#history
1 messages · Page 202 of 1
I love the stern crane that just extends into nothingness
imagine the steam piping needed between the boiler and turbine
With how the shafts exit the ship the turbines gotta be somewhere between the turre trees
Hooray for
c r e a t i v e
internal layout
What if it's Diesel Electric
im very keen on hearing the porsche comparison here
@spiral cedar @alpine onyx your thoughts on this argument?
Comments were pretty spicy, some saying that it's Okun's fault for this "fallacy".
wrong armor values aside, there are a few correct points they make, but also plenty of wrongs
if you're only planning to go up against convoy escorts though, building a ship which can resist citadel penetrations by BB shells at close range but can sink to non-citadel penetrations seems questionable

as the historically accurate naval warfare simulator world of warships demonstrates, Bismarcks can quickly sink to concentrated cruiser HE spam
Bismarcks weren't made to go convoy raiding, that is one of the more persistent myths
really?
maybe not at the time of their design
but by the late 1930s surely the germans realized they weren't going to be starting major fleet battles with the british
both BB generations were not designed with the intention of sending them against the UK
but to send them either against France or towards the east (Poland, USSR)
in the illusion that the UK would sit idly by
when they got their wake up call they started their fever dream Z Plan to somewhat get onto the UK's level
anyway, that txt file broken down:
"Germany was also well aware of emerging trends in naval technology around the world." - correct
"Germany was well aware of the trend towards inclining the armored belt to improve relative armor thickness in other Navies. However, they settled on the simpler vertical belt due to ease of maintenance and easier construction." - semi correct, they also wanted a splinter protected waterline on top of that (and considered decapping schemes for that reason)
[second shell-stopping layer is the turtleback] - correct
"In effect, the shell would have to penetrate some 640mm of armor to penetrate the vitals!" - abso- fucking - lutely not
[upper belt vs BB grade shells] - idk, could be, but shouldn't really affect much
"In addition, the upper belt also provided the benefit of armoring more of the hull against light and medium calibre guns. This was an important benefit considering the Bismarck class was expected to tangle with enemy destroyers and cruisers regularly." - correct
"The last major layer of armor was the upper deck that capped the top of the hull. Just like the upper belt, it was not intended to defeat incoming projectiles outright. Rather, it was intended to reduce their effectiveness, allowing the main armor deck to more easily defeat them." - unless it jaws the projectile into a more favorable angle allowing the penetration of the deck, so 
[upper deck vs bombs] - judging by some damage reports from TP, that might actually hold some truth, but need to verify with proper damage mapping at some point
"Was the system effective? History would suggest that it was. The Bismarck class proved difficult nuts to crack. Of course, like anything else, the German armor system was a trade-off." - ahaha no

