#history
1 messages · Page 175 of 1
Weimar was a living hell
That's... Certainly a take
More like millions must putsch
I do wonder
Would German democracy have held better if the Great Depresson didn't nuke the economy
-Political violence in the streets
-Bigger divide between the right and left
-Economic hardship
-High unemployment
Honestly considering the other options in the 1920s it ain't THAT bad
Not stable enough to prevent the rise of the mustache man, but still
You could be in Russia where 10 million people were brutally killed
Or be in China where 10 million people were brutally killed
No
Too much resentment left over from ww1 and Versailles treaty
If anything, if the Depression didn’t happen, German still going to rearm and launch ww2 a bit sooner.
Potentially
I mean, that's only true for post-Depression Weimar
20s Weimar was in a pretty good spot
political divide notwithstanding
yes there were discontents among the German populace but the country didn't plunge into outright fanatic militarism until the early 30s, partly because a lot of their money did came from American loans and finances
Japan also emerged from the great depression relatively intact but
It wasn't enough to prevent the rise of people with insane ideas
Weimar was actually pretty good
The economic depression disappeared pretty quickly
The nazis rose to power in a general recession but it wasn’t all that bad really
God damn those old ladies got sterns for days
although unfortunately it was a bit of a too little too late moment because conservative movements in general managed to whip the public into a strong da joos sentiment despite some rebounds
I've trouble finding info on torpedo-related practices of the US, was Porter the only class to have carried spares..?
Ehhhhhhh I wouldn't say so https://share.google/HFzxKbKCeh8xggQi4
Idk why the link is messed up but what Im pointing towards is the German Revolution
1918-1919
dawg
of course that's a fucked messed up year
Germany just lost the war, lost millions of men, and was literally bankrupt
if you want an indication of Weimar you're better pointing to post Dawes Plan recovery from 23-29
like this is kinda if you judge life conditions on average in Imperial Rome solely through the time of the Antonine Plague, of course it'd look shit
Мир кораблей — бесплатная онлайн-игра от Леста Игры. В составе нашего флота — более семи сотен кораблей первой половины XX века. Управляйте кораблём любого класса и окунитесь в мир грандиоз...
What's that
Hamburg Uprising https://share.google/dmEHGEOuSvUuyRzCB
The Hamburg Uprising (German: Hamburger Aufstand) was a communist insurrection that occurred in Hamburg in Weimar Germany on 23 October 1923. A militant section of the Hamburg Communist Party of Germany launched an uprising as part of the so-called German October. Rebels stormed 24 police stations, 17 in Hamburg and seven in Schleswig-Holstein P...
German October (October 1923) https://share.google/mlgvAEKUXPKjmXrFw
The German October (German: Deutscher Oktober) was a plan of the Executive Committee of the Communist International (ECCI) to attempt a communist revolution in the Weimar Republic in October 1923, amidst acute political and economic crises in the country. The Communist Party of Germany (KPD), under the United Front strategy, was directed to ente...
And who could forget
https://share.google/7y7wnyVew9w9Ewdrl
The Beer Hall Putsch, also known as the Munich Putsch, was a failed coup d'état by Nazi Party leader Adolf Hitler, Erich Ludendorff and other Kampfbund leaders in Munich, Bavaria, on 8–9 November 1923, during the period of the Weimar Republic. Inspired by Mussolini's March on Rome, Hitler's goal was to use Munich as a base for a march against...
when was the Dawes Plan again, if I may ask
when was it
Literally a month later
and from any of these, were there even any in the following year
1923 was basically the ultimate culmination of Germany's hyperinflation issues, the following year the Dawes Plan was drafted which rapidly helped Germany to recover and stabilized the economy, and with that the political scene
like if you have anything, anything close to a revolution post-1925 and pre-1929 then maybe you can use that as an example of the Weimar being a shitty time to live in general, but until then I need you to remember the massive hyperinflation crisis, the Ruhr Occupation, and the passive reparations resistance instigated by the Germans themselves between 1919-1923
The most powerful weapon of the USSR, it is still in the Russian navy)
Its caliber is 406 mm and can fire 2 volleys in 1 minute)
I think its worth bearing in mind that there is a time called the "Goldene Zwanziger" - literally the Golden Twenties.
yeah exactly, the five years before the great crash was for the most part a VERY good year internationally
Agree
Yeah and Weimar republic was strong enough and have the support of the public to thwarted all those attempt
I still maintain that the Golden 20s was a facade, a temporary boom due to immediate recovery after the war but not having a solid base. Problems were brewing in the background but everyone is blindly believe that the stock and economy will away go up, either out of ignorance or they don't want to acknowledge it.
weimar was screwed economically mainly because of the depression.
if the depression didn't happen then i don't think the nazis would have risen to power
even fantic elements on the left and right wouldn't become popular
Problem is that even without a Nazi due to no Depression, you're having a Germany that either fully recovered or in a better economic position than the Nazi could. Not to mention that Germany re-armament already started since under Weimar so its going to to happen anyway, Nazi or not.
You are having a scenario where a fully revitalize German wanting to either have a rematch or at least influence politic in Europe, not to mention the USSR still there. WW2 will happen no matter what, question is who and where?
Unironically, yeah
Not that I put much stock into Stalin ability to actually conquer Europe in reality without having the Juggernaut of a Warmachine that is post ww2 Red Army but USSR will definitely initiate something in Eastern Europe and German will definitely pull something for Danzig
Having two coup attempts a month apart from each other isnt exactly what one would call stability
You still haven't provided an example beyond 1923 FYI
The year that has been spelt out to be among the single worst one in Weimar history
2 coups that was crush hilariously easy meanwhile the opposition other than the Nazi fractured and never be a serious political force for the rest of the decade
I did for 1919
The German Revolution
The March Action (German: März Aktion or Märzkämpfe in Mitteldeutschland, i.e. "The March battles in Central Germany") was a failed communist uprising in 1921, led by the Communist Party of Germany (KPD), the Communist Workers' Party of Germany (KAPD), and other far-left organisations. It took place in the industrial regions of Halle, Leuna, ...
1919 - 1921 https://share.google/cr5TzrH5itOAlzoVD
The Silesian Uprisings (Polish: Powstania śląskie; Silesian: Ślōnske aufsztandy; German: Aufstände in Oberschlesien, Polenaufstände) were a series of three uprisings from August 1919 to July 1921 in Upper Silesia, which was part of the Weimar Republic at the time. Ethnic Polish and Polish-Silesian insurrectionists, seeking to have the area...
And these examples are just the conflicts
"Beyond 1923", it mean since/after 1923, not before it
If he ment that then I got some. But does he want conflicts, economics, incidents, or political tensions?
Anything that illustrate your points that Weimar was not stable between the period of Dawes Plan and before the Great Depression.
You mean when their currency became worthless?
If you use Currency instability and economic downturn as a sign for political turmoil then of course it is. But that would be very cherry picking bc you choosing a specific time period where we told you that Weimar was stable when the economy was good.
Yeah but what about everything else that was going on?
I swear, if this turn into another "Soviet invasion of Japan" thing. And that was started by you no less.
@remote monolith Please deal with him, I am having massive flashback and headache
All I said was that Weimar was a living hell
Does Blutmai count? https://share.google/5qPYJ0ZGehc314Dsm
Blutmai (English: Bloody May, lit. 'Blood May') was an outbreak of political violence that occurred in Berlin from 1 to 3 May 1929.
It occurred when the Communist Party of Germany (KPD) held May Day marches in defiance of a ban on public gatherings in Berlin ordered by the city's police chief Karl Zörgiebel of the Social Democratic Party (SPD...
true
i think if that were the case then Germany would likely be more willing to ally with Poland against the Soviets.
a non nazi german government could still be interested in danzig but they would likely see the soviets as a greater threat and as something to focus on more. the weimar government has already dealt with internal communist forces before in the spartacist uprising, establishment of the bavarian soviet republic, and ruhr uprising. this is where the weimar government used the freikorps to help them supress internal communist forces. Poland also had their own fair share of problems with the polish soviet war and Poland at the time of ww2 was led by an authoritarian conservative government with one of most powerful people in the government being marshal edward rydz-śmigły.
Considering the fact that the weimar government had problems with internal communist groups and Poland having problems with the soviets during the Polish-Soviet war, I assume that Germany would be more willing to put aside the issue concerning Danzig and Poland would put aside its already existing issues with Germany to make a pact against the Soviet Union.
a war would happen and the alliances would be different
the soviet union's military during stalin's great purges was not at a great state
it was powerful but still not at a great state and nothing like the soviet military post 1941
Honestly a good spank could have broken the USSR around this stage
Was Finland not hard enough?
