#history
1 messages · Page 167 of 1

Maus's engine is literally one of highest hp tank engine of ww2
V2 model had 1200hp engine
That's literally Challenger 2 level of today
He already said "giant tanks with underpowered engines", you don't need to repeat him.
Oh yeah it's Chal 2 
The "underpowered" aspect is more like
Higher ups that didn't know how to design tanks kept adding insane requirements
The ones that didn't suffer that fate weren't all THAT unreliable...
Romusha
In our third look at the wreck of USS Lexington, we return...to the debris field. I only briefly touched on this, in my first video on this wreck. And, aircraft aside, not at all in the second.
For this video, we'll be focusing entirely on the debris field. Excepting the aforementioned aircraft, as I already have a dedicated video on that topic...
"Under new management"
Huh
It's a joke from that one Incredibles movie
Yo Epic ComeBack
When it came to subterfuge, lying, intimidation, hypocrisy, bigotry, fraud, and possibly murder, few can touch US President Lyndon Baines Johnson. So, who was the real Lyndon Baines Johnson? Hosted by Colin D. Heaton. Forgotten History is a 10th Legion Pictures Production.
========================================================================...
Not sure if Japan has a ship motto but this one should be "from beyond the grave"
if it's a german tank, 90% chance the leading cause of loss is mechanical failure
https://panzerworld.com/tiger-losses
ok I found a source, the #1 cause of loss is, wait for it, combat losses caused by "combat"
Analysis of the cause of Tiger I and Tiger II losses.
didn't find any other sources, besides a KBismarck thread where some Wehraboo tool is spouting "muh 5:1!!!!" with 0 evidence
https://kbismarck.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2870#google_vignette
nah bro, drach knows what he's talking about! he cites every source! (source: someone on discord somewhere, I forgot)
oh this rieminds me, how many sk c/34 variants were there again? and which ones were which?
I'm wondering if there were calibers between 203 and the BB calibers
I'm a bit tired with the German jerk and counterjerk and it makes me wanna delete Prussia out of existence
Which one.
That just means "quick fire canon construction year 34"
The 38? The 20.3? Or the 12.7?
For your second question. Deutschland. 
I think it got up to g, so seven
That's the point. They only labeled them as C/34a to C/34g (or was it h?)
Guess the caliber
the Calibre in cm is part of the designation.
No idea where you got the a-g from
I get the a-g from the blueprints.
There is no caliber designation here. It's C/34[letter]
Cause thats the mount not the gun Drh. L = Dreh Laffette (turnable Mounting) 
Show the Rest.
I literally replied to the post showing the entire blueprint..
Well to me that looks like f.4. für 4 (for 4) Einzelwiegen (Single (Gun)Cradles)
And for the two gun turret in the print above (Drh L C/36g) that the g stands for... goppelt? gweifach? gwilling?
Well i dont know.
"Gesamt" maybe.
Its not a version lettering imo.
Otherwise find me the other 5.
Ill wait. 
RM 24 589 is C/34f, dimension wise most likely the 40.6cm turret
375 has C/34h4
351 has C/34d
353 has C/34e
And for the rest you are more than welcome to explore the unchartered regions of the digitized German archive, you will find C/34a and find it to look remarkably close to Hipper's turrets, and if you find C/34b and c feel free to ping me because I couldn't be arsed yet to load up those few hundred archive entries
Actually did have RM 24 / 662 saved already, which is the turret armor for C/34a
so... guess that's five?
Well thats genuinlly interesting.
Guess i learnt something new today. Thanks.
C34a is definitlly hipper turret.
Tho they show diffrent things
34a shows armor, f Shows changing the barrel with a crane on what looks to be a battelship.
Could be that there in a-f for the diffrent mountings
20.3, 38, 40(.6) etc
The M4 Sherman has a bad reputation. It had a relatively low velocity gun, it was rumoured to burst into flames at a moments notice and was seen to be inferior to German heavy tanks. But is the Sherman's notoriety deserved?
In this video, IWM's John Delaney will examine the M4 Sherman in the round. He'll look at the tank's design, what it was p...
lmao, the disciple argued with the grandmaster 
there's always someone on the internet who knows more, it's the law
ty sirene
yep as expected.
Drach released a torpedo ranking video
air dropped torpedo category excludes drop envelope from the ranking consideration

he also categorized based upon size rather than role
The different letters most likely differenciate between the calibers of the guns. Or they would relate to the different ship project versions, but that would sorta end up being the same.
uh no
there was also many glaring ommissions from the rankings
the letters have nothing to do with caliber
If you are going off of that then google failed you
That comma is crucial
thats a 1
drach spotted, grain of salt activated
its speciffically about how these two fit together
I don't know if this video is worse than his naval gun ranking video where he excluded the gun mounts from being part of consideration
wouldn't they be differentiating between different variants of the same design series?
so basically the same thing in practice
I sure hope he took loading arrangements into account...
afaik its just numbering the diffrent parts
so you have
Mount C/34 for ex. the 38cm
then you have
A: Armor
D-E: Ammo Elevator
F-H Elevation
Etc
range, speed, warhead TNTe
this is obviously untrue
and range only when convenient
Oh hell no
Like
Absolutely not
the Mark 13's 5km range was dismissed
I can give you elevation mechanism gear plans for the C/34a
at least he used warhead TNT, some people use total charge and forget different explosives are le different
I did not send every blueprint I found, because we are talking literal dozens to the hundreds
ok but tbf, extra range on a torpedo is not that useful
good luck hitting a 34 kt air torpedo on a maneuvering cruiser from 5km!!
i have it open i look myself
port strikes
anyway
ah yes, surely there are no obstacles in the harbor, and the enemy lines up a nice bowling alley for you to click on them
Type 96, Type 95 and Type 95 Mod 1 are the top torpedoes of the 21" category. Mark 16 and 17 are ignored. Late model Mark 15s and 14s are ignored, with only the Mod 3 versions being on the list.
just like the simularions kekw
wait he ranked air, submarine, and surface torpedoes together?????
yes
he grouped them based on size
not role
except for air dropped
also his justification for not including drop envelope as a point of consideration
delivery systems aren't relevant to the weapon itself and I'm not qualified to evaluate aircraft
at least they should be by weight, otherwise the long 457mm air torpedoes and the short 570mm mark 13 will be in diff categories for 0 reason
all air dropped are grouped together
then all submarine, surface, and PT boat torps are grouped based on their diameter
man, Drach really needs to be doing more quality control
for someone of his influence, he needs to be responsible
and not responsible for misinformation
this is the third(?) ranking video where he's pulled this sort of shit
After the AA video it should've been obvious that he ranks it based on feelings
like his AA gun and naval gun ranking didn't include the mounts the guns are attached to the ship by
delivery systems aren't relevant to the weapon when their CV gets torped by a submarine from 5km (that's cheating)
also he included and excluded things seemingly at a whim
uh oh, that sounds like a disaster
the WW1 era USN Mark 9, updated for submarine use by old model subs during WW2 was included
AA guns probably should be ranked on fire control anyways
the WW1 RN Mark II was not
iron sights? F tier automatic
yeah for AA guns that's a grave error
late model/variant Japanese torpedoes which didn't get pushed out to the fleet were included
anything that needs to fire at aircraft needs to meet the baseline train speed
late model/variant USN torpedoes which varyingly did and didn't did not
who made this?
This was his "precise figures used as a basis for the ‘scores’"
From his blog
Drachinifel's
"range"
looks inside
height ceiling pulled off of navweaps
happens
It was a clip fed autocannon cycling at 250rpm
yeah, literal wikipedia should make you question "60 rpm""
let alone if you used any real sources
sometimes it feels like this guy is trolling
and going off of the weapon's manual, the practical RoF be 140 to 160
look at this section of the DP/heavy AA guns in particular
notice anything odd about the wording compared to the actual numbers
no, what are there unit conversion errors?
I see an awful lack of RPC
wait since when is the 76mm/50 an anti-surface weapon?
but British guns kinda dropped behind there, shame over you if you suspect anything off of that
nuh uh, we said mountings don't count for AA effectiveness!! 
yeah that's bait
that's some weird praise
weird way to say "this anti-surface gun is not that good at AA"
oh right
he also omitted the 4.7"/45 from that list despite it doctrinally being an AA gun according to the RN
yes
that 4.7"
the one primarily arming RN DDs with 45 degree maximum elevation
because RN doctrine thought DDs wouldn't be worth dive bombing
I mean, there's usually not too much in the way of a moored ship and straight open sea (especially not random rocks in the middle of a harbor), varies of course depending on the harbor but range is genuinely very valuable for aircraft survivability in either case
they're also pretty good for another scenario
You mean the one mounted on destroyers that would have a torpedo bank removed to install a single 4in AA gun?
yes
where a single additional AA gun was considered game changing by the RN
a single additional AA gun aimed by eyeball
So to give them technically a mixed DP battery, which he would then oddly enough critizise for the Germans claiming them to use 88mm and 105mm guns on the same ships at the same time?
wait, huh?? why is the Mark XII called a "120mm/50"
Mark XI was the 120/50
but that's just a typo, so I guess it gets a pass
cuz his actual data is correct asaide from that
oh, right
still, the entire ranking system is bogus
not sure what I expected from drach though
he does include rate of train but not other features of the mounting
Only when it's convenient
I mean, Drach just goes based on feelings a lot of the time, same with a lot of other content creators
he also makes remarks regardless of what contemporary sourcing says on the matter
like for wows tierlists, it's usually based off of feelings, and drach is no different for naval history
like he says the 5"/25 is only good for AA despite battle practice of the era showing the 5"/25 could achieve very respectable anti-surface performance
Both long 88mm guns and the long 105mm gun were in the exact same design of a mount. Only minor scaling differences, and small adjustments. Only one of them he mentions the mounts for, and then with claims that sources won't back
I doubt he is looking at contemporary sourcing kekw
also why are AA guns being ranked off of anti-surface capability
that should be its own "dual-purpose gun tierlist", not an AA gun list
If you wanna judge DP abilities, sure, can do that. But then do it consistently
Not when it's convenient to do so
he also includes ASW shells on some of the Japanese AA guns as a "pro"
lol
lmao even
does the list have any other straight-up errors? I could imagine some of the Italian data being wrong
how easy would it be to convince drach that the funny Japanese colored flak is a pro
since most sources on the internet are wrong about them
anyway I think there's something funny I recall being buried in this channel
one moment
It's inconsistent in the RoF figures
Italian 90mm gets a dogshit RoF
RN gets radar for their AA guns
uses it for massed single chance salvoes at short range
Japan gets it's magic ready-rack only RoF for the 100mm
at least he didn't list 20 rpm
Also just seeing the Italian 100mm getting all angle loading as a pro
Damn, that's one tough bar to beat
@alpine onyx something you might enjoy is that I ran across someone citing a 17 rds/min burst rate for the 5.25" based off an old British Pathe clip
which was filmed at 18 fps and mistakenly converted to 24 fps during digitization
he cited the magic long range totally catching the IJN off guard this one time
because otherwise they could totally just sit and circle outside the range of the weak flimsy 5"/38
true, because long range 460mm shells easily destroyed USN aircraft by droves in the last battle of the Yamato
same with Tirpitz guns agaisnt the RAF
they were so distracted by the pretty lights that they lost control and crashed into the sea
💀
what a gem, I don't think we can beat this
superior britishium guns most easy to install
pack up usa, it's over gg
If it was at least present in somewhat high numbers on ships
But usually British cruisers had the same amount of heavy AA guns as those of other nations, except way smaller ones
For the Italians you can say that with the 100mm gun, the Zaras starting with sixteen of them is an actual volume
well, if we go by heavy AA gun count, USA wins always, and then Hipper
But a Southampton only had eight guns, and so did a Brooklyn
idk man, Southampton 102mm was easier to install
so a southampton is better
when the ship is sunk by machinery fire, iot's easier to take the AA gun off the deck to install it on the next ship
checkmate USAsians
And the capital ships were also not that great, Hood with seven 4in twins, the superdreadnoughts with four twins, there's just no volume to justify his point
tbf, those are WW1 shitters, only the USA was able to properly arm theirs
and you can argue that these limited counts are more production bottlenecks
but I think ease of installation is whatever for a heavy AA gun, those are limited more by space and director constraints than production or installation
ease of installation for a light AA gun? yes that's reasonable, if taken into account for all guns
I was going to say the 5"/25s used on the Brooklyns could just as easily be removed, then I remembered RPC refits out the wazoo
nuh uh, RPF isn't real, mountings don't count!!
also, where French 100mm/45 :madge:
and also superior Soviet AA, trust
ok I'm going to watch that torpedo video, should be fun to have a laugh or two
maybe learn something new! (copium)
Well you were right. but please. tell me which ship this is 
Could be Bismarck in one of it's version
At least the mag subdivision is fairly close to her
don't like his relative ranking system
you can be 10% worse, but if that makes you go from 1st to last, you go from 10/10 to 0/10
also, imperial system, madge
soviet torpedoes having charge type be TNT instead of their proprietary "TGA" explosive shows a lack of research
and it hurts them in the rankings, considering their formula was 1.45-1.5 times TNT
Well i think this solves one of them
Could be but i need more evidence. F could be Scharnhorst but i need more evidence or its for both of them.
Something I found... 1947(?) electric car from Japan, apparently oil imports wasn't fully allowed during the occupation so someone had the idea of EVs
EVs are only a bit more than 2 decades older than the first ICE vehicle
Honestly wasn't viable until fairly recently due to battery life
Blueprint for the Nelson class Battleships
Always found their belt coverage a bit scary
God's scariest underwater shells:
Had to be WNT compliant I guess...
I'm more concerned with those unprotected openings in the machinery spaces
Getting slam dunked by cruiser caliber shells because you're unlucky be like
iirc from something years ago, the nelson armored raft is too small to float the ship
yeah, that was the tradeoff of the internal armor
ironically, the British themselves considered it a failure
but France, USA, Italy, NL, etc all decided it was usable
tbf, USA does have their gigaside plating with STS, France has their magic supersubstance, and Italy just armors the outer side
the Iowas are close to that issue of armored raft functionality if I also recall, but can still float
yeah, but at least they don't flood from DD shots
also calling the french one magic supersubstance is funny and would make @tough quail smile
the haha funny soft supermaterial
Honestly I'm sure more than a few WW2 battleships had that issue
the french way, absorb the blow with love
Yammy also
it was pretty rare for aon designs to have this issue
iirc kgv/vanguard/bisko/littorio hit the mark
the iowas get a little close because they have some turbo projectile shaping going on
I thought yamato could float with just armored raft
how did they mess that up at that size and width
richy I could pardon because it's hyper specialized in many ways
including god's most hard working mini ITX boilers
yamato im actually not sure
i think she's straddling the line because of weight savings
how the citadel kinda tapers off a bit

