#history
1 messages · Page 176 of 1
not huge into the 'weld on extra shit' aesthetic. Like .. she's got some love handles.
Look at that stern ..
From a few sources, only the lead ship Dealey had 533mm torps on her suite
Navypedia listed them, a member of my community stated so, so does Wikipedia (< questionable)
Navypedia doesn't list them, and the wiki pages disagree with each other
It also just generally be really weird for them to receive 21" tubes
The extant ASW torpedoes around when the class was being designed and built are all 12.75" or 19" weapons
And there's a general dearth of 21" ASW/homing torpedoes at the time as well
Special thank you to Atilan, Batavia1885, Stalinium, Hex, Не В ТеМу, moonsk, khaleefa al dhaheri, Yuriy Yashkir, Labcat, Marco Wilson, and Tupolev for supporting my channel and to Михаил Крупский/Michail Krupskij for correcting the subtitles.
This song is from the Vietnam war, about Soviet MIG-21 pilots who allegedly flew ...
To be fair, only two of the Japanese cruisers were lost due to their own torpedoes being set off.
And in any event the Japanese learnt to jettison their torpedoes overboard in the course of war.
Suboptimal, but not worth the risk.
So, about the new ships, what are the historical context about them, especially about bigger fleet unit like CV and BC
what new ships
Hakuruko and Omi, I think
Hakuhou is G15 (if we follow the line that she's Taihou's little sister).
G14, if you follow what EN posted about. There currently is zero distinction betwen G14/15 on the English side of things, which is rather unfortunate.
Oumi Alliance is Battleship No.12, a Kii-class battleship. Both No.11 and No.12 are not officially named, but post-war literature suggested Suruga and Oumi. Their armament is not particularly clear, with some different schematics on how they should eventually end up. Naturally, nothing comes to fruition since neither were even laid down.
G14 is a taihou-similar design also, but larger
Even larger than G15, close to midway
<@&472236072743600148> I guess this is the right button for this

☠️
yup
Found out that Downes and Cassin were burned down during Pearl Harbor, even though they were eventually repaired and returned to service(at least I know Downes was) That still feels like a dick move.
Care to explain what you mean by zero distinction between the two? I was under the impression G14 was a Midway/Malta-esque equivalent whereas G15 is Taiho with some improvements
Damnation
Precisely, there's a difference. As far as I'm aware, most English sources tend to mix these two up.
Hakuryuu might even be a product precisely because of that.
Power move
I believe we are indeed getting G15 aka Taihou Kai, and it would make sense given she is like sister of Taihou
"IJN carriers were very successful in the early stages of the war but were defeated in June 1942 at Midway, when four carriers were lost. So serious was the loss that the IJN modified its wartime supply plan 'Maru-Go' (Circle Five) to 'Kai-Maru-Go' (Revised Circle Five), intending to reinforce its air strike capability. The "Taihou Kaiclass carriers" were a part of that plan. TAIHO was the only carrier included in 'Maru-Yon' (Circle Four) shipbuilding plan, featuring heavy armor, quite untypical for traditional IJN carriers.
The 'Taihou Kai' class carrier was to be a larger, advanced version of TAIHO. TAIHO's displacement was 34,200 tons (trials); 'Tauho Kai' was to be 35,800 tons and 4 meters longer. TAIHO's flight deck length was 257.5 meters and 'Taihou Kai' 261.5 meters. TAIHO had six 100mm twin AA guns Type 98; 'Taihou Kai' was designed to have eight Type 98s as suggested by TAIHO gun crews.
Another improvement was the revised anti-torpedo protection. Recognizing the development of enemy torpedo power, 'Taihou Kai' had a well-designed under-water protection structure, enough to withstand a 350kg torpedo explosion. Again learning from Midway the electrically powered bucket chain hoists for bombs and torpedoes, connected flight deck and magazine directly. According to Revised Circle Five plan, the 'Taihou Kai' was designed under basic design G-15.
The plan was to build five of these ships"
"No.5021 at Kure Navy Yard
No.5022 at Kawasaki Kobe Yard//
No.5023 at Mitsubishi Nagasaki Yard//
No.5024 at Yokosuka Navy Yard
No.5025 at Kure Navy Yard.
However, the war situation prohibited building such high-quality giant flattops that needed too much tooling. Mass-produced medium carriers, with lesser attack capability but needing less building work were required. Therefore IJN authorities decided to build the UNRYU class prior to 'Taihou Kai' according to the same Revised Circle Five plan. UNRYU's design was based on HIRYU but featured some improvements. With the worsening war situation, the shortage of materials prevented any ship keel lay and abandoned their building"
Anyone here know the specifics of G15 to be able to compare it with WOWS Hakuryu ? I've heard her described as a hybrid between G14 & G15 but I just consider her as a G15 exactly
James
Its literally right above you
Here
Omg 
Hmm
Maybe there is different variants of G-15
Because you posted that is why I asked
Hakuryu gets way too large over this G-15
And she gets more 100mms
So either WG knows a design or variant of G-15 that was larger
Or they mashed G-15 G-14 together
I belive Khaba from wows had similar story as combination of 2 DD design
That's generally what's accepted
No matter how good of ships the ijn could produce. They could never beat the americans, pilots aircraft and industry.
Taiho Kai would have met the same fate of the unryu. Abandoned target practice for the americans during a carrier raid
I suppose one could wonder what the IJN fleet would look like in a "Man in the High Castle" type world
whatever the hell you want it to with that level of divergence
True
Man in the high castle you'd get space battleship Yamato by season 5
I want the flag of freedom
Thanks for turning into the mods, that means I won this internet fight
Eh
If we are going the full space battleship, I rather have the Arcadia
Ohh got it
But yeah
Speaking of man in the slop castle
They really fumbled the bag on the Japanese uniforms
Even if they had a decent story early on
Mf
First and second class private with sidearms and swords
They guys with swords have rifle ammo pouches despite having no rifles
For some reason the 2 NCOs on the right are kitted out as grunts with rifles
Not to mention nearly everything except for the leather equipment and the tunics of the guys on the right is trash
isn't khaba mostly project 47?
Out of fuel yes
I believe Japan used/lost so so so so much fuel during Battle of Midway than they expected
And its effects felt all through the war
Huh, interesting.
The fact they couldn't replace it was a bigger problem.
That's the logic yes
“I sunk your battleship!”
“Lol no.”
Japan in WW2 was essentially a display of sunk cost fallacy lmao
wasn't the battle, was the attacks by USN subs on IJN shipping.
And the 'fleet tankers' weren't gone because of use at midway ..
Read the battle of midway part @peak mango
Yes, that's one statement by one IJN admiral.
An Ijn admiral likely knows its own fleet ye
These men didn’t invade the mainland for some fighter jocks to steal all the cred.
Concerning both loss of ships and resources expenditure. That said, blaming a battle in 1942 for low resources in 44/45 when 'knowing the fleet' still didn't result in adequate protection for their logistics assets .. might be why he was on the losing side.
Such thoughts brought to you by the same admiralty that gave us: “America will come to the negotiating table after Pearl Harbor.”
Indeed
Ijn refused to build escorts for their merchant ships
Refused or couldn’t?
Refused
I’d believe either.
Barely if ever added to their construction program
Remember they were still building fleet carriers when in bad state
So escorts aren't a problem to build
1 ton of capital ship != 1 ton of escort, escorts are cheaper per unit but cost more in manpower and resources per ton.
So you are saying US admirals are also wrong on this assessment
But yes, less capital ship construction might have resulted in more escorts.
No need to be a contrarian yes
'Aren't a problem' is the statement. You still need the yard space and drydockage etc.
Again, if you are choosing to build fleet carriers, you could have build escorts there instead
So you have the space
You choose not to
Ideally you'd have a mix of replacements for the lost capital ships AND escort construction, and neither one precludes the other in it's entirety.
Yes Japanese doesn't have that and part
Would have conflicted with their naval strategy, they were never going to be outbuilding America, or the Royal Navy, so they built better(in their eyes at least).
Which end up never finishing most, barely using ones that managed and stuck to port for lack of fuel because they lost their oil ships with no escorts to US forces ye
So as USN puts it "lack of foresight or great overconfidence"
The IJN in a nutshell.
The matsu class boats were effectively a DE class, even if too little, too late.
“BEHOLD BIGGEST BATTLESHIP AND TURNIEST FIGHTER!!!!”
Meanwhile, in America:
Yamamoto was right. "I can run wild for six months... after that, I have no expectation of success"
Yup. “I can beat the shit outta the side of this tank until the turret turns.”
I gotta go watch Midway again.
tora tora tora 😛
Imperial Japan is what happened when you let rigid military command take control of a country's government and dictate its foreign policy
No should or why, just when
IJN vs IJA ... lol
I was mostly referring to the new one. The casting for that one was immaculate.
Yes because the USN was solely responsible and no other organisation participated
Imperial Japan never stopped being a shogunate, they just changed Shogunate to “Admiral/General”…
There's the Taisho democracy, and in fairness it did restore power to the Emperor to a massive degree
Let’s be honest, others were there, their contributions at sea were negligible.
The war against Japanese shipping was a combined Allied effort
Wrong
Remember the last time a Japanese emperor was able to directly rule Japan was in the 1300s
And Go-Daigo was deposed violently
The RAAFs aerial mining operations were arguably the most effective sea port denial operations of the war
Meiji ascending returned Japan to a state not seen for seven hundred years
Almost always operating in conjunction with USN submarines, RAAF Catalina’s would mine ports from hundreds of miles away, at ranges that only the indigenous Australian Catalina variant could achieve, in daring night raids, forcing Japanese transports to wait outside of port while mines were cleared and USN submarines lurking nearby would go in for the kill
Didn’t know about that.
Either way with Meiji's era, the Emperor got his temporal power back
And that's part of why WWII ended up as it was
I cannot factor in information I do not have.
I'm not discounting the allied contribution, and feel free to append USN submarines and friends to the previous statement about destroying IJN shipping.
Like Hirohito for example isn't a powerless puppet, he definitely has a lot of input in policies and his favor was incredibly important
He was in tacit agreement of military actions and never condemned what happened in Manchuria, Nanking or Java
Perhaps reading the perspectives of the other Allied combatants when learning about the war would broaden your own understanding of the topic rather than making blanket statements that are obviously wrong
Compate this to say emperor Ogimachi
Or you could stop getting offended and inform instead of berate.
