#history
1 messages · Page 192 of 1
It's not but it's the internationally recognized international organization that organizes earth things on a international level
'how can this be the human flag there's not even a human on it'
I cant believe we will send a copy of Elden Ring to aliens if we ever find them
What is going on here
oh no how will I ever recover from this
I dunno
Maybe german ship posting? 

anyone i wanna know did alabama tried to fight tirpitz?
it did but the Germans did not want to risk the Tirpitz so she stayed in the fjords
The XF-84H was almost certainly the loudest aircraft ever built, earning the nickname "Thunderscreech" as well as the "Mighty Ear Banger".[16] On the ground "run ups", the prototypes could reportedly be heard 25 miles (40 km) away.[17] Unlike standard propellers that turn at subsonic speeds, the outer 24–30 inches (61–76 cm) of the blades on the XF-84H's propeller traveled faster than the speed of sound even at idle thrust, producing a continuous visible sonic boom that radiated laterally from the propellers for hundreds of yards. The shock wave was actually powerful enough to knock a man down; an unfortunate crew chief who was inside a nearby C-47 was severely incapacitated during a 30-minute ground run.[17] Coupled with the already considerable noise from the subsonic aspect of the propeller and the T40's dual turbine sections, the aircraft was notorious for inducing severe nausea and headaches among ground crews.[11] In one report, a Republic engineer suffered a seizure after close range exposure to the shock waves emanating from a powered-up XF-84H.[18]
jesus
imagine how much terrifying this would be for psyops
you fly over an enemy camp and half the soldiers fall to the ground convulsing from seizures
basically, every propellor causes a sonic boom
so imagine that vine 'boom' effect but thousands of times per minute
That'd probably be hilarious to watch from a safe distance. With a very powerful telescope.
The Tu-95 is just about as loud if not louder
It also has supersonic turboprops
But 4 of them
They made a funny maritime recon version, Tu-142
Which was notable for being so loud that subs could hear them on sonar
noisemaker launched
I had the pleasure (or well the opposite of pleasure) of hearing it... needless to say I almost went deaf
it basically uses task manager to make your ears stop working and start bleeding if you hear it long enough at close range
reminds me of the Chrysler Victory Siren, I mean it was supposed to be loud but still. At full tilt the thing would form fog in front of the siren bells.
because the typical american response to "how can we make it harder/better/faster/stronger" is "drop a Hemi in it"
the YF-84H was that but multiplied by 2 and then raised to Pi multiplied by 1000
oh believe me I'm not seeking competition or thinking the Siren holds a candle, just remarking on the similarities in volume over distance
fair enough
🇮🇹Throughout the 1950s and up to the 1970s, the Italian Army had been using a variety of American surplus tanks, such as M47’s, and had even manufactured a large number of M60’s domestically under licence. Despite the various upgrades carried out on the M47 by OTO Melara, the tank was still outdated and the German Leopard was much better suited ...
mmm yes
let's show up with a Leo 1/AMX-30 style tank after production of the Abrams has started

Ww2 oofed Italy's industry
They would come with something better if it didn't
honestly, OF-40s features always make me thing it's part of a trio with AMX-30 and Leo 1
then I remember that, no, it's not
it's from the 70s
and post-dates Abrams
Colourized version on Bagnasco and De Toro's book cover.
@junior trench https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wiesel_AWC
The Wiesel Armoured Weapons Carrier (AWC) is a German light air-transportable armoured fighting vehicle, more specifically a lightly armoured weapons carrier, produced by Rheinmetall. It is quite similar to historical scouting tankettes in size, form and function, and is the only true modern tankette in use in Western Europe.The Wiesel has been ...
I wonder why this concept didn't continue
Especially by passing to something like drone models etc
it did
They are effective for their size, very cheap, easy to carry
just very few people think it's worth while

the concept really carries on with the BMD series
which is the epitome of all the problems
being tin cans that are still relatively large targets
How bout this one
The Uran-9 is a tracked unmanned combat ground vehicle (UCGV) developed and produced by JSC 766 UPTK (currently by Kalashnikov Concern), and promoted and offered by Rosoboronexport for the international market. According to a release by Rosoboronexport, the system designed to deliver combined combat, reconnaissance and counter-terrorism units wi...
especially when you consider that even infantry small arms can pierce the armor
absolutely fucking garbage

Ain't Bradley got BMD concept?
Didn't they made her hull from aluminum 
A2 variant improved the armor
Bradley was designed against 14.5mm API all around
BMD can't even keep out 5.56 AP from the sides and rear
read the wiki article
Taiwan Knox class
God they upgraded this baby so much that they could have bought a new ship
Started to slowly retire irrc
Today we take a look at the long and convoluted design history of the Alaska class, which continued even after the ships had been built! And of course the debate as to what exactly they were.
Sources:
https://www.amazon.co.uk/U-S-Cruisers-Illustrated-Design-History/dp/1682477592/
https://www.amazon.co.uk/United-States-Battleships-World-War/dp/...

