#history
1 messages · Page 218 of 1
Imagine just circling and not shooting at all
Tactics that should be tried on Samar
french ww1 version of the concept
time to swarm Dreadnought
"you see tovarish, if hull is whole planet, tank can never be disable"
@ivory ridge @tough quail Found the picture.
1967
But I don't fucking remember where
But wat of the turret
wows player moment
second best protected battleship of the 1940s and the best protected of her weight class
hopelessly fragile in wows
"Tanky" battleship players with huge superstructures when they see a DD shooting 1000 HE shells per minute in smoke
yes i have touched the game before
sure she gets HE spammed easily but the german BBs also get cucked by their superstructure
italian bb accuracy
Bad accuracy compensates for skill issue because shells fly in such a large area that a miss can be a hit instead
🧠
so true
english naval literature issue
Uncle Drach said shell quality issue
then the hit is an overpen

at least he doesn't call the bismarck a "he"
TRUE

jaba pls
france had to build 4 richelieu's to counter 2 bismarcks...
come on
and the nitpicked dispersion too
aaaaa
Use a French one at least
yeah you're right gonna use my monza fund to buy a mas 36
or two, and do the bayonet lock trick for increased bludgeoning weight
not a lebel?
lebel is too precious to hit him with
omg...
US build 6 Iowa to counter 2 Nagato 5Head
perfect fit for his butthole
US built 11 CVNs to counter 0 russian CVs
Ridiculous. The US actually built 6 Iowas to counter 4 Kongous
Russian CV broken
What
483483 fletchers to counter mutsuki
*Shimakaze
thats what the 3546348 gearings and sumners are for
1 france to counter 1 europe
Tru

24 Essexes for 1 Taihou
3000 black liberty ships of USA vs one kashino
3 Yamatos for 2 North Carolinas 
the 3584693464463246 clemsons are to counter the omnipresent japanese torpedo boats russia warned them about
quiet frenchy
1 funny moustache man to counter 1 funny moustache man
shaddap
1 guy on wheel chair to counter one nerd with glasses
me dumb , is high number good or bad
The Bismarck had excessive stability in many respects in that her GM exceeded the "good design practice" standard for GM (at last 5%, but no more than 10%) of the beam. Too much stability results in an unduly "stiff" ship with somewhat unpleasant rolling characteristics which tend to degrade weapon's systems effectiveness.
or is this some weird subclass shenanigans i dont remember
There’s a “sweet spot”
Is "good design standard" is everything with US flag?

This is…not how endurance works
German colonies:
CB-1 Alaska
No

Tru
You won't see Manny shitting on Alaska tho still
dunkerque
Im not a mathematician but im sure 20 is lower than 10
hi
have you met me
🤓 Battleship
What's the worst insult you can do for Alaska
um akshually she's broken in wows
duilio
she's one of like two ships i think are ugly
She looks like a better ship stepped on her amidships
yeah pretty much
The single funnel is fucking ugly and that's all
whomegalul
I'd rather have a klondike bar
alaska is like
this bizarre bundle of every bad aesthetic in the usn
with as little of the good aesthetics as they could fit
she looks pretty alright from the front
and you get to the sides
and
SDFGHSFGWSRHWS

her best angle wink wink
and you ask yourself, "where did it all go wrong"
most beautiful ship ever built
sip
Denied
the bits jutting off of the forward superstructure and the funnel dont help
Bread box looking ass
everything looks janky and unconnected
Looks like a piece of toast
like a bad shipbucket kitbash in real life
Doom Barn*
OH NO
Doomed barn
yeah it looks like a barn that was flooded
It's still in service
ayo horse
literally italian
doesn't put this as most beautiful ship
she has one thing going for her

real talk tho, in one of drach's dockyards someone asked him if Italian ships looked good because they were legally required to
which of course is a stupid question
and while he's correct that no, it wasnt a thing
he uses faa d i bruno as an example
ig this is why GPT3 thinks biscuit has 16in guns
H-39 moment
It's literally a ww1 ship, even if such a law was used during the fascist regime, this ship wouldnt have been built under it
you know Alaska was good since her turrets cost more than those of Iowa
Can richy have sextuple guns if they were 12 inches

