#history
1 messages · Page 194 of 1
A most splendid meta version
gneisenau is cuter
People wonder why I don't like the warthunder community and wehraboos
See posts, photos and more on Facebook.
Just read the comments
So bored of the same joke and shit takes
welcome to pop history, where most is a reheated meme with inconsistent standards at best
fasiboki
But people would get upset if I said, "lol 1 bomb arizona"
Which is equally tasteless

Average red name humor 
tho stuff like that is equally 
Jerome Lee you do know that bismarck was beaten down to the point she had to run? She may of taken diwn the hood but the hood absolutely wrecked her. Hence how we were able to find her after we called for the hunt on bismarck
not even sure where people come up with this stuff
Hood's sin is giving wehraboos a death where they can praise Bismarck as best
Songs didn't helped well either
Unrelated, but I think Hood may be the only battleship to have been on the giving and receiving end of an ammo detonation, since she was the one who landed the hits on Bretagne a few months earlier

interesting theory yeah
tho pop history prefers to only remember Hood detonating, and then paying at best 25% as much attention on other cases of detonations


didn't Bretagne suffer the ammo detonation after she capsized?
like Yamato
ok nvm the secondary charges detonated before that
so very much like Hood
I love scharnhorst and gneisenau
They let me skip two meta seasons in a row
"yes i want to slave away for 2983479hours a day to get fucked by f1 racer subs so i can get mediocre t1.5 BBs"
-statement by the utterly deranged
It takes me 2-3 minutes to get 100 coordinate points
And helps me to test out boss fleets
So don't mind it
But META ships should be stronger yes
I dunno why they're all so mediocre
Am in Turkey, saw this
Dardo as main gun
Meroka as main gun when?

Tuzla-class patrol boat
I love that quad Oerlikon? They have as old CIW
That's quad Oerlikon KBB
Which is yes, Oerlikon, but not that WW2 Oerlikon
What's the deal with Oerlikon naming scheme anyway
*THE* Oerlikon 20 x 110mm
The other Oerlikon 20 x 70mm
20 x 72mm
20 x 101mm
Oerlikon KAA/B/E 20 x 128mm
Oerlikon KAD 20 x 139mm - HS.820
Oerlikon KBA 25 x 137mm
Oerlikon KBB/D 25 x 184mm
Oerlikon KCA/B/E 30 x 173mm - HS.831 (B)
Oerlikon KDA/B/C/E 35 x 228mm
Idk, they have too many models 
This video just popped up on youtube:
A decade before the outbreak of World War 2, the Japanese Imperial Navy was already building its strength. But limited by strict international treaties that aimed to prevent another naval arms race after World War 1, the Japanese Empire's expansionist dream was about to be smothered.
Still, the Japanese were determined to bulk up their fleet. ...
"Dark" is a little bit meh as far as content creators go but they do get some good pictures
At least they went slightly more than a Wikipedia narration
Which is already a plus, sadly
Dark Seas...
Yeah I don't know why that's the name, but good video though.
If I widened the criteria a bit to include post-sinking detonations and standard ammunition fires the ship count would increase quite a bit
A bunch of WW1 dreadnoughts I'd presume that title due to Jutland and Dogger Bank shenanigans
And Bismarck herself of course with all the irony that comes
It hurts

It's because the author used to have or has a channel about dark things like underwater sounds and horror things called dark docs IIRC.
Did Bismarck ever detonate?
Thought her wreck was whole.
OOohhhhh
Bismarck had an ammunition fire in one of her main magazines
It was of little consequence at that point since she was already a crippled wreck and they managed to put it out via flooding, but technically...
the fucked up thing is that it'd probably be kinder to the ones that got left in the water
US and Japanese convoys are trying to reach Guadalcanal to provide much need supplies for the fierce ground fighting. At night, cruisers of the US Navy and Imperial Japanese Navy clash, and chaos ensues in the waters off the island.
My "Group Captain" tier Patreons vote on my next video subject. If you'd like to have your say on my next video, ...
@tough quail 
@delicate beacon
What do you think of this little feller? 
Looks cute
It's one of the few Dutch built ships we still have in operation
Like
We only have 4 Dutch built ships
Which are like, 4.2% of the total fleet
This is one
It's Potengi
A riverine logistical support ship
She's just as old as monitor Parnaíba (1938)
Until 1996 she operated as an riverine oiler
But when monitor Parnaíba was converted from an oil burning boiler to a diesel engine
Potengi was converted into a logistics ship
She have the same capacity of cargo carrying as from her days of oil
460 tons
Her builder is N.Y. Scheeps Boower
NY Scheeps Boower?
Built by: De Merwede, Hardinxveld, The Netherlands
Launched: 1938.03.16
Commisioned: 1938.06.28
Dimensions : 54.5 m long , 7.5 m wide and 1.8 m draft .
Displacement: 594 tons ( loaded) .
Propulsion: diesel , 2 Krohout diesel generating 500 bhp , coupled to two shafts with fixed pitch propellers .
Speed: Maximum 10 knots .
Crew: 19 men .
Callsign: PWGY ( PXGY )```
that's remarkably unremarkable company name
Yeah, I think he meant N.V. Scheeps Bouwer
Which translates to Limited, Ship builder.
Maybe i should contact someone to change that on NGB
Althought it's an old website
What its your English source? 
Ah
Well
He basically copied and pasted the info from NGB
Which means it's good info
I'll show the other three Dutch built ships we operate
Riverine transport ship Paraguassú (operates in the same flotilla as Potengi)
Built by Amsterdam Droogdok
Corvette "Caboclo" (the last of the Imperial Marinheiro class still active)
And lastly
Cisne Branco, our tallship
tall 
I need to translate the pie chart i made with the countries of origin of the 96 ships we have on the Brazilian Navy's Official Silhouette Board
But all i can say for now is that 4.2% of the fleet have Dutch origins
hood seems like a bit of a jump when some nations are still using only 12''
just a bit
teensy bit
like i said earlier it's like dumping a t-44-100 into a pziv/sherman/cromwell brawl