this is all going off of memory tho so i could be rambling out my ass
yeah yamato is just so wide it's weird to imagine
just eyeballing it i would think so
there's some funny tapering going on but the protected space is still enormous
few did, generally this issue was with WW1 battleships who had poor subdivision
Yamato will float with only her citadel unriddled
"The Yamato-class battleships were designed to meet the highest survivability requirements. For example, if all unarmored compartments were flooded, the buoyancy of the undamaged armored citadel would ensure that the ship would remain afloat and maintain stability with a roll angle of 22°. If all empty compartments on one side were flooded, the roll angle would not exceed 18°."
Yamato was one of the ships that actually managed to live up to its design standards relatively well
although yamato schnose being totally soft is definitely unfort
brits are germans were right about their "armored deck contains flooding" principle
Kinda do wonder what kinda batshit designs we would have seen if WW2 just didn't happen
And battleship building continued
Might have been as easy as just preventing the godforsaken great depression
What's the historical bomb load for the Fw 190 G-3?
Check Out The Henson Shaving At:
http://hensonshaving.com/thefatelectrician
Get 100 Free Blades With Discount Code: thefatelectrician
Merch Store & ALL Other Links:
https://thefatelectrician.com/
Seriously EVERYTHING is on my website
--------------------------------------...
It'll probably be 2×500lb bombs in game, but it'd still be cool to know
Kinda lame how the Corsair, Sea Fang and Sea Fury also only had that loadout even though they could carry more IRL, but I suppose balans™️ is more important
we could have gotten some real gamer designs in 1920 too
Holy jeebus SIXTEEN cannons
Would have run out of ammo real quick on that ship though
centerline rack only has shackles for 1 bomb at a time
wing racks can do 1 each up to 250 kg, or fuel tanks
though I am a bit curious what a lot of sources mean when they claim the G-3 can carry two ETC50 racks per wing, because that would mean having space for 8 50kg bombs on each wing
and, notably, ETC50 racks aren't like the zero length rails or stub shackles you'd find on a USN aircraft
hm, looks like they meant singles but didn't specify
anyway the AM-1 Mauler provides a pretty good example of the difference in bomb shackle setup
(the big ones are for torpedoes, you probably won't even see the bomb shackles at first)
It's a G-3/R1
so the wing pylons/station arrangements are just being used for two pairs of 20mm gunpods as a weird way to cram in a 6 x 20mm fighter
imagine if instead of carrying 8 hvars and 1 1000lb bomb, Skyraider carried 12 hvars and 3 1600lb bombs
What could have been 
The person who save 669 live
The inherent problem with ranking weapons systems is they are just that, systems. Platform, FCS, handling, etc, are all are intrinsic qualities that effect how effective they are. A serious look would start with fire control systems
then move on to the weapons including comparing deck space and weight distribution since these factors effect how they can be mounted and how many can be mounted.
Ergonomics too and protection. An unshielded mount is vulnerable to straffing and thus suppression. Powered mounts obviously have massive advantages over manually cranked ones.
aren't there like a bazillion better 6x20mm fighters?
you can find those in USA and UK variants very ez
to hell with that, bring in the 14" Richard rocket
Skyraider carrying 6 x biggus dickus
not to mention open mountings are more vulnerable to weather and blast
and also you need to take into account maintainability and reliability (Wehraboos HATE this one simple metric!!!)
but of course, it's Drach, he makes casual content for casual enjoyers
although somehow his videos are still 40 minutes even though he says he doesn't want to overcomplicate them
No? (in regards to number)
Most go up to 4 x 20mm max, there's very few carrier based fighter prototypes that even consider 6 (e.g. the XF8B)
mostly because you really don't need more than 4 realistically unless you've got a tailored bomber interceptor
(and in this case they are being really specific with the G-3/R1 specifically because funny in game statcard number that would otherwise be nonsensical)
and they just go and do that shit instead of throwing the XF8B in because
IB
true, I checked and only A7M3 (and F8B) had that much
and then of course glorious land interceptor, BZ.303 has 8x20mm
the A7M3 was to be a ground based interceptor though
what B-29 does to a mf
Sign up for Nebula and watch Rhineland 45: https://nebula.tv/realtimehistory
The Battle of the Bulge was one of the last German offensives during the Second World War. It caught the US Army off guard in the Ardennes sector but ultimately the Allies prevailed. But did Unternehmen Wacht am Rhein ('Operation Watch on the Rhine') ever have a chance...
Following the successful Allied landings in Normandy in June 1944, the German forces defending occupied France were slowly being whittled down as the Western Allies' material superiority made itself felt. In July, the Allies prepared to break out of the Normandy coast in their mission to liberate the rest of France, spearheaded by the US Third A...
Aside from this guy and the famed Onoda Hiroo there was some insane person who decided to hold out on Iwo Jima until the 1949 or something
Whatever indoctrination the Japanese were doing...
A captured v1
Scrapped
I hearing that voice from Family guy
Configuration Control: Italy’s Paolo Thaon di Revel–class Patrol Ships
By Eric Wertheim
January 2025 Proceedings Vol. 151/1/1,463
ayy I saw that short too
Really fucked up what happened to the pow that didn't make it home
No one deserved that
So who is to blame for the Vietnam disaster
France, Japan, or the USA
France for colonizing it first, Japan for invading it in WW2 and creating a massive power vacuum there, or the US
They're all responsible. 
After 1945 French
So their logic is "we need colonies to stay on the cool kids group"
They throw money into it, The US throw money into it
Which they all lost more money in 1954
And the power vacuum in 1945 is not exactly peaceful either
The war is stupid and should never happened in the first place
In April 1944, during the height of WWII, patrol torpedo boats PT-346, PT-347 and PT-350 would become the target of a tragic friendly fire incident whilst being stranded in the Pacific Ocean. This video documents the true story of the soldiers who lost their lives, and friends, to this unfortunate tragedy.
Want me to cover a particular story?
E...
anyone else haven't heard of this before?
this is just depressing
I think some people don't know how big of a ratio that is
For comparison, the usual attacker to defender ratio is 3:1 in order for the attacking force to be successful
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=A2LKG2ygzhs
Favorite plane of the Vietnam War
A brief overview of the F-4 Phantom II as seen in the movies.
More War Movie Content: https://www.youtube.com/johnnyjohnsonesq
Johnny's second channel: https://www.youtube.com/johnnyshistoricmoviereview
Request a review: johnnyjohnsonreviews@gmail.com
Movies/Video Games Featured:
Bumblebee 2018
Sully 2016
Anadolu Kartalları 2011 (Anatoli...
We always have to keep in mind that a Documentary, after all, can tell lies and it can tell lies because it lays claim to a form of veracity which fiction doesn't.
Battle Stations: B17 Flying Fortress (War History Documentary) Profile of the B-17 Flying Fortress, the aeroplane which brought devastation to Germany as its .
The Memphis Belle: ...
suprised he used a transformer as the thumbnail
i love that scene
The F4 is my favorite jet
Phantom II, great bomber poor fighter (mainly because of sh*tty missiles)
While the reliability of early missiles in general certainly left a lot to be desired, Phantom was still a revolutionary fighter for air to air combat simply for being the first fighter to really make practical use of BVRAAMs
The (relatively) poor performance during the early years of the Vietnam War were due to a combination of many factors, not only did early AAMs have some reliability problems, but there were issues with crew training, the ROE were very restrictive, many Phantoms were caught while engaged in bombing, and North Vietnamese fighters fighting in Vietnam initially had access to far more effective fighter vectoring and command and control
Nevertheless, when engaging in dogfights on equal footing the Phantom still proved a formidable aircraft, and as American command and control facilities improved towards the end of the war (allowing greater usage of the BVR capabilities, and vastly diminishing the chance of North Vietnamese fighter ambushes) and the reliability of missiles improved, Phantoms on CAP achieved similar success rates to Sabres in Korea
Ultimately when the kinks were worked out of it, the Phantom-Sparrow system was not only effective, it revolutionized air combat
And if you look at Israeli Phantoms at the same time period instead, you'd find them smacking Arabian MiGs left, right and center
One of the more famous (albeit disputed) examples:
https://youtu.be/8csYNXtJgbc
Thank you to Wondrium for sponsoring today’s video! Signup for your FREE trial to Wondrium here: http://ow.ly/O9Z550MESoE
The Yom-Kippur war begins with a massed aerial assault by Egyptian MiGs against Israeli military targets, including Israeli airfields in the Sinai Peninsula. A wing of 28 Egyptian MiG-17s and MiG-21s arrive at Ofir Air Base,...
The Air Battle Of Ophir is a classic dogfighting tale. The surprise attack. The insurmountable odds. The outrageous kill ratio. It has the lot.
Curiously it has somehow avoided the same kind of detailed scrutiny that similar tales from other wars have attracted. In this video I tell the story of the battle with as much cross referencing of sour...
One of the best gen 3 fighter I guest, but it really shock me when I check out the warload
