
Idk if they still do the Australia Day airshow in Perth tho
They cancelled it for a few years after the crash
And then covid shit
And I haven't been since the crash I don't think
Perth Plane Crash: Two people have been killed in a deadly plane crash on the Swan River. They were taking part in the Airshow as part of the Australia Day celebrations in Perth. RIP
Video from 7 News Perth
Dumbfuck flies a plane he's not qualified to fly, illegally takes his mistress on the plane with him, then does dangerous aerobatics probably to impress her
that's how accidents at the gun range happen too
Didn't forget France too 
don't mention the commune
also don't mention the franco prussian war
nor spain
nor eugĂŠnie
nor victoria
nor bismarck
french commune
spanish civil war
The best tank of World War Two or a piece of junk? Using the original held at the U.S. Army Armor & Cavalry Collection, Chieftain and Rob Cogan take you on a literal deep dive into the iconic Tiger I.
Join us on Patreon: https://bit.ly/HADWARE_023_DE
Or join the TimeGhost Army directly at: https://timeghost.tv/signup/
Check out our TimeGhost H...
@gilded girder my phone went flat I had to get to my car to get my powerbank
So no more TSR sadly
I just fucking missed a picture of a spitfire and 109 flying in formation
Because my fucking phone didn't open my camera fast enough


Sipher be like
Enters chat
Posts video link
leaves



reminds me of https://youtu.be/GgNV0N3p9qs
Dat Yamato.
Episode 2, season 3.
Fair use, I don't claim any ownership of the content within, etc.
Actually
I think Turkiye is offical now
During last NATO meeting. They announced them as Turkiye not Turkey
Turkiye was always official
Just like Nihon over Japan, or Zongguo over China
Just like the Netherlands are officially the Netherlands?
Well
That affects me, a portuguese speaker
Who is used to call it "Holanda"
Now i've to call it "PaĂses Baixos" or "Neerlândia"

Now every time I see PaĂses Baixos I'm reminded of that glorious Spanish F1 article 
Same etymology
Dutchmania
Nederland Inlaander!
Huh
Hyundai Rotem next-generation wheeled armored vehicle concept with the goal of putting it into practical use after 2035.
What's with new AFV with their barrel shrouds...?
Looks more futuristic
They distribute the heat I believe
Helps with avoiding IR detection
That's my guess
Mostly this
General Dynamics Land Systems wins a $1.14 billion contract to built new Mobile Protected Firepower (MPF) light tank for the US Army Infantry Brigade Combat Teams.
"The Army could announce a name for the tank at the annual Association of the U.S. Army conference in Washington in October", Army Acquisition Executive Doug Bush said.
So Griffin II is just the manufacturer's name, the Army will name MPF tank after the generals.
I would go with Summerall or Craig. MacArthur could be problematic
Wait, 82nd airborne is now mechanized?
What?
Could be M1 for what's it worth
Since new role

For the cavalry regiment I guess, replacing(?) LAV(?)
@shrewd pecan
"A next-generation Stryker upgrade that is currently in a concept development phase, possibly called the Stryker A2 double-v hull, will include a range of vehicle protection enhancements", Col. William Venable said.
Nah, they wouldnât operate two separate tanks both named M1
She cute
The absolute troll if it gets M8 tho 
So it might be M9 if sequential or M10 if no overlap
Sup
@tough quail
yos
@spring briar
The brochure of Nexter's new 120mm SHARD (Mk1) APFSDS for EMBT and Leclerc XLR tank
what's the LOS pen
Isn't that classified
Is there a STANAG for that or is it just whatever condition the manufacturer deems reasonable ?
Otherwise, yeah, numbers
For average standard charge MV, 6crh shells (Vanguard), flat broadside (90 deg target angle), Bismarck machinery spaces
**Immune zone - 1000-20000 yards (19000 yards wide)**
"Completely" immune zone - 30000-13000 yards (-17000 yards wide) [no holing of main belt or main armor deck]
Note: Due to short British delay fuzes, the median shell will need to strike at above 26000 yards to penetrate the main armor deck before detonatingâthough fuze variance will permit some shells at shorter ranges to get through.
For average supercharge MV, 6crh shells (Vanguard), flat broadside (90 deg target angle), Bismarck machinery spaces
**Immune zone - 10000-21000 yards (11000 yards wide)**
"Completely" immune zone - 34000-15000 yards (-19000 yards wide) [no holing of main belt or main armor deck]
Note: Due to short British delay fuzes, the median shell will need to strike at above 28000 yards to penetrate the main armor deck before detonatingâthough fuze variance will permit some shells at shorter ranges to get through.
WIP, but will try to add magazine area later

ooh, brazilian stuff IVS stuff https://www.secretprojects.co.uk/threads/brazilian-never-were-warship-proposals-1920-1940.34029/page-2#post-458288
One more detail and one more dreadnought:
The "Brazilian Original Design" (Riachuelo proposal, 8x381) had twelve 4"/50 anti-ship and anti-aircraft capabilities.
There is a "Rio de Janeiro proposal" with 18x305mm:
Sorry, I have no scheme. Maybe a Progetto 1908 plus one turret?
Source...
Oh right, @maiden citrus @jagged monolith @spring briar @tough quail @eternal veldt @junior trench @ivory ridge

May be of mild interest
don't forget a negative number for immune zone means both belt and deck get penned
Bismarck is sort of the ship you don't want to fire HE at
i'd say w23 counts as HE 
Thanx. Also a good opportunity to compare now that the 6crh shell is now added at the core shop in the next maintenance
Fixed a typo
Note when I say "Vanguard" I mean that all the British 15" guns with modernizations use the 6crh shell. Only the unmodernized mountings (e.g. on HMS Hood) use the shorter 4crh shell (the 4crh shells were also the only ones to actually receive supercharges historically)
i mean, in a situation where VG would need to fire on enemy BBs she most likely would have carried supercharges, no?

