#history
1 messages · Page 160 of 1
it's already a plane where it's marginally faster in level flight only and if it dives it tears itself to shreds, so still fragile
Operational losses for Zeros due to the planes just wearing out was positively painful
yup
The Imperial Japanese were just pretty hobbled by their inability to produce powerful engines at scale huh
it can't follow you lol
Dont dogfight with it
Like the tactic of cutting weight which worked so well for the Mozzie could only carry the Japanese fighters so far
anything above slow dogfighting speeds it became a brick because if it turned
rip
I think it was like 200mph+
I wonder if this tactic is recommended in WT too
USN 8” Mk.21 mod 3 vs Japanese 6” homogeneous plate at 35° and velocities from 1350-1500 fps
richy with the penetration
RAAF Spitfires and even kittyhawks regularly outperformed zeroes over Northern Australia and PNG even at lower altitudes
77sqn was engaged from almost the start of Japans attacks on the Far North up until the very end of the SWPTO and never lost more planes than it shot down including multiple zeroes
Caldwell personally shot got 6.5 kills against Japanese aircraft mostly in his Spitfire, which despite not being the majority of his kills (the rest scored in North Africa) was regardless an exceptional performance

this is fucking hilarious
Check Out Delete Me: https://joindeleteme.com/Electrician
20% Off Code: Electrician
Merch Store & ALL Other Links:
https://thefatelectrician.com/
Seriously EVERYTHING is on my website
Other channels:
Th...
Blacktail experience...
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-06-27/japanese-world-war-ii-bomb-discovered-in-darwin/104025694 Japanese World War II bomb discovered, then detonated, in Darwin Harbour near CBD
Yeah, best to detonate it since it could be potentially unstable.
NASA B-52s
they also had a B-52H from between 2001-2008
whys it called balls 8
I mean it’s better the being called a big ugly fat fellow
Why did the Germans switch to jet fighters like the Me 262 and He 162 over the Bf 109 or Fw 190? In this video I talk about the main reasons for this decision.
-
Spitfire Watches -
Check out the Spitfire X4009 REC watch range and get 25% off during the pre-order period
https://www.recwatches.com/timepieces/limited-editions/aircraft/ -
Video r...
After 18 months of planning we have finally done it!
The FV4005 is loaded up for Tank Fest 2024
HUGE THANKS TO @WorldOfTanksOfficialChannel and @thetankmuseum
And all the individuals for making this happen.
I think I have some photos from 9 years ago of when I visited the HMS Belfast in London. And a few from 2019 when I visited the USS Lexington in Corpus Christi. Might post em here later.
Belka... sigh, here we go again.
false advertisement this thing doesn't look like it'll nuke itelf 7 times
a design I like
It's the most expensive and protected MBT design ever
She has 2 engines too
Main weakness was extremely weak rear armor and barrel cannot look at the rear
Tho tank rears are weak anyway
seems like a ergonomic nightmare
Soviets make a tank with good crew ergos impossible challenge
I honestly think that they didn't really care
It's fine actually
2 crew in capsule rear cabin
So they are at safest location during frontal hit and ammo won't damage them
turret probably had to be removed
when gaijin runs out of material
Likely would have worst side depression angle
Further you look back worse angle you have
Hmm could be useful on hill tho
Low tier Maus curse
Tho unlike Maus it can run away at least

