#history
1 messages · Page 205 of 1
Boo. Get new material.
CFB borden brought their M13/40 to the aquino tank weekend
At least make it a risotto joke instead
can i offer you a replica Latvian interwar tank built ontop of a Bren carrier?
rip lol
Anyways a bunch of second rate powers vs pretty much every other country in the world
It wasn’t about whether the allies would win: it was about when and what would be the cost
the M13/40 wasn't just sitting there and looking pretty, it moved under it's own power
Unfortunately due to the previous museum that was borrowing it slapping a new engine and transmission without permission and doing lord knows what with the original engine
M13/40 doesn't get much credit for what it is considering the other designs of the time
While the Map does look like alot. What if US was Axis side 
US would end up having to deal with invading Canada and fighting a war across the Atlantic to fight Britain
European axis would probably still get fucked up
But the US had zero reason to want to help them anyways 
Italian tanks are pretty cool, i was really excited when i saw it waiting to go around the track
they did they best they could with what they had
Nah like
If you actually compare the M13/40 to other tanks from the same year and broadly within the same weight class
It's pretty top of the bunch
Best case scenario for Axis-US relations is total US neutrality
Thankfully Tojo was such a paranoid idiot he attacked PH

I will admit I can’t help but feel bad for the Germans: they both ended up in hopeless wars with them having to solo a massive coalition of other powers basically on their own
Germany’s biggest weakness is picking sides
Replica StuG and a not replica M577
First by allying with the rotting Austro-Hungarians and ottomans and then basically isolating everyone in Europe from them other than Italy and Romania
M13/40 my beloved
it's in pretty bad form to call your opponents "second rate" when the opening months involve them beating your ass up and down the field
it makes you look worse more than it makes them look worse
and this is just stupid
Weren’t you arguing the last time I talked to you that France and Britain were ready for the next war and Germany only got lucky
oN tHeIr OwN
Tell me: what did Austria Hungary even do in the final years of ww1
Or the ottomans for that matter
Italy in WW2 ended up having to be turned into a client state because they signed peace with the allies
But then again why bother when it seems you guys just change your stances on something for the sole purpose of disagreeing

my man
do you understand how dramatically harder germany would have gotten fucked without their allies
the sheer amount of forces they were tangling up before the hammer came down on Germany proper?
or the fact barbarossa was pretty much only possible to begin with because of germany's allies in ww2
because they geographically widened the invasion front by over 3x
wehrbs thinking that germany solo carried barb