some claims I cannot really verify, but overall I schmell some fanboiism
Zwei nuts
đ° đ°
i hate the fact this is legitimately upsetting to me
Is mers el kebir just order 66 for the french
Nah, Britain was never not expected to betray.
I mean the brits only sank a bb and a minelayer
Well the jedi didnt expect the clones to betray them
Quetzalcoatl being drunk af
Had too much drink and did stuff that made him cross the Atlantic and turn himself into the sun
realistically, expecting the british to betray you is the best course of action
HMS Indomitable detonating the aft magazines of the Seydlitz, which causes the Germans to take safety precautions, eventually saving most of their ships at Jutland while the Bitish that did not experience such a magazine detonation lost 3 battlecruisers
ALSO HMS Indomitable being the first BC to arrive at the Dardanelles to shell turkish coastal batteries ahead of the battleships, giving the turks ample time to assess the situation and lay mines in the dardanells which sink 3 battleships
HMS Indomitable is the root cause of pain in the universe I tell you
Mostly agree with Sirene, but Iâll provide my own commentary as well
One of the most annoyingly persistent myths in the world of naval history concerns the armor scheme of the Bismarck class.
No disagreement here.
This is a major fallacy. ```
Certainly an oversimplification.
```The reality of the matter is that Germany was hard at work during the interwar years. Despite restrictions imposed on them, Germany managed to carry out extensive development of naval armor and weapons through companies and other fronts. In fact, they conducted so many clandestine tests, you could even make the argument that they did more development than the US, UK, or France. ```
âMore developmentâ isnât really true. They did do testing, but several other navies just had more hulks to sink and bomb, which is an inherent advantage.
The armor of the Bismarck class can be broken down into four major components. We will briefly look at each section to see how they functioned as a whole.
The Main Armored Belt
The Bismarck class was protected by a main armored belt of 320mm thickness. The belt was attached directly to the outside of the hull in a vertical (Non-inclined) fashion. Germany was well aware of the trend towards inclining the armored belt to improve relative armor thickness in other Navies. However, they settled on the simpler vertical belt due to ease of maintenance and easier construction.
This armor was immune to light and medium calibre naval guns. However, due to its relatively modest thickness (compared to other dreadnoughts), the heavy calibre guns of other battleships could penetrate the main armor belt of the Bismarck class relatively easily. However, this was not seen as a disadvantage as a second layer of armor behind the belt would then defeat any projectiles that managed to penetrate the main belt. This second layer of armor was the main armored deck.```
Not much particularly objectionable here. Could note some slight outward angling following the hull abreast some turrets, but thatâs just nitpicking.
The main armor deck of the Bismarck class was 80mm to 100mm in thickness along the central portion. However, the outer edges of the armor deck sloped down to meet the bottom edge of the belt armor. This layout is popularly known (Though not officially) today as turtle deck or turtleback armor.```
Well, the âcentral portionâ over magazines varied between Bismarck and Tirpitz, but technically yes, across the *entire class* the main armor deck did vary over that range. Again, doesnât really change the overall picture.
```These sloped portions of armor were 110mm to 120mm in thickness. While not particularly impressive, they were well sloped at about 22 degrees. This produced a tremendous relative armor thickness.
An incoming shell hitting the hull at 0 degrees (Essentially point-blank range) would have to penetrate the 320mm armor belt. If it succeeded in doing so, the sloped armor deck would then present a layer of armor with a relative armor thickness (120mm at 22 degrees) of 320mm! In effect, the shell would have to penetrate some 640mm of armor to penetrate the vitals!```
Of course, the 22 degree sloped portion is covering primarily the machinery, which has 110 mm thickness, not 120 mm. The 120 mm portion is abreast the magazines, which (due to the narrowing hull) is, for most of its length, angled to a lesser degree. So a bit of generous âbest caseâ cherry picking here with numbers. And thatâs not to mention that spaced armor simply does not add together in âeffective thicknessâ in a uniform way for all shellsâsome will deal with spaced arrays better than others. And, of course, Wh (homogeneous armor) resists penetration in an inherently different way from KC n/A (facehardened armor), which makes any attempt to come up with a single number for âeffective thicknessâ absurd from the outset (thanks, wart hunder).
Of course, as ranges increase and the shell approaches at a greater angle, the relative armor thickness of the armor deck diminishes. However, the relative thickness of the main belt increases in compensation.
True, which is a major factor in the relative range-insensitivity of the sloped deck arrangement.
Another factor at play is that a shell penetrating the main belt is also severely reduced in its ability to penetrate armor. Velocity has been slowed, yaw has been induced in the shell, and its cap has likely been deformed. Altogether, this reduces the shellâs ability to penetrate armor, giving the armor deck a greater chance to resist it entirely.
This comes up several times, but cap âdeformationâ is a weird way to phrase it. This is a hard, brittle cap striking a hard, brittle faceâthe cap should be shattering if hitting such thick armor!
A second armor belt of 145mm thickness was mounted on top of the main belt, continuing all the way to the top of the hull. This secondary belt is often criticized as being another carryover from the medium armor used by dreadnoughts of World War 1. However, this armor belt was chosen by German designers for a different reason.
This armor was primarily chosen to help enhance projection against long-range gunfire and bombs. Projectiles striking this belt would be reduced by the same reasons we discussed in the previous section (Velocity slowed, yaw induced, cap deformed). This meant that the main armor deck would have a better chance of defeating any projectiles that managed to penetrate the upper belt```
This is not an inherently convincing argument. That weight could instead have gone to the main armored deck, after all, which *directly* improves resistance to plunging fire. Youâd have to provide some demonstration of why you think this scheme is *more* efficientâand of course, none is provided. Also noteâhow does the upper belt help the deck resist *bombs*? Aside from a small fraction of bombs coming at an angle that strike the upper belt first, this is a pretty nonsensical argument (one could also argue that it would be equally likely to deflect some bombs that would otherwise pass through the ship back into the upper hull!). And of course, the upper belt does nothing against plunging fire coming from ahead or astern, which would be most likely to be hit while trying to open or close the rangeâaka when youâre most likely at long range, chasing or fleeing. Iâm surprised no mention of the ability to save some barbette weight was mentionedâarguably not more efficient than a single thick barbette overall, but it is a real use of the upper belt.
In addition, the upper belt also provided the benefit of armoring more of the hull against light and medium calibre guns. This was an important benefit considering the Bismarck class was expected to tangle with enemy destroyers and cruisers regularly.
No objection here, though one could also point out that it also reduces the chance of passthrough large-caliber hits slightly. Tradeoffs.
The last major layer of armor was the upper deck that capped the top of the hull. Just like the upper belt, it was not intended to defeat incoming projectiles outright. Rather, it was intended to reduce their effectiveness, allowing the main armor deck to more easily defeat them.
Just like the upper deck, the upper belt did have the benefit of enhancing protection against light weaponry. It was sufficient to protect the ship from light bombs, shrapnel, and strafing attacks by enemy aircraft.```
All this is true of basically all other battleships of the period. No mention of why Bismarckâs scheme was uniqueâit was uniquely thick (and unusually good at deflecting shells downward, which can be rather detrimental).
The secret to the armor system of the Bismarck class was multiple layers of armor, each designed to perform a role in addition to supporting the others.
Any projectile striking the Bismarck class would have to penetrate two of these layers. Close-range gunfire would have to penetrate the belt and then the main deck. Long range gunfire would have to penetrate the upper belt or upper deck and then contend with the main deck. Aircraft bombs would have to penetrate the upper deck before the main deck.
It was an intricate armor system not found on other battleships (With the possible exception of the Littorio class). Germany was well aware of "All or Nothing" Armor. They simply discounted it and went in an entirely different direction. ```
Not found on other battleshipsâŠexcept for most of them made in the 20th century. I can only assume âother battleshipsâ actually means âother fast battleships,â but even then itâs not trueâeveryone has the upper deck, and several ships (e.g. Nagato, Richelieu) had a sloped deck behind the belt as well. One could argue it was better implemented on the Bismarcks (which would vary on an area-by-area basis), but thatâs not the claim being made here. Also, strangely, excludes the ScharnhorstsâŠ
Was the system effective? History would suggest that it was. The Bismarck class proved difficult nuts to crack. Of course, like anything else, the German armor system was a trade-off.
History would suggests that fast battleships in general were âdifficult nuts to crack.â This claim could be better improved by specifying against what particular types of attack the claim is meant, else one can easily point to the various failures of the system. I also point out that armor is far from the only factor in overall ship durability, so using the latter to demonstrate the âeffectivenessâ of the former is rather questionable, logically speaking.
Germany achieved a citadel that was almost impossible to penetrate in many situations. However, they had to sacrifice the overall volume of the citadel to achieve this. This could have disastrous repercussions in certain situations. The most notable was that the small citadel did not provide enough buoyancy to support the ship in the event of severe flooding. This was in stark contrast to the US and UK where the Citadel could keep the ship afloat even with the stern and bow completely flooded. You could theoretically sink the Bismarck class without ever actually penetrating her citadel.
âMany situationsâ is both technically true and rather misleading. Against certain types of attack, along certain paths into the ship, yes. But the citadel could be, and repeatedly was, compromised by weapons available to Germanyâs enemies. I am also, personally, of the opinion that the âbuoyant even with flooded endsâ metric is nothing more than a useful design ârule of thumbâ with little bearing on realistic combat consequencesâglossing over the question of whether it was a design requirement by the nations mentioned above, itâs a metric that really should not govern how we evaluate ship survivability, except in extreme cases.
Overall, for the environment that the Bismarck class was supposed to operate in, the armor system was sound. German designers continued tweaking the system for the subsequent H-class, further enhancing it.
Yes, though âenhancingâ does come with an asterisk. Still, just a quibble.
The system was not outdated or ineffective compared to other battleship armor layouts, it was just different.
Again, a failure of specificity. I agree that âoutdatedâ is a bad metricâsometimes ideas persist because theyâre goodâbut âineffectiveâ really is a question of which particular means of attack one is looking at. Bismarck has advantages in some, but disadvantages in others, and this essay largely ignores the most salient disadvantages in order to present the lukewarm take that âan armor scheme that focused on one specific route of attack is better than average at defending against that route of attack,â possibly to the detriment of other areas.
blaming Okun while using no original analysis beyond âadditive LOS thickness is a perfectly valid way to measure armor resistance, especially for spaced armor schemes, right!â