Curious box
Credit where credit is due, that was put together with incredibly skillful craftsmanship
when were some of the earliest naval air planes, and when did ships start having anti air guns?
can't be certain of that unless you can inspect it physically
German engineering
don't
I'm not. I'm just stating that the Germans had great engineering but over engineered things at times
But you gotta admit that Zimmerit was over engineering
Zimmerit is not really what I would think about
I'd also think about the Krummlauf, the interweaved road wheels on the tiger 1, the idea of the maus
Good engineering is not having to file components to fit
Over engineering is when you have a job that requires 500 hours of life and use a part with 2000 hours.
What Germany did was bad engineering
Is Zimmerit even a type of overengineering? Its so something that simply adds a Coat of paste to the tank
And under engineering
That's just unnecesary addition at best
The reason why was a stretch
Overengineering is when you go through a lot of hoops and complications to pull of something that can be done with much simpler ways like, IDK making doors that fold on itself rather than swinging normally
Zimmerit was just Germany being paranoid of something that realistically wasnt a particularly big trouble in the first place
That's what I ment by a stretch
Overengineering
have 20 more moving part in a piece of machinery that only need 3
that's bad engineering
That is ww2 Germany engineering
These mf ration papers
The more I learn about ww2, the more of a miracle that Germany even have some success in the first place
Damn I fumble the grammar of the sentence
in that case study the allied situation a bit more : )
Blame that partially on early war incompetence by the Allies
There's a lot of reasons depending on who they were fighting
But mainly allied incompetence
stares in H&K G11
And in Japan's case it was because they were fighting a country who had sword battalions due to a firearms shortage
And limited tanks
And almost no anti tank weapons
good low level tactical competence, lacking in pretty much every other department
Agreed. Fall of France is a prime example
in the defense of at least the last two there was very little armor on the scene until the Americans arrived
That's what I mean with China. They mainly had tanks purchased from other countries
they did actually have very good combined arms and armor tactics in the early 30s when the china wars first kicked off but with both China's lack of armor and the Chinese landscape not really being forgiving for armored ops the specialization was lost quick
I also read that infantry armor coordination was poor
What's what?
River-class DDG(H) infographic
Nice
Image form
特Ⅱ型駆逐艦「綾波」は第三次ソロモン海戦第二夜戦で、孤立した状態にも関わらず大戦果を得た駆逐艦として知られています。綾波はどのように戦い、乗員たちはどのように振る舞ったのでしょうか。
今回の動画では「ソロモンの鬼神」綾波の全貌と生涯に迫っていきます!
Twitter https://twitter.com/teikenCG (フォローお願いします!)
Booth https://teiken.booth.pm/
支援物資御願イシマス https://www.amazon.jp/hz/wishlist/ls/23FDXTGWM3LF3?ref_=wl_share
pixivFANBOX https://www.pixiv.net/fanbox/creator/467276
===...
pretty much the moment military airships and aircraft start to become a thing in the late 1900s-1910s
as for the earliest naval aircraft, arguably the very first was the Farman MF.11 which had a dedicated seaplane variant
My question is how are they supposed to replace frigates?
Because they plan to build fifteen of these frigates to replace 12 older frigates.
And they're much more capable ships than the older Halifax-class in basically every regard.
So smaller but more numerous and better armed correct?
No, the River's will be about twice the displacement of the Halifax-class.
But aren't they destoryers?
They're replacing the old frigate fleet with a larger number of larger and better equipped frigates, to enhance the capability of the RCN's surface fleet overall rather than just sustain the limited capabilities they had before.
The RCN is calling them destroyers, but they are very squarely a frigate design.
the type 26 is a frigate
Oh so it's one of THOSE situations
In modern ship designs, destroyers are typically much larger and more heavily armed than frigates, with more capable sensors suites, as they specialize into long range area air warfare.
Modern frigates are descended from the destroyer escorts of WWII.
Kinda confusing tbh
in the british numbering scheme
20/30 is a frigate
40 is a destroyer
80 is both at once
Though there was a period from the 50s to the mid-70s where the French and Americans used frigate to describe a class of intermediate ship between destroyers and cruisers. But the Americans dropped that system in 1975.
Blame the British.
Actually, it may have been an RCN officer. But they decided to start calling the twin screw corvette designs 'frigates' during WWII and that lead to all these small convoy escorts being called frigates too.
To be quite honest, IMO the system the Americans and French used post-war made more sense in general - by the ship has long since sailed on that one.
Question if right after the Japanese attacked the American and British positions in the pacific the British pacific fleet Dutch pacific fleet and American asiatic fleet gathered together as one large task force could they have effectively repelled Japanese naval movements and landings in many of the island chains? And how would it have changed the war?
No
Not to mention the difficulty to command a multinational forces like that, the fact that they are facing 1941 IJN with all of its big fleet units outside of Kido Butai are focus in East Indies Campaign have way more in term of tonnage and capabilities than any forces that Dutch, American and UK stationed there.
And ABDA command also face the challenge of locating IJN fleet. IJN pretty much have the initiative and they pick where to fight and where to land while ABDA have defend entire East Indies and have to second guess where the Japanese would attack.
Don't forget that Kido Butai can also swing down after return from Pearl Harbor to finish what left of ABDA that manage to survive the Central Force
That’s true but you don’t think for example the added carriers cruisers battleships and destroyers could’ve prevented the invasion of the Philippines? Mainly the British carriers I suppose I wouldn’t expect them to win against the Japanese forces in the region but maybe stall long enough to for reinforcements from the US pacific fleet?
That would require the British to send their Carriers there before the Fall of Singapore. I will refrain from the absolute idiocy that was sending PoW and Repulse with no aircover but despite how big the RN were, they are stretch between multiple fronts.
And even with Carrier add into the equation, they won't stall the Fall of SEA long enough for US Pacific fleet to ready.
That’s fair and yeah the sinking of the PoW and Repulse were tragic and avoidable battleships should always be escorted by cruisers and destroyers to help deal with subs and aircraft no idea what the thought was behind that. In fact who ordered them to go out alone?
It take US 5 month to ready the Dolittle Raid, and even before Midway, US Navy primarily use their Carrier in Hit and Run attack, there won't be any US force available for the kind of decisive battle that will stall IJN advance in SEA.
I suppose that’s true I just always think about how many problems there were with the allied forces early in the pacific and how things could’ve gone if they went differently the loss of the PoW and Repulse the boise having to split off from the asiatic fleet because of a freaking coral reef ofc one of the only radar ships there
I mean, if I were in command of ABDA, best thing I could do is to allow my sub to hunt down Japan merchant fleet. US Sub might be a bit impotent early in the war but Dutch sub was relatively effective in their job.
But ABDA also suffer from chronic difference in priority for each of its smaller command.
What would you have done with your surface units if you were in charge? Pulled all the way back to Australia or tried to stall the Japanese like the US asiatic did well until they were mostly destroyed
Dutch have to defend their holding in East Indies and support KNIL forces while British are more occupy with Burma and Malaysia campaign. US and Aussie only care if IJN can't get past Papua New Guinea to attack Australia.
Only saving grace is that McArthur wasn't there to interfere with ADBA command much.
Burn everything, scorch earth every oil field, every airport that I can't protect. Pull back units to defend key locations and start withdrawing men and supply to the East
But then I will immediately get sacked bc I didn't protect Singapore or helping the British, or how I fail to protect Dutch "second homeland".
ABDA was not only facing IJN, it also facing a really stupid politic battle of its own.
Scorched earth isn’t a bad idea especially given realistically there’s no way the US forces in the region could contend with the Japanese forces themselves and I mean tbf if I recall correctly all the destroyers were outdated and the only real heavy fire power the US had there was the Houston and boise which still couldn’t contend with IJN battleships and obviously couldn’t contend with IJN carrier divisions
I mean, there is reasonable chance for KNIL and RAF to inflict heavy damage on IJN Battleship and Carrier with the right condition but it basically an impossible battle to win
Oh yeah RAF and RN might win battles but they couldn’t defeat the IJN alone
what carriers
in late 1941 there is not a single otherwise engaged carrier in the entire Royal Navy
and even if they could scrape together a handful, they wouldnt stand a chance against Kido Butai
after the destruction of the US Pacific Fleet there is not a single force in the Pacific capable of preventing the Japanese advance, even if the Allies had made all of the right decisions, all it does is delay the inevitable
if MacArthur hadn't allowed his entire air force to be destroyed on the ground, it wouldn't have prevented the fall of the Philippines
if the British had called upon their air cover to save PoW and Repulse, it wouldnt have stopped the fall of Malaya, although it would have delayed things
How long till ours next "McArthur Bashing" session?
The illustrious was still there I think at a minimum and seriously I will never get over the sinking of the PoW and Repulse what a waste of resources and lives
Keyword here, "delayed"
3, 2, 1...
Lusty was messing around in the West-Indian Ocean and she was worthless against a coordinated Japanese air attack
if PoW had gotten into range and intercepted the landings in Northern Malaya, it would have caused considerable delays but the IJA was already advancing through Thailand at that exact moment, and the forced in Malaya were wholly inadequate
Really? I thought the British left her over in the south east pacific at that time since they pulled a bunch of the rest of the pacific fleet back
only a single division was properly trained and equipped on the whole peninsular
I mean, is there even anything new we can bring up about the guy? Unless someone come in here with full propaganda about him, I pretty sure majority of this channel hate his guts.
There were a decent number of surface engagements that US asiatic forces got involved in where having two battleships would’ve been a massive difference or even when the US moved more of the pacific fleet there
Would it allow a longer time frame for British to evacuate their force from Singapore?
she was in the UK until Feb when she moved to South Africa before moving North for the Indian Ocean Raid
there would be no evacuation from Singapore
Depending on how much the Japanese move things around to move more forces it could have allowed more time for asiatic fleet or what’s left of it to relocate to Australia as well
The thing that happened irl was much more effective
Oh right, can't lose face even if it meant a possible military disaster
It was actually Indomitable trying to planes to Singapore/DEI along with Indomitable right?
IIRC Lusty at the time is still repairing from collision damage between her and Formidable
