#history
1 messages · Page 210 of 1

And since he is a communist. Qwerty will be happy to joke about his height as well
Problem solved
i was gonna make a joke involving shells in the wrong place

but given i got warned for saying why i was up at six in the morning in this channel
i think i'll just go ahead and keep that to myself
what
I gotta go to bed
did I miss horse lore?
forbidden lore now unfortunately
farewell friend
What
Where the hell are you getting these assumptions about me and communists
I’m literally from a communist country

Kremlin’s implying you’re especially susceptible to misinformation due to your upbringing and education in a communist country
Why would I be predisposed to make jokes about communists if I was educated in a communist country

i cant tell if qwerty is on like
eight layers of irony
or if that was the most dramatic whoosh ive ever seen in my life
Probably both tbh
whichever is funnier imo
yeah that's a whoosh so powerful it's like a foxhound passing a foot over your head at full tilt
who is this guy and why does he look familiar
This forklift is cute
The Army had to essentially berate the Navy into setting aside cargo space for cement powder so they could build the forklift friendly warehouses for managing logistics
And the times where the Navy skimped correlate to instances of notable supply shortage and bottlenecks
Get fucked OSHA
look at those lads having a good time
The virgin battlefield miniature modeler vs the chad logistics miniature modeler
@tough quail if you want era appropriate jank
now that is some j a n k
Here's some more forklift lore: there's no stairs in the pentagon, because the building was built with the expectation that after the war the army will demobilize, and was built with high-loading floors and ramps to use... as a warehouse.
actually yeah
So we have zero things stopping us from doing fork lift races in the pentagon like its Mario kart
the reason why the allies won was because they had more industrial capacity for war then germany or japan
“We would have won the war if Hitler was forklift certified”
forklift the red army and drive it back into russia
King Michael's Coup ensured that the Axis only remaining industrial centers were seamlessly merged with the allies dooming Germany and Japan
Naa the Romanians stole all the German forklift wheels
They're doomed
Now I’m imagining a German forklift with a Tiger’s hellish suspension
Only a Romanian could steal such a thing without breaking their fucking backs
Interlocking roadwheel forklift
more like intermemed am i right redditors
at least you're usually not plowing a forklift through muddy russian roads
i think thats just a very small maus
It’s small as a maus
But why is it a hover craft on train tracks
Germany never did invent a water slide did they
nazi super science
literally an ms-1
yeah they dont know what waterparks or even slip n slides are to this day
Can only imagine that things flying off the tracks like a child getting throw out of a corner on a water slide
What poor poor people
I have a question? I'm playing wotb then they add Ju-nu and other heavy tank in japanese tech tree. Isn't it doing or experimental tanks near the end of the war
Like Chi-nu they are not deploy the war because japan surrender in 1945
They had like 150 chi-nus and I'm sure they used them
But yeah I'd assume the ju-nu would be a blueprint design or failed idea from the Chi-nus tank bid
I just found on The Online Tank Museum I seen Mitsu 104 and not 108 and how? the british get this information and it is original copy they got from the Japanese
and looks liked they copied from the A1E1 Indepence british tank
But its say here its contains before second world war and like the U.S they also make equipment handbooks to its allies
[ All the information on the Mitsu-104 comes from a British military intelligence dossier on enemy tanks, which was compiled between January 1939 and March 1943. This information was then later passed on to the rest of the Commonwealth and the United States, who included it in their own enemy equipment handbooks that were issued to the armed forces.
The British information came from original Japanese documents, obtained before the Second World War, although no details of where or how these documents were obtained is included in the files. The paper type and size are all identical to the Japanese standards used at the time, both of which were different from the conventions used by the British, all of which implies that the documents are original, and thus credible. ]
I can assure you, the british documents are not trustworthy
I know the story in good detail
250 shells
8 men
A mitsubishi (okay) water-cooled (?! from mitsu?) giving 250hp? (??!?!?!?! what is this, an engine for ants?)
And the drawing of it is... well...
Someone was at Khalkin Gol and saw a T-28
OH I HAVE A MODEL OF THAT
Yeah there’s like 2ish, one have the mg turrets and then the other design had like small canons, like 30ish Mm
The fact those documents ended up in Lister's book is... due to some excessive enthusiasm, they were simply the statements of defectors and PoWs who didn't really know much.
It’s cute tho
(This becomes abundantly clear if you look at the other vehicles in the documents)
5 0 0 shells
10 men
Also, made by Aichi, a firm that never was involved with AFV production
(Aichi was also devoted to knowledge of welding and aluminum, being at the bleeding edge of tech. Them building a riveted steel vehicle would be nonsense. The idea of an engine that is somehow both an aircooled and water cooled engine is also bogus)
Captain Torres
Oh shit it is
HMS Howe, King George V-class battleship, passing through the Suez Canal on its way to join the British Pacific Fleet - July, 1944
howe cookie
Kgv were a very pretty class of ship
After a decades long dispute, Canada and Denmark agree to partition Hans Island between them.
➤ Support this channel with my Patreon!: https://www.patreon.com/emperortigerstar
. . .
It'd be nice if they left a single rock in the center disputed.
No nautical zones to worry about, only beverages