Events like this and some others (particularly famously in the Winter War and Continuation War) kinda demonstrate how at a certain point in air combat it could actually be detrimental to have too large of a force overmatch without effective command and control, since it was would be basically impossible for the Migs to actually find the Phantoms in all the chaos
more than 18,000 pounds (8,400 kg) of weapons on nine external hardpoints, thats A LOT
literally four times payload of the BTD destroyer, two times of skyraider
Anyways when discussing the Air War in Vietnam one of the key things to understand about it is that the VPAF never actually seriously challenged the USAF's and USN's ability to operate freely over North Vietnam, so the US for much of the war kinda put the minimum effort in suppressing the VPAF necessary to keep the loss rates down rather than actually setting out to sweep them entirely from the sky, in favor of just flying more ground strike sorties. The USAF was for the first few years largely willing to accept what casualties were occurring in favor of simply flying more strike sorties, and when they weren't you had events like Operation Bolo
That's the power of two GE J79s for you
From Jaba in another server:
No factor during the A2A engagements in Vietnam mattered more than advance warning. 81% of US aircraft lost in A2A combat were lost while unawares or without any reaction time—the other factors of training, missile technology, and shudders guns were a drop in the bucket compared to simply knowing the enemy existed before the shooting began. On the rare occasions when the playing field was "level"—when the VPAF actually tried to stop a US strike package, rather than opportunistically picking off a single plane from a strike package—the results were lopsidedly in the USAF and USN favor.
What gave the USN the edge over the USAF for much of the war was not better training, or Top Gun, or anything similar—though undoubtedly training did need improvement—it was the presence of seaborne USN radars that gave early warning of incoming MiGs, a tool the USAF didn't have until Teaball went online in mid-1972 (whereupon the kill ratio quadrupled in the USAF's favor—and even then, a majority of the 6 losses were during periods when Teaball was offline).
The VPAF flight controllers had the luxury of only vectoring in fighters when a kill seemed very likely to result from the ambush, but this came at the cost of any hope of contesting any individual strike package, lest the disastrous head-on battles repeat themselves. Of 47 engagements during the 1969 Rolling Thunder campaign where a US aircraft was lost in A2A combat, in 89% the MiG started from a position of advantage due to the "home turf" advantage the MiGs enjoyed from the North Vietnamese radar network. Just two US aircraft were lost when starting an engagement from a neutral position. When it was a "fair" fight, the US pilot was likely to win—so the VPAF controllers made sure to pick as few fair fights as possible, even if it meant picking fewer fights in general.
what jet engine thrust does to a mf
Jaba is probably citing this article https://www.historynet.com/great-kill-ratio-debate/ and Sayers' other work, one addenda I'd add on is that it turns out one of the key sources for Teaball, in addition to the EC-121s and ground based radars we already knew about, was actually real time decryption of VPAF fighter control communications by the NSA
That being said I wouldn't read into it quite as far in terms of SA being the overwhelming factor, certainly the vast majority of US losses were due to the poor SA picture, but there were missed opportunities for A2A kills caused by poor missile reliability, ROE, and the pilots not fully understanding the capabilities of their weapons systems
Nevertheless, Teaball, and a few other contemporary programs like Combat Tree (a top secret device flown on some Phantoms that allowed them to interrogate VPAF flgiht transponders), gave the air war in 1972 a dramatically different flavor from Rolling Thunder
In a headon fight the Phantom can detect the Mig before the Mig can so it instantly stopped being a fair fight
But I seen a bunch of cases where the pilot had a perfectly good shot only for the missile to fail
Aerodynamics can be overcome with enough thrust
-the phantoms motto
#OTD in 1944, USS Missouri (BB-63) was launched. The "Mighty Mo" would become the last battleship commissioned by the U.S. Navy and later serve as the platform upon which Japan surrendered. She was decommissioned in 1955, recommissioned in 1986 and decommissioned again in 1992.
In the spring of 1941, Britain was in the midst of an Atlantic crisis. German submarine, surface and air attacks were sinking merchant ships by the hundred. If those losses continued, Britain could lose a quarter of its fleet within the year and might just be starved out of the war.
Yet, just a few years later, everything had changed. By 1943,...
Honestly the F4 is one of the less egregious examples of this
The Nighthawk straight up can't fly straight without a computer stabilization system
Doctrinally the mig isn’t meant to spot the Phantom first
That’s the job of GCI, which the VPAF used masterfully throughout the war
It’s not really possible to discuss the air war in Vietnam without discussing Vietnamese GCI and yet it is ignored constantly
The mig-21 doesn’t need to have a better radar when GCI spotted the strike package before it even entered VPAF airspace and is vectoring the intercept to have an advantageous position
This is why the VPAF consistently managed to get the drop on US pilots, it wasn’t because of a lack of situational awareness (although that was sometimes lacking in USAF planes, the USN was better off) it was because the VPAF was being directed to intercept at vectors where detection was difficult to impossible
This of course ignores that most of the VPAF was flying the mig-17 which, while it could hold its own in a short dogfight with the Phantom, it was entirely reliant on GCI because it was woefully incapable of a sustained engagement with the Phantom
The mig-17 holds its own in the horizontal but the moment the fight goes vertical it loses every advantage it has, the Phantom just needs to punch the afterburners and come back around
I mean yesn't, VPAF GCI during the last year of Rolling Thunder and during Linebacker was certainly excellent, but when American fighters had a similar degree of information, the Phantom's ability to make those long ranged missile shots meant MIGCAP fighters were able to basically neuter the VPAF, during the last 6 months of the war while Teaball was online the USAF only lost 3 aircraft to Migs
This may have been true at the start of the war, but even the Mig-19s were starting to be phased out during Linebacker
And since the Mig-17 was subsonic, unlike the Mig-19 and Mig-21, even in the bad old days towards the end of Rolling Thunder, they were still getting killed by Phantoms at a quite favorable rate since it was difficult for VPAF GCI to actually set up intercepts against the supersonic phantoms
They will figure out that you can add bed like cruise ship
Series
- Episode 1 https://youtu.be/wo3Bn2QF8Nw
- Episode 3 https://youtu.be/4BQ-n_CYg9M
- Episode 4 https://youtu.be/R2L8-7nHcI8
Check out my books
- Ju 87 Stuka - http://stukabook.com
- STG-44 Assault Platoon - http://sturmzug.com
- German Panzer Company 1941 - http://www.hdv470-7.com/
- Achtung Panzer? Zur Panzerwaffe der Wehrmacht - http:/...
CITIZENS OF HISTORY! Decorate your walls with a Simple History Premium Print today: https://electrify.art/collections/simple-history and don't miss out—grab a 25% discount now!
In this video, we dive into one of the most compelling comparisons of World War II armored warfare: the American M4 Sherman tank and the German Panther tank. These legen...
Thank you Sipher
lategame boss rush most likely
Carrier spam
Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/ahoy
Merch: https://ahoy-shop.fourthwall.com/
00:00 Introduction
00:55 Surgical History
01:34 Industrial Use
03:04 Military Use
03:29 Use in Horror
05:11 The Chainsaw in Video Games
09:39 Conclusion
Benito Mussolini led Italy to war in 1940, in part to build an Italian Empire and in part to side with his ally Adolf Hitler. What would follow would be a disastrous campaign on all fronts, marked by heavy losses and easy defeats despite having superior numbers. How did these bold ambitions translate into being nothing but a burden on the Nazi w...
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=H7Op2NhIlkA&pp=ygUOc2ltcGxlIGhpc3Rvcnk%3D
My favorite Leopard tank
Thanks War Thunder for sponsoring today's video! Be sure to check out War Thunder on PC & Consoles: https://playwt.link/simplehistory2024 and Android & IOS: https://wtm.game/simplehistory to receive a massive bonus pack, including multiple premium vehicles! It’s available for a limited time only, so be quick!
Germany earned a reputation for imp...
The tank battles of El Alamein saw two legendary commanders face off against each other; Bernard Montgomery and Erwin Rommel. The outcome of these battles would prove to be decisive in the North African Campaign of the Second World War.
War Stories is your one stop shop for all things military history. From Waterloo to Verdun, we'll be bringin...
Michael Wittmann was considered as one of the greatest Nazi tank commanders of WW2. Having served in the Battle of Kursk he was redeployed to Normandy soon after the D-Day landings. Receiving The Knight's Cross of the Iron Cross from Hitler himself, Wittmann was considered a cult hero with the Nazi propaganda machine embellishing his already wel...
wonder how usable the Graf Zeppelin, Aquila, and Joffre would have been if they had been built
Joffre definitely had issues with the double-ended flight deck + not enough aviation fuel
and Graf Zeppelin with over-reliance on catapults, apparently (also the fact its planes didn't have folding wings)
of course, all CV discussion hinges on the planes though, and all of the planned planes are inferior to like F6Fs