if ABDA survived with more assets I cant see it making any real difference in the long run
its less that and more that the entire prewar planning of multiple nations hinged upon the security of Singapore
evacuating Singapore and leaving it to the Japanese would be the highest betrayal to the Indian colonial government as well as the governments of Australia and New Zealand
Also to the people who lived there obviously
and while the British internally believed that those countries should be left to their fates, regardless it was necessary to not make any overt moves to anger them as it would hurt British long term interests
I mean I feel like at the battle of the Solomons the Prince of wales and repulse alone would’ve made a substantial difference for one the hiei almost certainly would’ve been sunk instead of dmged possibly could’ve saved some allied ships as well
Right I almost forgot they had a collision
But what I ment here is this
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guadalcanal_campaign
The Guadalcanal campaign, also known as the Battle of Guadalcanal and codenamed Operation Watchtower by American forces, was a military campaign fought between 7 August 1942 and 9 February 1943 on and around the island of Guadalcanal in the Pacific theater of World War II. It was the first major land offensive by Allied forces against the Empire...
if PoW and Repulse surived Malaya, they'd almost certainly be sent right back to the Atlantic/Mediterranean until the British fleet arrived in force in 1945
Hmm, I guess leaving thousand of soldier and countless civilian to their fate to achieve political victory is a really cold and calculating move
Yeah, the British were a bit short on BBs during this time
And also had to split the ones they did have to fight the other axis powers
Well they'd probably go through IO raid first before getting sent back
Churchill sincerely believed the Australia and New Zealand were 'prunable' and could be abandoned, even if the British had promised to use Singapore as a lynchpin to ensure their security
That’s a good point tbh British were super unlucky too during the war the way glorious was lost the way hood was lost I mean yikes I still stand by the fact that PoW and Repulse’s losses were absolutely avoidable and there was no reason not to have escorted them properly
And the disaster in France in 1940
escorts were of little concern the issue was that no attempt was made to call the RAAF squadron assigned to provide them with air cover
As well as Norway and early battles against italy
Just basically no ships available, but something had to be done
Norway was a strategic victory for the Allies
Wait they did have assigned air cover and they didn’t call them?! I thought they weren’t assigned air cover or proper cruiser escorts
the Luftwaffe that was meant to gain air superiority over Britain was shot down over Norway, the Kriegsmarine that was meant to invade Britain was in a small fjord in the North and Oslo harbour
That one battle where Germany lost 8 DDs right?
453sqn RAAF was assigned to provide air cover and wasnt called upon until well after it was too late
10 DDs
cruisers would do nothing against that Japanese attack, the RAAF would
Is there a reason? Was there a communication malfunction or something?
If I recall a lot of the aircraft the Japanese used in that attack were low flying torpedo bombers I’ll take aa guns for that it’ll always help I mean look at what the laffey did with aa by itself and it’s just a destroyer
multiple reasons but one of them was that the admiral in command of the operation did not believe that battleships at sea could be sunk by aircraft
Wait really? He didn’t think they could be sunk so he didn’t call for the escort provided for exactly that reason?
British AA in 1941 was atrocious, Laffey was a well equipped, well commanded ship backed up by years of experience, the British had none of that
I thought the losses weren't that severe that it crippled the Luftwaffe? A loss of 260 planes throughout the campaign doesn't seem especially high for said campaign, 3 months for 260 lost planes, vs BoB which was a magnitude worse in a similar time frame. The Kriegsmarine got (rightfully) mauled, and tbh should be expected
it was the captain of Repulse, not the Admiral on PoW who called upon the air cover, and they didnt arrive until after both ships had gone under
if called upon the moment radar contact was made, 453sqn would have saved the ships
I was under the impression that US aa was best then British then German then Japanese which was awful
every plane the Germans lost was irreplaceable
Japanese AA was considerably better than people make it out to be
That’s tragic lost two major surface vessels and a large number of men for the overconfidence of one man
British AA was considerably worse than people make it out to be
HAA British worse than Japanese, LAA British was better
I'm in the opposite camp, maybe you could argue for the Luftwaffe losses but the idea that the kreigsmarine stood any chance at holding a channel crossing against the royal navy even at their highest state is comical.
Seriously? Whenever I bring up aa with Japan people keep telling me it was almost a waste of time unless they had a full task force worth of it
the Mediterranean fleet did an exercise in 1937 where a drone flew around the fleet for hours and didnt shoot it down, in fact the drone ran out of fuel before they shot it down
Oh of course lol, no one said Sea Lion was any way feasible
The RN and the RAF would destroy the barges before they could even leave port
Depends if they got as lucky as they did with the Hood and just keep mag detonating every ship immediately they could lol
I mean, using a late 19th century, despite upgrade, is still a late 19th century design
what AA fire control system did Britain have in 1941 that was in any way shape or form superior to the Japanese
There were a few good guns but the very common double and triple 25s were useless in the aa role
and what AA gun did the British have proliferated that was better than the Japanese
The thing with japanese AA is that they never had a decent medium caliber weapon
because I can tell you I would rank the Japanese Type 96 well above a vickers .50
Ah okay that makes sense
It was all light or heavy
the type 96 was not that bad of a weapon
it was not a great weapon by any means
but people make it out to be far worse than it actually was
40 mm pom pom with new ammo is better than the Japanese 25 mm. Of course Vickers 0.5 in is like nothing against aircraft lol
Their 127 could have been good but was crippled in aa performance by low train rate and bad loading speed specifically at high angles
the 40mm pompom in 1941 had no tracer round
And by 1941 most British ships had 20 mm Oerlikon (4)
another reason for the loss of PoW and Repulse was the lack of tracers from the pompoms
The 10cm was very good but did not exist in sufficient numbers
other than magazine capacity how does the oerlikon outperform a type 96
Tbf, it was compare a lot with Oerlikon in single mount and when in triple mount, with Bofors. There is no winning that competition
RoF?
again i note that the oerlikon is not supported by a robust and effective fire control system
the type 96 is
that fact alone makes it a more effective weapons system than anything the British were fielding in early 1942
fair, ill concede that
the issue is that there is no fair comparison
The Oerlikon doesn't have the range to really dissuade attacks
Only to make them cost more
comparing it with the oerlikon is pointless because the type 96 massively outranges it, and it doctrinally is used completely differently, but comparing it with a bofors is also pointless because the round is almost twice as large, of course the bofors will win that fight
Why you usually had 40 mm pom pom
Since so many knowledgeable people are in chat
Sorry ping
the pompom couldnt dissuade attacks because it had no tracer round
Did the japanese ever have a medium caliber AA weapon? Even in the works?
it couldnt fire accurately because it had no tracer round
The 25mm
Was medium AA
it couldnt even really out-range any comparable AA gun because it had no tracer round
and also because it was shit
True but outside of Chicago Piano, the Allied really don't have an equivalent to type 96 in term of doctrine either.
and had low muzzle velocity
which is why there is no fair comparison
Bofors and Chicago Piano are both a fair bit heavier than Type 96, though in turn they are significantly more capable
They reverse engineering the bofors but never in mass production
a quad mount type 96 would be a fair comparison to the Piano but there was no quad mount type 96 again making it a pointless comparison
The Chicago Piano is another weapon that's been kinda unfairly tarnished, obviously the Bofors is just better, but the Chicago Piano was by no means a bad gun in 1941
Maka made me a Chicago Piano defender
I sense
gods greatest Chicago Piano defender has arrived
Tracer rounds were used in the during the Battle of Crete but didn't make it to POW and Repulse fyi
it was rough years ago but like some other things people have mostly come around
jsut realised i accidentally said the type 96 was a great weapon, edited to fix now oops
On a per barrel basis the quad Chicago Piano is significantly heavier than the triple Type 96
British FCS for the pompom was a guy with a stick pointing at a plane
the British never developed a tachymetric FCS
like at all
The 1.1" gun itself was like twice the weight of the Type 96 gun alone
the Japanese developed one and post-war American analysts considered it quite good
I still laugh at the fact that a Maxim gun in late 1900s somehow make it into British main AA armament in early ww2 
it was a great weapon that had practically all of its problems that gave it a bad reputation fixed before it was fully replaced, including being one of the first to have a good off mount director and exceptionally good shell fuses, it also had unique aiming capabilities, just the bofors is a much newer gun and much larger too
Lol
It was an ok weapon
I mean, you could say the same for the Type 96
That's HAA, for LAA that had GRU, not great but something
Multiple mounts had director fire control, with later ones having RPC
they had centralised fire control for heavier type 96 mounts
open single and twin mounts often didnt but closed mounts almost always did
i cant really be bothered going the US Technical Mission to Japans report on Japanese AA right now but its probably the only real source out there on the type 94 FCS
this is on page 3 though so ill share it
yee, off mount director for better targeting
Hazemeyer: wtf
the type 94s predecessor, the type 91 was also a solid design, it was old and cumbersome but still outperformed anything the British had at the time (hopes and dreams)
38 kills with the 0.50 cal in 1942? Very interesting
Unfortunately even it has very little information about the Type 95 and Type 4 light directors
you scream at a computer until it tells you where to shoot
another thing easily forgotten is due to the depression era making it mass produce slowly it made the chicago piano seem to be a later weapon than its actual design was
it was in limited production as early as 1934, it had had most troubles fixed by 1938 models
Unfortunately only got it started fitting on sizable number of ships in 1940. IIRC even a couple BBs at Pearl Harbour didn't have it
on the other hand, the bofors often thought of when one thinks of 'bofors' (aka the redesigned one) is an early 1942 deal
Most of the cruisers got it earlier IIRC
yup, iirc oklahoma or arizona even had open deck weapon rings to have some fitted when sunk
meanwhile the British still using the shit mounts until well into 43
Mhm, probably, should be the Brooklyns?
(the RAN got the good ones as soon as they were available)
Even the older ones, all the treaty CAs got them I believe
Do the earlier mounts have a problem in service? I though earlier Bofors the problem was mostly just that it was laughably had to mass produce

