#history
1 messages · Page 151 of 1
Tho I love my Kor-2
Indeed. We don't have information on the NdB 42,000 tons yet, sadly.
Up.41 was the 1935 design, IIRC.
by the way
today is a very important day
Hello gents
BTW where did you find this?
Sussy
It's from a Russian book - Super Battleships of the Union was the title, I think.
Thanks
Yeah, the more expansive plans called for 4 aircraft carriers and 9 battleship, and lots of cruisers and DD, the more conservative, which was approved called for 2 aircraft carriers and 6 battleships.
The only ships who saw the lights of the day of the breakout fleet were the Capitani Romani class, the Cagni class subs, and the Sterope experimental oil tanker wich tested the large diesel engines.
Early US and pre-revolution france
btw Riche - in case you missed it.

Hmm come to think of it the military anime community has to be fucking tiny for me to run into people I've seen elsewhere all the fucking time
go figure, I mention Ro.43 and Pretz comes
what do you mean by a gas problem
The U.P. 41 in fact had an enclosed hangar.
So did Littorio, in her early design stages.
It was removed in anticipation of the Ca.316, alongside the double catapult system.
Nah
А. М. Васильев
ЛИНЕЙНЫЕ КОРАБЛИ
ТИПА
СОВЕТСКИЙ СОЮЗ
My bible
Ish
I mean, what are the cap's functions?
to protect the capsule
Other ships of the breakout fleet were, the improved Soldati class DD, armed with dp 120mm, the Costanzo Ciano cruisers, and some iterations called for a different range of pocket battleship, like the U.P. 90.
ah, I misremembered - was thinking it was from this one.
Still packs loads of information, including one of my favourite mistranslations of all times
"Shitadel"
Krem's Soyuz bibles
А. М. Васильев ЛИНЕЙНЫЕ КОРАБЛИ ТИПА СОВЕТСКИЙ СОЮЗ (Most detailed one about Soyuz, but Russian)
Mclaughlin's Soviet Battleships (best summary)
Warship 2021 (Also best summary on Soyuz section)
Warship 2022 (cool summary for Project 24)
And this book you show is kinda outdated but still useful
I also have one of these in my bathroom
There was an article on Pr.82 1949's model - I forgot which Warship was that
My informations about soviet ships come from this and from articles of McLaughlin on Warship.
The one cited for Petro
I call them: Red Yeet
This one is good for understanding why the Soviets created the ship, but not much information on the ship's technical specifications.
I think this one shows wrong belt for Project 24
There are some interesting details like Kirov's disaster and ultimately her designer getting arrested.
Warship 2023 has a good summary on U.P.41
Honestly I can't believe Ansaldo designed that
It looks like something the Germans would come up with
It's not that far from the Littorios, to be frank.
No way, I think the only policy Azur Lane actually enforces is that the ships has to be laid before the end of WWII.
The Littorio's deck armour is....insufficient, to say the least, and the Italians are well aware of it.
including some wacky proposals to weld 36mm plates directly to the deck.
Early Soviet BB design KB-4
Wdym?
No it's just... it straight up looks like Bismarck's armor
If you're thinking that because of the splinter deck (the sloped edge), boys do I have news for you
They did some improvement is deck armour on the Romas, I think.
Richelieu and Dunkerque also has such a splinter deck, IIRC at 40mm and sloped
The "turtle deck" armour we often discuss is when that slope is used as the "strength deck" to defeat shells, rather than catching splinters
I think the Italians used the triple bottom for their ships, this has only a double bottom.
Hmm, that so? To my knowledge, Roma's main modification is to the bow only.
well, and the superstructure - the navigation and admiral bridge.
The French ones have a much steeper angle on their sloped decks iirc
Yes, the bow and some minor improvements to the armour I think. Don't know exactly where right now tho.
I'm halfway a book on the Littorios lol.
Kinda had to pause due to university exams.
great stuff
Afaik no improvements were made to Roma's armor
Ok, I was misremembering
Sorry.
Possibly the best armor of any Treaty battleship 
Improvements were the better bow shape, sonar, and AA fire control
Littorio's main deck goes down to 100mm in machinery areas right?
That's actually... pretty sh*t
All things considered, the minor improvements to Roma changed neither the general characteristics nor the performance of the ship, except for a few modifications that allowed the engines greater responsiveness at cruising speeds.
this is a crazy section
The difference was 313 tonnes than Littorio and 483 more than VV.
Almost 230mm of deck armor
The machinery is 100 and 150 over magazines.
Yeah, sorry, definitely misremembering.
Since to reach the armor deck you have to go either through the upper deck (36mm on 9mm) or upper belt/bulkheads (70mm).
Unfortunately Roma just eats her coup de grace right in the machinery area next to the magazines.
Fritz-X go boom
Additionally, worth noting the 150mm portions extend past the magazines, covering parts of the turbine rooms.
huh
never realised that richie had a "triple" bottom on her mags
Didn't they drop the Pugliese TDS in favour of bulkheads of UP 41 because they feared the possibility of some shells penetrating the thin 40mm internal armour?
Doesn't Yammy straight up have a 25mm plate attached to the bottom of her magazine?
Jane's: understood, conflating that to 6" strength deck and 4" weather deck

