#history
1 messages · Page 198 of 1
Didn't seem to matter for the rich class or the Nelrods
Then you have the planned N3 class which was ABC
Both having heavier main armaments than the KGV class btw
“We should put the turrets close together to minimize citadel length and conserve the amount of armor needed”
“We need them far apart to prevent a massive explosion from taking out all of them at once”
Something changed

What changed?
Unironic question
ABQ is quite a compromise between distribution of firepower, concentration of armor, and keeping engineering spaces tightly coupled
Yeah, I like ABQ even if it is ugly as sin
It's just weird seeing so much "free" decks below the bridge
Yes, they tried it out
What were the issues with the nelrods
Not counting the aluminium issues
Anode cathode catastrophe
Do you count the misguided 16" gun philosophy
I'll check my copy of Nelson to Vanguard later today when I can
I mean in relation to the ABC
it also can make your armored raft too short, such as in the nelsons
there's guns together to reduce citadel length and magazine area but then there is also too close together and you sacrifice survivability of the area 'whoops all magazine' and flotation space
nelson has a relatively longer citadel to the ship length than iowa and richelieu though
iirc iowa's floatation space was something the usn didn't like but it is still longer than nelsons
iowa's citadel covers a bit less than 54% of her waterline length
nelsons is over 58%
iowa is also like 20% tiny sharp bow
her flotation space of her armored citadel can still float her
and gigantic wide stern
and BCR (or whatever the bureau was at that point) absolutely hate the bow
i really doubt nelson is gonna have any seriously worse issues than iowa would
iirc nelson's unarmored ends flooding was a concern because they weren't sure if she would actually float with her citadel in tact, I forget where I read that from though
iowa is borderline and so was rich
the glorious short citadel + internal belt dream team
That is less an issue with ABC and more an issue with nelrods displacement
well it's also somewhat one of the goals of abc, is it not
Yes, obv but nelrods had a lot of issue associated with displacement limitations
Ie, they could have added displacement and done more with it, kinda like how the didos were too cramped because they were built to a displacement
Ok, here is another one,
Would you consider torpedos to be a form of asymetric warfare
yes
weren't the nelsons more or less designed the way they were to cram all the desired features into treaty limitations
Yes
g3 downscale and all that
Biggest issues with teh Nelrods were the 2 screws
If they did take a hit to the stern they were dead
3 basically adds one along the centerline of your ship and makes things awkward, while not really providing the benefit of 4
so it takes away more than it adds
very few ships use 3
Mostly because it was a technological dead end, like german jet engines of ww2
Was there a reason why Bismark used 3?
afaik it was because of a requirement for high speed with tiny space aft
triple shafts combine all the worst problems of a single-shaft layout and a twin shaft system. About the only advantage of the triple shaft layout is that it eliminates the vulnerability of the single shaft layout to mechanical damage or accident. The design hydrodynamics is such that the effects of the centerline screw actual degrade the efficiency of the wing propellers.
I have read that somehwere before
Do you play warthunder btw?
Opinions on hood vs Bayern in that game
I have not played for a while but have played
also afaik you should be able to steer on two shaft using the rudder, the centerline third screw also makes vibration issues
I like bayern a lot as a ship personally though
unfortunately bayern is such a ship with triple shaft
Didn't realize that
they weren't happy with that point it seems, but other than that I feel they are fantastic ships for the time
Since today is May 25th
I'll post images of the Argentine ships that shares name with today date
@delicate beacon This one is also for you
Since it was a former Dutch carrier 
@ivory ridge Since it is Made in Italy
Mini Trento my beloved
All the ships share the same name
25 de Mayo (25th of May)
Mini Trento
"heavy" cruiser with 6 190mm guns
I see I see
That's more like a light cruiser, tho I guess that's the reason you said it like "heavy"
huh, looks like it did a pretty good job for the weight
And there's also the Almirante Brown
Sister ship of the Veinticinco de Mayo
it's above 155mm so it counts as heavy
So not as much armour?
The class was meant to be 3
The 3rd was cancelled
And the 3rd became La Argentina
An Argentine Arethusa class
Heavy and Light is determined by caliber, not by Armor class.
Okay
Otherwise, the Northampton-class would be light cruisers.
I understand now.
the baby trentos do have less armor than I'd like but like
lol they're very light displacement
The reason I said the Northampton-class was their armour was not very thick compared to other heavy cruiser classes, which is actually the reason they are less dressed in Azur Lane.
"The heavy cruiser was a type of cruiser, a naval warship designed for long range and high speed, armed generally with naval guns of roughly 203 mm (8 inches) in caliber, whose design parameters were dictated by the Washington Naval Treaty of 1922 and the London Naval Treaty of 1930."
non-members of the treaties tend to have weird calibers as well
looking at you, kirov class
eh I wouldn't use azur lane as an example, witchita has light armor in game
Huh.
and northampton is probably comparably protected to the admiral hipper class, which only manage a 3'' or so belt themselves
By treaty, if up to 10,000t standard and up to 6.1" caliber, it was a CL
Interesting.
Alright
So, I recently read something that had Richelieu in it.
Did she have HE shells that used napalm to cause fires?
hm, I'm unaware of it for sure, at least, but that doesn't sound like what HE shells want to do or are made of and such, I'd say, was it a wows joke? they often make he = napalm type remarks
No, it was an AL fanfiction.
with the volumetric capacity inside a shell, napalm filler probably do fuck all
napalm was also quite an american thing and invented in 42, they did make bombs for it and rich did have contact for armament related things here but it just doesn't seem like that would be the case
Okay, so it was entirely fiction.
Because Richelieu said that it was made by her people.
They were "special vessels" that, like seaplane tenders and minelayers, got an exception
oh, yeah, napalm was made in 42 at harvard in secret
I think various thickened fuel were already in deployment even well before ww2
Not exactly the napalm, but would be something a today's layperson call napalm
possibly where it comes from yeah
also if I recall they did have some sort of weird chemical shells at one point didn't they
the only weird thing you can put in richelieu's shells was uh
gas

which uh
yeah
Kansen with gas masks
Thats a thought.
NBC is fair play tbh, even today
especially against warships, since the chance of civilian collateral damage is practically zero
unless you somehow spectacularly fucks up
Eh... Nuclear is out of the question for obvious reasons.
Biological still is indiscriminate due to its contagiousness.
Chemical is basically the only discriminate and politically feasible option. So long you don't cause unneccesary suffering.
Biological I can see
Nuclear tho is somehow doctrinally untested
especially if you can weasel your way out of using it in offensive manner
I can see the utter confusion when it comes to decide against one such tactical use. On one hand sheer reluctance to use one and fear of escalation, yet the other hand not wanting to normalize usage and almost primal desire not to be dead wrong
ok, hypothetically, let's say you fire contagion shells at an enemy ship