tfw h39 would still be undergunned compared to richelieu anyway
You guys never purged your engineers right? So the guys who designed that ship in ww1 continued in ww2?
absolutely fantastic
Yes
incredibly half baked cruiser killer that was delayed so long that the cruisers just kind of died by themselves, horrendous logistics waste due to using new guns that nothing else will use ala burke, and just
by the time Bismarck gets within a range where richy's dispersion "issues" disappear, she's already sunk from shells blowing up her boiler room from the bottom of the hull

you can have the same people, but no company in 10-20 years will have the same people
Tfw Alaska helped creation of Stalingrad 
I see

ish
but family owned companies
afaik stalingrad was mostly in response to the like
absolute fucking deluge of british and american cruisers still afloat
When were stalingrad blueprints being drawn up
and again, it's about laws not who was designing it
Started around 1943? Finalized in 1950s

1950 to be more exact

Remember Riga in wows? That's 1943 design of Stalingrad

smolingrad
Yeah but wasn't scrapped no? Iowas did come back after being decommissioned
So until the scrapping. They were sus
still, the bigger reason for a cruiser killer isnt to kill
you know
other cruisers killers
its the 368396830 british and american cruisers loitering everywhere
Of course. Stalingrad is also a cruiser killer
She would only run away from BBs
Ye. But Des Moines, Worcesters were being a thing too
And while Stalingrad could run away from BBs, it's kind of hard to justify its existence in the face of naval aviation already proving its worth at shitting on BBs in WW2
Like if it runs into a bunch of American/British cruisers it can roflstomp them, that's what it's intended to do
but
as cool and good as the stalingrads were it was mostly just stalin pushing for them
thus why the navy immediately cancelled them when the guy died
That's why her only defender was Stalin himself. She got scrapped after his death. After being tested for anti ships missiles and torps
and then
yea
shoot the big boom
He was fan of BBs before ww2
But when BBs sunk like no tomorrow
He preffered heavy cruisers after ww2
""cheaper""
Dunno man. Project 24 vs Project 82 does sound cheaper 
tankette moment
i mean yes you're
comparing ships one half the tonnage of the other
compare the """heavy cruisers""" to treaty BBs
Ye. Thus cheaper
Treaty? Why would you go with treaty after ww2
treaty as in that tonnage
Ah
truly qoefyl arrangement
Any idea what this means
Well Soviets wanted a BB that can counter Iowa in 1v1. So that tonnage wouldn't help much
they're cheaper compared to a soyuz but yeah they're uh, damn expensive either way
Imagine if Kuznetsov became the Ruler after Stalin. Heavy focus on carriers instead missiles
ok but that's still not the point, because we were talking about stalingrad, which wont 1v1 an iowa
so the 35k tons BB dont need to do that either
but will still fuck over any cruiser
while being more protected
and while having more of a chance against bigger BBs than the BCs
Awful
true. Closest example is Borodino I guess
but like
Sure Iowa was initially meant to do BB things and fight kongos and shit
but they pushed them into being a bodyguard for carriers pretty quickly
Yea same thing for alaska
Rumoured Japanese cruiser
Meant to kill smaller cruisers
Oh
I thought Alaska and Churchill class was designed to counter a mysterious large cruiser Japan was building
and then the japanese actually designed azuma
Ye