does anyone know if legally I can get a replica of that in my backyard (im in america)
I’m pretty sure Terbuchets aren’t named out right in any laws here and are more likely to be 100% legal. Only problem would actually be a fucking HOA sending some Karen’s after you
Not just any Sherman fuckboy
But I digress
I heard some rumors that they’re adding Yama to squeeze some last bucks out of naval

rofl
Naval got potential. But aiming is still horrible experience
No way she is coming before Nagato
410mms should blow up anything in game currently anyway
no way hyuuga would comes before kongou-- wait
no wait hood comes before QE and renown... wait
Scharn did come before Biscuit
You're like
1/9
They will 100% just put Yamato in thr game with no consideration for other tech trees
Case and point, literally every large bb ship so far

and
If there's anything illegal about the Ryujo...
As the day of the handover to the navy draws near, the designer ordered the fitting out workers to work overnight to hasten the process - the next day he came to the dockyard, he heard some news: An officer monitoring the work of the Ryuujou got piss drunk and wanted to sleep - but the carrier's fitting out work was so noisy that he took a pole, started chasing the workers down and beating them - one worker even injured his face while running away. Angered, he ordered his workers to stop working, and the workers all got off the ship - but just as he wondered how to sort the mess out, the sheepish officer came in front of the designer, apologized, and got punished - the workers resumed their work.
le IJN drunkenness and abusement

good thing I dont have one
yes
..or the fact that 8x8 hardwood cost a shit ton 
Understandable
if they add yamato they better add the gulf war NJ
Why?
balance

