#history
1 messages · Page 207 of 1
it gets some ships like one billion inch thick armors, so sure
10" deck North Carolina here we come
we want montana NOW
10” deck will give me a 10” d-
[dragged away by tea]
A 6" D on top of a 4" D?
That'll definitely get you in trouble
Inb4 they actually do have 10” deck and modern blueprints were fake ones to deceive spies
Well, she is a museum ship...
And that 16in belt
In fairness, the official USN estimate is that her belt is equivalent to a vertical 16" belt
So I can't really blame them too much for that one
But a 6" upper deck is just too brainy
the one between the Eurofighter and the Gripen is a Super Hornet
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f1/Four_Super_Hornets.jpg
let the gift of metacentric height take you higher
whilst KGV stayed back beyond 10,000 yards, so that her guns would still have a plunging arc

I’m sorry do you run around on museum ships with a hidden steel drill to measure weather deck thicknesses
(Fuck you actually might)
Well, there’s a reason I couldn’t go on board Iowa for the Azur Lane event…
... did you try to fuck it
My lawyer advises me to plead the fifth
I see.
In fact Roma which had a similar top armor of 157mm’s quite similar to Bismarck’s

mmm
no
The King George V class battleships are ton-for-ton the most heavily protected battleships ever made, and in absolute protection second only to the Yamato class battleships

I like how this is wrong even with their premises, because Vanguard existed
How the hell do some of these idiots come up with this shit
Rivet counters who are good at memorizing numbers
DO NOT stick your genitalia into a 16in/50 cal Mark 7 gun
With the right combo of numbers, you can make those conclusions
But numbers alone do not always bring enlightenment
citation needed
Remember:
There are lies, damned lies, and statistics
ton for ton so protected that we can immediately name two other ships the same size better protected
the 6'' deck roma tho
Over mags 
Remember, it’s okay to assume all enemy attacks will hit your heaviest armor only
don't crush my dreams like that
There’s no reason to give armor values that are less than the max
something tells me elsewhere it is much less
4” over machinery
so that this is not a convincing number
Given people have climbed inside the barrels
Technically
People have already done so
TA 50
14 - 1369, 37.76/9.48/80.52 - ncp
15 - 1334, 37.81/10.38/79.62 - bfp
...
23 - 1085, 39.08/18.46/71.54 - bfp
24 -
25 - 1037, 39.76/20.71/69.29 - bfp
26 - 1013, 40.12/21.83/68.17 - bfp
27 - 990, 40.48/22.94/67.06 - ncp
28 -
29 - 939, 41.15/25.06/64.94 - ncp
30 - 917, 41.57/26.15/63.85 - ncp
31 - 892, 41.96/27.20/62.80 - cp
-
15k-26k bfp, 31k cp
-

No pen from 0-14k yards, base-first pen from 15k-26k yards, no pen from 27k-30k yards, complete pen from 31k+ yards
This, more than any other reason, is why I hate incremental armor schemes
He brings the portable ultrasound system
"it's a girl!"
How does that measure armor thickness
It can only discover where crewmen would store bodies of their enemies
Because ultrasounds systems can peer through and get a thickness measurement?
You do realize that tank autists have been bringing them to measure tanks in museums?
I thought they just gave images of shit like babies
Lmfao
Here's a chieftain that they used the ultrasound on in a bunch of places
It was developed for ships
These are nominal thicknesses?
Those are the raw thickness of material, non LoS yes
yes, I use ultrasound at work to see how full liquid containers are
it's very flexible
me when a 12” shell ricochets off the water and is heading for my fighting post
I get shredded
You become the dinosaur
in fact, i get so shredded that I pick the shell from the air and throw it back, detonating the enemy magazine
Must’ve put the powder mags over the shell rooms
The sheer heat of my return throw caused the air to super heat, detonating the powder
Relativistic shell
My throw however caused an air burst which vaporised most of my own fleet

@tough quail
lesgoooo
hardened baguette dispenser
@tough quail can you explain this
when having 120mm AP from the highest energy tank gun in the world isnt enough, the french decide it needs to be reloaded in six fucking seconds
Ultrasound is very common in shipyard to QC weld quality
We use gamma ray from Cobalt-60 to NDT pressure vessel 
Imagine modernized the damn AMX-50... in 2010+ -ish time period.
so the leclerc?
I was thinking adding RWS and APS...
Putting some modular armor...
But trimmed the weight down abit
As if you still like the Oscillating turret
oh and add a newer 120 gun and some FCS by Thales
or the funny 140mm leclerc for the overkill gun
Would an unmanned gun-only "turret" counts as oscillating turret or does it need to have the magazine oscillating with the gun elevation 
unmanned turret... on an AMX-50
Damn... beating the Russians early for unmanned turret
Well, AMX-13 is already halfway there
I don't think AMX-50 was significantly different

ok... maybe I just imagining turning AMX-50 into a French Armata...