Puma is armored against 30mm APDS and MBT HEAT
which... isn't actually hard to do
except for some weirdo multi-stage HEAT rounds, you can protect against MBT HEAT with armor only a bit more intensive than what stops single stage RPG
the problem with these things can be solved if we just let children crew them
children = small = smaller crew space = smaller tank

The OF-40 mostly exists so the Italians could have a vehicle to sell to certain african and middle eastern states the Germans weren't letting them sell to (they had been license producing and selling Leo 1s)
I got some mandela effect there. Always tought that Ariete was 80s and OF40 was 60s
I mean, Ariete was an 80s development... And then dragged into the 90s with deliveries wrapping up in the early '00s

feels like french speed of pre-dreadnought construction phoe
Some of the drumbeats might be familiar
The initial stages of the project weren't actually that slow, with official requirements issued by the EI in 1984 and a prototype already completed in 1986 and presented in '87.
From that point limited funding for the program became fairly sparse so development and testing of what ultimately was six pre-production models dragged on for the the rest of the decade, to the point that the first production contract wasn't issued until 1994, with the first complete tank arriving the year after. And the order was ultimately slashed from 700 (400 + 300 buy) to 500 maybe (200 + 300) to just 200, which naturally caused unit costs to skyrocket and in end the tanks were also delivered at a slow pace (200 from '95 to '02).
Fucking misery
1960-70
Engineers: This is T-72. It's a design that should be used during a total war where fast mass production is vital. A modern t34
Soviets: Let's just build them now
doesn't really matter phoenix
same with arjun

Dont worry, Arjun Mark 2 will be best tank in the world
I mean, at least with Ariete there aren't toxic nationalists everywhere online insisting that it's actually the best tank ever XD
brb
oh no

ehhhhh
you know that isn't true
there's nationalists for everything
Ariete doesn't have 120 mm Penetration Cum Blast (PCB) shell.
it's just
I mean, there are, but few places rival what gets produced by certain countries
an heat shell
1 billion people does that to you 
France
turkiye stronk

How many F-16s they have now. 200-300?
Wants to order more from US. With block 70 variant upgrade
Well, they certainly proved second best to Russia in tank warfare. Their turrets in Syria weren't flying nearly as high as Russia's were in Ukraine
And obviously that's the metric that counts
Leopard 2 A4s
Wait. When was the last time Germany did tank warfare
I'll give Arjun a lot of leeway. It's a learning phase for them, even if they miss darn obvious lessons learned during its inception.
I just can't stand bharatboo who somehow hoist it high to the sky

the S-400 situation didnt let them get more upgrades for the f-16 iirc
Well, India v Pakistan is always ugly like that
Kicked from 35 program. But Congress just doesn't approve the F16 request yet
It's up to them
Bloomberg did reported that
Turkey may request lift of sanctions
To give approval
Global warming 
Just melt more icebergs 5Head
melting icebergs actually cools the world
since the heat you put in the icebergs gets removed from the atmosphere

just wait several million years, the great rift is already doing the works there
the problem is the change in entropy
i mean, dead sea is right there in the middle
can't wait for pangea ultima
I'd give it more leeway if it wasn't the culmination of 13 years of design with an 8 year delay until production
Vikrant 
Superpower 2024
supapowa 2020
will be amazing to see F-18 using ramps tho
design delay is okay, if they actually incorporate new advancement "found out" during development
But nah, the delay was just so that they can implement the OG spec without any improvement
sadly they didn't find out the optic doesn't actually count as spaced armor
German noises
Gotta admit considering its demographics, India is doing well getting into cutting edge tech
At least their rocketry are on point
though at least Germany put some armor behind the sight...
random out of context american cope slope to prove a moot point moment?
Here
India plans to purchase F-18 for Vikrant carrier
F-18s already did cope slope tests before
So data is here
Which makes them more likely to win
Over Rafale M
Since well. I don't think Rafale M ever did cope slope tests
if they're compatible with the Vikrant I'm sure they have
The Indian Navy will start the flight trials of Boeing F/A-18E Super Hornet carrier based multi-role fighters at the shore-based test facility (SBTF) at INS Hansa in Goa from May 23.
Still called as indigenous aircraft carrier-1 (IAC-1), the warship is going to be commissioned on August 15, 2022, the 75th year of Indian independence, by Prime Minister Narendra Modi.
According to information, the flight trials of the F-18 carrier capable fighter on the mockup 928 feet deck of India’s sole aircraft carrier INS Vikramaditya are expected around May 21.
Welp. Feels like a Loss for Rafale


and that's from?
here
it's in french tho

That's from the leaks from the Swiss trials. Fairly well known at this point, did not reflect very well on the Gripen
the gripen is fine as an f-16 equivalent
main problem is that SAAB is trying to sell it as an f-35 equivalent

wew... are we into Gripen memes again?
That's impossible by stealth no?
well duh, but that's not the point