Apparently even Germany wasn't hard enough
Straight up trying to conquer the USSR wouldn't really work
Has there ever been an instance where two planes shot each other down, the pilots bailed out, found each other on the ground, and resumed the fight there?
Dude that's not even a rebellion, that's just communist crackdown
And I backread, you still haven't managed to find any concrete point about Weinar being, in your own words living hell
You just keep talking in circles about 1919-1923
cites a 1929 event
everyone has been talking about the time between 1923 and 1929
?
Maybe no one knows
Most destroyers don't have reload torpedoes in the first place
Unless you are the Japanese or the French
Hence why every shot mattered so much at Samar - the fish runs hot, that's it
True
They mentioned it on Maillé Brézé
IIRC One of the DDs, I forgot if it's Hoel or Heerman, had the torpedo launch mechanism disabled
so the torpedoman just used a hammer to launch the torpedoes - a miscount happened too, I think, launched all 5 instead of 2-3ish
So did those torpedoes actually launch properly?
I don’t see why not
All launched properly
Johnston's crew were on standby with wooden mallets - all 10 were launched against Kumano successfully
Hoel did two half salvos - Tube 2 was manually launched by hammering the pins
Heerman's crew got too excited and launched 7 torpedoes instead of 5 on her first salvo, followed by the remaining 3
Yes. The reason why the class even had them in the first place was because the given displacement had leeway for either extra artillery or AA or extra torpedoes. US approved the latter and we got the Porters. Other classes did not have this luxury and instead focused on more DP guns.
Where were these stores located? The aft superstructure? Forecastle?
And why'd the US consider 10 centerline tubes to be superior to the 12 mixed tube or 16 wing tube arrangement
I've read that it's got to do with spray, but I feel that there's a greater reasoning to this
Kinda
The Winter War was a sort of win for the Soviet. Even with massive casualties and Soviet not completely capitulate Finland, the peace treaty afterward was skew toward Moscow favor. It is an embarrassment for sure but hardly something that will deter their Expansionism
They need a Russo-Japanese war moment
Most aggressively expansionist countries need one
Aft superstructure, 2 specialized containers at both starboard and portside.
As for the centerline torpedo launchers, there's not one definitive answer but if I had to give one it'd be torpedo technology was still premature at this stage. They weren't guided and you needed to aim them at opponents. Lo and behold torpedo launcher's aren't that different from main guns, and so instead of putting it either forward or aft where the actual main guns sat, they chose amidships and centerline, allows to aim on both broadsides of the ship without sacrificing firepower elsewhere. They only did wing mounted torpedo launchers very later on.
Not quite. Gyro-guided torpedoes were already a thing, and proponents of the torpedo school advocated for 16 tubes originally.
a major reason for the switch to centreline torpedoes, rather than the sixteen tubes ala Gridley and Benham classes, is partly due to the discovery that centreline torpedoes mounted higher in the ship allowed its use in adverse weather - a severe handicap in rough seas for TTs mounted on the main deck.
Worth also noting that these destroyers are relatively light, at around 1.5k tons, compared to the "relaxed" displacement enjoyed by Fletchers at 2.5k tons.
More importantly, with 22 destroyers with 16 tubes already constructed, the later ships did not have as much pressure on the torpedo front - so centreline mounts with a quintuple arrangement was deemed acceptable, for a more generous broadside and saving some 6-7 tons.
16 tubes is certainly... IJN-esque
Did US Navy have a cult of Torpedo like how US Army have Cult of the Machine gun that I didn't know of?
When your adversaries are building ships with a heavy armament, it helps to look into your own ships and practices
The US are just about as curious on Nelson and Hood when they first came out, with conjectures on why they built it so
You mean the "All torpedo Battleship" proposal?
The torpedo battleship is dated much earlier and IIRC it performed poorly in war game hypotheticals
at which point the advocated just said "your games are rigged, bullshit" and threw the towel then and there
Apologies on my end, but weren't gyroscopic torpedoes very rudimentary as they only changed course if they veered off from their intended direction? Not chase targets like later magnetic and acoustic torpedoes.
Also jesus, 16! 
You are correct that guided torpedoes aren't really there until Mid-WW2 with acoustic homing torpedoes from Germany.
I mean, it is not as if USN is above introducing BS scenario into Wargames but rely on short range slow moving torpedo that required BB to get close is certainly dumb
Most of these gyroscopic torpedoes essentially have a switch that allows you to set the heading of the torpedo and where it will go once it leaves the tube.
I listed 4 main points about Weimar's problems. Furthermore, if the only good years were 4 years out of Weimar's 14 year existence, then that isn't exactly good
I see.
Technically, it just a minor adjustment for better spread
The main issue with these torpedoes, as the US would sometimes find with their own faulty torpedoes, is that they have a chance to circle round
This results in the torpedo going in a massive circle then coming back and striking your own ship, as had happened to the torpedoes of HMS Trinidad and USS Tang.
Didn't the movie Midway in 2019 have a scene about this
That's another problem of the Mark 14, but not the gyroscope.
Was it something to do with the fuse?
It's the exploder
The Mark 6's contact exploder mechanism descended from the Mark 3 contact exploder. Both exploders had the unusual feature that the firing pin's travel was perpendicular to the torpedo's travel, so the firing pin would be subject to side loading when the torpedo struck its target. The Mark 3 exploder was designed when torpedo speeds were much slower (the Mark 10 torpedo's speed was 30 knots (56 km/h)), but even then the Mark 3 prototypes had problems with the firing pin binding during the high deceleration when the torpedo collided with the target. The solution was to use a stronger firing spring to overcome the binding.[87] The Mark 14 torpedo had a much higher speed of 46 knots (85 km/h), so it would see significantly higher deceleration, but BuOrd apparently just assumed the contact exploder would work at the higher speed. There were no live-fire tests of the Mark 14 torpedo, so there were no-live fire tests of its contact exploder. If BuOrd had tried some live-fire tests of the contact exploder during peacetime, it probably would have experienced some duds and rediscovered the binding problem.
So basically the fuse but for torps?
Not exactly, as Friedman indicates above, the idea is that you can fire off everything from both sides, set the gyro to autocorrect and become a single massive salvo.
Yes.
Ah, spray then. Tysm Silver Tears!!1!
Big fan
It's just bad.
and to top it all off, as I said:
the Germans and the Soviets carried reloads, no?
meanwhile French DDs were carrying like 2 reloads total
he would fit right into wows
"whenever I lose, it was because matchmaker was rigged"
no, but spares were removed from most ships during wartime
I believe every class from Farragut to the 1000 Bensons carried exactly 4 reload torpedoes (the 16 tubes ones might have had 8)
the reloads were quickly landed as weight compensation
yeah, in fact the navy was happy to return to 2x4 centerline, and the development of the quintuple tube was just a benefit
there were even several projects with 3x4 centerline TT (the repeat Porters aka Somers class which were built, as well as a repeat Somers with DP guns, and a 2400 ton destroyer leader with 12 tubes likely would have had 3x4 centerline)
Ty!

<@&460646206851252224> We got a scammer here
Thanks to whoever that was that picked up the call
The more you look at it, the axis was playing amateur hour during the entire second world war
Most of them didn't like each other
Comically at times
-Germany saw all slavs as racially inferior
-Germany saw Italians (specifically Southern Italians) as racially undesirable
-Slovakia and Hungary didn't like each other
-Romania and Hungary hated like each other
-Japan saw all their puppets in Asia (and also Thailand who they forced into an alliance) as part of their Asia co-prosparity sphere
-Vichy France and Thailand had a war with each other
WW2 as an event was one of the history moments of all time
People are trying to relive it every day
Number 2 of the modern era, only WW1 was more impactful.
The modern world as we know it geopolitically, is entirely down to WW1 and its aftermath. And yes, that includes the higher budget sequel to WW1.