In 1576 the Emperor couldn't even tell Nobunaga to not march into Kyoto
Makes people like me shut down and lash out.
I apologise for berating you
Neithet could he stop Hideyoshi from taking the role of Kanpaku and ruling as aj unofficial Shogun
I have a rather hostile reaction to the America-centric view of the Pacific War
Or WW2 in general
So, in the end, Japan did change after Meiji, probably for the worse because giving that kind of power to a person worshipped as a deity's progeny will fuck with people
In a lot of instances the US was the lynchpin and foundation of the allied effort, if not militarily then materially. Even Australia, well, especially Australia.
But you are right in that many of the samurai clans that were abolished like Tosa, Chosu and Satsuma ended up becoming high ranking naval and army officers anyway
Materially Australia almost gave more to America in reverse lend lease than it received in raw dollar value
It's just that, ultimately the decision making wasn't fully with them, but rests with the Emperor, his family and his closest advisors
New Zealand actually sent more
I do not disagree that the America was the lynchpin of the Allied effort
Industrial assistance was very crucial to the Australian war industry.
But it was regardless an Allied effort
Machine tools, engines, etc.
Agreed
Not discounting anzac contributions at all.
10’000 Australians did not die in New Guinea to have their efforts brushed away as insignificant to the Allied war effort
Also the Emperor is still so important now that the Japanese government is still shielding Hirohito for any kinds of culpability in the war
While I understand why people use Anzac as a catch all term for Australia and New Zealand it is inaccurate to use the term unless describing the combined army corps that existed between 1914 and 1916
The view that Hirohito was a puppet started directly with them, on the belief that the Emperor must nott have his image syllied
I was mostly referring to naval efforts in that statement.
Yeah, was talking about naval efforts against shipping.
The RAN had a massive escort force which was invaluable in supporting USN operations
Take for example Herbert P. Bix who's made the most comprehensive research about Hirohito's role in the war until now, he can't even access the imperial households records
Because people in the Japanese government are afraid he's going to expose Hirohito's culpability
He's forced to rely on secondary sources and diaries of other figures close to the Emperor
The Bathurst class kept the troops in New Guinea and by extension the entire South Pacific fed and supplied
Indeed, but at the same time escorts aren’t going to hold up against, say…The Akagi…
Australian interwar military policy could best be described as hopelessly optimistic and at worst borderline treasonous
And any capability capable of going toe to toe with Japanese capital ships would require interwar investment
The irony is that, as much as Tojo was the face of the fascist Japanese government, as far as powers go he was toothless, because he didn't resign his military commission and he actually had superiors in the military, aka he can't do shit to reign in the military because his superiors can countermand him
The RAN however found itself a niche
Indeed
It did the dirty work that no one else wanted to do
Everyone found a place, even the Dutch.
And outside of that, proximity with the emperor allowed a degree of flexibility and power far in excess of even the imperial cabinet
This freed up American capability to spearhead the island hopping campaign
A lot of our escorts were busy in the Atlantic, in fact for a while the Pacific fleet had to fight for escorts.
Find me some tulip girls
65 corvettes is nearly 2 battleships worth of steel, or 2-3 Essex class carriers
Same thing with Kuniaki Koiso who followed Tojo and Kantari Suzuki after
Imagine if the USN were deprived those ships because it needed to build additional escorts
And borrow carriers.
Steel does not, sadly, transfer over to shipyards.
They're all powerless men used as the face to protect the Emperor
Oop see where you were going there, never mind.
The argument is hypothetical and illustrates the point of how useful it was for the Allies to have a capable and experienced escort force operating in the South Pacific
Either way, the question of Hirohito's exact role is, unfortunately still difficult to answer
Until the Japanese government man up and release incriminating evidence there's always gonna be arguments that Hirohito is a puppet
And battlewagons…as much as they were ultimately of questionable use outside of the island hopping campaign and a few key battles.
The RAN probably should have had some better peer surface combat capability but fortunately we had a USN to do that job for us while we were able to do the smaller and less glamorous work
Like I said earlier, yard space for capship production doesn't necessarily equal yard space for escort vessel production.
Or steel, or other resources.
Because despite strong suggestion that it's not the case, lack of actual, strong evidence damaged views like Bix's that the Emperor is responsible for much of the Pacific War
Oh right yeah, and also that the Americans themselves helped removing evidence of Hirohito being responsible for WWII in cooperation with the Japanese
The RAAF found itself with quite a capable anti-ship capability by the end of the war however, Rabaul was rendered a pointless investment thanks to RAAF Beaufighters and USAAF B-24s well before the USN flattened it
Since having Hirohito as a figurehead to keep Japan glued was super important in light of the cold war

Also killing a Shinto god is probably not a good idea anyway
Not that the Japanese didn't do it before, just that it'll probably tick off more than a few Japanese if the Americans did it
Pretty sure the occupational forces were busy enough and didn't need an insurgency.
Nothing says “GFY” like getting multiple tons of bombs to the scalp.
Especially in the face of the neighbors getting their asses handed to them by Soviet backed Rebels.
Well theoretically the Americans can just flatten Japan and conduct a full genocide of it's people, which it had the means to
The Allied occupation of Japan was probably one of the most successful military occupations in history
It's just, well, you know the issues with THAT route
I think Hirohito should have stood trial but that’s mainly out of principle and I fully understand why he wasn’t executed
Nah I'd give that to Odoacer's takeover of Rome, or Cyrus' conquest of Babylon and his takeover of Sardis
Fair enough
And yeah
From a pragmatic standpoint its understandable why Hirohito stayed alive
Unfortunately it does mean we have to keep dealing with the Japanese governments continuous stubbornness in fully admitting their part in the war
At this point the only people who care are the ones who are trying to cause their own problems in the world.
It’s so sad that we got bombed by the Americans us poor innocent Japanese who never bombed anyone else :(
Yeah…
We fought this really big war in 1941 don’t worry about how it started and don’t ask about the stuff that happened before but we got bombed and that’s sad :(
America is so mean to us why would they do that :(
As much as I don’t give two shits about other peoples’ national pride, historical revisionism pisses me the fuck off.
Comfort women? Yes we liked making women very comfortable with fine silks and comfy chairs that’s how that works right?
Ah, I see you are a scholar reading about the consensual sex of Nanking
Sure, but using it as international political needling, 80 years after the fact.
I don’t think the Koreans are in the wrong for wanting the Japanese government to accept responsibility for its actions 80 years ago
Just because something happened a long time ago doesn’t mean that we should simply ignore and forget about the sins of the past
Technically a predecessor government.
Legally speaking Japan has had the same government for 3000 years
I think it’s a cultural thing.
Since the emperor is a divine being who is not beholden to legal documents such as constitutions and the Japanese government gets its legitimacy from the emperor
Also it’s not as if the Japanese political elite isn’t directly related to the people who did those things in WW2
Depends on whether you date it from the enactment of the post war constitution or not.
Shinzo Abe had multiple relatives who were also war criminals
Like, does france date from Charlemagne or the fifth republic?
Who also served in the post war government
The various republics all had different mechanisms of government
The post ww2 constitution of Japan still derives it’s legitimacy from royal ascent in much the same way the British constitution does
Would one argue that Britain dates to 1066, or the statute of Westminster? Or perhaps the Magna Carta?
It’s all part of the same royal family line in any case
Heh the Brits don't have a codified consitution persay, but the present british government is likely dated to the declaration of rights and other post glorious revolution documents, imho.
I mean... what do you expect?
FWIW this is the Japanese MFA statement and summary of actions on the issue so far.
As the issue of comfort women has been a major diplomatic issue in Japan-ROK relations since the 1990s, Japan has sincerely dealt with it. The issue concerning property and claims between Japan and the ROK was settled completely and finally in 1965 through the Agreement on the Settlement of Problem Concerning Property and Claims and on the Economic Cooperation between Japan and the ROK (see Foreign Minister Kono’s statement). However, from the perspective of facilitating feasible remedies for the former comfort women, the people and the Government of Japan cooperated to establish “Asian Women’s Fund ” in 1995, through which they carried out medical and welfare projects and provided “atonement money” to each former comfort woman in Asian and other countries, including the ROK. In addition, successive Prime Ministers have sent letters expressing their “apology and remorse” to former comfort women. The Government of Japan has made every effort as mentioned above.
(2) Furthermore, as a result of great diplomatic efforts, the Governments of Japan and the ROK confirmed that the issue of comfort women was “resolved finally and irreversibly” with the agreement reached at the Japan-ROK Foreign Ministers’ Meeting in December 2015. The Japanese and ROK leaders also confirmed that they would take responsibility as leaders to implement this agreement, and that they would deal with various issues based on the spirit of this agreement. This agreement was welcomed by the international community, including then Secretary-General of the United Nations Ban Ki-moon and the U.S. Government.
(via https://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/postwar/page22e_000883.html)
It's just his maternal grandfather wasn't it?
Nobusuke Kishii, aka "showa no yokai"
Part of this was
Compared to Nazi Germany, imperial Japan lasted almost 90 years
By 1945, there was almost no one left alive that remembered the pre-Meiji restoration Japan
So the issue Japan runs into as a society is: where did "good Japan" end and "bad Japan" start?
Almost certainly none left
A certain Mitsumasa Yonai... aka the most forgotten, yet potentially one of the most influential, WW2 commanders made sure testimonies and documents were all altered in a way as to clear Hirohito as much as possible
And he... died in 1948 without having said anything public about the process
Korea and Japan has the fundamental issue that, despite being geographically close... understanding of each other's history is completely borked
I've seen people trying to connect the Japanese invasion of Korea in the Joseon era and the Japanese empire
Similarly some of the stuff the Japanese ultranationalists (65+ grandfathers that have never left their city let alone country) say is just insane
Yeah. ROC/PRC too. But anyway, looks like as of Aug 2025, the ROK deems the issue resolved with the 2015 pact. https://www.reuters.com/world/china/south-koreas-lee-intends-retain-comfort-women-pact-with-japan-paper-says-2025-08-21/
I mean fundamentally no country wants to be looked as "bowing down" to the other but
We've reached a point where no one cares anymore
The war was 80 years ago. There is less than a few hundred people left alive that remember it.
Except as international needling points.