Wouldn't this effectively long-term mission kill the ship
because you'd certainly want the ship to be locked down and quarantined to prevent a whole pandemic in your port
alternatively yolo to your port, now you have two problems
now i'm thinking about that zombie boat in warzone
basically a random boat floating around since the 80s that had its entire crew infected by zombies crashes in a port city and unleashes a zombie outbreak upon the whole city
Damn.
It is 
As i said before
I never saw someone stating that Rule Britannia is a RN song
I see people associating it the UK as a whole
Yes
Given the RN was an absolutely incredible show of power projection for a very fucking long time, so using the song for anything remotely British is quite acceptable
Rule Brittanyaa
i think this is what the new UR equipment is based on
some type of firecontrol system
thought it was a fucking kitchen at first
"UR equipment: a fucking kitchen, buffs all stats by 3%"
ur equipment, a kitchen, you can make hot dogs here
The Admiralty Fire Control Table (A.F.C.T.) was an electromechanical analogue computer fire-control system that calculated the correct elevation and deflection of the main armament of a Royal Navy cruiser or battleship, so that the shells fired would strike a surface target. The AFCT MK 1 was fitted to HMS Nelson and Rodney in the early 1920s, w...
You're looking at this for Vanguard, specifically, the Mark X
Earlier ships like Hood only had the older Dreyer FCT
that's not a kitchen
You'll need more than one kitchen anyway
Montcalm alone has six
(much to the bewilderment of the US Navy during her refit)
Im back
Hello
hi

le foosh en chocelute
Manger, c'est gagner
gosh I'm so hungry

mmm, yummy, thank you france



I knew that would get posted here
Thats a nice kitchen you got there
Would be funny if I turn it into a 40mm ready ammo locker 
Lancaster is a good bomber, anyone agree
One of the best from the war
Everyone agrees
Yes
Except berci but we don't talk about him
Nah, Lancasters commited war crimes, bad plane /s
Bomber Command's bombing of German cities is not looked upon well and IIRC did quite a bit of casualties. Just to clarify, I'm not pulling a "Dresden war crime" card here. Just saying casualties are high, and the Germans pulled the same shit during the Blitz.
For not being as chad as the Whitley, The flying... uhh... how is that thing even flying?
Yk they did that after German Ju-88 bombed london
Precisely why I mentioned the Blitz.
And London wasn't the worst as I recall, compared to other places like Coventry.
German's reputation was pretty much saved by their godawful navigation during the blitz
I actually know the Germans bombed london by accident
Can't do warcrime if you can't hit a damn thing
Either way, want real bombing war crimes?

officially were meant to bomb the RAF base near London, but over past it and the pilots were tired
The Bombing of Frampol occurred during the German invasion of Poland in 1939. On 13 September, the town of Frampol with a population of 4,000 was bombed by the German bombers of Luftwaffe's 8th Air Corps, under General Wolfram Freiherr von Richthofen. The town had no military value, and the bombing was seen as a practice run for future missions.
Jfc
Yea, that town has no military targets, it just looks like a target
Quite literally
So we bomb the shit out of it for practice and strafe the civvies
According to Davies, Frampol lost 90% of its buildings and 50% of the population became casualties.[5] Only two streets remained untouched, including some houses on the outskirts.[6] Today Frampol's population is still much lower at about 1.400 people
Well it wasn’t done for on like accident, and umm had it been a legitimate military target the thought process of “hey so I know we’re at war now but our illegally made air force needs some practice what’s a good target we can use for this war” I feel it wouldn’t be as like fucking bad as this
I don't think its far fetched to say it's done for "shits and giggles"
Yeah but there’s a reason for said shits and giggles, I don’t mean to play devils advocate, it’s an atrocity for sure which is why I don’t think saying idiot is appropriate
Yeah it’s definitely clearly conscious
But usually dumb things or being an idiot is when you arent thinking
Apparently bombing trees and beaches like every other airforces was too mainstream
What the objective that they can't do on normal firing range even? Assessing potential damage to cities/settlements?
It’s fucked up
Well usually air forces also do that type of training when they aren’t at war
And Germany kinda couldn’t have an air force and did a bunch of back door shit to get one
Because what better way to remove the population?
Something something lebensraum, ethnic cleansing
Yeah basically
Why couldn’t it just be a normal military target like a fuel refinery 
Or base
Germany pls why do you have to be horrible
Because they're Nazis back then
problem is that it's pretty much insignificant city. Wiping it off the earth doesn't make their conquest any easier. I don't think they even use the city for anything.
If the ideology is "wipe the people off the map so the Germanic people can settle upon it"
I dont think anything matters
Yeah you have a point there
Sometimes I can't understand their way of thinking. like... let's do this random thing first before doing actual combat
The same kind of reasoning behind Oradour Sur Glane
Like, fuck me, they didnt even bother to check the name properly
On 10 June 1944, the village of Oradour-sur-Glane in Haute-Vienne in Nazi-occupied France was destroyed when 642 civilians, including non-combatant women and children, were massacred by a German Waffen-SS company.
A new village was built nearby after the war. President Charles de Gaulle ordered that the ruins of the old village be maintained as ...
But then again, this isn't just for Germany either
Nanking's 100 beheadings competition is well known enough
And Ive posted a Japanese military convoy shooting at civvies after the British surrendering at Hong Kong, elderly and children included, for zero reason. The civvies were just curious at the procession, bystsnding on the side and they got a couple bullets to the face.
Fuck these two regimes in particular, really.
Yeah.
Thanks for reminding me the Whitley existed