WW1 and 2 is still the same thing
It just have 20 years lull
The conclusion at the end episode 1 is unsatisfactory to many fans so they're pretty pissed
Not exactly 2 separate episodes, more like someone turned a book into movie but make it 2 parts
At what point does increasing barrels not increase total salvo weight as compared to increasing calibre for the same deck space
Salvo is a salvo, a shell thrown downrange is always good in theory
That is, until you have so many guns opening up that spotting the fall of shot becomes a difficult task and adjusting the elevation of the gun barrels to fire for effect is impacted
Most nations from what Ive seen set the limit at 12 guns, at least for battleships - Italy has a clearer policy of more than 10 guns = up gun calibre
the hard limit on barrels is 16, aka 4x4 (since quintuple turrets are folly, as are 5 quadruples or 6 triples)
so since more barrels is always a better way to increase salvo weight than bigger guns, the best way to increase salvo weight is just more guns until you have 15/16
(example: a Montana's 4x3 406 is 1225 * 12 = 14700, which is greater than the equivalent 4x2 457 = 1,746.3 * 8 = 13970.4)
however, salvo weight isn't the only heuristic, since obviously you want shells heavy enough to inflict damage to whatever you'll be fighting, which necessitates larger gun caliber
that's why most BBs and CAs have 8-12 guns (light cruisers are an exception since they're locked to 152mm caliber)
Some people view the American Revolutionary War and the War of 1812 like that
Mainly Americans
no lol
Give us jets
Actually that can wait
What battle would w16 based on
Speculation chat
This video takes an in depth look at the Second World War, the biggest conflict in human history. Why did the Allies win the war? Or might a better question be - why did the Axis lose it?
00:00 Why did the Axis lose?
00:36 Axis strategy
01:33 Allied strategy
02:27 War begins in Asia
03:01 War begins in Europe
3:59 Blizkrieg
5:28 The big problem...
Im looking at ww2 nose art, the more "modest" ones to get an idea of swimsuit designs in the 1940s lol
my point being about what skimpy clothing looked like then so i looked at ww2 nose art for
research
knowing that elastics werent that widespread
bikini ATOLL ofc
Bikini gone
Anything resembling one at the time were merely considered "two piece" is that the word?
Idk I not a swimsuit expert
But that one look like just underwear
What project number was the DP Somers and 2.4kt DL?
project number doesn't really exist in usn
at least friedman doesn't tell us it
here's the mention of the DP somers
the 2400 ton ship was related to the Gibbs destroyer for the USSR (ig the best source for this is kingpin's essay? https://docs.google.com/document/d/1nmOCNEAr8WQ8G_UpwOxKv85hABrqr-4a2nLncNncR9o/edit?tab=t.0)
NOTE: IN REWRITING PROCESS AFTER NARA RESEARCH 4/8 In the late 1930s, the Soviet Government asked American shipbuilding firm Gibbs & Cox to produce some sketch designs for battleships and destroyers. Ultimately, nothing ever came of the designs- the original battleship designs were unsatisfa...
Battle off Samar; Yamato as the first UR map drop
/j
If I'm reading this right, the 1620 tonner is akin to the Somers and has single purpose guns in mind, but the 1850 has dual purpose instead
Check Out Delete Me: https://joindeleteme.com/Electrician
20% Off Code: Electrician
Merch Store & ALL Other Links:
https://thefatelectrician.com/
Seriously EVERYTHING is on my website
Other channels:
The...
well they would be 1970 and 2024 tons, but yeah
idk
Is this quad 14.5mm machine gun
The Henschel Hs 123 is often presented as a missed opportunity for the Luftwaffe. As a rugged, simple biplane with a respectable bomb-load, it is presented as an excellent Close Air Support aircraft that was to be put back into production. But is this truly the case? Join me as I talk about that and the other misunderstandings/out of context myt...
Kinda
I mean, it has been a running joke that both side of the Libya Civil War right now is trying to cobbler up a functional MiG-23 using whatever scrap they have left in the hangar
Rip
babe new Ronson myth just dropped
Soyjet
Gadyum
We have ERA on T-54 tank
Whatdehelll
Man that thing better have stabilizer
It might
stabilized sight =/= stabilized gun
Shit

I mean, the program was proposed by Israeli based on their own modification of T-54/55
K
Iirc, they did actually calibrate the gun to sync with the FCS. Not sure about automatic lead tho.
Don't get your hope up, they shot down the smoke launcher bc the brass wanting to cut cost
Only to add it in again in future program but the mounting is so ass
words cannot describe the fucking FEAR i felt when I read that
Pennant of the 1st Brazilian Fighter Squadron that was used in Italy. Santa Cruz airbase. 2010
Might as well retire the damn thing
Nah, it is still a perfectly capable Fire Support vehicle for infantry formation. Until we got stuff like Centauro or Rooikat then T-54/55 with its 100mm gun will stay.
I mean yea 100mm HE is no joke
The upgrade package is good actually, the T-54M is probably the best upgrade variant currently. The lack of ATGM launching capability mean it can hardly engage in tank on tank combat with modern tank but the upgraded FCS meant its is league ahead most opponents that PAVN expect to fight in a ground war.
But like what the fuck is that thought process about smoke launcher
Cost and the top brass never actually have tank combat experiences.
Most of them coming from Infantry or Commando background.
How expensive smoke launcher can be bruh
Already paid for all that ERA and FCS might as well go all the way
The tank upgrade program was a compromised and reaction to Cambodian and Thailand upgrade their tank fleets.
High Command rather invest more in Infantry and drones but the FCS has already been ordered and delivered plus many turrets was already in process of upgrading so they continue with the program.
Cambodia still use the same T-55 like we do, and I think Thailand have M60?
But honestly, the terrain in this region is pee pee poo poo for tank on tank combat
Cambodian have a small number of T-55 that has been upgraded by Romanian, Thailand M48s and M60s received Israeli upgrades packages.
T-90 was bought as a counter to Thais T-84, when High Command realize that Thais not going to receive anymore MBT anytime soon, they also cut down on the order of T-90.
There were talks of buying T-72s as well to replace T-55 in less important regiments but T-54M program is much more realistic and cheaper.
Need someone to fix the mobility issues on the T-72/T-90 series
Thais newer VT-4 also caused a small concern but T-54M has already been finalized by then so no panic buy to try to match Thais.
Why they even panicking about what Thailand have, we not even shared border
They have always been a theoretical enemy in High Command Wargames for the last half of Century. The scenario ranging from a Cambodian Civil War where RTA and PAVN clashing in Cambodia to a 2nd Border War where PAVN have to defend Cambodian border.
I think I want whatever they have smoking
Myanmar was never realistically considered bc one, they too occupied with their own Civl War and two, Laos is too much of an obstacle for anyone to fight through.
Cambodia scenario is much more plausible. The terrain are treacherous in the Western part but the plain and Ports allowed Thailand to sustain a big enough force.
Thanks for answering my questions
What's a war or conflict that you guys like to study and research that isn't WW1 or WW2
I'm confused about the torpedo suite of the IJN CAs
I'm assuming each and every single rotatable deck / cutout tube from Myoko's 1935 refit to the Tone's had 1 torp reload, no?
It was only the Takaos that had 8 spares, and the Myoko's (1935 and 1944 fit) that had 24 spares?
Napoleon is pretty dope
I like studying a lot of conflicts but my favourite one that isn't the world wars is probably the War of 1812
Its finally here after a long wait. Sub and like lets get this going.
Original song - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=50_iRIcxsz0
Go give love to the original song.
1812 is pretty good, always fun to think that indirectly the us was on the side of napoleon.
I've also been looking at the Spanish Civil War more in depth (more than I used too) in the past few years
Kind of tangential to wwii, Franco was the only one with common sense.....not another corspe to shackle to the germans
The WW2 pre-game
Germans always seemed to get the poor choice of allies
Also I didn't say the second Sino Japanese war because its technically part of WW2
Pre world war one conflicts should be interesting
Babies first industrial wars
Franco purussian and the american civil war.
Crimean war
The later being most proto world war 1
I don't think there's a conflict in history that I won't at least look into
Some people in America view it as a second war of Independence
It was
No one* messes with our boats
Also its not a name that's uncommon as it is also used by the American Battlefield Trust https://share.google/5C6WOd7sgrUB4OroT
Wasn't it your sailors and desire to annex Canada?
The 51st state
Russo-Japanese war
Had a lot of implications on the US financial sector, yet no one talks about it
Also Fedorov got his idea for his Assault Rifle from that war
Because he saw how portable automatic weapons are very good at killing people
The Australian Bush Wars
#RIP U.S. Navy aviator Donald McPherson who passed away on August 14 at the age of 103. McPherson was the last surviving American ace of WWII. Assigned to VF-83 aboard USS Essex, McPherson scored five aerial victories while flying an F6F Hellcat named "Death ‘n Destruction".