That too has the issue that no one else really bothers to care
Like, say, I could complain all day about Japan's claim on Dokdo island and 99.9% of the earth will say "what is Dokdo"
And China + Russia + North Korea etc etc are bigger issues now
Until you mention the EEZ shifts. I mean no one cares about the western phillipine sea islands or the nine dash line either, as abstract issues...
Yea
Though issues related to China gets more attention globally
Fundamentally neither Korea nor Japan is willing (or honestly capable) of threatening the other militarily over some halfhearted territory claims or some 80 year old grievances
And there are countries that ARE willing to
Machias Seal Island lol.
So those are bigger issues
Eagle Union vs Maple Monarchy time...
Honestly the recent US vs Canada debacle was many times more dangerous than the worst KR vs JP debacle after WW2
...except that one time we tried to blow up the Japanese red cross in like 1955
What if, thanks to recent changes, the Japanese make a railgun battleship before us? And they just call it the Yamato?
While consumption of fuel in individual major battles was something that can be considered, it is a drop in the bucket considering imports and the fluctuating state of the Tanker fleet that was bringing those imports in, which did not begin to suffer debilitating losses until the winter of 1943 and through much of 1944, mostly at the hands of Submarines but also the infrequent, but catastrophically heavy losses to Tankers (in addition to other shipping) from Carrier raids like at Truk and throughout the Central Pacific during the main push there, or the Jan 1945 South China Sea raids, as they otherwise usually did not travel the same vulnerable routes as dry shipping
While everyone's contributions should be considered, I find this statement to be peculiar-
While great effort was put in by all air forces in the Solomons and New Guinea against shipping in Rabaul, the vast majority of sinkings were still by submarine throughout the war, and generally did not occur near harbors or in waters that could be mined by aircraft at that point in time, like those in much of the central Pacific, or more crucially the inner circle of imperial waters closer to Japan itself, where a good chunk of kills by US submarines occurred
D = Days on offensive patrol, S = Ships attacked, T = Torpedoes expended during the period
All passages from this
Additionally, from Japanese Naval and Merchant Shipping Losses
During World War II by All Causes:
Oh hi there, Pretz, I haven't seen you in a while
Great quality original film reel showing the sinking of the HMS Glorious aircraft carrier by German battleships.
If you'd like to support my channel, i have a Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/LookinthePast
Also check out my main channel for informative videos about military history, vehicles and weapons: https://www.youtube.com/c/LookinThePast
...
Yes Scharnhorst blew holes in her
Hit when he mistakes convenience for necessity
anyway if you wanna talk about crazy harbor mining operations then you'd should really care more about the, one moment, let me go for poetic justice
Almost always operating in conjunction with USN submarines, USAAC B-29s would mine Japanese Home Islands ports from over 1500 miles away, at ranges that only the indigenous American B-29 could achieve, in daring night raids, forcing Japanese transports to wait outside of port while mines were cleared and USN submarines lurking nearby would go in for the kill
I mean the issue is that the US did 95% of the work defeating the Japanese empire
Sure the Chinese took many losses, but you aren't beating the Japanese by dying
The USSR only delivered the finishing blow to an already defeated (the 1st nuke) Japanese
And they probably wouldn't have been involved in the first place had Roosevelt had more faith in the bombs
I would go with 98%
1.9% for the anzacs and then the rest of allies make up the rest
Brits probably could have done a bit better at Burma
Wasnt burma mostly indians with a few brit units.
Sort of because no one wanted to be there
not even that
the invasion of Manchuria was a botched footnote
it didn't even figure into the Japanese strategic picture
so long as the Soviets weren't touching the Home Islands, they don't matter to Japanese planning
and if they do, well, then they're actually playing into the Japanese plan to bleed their enemies as much as possible in the forlorn hope of a negotiated surrender even at the final hour
it was the prospect of the US being able to use atomic bombs to possibly just bombard Japan into dust without ever setting foot on Japan that resulted in a pretty remarkable confluence of events
which opened the opportunity for the Peace Faction of the government to force a tie vote on the council
which the Emperor subsequently broke in favor of peace
which was met with a failed coup attempt
most the Soviet "accomplishments" in Manchuria occurred after the surrender had already been announced
and including amazing feats like
checks notes
completely losing track of an entire Army in the backwaters of Manchuria
only for them to show up weeks lates to their objective on a stolen train because they ran out of gas in the middle of nowhere
and
having the advance of whole divisions stopped by a single dug in IJA brigade while the rest pulled back into prepared positions in the Korean mountains
because the Japanese knew a Soviet invasion was coming, they just weren''t sure when
That sounds ... familiar.
*it's not hard to pull this kind of thing off, especially when the advancing force is on a shoestring supply line and has no idea wtf is going on ahead of them
see: Kampfgruppe Peiper and multiple German divisions during the Battle of the Bulge being delayed for 20 hours by a force of 22 US recon and arty observer troops
Thinking more recently.
k
Are the big companies Japan have right now is the result of them being rich from the war
That is definitely a statement of all time in the context of WW2 Japan
the Mitsubishi factory, for example
Cashio have its start as selling cigarettes holder bc in post war Japan, wasting Luxury Goods like cigarettes is something really stupid.
Any big Japanese Companies that may have benefit from the war pretty much have all of their factories turn into rubble thanks to US strategic bombing. Any wealth they have accumulated to that point pretty much either gone or turn into ashes. What saved them was the Japan version of Marshall Plan.
That and Mcunter didn’t go hard enough in persecuted every executives that support the Military
I only heard one or two thing about MacArthur
Either he is a military genius
or outright dogshit
There are no in-between

Thought it was a French hotel pre dreadnought
Drouggie Mac had the same problem Patton had....great commander....didn't know when to shut up
No they're the ones that recovered the best from the damage
Nintendo for example was just a game card shop in Kyoto at that point
Douglas MacArthur was a fucking awful commander
The man should have been shot for his actions in the Philippines not promoted
In fact, knowing when to shut up was actually his greatest talent
He was a media man through and through
Dmac did well administering Japan
And that was his high point
An expert in creating narratives that suited him regardless of what the facts of the matter actually were
Most of the famous generals were.
Yes he did so well that he had multiple black American servicemen executed for rapes which he knew were commited by white soldiers
You had generals throughout the war that did better and faced stiffer challenges but either didn’t or couldn’t take part in the media circus.
Or weren’t politically liked.
Claire Chennault was good
Blamey was the worst of both worlds, utterly incapable as a media man and, much like MacArthur, promoted well beyond his competency
Even at lower levels?
It was the lower level commanders who often took the blame for failures created by MacArthur and Blamey
Yeah…
Blamey had his strengths, the war in the South Pacific was not one of them
The only good MacArthur ever did was funny nuke thing and get fired.
We had to atone for failing the KMT somehow.
(This is a joke)
Shockingly also MacArthurs fault in many ways
I thought it was Truman…
KMT collapsing was honestly inevitable but the Korean war was one hell of an oof moment by the USA
I disagree, such a statement implies we started it.
Dugout Doug taking control of American forces in South East Asia invariably led to the effective abandonment of Chiang Kai Shek
Yes the administration was fundamentally to blame but MacArthur was also the senior commander in the region and had a lot of sway in policy decisions
The Americans hardly prevented it
That was... Stilwell?
And yea the US had no coherent China policy
Partially Roosevelt's fault but
Honestly whose fault isn't it
Joe Stilwell was recalled from China nearly a year before VJ day
We had the airfields and bombs are cheap. Especially when we can fly above like 99% of AA Fire.
US-China relations deteriorated a lot while he was in charge
And quite honestly I don't think a whole lot changes even if the KMT somehow won on the mainland
The CCP not being in power is a good start.
Probably less people will die from commie induced famines but
It's not like the Chinese will bend their knee to the US
It probably adds another faction to the cold war at best
Stronger non aligned movement I guess
When the famine is induced by nationalists instead of communists it's based
Hoe Cheese Minh and Kim Il Sun would have a hard time getting Soviet aid without the CCP’s cooperation.
Chiang might still try to insert himself
The guy definitely tried to "retake" Korea after WW2, though by the time that war did end the Japanese had basically removed his armies so well...
Given what the Vietnam Minh did in Vietnam before during and after the war, Mao and the USSR not funnelling them grenades and AKs is a good thing.
The Viet Minh were most certainly the less brutal combatants in the 2nd and 3rd Indochina wars
I'd much prefer Ho Chi Minhs government to Nguyen Van Thieus
I disagree. They really liked throwing grenades at school children.
“Black April” is a thing.
The South Vietnamese government was insanely brutal in its repression and massacres
Murder, kidnapping, torture and intimidation were a routine part of Viet Cong (VC) and People's Army of Vietnam (PAVN) operations during the Vietnam War. They were intended to liquidate opponents such as officials, leaders, military personnel, civilians who collaborated with the South Vietnamese government, erode the morale of South Vietnamese g...
Ho Chi Minh at the very least professed symbolic ideals that were aligned with at least some form of human rights
His declaration of independence was quite literally the US declaration of independence
Admirable. But kinda overshadowed by what him and his government did after the war.
And keep in mind it wasn't the South Vietnamese that ended Pol Pot's regime
The Buddhist crisis (Vietnamese: Biến cố Phật giáo) was a period of political and religious tension in South Vietnam between May and November 1963, characterized by a series of repressive acts by the South Vietnamese government and a campaign of civil resistance, led mainly by Buddhist monks.
The crisis was precipitated by the shootings o...
That was about the only good thing they did, that and kick CCP ass.
Modern Vietnam is a wealthy post-communist, state capitalist economy transitioning to a democratic system while being aligned with the Western Rules Based Global Order
I'm actually somewhat of a fan
Of all the post-communist nations, Vietnam is arguably doing the best
Excluding nations which were unwillingly part of communist states
I agree. It’s the period between now and when we left that Im not a big fan of.(part of my family comes from Vietnam)
I really can't see things being any better under the Saigon government
If you want to get into it, the CCP not coming to power would likely prevent a lot of it happening.
The true good ending for Indochina, letting the French create independent states
Because that went so well every other time they were left to their own devices
That’s fair.