6/10 apply yourself
chad angled belts adding their angle to the fall of shot angle, thus drastically diminishing the ability of the incoming shell to penetrate despite maybe being capable of penetrating the same nominal armor thickness in a 0° obliquity shot 
Also, Okun would probably agree with a decent chunk of whatâs here. But because he has the gall to say that, perhaps, the upper deck is a bit too thick? Why, what a purveyor of misinformation! I, mister 9th grade math expert, know far better!
đ„±
Iâm somewhat disappointed that I cut short a gaming session with friends for this
Iâd say itâs fit for an average forum, and above Quoraposting
But thatâs about it
jaba you don't want to go into the fact that any shell penetrating the main belt will have its angle compared to the turtleback slope made less oblique and thus more suited to penetrate?
I mean, thatâs not technically true, only for certain impact scenarios
At close range, for instance, thereâs effectively no deflection during perforation of the main belt
well yes, it scales with angle of impact
And broadly speaking, a descending shell will deflect closer to the horizontal after penetrating, which means a steeper angle when striking the sloped deck
towards the normal of the armor they penetrate?
so you're saying this is more correct?

Yes
for long shells maybe
26000 yds - 1617 fps, 22.08 deg - 909 fps, 19.61 deg
you got some simulations to show the difference between impact angle and exit angle
oh nvm
and you're sure this reflects reality?
Well, think about it
In an oblique impact, the side of the nose that strikes first will face a greater resistive force than the side still contacting air
So there will be a net torque that turns the shell inward, towards the normal
I'd say that force would push the shell away from the normal tbh
as you can see on penetration simulations for tanks against shells
then, adiabatic shear starts to weaken the armor below the nose of the shell towards the normal of the armor
I believe it's different for facehardened armors, as the face is effectively immobile during penetration
possibly?
idk i'd have to see an example
I'll look into armor penetration tests on FH armor
that being said I don't think naval shell deflect that much to make a huge difference
Sorry for disrupting your session, jaba.
No worries 

