#history
1 messages · Page 214 of 1
Would you happen to have any links for me to check out or that I can use for a citation?
Les bâtiments ayant porté le nom de Garonne
Double thanks!
De rien
?
very rarely, most of Guadalcanal averages at like 19 knots, even for in combat
the original gaming pad
Radetsky class right?
Yeh

training ships are cool and good
STS Young Endeavour with HMAS Perth
Young Endeavour delivers up to twenty youth development sail training voyages to young Australians aged 16 – 23 each year. Navy personnel staff the ship and the Young Endeavour Youth Scheme coordinate the voyage program.
During each voyage the ship embarks up to 24 young Australians who learn the skills required to sail a square-rigged tall ship; including how to navigate, keep watch, cook in the galley, take the helm and climb the 30 metre mast to work aloft, setting and furling sails. They are encouraged to pursue personal and team goals and challenges in an unfamiliar environment as they learn to sail a square-rigged tall ship.
Near the end of the voyage, youth crew elect a command team who take full responsibility for Young Endeavour for 24 hours, sailing the ship along the Australian coast. On their last day at sea, the youth crew host a local group of youth with special needs, sharing their newfound knowledge and experience.
bruno ganz not receiving an oscar for his role as hitler in downfall is a war crime


@alpine onyx @chilly osprey @delicate beacon @eager dove thanks for the answers .v.
@spiral cedar , do you have the sources mentioning the Nelsons' disadvantages? especially regarding the stress they received when firing all their guns, full broadsides or not.
also @chilly osprey
From Burt:
Damage sustained by Rodney during the Bismarck action, 27 May 1941
During the action Rodney sustained very little damage from return fire – three minor shrapnel holes in the side and another small hole which cut the searchlight control leads on the conning tower level. The high-angle director trainer telescope was distorted and put out of action. Much more damage was caused by the firing of her own 16in guns and was as follows:
External. Upper deck was depressed to varying degrees in wake of the turrets. Wood decking was lifted, split and blown out of place. Deck fittings including stowage huts, mushroom heads, skylights, breakwater and berthing rail stanchions were broken and distorted. Watertight hatches to the sickbay flat were blown open.
Internal. Deck pillars under girders were distorted and shaken, the fore and aft girders themselves being fractured in several places. In the torpedo body room the depression was transmitted to the lower deck and put the torpedo transversing trolley out of action. Partition bulkheads were distorted and split between upper and main decks. Considerable lengths of ventilation trunking were split open and in some cases blown out of place. All the stanchions supporting the sick bay cots came away from the deck fastenings.
Damage by blast. HACS roll corrector glass fractured. The angle support on 16in guns around inside of armoured ring bulkhead for supporting leather apron was damaged. Brass bolts within the turret broke loose leaving some hanging out of place. Periscopes in ‘A’ turret were pulled from securing bolts by blast from ‘B’ turret. Various periscopes in both 16in and 6in turrets had hoods so distorted that they were rendered practically useless. The superstructure stood up quite well to the blast of the 16in guns, but the upper deck and fittings proved to be a problem and there was a need of extra support and additional stiffening which was carried out during refit as opportunity arose.
many thx 
Surely a lot of those should be caught during previous drills, no?
Damages to decks might be explainable with the unusually short engagement, but turret fittings shouldn't shake itself loose
imagine being super hyped that you just sank a bigass german battleship, only to return to find your cot's been warped
also: the leading edge of a (YF-104A) Starfighter wing is put to the ultimate test
cabbage, apple, unidentified root vegetable(?), carrots
Loomis Dean, LIFE magazine, 1956 - before this aircraft (55-2956) was converted into the first production F-104A
https://t.co/BzSPNFs6UC


kentucky windage
While you slept I studied the plade
French supplying the Americans with guns again
Run Brits run!
"I don't care about winning, I just want the British to lose"
Sanglune is IB again
the correct notion
France losing the Franco-Prussian war deliberately to boost up Germany and make them beat Britian in some battles