The Ro.43 is certainly superior in range and sheer endurance, with a 4 to 8 hour flight time that it made good use of during many of the Mediterranean clashes- but it's main problems compared to some of the more modern (and purpose-built) scout and observation types of the time like the 196 are fragility and poor seakeeping. The Ro.43, adapted from the Aeronautica's Ro.37 reconnaissance aircraft as an interim seaplane design until something more modern could take to the stage, somewhat lacked in a general structural integrity for naval operations, particularly in resistance to salt water corrosion and general shock, whether from gunfire (though largely applicable to ships using the bow catapult arrangement or the aft of the Littorios) or simply hard landings and less than perfect sea conditions, in addition to lackluster water handling (though, this didn't stop some crews from sailing their Ro.43s for well over 24 hours when forced down onto the sea from an engine failrue, there's actually a few incidents where it stayed afloat for much longer than you'd expect). Both of these limitations, among others, largely led to it's use involving flying to nearby ports and seaplane bases after completing a sortie, rather than returning back to the ship directly (though in fairness they could continue to carry out missions from that port if not relying on another Ro.43 launched from the fleet, and furthermore it was generally a good idea concerning ship safety rather than having aircraft embarked at all times). If it weren't for the nature of the Mediterranean war, and the Ro.43's own strengths such as range, it's weaknesses would otherwise be unacceptable in a shipborne seaplane.
Oh it's... 50mm
If only they launched their catapult fighter to provide some escort.
They did, IIRC.
They had, funnily enough- after the Dorniers attacked.
the Re.2000s could not reach the altitude and returned to base.
how would this help
Only Vittorio's was launched, and it failed to climb up in time to do anything
Littorio's was damaged and jettisoned overboard
and Roma's went down with the ship
Iirc the Germans didn't exactly come loudly
See, this is why you should protect your cute little seaplanes
looking at you, USN, smh, smh
Gascogne under deck garage
RN: Structural integrity weakness
But honestly, no ideal solution
Rough edit but this is what the coverage at the battery deck actually looked like. As you can see, the coverage over the turbine rooms is split fairly evenly between the 150mm and 100mm sections, and leaving the turbogenerator groups under the 150mm armor.
put it in the middle, it lights up for everyone to target you
put it at the back, it obstructs firing, unless you're an all forward design
I dunno, I think the innovative sea sled is indicative enough of how much they care
At the beginning the admiral didn't open fire on the Germans bombers. Moreover really bad luck with the Fritz X centering the ammos.
What's with Germans and trick shots
Just joking about the battleships not having it
I mean hangar, and yea, they have the sled
It goes down to 90mm huh
excusable enough for the BBs tbh, rather than trying to fit one into the stern as a vulnerable space
Come to think of it, is that a system that the US used?
To my memory, most ships just have their seaplanes taxi to the crane and take them up.
Littorio was also hit. But survived. Also the Roma was already hit but the bomb exploded out of the ship.
yes, the sea sled was standard issue for the USN
: )
It's why all US shipborne seaplanes had a book on the bottom of the pontoon, and also used single-pontoon configurations in their designs
Would be a shame if something jammed that door shut 
Not that I know of. Or, at least if it was a consideration, it was a minor one.
With the '41,000-ton' battleship design UP.41 was derived from, they knew they weren't bound by a low displacement from the start relative to what they wanted.
The Pugliese system's main advantage was the high protection it achieved at a relatively low weight cost, compared to conventional bulkheads systems. It was, however, more volume-intensive than other systems, reduced available volume inside the hull for other systems.
So with the new design, because the displacement was so much higher from the start, they felt no need to pursue weight savings in the TDS and just opted for something heavier but less volume intensive, and hopefully even more effective, from the start.
Yeah, the US used that.
They were also the first to completely drop hydroplanes.
only really the Germans experimented with a similar system at some point but never adopted it for whatever reason (perhaps something to do with the twin pontoons they often used)
Ehhh, not entirely
God, I hate how garbage the Kindle version of the book is
On the outboard sections that aren't over the 'citadel', yes.
150 pixels for your plans of the Littorios, take it or leave it
you mean the sled?
For observation roles certainly, gunfire spotting was completely obsolete compared to systems introduced in the USN like radar fire control assistance
💯
It drives me up the wall
aye
we had it too
Ahhh, wasn't aware
Ok, as I said I read that info in the McLaughlin article on Warship 2023.
Aside from the U-boat rotor kite, did anyone think of deploying towed gliders or something to assist with spotting aboard BBs or something?
Yes, sorry, they also used cranes like everybody else, but they were the first to drop reconnaissance planes since radar become capable enough.
That's what the catapult planes are for- gliders wouldn't really work.
The purpose of the plane is to observe the fall of shot and report it back to the ship - so that adjustments can be made.
The RM briefly looked at using autogyros on the Littorio's (not just for spotting, though).
At least until the Air Force went and said 'no you can't have those' right after the trials on Fiume...
✅
Don't let bin know it
otherwise they'll make another abomination of a Littorio with a helicopter deck on it
I'm going to assume those trials on Fiume went horribly 
here ya go
Oh god
Something something Littorio '59
They also tested them on some cruisers, or I'm always misremembering?
"It can be assumed that Italy managed to keep both Littorio class battleships and use them in a training capacity"
The Italians really would have liked.
Oh, that I'm sure.
For scouting and sea rescue though, they still very much had value to the USN, enough so that all three of the main types (SOC Seagull, OS2U Kingfisher, and the late-arrival SC Seahawk, which specifically was tailored for scouting work) were still in use on many Cruisers and Battleships at the end of the war, and also in the postwar years until about 1949, when Helicopters fully replaced them for utility and sea rescue (and they had been outpaced technologically anyways)
They scapped them in the 60s or something.
No, actually.
I mean, it wasn't something that was going to be militarily useful in the short term but otherwise went well.
The main thing was that the Air Force took them over as soon as they realized the navy was trying to get around the ban on fixed-wing aircraft for the navy.
But, Roma inconveniently sank herself and the WAllies don't really want the Soviets to get a Littorio.