Yeah alaska was meant to kill a potential Japanese large cruiser and other Japanese cruisers
but
There was no large cruiser design in Japan when Alaska blueprints were finalized
wows moment
resisting urge to samar wank
I wonder
I guess…technically, Surigao…but that’s really the torpedoes and not the guns
Montana was the other side of the US BB design split iirc
pain
they wanted to make a fast battleship design, and a heavier battleship design
they weren't designed against anything
Yeah the true BB split. But still gotta have an enemy In mind
they just wanted "bigger BB"
Is it same with Yamato?
Or did Yamato expected vs Arizona or smh
What does this have to do with the KGVs as ships
yamato was part of the decisive battle thing
so they were basically designed to just beat up any BB they came across in general
Ahh explains why Japan wanted 510mm later. Likely expected US to build something bigger than 460mm
What about Baltimore vs Chapa
More Colorado. Yamato got 18.1” guns in large part to “outrange” the Colorados
I mean
Speak of Overkill
UK has no heavy cruisers but a town class vs a chapayev is roughly comparable
but there's a lot more towns
And Sverdlovs 
tfw forgets Sverdlovs
Knowing how to build a galleon means you can build a great bb
Also fijis and minotaurs
the rest were cancelled and their parts were rendered up to build Super Molotov
Kinda less than I expected
3 galissonnieres
If only we could've had the minotaur 
Ah yes, the KGVs had the most main-gun broadside of any battleship 
my fav wows ship
pic related
I remember when the British built the Hood against the German D-class battleships
oh no he's onto me
ah yes the blablabla tradition of shipbuilding where they use all the key technological advances embodied in super dreadnoughts such as
us turret arrangement
us armor arrangement
us tds design
and many other things british
I love them, some are in friedman's too
lol where does one start
With a hotdog perhaps
you ok there maka
Oh ffs
just more poking fun then your comment on it
yours is matter of fact observation but mine is more pointing out specific lols
a gallon of chocolate milk
bote
POV: you’re an American rebel in the war of independence looking for 4 redcoats in a green forest
where are they?
smol bote gud
dont bait maka with redcoats she's gone through enough as is
which bote is this
very pretty
they're getting there

we've moved to warm from antarctica climate in hot or cold
I’m just gonna ask random naval history questions in quora and see what sort of bs answers I get
"the hms vanguard was..."
A battleship
at least it's a ship with good armor
the rest is questionable but at least they didn't answer with like bismarck
as far as "most advanced" goes yeah i'd probably give it to them, the only better armored ship that was actually built was yamato and that's in large part through sheer brute force
A fully armoured Battlecruiser!
thats iowa goof
oh no
I wonder how the “weak stern issue” was “resolved”
Richie and JB are anything but unproven considering the breadth of scenarios they were subjected to lol
Presumably by sinking
correct
no it was resolved by removing the stern
no stern = no weak stern
just blast it off yourself
Legendary damage
the tall boys were there to hack her stern off
Some midget subs
they uh
A torp to the rear rudder
markedly did not return home from the "legendary damage"
nor was 90% of the damage neccesary for their demise
Legendary damage such as a single 14” (weakest shell ever) shell penning the fuel tanks
ehh they do need a thorough beating to actually sink
they're just comically easy to mission kill
and they need a beating just because they're really fucking wide
not because their protection scheme is good
nevada killing bismarck

Yes
get richy's barrels and start shelling their shitty frigates

a dunk looking at a german dd would sink it
this isn't even a crappy take this is literally just, where did you even see this information
it goes from 'this is stupid' all the way to just immense confusion


Yamamoto battleschip
bismarck sank one ship, it's the greatest battleship ever put to sea
I don't get it
kraut garbage

all of it is wanked to the moon unless its actually good
thats why nobody talks about panzer 2s or elbings
people only talk about the deutschlands because they're a novelty

uh
man that's like, wrong of onion layers
20% overloard for more than three minutes would literally detonate the boilers straight into her fucking magazines

35 knot richie at overload time
yet another boost of speed, genius
german ship designed hailed as outstanding as they break another world record
by hurtling a 15" barrel from the mangled B turret through the air at an astonishing mach 1.4
Could Bismarck get 1 more SHP if it was watercooled
Hey Richy, did you know that Richy’s gun blew up because it was loaded with a 381 mm shell

I consider this a strength

bruh
Typical Quora answer
use Wikipedia
assume peculiar starting conditions
give hand-wavey answer dependent on an overly simplistic model
get hundreds of positive votes
he of all people should know that you can easily dettach rudders with this simple german trick
-blows up the rudder-
jb in the 50s would pulverize bismarck what
lol
She could probably do it with just HE
lets be real even in the 40s jb could just
sail around in circles until bismarcks boilers die
and she runs out of ammo before scoring any real hits on her
WoWs and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race
have random roman theatre i found in my saved pics
guess the city for a magical prize of ||nothing||
Underwater AP from her working turret would do the job
at least they have a little bit of merit this time such as smaller target and thick front bulkheads/turrets
Unironically, this is a huge reason I use all-forward designs in RTW
"oh no you crossed my T, look at how little I care"
Also better for dodging torpedoes
Is it in the north west?
North east
meanwhile me in rtw closing to like 5km and wiggling profusely as an optimal battle strategy