As if NJ isnt broken as fuck already
i know
My bad. Gulf War NJ is still why.
The WWII one is fine for WT
Indianapolis???? N one battle
If anything, the shitload of AA makes it more appealing
hmmmm
USS West Virginia refit would be a good premium BB
Same FCS as the Iowas
Should've saved the Colorados... could've had some backup Iowas...
Simply very feasible
Where your money?
Where your maintenance fees?
And more importantly
dont ask me
How old is WV?
20 years older than NJ
Old*
Simply not worth the money in the post war navy
Practically the dame guns
Lmfao no
Can't just scream and cry about keeping a ship when you literally cannot afford to keep it moored somewhere and they make no money as museum ships
The 16"/45 Mark 5 fired AP Mk 5 shells
That's why we have so few
Iowa's 16"/50 AP mark 8s
saves super dreadnought
doesn't have missiles
nobody comes to visit it
everyone visits the Missouri and NJ because of Battleship
Just as a note, the SoDak, NC Museums were all cannibalized to reactivate the Iowas
suddenly make several million dollars in a year because of FO76
Even Texas is in a rather shit state as it is
Drydock soon™️ for god knows how much longer
thanks america
smh
why does nobody wanna visit a battleship
Whats so good about LA and NYC
Becauss not everyone is into WWII history?
No everyone wants to travel to an expensive city either
The naval front especially
I've only been to Iowa cause she's in driving distance from me
Why do you think naval models are so lackluster compared to the absolute giants that is AFV and plane modelling
But like I'm not going to see Bama
Because naval history as it stands is a niche hobby
Some people like me drool over the details
It's the more Niche one out of the war models
Others just pay a visit to it because "oh hey, famous ship, gotta do selfies"
Furthermore, some naval museums are just parked at absolute shit spots
The French cruiser Colbert is an eyesore to the entire neighbourhood; The destroyer Barry was about to be sealed off by new infrastructure
Both were sent off to the scrapyard even though they were museum ships
And more recently we have the INS Vikrant
Scrapped because no 💰
The traditional joke stands true
Yeah there's not really a good amount of places to actually toss a ship especially after zoning and all that has been done, and its not cheap either to get water front land for basically a permanent lease
The government willingly scraps museum ships?
"Its not the initial cost that breaks you, it's the maintenance"
It's not even the government
why is waterfront land so valuable
A ship left ill-maintained is just a horrific sight
It's waterfront land
Except it doesnt
That's LITERALLY the reason
you can get a boat in the water and look at the ocean big whoop
you get a hurricane or earthquake and you're the first to go
oh right because everyone loves the beach and businesses love the free business
You have a very flawed world view on coastal stuff
I'd love it
Every fucking day multiple tourists come here and makea a ruckus
All the way until 11PM
I'm from West Virginia
You have a wide sea view obstructed by a fucking lattice mast
Oh right... Tourists.
Id be fucking pissed
Water ways are major for trade and what not, and are pricey because how cities usually grow around water, so it's prime real estate for everything
What's so good about a sea view though? Why is it so expensive? You can't farm on it. All there is to it is trade
It helps people relax
It's nice
Thats why its called scenery
gl relaxing when only the world's richest can afford it
No good reason for a bit of land to go for millions
So? It's their property
And they dont want that eyesore
Or just people shitting or pissing themselves late at night
then pay for it to go to an actual dock or something
Or a baby howling suddenly
or idk don't welcome tourists
Where the money?
The navy is not about to relinquish a piece of valuable metal to the public
It's not like an HOA near it pays for it
right
Sentimental feeling is not a factor here
you know maybe the mountaineer redneck hick shouldn't be speaking on rich people beach city
If nobody raises enough money to buy it off
My "city" has 5-600 people
They sell it to scrappers for money
Navy's usually turn down museum ship proposition unless they have a fuck ton of funding or some deal worked out
cringe
And some ships simply arent worth salvaging
Aight
Scrapping ships also helps jobs and stuff at those ship yards the navy's have contracted
I'm gonna buy the nagato and turn it into apartment's in Ohio
Ships as badly damaged as say...Enterprise
So it's probably better
And again, the initial cost is the easy part
why not, instead of a museum ship, beach the vessel and turn it into housing?
Once you buy the ship off, it's your ass on the line
Why would you do that
No, they dont.
That's not how housing works nor would a ship be a good idea for it
A ship doesnt use walls
WAIT I JUST REALISED
They have bulkheads
China turned a Kuznetsov into a theme park... or put it into one
Kiev herself, yes
It's a museum ship with a bunch of extra steps
But an expensive undertaking
It's still not done yet either
Its done tea
Maybe ships really are too expensive to have them sit around
Or even be worth keeping around if they do anything that isn't moving massive amounts of cargo
Yes, ships are difficult to maintain
Didn't realize it was actually done
Becauss what a surprise
water likes to eat stuff
Metal on water makes it degrade
saltwater+oxygen on metal is a big no no
Im sure youve seen what happened to the Sullivans
The symptoms were already there years ago
A worker dropped a wrench and it punched clean through the bottom
Thats how fucked she is under poor maintenance
Wouldn't this work with using one of those huge crawlers NASA uses for moving rockets
Again, why would you do that
Or doing what they did with the Spruce Goose and taking it apart then rebuilding it
Just build a new fucking thing
Preservation. Can't fall apart if it ain't in the water
Its way cheaper without the limitations of a ship hull
looks at the Spruce Goose in a museum
True...
You can build everything above the waterline and ignore the rest
And have that be the museum
Heck
At that point make replicas in ohio
And I have to remind you, not everyone is on board of preserving a ship
Just build replicas of everything deck level and above in a city park
It's fucking cheaper
Some of Enterprise's veterans were vehement that she not be preserved
Because in their eyes, the ship deserves dignity and not be visited by civvies like a clown car
Yeah
So you have internal and external resistance
maybe scrapping the majority of the ship, then saving, say, the bridge, for display would work
Put ir in a city park somewhere or in a naval museum
better for education than waow!!! $1,000 tour!
Thats exactly what is done
I reinvented the wheel
Portland's mast, Derfflinger's bells, are all on display
West Virginia's mast
That'd be an interesting project... building a replica of the bow turrets and the forward portion of the superstructure
I think they saved WV's bells
The USS Huntington's name plate is preserved in the middle of nowhere
Make it a small airport in fucking the middle of no where
I'm pretty sure a Colorado or Iowa turret is about the size of my house xd
They are huge
Actually, a reminder
Shangri-La's nameplate is outside the scrapper's office in Kaoshiung
caked in rust
This is where my favorite cruiser's remains lie
The nameplate of the USS Huntington, CL-107
that'd be a cool park...
Building a replica of a turret from each major American BB class
s u p e r i m p o s e d
THIS
build a replica of this
USS Kearsage when
Hey sorry I know this is not a naval history question but what eastern front city battle lasted for years in all weather? I thought lenin and stalin grad but stalin was only 3 months and lenin grad lasted for years but I hear it was only the city outskirts so little city combat.
Did they ever actually get into moscow?
No
Some of the Chinese battles were constant enough to be call full fights
yup, saw it last time I was up there though it's the acr wv bell, there's a few weevee things around though
I think they even have a 5''/38 iirc
HMAS Brisbane at the AWM Canberra
A very very landlocked city
The ACR bell?!?!
They actuallt preserved WV/Huntington?!
Yo!
I need to go up there sometime lol
That looks sweet
It’s fine, this channel is general history
And sometimes off topic
you can mostly point to a random russian city and say that one
@tough quail
Russian navy sidearm
Dont think many cities were fought over for long.
immensely based
it depends on what you define as "long"
there's a good few protracted sieges
and then there's absurdity like leningrad
“Haha! He’s out of rounds!
Why is he throwing that at me”
Real Russians don't need silly things like ammunition
Aggressor at the entrance reference
oh i thought it was a tww 3 reference
finished cursed Fuso, cursed Montpeiler is next 
You call that cursed, I say it's now better than historical Fusou
Tho needs some small and medium caliber AA on top, but that's a detail
Can finally breathe in the machinery spaces
I was thinking that too but didn't post lol
IJNboos don't want you to see this
Trading some of the awful main guns and the awful 152s in horrible positions for much improved internal layouts, one of the best CL guns in triple turrets and a glorious heavy AA battery
I call it a win
Lorraine time
Yeah fixing the fucking cramped machinery is a dub, and the AA and sec bats are chiefs kiss
Wish I had this plan for post modernization, but I doubt that it got that much better
auxiliary machinery just getting thrown into any corner that was empty