I had to help a friend fix her PowerPoint on ww2
She put the US working with the germans when they were against

:P
I mean
We did kinda take their scientists and give a few ex nazis positions in nato and provide cover for them from the ussr
both sides did to try to snatch up potential useful things
Operation Paperclip.
I will gladly bring rich over for 'science'
Stalingrad, a Soviet city and industrial centre on the river Volga, was bombed heavily by the Luftwaffe during the Battle of Stalingrad in World War II. German land forces comprising the 6th Army had advanced to the suburbs of Stalingrad by August 1942. The city was firebombed with 1,000 tons of high explosives and incendiaries in 1,600 sorties ...
later wrote that the city was completely destroyed without any worthwhile further targets. In the evening, Soviet searchlights illuminated the sky as the city burned bright, spewing smoke and flames into the sky, a sight that Generalmajor Wolfgang Pickert, commander of the 9th Flak Division, described as "fantastic".
alright boys we did it
we destroyed stalingrad
now since we aren't encircled, it's time to- schiesse
Japanese propaganda poster during the Russo-Japanese War
Yes, that's SKK catching Russian ships
Real life Azur Lane is horrifying
What even is this?
Fear of Axis
So a WWII Allied propaganda poster?
Shouldn't be too hard to get it 
where tricolor
Even the Varguist follower of my naval history Page likes Rooselvelt 
Even when he despise the US
The next major update on the horizon.
🔘 Site: http://warthunder.com/
🔘 Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/warthunder
🔘 Twitter: http://twitter.com/warthunder
🔘 Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/WarThunder
🔘 Forum: http://forum.warthunder.com/
#WarThunder
may of been a expensive piece of shit but god damn I look forward to it
Frankenstein Delano Roosevelt
BRO FUCKING NICE
Lucky bastard.
The restricted access rocks
Got a tour from the CO because my dad knows her and her husband
Went to battleship cove yesterday
Okay, now you're just flexing.
Ia that a rocket?
German missile corvette Hiddensee
Oh, okay
She was build in Leningrad, one of few Soviet ships US has
Tarantul class 
I am the captain now
Massa
cool

Big mommy
Cassin Young
Vietnamese Lim-5 (MiG-17F), Polish MiG-17 and MiG-21, UH-34, T-28, P-47Ds, OV-10, and an Albatros
big boat vs big plane
So independence was reported to have some serious hull issues
What about the freedoms
Independence's issues are nothing compared to the Freedoms
if thats what I think it is then the big bote is ded
Yep
Jaxa (Chinese: 雅克薩; Polish: Jaxa, Jaksa) was a 17th-century microstate in North Asia with its capital in Albazino existing between 1665 and 1674. It was located on the border of the Tsardom of Russia and Qing China, by the Amur river. Its population was made by from Polish and Ukrainian refugees from the Tsardom of Russia, and the autochthonic E...
So this was a thing
a fuck ton of death is loaded into them wings
Apparently in 1938 the UK had such a shortfall of non-cemented armor steel that it asked several nations, including Germany(!!), if they'd sell them some
Got Vanguard boys
'Grats
isnt that one of the lowest rated CoD games