For an anime fest, yes, but why is it here in this channel
Wait yesterday was the 211th anniversary of the Burning of Washington https://share.google/S616HgJj2foQaU547
The Burning of Washington, also known as the Capture of Washington, was a successful British amphibious attack conducted by Rear Admiral George Cockburn during Admiral John Warren's Chesapeake campaign. It was the only time since the American Revolutionary War that a foreign power had captured and occupied a United States capital. Following the ...
I remember seeing RCMP guys walking around this festival a few days ago so it probably is
And plus the festival ACC posted this lmao
Apollo Soyuz Cigarettes. The past really was a wacky time.
You don’t really want to continue with this
couldn't be worse than Interbalkan competitions
or between Japanese and literally everyone else in East & Southeast Asia
Or China vs India
Canadians win because they are morally superior
on the contrary, airline polls show american travelers are nicer, rekked
Yeah but that one is funny
Or literally any SEA country that have border together
I mean, saying that but then stuff like Johnny Somali exist 
Rice balkan
John Somali
John Yemen when
Somehow it is worse than Balkan, Burma alone have more ethnic group than entire Eastern Europe combine.
Its a historical event
Wow I didn't know that
Wow, the strategic nuclear bomber could carry more bombs than the tactical fighter
Who would have thunk it
Maybe that's why Serbia celebrates shooting it down 
Serbia did not down an F-111
F117 F111
I really love F-111 and Su-24, the entire swingwing concept is so beautiful to look at
I mean, try AGM then
Maybe I mixed up the F111 and the F117
I'm doing a render with aircraft meant to come from Graf Zeppelin in it, but War Thunder doesn't have a 109T. Could I just use some G-6s in their place and call it a day?
U guys know where to find RN naval badges?
i found a description of HMS Grenade s badge but no images
did a bit of digging, but I think I got the right thing
aight
Badge: On a Field Green,. a Grenade Black with flames issuant Gold.
do you have any other ones you need found?
Where did u find it
For fun look up hms terror
I already seen it but
You will see
All posts from the Ships/Badges - Crests etc thread of the Archive of the World Naval Ships Forum
this thread is SERIOUSLY extensive
Each attatchment is a badge?
yeah
I see
at least from what I can tell
I mean, they mostly the same other than the landing gear and the arresting hook.
landing gear doesn't matter since they're gonna be in flight, but the arresting hook sounds problematic to me
did any of the other 109s get tail hooks?
because I can just yank it off one of the others and propweld if that's the case
@autumn sorrel
Will you watch the parade
On TV, already spend 2 day watching the rehearsal, I rather not standing and rubbing into other people like pig.
I will send you the picture but it is simple hook from the look of it
Welp I haven't watch the rehearsal
I hate the civilian, they have no order at all. Some even broke the line and almost get into the way of parade formation
Does anyone have info on what this is
Whether it's referenced in Friedman's or something
“10k tons scout cruiser”, twin funnels, super firing turrets fore and aft, in 1921?
I mean, it is possible in theory for design like that to exist but I’d expect it to be in the late 20s and in 30s.
Apparently someone on Reddit mentioned it had /47s, but I doubt them since they mentioned another error with another paper design
I found one mention for "Preliminary Design Sketch for a "35-knot Scout" Cruiser "Preliminary # 3" ... January 8, 1921":
Preliminary design drawing for a scout cruiser. This design was one of many considered in the process of settling on the plans adopted for the Pensacola (CL-24) class of Fiscal Year 1926. This sketch was one of four undertaken as part of the work leading up to development of a set of five alternative designs (see Photo # S-584-174 to Photo # S-584-178) that were presented to the General Board in March 1921. This design provided four twin 8-inch gun turrets, two forward and two aft. It differed from preliminary sketch # 2 (see Photo # S-584-171) in being flush decked and having a different disposition of the main battery.
This plan provided eight 8-inch guns, turbine machinery, and a speed of 35 knots in a ship 615 feet long on the waterline, 57 feet in beam, and with a normal displacement of 10,800 tons.
Oh it's a CA
My bad, wrong design
Here the correct one:
https://www.shipscribe.com/styles/S-584/images/s-file/s584177c.htm
There are 2 scout cruiser design, both have the same displacement and Armament
Yeah, that's why I am surprise that a design like that appear in 1921, sound suspiciously like Fischer "Large Scout Cruiser"
"Light cruiser sketch"
"Cruiser > Heavy Cruiser"
The heavy cruiser was a creation of the 1930 1st London Treaty
Should be this one
https://www.shipscribe.com/styles/S-584/images/s-file/s584190c.htm
Pensacola when built was classed as a light cruiser
I mean, the class was the first "treaty cruiser"
It was only after 1st London created separate cruiser tonnage limits for 6" and 8" cruisers that the US would call all of its 8" light cruisers heavy cruisers
Ah
Yeah in the USN it was the first treaty limited design, though as the prelims illustrate they had already intended to build 8" light cruisers of about that size before WNT made it the limit
I supposed the design was a good learning lesson for USN.
Regretting my decision rn
now I stuck in the middle of nowhere
Now I in the house of a relative with AC and shits
While half of the capital sleeping outdoor
Wait, you go to the capital?
Bruh, there no hotel left that is vacant for the next few days 
Decolonization in Africa is already messy but Rhodesia seems to be the worst of them all
The fact that is Ian Smith government is wierdly popular among the black people of Rhodesia said many thing about how messy this war is
They ultimately lose in the Political and Diplomatic fronts but they held pretty well with just covert aid from Salazar and SA

Also Zimbabwe's $1 Trillion dollar bill however that comes in much later
yeah that guy is trolling, this is a 203mm cruiser
I mean there were funny scout light battlecruisers (think Courageous class ships) from around the same time
#OTD in 1945, Omori became the first prisoner-of-war camp on the Japanese home islands to be liberated when it was reached by landing craft from a Navy rescue mission. Prisoners at the camp had included Marine ace Pappy Boyington, sub commander Richard "Killer" O'Kane, and Olympian Louis Zamperini.
I mean the entire decolonization idea that happened after WW2 was basically a disaster
I have never met a Black Zimbabwean with nice things to say about Ian Smith
And only a handful of white Zimbabweans
You would have to be a fucking idiot to have positive opinions on Rhodesia

It is impossible for Britain and France to hold on to their Empire post ww2. Their economy is in ruin and their population are in no mood for foreign War for some far flung Colonies.
And most Colonies post ww2 have already seen Britain and France for what they really were, weaken powers. Their myth of invincibility were shattered in South East Asia by the Japanese. No matter how much they throw at it, the Natives no longer fear them.
The French taste it first hand in the Indochina war
Like it or not, decolonisation are bound to happen no matter what.
in SEA particularly,the Japanese defeat also open up window of opportunity for these colonies to declared independence when the Japanese are gone but none of the Empire return yet
SEA region is a mess afterward,even in modern time with how unstable some of the countries is
Myanmar having a full-blown civil war,the dispute between Thailand and Cambodia and whatever is going on in Indonesia rn
Tbf the current situation in Indonesia has less to do with it colonial past but still
Decolonization was too hasty imo
It created a power vacuum that just couldn't be filled by reasonable people.
I would feel better if they(the colonial) don't try to return after ww2
I'm speaking moreso for Africa than east asia
Like everyone would be better off not having to fight more wars
Wonder why it is really hard to explain to people that "war is terrible"
Say what you want about Rhodesia being an apartheid state the black Zimbabwens weren't absolutely starving
As Zimbabwe currently stands
Iirc, i read some stats where Rhodesia had the lowest crime rate in Africa up to that point.
Per capita
Rwanda atleast is currently ina development boon (at the expense of the congo though)
Its crazy how such a small state is bullying the Congo as of recently
Myanmar problem is hardly the result of colonialism, it is more of the unfulfilled promises that Junta Regime rather ignore. As for Thailand and Cambodia, the map might be drawn by French but the Conflict is the result of Ultranationalism, Political intrigue and internal affair of both Countries.
Simple, you have a well motivated and well armed Forces vs a demoralized, barely supplied and fractured commands Army.
Congo might be larger but the barely developed infrastructures and roads mean they cannot deploy force large enough to actually become a threat to Rwanda.
Not to mention DRC internal political conflict mean that the current ruling president cannot afford a big defeat.
Does anyone know the location of Dealey's 533mm fixed torpedoes
I would assume it would follow the same style as in the Mitschers, but Dealey's railings don't imply such a position
#OTD in 1955, an Australian pilot cranked the propeller of an Auster Autocar J-5G training aircraft but was unable to get in the plane before it rolled down the runway and took off. The pilotless plane flew around Sydney for 3 hours before two RAN Sea Fury pilots shot it down.