GODDAMNIT PIXY!!! NOT AGAIN
Would you consider Graf Zepellin as T6 in terms of offensive capability
T6?
The main thing that is extremely
for Graf Zeppelin is that allegedly everything needs to be launched by that air-tanked catapult
in which case, concern
Yes, I understand
What's the currency in early colonial America
probably whatever they could get their hands on really
likely pounds or w/e but other european currencies too almost certainly
or debased shit like pieces of eight
What to use when trading with the natives
probably stuff they needed or could con them into accepting
the tale of the sale of manhattan is a good example
So Type-003 drydock is flooded
Launch should be so damn close
Flag is also ready it seems




did someone say botes
Where is it


wait a second
Sup
i forgor this turret existed
it's the old /54 but lighter
so it's like a mix of the 127/54C and the 127/64LW
incredibly funny, thanks r/warshipporn
Just switch sides, smh.
Incredibly funny, i'll program my laugh to February 32nd 2032
I used that on an article about a request a British Admiral made to our Navy General Staff
The request was that our submarines shouldn't go as far as 500 NM off our Coast
For them to not being confused with argentine subs
That was during the Falklands/Malvinas War
And then someone commented
"I bet the Admiral was flattered with the British assuming our submarines could go that far"
Type 003 is the ultimate PLAN cope
Kind of funny
Because we had Oberon class submarines
As well as some GUPPYs (I know GUPPY ins't really a class)
Ah
There was another comment saying that by complying with the British
We were being "Submissive"
That one got some very Nice replies
submersive and breathable

We had a dispute over some Islands with the British as well
But it ended in our favour
The Principality of Trinidad was a short-lived unrecognized state declared in 1893 when the American James Harden-Hickey claimed the uninhabited Trindade Island in the South Atlantic. He declared himself James I, Prince of Trinidad, and intended for the islands to become a military dictatorship under his leadership. Britain and Brazil later arg...

Italian and Soviet Navy being victims of similar jokes
🤝 
submarine flamethrower
The soviets had a navy?
Exactly Dutch. Exactly 
it hurt itself in it's confusion
thats true yes, because they went the long way around
Supply Corps big brain moment
Speaking of the Italian Navy, Undef, they were (partially) descended from the Venetian Navy in terms of tradition yes?
We should have that replaced with eugen or Fdg
Since Bismarck is actually a well designed character
lol no. bisko is double trash
Bisko herself seems alright, though I'm not deep into AL lore. It's mostly the fanbase. Which seems to be the problem with anything German.
bisko hasnt been a thing in AL for over 2 years 
Biscuit is humble and not annoying
The same can’t be said for most of the recent IB cast
still a nazi
where Australia?
and in fact, worse than just a nazi because the IB sold out humanity to literal alien invaders, on top of already being nazis

you can't get worse than that
on the map, unlike NZ
I put it in the same spot as HMAS Vampire.

you'd be hard pressed to get more cringe than that whole spiel too
death
Listen. My source didn't have the UK and commonwealth separated. Nor was I inclined to figure out in detail the rules for which belonged to which faction if they served multiple. I already died inside since the Wickes incident.
... so I just went with the AL canon.
but Canada is its own faction in canon
almost nobody separates the RN from the commonwealth in ww2 anyway
and those people are fucking stupid
Hit the way you phrase it makes it sound like the people who do make the distinction are stupid

excuse my nationalist wank here but while the RCN made itself completely subservient to the British and British interests the RAN... didn't
uh
what, all 2 ships of it
eskimo was always royal navy afaik
Was she? 
Royal Navy's F-class destroyer, Fortune. ...I was transferred to the navy of the Maple Monarchy along with my younger sister Foxhound. ...As an F-class destroyer, I have worked hard...
the RAN was the worlds 4th largest navy in 1945
Not hard when you let your allies die whilst killing your enemies. 
Canada was bigger but like...
list of achievements of the RCN in WW2:
you really should not do this
By my current rulings if I'd separate the commonwealth those ships would be Maple Monarchy... even though they're already in RN in AL.
i will say Maple Monarchy owns as a name though
What would the other factions be.
Yostar pls hire me i'll write the Southern Cross Commonwealth for you
when
discussion has been had many times
why do i always miss the fun stuff