the earlier mounts were air cooled not water cooled
air cooling of course being somewhat innefficient when you're surrounded by water

Yeah skimming through Friedman they seem to have got them from 38-40
I imagine you call out targets to each of your aa crews so that you can designate properly when dealing with multiple aircraft in different directions? I suppose
Alt timeline where Canberra is lost to air attack so we get Chicago pianos out of desperation for more AA (waiting on bofors) and become the sole operator
The Chicago Piano refits happened at the same time the earlier treaty CAs had their 5" armaments doubled
the treaty cruiser experience is truly just having some weirdly convenient refits happen right as the system starts to collapse
That time a Zara had to Drydock in Malta and the British figured out its actual displacement as a result
The Pensacolas and Northamptons weren't designed originally with 8 5" guns, but work to refit them happened basically as soon as they hit the water and they realized the ships were dramatically underweight
arizona sporting an open aa ring to likely receive as such in 1941
funny thing is that the brits thought only that one was special
Certified British intelligence moment
The refits would have happened before the treaty system collapsed, except for a lack of money
Ya gotta remember half of them were designed specifically with that eventuality in mind
That is the point spoon was trying to make
What an awfully convenient 4.5in belt you have lying around Vickers, oh and an awfully convenient County with an awfully convenient empty spot and an awfully convenient excess displacement
How awfully convenient
the solution is to build ten thousand eries
This is the way
you're telling me the tonnage limit for ships counting towards the total is 2000 tons? alright let's make ships that are 2,000 tons standard
no more than four guns and can't be above 6.1''? ok four 6'' guns
20 knots maximum cruising speed? so it is
Since the London Treaty did not specify that armor plating could not be used Navy officials decided that armor plating was allowed.
and fuck it we ball
slap a 3.5'' belt on it and call it a day
seems like we are starting the war with 500 super DDEs
Where Centauro Draco
Honestly just splinter proof is required, 4 6 in/47 guns is pretty heavy lol. Remember to spare loads of weight in design for future AA upgrade as well (unless you want to trade armour belt for that lol)
a radar, depth charge and sonar equipped ship that goes 20 knots, has fantastic staying power for its size, large guns, has a scout plane and top notch aa too? in my 1936?
well maybe they gave up other factors like ra- 8,000 nautical miles you say?
honestly with the armor they have eries are a destroyer's bane, and can probably hang with some of the lighter armed cls
it's certainly one of those ships that got so kneecapped due to expenses in the depression
Too bad they couldn't fit a small TDS in there, could have prevented Erie from sinking
yeah, though honestly any ship that size getting hit with a torpedo is going to be pretty luck based if it survives and if the machinery arrangement felt good that day
Question irl have a nation captured and reused a former foe warship? And examples
A couple, yeah. Off the top of my head, the Japanese used a bunch of ships they captured in ww2 like an American destroyer, those Chinese mini-cruisers, an Italian gunboat, etc.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Stewart_(DD-224)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_cruiser_Ning_Hai
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Italian_minelayer_Lepanto
USS Stewart (DD-224) was a Clemson-class destroyer in the United States Navy during World War II. She was the second ship named for Rear Admiral Charles Stewart. Scuttled in port at Surabaya, Java, she was later raised by the Japanese and commissioned as Patrol Boat No. 102. She came back under American control in 1945 after the occupation of Ja...
Ning Hai (Chinese: 甯海; lit. 'Peaceful Seas') was a light cruiser in the Republic of China Navy (ROCN) before World War II and the lead ship of her class. She was sunk in the early days of the Second Sino-Japanese War by aircraft from the Imperial Japanese Navy, and her wreck was raised and repaired by the Japanese, re-entering service with the J...
Lepanto was an Azio-class minelayer of the Italian Navy. She was reclassified as gunboat in 1934 and remained in Italian service in the far east from 1933 to 1943, when she was scuttled in China, during World War II. She was then recovered by the Imperial Japanese Navy and taken into service as Okitsu, spending the remainder of the war escortin...
was about to mention stewart yeah, truly interesting case lol
Interesting
I didn't know Ning Hai was used by the Japanese, interesting
Vasilefs Georgios I, reused by the Germans as ZG-3, later named Hermes
I wonder how Will these be implemented in game
But most importantly what are paper ships
they wont
AL doesnt do captured and war prize ships
only sold ships and willing transfers
or well, they might, just as their original faction
Hermes' career under the Greet flag wasn't that spectacular, might as well make her part of IB
Why not the last faction they served
because they dont do that
Or the one that had their best run
the concept of captured ships when they arent simple machines ran by humans but actual living beings
is
yknow
Example?
Awful
The anshans, Tallin, Murmansk, arkhangelsk
I understand
But currently al is getting together
It's still dumb
it wont happen
especially with ships from factions that are in the game
while captured ships from even smaller navies just wont be added
I want identify crisis of a soldier fighting against former allies
That could either be gold or shit
Sad
.
the one I remember off the top of my head is Hibiki, which was turned over to the Soviets after surviving the entire war
That's not really capture tho
It's Nurnberg, Cesare, Nagato, Litto etc etc situation
Axis ships shared among allies
China gets some Japanese ships too
I was hoping to see them in game but nonetheless I want to know about BP ships now
Nice
Speaking of ships to add Johnston when

What are some countries' worst defeats in ww2. I listed some awhile ago but I wanna hear more opinions
Matapan comes to mind
For which nation?
Thought it would have been obvious, but italy
Strictly naval, or on land too?
naval-wise, the norweigan campaign was pretty bad in numbers for the germans
half of their heavy cruisers, a third of their light cruisers, and half of their destroyers were destroyed in it
the aftermath of the barents' sea saw the surface fleet of the kriegsmarine almost entirely abandoned as well
NSM on a Burke 👀
Half the heavy cruisers? They had Hipper, Blücher, Deutschland/Lützow and Scheer, and lost Blücher. Or do you count the damage sustained by Hipper and Deutschland as a full loss?
Ackshually the Deutschlands are pocket ba-


What are paper ships
Ships that never existed IRL and only theoretically modelled from blueprints
One message removed from a suspended account.
One message removed from a suspended account.
One message removed from a suspended account.
One message removed from a suspended account.
Both
Ah. Well, tbh, for the Italians I'd probably say Operation Compass or the final result of Tunisiagrad.
Matapan was the worst defeat the navy suffered at sea but that was still only the lost off one cruiser division and half a destroyer squadron. A significant loss to be sure but not one that impacted their ability to continue their core missions.
Whereas the effective destruction of an entire army and its loss of equipment, as well as a big chunk of North Africa (or all of it, after Tunisiagrad)... much bigger deal.
Italian propaganda poster calling for revenge against the British, 1942
Pollice verso or verso pollice (Classical Latin: [ˈpɔlʲːɪke ˈu̯ɛrs̠oː]) is a Latin phrase, meaning "with a turned thumb", that is used in the context of gladiatorial combat. It refers to a hand gesture or thumb signal used by Ancient Roman crowds to pass judgment on a defeated gladiator.
The precise gesture described by the phrase pollice verso,...
Tho it could be just symbolizing squishing London easily with one finger like a bug
Pretty cool tbh
Hey not sure if this is the right channel for this but my friend was checking US archives available and didn’t find log books for a few ships during WW2 (Yorktown Hornet Gambier Bay, and part of the Enterprise and Laffey supposedly) and so he put in a FOIA request. I told him he should look around a bit more first, are they really not public or did he not look enough for them?
it could be that those log books exist somewhere, but theyre either lost in the archives or are just missing entirely
looking more wont hurt imo, but dont have your hopes up
I just wasn’t sure if you can get in trouble for wasting the governments time requesting info that may already be publicly available so I figured we should look more
im 100% sure you wont get in trouble for requesting something from the archive, they're open to requests for things like this lol
I think he put the FOIA request to the navy
Yeah department of the navy just double checked
@tough quail finally it has a video
Did you know you can get 10% off your first website and domain here?
https://www.squarespace.com/found
Check out my new channel:
https://youtu.be/X5lpwo8IJvc
Merch Store!
https://www.foundandexplained.shop
NEW CHANNEL:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qXxl5Ef5lFg
Discord: https://discord.gg/4x7zTbr53W
My News Channel: https://www.youtube.com...

Likely most unique looking aircraft carrier design ever
Think this was the smaller design
that thing doesnt look real

I mean ye it stayed as a design and some test models
Since there was experince gained from Lun class
Of course something like this is Russian
Found And Explained, I think of him as the budget version of Mustard.
I always think the Ekranoplan was the Soviet idea, but it seems even the US explore that idea too.
Ngl, I confuse them sometime bc of the style of their thumbnails
On Canada day too
Golden rule
Every military crazed nation looked into how to apply X knowledge of physics into weaponry
It’s being considered right now as a potential capability for supplying forward positions in the pacific by the US
Waves are it's weakness
generally the proposed use as a missile boat seemed wasteful though as a supply vessel it could be rather useful if the kinks can be figured out

-DISCLAIMER- I initially made this video as part of a fun hobby project without thinking it would get this much attention. I used a bunch of other peoples artwork and music to do it and as such this video is not monetised in any way. If you are the owner of any of the content in this video please get in touch via my email address included in my ...
God I hate how British and American English differs for words
Civilisation vs Civilization
Honour vs Honor
Armour vs armor