<@&472236072743600148>
What type of scam was it again
Is it what I think it is
What AA is that
Message delayed by 2 hours
Vietnam military museum ?
Then it is Soviet Made,the missile is for sure SAM-2
Bofors and S-75
Not the 37mm?
I be damn
Like I have an inkling that it is the bofor but I think "nah it can't be"
Those WW2 AA gun is still effective against ARVN airforce
Probably, it would be China Type 65
Honestly, it is difficult to say from the angle and the picture
How did USS Phoenix goes all the way to Argentina and became the Generenal Belgrano ?
Like there are real 37mm outside and they look nothing like that picture
The con center is very crowded
The Americans decommissioned and sold her to the Argentinians post-WW2
Holy shit general is insane…anyway, this place looks cozy.
They did the same thing to the USS Barb and I’ll never forgive the Italians for such a crime.
What do these two pictures have in common?
Cursed timeline where Yamato survives WW2, someone buys her and sells it to the Argentineans
ah yes, the Tojokistan world
Some part of me wonders if it might have been possible if for some reason the planes just bombed and rocketed the turrets and guns out of action and left the hull alone
Definitely wishful thinking, but still
Personal opinion; any aviator would prefer not to stick around too much
But recreations are possible, see movie prop Yamato
Kickass.
Florida Man did a thing during WWII I see
Norway has selected the UK as its strategic partner to deliver future maritime capability, which will include the export of at least five BAE Systems’ designed and built Type 26 frigates.
︀︀
︀︀Read more about the partnership here 👉baes.co/aL8S50WOJrX
I thought you said tokyostan...i was going to be like give it a few years
Delivery date of never
Bruh, it take them 11 yrs just to commissioned the first ships 
There's speculation that they might be getting hulls originally destined for the RN
I mean, it certainly going to cut down on the receiving time but isn't that is at the expense of RN? RN do need those frigate, like right now.
Any particular reason why they choose Type 26 over SIGMA and FREMM?
It's believed due to political reasons
🧵 #OTD in 1983: Korean Air Lines 007, a B-747, is shotdown by a Soviet AF SU-15 off Sakhalin (USSR). All 269 aboard die. Jet strayed into Russian airspace; air defenses misidentified airliner for US RC-135 spy plane. Factors: navigation error, navaids, Soviet military organization. (More info on comments 1/16 ⬇️ )
for political reasons, we're choosing to not receive any ships
What is the biggest DD of ww2 is chat?
that's funny asf
mogador
although in theory you could count a Capitani as a "DD"
1936A
👍
1936A tonnage varies pretty wildly.
Gearing class is consistently around 2620 tons to the 1936A's ~2540-2650
and yes, a range of 100 tons is pretty wild for ships of that size
That explains why Z23 is the way she is
Honestly just pick any German or French DD and you have your answer there
France because "noo our DDs must be cruiser sized" and Germany because for some blasted reason their shipyards can't produce anything without being comically overweight

RIP to whichever poor fuck that had to deal with the 1934A class's engines
1500 psi boilers with dogshit ergonomics
I can tell you’ve never been to Tokyo
Got Try Some LMNT & Get a Free Sample Pack: https://drinkLMNT.com/fatelectrician
Merch Store & ALL Other Links:
https://thefatelectrician.com/
Seriously EVERYTHING is on my website
Other channels:
The Fa...
Can you explain the joke, because I also never been to Tokyo
Simplifying years of design considerations influenced by the rather unique situation of the French fleet to “nooo our DD’s must be cruiser sized” is a bit…
Do you even know what a cruiser looks like
I wonder why there's specifically a Contre-Torpilleur and Torpilleur d'Escadre territory.
Or, you know, Esploratori.
Is that why their "Large Destoryers" exists?
Notably the Mogador and Vauquelin classes
They are fleet scouts designed to punch trough enemy destroyer screens
While also being able to perform normal destroyer duties
Mogadors had the more specialised mission of escorting Dunkerque (Mogador) and Strasbourg (Volta) as part of a squadron in hunting down German Panzerschiffe
ASW and the like
The core of them is engage the enemy screen quickly then disengage
I mean isn't that also CL job?
I mean, the name Contre-Torpilleur is pretty good on an etymology level
"Counter to destroyers"
The CL’s are general purpose
Defending trade
Colonial duties
Isn't that "counter to Torpedo"?
Mogador is a bit low on the power generation levels IIRC and a bit overstretched on the CT concept, but, not the point
Well, Torpedo boat, if you're being more exact.
Oh right, Colonial duty ships. I do remember those are exempt from Naval Treaties. So does France trying to skirt the limitation place on them by investing into those ship?
The cruisers are not exempt
France just needed a light cruiser that could perform the menial tasks while also having them be armored enough to do stuff like the Brooklyns, Towns or Abruzzis
I mean the Avisos class of ship
We’re talking about CL’s like the Duguay Trouins, La Galissonnières and de Grasses
I forgot what the treaties had to say about avisos
What are the threat assessment on IJN then?
Not a huge factor for France
Like the Dutch, France surely have ship plan with IJN in mind?
French designs were mostly influenced by the European theatres
They expect to not hold on to the Far East?
Not realistically no
The avisos and cruisers are for local defence and internal issues but you can’t really hope to win against a navy like Japan while also having to defend the homeland
The Dutch have a tiny coastline compared to France and relatively speaking benefit much more from their colony to justify investing in a larger fleet there
But even then it’s not going to realistically hold all the territory against Japan
Methinks
@delicate beacon DM me with your thoughts
torpilleur = torpedo boat
French is pretty unique in that they call their destroyers "torpedo boats"
most other navies just say "Destroyer" (Destructor, Zerstörer, Niszczyciel) or the like
there's also italian "cacciatorpediniere", which I believe translates to "torpedo boat hunter", and contre-torpilleur ("counter-torpedo boat)
there's also smaller vessels that can be used for basic duties, think like gunboats and sloops and the like
you can save tonnage because you don't really need speed for that
wasn't the idea to have some sort of "fleet in being" that can make the japanese think twice and delay them long enough that the British and other allies could intervene?
germans did produce destroyers lmao, but they called them "torpedo boats" (even though some are similar size to the italian fleet destroyers)
the big destroyers are motivated by the desire for high aramament, high speed, good enough endurance, high seaworthiness, and high survivability all in one package, which like with other german ships pushes up displacement
I mean
destroyer derives from the shortening of "torpedo boat destroyer"
also ya'll keep just sitting there ignoring the Gearing sized elephant in the room
the biggest DD is still either Mogador, Tashkent, or Regolo
whether by dimensions or tonnage
ok well technically the biggest DD is a zumwalt
Sir as i have been reminded countless time. This is a history channel
If talking about more modern military equipment really was enough grounds to lose access to this channel, me and a good number of other regulars here would have have our privileges revoked a long time ago
Yo it's Mister Ed 
it really is true: communists that understand economics are just capitalists of a different flavor
When everything is class struggle...
I mean, yeah
Too bad they are just a fantasy nowadays
My college professor said that if I give up all my rights we can get a rich person to pay me to write my slam poetry while I sit at the fair trade coffee shop in uni town
At what point did we stop putting Deck Guns on submarines?
When people realize that surfacing for a surface gunfight mean death sentence.
In actuality, it is obsolete once Convoy system was implemented. And the death knell come when Surface search radar become a thing and night raid no longer viable.
Counterpoint:
Yeah, I rather take the chance with Hedgehog than a cannon duel with a Fletcher
Those are 5” rockets…
It doesn't matter, you can spoof and hide from Sonar and Hydrophone, there no hiding from Surface search radar.
1945
Many of the last submarines of ww2 were equipped with deck guns, almost all of which were removed within 10 years of entering service
Almost all post-war submarines built by major combatants had no deck guns, excluding pre-war designs
All of the European shipbuilders basically stopped building submarines for the first decade after the war, with few exceptions, so they basically went into the post-war submarine developments having already caught up to the lack of deck guns being used internationally
A lot of these designs were following German developments
The Type XXI didn't have a traditional deck gun (although it did have anti-aircraft guns) because it was the first submarine designed to operate under water for extended periods of time
Thess ideas were rapidly adopted post-war
I'm sure there's a handful of post-war submarines with deck guns, but none which come to mind, certainly none from the major players
I mean, experiences show that Torpedo attack while submerged is much more successful than early war night raid. As much as Uboat force suffered horrible casualties, they do learn the lesson even if it was a bloody price.