What's wrong with double end
The Ju-87s would be foldable, just not the Bf-109Ts.
As for the catapult thing, it should be possible for 109s to take off, just makes deck parking rather difficult.
🌎 Get an exclusive 15% discount on Saily data plans! Use code "sandrhoman" at checkout. Download the Saily app or go to https://saily.com/sandrhoman ⛵
Being the first to charge an army or fortress often meant certain death. The small groups of men who took on these dangerous tasks were known as “forlorn hopes.” They formed the spearhead of an ...
source: warship international through phoenix jz
no place for crash barriers is the main thing that stands out when first looking at the ship
especially when we're talking about the gigabombers
although Laté 299 or American planes would be possible in theory
http://fandavion.free.fr/LatecoereLate299.htm
Description de l'avion de combat français : Latecoere Late.299
I am a pole
One of most stupid DD ever
the destroyer attacks could no longer be executed on Bismarck in a coordinated fashion as Piorun broke all order
Piorun fucked up Admiral Vian's coordinated torpedo attack effort
Then Piorun gets scared and becomes less aggressive after Bismarck lands couple of shots close to it
One of most overpraised DD ever despite very possibly doing more damage to British
"The fact that popular narrative claims that Piorun's crew fired everything they had at Bismarck, she was the only one of Vian's destroyers that didn't launch her torpedoes"
bruh why wouldn't Vian make a torpedo attack
an unescorted battleship at night is like the perfect target for a destroyer squadron
thats standard doctrine in literally every navy
The brits would have thier revenge after the war.
Got Try Some LMNT: https://drinkLMNT.com/fatelectrician
Merch Store & ALL Other Links:
https://thefatelectrician.com/
Seriously EVERYTHING is on my website
Other channels:
The Fat Files
----------------...
because the weather was quite bad that night
bad weather is an advantage and an opportunity, since it further impairs fire control
which is what he thought, but after losing contact a few times, it turned out Bismarck could shoot them anyways and the attack had to be called off
in the end it was displayed very nicely that singular torpedo attacks against maneuvering ships are usually impossible
even from 3km
Ah yes
Because Polish crew knows better than experienced Royal Navy Admiral
Piorin's strongest aspect was her luck when Bismarck missed her by 20 yards or so
Or else "I'm a Pole" would turn to "I'm a popcorn"
famously, german AP which needs 45mm of armor to fuse was very effective against planes and DDs
also Vian was a master of ignoring orders himself, so he should have understood 
This ain't Wows
Yamato's shell literally rips through Johnston
Sure it doesn't fuse but it still rips through and creates flood
Johnston was hit by 3 shells
Bismarck was shooting in conditions of much worse visibility, against a ship that was also being buffeted by storm
no way anything more than a superficial hit (like the one on Cossack that took off a radio antenna) is landed