SAAB's marketing is what makes it insufferable
Relying on the price of the Gripen C/D to try and sell the Gripen E, and preying on people not understanding how VLO works to make claims about stealth being obsolete and trying to claim they have 'electronic stealth'
Other than that it's a servicable aircraft

hey this doesnt reference [the thing] directly so i think it's fine to post
kekw

Su-57 also has a major advantage in regards to the fact that they can't be shot down in large numbers
Because they, uh, don't really exist in large numbers
it's so stealth that we never seen more than 3
Armchair Scrub...
how many SU-57's are there?
Su-75 is outright immune to being shot down
10 ish 
poggies
Because, it, uh, doesn't fly
On 24 December 2019, the first serial Su-57 (bort number "01 blue") crashed 110–120 km away from the Dzyomgi Airport, Khabarovsk Krai, during the final stage of its factory trials due to a control system malfunction.
merry christmas

Russian don't celebrate Christmas on that day 
ouchies...
Russian plane crash
Russia: System error
American plane crash
America: Human error
Usually goes like this
China: What error
Doktor release my coping inhibitors
. . .
So B-2's crash. Who do you blame.
Maintenance crew for letting her stay under rain? Or the engineers for making her systems fragile to rain? 
I really want to forget about Aeroflot's crashes...
Boeing crashes 


See, this is why crash rates are usually compared to hours of activity
aeroflot is an airline
Which usually allow us to get a better picture of crash rates relative to how much the aircraft actually get used
Aeroflot was unique because everything flying in Soviet Union was "aeroflot" back then, from airliners to crop dusters. So there's hardly unified standard of safety or service
But yeah, even accounting for that and ignoring the odd planes, it still astronomically high
phoenix gonna explain the importance of population size and normalisation in regards to comparing statistics???

I can't do that unless I have a statistics textbook to pound my fist on
I think Antonov planes had the most problems
J-20 crash: 0
F-35 crash: 7
J-20 is best plane confirmed)))
they should pander into modelmaking industry, slick designs
They are certainly beautiful yes
Foul Gripen
searching for the defence contract
emboldened by the saab of ambition
pickle godrick
Ngl ITAR-free fighter jets legit have a market if they truly can achieve that
ITAR and CAATSA-free 
US dominates the market by that. French is focusing on reducing the US equipment they use so they can sell stuff to nations with US sanctions
france sus?
You know their weapon policy. To the highest bidder
Oh?
Hmm
Is Maya class better than Burke class
They do look similar but Maya is brand new
So should have some technological improvements over Burkes?
iirc the summary is they have a lot of custom stuff for their mission profile and that's why they seem newer, but are otherwise similar
Different role tho
Maya, or Kongo descendants in general are more like Tico in role
Didn't knew Maya was longer than Burkes

They got extra flag officer space
Maya is planned to get locally made railguns in future
Should be interesting
She also use Integrated Electric propulsion. Only destroyer that has that except Zumwalt
Maya's mostly better than a Flight IIA (not flatly), but the fact it's still using SPY-1D(V) means it won't compare well to a Flight III
It also has to be said that for the moment the kinda of missiles it loads is much more limited than a Burke
Basically just SM-2MR and SM-3
Which is reflective of the much more specific role DDGs have in the JMSDF, and also how they handle AAW in their flotillas

The lack of SM-6 is mostly logistic tho, not doctrinal
BGM-109 on the other hand should be obvious...
considering the lack of real offensive power in the Japanese aegis destroyers due to not only Japanese politics but lacking significant amounts of SM-6s and cruise missiles
Burke’s overall in my opinion shape up better due to the armament they’re able to carry over Japanese destroyers which are usually limited to just AA and anti sub missiles
agony
HMMMM I WONDER HOW HARD IT WOULD BE TO SPOT A PLANE THAT IS A LITERAL FLYING MIRROR

germany should be banned from designing military equipment to punish wehrbs
U sure this ain’t from a German toys r us?
ah yes another desgin that didnt make it off paper
wouldn't have made it off the ground either
wehrbs pulling some design out of their ass that is only theoretically doable even with modern technology and going "SR-72 IS CLONE OF UNDER WUNDERWAFFE SILBERWHJKAIFGUIOGEL"
speaking of dipshit wehraboos
get some popcorn for the cope in the comments

All the panthers should have: -Spontaneous Transmission breakdown -20% all crew skills due to employing child soldiers
that one comment chain gets better and better