just like the british empire ruined ireland,the middle east,africia,india,north americia ,am I missing anywhere
We do a bit of colonizing
British empire and their funny lines
still dividing the world centuries after colonization ends
China
tbh that was more of a group effort by all of europe
and that one moon god that killed junkos family
a short story about the British Empire
music used: https://youtu.be/N8nGig78lNs
Admiral Jorge Dodsworth Martins (right) with General Eisenhower
@tough quail
sometimes you learn cool stuff from quora
also 88 lmfaoooo, get bent fascists
WW2 was a very funny time of everyone just throwing wild ideas at the wall to see if they did anything
thats not really medevial
and the plate armor used in ww1 is more reissuance
but yeah in major wars you often times see crazy ideas as they try to see what can get a edge over the other side
shame they didn't think of putting a steel plate in a huge chest and back pocket at the time
HMS Vanguard Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
by Jabajabajebejebe
———
Q: Is HMS Vanguard based on the King George V class or the Lion class?
A: Both, really. Lion herself was mostly a derivative of the KGV design, but with some technical improvements. Vanguard utilized the new machinery developments intended for the Lion class to get more speed, but was otherwise using a KGV/Lion hull with some tweaks resulting from wartime experience.
Q: Did HMS Vanguard use WWI guns? Were her guns from Courageous/Glorious/Queen Elizabeths/Hood/etc.? What about her turrets?
A: HMS Vanguard did indeed use the same British 15”/42 Mark I gun design that was used on Queen Elizabeth, Revenge, Courageous, Renown, and Admiral classes (and on some monitors). However, she did not literally receive Courageous’ or Glorious’ old guns—her guns came from a stockpile of spare barrels that had been ordered long before. However, she did inherit Courageous’ and Glorious’ mountings, though not without modification. Her turrets were modified to WWII standards, with higher max elevation (30 deg max instead of 20 deg) and thicker armor (though still below average by WWII battleship standards). Notably, she was the only British capital ship to receive RPC (Remote Power Control) for her main armament and secondary battery, though her main gun RPC was only for train (rotating the turret) and not for elevation (of the gun barrels). As a result, her mounting was unique, and was not identical to that used on any other ship. For more details on RPC, see the IAQ.
Q: Did Vanguard use WWI shells?
A: Thankfully, no! I say ‘thankfully’ because British Jutland-era shells were really, really bad! But no, she got shells that were 2 generations displaced from the last British WWI shells (and 3 generations after the Jutland shells). The modern British 15” shells had their quirks, but they performed well. Note that like most of the other modernized 15” gun ships, she had the more streamlined 6crh shells, and not the less streamlined 4crh shells of many of the unmodernized 15” gun ships. For more details on the shells, see the IAQ.
Q: What about supercharges?
A: Vanguard never actually received supercharges, like the other 15” gun ships that had the 30 deg max elevation—it was only issued to the 20 deg max elevation unmodernized ships, and only at a rate of 20 shells per gun, because it produced excessively high barrel wear. The supercharges were issued specifically to get a bit more range, as the low-elevation guns could not return fire against many Italian cruisers and battleships at extreme range in the Mediterranean. However, had Vanguard been called to service in a new war and been expected to fight enemy battleships, it’s possible she would have received a small allotment of supercharges—though certainly not as a replacement for all her standard powder charges, as the barrel wear would have rendered her guns unfit for combat far too quickly to be practical. For more details on the supercharges, see the IAQ.
Q: Is it true that Vanguard outran Iowa in the Atlantic?
A: Yes, it was a real incident during a joint training exercise. Vanguard incorporated a raised bow that improved her seakeeping relative to the KGV class, which had a flat bow due to a design requirement to be able to shoot flat directly over the bow with the A turret (which they never had to do in practice). In contrast, Iowa used a very thin, heavily tapered bow for maximum speed—however, in heavy seas (as you’d expect in the Atlantic), the narrow bow tended to dig into large waves and drench the ship forward, slowing it down. The Scharnhorst class battleships had similar seakeeping issues.
Q: Did Vanguard have the best fire control of any British capital ship?
A: Yes, she did, with the caveat that “fire control” is really a category with several different factors in it, including the fire control radar, rangefinding optics, director, rangekeeper, fire control computer, stable verticals, and more. Many British WWII ships were stuck with old, outdated systems, as there had not been enough budget to go around for modernization in the interwar period (notably contributing to Hood missing every shot at the Battle of the Denmark Strait). Vanguard was able to incorporate many wartime lessons, and was not as pressured for time to be completed during the war (compared to more urgently needed carriers, cruisers, destroyers, corvettes, and transports), so she ended up with the best Britain could afford. The unique feature was her main battery RPC for train, not seen in any other British capital ship. Arguably, her overall fire control suite was second only to the US fast battleships by the end of the war (and not by much).
Q: How heavily armored was HMS Vanguard?
A: Without going into the specific details of thicknesses, armor quality, layout, shell choice, etc. we can say that Vanguard was overall decently armored. Broadly speaking, she was well protected against 14” fire, decently protected against 15” fire, and marginally protected against 16”+ fire. Her armor scheme was mostly a duplicate of the KGV layout, though with some detail improvements to damage control systems and with inferior turret armor. She had a bit more armor over her magazines than her machinery (boilers and engines), as was common in several British ship classes. For more details on her protection, see the IAQ.
Q: Could HMS Vanguard have blown up like HMS Hood?
A: Yes, in a way, though it would have been much more unlikely. While multiple factors contributed to the destruction of Hood, a major factor was the fact that Hood’s powder magazines were positioned above her shell rooms. From Nelson onward, British capital ships switched this layout and placed shell rooms above powder magazines, meaning that bombs and shells coming in above water would be more likely to hit the shell room filled with thick-walled shells and insensitive fillers, than the very volatile and flammable cordite charges below the waterline. Hood never had her layout reversed (and her planned refit did not include changing this, meaning she would have remained vulnerable regardless), and Bismarck’s shell had a much easier time causing a magazine detonation as a result. Still, Vanguard does use basically the same shells and powder, so a similar occurrence, though more unlikely, is still possible.
Q: Should Vanguard be UR?
A: ¯\(ツ)/¯


Since she’s the new ship, I figured I’d provide this for ease of copy-paste
i mean cant any ship blow up like hood
IAQ (Infrequently Asked Questions) will come out tomorrow (hopefully) and will go into detail
Supposedly discord is working on a feature like threads for faqs so many of your things can be transferred there
"Do nothing = UR" "do everything = elite (sr if lucky)"
Added one final Q
welcome back shimmy
anyone know some good books on Earl Browder
it's almost as if
hello qwerty
the final technological developments of any ship class were created near the end of ww2 which meant they saw virtually no action
barring yamato but i mean she also did nothing
Yamato was more
it do be like that
saving her for a decisive battle that never came
it wasn't
Notably, she was the only British capital ship to receive RPC (Remote Power Control) for her main armament and secondary battery, though her main gun RPC was only for train (rotating the turret)
thanks, I told someone this but couldn't 100% remember if it was rotation or elevation
i mean, they sortied her plenty of times
yamato or musashi sortied to virtually every large scale engagement
samar was the closest she ever got to actually fighting, where she did
and then the surface fleets never really connected
but her captain mysteriously couldn't figure out he was chasing slow ass CVEs
somehow

i mean, she has the best rangefinders in the IJN
and i don't think the CVEs were bombing at 40+ knots away from her
It’s actually the reverse of Bismarck
Bisco had it for elevation only
Combined, they equal 1 US FBB 
lol
(Or 1 New Orleans, given NO had RPC as-built for her mainbat)
May i remind you US BBs have two backup methods of elevating guns
the second method is called flooding the damn ship

“They’re getting away!”
“The hell they are!”
Massy notes in her Casablanca report that since operators matching elevation have to watch the guns elevate to firing angle and depress back to loading angle with each firing cycle, they fatigue much more rapidly compared to the operators matching train
So generally speaking, RPC for main guns in elevation is more helpful than in train
…so Vanguard picked the wrong one


You kinda need both for AA control, so idk maybe the Brits didn’t think it was necessary to have both or something for BB caliber
Or maybe they just couldn’t get it to work
FWIW the Germans apparently weren’t fully satisfied with Bismarck’s either
Today we look as the second phase of carrier development, from the conversions of the Washington Treaty to the start of the Second World War.
Sources:
Warship IV - HMS Illustrious: The First Armoured Aircraft Carrier, by Alan Payne, MINA
Warship IX - Early Aircraft Carrier Projects, by David K Brown, RCNC
Warship 2014 - The IJN Light Carrier Ry...

do you guys think Drach plays Azur Lane/Kancolle?
Besides manufacturing capacity, there might be space consideration too regarding the train-only implementation.
British RPC was mostly hydraulic servos which was more complex and require specific space requirement, compared to the mostly elecric RPC on USN
Training gear usually have more relaxed space constraint than elevation gear, and only one needed per turret (excluding backup)
Has the new event made anyone come in here complaining about Hood killing their dog yet?