Non, Leclerc is AMX-56 )))
@spring briar first French tank I've ever seen in person
is that a tank?
Tankette
That one specifically was abandoned in Norway before being found and brought to this museum
very smol and cute
Renault UE
406mm shell
isn't the biggest shell a 600mm shell from karl gerat?
the one on the right looks like a 406
The placard was wrong rip

I wonder what ship this came off
My German ain't great
'In the 30th year in the Reichsmarine ???
And of/from Torpedo Boat ???
Caliber 105mm'
Probably a 1923 to 1937 type Fleet Torpedoboat
Which doesn't narrow it down that much given the volume of these ships
Can exclude the 1939s, the pre dreads and Emden tho, as it's not HA
I haven't got a clue what eingefuehrt or verwandet mean unfortunately
I'm not about to try to type an umlaut on my phone ok
Aha
Eingeführt can also mean inserted, but that would only apply in the ecchi/hentai genre
Lmao

So basically either the museum this is at had no idea what particular boat it came from or no one cared enough to note it
'Torpedo Boat 6969'
Good enough as any
Eingeführt
I love it when what looks like a digraph isn't actually a digraph
from Emden?
Yeee
It's tall
the motor they developed for Z-51 and that I dream of at night
The 15,000hp Diesel motor


I'm leaving the museum now

I found a gloucsefeerzter meteor engine in the basement of my university
is that the russian concorde clone
Yeah
well ig it was technically first
big chungus
your voice is somehow australian
Whoa really
Yeah they got an imax theatre here
It's cool but I fell asleep during the ocean thing mainly because it was in German without subtitles
hit voice
My knowledge of German is basic at best
I've just found out that USS Enterprise looks like a very long Béarn and now I'm basically scared
@chilly flower I call upon thee and request the aid of the aircraft recognition god
What is this plane?
My best guess is Victor but
I doubt it
Had this on the side
HMMM
lead and mislead
How could someone not recognize a Nimrod?
I don't think that hull profile is used anywhere else
I-
Didn't think of it
I was confused
The only nimrod I know is the Hawker nimrod
I guess this particular airframe is XW665
opinions?
Are you WW1 Germany?
no units make this annoying as piss to read
What is this, rtw?
are you trying to simultaneously trigger as many people as possible jord
is that what this is
Either put on wing turrets or don't built it until you get B
AX twins or bust.
AWY is lightest configuration in RTW
B and X gets barbette tax
France
No superimposed tech
ok cool
1906
i suppose 3x2 15cm battlecruiser doesn't make any goddamned sense anyway
kek
no main batteries at all
secondary and tertiary guns only
think of the weight savings
Nobody will expect you to use a gigantic battering ram in the 20th century so it'll probably work
Build your ships with barbettes and magazine spaces, but no turrets
Easily fits treaties
Then when needed you drop in the turrets and you get a fully functional ship
devious
im kind of surprised nobody ever just made a battlecruiser with shitloads of armor and tons of regular 8" guns as some dumb cruiser smiting brick
i mean its stupid
but im surprised nobody did it
We can drop in the 355mm gun there
or alerted by the horse in this case
Just you see
How about this
We take a boat a label it as a ship and then build an actual ship around it without treaty limits
🧠
let's use aluminium
Weight stipulation: Am I a joke to you?
yes
Everyone barely made an actually floating cruiser within limit, imagine putting armor
by that i mean like
an actual battlecruiser sized capital ship with just a stupid amount of 8" guns
again, very stupid, but a trap im surprised nobody fell into
I guess that might actually happen had Tsushima never happened
But. Why do that when you can build more cruisers
Why build a ship with 20 203mm if you can build 2 cruiser with 10 203mm each
or if Pakenham had taken some splinter straight on the face
why did germany want to build the Spahkreuzer?
naval design is not the land of the sane
Because they can't build BBs
openly
this is after they rejected all treaties and told the british to eat dick
the spahkreuzers were in the same building program as the whole h-class
Yeah no clue
Novgorod
I seriously think that had the treaty didn't made CA "the next best thing you can build that isn't BB", every Navy eventually will just build BBs and CLs
the spahkreuzer makes sense as a scouting cruiser
but sadly the KM was nowhere near the size it needed to be to use them effectively
so