Is there any Kriegsmarine Warship that survived until this day? (Aside U505)
Not really? The Soviets really liked their scrap steel. The closest was Eugen…buuut…well…
I would say inchon
There are a couple other u boats, a tender, a S boat, admiral sheer and tirptiz....well she is kind of all over the place
Nah that was wayyyyyy too risky
If Incheon failed, the UN and Korean forces would have... basically lost the war
Douglas MacArthurs high point was avoiding a bullet for destroying the entire FEAF
Utter incompetence from a commander who never failed to disappoint
What kind of coward abandons his men after losing his entire command anyway
“I will return” you never should have left
Incheon wasn’t even successful when you consider what it directly preceded
The greatest and most successful tactical victories the US had ever led directly followed by some of the most crushing strategic defeats the US had ever faced because Dugout Doug was completely convinced that the Chinese wouldn’t get involved and ignored every intelligence assessment that indicated otherwise
What is your assessment on Diem then?
Don't forget, he try to denied Wainwright the MoH after leaving him to die. All because he can't stand that Wainwright did what he thought was the best choice for men under his command and surrendered.
Nani?!?!
Shinmeiwa GS-1
Probably the most glorious thing Japan designed since the Yamato hit the water
reminder McArthur tried to run over veterans with tanks when they wanted their benefits
USCGC Eagle.
Ex Horst Wessel
Yup. She's still looking good, too. Arguably it's the training division of the kriegsmarine and not the combat side, but during the war she did have AA batteries.
I think she actually did manage to shoot down a plane or two during WW2
Looks like a couple of her sisters are still afloat too. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gorch_Fock_(1933)
Gorch Fock I (ex Tovarishch, ex Gorch Fock) is a German three-mast barque, the first of a series built as school ships for the German Reichsmarine in 1933.
After World War II she was taken as war reparations by the Soviet Union and renamed Tovarishch.
In the 1990s she spent a short period under the Ukrainian flag and a prolonged stay in British ...
This the best part, nobody told MacArthur to do it. He was ordered to control and maybe disperse the Bonus Army but instead of talking and negotiating with Veteran whose grievance are fully justified, he ordered the Army to mount a cavalry charge with tank support into the camp. Mcunter even ignored Hoover orders of stopping the assault and continue to attack the Veteran camp on the other side of the river in the next days.
Yea the Gorch Fock is actually a really good design
Several nations bought copies of her
Yeah, Mcunter literally ignored a Presidential order of not attacking American Veteran. And then he claimed that he didn't receive those orders.
I'd like to see her as a shipgirl lol.
I like to imagine sailboats as guys because ehem "long masts"
If it’s younger than ironclads it’s a twink.
He later received the Medal of Honor, an honor which had first been proposed early in his captivity, in 1942, but was rejected due to the vehement opposition of General MacArthur, who felt that Corregidor should not have been surrendered. MacArthur did not oppose the renewed proposal in 1945.
Meanwhile, the constitution: this but Jacked as hell

I was about to reply…yeahhhhh…that’s FUCKED up, and I thought the Battle of Athens was bad.
Have you read the part I said about MacArthur attack a protest of US ww1 Veteran that try to ask Congress to guarantee their Bonus?
Lol she's got engines too.
Also, Tempesta
tag:futanari
Tentacles
Ye i did, got mixed up for a sec. Yeah, fuck MacArthur.

That’s just the Sirens…maybe the IronBlood.
And every Tempesta girl
And that's after Eisenhower tried to rein him in
The US-2 isn't too shabby either. Basically a modern Catalina.
Yea but it's not a spruce goose sized seaplane with six mega turbofans and 4 decks
F2Y is pretty hot too.
We need a supersonic seaplane
Said no one ever
Amphibious SR-71
I wish I knew what this meant. 😢
The sailing frigate faction?
I mean, USN
They did invest into it so they can have a nuclear strike capable bomber
Wait…WHAT?!?!(sorry I came into the game late and haven’t sat down to play in a while)
Just put Pontoons on an A-1 Skyraider.
A faction that have ship from the Age of Sail
That’s cool
Don't forget the P6M too.
Until you realize one of them are notorious for being a slave ship

Oof
Halloween events. And yeah all the pirates did naughty things.
Ah
I spent most of my time seriously Im game grinding for and upgrading Musashi, also oathing all of my main fleet.
Ships from the last event were all from https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capture_of_the_Grand_Mughal_Fleet
On 7 September 1695, English pirate Henry Every captured the 25-ship convoy of Imperial Mughal vessels making the annual pilgrimage to Mecca, including the treasure-laden ghanjah dhow Ganj-i-Sawai and its escort, Fateh Muhammed. Joining forces with several pirate vessels, Every found himself in command of a small squadron, and they were able to ...
*Barbary corsairs, under the protection of the Ottomans
Also, Mughals aren't Ottomans
... to the halls of Tripoli ...
They were effectively Ottoman vassals, no?
Then what were they?
Mughals are an entirely different empire with different origins and lineage?
But, like, where?
It'll be like calling the Umayyads Mataram
Were they one of the Mongolian offshoot empires?
And the Ottomans notably aren't that, and neither do the Mughals
This is going way over my head.
Mughals had nothing to do with the Barbary pirates.
The Mughals were closer to the Timurids than Mongols, and while they do have Mongol heritages by that point they're closer to Turko-Persians. The Ottomans are wholly Turkic and basically has literally nothing to do with Mongols, being entirely separate culture
Also ones based in India and the other is restricted to Anatolia, Southern Europe and the Middle East so there's that
There was an entire other empire between them
This all so enlightening. My historical knowledge is focused on the period of time when dive bombing naval warships was a thing.(which does include Operation Praying Mantis)
All good, since this channel is mostly modern history anyway
Not a lot of people here care about say, Myriokephalon or Magnesia
If it's antiquity naval history, sure
There need to be more discussion about Artemisium, Salamis or Naupaktos
aye
Well we were just talking about the raid on the ganj-i-sawai
Which isn't antiquity, really
That's a start sure, but still wr can go older than that
Back to the era when the moat advanced tactics boils down to "get in position and ram the bastard in front of you really hard"
Sure. Can't wait to see the Zheng He fleet ...
The Ming treasure voyages were maritime expeditions undertaken by Ming China's treasure fleet between 1405 and 1433. The Yongle Emperor ordered the construction of the fleet in 1403. The grand project resulted in seven far-reaching ocean voyages to the coastal territories and islands of the South China Sea and Indian Ocean. Admiral Zheng He was ...
Heh sure but not a lot of named vessels at that point.
I guess ancient people weren't big on naming ships
Otoh ... This discussion has a bunch of dead links I should investigate later. https://history.stackexchange.com/questions/43145/were-ancient-ships-named
Aah so the tradition may have emerged somewhat later
I mean, could be an Iachino situation where an admiral makes up bullshit to cover his ass
why not both 
and luckily the Chinese were doing the real dirty work of fighting more than half of the entire japanese army
second in contribution to the pacific war effort is probably china, not britain or australia or the dutch
for all your focus on the "allied war effort", you missed that contribution
yeah pretty much, the Soviets just mopped up weakened Japanese forces with a surprise attack while swooping in to capture territory and influence
the forces in manchuria had been fighting the Chinese for 8 years and had also been continually having units pulled away to help fight in the Pacific, so it's hard to even call them a real fighting force anymore
I would say that the contributions for the pacific war are: 80% USA, 8% china, 5% britain, 5% australia/nz, 2% "other" (NL, france, USSR, filipino guerillas, etc)
yeah, if you looked solely at his contributions to the Japanese war effort in 1941, you would be right in assuming him an enemy agent
... This is a joke, right?
You're not actually that fucking delusional, right?
Also nice job citing the pop history version of the "Buddhist crisis"
A Secular State for a Religious Nation: The Republic of Vietnam and Religious Nationalism, 1946–1963 - Volume 77 Issue 3
Ngô Đình Diệm crushed Cao Đài and Hòa Hảo dissidents because they refused to give up their administrative and military autonomy. But Saigon did not repress religions altogether. It promoted spirituality as a core value of the Republic of Vietnam.
In fact, Ngô Đình Diệm attempted to enshrine the importance of religions to the Vietnamese nation in a similar fashion to what Sukarno, his Indonesian counterpart, had accomplished in the Republic of Indonesia. Sukarno proclaimed that faith in God was one of the panca sila’s five principles at the core of Indonesian nationalism. He did not declare Islam as a state religion, nor did Ngô Đình Diệm make Catholicism or Buddhism Vietnam's national religion. The political formula Diệm used to promote this religious diversity, however, was entirely different. Unlike Jakarta, Saigon did not create a Ministry of Religious Affairs. It did not collaborate with communists either. In fact, the Republic of Vietnam never attempted to guide or control all religious activities, because it considered that religions remained a private affair. Such an authoritarian state let religions remain free from state control— at least initially—because of one central assumption of the Republic's Personalist Revolution: the idea that spirituality would spontaneously oppose communist atheism. This fragile political formula, of praising religion as a central value of non-communist nationalism without any precise policy, encouraged the reinforcement of a religious consciousness that increasingly challenged the Republic itself.
Because, to be clear, the issue was that Buddhist nationalist movements were basically operating as a state within a state as a law and military unto their own, which isn't a state of affairs any nation tolerates
(see Black September in Jordan as an example of why)
That western press didn't understand this and just printed headlines chaser articles about monks burning themselves is pretty emblematic of the era
And if you want to spice it up even more, both organizations were also leftovers from Japanese Co-Prosperity Sphere operations, and were also weaponized by the Vichy French prior to Japanese occupation
So, yeah, shockingly they weren't very well liked in the halls of power, at least beyond their usefulness to the North as destabilizing agents
Tl;Dr, as it turns out, Buddhism isn't actually all just fuzzy wuzzy warm and welcoming stuff, and the Japanese Buddhist warrior monks trying to make their own fiefdoms isn't as weird and wild a thing as many people think
(also the Catholics weren't a monolith in many senses of the word, but I've already gone on for quite a while)
don't worry, it's just ragebait
some people on this channel love to be contrarians to provoke reactions
Black April is a prime example of why the Viet Minh were not the best option, as per like, 99% of Communist parties.
I could talk a lot about Magnesia
Hadn't heard of Myriokephalon though
Not really familiar with the Byzantine Seljuk wars
You might be right, if it was 1955. But once Diem break those orgs, he turn to blatant favoritism toward his Family and Catholicism. 1963 Crisis was the direct result of yrs of buildup resentment toward Diem’s nepotism.