I figured the claims here were bold enough, and without sources, might be off.
Most aren't actually that bold
Just more nuanced versions of the same common misconceptions, from a different angle
(The editorâs note refers to a different, preceding statement)
I do agree with this in case of a small angle of impact yes
since the geometry will aid in this case
but starting at what.. 20 ish degrees your shell will experience much more force on the nose pushing it away from the normal
this is especially effective against SAP as the nose tends to crush a lot more, dragging the rest of the shell with it
analysis sins rating; regurgitation
Hereâs the passage from Ballistics Theory and Design of Guns and Ammunition on ogival projectiles
yes, there is a balance between the nose force and forehead force
but since we now know about adiabatic shear, the nose force generally affect the shell more
(in case of oblique hit)
if it doesn't include the effect it doesn't really matter
we're getting gritty
And we're talking belt hits on a vertical plate at sufficiently high velocities above the NBL to penetrate another layer of armor behind?
That's low obliquity, well above NBL
AKA the regime I've been discussing
can you send the link to the page so I can look at it further?
Page 378 of the 3rd Edition
by carlucci and jacobson?
Ye
do their observations match up with the facehard data?
Havenât compared in any depth
I'd be willing to draw some comparisons but I don't know if it holds up on that scale
this asks for real life result analysis
I'm not saying I don't believe in normalisation
I just don't think it's as big of a help as some people tend to think
you know the gist

If your shell is doing that, itâs not penetrating anything else anyway
aka not in the regime Iâm worried about
you want to know what happens if smth like bismarck is shot at very close range with a gun that has a NBL much higher than the belt thickness?
nice argument, however, my armor cannot be penetrated
reveals quantum tunnelling shell developed by Jaba and I
the regime you're worried about seems exceedingly rare

Very slow?
I was typing something dumb but you know what, yeah, I reveal hot dogs that harden in response to proton trauma
The regime where the shell has a chance to penetrate the sloped deck?
even after it penetrated the main belt?
If the obliquity is too high, or the residual velocity too low, then the sloped deck isnât threatened by penetration
So the low obliquity, high residual velocity regime is what matters
yes
I know, but I think that that is something you will only get with sub 5 km range penetration with high caliber shells... oh wait RODNEY

I would love to aid in this endeavour after I finish university and get the chance to download FH
then I can tune my armor using the input of two facehard users
Just pulling up a random gun, Nuggetâs Type 91s are falling at 21.77 deg at 25k yards
Wish Dahlgren had public logs of its testsâŠ

Wonder of any of the g.kdos files have any
I theorise that a shell made from pure tungsten will rip out my rifling
@spiral cedar Of course, the 22 degree sloped portion is covering primarily the machinery, which has 110 mm thickness, not 120 mm. The 120 mm portion is abreast the magazines, which (due to the narrowing hull) is, for most of its length, angled to a lesser degree.
Quick note on that, all of Bismarck's (and presumably TP's) turtleback was 110mm. There was no 120mm there

See
I remember you telling me that
But I searched for it in Discord to confirm
And couldn't find it
So I assumed it was for Scharnhorst only instead
hol on I'll send you the entire blueprint
Inside Amiens Notre Dame
or the relevant portions cut and skillfully encircled
also semi-visible on the first pic, the deck armor above the magazines was only 95mm, not 100mm
NIETVERBINDUNGEN


also while at it to make it easier to find when needed, the H-class also had a uniform turtledeck thickness (in her case 120mm), with the main difference being that the entire horizontal deck was 100mm
This 120mm horizontal and 150mm turtledeck at the magazine nonsense that's floating around is 

Makes it easier for me
Iâm glad 10â deck North Carolina got fixed a lot faster
?
Scharnhorst has better anti-AP bomb protection than Bismarck and can somewhat hold up against the H-class, despite being much smoler
She has all the reason to look down on them in disgust

In principle
Given the Germans just scaled up and down the same L/4,4 shell design
It should be possible to determine the expected ballistic coefficients of a German 35.5cm shell right
The internal ballistics would be a black box but Iâm sure someone could come up with a reasonable range of MVs

with the ballistic curves for all German naval guns in service being readily available, I can try and guesstimate some stuff
Praise GkdS 

heh, I'm not home anyway and am not gonna start some spreadsheet formula hell on this 12" tablet
I am confused, should I connect them or should I not? 
I wonder who sunk the yamato
It was a combined effort. 
The Aztec gamer god, Macuilxochitl
Literally Five Flowers because that's his very own date
You pray to him, give him food and stuff for good RNG when gambling
Are professional gamblers still a thing today?
Sounds like America to me
who I send hot dogs to to roll Nevadas
Yes professional gambling is very much a decently big thing in the US
The world if Australia and New Zealand had funded a Lion class bc instead of an Indomitable class
Indomitable is an Invincible class, Riche 
Australia and NZ are both Indefatigables
and honestly, the big cats are just prone to explosions 
Indomitable, Invincible, Indefatigable.
All French ship names anyway.
imagine coming up with original names
Hercules, Mars, Jupiter
Greek
Ok Roman
no not those names 5head
triton