tfw hungary romania and finland increase the invasion corridor four fold and stretch the red army accordingly
Rip to the Romanian army: beat the shit out of Russia only to be annihilated by Stalingrad
austria-hungary and the ottomans in ww1 similarly tied up so, so many troops in ww1 for germany
consider that after the battle of vittorio veneto, the italians had basically free reign to yolo right into germany
austria-hungary useless btw
They basically beared the entire western front, Austria only had Italy (ended up losing despite having every single advantage possible) and Russia (collapsing) to worry about
every single advantage possible
the fucking alps
If Austria-Hungary’s role as an ally simply was “distraction” then they were quit the shit allies
what is this delusion
That’s literally what I mean
Defensive war in the alps!
They still fucked that up!
because germany would've just shrugged off russia, italy, the french and britain all piling into their homeland from left right and center
Italy’s army was also hopelessly incompetent
bruuuuuuuuhhhhhhhh
ok at this point
When the fuck did I say that
you need help
you realize like
a large part of italian operations in ww1 is attacking austrian held positions in the alps
Yes.
And somehow despite the fact that they had the easy task of defending the alps against the hopelessly incompetent Italian army it would’ve been easy, but instead they ended up collapsing
How do you mess up that bad
ok at this point you're just a braindead germany coper
bruuuuh
"muh poor glorious germany having to carry shit teammates smh"
More like: “Germany fucking sucks at picking allies”
And is even worse at choosing enemies
they're kind of starved for choice
“Who we fighting today” “everyone”
I literally said “hopeless war”
I’m not a wehrb
Or kaiserb
you're either grossly overrating germany or grossly underrating her allies so, 's a bit hard to tell
During that time their only directly hostile nation they dealt with was France, but then they proceeded to also piss of Russia (backing the oppressor of the Slavs by helping the brain dead Austrians), Britain (attacking Belgium), and the US ( Zimmerman and the submarines) and no, they’re not starved, they’re just F tier diplomats
Britain is part of the triple entente with Russia and France
They basically did everything they could to only end up with two rotting empires as allies
Britain wasn’t even part of the entente at the start of the war
Wym
Triple Entente was created post Belgium invasion
Due to the British guarantee
Britain might’ve just sat it out if Belgium was left alone
in a 5s search from wikipedia:
The Triple Entente (from French entente [ɑ̃tɑ̃t] meaning "friendship, understanding, agreement") describes the informal understanding between the Russian Empire, the French Third Republic and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland. It was built upon the Franco-Russian Alliance of 1894, the Entente Cordiale of 1904 between Paris and London, and the Anglo-Russian Entente of 1907. It formed a powerful counterweight to the Triple Alliance of Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Italy. The Triple Entente, unlike the Triple Alliance or the Franco-Russian Alliance itself, was not an alliance of mutual defence.
Then why didn’t Britain immediately declare war once Russia went to war
Britain only joined once Belgium’s neutrality was violated
because britain has closer ties to france?
But they also didn’t declare war when France was attacked
As said, they only declared war when Belgium was attacked
i am 99% certain that even if belgium was not attacked, it would only take a while for the french to convince the british to start fighting the germans
considering the nature of europe at that point
Hold on lemme research that
also germany and austria have such strong cultural ties that, like
time traveling back to cause germany to not ally with austria is tantamount to deleting germany's identity altogether
Aight, I concede
My eyes tricked me there for a second 
pretty sure the norcal prelims have both a triple 127 and quadruple 127 in some of them
Octuple 5" fuck it. 2 layers of 4.
did i miss shitposting time again
Nope
What does the AA crew do when there are enemy planes, but the ship still has to shoot at the enemy ship? Do the blasts significantly hinder the AA crew's operation capacity?
Yes
combined air and surface warfare is very rare
owing to the fact that most aa gunners will just see a blur in the sky and shoot at it
it's fairly common during dogfights for one ship (even not having to engage enemy ships) to accidentally shoot down allied planes
Calabria iirc featured a fair amount of surface and air warfare
yamato and tirpitz also attempted to fight planes with their main guns
didn't really work, and i'm pretty sure they need to call all crewmen below decks before they shoot
otherwise the aa gunners will probably be swimming
So the AA crew still shoot at planes regardless if the main guns are engaging enemy ships?
Not at all
During surface engagements there are still manned AA emplacements
And obviously large calibre guns don't work for AA work
confetti shells moment 
Yamato's attempt was laughable
Tirpitz's was brainy
timed 15" HE to break up formations
vs an 18" firework
pretty nutty
Not all AA emplacements can be manned during a surface engagement, positions that are close to the guns cannot be manned as the pressure of the guns firing will kill those manning them
But in the event of air attack, there are still positions manned just in case
And also qwerty is yet again talking out of his ass, friendly fire from AA was not exceptionally common as its not hard to tell which planes are hostile and which are friendly, you can use the course and the formations of the aircraft to determine their nationality and in lower altitude engagements (which most naval air battles are) its more than possible to see enemy roundels
Germans also pretty much knew exactly where the bombers would be coming from due to fjord's shape
Plus IFF was in its infancy and also helped prevent friendly fire
so it's not exactly a horrible idea to just fire 15" timed HE into the path the enemy bombers have to take
thonks 👌
15” anti personnel shell filled with steel shot
I am yet again left in pain trying to find the diagram of the safe and unsafe areas on Iowas deck when her main guns are in operation
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NKimuGp2LSs it was stated recently in Simenski's vid
In this episode we're walking from the front of the ship (the bow) to the back (the stern) on the main deck.
To support this channel and Battleship New Jersey, go to:
https://www.battleshipnewjersey.org/videofund

wait wrong vid
In this episode we're talking about the noise made by the 16in guns.
To support this channel and Battleship New Jersey, go to:
https://www.battleshipnewjersey.org/videofund
A bit late, but from accounts of the Bisko and Eugen they did keep crew on deck near their AA mounts during gunnery duels, but usually in a shelter location to reduce the likelyhood of losses to splinters. But there was no rule that the AA gun posts had to remain empty during firing, as there were plenty of witnesses that saw the engagements while at their mounts.
Also while not a BB gun, Eugen did use her main guns to fire flare rounds towards enemy planes to mark them for her escorting fighters when she came under an air attack en route to Germany with her aft missing
And at that point all AA posts were manned for obvious reasons
Ayo they turned Europe into an island archipelago
Denmark isn't fucking real

missisipi river hyper mode engaged
Ice land looking think
Me, a western interior seaway mosasaur 
vs
You, a pacific mosasaur 
me: a baby t rex just tryna swim with my dad
yeah
and the animation is just stunning
I'm the third baby, and on the beach can't find food because I'm searching for hot dogs as prey
western interior seaway my beloved
now if only you preserve Appalachian dinosaurs as frequently as Laramidian ones
also speaking of Prehistoric Planet jesus fuck pterosaurs look freaky
their proportions are horribly wrong, their head looks too big for their neck, and they way they walk is unsettling
when they walk it's like, my brain trying to figure out what kind of animal that is
cuz there's no animal like that now
ikr, they look like something that's not from earth
maybe bats but they're miniscule
bats at least are small and they kinda mostly crawl. while pterosaurs can grow to giraffe sized and fucking gallop at you
yeah like in their episode
when that one comes back to find the other female messing with its nest and its running animation and noises it's like
ah yes, xenomorph
yeah this one https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eTt7RXRve18
The Fight of two Quetzalcoatlus Mothers/ Pre-Historic Planet #shorts #appletvplus
please subscribe my channel for more !!
https://youtube.com/channel/UCII8yvxL2cOMu_nr_epb9qg
my video about dreadnoughtus
https://youtu.be/WHxFslVRP3E
Acrocanthosaurus :
https://youtu.be/X6l-sSKP-9M
------------------------------------------------------------...
holy fucking shit man the noise just makes it worse
wtf are you
I'm just glad we finally have a believable dinosaur documentary
that doesn't have PS2 graphics
apparently not all enjoyed it though https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k2xFIuky8C8
Twitter's idiocy was devastating. Ignorance was bliss.
dinosaurs are warm blooded
do people just forget that
we believed they were cold blooded for the longest time
but look how chonky they are
yeah, I do think metabolism probably varied by species though
likely
Well they were mistaken for reptiles of sorts
probably yeah
like how sauropods probably can get by on gigantothermy when they get large enough
it's funny how hard this documentary dunked on jurassic world tho
the Trex looks both softer and more bad ass
PrePlanet has so many shades thrown at Jurassic Park lol
mesothermic
panthermic
Relationship goals 
yeah they're kinda not as warmblooded as modern animals, but not reptile cold either
love me some sauropods
that Dreadnoughtus part was insane
you don't often see sauropods smash into each other like that
same energy
yeah, and accurate, if something that large fell without bracing it could be damaging
Don't watch spear and fang 
they just became smol
spear and fang is based though
nah I've seen that
Zombie episode 
maka
theropod moment
lil dinosaurs