Is that a cruiser
yes
Isn't that the 17,500t cruiser killer?

(798 mps vs historical 965 mps)
and only 45 cal. vs 55 cal.
could've easily been a tier 8-9 cruiser
Know the feel
Giving Kremlin 48 cal vs planned 55 cal
Maybe WG hates the 55 cal
yes but kremlin has high muzzle velocity still
True. But 1300?kg shell instead 1720kg 
source on the 1720 kg?
Here
There is two shells
One with 1720kg weight but 820m/s velocity
And 1460kg weight but 870m/s velocity
620kg charge weight


(also a year later there were projects of battleships with guns of even larger caliber - 500 and 530 mm)```
fake
also
In the project, the weight of the projectile could be from 1580 to 1720 kg
Not fake. Early Soyuz concepts did that that 500-530mm in mind 
Tho of course they pass to 406-457-356mm limit as logical choice later
Unlike Germans that got bigger as new designs come
give me an official source for that and I might believe it
Got the info ready on 1935 460-456-450mm designs. But fine you gonna make me search the 500mm 

how about info for literally any of them
not an official source indeed
This book
Васильев А. М.,Морин А. Б
Суперлинкоры Сталина. «Советский Союз», «Кронштадт», «Сталинград»
Vasiliev A. M., Morin A. B
"Soviet Union", "Kronstadt", "Stalingrad"

do you have a page number or a digital copy
because rn all we have is a screenshot from ???, a pixelated book cover, and a name
I do. But before I do that I will also post Mclaughlin's writing
Which is English
From the book Russian and Soviet Battleships by Stephen Mclaughlin
It's a Tillman boner. It was never considered as serious
that's a near direct copy of the passage from the Russian source
and...
lmao
it's circular sourcing
@spring briar https://www.e-reading.club/bookreader.php/1002749/superlinkory-stalina-sovetskiy-soyuz-kronshtadt-stalingrad.html
Автор: Васильев А.М. + Морин А.Б., Книга: Суперлинкоры Сталина. «Советский Союз», «Кронштадт», «Сталинград», Жанр: техника, научно-историческая, справочники, Издание: 2008 г.
Here the link
they thinking up shit like this but then fail to even get 5 acceptable light cruisers

and the primary documentation is laughable
Yeah invasion hurts the construction and fixing it seems
You French should know it the most
no
well we managed to mostly fix dunkerque, strasbourg among other ships
Yet couldn't continue with Alsace's project. And couldn't fit the Jean Bart turret in time
Since you know. Germans
preeeetty sure Richelieu is talking the Kirov garbage fire
of which 4 are finished by June of 1941
Yes
and the only delays related to war for those are related to cocking up the invasion of Finland and shuffling resources around after helping to kick off WW2 in Europe
Poland was clearly only invaded by 1 country
NKVD
and how did they get there?
Soviet Invasion of Poland?
Imperialism naturally
4 years for Gorky and Molotov
Is an oof and a half
Given the first 2 "only" took 3 years
On sub 10k ton cruisers
Well yes Italian assistance was needed while building the new infrastructure
Since most important things of shipbuilding were lost during the revolution
Likely what doomed Izmail sisters after the revolution
Spanish war ruined Italian X Soviet relationship 