Isn’t Tsushima anniversary coming up 
Or was that today
Today depending on your time zone
good reinforcements
also wow yeah that torpedo summary is actually really funny considering how absolutely low the accuracy was
unit system good
Hood killed my dunkerque
Aside from Juneau, did the USN lose any cruisers to magazine detonations from torpedoes 
I love how Des Memes was written simply as Machinery and Void
All the armor plating in the world ain’t worth not having backup diesel generators and a crew that knows how to properly counterflood
This is the passage right before that one
Bad damcon prioritization, focus on stuff not usually critical to ship survival
And yeh
iirc he was also in command when Javelin got torpedoed
Ah, just in command of the unit, not on board
F for Ark, should've stayed away further from the battleship
Oh yeah, here’s a funny
“Hm, yes, Resolution taking 7 torpedo hits is likely to result in a loss of 30% of speed.”
Actually he was on board
Damn, damcon master
Conversely, dodging noob
suuuuure, 7 torpedoes is more than even the standards could handle
9×19mm Parabellum - Othias
Ja - Georg Luger
The rest of the world from past to present... REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE


Dimensionally terrible? 9mm is certainly up there, but so is .45 ACP
from Mr. Luger's perspective
He wasn't too happy for developing that 9mm
They are both piss poor designs kept around for logistics sake, even though much better designs are around. 5.7x28 gets you more energy to either in a vastly smaller round.
To think that there's still people swear by .45
.45 "test"...
Note: the fact is that the .45ACP as adopted didn't even match the test regime
Because the test regime had the three "satisfactory" rounds all as lead hollow points
"None of the full-jacketed or metal-patch bullets (all of which were less than cal. . 45) showed the necessary shock effect or stopping power for a service weapon"
.45ACP in its US military issued FMJ format, isn't even following the really important lesson from the "test" regime... that hollowpoints had way better stopping power than FMJ.
Which nobody would deny. But by having all of the big rounds be only hollowpoints and the "small" rounds all FMJ or soft tip...
I wonder what they would have seen with a 9 para or .38ACP hollow point.
Tell me, what is your favourite handgun caliber?
But much as there was absolutely no effort to standardize the targets or the exact methodology of shooting them, there was zero effort in making sure the different calibers being competed were shot with the same bullet type or barrel length.
I mean, for military use the 5.7mm is provably pretty much the best.
But YOUR favourite
The Germans being unable to defeat the trials results by argument had to simply cry and go home 20 years ago which lead to the 9mm replacement program collapsing.
How so
Penetration and capacity
Yep
As to my favorite that's tricky given I don't have any ownership or experience, and so I'd have to vouch for what is mathematically and trials wise the best.
good ol .22
.357 sig is out there
.45acp is huge when compared to other full size pistol rounds like 9mm or 5.7mm
It’s just so darn slow
It's not just capacity and pen, it's a combination of things. It's got excellent external ballistics, the best of the AP pistol rounds, it has a better terminal effect than the microbullet of HK's 4.6mm.
It is also slow
well yeah the .45's size is to store all the 'fuck you'
Isn’t that due to the 5.7’s high velocity making a bigger tempirary cavity?
it is slow because it is overloaded with fucks to give
You want a .45ACP sized round that isn't crap?
Get 10mm Auto
It's actually slightly smaller than .45ACP
in both length and diameter
20mm
I mainly see this argument for law enforcement uses and not actually military use
10mm based
Lol 10mm is noice
It’s a .40 right?
0.39
For LE use economics trumps everything else, pretty much any common caliber jacketed hollowpoint does the job for LE.
4.6mm... idk why H&K didn't make a pistol for that cartridge.
I mean they tried with the UCP but cancelled in 2009.
While FN got both the P90 and the Five Seven.
Also... ohdear 10mm and Bren Ten 
Alternatively you could just not use shit 9mm rounds
5.7 >>>>>>> 4.6
The actual bullet for 10mm Auto is exactly .40 caliber.
Yea
"Whatever military hand me down comes down the pipe"
Because .40 x .00254
Yeah, HK tried to make a pistol for 4.6 but the already weak 4.6 became basically a spitball out of a pistol-length barrel.
Its only good point is short range pen but it just dunks most of its energy in the first few dozen yards
So light
Dear god no
Eww
.223
what I mostly buy
Also if you really want to laugh, you can always look at subsonic .223 rem or subsonic 5.7mm... which are just a very expensive way to shoot .22LR
I'm partial to .58 cal flintlock
In fact, they have less energy than .22LR
most ruin your day I have is 12 gauge
One of the neat things about the 5.7 pistol round is that it uses the same exact bullets as 5.56
both important
Frierarms
jaba got it
brilliant
I'm also interested in those Indian INSAS rounds
INSAS... ohgods
If you absolutely must penetrate some fool's body armor with a pistol, you could reload 5.7x28 with M995 AP projectiles
black tip 556?
HEAT rounds for a pistol
5.7 has some of the meanest looking rounds
this is post-penetration frangible ammo iirc?
That's a marital aid


Dude I wish I could carry 5.7 for work
When you gotta penetrate someone's helmet from 500 yards

Frangible ammo moment
when you gotta create 4 wound channels
Hey look it's Vanguard