Bingo chart is gettign filled up nicely
Bismarck's ammo loadout being like 30% nose fuzed HE is a thing we prefer to ignore
didn't matter in the end since no hits were scored 
It did drive Piorun off. She engaged at 2245, and lost contact ~2330 as she was forced to retreat under 38cm gunfire - didn't matter is a pretty strong word.
The rest of the 4th Flotilla is responsible for the harrassing work the remaining night.
Indeed, no hits were scored. Bismarck's fire was good enough to prevent such hits from happening
Ah wait, the goal post set here is that when defending yourself you must sink everything, not prevent taking damage
Buy a Poster! https://www.historigraph.media/store
Get Early Access to Videos: https://www.patreon.com/historigraph
How many heavy gun turrets should a battleship have? A question that kept naval designers up at night for decades. At the start of the 20th century the answer was generally two. Then with the coming of the dreadnoughts ships had...
'HMS' lol
More like too many turrets.
Remind me what the heck this was?
Found this on reddit
https://www.reddit.com/r/interestingasfuck/comments/1ihlzpg/us_navy_warship_firing_a_secret_laser_weapon/
Because honestly I just wanna see this in a video game at all, AL, World of Warships, whatever, this feels like a fever dream

Its 80s tech actually lol
Tho lately you are getting lasers and powers good enough to damage drones
Idea is them being strong enough to destroy fast missiles in time
For now they work fine against slow drones
Since you know they stay still and slow for decent ammount of time
With higher powers, you can get a laser uhh "hot" enough to burn incoming missiles in time
when you are immobilized with a British fleet coming in the next morning? yes the goalpost is to sink everything
and the original part that started this is "piorun bad", not "bismarck incompetent"
don't aggro on me
Honest I can't imagine what a Northern Parliament shipgirl would like with that kind of tech
I mean... Collab characters like Ryza (Atelier Series) and Rikka (Gridman) have lasers, I feel we might have something like that in the future
If you expect a ship that goes 8kn and that only into very specific directions, that is listing to the point where auxiliary armament gets submerged, to sink everything coming at her, then you are applying unrealistic expectations. And I am calling those out.
Bismarck's goal at that point was to survive, not to sink an entire fleet. Just like when a ship comes under an aerial attack, the goal is to not take hits. Not to shoot down as many planes as possible. There is an overlap between the two goals, but they are not interchangable. And Bismarck did succeed with that goal, no hits taken.
As seen in Squid Game, this week Jonathan delves into the South Korean service rifle - the Daewoo K2.
0:00 Intro
0:15 Daewoo K2
2:10 Firearm Features
7:20 Adjustable Gas Regulator
8:15 Firing Mode: Cow
9:20 Magazine Release
10:54 Features Continued
11:30 Disassembly
17:50 Conclusions
20:47 Outro
Link to Lithgow Small Arms Museum: https://ww...
All the best firearms history channels streaming to all major devices:
weaponsandwar.tv
For political reasons, India decided to adopt the 7.62mm NATO cartridge when it needed to replace its No1 MkIII SMLE bolt action rifles with a modern self-loader. They chose the FN FAL as the rifle to adopt, but wanted a license to produce it domestically at...
This video was made possible thanks to everyone on the Simple History Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/simplehistory
In this video, we dive into one of the most fascinating comparisons of World War II naval warfare: the USS Enterprise and the IJN Shokaku. These two formidable aircraft carriers represented the pinnacle of naval power for their r...
yes, obviously no ship in existence could have survived that situation
but my goal was not to bait you, it was to bait krem who was flaming glorious polish patriots
obviously I am not saying "german ship should easily have used its laser cannons to defeat entire british fleet :madge:"
Honestly, this could be turned into an Ace Combat 7 mod so easily
<@&472236072743600148> scammer in heah
the one in the rudder is a middle finger
Stop leaving yourself vulnerable to data breaches and brokers. Go to my sponsor https://aura.com/intel to get a 14-day free trial and see if any of your data has been exposed
In this documentary we look at the Iraqi High Command's perspective of Operation Iraqi Freedom - the Invasion of Iraq 2003. How did the Iraqi commanders planned to win the...
Mhm
Here’s wondering if the shell was traveling base first trough the water to get this hit
incredible that like half of these happened to hit in very lethal spots
all the underwater hits (mainly on the machinery spaces even), 3 shells to turrets, 2 hits directly on secondary battery guns, tons of hits on the superstructure too that probably damaged directors
although, after 20 hits it's pretty likely you'll have hit something important
there is a bit of a statistical oddity in that hits in general are already a low odds event, but even then they tend to cluster into spots where they really mean something
I mean battleship v battleship shoot offs aren't a daily occurrence either
Yes I don't wanna call Kirishima a "battleship"
Then call her a battlecruiser which she was previously classified as?
yeah, like exeter getting hit only twice in 2 battles with the IJN, but both hits being crippling hits to the machinery spaces
I don't care about what poles say or scream lol
I'm against exaggerating actions of her
Because as you pointed out, she is "patriotic"
So it's much easier for a Polish or say Poland fan to exaggerate her actions against the historical facts for the sake of sentimental love of Poland or memes
Didn't the Japanese classify her as a battleship post-refit?
Battlecruiser > battleship > fast battleship
The IJN called her that so she is that
I forgot if the captain survived the barage
Barrage
He should have
Wasn't Kirishimas captain the dude that commanded the battle of Manila
Oh yea, Sanji Iwabuchi
I'm not sure if he was on Kirishima at the time but he survived Guadalcanal, and subsequently went a bit mad apparently
Because he wanted to defend Manila to the death to redeem his honor or something
I mean
Losing your whole battleship doesnt seem very
Great
Yea but his decision to fight to the death ended up in what was the most fierce urban warfare in the pacific... and took a quarter million people with him

Hi there, does someone know what type of French Medal this is? It was given to my Great-Grandfather, at least according to my grandpa, which checks out since it's the right family name.
From looking around it looks like an honour medal for civilian personnel of the defense ministry
The back clearly says commerce ministry
Didn’t see the back, sorry
found it, thanks for the help still, it's a honour medal for the trade minsitry (only 71 issued from 1922 to 1937)
Ah
tried to look why he got, or why would a police commisioner get one, but there is no registry for those
You could possibly talk with a local government office or something and see if they have any information on it. Most countries and their cities will keep records on stuff like that. Usually.
he'd be rolling in his grave if he saw your pfp lol
That's actually crazy
Prinz Eugen was technically French

that was pure cope
but the designation "battlecruiser" was obsolete at the time anyways, so it's whatever
by the time of WW2, I think the Kongos were the only real battlecruisers in the world, besides maybe Yavuz
oh and besides Renown and Repulse of course
yeah true, and by that logic, Bismarck is 35,000 tons, and the Panzer force is actually a very nice fleet of agricultural tractors
Japan's late war pistol
The idea was for people to build them at home so that factories getting bombed won't cut off firearm production
looks like something out of Fallout
IJN Mishima
this is actually still Admiral Seniavin
Ah I see I see
There's Mishima
Pre-dreadnought era are some of my favorite ships
Along with later ironclads
Basically everything unique and funky
absolutely
I love them all
and ironclads
they should add more in AL
I want more proper Dreadnoughts
Yeah, NJ, Musashi and Zweimarck are cool
But I need more of the pinnacle of "Big gun, thick armor, fast boat"
And even more with the names. Revenge and Kaiser need to judt have that Aura
I still have no idea wtf Zweimarck is
Either a copium refit of Bismarck or it's own class no damn clue
Weirdest justification to make Bismarck UR I guess
Normandie, Languedoc
✨
Black and white footage of WWII Japanese Navy Soldiers practicing Bayonet and Sword fencing.
You can see them wearing the half armour. The body armour "Dou" and "Tare" only covers the left half of the body.
But interesting, even the swordsman also wears the half-armour. Perhaps it's due to convenience? By right, the swordsman should be usin...
IJN, not sure exactly when
Its literally just Bismarck. She still sports the 10.5 C/33 mounts
Combat Instructions, shall we say?
Series
- Episode 1 https://youtu.be/wo3Bn2QF8Nw
- Episode 2 https://youtu.be/nRdeK7xw5wM
- Episode 4 https://youtu.be/R2L8-7nHcI8
Check out my books
- Ju 87 Stuka - http://stukabook.com
- STG-44 Assault Platoon - http://sturmzug.com
- German Panzer Company 1941 - http://www.hdv470-7.com/
- Achtung Panzer? Zur Panzerwaffe der Wehrmacht - http:/...
Why did Japan leave tanks such as the Chi-nu on the home islands rather than deploy them somewhere?
Tosa
yeah it's some copium for the Wehraboos
at least Wargambling tries to write fanfiction to explain what their ships are, devs didn't do that with Zweimark
where are they going to use them where they are worth the fuel cost for a nation under constant submarine attack?
tanks aren't that needed in China, and they aren't too useful in Pacific jungle islands
so better to keep the tanks (which aren't that good anyways) in reserve as a last resort, instead of relying on them
don't give WeeGee any ideas... they will add T10 "AL Bismarck Zwei", who magically has 3 times better maneuverability than Bismarck, and a magic button that gives it 30km secondary range after taking 3 shells worth of potential damage
and also the button does the Wisconsin MBRB and consumable boost as well
price: 600 euros through lootboxes to get access to the dockyard missions to have the chance to win an auction for the ship
On 25 March 1945 the 'Mighty Eighth' sent
its entire bomber force (although only 243
B-24s made it to their designated targets)
against oil refineries in Germany, and
amongst their powerful fighter escort were
Thunderbolts from the 56th FG. Maj George
E Bostwick, CO of the 63rd FS, was flying
P-47M 44-21160 "Devastatin Deb" when
his flight engag...
1117
Oh god
Bismarck can be a Tier 11 if you make put her on cruiser slot
i mean there's Siegfried, just one turret short at T9
I hope the movie won't be hot garbage
The Philippines is one place. The Japanese even deployed their only tank destroyer (the Ho-ni) there
Here's some more info on it
https://x.com/Jerry_duy_I/status/1888242357763776939
It's a novel adaptation
M4A1 with infantry sleds
Go to https://ground.news/TOR to stay fully informed. Subscribe through my link and get 40% off unlimited access this month only.
At the beginning of the surprise German offensive that would become known as the Battle of the Bulge, Team Desobry of the US 10th Armored Division must desperately hold onto the town of Noville for as long as possibl...
This is a rare, never-before-seen silent film from the Battle for Königsberg in March of 1945.
The film offers an incredibly unique and rare perspective of the Battle of Königsberg by Volkssturm militiamen, and it gives us a idea of how desperate the situation really was for Germany during the final months of WW2. Since there was absolutely no ...
WeeGee announced a "new large cruiser line" in waterline, so it might be panzerschiffe
and the supership will be Bismarck, the most played ship in the game, repackaged
surely
I'm surprised this ain't UR event yet in AL
Likely one of largest "cruiser" ever
KW45
45,000 tons, 984' long, 111' wide
36-37 knots
8-380mm/47 (4x2),
12-150mm/55
4x3
8 105mm
(4x2), 8-533mm TT
203mm belt
She reach this speed by using 300,000hp
I see these as German super Kongos
300,000 horse powers
That's more horses on her than a Nimitz class nuclear carrier
How in the name of god were the Germans planning to propell that thing
they weren't, now please don't send me to the front, I am useful see, here is sketch for 45k ton ship with 8'' belt
I mean at least they were planning to do it with 4 screws
I would have preferred 5 with such enormous horse power but
I doubt Hitler would have known about any of that lmao
Check out Crossout now! Use my link to sign up and get a massive, free bonus pack for PC: https://playxo.link/greendotaviation
🟢 Did you like this video? Support the channel and get exclusive perks on Patreon! https://www.patreon.com/GreenDotAviation
Follow me! 👇✈️👇
https://discord.gg/w7bZWQARJv
https://www.instagram.com/greendot_aviation/
htt...
"super Kongo" you mean Hood? 
knowing WG, they will change the main armament to Brandenburg guns, 4x3 305/56
and then add some ahistorical armor like they did with Agir
actually, KW50 is basically just a modern German Hood
interesting
It is 5 screw
Oh, it is 5 screw.... didn't see the middle one
meanwhile glorious soviet project 24 battleship easily beats puny germans (bait used to believe)
I always said picking a side on the eastern front was like picking a side in a gang war, but the gang members have down syndrome
The eastern front was a choice between genocidal socialist governments