They trialed them on Fiume
also oooooo, wasn't actually aware of Autogyro trials on Fiume
So, happiest solution for them is send them to the scrapyard.
Hang on, I have photos
Oh, yes, sorry, was thinking of the city. Lol
(Hence "Observation")
Also they held on on the Aquila until 1953.
Here on Foch
Or, if you're the Japanese, have another just for recon.
"After WW2, Japan was allowed to have a coastal defense force: under a peculiar condition, that their warships be restricted to their remaining WW2 vintages for the next 30 years."
E13A is observation, F1M is recon, IIRC.
Oh wait, now I remember these
Imagine her twerking with that
Also the US were ready to give Italy a independence class carrier and a commencement bay class escort carrier, tho for economical and political problems it went anywhere.
Sad that gyroplanes never really took off
Did they just build the deck on Fiume?
Yup
I can see what looks like the turret on the first picture - I'm guessing they just built the deck on part of the deck.
40 meters long, 15 meters wide at the start thinning to 10 meters at the end
They only got SBC2 to form an air squadron.
Brief article on the experiment;
https://www.militarystory.org/lesperimento-autogiro-sullincrociatore-fiume/
L ‘”Autogyro”, noto anche come “Gyrocopter”, era un predecessore dell’elicottero, che anziché fare affidamento su un motore per alimentare i rotori, si basa sull’aria che spinge attraverso il rotore dal basso, con una spinta in avanti generata da un separato (e alimentato) elica. Questo nuovo tipo di tecnologia è stata oggetto di test da parte [...
I believe they were just S2C's, specifically
ASW version, not bomber
They actually gave some to the navy
Flew off an American carrier
Landed at Naples
And the air force had Carabineri on site to arrest the pilots
[screaming]
Yeah, that ones
The difference is that the USN sea sled is placed alongside the ship, suspended by the catapult, rather than trailing directly behind
They trained some people in preparation to a possible acquisition of a carrier by Italy.
One of Alaska's seahawks trapping on the sled
Yeah, was thinking of that before.
Still, the French system would be beneficial too I imagine
The law that allowed the air force to control every fixed wing aircraft was scrapped in 1989.
For some years Garibaldi only had helicopters.
Harriers, my beloved.
Kinda sad that they are getting replaced by the F35.
Have to replace them at some point
And even if the AV-8B+ could punch above their weight with their radar and AMRAAMs
Btw hope one day WT adds the Hawker siddley p.1204 or something, the supersonic Harrier.
F-35B is so much better in basically every way
It's not even an evolution in capability, so much as it is a revolution in capability, for GRUPAER
The Pegasus engine is a masterpiece.
I'm not convinced about the F35 central fan.
Litteraly a development of the yak38 and yak141, lol.
The Hawker Siddeley P.1154 was a planned supersonic vertical/short take-off and landing (V/STOL) fighter aircraft designed by Hawker Siddeley Aviation (HSA).
Development originally started under P.1150, which was essentially a larger and faster version of the basic layout and technology being developed by the smaller subsonic Hawker Siddeley P.1...
Makes me wonder if they'll toss the stacked director system once they actually find out with what's reported at Dakar.
Clem and especially Gas not being built was a tragedy
Come to think of it, I dont think the Littorios had issues with their stacked rangefinders despite being bomb and torpedo shocked all the time.
Was wondering if it was because of shoddy work on Richelieu
Because Dunkek seemed to eat Terre Nueve's depth charges without director shock - though at that point director shock is the last of her issues
Spee x 3
we'll never know
Aha, found the photos on Rod's warbirds
(D-ISFD) (TJ+HB) vkz (T3+HB) WrkN2522 Being Hoisted On Board with Use of Special Recovery Mat KMS Gneisenau During Sea Trials Travemunde Germany 1939 (153K)```
did the littorio's take torps in shallow water?
Most of the gun directors should have been at rest
idk if the 90mm battery went into action? Actual specifics on the AA fire from the ships is pretty limited.
yeah no clue
Tbh, I dont think where it hits matters too much since Richelieu got smacked near the shaft
Same as VV by Urge at one point
sounds like richie's directors that high up on the mast were just too heavy
causing them to sway back and forth after the hit which ripped the clips and bearings
The only BB that I remember has director/turret shock of similar seriousness is Tirpitz
With the explosives from the subs IIRC
That I can tell, none of the Littorio's had their directors taken offline by shocks
Unless you want to count Roma
But...
could have been that the hits on Littorio wre more lateral
and the one on richie more from the bottom
the aft hit on Litto is a bit higher up than the one on richie
so the shock was more in the axial direction of the mast
causing the clips to be under more stress
-and I also just discovered a thread that seems to give more context for both the German and French recovery mats, likely both being the Hein mat (also used by the Swedish Navy and the British during the interwar period)
https://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic.php?t=201550
I imagine the amidships catapult and aviation deck placement on most Royal Navy and German ship designs by WW2 probably precluded further use of the Hein mat system with those navies, as it seems to be largely reliant on a stern arrangement and may be unwieldly to tow alongside via crane (as in the Ar 196 photo, the only use of the mat with that type as operationally they relied on the standard unassisted recovery procedure, likewise with the RN) compared to the smaller, newer USN sea sled
idk
That'd make sense. Always find it a bit weird to see Jordan trying to word it like its a big sin of the French BBs.
I think Marzin was absolutely right to mention it
I'm a chemical engineer and design plants
which we assume will work
but there's always issues you never think about

Sounds like my job.
the thing I would expect on Richie to be subpar due to the speedy construction was the welds
mostly the welds near the top
I remember Shiki railing on about French 20' steel quality as well?
What was it again? Wrecked French steel industry or something else?
nothing with the steel quality
just the type of steel used wasn't armor grade construction steel from 1922-1930ish
due to massive tax on the french steel industry
this is why the Duguay Trouins and early french CA's have so little armor
all the weight that would normally be allocated to armor went into thicker plates and beams for the hull
to reach the same strenght as if the hull were built from armor grade steel

this is also a reason for the seamingly big disconnect between the Suffrens and Algérie
and between the DT's and the La gals
Tax as in, the steel industry is costly, or the industry not free to make armour because of rebuilding France?
both
This is the relevant section from Jordan & Moulin;
Ah, got it. Thanks to both. 👍
I want to kitbash a first generation treaty cruiser between France and Italy
Think of the things we could accomplish together
Italo-French treaty cruiser "Solferino"
Perfect name
Our steel, your (203mm) guns
Well, technically the 203/50's used by the Trento-class were part French anyways
Solferino class treaty cruisers:
- Solferino
- Montebello
- Magenta
They were Schneider-Ansaldo guns
There was a French presence at Palestro, too
Which is also notably the last battle in European history a King rode into battle
magnificent
I know the last king who was beside his troops in combat was Albert I
my king : )
whose interior design
I would lean towards French on this one since they don't use seperately mounted guns
I remembered another name
And the ammunition replenishment of the Italian 203/50's was pretty mid
However it is also worth noting that Victor Emanuel III also frequently visited the frontlines in both world wars
Though the 203/53's have a much better argument for them, aside from the damn common cradle mounting.
Jacob van Heemskerck class Anti-Aircraft Warfare Frigates 1986-2005
and
De Zeven Provinciën class Air-Defence and Command Frigates 2002-now
not sure
jesus
inflation in 1928
when the Vauquelins were being built
they were 24% more expensive than the aigles
yup
and the Fantas were 28% more expensive than them
73 million francs each
about 1/3 of the cost of Dunkerque herself
which really shows that machinery costs a lot
Machinery, guns and gun fire control tend to be the most expensive parts of any ship, yeah
Followed by armor
The Fantasques are still something of a religious/biblical class of ship to me
maybe mystefying is a better word
I can't believe the Italians named a destroyer Lanzerotto Malocello


what
: )
De Zeven Provinciën class ADCF-Frigates support escort landing ships
lots of nice discussion to read
Umm... Did Japan just researching their own EFV???
Oh boy I can't wait for someone to leak classified documents of this
But seriously what the hell is that design
i don't have money to register... 
Just leaving this here