Yeah exactly
future naval historians will look at my ship movements in battles and want to gouge out their eyes

the ship's logs are impossible to read as it's just an order being given every other shell firing to change angle 2 degrees
“dozens of rounds per gun”
I guess. technically, ten dozen is “dozens…”
every time I see distances like that as what ships should stay at it enters a surreal dimension
yeah just uh, make sure the enemy doesn't get within 35km
this is how real ships fight
Ye olde crane
Yes, the Germans would of course do exactly what the British did at Denmark Strait, as is their national character
it has its own wikipedia page
https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ursus_(pontone-gru)
L' Ursus è un pontone-gru varato nel 1914, ma completato nel 1931, dichiarato poi Bene di interesse culturale come pezzo di archeologia industriale della città di Trieste. Strutturalmente il complesso è costituito da un pontone con propulsione propria sul quale è montata una grossa gru composta da una torre girevole sulla quale è incernierato un...
it is!
if you have exactly two ships in a completely empty stretch of the pacific ocean
so it's technically a ship
and neither side gets bored
Bismarck zig zagging her way into never getting an accurate firing solution

The naval historian Drachinifel answers this better than I can.
hog big is the cranesarge crane 
where did the fucking myth of german accuracy come from
they almost always shot like fucking dogshit
Wehraboos trying to figure an explanation of twin turrets
germany should have been partitioned and every mention of it scrubbed from every history book on earth
at least the porsche lmdh looks nice
Spoilsport

yeah we only use HISTORICAL FACTS here
like BISMARCK absolutely fucking OWNING HOOD and killing SEVENTEEN BILLION SAILORS
“Period records of the time contradict your claims”
“Well, I’m a detective, so I know you can’t trust the documents”
disregard her getting mission killed by wales, her sister getting bombed uselessly in a fjord, scharn and gneis doing effectively nothing but break down while firing at renown, north cape, narvik, barents sea, yada yada
Marat singlehandedly halted the entire german army during barbarossa

What did you do today
probably not
working an extra day to cover a sick co worker
Thank you maka

mode'le
è
Failed escape attempt 
Ę
(pronounced modulay in my head)
Found the Nazi party
1937
Bombard Shanghai
unfortunately
I feel less than confident about those shell walls
Ah yes, 1920 SoDak, the superbattleship
i read that as superb battleship at first
tho like
tbh
it's not that far off for 1920s
it's not yamato sized but still
the 16''/50s on it are absurdly powerful for the time period and future shs capable
dimension wise it's not that big though
lol
Given how long these were, they probably landed base-first at extreme range exceedingly often too
lol
richelieu has an army of cats he could sic on bismarck
Yamato
Slow battleship

yamato ain't that slow, but no
i mean
Tomorrow I will continue my lego scale model work
given japan's oil reserves you could call her slow in another sense

Night
i tab out of here to avoid bad quora takes and then get met with azov wanking shitposts so now im back here
limitless pain

extremely based
this really is a maka moment
far less delusional tankies though
wheeze

:jimmyneutron:
that sure do be how the usn do
the legendary sodak hit and run convoy raider
a type of ship certainly faster than bismarck but less protected
i too remember 35kn sodak
who needs armor when you have speed
Wait, were Ise' planes allowed to recover?
40 knots minimum for any capital ship
maybe he comes from an alternate reality where the lexingtons exist
since that would make his statement make any sense
wah
Could crane the floatplanes back on board after they landed in water
But not the non-floatplanes
Oh wait, they were a mix? Hmm..
Lemme guess, non floatplane go Tenno heika
just overclock the engines tbh
Only land-based units were kamikazes
The Ise ones were just meant to land at nearby island airfields

what
the ghost of berci appears
but what if british ship [statement so far out of left field it wins a game of baseball]
i once took a shit aboard one of the tribal class and it sank instantly
the royal navy sucked
the tribal struck her while sinking and the british played it off as a german fault
that oddly reminds me of that one happening where british bbs were ramming their own subs
get out of the water you pansy bitches
inflexible is one of the last names of a ship you want to hit you
minimum flex
The submerged endurance was much less than expected, 8 nmi (9.2 mi; 15 km) at 8 kn