it goes back and forth on both and that one is short but sweet
the wt tooltip would be pretty incredible
it's a real good thing that the british didn't test literally brand new, made for the purpose panthers built in the british occupation zone for evaluation
and they had to be cannibalized to keep one running
and the last one still couldnt finish the standard british AFV trials
and iirc had it's engine catch fire after it rolled down a slope and hit a tree
you heard it here first folks
soviet propaganda-sorcerers were so powerful that their slander was enough to physically destroy German AFVs long west of the Rhine
average reddit moment
anyways
when wehraboo dreams about the T-34 are actually valid
irl
I fucking love this video
ah yes
france, britain and the us don't know how to maintain tanks that were built to be easy to manufacture and maintain
yes
logic
German child soldiers can
people use this as a cope for the french panther trials too
because if the french had operated them properly they would have lastedlonger
but if, again, your vehicle requires crazy esoteric techniques to operate and maintain
your tank fucking sucks
Wehraboos butthurt T-34 beat them 
a blind monkey that's never felt steel in their lives can repair a sherman or a t-34
the entire propaganda argument makes no sense anyway even from his perspective, soviets didn't tend to do much about other's stuff being bad, just themselves being really good
it's the british that hyped up the enemy's stuff
British and their documentaries about Germans were the greatest tragedy
soviet officer; yeah those german tanks are really strong
???
historical events™️
Like I believe what made Bismarck so hyped was also British
Since it sunk Hood. Hood had to die from something so great
Like a knight would look more heroic dying to a dragon instead a bull
it's not even the type of propoganda they tend to use, so calling it propoganda just doesn't work
Embellishment is probably the best term
Yeah
our stuff is really good™️ is their tactic
enemy stuff very scary but we will prevail™️ is british tactic
the soviet internal lend lease reports that i've read are pretty no nonsense
fairly good way to understand the stuff they liked
like churchills kind of suck ass but valentines are 👏 👏 sign me the fuck up
slather me in these motherfuckers
I never got people trying to make skitzo breakdown mechanics in video games like war thunder
we're bringing one to the reichstag
My brother in Christ we are playing an arcade tank game
dont say it's arcade
Didn't BT series inspired Valentines?
Makes sense
tanks are already annoying enough to play in wot or wt
warthunder goobers will insist that it';s the height of armored warfare simulations
the tank, well known for getting one shot
welcome to an fps for snails
by snails
iirc they liked it because it was dead fucking simple, sturdy, could be fixed with a rubber mallet and driven by a toddler, and had just enough firepower
like a tiny mobile fort
They also liked Sherman for being reliable and good armor. But disliked her uhhh height? Center of gravity?
absolutely yuge height whereas they really liked low profile hulls
but other than that and a few other minor things they really liked it
as long as it had a diesel
petrol engines gave them hardcore super cancer

i still think the most adorable thing is that, since the program that lead to it got kickstarted by the soviets sending them a t-34 and a kv-1 early in the war
they sent one of the pre-production pershings to the USSR literally to just get their opinion on it
ripple firing all 16 hellfires in WT at one target just because you can
first comment was that it wasn't really a heavy tank at all
and everything else was basically
"this shit's bitchin'"
IS-2 gang
fwiw it literally isn't a heavy tank
iirc it was only classified as one (and temporarily at that) because the grunts were screaming up and down that they needed a heavy tank
because tiger panic
so they just slapped the heavy tag on to get them to shut the fuck up
'it's heavy'
'no it's not'
'oh, pardon me, do you weigh a few dozen tons? stfu'
lmfao
where is the somua
soldiers in europe dunking on tigers;
vs
soldiers being sent overseas afraid of tigers
this was in europe though
like, they were scared shitless of tigers despite dunking on them
it's really bizarre
The Soviet hated that the M3 used gasoline (made it a fire trap, plus diesel was much more plentiful there) and the pitifully weak 37mm main gun. The Stuart was the main US tank at the time (it only began production in March 1941, the Lee later in the year), though, so the Americans sent 1,665 Stuarts and about the same number of Lees while they worked up other designs
that and they also thought everything under the sun was a tiger in the field
Tiger panic yeah
call a td
but not for me
Their conclusions about the M3 Lee:
Obsolete hull, too tall with insufficiently sloped armor;
Periscope that was adequate but basic, i.e., nothing special;
Limited traverse of the 75mm gun;
Lack of sights for machine guns;
Reliable engine, but with a design that led to an undesirable high profile;
Reliable transmission;
Good radiator design;
Good rubber-metallic track;
Good suspension;
Poor tracks for mud;
Poor access for repairs
it was a stopgap
PLEASE HELP WE NEED A HEAVY TANK HOW ARE WE SUPPOSED TO SURVIVE AGAINST THIS MENACE
I mean
just because there able to kill it
doesn't eliminate the fact they likely want something for lack of a better word "good as it"
they already did though
a 76mm sherman is comparable or better in nearly every aspect
even effective protection
iirc sherman hull at a slight angle is immune to tiger at 1km
The M4A4 also got the big thumbs down from the Soviets. When a Soviet delegation visited Chrysler in late 1942 - a time of great crisis for the USSR -hey reviewed the M4A4 and found it wanting. While clearly superior to the M3, which required higher octane gas and was not water-cooled, the Soviets considered the M4A4 worse than the M4A2 tank for the following reasons:
Large and unwieldy engine;
No improvement over the M4A2 in terms of armament and other factors;
No improvement in suspension;
Only a slightly better turret traverse mechanism.
So yeah Soviets prefer A2 over A4
yeah the M4A4 engine is uh
it sure is something
You're facing these big ass scary looking tanks
yes you can kill them
but just because you can kill them doesn't eliminate the fact you would probably also want a big ass scary looking tank (I get the German tanks are paper tigers)
reading that physically hurt me
just like the funny meme churchill screaming video attributes the M4A4s engine to the firefly for some reason
BEHOLD, THE HEIGHT OF AMERICAN TECHNOLOGICAL SUPERIORITY
WELDING A BUNCH OF SHITTY CAR ENGINES TOGETHER
chrysler could've beat ferrari and ford at le mans if they just shoved the multibank into a lola
Nuclear buttplug