maka when one of the largest sauropod species is called Dreadnoughtus and not South-Carolinus
true
least it didn't get named Kaiserius
dang, kinda has a nice ring to it I admit
need more ancient creatures named after battleships of old
Tsaraurus
Once again I am forced to remember that black swans aren't the international standard swans
or ships named after ancient creatures

Pyotr Veliky vs Des Moines in balanced War thunder match making
@manic latch
those red eyes ain't gonna stop those ATGMs
So... rip Shtoras
Montgomery's plan for the Normandy landings. Pay attention to the remark on the bottom right.
Don't let Yamamoto read that.
Rather late, and specifically only for Yamato: Any gun crew that is not within shielded structures (i.e. Sandbagged/unshielded 25mm/13mm positions) are required to get inside the superstructure or below the ship, taking along with them the Le Prieur sights for the 25mm while they are doing that or risk
- extreme eardrum injury
- messing with the Le Prieur sights' delicate calibration from shockwave
I think Maka did some calculations as well, being on deck while the main guns that bkg are going off isn't nice to your lungs either and risk having it collapsed if too close.
There is also the case of Richelieu's 380mm giving severe burns to the forward Oerlikon gallery crew as she fired as the ship's guns were not trained abeam enough; By that point as I recall a bulkhead was already installed to mitigate the blast effects. Nonetheless, a few guns were also ruined because of that.
Conversely, as Ive posted before, there are also cases where these effects are completely irrevelant or otherwise ignored, as demonstrated in this reel below.
For anyone wondering about blast, just pity these poor sailors aboard the Wyoming as a 12” gun goes off.
194
Helmet blown clean off from shockwave.
OSHA moment
You generally just dont want to be in proximity of these things; Wisconsin's bridge crew duck to cover as soon as the firing command was given during her service in the Gulf War.
ofc you don't want to be near a tube producing 500 million joules of energy
You don't want to be on the receiving end, either...
hope that the shell remains stuck in the armor
(Please dont post the exploded PzIV, that was a demo charge, not Rodney's handiwork)
yes but the effects would be similar in case of a direct hit
Probably, lots of defoiling and probably a crater to boot.
a non-direct hit would likely crush one side and penetrate the entirety of the tank with shrapnell
like the russian BB's at tsushima
What happened? Non direct hit on the waterline, spalling happened anyway?
japanese AP shells acted like HE
and the upper works of the russian BB's are somewhat armoured like medium tanks
So fuse activated and shrapnel everywhere?
Pepperpot moment
Japanese shells were unable to defeat the actual armor of the ships
but they set everything on fire as coal dust was littered everywhere

and most russian crew for DC got blasted with shrapnell
so the fires were left to burn
Why flameproofing is absolutely important
why maintenance and cleaning is absolutely important
comparatively, russian shells were able to penetrate japanese BB's but had very limited bursters
In the defence of the 2nd Squadron, well-maintained is the last word I'd describe them after that long trek to Tsushima
Embellishments notwithstanding
I'd imagine the hull is caked with rust and barnacles
See, this is why Dunkek gets the nice carpets and things off as soon as war is declared
At least I hope they didn't remove the tables too 
russian bb's get shit on relentlessly for tsushima
while it was mostly a maintenance problem
and the shells were rather whimpy after penetration
If the motley crew is as described as "untrained"
Then it's a significant problem itself already
I've described before how the Chinese Beiyang Fleet is just a floating disaster
Shells that are left rotting for god knows how long, funds for training diverted to the imperial court
Guns so badly maintained that allegedly one of them had a breech explosion
🤡 /10
two Japanese ACR's were forced to retreat because they received underwater flooding from russian AP shells
tsushima is a weird one honeslty
I would've loved to see how it would've gone had both fleets had proper AP shells
and we cleaned the russain bb's
A properly maintained fleet would generally be good enough
And, if anything, good morale and discipline assuming the crew is indeed not yet proficient
Simply removing fire as a hazard would massively shift the battle in favour of the russians
how to destroy the Jeune Ecole once and for all
breech explosions happen from time to time
but if your rifling is rusted...
let's rewatch drach's video on Tsushima shall we