except >seakeeping
Soviets: Casually goes with Soyuz construction since they weren't in treaty. Yet keeps it secret
they're at this perfect design and tonnage crossroad to be simultaneously
poorly armed
horrendous seakeeping
overarmed relative to that seakeeping
virtually completely unprotected
Essentially Konigsberg pt.2 huh?
they're gonna end up getting the z23 treatment of just being unable to reload their guns in the atlantic
the 6" armed destroyers were horribly difficult to reload due to the horrendous seakeeping and stability
they weren't literally impossible to reload
Nothing new with KM's light cruiser
but it was really hard
look at their technical record
and completely negated the firepower jump and then some
it's awful
Why she is slower than Kirov? 
she isn't tho?
"what if we made something even worse than this"
Like sure trial speed says 40. But why normal speed is slower
36 vs 34
the kirovs are 2k tons heavier
be careful with speed at what load condition
Yeah 9 180mm vs 9 152mm 
yeah emile is about 3k tons lighter at full load
have you seen how cramped the kirov turrets are krem
I doubt the turrets are that much heavier
Yeah. Fix to those turrets were Donskoi's 180mm design we see in wows 
And Bagration that is
too heavy
nevermind emiles turrets are literally half the weight
lolw
Kirov is 113k while 3k difference
that's pretty darn heavy then
chapayevs turrets were nearly identical in weight btw
daily reminder the kirovs should have just been rearmed with those
also don't forget the kirov's actually have armor
which is the main difference here
Ah fuck I forget the armor
emile just needs to operate with the DD's
yeah emiles lighter on armor
Re: Spähkreuzers, from what I can tell they suck as hard as they do because they wanted to cramp way too much into them
if you want a comparison
maybe la gal but then again she has much more armor and still has 152's

Soviets had plan to arm Tallinn with 12 180mm or 12 152mm (Chapa guns) after the war.
But 180mm production was stopped and 1 ship wasn't worth to start it again. And 152mm refit would be too expensive that you could have bought another Sverdlov for same money. Thus Tallinn stayed with no refit
Long range, the entire midship hull is stiffened with armor, 35kn speed and a catapult
They're not as bad as Leipzig I guess
Flamu: DEAD ON ARRIVLA BECAUSE WG HATES GERMANS
see the thing is
leipzig is a mid 1920s design
nearly every cruiser in the world was a piece of shit
I just want to know if its true that Wargaming hates German stuff. They seem to not want to give the Germans any buffs and they introduce the Russian BB line which feels like its designed to 1-up the Germans in every category (except for citadel armor of course). The same thing happened in WOT wh...
the spahkreuzers being late 30s is humiliatingly poor
That I hold against the Spähs
they're some of the absolute worst ships designed past 1930, if not the worst period
Other nation managed to build CLs that didn't fall apart just by floating around in 1920 tho
But Leipzig is like, really bad as a second gen
Soviets: Why you guys call light cruisers as heavy cruisers
speaking of heavy cruisers
I found more stalingrad pictures

gib gib
How
place stoolgrade directly into my brain
Dunkerque is a heavy cruiser for Soviets
I think
should be
same general idea as kronshtadt, just hyperfocused on fisting panzerschiffes specifically
Izmail was the true battlecruiser for Soviets 

The magic of Russian forums(?)
Too bad there was the great purge few years back 
cries in 17500 t french cruiser killer

russian and for some reason also polish forums seem to be like
an infinite trove of naval history
a good 80% of detailed diagrams ive seen outside of books and museums are in Cyrillic
There's a lot of technical naval book in Polish for some reason
Exactly. Found 1949 design of Stalingrad like that
It's Petro with 305mm guns
thats trippy
Brennus bussy 
kremlin no
The "State Anthem of the Republic of Belarus" (Belarusian: Дзяржаўны гімн Рэспублікі Беларусь [d͡zʲarˈʐawnɨ ɣʲimn rɛsˈpublʲikʲi bʲɛɫaˈrusʲ]), better known as "My Belarusy" (Мы, беларусы; "We, Belarusians"), is the national anthem of Belarus. It was originally written in the 1940s and adopted in 1955 for use in the Byelorussian Soviet Socialist R...
Its too late