Wish War Thunder add this feature for BTs
Christie suspension gives me physical pain
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/823955653869174794/972164911998332938/s3ts0q.mp4
how about the opposite

tfw barbarossa cucked us out of the torsion bar t-34 with the cool side slopes
ah yes, future science

Anti-mine tracks
I also like the T-34 we got
yeah
we would've missed like
the weirdo handful of 57mm T-34s for example
and thats sad
Tfw Soyuz is too large to pull T34 on her 
just slap a bunch of t-34 turrets on marat after she's converted into a floating battery
Soviets got the designs, US got the quality
They rarely ever combined 
Sweden got the steel
Austria got the officers
Spain got the warcriminals
France got the technology
And Germany got the L

as far as im aware 1944+ once the pressure was taken off the production quality jumped up a lot

Dancing with the devil here undie
I respect it tho
at some point the USSR at least temporarily leapfrogged the US in metallurgy but i cant really pinpoint the years
but it was by 1951
Of course you do.
Counterpoint:
Tiger looks cool
cope
not cooler than the sherman though
Ffs
though admittedly that's also in part because of casting just being kind of stinky
some of it does
Also depends on what aspect of metallurgy
There’s something to be said for the simplicity of b l o c k on the tiger
iirc by then, early war shermans and 34s had about the same failure time
mg42s despite being everything wrong with LMG design
look like giant ppsh's
so i have to like them a little bit
Typical retreat
Sherman engines are 6 months more reliable irrc
But in a nutshell. Soviets saw T34 and Sherman as equals mostly
Sherman was more comfy for sure
they're head and shoulders above everything else in the world so let's leave it at that
the real circlejerk is t-44s vs pershings
See I was wondering.
What happened to 4
T-34>44>54>64
Then uhh why 72
that's kind of a myth
a lot of it was honestly just down to heavily competing factories
T-72s were a bit more expensive on introduction, not cheaper
though, yes, it's ultimately more reliable
Amx-30 my beloved

AMX-30 cute 
So I guess T-80 popped from 64 X 72?
Man 3 tanks is way too confusing really
72, 80, 90
yeah
Should have been single unit like others
that's why the T-90 became a thing to clamp down on all of that nonsense
I mean
that said all three are from separate factories
yes, they settled on the T-72 as a base going forward
you're not really saying any big revelation here
fair
the T-64 was born in the horrifying bowels of Kharkov
Tfw India has more T-90 than Russia
the T-72 rolled out of Uralvagonzavod
aaaaand the T-80 rolled out of Kirov, and later Omsk
2078 T-90S
with iirc kharkov picking up the T-84 development after the split
i like modern ukraine's weird dome tanks
shame the production quality for the T-84 is kinda ass
they looked at the T-80U's turret flaps and went
hmmm
but what if literally the entire tank was a mudguard
Wiki says they only have 2
ukrainian production quality for like
But weirdly enough. Thailand has 49 T-84
everything is really, really bad
BTR-3 and BTR-4 from what I've seen have been fine
same with their modernizations of older vehicles
its more for new produced tanks
like, old soviet stockpile mortar shells were working much more reliably than brand new ones built in ukraine
are you sure
and a lot of their export stuff had to get armor steel built in finland to be used instead of domestic steel
Turkey planned to purchase T-84 then said nah we will build Altay
2 oplot
Yup. Thailand has more as 49
I’m going to put post-refit Lorraine here to give everyone happiness
swell
we have to find big lorraine
Why US doesn't build Diesel variant for Abrams for export
why would
Smaller Lorraine
In the line of smoll pics
yes!!!
nobody else likes gas turbines
but why would we want to export it
Uhhh
..the uh
Poland?
nah
the same reason you're already exporting it?
multiple times
gas turbines got plenty of buyers
and have been for years..?
main thing is just being under cut by cheap export leopads
sure but why rebuild it to export
the abrams is not being bought for its turbine
its being bought for its everything else
there's a reason literally nobody on earth is designing new gas turbine AFVs
you already do, most of the exports variant have different armor
and even internal US preliminary designs aren't using them
i think only poland got actual american abrams
russia stopped producing T-80s and Ukraine ripped them out of the design too, they're just not worth the dosh
Abrams had few proposals for diesel replacement. General Electric proposed Merkava MKIV engine as replacement
I mean
the only acceptable replacement is the hyperbar
that's because the T series platform isn't really able to counteract the trade offs of the gas turbine
due to limited space for fuel
What about MT 883 engine
yeah the abrams engine is microscopic
Abrams is able to make up for it since its able to carry a good deal more fuel than other tank designs
Who else use Gas turbines except Abrams and T-80s? 
very very cool locomotives
not really sure who else really explored it for tank use besides the soviets and the US
wouldn't be surprised if there's a gas turbine leopard 2 or something out there
Stridsvagn 103
that used both a diesel and a gas turbine
and I don't really count that since the STRV-103 is just weird
while also consuming more fuel
so it kinda doesn't really matter
it's not really a difference
Plane paradox
Heavier plane= need better engine= need more fuel= heavier
while being able to use different fuels
Abrams can run diesel
the majority of good quality fuel is going to be used by the air force in an engagement
That isn't a paradox, it's just variation of Tsiolkovsky equation.
Think like this
Challenger 2. A Japanese with 1 liter British tea on his hand
Abrams: A German with 2 liter Beer on his hand
Which one would drink faster
dammit where are the dimensions for the hyperbar
Exactly
at the same time actual impact on range is limited
0.6 vs 0.9mpg
but gotta have a talking point
Yes. Thus it consumes more fuel for same range
Rocket equation moment
extra range honestly doesn't matter when that 400 KM mark is the golden mark for setting resupply points since almost every other vehicle has that fuel range
this is strangely defensive
if the entire rest of the world isn't doing what you're doing and your own future designs arent using it
yeah
anyway vae is yelling at me to stop typing in this call
later
Drawing the 35.000t version, need to think of a lighter secondary distribution (get rid of the tall barbettes?) that doesn't make a mess for fire control. Calibres atm are 48, 24 and 12cm 
by the way, gas turbine problem wasn't really about bsfc, it can be very efficient
it's about how it consume about the same fuel regardless if it's idling or at full tilt
Get rid of the 24 and put more 12