expands French colonial possessions, creates margarine and cinqo de mayo, beats the shit out of russia, helps unify Italy, simps for a spanish girls and loses against Prussia
Portsmouth?
One of sexy sister of Izmail yes 
Oh wow. Reading a new book. Think you guys are aware that Unicorn is the only carrier to have commenced shore bombardment using her guns. Turns out, she has an interesting tidbit here near Hong Kong.
On 27th July 1953, SS Inchkilda departed Hong Kong for Fujian on a regular trip. While the ship was passing through the Greater Qiu Islet, three ROC gunboats approached, and started shooting at her. She was hit by 200 rounds, and was boarded by 20 men. The crew was ordered to sail towards Kinmen with the three gunboats as escorts.
When the Admiralty heard of the news, an order was issued for the closest vessels to rescue the ship. The closest ship at the time was none other than the Unicorn, a ship frequently passaging between Korea and Hong Kong. She arrived on scene mid-afternoon, aimed her guns and ordered the gunboats to stop all engines. When the gunboats saw Unicorn on scene, they instantly left the scene at best speed. "Ran away like cartoon villains", as my book described it. Inchkilda continued without further incidents.
ROC?
Republic of China/Taiwan.
Yeah ik
Chinese Civil War is still ongoing at that time, as I recall.
Just wondering why they're attacking civilian shipping
Inchkilda wasn't the only case either.
The ROC was performing a "blockade" of PRC ports at the time
Maybe assumed she was there to supply enemy? 
Though the word "blockade" wasn't exactly used, since that would mean hostilites between the two states. The wording used was a "closing operation".
The UK wasn't exactly happy, especially since it interfered with their trading.
Between 1951 to 1953, there were 141 reports of British merchantmen being attacked, 4 wounded, 1 dead.
That notwithstanding, apparently lots of Essexs made Hong Kong a port of call too. Valley Forge and Bon Homme Richard were regulars, it seems. 
Ah, one more tidbit. HMS Peacock, of the Peacock class corvette.
Apparently these couple boats were really fucking controversial, and this is probably of interest to Undie:
It is thought that the Oto Melara 76mm had too much firepower for a boat that is made for deployment to Hong Kong.

Either way, to cap it off, there are some other interesting stuff like Hermes doing anti-piracy patrols in the local area
and waaaaaay too many people trying to visit New Jersey when she first came around in 1953. Later visits apparently never got as popular as her first, sadly.
So I have been wondering
What caused British to rely on Italians for artillery
Why British couldn't make their own 76mm despite experience
Ok so fun fact
they uh
didnt
Why the 76mm purchases? 
there is a single class of british ships that ever used the 76mm
patrol boats
that were then sold to ireland
it's why im so mad about the wows 76mm
not only another nations gets them before Italy
but it's the operation nation that literally used them the least
the fucking US used them more than Britain
Ye they got Samuel, Roisin, Peacock
the UK doesnt even appear in the wikipedia page for the operators, only ireland does
The peacocks were eventually sold off. maybe ex-operator?
Philippines should be one of the operators as well since they got a hold of couple of those.
No, the list in the page is both current and previous operators
Holy shit I forgot Oliver used 76mm

Oh it says it
While the 57 mm cannon may not seem as powerful as larger naval guns, such as the OTO Melara 76 mm, some of its performances are comparable; given its rate of fire and amount of explosive per shell, the Bofors gun actually achieves a higher amount of "explosive fired per second" than the 76 mm
Could explain why US preferred it
well the first obvious reason is because it was designed and built by them
the 76 was licensed built only
I thought Bofors 57mm was Swedish
57mm can, if you compare specific shell types, theoretically put out more explosive mass per minute
Though, that's not really how effectiveness of fire works, and each 76mm shell hits much harder than the 57mm
And weight of fire overall heavily favors the 76mm

The gap also widens when you step away from theoretical rate of fire, since while the 76mm can continuously fire at 120 rpm, while the 57mm, in its most advanced versions, is basically fire 40 rounds at 220 rpm (10.9 sec firing time) and then take 8 seconds to reload, before firing another 40 rounds. So, if you measure the amount of time it takes for them to exhaust their ready ammunition, the 76mm has an effective RoF of still 120 rpm, while the 57mm is just under 150 rpm
And, uh, after that point, with the 76mm you can just keep throwing rounds into the ready rack, with the 57mm it seems you need 3-5 minutes to reload the ready ammunition
Must be a reason US choose it over 76 for Constellation
Oh, that's easy. They already use the 57mm (introduced for the Zumwalt and LCS programs).
They've already sunk the money into developing more advanced ammo for the guns, they've got a production line going in Kentucky for them, and they've never used the Super Rapido, only the other Compatto
The 57mm was a requirement for the FFG(X) program from the start