You've heard of Dido
but what about Didon? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMS_Didon
Ah
Nice
stop capturing ships
I will literally impress you
Also, what was it again? Pallas?
Andromaque was also a popular name.
Same for Atalante and Arethuse.
đłđ±
When are we getting another ship named Droits de l'Homme
Kinda shame Helenic navy never rise to its ancient level
Would be interesting to see Greek aesthetic BBs
Orion too
Ship of the MINE
nice argument, unfortunately
Piet Hein too
Western Europe trying not to name their ship after Greek heroes
Ah yes,Temeraires
We fortunately have a Germano-Nordic pantheon to name our ships after.
đłđ±
mass production 74s
Renommee is a gud name
Heavy metal shit
also extremely good looking
best flag
Haha France white flag
tfw you're so powerful you use the actual white flag
My dream
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_ship_Héros_(1801) When you think you are the the protagonist
Unironically if we'd bought a Tiger I doubt we'd have been so willing to get rid of it in the 20s
I like how every fucking page of the Temeraire is literally just the scale model of the Achille
ironically, the one that fucking blew itself up at Trafalgar
Since there was a fair amount of resistance to losing Australia, even if it was somewhat impractical to have kept her
But if she was a Tiger
Proof that Achilles is indeed the best Greek hero of the Trojan War

Proposal: Buy Haruna off the Japanese
Then most arguments for getting rid of her would be null and void
Australian resistance raised by 150%
Nutnutnutnut
Put her under a proper flag
Just use a shitty excuse, like trying to "fix" her turret after she had a turret explosion
we have the "technology" for flash proofing
proposal: boarding action on scharnhorst and gneisenau at Coronel and gift the ships to AU and NZ
and then just seize the ship like the Brits did to the French and Ottoman ships
lorf
why would you want yamato
wait
Shits n gigs
hang on, where's that joke
Suicidal Poles boards the Bismarck and steals it
I forgot where I saw that thing

It's simple, load the Snake class with Japanese fluent sailors with force Z commandos
there you go, Force Z is now invincible
Sail right into Sagami Bay with the portrait
While someone drives a truck into Moscow
gg boys, we did it, we won the Pacific war
They'd never suspect an enemy of the emperor to have the portrait of the emperor aboard
at least 5
I've been subscribed to ISP since he was at 2k
idea
prevent the british from taking india in the 9 years war
the british empire:
and germany
because no hannoverian dynasty

English speaking population of India -80%.
Ironic it would reduce phone scam percentage 
But Indians are good at cricket
And they make good competition with us
Unlike the English
Want to try their food one day
as going to make a joke, Spon beat me to it
Indian good is great
India has more T90 than all ex Soviet countries combined
can you imagine the amount of deforestation caused by the royal navy
ok where are the british forests then
Fuck you I'm taking my African Teak and you cannot stop me
I mean, the French isn't exactly low on the tree count
Britian has forests
I think
Gimme a home among the gum trees

Canada

With lots of plumb trees
A sheep or two a Ka-kangaroo a clothesline out the back
I don't think they would be any better tho Richy
Also, jesus christ, I can't imagine the sight of someone drinking french wine while eating naan bread
Lmao
not like it's any better with tea
Verandah out the front and an ooold rocking chair
Dutch Nova Holland, Dutch Nova Zeeland 
Lmfao French South Africa
Gifting Soyuz highest quality wood for her library room and tables 
Good lord Cape Town would be a warzone
That's fine and dandy until you need to fireproof your ship
and the person in charge is on Jun'you's level of strictness
Fireproof books?
Imagine a warship with no book inside
Yikes
remember that time France and Britain considered becoming one country
now that would've been hell
EU
I mean more like the shelves and tables
They considered it a few times actually
Those are going to be gone

Hell wasn't that what half the hundred years war was about
Also, watch as Soyuz gets all her portholes blanked out like the IJN
no more officer luxury
The hundred years war was basically a civil war
No more beds either, just a rug

Franco-British alliance in WW1
that you have to store away in the proper bulkhead every time general quarters is sounded

the british started the hundred years war by attacking a peaceful flemish fishing village to provoke france
glad they lost
karma

hms jemmappes
Loved that village that much huh 
But then again, HMS Marshal Ney is a thing
Results in destruction of more villages 
tfw you're such a chad the enemy names a ship after you
cope in eternity russia
your centre is still breached
Hate the British love the French simple as
love both and hate both when it suits you or hate them if you're a standard american
But, conversely, the problem

HMS Alsace, HMS Dunkerque
Silver isn't American though
or French Battleship Lyon Lion
I'm a Chinese living in Hong Kong 
Lmfao
that explains a lot actually

shi shi shi shi shi
I thought Silver was German
Lmfao
You are Belgian
Nein, ich bin Chinesisch.
đșđž đ
Nationality bingo in this channel
đ„
We are missing a Swede, to spread the word of hand-crafted Bofors
and not westphalia, I come from the land of good cider
my tenant was a sweede
Of course it will
which is?
Not like they can afford a navy
Hesse
oh I was actually gonna say hessian
although we shouldn't have let them escape annexation
Ngl, kinda surprised people think Im American
well
If we managed to annex NZ the RAN could have afford 1.5 battlecruisers
But I guess I have the NA tag on WoWS
you and your usn camouflage knowledge
Thats just cos he likes painting models
But you see me go on about British antifouling spiel 24/7
knows camo so well I had him make me two models to buy from him
And the USN actually standardises things