Everything is an F-35/F-22
F-22
The Swedish system with dispersed air bases goes back decades. The ability to move quickly between different dispersed airbases with minimal resources spread out across the country, makes us unpredictable. Gripen was designed with that in mind from the beginning. What makes the Swedish Gripen system unique is that we can operate like this and s...
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forest_of_Tronçais
@tough quail @spring briar
The Forest of Tronçais (French: Forêt de Tronçais, IPA: [tʁɔ̃sɛ]) is a national forest comprising 10,600 hectares (26,000 acres) in the Allier department of central France. It is managed by the National Forests Office (ONF). Its oaks, planted by Louis XIV's minister Jean-Baptiste Colbert to supply the French Navy, constitute one of the principal...
Love its story
"The forest is not a relic of the primeval forest that once covered most of France, but was organized by Jean-Baptiste Colbert in 1670. With forethought for the requirements of the French Navy two hundred years hence, the Colbert Forest was planted as an oak grove. The oaks were interplanted with beeches and larches to encourage their growth for favourable timber for ship's masts: straight, tall, and free of knots.
But by the time the trees were fully mature, the navy was rapidly switching from sail to steam"
Fun fact. The top scoring western allied tank ace was Canadian
that heavily depends upon how you count non-turreted cannon armed armored vehicles
I would be keeping an eye on BAEs recent proposals to the RAN
type 83 or upgunned Hunter
there's really no feasible option for building anything that isnt BAE
True. The top allied one was Soviet
non sequitur
15 February 1944 two Soviet engineers proposed equipping Sherman tanks with 85 mm S-53 guns either in the original turret or a transplanted T-34 turret
No I think his name was Dmitry Lavrinenko