usn moment
from what i remember they were working/worked on a pseudo dart guided round for the 57mm so it shouldnt be too bad
Type 003 cope is legendary
"Our island looks smoother than Nimitz and Ford's island so it's better"

smooth deez
i mean it looks a little more interesting than the usual US CVN
so yeah sure that works
i mean aesthetics wise it looks way better but
people on the chinese internet are unironically claiming it's technologically superior

because it's smooth
aesthetics is the more important battle in an age where like
That would be MAD-FIRES. It's in development at the moment, no word yet on when it's expected in service.
yeah but zumwalt also looks smooth asf
it's certainly compact
and no one accuses that ship of looking good
good in her own way
fair
iceberg
i think it's the cell phone tower on top of her 
I swear you can make a cool iron by using Zumwalt model
Unfortunately she was already partially stripped down by 1973
She's definitely not looking her best
the main guns are fascinating
incredibly funny comment whenever taranto is mentioned
Why I remember that name
Taranto getting fucked 🤝 Kuznetsov fire
Such kissable faces 

i mean taranto wasn't even that bad from what i heard
italians launched a sortie just a few days later
matapan though
Matapan is so nonsense I'm not convinced it was actually real
nah see zumwalt's different
matapan was made up by warspite's crew
therefore it is legit
because warspite deserves to be wanked
valid
zumwalt's sharp design is so that if they run out of ammo, they can just ram the enemy and cut 'em in half like a knife
ginsu style
fall of france was real so that was too
richelieu you live in belgium
see what?
therefore most of the blame of fall of france falls on you

"captain something just hit us"
"what did?"
"I don't know, I didn't see anything"
so true
because we could've had a sea-to-sea maginot line
Germany exists

your mom
thanks for that belgium
Before Taranto: Italians can't leave port
After Taranto: Italians can't leave port

Two-step Anglo guide to describing the Mediterranean in WWII;
-
After every battle, remember to let the reader know that because of this battle the Italians never left port again
-
When describing subsequent battles, ignore your prior conclusion and remember to repeat step one.
History memes 
'byplanes'
let byplanes be bygones
crippled, but not sunk by Biplanes Bismarck lmao eksdee
If they're British why does the tail have a Dutch flag on it in the image? Checkmate teaboos
Even ironic posting of r/historymemes or r/ww2memes in this channel should be bannable
Britain colonized the Netherlands and are using them as colonial conscripts
Britain never managed to conquer the Netherlands. but the Netherlands technically conquered Great Britain. I shall therefore conclude that it's British colonials in colonial made planes.
it's french smh
Can't be.
If it was French it would be saving the US's arse only for them to forget.
@chilly osprey 
Finally found a place that had it
Or more like
Finally managed to go the place that i know had it
They have insanely bad opening hours for a shop in a tourist city ffs
i think they are open in the morning and then at 20

also i just realized that i dont know how this kind of shop is called in english
somehow all of this sound wrong to me
English aside, now i just need to order the volume about the Soldati class from like April that i missed
I think newsstand is the closest english equivalent?

Tfw after 500 years an Alien race find this data shard from a half broken server and thinks it legit
Check this sexy beast 
God I want to lick her 
Newsstand/Kiosk can refer to a variety of sizes of those kinds of stores, so depending on what size you're thinking of for those words it may or may not seem like it fits
Tfw any European weapon project is now like
🇩🇪 🇫🇷 🇮🇹 🇪🇸
🇬🇧
Tfw i keep forgetting spain has typhoons

what's with this what if UK joined the central powers shit i see on youtube
i can't even see a reason for them to join the germans
Kaiserboos?

kaiserboos 
japan joining the central powers seems reasonable with their rocky relationship with russia
but the UK?
nah

I mean, it was an angle that Imperial Germany had tried to pursue earlier, in order to keep France isolated
But the British weren't very interest, and as with most things in regards to German foreign policy of the era, Wilhelm II royally screwed it up
wilhelm really fucked over his chance of being allies with the UK
with the naval arms race
and also the whole invading neutral belgium thing
did the germans also invade luxembourg or was it only belgium

Luxembourg was occupied
idk Germany didn’t really have any other options for invading France beyond Belgium
French-German border in both wars was heavily fortified
Any fight amongst that line would of just descended into trench warfare and artillery throwing
they invaded through belgium and trench warfare still happened

line didn't move for months
wilhelm really got out lucky after the war compared to other monarchs who lost major wars
he spent his last days chilling in the netherlands