I wonder if the lack of supercharge for 6crh is chamber volume/pressure problem, since it's longer afterall
But there's number for 6crh w/ supercharge so it's at least tested if not certified or operational 
Ah, nvm. I thought 6crh was heavier.
Itâs plausible
But it has to be remembered that the primary purpose was to extend range
Which made it important for the low elevation guns
US 1908 AP included 12â 7crh projectiles

Early AP projectiles were 2.5crh or 3crh. In 1908 AP projectiles were fitted with a longer ballistic cap of 7crh which improved their ballistic performance and increased penetration ability at longer ranges.
A new addition to makaâs hot dog condiments
Hershel âWoodyâ Williams, a Marine Corps veteran and the last living World War II Medal of Honor recipient, died Wednesday morning at the VA Medical Center in Huntington, West Va. Williams, 98, was surrounded by his family when he died, the Marine Corps said in a news release. âOn behalf of all Marines, Sgt. Maj. âŚ

In 1965, O.T.O. Melara of La Spezia was presenting to the Navy a project relating to a "compacted2 medium caliber cannon, developed on the specifications developed by M.M. itself, but leaving it to the latter the choice of the caliber that the weapon should have had: 135 or 127 mm. The project had been drawn up by O.T.O. in a relatively short period of time, being able to draw on the experience previously acquired with the construction of the 76/62 mm and with the rejuvenation of the 135/45 mm embarked on the missile cruiser GARIBALDI.
In the evaluation stage, the Navy chose the 127 mm caliber, almost certainly in relation to the evident logistical advantages deriving from the choice of a weapon whose positioning is widely used within the NATO Marine Corps. This fact justified the abandonment of the 135 mm caliber, although a piece of this caliber could have been considered superior in terms of firepower, in favour of smaller footprint and lower costs.
Some projection in the backread but negative immune zone always funny
Damn
Why not make NATO pass to 135mm slowly?
l a r g e
also heard that Garibaldi never actually received the "new" 135/53, but they simply swapped the /45 barrels with /53 ones to improve performance
but im not 100% sure about that
Usshit
One day this will happen Horse
One day
the actual 135/53 was supposed to go to 25 rpm per gun
from 20
so yesnt
Speaking of that
What did /53 do after the upgrade
Any action?
Iitaliam
stolen from phoenix
bites your finger
Cc
not sure about the /53 1957 tho
Did you know Soviet citizens had more daily calory intakes than Americans because they consumed more potatoes and cheese?
While Americans had more meat
the cheese bit is actually kind of surprising
WOOF WOOF
Nnerd
Xaxaxaxa
.
Tvorog 
u rite
How to solve 130-140mm shell loader problem
Exoskeletons
Maybe I can princess Carry Soyuz with this 
soyuz too fat
even better

Ddgho
Doggo
BBQ party with Soyuz when
Donât go on this server while drunk

what the dog doin'
Ookkdadd
Remember the time I mixed wine with beer
gettin devoured that's what
Most of the time when the upgrade is mentioned it's only ever stated that they moved to /53's.
The source I have that actually gives the performance of the gun, and the rate of fire of the /45, is Giorgerini & Nani's Gli Incrociatori Italiani, 3rd edition, which is the version published after that upgrade (1st edition is 1964, 2nd is 1967, 3rd is 1971).
If that helps.

which ships that use the 6crh shell in real life?
Huh, yeah, now that I'm checking, that specific tidbit is something added by the third edition
This is the passage in the 2nd edition;
And then in the third edition;
that's unusually many significant figures for the weight 
Of the British 15" gun ships?
As they came out of their major rebuilds in the late 30s/early 40s;
- QE
- Valiant
- Warspite
- Renown
From then on, Barham had access to them after a refit in mid-1940, then Malaya, Revenge, Royal Sovereign, Ramilies, and Resolution were all modified to be able to take them from late 1941 to mid-1943. Vanguard also had access to the 6crh shells when she was completed after the war.
Royal Oak, Hood, and Repulse were all sunk before getting access to the 6crh shells.
Basically every 15" British BB, Monitors, and coastal batteries that wasn't sunk by 1941
Actually, is there positive confirmation that the shells were indeed different (beyond the usual incremental improvement)?
I always suspicious of such difference in significant figures since one might suffer from rounding while the other doesn't

The older 135mm shells are usually reported as either 32.7 or 33 kg, these as 33.55 kg
Rounding errors would only really make sense for the older shells, since 33.55 kg should always round up rather than back down to 33 kg
it wasn't necessarily the rounding error itself, comparing two data with (obviously) different sigfig is 
listing data with unnecessary sigfig is even more 
Few ww2 veteran will remain till next decade

wij in Engeland wel de kruiser Orion hebben kunnen kopen, maar
deze was alleen als opleidingsschip bruikbaar en niet als deel van
een strijdbare vloot. Een dergelijke kruiser moet men, naar mijn
smaak, niet kopen```

Kope
kopen
Still no info on Kruiser 1946 
hahahahah
T-34 during tests in Aberdeen, USA 
Kinda wish Americans tried to modify it by adding their own tech to see what happens
Heavy tank
The Americans had lots of things, both good and bad, to say of T-34
While there was obviously no consideration of production or adaptation of it, many systems were used as references for designing US systems (Wehraboos would be shocked to find the T-34's gunner primary sight was the best aberdeen ever tested and was the reference for improved Sherman optics that showed up on mid and late ones...) and APG even drew up their own vehicle inspired by it using Sherman parts.