Oh sorry my Latin isn't the best

The creative never stops 
Maybe they should have
Oh... so the Radley-Walters medal I keep on getting in WoT was Canadian all along? 
What in the fu-
I mean the Soviets also did this
This is why the German loss
I want it in enlisted
It's a very good gun
57mm
Likely third best Soviet gun for tank hunting after 100mm and 85mm
It will be a premium vehicle
War thunder
it's a 57mm that's almost the same weight as the PaK 40
Firing 3 kg shell at a muzzle velocity of 990 m/s ye
I feel like you got something against the Soviets. Yeah they weren't the best and morally questionable at times but they did help in final victory
Also 57mm
But what's the ZiS-30's penatration
112mm @ 90 degrees @ 100 meters @ 75% criteria
Thanks
~121mm @ 90degrees @ 100 meters @ 50% criteria
though I guess I should grab the 500m numbers considering the available comparisons
What da hellll
Ivan and Boris got drunk on vodka and turned an APC into a decent tank destoryer
Also this
Vodka bruh I swear 
I think japan also tried that
Vodka drinkers were the only successful ones though
Yeah Japan's was only a mock up
I'd rather get an A-40 over any tank Japan put out back in those days
Christie's concept
Japanese tanks were worse than Italy's
I forgot about Italy 💀
Somehow that gun looks way more inefficient than an anti-tank rifle...
an apc for little plastic army men maybe
La creatura
is it an apc if the only personnel it carries are the crew
and its a factual statement?
🤔
Yes
1250kg ZiS-2
~111mm @ 90 degrees @ 500 meters @ 50% criteria with a 3.14 kg projectile @ 990 m/s
1425kg Pak 40
~132mm @ 90 degrees @ 500 meters @ 50% criteria with a 6.80 kg projectile @ 790 m/s
1215kg OQF 6-pounder
~112mm @ 90 degrees @ 500 meters @ 50% criteria with a 2.85/2.86 kg projectile @ 853/892 m/s
Isn't the PaK 40 75mm?
we stan the 6 pounder
6 pounder go Thunk
ammunition quality/design choices biting the Soviet gun in the ass
ZiS-2
111mm actual, 97mm Krupp estimate, 114% Krupp
Pak 40
132mm actual, 99mm Krupp estimate, 133% Krupp
OQF 6-pdr
112mm actual, 79-83mm Krupp estimate, 135-142% Krupp
krill issue
Chukchi Peninsula
I think Soviet crack was more potent than German ones
Yea but in Japan you get to mow down barely trained Chinese
In Russia you face Germans with actual heavy tanks 
ran a few other numbers to make a vague trend
90mm M3 w/ M82 produced an actual vs Krupp of ~132%
OQF 17-pdr w/ APCBC produced an actual vs Krupp of ~139%
8.8 cm Flak 36 w/ PzGr. 39 produced an actual vs Krupp of ~137%
85mm D-5T/ZiS-S-53 w/ APBC produced an actual vs Krupp of ~113%
76mm F-34 w/ APHE produced an actual vs Krupp of ~84%
75mm M3 w/ M61 APC produced an actual vs Krupp of ~105%
Kinda wish KV-220 was mass produced before 1941, she was basically Soviet Tiger with a 107mm gun that should be very useful when fighting with a tiger 1
Second prototype that is
107 mm ZiS-6
Some of them only had swords
Damn
Also known as the Da Dao
Supposedly several recorded sword 1v1s with the Japanese
Which is fucking metal. Literally
And the Japanese Army in their infinite wisdom only really trained their officers to 1v1, not actually useful things in war like... quickly drawing your sword
just use kv1
That's the problem
She use 76mm
Wasn't good against Tigers
According to korean wiki the Kv-220 had engine issues, and if the Soviets care about that Iirc it was as bad as the Porsche tiger or worse
Oh and Japanese bayonet training programs from that era survives to this day
Which tank didn't had engine issues lol
Krem
Didn't US fixed GAA engine only around 1944
Well... not many to the extent of the Porsche Tiger
Krem
Rich
Hi Krem, I'm Roon
Funny hair
Not that one
Big ass sword
Omniman
Look something like 50% of men from 1920 previous are omni men
Bayonets can still be useful
Yea it's just that I find it funny that someone was fucking dense enough to try to turn that into a school curriculum in the aftermath of WW2
Just steal it from some poor Russian guy
They are armed with fucking mosin and ppsh
I don’t really see the issue
This is not a memes channel
💀
History meme
Ok that's not histoy💀
"Look Satoshi I know you love history but it is really annoying to everyone if you yell Banzai every practice okay??"
Bro remember his past
Pretty much useless
Putin's moving castle
One sec I think I have a chart
Its armed to deal with
the one threat that’ll never be sent to attack it
infantry
It’s got inadequate aa for its size
AA against what
Nothing
and all you need is a good hit with an anti-tank missile to mess the whole thing up
Unless you make it like that Yugoslav armored train
Because the funny thing about trains is they’re all connected up
It’s not like a column of separate trucks
You hit it near the front and you’ve stopped the whole thing in its tracks
And while I won’t argue that gun-based shorad isn’t effective
The size of the asset you’re protecting, and the fact that said asset is very restricted in its mobility
leads me to conclude that a handful of ZSUs aren’t going to stop a determined attack
I forgot what that one was called
blow up a section of track or hit one of the lead cars with a TOW and congratulations
you’ve done much more damage than if you’d hit a single truck with the same munition
I think that they're more for logistics rather than attacks
I am a big fan of armored trains
Same
Arming them like the russkies have is just a half measure
yeah
Thus you armor the logistics
Sticking a few ZSUs on will protect it from like
Drone attacks and not too much else
though I do like them a lot, one of my fictional nations uses them heavily due to their mountainous terrain
And infantry but as you said they need to reach rails first
Like I said, a half measure
Don't see any damaged trains yet
You’re putting a bunch of eggs in one basket and then half-heartedly reinforcing the basket
It’s more a propaganda measure than anything significantly practical
Eggs have boxes yeah
Reduce their chance of cracking
US's Rail Escort Vehicle (REV)
Not sure how much is the armor but it's there
designed to protect shipments of radioactive waste and house mission-relevant security personnel.
A partisan group claimed to destroy one during the battle of mariupol or melitopol but failed to provide proof
You know like images of a wreak
But drones are a big factor
I think the trains themselves have their own drones
Which makes sense because one of their roles is reconnaissance apparently
It’s not capable of taking down a dedicated drone attack
As in
More than 2-3 coming in at once
If it was made the priority target of an attack, it’d be gone
Coming from where
As you said it's a logistics unit
Thing doesn't roam around Frontline
Rcs drones lose signals at certain ranges
Yet it somehow also has the reconnaissance role?
Don't think you would use a train over drones for that
Hell I never heard train reconnaissance ever
Neither had I
Oh wait seems it's a case?
"The War in Egypt, the Ironclad Train during the Reconnaissance of 28 July"
Tho these people didn't had planes back then
Or drones
Listing the armaments of each:
Yenisei:
1 30 mm autocannon 2A42
1 ZU-23-2 cannon
Machine Gun slots (I think they're PKMs)
And 82-BM-37 mortars
Volga:
2 ZU-23-2 cannons
Machine gun slots
Amur:
1 ZU-23-2 cannon
1 Kamysh M4K electronic warfare system
Baikal:
2 ZU-23-2 cannons
1 Kamysh M4K electronic warfare system
1 unknown anti-air missile system
2-4 Machine gun emplacements
2 AGS-17 grenade launchers
This is from 2016 for example
Yes. Baikal and her sister Amur (yes they are shes) are from 2016 and have since been upgraded
Those are all well and good but you’re still taking a logistical asset not meant for near-frontline service and putting it there
Without addressing the main flaw with putting it there
I remember reading that they dumped off some BMPs and soldiers and pulled back
Trains are not particularly known for their off-road performance
they can only go where there’s a track
There is one...
Soviet Diesel-Electric 12×12 Overlanding Train
And not only that but again
You hit it on the right car and the whole thing is stopped
Probably why they are rushing into combat with these
Ye
At most dropping off soldiers and BMPs
I remember reading about it
Trains are best logistic units
Because there's rail behind you
Especially for tanks
Ships are cool but they can't go on land
Big Planes barely enough to carry 1 or 2
They're kinda acting like on land landing ships
And Russia has specialized units for rail stuff
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_Railway_Troops
Railway Troops of the Russian Armed Forces (Russian: Железнодорожные войска ВС России) are a railway troops service in the Logistical Support of the Russian Armed Forces. They are involved in ensuring the defense of Russia. Railway Troops perform the tasks of rail services (preparation, construction, reconstruction and protection of the objects ...
Realized a painful death
In May 1951 a passenger train hit a Sherman tank, killing its crew (except one who jumped out before the impact)
Crew likely hit their heads into tank so hard
Ow
Oh fuck
I mean wasn't a big part of the reds taking over from the whites through railways from leningrad?
so I can get the train love
also tbf I feel like the armored trains are mainly to quickly transport stuff without risk of sabotage
which kooky mf is gonna smuggle anti tank weaponry into russia, station near one of the tracks and fire?
if it was a truck delivering assets, just have a gang with guns and shoot the driver and guards
with the train not only will it never be able to be blocked by traffic, saboteurs can't easily ambush it with just some guns
also I feel like it would better stand the weather, trucks can slip on ice, have poorer mileage when its cold, etc...
Rest in peace, hero
Man it must have been horrible to be a hospital corpsman during Pearl Harbor btw rest in peace war hero
“Anti-Submarine Warfare Frigate (ASWF)” future 2028/2029 new ship for Netherlands Navy
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Submarine_Warfare_Frigate_(Koninklijke_Marine)
The Anti-Submarine Warfare Frigate (ASWF) is a project of the Royal Netherlands Navy (RNLN, Dutch: Koninklijke Marine) and Belgian Navy to replace the existing Multipurpose- or M-frigates. The project shows similarities to the British Global Combat Ship (also formerly named FSC program) but development is fully separate.
Sleek
What's a good resource for finding weather reports for the North Atlantic? I'm particularly looking for records between May 24th and May 27th, 1941
I want to know about general torpedo development from ww1 up till ww2.
More specifically, comparisons between each navy's torp tech, and how they evolved throughout. If there's a free source I can read from, feel free to inform me about it, or if you wish to write here, that's fine by me.
Titanosaur fans rejoicing rn
Was reading the account of the sinking of Repulse again, and found this tidbit after abandon ship was ordered:
Many men speak of the courage of a young Australian, Midshipman R.I. Davies, who was last seen strapped to his Oerlikon gun still firing at a Japanese aircraft and cursing anyone who got in the way of his sights. He was never seen again. He was awarded a posthumous Mention in Dispatches.
Aussies truly are built different
a Japanese Tyrannosaurid
now this is unprecedented
Me in Soyuz's quad 37mm 46-K
Here we see Krem on his Soyuz... if he had one