I mean it still ended that way but the fighting was mainly in France and Belgium, not in Germany
it also let Germany make rapid advances during the initial phases of the war
Germany was fought to exhaustion and its Allie’s were collapsing
By the end of the war the Entente were completely dominating the field and making rapid advances
I don’t think US involvement had much of a impact as allied victories toward the end of the war along with the blockade, tho it certainly was a massive boost to allied performance
a bunch of fresh soldiers would be a good change of pace
considering what the entente had to endure the first 3 years of war

To reprhase my statement
Without the US the entete would have been able to force a winning armistice out of the war
but i don't think they could've proper invaded germany, at least without unacceptable political ramifications
then again, depending on who you ask, that would've been true with US support as well
Germany was on the brink of collapse and it’s army was in open mutiny
that was after about a year of US involvement though
you're overstating the importance of the US in WW1
they were great as a morale boost and as temporary fodder in 1917 sure
the US was dependent on equipment gifted from the French and British
and training from their veterans too
combined with the French and British still doing the bulk of fighting and the rapid victories toward the end of the war
the US was anything but ready to fight a European war as is
still, as I said
the US quickened the inevitable so more lives and suffering was spared to some degree
but I'm not sure the UK/FR could necessarily directly invade Germany at the end; German morale was basically dead by mid 1918, but british and french morale weren't exactly high either before the US came in
they mostly didn't want bolshevism to spread
a lot of generals thought the uprisings would be contageous
so invading an "infected" germany was the last thing they wanted
and everyone was simply sick and tired of the war
nor did they want to cause a scramble for german territory
since we all know what those lead to
the Italian scramble for Austro Hungarian territory was wild tho
Real treaty of London hours
But, overall - Germany was pretty much on its last legs by 1918 due to the blockade
And its allies were crumbling
If it tried to stick it out much longer it would have been back to a two front war with vastly worse economic conditions than before
in the end, the entente got most of her goals at the end of the war
France got Alsace-Lorraine back and had new influence in the middle east
Britain was able to defend Belgium (sike) and got the influence in the middle east
Italy got Trento and some other stuff they wanted
in hindsight, some harsher restrictions on German industry would've been nice
or atleast some way to make the german people understand that they had decidedly lost this war
which would discourage them from starting another
but this didn't happen
allowing disillusionment to spread among the german population
and this, combined with the 1928 economic crisis kinda laid the groundworks for hyper nationalism
the funny lines that the french and british drew in the middle east resulted in countless conflicts and territorial disputes there
and america got trench gun montages 
people really sleep on the sykes picot agreement
best weapon of the war
livens large gallery flame projector time
the best weapons of the war were the
75mm mle 1897
any sort of maxim gun variant/hotchkiss HMG
rifle
grenades
why the bar
no?
while being a maintenance nightmare
🍿
any sort of nightmare is a result of pepega ww1 american logistics
i mean it wasn't even standard issue in ww1
30-0.6 my beloved
i recall horse spent like a whole hour in shitting on the bar
Mosin–Nagant 

it's ok Krem
I might shit on russian politics
but I love the guns and ammo
9x39 mm my beloved


lewis gun is also capable of actual sustained fire
and not having to reload every 20 rounds
Source: I play BF1
thats an image
KGB requirements be like:
- subsonic
- good armor penetration
- long range
- subsonic
- heavy bullet
- accurate
- subsonic

that's quite the penetration
NATO be damned

i mean richy
i get that you would simp for the hotchkiss HMG
but you would seriously state that the maxim is a better gun than the Lewis
Case AK-47 
i mean
yeah
I would
lol
also
lewis is an LMG
maxim is an HMG

so why compare them?
ik the difference
except maxim guns aren't exactly useful if you're, well
attacking

like a lewis can't do that
and you can actually haul a lewis gun around to a better spot

all you need to do is bring one mag along with the gun and you have 200 rounds
that's fairly sufficient for suppressing fire
and the Maxim has a 250 round belt
you also can't haul ass with a maxim in case your position gets lit up with artillery
with continuous fire
well you can just keep the maxim hidden until an assault happens
how exactly are you supposed to help with assaults with a maxim
but those are late war
after you break like the first trench line