You know always good products came out when you combine Soviets and US
This used sherman mechanical bits, including the D200 engine from the M4A6 experimental branch, and a slimmed down M6 HVSS suspension.

that's rad
M34 or T4?
đşđ¸ đ¤ 
WoT is
weirdly enough
a really good starting point to find weird ass tanks
ancient mostly ww2 tank game that needs to sift through the most niche of shit to still add content
makes sense

This has actually been in the game a real long time
It's something you find in Hunnicutt
It's not like the Yoh designs that time forgot
(and it's a good thing they were forgot)
whats it actually named in wot anyway
yoh designs were in the mobile games for quite a few years now
I posted a gif while image banned and got warned again someone please shoot me
with an M4 improved
the mg or the main gun
both
Question, which specific variant was the gold baguette Breguet Bre 810 based on? I know that it was a two-seat bomber model, but the airframe was kinda murky on the details.
prolly @spring briar may know...
1450 hp with 8500 meter ceiling and 300 knots/500 km/h ish.
sounds like it was specifically built to counter the Stukas and fockes
cfr. Phoenix_jz
one year this month for Blitz
or so. i started playing may of last year and they were added shortly after i started
lmfao

i mean it is true they named new jeresy after the bunny girl
Tomcat
no particular reason why i'm posting this rn, especially not as any form of potential retribution

Cool haruna pic bro
Holy shit
Colourised
Unironically banger pic
Shame about what they did to her pagoda though

Horizontal for the first 10 miles
You know, given the curvature of the earth, that canât be very good
grug no believe in ballistics, grug point reticle at enemy and shoot
how does one manage to get things so decisively wrong
Anyways people like that should be banned from the internet
I was about to send some BS i saw today
But it was about a guy thinking our OPVs are underarmed
And then proceeded to suggest things like
Missile launcher (even mobile ones)
100 or 155mm cannon
Heat guided rockets
Well, he made a 10 line text
Ending with
"Hope i wasn't boring or anything. Roger out"
And nuclear torpedoes too, just in case

It was his response to my response to him saying they should have an "Offensive weapons"
My response was that patrol vessels have a defensive role
He started this response saying it was the "Coastal patrol ships function to defend"
And then he listed all his suggestions
the sight was the clearest
it was not the best
the reticule is absolutely garbage
and of course it doesn't really help how good your gunner sight is if you can't acquire anything with it

Yet they still don't have Hungarian or Romanian tanks
Come in gajin you added China who's early tree is literally tanks from other nations
Somebody needs to make the "inoperable" tumor wojak but it's quora
fucking wehrbs
Negative bitches
With how effective the Japanese were at torching their sekret docs, would it be possible for a whole ship design to be entirely erased
(not even Circle 6 Type A CA amounts of redacted, just nothing).
And were there actual plans to build a Japanese Deutschland (I.e. Chichibu Cruiser)
Kadekuru/Japanese Deutschland are faulty information.
Which is what prompted the US to construct the Alaskas in the first place and Japan actually responding with B-65s.
What have you done, now kancolle will make Japanese desuland
As for Japanese documents, yes. Most of Yamato's documents are torched, and A-150 remains shrouded in mystery.
Shinano's original documents were also torched.
Oh lol
The guiding light forward is by a person called Shizuo Fukui
Who apparently had over 3000 classified documents (!) hidden in his attic when he died in 1993.
If you want a comprehensive view of the IJN, that man's basically the massive supplier of most information on the Japanese side.
Ntk
Also, top kek, cruising at 30 knots in rough seas
How to blow a turbine and damage your bow 101
Also, forgot the British and US side.
Edinburgh design K XVIII, the quad x 4 design, was destroyed accidentally by the national archives sometime in 1988
The only surviving drawing is now a drawing made by Alan Raven prior to its destruction
on the US side, Spring Style Books 2 was either accidentally lost/burnt, or buried so deep in an archive that nobody found it

@delicate beacon apparently ate it. 
Also relevant, Spring Styles Book 4 was recently scanned.
pog

Theres more. Will check once I have breakfast.
werent tbe b-65s already going, just actually unknown to the usn
and the response was the consideration to upgun them to 14"
No. It was in response to the Carl Vinson act.
oic
In which the Essexs and Alaskas were also announced.
The 14" upgunning appeared later around 1942 IIRC
Before the whole project got canned after the Midway supershitshow
come on hit let's get you to bed
Someone put a speech bubble over Haruna's 1920 turret explosion

Gun
Tea and Jaba are drunk Hitâs mom and dad when heâs on ALO
I'm in fact the leader
Tea to censor hitâs comments and Jaba to drag him away
Where does a 225-year-old working warship get its parts? At the Navy forest, of course - National Geographic