You just jinxed it with the next event being RU. Good job.
Can't really say they jinxed it considering that we already had this info beforehand
Although we can't say for sure we're finally getting Soyuz
But surely devs don't have the audacity to keep her in NPC jail any longer
I mean, sure as hell wished for someone to jinx me with Hermes
But fate is cruel
just like it was to Hermes
NP event coming, Soyuz wife is coming 
Does Scot Highlander ever fight as light infantry before WW1 or are they strictly shock infantry formation?
Sussus amogus
Please support us on Patreon at https://www.patreon.com/TheOperationsRoom
As the US 1st Marine Division advances north from Nasiriyah towards Baghdad, 1st Recon Battalion moves to the east side of the town of Al-Gharraf to act as bait for the Fedayeen so that the rest of the Division to pass the town safely. However, once the Division has passe...
@spring briar 1K113 " Smelchak" guided weapon system for 240 mm
meanwhile
Ya
not the last time such a thing would happen
Edward "Teddy" Sheean, (28 December 1923 – 1 December 1942) was a sailor in the Royal Australian Navy during the Second World War. Born in Tasmania, Sheean was employed as a farm labourer when he enlisted in the Royal Australian Naval Reserve in April 1941. Following training at HMAS Derwent and the Flinders Naval Depot, he was posted to Sydney...
only enlisted sailor to have a Collins class submarine named after him
The absolute advantage of Western electronics

Currently being used it seems
I'd prolly be careful posting a barge with Z slapped on the side firing on the outer edge of a town here
I don't know what that thing is and all I can say is that it looks fucking bizarre
it's just a mortar
Fighters and Flak (Anti-Aircraft Artillery) were both used by Germany to shoot down Allied Bombers like the B-17, B-24 and Lancaster. However, which one was more successful? The answer is not that straightforward, so let's have a detailed look.
- Check out my books -
Ju 87 Stuka - http://stukabook.com
STG-44 Assault Platoon - http://sturmzug.co...
Laser guide?
Tyulpan, my beloved 
Nebula with 40% off annual subscription with my link: https://go.nebula.tv/realtimehistory
Watch Red Atoms on Nebula: https://nebula.tv/redatoms
After years of boots on the ground and bloody combat in Vietnam, US officials are publicly confident. The strategy of eliminating the Viet Cong is working. The North Vietnamese communist forces are on...
Reject tracked mortars
Huh?
The goofy trapdoor hatches
Soviets were actually looking into 535mm
Then decided that maybe its too big
I think gun itself was 15 tons
jesus christ