But I need 24s to help with the fire control of the 48s 
The chieftain always emphasises this
me when horse's keyboard

Look at these fuel flow...
what was it again called on the abrams
waiting for korv to tell me the hyperbar dimensions dammit
the external generator
might as well go full tilt all the way
APU or something
Ya
Help I accidentally made the 48cms 360 rotatable
I know 
360 turrets are dope though
wonder if rule the waves 3 will have them
(coming out later this year)
Dope but rather impossible for large caliber guns
for more than a few turns yeah, but I'd still use em
kek
anyways regarding the abrams gas turbine, I get why there moving away from it in future tanks along with why no one else really picked it up
Eendracht had 360 degree turrets 
I just don't really get why people stress over its draw back all that much due to how easily mitigated it can be
if it offers tactical advantages they should keep it
I mean there's a reason why they went with it over the competing diesel engine
(it does)
the a-10 has a big ferry range compared to the f-35 while having a smaller fuel tank, better plane and skill diffed
having much lower wing loading and higher bypass engine helps a lot of that tho
also Abrams engine selection was much more political than technical
or at least more political than many might thought
that was also back when NATO multifuel engine was a requirement, before everyone drops it
Leyland didn't get the memo tho
it turns you into Champaign
gorgeous bote
Was also the design basis of the Brandenburg class of pre dreadnoughts
boats on sides is always a nice look
saved
We used that same name for two of our "Fleet Battleships" (Encouraçados de Esquadra) 

dat war thunder?
yes
bit late
but I would genuinely love a game where stuff like the transmission randomly breaking, cannons and firearm misfires or jamming and other technically issues would happen
thats a issue even with the more realism focused shooters and rts like men of war and squad
play bf2042
malfunctions happen all the time
actually only game I can name of the top of my hand to even have weapon jamming be a genuine concern is stalker
far cry
yeah i was gonna say the earlier ones had some heavy jamming iirc
...is uh
is far cry heavy in it's politics?
well the new one
More like nutshell
Usually always extreme type of ideologies
Dictators, zealots etc
but yeah
i've never seen tank transmission be a issue in games
unless its in a convenient point for the plot of a singleplayer game
Metro series has gun jamming
Cleaning firearms is tied with it for immersion and horror
only exdous really had it

the only soviet gun was the kalash (basically a mix of various AKs)
the rest were makeshift
and honnestly beyond the mutant sections you arent really supposed to use guns in metro
not really
the new one is just a commie revolution on not!cuba
"here is big bad dictator backed by US oligarch, kill him"