Yet the technical assistance continued despite that. There were Italian Constructors at Soviet shipyards up to the declaration of hostilities in June 1941 
In 1931. Soviets also ordered equipments for Leningrad class from Italy. Including rangefinders and fire control computers from the Galileo
3 years for a cruiser isn't that bad of a construction time, TBF
If you're talking from being laid down to commissioning
It's called Soviet= Bad 
Norleans took 2
Now, when you consider the state of the ships given the modifications the Soviets decided to introduce... Well, that's more the indictment on the cruisers
Australia took 2.5
NOLAs are;
A) Being built by the Americans
B) Mostly took about 3 years
Usually about 2 years from being laid down to launching, and then about a year fitting out
Wait. Isn't that the John Brown and Company's product 
Ain't they already advanced on shipbuilding
Yeah they are the builders of Hood
As a general rule of thumb, the British and Americans had some of the most advanced and fastest-paced construction anywhere, so again it's a bit unfair to use them as a measuring stick.
And even then many of the Kent-class took about 3.5 years to built

is it just me or hms unicorn was the only ship of her class?
She was a one-off, yeah
@spring briar 
astérix!
- & +
For Obelix i already showed the flag of NAe São Paulo's Department of Aviation
Yes. Aircraft repair ship
She was the first ship built in any navy that could "carry out the full range of aircraft maintenance and repair work in addition to the ability to operate aircraft from the flight deck"

that's a pretty lofty claim considering how extensive the spare parts stores and repair shops on a full sized fleet carrier are
the volume will be different, but the capability?
unlikely
indeed, especially compared to American carriers
the overhead handling measures in a USN CV's hangar sure come in handy
the Lustys own repair facilities left a lot to be desired though, which necessitated Unicorn and her successors
This claim was done by Hobbs, David, Commander (2007). Moving Bases: Royal Navy Maintenance Carriers and MONABs.
k
Did Perseus and Pioneer had better performance after their modification to this role?
perseus and pioneer basically never operated in their designed role
pioneer repaired a grand total of 24 planes before wars end, then was sent to reserve
Why they weren't able to land aircraft?
and perseus ferried planes back to the UK from Australia before also being sent to reserve
no, they commissioned in in mid 1945
Perseus after wars end and Pioneer in May
Bruh, how tf centaur heavier than lusty despite it's classified as"cvl" 
they probably would have performed better but they were never placed under the strain of supporting constant frontline combat operations

In those few cases where major repairs were performed in combat areas, Aircraft Repair and Overhaul units, AROU's in naval parlance, handled the job. Such units operated from our bases at Noumea, Guadalcanal, and Espiritu Santo. By far the most numerous and versatile of these units, however, were the Carrier Aircraft Service units, commonly called CASU's. A few weeks after the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor the first four CASU's were commissioned began to operate in the Hawaiian area. Because CASU's maintained most types of combat aircraft including fighters, fighter-bombers, torpedo planes, dive bombers, and night fighters in the later phase of the war, they were redesignated Combat Aircraft Service units, or CASU (F)'s (the [F] indicated Forward Area). During some of the Pacific island campaigns they supported marine, army and Allied combat aircraft as well as their regular navy charges. While all CASU's were theoretically stamped from the same mold, much of their value stemmed from their flexibility. Those units which operated in combat zones concentrated their efforts on keeping their squadrons in the air, while CASU's based in the United States or Hawaii assumed the added responsibilities of receiving new planes, training personnel in their duties and commissioning men and planes as squadrons. This function of the CASU's operating from permanent naval air stations was especially important because they were responsible for organizing and training the service units that maintained aircraft aboard aircraft carriers, the Carrier Aircraft Service divisions, or CASD's. Quite often experienced CASU personnel became the nuclei for new CASD's in process of formation.
The entire book is online here, part of an American and military history site with 6100 webpages, 86 books, 37,000 pages of print.
the US Navy preferred to do any major work from a land base, but every carrier had a service division capable of performing major overhaul work
lusty is heavier fully loaded

unless the claim regarding Unicorn requires going so far as to involve things like the disassembly and replacement of worn parts in even engines
then it seems to just be one made due to the sheer ubiquity of the capability making it not notable
Who was the standard carrier of British? Illustrious or Implacables? Since light carrier term is a carrier that's lighter than standard carrier of the navy right
Lusty's*

lustys are measured usually in standard displacement because of treaties
centaur uses full load usually
my book doesnt have full load for the lustys
implacable was just a redesigned lusty
Also CVL doesn't always refer to displacement. It could also mean a carrier that is faster, which requires more weight.
I can't think of any case of that off the top of my head
Yet Centaur was 28 knot
While Implacable was 32.5

Lusty was 30.5
*and are made to civilian yard standards
Centaur got better engines
To think Chad Shimakaze had 75k hp 
centaurs were built to be the best light fleet carrier possible
colossus/majestics were built to be the easiest to build possible
in as short a timeframe

my book calls them the hermes class

Shima made 40.9 knots with 75k shp with a nominal displacement of 2570 tons.
Maury made 42.8 knots with 50k shp with a nominal displacement of 1500 tons.
Le Terrible made 45 knots with 73k shp with a nominal displacement of 2528 tons.
one of the requirements for the centaurs was they be able to operate in fleet task forces, something not possible for the 25kn Colossus/Majestics, so they shoved in half of the engines of ark royal
if anything, Shima is below average for what she managed
painfully so
when it comes to speed demons
How did Le Terrible gain that superiority
Better hull design?
Propellers?
French had exceptional engine designs
So something like rpm?
Tashkent makes 43.5 knots with 110k shp with a nominal displacement of 2840 tons.
which is actually one of the worst showings for the amount of horsepower

the Centaurs were close in size and capability to Illustrious with superior passive protection, with some claims that
1943 light fleet carriers could stay afloat with six main compartments flooded amidships, or with five flooded at the bow or stern
Leningrad makes 43 knots with 60k shp with a nominal displacement of 2350 tons.
boilers rated at 325°C (225°C + 100°C super heating) but were able to do 360-370°C pretty comfortably
what this tells us is that Tashkent is fucking fat
bad Froude number
Kremlin
also Le Terrible's propellors were of a new and improved type