everytime i am here it is just dumb bullshit or werhbs
Implying Australia name discussions aren’t dumb bullshit
I sincerely wish the British a very nice die
Nova Hollandia. Take it or leave it.
Leaving it
id rather be a bitch to the brits
Fine. No cake for you... only death. 
Spon. Think it over very carefully.
Which cuisine do you want imported to your country.
chinese is pretty awesome

the british export sad people and thats about it really
love the Dutch
half the people i talk to here tell me they have family in Australia
We could export you some flood management techniques for when there's a lot of rain.
....
....
...wait...
My dad's best friend married and moved to Australia.
lmfao
the Snowy Mountains hydroelectric scheme was built in large part thanks to post-WW2 immigration to Australia from the Netherlands
so yeah you kinda already did that
Great. You have us to thank for your country not flooding. 
EN only, fwiw
iirc CN straight up just says Canada
and i forgor what JP says
ah right
uh
JP goes the uh
KC way
I'm royal navy's F-class destroyer Fortune... I was transferred along with my little sister Foxhound to the country of maple where we worked hard as an escort destroyers...
Being part of the Battle of the Atlantic i guess? 
We also have that one
Serious question
Does any submarine today have any AA defense?
I'm only asking it because there was one guy complaining we are constructing a new antartic ship instead of a "Nuclear sub with fighter killer missile" 
handful have either MANPADs or that German missile
Well
The way the guy says almost sounds that the "missile" should be fired either from the torpedo tubes or a VLS
IDAS (Interactive Defence and Attack System for Submarines) is a medium-range missile currently being developed for the Type 209 and Type 212A submarine class of the German Navy.IDAS technology is (based on the IRIS-T air-to-air missile) that is primarily targeted against air threats, such as ASW helicopters, but also against small or medium-siz...
Although i'm used to those complains since announcement of the contract for that new ship
Of people saying it's a useless ship
Not so long ago, one of our polar ships, Ary Rongel
Suffered a breakdown on the Drake's Passage
And had to be rescued by two Chilean vessels
lmao what is this for?
And that's why the MB want to substitute her
Assuming there are [4] new shipclasses per event, it's how many events it will take for a faction to have an average representation of ship classes based on their ww2 diverisity.
I think Wehraboos can go crazy when they see Ary Rongel's hul number 
It's also to show faction bias
Sang
Have you came up with a name for your Dutch faction?
Tulip Federation
Mine's was like
"Southern Cross Republic"
But Hit also have something related to the Southern Cross
I expected something like
Kingdom of
But it is okay 🌷
Kingdom doesnt make sense
since Queen
Federation is reminiscent of United Provinces

Well
One of the names i came up for Brazil was like
"Southern Confederation"
Although in the 1930s, we were living under the Estado Novo regime
Southern Confederation seems also a way to grab the rest of the SA nations in
I'd be somewhat interested, but I prefer war participating countries with largest navies first.
Did any country besides Brazil join the war btw?
They never showed up their arguments to me
But i think it's something related to Argentina having the 25 de Mayo cruisers
In SA you mean?
ye
If that's so
We've Colombia
Joined in November 1943
And had a skirmish with one of their destroyers and U-154 in 1944
Keep in mind that a lot of SA nations declared war in like
February 1945
March 1945
Or 1945 as a whole
The only exceptions were
Brazil (August 1942)
Bolivia (April 1943)
Colombia (November 1943)
Ah yes Poland in SA
yes courland had a colony there
Colombia had two DDs
That what they can give for now
The Antioquia class of destroyers consisted of two ships, ARC Antioquia and ARC Caldas, used by the navy of Colombia, the Armada Nacional República de Colombia, between 1934 and 1961. Initially constructed at the Lisbon Naval Arsenal as part of the Portuguese Navy's Douro class, they were acquired by Colombia before completion in response to t...
The problem is that most remaining large navies besides the NL were neutral
Iberia and Fennoscandinavia would be interesting but the navies that were war participatants are the smaller supporting parts
Argentina would have their Dreadnoughts (just like us)
DDs (7 of them were built with their design following the British G & H class)
And their cruisers (25 de Mayo, Almirante Brown and La Argentina)
And Chile
Well, i only remember their Dreadnought as well
Almirante Latorre
Which is Eagle's sister
Coch


It's funny that we never named any ship with Cochrane
Even when he helped us in our War of Independence
Yet we have some "Gringo" sounding names like
Greenhalgh, Dodsworth, Rademaker, Leverger
to my knowledge no one really does VLS launched air defense missiles for subs
Guidance would likely be a nightmare and I don’t think submarine radars are capable of providing targeting data for air targets
plus you know guiding such a thing would likely leave the submarine vulnerable
all I’ve really seen are just F&F missiles that are typically torpedo launched
Not sure how the Russians handle their submarine iglas tho
Well
Like i said
It's Just an armchair Admiral complaining
Since the post is about the signing of a contract for the construction of a new polar ship
It's that kind of people that think we should copy Azerbaijan and put Cannons on tugboats
Youtube comment of the day:
"Germans were the premier fighters in the two world wars, they were beaten strategically as the entire world and major industrial nations banded against them. But one on one, no one could stand against either the Wehrmacht or the Imperial Army."