The ship that would not die, was called a He, saw torpedo boats everywhere, and that took an entire fleet to sink
Probably
the fleet didn't sink it
Unicorn
Also 💸
it scuttled itself
noone:
7.5 FK:
after turning around to run from jeep carriers
yes but atleast it wants to be something more
Did someone say.. VANGUARD?

anyways
what I've learnt about firearms in the years that I've been interested in them is
- shotgun slugs are best home defence
- AR does not stand for assault rifle

when you absolutely need to blow the guy's arm off at 100 yards
Slugs are just really neat and underrated
shotguns have a strange reputation due to games
Yeah
'they only work up close'
tell that to the dead bear at 100 yards
It’s actually very simple
But like it's funny cause they are used for bird hunting
After flying 4 feet the slug dematerializes
And birds can get pretty high very fast
That’s why the Germans didn’t like it. Not because of any sense of honor, but because it broke conventional ideas of physics
I think a standard slug has a bit over half of the energy a friggin 50 cal has at the muzzle

Didn't the germans literally have the Brenneke slug?
or did they use buckshot

don't tell me they used slugs in a smoothbore
'honor'
yeah bro sorry we're using better weapons to kill with that's really unfair and imbalanced in hindsight, apologies
To be fair
slugs are probably more humane anyways
Idk if you break into my house Im filling you with bird shot
I don't make the rules
It's just cheaper for me
there is no torture involved when you immediately cease metabolism due to kinetic catastrophe
To be fair if I had just spent the last several months sitting around in a trench getting bombarded, only to see some yank jump in and turn my 3 closest buddies into pink mist I’d be fairly annoyed too
after watching taofledermaus for years I can say a slug to the chest will just punch straight through you
and kill you from the hydrostatic shock
firearms and weapons in general are way underrated due to media, kinda sad
Either the recoil doesn’t exist or it propels the barrel into the ceiling
was watching stranger things with friends the other day and after seeing the big bad get hurt and pissed at a pistol, I was like 'why don't the government dudes unload into it with their 20 military grade rifles and make it commit unalive'
I mean...
AR can stand for multiple things
auto/automatic rifle, autorifleman, armalite and/or armalite rifle, assault rifle (yes, this is actually a term, don't let anyone try to gaslight you into thinking otherwise)
augmented reality...
yesn't
I thought AR is a repair ship?
there's enough temporary expansion from a shotgun slug to largely make the difference academic

but there's a magic number of around 2400 fps/730 m/s* where that temporary expansion occurs so violently that the flesh is basically turned into a bloody sponge due to the shock
*terminal speed, to note
at lower speeds rifle rounds are also still more likely to yaw and/or fragment, so they're still operating in a more efficient manner than "big slug go yeet"
Yes.
The flat frontal surface area is the thing that is so devastating
It is much less based on its velocity ofc
Being a slug
@manic latch
Well well well

?
kronk has arrived
oh
Alaska is also already in the files
Shown on screen, even.
Tirpitz and Biscuit as well
https://utreon.com/c/forgottenweapons/
http://www.patreon.com/ForgottenWeapons
Cool Forgotten Weapons merch! http://shop.forgottenweapons.com
For another perspective on the AA52 check out Bloke on the Range's video on the gun today:
https://youtu.be/SOTsZklFpMQ
Contact:
Forgotten Weapons
6281 N. Oracle 36270
Tucson, AZ 85740


Cold war france be like
Still waiting for Flyhawk to actually commit and do a 1/700 Gloire
YOU LIKE LEVERS?
pain
delayed blowback for full power RCMGs is one of the brainier things to ever come from small arms development
2.5 oz. slug vs my sternum pls
my favorite is 5.45 AKs always having absolute fucking nightmares recoil in games
despite the actual round kicking like a small kitten
it really doesn't
if you can't control an AK-74 you're probably a malnourished 14 year old
it does tho
in the AK you got the entire gas rod added to the system
in the AR you just got the tube
unless I'm missing smth ofc
more recoil than an ar-15 =/= your arms being torn off five rounds in
which bido james dont seem to understand
not atm but ill look around after fp2
the most recent one ive fucked around with is pavlov
where the m4 is basically a laserbeam and the ak-12 for some reason has like double the recoil of the regular AK
and it's like trying to wrestle lightning to the ground
There's less felt recoil in a AK-74 than M16
Communism joke
Free recoil of the AK-74 is an astonishingly low 3.39J (2.50 ft*lb) - full length M16 is 4.4 ft*lb of free recoil.
Held a real AK for the first time today
In a nuclear bunker in prague
Unfortunately deactivated
any idea which model?
yes but he's not talking about free recoil lol
Agreed. 5.45 is a bit anemic. An old buddy of mine in the army said he preferred 5.56 or 7.62 over the 5.45
really hard to judge this without a specific criterion
even though it has more felt recoil. Then again unless you're a fat reserve or an officer you're pretty much required to train and doing so pretty much makes the recoil more or less an inconvenience.
He said the export AK-103 is surprisingly a better AK to shoot.
The ak-74 might have a little bit of problems on the breech or gas system throwing off the sights idk
never shot one
Which is funny because our standard issue rifle is just a modernized and accurized FN FNC (which uses a modified AK action but chambered in 5.56)
I mean.
yeah
the AK-103 is what happens when the Russians aren't the ones who need to foot the bill
which is why AK-12 ended up being such a relative garbage fire
5.45 ammo design philosophy also just gets weird
ball ammo where the core is an alloy rod because armor pen above all else... but still can't actually pen peer body armor and sacrifices any semblance of terminal effect
and I guess the British took notes because they decided to make a all steel jacketed 5.56 their new standard
556 green tip scaled up?
yes
as ball
M855/SS109
and the 5.56 is just...
solid steel with a jacket
and performs worse than M855A1
but they can't fit M855A1 into the L85 anyway
so
meh
oh yeah
copper is denser than steel
so that British round needs to be even longer than M855A1
to be the same weight
so either the OAL changes
how long is that shit
or the case capacity shrinks
LONG NECK
and the UK needs to choose between pressure people think M855A1 has
or less velocity
no indication
but it was explicitly designed for hard target performance
does worse than M855A1 at it
and gives up all semblance of terminal effect on a soft target
which just makes me think someone told the design team that hard target performance was the goal and nothing else
like how RN shell makers never got to to stop making shells that explode while still in the plate
so probably some super hard super light steel
that makes the round even longer
might as well fill it with tempered glass
Graphs from BAE claim that the HP bullet can penetrate an 8mm steel sheet out to about 400m
for the 7.62
assuming that's mild steel...
M855A1 does 9.5mm at 450 meters