Hm, so propulsion also plays a factor
the main weapons of any warship, are its engines
Irrc, NC's vibration issues was solved by a simple change on propellers alone
The Gridleys' boilers were a significant upgrade from the Mahan class, with steam pressure increased from 465 psi (3,210 kPa) to 565 psi (3,900 kPa), superheated in both cases to 700 °F (371 °C).
Friedman, Norman (2004). US Destroyers: An Illustrated Design History (Revised Edition). Annapolis: Naval Institute Press. ISBN 1-55750-442-3.
*and those engines aren't even the final form
SS United States designers using dozens of propeller designs because she keeps fucking shaking
It's like land vehicles really. 500 horsepower, conventional front wheel drive vs 350 hp rear wheel drive. the 350 can outrun the 500 rather easily
*400 I mean
Tfw French wasn't willing to share ship plans with Soviets during 1930s. So Italy friendship was made

Speed is armour? 
Thermal efficiency is pog
Speed is firepower
Imagine NC's vibration issue was never fixed. She would be stuck at 23 knot max speed limitation. Would that doom Iowa's fate?

I need to create emoji's from my country's naval personalities




nah, the machinery itself doesn't contribute to speed once you got baseline shp (unless you somehow spectacularly mismatch the shaft speed). It's almost certainly hullform and propeller
Wouldn't this make the perfect "Bruh" emoji? 
Fletcher class
https://maritime.org/doc/destroyer/steam/sec06.htm
The maximum operating pressure of the boiler is 615 p.s.i. in the steam drum, and the maximum allowable temperature of the steam leaving the boiler is 850 degrees F
Give Allen Data
yes but if your propulsion can't make your ship run at it's optimal RPM you're screwed
it's the same
the manual is for the DD445 and DD692 classes

RPM matching should be solved through proper gearing during design
the fantasque's bridge was even streamlined
So who had the best engines for destroyers by the time of 1945
Le Terrible 's famous 45.07 knot run was 94,353 CV, or about 93k shp.

thinking of what could have been
what is your criterion?
Kinda empty
slap more launchers
Let's call it. Reliable and efficient
4000t
more launchers
6 harpoons already
off the top of my head
sir please

RN machinery is sometimes painfully conservative
Her normal trials, conducted at normal load (2,853t) saw her do about 43 knots on 86k shp and 43.78 knots at 90k shp, and her service speed at normal power (73k shp) was about 40-41 knots
but that also mean it just runs
That empty place near funnel looks juicy 
Put something there
USN boilers and machinery was an envy producing mix of cutting edge and actually working reliably
unlike German boilers and machinery
theyre already better armed than the charles f adams that ended up replacing the cancelled program
France crams a shit load of performance into a very small package but has some problems along the way afaik
probably would have been given ikara around there
Japan was just... uninspired, relatively speaking
Italy idk, don't know enough to comment
Italian machinery, at the destroyer level, was pretty mundane.
the big problems were around the implementation of superheated boilers in Milan/Erpevier
and the same model was fitted on the Fantasques before those on Milan/Erpevier were optimised
but as far as french boilers during the war are concerned they performed well with a tendency to foul
but that might've been due to the operation in the hot pacific climate
were the painfully wasteful British boilers just on the case of KGV? since I think the cruisers were efficient.
like
8k nmi for a full tank of gas (relatively speaking) was... making her a big eater.
but afaik, like a lot of it, it revolves around using reports from the RN that just say things are satisfactory, but kind of ignore that things can still stack up poorly in a comparative way, even if they're satisfactory for the user
Usually reliable enough in service at normal operating levels, though the constant tempo of operations meant a lot of ships were running their engines constantly, often stressing them when it came to high speeds, and not often getting a chance to give them an overhaul when needed. So by the end of the war a lot of ships were having reliability issues.
By far the biggest issue for RM DDs in terms of machinery was just that it was thirsty (which hindered endurance) and the fact every design ended up seeing significant weight growth during the war meant few operating at their intended displacement, and thus typical top speed in service tended to not be the intended 38 knots.
Satisfactory is a strechable term

like
ouch
afaik the 5.25" gun revisionism is around reports that say they perform as expected and satisfactorily
but it's kind of... devoid of content
essentially
"as expected"