This is what happens when you don't pronounce your vowels and can't say 'z' properly
A controversy of aluminum
“Taxation without representation”
That and grammars
Something was deleted
Found out about the anti-drone Yak-52 in Ukraine. Turned out I had just found old news again
Would be funny if we bring back prop dogfight
Something something "getting rid of u"
And the first rule of English grammar is don't ask about it
On that note, there have been quite a few aces during the conflict
Yak-52 vs Sky Warden vs Super Tucano 
My 3rd favorite swing wing, after MiG-23 and SU-24
This video is about Adrien Arcand, Canada’s very own homegrown Fascist. Don’t need much more introduction than that. Happy Canada Day :)
Previous Video: https://youtu.be/8ow8UezqoTw
Sauce:
Nadeau, Jean-François. The Canadian Führer: The Life of Adrien Arcand. Translated by Bob Chodos, Eric Hamovitch, and Susan Joanis. Toronto: James Lorime...
An Analysis of the Anti-Tank Scene in the movie Fury (2014), we look particularly at US and German tactics or better their absence.
Cover: Columbia Pictures, Sony Pictures
»» GET BOOKS & VIDEOS ««
» Stukabook - Doctrine of the German Dive-Bomber - http://stukabook.com
» The Assault Platoon of the Grenadier-Company November 1944 (StG 44) - http...
quoting from elsewhere
This video did not hit
Which is rare for MHV but yeah
The argument basically boils down into "The scene makes zero sense with real life tactics" and breaks down quickly once you realize that WW2 Western Front shenanigans were an absolute fuck and you have both sides being absolutely incompetent and defying their tactics at multiple points
The Battle for Dompaire with Panzer Brigade 150 literally not bothering with recon or the Sherbrooke Fusiliers getting their shit kicked in by 12th SS Panzer at Buron because they didn't have infantry come to mind (edited)
Fury's problem is that it tries to use the British tanker war experience for the April 1945 setting
Yeah losing all your tanks is a very British 1944 Normandy thing
Yeah having to defend a crossroads alone against an infantry battalion is a very British 1944/Canadian 1944 Normandy thing
It is not really an American April 1945 Germany thing
Hello, um I have a question about Japanese destroyer gun turrets. I tried looking up whether or not their was a prototype gun or better gun than the 127mm gun type 5 besides the 100mm gun made later on. Is there a better gun or is the 100mm gun it?
do you mean the Type 3 12.7cm?
because the actual Type 1/5 12.7cm is the only remotely viable prototype that could have displaced it
especially with the Type 98 10cm being an objective downgrade for anything other than AA use
Yeah I think the Type 3 12.7cm yeah the one you get through gear boxes or by making through blueprints.The Type 1/5 12.7cm is in the gear a lab in Azur lane as an upgrade right? I was wondering if Japanese ever made a prototype gun turret to replace the Type 1/5 12.7cm gun or was it the prototype?
the Type 1/5 was the abortive prototype meant to replace the Type 3, yes
and it only existed as the Type 1, which was meant for use aboard ships, for a very short time
the Type 5 revival was solely a shore based AA/coast defense gun
Ain’t no way the thumbs up existed back then
extended reach
That's because everyone wanted to see someone die when they asked for mercy
do note police verreso seems to be incredibly rare as most gladiator combats aren't to the death
gladiators are expensive as fuck to buy, train and promote since they're designed to entertain as long as they can
think modern WWE stars
for the most part the gesture seems reserved for when someone fucks up bad
http://www.headstamppublishing.com
Headstamp Publishing - the best publisher of exhaustively researched and beautifully photographed firearms reference books.
The Landstad Model 1900 is a magazine-fed, semiautomatic revolver designed by Norwegian Halvard Folkestad Landstad, who lived in Kristiana (now called Oslo). He designed the gun on his o...
BT-7A, but instead of the F-32... They mounted a freaking 76mm L-11 gun.
Gaijin, BT-7A (L-11) when???
It's in Enlisted
Wait really?!
Yes but it was an event
2022 I think. I have it but I can't play cuz my Xbox broke 
not sure why you're freaking out about it being an L-11
Aw what a let down. Hope I can get my hand on those dem speedy baby T-34.
it's effectively identical in performance to the F-32 ballistically
In WT
and was found inferior in handling
Which one has bad handling??? L-11 or F-32???
L-11
industrial feudalism
F-32 had been picked for the KV-1 1940
and L-11 had been picked for T-34 1940
and all the people who could have brought up the issue were also a bit too afraid to a raise a suggestion which could be twisted as trying to delay Soviet industry
But then they decide to use L-11 for early KVs?
L-11 was used on the 1939 model
if you ever get confused over weird lack of standardization
keep in mind Soviet factories wanted to only build the designs they came up with, and were effectively the personal fiefdoms of whoever was running them
aaaaand also just recently in 1937 the whole commission who ran the Soviet census was arrested and put on show trial for accurately reporting numbers which ran counter to Soviet expectations
do you want to be the person suggesting a delay in production for something as counter-revolutionary as "standardization"?
Nope. Not gonna send myself to Gulag or get hanged.
Or worst.
the actual reason will be because you make one factory or another lose face, and the people who run those places have friends in high places
I forgot to mention that only 150 of them were made
incidentally
speaking of that 1937 census
it has
interesting implications regarding the oft claimed "but Soviet literacy rates"
left is the original question, right is the Stalin approved question
With like... Single BT-7A survived this day.
you can see how the Stalin improved one would artificially inflate the rate
the worst for tank vs tank
not the worst if you just want to fling HE and not stress a rather lightly built tank
WT's implementation of the shrapnel shell is largely anachronistic
and their use in tanks, even direct fire artillery support types, is also rather out of place
Short gun if I remember correctly
People tend to forget that 90% of a tanks fights are vs infantry
It's cuz of Hollywood
In the summer of 1944, Germany suffered perhaps the greatest military defeat of all time. But it did not come on the beaches of Normandy where the combined Western Allies faced less than 25% of the German Army. It came on the Eastern Front where the Soviet Union faced 75% of the German Army on its own.
This was Operation Bagration. An operation...
The SA80 is, no surprise, not a stranger to this series but this week we get to showcase the latest & greatest iteration of it's hotly-debated legacy: the L85A3.
Jonathan will reveal all in this week's episode of #WhatisthisWeapon
0:00 Intro
0:15 L85A3
0:50 A Small Flex...
1:20 And a Small Plug.
2:23 Firearm History
3:21 Changes from A2
7:20 ...
This is the story of our journey rebuilding the FV4005 (SPUD) and showcasing it to the public for the first time in history at Tankfest 2024.
Huge thanks to everybody involved in the project and special thanks to
@thetankmuseum & @WorldOfTanksOfficialChannel
If you could choose another tank to be brought back to life, what would it be and w...
Today we take a brief look at the design history of the French pre-dreadnoughts.
Want to support the channel? - https://www.patreon.com/Drachinifel
Want to talk about ships? https://discord.gg/TYu88mt
French pre dread is a love-hate relationship
I remember putting that as Germany's worst defeat on my list
there's also the concurrent Lwow-Sandomierz Offensive
Bagration wasn't really meant as the massive deathblow that it was, most of the Red Army's resources were actually for L-S Offensive
but the deception was so massively successful for Bagration that it ended up completely overshadowing the bigger operation
Germans forces meant for the area where Bagration occurred had been diverted as well
crazy
the funny historiography footnote to this is Soviet propaganda immediately turned it into a "just as planned" moment by Stalin
#OTD in 1949, the AJ Savage medium bomber had its first flight. Designed to carry atomic bombs, the Savage was the largest and heaviest carrier-based aircraft at that time. It was replaced by the even heavier A-3 Skywarrior strategic bomber, AKA "The Whale".
This reminds me of tank that had a motar instead of a barrel
The recent keel-laying ceremony doesn’t signal all-ahead full.
By Brian O’Rourke
June 2024 Proceedings Vol. 150/6/1,456
The gun is the 76mm KT-28, basically the tank version of the 76mm Regimental Gun M1927.
Wowie zowie
(Autocorrect)
Which is... An infantry gun.