guess I was told wrong
like I said im not downloading Uplay or paying modern AAA prices for a game that might be mid
the qq over games having politics in them will never be not funny
why would you sentence anyone to that horrible fate?
they wanted a game where things randomly go wrong at horrible times
does bf2042 not perfectly fit that description
COD:IW and COD:G?
I just want a new MoH game. Warfighter was an awful experiment
I just wanted stalker 2 for upcoming FPS
lets just say unexpected circumstances happened to the kiev based company
Kiev
Russian bot detected
Because that's the Ukrainian spelling
And the internationally correct way of spelling it
Ukraine isn't a Russian colony state anymore so we use the Ukrainian spelling and pronunciation not the Russian one
No one really gave much of a shit about it before current event
yeah lol
bf1 and bfv are still quite popular and good games
BFV gets an incredibly bad rap because w*men
but like, it's honestly still a fucking amazing game
highly recommend it
I liked BF1, it just felt really lacking in actual things to unlock and do
it lost my interest before the DLC's came out
I played the BFV beta and made the choice to stay far away from that mess
If bfv led with the trailer they used for the Pacific the game would have done much better
I didn't even care too much about all of the devs politics and all of that foolishness with the setting
the game was just a barebones recycled mess for the longest time from what I've been told
I'm far beyond tired of paying full price for games at launch with no content
fuck games as a live service models
I was excited for Halo Infinite multiplayer until I saw that all of the customization is locked behind the battlepass
where you only get progression for doing specific ingame challenges instead of PLAYING THE GAME
i hate triple a developers i hate triple a developersi hate triple a developersi hate triple a developersi hate triple a developersi hate triple a developersi hate triple a developersi hate triple a developersi hate triple a developersi hate triple a developersi hate triple a developersi hate triple a developersi hate triple a developersi hate triple a developersi hate triple a developersi hate triple a developersi hate triple a developers
eh BFV is fine but
Main thing is I want something semi modern that doesn’t suck
it feels substantially different from bf1
have you heard of world war iii?
yea
arma reforger also looks spicy
I’ll have to revisit it
Arma reforger I’m holding off on
tho wwiii I’ll revisit
Guessing that game has ended up being a diamond in the rough
I have a innate desire to play some type of non shitty game I can run a MCX in
MCX?
based
The SIG MCX is a family of firearms designed and manufactured by SIG Sauer, produced in both selective fire and semi-automatic only models, and features a short-stroke gas piston system, which is inherited from the earlier SIG MPX submachine gun. The MCX is available in rifle, carbine, short-barreled rifle, and pistol configurations (the latter...
while tarkov is a option for that
i've heard you need a ssd for that game
I don’t feel like grinding that again to get to the point of being able to afford to run MCXs again
that too
idk I have a high end rig nothings out of my realm to run
knowing it if you want to learn the controls arma proabbly has it (or a mod for it)
I’ll get to history in a tad
beyond that try squad

i've had good experence with post scriptum and BTW which are both based on it
one is in ww2 and the other is ww1
the beta didn't to me
what obscure thing to make a completely unrelated to the conversation to make a comment on
essex
nah since it’s been awhile since I checked up on her in particular
beta was pretty bad
my personal favorite would be a proper BF3/BF4 style DICE game set in Korea or alternate history Allies vs Soviets 1945 onwards
but the pacific update and various new weapons are super cool
Probably about the time I check for the M1 thumpers location again
you haven't lived until you've stormed mount suribachi with a weeb katana slaughtering dozens of men
assuming satellite imagery has been updated again since she’s moved a few times
yeah no thanks
especially seeing how the pacific update was what like
released over a year after the game came out originally lol?
thankfully I didn't spend my money on that
I just want a traditional battlefield game ffs
wonder how dead BF3 is on PC
no stupid ass bootleg hero characters, no removal of class systems, no battle royale, no wack ass customization, no stupid tacked on gamemodes, actual content at launch
good luck getting that these days
if they wanted to do heroes they could just of done fucking battle front 2s system
where there’s both heroes and classes
even then I wouldn't have done that at all
battlefield games shouldn't have heroes
star wars it makes sense because they have a huge roster of famous and unique characters
honestly battlefronts system would work well in battlefield since it doesn’t need to be for just heroes
It includes specialist and vehicles as well
could easily have idk someone with a javelin for example be a specialist you can bring in for points
I don't see the point in specialists when BF has specific classes that can just use those weapons and equipment
Honestly specialists could work if implanted right
2042's specialists should have just been class specific equipment
it's change for changes sake
2042s heroes were just stupidly done
I played the game for free and felt like I needed a refund for it man
idk how it got worse from beta playability wise
I might try BFV now that I think it's on gamepass?
If it’s on sale it worth it
Why'd they do away with specialists being a pickup anyway
because we have to be like OVERWATCH XDDDDD
WOWIE QUIRKY CHARACTER
LOOK AT THEIR FUNNY QUIPS AND LAUGH
my brother in christ this is not bad company

Anyways made some of Akagis planes today
1/200 little shits
And yeah they are actually the incorrect color as zeros aren't really white
same place still
40.20512261468715, -120.13609598312082
makes me wonder if she's gonna end up at the armor collection or not
anyway back to history
I found the name of the chad british ship that stole supplies from japan
HMS Phaeton
is jaba lurking?
No

@chilly osprey which of the two european axis navies would you call the most effective overall?
Italy's or Germany's?