You say that
the kgb has been digging into foreign navies of the last century in case any irl shipgirl shenanigans actually comes to fruition
french forums are still the best ofc but
But the only thing out of Russian media I've found is a Celebes with random AA guns and barbetteturrets penetrating the entire thing.
got to be prepared in case algerie or saratoga are suddenly a viable combatant again
I hope Kremlin will love Tsesarevich one day
French Navy destroyer D621 "Surcouf" after a collision with the Soviet tanker "General Bocharov" on June 6, 1971 in the Mediterranean Sea
why must the things i love destroy each other
Horse

Perhaps
yos
Pamiat vibes 
thats just a dick
one day kremlin, you will see why the russians lost at tsushima
If only Soyuz was teleported there
and it's not because of their ships
i think there's like 70 different reasons you're gonna need to be specific
if you told me all of the turret crews were suddenly attacked by snakes i would believe you
Admiral dreadnought challenge needed
1 Soyuz vs Japanese fleet of Tsushima
biggest reason is the long voyage of the 2nd ps and japanese use of blackpowder filled HE

comparing the battle of tsushima to that of the yellow sea, it becomes clear
i love soyuz but its togo
i think he'd just board her and fight the crew if he has to
ah yes
the butterfly effect of the turn of the century IJN capturing a completed Soyuz thrown back into the past

shits gonna get weird
The cruiser Bayan (Russian: Баян) was the name ship of the four Bayan-class armoured cruisers built for the Imperial Russian Navy in the first decade of the 20th century. The ship had to be built in France because there was no available capacity in Russia. Bayan was assigned to the First Pacific Squadron after completion and based at Port Arthu...
Kremlin the borodino's would've shrugged off the Japanese fleet if the crew had simply been given the tools and time to properly maintain them
like how they were able to properly maintain Tsesarevich in Port Arthur and how she was barely scratched at tsushima


please
bayan got shot by japanese 11" mortars directed from hill 203
and was a fine ship


RIP admiral makarov and admiral vitgeft
had they not died we would not have sakura empire today
but maybe sakura union
don't cry krem
Oslyabaya wouldn't have wanted that
she wanted you to be happy

On positive side
Tsushima loss is one of things going for revolution
Sovetsky Soyuz wouldn't exist without Soviet Union
so Tsushima loss actually created her
uhhh
It gotta influenced Soyuz in some way
you know Gangut has 152mm barbettes and 75mm turret roof yes?
As I remember. Gangut has lessons from Tsushima. But not sure what lessons
if anything she was a lesson what not to do in Soyuz
vibes in bayesian statistics telling how fucked the british could've been
I’m pretty sure a lack of advantageous loss ratio at Jutland would somewhat nullify the morale advantages of a draw at Doggystyle Bank

ok but
who says dogger bank would've been a draw
actually
as long as the british don't fix their safe ammunition handling they're gonna have a hugely skewed loss ratio
Loss of 1 UK BC, loss of 1 IG ACR, end of that squadron’s raiding? Seems like a draw argument could be made
ah yes
since at that point it just becomes a battle of who gets the most hits as close to the turrets/mags as possible
divination through borscht
losing a BC to an ACR would be rather devastating to the RN imo
ofc that should never happen with the proper safety procedures
but it still feels like a phyrric victory for the germans
im with jaba here, tipping the british off to the cordite problem before jutland is
going to be very
very bad
but after listening to drach's 1918 showdown between the RN and HSF I was rather bewildered
You’ll find people saying Denmark Strait was a British operational victory because it stopped the convoy attack plans 