Infantry Support Gun rather.
Best infantry gun in my opinion is the M1 Garand
Norwegian Krag and MAS-44 for mine.
Coolio
None of you have heard of the Owen gun and it shows
I have
Was Rome close to an Industrial Revolution? Build up your own settlement in Bellwright today: https://rebrand.ly/invictabellwright
In this historical discussion we examine how close Rome was to an Industrial Revolution. Its a deeply complex subjects which I've long considered. To answer the question, we are joined by Chris who is a historian wi...
Ok, who have “air launch SM-6” on the bingo card?
They were already testing it
Why you guys are so late to everything

Krem 
we've seen test missiles for that for the last like six years
new pictures just confirm the designation
ABM capable hornet sounds funny I must say
Apparently they removed the booster for the air-launched version, so it's not quite "SM-6 max speed and altitude + speed and altitude of F/A-18E/F Super Hornet" kind of range
But probably a stopgap long range A2A while waiting for JATM & LREW to come online, maybe?
It's just a concept testing if you ask me
While this is true, not having the booster is a very good trade for not having to work your way up to speed and high altitude from surface launch. Getting launched by an F/A-18E/F is likely going to see a fairly massive air to air range, especially against less maneuverable targets.
I would think of this as a "we're hunting for your bombers and enablers" type of missile.
While also maintaining the capability to attack other (not air) targets.
Grumman F6F with a Mark 13 torpedo.
well I think the MAS-36 with MAT 49 is better
I heard it and see it before
How did the carrier task force come to be the premiere weapon in the US Navy’s arsenal, eclipsing the mighty battleship? Today Indy takes a look at how the Navy worked overtime to produce flattops, train the men who sailed them, and develop new doctrine for the war against Japan. What does the future hold for the carrier force?
Join us on Patre...
Get Nebula with 40% off annual subscription with my link: https://go.nebula.tv/realtimehistory
Watch 16 Days in Berlin: https://nebula.tv/videos/16-days-in-berlin-01-prologue-the-beginning-of-the-end
Gift Nebula to a friend: https://gift.nebula.tv/realtimehistory
During Japan's war against South-East Asia during the Second World War, China was...
Rifle: Lee Enfield
SMG: Beretta M38
MG: MG-42
Pistol: Browning Hi-Power
Yeah good picks are a shock I know
for my MG, its the 50 cal
I picked the mg42 for its versatility and because it has an easier barrel change system than the mg34
real
@alpine onyx I think this might interest you, pertaining to Fletchers:
On 15 June 1940, the Secretary of the Navy approved a C&R/Bureau of Engineering suggestion that one of the new destroyers be used as a prototype diesel warship, a new lightweight diesel having been produced. It was expected that a diesel electric plant would be fitted, which would facilitate subdivision. Other supposed advantages included clearer decks and the elimination of much piping. Surprisingly, they did not include improved endurance. Verv little work seems to have been done on this project. and the ship was never built.