covering fire
read my second comment bro
like sure all of your tactical objectives are in the sightline of one static maxim
also
ok but it's soviet
you can't use a lewis for sustained fire
like
the soviets grab whatever they can
for any war
including [redacted conflict]
i mean we saw panzer iv running around in syria

doesn't mean it can beat a patton
Ok Qwert then how you explain this
gun was not initially adopted by the U.S. military, most likely because of political differences between Lewis and General William Crozier, the chief of the Ordnance Department. Lewis became frustrated with trying to persuade the U.S. Army to adopt his design, "slapped by rejections from ignorant hacks", in his words, and retired from the army
Seems Lewis didn't got much respect first at all
talking about the gun you moron
Yes
and this is a case of political differences getting in the way of military efficacy

again
a maxim can only be used for helping with assaults by suppressing inital objectives
Qwerty please just go read a field manual on the maxim or lewis or smth
who tf is assaulting with a lewis guns
you grab that shit, go find a crater and use it to provide covering fire
you're not the one leading the charge
but a lewis gun can help provide covering fire to an assaulting force better than a maxim can
yes the maxim can fire continuously but it's also static
they are two different weapon systems...
and i'm arguing the lewis is better
Can't wait for this baby 
it's like saying a fork is better than a knife because I can use the side of the fork to cut my fish

American flag= better 
no, the fork is better than the knife because i can stab stuff and pick up stuff with it, which the knife can't do, while also doing a half-assed job at cutting fish
plus the british have the vickers for an actual HMG
ok go and stab me through this vest with a fork
but the germans don't really have an LMG to provide flexible coverage for assaults
go ahead
stabs you in eye
Yeah eye loss doesn't mean death
trench is static
idk you can't see anymore
I still have another eye
Stabbing both eyes with single fork?
gotta do it quick
also the entente didn't win the war by just sitting around in the trenches
and needed to take their HMG's with them to defend their new salient
because you can't defend a static position with just LMG's
now if you gave the Lewis a heavy bipod and a gun shield
now we're talking
if you added some water cooling pumps on it
now you're essentially making it an HMG again

gives Kremlin a Berdan II rifle

But all this data is legit?
It's also on secretprojects right now.
I was worried you put some of your own designs inside
I mean it feels like this debate is less over Lewis vs maxim and more about whether lmg or hmg is better

And the thing is
The biggest own designs I put in there are my images of a Groot Destroyer and van der Sluis Battleship, which I emphasised were my own.
The Lewis gun can enable attackers to make a salient where the British can then move up their HMGs like the vickers to hold the salient
It opens opportunities
I get your point that the LMG can be used both for static suppression and for mobile defence
that is indeed a big advantage
but for sustained fire it is useless
and that what you want in a static position during an enemy assault
Whereas the maxim is only good for defense
And like
The Lewis isn’t entirely useless for defense either
sure
you're right there
Sure it can’t sustain fire but you can at least bring them to a defensive position easier
but it doesn't matter
Imagine not having Tachanka lmao
Imagine not having Friesland guns
built by the Swedes
Friesland will always be pan European sang
Forever separated from her sis Groningen
For some reason most sources say it's Wilton Fijenoord
I believe Qwerty's wife is a Lewis gun and he feels like I am insulting her or smth
I know the feel
Captain obvious here
I mean cmon the Lewis gun is a fuckable gun
We should turn Kremlin into a French BB because French gun. And all the British Ships into Dutch because Dutch AA
Even if there is a thot behind her
So Dutch ships are German now
But none of them use German guns... Wait.... 

What bout the 7 provinces
Swedish
Sniff Rich's gloves
She's never creditted with the correct Swedish guns tho
Go on
wut
kronshtadt in WT is too powerful
So I think it is
Yes
I think Kron is around Scharn's BR
Let me check again
Scharn is 6.7
Kron is 6.7
Hood is 6.7