Be careful there extrapolating between performance and efficiency, since machinery for flank speed and cruise speed are literally separate
Not quite since my main goal with the combat reports is to find data on their reliability
Problem of Soviets was they always wanted "the best" from the foreign countries they wanted assistance.
Like in 1939, Soviets thought to have destroyer leader build in United States, but Navy Department said something based on Mahan class would be permissible only. Soviets disliked it since the design was from 1933 and was no longer up to date
???
basing off the Mahan class nets you a baseline that's up to overseas standards in regards to the machinery
and as a non-signatory you can enlarge from there
And the difference between "gun breaks down all the time lol" and what the reports describe is quite big
not too much obvs
I know, that number was for cruising speed.
I did had read a bit about her engagement and flanking range, tho when looking at her actual performance it's... a bit contradicting to say the least.
I think they would prefer something like Bagley or Somers class
Or maybe even Sims?
ain't problem being the Brits defined DP a bit differently than the Americans did?
iir the issue with KGV's endurance was twofold:
- the cruising ranges were calculated excluding auxiliary machinery consumption
- their intended cruising speeds were below those of American ships they operated alongside with, forcing them to go above their more economical speeds
Did they fixed this problem on Vanguard?
cause for all I know the KGVs can just take the Nelson's 6 inchers without problem
Not gonna blame them for 2., but 1. is somewhat embarrassing
Vanguard's endurance wasn't all that much better if at all
Yeah, 15 knots vs what, 10 or 12?
oh speaking of shima drach just uploaded a video on her
shima_discovers_you_can't_outsail_planes.mp4
Also I think there was an issue with the fuel purification system since the outboard bunkers would be filled with seawater as fuel was getting pumped out, so the system had to first seperate fuel from seawater before they could use it for burning with the delivery rates of those filters being not quite up to the task
just go faster 5head
Why Mass produced versions of Shima was called super Shima?

and no parallel refueling

... how do you forget about the auxiliary fuel consumption
Armament is speed.
Armor is speed.
Speed is more speed.
Reload is more cordite before big boom.
then again, KGV's aux machinery got shoved into counterflooding compartment outboard main machinery/boilers...
Ask Berci
so it's not like they were only forgotten once...
because theyre british
machinery TDS


are on subs

which sub had the boomerang torp again?
Not even Mark 16s can halp... rip USN WW2 torps.
???
1943 onwards the USN pulls ahead in warhead TNTe even compared to Japan
with Japan only coming back via the comically large mods to the Type 93
which afaik no one is really sure ever got to sea
USS Tang?
still pretty sad
that puts her with Maillé Brézé in the "I got killed by my own torps" category
I was meme-ing. I understood that Mark 16 was a much, much needed improvement over the Mk 14 (I mean, the unfinished
mega floof was sunk by it fired from Archerfish iirc)
???
wait, Archie still carried mark 14s?
the late-mod Mark 14 is running straight with a warhead that's equivalent to ~450kg of TNT
990 pounds
which exceeds the TDS of any BB other than KGV's erroneous 1000 pound rating
takes a look at BB TDS
compares richie, NC and Sodak to KGV
tf is this shit
and the late-model Mark 13 is just a freak of nature that you can drop from a Corsair at max speed from 2km up and have run straight and up
with a warhead equiv to 900 pounds of TNT
which, again, exceeds any TDS rating
even if Yammy's TDS didn't have the flawed joint, being void only and getting smacked with warheads like that is just
Oh yeah, the fixes were pretty much done by 1943.

and those beam shenanigans that will gladly transfer all shocks deep into the ship
like
That's just yikes.
just to reinforce what a fat fuck the Mark 13 is
Hey, nice way to stop shockwave propagation
the British Mark XV has a ~770 pound TNTe warhead
I don't think the doctrine was even developed with long lance in mind
The Type 91 Mod 3 Mod 7 manages to pull ahead, but already straight up has over 900 pounds of explosive in it
and one of the refit Standards was hit by one
afaik
it's the other way around, no?
Shimakaze with 100mm gun refit copium
It actually feels like long lance was just happens. A long shelved project finally gaining several breakthrough development
are you referring to the joint under the belt?
the 45-36AN is a bit of a joke showing up with a 440 pound warhead
yeah
yikes
I am wondering how she will perform in war thunder. Since Shimakaze torps already one shots every ship in the game
Does WT even model TDS?
Meanwhile WG just slaps random % damage reduction for torp belts
kinda wondering that. I think they do
doubt
torp hits used to be a 1 hit kill no matter where you were hit
theyve changed it now
unless they use some random empirycal formula
but its still not accurate
it's a function of holes and time

the F5b maxes out at ~550 pounds of hexanite, if anyone has the TNTe for hexanite handy
Reserve torpedo boats one shooting Prinz Eugen with 200?kg torps 
Good times
KGV kinda has the same problem
where the joints are spaced in a way that they will just push the inner bulkhead inwards
force dissipation moment

Why the Mk 14?
MGC at it again
is that
cough torpedo explosion force vented upwards into the toilets
I was about to ask lol
The one and only
Japanese spray toilets
Why? Out of every single iteration-
**Bidet
tfw KGV only has 3 seperate layers of TDS
with individually thinner plates
and less depth
than French or US BB's