Where is that talk of how the British ships gangbanged the Germans at Denmark Strait

it was an operational victory because it put the fear of god into the kriegsmarine
also, drach literally added an extra luck stat to HMS NZ
“Let’s never do this again”
“Renown gets an extra accuracy bonus”
and the wildest bs he added was that the british bc line was again shooting in the wrong order
like
???
hello
every single man on board of the BC's would've had it drilled in their skulls to only engage their respective opposite targets
oh look, someone finally dropped their brain on the floor and actually asked that question
She probably did, temporarily, due to fires melting the insulation off
But probably not what was meant
Rangefinders should be in the main belt smh
do rangefinding with hydrophones
Eat carrots, obtain Mark II eyeballs
“But the top rangefinders are unprotected!”
“The main rangefinders will be in the turrets.”
“Oh, I see. So they’ll be armored?”
…
“You’ll armor your turrets, right?”
Who dis, design is cool
Shylily
Brezhnev
lmfao
mm right there that right there sure is some history yes sir
Think you skipped a few steps
part 3
eating seal
part 4
disrupting submarine radars
part 5
revenge of the sonars
Oh shit it’s the commie trained dolphins
babe wake up new gigantic Spinosaurid is discovered https://twitter.com/TetZoo/status/1534856738989645826?t=3By6YiFQDr-Zgm6rt-5rgA&s=19
New today in @thePeerJ ... a new #dinosaur from the #Cretaceous #Wealden of the #IsleofWight: a gigantic #spinosaurid... link to paper below but here's a #TetZoo article... https://t.co/GGBRCzJeyt
181
and its the Brits that got em
Actual history lmao
So baboons are better waifus than humans
possibly
#prehistory 
ah sweet, this Spinosaurid is suspected to be the biggest theropod ever found in Europe too
What’s a theropod?
Theropod
any 2 legged dinosaurs basically, avian or non avian
theropod needs therapy
bords
Postcranial elements (cervical, sacral and caudal vertebrae, as well as ilium, rib and limb bone fragments) belonging to a gigantic tetanuran theropod were recovered from the basal unit (the White Rock Sandstone equivalent) of the Vectis Formation near Compton Chine, on the southwest coast of the Isle of Wight. These remains appear to pertain to...
But why
305 i think
Wait
when are we getting 1000mm torps
im no ship expert but this just looks dumb for some reason
why are there ww1 casemates in there
Someone saw Spee and thought, why not stretch her to add 3 more oversize turrets
If this bitch gets added to pr5 I will build her for the sole purpose of throwing her into arbiter fights and watch her die
These are 350 mm guns
take Mackensen
Yes
stretch it
put an extra aft turret
widen it
put an extra barrel per gun

tadaa
Those turrets look so smushed
I will tell you now Richy
Pr5 will have Germans again even 2 if WG keeps adding Germans ships like this
it still doesn't exist
No like
it's completely turret swapped
As a napkin
I'm coping and seething spain is getting a CR
Wait what
Pls not steel pls not steel
Tier?
10 duh
Holy fuck that bow 
basically a re-hulled CR
Inb4 Spain gets their first ur and it’s a cr
Soviet style bow= my respect 
"soviet style bow"
Isn’t it Italian
it's a cruiser bow

Close enough, still coping
Yeah
It’s just a game after all
it sure is
Honestly, there’s faker
Womp womp
never ask a woman her age, or what an SHS looks like under the ballistic cap
This is on NJ fyi
Never ask
A ship her age
A shell its weight
Or Tone what she did with the passengers of SS Behar in March 1944
All the better to penetrate the French with(?)

Your comment has been noted
Also found a pic of the elusive british 13.5” apc
Its taking a nap
i keep forgetting that americans back then had british accents

when exactly did americans sound like modern americans and not british
The British accent didn’t really become a thing until around the industrial revolution
iirc

also the "Americans" didn't see them as such until after the revolution. when Paul revere went on his famous ride he yelled "The regulars are comming out!" Regulars being the british army, because people in the US colonies saw themselves as British subjects protesting/revolting against unfair tax laws
does a like 18,000 ton anchorage armed ship in the late 20s count because I did have a class of those
yes
pog
@maiden citrus @spring briar @tough quail @junior trench @alpine onyx @chilly osprey
The effects of a medium-thickness upper belt on deck hits, using our favorite punching bag.
UBD = Upper Belt + (flat) deck [complete pen]
UBD BFP = Upper Belt + (flat) deck [base-first pen (usually ineffective)]
Unsurprisingly, the upper belt's presence means that target angle will affect deck penetration. The effect is moderate at low target angles off broadside, but increases substantially beyond about 30 deg off broadside (60 deg target angle), akin to the way it works for belts. While base-first penetrations are barely affected in this case, that is in part due to the thin nature of the 80 mm deck—can't go above an 80 deg impact obliquity, so 14k yards is already "bottomed out."
The first image shows the UBD and UBD BFP curves as half-thickness lines, and the third image depicts just the UBD and UBD BFP curves. The second image is the data table; note 40 means no pen out to the max range of the gun (in this case, actually about 36.9k yards).
The data sheet, if desired (not optimized for readability)
And just in case anyone's forgotten:
EFF = Belt effective penetration (intact, fit to burst)
CP = Belt complete penetration (>80% of shell weight through plate)
PP = Belt partial penetration (hole in plate)
SDCP = Sloped deck complete penetration
Deck = Main armor deck complete penetration
Deck BFP = Main armor deck base-first penetration (tumbling, unfit to burst)