Huh, another person who believes the Nazis were socialist just because they had the word in their party name
There was a socialist wing of the party, led by Rohm, but they all got purged in 1934, shortly after Hitler took power
if anything the Nazis were utterly beholden to companies lmao
they involved private companies on everything from tank designing (the Army only gave out desired specifications while the companies get to fill in how they reach said requirements with whatever means they can use) to making Holocaust ovens
Very socialist of the Nazis to checks notes initiate mass privatisation
It's hard to say they were "socialist" but that's a whole 'nother issue
But yea it was a choice between two terrible governments
I mean that's not debatable, the Nazis aren't socialists ever since Night of the Long Knives and the purging of the Strasserist faction
Rohm, who is uhh... probably best described as a swastika made of cocks
lmao, neither side was "socialist" in anything but name
although I suppose states like the USSR are the end result of socialism, so it's not technically wrong
not sure why stalin fanboys aren't treated with the same disdain we treat the kanyes of the internet
The only good thing he did was being a good meat shield against the Germans lmao
Dear god, please not the "human wave" stuff
its been a while since there's any human waves discourses round these parts
LoL no
Muh college professor said that real socialism was never tried
Let's not get into that debate
Series
- Episode 1 https://youtu.be/wo3Bn2QF8Nw
- Episode 2 https://youtu.be/nRdeK7xw5wM
- Episode 3 https://youtu.be/4BQ-n_CYg9M
Check out my books
- Ju 87 Stuka - http://stukabook.com
- STG-44 Assault Platoon - http://sturmzug.com
- German Panzer Company 1941 - http://www.hdv470-7.com/
- Achtung Panzer? Zur Panzerwaffe der Wehrmacht - http:/...
When you really think about it, Japan and Italy both had a lot of similarities post ww1 and going into ww2
They both:
-Were on the winning side of ww1
-Gained a little bit of land
-Were seen as rising powers
-Participated in the allied intervention in Russia
-Fought against countries or factions who didn't have a lot of tanks (the only exception to this is Italy fighting the Republicans during the Spainish Civil war)
-Modernized their standard issue rifle by shortening it and giving it a new round with a spitzer bullet
-Had a weak industrial base which hampered their military campaigns
Two countries that really shouldn't have joined WW1
Join us on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/TimeGhostHistory
Or join the TimeGhost Army directly at: https://timeghost.tv/signup/
Check out our TimeGhost History YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/c/timeghost
World War Two: https://www.youtube.com/@WorldWarTwo
Follow WW2 Day by Day on Instagram: @ww2_day_by_day
Follow TimeGhost History o...
T34t34t34t34t34
the word outright exists to describe Nazi policies
it first appears in English in 1923 in a single article describing German economic actions post-WW1
then properly gets popular in the 30s for describing Nazi economic policies
then dies out before roaring back in the 70s thanks to Thatcher's Britain
I feel like people don't know what a human wave is
the existence of a doctrine doesn't mean said doctrine is executed well
Soviet offenses would start off according to a doctrinally "sound" plan, but without frequent operational pauses would quickly devolve into just shoving as much men and material into a perceived weakpoint or breakthrough as possible
Great. people nowadays not only confuse with Syndicalism and Socialism but also Nazis and Socialism, D'Annunzio is crying his heart out LMAO
Wouldn't be the first time dictators used misleading names for their states; see: Democratic People's Republic of Korea
The old grant strategy of we have more irishmen in new york than the south has gunpowder
That's called attrition. And it's currently being used in a certain part of the world
Also i feel like people misunderstand Grant
scrolling up and... sigh
Korean Air early history is troubling, Flight 801 is just sad to me.
I always think Flight 8509 the "last straw" that forced the entire company to change for the better.
Grant is what union army needed. A man willing to fight. Hooker was willing to fight but was scared after one or two loses, Burnside was punching above his wieght and McClellan was too much of a father. No better a man to win a drunken brawl than a drunk....
And yes grants drinking was over exaggerated but the saying kind of fits
The turn after the wilderness tells you the type of general grant was
- Two countries that really shouldn't have joined WW2
aka. russian doctrine for the past 300 years
nothing new here
I mean I wouldn't say that at all
That's certainly not true for the Great Northern War, the Napoleonic War, the or the Crimean War
And arguably not even true for WWII also
and what cleve said also isn't human waves, that's still basically the same thing Germany does, try to funnel men into narrow points in the enemy lines and break through
Human wave is more like the people's volunteer army of the people liberation army. Where it was a broad front sent, instead of cutting a steak with knife you cut it with a tenderizing mallet
but even that isn't one of them
what the Chinese did was classic shock attack by infiltrating enemy lines after scouting out weak points
its the same thing Germany played around with in 1918 and what the Japanese applied in WWII
Learn something everyday, thank you
its not even that different from what the major powers used in WWII since the principle is still exploiting weakpoints, its just that the Chinese was far less mechanized and they were fighting in shit terrains so they had to use leggy guys, and when they failed to get the surprise or the breakthrough they tend to eat shit and lose a lot of men
and in fairness, the Chinese leadership were definitely willing to send in a LOT of men to a perceived breach if they think it'll lead to major progress or close to winning an engagement, costs be damned
that was the intention
it was not the practice to an utter lack of tactical command and control
like how the intention of the T-34 and the practice of the T-34 are vastly different
I mean I agree there would be cases where breakdown in operational capabilities would end up making them look like they do human wave attacks, but I wouldn't indict the entire system anymore than I would indict Crassus as the model of Roman system due to his performance at Carrhae
since Crassus walked in into a trap laid by Surena almost willingly despite the warnings of his allies
And most of all, Artabazes the king of Armenia gave him courage, for he came to his camp with six thousand horsemen. These were said to be the king's guards and couriers; but he promised ten thousand mail-clad horsemen besides, and thirty thousand footmen, to be maintained at his own cost. 2 And he tried to persuade Crassus to invade Parthia by way of Armenia, for thus he would not only lead his forces along in the midst of plenty, which the king himself would provide, but would also proceed with safety, confronting the cavalry of the Parthians, in which lay their sole strength, with many mountains, and continuous crests, and regions where the horse p373 could not well serve. Crassus was tolerably well pleased with the king's zeal and with the splendid reinforcements which he offered, but said he should march through Mesopotamia, where he had left many brave Romans. 3 Upon this, the Armenian rode away.
Now, as Crassus was taking his army across the Euphrates at Zeugma,31 many extraordinary peals of thunder crashed about them, and many flashes of lightning also darted in their faces, and a wind, half mist and half hurricane, fell upon their raft, breaking it up and shattering it in many places. 4 The place where he was intending to encamp was also smitten by two thunderbolts. And one of the general's horses, richly caparisoned, violently dragged its groom along with it into the river and disappeared beneath the waves. It is said also that the first eagle which was raised aloft, faced about of its own accord.32 5 Besides all this, it happened that when their rations were distributed to the soldiers after the crossing of the river, lentils and salt came first, which are held by the Romans to be tokens of mourning, and are set out as offerings to the dead. Moreover, Crassus himself, while haranguing his men, let fall a phrase which terribly confounded them. He said, namely, that he should destroy the bridge over the river, that not one of them might return. And although he ought, as soon as he perceived the strangeness of his expression, to have recalled it and made his meaning clear to his timorous hearers, he was too obstinate to do so. 6 And finally, when he p375 was making the customary sacrifice of purification for the army, and the seer placed the viscera in his hands, he let them fall to the ground; then, seeing that the bystanders were beyond measure distressed at the occurrence, he smiled and said: "Such is old age; but no weapon, you may be sure, shall fall from its hands."
no, it's absolutely an indictment of their whole system considering the total lack of field radios for P"V"LA units
After this, he marched along the river with seven legions of men-at‑arms, nearly four thousand horsemen, and about as many light-armed troops. Some of his scouts now came back from their explorations, and reported that the country was destitute of men, but that they had come upon the tracks of many horses which had apparently wheeled about and fled from pursuit. Wherefore Crassus himself was all the more confident, and his soldiers went so far as to despise the Parthians utterly, believing that they would not come to close quarters. 2 But, nevertheless, Cassius once more had a conference with Crassus, and advised him above all things to recuperate his forces in one of the garrisoned cities, until he should get some sure information about the enemy; but if not this, then to advance to Seleucia along the river. For in this way the transports would keep them abundantly supplied with provisions by putting in at their successive encampments, and, by having the river to prevent their being surrounded, they would always fight their enemies on even terms and face to face.
While Crassus was still investigating and considering these matters, there came an Arab chieftain, Ariamnes by name, a crafty and treacherous man, and one who proved to be, of all the mischiefs which fortune combined for the destruction of the p377 Romans, the greatest and most consummate. 2 Some of the soldiers who had served under Pompey in these parts knew that the fellow had profited by the kindness of that commander and was thought to be a friend of Rome; but now, with the knowledge of the royal generals, he tried to work his way into the confidence of Crassus, to see if he could turn him aside as far as possible from the river and the foothills, and bring him down into a boundless plain where he could be surrounded. For nothing was farther from the thoughts of the Parthians than to attack the Romans in front. 3 Accordingly, coming to Crassus, the Barbarian (and he was a plausible talker, too) lauded Pompey as his benefactor, and complimented Crassus on his forces. But then he criticised him for wasting time in delays and preparations, as if it was arms that he needed, and not hands and the swiftest of feet to follow after men who had for some time been trying to snatch up their most valuable goods and slaves and fly with them into Scythia or Hyrcania. 4 "And yet," said he, "if you intend to fight, you ought to hasten on before all the king's forces are concentrated and he has regained his courage; since, for the time being, Surena and Sillaces have been thrown forward to sustain your pursuit, but the king is nowhere to be seen."
damn I actually forgot how much of an idiot Crassus was
complex infiltration attacks which are supposed to be organized, at night, by sight and sound signals
do you see the problem?
there were many signals that the parthians were up to no good and he's getting into a trap
and he ended up missing them all
hile the Romans were in consternation at this din, suddenly their enemies dropped the coverings of their armour, and were seen to be themselves blazing in helmets and breastplates, their Margianian steel glittering keen and bright, and their horses clad in plates of bronze and steel. 2 Surena himself, however, was the tallest and fairest of them all, although his effeminate beauty did not well correspond to his reputation for valour, but he was dressed more in the Median fashion, with painted face and parted hair, while the rest of the Parthians still wore their hair long and bunched over their foreheads, in Scythian fashion, to make themselves look formidable. 3 And at first they purposed to charge upon the Romans with their long spears, and throw their front ranks into confusion; but when they saw the depth of their formation, where shield p389 was locked with shield, and the firmness and composure of the men, they drew back, and while seeming to break their ranks and disperse, they surrounded the hollow square in which their enemy stood before he was aware of the manoeuvre. 4 And when Crassus ordered his light-armed troops to make a charge, they did not advance far, but encountering a multitude of arrows, abandoned their undertaking and ran back for shelter among the men-at‑arms, among whom they caused the beginning of disorder and fear, for these now saw the velocity and force of the arrows, which fractured armour, and tore their way through every covering alike, whether hard or soft.
But the Parthians now stood at long intervals from one another and began to shoot their arrows from all sides at once, not with any accurate aim (for the dense formation of the Romans would not suffer an archer to miss even if he wished it), but making vigorous and powerful shots from bows which were large and mighty and curved so as to discharge their missiles with great force. 6 At once, then, the plight of the Romans was a grievous one; for if they kept their ranks, they were wounded in great numbers, and if they tried to come to close quarters with the enemy, they were just as far from effecting anything and suffered just as much. For the Parthians shot as they fled, and next to the Scythians, they do this most effectively; and it is a very clever thing to seek safety while still fighting, and to take away the shame of flight.
and of course he lost in son trying to make a decisive engagement with the Parthians a reality
ow as long as they had hopes that the enemy would exhaust their missiles and desist from battle or fight at close quarters, the Romans held p391 out; but when they perceived that many camels laden with arrows were at hand, from which the Parthians who first encircled them took a fresh supply, then Crassus, seeing no end to this, began to lose heart, and sent messengers to his son with orders to force an engagement with the enemy before he was surrounded; for it was his wing especially which the enemy were attacking and surrounding with their cavalry, in the hope of getting in his rear. 2 Accordingly, the young man took thirteen hundred horsemen, of whom a thousand had come from Caesar, five hundred archers, and eight cohorts of the men-at‑arms who were nearest him, and led them all to the charge. But the Parthians who were trying to envelop him, either because, as some say, they encountered marshes, or because they were manoeuvring to attack Publius as far as possible from his father, wheeled about and made off.
complete mismanagement of the entire situation
and you know, while in the long run Carrhae didn't massively weaken the Roman hegemony it was still an embarrassing affair
I mean, what will happen has Crassus actually follow the Armenian advice and succeed or even the case that he failed, Crassus managed to get away?
Would the Triumvirate still stand or Ceasar and Pompey will capitalize on Crassus failure to get more concessions from him.
if he lived he probably would have slid into irrelevance imo
he was already getting outshone by Pompey and Caesar
So the Civil War is inevitable?
yeah, Pompey was plotting already by that point. I would guess Crassus prolly would back Caesar since iirc he didn't like Pompey while he was pretty chummy with Caesar and Caesar owed a ton of money to him
Oh right, Crassus bankrolled Ceasar political and military career
yeah pretty much
Ah, wasn’t Crassus son promised to Ceasar Daughter? The one that later married Pompey?
Hmm, in a case where the Civil War happened like in our timeline but Crassus still alive and support Ceasar, what could he ask more from Ceasar when he assume the dictator role?
Another chance at the Parthian? Bc in our timeline Anthony pretty much try to do it in a smaller scale, and while it still failed, it isn’t as disastrous as Crassus one.
well he was insanely greedy so I assume Caesar could satisfy him with governorship of rich provinces
or several monetary concessions
paying his debt would be a start probably
Would the debt carry over to Augustus?
As part of his inheritance to Ceasar estate?
idk anything about Roman debt inheritance law so I can't say
Support us and get 40% off Nebula: https://go.nebula.tv/the-great-war
Watch 16 Days in Berlin on Nebula: https://nebula.tv/videos/16-days-in-berlin-01-prologue-the-beginning-of-the-end?ref=the-great-war
The ongoing Israel-Palestine conflict has its roots in another war more than a century ago. When the First World War began in 1914, the ter...
Was going to ping the mods, but it appears they've detected and deleted the post
I'm not an expert on the American civil war but I heard that Burnside didn't want to be promoted and he even said that he shouldn't
Yes, Burnside warned that was grossly unread for the command. Plus his command was poisoned by McClellan loyalists in core leadership and poor communication with his common staff. The fact that he totally fooled Lee right before the cluster... that the battle of fredericksburg should be commended
Just execution beyond thay was beyond poor.
But one thing is for certain, he had a killer mustache
Fredericksburg would’ve looked a lot differently if his pontoons would’ve been delivered on time by halleck
So much so, we have sideburns for a reason
Yes
<@&472236072743600148> usual stuff
Ping admins for scam messages please.
/ban 1339689952736313417
mastertrading_class#0 got banned.
gotcha
Bruh
I think it is weird that South Korea might have more T-80 than North Korea
No, we don't.
All the T-80Us Korea acquired from Russia was retired and either broken up for parts or converted to test targets
The Russo-Ukraine conflict was the nail in the coffin since it became impossible to get parts for it
#OTD in 2002, Royal Marines accidentally invaded Spain during a landing exercise. The marines thought they had reached the British Overseas Territory of Gibraltar until Spanish fisherman informed them that they were on the wrong side of the border. The marines then beat a hasty retreat.
To think you're about to do some training exercises, only to be told you landed on the wrong side of the border. Well at least they did what would be considered a quick extraction of sorts since that was the case there