That's the problem
The rifling was dusted, and the crew in their haste rammed the shell right into the chamber without cleaning it
Boom goes the gun crew
kekw
Which is why I said shit training is such a massive problem
This situation could have been easily prevented if proper and regular training was done
But no, let's spend more money for Dowager Ci Xi's disposable embroidered towels

Also, I'd just like to note
For the Beiyang Fleet, the commander knew the fleet is in a shit condition
But the imperial court asked "wtf is the fleet doing while Korea is getting fucked"
So 
Also a gross underestimation of Japanese naval power, of course
The Imperial court still refers to the Japanese as "Wokou" then, a derogatory term meaning Japanese pirates
Chinese calling the Japanese pirates
haha
how ironic
speaking of
RIP Ning Po

The term traces quite far into history, so not entirely incorrect
And keeping in mind that the Qing is still quite... pompous

(and that's how you fucking overdose on copium and unironically believe in boxers)
Invincible flesh armour that can stop westoid boolets, shi de
Abrams has her own
Or used to
Not sure if they still use it
I think Bardley has it
Uhh
Puma has her own
Ztz-99A has similar style with Puma
DNO Rear-Admiral A.G.H.W. Moore summarized Ordnance Board remarks regarding armor penetration in a "Memorandum to the Controller" dated 24 October 1910. In this Memorandum it was stated that 12 inch (30.5 cm) APC shells striking at any angle over 20 degrees were unlikely to penetrate even 4 inches (10.2 cm) of KC armor (face hardened) and were likely to breakup at angles of 30 degrees when striking 6 inches (15.2 cm) of KC armor.
Thus, it can be seen that the poor performance of British shells at Jutland (Skagerrak) cannot have been a surprise to the Royal Navy. Remarkably, the memo does not suggest that the shells be improved, but instead urges that these thicknesses of armor be considered for future ship designs, as if it was expected that enemy shells would perform as poorly as did their own.

bruuuuuh
Abrams doesn't sacrifice it's front armour profile for it's red eye
Unlike the T90
Yeah that's why T-90M doesn't have them anymore
And Abrams doesn't use this thing anymore I think
But German PUMA and Chinese Ztz-99 does
Works like PUMA one
Yes
Speaking of PUMA. I think Challenger 2 will get MUSS system too
T90M is reasonably cheap so it is ok
And Sexy 
The chally 3 has it, it is also having an APS tested
I actually saw the chally 3 in the wild
I thought there was only 1 model
Megatron has tonnes of unique tech
Like thermal viewer bammers
Jammers.
Not sure about the plate
I hate the way warthunder portrays the chally
T-90 doesn't sport the active jammers of the Shtora system largely because guidance has moved on and newer jammers weren't developed.
Why. Black Night is cool
Now you get the Desert Storm Chally
Meh, chally is crap in any guise.
What's her problems except the rifled gun 
Fat, underpowered, very fat, comedy cannon whose problems are far deeper than rifling, exceedingly fat, hilariously poor hull protection, the fattest lad since maus, completely unsurvivable ammo stowage, big chungus, outdated sensor kit.
what he said
Yeah kinda weird still no 1500hp engine
L30's ammo involves black powder igniters, bagged charges, obturating breeches, and touch holes to set off the igniter.
It reminds me of old naval artillery.

Games act like it isn't
not enough
Can you share secret documents to prove it
Lol
There is, I kid you not, a touch hole (flash channel in British terminology) for the gun
It is very ye olde fashioned
LFP is a flat 76mm RHA.
Touch hole?
It literally isn't tho
Woah that's.. low
So, the TVE is a blank cartridge that serves as the primer - and the flash of the cartridge travels down the channel to ignite the black powder igniter.
It's very much like an old cannon's touch hole & fuze
The only integrated armor in the LFP is the 76mm RHA plate, everything else is applique.
You can see the armour is far thicker than it is portrayed on that lfp
Why yes, because Megatron carries the late applique package
Applique is fine
It's... okay but suboptimal. It has durability issues and results in comical weight.
Idk man
Looking at Leo 2s popping in Kurdistan was pretty special
That's a literal silk pouch of black powder that is sewed onto the back charge.
The Leo 2s lost were in their original 1980s B-tech configuration with zero applique. Which is still better LFP protection than the CR2 without applique.
L30 is also a wacky comical split-breech gun, and uses three part ammo
The third part being the blank cartridge used as the primer, they come in 10 round magazines the loader has to manually replace every 10 shots
other tanks use electrical primers I suppose?
Yes, but integrated into the round as is sensible
And not a totally separate component firing through a touch hole
Chally 3 is pretty meh but still far better than ariete
I mean
L30 was great when it was first introduced
who is seriously comparing Chally 3 to Ariete
But typically britihs, they fucked it up
I meant chally 2
The L30 was always a "good enough for now and domestic" gun, it was never that good.
they just needed to make a new tank from the ground up
yet decided to make an upgrade package to the chally 2