Are you trying to use extreme version of Shinto Buddhism which was considered too extreme to somehow equate Vietnam Buddhism as power hungry and aggressive?
Not only that, did you just group Cao Dai(a local religion) and Hoa hoa(an local offshoot of Buddhism) with mainstream Vietnam Buddhism?
Even more rage bait for a lil bit of rage bait
It's funny to open Wikipedia and see all Vietnamese is called Nguyen
Byzantine got BTFOd so hard there it's not even funny
Like at Manzikert at least it's because Romanos Diogenes got straight up betrayed and a noble disappeared with close to 30k soldiers
Myriokephalon basically had the entire arny just crushed through ambush
I wasn't discussing CBI I was discussing PTO
More than happy to discuss CBI, but it's not really part of the point I was trying to make
I'm actually not one of those people lol
Any discussion about PTO that places Britain above Australia is blatantly wrong
when?
It's actually the single most used family name in the world lol
Thing with China is that yes they were taking many losses and holding on better than expected but they weren't really capable of draining the Japanese and pushing them back to a point of surrender like the Americans did
to the words of someone in this channel
"You arent exactly beating the Japanese by dying"
Had the war continued until... IDK, 1948? China should have been (alongside US help) been able to push the Japanese out of the mainland, but at that point...
The involvement of the Chinese wouldn't have changed the outcome of WW2
The Japanese deployed as many troops as they could to the Pacific without crippling their supply lines
they are pretty involved tho?
The Kwantung Army was relatively self sufficient with supplies getting a lot of its equipment built in factories on the Asian mainland
There was basically no possibility for more troops being deployed into the PTO even if troops were available
Also
China suffers from Vichy France like issues
There were a whole bunch of Chinese collaborators, and the Sino Japanese war involved a fuckload of Chinese on Chinese violence... which most certainly affected US and British perception
Hence:
The only major change would be more planes for the Allies to shoot down
And even then, that wouldn't have been a major factor until later in the war since the IJA didn't want its planes anywhere near navy operations
The IJN didn't really deploy land based fighters to CBI after 1941
The China front is a pretty good case study on human psychology though
Because the IJA included a huge chunk of people that were begging to experience some violence but never actually had the chance to dish out said violence
Stories of... people lining up to be PoW executioners
Or just the usual beating the locals up
Neat
Do you have any suggestions about books or articles about the Seljuk wars?
Yeah basically a 3+ way fight
Yea, nationalists and commies are the usual two factions that get brought up but there were also non aligned guerrillas fighting the Japanese behind the lines, straight up bandits, and a certain collaborator that tried to establish an independent state in Yuannan
Which we know barely anything about sadly
Sorry, bad bad joke. Nguyen can be pronounced 'when'.
not specifically about the Byzantine-Arab/Seljuk conflicts, but there are a few ones that covers the entire period like the Byzantines by John Criticos, A Companion to Byzantium series, and Cambridge History of the Byzantine Empire are good starts
De Administrado Imperio and the Alexiad are good reads too
If you're into video/podcasts, 'Fall of Civilizations' is excellent. https://www.youtube.com/@FallofCivilizations
since they offer rare first person perspective from people close to the Emperor, and the Emperor himself (notably they reveal the fact that Byzantium are extremely shameless at their duplicity and double-dealings)
Should they ever require and demand, whether they be Chazars, or Turks, or again Russians, or any other nation of the northerners and Scythians, as frequently happens, that some of the imperial vesture or diadems or state robes should be sent to them in return for some service or office performed by them, then thus you shall excuse yourself: «These robes of state and the diadems, which you call 'kamelaukia', were not fashioned by men, nor by human arts devised or elaborated, but, as we find it written in secret stories of old history, when God made emperor the former Constantine the great, who was the first Christian emperor, He sent him these robes of state by the hand of His angel, and the diadems which you call 'kamelaukia', and charged him to lay them in the great and holy church of God, which, after the name of that very wisdom which is the property of God, is called St. Sophia; and not to clothe himself in them every day, but only when it is a great public festival of the Lord. And so by God's command he laid them up, and they hang above the holy table in the sanctuary of this same church, and are for the ornament of the church. And the rest of the imperial vestments and cloaks lie spread out upon this holy table.
De Administrado Imperio, page 67
Pretty much. All sides.
Im always dubious about youtube videos, especially ones that dont clearly display sources
the next page also has Constantine VII advising his son to say this if a barbarian kingdom wants to marry a Byzantine princess: "Sorry, Constantine I told us that's not allowed and we'll get cursed by Christ if we do that. Also, the last Emperor who did marry off a princess is an idiot and he got cursed by lightning bolt, so he was never a true Emperor."
primary sources are always interesting, but I really don't have the level of knowledge necessary to really get everything from those, do you have any suggestions for good annotated versions?
For one of the emperors, Leo by name, who also married a wife from Chazaria, out of his folly and rashness took up one of these diadems when no festival of the Lord was toward, and without the approval of the patriarch put it about his head. And straightway a carbuncle came forth upon his forehead so that in torment at the pains of it he evilly departed his evil life, and ran upon death untimely. And, this rash act being summarily avenged, thereafter a rule was made, that when he is about to be crowned the emperor must first swear and give surety that he will neither do nor conceive anything against what has been ordained and kept from ancient times, and then may he be crowned by the patriarch and perform and execute the rites appropriate to the established festival.
something akin to say the Landmark series
they're very easy read, De Administrado is literally just a manual on how to govern, so its very dry and factual with the informations available to the emperor at the time
Extensively footnoted in the descriptions.
its more or less just "son do this and don't fuck up ok?"
both are also available online for free
Example from the Roman Britain episode. Plus more if you pick up the book.
there's also Liutprand of Cremona's writing The Embassy to Constantinople and Other Writings that reveals about 10th century Byzantine courts and their diplomacy (he hates the Byzantines)
yeah, that's why I said the americans contributed 10x more than the chinese
wearing down the japanese does count for something at least
lots and lots of resources were committed to the chinese front with basically nothing to show
Uh....
Sort of?
It's honestly kind of embarrassing how much the IJA did with so little in the C part of the CBI
Still can’t wrap my head around the fact that KMT Chinese “division” fighting strength is worse than a IJA regulars regiment.
Looks outside window.....please continue
To be fair the China front is understudied
We're basically at a point where we're reading Chiangs diary and accepting it as fact
Japanese scholarship has been much better at this, including the recent scholarship on collaborator regimes and the CCPs role in north China but
There are topics that no sane researcher wants to touch
Both politically and "where info"
And where translation
Also to be completely fair a vig part of KMT divisions were former warlord troops with catastrophically poor logistics and bookkeeping
Hence it's so hard to determine how many troops they had at any given moment
I think I've seen some estimates claim the Japanese + collaborators actually outnumbered the KMT force
points to Zhang Zhongchang freely admitting he didn't even know how many men he actually has
Why did Japan not build Strategic bombers? The better question is, did they need them?
- Naval Institute Press: 25% off with "MILAVHIS" https://www.usni.org/press/books
Check out my books
- Ju 87 Stuka - http://stukabook.com
- STG-44 Assault Platoon - http://sturmzug.com
- German Panzer Company 1941 - http://www.hdv470-7.com/
- Achtung Panzer?...
The nation of Japan as a whole went wrong
Too invested in China smh
@eternal veldt I've passed by some people as well as Drach saying the IJN planned on using twin-engined aircraft on G14, I was wondering if that's true or not
Well that and "invade indochina"
Initially a specification planned in 1940, but it was rendered unnecessary once the Homare engine was ready for production for new aircraft designs (although it was quite troublesome), chiefly the A7M, B7A, and stillborn "Wakusei"
https://www.secretprojects.co.uk/threads/japanese-twin-engine-folding-wing-carrier-aircraf.32388
According to this document, the specification of this aircraft was decided by Dr.Masao Yamana(Kugisho, Suisei designer).
Weight : 8ton, Length : 12.3m, Span : 18m(9m), Height : 3.5m
Maximum speed : 250kt(463km/h)/4000m, Range : 900nm(1666km)(attack),1700nm(3148km)(reconnaissance)
Torpedo : 800kg or Bomb : 1000kg
Engine : same as Suisei?(seems to be liquid cooling engine)```
```The twin engine carrier bomber(unified attack aircraft and dive bomber) discussed here was planned in 1940.
When planning a high-performance dive bomber more than 13-shi dive bomber Suisei, there was a limit in the single-engine aircraft.
Then twin-engine attack aircraft/dive bomber and large aircraft carrier were planned.
But Nakajima succeeded to develop high performance Homare engine, neccesity of twin engine carrier bomber disappeared.```
What is this plane? It is from a picture in the thread below about successors to the Tahio class carriers.
Bears a resemblance to the Tupolev SB except for the twin tail
Nothing more to add, Pretz is spot on.
In fact, most information pertaining to this series comes from that book.
Ok, now my interest is piqued. Is there an English version online to buy or download?
No. Japanese magazines are almost never localised or rather reissued.
I broke bank to get my hands on a Takao issue before and Im not inclined to ever do it again.
You know, not provide source is a major crime
飛行船創作、近未来創作で架空戦記/メカ、兵器擬人化などで色々描いてる変な鳥。
亡命政府(仮)→https://t.co/FRW25gLNlU
Skeb→https://t.co/Sn52fkDiSF
This artist
Oh, them
I already follow them for quite a while now, no wonder why I feel the style so familiar
Yea
Fella did a "what if the Japanese empire was OP" series today XD
The Heinkelocopter was too cursed not to post
That's just Kancolle
Kancolle was "what if the Japanese empire was cute anime woman"
Not just the investment in China, the fact that it taught them so many bad lessons on logistics and warfare.
The fight against the disorganized and largely pre-industrial Chinese over an entire continent warped their thinking in ways that badly hurt them.
Case in point: essentially pausing armored vehicle development for several years so better fund horse calvary. Because Horses can live off the land (easing logistics everywhere) and go into crazy terrain without roads, important for lots of valleys, mountains, and other places they were fighting the Chinese.