The problem is North Korea have none
😭
Get Task Force Admiral here: https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/microprose/task-force-admiral-limited-first-team-physical-edition?ref=4ttnka
Wishlist on Steam: https://store.steampowered.com/app/1281220/Task_Force_Admiral__Vol1_American_Carrier_Battles/
TFA footage provided by J.P. Ferré: https://youtube.com/@jpferre?si=EurfWdc4_qtA_7rF
Che...
In this video we look at what the Germans reported about the IS-2 in their documents. We look at initial reports before the IS-2 was encountered and then at various assessments from first engagements to technical analysis.
Thanks to Jens Wehner @MTGJW for providing me with his script & sources.
Disclosure: I was invited by Militärhistorische...
Dive bomber tactics evolved during the war to ease the training of new aircrew, eliminating the pull up step
who would win, a 10 minute yt video, or a single frame from a doujin
Sauce?
This video was made possible thanks to everyone on the Simple History Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/simplehistory
Are you one of those weirdos who think serial killers are just fascinating? Us too! Turns out, quite a few used wartime chaos and blackouts to commit their crimes. But these killers have flown under the radar in history due to al...
Prints/patches/shirts from the show:
https://candrsenal.com/shop/
If you enjoy this content and want to see more, please consider supporting us at:
https://www.patreon.com/CandRsenal
https://playeur.com/c/candrsenal
Othais and Mae delve into the story of this classic. Complete with history, function, and live fire demonstration.
C&Rsenal pre...
Tomb is discovered in 2022 but only identified now
Happy 85th anniversary to the Kriegsmarine's most successful operation 
When Germany beat itself
If you haven't watched it. you should all watch "Battle 360"
The attack on Pearl Harbor, the entry of the United States into World War II, the Marshall Islands Raid, and the Doolittle Raid.
Isn’t T-80U is Kontakt-5 equipped?
Iirc, what SK have is not even watered down export model but Guard tier level of equipment
Operation Cottage. One of the most humiliating "battles" in WW2. Between the US, Canada, and Japan.
Thanks to my Patreons:
https://www.patreon.com/masterofroflness
Discord: https://discord.gg/g2A92uCz6N
Tik Tok: https://www.tiktok.com/@themasterofroflness
Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/masterofroflness
Twitter: https://twitter.com/MasterRof...
Yo, that's a sick ride, how long till they start selling them?
SS united states went under philly bridge
RIP to peak ocean liner
There will never be a ship like her again
On the 2nd of August, 1990 Iraq invaded Kuwait. Saddam Hussein’s forces conquered the country within a matter of days. But they would soon suffer a stunning reversal.
Using cutting-edge warfighting technology, a US-led coalition crushed the Iraqis from the skies, and drove them from Kuwait in the space of just 100 hours. It was one of the most...
The Regia Marina was better in every regard
Not saying much
That's not really an achievement
I mean in complete fairness the Regia Marina did semi-contested the Mediterranean for 3 years and kept the African supply line open
That's already far better than utterly failing to close the Arctic route
I mean it's not hard to beat a country whose navy was severely limited because of another war they lost 20 years ago
Nachi's seaplane with Haguro in the background
Should have been a German ship
They were on the winning side of ww1
... Germany I mean
Oh sorry
The "set my hangar on fire"
Nine ships sunk by German torpedoes during World War I have been found off the coast of Morocco, experts announced.
https://search.app/vL9mj5DkeDo42dtz9
never underestimate the power of autism 
go to 1:54:37 on the SS united states towing stream
timestamped link alert https://www.youtube.com/live/FVhF-q0nfjs?si=ARwju7i6oXAiAZtg&t=6876
The SS United States is scheduled to leave Philadelphia on Wednesday after several setbacks and weather delays. Christened in 1952, the SS United States was ...
I kinda have questions
When Bismarck sunk,there lot of survivor in the water,Dorsetshire and Maori try to take them in,but a look out in HMS Dorsetshire say they spotted what could be a u boat periscope,so they both need to go
Did any of you think a u boat would torpedo the ship that trying to help their countrymen?
SS united states is outside virginia
vinik no 6
i'm scared because what happened to SS america
What site is that
Probably not, just an excuse for the brits to leave them. Revenge for hood. Remember the brits left alot in the water at Falkland in the great war
Sic
????????
schizophrenia much?????
both British and German soailors and officers were quite diligent at picking up survivors
because tomorrow it could be you
it's one of the rare courtesies of war
no, but they might not know what is going on
so of course the British have to operate under the assumption that the sub is hostile and will attack
There is no legal obligation to rescue hors de combat of the enemy upon the sinking of the enemy vessel; it is done only morally. Claiming that this effort is abandoned for "revenge" when the ship is putting itself at risk is asinine.
Executing and killing survivors, on the other hand, is a war crime.
There are also cases of ships intentionally leaving their fellow ships' survivors to die, as in the case of Helena not performing any rescue operations on Juneau as I-26 was still in the vicinity after the torpedoing, and the assumption that there were no survivors in the spectacle of her destruction.
bro just speedrunning dogshit takes at this point
the British were well aware U-boats were in the area and considering they DID pick up some survivors, over 100 even, where the hell did you get the revenge notion
Check Out Delete Me: https://joindeleteme.com/Electrician
20% Off Code: Electrician
Merch Store & ALL Other Links:
https://thefatelectrician.com/
Seriously EVERYTHING is on my website
Other channels:
Th...
hello captains o/
is anybody here know the name of these radar? it was on Scharnhorst 
Good to know there's another Fat Electrician enjoyer in this server.
That would require them to be radars to begin with
Thanks. I've found the answer. they are 3-meter and 7-meter night rangefinder