OH FUCK YEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH
milduras a nice town
what about Traralgon?
nah literally only been to melbourne and driven through mildura
oh been to geelong too
cos airshow
should see Tasmanias place names
indigenous names are fine, Tasmania though
Bagdad is a small town 37 kilometres (23 mi) north of Hobart, Tasmania. It is in the Southern Midlands Council.
In the days of the horse and buggy, Bagdad was an important rest area and horse-changing place for those continuing their journey up Constitution Hill. It is now an area of orchards and small mixed farms and a commuter settlement.
wheeze
In April 2003, during the early part of the Iraq war, the town's website was bombarded by confused internet users from around the world trying to contact Iraqis

I can't believe the Mongols burned down one of the world's largest libraries there at the time

Oh in Perth you can either go Innaloo or Upper Swan
Joke works best if you say it out loud



F35 Harrier?
fat plane
Why carrier still has slope
British think slope> catapults now?
Based ngl
chonk
Norway has terminated its NH90 helicopter contract, citing the contractor's inability to find replacement components for some critical systems... 🇳🇴
https://t.co/r3Q1zewaWz
267
NH90 ehh..?
Shittiest helicopter around
Spon not being able to rationally think when something bad happens in regards to Australian defence
take the helis
employ some people
get them to see what needs to be fixed
fix it
proceed
please
for me?

they can't fix them due to a lack of spare parts
"“Regrettably we have reached the conclusion that no matter how many hours our technicians work, and how many parts we order, it will never make the NH90 capable of to meeting the requirements of the Norwegian Armed Forces. Based on a joint recommendation by the Armed Forces and associated departments and agencies, the Norwegian Government has therefore decided to end the introduction of the NH90 and has authorized the Norwegian Defence Material Agency to terminate the contract.”"
guess its back to Blackhawks ehh?
"“We have made repeated attempts at resolving the problems related to the NH90 in cooperation with NHI, but more than 20 years after the contract was signed, we still don’t have helicopters capable of performing the missions for which they were bought, and without NHI being able to present us with any realistic solutions.”"
guessing we're getting Norwegian Blackhawks
tho would be nice to see the S-92 get some attention
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sikorsky_S-92
The Sikorsky S-92 is an American twin-engine medium-lift helicopter built by Sikorsky Aircraft for the civil and military helicopter markets. The S-92 was developed from the Sikorsky S-70 helicopter and has similar parts such as flight control and rotor systems.
The H-92 Superhawk is a military version of the S-92 in the utility transport role, ...
certain key components, notably those related to the NH90’s anti-submarine warfare (ASW) capability, have also become obsolete, she says, with NHI unable to find suitable replacements.
such is what happens when you're delivering helicopter up to 20 years late
and are busy fixing things like the width of the doors
and how much weight the floor and ramp can support
I mean
It's not a helicopter that's uniquely problemed in Australia
Nor is it faulted in every country it’s used in
The sole nation without serious complaints is France really
Because they build it
And thus take all the stock of spare parts
Australia was it's first major export customer and it was 15 years late to delivery
How the fuck do you get 15 years latw and not get sued into bankruptcy
Domestic industry involvement 
Join the club
I wasn't involved
Skill issue
want to talk about how the RN didn't deliver 4crh AP to HMAS Australia?
:v
Hipper big head

What did they issue then
CPC?
2 crh

this one
it got replaced on the royal navy ships with the 4crh shells around 1915
australia not real
That's what the Kiwi's want you to believe, but in reality they're missing from maps more often than the Aussies
Also, Richy, quick question, when did the MN move from 2crh to higher crh shells?
you mean when they put winscreens on their shells?