Wouldn't call it the greatest - was quite the hazard trying to land at Kai Tak, as I recall.
(Also worth noting that it is full blown chaos on the first day Chek Lap Kok opened - with much criticism given to how hastily Kai Tak was shut down while the new isn't ready yet)
It was hazardous and spectacular
Thats why it was the greatest
Not so great if a plane crashes into the neighbourhood - a rather worrisome concern at the time.
great
That does not look safe.
India unveils its new light tank: Zorawar
— It has been designed to meet the Indian Army's requirements for high-altitude areas like Ladakh.
— Weighs only 25 tons, half the weight of heavier tanks like the…
💖 298 🔁 61
Why are the side skirts so fucking thick
ERA tiles
Today is National Bikini Day. The modern version of the two-piece swimsuit by French designer Louis Réard debuted #OTD in 1946. Réard named his creation after the Bikini Atoll where the U.S. was conducting nuclear weapons tests for Operation Crossroads.
#NationalBikiniDay
you thought they named the atoll after the garnment?
No
idk what i thought
i never made the connection between Bikini Atoll and the Bikini
https://youtu.be/11173sD3kgc?si=-1ho9YzhUUBHhZFt
Operation Harpoon & Vigorous
Titles read: "BATTLE OF THE CONVOYS".
Mediterranean Sea and Malta.
L/S of the Rock of Gibraltar. Seamen on a warship wave at the camera. Various shots of a Mediterranean convoy heading for Malta. Dusk falls and the convoy's guns open fire on enemy aircraft.
Depth charges are laid and then we see them exploding. The following day the...
Join our PATREON to support the channel, gain access to exclusive videos, Q&A, livestreams, vote & influence the direction of Leave Curious.
https://www.patreon.com/leavecurious
Leave Curious T-shirts & Hoodies all sustainably created
https://leavecurious.teemill.com/
Go and check out the trees at the Markshall Estate
https://www.markshall.o...
@remote monolith
Glad to see this
You can see the similarity between this and Araucaria in morphology
Not composite add on?
so it seems an even larger, but undescribed, specimen of Ichthyotitan was discovered some time ago https://youtu.be/N4dsVkSIFjo?si=JM9J-2Jj4HpANhkT
Secure your privacy with Surfshark! Enter coupon code VIVIDEN for an extra 4 months free at https://surfshark.deals/vividen
Receive free short stories by signing up here: https://forms.gle/GGGFqMfn1AgMZJaF9
Hector's Ichthyosaur speculative reconstruction by Diocles305 https://x.com/Diocles305
Music by Unicorn Heads.
The Mesozoic was terri...
the fossil, a surrangular bone, was about 15% larger than previous remains, making it possible it came from an animal 50% larger than the previous specimens
its still smaller than the utterly gigantic Aust Cliff specimen, but still ludicrously huge
All the best firearms history channels streaming to all major devices:
weaponsandwar.tv
Today we are taking a look at the backstory of the famously recognizable Krummlauf device, the curved barrel attachment for the StG-44. It is really a perfect example of how German late-war desperation weapons took shape. It went from an idea nobody actually...
will have fun watching this
(From Surface and Destroy: The Submarine Gun War in the Pacific)
The use of TNT charges in subsequent boardings afterwards was because sinking via the 12 gauge took too long
Naturally lmao
Damn 
All the best firearms history channels streaming to all major devices:
weaponsandwar.tv
East Germany purchased a license for production of the AK-74 in 1981, but that license was for domestic use only. There was an apparent market for export production AKs in the western 5.56mm cartridge, and so the East Germans developed their own new rifle to...
Nice
Dang, crazy https://youtu.be/1thNIkX6hQc?si=YzBczkSlGV2uB-PC
A brief over on the Japanese Type 98 320mm Mortar of WW2
More War Movie Content: https://www.youtube.com/johnnyjohnsonesq
War Movie Reviews: https://www.youtube.com/johnnyshistoricmoviereview
Request a review: johnnyjohnsonreviews@gmail.com
Movies/Video Games Featured:
Flags of our Fathers 2006
Letters from Iwo Jima 2006
#ww2 #warhistory
Nice
Kai-tak had... quite the assortment of nicknames by pilots here because it was such a hazard to land
It's a miracle a major accident didn't occur, though I heard a plane once clipped an antenna on those buildings once
They fortunately have a checkerboard hill to see, at least
What really helped cement Kai Tak with phenomenal sights is because the Kowloon Walled City is right next to it, a densely packed dystopian shithole that no governmental body wanted to handle
Ironic that most westerners' stereotypical image of Hong Kong is that place, packed with neon signs and walkways everywhere
(and, obligatory reminder that HMS Hermes, the first carrier was responsible for developing Kai Tak in the first place after the initial ventures failed)
@ivory ridge
Cavour my beloved
#Onthisday in 1941 Private James Gordon was awarded the Victoria Cross for actions performed while fighting the Vichy French. Shortly after, official war artist William Dargie was commissioned to paint Gordon’s portrait and it won the 1942 #Archibaldprize https://t.co/fJbfRyG8LD
James Gordon, a private in the 2nd Australian Imperial Force, received his VC for his actions at Greenhill, north of Jezzine, Lebanon, on 10 July 1941. Under intense machine gun fire, Gordon approached an enemy machine gun post, and charged and killed four machine gunners with a bayonet. This action demoralised the enemy and allowed Gordon's company to advance, taking the position. Gordon was greatly admired for the courage demonstrated by these actions.
Dargie noted his experience of painting the portrait that Gordon was, "Not the smiling, happy-go-lucky "Digger" of legend, but the slightly older-than-young man with a very definite sense of responsibility. A farmer from Western Australia, he had all the countryman's modesty and reticience of speech. He rather deprecated heroism as such, and said "No-one likes wars. It's just a matter sticking with your friends." As I was painting this portrait, and was discussing with him the action at Merjayoun, in which he won his V.C., I noticed he was trembling. Thinking he was feeling the strain of the pose, I said, "Have a rest. I've had you sitting too long." "No, that's alright." he said, "but I always get like this when I think of that action." I felt sorry I had reminded him of it, and said so. He replied: "My cobber and myself often talk about it." "
Filipino FA-50s in Darwin for Exercise Pitch Black 2024
That was during the Syria and Lebanon campaign right?
@manic latch you interested in 8" AP Mk.21 mod 3-5 perhaps
Inspired by our friends at C&Rsenal, Jonathan has rooted through our expansive collection to find different patterns of the Webley Improved Government Revolver, including it's very first iteration.
Check out C&Rsenal's video here for a deeper dive into the inner workings of these revolvers: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=92bdSltjKIY
Subscribe...
Wait wtf, I just realized they added a real ship that saw combat service as a PR
She has attack planes made out of what if F8F floatplanes
So that caused her to be like that yes
Since historically she had spotter planes
In 1943
Which is of course silly, but regardless this ship actually existed
Yes
It changed lot of implications
It means Wisconsin herself can be PR because of her gimmicks
I can't tell if thats a good thing or a bad thing.
Latter to me
Because you're taking somebody who could have been a regular event character with a unique gimmick and wasting them on a collab in favor of somebody more interesting
Its also kinda leaves a bad taste in my mouth because again this is a real ship that saw combat in WW2 in the USN
I hope they spring for "Vermont" instead then.
Halford before the catapult was removed and the ship was converted back to the standard Fletcher layout
Friendly reminder, they made three of those little fuckers
yep
For science...
Why did I read that in GLaDOS's voice
Pringle and Stevens
I legit forgot one of them was named Pringle
named after a Vice Admiral who had served in WW1 and been president of the Naval War College
Neat.
I believe Halford was the only one of the three to actually have seen combat while in her original configuration with the seaplane, participating in the 1943 Marcus Islands Raid
lmao
What is it
He didnt
Well
You know the history already
I wanted to share the newspaper illustration
Maryland paid a visit to Rio de Janeiro
But that was in 1922...
There's also the case of HMS Petunia you may already be aware of
What’s yours guys thought on ww1 ships and interwar ships being constructed or lunched?
Every ship after the first ironclad i like on some level bordering on care. Except the french predreadnaughts.... i just feel like they have wasted potential.
I only know the Deodoro class 
If they can be considered French pre dreads
They look out of proportion. Compared to the ships France would build after Dreadnaught.
First of all you’re thinking of the first one or two classes of French pre dreadnoughts (Charles Martels or Charlemagnes) that looked weird sure
The later french pre dreads look much more conventional
Yeah primarily those ones. Are the ones I remember the most.
Though it should be noted i still like them... just not as much as other ships.
I mean the French weren’t the o my ones that made ship I mean look at early USA pre dreadnoughts that weren’t so great ships because America was experimenting with them
Yeah I can't deny that.
@spring briar were the French pre dreadnoughts good or they were ok designs?
Anyone has any historical sources on the S-21 rockets?
They were innovative designs which lacked in some areas
A fancy way to describe a batch of experimental ship 
Nous avons pu monter à bord du nouveau char Leclerc, le plus puissant et le plus spectaculaire des véhicules de l’armée de Terre !
Toutes les infos sont ici :
https://www.auto-moto.com/insolite/reportage-a-bord-du-nouveau-char-leclerc-xlr-40380
😊📘 FB ➡️ https://www.facebook.com/automoto.magazine.officiel
📸 Insta ➡️ https://www.instagram.com/...
hello, i was wondering if anyone here happened to have a picture of an american 21" mk 17 torpedo
as far as im aware they made a few right before the end of the war but i cant find like any pictures of them lmao
It's a unguided airburst rocket
That you can technically use it for anti surface duties as well
Like the Wfr.Gr.21 and RS-132, both also airburst AA rockets.
I actually like that batch, it is so nonsensical that it is cute
I mean we can’t really criticize there designs because every single country were getting there get wet to craft the great ship designs. Which require to think out of the box ship hulls.
I mean America also had experimental designs, heck look at uss Oregon it was very heavy if I remember correctly
Reminds me of how the nato reporting name for the mig 15 was the fagot in reference to the instrument
Cool!
The Admiralty Fire Control Table (A.F.C.T.) was an electromechanical analogue computer fire-control system that calculated the correct elevation and deflection of the main armament of a Royal Navy cruiser or battleship, so that the shells fired would strike a surface target. The AFCT MK 1 was fitted to HMS Nelson and Rodney in the early 1920s, w...
Cool, it's an actual thing
it's also not particularly high performance, which makes its existence as a UR just one of many ??? choices in AL equipment from a historical perspective
I mean
there's better grounds even for UR Japanese FC director computers
the Admiralty Table is just really
mid
it's a thing of all time
US when they don't want to hand over VT fuzes because the AFCT was too poor
Basically what happened was
getting Vanguard
We already had everything she had in game already(guns, AA, secondary)
Manjuu: Let's add her fire control to make her special smh
That's HACS lol, AFCT is for surface gunnery control
you're honestly hard pressed to find any surface only FC computer which is worth putting as a UR
mostly cus it's a pretty comprehensively solved problem outside of some... loss of institutional knowledge cases
it's the DP and AA systems where all the interesting shit is going on
they both suck lmao
sorry
I do get them confused
Well HACS sucks, AFCT is more or less middling, Warspite, DoY after all got their 20 k+ yards hits with it
Although Mk 37 imo probably should have been the UR gear, like HMS Vanguard also has that, would be a good reference
They were correct in choosing the fire control system for the UR, they just picked the wrong FCS
Behold, low quality video of Laffey:
https://youtu.be/mInThy-A6yI?si=XHy5-z5bU7UJRQ43
On Wednesday morning, January 12, 2012. a crews towed the USS Laffey from North Charleston, under the Ravenel Bridge and to its new berth at the Naval and Maritime Museum.
"We've been waiting for this day for quite a number of years now. I'm looking forward to having the Laffey back," says Bob Wampler who was a radioman aboard the USS Laffey ...
Did Vanguard ever have anything unique?
Her AA
Last battleship ever produced
Well then
I just learned that the UK one-upped the French before they even thought about Surcouf
The M class submarines, monitors/minelayers/underwater aircraft carriers of the British Royal Navy, are today's subject.
Read more about the ship here:
https://www.amazon.co.uk/British-Submarines-Two-World-Wars/dp/1526738163
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Grand-Fleet-Warship-Development-1906-1922-ebook/dp/B0CBNF2PJS
Naval History books, use code 'D...
THEY PUT A BATTLESHIP GUN ON A SUBMARINE… IN WW1!
I should have clarified that I meant technologically.
You mean worldwide or just for the British?
Either one.
Honestly, probably not Mark 37 as UR
Use Mark 38, for main battery DCT
Alas, gold in AL's eyes
Since it's AFCT it should probably be the Mk 8 range keeper rather than the Mk 38 gfcs as a whole
First British FCS that was built to track a highly maneuvering target, only RN BB with any form of RPC for both main and secondary battery (USN did this first). As a whole most efficient BB at or near top speed for its displacement, and had good sea keeping
Could always pair it with the post-war Mark 13, but I digress
Interesting. Thank you for the information.
What would of happened if the United States military had turned the entirety of Iraq into a military state after the 2003 Iraq War until it became functional to be its own country?
Then you would have a post military state functional Iraq
Don’t sleep on solving your internet problems while travelling and go to https://Saily.com/sandrhoman and use the code sandrhoman to get an exclusive 15% off your first purchase.
In 1686, Chinese cannons bombarded the Russian fortress of Albazin for several weeks. The Qing Kangxi Emperor had sent an army to the frigid and inhospitable east of S...
I mean, at least it was good enough to outdo the Iowa-class BBs during gunnery exercises with them? Vanguard's AFCT was also the final variant, the Mk X
that's not an FC thing
that's a natural difference in dispersion between the guns thing
Anyone know what classes the other three warships in Greyhound are? I think Dicky is a Flower-class? Eagle looks like she's an L/M-class or something similar. Couldn't see any good shots of Harry in full view, so it's hard to figure out what she is, best I could find was the third image.
I don't know, I'm pretty sure I got all of their classes wrong
iirc, Dicky is a flower class, Eagle is a Grom class, I forget what Harry is
looks kinda like a battle class though from this shot
(which wouldn't have really been around during this film period, but greyfound is supposed to be a mahan but was filmed on kidd so)
Isn't Harry a Tribal?
(in the movie)
turrets aren't big enough to be a Battle anyways
doesn't seem to have a big shell catcher ahead of turret 2 but that may be the angle
admittedly I haven't seen the movie in a long time
Second funnel on her looks too short to be a Tribal
Could be Battle-class, but that makes no sense, since they didn't enter service till '44
Bow proportionally isn't long enough to be a Battle though
(and they only have one funnel anyways)
Tribal fits best