Almost big as Karl Gerat*
Gustav is 800mm
Great is 600mm
Karl has a much much shorter barrel
Suprise elements
Which Museum have the best tank collection and exhibition? Kubinka or Bovington?
Lol, 60000 tons and F35s on the deck, surely it can't get more non credible.
The ship for F35 for Turkey, really left long time ago.
No way in hell they get some in the near future.
F-35 is a fat being
These planes are long
It's likely Kaan
Maybe even more unlikely then.
I hardly believe Turkey will be able to produce it.
Isn't the first prototype almost ready and still they haven't the engines or something?
Considering it has to enter service before 2030 is not really promising.
Probably the whole plane is simply Turkish cope about getting excluded on the F35 program.
Anyway, given that we are getting another russian event I hope we are getting this.
The Pr.23bis with twelve guns.
There's been some speculation about them being reallowed to get theirs back recently
Unlikely. Otherwise they wouldn't have made the whole shitshow for the NATO application of Sweden to get the new F16s.
As things stands I don't think they'll get anything.
The Ice cream seller really is delusional and thinks he can reform the Ottoman Empire, instead he is only antagonizing the West with his actions.
The only reason they are still in NATO is because they are strategic in the control of the Black Sea and they kinda border Russia.
more like there's no mechanism for removal
the strait isn't actually that important considering how many other chokepoints there are
First engines are F404 engines
and the old reasons regarding nuclear weapons range just don't exist anymore
The russian black see fleet has kinda taken a beating
Doubt
I guess, until they do something truly inexcusable, it's better to have them inside, that outside.
Right now, they kinda interfere in the interests of the french and the Italians, and obviously the Greeks.
With their meddling in Libya and in Somalia it looks like they want to take over the Italian colonial empire, lol.
Ah, ok, I see.
Kinda don't see them capable of developing and producing a fifth generation fighter jet.
The time were a single nation could develop and produce one are virtually over, fighter programs become so expensive it's really difficult for one nation to do all alone.
Much less for a nation with a disastrous economic situation, with little to no experience in producing modern fighters.
"No, tovarich, the Russian black sea fleet was converted into submarines..." /S
Well in terms of ships, Ukraine has lost more. In terms of tonnage, Russia has lost more
80s landing ships never expected to face drones I guess
No shit
Tbh it makes no sense to give another UR to Russia.
They basically added almost everything that could be added, bar sister ships, there are only a few SSR worthy project, and even less UR worthy ones.
Italy should have gotten a UR probably.
Still really embarrassing to lose ships to a country with no navy.
Doesn't Soviets have more UR designs than Italy lol
Italy was damn shy on designing big
It's like if China in the thirties started sinking Japanese battleships left and right.
Like Aquila was the best CV design Italy had, and it wasn't that large carrier
Sparviero left but she doesn't look UR tier either
Aquila's sister
Ukraine has a navy it's just mostly sunk or of small ships
Yeah, Italy liked to design project they could actually build nevertheless, big isn't really the only deciding factor in the UR status.
For starters the Capitani Romani and Marcopolo should have been UR.
Yeah Marcopolo is precursorish to Soyuzes
Also Impero, as an aircraft carrier, as in game should have been UR
Converted Littorio class as UR?
That's kinda pushing
Lexingtons ain't UR after all
Or Kaga etc
This was the layout of the carrier, pretty modern looking if you ask me.
Also she had a sky-jump.
I also would say she is more akin to Shinano than to the Lexington.
Any ship would explode if hit by basically a torpedo.
The deficiency of the Russians is that they still aren't able to secure the port.
Or not taking the whole coast
They have quite a lot of carrier designs before the war, but they aren't UR worthy, they should probably be either elite or SSR.
Regarding sparviero she is basically a worse Aquila, slower because she retains the old engines and also the conversion is less extensive.
Yup
Given that she was supposed to escort convoys, maybe Sparviero could be an Italian Unicorn?
For NP UR CV I expect Project Kostromitinov
Other Ur worthy designs of the Italian could be the Costanzo Ciano cruisers.
Various precursors project of the Littorios in a CB forms.
And especially the Comandanti Medaglie d'oro destroyers.
Also the improved Soldati class and various pocket battleships designs, maybe.
She is quite nice, too bad Stalin didn't quite like carriers.
300m length
16 152mm
16 100mm?
106 aircraft (66 fighter 40 torpedo bomber)
50mm flight deck armor with i think 130mm total deck armor
51k ton full displacement
He was looking into it
Khrushchev canceled it wholly
Stalin allowed construction of Project 85 light carriers in 50s
Khrushchev cancelled those tho
Also if we are talking of UR retrofits you surely have to mention the Garibaldi.
She could be retrofitted into a UR missile cruiser.
Voroshilov could become AA missile cruiser too ye
Yeah, basically with the death of Stalin every big ship was cancelled in favour of smaller ones.
I guess they kinda did the right thing, ships like Stalingrad had no business in the postwar period.
Never understood why they never completed the Kronshtadt which was still in the dockyard but decided to build a new CB from scratch.
Kinda sad they are doing so few retrofits nowadays.
If the Chinese have missiles they should give the early generation of missiles to other nations too.
Mississippi ye
Regarding AA guns and elettronics she could be retrofitted.
Stalin wanted the Stalingrad fast because he wanted her to be able to catch the Iowa class battleships.
Uhh
Nope
To escape Iowa class battleship
Thus 33 vs 35
Stalingrad can't take her
Project 24's duty was going to be handle Iowas
But her problem was she was 30 knots
So she would stay defensive no chasing
Project 24
Likely last battleship designed by a nation
This is what is written in the 2006 article on Warship by McLaughlin. Apparently Stalin was pretty confused about the role of such ship himself.
As mentioned there
"Escape from enemy's more powerful ships"
She would prey on cruisers and such
Escape when BBs appear
Since do mind, Soviets also think Iowa has 482mm belt, Stalingrad just can't handle that with her 305mm
Yeah, you are right, I was kinda misremembering.
I read it some time ago.
Nevertheless the Stalingrad had a pretty poor AA, she probably would have been an easy prey of NATO carriers.
12 130mm
24 45mm is kinda low yes
Simply, for what Stalin expected from the navy, a defensive navy, they would have been better off with some carriers and some cruisers.
And 40 25mm
That was the plan with Project 85 carriers, and Project 84 AA cruisers escorts for them, complemented with Sverdlov class cruisers
The AA was sacrificed for other things. Stalin said that the ship would have been protected by destroyers, but Soviets destroyers at the time didn't really had any good AA. Good DD with good AA were built right after the death of Stalin
Kotlin-class destroyers were Cold War era ships built for the Soviet Navy. The Russian name for this class was Project 56 Spokoiny (Спокойный, "tranquil"). 27 ships were built between 1955 and 1958; they were all decommissioned in the late 1980s. The Kildin class is based on the design of the Kotlins. The Chinese Luda class which is based on the...
Postwar planning of the Soviet navy was really a mess, especially because kuznetsov, which had a more balanced approach, was demoted and after promoted again.
After the death of Stalin they finally fired him because his approach was definitely too much oriented towards capital ships.
The new soviet leadership preferred smaller ships instead.
And they pretty much didn't want them somehow.
The Soviet Navy in the end only had smaller aircraft cruisers, they were getting around and finally building proper aircraft carriers right when the USSR collapsed.
Shame about Orel indeed
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_1153_Orel
Project 1153 Orel (Russian: Орёл pr: "Or'yol", Eagle) was a late-1970s plan to give the Soviet Navy a true blue water aviation capability. The aircraft carrier would have about 72,000 tons displacement, with a nuclear power plant and about 70 aircraft launched via steam catapults, similar to the earlier Kitty Hawk-class supercarriers of the U.S....
cancelled in October 1978 as being too expensive, and a smaller Project 1143.5, more V/STOL-aircraft-oriented, was developed instead
Someone made nice model
Tho this is smaller variant I think
This should be larger model
why the fuck does that even matter when Unzen exists even
why dont you have more shitty magazine designs for the RM
no no we need to be more authentic, something out in the wild
unde, go find the most fucked up inaccurate model of littorio you can and submit it as a separate battleship
like some awful manufacturing error where it has an extra barrel on two of the turrets
To be honest
I always found it a tad strange she has that open quarter deck
Chad
Not strange, it's more like "it's complicated"
Littorio as designed has two catapults and a hangar - that hangar was eliminated because it restricted the arcs of fire for the 152mms
Ok
And looks partially weirder imo
Man reading the book about Washy made me feel sad about her fate
Yeah, so I just went to work with Bismarck's WoWs model and uhhh...
for anyone who doesn't use blender. those dots should be connected to that very top line
Most game models are non-manifold and exist solely for gameplay purposes
They are good references only - Sometimes not so good due to the amount of errors they contain.
Join My Patreon Here - patreon.com/LordHardThrasher and get access to video previews, scripts, and my Discord Channel
Contact me via email here - lordhardthrasher@gmail.com
Description
00:00 – 00:22 – Trailer
00:22 – 01:49 – Introduction
01:49 – 05:14 – Willy Messerschmitt’s World Falls Apart
05:18 – 08:03 – Udet’s Flying Circus
08:07 – 11:26 -...
yeah like wows Prinz Eugen is completely off compared to original construction plans
-entire hull is to narrow by about 1,xx meters on each side and therefore entire superstructure is squished together
-side angle of the hull is off by about 10° in midsection
-torpedo bulge is coming out way to far
-decks are just entirely flat and not curved resulting in wrong heights in all decks abouve the main deck
-AA gun placements seems off
-minor errors in the keel and outer shafts aso..
its nice model ,but if you need something accurate not so useful
I wouldn't rely completely on the construction plans, as Prinz Eugen was modified quite a bit during her construction.
Kreuzer J's Laengsschnitt plans, for example, indicate that the wackeltopf 8-metre SL rangefinder would be installed on the bridge tower; This wasn't the case, with hers being donated to the Soviet and wasn't obtained until late 1942.
Also not sure by what you mean with decks entirely flat, the model scales out reasonably well against the very creased plans of the ship.
The AA configuration is an easy explanation: The ship is modelled in her 1945 configuration, not as launched. Therefore, the original construction plans should not be relied upon. For example, a 20mm flakvering would occupy the position of the searchlight dome during one of her refits.
Problem is that there is a set of Eugen plans that shows her pre-construction, and one that shows post construction (presumably)
So if you have the wrong set, you get all sorts of issues
Like the second pair of 105s was meant to be one deck higher
I suspect another foul player is Profile Morskie - IIRC some of their plans are notoriously terrible
Agreed with the side angle of the hull - it does seem off, but Prinz Eugen's model is fairly old at this point.
i meant that the superstructure decks were modeled flat (straight) while in reality decks were curved
its just minor and only in superstructure but when you add up a lot of decks it gets noticeable
It's very resource intensive - They naturally don't do it.
yeah its fine for game models to do so
Many destroyers also have a slanted deck like this.
the fuck-
Wow
French officers in blackened greatcoats and face coverings for night operations (1915)