annexation justified
Basically, yeah
🚮
but French APC caps were also somewhat close in shape to British 4crh projectiles so it wasn't that big of a detriment that they had no windscreens
I circled some of the navy shells in red to demonstrate
Compared to British 4 crh shells:
I hope this makes it a bit more clear
Yeah, it does, thanks
french AP caps necessitated a very long windscreen, which is what they also went with
Land based artillery, which used big HE did put windscreens on
µ
haven't been successful in finding pictures of the early 340mm with windscreen tho

nor the heavy AP used on the earliest of russian battleships
also the more I read on tsushima the more I call bs on togo
How so
ordering german fuses for the HE and not bothering with AP
what if
bombardment HE with a windscreen, solely so you can put an extended trigger rod out the front to the top of the windscreen
so the shell explodes above or at ground level
rather than below the surface
will have to be a long rod
or a slow shell
like my man togo went into battle without AP
and somehow faced the one fleet in all of the seven seas that had ships more flammable than a hay bale in death valley
man rolled a nat 20
3:25 AM Jun 10 1918 Italian boat, MAS-15, fires 2 torpedoes which strike boiler room of Imperial Austro-Hungarian Navy Battleship SMS Szent István. Flooding causes ship to list. Its crew crowded deck in hopes of balancing her. 6:12 AM she capsizes, 89 KIA https://t.co/MK4TqYwllX

Its crew crowded deck in hopes of balancing her.

As Petropavlovsk moved closer to the harbour's entrance, she detonated a Japanese mine that his men had failed to clear as he had instructed.[19] Secondary explosions followed quickly in succession and Petropavlovsk sank, taking Admiral Makarov with her.

He's also extremely lucky his HE shells that detonate prematurely onboard his ships didn't cause sympathetic detonation
Rough...
yeah that too
in that time any sort of breech detonation can just turn your ship into a pipebomb
Predreds try not to explode violently and sink quickly challenge (impossible)
One of wonders of aviation
The helicopter that crashed during Bin Laden's assassination
We dont know about the full design yet right
Only the tail
God I wonder how it looked in full body
Found an interesting read on Bismarck’s crew morale
Kaptänleutnant von Müllenheim-Rechberg, when interrogated, ventured the opinion that “Bismarck” could still have held her own against “Rodney” and “King George V” had not a shell from, he believed H.M.S. “Dorsetshire”, hit the Main Control Position. This blew out “Bismarck’s” brains. Main armament was then put into local control and von Müllenheim-Rechberg moved to “B” turret which was ordered to engage H.M.S. “Dorsetshire”. Only one salvo was fired. The gun’s crew had become thoroughly demoralised and mutinied and left the turret saying: “We are not going to stay here for target practice.” Müllenheim-Rechberg also left the turret. Similar scenes were taking place all over the ship for at this time “Bismarck” was taking terrific punishment.
According to one prisoner one officer drew his revolver and shot down some of the crew when they refused to obey him. Turret after turret was silenced, and communications were wrecked. Shell after shell hit the upper deck which was speedily reduced to a mass of twisted steel scourged ever again by fresh shells. Fires had broker out amidships and aft. Sheets of flame were pouring out of the funnel and the ship’s four aircraft were also burning. One shot snapped the mainmast which spun down over the quarter deck creating fresh carnage. Slowly the ship began to heel to port, water began to pour below through ventilators on the port side, water also rendering two port secondary armament turrets useless. Below on the Battery Deck ratings fought to escape with others who jammed the companionways, afraid to run the gauntlet of fire sweeping the decks above. The order to “Abandon Ship” never reached many parts of the vessel. Groups of men acted independently for themselves, but many such groups were blown to pieces before they could leave the ship.
As regards the final phase of the destruction of the “Bismarck” a conversation between two prisoners is worthy of notice. One remarked that a number of members of Germany’s Propaganda Kompanie were on board who filmed the scenes during the last battle. His companion said: “If that film was ever shown in Germany there would be no more volunteers for the German Navy.”!
I wonder if those films are in some archive
Dashcam vids of the 1940s
the formerly known as a man getting hit by a 16'' shell
As if there would be teeth left
- Although HORNET and YORKTOWN were constructed at different times, HORNET was essentially a duplicate of YORKTOWN. In the actions which resulted in the loss of these ships, they were both initially struck by two Japanese aircraft torpedoes. It will be noted, however, that the list resulting from these two hits was considerably different on the two ships. YORKTOWN listed initially to 17° and then to 24° through slow flooding, whereas HORNET listed initially 10-1/2° and remained there momentarily until counterflooding reduced the list to 7°. Although YORKTOWN took aboard more water, the difference in quantity was negligible and does not account for the difference In list assumed by the two vessels.
- The most important reason for the difference is the fact that YORKTOWN was struck by two torpedoes in the most vulnerable section of the ship - the firerooms. In this section the torpedo defense system consists of only three bulkheads. The immediate flooding of the generator room and the outboard firerooms produced about 13° of list. The flooding of the voids in the torpedo protection system and the four crew's spaces above the hits produced the remainder of the 17° initial list. HORNET, on the other hand, was struck in way of the forward engine room -a more adequately protected section of the ship. The flooding of this space resulted in no list because no longitudinal bulkheads were present. The flooding of No. 9 fireroom and torpedo protection spaces produced about 5-1/2° of list. The other hit aft struck in a section minutely subdivided which was near the centerline. These spaces in themselves probably produced about 5° of list.
Italyans
I, Tall Yan(dere)