Make it a gif so I can save it
Its already a gif 
What panzers saw action in the invasion of Greece? Also, what submachine gun would the British have during the invasion of Greece too?
So, is this true or completely false?
very false
TL;DR: No.
Slightly longer answer:
-
Yamato or Iowa would almost be never without escort, even Bismarck was escorted by Prinz Eugen until ordered to detach to complete the mission of commerce raiding (which failed miserably). So the premise here is already a massive red flag.
-
You can cruise at maximum speed in rough seas if the situation calls for it, just that it stresses the hull and would likely damage machinery due to sea conditions. This is not something unique to Bismarck. I don't even understand the logic behind being unable to shoot at maximum speed, given this falls under the gunnery director/plotting suite, and irrelevant to the hull. Both Iowa and Yamato were perfectly capable of engaging targets at maximum speed. If anything, Bismarck is a poor gunnery platform due to excessive stability of the ship, made due to the high metacentric height of the ship. The argument that only Bismarck could turn on a dime is just blatantly false, given that the Iowa class had double rudders and enjoyed an excellent turning radius (to the point that escorting destroyer captains were advised to be cautious), while the Yamato was beamy enough to facilitate such turns.
-
Yamato and Iowa being escorted to shore bombardment is just very no. Iowa was designed from the keel up as a "fast" battleship for carrier escort (not against aircraft, but against the Kongous or other sort of high speed threats), and Yamato was often cited as the crux of the "Kantai Kessen" doctrine, the Japanese dream of using battleships to annihilate the already weakened/fatigued enemy fleet. To argue that they're relegated to shore bombardment duty is to peer at the role of battleships through the small window of Saipan/Okinawa/Iwo Jima, etc., which is not even remotely close to a holistic view of what battleships performed throughout WWII.
-
Radar going offline: Amusingly, Bismarck was the one that suffered radar issues after engaging Suffolk/Norfolk during her voyage through the Denmark Strait. Granted, New Jersey, Massachusetts both also had their gunnery radar also taken off line due to gun shock, but radar in general is finnicky equipment and doesn't fare well against shockwaves, so, again, irrelevant.
-
Accurate gunnery of Bismarck and fast reload - blatantly false. If anything, recent research has found that Bismarck's gunnery officer intentionally increased the dispersion of the shots for better hits - "Spray and Pray", if you will.
-
"Bismarck could destroy the damage control centres of Yamato and Iowa, Iowa could not hit Yamato at a distance of 24 miles, even with the radar, Iowa would run out of ammo, Iowa would need to close within 10 miles to do any damage" are just statements dreamed up by a person that either has a serious lack of understanding on naval gunnery, or utterly demented. You'd need to back this up with ballistics calculations or other form of research.
đ
TIL the 203 mm guns of Tourville; from front to back were called: Le Sceptre; Le Sans Pareil; La Syrène; Le Soleil Royal.
And for Duquesne: RĂŠgina; Soleil; Le Saint Esprit; Le Petit Saint AndrĂŠ.
Should have put plaques on them like the Italians.
they did
On the front?
I know (one of) Strasbourg's 130mm DPs have "Reichhoffen" on them.
Ah, okay. Thanks Riche.


of course
I bet the shell that killed the dogkiller Hood had a name given by the loader.
Nah bruv, it was obviously some overly contrived name like Schell 43879070-90 E 50 C 380 -500
Only works if the loader also gives a farewell kiss to the shell before ramming it
French kiss the shell đł
bad idea on "K" type shells
K type as in ones loaded with K Dispositif or?
Re 5), wasn't that more a case of the AO deciding to go rapid fire before reaching an accurate firing solution because he hated the odds he was facing and wanted take the chance of faster hits? Tho in any case German gunnery with their ladder firing is a sort of artificially increasing vertical dispersion for more accurate follow up salvos, sacrificing the ability to maybe land a full salvo straddle with the first broadside.
Pretty much, tho I believe only the first couple salvos were actually ladders, and the rest were just typical half-salvos
I must have misunderstood then.
Yeah you'd only fire a few ladders until you get your range in, after that you can drop that and fire all at the same range
But it does count as going for more dispersion, just that it is calculated dispersion for a purpose
In any case, concern about naval guns being too accurate for their own good is true. Since it will put so much weight on rangefinding (and rangekeeping) being at least ship-sized accurate.
Radar knockouts are common when you first try installing them on ships, but given the time and effort they can be made fairly reliable. In Bismarckâs case it seems to be that the Kriegsmarine probably just never tried a full-salvo firing of 38cm guns during workups for Bismarck
Pretty much
As an example, both the British and Germans concluded after Jutland that the other side wouldâve scored more hits with looser salvo patterns
They used sub caliber guns a lot, because barrels and ammunition are expensive
I think 23cm guns for the Bismarcks
I recall Iowa also having issues when she started firing on Katori, at least something along those lines in her engagement report
Shockproofing was not merely a matter of the radar set itself, but could also be a function of the specific installation on the ship
e.g. New Orleans had her forward radar remain operational despite losing her bow to a magazine detonation
Though what I'd be interested in is how North Carolina's radar handled those early service vibrations
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Featured_topics/Battleships_of_Germany
Damn, the Ugly Sisters get no love from Wikipedia
Which BuShips attributed to her crew being particularly good at shockproofing
What am I looking at there?
the scharns don't have a star
Not featured articles
Sad
You need a fumo
Add a funkgerät while you're at it
I prefer saying FunkMessOrtungsGerät
one could say, it was simply a difference in skill
When the dramatic irruption of German armies in Paris in June 1940 interrupted these promising developments, CSF managed to transfer just in time its magnetron achievements to its English partner GEC. But it is less known that, over the next two years, it also carried on with a clandestine development of its naval centimetric prototype. At the time, no equivalent was found in the Allied Navies, and it could be seen in the global radar story as the first centimetric gun guidance radar. All ended in November 1942 when Hitler gave his troops the order to capture the French fleet in the so-called âFree Zoneâ at Toulon. The CSF test model was destroyed before their arrival, together with the other operational radars that the French Navy had developed at this time. This was the end of French radar researches in the war period.