Should have picked on Russia instead smh
the IJA wanted that, but they lost Khalkhin Gol
Should have tried again
It wasn't even the IJA and more like
A certain colonel Tsuji
Tsuji Masanobu... war criminal, later potential CIA recruit, somehow got himself elected to the Japanese parliament postwar(!!!), went MIA somewhere in Burma
Dude was an IRL bond villain, unfortunately rather unknown
Those indictments were basically a fast track ticket into the Japanese government back then
Not denying there were many of those sorts in the Japanese government in the 50s but
Tsuji was something else
He would have most likely not survived the US occupation had he been in Japan in the immediate postwar era but
He was employed by the Chinese(!!!) intelligence, and just chilled there until 1949
At which point most war crimes trials were over and no one bothered to put him in jail I guess
Masaharu Honma pretty much got blamed for everything Tsuji did
If I got a nickel every time that happened to a Japanese general I'd probably have... 2 nickels, which is not much
They can't, the entire Khalkhin Gol campaign was to gauge the Russian position and response. Even when the Russian suffered heavier lost in AFV and wounded, the percentage of combat death and equipment lost still heavily skewed toward Russian favor. IJA literally lost nearly entire Corp worth of force for nothing. Even in the worst day of USSR in Europe, they still maintain enough force in the Far East to deter IJA from ever thinking of exploiting anything.
I know, I'm just joking
Not to mention, War in China is already in full swing, even if KMT are a bunch of useless buffoon when it come to fighting, the fact that KMT Army and Communist Force still alive mean that IJA have to dedicate a large number of garrison troop to China just to make sure their supply lines aren't completely kaput.
Funny, we often joke about USSR have bad motorized supply system in ww2, IJA is even worse than that.
and the Wehrmacht
no seriously by 1943 the Heer is the second least mechanized and motorized armed force in WWII, just in front of Japan
Which is insane to think about
fun fact of the day, Canada built more trucks during WW2 than the USSR and Nazi Germany combined
Eastern front really was two schizophrenics bashing each other with bedpans lmao
I was alluding to pre Lend Lease system. It have certain good thing like GAZ Artillery tractor and Zis truck but the production was never enough.
Yeah but they were able to capture large amounts of French trucks and their factory. Heer motorization might be shit but their system is way better than IJA.
Well, except the part when captured vehicles turn into a problem in itself once the maintenance date go up
I got this yesterday
Were the Japanese more acceptable of 6 twin designs over 4 triples?
Depends on who you ask.
Hiraga has a hateboner against triples early onwards, mainly due to following the practices of RN half salvos that require two guns at different elevations to bracket a target.
He also has a hateboner against odd-numbered barrel counts, and favoured usually for 10 guns
Which usually doesn't leave much room for imagination when it comes to the arrangement of turrets.
After being hit by Japanese anti-aircraft fire during a patrol, a PV-1 Ventura lost so much hydraulic fluid that the flaps would not function. The crew gave the crippled plane a lifesaving transfusion by pouring their coffee and orange juice into the hydraulic system. The Ventura managed to land with wheels and flaps down.
︀︀#SeaStorySaturday
Thinking back to last weekend at Brisbane Riverfire in the E/A-18G Growler! 🥰🥰
#Riverfire #Brisbane #AusAirForce #YourADF #StrongerTogether #OurPeople
I will forever be amused that the RAAF is a more capable force than it's 'parent' in the RAF
I'm going to guess that the Aussies generally make less bone-headed decisions than the British
The only real potential procurement headache for the RAAF at the minute is F/A-XX
The RAAF is a smaller force than the RAF but it has a considerably superior AWACs force and a far more developed EW force
The MQ-28 is also going to prove a dramatic force multiplier for the RAAF when that rolls off the line
I saw a recommendation suggesting the RAF go back to the original planned purchase of 5 AEW&C aircraft, but I'm not sure if the government will actually do it
That would require the British to spend money on their military
An unacceptable decision for the British taxpayer
Also saw a pledge to purchase 12 nuclear-powered subs, but that seemed a bit ambitious and unrealistic to me
Pillar 1 of AUKUS is not at risk and those claiming it is are scaremongering
Eh, that's not what I'm thinking of, I'm more doubting the willingness of the British government to actually go through with purchasing 12 SSN-AUKUS submarines
the Aussies are probably gonna have more of a budget to work with than the Brits in the long run I'm ngl
12 submarines would be the bare minimum for the RN submarine force
As it stands the force is wholly unsustainable and far too small for its mission set
Sure must be nice having governments that make less stupid military procurement decisions
the US doesn't even have budgetary issues and its making terrible procurement decisions left and right
at a minimum the UK has the excuse of shitty budget and economic conditions
I was thinking of the Aussies when I said that

The Australian government isn't strictly making good decisions but more correcting for the bad decisions made 30 years ago
Discussions about nuclear submarines should have been had in 2008
The Anzac replacement should have been discussed in 2003
The actual viability of the RANs DDG force should have been discussed in 2013
Anyways, I'm envious of anybody with a government that doesn't make a stink out of defence procurement
Hopefully it isn't too little too late
But the RAN will come out of the next decade with a larger, and excluding carrier capability, a more capable force than the Royal Navy, which is less a compliment to the RAN and more an indictment on the RN
Assuming of course that estimates on a Taiwan strait crisis occuring in the next 5 years don't come true
Sure hope not
The economy of the Asia region will be obliterated if that happened
Economics is probably the least of your concerns
the Europhile period and it's consequences were a disaster for the Australian military
humu
But guys the Europeans will give us better contracts
doesn't read the part of the contract about whether you're allowed to stockpile spare parts
Japan’s war against US submarines in the Pacific during WWII was an uphill battle, one in which they suffered greatly in, but their capabilities in the air are seldom discussed. Join me while we explore the fascinating history of the Q1W1 Tokai, Japan’s first (and arguably worst) anti-submarine patrol bomber. We will also be discussing brief...
Talk about throwing everything at the americans
Hey Airbus can we get some new engines because all ours ingested ash and need complete rebuilds which we aren't allowed to do :)
Oh you didn't build enough engines because you weren't expecting such high levels of engine wear in Australian flying conditions compared to European conditions?
Okay that's fine I guess we'll just have to let people die in the greatest bushfires in this countries history sounds great
At least the Navy could do its job
Well that is the ships that weren't built by Navantia because both Canberra's were in and out of action during the Black Summer fires thanks to propulsion failures
Would have been nice to have some extra sea lift capacity during the whole evacuating entire towns before they burn down thing
But guys this European platform will be different I swear
This is why I never like modern military contract orders. Company really don't like the buyer to self maintain the equipment that they themselves spend billion to buy.
I mean... that was Japan's entire WW2 strat
Throw the kitchen sink at the Americans and hope they're too tired to fight on
It's mostly a European thing
American contracts are restrictive in different ways, but generally they're not as strict with parts and the like
South Korea has proven to be a generally relaxed export partner to
It will be interesting to see how the Japanese handle the Mogami export
In October 1972, as relations between the Soviet Union and the People’s Republic of China continued to deteriorate, ITN took advantage of Mao Zedong’s increasing sympathies for the West, resulting in two weeks of rare, detailed reporting from inside China. Earlier that year, US President Richard Nixon had made a historic visit to the country...
China before Deng
If you're getting North Korea vibes, you're probably right...
I mean, if they already pass the "no selling military hardware" rule, selling you spare parts is quite easy. Also, RAN will be their first major foreign buyer, I doubt that the Japanese will do something that might sour future contract.
Although, don't expect SK level of bonus sweet point. I supposed that helping with an upgraded maintenance facility in Australia is not off the book.
Uh, buddy
The ships are being built in Perth
The government recently invested billions into revamping the shipyards and Mitsubishi is already on site providing expertise
It’s not an upgraded maintenance facility it’s a domestic Australian supply chain
One of the major requirements of SEA3000 and its parent document in the Surface Fleet Review was that the first 3 ships would be built overseas while the remaining 9 would be built at the Australian Marine Complex in Henderson Western Australia, which would be upgraded and have its business contracts reworked to streamline construction
The issue is simply with a lack of experience on the part of the Japanese in working with export customers
The RAN likewise has never worked with Mitsubishi before
Obviously neither side is going to sabotage the program but an inexperienced exporter is always going to introduce considerable risk to a program
Bureaucracy will need to be established, laws written and rewritten, regulations created and contracts devised
Long term sustainment will need to be understood
The way the Japanese do domestic acquisition is not the same as how the RAN works
These are all factors among countless more that will need to be worked out before steel is even cut
It sound like a full blown long term ship building program. So it should be the Austal shipyard, right?
But why Henderson? Would it be more logical to choose Williamstown where ANZAC class was built, bc they already have experience with frigate size ship?
It is not Austal. Austal specialises in aluminium hulls and is far too busy building ferries and LCS to get involved with the Mogami program
It’s Australian Marine Complex which is next door
Williamstown built the Anzacs 30+ years ago
The people who built them have either left the workforce entirely or moved up the ladder to the point where their knowledge isn’t particularly valuable
The Surface Fleet Review recommended that government adopt a Continuous Naval Shipbuilding and Sustainment Enterprise. Previous shipbuilding programs have basically built an entire shipbuilding industry to build a class of ship, and then watched it die off for 30 years, wasting that investment, creating inefficiencies and defeating the whole purpose of building domestically
The new model is one where both major shipyards, Osborne and Henderson will have constant orders in order to keep experience and keep the industry alive
Henderson keep in mind has just recently completed the Anzac class mid life upgrade, it’s been building the Cape Class patrol boat (Austal) and the Arafura class, the order of which was recently cut in half
It’s also building the Choules replacement and the new landing craft
I see, so it is because the current workforce already have experiences overhauled ANZAC hull and the facility there can be expand further.
But even this requires more orders after Mogami, no? Even if you take it slow and laid down 3 ships at a time, it still going to be just over 10yrs of working, I imagine that after Mogami building is finished, RAN will order something else to keep the shipyard working, yes?
That's the intent yes
The Mogamis are going to be rushed through as quickly as possible, but once the Mogamis are built then there will be other platforms to build or replace, the yard effectively already has orders for after Mogami regardless
"the product is the product, stop asking for modifications for the sake of small production runs"
vs
"oh yes, dear customer, we'll make whatever changes you may desire*"
(warning support for altered product not guaranteed)
For replacement for ANZAC or further Mogami?