My understanding is that the majority of submarine attacks during the war were from surfaced boats
And in any case, WW2 boats weren't designed for extended stays underwater
Tech limitations Im sure.
Yes
Battery technology simply didn’t allow for extended undersea cruises at the time
Mmmm…spicy rocks…
Even today, modern diesel electrics have to move near the surface to run their diesel motors, they do have much longer endurance and they don’t have to completely surface anymore, but the principles of the technology remain the same
Submarines of ww2 can really be better thought of as submersibles
Only capable of diving for a few hours at a time, at most 24 hours but rarely that long at all
They were not anything like the modern nuclear or diesel boats of today
Asahi reports that the upcoming 2+2 meeting between Australia and Japan will, among other things, establish a forward maintenance regime for RAN missile destroyers docking in Japan. This would presumably also lay further foundations for SEA 3000.
https://t.co/TpC7QlKlcP
Hmm, this couple with Mogami deals mean that RAN could possibly have further cooperation with JMSDF.
Seeing that AUKUS sub program future is a bit uncertain right now, would RAN reconsider acquire AIP sub from Japan?
Until the snorkle, at least.
The snorkel of WW2 was a shitshow
U-boats were gambling their lives every time they wanted to run submerged with it up
In any case, no deck guns once everyone went teardrop shaped for more quiets. Yay albacore
I somewhat doubt they would get anything non-nuclear at this point in time
Even if RAN opted for a modified Taigei then it still going to have sooner delivery date than AUKUS.
It seemed to me they're going all in on the nuclear-powered subs, but that's just my perception of what I've read
Huh, my impression was that they at first want AIP sub but then opted for a SSN designed by France. The deal fell through bc of US and AUKUS agreement so now they are stuck with AUKUS SSN.
Idk what exactly happened, but the French apparently screwed them over in some way which ended the original plans for subs
I thought it was the other way around?
Like I just said, Idk the exact details of what happened, but something caused a falling out which resulted in that deal being cancelled
How would the Dealey been able to carry long 533 torps on that small of a structure?
Japanese subs do not have the range for Australian requirements
Pillar 1 AUKUS is going ahead as planned
context?
No, the us ground your army and navy into dust. We produced more of aircraft than you could hope, we train men better and quicker, we produced ships at a scale never before seen. You were ground to nothing.
Way to miss the point
Nah, there are noble ideals in war. Only the will to produce more.
To outcast the enemy
There are nobler ideas in democracy, freedom and liberty
The United Nations were superior on the battlefield, yes, but that superiority was enabled by their ideals
The brutal victories in the Pacific, Burma and China were not won because the soldiers were merely better, they won because their ideals were better
WW2 was a battle of ideas as much as it was a battle of soldiers and nations
A coalition of lesser ideals would not have won the Second World War
don't forget the ideals of the soviets
noble things like not getting shot by the komissars
That didn’t really happen but go off I guess
Not saying the Soviets were good, they weren’t, but there’s no need to spread myths, they did plenty of stuff that’s actually worth mentioning
Reality says that the people getting shot by barrier troops was the exception and not the rule
^
firstly, there were not many barrier troops in the first place, thats a massive waste of men that could be heading to the front instead
secondly, even if someone did get caught, they usually simply get returned to their unit, since the chief concern was desertion
if you're bad enough though you do get to the penals
Most armies of WW2 shot deserters regardless
or hang and torture
and was the case with the germans
well, by the end just talking defeatism gets you that
The British and commonwealth nations were the only ones who made a point not to execute deserters
It should also be noted that the Australian army was one of the first to remove the death penalty as a potential punishment, some Australian soldiers were regardless sentenced to death in WW1, but all sentences were commuted
Just suck it up japan
Just say they lost on all fronts, culturally and tactically/strategically/military
enabled by lend lease ...
At the DALO Industry Days 2025 in Copenhaguen, Denmark, Naval Group was showcasing its FDI frigate in Royal Danish Navy configuration. The French shipbuilder is proposing this modern surface combatant design to answer the frigate requirements of two navies in Northern Europe: The Royal Danish Navy and the Royal Swedish Navy.
==================...
The Lynx Skyranger 35 will celebrate its premiere at DSEI 2025 in London, setting new standards in mobile air defence. The combination of the modern Lynx KF41 platform and the powerful 35 mm Oerlikon revolver cannon with AHEAD ammunition makes it highly effective against a wide range of aerial targets, including drones and helicopters. The Lynx ...
Dont know if this is the right channel but the Wreck of the german U-Boat U16 was recently recovered but broke in half during the process
Apparently theres also talks of scrapping it now
From the design tables in Germany to the launch pods in New Mexico: Driven by partnership, purpose, and precision, the GMARS (Global Mobile Artillery Rocket System) builds on Rheinmetall’s profound experience with the Bundeswehr and NATO allies and Lockheed Martin’s decades of missile artillery industry leadership.
It combines German engine...
It annoys me a lot
Its from 1911, how much do we still have from that time? Not that much
That boat was in an Ok state because it was supposedly scuttled near port but no experts were consulted for the recovery and no proper documentation was done
i was trying to reply to the "darn shame"
I am bothered by the lend lease argument
It enabled the soviet to do everything more effectively
But doesn't feel like the soviet would lose Stalingrad without it either, it just gonna take longer
The worst thing that can happen is just they(USSR) can't push as far as they did
Without Lend Lease, Soviet logistics will not be mechanized and the losses in locomotive will not be replace. Without Lend Lease, the Red Airforce will suffer even much worse in term of losses and fuel.
Not to mention, Red Army will not be able to amass enough strategic supply to even think about Deep Battle
Assuming the US stays out of the war, perhaps Japan doesn't strike Pearl Harbor somehow... I'm expecting Germany to eventually be ground down, but Europe would probably lose something like 10% of its population
Without lend lease Japan would likely be able to somewhat control China and the pacific and the next logical step would be attacking the soviet western and southern borders. Which would heavily reduce the soviets ability to combat the german push.
With no lend lease it wouldn't be out of possibility that the Axis secures Africa allowing more troops to move to the eastern front.
If you were to design a battleship for a frontline conflict in the 1980’s what would you do?
I would make a battleship of around 10,000 tons
and it would be called something like Arleigh Burke
then we could build a lot of them
Lol
Roosevelt was going to get into the war one way or another
Would be interesting to see a 1941 royal navy vs ijn without the us navy
Without US I dont see the allies keeping the Solomons but I doubt japan could invade aussie land
Europe in the other hand: the brits would probably starve without us navy hunting and killing the u boats to the degree that we did. The east would still be the meat grinder that it would be, probably the germans collapsing but the soviet chase would take longer....46 or 47 to Berlin would be my rough guess
If the soviets could reach it depending on how far they could get thier supply lines m
The Indian Ocean raid, also known as Operation C or Battle of Ceylon in Japanese, was a naval sortie carried out by the Imperial Japanese Navy (IJN) from 31 March to 10 April 1942. Japanese aircraft carriers under Admiral Chūichi Nagumo struck Allied shipping and naval bases around British Ceylon, but failed to locate and destroy the bulk of th...
The biggest issue for British carriers against the Japanese was their complete lack of dive bombers
In most other respects the British very well could have stood toe to toe with the Japanese, in fact the British caught the Japanese carriers completely by surprise with land bombers at one stage
Japan couldn't have invaded Australia, nor did it have any intention of doing so
The IJA had no interest in making the attempt, and even if it made an attempt it would have lost
The U-boat campaign would not have starved Britain, in fact it was an utterly ineffective waste of resources with or without the USN
Meet HMS Zubian
Unlike other ship she…
She was built by combining two Warship
HMS Zulu and HMS Nubian
HMS Porcupine was Torpedoed and crippled by U-602. Cut into two by the Royal Navy. Both halves converted into two individual accommodation hulks known as HMS Pork and HMS Pine.
HMS Gojocupine
Knowing Makarov myself, it is so funny seeing Chinese turn one of the most reliable and simple designed pistol into a mess bc of cost cutting and DIY mindset.
Like, how could you mess up the Sear spring?