i dont think anyone but americian corperations were happy at world wars
I don't they they meant gay in that sense of the word
Dunno
So I sent an email to Okun; if he doesn’t know then I’ll ask some others
italnyas

Garibaldi on his way to troll Cavour
air burst anti-air/anti-surface mortar HE obvs /s
So, an officer is also a shell there?

They're actually pretty useful for defending narrow waterways
The RM had a ton of 11" mortars around the straits of Messina, for example
Macc
Want to learn more about Bulldog? Check out David Willey's Tank Chat on this infantry transport vehicle this week.
Consider becoming a Patreon Supporter today: https://www.patreon.com/tankmuseum
00:00 | Intro
00:20 | Coming into Service
06:48 | Features
#tankmuseum #tankchats #DavidWilley
POV you’ve challenged the USAAF to a game of water polo
Thought those were skip bombs
#paleontology #cursed #cursedimages
A cursed image compilation that focuses on paleoart
Note: This doesn’t only include paleoart, it also includes other paleontology-related images
Audio: https://youtu.be/X6N671K_qU0
noooooooo

Full scene in HD! Ships duel in WW1, Russian Empire vs Germany. From russian movie "Admiral". Сцена битвы/дуэли кораблей из фильма "Адмиралъ".
21 cm AP setting fires on a steel deck
must be painted with crude oil
Nah, it's just coal dust.
This is why you dont paint the deck with vodka
Big fast shell hits it and it gets set on fire

Type 4 Ke-nu
👗
There is a fairly inexhaustible supply of people who think naval administration and the classifications which navies gave to ships implies that battlecruisers should never have faced battleships. Indeed, when challenged, we're often advised to "go read a history book". Like quite a few others here, my library is quite extensive but I'm aware that when told to go read a book, what the person who's backed themselves into a corner really means is "I watched a very poorly made TV show once". Study of naval warships to any meaningful depth takes a lot of time and more technical and engineering understanding than most people are willing to give it.
So, here's a fairly simple illustration. On the left, a midships cross sectional diagram of the belt and deck thicknesses of the highly regarded Queen Elizabeth class battleships, 4 of which served with distinction under Adm Beatty as part of the 5th Battlecruiser Squadron at Jutland in July 1916 and, famously, absorbed a pounding. Some of the class were heavily reconstructed later gaining substantially more horizontal armour but slowing them down further. Famously, HMS Barham exploded after being torpedoed in December 1941 in the south east of the Mediterranean. On the right, a midships cross sectional diagram of the belt and deck thicknesses of the very poorly regarded battlecruiser HMS Hood, which exploded in May 1941 following a hit from a 380mm shell travelling at 10.5 degrees below horizontal, according to the German ballistics curves for the 16,300 yards/14,900 metre range of the salvo.
It should be immediately apparent to all with functioning eyeballs that simplistic remarks such as "Hood was a battlecruiser and had armour nowhere near that of a battleship" are simply incorrect.
Hood fans explaining why a battlecruiser should be called battleship
Speaking of British
@desert agate https://www.express.co.uk/news/science/1623588/rolls-royce-engine-aukus-nuclear-submarine-deal-brexit-news-defence
Pure speculation



