The Mogami class is the Anzac replacement
So more Mogami orders
Mogameme
Australian defense blogs had a field day because they realized the Mogamis are a bit made of paper
Also this is Japan's first warship export since they sold Ninghai to China in the 1930s
I wonder if the US Navy should try ordering some Mogamis, considering the state the constellation class program is in
The US Navy doesn't really have a doctrinal need for a tier 2 surface combatant that the RAN needs
Also while being delayed, there really isn't much to go off from since the Constellation and the rest of her class are still early on in construction or haven't even started construction at all. Opting for Mogamis while they're building the Connies will only result in more money being spent at the same time.
Also the Mogami is
Like I said a bit made of paper
It doesn't fit US standards
Us needs to remember how to build thing again
Found in an Indonesian history text book I happen to browse
Regarding ocean voyages and exploration, there is an interesting opinion from Menzies, a British naval officer. He asserted that the first to successfully circumnavigate the globe was a Chinese fleet led by Commander Zheng He (Cheng Ho) in 1421. Zheng He was a trusted eunuch of the Ming Dynasty Chinese Emperor Zhu Di or Yong Le. Menzies explained that Zheng He and his fleet sailed around the world using ancient maps made by Chinese cartographers, as well as maps such as those by Fra Mauro (an Italian) and Piri Reis (a Turkish).
I fucking swear I'm going to blow my brains out
I have to teach crap like this on my classes daily
At least I have the freedom to call out that they are indeed bullshit
Huh?
Since when Indonesian teach Chinese textbook history?
Idfk some random ass hat put this in a history textbook that's now proudly shown in the Ministry of Education's website
Hmm
You might get prestige problems
"Did we stoop so low that now we have to order warships from others?"
Loke overall the Indonesian history curriculum is what would you call horse shit
It tends to repeat the myth that Europeans didn't know the world was round, it still teaches a disproved theory about how colonization started, it actually spread around a fucking Turkish propaganda movie of all things
And it's just overall highly nationalistic and apologetic
Its called soft power
I actually really want them to explain how essentially an enlarge flat bottom junk can cross the Pacific 
And when you want to deepen your influence and cooperation you also touch on things like education where future youth will have more favorable view of said nation
I mean, Constellations is essentially a modified FREMM
They aint fucking understanding that
Also kremlin kinda missed the point and is rambling about nothing honestly
The textbook is pretty transparently written by someone who basically just parrot whatever they read on the internet without due diligence
Bruh hooww
Rowan Gavin Paton Menzies (14 August 1937 – 12 April 2020) was a British submarine lieutenant-commander who authored books claiming that the Chinese sailed to America before Columbus. Historians have rejected Menzies' theories and assertions and have categorised his work as pseudohistory.
He was best known for his controversial book 1421: The...
Isn't this guy responsible
- Ain't you guys are making educational corporations with China
Oh you meant Menzies, not the textbook, Menzies is just a nutjob
Bruh, he is one of the Atlantis guy? 
Also nope, no collaborations like that here, it's just that most of the people writing history books for Indonesia n curriculum isn't actually someone with even cursory knowledge of history
"1421: The Year China Discovered the World, in which he asserts that the fleets of Chinese Admiral Zheng He visited the Americas prior to European explorer Christopher Columbus in 1492, and that the same fleet circumnavigated the globe a century before the expedition of Ferdinand Magellan'
Like, I like Atlantis myth and all but even I can see that Plato entire whole point about Atlantis was about a moral story, not a literal place 
Like they're mostly written by tired old bureaucrats and mostly regurgitate older books because the curriculum itself is dogshit and never changing anything
While simultaneously adding random stuff like the one above, as long as it serves the purpose of owning the Westoids
That's not even getting to the insinua that Native Indonesian kingdoms were always harmonious and never waged war with each other and Imperialism was a concept never practiced by natives
I mean, it is possible if the Chinese use certain route but even Magellan fleet have to rely on some of Spanish outpost in South America before move into the Pacific. Zheng He fleet literally have so many mouth to feed that it was a miracle that they were able to reach Africa.
Ah ok, because Zheng Ze is also symbolism of Belt and Road for China, so I thought China using its influence over bureaucrats of education of Indoneisa by highlighting the importance of Zheng Zhe might be using his image to improve the opinion of Chinese on Indonesian youth
Maybe I thought too hard about it 
Yeah right, so how do they explain the part where Majapahit use Mongol Navy to get rid of their rival and later betrayed the Mongol themselves?
I mean, I don't to talk bad about Vietnam historical education but it barely any better than Indonesia.
Dawg Indonesian youths mostly couldn't even point out who's the longest serving president out of the eight, they ain't understanding anything about China unless I chew it into simple molecules and spitting it out for em
Like I became one of the more memorable history teachers where I worked at simply because I could boil down the shitshow that is the Chinese Revolution into something that they can actually wrap their heads around
Oh they don't teach this part
No seriously it's not part of the curriculum
It fell into my own discretion
Oh also the new government just gutted History as a subject by removing world history entirely so I'm extra pissed off
Man, I never known that I need to feel grateful that Vietnam Historical book are extremely Western lover to the point we both learn World/Western history and Chinese history at the same time. 
The amount of shit that I need to learn about Ancient Greek and Roman is simply astounding.
Wouldn't that be a dream
Now I'm stuck teaching the same crap again and again
Oh yeah there's this too
"The discovery of Heliocentrism shook Europe out of an age of ignorance and myths, and caused them to be brave and seek out new worlds outside the boundaries of legends"
In other words they're saying Heliocentrism helped started the age of Discovery
Ruminate on that
I mean the Constellations kind of are seeing as they’re based of the FREMM which is Franco-Italian
Wait, they still think that the Church was all "Earth was center of the universe"? The entire debacle with Galileo wasn't that the Church disagree with Heliocentrism, as matter of fact until it was disprove that the Sun was the center of the Universe, the Church have no problem with Earth orbiting the Sun.
that Europeans believed the world was flat, that Columbus set out to prove this wrong, and so forth yeah
told you, backward shit
its super jarring because the specifically Indonesian part has actually been pretty modernized in recent times
The entire Heliocentrism vs Church thing was bc Corpenicus failed to provide a definitive prove for his theory meanwhile clashing philosophically with his contemporary.
That and Galileo involve in Church politic which for his opposition to adopt the anything that can attack him which include criticism of Heliocentrism doesn't help.
yeah, and Galileo failed to decisively prove it too
he had to resort to actual Heresy to do it (reinterpreting the Bible)
Jesus
In 2008 Menzies released a second book entitled 1434: The Year a Magnificent Chinese Fleet Sailed to Italy and Ignited the Renaissance. In it Menzies claims that in 1434 Chinese delegations reached Italy and brought books and globes that, to a great extent, launched the Renaissance. He claims that a letter written in 1474 by Paolo dal Pozzo Toscanelli and found amongst the private papers of Columbus indicates that an earlier Chinese ambassador had direct correspondence with Pope Eugene IV in Rome. Menzies then claims that materials from the Chinese Book of Agriculture, the Nong Shu, published in 1313 by the Yuan-dynasty scholar-official Wang Zhen (fl. 1290–1333), were copied by European scholars and provided direct inspiration for the illustrations of mechanical devices which are attributed to the Italian Renaissance polymaths Taccola (1382–1453) and Leonardo da Vinci (1452–1519).
Constellation will be fine tbh, just way delayed because 'Americanize a FREMM' made it overweight and basically took away a lot of advantages of buying something already finalized, so ... hull 1 is pushed back. That said, as long as they don't get the urge to tinker further...
Domestic supply is a thing.
While technically not a warship, the Nasty-class patrol boats, which were essentially Norwegian Tjeld-class patrol boats fit for the US standard, were operated by the US Navy during the '60s.
There's nothing inherently wrong with the procurement of a foreign design, Japan did it with both Kongo-classes and used and uses them potently. So does South Korea with its KDXs. And don't forget the FRAM-cans that were sold to other nations, were said nations found those designs useful for them.
But the problem with the Connies here isn't that they're foreign, it's that they were pushed so far behind on schedule and drastic changes that practically negated the need for using a foreign design in the first place.
For a more modern example the Independence class for better or worse was built by AUSTAL USA
I see, ty!!!
If let's say cruiser wise, which arrangement would be preferred
Depends on the role
AB-XY is a good standard but you have thing like Atlanta and Takao
Atlanta is because triple DP guns of that caliber are a nightmare* and the Myoukou/Takao situation is because the IJN was allergic to three-gun turrets
*or well, triple mounts of any kind in that caliber range
"I love having a crew of 32 men for a mount of this size!"
- the Royal Navy
"The triple mountings were always extremely difficult to train, and the general procedure when moving through a large arc was for the two trainers at the 'normal' and 'director' training wheels to be assisted by the remainder of the crew pushing on the breeches or muzzles."
Ah ty
Woaaahhh
I wonder what the Americans thought when they realized Hippers belt was actually 80mm and not 100
"Where the fuck is all the weight coming from"
Which country?
🇩🇪
Of course
(I know, not the flag from 1944, but let's be real here...)
Wait don't they put this with the Stg 44?
Yes but no one actually used it
?!?!?!
Company of Heroes 2 lied to me...
I thought the Fallschirmjager were issued these
lolno

based upon the German's own reporting US troops were the most stubborn enemy they'd ever met
uh huh
including rear echelon troops
the Battle of the Bulge was partially decided by the sheer number of US troops of all types deciding to stubbornly hold defenses regardless of their situation, even if it just came down to a single house in a single village, especially if they still had a working radio
The report of the 212th Volksgrenadierdivision on the Battle of the Bulge is quite revealing. It clearly points out various shortcomings on the German side, but also details the strength of the US 4th Infantry Division. It gives many reasons beyond the "material superiority" trope, like tenacious defense, good inter-arms coordination, artillery,...
This is also where that one German commander offered a surrender and the American replied with "NUTS!"
?
Oh damn I see
You get quite motivated to fight if your opposing enemy has a 50% chance of just not taking prisoners
This got extreme in the Pacific
And the China front
I don't know how the Germans treated US PoWs, but I don't think it was that good
it was ok
And God forbid you get snagged by the SS
the same
until the SS got involved
The Germans gave Western Allied POWs treatment in accordance with the Geneva Convention in most cases
its McAuliffe who said nuts
the Malmedy Massacre motivated US troops to continue their defense even harder than they'd already been doing
Great idea Joachim Peiper let's just make your enemy troops even more stubborn
-ish

one area they consistently failed in is that POWs are to be held and fed in the same manner as their guards
ish yeah it was hardly a guaruntee what your treatment was going to be
Eastern Front was pretty bad
Germans just kept captured Russians around until someone came around and shot them
Wow, POWs were treated pooly on the Eastern Front?