czech one with a full wooden stock
had 1974 written on it
ok so they used stainess or some shit
are you sure it was an AK

if it's Czech
cus
The vz. 58 (or Sa vz. 58) is a 7.62×39mm assault rifle designed and manufactured in Czechoslovakia and accepted into service in the late 1950s as the 7,62 mm samopal vzor 58 ("7.62mm submachine gun model 1958"), replacing the vz. 52 self-loading rifle and the 7.62×25mm Tokarev Sa 24 and Sa 26 submachine guns.
While externally the vz. 58 resemble...
isn't an AK
go call the Vz.58 an AK on a czech forum
I dare you
distinctly remember the cleaning rod and longer sight on the AK
and the shorter sight and lack of cleaning rod on the vz
look guns arent my forte alright
the VZ also has a way different charging handle
also look at the gas system
it's much shorter on the VZ
and if the gas system is different it just isn't the same gun
not to mention the bolt locking and magazine feed systems
no you idiots that's a fal

yeah they had both
i was wondering about the differences i spotted
and forgot that the czechs had their own gun
is oki
the VZ and AK are some of the most confused guns
and VZ's are often used in movies to represent AK's
as they are still a lot cheaper last time I czeched
the arsenal
i just think of the AK-74m
me checking out steel case tula ammo
imma be honest
well it may seem annoying to some theres a reason I like to point out the minor inaccuraces in movies
since often times thats the only point the public sees a era of history
also lord of war was a mid movie
nick cage is a mid actor
but mah steel core penetrator :Kappap:
My initial problem with the 5.45 is that why did the Russkies keep the 39 mm case length which for all the good things Kalashnikov had made, actually pretty much dwarfed the potential tumbling effect that the bullet has (iirc I read a comment that 42 mm is the ideal case length because it gives the bullet better velocity and even better pen with a bit of a tinkering with the bullet to handle the extra pressure. not to mention better AP properties).
because they were already making a shitload of x39 cases
Classic Russian move there.
I hate how its so easy to load a shotgun in video games. They just go ONE TWO THREE FOUR FIVE SIX SEVEN EIGHT pump OKAY
Where in real life it's more like
grab handful of shells from box/pocket
One two three (fuck that ones backwards) four.....
grabs more shells because a human hand can't hold 8 shotgun shells
Five.. six.. seven..
sound of shotgun she'll smacking into shotgun shell
sigh pump
Eight
Okay Pull
Saiga 12 enters the chat
tho to be fair unless you get the non-AK-based variant, you'll get gas system issues.\
especially the early ones.
"Ohhh those russians..."
~Rasputin, Boney M
Yet shotguns are heavily nerfed in games
my personal favorite is the KS-23, why let perfectly good 23mm AA guns with slight Manufacturing flaws go to waste? when you can create the largest shotgun on earth (so far)
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/21/Карабин_специальный_КС-23М_Дрозд%2C_вид_справа_без_приклада_01.jpg
Ahh the barrel of GSh-23

where my barrikada simps at
oof, the gulag gun
finally
?
As will be seen, the extensive damage sustained by Bismarck was sufficient to overwhelm and defeat the ship, but was not of a nature to cause her to sink quickly.

The day Bismarck goes under
Ohhh right
May 27, 1941, at around 0900 in the North Atlantic, the British heavy cruiser Dorsetshire torpedoed the Bismarck, and she finally went under.
There was a large hole in the vicinity of the amidships catapult on the port side. The size of this hole was perplexing, if it was caused only by shell hits. Upon further analysis, we have concluded that this hole was probably caused by the last torpedo hit on the portside by cruiser Dorsetshire. Information from Mr. Statz has indicated that listing was at 15 degrees when he jumped into the sea at 1030. Dorsetshire's action report states that she made her final run on the port side of Bismarck at 1034, with the torpedo set for a depth of 16 feet. Observers on the British cruiser noted that the torpedo struck amidships. We are now almost certain that this torpedo hit just below the outboard edge of the Aufbaudeck (USN 01 level) near the port catapult position. A 15-degree list to port and water surge into the ship from the 25-45 foot waves makes this a likely event. Most of the energy of the torpedo explosion (750 pounds of TNT) was vented upwards, but there was sufficient energy left to cause the large hole in the Aufbaudeck seen in the overhead view of the damaged Bismarck. This torpedo hit, although not decisive in sinking the ship, did serve to accelerate the capsizing process already underway.
The torpedo hit the weather deck when Bismarck was already listing so heavily that the torpedo could hit the top of the ship rather than the side
i.e. it made another hole to make her sink faster, but didn't cause her to start sinking in the first place
Littorio
One of the designers of the Bismarck, Mr. Heinrich Schlüter, was quite unhappy with the protective scheme adopted for these ships. He felt that the lower portion of the side armor belt should have been terminated further below the design waterline than was done in the final design. He confided these concerns to his wife before he left on the fateful voyage that was to take his life. Such a change was impossible to make with the standard displacement already exceeding the limit by 7,600 tons and proposals being made to reduce the displacement.
Everyone knows the she was scuttled, not sunk, right?
What?
You have so much life ahead of you
My entire life is history.
I spent the entirety of 2020's quarantine learning about the Bismarck.
i know the ironblood tag and all but im pretty sure he's taking the piss
Yes, but how much of your life is reading naval damage reports
Fingers crossed
if only there was some extra armor laying around on the ship that served no serious purpose, hrmmmmm
HMMMMMM
I don't understand them.
there's so much you can patch up on bisko if you just rip off the upper belt
aaaaaaargh
Not really tbh
I said this based on what they observered when they found her at the bottom in '89.
Upper belt was necessary for
a) preventing over-belt deck hits
b) protecting barbettes
Let me pose you a hypothetical
Is it possible for a ship to be both scuttled and sunk?
Saying she was sunk would give full credit to the Royal Navy, which would be completely incorrect.
Please answer my question
i'd be really surprised if they couldn't just reinforce the barbettes and the deck to a practical degree on similar weight
bismarck with no further underwater protection vs French 15” underwater shells
Can a ship be both scuttled and sunk
Who wins
given the sheer surface area and thickness of the upper belt
but that's just basic brainthink, no serious math behind it
It depends on your definition of "sunk"