what year?
what's the spotting ranges for these numbers?
Which numbers
at what range was the Mk8 able to spot ships
the germans will be even more surprised than the british were when the us tells them 'but we already have that'
hm phoenix had a nifty chart of them
Mark 13 is around late 1945 IIRC
Mk8 and Mk13 was fire control, not search 
who are you answering, ard?
why would anyone want centimetric radar for search anyway?
I mean, asking ship spotting range would be weird since FCR was mainly graded for splash spotting 
Iâve not found anything to this effect. Iowaâs radar spots were good enough throughout the Katori action to produce a table of spots that I have, and they likewise produced a similar table (with accompanying MPI errors measured by both radar and air spot) shooting at Nowaki shortly thereafter
Radar range would most likely artificially limited by PRF, tho on USN radar it 's mostly 2 settings of around 20k yards and 40k yards
i.e. long range but slow repetition, or short range but fast repetition
I'll dig up the action report again, I recalk it being an utter pita to look through tho so expect it to take some time
Trials in Saint-Mandrier from 10th to 25th August 1942
gave satisfactory results: the battle-cruisers Dupleix and
AlgĂŠrie were tracked from a distance 16 to 25 km, torpedoboats from 10 to 18 km. Their accuracy range of Âą25 m was
said to be better than the geodesic measurements which were
used in control trials.

battle-cruisers dupleix and algĂŠrie
gotta love the honesty here
algerie the battlecruiser
In May 1942, the entire system was settled in a Command and
Control shelter, rotatable in elevation and azimuth at the
âbattery 340â, still in service in the field test facility of the
Navy at Saint-Mandrier [26]. At the time this device had no
equivalent in the British or American Navies, it may be
historically considered as the first gun guidance centimetric
radar.
At the time this device had no
equivalent in the British or American Navies
can someone fact check?
that they knew of*
this is written with hindsight maka dear
just wonder if he missed some early Mk8 trial
Only some surviving ships, escaping from Algiers or
Dakar, succeeded in sailing to the USA. When the Richelieu
was making a prolonged stay for repairs in the New York
Arsenal in May 1943, the American engineers were very
surprised to discover a totally French-designed radar of which
they had never suspected the existence ! It was a SADIR radar
built in 1939, rescued from Bizerte in 1940, and installed onboard in Dakar in 1941 by the Vichyâs Navy technicians.
lol
đĽ 
ayo where'd everyone go
I am cooking
nice
I am home from work so preparing a meal
bon appĂŠtit
That's most likely true, at least for USN since their early development was mostly L-band
well it's something to be excited about considering all research ceased in 1943-1944 for
reasons we are all familiar with

and it fits in with French RPC and range doctrine post ww1
hi spon
Saa dude
I am not too versed in the lingo of all the radars anyway
it's best to first understand the physics behind it
and the methods
and then get into each radar
and why which one is better
otherwise it's just a loose set of numbers
just good to know that the allies were once again at the forefront of development in that field
dunno about german radar development
would have to ask sirene
The Germans had good radar
Afaik wasn't on par with the allies
But they developed radar fire control and shit
yeah ik
I just don't know the dates
I'd say '43 for fc
maybe they could add smth to the dye to beter reflect radar to detect the shell splashes more clearly

@spiral cedar semi-correcting myself, it does not say that the failures were due to gun blast, but two of Iowa's radars did experience failures causing a 10 minute off-time each
Richie
these vacuum tubes are not bound by your meager human means
How do I tell boy shells from girls?
boy shells have tracer compound

Gender reveal naval bombardment
SG was probably at navigational role at that point, I doubt it disrupt the shelling itself
There was no disruption of gunnery noted, my point was more towards Iowa also having radar issues when engaging Katori which was somewhat correct
Were contact detonators that sensitive? Naval guns can just be thought of as artillery right? The British created a new artillery shell with an updated contact detonator after the Battle of the Somme because shells sank into the mud before detonating and so did not cut the German barbed wire. The only difference between artillery and mortars is that mortars could be fired from the relative safety of a trench and mortar shells are thrown down the mortar.
ofc they weren't
we were making shell x human fanfic
the contact detonator was made to detonate when hitting water at speed
hit the fuse with a hammer 
Artillery fuze would also incorporate inertial safety anyway
Or at least you damn hope they do so
so yeah, no, not even hammer
water at ~400 m/s will do the trick
Surprising the United States of America-an Allied country-repaired the Vichy Navyâs Richelieu.
she wasn't by that point
So De Ruyter?
C801 is De Ruyter
Bote