Please tell me more I didn't know about this
...honestly I dunno why the Germans ever bothered to capture Soviet PoWs
like forget PoWs you have crap like Generalplan Ost and the "100 Soviets civilians for 1 dead German" policy
conversely towards the end of the war the WAllies were doing kind of goofy stuff like labeling groups as POWs who normally wouldn't be, because it entitled them to certainguarantees of treatment as a humanitarian measure
source of Hiwis
When your entire economy is reliant on slave labour generally it helps to add more slaves into the mix
the Heer got chronic shortage of men entering 1942, Hiwis helped plug that gap
It was to the point that during Battle of Berlin, German troops would try to surrender to the American
as you can imagine, Hiwis tend to not get a good reception when the Soviets got their hands on them
like they could just release all these conscripted Hitler Youth and female support staff/auxiliaries as they're not technically troops, but where would they go and there's no resources to support them outside of the POW system
Meanwhile Japanese:
"We have no food"
looks at particularly meaty PoW
"Takashi"
"You thinking what I'm thinking?"
if that was the only reason it wouldn't be nearly as bad
some Japanese troops just did it because they could
Cannibalism wasn't done for starvation reasons on Rabaul until the end of the war
the Chichi Jima garrison for example, didn't actually need to
Soviet PoWs are also good sources of Sonderkommando units
I mean that commander was the only one that got specifically executed postwar for cannibalism so that goes without saying lmao
I'm not sure if it was ever done on Rabaul in particular tbh
the farming setup there was extensive
beause the IJA had stripped the countryside of farmers for conscripts
it helped keeps the train running by assigning men who's going to die sooner or later anyway as the main operator of the chambers over actual Germans because unsurprisingly killing that many men women and children in weeks tend to mess with one's psyche
... who got sent to Rabaul
no matter how hardcore your ideology is
The Takenaga incident (Japanese: 竹永事件, Hepburn: Takenaga jiken) was a surrender by an Imperial Japanese Army battalion that occurred on 3 May 1945, near the end of the Pacific War. The battalion, commanded by Lieutenant Colonel Masaharu Takenaga, surrendered to the Australian Army in eastern New Guinea. This was extremely unusual for the...
I remember the worst was New Guinea
Rabaul isn't on New Guinea
I know
IJA had to specifically tell their troops NOT TO EAT THEIR OWN SOLDIERS
At that point this is less of a horror story and more of a dark comedy
This is like 40k stuff
Heaven is Java
Hell is Burma
But no one returns alive from New Guinea
it's just kinda funny that not all the Japanese garrisons left to wither actually starved because too may of their troops were conscripted farmers and there was arable land around
no longer relevant to the war?
time to farm
which ironically meant some of those garrisons were kind of a paradise posting
oh yeah that reminds me, there's that one scene in Saving Private Ryan where the Americans shot two Czechs saying they're not German right, and people called it a dick move
I think like... more than 90% died there
well as it turns out there were no Czechs conscripts in the Heer, only volunteers
so these guys voluntarily joined in the Heer and then tried to save themselves from throwing their lot with actual Nazis
it's also kind of an unspoken rule that trying to actively take POWs during an assault is uh, hilariously impractical to the point of often being lethal
even under more controlled conditions there's video from a certain ongoing conflict showing how much of a clusterfuck taking POWs is*
I mean that's one of the nasty things with European WW2 recognition
Apparently everyone was resisting
No one was collaborators
(Looks at the pile of dead Frenchmen in Berlin)
*even when all of them but one want to surrender
Not quite that extreme but it was a lot
Also the majority of Japanese casualties were from disease and starvation
200'000 Japanese soldiers died in New Guinea to 14'000 Allies deaths split 50/50 between Australia and America
stares at the postwar French gendarmerie and police
I can see that especially on something like D-Day
slaps crust of baguette
"you can fit so many whitewashed collaborators in this baby"
I mean two thirds of all Japanese troops dead in WW2 were killed by starvation or disease
Truly the worst army to serve in in the goddamn war
I would also note that it was informal practice but widespread to the point of being standard operating procedure was that neither side made any effort to take prisoners for most of the New Guinea campaign
Kokoda was particularly brutal
it's also one of those things kind of inherent to paratrooper operations that no one like to talk about
airborne units are generally very lean and fighting focused
glance at Speirs yup
you're not often dropping MP battalions in the first waves of a paratrooper op
if ever
Speirs wasn't really wrong though, the division was still isolated and behind the lines and trying to take their objective
Being tied down with POWs wasn't going to help the units fighting capacity
he was correct but he wasn't right
that's pretty much the point yeah, paras ain't carrying these guys back so he took em out
On Japanese cannibalism:
Apparently at the time in Japan there was a bunch of myths around human flesh consumption, supposedly it being the best meat ever or having health benefits or sometimes just superstition
There's one Japanese historian that researched just this topic, but I'm yet to read the whole report
they also believed Koreans poisoned the wells and caused the fires that came after earthquakes.
and that Jews ruled the world like the Germans claimed they do. So they should buddybuddy up with them because why the fuck would you try to fight the undisputed centeries-long rulers of the world?
contextless racism causes the big funny sometimes
Well that and one general seriously believing his houses well produced... gasoline
Whatever was in the water there in Japan, I want it... has to be good stuff lmao
Also the riots after the Great Kanto Earthquake had a real funny (grim dark way) aspect to it
it's called secret military societies
where they're all simultaneously treasonous to the Japanese government and loyal to the Emprah
They "found" Koreans by forcing them to pronounce tongue twisters and if he/she couldn't, shoot 'em
goedendag
Guess what, regional dialect speakers got caught up in the mix
And at least several dozen Japanese got killed
The origin of the weapon's name "goedendag" has different theories.
One is that it may have derived from French descriptions of the Flemish weapon. Guillaume Guiart mentions of a Tiex bostons qu'ils portent en querre ont nom godendac ("... a weapon called godendac") which happens to be cognate with the Dutch translation of goedendag, which means "good day".[2] Allegedly this is a reference to the Bruges Matins massacre in 1302, at which the guildsmen of Bruges purportedly took over the city by greeting people in the streets, and murdering anyone who answered with a French accent. This derivation of the name may however be spurious. The Flemish themselves referred to the weapon as a "spiked staff" (gepinde staf).
"Japan was anarcho-fascist"
-Friend, after a few drinks
"don't worry bro, the American are poorly trained mongrels"
"bro these dogs got hands"
Was doing some research for a story I’m writing and the fact that in a torpedo run Japanese dive bombers had to throttle down so much on a run is hilarious…on an unrelated note a Kate in a torpedo run could be over taken by a UH-1 Huey.
meanwhile
These problems were greatly reduced by the latter years of the war. Torpedoes had fin stabilizers, nose drag rings and tail shroud rings added, all of which worked to slow the torpedo after it was dropped so that it struck the water nose-first and at an acceptable speed. These improved the drop characteristics such that the recommended aircraft maximum launch parameters were increased to a height of 2,400 feet (730 m) and a speed of 410 knots.
A lanyard was attached to the tail of the torpedo. When dropped, the lanyard tripped a starting lever, but a water trip delay valve prevented the combustion flask from lighting off until the torpedo had entered the water. When dropped at 150 knots or more, the torpedo would enter the water at an angle of between 26 and 30 degrees. The water needed to be at least 150 feet deep (45 m) and the torpedo assumed its preset running depth after water travel of 300 yards (275 m). The exploder mechanism was armed after water travel of 200 yards (180 m). Depth could be set up to 50 feet (15 m).
The addition of the nose drag ring improved aerodynamic performance by stabilizing the torpedo in flight and reduced air speed by about 40 percent. It also acted as a shock absorber when the torpedo struck the water. The tail shroud ring improved the water run by reducing hooks and broaches and by eliminating much of the water roll which had characterized the earlier Mark 13s. Hot, straight and normal runs now approached 100 percent. To speed availability of the much improved torpedo, the Bureau of Ordnance had tail assemblies built with the shroud ring attached and then shipped these to the fleet for upgrading the existing inventory. By the fall of 1944, the modified torpedo was in general use by the front-line carrier units which were enthusiastic in their praise. On one occasion in early 1945, six torpedoes were dropped from altitudes between 5,000 and 7,000 feet (1,500 to 2,100 m). Five out of the six were observed to make their runs hot, straight and normal.
Too little too late but not a bad idea
So Kate Torpedo runs were so slow almost entirely for the Pearl Harbor raid, they had wooden wings attached to the torpedoes and had to angle their aircraft up like ten degrees. All to keep the torpedoes from sinking into the bottom of the harbor.
the fact that after this the Germans still tried pulling stunts like Fruehlingserwachen
and the guys doing that are still the same guys from the Bulge
speaking of Bulge I remember reading Osprey's book on it which has the German order of battle in it, and the only thing it says about the 7th Panzer Army is "These guys are shitty as hell and aihn't doing much"
The German Army had serious problems with conducting counter-attacks against the Western Allied Forces in 1943-44 this was different to the Situation on Eastern Front against the Red Army. As such the question is, why was this the case and this is not about logistics.
Disclaimer: I received a pre-release ebook of Prof. Neitzel’s Book “ Deu...
this vid the professor notes it was like the Germans didn't actually plan beyond "launch a counterattack"
Sounds very German.
"so we're gonna preposition units and have supporting elements ready, right?"
"idk, just launch a counterattack"
like one example cited is that the Germans were aware the Allies were going to land near Salerno, and had previous experience with how bad dealing with naval fire support was
and as a result... they didn't preposition any heavy artillery to provide coastal gun fire against ships
they just tried to counterattack
again
like they did in Sicily
and got slaughtered
again
like they did in Sicily
and even when they do have operational goals set its ludicrously impossible
like the Bulge for example has the aim of not only retaking Antwerp, but also crossing the Meuse and springboarding to retake the entirety of France
the underlying subtext being
the Germans had severe Eastern Front brainrot
and had no idea how to deal with an enemy who had responsive and flexible fire support
“SIR THE GERMANS HAVE BROKEN THROUGH!!!”
“Stop panicking, Ive already tasked P40s and three Artillery regiments to this shit.”