you could make a case for the imperial army i think, but the other stuff sounds like bs
though all that is pure speculation
Foch disagrees strongly and replies by ordering a converging offensive on this man’s location
are you talking a about a purely hypothetical german vs french 1v1?
oh he's a general
hmm i don't know that much ww1 french generals
geography issue?
Have you opened a map of Europe?
Pretty much the only way people have gotten anywhere against france is by taking paris
Paris is right next door to Germany with a giant plain from there to Berlin.
i think you missed the joke

Oh, autism, me no read sarcasm.
it's ok
We should change the capital to clermont ferrand
In the middle of a volcanic highland
Somewhere near the Pyrenees sounds safe

change your capital to the moon to make victory points harder to get
Move the capital to the maginot line
Blockade?
Probably not
Navally?
like naval
Blockade? No. Walk into France? Yes.
They would have to take their fleet to the med
You’d have to go all the way to Gibraltar
ok, well, obviously discounting the med
France can easily get supplies from the med or rivers into neighbouring countries
They also have their colonies
Germany would have to spread their fleet thin
Because you’d also have to regularly cross the channel to properly blockade France
And that seems pretty optimistic
alright i agree i worded myself poorly, i basically just meant: "could the HSF achieve total control of the atlantic side of france"
just a stupid though experiment
That’s a lot of coastline
all atlantic side
the english channel will be real goofy
let's just assume all the brits are asleep
i know france had a pretty decent fleet, but so did germany
The problem with blockading France from Germany is that you’re constantly going to be funneling vessels through the English Channel
Unless you want to be horribly inefficient and go around Britain
All the minelaying
yeah, that's gonna be awkward
Ehhh, minelaying maybe not
Considering the British will get miffed
France will just go full jeune ecole
But the look of the English Channel gives me a wows torpedo boner
They had stupid numbers of torpedo boats and coastal artillery
And the gulf of biscay is also full of uncharted rocks

ww1 hypotheticals are much more fun than ww2 ones
They are because germany had spent 40 years preparing their army
Can confirm. Sinterklaas always seems to get stuck there. 
Also the russian revolution is just such a wildcard
well if you expand the time scope a bit, it's also that different alliances or war starting points could easily be imagined
not so much with ww2
Bulgaria joins the entente and beats AH in 1914

Britain gives Agincourt and erin to the ottomans
bulgaria stronk 💪 💪💪
According to bf1 if the ottomans had beat the British in 1914 they would’ve joined the entente because they had oil
Ottoman invasion of german east africa


Japanese invasion of German China
Wdym that actually happened
german and Austrian relations break down but the german and british alliance efforts succeed in the early 1900's
Germany and UK vs France Russia AH
ottoman and US wildcards
idk i'm just schizoposting
A-H was already collapsing truth be told
They killed some serbs
And then got three years of fun with the italians
oh yeah italians
After which they keeled over and died
italy germany vs france AH russia
indeed
i think only a toilet in paris will be left after that war
Who dies first
AH
Not Serbia?
Doesn’t matter as long as AH and Britain keel over and die
maybe?

How does Britain die in that engagement
From laughter?
by the power of french cope
sure man

So
Surcouf at the uk was secretly blockading it??

Because the only way French sailors end up at Liverpool is as POWs
but for real tho, everyone wants shit from AH

AH is dying really early yea
Aa always
But I think Serbia would get trampled first
Just
From the sheer excitement of getting to AH
i wouldnt say it was "fated to collapse"
i'd say a confederation was entirely possible
if no war
and some luck
And a dash of divine intervention
1917-1918: happens
Finland, Estonia, Lituania, Latvia, Hungary, Croatia, Slovenia,…: bonjour
Eesti stronk 💪
They were the first to get born from the revolution
Also for anyone that hasn’t experienced LSD, I can recommend reading in depth about the russian revolution
Especially the part where they started shooting 15 and 16 year olds

Sounds like russia
Is it really a russian war without child soldiers?
Well it was not even a war
Alright "conflict"
Just killing the only people that could possibly oppose the glorious Bolshevik cause

(They only got 20% of votes)

"Special military coup"
Petrograd moment
Inb4 ban

Also AH didn’t have a reserve army in ww1
So
They…
Couldn’t let their soldiers rest
By swapping with reserves
Like literally everyone else was doing
sounds like a recipe for success
though i guess that sufficed for the mountain adventures they had with italy
1 nothing wrong with me
2 nothing wrong with me
3 nothing wrong with me
ok i wont post all like 13 battles here i'll get warned for spam probs