bruh
cursed
Is there even a BB guns that performs better on long range than close range
inb4 rocket assisted shell
You just got Zumwalted
For any gun, vertical pen is always better at short range, and horizontal pen is always better at long range. But generally speaking, heavier shells retain energy better over long range, and thus have better performance against homogeneous and horizontal armor overall (and generally also inflict more damage), whereas lighter shells have higher initial velocities and flatter trajectories and thus are better against facehardened armors (plus larger danger spaces). 'Course, you need to make sure your shell is aerodynamically fit for its length, so you can't go too far into either extreme without carefully working out the ballistics either.
Richelieu 380mm AP - 1949 lb, 2723 fps
Bismarck 38cm AP - 1764 lb, 2690 fps

yeah okay i was thinking
the french didn't really pick between low weight/high velocity or high weight/low velocity
they picked "yes"
So quantum shells with varying velocity and weight
Some really low hanging fruits, not going to lie.
time to revive r/ShitQuoraSays
Is there a source where I can read about each navies' doctrine on loading mechanisms?
Is there historical reason for *Joffre * to ends up in Vichy France? 
she was still under construction at St Nazaire when France fell
I guess it's almost completely random whether a ship ends up in FF or VF in this game
I mean, Jean Bart was with FF her entire life but here ends up with VF
she gets shot at by mass because she's vf
yeah uh
Jean Bart's most famous accomplishment was fighting against allied forces during Operation Torch
so no shit she's gonna be with Vichy
oh right, somehow I blanked on the entire Casablanca episode 
Then ranger dropped fat loads on her 
and then bort outlived her

Outlived her to see the suez crisis?
Careful what you wish for 
oklahoma outliving all the yamatos
challenge hellcats? aviation battleship?
alright let's get you to bed
Then perish
3 torpedo bombers, almost enough to give a single alone fletcher pause
average Kancolle player
Love how someone else commented
“Warspite is an aviation battleship because her seaplane actually sank something”
scrolls further
“Battleships were obsolete as soon as Saratoga was launched as a carrier”

like uhh
The naval battle of Guadalcanal would like a word
the ww2 battle style of clumping carriers to overwhelm surface units and that not being differentiated from what a single carrier can do or is for has been a disaster for strategy discussions
it's akin to saying the clemson horde made battleships obsolete because if you clump them and run them into surface units they would win
Guadalcanal went that way because carriers present might as well not present at all
Also night action in general was a show stopper for carriers until well into postwar
Just
Floatplane
alone is a
against Hellcats
Are you going to use that pontoon to ram that hellcat to death?
to be fair, maybe all 4 could give 1 hellcat a challenge
oh, N1K1 was indeed a floatplane. Never mind.
But back on topic
OS2Us and SC Seahawks also have guns and bombs on board
N1K1 was never actually operational, bruh
Therefore, the US fields aviation cruisers, aviation battleships, and aviation destroyers
not like it's too far from the truth anyway after their refits
Lmfao
I asked for a source on the “can challenge hellcats” claim and he linked to Wikipedia
To be fair, the N1K1 series are very good planes
“B-but having a hangar makes you an aviation battleship!”
Breaking news, Portland now considered an aviation battleship, more at 11
That said, only 97 of the floatmobile N1K!s were made
Exactly
What flight deck?
EXACTLY
Worst part is
This is in the comments of a post comparing AL and Kancolle
So you know exactly where this dude’s getting this idea from
Would have to check, but whatever the British sent to sink her when she returned to Germany without her stern
lol, I thought you were referring to the one she lost, that got salvaged by the Norwegians and used against the Germans
Nvm, that was Hipper's
Oh
Lol
No, I meant the one they did throw up as cap to at least disrupt some of the torpedo drops
Molotov Carrier confirmed since Spitfire 

boilers activated
Historical quotes time
Down to listing the built-in 20mm and free fall bombs as proof of "multi mission ability" lmao
true multirole capability

good bote
Bote
Looks like a shitpost
Like you know those memes with the american flag and the bald eagle in the background

Heavy uav
Euro drone
@rapid junco check drachinifel's channel
Yeah
I'll watch after my extra physics class that'll have in 10 minutes 