Damn US media smh 
not counting past the outer torpedo bulkhead
forrestal my beloved
Forrest fire 
Ah, four layers on NC.
there's certainly smth fishy going on
if KGV with it's objectively worse TDS has a higher rating
best part is one of the top comments is someone saying that it's bait, and QE below agreeing

Battlecruiser

still want to know what the protection of richy's crumble zone self healing TDS was

Break into the archives.
French TDS in the 1930s and 40s be like:
"Everything is designed to resist 300 kg"
Phoenix breaking Italian archives to find the engineer who put 150mm upper belt armor on Up-41 
there is
How much was the warhead on the swordfish from Hermes?
175kg?
or was the hit outside the TDS/tapered at 50%
Yea, I was wondering if it's out of the TDS
Did KGV's TDS performed badly when Wales was sunk?
F
turn at that moment, get fucked
there was maybe a thin sliver of TDS there still
but it was in very shallow water so the shockwave rebounded a couple times
It was entirely aft of the TDS, afaik
What if. You put ERA plates behind the TDS's first plate 
10m TDS on Alsace?
I just don't remember if it was on the shaft attaching point or just behind that
The only time the modern TDS for the French ships got a chance to do into action is when Dunkerque had to eat the 1,377-kg of TNT in depth charges going off next to her

Which was obviously more than any TDS could handle

well it did its job to a degree
There wouldn't be a crippled dunkerque if the mags weren't flooded as soon as the swordfishes appeared
I mean, absolutely it reduced the scale of the damage. Just, there was no way it could have ever totally kept the damage out of the vital spaces
french armor placement meant that shocks would always be lead away from the horizontal or vertical
which kept the structural beams in tact
which I find neat
Was about to ask if Ranger tested Bart's TDS, then I remembered she fucked Bart with 1000lb bombs
average joe sees 1000 lb bomb damage on JB
"reee all or nothing is shit"
"praise lord Bismarck"

and yea, that looks like out of Riche's TDS.
and a mine doesn't exactly count as a torpedo...
at that point it would be like hitting a Trento in the bottom of the hull

It looks more like VV's hit from Urge if you ask me
I don't mean in terms of placement
Not sure if it tore the prop blade off entirely like it happened to VV
I think you mean the aerial torpedo from the Albacore during Gaudo?
Yeap. Was lazy and didn't open the book. :x

ow.png
inb4 confetti shells 
@chilly osprey
Found a picture of the 340mm mle.1924 being operated by Germans at Normandie in 1944
The shells on the foreground are 194mm shells

oh, nice
I'm kinda intrigued by the star drawn on the tip of the 194
3000 warthogs of Marc Mitscher
Marat 
Nah Marat ladder is better
give Marat to France
btw, lads do any of you have the data for a Jaguar-class torp boats?
any ship named after something French should be returned to France
Agincourt
Crécy
Sans-Souci
Téméraire (Lion class)
Bonhomme Richard
Marat
Parizhaya Kommuna
etc

Going from WW2 photos to a decapitated anime girl is some whiplash lol
Phoenix, a question, don't remember on top of my head. Was the triple rudder system of the Littorio ever tested in combat? (i.e. main rudder jammed, need both aux rudders to steer ship)
Shipgirl* 
And she is still alive. Like Marat wise 
Marat was pretty dead
i dont even believe that's real
they just used her corpse
that's a baiting shitpost
On life support
Sadly with %25 firepower loss since frontal 305mm gone 
the sheer rage kept her heart beating
too angry to die
too many germans left to shell
"Even in death I still serve"
a dreadnought dreadnought
hans the baltic is haunted
nought dead
@spring briar 
Spanish 305 mm anti-universe shell

that's more a spear than a fucking shell
(the greenish brown ones)
That must be pretty crazy twist rate
I hope so for them
richie needed more powder than similar BB's just because of her crazy twist rate to stabilise these bad boys
see see this is why richelieu i worse than bismarck the french were being bankrupted by powder demands
surrender monkeys destroyed again
激しい対空砲火に臆することなく対艦攻撃を敢行するA-10
実質対艦攻撃機である。シャルンホルストの対空砲火はAI操作
Dev鯖最終日に撮っていたものです。
00:00 GAU-8 30mm ,20mm M61ガンポッド×2
00:52 FFAR Mk4 無誘導ロケット弾×84
1:57 2000lb Mk84 無誘導爆弾×6
2:48 AGM-65Bマーベリック×6
4:03 到底やれそうにないので突撃
4:42 GBU-8 2000lb 誘導滑空爆弾
使用曲(ライセンスフリー)
ベートーヴェン:ピアノソナタ第14番 嬰ハ短調 Op.27-2 「月光」 第3楽章
http://classical-sound.seesaa.net/article/222530759.html
each day we stray further and further from god's light
We got Scharn
Make a 406mm version and we have a deal
we did
I just can't find any sketches or pictures


Sometimes I wonder the wisdom of contracting for a whole new gun instead of one already on production
