It may or may not have something to do with the location being the only spot along the border where you can actually launch an offensive from the Italian into something other than sheet mountain face, but, yes, meme go BRRRR
Phoenix I understand the complexity of the ordeal but
12 battles

Please just delete Cardona
And get Diaz
I mean, yes, but I want to imagine for a second that you count every battle along the entire western front as a repeat of the same affair.
It's kind of the same thing, except now add an extra front the Germans could attack from but you couldn't
no regrets 
Though, yes, Cadorna was an ass that should have been replaced earlier
All the battles for the Aisne river
Challenge accepted
That’s honestly my only gripe lol
But let’s have a moment of silence for Belgium
That said, it does have to be aknowledged that he is often used as a scapegoat for issues with the Italian war effort - namely, issues with how the government approached the war, issues much lower down in the CoC that had to do with how the Italian army was organized, and also idiotic commands that came from on high - ex, more than one offensive was launched because the Entente asked for one, in order to 'take pressure off' the western front. Which, uh, for obvious reasons didn't actually do anything to impact the Western front really until 1917 when the Austrians asked for German aid (which lead to Caporetto).
in different news, i've seen people on forums talking about how the new KF51's drone launcher module can actually be swapped for an extra 10 round ammo bustle
that would be pretty interesting
though i don't know how true that is
That's what the drone launcher module replaces, yeah.
Normally that space would be used for ammunition storage
Drones are the way
Would prefer that over 10 shells
They can also scout
Extra shells cant
i guess their idea is that each vehicle can provide atleast limited reconnaissance
Overdo it by team operation
Whole tank battalion launching drones
Or half carry scout drones half Carry Kamikaze drones
Tbh I'd prefer to keep more ammo and have the drone launching/recovering separate from the tank.
But there's a lot of potential there
guess having options is never a bad thing
smh old news /s
https://www.armyrecognition.com/defense_news_march_2021_global_security_army_industry/italian_ariete_mbt_can_launch_uav_from_its_gun.html