Very cute
send him to the gulag

I agree
Got a link to the full thing?
Kewl
The Swedish ambassador to the Czech Republic, Fredrik JĂśrgensen, revealed in an interview with Seznam ZprĂĄvy, a Czech internet news website, that Sweden is ready to offer the Czech Republic a free transfer of Gripens that it leased from Stockholm. âMind Bogglingâ â China Developing Tech That Allows Human Brain To Beam Radio Waves & [âŚ]
oh no no
wait wut?!?
They likely know Gripen will always lose to F35 alternative deals
SAAB sales pitch is really something else 
Can always just bribe their government.
reads Operation Torch stuff
Richie was sunk 


different area
this is from Texas shelling ground stuff, not the action vs Jean
I got what I came for
it's time to leave
points and laughs at +15° elevation limit
Time to flood the ballast tanks!
So cute
texas' was never upgraded to 30°?
Because did you know that
Texas
flooded
her
outer
ballast
tanks
to
increase
elevation 
Yeah, no, NY and Texas never got such upgrades
They were never able to fire past 21,000 meters or so
Bretagne got up to 23700 meters with her 23° upgrade in the 20's
and Lorraine I dunno
please spare me
Lorraine iirc should have been 18,000 meters on the one turret with upgraded elevation, though that turret only got installed late in WWI as I recall
oh shit we finally found makas quora account
Though, with the Mle 1912-21 APC I believe the +23° elevation was sufficient for 26,600 meters
Also;
lol
yeah
and the mle.1924 used in the coastal batteries with 47.5° elevation had a max range of 35430 meters

yep
actually, 23700 meters would be a better approximation
the 26600 meters is with the Mle.1924 shell and we dunno if that was used on the BB's
Oh, interesting. I thought 23,700 meters was with the original Mle 1912?
Yeah, before the ballistic cap was added, no?
yes
wait you meant the og mle 1912
The Mle.1912-21 had 23700 m range at 23° elevation
but only the Mle.1924 had 26600 m at 23°
so navweaps goofed up there
Yeah, the navweaps page was throwing me off hard
Just so I can use as a future reference, what's your source for the correct figures?
đ
I mean, hey, at least you get more data on the 340mm than I can get for the 305/46 and 381/40
I don't even have a clear picture of how many kinds of shells and the exact maximum range of the 305/46
lots of conflicting data
Which may just be multiple shell types over time
I can help you with that
I don't suppose on the French end there are any records of Italian naval guns of the WWI era?
I'd have to look for it
The Sovetsky Soyuz class, never-completed battleships of the USSR, are today's subject.
Read more about the ship here:
https://www.usni.org/press/books/russian-and-soviet-battleships-0
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Russian-Soviet-Battleships-Stephen-Mclaughlin/dp/1682477266
"Stalin's Super-battleships: The Sovietskii Soyuz Class" - Warship 2021
N...
for the love of god, just watch this
Ah Drach
The good ol British
Check his Lion video
You see why I call him biased
Also yeah. Don't really listen to him for Italian ships
His British side shows most there
So, if a russia made the video, it would be "unbiased"?
No. If an Italian made it
makes 0 sense but okay
National bias always there Salem
Like would an American explain Abrams with no bias or A Japanese
American one gets more chance to have bias because of national identity
Drach being biased is nothing new
Well he is British. So there is high chance he dislikes Soviets and Italians for being enemies once
Thus it shows in his videos
but the thing is, that even if the soviets completed the ships, they would continue to run into problems
just like admiral kuznetsov
i could see it it panning out like that
never assume malice when incompetence is a probable answer
drach just isnt as smart as he thinks he is
Not sure if it's national bias, but there are weird tendencies of his to pick on things for one nation while showing total leniency for others
At least national bias in the sense you describe it
He does have some national bias that creeps in from time to time. It is particularly glaring with his shitting on the USN's superheavy projectiles for being slow... despite being faster than any UK naval projectile bar Nelsol's failed shells.
Timing of Kuznetsov is horrible. You will realise most of her problems appear after the collapse of Union. When you loss that budget you Need for her
If you give Iowa to Brazil in 1940s. You can bet Iowas would break down alot
even pre collapse, they had problems with even building a carrier or developing a fleet air arm
He'll come out and bash the superheavy shells for being slow, fat pigs - while discussing the UK's leading edge shell designs and such.
tfw infrastructure goes goodbye
It's very blatantly butthurt about the superheavy shells being over supported, which to a degree they are, but he also can't make a solid argument as to why they are bad either.
the argument between me and kremlin can be broken down into this
"But muh russia stronk"
"Noooo Russia not stronk"

You can't really compare Soviet Union with Russia. Since one had %50 larger economy and millions of more people
Tsar Empire
nuance is for witches and the impotent
meanwhile British 356mm shells bending into a đ upon hitting thick armor
That's the main problem. Current Russia can't handle Kuznetsov's maintenance
Older Russia. Which is Soviet. Could have
And they did till the collapse
Was building her sister already
And Nuclear Ulyanovsk
And guess what happened to Sister
China got the money you see
So she is comfy
Also Drach treats anything Italian or French undeservedly horribly
British moment
He does show a lot more leniency towards France to towards Italy tho
could the soviets could have? like in the 1970's maybe, but 1980's? hell no
agfan war moment
and space race
They still had second highest military budget of world by that time
resources in the soviet union were super stretched thin when the space race and arms races was in full swing in the 60's
yeah, but their net GDP per year was not making up for it
that's why they collapsed
Yes. Too much gone to military
and space tech

the soviets also had to deal with more autonomous zones
but also mainly because of the close-border policy
because with china now, people from the west can go study and live there, even have families
but during the era of the soviet union, that was not possible, even in the 80's
plons
oh thank god something else to talk about
yes, like the fact i keep forgetting that the F-35 can actually mount stuff externally if needed
its bizarre to see
Yes. You fuck stealth if you do it
So externally only useful for no radar enemies
Erm, not really