Guess churchhill (imagine my shock) lied to the americans
Well, no, obviously not
We only know how inneffective the campaign actually was with the benefit of hindsight
But there was not a single month through the entire u-boat campaign, before and after US entry into the war, where more than 1% of merchants were lost
The Churchill slander is somewhat unusual there since it's not as if the US didn't know what was going on in the theatre
Roosevelt was simply determined to help the Allies win the war
Churchill was many things but he was seldom a liar
Today we take a look at a heretofore unpublished account from a sailor who saw the destruction of HMS Hood, and take a look at what this might tell us about the incident.
To purchase the September issue of Britain at War at a discount to read the account in full either use the following link or the code 'BAWYT4': http://shop.keypublishing.com/d...

<@&472236072743600148>
What is it with all these scam bots
That's like the 3rd or 4th time I've had to ping mods for it
Insane
Old hacked accounts, unfortunately.
The number of hacks has increased....probably due to low cyber security quality.
Probably written by ai and cheap worker not giving a care
Or
Code written by chinese for chinese if you know what I mean
I have a feeling that is a racist remark but I still want to hear more
Chinese isnt a race
Asian is a race
The chinese programed that into people when they were deflecting on the "virus of unknown origin"
On a side note, ask another Asian what they think of the PRC
I can ask myself thank you
But, the chinese are known to leave backdoors in most programs they develop so the ccp can access the device or network that they use
As example
Azur lane the app probably has that backdoor in it as well
any game with kernel anti-cheat tbh
Yeah, that the natural response
Play WoWs for FREE here: https://wo.ws/Mitsi Join the EPIC celebration and use my link to claim the biggest starter pack in the game’s history!
From the first flagships of the 1500s to the formidable warships of the 20th century, naval warfare has undergone profound transformations. This explainer delves into the evolution of maritime combat ...
cute, very shallow
but cute
Get Nebula with 40% off annual subscription with my link: https://go.nebula.tv/realtimehistory
Watch 16 Days in Berlin: https://nebula.tv/videos/16-days-in-berlin-01-prologue-the-beginning-of-the-end
In Fall 1944, Japan is set on stopping the US from re-capturing the Philippines, a vital trade route between the Japanese home islands and the ...
Spoiler: it's because their ships were sunk 
Ask a non-PRC dwelling/aligned Chinese what they think of the PRC ...
brits vs IJN, germany, and italy at the same time
hmm I wonder how that goes chat
maybe in this timeline, Italy will managed to win 1 battle in the mediterranean
you really think the British carrier fighters could have handled the Zeroes?
and not like British offensive carrier aircraft were anything special, either
british carriers had to use american aircraft in the end
Please support us on Patreon at https://www.patreon.com/TheOperationsRoom
The bombing of Dresden in February 1945 remains one of the most controversial operations of the Second World War. Over the course of several nights, waves of British and American bombers descended upon the city, transforming a historic cultural centre into a firestorm of ...
That is what I going to say. Would the brits and the limited other navies be able to deal with the med and pacific and Atlantic at the same time with the 1941/1942 without the american navy
Depends on if know someone is listening
The chinese i worked with would bad mouth the prc but if they knew someone was listening they were yhe most patriotic person out there
Like: "I dont agree with president xi and thinks his policies are bad" to " i am studying in the us to take my knowledge back to china and make it a stronger and better place" while standing at attention
Imagine Guadalcanal, the convoys to Malta and the battle in the north Atlantic....at the same time with limited ship yards making up loses to both merchant and military. I think the royal navy would be over whelmed unless they scored major back breaking victories like midway
I dont think the brits could lose the 6 heavy cruisers like the us did and make them up like the us did
no they would get smashed
the IJN just walks through the pacific, blockades Australia into surrender, and then the army might even be break into india or something (considering they are not tied up in New Guinea or whatever tf they were doing)
also they won't have any fuel shortages ever because no American submarines
yeah the Brits were already getting hugely attritioned just in the atlantic
cruisers getting sunk by bombers in the med, the submarine campaign, and then Prince of Wales and Repulse getting sunk instantly
Germany would still lose though, the Soviets will eventually pull through (albeit with heavy casualties) even with much less lend-lease
a peace settlement with Japan would basically be forced and Japan would basically get whatever they wanted, and then the cold war would be Allies vs Japan (the Soviets would have been smashed by the Germans and left a second-rate power, even in victory. Kinda like what happened to the UK or France after the war, except with far more devastation)
Why would Guadalcanal be a major focus for the Allies in this scenario?
Papua and Port Moresby would be, as it was historically, the major combat theatre of the South Pacific
The famously effective American submarines of 1942 indeed
Where is the IJA getting the troops to do a better job invading Burma?
Britain probably isn’t winning a war against Japan while fighting Italy and Germany alone
But
I really can’t see it being as disastrous as you seem to think it would be
Burma is basically a non starter for the IJA, good luck invading the area when they struggled to supply the troops they had, somehow adding more divisions isn’t going to help
Port Moresby probably isn’t surviving the naval invasion
But the Japanese cannot, and also are wholly unwilling to go any further. The Japanese are just as aware of the size of the Australian landmass and the quality of Australian troops as anyone else
key word is "ever"
they don't even have to worry about submarines
if there are no Americans, wouldn't defending new guinea just be an impossibility for the Allies? that's where their resources would come from
new guinea was a lot of effort for Japan that is saved now that American resources, transports, and money don't exist
ok, they have to deal with submarines for the first 2 months of the war
until the east indes are taken
Most of the Royal Navy submarine force was built for war with Japan
yes but what bases are they going to use that aren't getting bombed by the kido butai?
It isn't a stretch of the imagination to view a scenario where the Royal Navy is able to redeploy some of their submarines Eastwards
they will basically be stuck in the indian ocean
The 2nd largest submarine base of the war was in Fremantle
hmm that would work
I doubt the japanese can get rid of australia even in this cursed timeline
and it's far
There's basically no winning the Battle of the Coral Sea without USN carriers, you are correct, but the RAN did sustain a guerrilla war in Timor for almost a year, and Timor is a lot further away than Port Moresby
yea but it doesn't take as many resources to fight guerilla as it does to fight both guerillas AND the australian and american armies
American army in PNG lol
idk anything about the new guinea campaign
MacArthur sent the marines up the Kokoda track, and they didn't even make it to the front before they were forced back
my land knowledge stops at the dutch east indes falling and after that I know about naval battles only
gg reds
seems useful
Well you should probably seek to educate yourself
nah I don't care about land battle
The US was mainly involved in a supporting role in the region, they provided invaluable cargo and transport aircraft, and had them blown up because they used peacetime spotting arrangements
The RAAF was a sizeable force, capable of keeping the Japanese at bay by simple matter of concentration
the fuel would be shipped from America, right?
Fuel exists in other parts of the world
would be difficult to keep that supply line going without the USN
still would be hard to defend convoys
do they have the ability to refine it?
Ridiculous question
Of course Australia can refine oil domestically if it has a domestic oil industry
well yeah, but this is about sufficient quantities
also judging by what happened at Darwin, even transporting from Australia to New Guinea is not completely free
Darwin wasn't being used for transporting resources to PNG
It was full of ships, planes and personnel who had just escaped the East Indes, and were preparing to move further South before the IJN got involved
if the Japanese can bomb Darwing, they can bomb the convoys coming from New Zealand or wherever
what? the endpoint is new guinea
it doesn't matter where they came from
just attack them when they show up
The IJN isn't just going to park carriers off PNG for the rest of the war
Where else are they attacking the convoys from?
yeah but they can walk in every once in a while when needed
it's not like the IJN has anything better to do
Yes it does
The Far East Fleet is sitting in Ceylon and getting stronger day by day
The Royal Navy is hardly going to sit idly by
well the last time the far east fleet fought the Japanese, it didn't go so well
It actually kind of did
losing 2 battleships, a couple cruisers, and defenseless aircraft transports that couldn't be protected is a good outcome?
The heavy cruisers were admittedly critical losses, but the rest of the battle didn't really go that poorly
The Royal Navy was on the offensive more often than it wasn't
yeah because the Americans were there to keep the Japanese busy
The IJN carriers were jumped multiple times and barely escaped critical damage
Kido Butai was itself bombed, and didn't even realise it until it saw the water started to explode
the RN was on the offensive in the second half of the war, when Japan couldn't do anything about it
without USN forces for the Japanese to throw their ships away on, things are more dicey
Yes because the USN was famously involved in the Indian Ocean raid
and the RN was famously involved heavily in the pacific in 1942 and 1943
It absolutely wasn't the main force of the IJN sending itself against the RN and destroying a handful of expendable assets while Cunningham preserved his strength
and he could preserve his strength because the Americans were there to stop the Japanese from taking whatever they wanted
what if the far east fleet has to sail out before 1944 when they're done gathering strength?