When it was new it was good
Here's a more complete diagram of the breech in both unlocked and locked, from the declassified investigation into the misfire they had.
Chieftain was the best western tank of it's era kinda
When new it was completely inferior to all competitor guns being issued.
When new it was against the L7
So...
Oh wait, chieftain had a different rifled 120
Oh
No, when new L30 was against the Rh-M 120mm L/44, the CN120/52, and the 2A46M1
Chieftain had the L11, which the L30 is just a modest update of.
(L30 was in fact developed as an upgun for CR1 and Chieftain under CHARM... and ended up getting rolled into CR2 because it was the best domestic gun they had)
Well budget curse. Next generation tanks are damn expensive as seen by K2 and Armata. So nations prefer upgrades like T-90M, Chal 3, M1A2 SEP V4
Had Thatcher's personal politics not played a key role, the CR2 would have been very different. It would have used a Leopard 2 hull and likely the French CN120-52
Speaking of. Any new plans for Leclerc?
Are you referring to the mbt 80?
Honclerc is getting a fairly modest but adequate renovation, and the Italians are actually doing an extra deep rebuild of the Ariete.
If so it wasn't the leopard hull, it was inhouse

Referring to the Vickers Mark 7/2, the vehicle that actually won the tender that became CR2.
It was just a standard design for the era and it's cancellation had nothing to do with thatcher
Ah
The British fuck up everything the succeed at
Look at you aviation, tank, car, shipbuilding industry
That is what is pictured in that photo, but ultimately the Britishized leopard 2 hull was killed because A) Thatcher wanted a purely domestic tank and B) Thatcher did not want the tank to be beholden to German export permissions.
Invents Steam catapults
Uses ramps on their latest Carriers
Also invents angled flight deck

Scharnhorst 
And was some great early jet designs
Tfw Harrier, famous
Forgets to make a new one
Joins F35 instead
British tank procurement can best be described as one massive trainwreck, to the point where every vehicle (with the noteworthy exception of centurion) from the interwar rearmament to the CR2 itself was issued obsolete on service entry
Wtong
Wrong
The Brits had ambitious follow-up programs to Harrier, they just didn't fund them.
British everything procurement
FFS, the British were the only other tier 1 contributed to the F35 other than the usa
1980s study for a supersonic VTOL stealth replacement for harrier
Absolutely bleeding edge, included a prone pilot in a virtual cockpit
Ariete getting a cavour and duilio style rebuild?

What went wrong? 
You'll note no windows on P.125, the pilot sat in a virtual cockpit made of display screens linked to cameras in the skin of the plane, ace combat COFFIN style.
Don't get me started on the British nuclear program and the British attempts to break the sound barrier
In both cases they gave the tech to the USA who then hid any future developments from the uk
The Avro 730 was a planned Mach 3 reconnaissance aircraft and strategic bomber that was being developed by Avro Aircraft for the Royal Air Force (RAF). It had been originally envisioned as a very high-speed aircraft to perform aerial reconnaissance missions, conforming with the requirements of Air Ministry Specification OR.330. Avro subsequently...
Could have beat SR'71 
Tube alloys and the M52
Ariete AMV is an incredibly comprehensive update, yes.
oh they got hipster scarfs
The British Aircraft Corporation TSR-2 is a cancelled Cold War strike and reconnaissance aircraft developed by the British Aircraft Corporation (BAC), for the Royal Air Force (RAF) in the late 1950s and early 1960s. The TSR-2 was designed around both conventional and nuclear weapons delivery: it was to penetrate well-defended frontline areas at...
"-new 1600HP engine;
-new Renk HSWL295TM transmission;
-new fuel tanks and fuel feeding system;
-new return rollers;
-new AFSS (fire prevention, will use FM200 gas instead of Halon 1301);
-reallocation of exhaust pipes;
-electrical turret drive instead of hydraulic;
-upgraded CBRN system;
-new 3rd gen ATTILA commander sight;
-new 3rd gen Lothar-SD gunner sight;
-new DNVS digital driver night sight;
-new FCS;
-improved hull protection against mines;
-new quad-channel SDR radio and ASID communication system;
-new Rheinmetall Rosy smoke launchers instead of the old GALIX. "

You know this is how upgrades should be
Instead going little by little you slap many things in single go
TSR showed promises but wasn't the aircraft for it's era
Is there stronger tank engine
m1a2 is 1500 HP iirc
Yeah everyone is 1500 at max
T-80 
Pretty much
The last good Russian tank

It's actually the same engine but heavily overhauled
It went from being two centauro/dardo engines... to being two centauro II/freccia engines.