gun lauched UAV's
lol
based
gun launched loitering munitions
The russians were one of the first to gun-launched UAVs, they have had a 152mm diameter one for a long time to be fired from arty
You almost certainly could fit the regular switchblade 300 in any standard 120 or 105mm gun.
76 
M18 hellcat launched loitering munitions
brb repurposing the otomatic as an automatic switchblade launcher
I mean if you really wanted to
smack in another storage rack extension and smack one of these in the back of the tank
👁️ tho Paladin gun launched switch blades 600 does sound fascinating in concept
but again gun launched wise probably better to just have conventional guided rounds
I think Switchblade 600 and all the NLOS ATGMs share a niche without realizing it
And I'm pretty sure Switchblade is going to win once they realize
Considering the whole
being considerably cheaper and being able to loiter
Does everything the ATGMs do, but loiters
So even if you lose sight of the target initially you can just
Wait for a while
Within line of sight you're better off sticking to fire and forget ATGMs
I mean the main flaw I see in switchblade is travel time but that's made up by being able to loiter
And just dropping the NLOS cost and weight
I can why you'd have 600s/300s be a more dispersed asset while you have spike NLOS or something in more dedicated units
Also
Little things like
The field of view on an NLOS means you better know damn well where the target is
And if you've got the target located that well you might as well let actual indirect fires take the shot
On an ATGM scale it comes across as a bit...
GWOT/COIN influenced
thinking about it
why haven't the TOW Humvees or Strykers gotten anything significant done to them upgrade wise
suppose they're experimenting with Spike equipped JTLVs
but like, why are we still having TOW only equipped Strykers
Direct fire anti-tank from defilade
wouldn't it be better to just convert them to spike carriers
that or give TOW a F&F capability if its possible to just smack a javelin seeker on it
(I remember that being brought up in a chieftain video)
TOW remote launcher when 👁️
There's also just sort of
Not a huge reason to go very hard for a TOW upgrade
Due to how proliferated Javelin is
idk for the vehicle role, I just don't see the point in the Stryker TOWs since in any combat encounter they're probably gonna get folded outside of the most ideal circumstances
suppose its different when they're acting in support of Stryker Infantry units
since they'll have Javelin infantry supporting them alongside Stryker Dragoons
but like outside of that I think it would be more ideal to either smack them with Spike or up their firepower somewhat
I mean
If they really need to
They can just go all in on ground launched Hellfire and/or move JAGM into a surface to surface role
believe JAGMs already moving to a surface to surface role
would be funny to see ground radar guided hellfire/JAGM tho
with the hellfires and assumingly the JAGMs ballistic trajectory should be doable
I mean the frontal Stryker units are already getting CROW-Js
and Stryker Dragoon's can mount Javelin as well
If someone digs into a treeline with the proper spacing from the actual edge of the forest
Then anything with a top attack profile is going to have a bitch of a time
direct fire the Javelin
It's still lofted
fair
Eh, from what I remember Javelin direct fire mode isn't lofted much at all
idk I feel moving Stryker TOW to either JAGM or Spike would give Stryker units a NLOS capability since the TOW's role seems to be less needed with the wider issuing of Javelin
JAGM would still have that direct attack capability as well
Direct fire Javelin is direct in a very relative way
Yeah I know, I just didn't remember it being up to 60m
Probably because the shots that show up in most promo vids are direct fire and extremely short range, so they probably barely reach the ~20 meters to reach 1km
The flight profiles for the 4km+ shots must be pretty wild
Oh, right
Also
There's a point where trying to add too much reach to systems just ends up being counterproductive
At 4km Javelin is already outranging most tank fire.
Meanwhile Spike ER is getting out to 10km, and NLOS is going all the way out to 32km
And you start running into issues with people wanting to use your ATGMs for things they're not meant for
Especially when you start putting things like that onto IFV-esque platforms
I mean ATGMs are likely gonna be used on any vehicle encountered
that just boils down to AT discipline
I mean
More like
You need your unit of IFVs in the here and now, overwatching some point
Not being asked to answer a call for fire from a unit 20km away
I mean
I'm not saying throw Spikes on everything
I'm just thing the TOW Stryker might have greater capability if it was able to fling missiles at targets 8-30 KMs away
even for Bradley I see the reasoning to maintain the TOW
TOW Stryker with missiles like that would be an indirect fire asset
since Bradley has not only its auto cannon but also supporting infantry
The point is they needed a direct fire AT asset for supporting Strykers and infantry
And now that CROWS-J and Dragoon are running around they're more likely to just drop it entirely than upgrade it
I don't really see why they'd drop CROWS-J
???
is there some issue with it I haven't been seeing
Protectors been in service forever how the fuck are they fucking up mounting a Javelin on it
Where did I say anything about dropping CROWS-J?
👁️
Unmanned non-penetrating M230 + quad Javelin turret
30mm and 4 ready to fire Javelins
god I hope next gen stryker is a development of the LAV-700
I mean
they might as well just make a stryker dragoon turret with a TOW launcher
give the Stryker TOW a bit more umph in that direct fire role
it should be a UR DD gun
so they'll make it a gold aa gun
because that's what DM's twin 76mm are, and they hate UR AA guns
How i wished Armchair Generals/Admirals could understand that there's no point on militarizing this 
Put a giant laser on it
the Bond villain strat
Ariete launching UAV... from its gun
oh hi there Hiro Hito
The Sea Control Ship (SCS) was a small aircraft carrier developed and conceptualized by the United States Navy under Chief of Naval Operations Elmo Zumwalt during the 1970s. Currently the term refers to naval vessels that can perform similar duties. The SCS was intended as an escort vessel, providing air support for convoys. It was canceled afte...
shame the 200 lost to this piece of shit
thing would of had similar VTOL configuration to the F-35B while also having a proposed CTOL version
fair
should of clarified that I was referring more to the engine
single engine vs the dual engines used on the YAK-38 with actual super sonic capability
eh thinking about it
more YAK-141 style than the YAK-38
well
none of them are very F-35B like actually
F-35 has more in common with Harrier
once you get past the superficial placement of the thrust fan being like the two whole extra engines
mmm
makes me wonder tho, why they went with the VFX-12 over the 200
probably looking at it with the benefit of hindsight but 200 seemed to be a lot more proven in terms of configuration
vs uhhh this thing
They augmented the math on the proposal for the augmented thrust engine
o right that entire thing
"Lab tests showed 55% thrust augmentation should be expected; however, differences in the scaled-up system dropped augmentation levels to 19% for the wing and a mere 6% in the canard. While the augmenters did work as expected, the extensive ducting of the propulsion system degraded thrust, and in the end the power-to-weight ratio was such that the engine was capable of vertically lifting only 75% of the weight of the aircraft in which it was mounted."
tfw you augment the math
we could have had it all... 🎶
P.1154 is the real deal
Literally supersonic harrier++ designed by Camm himself
something about just looking into old USAF/Navy aircraft competitions
and finding the American MIG-29
Well, that played a part
But what drove P.1154 off the deep end was the demands it be a joint RAF-FAA programme, and the FAA sabotaging the requirements
time period when the FAA still had CATOBAR capability
(Basically, they A) wouldn't accept a single-engine plane, and B) were extremely hesitant to get a STOVL plane as it might mean doom for their CV programs if they didn't need CATOBAR CVs)
So it became a RAF only program, and then in '64 the new Wilson government told the airstaff that they got to keep one of the three major programs in development - these being TSR-2, P.1154, and HS.681.
HS.681 was easy for them to ditch, and when it came down to it TSR-2 mattered more than P.1154 to the air staff. So P.1154 died.
HS.681 was a really woke blown flap STOL transport, kind of like a baby C-17 but much earlier
kinda reminds me of that British C-130 competitor that never took off
The argument for buying F-111 over TSR-2 was sound, it offered more for less.
yeah