The RN was involved enough to leave a carrier division parked in Ceylon with a handful of battleships and was able to spare a carrier for the USN
And that carrier division is why the Japanese lost in Burma
yeah, they could spare those ships after the Italians were basically done for
This is early 1942 mate
HMS Victorious deployed into the frontlines of the Pacific alongside the USN 6 months before the Italian armastice
Even longer if you include her refit period
wait weren't ships being withdrawn from the east indes fleet in 1942?
they were busy walking into madagascar
Yes but that was because the USN was around to keep Kido Butai busy
Do you think the RN would draw down forces when it was facing the IJNs main force?
even if the RN transferred forces from the Atlantic and the Med, they would still be heavily outnumbered
The British had more battleships present at the Indian Ocean raid than the IJN did
yeah but those were antiques
and that was an air engagement
battleship forces not the most useful there
The British yes, only had 2 carriers (they planned on having 3 but one ran aground) but the RN also had the advantage of the RAF on land bases
the Japanese would need a Midway-level fuckup to get the field anywhere close to even
The famously modern and advanced Kongou class against the famously antique HMS Warspite
They literally had a Midway level fuckup in the Indian Ocean Raid
yeah and also the very useful R-class battleships
how many carriers were lost
oh, that's right
I personally do not consider it a stretch of the imagination to consider that they would have done it again
And maybe even again after that
I would rather be on an R class than a Kongou in that gunnery duel
so it's 6 carriers vs 2 carriers + hurricanes and bombers operating from land
idk about this one chatters
what gunnery duel? any battle in the Indian ocean would be a carrier battle
what's happening in here, there's activity
and if there were a battleship action, it would be some Mediterranean-level "we shoot each other 3 times at 30km and then disengage"
But as I have already argued, the RN would deploy more forces to the Indian ocean, once Indomitable was repaired they would have a third carrier, plus Victorious on her way
The battle lines very nearly collided
someone asked "what if the Americans never entered the war, how would the British handle"
They were absurdly close and basically didn't spot each other by sheer luck (or lack thereof)
yeah, and we saw what happened when battle lines collided in the Med
big things
like shooting each other from 25km with no real results
Both sides wanted a surface engagement in the Indian Ocean because both sides believed they could win
Unlike in the Med where the Italians were very aware that the moment they saw RN battleships it was in their best interest to leave
they'd be fine navally in europe, much like real life, but they'd probably pull out of the pacific
If a surface engagement developed in the Indian Ocean it would not go well for the IJN
I mean warspite and 4 antique Rs against 4 Kongos is a clown fiesta either way
those 4 kongos would probably lose tbh
those ships are more suited for jutland than for a modern war
I don't see it being much of a problem there
Oh yes because the Kongou class is famously modern and prepared for naval engagements against battleships in 1941
yea that's what I said too
I said the same thing
most likely the engagement is completely inconclusive with very few hits scored
just like in the Med
Please tell me more about your 203mm of belt armour
as if they would hit each other
British gunnery was very impressive in the med, I must say
Sincerely I do not believe the Japanese would withdraw from that engagement
At least not until they took their first loss
how about Renown causing no real damage to Italian cruisers
even when unfired because Veneto was retiring from the engagement
The IJN, keep in mind, is the same force which attempted a surface battle at Midway
This is a force which is culturally incapable of retreat until critical losses are sustained
fair enough, they would probably run it in
it's not like the Italians whose priority is to avoid engagement
Because the Italians recognised that they couldn't win
The Japanese in 1945 still struggled to recognise that
no, it's because the Italians didn't want to engage without numerical superiority
not exactly
Thanks for elaborating further
the Italians wanted to win without losses
the Japanese just want some sort of battle
Some of us have no family anywhere near the PRC and haven't for a century.
I swear just one more decisive battle and we'll win the war
One more decisive battle guys c'mon
entire axis war effort was just copiumOD
The last battle wasn't the real decisive battle, the next one is guys I swear
taking bets on which cruisers die harder, the ones with 1'' turret faces and explodium torpedoes or the ones with 1'' box armor magazines
But that's us 唐人 from the south lol
germany: we just need to win this 1 battle and we will win the war!
japan: we just need to win this 1 battle and we will win the war!
italty: if we sit in port long enough, the fleet in being will cause the British an inconvenience!
now that sounds like a surface battle of silliness
both have 25mm turret faces lmao
in hindsight, yeah
At least the County class was refit with actual armour belts later on
They also had a comms failure where the land based RAF didn't provide them fighter cover...
japanese turrets were disabled by destroyer shells off Samar, and British turret faces were 2 half-inch plates fixed together
which side is which, that's the joke
Singapore was a fiasco, the RAAF (not RAF) was ready and able to provide air cover but it wasn't called upon until it was too late
ooh wait does this scenario mean that Berwick gets to be damaged by 203mm shells from all 3 axis navies?
we're going for a record here
both sides had some truly awful surface ship designs
Like I said, comms failure.
Failure to communicate needs and requirements, rather, not comms equipment failure.
They just weren't used
they weren't used because Philips believed they weren't available
which is a communications failure
The admiral in charge of Force Z sincerely believed that no battleship at sea could be lost by air power alone
yeah, but he still wanted air cover
He had it
he believed he didn't
Renown literally called for it as she was going down
which is a communications failure
Which means someone knew about it
too bad the admiral in charge of the fleet believed completely it wasn't available
the Japanese cruisers were pretty ingenious in a way though
453SQN RAAF was ready and waiting to go
and that's a communcations failure
Phillips had asked for air cover the previous day, but understood that he was told there was no air cover at all
Phillips refused to liase with his air officers and maintained radio silence
I mean it was believable with how badly the situation was going, that all fighters weretied up somewhere else
Renown broke orders when she called for support
well by that time the force was detected so it's moot
having a belt angle in areas that reduces your immune zone is ingenius heh
Just about everyone else in the force knew that air cover was available, somehow he didn't
not confirming that air cover was truly not available was kinda stupid though
that's the funny yamato deck right?
some of the cruisers had it too
it made their armor worth less
due to weird shaping
bismarck turrets are also kinda like that, the immune zone is deceptively small iirc
it's not so bad in the mogamis
because the deck slope is significantly thicker than the central portion
the more pressing issue would be the low height of the armored side
iirc it caused a gigantic weakness in the immune zone against us 6'' shells
more in terms of cramming so much armament onto a hull
well, they had their own trouble with that
well not like that immune zone is great to begin with, considering you have 35 deck
true, just making it worse by such a large amount is kinda goofy
'refused to liase' == 'failed to talk to' == 'failed to communicate' ..
the 60mm slope doesn't make it worse though lul
Sure
could maybe increase the height of the main belt and then just use a uniform 45 deck or so
but I suppose they wanted the side armor to stay internal
POV: Crammed as much armament as possible onto a hull
didn't go well for pola, cornwall, or dorsetshire either
that's what happens when prewar AA meets air attack
the difference being that one of the 5 ships made it back to port
A hit to the yellow, orange, or green trajectories with a Brooklyn 6" shell (post-refit) requires 18-20k yards, but the red deck slope trajectory can be penned at any range above 14k (!)
Hey Britain, where's your tachymetric fire control system that everyone else uses?
British ships seem to be lost to air attack as quickly as everyone else's
only Americans did better
maybe that's why the Brits adopted the Mark 37 director
I think they were jabbing that british aa fcs were pretty bad
I was going to say
the Italians did their best too, but they were years behind in electronics
the Germans did not do their best
peak county is that design from 1938
which was basically a County using modern technology and Southampton hull
also would look more attractive probably
true
hmm, imagine baltimore hull form but with british block superstructure
that's the ideal croozer
the block superstructure is a riot
I'm kind of fond of the fletchers ...
I prefer domestic superstructure in most cases
german ships also look decent
yea agreed
I'm not a fan of German masts
german ones look tough so I tend to like them, the hippers are good looking ships imo for example lol
But I'm biased towards modern hullforms ..
Though, can you imagine someone in ww2 looking at this?
@ 190m long and 15000t she's basically a heavy cruiser ...
fat even for a cruiser of the time
I do think modern hulls look fine too
I'm not a fan of stealthy hull designs and I'm glad they're going out of style
Modern naval architecture imo is at its best when it's more jagged, covered in censors and weapons that don't really look like they were part of the original design
Burkes are really nice looking ships imo