deadass an excel graph
wow

you gotta wonder where all the money goes in training sometimes
Undef
Something to think about
Sverdlov cruiser wiki weight
16,640 tons
Sverdlov weight in war thunder
19,200 tons
While in wows. Kutuzov is 16,340 tons
So yeah Gaijin got something very wrong I think
Can confirm
PowerPoints in defense fields are almost always... Uh, not exactly geared to quality presentation.
Also shout-out to Leonardo literally streaming a presentation about the hitfact turret that was supposed to be private
I think it was on YouTube
ah good ol Powerpoint...
Tfw 40mm Freccia
Based
Ah, we shitting on Powerpoints on defence fields?
May I present the old classic from you know who:
Thus, you know who. 
they can’t keep getting away with it
Would the real mike sparks please stand up?
I like how the implication is that Guadalcanal would’ve gone a lot smoother if we’d just built a ton of Japanese destroyers
Big if true
I mean, if anything, the IJN overall would have benefited much better from the construction of more escorts and better merchant protection
rather than a massive focus on 🅱️antai kessen capital vessels, appealing as it is
now I’m just imagining two destroyer forces blindly launching nighttime torpedo attacks on each other
Excessive emphasis on torpedo use at night can be a detriment.
A recent article(s) I read made the point that Italian doctrine for destroyers and torpedo boats in 1937/38, as it had barely evolved from WWI, while still calling for destroyers and torpedo boats to be extremely aggressive at night, also wanted them to use torpedoes only, up until the point it was clear the enemy was aware of their presence. Only at that point should guns be used, at which point all gun systems should be used 'to the bitter end'
This policy of guns only as a secondary weapon probably hindered the development of night fire control equipment and doctrine for the RM in the interwar era
And it definitely contrasts pretty strongly with how the British went about night combat with destroyers, i.e. 'cripple them with gunfire as early as possible'
Soviets in 1944: wait we were losing?
Stalin was basically pleading for a second front because the Soviets were taking the entire German onslaught for like 3 years
Of course. Allies should do their duties 
Easing the pain for both fronts
True…
the real turn is the falaise pocket closing and bagration concluding back to back
taking the arms and the legs off of the heer respectively at the same time
Mmm what if all our competent and equipped troops on both fronts die simultaneously
the austro hungarian empire dissolved itself
tbh tho Churchill/Kitchener listening to the French and redirecting the forces in Gallipoli to defend Serbia probably would have accelerated their decline
imagine NOT using outdated ships in a channel with the entire ottoman army looking at you through a gunsight

a channel btw which was mine free until you decided to send a battlecruiser into it to take some potshots

it wasnt mine free
3 lines of mines were both laid at each entrance to the straits
what happened was the combined Anglo-French forces attempted to force the straits however the minesweepers were all torn up by Ottoman shore batteries
then the Ottoman minelayer with the final 27 naval mines in the Ottoman naval inventory laid them all in a space where the British and French ships turned around during the previous attempt
thus leading to heavy losses to mines
as well as gunfire
which was far stronger than anticipated
listen, were there mines before HMS Indomitable had gone in it first?
yes
mines were laid in the Dardanelles strait before war was even declared
3 lines of mines at the entrance
then after the first bombardment, they laid more mines in a bay which the allied ships used to turn around
and it was that minefield which sunk bouvet, irresistible and ocean
i did
or well
i drove through it
minefield 11 in Erin Keui Bay was the one that did the damage
saw any shells or shell fragments?
nah its all cleaned up now

yeah i visited the bay and managed to fuck up so badly i hit every single mine one after the other
you're welcome guys
literally the last 27 naval mines in the entire ottoman empire too
Thought it was 26 
horse the minesweeper
thats me
and other things said by the deranged
SRBP has its place
And was common at the time
Even if not realistic
Also
Kearsarge
1 forward turret

look at the barrel sticking out behind the plaque
it's missing its 8" mini turret tho
Yeh


idk man

you just dig

spon, you ok?



British post-Jutland tests of Russian 12" M1909 APC [M1911 APC - TD] shells gave excellent results at 20 degrees obliquity, much better than the new Greenboy British 12" Mk VII APC shell did and seemingly on a par with the larger British 13.5" APC shells.

14" AP vs iron slab
who would win
me

This complex system worked well during the test, even though ammunition supply depended largely upon muscle power. Only five times before the 148th salvo did any gun fail to fire because it lacked powder and only once because a projectile was not available. BuShips commented that "for a good portion of the time, shell and powder handling lines were crossing each other in the lower powder handling room without causing any confusion. In fact, the flexibility of the powder handling system was most impressive, especially with the relatively green crew manning these stations. . . . 2,400 bags of powder were handled without any breakage. Considerable strength and dexterity were exhibited by shell handlers as they 'walked' the projectiles to any desired location by rocking and turning the shells so their points moved in a horizontal circle of about 6 inch diameter. This indicates the importance of acquired skills in any ammunition handling problem."

yes
How did the French turret crews rip the 38cm powder bags
did the US use the same bags as the 16" guns but with a lower amount of powder?
or did they make new bags?
I assume it’s fairly easy to just manufacture new bags
well they said that they behaved like sacks of coal so i doubt they were the nice and plump bags you see so often in the US gun reels
I honestly wouldn't be surprised that they were just underfilled 16" bags tbh