and you ardwar
eternally grateful
where are you from
wanna guess?
Japan
Somewhere on Earth
Indonesia for Ard?
Botswana
I think I know you from elsewhere.
Oh hey, fellow stuck-in-NA-server-somehow 
Oh wait, lmfao
Canada
No that's me
Ok, he's not Canadian
Nah Ard looks Asian
Which side of Asia
Phillippenes?
Hell or Super Hell
Hmm
somewhat hell
Maybe I should hop back on the Wows server
Well I guess he's from Taiwan
Latin America?
Last time I went on Wows I had to deal with Maine tho
That wasn't fun
Did my memory fail me and it wasnt Indonesia 
Thailand
I'm Indonesian 
Greetings fellow Indomien
Gottem
So many Indonesians in this channel frfr
How's coping with the price hike of soy sauce
And about this, not just online, even IRL
Go to the Queensland Maritime Museum, talk to staff
Spent too much time in the West boy
All sambal no sauce ftw
I have managed to keep that maryland case closed to this day, so it's spotless
Indonesians in this chat 
Just like my brother lmao
Run
Tbf the American accent is pretty standard for most people who speak good English
They're coming for you
Sang run
*runs*
*falls in a moat because it's all moats here*
Stroopwafels are not going to save you
accent removal
Oh god oh fuck they're invading West Papua
I'll help the indo's with the dutchie
belgium is the superior dutch speaking country

But Belgium doesn't even speak Dutch.
maastricht is mine
Hold up now.
Amusingly, I shipped something model related to someone in Britain recently
They didn't have an acessory, and only I can buy it dirt cheap locally
Bless the postman.

glad you're still having fun with it, if I get colorado I complete the set
I came across of Dutch text calling America something with those 3 words and it sounds so much like the Soviet Union I took it.
It's a federation with Explanation at 0'/0', Null Island.
I'd do one for you, but time isn't on my side lately
or energy, rather
that's a mood
Colorado's probably one of my more well researched ships in terms of paint schemes
USA?
Vaguely constitutional free border crossing autocratic federal state system of north america you mean?

Canada
Does their national anthem qualify them for the theocratic adjective?

seriously, america
please make puerto rico a real state
puerto rico voted for statehood, they should get it
Too many voters for [opposing political party]
what happens to "no taxation without representation" 
Just tax everyone
Colonialism bad. Anyway look some islands in the pacific.
Commit colonialism
I hope so
or I will close up the panama canal

Puerto Rico about to get their healthcare revoked
Funny coming from the nation that created "Gekoloniseerd" /s
evergreen baguette
Tbf the current american voting system is so marginal it might breaks democracy if there's new state added
Haha yeah I hate colonialism so much annexes Papua New Guinea
Ahead of schedule for the American construction industry
the wording is just so aggressive lol
the cancelling of the ready to go montanas have been disastrous
Stolen generation: 
Sorry, just in case it's too touchy
Montana design evolution
Stage 1: Ok, we need a slow battleship that's under 45,000 tons
Stage 2: War's starting so let's get as wild as possible
Stage 3: Panama Canal third locks? Well fuck, let's see all the crazy stuff we can make
I know Aussies now take this shit seriously
Papua was fine under Australia but in seriousness I support their independence
They should cancel SSN Montana to continue the tradition of the state never quite made it into ship name
Remove Kearsarge from existence to keep the name theme consistent
And speaking of subs, Illinois is 
Why was Independence named Amsterdam? 
Bottle didn't break on first smash in christening ceremony
I don't like talking about submarines anymore
aukus
Ok she's gonna die soon
Will oversteer and hit some rocks
The officers are extremely incompetent in handling the situation, forcing the coast guard to come and save them
This is why you weaken the bottle enough first
Christen with hot dogs, they are soft
Sub accidents are usually pretty fucking horrific
you know, the actual reason why bismarck got an atlantic bow was because the bottle broke her first one
Thresher, Kursk 
What's the color of the Union ironclads during the US Civil War
Kri Nangalla
black
US camo man I call upon thee
Based color
Black it is
return to monke
then return to primordial soup
Donwana go back to Gondwana
No blue? :(
No blue