Still
I'm very happy and anxious too see it
Although i'm wondering if he committed any mistakes
Especially regarding the M class' armament
I'm pretty sure they were fine ships
They're
I'm talking about the sources he used
For example
This is what Wikipedia says about it
I know it says "as designed"
But i don't show their actual armament
Or this 
There was plenty of warships built before the M class
The 1930s and 40s were kind of a "boom" on naval construction here
Or some sources citing their main guns as 5"/38 Mk12 (in reality is Mk21)
So i'm like
Very happy but apprehensive about that video
Well
Time for my extra physics class
See ya later 
cya
It's their other name
Even though the last ship was named "Greenhalgh" 
Class is over
I'll be watching Drach video
And i'll be giving me conclusion soon™️
Just finished the video
And wow
i'm so happy
He didn't made any mistakes 
And he used some of the pictures i posted on his server as well 
Hope soon he covers the Amazonas class
Which is wrongly referred as "Acre class"
Looks breedable
bruh?
nice magazine
You wouldn't miss an opportunity to have an offspring with a warship vessel would you? Can you grasp the splendor of it? The intelligence of human brain. Amalgamated with efficiency, durability, firepower and obedience of the machine.

194mms
wdym ardwar
@manic latch Since you're here
most famous Heli with Apache
Ye 48 nations? Had Hind
Replacing with what? 
I dunno tbh
Although the FAB's attention is on the Gripen program at the moment
Nations that used or had Hind 
lmao why not both 
Their name here was "AH-2 Sabre"
wdym lol, exactly the same as Iowa
But your only attack helicopter is the Hind, Mil Mi-35M
You sure gripen is replacing it?
I'm just saying they don't have any replacements now
Just like the Naval Aviation don't have a replacement yet for the AF-1 Falcão (Douglas A-4 Skyhawk)
The Gripen is for replacing the F-5s (Northdrop)
Yeah the other options were F-18 and Su-57 I think
Or offers let's say
Oh and Rafale
So out of F-18, Rafale, Gripen and joining Su-57 program offers. SAAB won for the Brazil

I do wonder when the Navy will open the bidding for substituting the AF-1s
Yeah
66 Gripens btw 
You mean 36 
Nvm, I thought how the magazine was placed on a very fine section of the hull and level with the propshaft which means shallow too was a bit weird
considering it was Duguay-Trouin, it makes sense tho
36 initially
Then the first Batch was extended to 40
Then a second batch was announced recently
With 26 more

Maybe when the Naval Aviation decides to substitute the AF-1s
They can choose for Rafales 
SAAB may get good influence there
large hull small displacement
draft: smol
Yep
They even offered once to build some Koster class mine countermeasures ships
With the transference of two used ones
freeboard, YES
Well
I need to check that info again
Although that would be good
Since the Minesweeping force today consists of 3 Schutze/Aratu class minesweepers from the 70s
@shrewd pecan imagine having a Harem like this
Without 35, 32 and X of course. They aren't legal
F-35's cockpit canapé looks like heisenberg from breaking bad
Some of them had a new paint
Although it offuscates the BNAV ensign
Now it looks almost similar to the ensign of the Argentine Naval Aviation
This one for you Riche
The AF-1s on the deck of São Paulo 


Is this your car
does anyone remember what these things are?
paravanes
@edgy linden https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paravane_(weapon)
The paravane , a form of towed underwater "glider" with a warhead that was used in anti-submarine warfare, was developed from 1914–16 by Commander Usborne and Lieutenant C. Dennistoun Burney, funded by Sir George White, founder of the Bristol Aeroplane Company. It was used against naval mines and submarines.
Mines are fascinating weapons
Its so easy to place them
But removing them is pain
be careful, you might traumtise british
Mmm, the Falklands were a good lesson in why your ships need to be able to defend themselves against sea-skimming missiles
It would be really, really dumb for any country to loose an AAW ship to similar small-scale attacks 40 years later.
Yeah missiles are overpowered
Are there an examples where anti ship missile attacks were successfully repelled?
Was it Iraq? Or somewhere else?
Yeah I think it was Uss Missouri in desert storm
"USS Missouri was bombarding Iraqi ground targets inside occupied Kuwait when a “Seersucker” was detected. The battleship launched SRBOC chaff rockets, while HMS Gloucester fired two Sea Dart surface-to-air missiles (SAMs) at the “Seersucker”, destroying it."
"this event was the first time in history that a warship shot down a missile with a missile"
Did Seersuckers used sea-skimming?
I don't remember it
side eyes Norway losing a frigate to a tanker
That's shows the great engineering of Burke class
Since those girls do end up ramming someone time to time
But don't result in sinking
But Norway's ship was using their most modern damage control no? Did systems fail or crew error?
It was largely down to crew errors
Automation is the future then I guess. US is reducing the crew number on their new ships with such technology.
Maybe we should work on damage control AIs
There are actually a lot of cases throughout their historical use, just a relatively limited number of hardkill defenses. The vast majority of AShM attacks tended to be defeated by sofkill measures