Wonder if US and French bag design was different

I prefer Mig-15 engine 
Seems like the standard silk bag with semi rigid ends
korea must be stopped
for D-day if I recall the allied invasion from the Germans perspective was almost suicide, and the invasion part was only successful because the allies built floating ports (after a week 1 was destroyed in a storm but the other was fine). heck the landings would have probably been a fail if they didn't use American boats because it would take them to long to get out of the boat.(not that a big ramp opening in the front is the best of ideas but hey it allows you to get off the boat faster)
not really
a lot went wrong on D-day and the landings themselves were on the brink of failure multiple times
What do you mean by “Germans perspective?” As in the Germans thought the Allied operation was almost suicidal?
and the British and Canadians used their own landing craft that were different to the American design
and worked just fine
and the big ramp at the front of the boat is the best method of landing troops
show a soldier who landed at Gallipoli an LCVP
it really doesnt get any better
even in the 21st century the concept remains
Keep in mind that these aren’t amphib tanks that drive onto the beach, drop off their infantry, and then drive inland
They are boats that drive up onto the shore, and then have to back up and go out to sea to get the next wave
So consider where else you can put the ramp
At the back? Then you’re dropping off soldiers into water
Which is far worse
as in from what information the germans had, they would only know there was troops on the beach with almost no way to get more supplies other than the landing crafts hitting the beach constantly which limits the unloading speed of supplies
the Germans believed the landings would directly target a port and thus the beaches around Normandy were a relatively weak part of the Atlantic wall
as yes, logistics are nice
The Germans knew amphib assaults were hard, but they also underestimated Allied supply capability, yes. They did expect that the initial landing could be contained in the better-defended areas (Pas de Calais, Normandy), after which the superiority of rail resupply (they assumed) over boat supply would allow them to out-reinforce the Allies and drive them back into the sea
it was part of the reason why the Germans were so convinced the attack would be at Calais, other than Allied counter intelligence and deception
They also expected that the initial assault would have to be at or near a port city to get the needed dock capacity, yes, as you implied
most German troops close to Normandy were concentrated around Cherbourg as it was the port and thus the most expected place of Allied attack
So the artificial harbors did indeed undermine that assumption—however, in practice the artificial harbors were not decisive, and direct shore offloads and the capture of Cherbourg proved far more important than the artificial harbors
Cherbourg was the busiest port in the world from 1944-47
the biggest setback with regards to Cherbourg was the Germans putting up stiffer resistance than anticipated and delaying Allied troops advancing on the city, allowing the Germans enough time to sabotage the port facilities
I would imagine the germans did everything in their power to keep that from being taken
Within their constraints, but the speed of the Utah beach breakout prevented the city from being held long-term
once the city itself was close to falling and the port facilities were sabotaged, the troops who could escape fled to Hague where they intended to do basically a Bataan and hold up the Allied advance as long as possible on the peninsula
they got bombed to smithereens and they surrendered after a relatively short push inwards
the whole area was secured by d-day +21ish iirc
after which the Allies invested vast resources into repairing the port facilities and railway station over the course of a few weeks to get the port useable again
okay good to know, normally all the crap I see is only about Dday its self
indeed
being here in normandy right now gave me a whole new perspective on the operations in the area
Are you implying that there were naval battles in the Russo-Japanese war other than Tsushima!?!
Radical!
(/s)

?
1944 Nazi Germany vs 1991 Gulf War USA
thanks, I hate it
It hurts
Whatthefuckisthat
It looks like some Wehraboo attempted to create their own scheme
150 huh
they were given the task of creating a paper demon that could survive a given bomb threat
and well... for those later designs they had to account for some absurd bomb threats, so it just went 
Trying to make Tirpitz resistant to tallboys it seems
so h41
god
germany is like the anti-france
where the larger the ship gets the more tonnage it wastes