If you mean her just going underwater, then yes.
Okay, then rephrase: is it possible to scuttle a sinking ship
Yes.
Indeed
However
This is why I asked if you read WWII damage reports
It is an excellent example of what may be termed a general rule for damage primarily involving flooding which has been derived from many cases of war experience, namely,
IF THE SHIP DOES NOT SINK WITHIN A VERY FEW MINUTES AFTER DAMAGE. SHE PROBABLY WILL SURVIVE FOR SEVERAL HOURS.
Loss of NORTHAMPTON by progressive flooding also parallels other war experience which has shown that,
CASES OF LOSS BY BODILY SINKAGE, PLUNGING OR CAPSIZING SEVERAL HOURS AFTER DAMAGE HAVE BEEN ENTIRELY ATTRIBUTABLE TO PROGRESSIVE FLOODING.
This is from USS Northampton's damage reports
Bismarck's armour was not ever penetrated by the British shells except for the shell that hit her bow during the Battle of the Denmark Strait on May 24, 1941 from Prince of Wales.
bisko was scuttled, yes, but there needs to be context applied to that and the decision to do it
Not actually true
But I'll get to that later
First
The matter of sinking
The decision was made when the captain and admiral died.
by the time the order to detonate the scuttling charge was given, bisko iirc had already lost the majority of power aboard the ship
was taking on a heavy list, and none of her main guns were functional anymore
she was dead in the water with no ability to fight
Here’s a table of the amount of time it took for various British ships to sink
@horse tell me
Note the U-shaped curve this forms
and the order was given to prevent the off chance that she'd stay upright long enough to get towed back to a british port iirc
as... goofy an idea as that is
Ships tend to either sink in a handful of minutes, or take over an hour to sink
There are few ships that sink in between
Perhaps this may be of some relevance
The damage Bismarck sustained was not of the sort to produce a rapid sinking
bisko is several hours iirc due to the numerous holes in both sides and her hilariously huge beam
She was instead sinking slowly
I can't read that.
there's just an enormous surface area trying to get underwater
Then just read my explanation
Bismarck did sink, but they opened the scuttle holes to say we scuttled her instead
For comparison, Kirishima was fatally wounded by Washington in just 5 minutes of shooting, but took nearly 3 more hours to actually sink
there was an actual purpose behind it
it wasn't to get brownie points on the internet seventy years later
No
During which time she was able to leave the battle area under hew own power
It was for pride.
Germany didn't want to say their pride and joy BB was sunk by the Home Fleet
In ships that don’t sink abruptly, there’s a considerable period of time where the ship’s crew can still perform various actions while the ship is irrevocably sinking
One of those actions is scuttling
This is getting confusing, there are too many people saying stuff and I can't process it.
2 for 2 
afaik the ships that were sunk in between the duration were either delayed detonation, slow seeping damage to either magazine, charge room, or fuel compartment, or the machinery was seized...
Yes, can I get some talking space
Not sure about the last.
I would appreciate it
I have not been able to see any of your messages because there was too much going on.
And my phone doesn't scroll up.

e.g. Johnston was clearly sunk by the Japanese, but her crew also scuttled her by opening the scuttles, as they abandoned ship
Who is Johnston?
A fletcher class
Most famous US DD at the Battle off Samar
Oh
Scared off Yamato
Never heard of Samar
We can discuss that later
Alright
Just know it’s a very famous battle
Anyway
Yes, Bismarck was scuttled. No one her disputes that; her wreck shows little implosion damage which suggests that most of her inner spaces were flooded internally prior to reaching crush depth, consistent with scuttling
However, ships don’t sink like video games, where when they hit 0 HP they blow up and go under in a few seconds
That would be strange.
If a ship hasn’t sustained damage of a type that causes it to sink in a couple minutes, it usually takes over an hour
Bismarck took roughly 40 minutes to sink
She was on track to sink over the course of perhaps 1-2 hours, but as her crew abandoned ship, they performed the standard abandon-ship procedure of scuttling the ship
Which hastened her sinking and caused her to go under more quickly
Why would you actually scuttle the ship? 
Scuttling is a French specialty 
Can confirm. The British tried to do it for them, the Americans tried to do it for them, but the French were still best.
None of this is a discredit to her crew—who held on far longer than was really necessary—or to her design, but it shouldn’t distort the fact that the British did inflict sufficient damage to sink her prior to the abandon-ship and scuttling
Scuttling is also a way to hold your pride, you can claim that your ship was not sunk by the enemy.
No, not really
I said you can claim.
As a trivia, Samar (or was it San Bernardino Strait?) would have been the battleground for the whole infamous theoretical Iowa Vs Yamato stuff.
Didn't say it's true.
you just end up looking extra desperate tbh
Scuttling was standard procedure in the Kriegsmarine when abandoning a doomed ship
there's not really much shame in uh
Well, that's rather interesting.
For France they had a valid reason
getting run down by half the royal navy in unison
So it didn't fall into enemy hands.
I know.
That’s the point of procedure
Watch the british tow bismarck back to britain






