Turret's are too squat to be a Tribal. God this movie doesn't make this shit easy
in the book I think harry was fictional
But they're not boxy enough to be a Battle

also, more critically, they aren't super far from the bridge like a Battle
at least they all look the part
that angle is really good for showing it
something something Dunkirk anti-CGI wank causing the destroyer's appearance to be massive whiplash
like I know it was super hot to rag on CGI, but sometimes you gotta do it and then do the rest on set
because
really?
aye
what's goofy
is that cgi naval vessels often look better than physical models, but cgi spaceships often look worse than physical models
ehhhhh
or rather
the bar for physical models of spaceships got set really fucking high back with the original star wars trilogy
Just put aside the Midway movie DDs
well yeah, we're assuming they're trying
Okay, so wikipedia says Harry's a Tribal and Eagle is a Grom
so it is a tribal
The thing that fucks with everything is the turrets
my british dd identification skills is not a high bar to clear
so I don't feel bad
the turrets are a bit scuffed, but still everything else lines up much more with a Tribal
second funnel is too short? what else has a second funnel lmao
the alphabet soup DDs get even weirder when you realize a lot of them should technically be under a single umbrella class
but due to the way the RN ordered DDs they get filed as a separate class rather than a subclass or flight
because the variances are so small
cough cough J/K/N-class
D-H classes are mostly the same as well
Also C and I class used generally the same hull
Dicky is HMCS Sackville, Eagle is ORP Blyskawica, Harry is a fictitious Tribal (IIRC with some oversized turrets), Greyhound is Kidd
which, surprise, nearly all of them are museum ships bar Harry, but that could be easily modified via CGI after some tampering with HMCS Haida
these few shots should give you enough details to tell where they got the ships from, especially the maple leaf on Dicky.
It's fairly decent for CGI work - save for the anti-kamikaze fit on Kidd, which didn't appear until 1945.
As for Dunkirk, just
Lol, lmao even
Russia is a country which has multiple border disputes with its neighbours, and soon there might be another one with a country which doesn’t technically have a border with Russia: South Korea. Subject of this developing territorial dispute is the former island known as Noktundo or No’ktundo (Ноктундо in Russian and 녹둔도 in Korean).
Since mediaev...
If remember correctly, another cruiser, Honolulu I think though I’m not sure, lost her entire bow in the same attack. The crew managed to keep her afloat long enough to get to the nearest post weld a big sheet of metal and sail her back to the US. The US damage control crew were something else.
Figured out what was wrong with Harry. Harry might've had these turrets as opposed to the 4-inch DP turrets we usually see on a Tribal-class
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/QF_4.7-inch_Mk_IX_%26_XII_naval_gun
The 4x 4.7" mounts was the as built armament for the majority of the ships except for 2 of the Canadian vessels which had 4x 4" mounts as built.
And war time modification of the 4.7" armed Tribals never replaced all 4 of the original mounts
Which is to say only 2 of the 27 had a fully 4" armament during wartime
Wasn't Eskimo one of those two?
No
ah
What does Beria, beer, pubs and a political collapse have in common?
Well my intrepid viewer, I am glad you asked. Enjoy the caper of the Petrov Affair.
Discord: https://discord.com/invite/7PTpVZewKQ
Patreon: patreon.com/HistoryofEverythingYouTube
I probably won't be posting my references too often anymore, it takes a significant amount of t...
The Jagdtiger was the heaviest armored fighting vehicle in World War 2 that was produced in series. It had great firepower but many issues, why it ultimately was a failure.
DISCLOSURE: I was invited by the Tank Museum at Bovington in 2017, 2018, 2019 & 2023.
https://www.youtube.com/c/thetankmuseum
Cover design by vonKickass.
»» GET BOOKS & VI...
Opinions on Operation AI
Aka the Japanese invasion of the aleutian islands
Anything from profound waste of time to actively sabotaging the far more important MI mission
The idea does seem okay if you are a desk jockey who's only looking at the situation from a globe and has never seen the arctic first hand. The steaming distances are a lot closer than a flat map projection might imply.
The Japanese invasion of the Aleutians only happened because of the political horse trading necessary to build support for Midway
It was a stupid sideshow that frittered away valuable resources
The moment you actually arrive in the area though, it becomes obvious why the islands are completely untenable for a forward base. The terrain is horrid to negotiate or build on, and an impenetrable mist hangs close to the ground making air ops a near impossibility at times and even caused friendly fire among the allies during the retake.
And then to stack the operation at the same time as MI was a downright criminal misuse of resources, especially when you look at the rosters and realize that the AL operation in its three stages sucked away more tonnage than MI even used.
I still find the decoy operation myth to be crazy though
And Kantai Collection even mentions it as a "decoy operation" though it has been proven not to be one
But I agree that Japan wasted A LOT of men and material in that campaign
How good was the Baltimore class desing and how powerful was she?
Repost
New M1 Thumper pictures featuring it with the 140mm gun have appeared online.
Quoting Wackleeb0 (@wackleeb0)
Alongside an image showing an original M1 Abrams with an abnormally long 105 was posted. Possible one of the long gun 105 proposals that came along when the tanks first entered service? Didn’t think they ever built one but ma...
Very good and powerful
Basically a new orleans but with everything upgraded because of no treaty restrictions
And a facehardened belt
m1 thumper my beloved
I can one shot her
The F-15 first flew in 1972, and fifty years later, the US Air Force is still flying F-15 Eagles in Europe. An upgraded model – the F-15EX Eagle II – is due to begin deploying in the next few months, potentially extending the lifespan of the F-15 until the 2050s, 90 years after the first F-15 took to the skies. Despite operating in every major c...
wrong! Hawker Hunter
Following on from our Knight's Armament KS-1 video last month, Jonathan takes a look at another firearm from the Project Hunter trials: the Heckler & Koch HK416 A5.
Project Hunter was launched by the UK to select a new Alternative Individual Weapon for select branches of the British Army, such as the Rangers and elements of the Royal Marine Com...
It won’t be long before there are no more WW2 veterans left
It's a sad reality
Stay tuned to this channel for a multi-month stop by Fort Irwin to see what life is like for the troopers of the Blackhorse Regiment.
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/TheChieftainArmor
Twitter...erm.. X: https://twitter.com/Chieftain_armor
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/chieftain_moran/
And TikTok (Not that there's much on it yet) https...
Hey, i have a question guys .
Did you know what happend to the RICHELIEU once it arrive in England ?
Even if they mostly stole it...
"stole" - The free french very much kept her in their hands, thank you very much
English took it
Who said that?
I remember sawing it somewhere...
I don't remember it...
Mostly fake i guess...
😮💨
Added a standard RN radar fit for battleships basically
Huh ?
I edited sorry if not clear
Richelieu remained in French hands through her career, she remained in Dakar until 1942 when Admirl Darlan finally ordered the French forces to join the allied side
At which point the USA took the Richelieu to New York for much needed repairs, although extremely unwillingly
Yeah, i know this part
And as a snub in the face, gave her a fucking PT boat radar as fire control
?!
It wasnt until 1944 when the British gave her Type 285 and SG radar at Durban
A bit late...
Even then, the ship is under French control, not British
IIRC when she first arrived in late 1943 in Scapa Flow she received Type 284 gunnery control radar. She got the Type 285, Type 281B, SG, and a FV1 Jammer in Casablanca in late 1944, she went to fix other issues during her 1945 Durban refit
Theres a book
French Battleships 1922-1956
Highly recommended if you are interested in Fr BBs overall

excellent thread on the logistics of the New Guinea campaign
I remember hearing that the Owen Gun preformed extremely well in this campaign
Performed well in every campaign it was used in from Papua to Vietnam
Also didn't the Thompson not preform well in that campaign?
The Thompson barely performed well in Europe of course it would struggle in the jungles of New Guinea
Join me as I discover the Final Assembly Line of Eurofighter Typhoon at Airbus Manching, a place usually out of bounds for cameras.
- Check out my books -
Ju 87 Stuka - http://stukabook.com
STG-44 Assault Platoon - http://sturmzug.com
German Panzer Company 1941 - http://www.hdv470-7.com/
Achtung Panzer? Zur Panzerwaffe der Wehrmacht - http://...
oomfies
didn't the hawaiian king put the union jack on the hawaiian flag just because thought it looked cool?
Let BetterHelp connect you to a therapist who can support you - all from the comfort of your own home. Visit https://betterhelp.com/operations and enjoy a special discount on your first month #advert
If you have any questions about the brand relating to how the therapists are credentialed, their privacy policy, or therapist compensation model, c...
iirc, yes lol
Surprisingly yes




💻 