what?
It is somewhat difficult to compare this, because fundamentally they were fighting two very different wars. The KM was acting as a primarily offensive force, the RM was much more of a defense force. Thus on the one hand the German submarine campaign was able to sink an impressively large amount of tonnage, and the Italians did not, and yet they also materially accomplished little - it's estimated that about 1% traffic to the UK was actually lost during the war.
The RM put up nowhere near as high numbers of tonnage sunk, but at the same time, it was primarily interested in protecting its own maritime traffic to its outlying islands, to the Balkans, and to North Africa, which it did with considerable success up until allied material superiority in the region became overwhelming.
The RM itself was also much more hobbled by its lack of naval aviation than the KM, as it was much less important to the KM's main fight (the U-boat campaign), and much moreso to the RM for the purposes of air cover and reconnaissance for the surface fleet.
Could do a blind ships sunk/ships available comparison, but probably not gonna be that fruitful
That's exactly why I framed the discussion as I did above
The teathers are vastly different too
That would without a doubt paint the KM in a very good light vs the RM, but, effectively ignores the difference in the kinds of wars they were fighting
One had access to the Atlantic, one not much more than the Adriatic
I feel like the RM had a large influence on keeping the african front alive for as long as it did, especially since they also had to fuel german planes and subs
iirc

It was the primary force responsible for keeping the supply lines to North Africa open
Didn't Germany steal all dem fuels
well, barbarossa needed romanian oil
German aircraft did have a major influence on it because the Luftwaffe was much more effective at supressing Malta than the Regia Aeronautica
KM tried to help them with the supply lines, but when the biggest asset is a captured destroyer that's a difficult task
But fundamentally almost the entire escort task fell to the RM, and the vital periods when supply lines were effectively cut were broken when the RM committed battleships to the escort forces.
but in terms of actual war impact
since I don't think the KM was actively keeping a front open besides maybe norway?

Honestly I'm not familiar with how supply arrangements for Norway went
I think it went something like
and they took norway in the well-prepared land phase of the battle
Worth noting that there were definitely areas the KM clearly beat the RM on - namely, conventional submarine designs and operations. Hard to make the comparison beyond that point, though. The KM simply did not operate at the scale or pace of the RM, in terms of having to manage the deployment and operation of an entire fleet at sea, or constant convoy operation in contested waters. They also never really got too far into the path of special forces operations.
speaking of subs, why did the hull design evolution from early ww1 subs to ww2 subs kinda feel like "sidestepped" (for a lack of a better term)? iirc ww1 era navies already went with the familiar sub hull form we know today albeit cruder, but interwar and WW2 designs went for the surface ship-like bow design (which was inefficient when submerged, but better in upper depths).
I figure it's an evolution in submarine combat but it's not telling the whole part of the changes it brought.
Probably a product of refining bow shapes versus WWI.
It should be noted that WWI and WWII-era submarines operated much more like submersible torpedo boats than they do modern submarines. Underwater endurance and situational awareness was extremely limited, such that they operated underwater mainly when they wanted to evade detection/attack when enemy ships were around, or just during the daytime to avoid being spotted by aircraft.
Otherwise most of their time they'd be on the surface, particularly when it came to attacking enemy ships with torpedoes or guns. Or other submarines, for that matter.
Submarines spend like 90% of the time transiting on surface, it's just logical to optimize for surface hydrodynamics
Performance at depth would have been less important than how effectively they could maneuver when surfaced or at shallow depth, and seakeeping when surfaced would remain quite important
There's also consideration for allowing deck works which necessarily require flatter upper hull on the small hull beam of the time
Makes sense. Plus sonar tech wasn't as sophisticated as it is today, so those subs just need to be submerged in order to avoid detection from either surface ships or aircraft (recon or asw otherwise)
I mean, there's Surcouf with her cruiser guns, so
Surcouf is tame compared to WW1 monstrosities
Steam powered submarine, because why not?
Thank Diesel for quieter sub runs tbf 
all thing considered steam turbine is much quieter than diesel
heck, reciprocating steam engine is quieter than diesel
And this is why batteries and electric motors are a thing XD
Any submarine intended for surface action is straight up idiocy
Who thought it's good idea for a pressure vessel to be subjected to enemy fire?
It only need a single dent to fuck up the hull for the entire patrol
that's a 6head move ngl.
So navweapons say Soviet 37mm 70-k performed similar to 40mm bofors during trials in 1940
But 37mm was using ammunition inspired from that US's Colt-Browning 37mm. While 40mm Bofors had better ammo choices
So would Soviet 37mm 70k become more famous if it used similar ammunition with 40mm bofors?
Probably not, as the original Bofors design wasn't exactly fantastic - it had promise but was extensively re-designed to become what it was when it started seeing widespread service in 1943 and beyond.
And, of course, there is the ever present issue of the VMF simply not being very well known during the war and the general lack of information from the Soviet side getting into the west until the 90s limiting any kind of reputation similar to something like the Bofors.
especially in a naval context
Plus, you know, the generally limited scale of the VMF
Yeah 1941-45 production was only 1,641
There was armored turret variant with double barrel but only one was build then war broke out

an armored enclosed mount for AA is as good as worthless without direction and RPC
at least an open undirected mount can have someone pointing at targets with a stick for you
It does look cute tho
Gangut used the only quad prototype
They were designed for Soyuz and Kronshtadt class
Without armor

Someday I will find the Dutch weapon design archives 
Looks like a 120/45 without a gun shield
Wait a second
Did Italy lost destroyers in Benghazi?
What's the chance that this gun came from those destroyers






