"Realize the party's goal of strengthening the army in the new era, and build the people's army into a world-class army in an all-round way" "Strive to build a strong and modern navy to provide strong support for realizing the Chinese dream of a strong military"
God that's cool
Oh yes how cool militarism and might
Cant wait to see how pathetically inadequate this thing ends up being
Hey it has catapults unlike QE now 
Would count that as pro already
And?
QE has F-35s
Half of the criticisms levelled against STOBAR carriers are obsolete with the F-35
Yeah it use B variant. Can't use the C variant
imagine having 4 classes of supercarrier to copy notes from and still fucking up the catapult layout
Lmfao
and elevator layout
The lift layout genuinely hurts me
Yeah US won't sell China
they have to use FC31 instead for future
J15 until they are mass produced
The PLAN and PLAAF don't have any aircraft in service or in development with a radar comparable to the F-35
And the F-35s radar is equivalent to a previous generation AWACS
or engines
How fucked is the catapult layout?
Which allows the F-35b to operate as an AWACS or AEW platform
Which is genuinely revolutionary since it makes the E-2 almost obsolescent
Differences with Ford
Still can't operate C-2 which is valid but that can be gotten around
While not a fan of the elevator layout, it must be noted catapult #4 on ford and nimitz is for all intents and purposes useless.
There's a billion restrictions on it.
is this another one of those, "you say things and people take you at your word" things
What's the problems with the elevators too? Obviously short of one on the port side.
???
The port side lift means you have to move aircraft across the flight deck in order to launch from catapult 3
I know it's fun to make fun of how far behind people are in the radar department, but E-2 brings things to the table that F-35 doesn't
Ah. Makes sense for that one. But catapult?
like a radar that does the stuff Russia and China try to brag about doing
Also means recovered aircraft have to move further to be stowed below
Which slows down recovery rates
i.e. actually spotting low RCS targets at all alts
Question
Why US prefers F35C over F35B. Going with catapults that is
More range and payload?
Is it worth sacrificing over vtol?
Yes

The C has the highest fuel load of the 3
I didn't say the E-2 was worthless I just said that a stobar carrier without them can use an F-35 to fulfil a similar role
Not as well but it's still a vitally important capability to have
C variant is objectively superior
But the b, despite being watered down is still one of the best fighters on the planet regardless
Wrong group sorry
As to cat layouts... Catapult 3 and 4 can't be used at the same time, for reasons that should be very, very obvious to looking at the Ford or Nimitz layouts. Cat 4 also has a wing clearance limit due to its proximity to the edge of the flight deck meaning you can't use it for anything with a wide wingspan - and I am still trying to find the exact limit.
(Am busy looking through NAVAIR manuals to get the exact number)
Unfortunately, the exact limit is in "Aircraft Launch Bulletin 0-16" which is not public. That said, it is quite clear that there are strict limits on it.
Was doing a read up on the F35 recently.
Ignoring the stealth(it is amazing) it is possibly the best fighter on earth by avionics suite alone
RGB missiles you say
where is your stealth god now
me looking at an rgb missile about to enter cwis range due to confusing all other systems
rgb missiles are easier to see
I wonder why that is
What was the equivalent of Graf Zepellin in other navies?
a slingshot and a rock
Fair enough
Imagine asking Japan how to build a carrier and they give you old Akagi plan and claim it state of the art, just as they pull her for complete rebuild
Closest thing is Aquila I guess?
GZ is oversized and underperforming. There are no similar ships.
Or in the state of utter delusion that you want to mount 2 x 3 203mm guns on your carrier
Raeder certified moment
I meant, just performance-wise
But thanks for y'all's input
Who fucking knows, we don't even know what plane were to be fitted
Probably a 17000ter in a trenchcoat
If you mean her performance as a target vessel for bombs
Bf109T and Ju87C no?
multiple candidates
Yes and no, the Fi-167 was also designed for GZ
Nah, it's her all important performance... as a floating lumberyard
You can also thank Meyer Goering for refusing to work actively with the designers
Yeah, the problem is expecting them to be working completely flawless as intended
"How big do the elevators need to be?"
"As big as my appetite"
I thought those were canned.
That's what I heard from Military Aviation History at least.
Let's theoretically say, in WoWs (sorry for mentioning the shithole), she performed as she would've irl, and completed.
Would.. she even be T6?
That's an awkward question
We really don't know
The fact that we don't know the plane complement, or even the mode of launching the planes is literally up in the air
Since no carrier in wows is historically performing.
Are the planes purely launched by catapult? launched conventionally? A hybrid mix?
as slow as she would launch planes, and as poor as the planes would perform since they had no real conversions and the ones they did have were super questionable, probably
It's honestly hard to quantify when you don't know the doctrine and institutional knowledge, which was like two third the point of carrier operation
You also need to take into account crew proficiency, you can have a green crew like Taihou and trashing your planes day 1
Compared to the veterans of the Kido Butai
You are correct, canned for Ju87E.
Ah.. alright
Also, if you're on wehrb copium, there's also this
laughs at the Jumo004 failing and burning the whole carrier
Maybe I need though, or just that Im in desperation trying to find competent T8, T9, T10 designs for my own tech trees that aren't underpowered, or far-fetched
Assuming everything to just work is also problematic. Take Corsair, who know it'll be complete pig to land if you're only looking at spec sheet. Or the whole SB2C
You're almost completely out of options for Germany
Definitely
You can go for the Europa conversion, which is bigger as I recall
please don't
Flugzeugträger B is most likely GZ without the idiotic twin 15cms, and C and D is up in the air
IIRC might even be smaller designs
Eendracht CV
h39 cv conversion
I used this (from a WoWs forum post) as a reference
Naval bombardment of the houses of Parliament by the RN
tbh anyone trying to add more cvs into wows is already an enemy of the people