Fastest moving continent now
1m every year
We're coming for you Papua
How to accelerate
Australian gps' get a bit fucky because of it
Also stop blowing cold winds here, it's fucking freezing now
Understandable
Anyways pick one
Green because green and gold are the national colours
You're complaining about wind when I'm from Perth tho
Ok, then the next USN event will have Missouri
The AP Mark 8 had a nominal 1.5 lbs. (0.68 kg) dye bag but this was allowed to be as large as 3.0 lbs. (1.36 kg) in order to bring underweight projectiles up to standard. The Iowa class was assigned the following dye colors: USS Iowa - Orange USS New Jersey - Blue USS Missouri - Red USS Wisconsin - Green
Jesser is blue
Oh wait, Wisconsin is green
Misread lmao
Omg it would be so cool if they gave them all hair colour corresponding with their shell dye colours
WisKey must be awkward 
According to Navweaps, the Iowas got some nuclear shells in the 50s
Guess who's the only one of the four to actually fire em (the practice shell version at least)
I wonder what the RAN used for their shell dyes
orange dust
USS Wisconsin did fire one of the practice shells during a test in 1957.
Nuclear Wiskey skill?
I keep hearing the consensus that every capital ship admiral would bust a nut at crossing the T, but about every mainstream naval game I've experienced go against that notion.
Is there something missing in these games??
Problem 1: It's hard to coordinate such movement in only less than 1 minute.
Problem 2: Dispersion, reload and other targetting practices has been altered or minimized to the point that it will not be frustrating for "players", that is otherwise critical in fleet engagements.
Ah, alright. Thanks a ton for the clarification.
Looking at that arcade game in particular, it's a simple matter of look via binoculars and click
In reality, at least for the Royal Navy, you fire half salvos from each turret, track the range, adjust the next salvo until you "bracket" the ship.
Naturally, all this data becomes worthless as you execute your own manuevers or that the enemy changes course, but this is completely irrelevant in most games.
Fyi, not just weegee's abomination, even other game's like UAD, etc.
I think UAD also tries to do that
Those "naval game" also have their dispersion model reversed compared to IRL (unless they already changed it, that is)
Crossing the T gives the inherent advantage that you bring the maximum amount of barrels down the enemy
While the enemy is capable of using only their forward guns
Yes, I understand that, but would "angling" be overall better?
Unless, they execute a turn to "unmask" their rear guns
I dont think angling works IRL
Especially over long distances where shells start plunging down onto your deck
UAD does good gunnery
When shells start plunging, angling would be the worst aspect since you expose more of your deck to enemy fire
I guess that even at closer ranges, you have
The turrets, the bridge
To pummel when they're bowed-in
At least UAD's hit rate is low enough that it's worth to bear more gun
They more likely angle to close in faster than angle to present more effective armor thickness
Do naval games tend to generally treat superstructures, especially the bridge/director/that stuff, as less important? (Like just an over pen)
Nice to know
Can't comment, but they are most certainly not unimportant.
Overpen or not, having a fucking shell tearing through your command staff or otherwise nearly killing you can cause judgment errors or otherwise hamper the operation of the ship.
Mikawa and Teach moment
Ah, aight
risk mitigation is important
It usually doesn't endanger the stability of the ship or cause damage to critical components, but it can still cause fires and destroy/disrupt a lot of the ships functionalities.
Cutting the wires to your directors is good enough.
Granted, backup systems are there.
If that doesnt work, let the tropic humidity do its work and disable your HACS.
Prince of Wales approved.
When is HE usually ideal other than shore bombardment, and lightly-armored ships
hitting a heavy cruiser in a fjord on its weakpoints
when your AP can't be expected to deliver desirable results
so for instance Scharnhorst was instructed to use HE if she had to fight a Nelson
because good luck getting anything done with 283mm AP shells here
the 203mm upper belt maybe
You can still wreck their topsides with HE
If there's ready ammunition lying around, an HE shell would most likely make all of that pop
lots of dead men
me looking at IJN CA designs
"time to lose turrets to 5" AA Common!"
like
atleast put them above deck
nah
encloses them in the hull for more pressure buildup
wows states 53.44k tons
wows doesn't give that 
I'll use their Iowa ratio
just take the difference of georgia's full load to iowa's full load and apply it to standard
Hm
It's nearly 45k clean
I guess I figured what Wargaming did here.
Here you go


Keep in mind that gun-focused ships tend to form up into a line in 20th century naval combat. This is very useful for coordination of orders, command and control, IFF, etc. One can easily look into the literature to find examples of the consequences of departing from the basic line aheadâcollisions, friendly fire, etc.
So in the typical Line Ahead formation, "angling" cannot be a major tactical factor, aside from simply presenting broadside and turning away from torpedoes. Ships are restricted to the angles and range bands dictated by their neighboring ships, and the flagship of the division must take all other ships into account. So at, say, Jutland, you can't rely on "angling" to save youâyour ship will be angled based off much larger considerations than its own position of best defensive advantage.
However, this isn't the case for engagements of only 1-2 major ships on each side. Ships are able to maneuver independently if desired, as the ocean is large and thus collision and misidentification are more unlikely. In such a case, angling can indeed be usefulâUSN WWII captains were issued "immune zone" charts of friendly and enemy warships that depicted the effects of angling, so as to give them the ability (if the need arose) to quickly angle the ship for tactical advantage. Other nations made similar observations. In the post-treaty era with far smaller hull counts, this became a possibility for smaller engagements. Though, hitting the enemy first was of course usually priorityâyou want to avoid masking your guns if possible, Denmark Strait tactical issues aside.
Any versions exist versus their European counterparts, or did the USN not really care too much?
Iâm unsure
Iâd imagine the NWC made some at some point
But no idea if any were issued to captains afloat
When you want to use metric but really don't want to use metric.
What are the most famous real-life WW2 ships that are missing from the game?
AFAIK they are Yamato & Musashi of Japan and Iowa & Missourie of the US
Taffy 3
Texas
is Johnston in?
no
where can i read or watch about them?
haida probably fits too
.
Taffy 3 out banzai'd the Banzai faction
Concordet, Courbet-class, Bretagne-class, Strasbourg, Clemenceau, the two Deutschlands, Arkansas, 2 New-Yorks, the 3 New Mexicos, an Arkansas sister, 3 more Iowas, Yamato, Musashi, Anson

and Roma 
*Condorcet Sanglune
Condetcord


The ships not in AL, or Taffy 3?
Yes
Andrea Doria
Duilio
San Giorgio
5 minute guides are a decent place to start
oh yeah roma too, definitely
damn i want to see an anime version of Taffy 3 vs. Yamato
O'Bannon, she must get excellent ASW
USS England
Supposedly
Iâm inclined to believe it but regardless thatâs not âreallyâ in the game
HMAS Sydney
Most decorated Australian ship of ww2
Definitely up there in terms of all battle honours across commonwealth navies
both sydneys pls
God almighty yes please
Sydney 1 was a legendary ship in her own right
yeap
wow, the kamikaze destroyer sure killed a lot.
I've read some accounts from her battle with Emden
Itâs because of the 35,000 km range torpedoes