That said, probably the most recent example of a hardkill defense against AShMs is the USS Mason's actions off Yemen (Oct 2016)
2 AShMs on 3 Oct, 2 on 12 Oct, and finally a five-missile salvo on 15 Oct
Falklands War, depending on your definition of “repelled.” The Argentine Super Entenards attacked with Exocet missiles, targeting (depending on your source) HMS Ambuscade or HMS Hermes. The defensive measures worked, with chaff successfully causing the missiles to lose their intended targets—only to then lock onto, hit, and sink the M/V Atlantic Conveyor carrying eight helicopters and significant logistical support. Oops.
Ah by repel I mean destroying it before it hits a target
Or making it miss with counter measures
Bear in mind this reflects all engagements from 1992 and prior and nothing beyond that date (as this analysis is from 1994);

Maybe detection is number one priority as well?
Since both measures won't work for things they can't see
Being aware is a huge element, yes
The analysis above splits ships into three categories, in fact
- Defenseless Targets (non-warships with no defensive measures available)
- Defendable Targets (warships that had the ability to defend themselves but did not)
- Defended Targets (warships with the ability to defend themselves and actively did so).
The hit rate on defenseless targets was 91.3%, those on defendable targets 68.4%, and those on defended targets, 26.4%
The Syrians fired missiles at 45 kilometres, 25 kilometres beyond the range of the Israeli Gabriel missiles. As the Styx missiles drew closer, the Israelis employed a series of electronic countermeasures that had never been used in combat. They fired chaff rockets, which produced clouds of aluminium chaff that presented false images to the Styx radar. Electronic jamming systems sent out false radar signals to confuse the guidance systems on the approaching missiles. All missiles fired by the Syrians missed their targets and crashed into the sea.
1973 Yom Kippur War, Battle of Latakia
Awareness is a huge factor, as unaware targets often fail to react in time or initiate defenses. And this makes effectively makes them defenseless, even if they tend to be harder to hit in the first place.
Of course, a defendable target can also be one that was aware of the threat but was complacent to it - this is, for example, what happened to the USS Stark.
You can use early warning planes to help these right
I wonder if you can give warships drones that does similar work with early warning planes
Yeah, AEW is suppose to give you early warning of incoming attacks so they don't appear out of nowhere. And, if you have CEC capabilities, they can even help you engage them beyond the horizon.
We're probably not there you. You want your AEW platforms to be able to operate at a high altitude and for a long period of time
Which is why it usually requires you have a carrier around with a catapult
Vtol AEW 
So it's not something you can just have take off from the average frigate's helicopter pad
F35 fans keep comparing their radar to AEW planes
It's the best you can get on STOVL platforms 

AEW-variant out of the FVL program when?
Lockmart and Leonardo, with our powers combined...
You can slap radar on top of Osprey in theory right
Or maybe rotors or balance would fuck it up
Nevermind Osprey production is ending soon
Yeah, AEW Osprey was never really considered that seriously
@maiden citrus https://twitter.com/DrNWillburger/status/1540424661590331396?t=3rVpEJ25vhZLQszvlXttdA&s=19
what a jackpot of a discovery
Poggies
klondike bar
that's literally covering every option
Or red
looks extremely fan-arty
Yeah 
5head
it's true tho
Pessimist
yeeee
I love britain too
Make a version for Jean Bart
I would kill for data on 1950s French fire control radars
AL lore shared it. But we couldn't find out where
God dammit im banned from there 
How

Anyway. If picture is true. It's Colombo very likely
it is colombo
I mean that's colombo, yes
16 guns, wedding cake tower, you can even see the sextuple 20mm on the turrets
Littorio style.
Please Manjuu don't do more Hutten style rigs
no more IB




