Wait why hood is 6.7
Perhaps
because they are incapable to balance that gamemode
Yeah...
Nah they will say Germany suffers then somehow lose on Bismarck so much that her BR will be 6.0
I just fear about how broken they will make her
H-39 will likely make an appearance to fight with ships like Yamato, Iowa, Soyuz, Lion
Maybe Gaijin can make an exception for Alsace on France but don't know
But Richels may have problems against such ships
As would Littorios
Also Alaska when she arrives
If I had to guess, they’ll first release Bismarck as like 7.5, then wehrbs will cry and she will get buffed to 1.1, then she will kill everything so then gaijin will nerf her repair costs to like 8 trillion dollars worth of currency
Then someone will figure out a way to reliably kill the Bismarck with that overpowered low tier German aa barge
I don’t play wt but that’s how I think it works
Dunkek
Ships like Iowa and Yamato will cost alot to repair because of their fanbase alone
Shimakaze already has iffy repair cost in order for Gaijin to prevent her spam
Wows ships basically have life insurance
Or rather ship insurance
Have warships ever been insured?
Anyways the subject of your next mark Felton video:
Kinburn
We have a maus with an l3/33 for a turret
Speaking of. Izmail could pop up between Stalingrad and Soyuz on BR now that you mention
They did it already for few ships. Ships under construction is fine
Kronshtadt came this update
Yup. Even launched with her 3 sister
But revolution happen
3 of her sister got sold to Germany for scrapping
Izmail got scrapped in Russia
FCAS/SCAF vs FCAS (Tempest) be like
🇫🇷 🇩🇪 🇪🇸
🇬🇧 🇮🇹 🇸🇪 🤝 🇯🇵

@manic latch
The US in the corner eating popcorn after selling F35s to half of those nations
(pls spain do the funny to make france mad again)
GariMALDi


The US was critical to Entente victory in WWI because Entente victory was reliant on the British blockade, and the Brits would have been forced to the negotiating table in 1917 were it not for Admiral Sims convincing the British government to force the Admiralty to adopt the convoy system 
tbh I think ||France.....|| is more important in the Entente victory.
Necessary vs. sufficient
your name wasn't always red, right? sanglune?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XB30mmmDuT4
anti tank machine gun
It seems like tank cannons always increase their effectiveness by becoming larger and more powerful, but this isn't a universal constant. In the 1970s, the United States Army sought to create what they called an "Anti-Tank Machine Gun", a very large autocannon that would fire fast enough to defeat waves of Soviet tanks. The program was relativel...

This is not land based military tho
Yes?
Britain, isnt that the country that copied the Dantons and helped France blockading the Germans with superdantons?
Or copied the Ft-17s but made them oversized and cumbersome, without turrets to boot?
Read Ft-17 as F-117 for a second
what would a hypothetical armistice between UK/FRA and Germany look like if US wasn't in the war?
Sims wasn’t an admiral in the Canadian navy though
Very true
None. I don't think either were willing to settle. Though Germany did seem to have less ambitious goals
indefinite stalemate like korea?
Mhm, I'd expect it implodes somewhere. Highly dependant on French morale
Then again, the German homewront wasnt looking to ecstatic either.
French morale was fine as long as the generals weren’t throwing lives away
double civil war 
The whole reason behind the 1917 mutinies was not wanting to get used as fodderino
i can't imagine french morale being that much better than GER in 1918 if US didn't join the war
Admiral Bayly isn’t even mentioned
F
I think the biggest change was making the convoy much more closely packed
Making it appear much smaller as well
Did you think of that maka?

Or just hotdog
@ivory ridge
I think of hot dogs, then have random epiphanies
I mean that's always good too
Here
203 mm capped shells from the original makarov tests
Right after the invention of the AP cap

Is that compound armor?
Rich
Where did your shell fetish came from
I don't remember you liking them this much before
Wood?
Not really talking about those…
Anyways I’m pretty sure it’s a harveyized plate
Would make sense given the time period
It does look somewhat like they slapped some plates together
Which is why I figured compound initially
Harvey method only gives a face of like 1.25” deep
The plates all seem to have very similar brittle grain structure
It might be mild steel tested in the russian cold