the french could probably fit more firepower than the fucking kriegsmarine combined on h-41s tonnage
At least H41 was a reasonably capable design in all regards, even if incredibly fat
i frankly dont consider your ship capable when it's demonstrably worse in protection and firepower to ships nearly half it's size
Drach-who?
man she's even slower than richy
at least the diesels wont constantly fucking explode
Need range
more range
should rather snipe the vision slits on the conning tower, if we can go that far
just shoot out all optics, then get close and fire a torpedo salvo
ez win
Nah
Down the barrel shits
Shots
Just fire shells down each gun barrel
Blow the turrets up from inside
Then sit on the barrels and take a dump
Also I'm suspicious of the claims/statements that Tirpitz' armor differed from Bisko
Any idea where it originated?
since the claim of TP's belt being 315mm is not supported by the blueprints, which also give her 320mm
probably originated from the same direction that gave the ugly sisters a 350mm belt
the range is honestly irrelevant, or just a happy bonus in hindsight
German steam plants were a pox upon this world and should have been replaced to the last
come to think about it the heer was also constantly suffering for not using diesel for literally everything
If you wanna live the fever dream of operating in the Atlantic without having any refueling or resupplying opportunities there you kinda have to go for absurd ranges
when you rev up your brand new panther and the engine compartment instantly bursts into flames because of leaking fuel vapor from the petrol engine
also yeah I know but the diesels actually run without dying which imo is an even more important improvement
oh of course
reading those machinery reports from Scheer from her 1940-1941 trip is 
and their improved ship diesels would've been on an even higher level
with 15,000 hp from a ~70 ton motor everything becomes possible
I'd give them some slack with diesel, few others use diesel on small(er) displacement engine
Tho considering their legendary transmission, diesel with higher torque and harsher power delivery would be interesting
Nah, what slack I'd want to give died when reading up all the lobbying and shit that led to the Diesel tech getting dropped in favor of high pressure steam
Teething issues with tech on that scale? Better drop it for this stuff that we only ever tested on merchants that is gonna fail all requirements and hopes
small(er) displacement
At large displacement the Germans are quite sophisticated
You'd think MAN, B&W got some low speed diesel design around at the time
I don't know how Sulzer was at the time
Wehraboo moment
God, hadn't bismarks captain ever played wows
Wonder if the Bismark person realized the Yamato has 2 rudders
"slightly beefed up cruiser"
Wehraboos are a lower than human level of life
Facts
Reading the comments is giving me a stroke
the 5'' secondaries would be sufficient, maybe even the bofors
Well yeah
Age of sale ships relied on wood for armour
Maybe not .50cal
I suspect they could cause splintering but not sure about penetration
There are mans on the decks
Doing kind of important stuff
Tell you what
HMS warrior is a beauty
Spent a day in her docks on her and in victory
Al should add HMS victory and give her like 1fp stat
Would be a great meme mini event ship
incinerate HE shells vs all wooden hulls
Nah mate
wows wishes it had this much fire
Wood is stronger than steel
But only if it were a German wooden ship and a foreign he shell
upper belt moment? surely not what they meant though
Who can tell
If you don't cite sources you can claim fucking anything! This guy gets it
the british navy never existed: source, my cooking friend richy thought about it once
Lmao
you're telling me this world is populated by warships?
To be fair, all armour belts are weak to plunging fire. Just like the Maginot is weak to Belgium.
he's pinpointing the pain since I am here
I think the answer is 10
that's painful start to finish
If we exclude the two Pearl Harbor losses
You guys seem weirdly masochistic looking up those questions.
oh right
Blame jaba
yamato could theoretically fight 1,000 planes at once
the conditions don't state win
Rofl
so the answer is every standard at once
could
theoretically
Should? nope Would? most likely since she couldn’t outrun them
Yamato can’t outrun the Standards?
heck even oklahoma was floating while yamato was

so the only one that can't is arizona
I meant the planes my bad
Absute speed demons of standards
Imagine if Yamato got Bismarcked
And that’s how the two of them both went down
Rudder out and going in circles
reminder that you cannot outrun a standard
Because she's got a well designed propulsion and steering system
Ah
100% of ships fired on by a Standard have been sunk, I believe
4 shafts > 3 shafts
(in combat)
What would happen if you jammed the rudders to where they were facing opposite directions but toward each other
/ \
New braking system?
The ship would go in a straight line but slower because of the extra drag
Of all the things the Germans tried to be redundant with they didn't consider adding another rudder? 
And you'd just have to use the engines for steering which is actually doable because you have 4 shafts

Remember, rudder scuttling charges
They did have two rudders, and managed to get one free while the other remained stuck hard over
But wasn't enuff so they prepared to blow the entire stern off

What? Three rudder? four?
all the stern is rudder
the stern is the rudder
iowas could use their rudders to slow down faster, so there are tricks you can do
I'm sure if you're trying to get the tightest turn circle you can for example you can just git gud to some degree with rudders/props
Do the Battleship Trick
Hahaha no
Drop anchor and Tokyo drift
almost all ship can do rudder braking
Two rudder means you don't ends up swerving
technically one ship did it iirc
Which one?
During the battle, cordite smoke was a real problem for the two British battleships. Rodney would not use any of her radar outfit for ranging; all of her guns were fired using ranges provided by her optical rangefinders. From 0852 until 0859 Rodney’s two aloft rangefinders were the only ones able to track the target.

I thought we agreed on smokeless powder, Britain
flashless powder actually have quite a thick smoke
Ok weird question but favorite naval batter
During this time, there was very poor visibility to the target due to rain squalls and cordite smoke from the guns and funnel smoke of the British ships as well as that of Bismarck and the large number of shell splashes ringing her.
This new heading caused problems with cordite and funnel smoke that were being blown into the area between the two British battleships and Bismarck, which made rangefinding aboard Rodney almost impossible. It was difficult for the spotting officer to observe the fall of the shells at the target.
At 0905 the port 134-mm guns were ordered to open fire. The range at this point had decreased to 12,800 meters. However, due to their cordite smoke, they had to cease fire a few minutes later.
When the range closed to 16,500 meters, the port 152-mm turrets opened fire. Funnel gasses and the cordite smoke made rangefinding impossible, and guns had to be fired blind at a low elevation angle.
Pancake
Crepe
Nope
Nein
It’s just fried dough with powdered sugar on top
It’s pretty good
And as a bonus, it gives you more calories than 10 Big Macs
Edible heart attack
Huh, the Austro-Hungarians used Vaseline in their naval powder charges
Up to 5% vaseline
Thats quite odd
What was the reasoning?
It is the same reason why the used pig fat for the old muskets?
Like on the charges
Oh
The turrets seem more reminiscent of the Japanese 20cm twin
https://www.reddit.com/r/WarshipPorn/comments/2qr7ff/sumo_wrestlers_practice_under_the_guns_of_an/
Nagato, allegedly
That’s a weird place to out sumo wrestlers
It’s to repel boarders after the ship rams an enemy vessel