Von Spee's bizarre adventure need its own arc
kamikaze defeated them all with the power of her really pretty wows camo
There was a hit right near the bridge, a good chunk of the crew there were killed, the guy manning the range finder on the guns literally has half a torso on him, and without saying a word calmly gets up, and says "where's my bloody telescope"
Some insane bravery
much style very good
Such biteable bow 
my goto of "get a load of chad thundercock over here" seems genuinely inadequate
the steel sheeting on the bow tip would be a bit bent
@tough quail
my man

...wouldn't spee technically actually count as a BB by treaty terms
đ€
iirc anything above 8" was uprated to capital ship by default
not that germany was a signatory, but still
ahh
Suddenly reminded of the time Maine said Germany violated the naval treaties
Capital ship itself wasn't defined so it wasn't necessarily a BB
troo
up until March of 1979 the US was still on schedule to deliver at least 2 of what would become the Kidd-class destroyers to the Iranian Navy
I believe the wording is that a ship would take up capital ship displacement, not necessarly be a capital ship.
the Iranian Revolution happened in February of 1979
The treaty subverts shipclasses quite well.
Didn't the shah of Iran get 2 gold plated destroyers?
Contra lol
2 ships had their orders canceled in February with the Iranians telling the US the contract allowed for the USN to take over the vessels
and then the other 2 were canceled in March under the same terms
thats just hilarious
there's something funny about the US actually just going full Vickers salesman
and being like
"so... do you still want these?"
kekw

As of February 2022, five ships have been ordered for the French Navy, with the lead ship being named "Amiral Ronarc'h", and an additional three for the Hellenic Navy.
And you are lucky this time US isn't offering a counterpart
Yet
That would require the US to have someone on offer other than the MMSC, i.e. worth it
lmfao
check the korean navy
Sejong class?
I am sure Japan also got their copy paste ish
But what I mean is the real export
Because, generally speaking, anyone who can afford to operate a Burke/has a fleet a Burke makes sense in can usually afford to build their own ship
Japan and South Korea are really the only two examples of navies that lacked the design experience and sensor systems for a real AAW combatants at the time, which is why they ended up going for Burkoids
Australia is just about in the same category, but they didn't require something as large and thus had on offer either a modified F-100 or a smaller Burke by Gibbs & Cox. They went the F-100 route and that's how the Hobart's happened.
i find kinda weird how countries with small-ish navies like germany and spain are so successful in exporting ships/designs
ohno
they do still exist

Germany hit it off very well with the MEKO series, just thanks to how customizable they were. And then they also really hit it off with the Type 209 SSKs in terms of offering a submarine that was decent but also still quite affordable for nations who weren't going to be buying anything in the league the larger navies were building in.
Spain had the advantage of everyone not knowing how many fun surprises come with working with Navantia until after the ships were being built!
Sorry, I meant to reply to Undefined's comment XD
But, yeah, Gibbs and Cox is still around. The Burke is their design to begin with
eugh


Not sure if Nagato can really fall under tha AoN rule

Then again, Nagato's armor is a mystery box anyway. Some frames would get mauled by entry level dreadnoughts, some I'd expect to withstand 16in SHS at reasonable ranges
how high is this guy on americium
I am good with Montana wanking. Since only such a worthy ship would make Project 24 possible
Also calls it âS.H.A.P.â
Because god is dead apparently

Virgins: Super Heavy AP because it's Heavy
Soviets: Super Heavy AP is standard weight
isnt it kind of standard weight for the usn too by the time they adopt it tbf
well unless you count the HC shells being smaller
Nah They had standard AP I think
Since Sodak armor was designed against standard AP
As did Iowa
Only Montana armor was against Super Heavy
I mean
Iowa's belt would still be alright against the SHS at relatively long-ish range
it's not optimised for that
That battlecruiser reduce armor for speed lmao
Montana is the real chad
but it's 406mm so it really performs pretty good anyways
since when has america had knights?
boogeyman

You know sometimes I wonder
If Yamato and Iowa did meet
And Yamato sunk the Iowa
How would Iowa fans defend her
i want to die
Probably something about weight
which would be valid tbf
Muh unfair conditions radar didn't work smh
Would depend on the âhowâ of course
e.g. is it a âlucky hitâ
(as if all hits in naval combat are not lucky)
Iowa vs Yamato is much better debate than Bismarck vs Yamato anyway
3 Littorios v. Yamato was one I saw

He is Roma now




