The shells look barely longer than the plates are thick
Which is 
Maybe it’s just perspective
@spring briar 
But
Would make more sense
Museum made due
City battleships have 305s
Museums make do
Why is the center one ribbed
Alongside the breech
There's two 305mm shells here on the Naval Museum
It’s an older style shell from before 1870 I think
It’s an early form of rifling
The French used similar shells during the Franco-Prussian war
For a better experience when sliding into your ship’s barrel
The Prussians used a lead jacket shell
Well, protection is important
Like half an inch?
Sounds like a lot of material
(With and without jacket)
(Also pp)
Decorative art shell lol
These are examples of contemporary French shells
Ballistics is my passion
Cause no wonder how good a ship
That one shell is always the great equaliser
shells effect everything about ships as it's a design area often overlooked but can mostly make or break a gun
No matter how good your ship
If the shells suck
Your ship sucks
Luckily those can get fixed
Lead
Lead
Lead
good or bad shells heavily effect armor as well as guns yeh
Shells are also aesthetic objects
so was reading about the sons of tuireann,and how believeable is it for pre-roman irish to make it to both greece and the persian empire
assuming they sailed to greece
Celtic tribes, or, rather, Gauls, did invade Greece in the 3rd century BCE, and some got as far as central Anatolia (where they settled down and became the Galatians). But, these are quite different groups to those living in Ireland. And it's not really clear how 'celtic' Ireland's population actually was at the time in the first place...

whether or not their celtic doesnt matter in this case
what matters is if it is possible with the iron age ships to use them to get from ireland to greece
It’s very possible
just gotta be lucky in terms of storms
If the Lexington and Saratoga survived Pearl Harbor, they would have immediately offered the USN a capability that it did not have until mid-1942, and in some sense not until late 1943; a fast battleship that could provide high-speed carrier escort in engagements across the Pacific. The Lexingtons might have seen duty at Coral Sea, Midway, and the Doolittle Raid, offering anti-aircraft and anti-surface protection for USN carriers. In late 1942 they could have operated as the core of cruiser divisions in the Guadalcanal campaign.

What is this erasure
NC/SD discrimination

USN already wary of committing the already "expensive" heavy cruisers during Guadalcanal and this guy propose to field a damn Battlecruiser?
tni moment, they had plenty of ships to commit if it had come down to it
Its always the TNI moment...
I’m just trying to imagine poor Fletcher juggling his oil-guzzling carriers and destroyers at Coral Sea while CINCPAC tries to convince him to carry a damn battlecruiser along
Or who knows, maybe Fletcher can use a CC as a dairy cow
I’d be unsurprised if using a CC as a high-speed tanker turns out to be more useful in 1942 than as a surface combatant
Keep the DDs topped up
'hm, yeah I don't want to bring along the oil efficient standards, but you know what I should bring? a gas guzzling huge fast ship'

This also wipes out credit of Lexington and Saratoga's air group during Coral Sea and Midway
Especially since VT-3 and VB-3 were both augmenting Yorktown's airgroup after the beating she got from Coral Sea
TNI strikes again
Also, if I am reading correctly, this is literally leading into "a big ship with lots of (mediocre, sorry Maka, they didnt fix the 1.1"at the end) AA is better than CAP"
Silver is a tsun

see
You can't just call me something and refuse to elaborate 
but I can

That article assumes that Lexington class #3 and 4 become CVs, and that every other navy will ignore them building two modern BCs, instead of going the same way with the Japanese and granting them Amagi and Tosa

i heard that at the battle of tsushima, yamamoto lost two fingers, had he lost more he would be unfit to serve the navy
man, imagine ww2 japan without yamamoto


Brits build G3s, France decides to do the 37,500 tonners
let's go 
if the Brits build the G3's
and the US the Lexingtons
The French might as well incorporate the 450mm
anyways
fun facts
"Baton rouge"
(red stick in french)
is a reference to the red stick with fishheads on it that was found by french explorer Iberville when exploring the Mississippi river
it was a territorial marker from two indian tribes
Indeed, perfection! 😙🤌
Here are some videos on Greek Fire and its usage by the Byzantine army:
Fire Ships: https://t.co/OPEY5DtFD9
Flamethrowers: https://t.co/YBQTMEFz0n
what's TNI?
They did fix the 1.1” really though, but yeah this sounds really memey
Fraunch my beloved
The National Interest
NCD calls it "The buzzfeed of the defense industry"
If I remember correctly TNI was established by a think tank originally created by Richard Nixon
The Northrop P-61 Black Widow is a twin-engine United States Army Air Forces fighter aircraft of the Second World War. It was the first operational U.S. warplane designed as a night fighter, and the first aircraft designed to use radar.Named for the North American spider Latrodectus mactans, it was an all-metal, twin-engine, twin-boom design arm...
Such a fuckable plane
Shame the tigercat prevented her getting much numbers for naval variant
Colonel Winston Kratz, director of night fighter training in the USAAF, had organized a similar competition earlier. He said of the results:
I'm absolutely sure to this day that the British were lying like troopers. I honestly believe the P-61 was not as fast as the Mosquito, which the British needed because by that time it was the one airplane that could get into Berlin and back without getting shot down. I doubt very seriously that the others knew better. But come what may, the '61 was a good night fighter. In the combat game you've got to be pretty realistic about these things. The P-61 was not a superior night fighter. It was not a poor night fighter. It was a good night fighter. It did not have enough speed
@ivory ridge 