Smoothbore guns from the 1840’s converted to rifled guns
it's always fun to read random threads from some forum about "who would win" (even if some of the information and logic is questionable)
https://www.kbismarck.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=8994
what are your thoughts on Hipper (say, New Year's Eve battle configuration) vs Wichita (say, Leyte configuration), chat?
Oh god you found that place
Can Mikasa BEAT a Yamato thats BOUND and GAGGED and DISMANTLED
yea, implying that neither one has a single escort vessel, which they probably would have escort vessels, rendering the bounding, gagging, and dismantling invalid
You don't understand
You put giant wraps on Yamato
Everywhere
still gotta deal with escorts
what bout the carrier that would be dragged along?
Wrapped
how would they afford that many bandages?
how do they afford the bandages?
Tbf I'm not sure if Mikasas main guns can penetrate Yamato even at ramming range lmao
My point is that historically ship vs ship was really difficult to predict
yea
for theres numerous factors, including the strength of escort, strenght of airpower
Well yeah pretty much, since a lot of factors goes into it unless you basically rig the entire thing to favor another
Bismarck one shot Hood when it really should have been fight the Germans don't win
Blucher was destroyed by 1890s torpedoes that had no business sinking a 1940s cruiser
lol
Pay off the Yamato's crew to blast a hole in the hull from the inside
Problem solved

well, if thats the case, wouldnt yamato just be skuttling herself?
On a more serious note I can definitely see something like a KGV class being able to deal with Yammy
Nonono, the paid off crew when they survive the inevitable sinking should claim it's actually the work of the Mikasa's main guns
Therefore Mikasa gains the win
Wichita would wipe the floor with her
reminds me of the "Warspite can beat Yamato" debate after that Drach drydock
yes, technically Warspite can beat Yamato, but in practice the conditions for that to happen will pretty much only be seen if Yamato is in port with a skeleton crew and boilers turned off
that, or Warspite gets 3 lucky hits that each jam a separate turret
they can't lmao
they're shitty 1900s shells, they just shatter everywhere
but Mikasa can still damage nonvitals with HE like at Tsushima, and of course with nobody to put out fires, Yamato will eventually burn down
that's an interesting thought though, if all magazines are empty/flooded, can a ship even be sunk by fires alone?
all fire sinkings I know of were because of secondary explosions (think Astoria, Blucher, etc), or abandoning ship
yeah, but it's still possible to decide who would have an advantage across a few likely scenarios
this reminds me of a funny story:
once I was browing a Polish warship forum. One guy was doing simulations of BB fights, and to his shock, KGV actually managed to beat Yamato when he simulated that
it turned out what happened was that in the rough weather conditions, Yamato happened to heel at the exact moment that a shell hit it (so that the shell landed below the waterline), and apparently that hit + flooding was able to impair Yamato to the point where the KGV won
but how tho
On January 27th, 1945 18 year old Raymundo da Costa Canario known as Canary by the other men in the 1st Brazilian Squadron, was flying over Northern Italy with a mission to disrupt and destroy German reinforcements. With the end of the war in Europe fast approaching, the resistance was expected to be minimal. However, while flying through the ...
Has to get lucky and pepper Yammy with HE before it can slam dunk you back
German cruiser shells when they meet Class A plates

Admiral Hipper when my ass:
The core issue of ship versus ship I often found is in a one against one situation, with zero context for its mission, escorts or otherwise.
It becomes a calculation of vulnerability zones and mathematical probability, or anecdotes if it comes to that.
And if its the former, there's already a program that does it and doesnt require much discussion.
And then there's the issue that any ship can take an unlucky hit
Any ship, no matter how well protected, is intrinsically vulnerable at the stern.
No ship has protection against, say, a shell going down the funnels
Yes not even the fucking Yamato
Well yea
PoW and Bismarck
On a lucky basis, you get a Vittorio Veneto situation where the shaft snaps off, and the ship would survive - maybe a couple bucket brigades if your generators get flooded or overwhelmed.
On a not so lucky basis, you get Prince of Wales'd and compartments flood at such a rate that closing hatches is not possible as the shaft vibrates to the point of tearing the whole hull open.
Honestly "lucky hits" don't sound so lucky based on just how often it happened
2 BBs got slam dunked in the ass
In WW2
But it is lucky; most naval actions tend to end indecisively with a mere anecdote left on the log book.

A plane appeared, we promptly shot it down.
Enemy ships were spotted, but no meaningful hits were landed and we were forced to withdraw due to unfavourable weather conditions - (Lofoten, Sirte)
"We shot at each other for 3 hours and ran out of ammo"
That happened to the plucky destroyer called Espero, yes
Expending 80% of British Cruiser ammo to dispose of her
And then there are unique cases like Shimakaze
.Bmg and bomb near misses tearing the hull open to progressive flooding, so much so it reaches the boilers and they explode on contact, incapacitating the ship and leaving it to the mercy of planes
Not so speedy now, eh?
You fool, that's a waste of resources given Mikasa's legacy.
Bribe Yamato's crew to host a booze party in her magazines and brew their own ethanol.
Mikasa's crews are experts on that front, and everybody likes a good booze.
Bring some flares and fireworks too, call it a celebratory toast before the duel.

Decisive Victory for Mikasa.
average engagement with the IJN:
don't ask kurita how many battleships it takes to sink 1 escort carrier
same for how many shells it takes to land 1 hit on exeter
I mean
Kurita hasnt slept for three days
The crew is weary after the torment of Palawan Passage and Sibuyan Sea
yeah it's not his fault of course, but for the sake of a bit it's more convenient to pin the blame on 1 factor
And now the destroyers are laying a smoke screen
Worse yet, there's a rain squall
Of course its easy to say "heehoo no hits"
well there were hits, they just weren't enough in time
Meanwhile Yamato's near miss knocking White Plain's electric grid offline:
the battlefleet had like 10 mins of good shooting conditions in the end
The problem is that the ships just switched from Formation 3 (AA) to Formation 4 (All out offensive)
No time for the ships to get into proper positions, and Taffy 3 is, for what they are worth, putting up extremely tough resistance
Look man the IJN is either an unstoppable kami of war or a joke there's no in between
sometimes both within the same day
if only that fleet had better communications
although, I suppose it's for the best that they failed
At least Kurita survived the war
Also lived to be 80 something
I swear a lot of these WW2 veterans live quite long
Maybe everything is easy once you survive WW2
You are speaking to a man who narrowly escaped his flagship's escape by swimming (Atago is done within 5 minutes), saw one of the most intense airstrikes and destruction of the Navy's one of the finest capital ships
And now, 3 days later, planes are fucking buzzing in the air again
I'd be very weary and cautious
yeah, kurita would fit right in with wows players

"Kurita turn"
Mans was mocked relentlessly due to that after the war until he died
what was kurita doing in the early part of the war?
He was in command of Crudiv 7
I remember he was commanding cruisers at midway when Mikuma sunk
and he got mentioned in that java sea book I read
It deserves criticism from hindsight
Less so in the fog of war
yep, at least it's valid criticism
Just like how Mikawa could just sailed on to wipe out the US transports at Savo, but did not do so
unlike "haha italian bad" and "lmao admiral phillips so incompetent, underestimating planes"
Same for Abe after Guadalcanal
Both are borne out of valid caution against the US (carrier) force
And Japan's not likely to reconstitute any losses in capital ships in time
The one that deserves to really get mocked are ones like Mutaguchi
(Every new capital ship ended up having worse fates than their predecessors)
"Ah yes I will LITERALLY START THE SINO JAPANAESE WAR"
Taihou? Dead in 3 months.
Shinano? Dead in days.
Unryu? Dead on Maiden voyage.
gg
Phillips deserves absolute ridicule for his inept communication and refusal to do so even when under airstrikes.
He received the message that no air support would be available [to the area he intended to operate in], which he and his staff did not seek to clarify