Stealth isn't an on-off switch
Doesn't radar pick up exterior missiles?
bigger cross section but still better than a 4.5 gen probably
It reduces the range at which you'll be detected, but that range is always going to be a function of what kind of radar systems you're dealing with
Stealth is a spectrum and a mindset, not really a tech
And fundamentally a 'stealth' aircraft carrying external weapons is still vastly more difficult to detect at a given range than a 4th or 4.5 gen aircraft carrying external weapon loads (or probably carrying nothing, too).
But I doubt we will ever see someone using beast mode F35
Depends on the context. There are plenty of scenarios in which payload might be more important than reducing detectability, and it might also be a question of if the opposition's AA capacity in an area is really that much of a threat

I mean, say your SEAD/DEAD operation has neutralized the S-400 battery responsible for protecting whatever you want to hit in a given area.
Suddenly maximizing VLO performance is a lot less important.
How do you confirm you take out all mobile radars or mobile anti air missiles? By using satellite or not getting locked anymore?
Always wondered it
Drach's latest vid:
"The Caribbean in WW2 - Oil, Sugar and the French"

Richel when French content from AL: 
Richel when French content from Drach: 

me when Navweaps fucks up: 

Me finding the wiki guy who type Non cemented armor line for Soyuz 
I mean

I mean, that is sort of the reason they decided to make it so thick
It was a way of compensating for the reduced performance of their armor at any given thickness versus foreign counterparts
So let's say they went with 375mm non cemented. What would the effective armor thickness difference would be compared to cemented 375mm
More or less than 100mm?
that'll depend on the shell you are throwing at it
I am of the opinion that against high quality, hard capped shells, a good homongenous armor will outperform cemented.
Note how high quality hard capped shells are known to penetrate further into face-hardened/cemented armor than homogenous in live firing data.
It will outperform hard capped AP shells at high obliquity hits yes
but at close to 90° impact it will likely be less effective than cemented
The issue was investigated to a great deal with thousands and thousands of live fire tests and the like in AFV design, and the universal conclusion was to drop hardened armor. There was far more work done in AFV design than with naval, but physics won't change.
I'm not too comfortable about using AFV armor logic on ships
the shells are just so much lighter
and the armor is comparatively similar in thickness

I mean, the issue is that the physics reason it ended up doing so is quite simple: the hardened layer is worthless protection wise and only serves to shatter/erode the shell.
and in tanks, oblique hits are much more likely to occur
If the hardened layer can't shatter or erode the shell, it's pointless to have it.
yes
but atleast shattering it in ship terms will render it somewhat inert
as where in a tank the shrapnell will kill crew
Yeah, but I don't think high quality hard capped shells are getting eroded or shattered. In which case your BB is wasting LoS thickness with the hardened layer.
Really is going to depend on the specific qualities of the two plates.
And to be frank I don't know how much it will change based on shell size, though design probably would impact it. One of the only data points for naval shells where I have both cemented and homogenous penetration data is for the RM 203mm, which generally sees the shells penetrating ~9% greater against homogenous plates versus cemented.
eg, the USN spent an enormous amount of money on simply trying to get their shells as shatter proof as possible
to make sure it would not be rendered inert
%9 huh
that's sort of what the Japanese did with Yamato
but is it worth it?
Mr burning bird, you disappoint me, didn't I send you detailed tables of German homogenous vs cemented performance?
clearly need to add some more gasoline
Average, yeah. I have only a limited number of data points and it varies from 8.5 to 9.5% for what I have
I'm on my laptop right now and all the German files you sent me are on my PC
đŚ
From the looks of them it's between 5 to 10% for the 283mm shell from Scharnhorst
tho I just looked at 30+° impacts there
Latest images of Shandong carrier CV-17. There are two new J-15D electronic attack jet models on the deck. Fujian carrier CV-18 will also be equipped it in future.

vs decap layer
man
This Welt article suggests that the trilateral FCAS future combat air system being jointly developed by France, Germany and Spain may not go ahead. If it does fall apart, it will be interesting to see what each nation does instead. #TempestFugit
never would've seen this coming /s
European collab never works huh. Except Typhoon perhaps
Got a feel Tank collab will also die as well
Sure
This means alot Richel
PANG was going to use FCAS
If FCAS is dead. PANG will need a new next gen plane
Cool
Rich your lack of hype is torturing
no, it's collaboration with france that arent ships
Idc about modern military procurement krem
QE class collab with British and France
Uhuh
French: Make it nuclear
British: No Diesel
France left
barely a thing
Exactly
:ShinanoSleep:


Why you guys need LPD
why not
Dunno can be spend for another class
@chilly osprey do we know anything about the actual LPD(X)?
because the renders with the forward 127mm or the horizon layout with the sovraponte look mighty sus
127, 2 76mm sovraponte, 16 VLS
2 76mm Strales, 1 sovraponte, forward MLRS? 
also 16 cells
@ivory ridge
Long and short of it;
The plan is for three LPDs in the 15,000 to 20,000-ton range to replace the three 8,000-ton San Giorgio-class currently in service. They're going to have a discontinuous flight deck like the American San Antonio's, rather than the full deck seen on the San Giorgio-class.
The idea is that, aside from the usual LPD features (well deck, garage deck, aircraft hangar) the MMI want to have the ships able to operate tactical and micro UAVs/USVs/AUVs. Self-defense armament is supposed to be limited, with lower-caliber weapons than the 76mm, and the MMI apparently wants them to have the ability to launch loitering drones.
The ships should start fabrication probably in the near future, as current plans have the delivery dates for the ships running from 2028 to 2032 (presumably then 2028/2030/2032 for delivery years).
The render we've seen thus far for the design, which should not be taken as final, is this;
Yeah, no
That was wishful thinking on the part of some forumners
Who were rather dissappointed when RID mentioned that they weren't planning a 76mm on the class
the 76mm version looked more realistic, especially with the sovraponte 
so what are those things in the front
30mm?
no uh
25?
These renders are unofficial (made by XTanguero), but are definitley closer to what the MMI has been looking at
Hard to tell but they kind of look like Marlin 30mm RWS
This reminded me that the game Naval Art has the 127, the 76, the italian/german 30mm but not the Dardo 40mm
sadface.png
Can we bring back the fast forty
And they even offer it with a funky angular turret now, too
France pretty much just announced their own version
Lol
Nexter and Thales presented exclusively for Naval News their new RAPIDFire remotely operated naval gun system. This complete solution includes the 40 mm CTA gun, an integrated fire control system, an operator console and a sighting system.
=====================
The RAPIDFire system developed by the consortium formed by Thales and Nexter has...
Fasty Forty vs RAPIDFire
Except one has a high rate of fire
And the other, is, uh, quite competitive
For 1945
Ok, sorry, I'm being too harsh here
But, Fast Forty is 300-450 rpm (per gun), and the RAPIDFire is 200 rpm
Fast Forty came in singles and twins
Just that typically the twin mount gets called DARDO

Which is, iirc, specifically the fire control system
DARDO can be either the 'regular' Compact or Fast Forty version, as I understand it
DARDO is more referring to the system as a whole
yes but what im saying is that i dont think the twin version of the fast forty was ever actually made 
ah
Yeah honestly I'm not sure if it was
Looking at Friedman's World Naval Weapon Systems and it actually only notes specific Fasty Forty sales as being singles to Kuwait, but those figures are only good up to 2004/5
maybe someday he'll come out with a new version, it's been a literal >15 years at this point
AL fletcher
because you can mount whatever gun you want
last news i find of them trying to sell it was 2013
I'm pretty sure the spicy new AARGM-ER just outright outranges S-400's missiles which are capable of shooting at tactical aircraft
And even then, with a 300 km range, I doubt you'd even spot an F-35 carrying them externally
Before it's closed to a more comfortable launch range
Tbh, we're getting to the sort of range where slapping a pair of AARGM-ERs onto anything big that S-400 would be flinging it's longest range missiles at might be worth it
TFW SEAD capability is hitting meme levels
Considering AARGM-ER is just AARGM but new engine and funny shape for range
This also means it's an AShM

A view of Daring-class destroyer HMAS Duchessâ open bridge.
Source: https://t.co/qGKMhReXvq
I wonder why we didn't enclose her bridge in that 50s refit
Since the other Darings had their enclosed for NBC iirc
Style points?
Nah it's prolly something to do with her being a loan from the British for 4 years before we took on full ownership
Probably for better air spotting/night battle...though that concern was around 30 years old at that point
Don't want to get run over by another carrier in the middle of night
I FOUND THE FUNNY MANS HOUSE
Nah we'd abandoned open bridges by this point
SUBSCRIBE!
Become a Lord and Patron of the channel https://www.patreon.com/okchamp
Subscribe: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDguFGmttEVCCORCBvSCxng?sub_confirmation=1
Like us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/OKChampVideos/

Yeah looks like it
What if we kissed outside William Bligh's House đł
map showing how many years regions were a part of the Roman Empire (east & west).
Aight finished my IWM trip

Very good museum, well laid out, well written, not apologist for the empire
I like
However
It's wayyy smaller than the AWM which means it has to kind of rush through things a lot which I found a little annoying
There's also fewer war prizes and exhibits
Overall the smaller size takes away from the stories the museum tries to tell and I think that's sad
Today Bahia celebrates her 199th year of independence
It's sounds strange at first, but we had to fight Portuguese loyalist troops in the Northeast and on the Cisplatine region (present day Uruguay)
2nd of July marks the end of the siege of Salvador, capital of Bahia.
After 4 months of siege, InĂĄcio LuĂs Madeira de Melo, commander of the portuguese forces in Salvador, surrendered
the highest level of sophisticated discussion one can expect from two named "explosivepancake9" and "nachocheeze60"

Baby fremm
Cute
i love
I can't ping maka for this on mobile for some reason
But here's a piece of Arizona
Neat
fucking mobile discord
Got any shells?

Jaba isn't maka
Ghost ping đ

Have 42cm German shell
Seems like a K type dye ap shell
Nice