Fun fact
Parts of the 3 submarines (after their retirement) were used as foundations for the pillars of the Naval School's Longboat Bridge at Villegagnon Island.
they never say his name but its dirle

yeah ik

worst thing is
it was probably worse irl
bro it didn't even scratch the surface of how evil the dirlewanger brigade was
literally so evil that other ss regiments would send it into suicide missions hoping they would die
I present to you all...
The ugliest aircraft in history
but its still a good movie
Bah, all they did was mass murder literal toddlers

What movie btw?
come and see
it's rough
Interesting concept
Arent a large number of the dirle brigades actions questioned
Ie, it may be other ss/Wehrmacht units commiting them and passing the blame on post war
thats just every nazi war crime in general
dirle had a unique way of doing them
I don't think the point of the movie is to point out who did what
massacres among the ss weren't uncommon in the slightest, but the way the brigade did it was extra detestable
Yeah at no point do they ever clarify its Dirle
you dont even see the crossed grenades
I get that
hell, they only really do a mass burning
that happened so many times
but its obvious they're supposed to be the dirlewanger brigade because they behave in the exact same way
To them it was like a game
well
the excessive waste of ammo and cheering wasn't fake either
they were just that depraved
the only thing that really matters is that dirlewanger the guy probably got beaten to death by the polish/french
so all's well
Yes
his death was never confirmed
all thats known is that he died
but no one knows how
most common story was that a group of Polish partisans found him and killed him by beating him in with the ends of their rifles
Given the number of Nazis who were thought dead but then turned up years later it is possible
he got off easy in any case
simplest answer is usually the correct one, and given the location
probably beaten to death by the polish and/or french
Well, being beaten to death isnt a nice way to go. You're normally conscious up until the death blow is dealt
so he got what he deserved

dying of internal bleeding is still better than what the average citizen of Ukraine got to experience in 1941

I mean yeah but he still got a gruesome death
Question is: who got shafted harder, Ukraine or Poland
other alternative is to set him on fire and watch him burn
Poland 100%
Fire doesn't hurt
Poland got shafted so hard even the ukrainians killed them
That is true
Poland got invaded from two sides
so they got to experience both german and soviet warcrimes
truly fucked
Then you have whatever the fuck was going on in the balkens
that said
their reward for winning: soviet puppet
and 6 million dead
ukraine also got the tug and war of barbarossa into bagration

the bulk of the protracted fighting was there
So did Ukraine tbf

which isnt great
I'm not gonna sit here and compare atrocities lol
shoutout to the soviets for purposely stalling attacks so that way the Germans could kill more Poles

Warsaw
shoutout to soviets deliberately killing scholars, writers, poets and doctors to wipe out polish culture and intellectuals

but dont get me wrong as evil as the Soviets were, Germany was the worst of the two
for sure
It isn't about comparison, it is more about pointing out the forgotten suffering of Ukraine under the soviets and Nazis
110% agreed
inb4 
😢
can't wait to have a German destroyer give me a ping about bad language or smth
oh boy
Siding with the Soviets was simply picking the lesser (way lesser) of two evils
I got warned for posting richie eating a lemon
Lulz

Tbf, Nazis wouldn't have been as successful as they were without the soviets
it was a "meme" so I got warned
KL is typing
My only warn was because i posted a meme that wasn't that safe
oh noh

laughs in no warns
Anyways both are like
Still bad
No point in making it a dick measuring contest
Let's talk about something less controversial
Sherman > T34
can we please not
StuG III > Tiger I
Like don't see me trying to flex the bad shit Romanian was doing
😂
tea
Only reason Shermans were called deathtraps was because the people in them could actually survive and talk about it
t-34 and panther crew just fucking d i e d
no witness!
let's talk about Romania in 1916-1917
T34 cost more to make than Sherman
we don't talk about that time though













TNI I see...