HMS Belfast is right there
It would be easy
Entwurf A-I is news to me.
Not a proposal, just a personal project :>
aight
shut the fuck up, I want my funny nonsensical Dunkerque hybrid /s

Aquila next patch 
Why basing most of the CV speculations off BB hull conversion anyway?
Everyone know it's suboptimal, and the sole actual datapoint, GZ, wasn't even based off Bismarck
Provided the construction is early enough, it's...okay, I guess?
'cause the nazis didn't have any experience building actually good CVs?
so conversions
I mean, they did design GZ specifically for a CV, what makes you think they won't do so later
Honestly, what would you think a solid original German Design would be like? Something of a Zuikaku to the Japanese, or a Yorktown to the US..
Oh, found it
Entwurf A-I are those funny aircraft carrying cruisers
in other words, please just shoot me and be done with the thing
and please don't send me to the ostfront kthx
"flight deck cruiser' A I presented on April 9 th, 1942. The ship would have had a displacement of 40,000 tons and air complement of 12 Me 109 fighters and 16 Ju 87 dive bombers. The artillery was to be composed of one quadruple 20,3 cm gun turret on the fore deck and sixteen 15 cm guns in double casemates. 210,000 hp Diesel engines would give the ship a top speed of 34 knots. The armour corresponded to the standards of a heavy cruiser.
Wait a minute..
Oh lord
Lmao
Honestly at that point idk how big the actual ship wouldve been
quad turret to boot
Just a bit better than this thing then
Lest you wonder, it comes with a floatable airfield
Looks like this shit I found years ago without the superfiring quad
4 triple 203s, on 5200 tons
It's a 203 mm, Graf Spee gun I reckon
HA-
The Panzerschokolade does wonders
It's not too far off anyway
and Sirene found evidence of what appears to be 380mm/406mm quadruple turret designs in the BdA anyway.
no...
..Just turn Belfast's guns around
Lexington's flight deck was 270 meters long. If the flight deck on that entwurf thing was that long then the ship would reach about 360 meters long, or just under 1000 feet
belfast didn't exist then
What year?
Restore Victory and bombard the Parliament with 50+ guns every 3 minutes
I forgor
Belfast was in drydock from 1939 IIRC
oh
After hitting a mine and breaking her keel
TBF Lexington was basically an anomaly CV development-wise
well we'll just use bow torps to take her out first
True, it was quite big
and then use her as a stable firing platform
She did

F
It's also why every WoWS Edinburgh is literally just Belfast
armor, no, powerplant, lol
Ah yes, bland like the Brits
have a sniff yourself, maka.
900 tons of lightweight metal, 800 tons of armour, 500 tons of ballast
Holy crap
I still don't know what the Jumo Turbines are
Preferably not as complex as the 004 engines
even assuming the armor is structural it's still whack
I mean, doesn't springsharp have difficulties handling Indret-Sural magic
step 1: make a block of steel
step 2: give it a name and commission the block of steel in your navy
step 3 : have it be present in every battle
step 4: ???
step 5: invincible warship achieved
or is that RTW2
ss
I basically only set a standard ca size, added the weight on there by force and it put the block coefficent so low it died
I mean, the Brits barely managed to cram together a design for 10,000 tons on 4 x triple 203, and that's with almost zero protection, so....

I would like to present algerie
I can make anchorage on 13k
Idc what you think

Skill issue
nah, it's based
is it tho
