https://twitter.com/NavalInstitute/status/1758872324818801067
https://twitter.com/NavalInstitute/status/1758872327905845342
Goofy
#OTD in 2002, Royal Marines accidentally invaded Spain during a landing exercise. The marines thought they had reached the British colony of Gibraltar until Spanish fisherman informed them that they were on the wrong side of the border. The marines then beat a hasty retreat.
I heard about that event its kinda funny
What the hell is this concept
Looks like a cross between the X-29 and the Flapjack
Underestimate the power of a slingshot
Thank god it was just a concept
The Vickers Utility Tractor started out life as a Carden-Lloyd design, eventually bought up by Vickers and continuing to be sold as the Vickers Light Carrier, Vickers Artillery Tractor, and other subvariants. This one is found in the Royal Military Museum in Brussels, and seems quite compatible with the typical home's garage.
Belgian Linkies:
...

can't disagree
https://youtu.be/b6YB3C0aBUo?si=jPEDUUaYY3vaPe1Z
De Zeven ProvinciënKlasse Luchtverdedigings- en CommandoFregatten -LCF (NL)
De Zeven Provinciën Class Air-Defence and Command Frigates - ADCF (EN)
Maritieme slagkracht tot aan het hoogste geweldsniveau: onze 4 luchtverdedigings- en commandofregatten bieden een krachtig antwoord tegen dreigingen vanuit de lucht. Maak kennis met onze LCF’s
⚓ Abonneer op het kanaal van de Koninklijke Marine om niks te missen ⇨ https://bit.ly/KoninklijkeMarine_abonneren
⚓ De Koninklijke Marine zet zich met...
Do you think Laffey II and JS Hiei have met during their time in service?
No since laffey was primarily limited to operations in the Mediterranean and Atlantic towards the end of her service life
And the Haruna class JS Hiei doesn’t show up until 1 year before laffey gets decommissioned
Hiei gets commissioned in November of 74 and Laffey gets decommissioned in march of 75
Most JMSDF personal of the time had very little ties to the IJN anyway
The Japanese government tried to push this narrative after WW2 that war is 'un-Japanese' which is uhh
I mean it worked I guess
pain... 💔
bae kingston p.1214
it was a concept for a stovl design
STOVL design so must mention Convair Model 200
Already mentioned the other day, but is really a shame this one was never built.
The Hawker Siddeley P.1154 was a planned supersonic vertical/short take-off and landing (V/STOL) fighter aircraft designed by Hawker Siddeley Aviation (HSA).
Development originally started under P.1150, which was essentially a larger and faster version of the basic layout and technology being developed by the smaller subsonic Hawker Siddeley P.1...
So, I'm trying to find out more about star shells, how they work, how much they illuminate, etc. Any good resources I should look for?
HNLMS Friesland (D-812)
she is “lead ship of Friesland class Anti-Submarine Warfare Destroyer”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friesland-class_destroyer
The Friesland-class destroyers were built for the Royal Netherlands Navy in the 1950s. They were a larger modified version of the Holland class with more powerful machinery. Eight ships were built. They were replaced by the Kortenaer-class frigates in the early 1980s and seven ships were sold to the Peruvian Navy where they served until 1991. Th...
Your creativity is beyond questionable 
Would it be odd if I said that Japan and Croatia were at times more cartoonishly evil than Germany?
What a goofy destroyer, i wonder what happened to it- Oh
lets not go into war crime olympics, its enough to say that they were evil and leave it there
Lmao
War crime Olympics
They really wanna forget everything
old habits die hard
They still deny a lot
Fr
Also this image caused controversy last year
No wonder why the IJN and the IJA were beefing each other back then 
The
The army aircraft carrier

I don't understand it... it's still used by the JGSDF...
Maru maru 
People got pissed and said it was "ironic"
"Army" aircraft carrier 💀💀
Mainly Russian and Asian users
Huh.... 💀
In Asia the rising sun flag is associated with Japanese war crimes and Japanese imperialism
Ig people from the losing side can't be patriotic now? 
That flag it's still the navy flag, they didn't change it.
Sadly... but they gotta admit, this ain't the same Japan...
I know. I'm just saying the image got a lot of people pissed and Russian propaganda probably had a field day
It's still Japan's military flag... just a different Japan
Russians can't be saying that 
The Balkans were really a mess.
Even some Italian units in Dalmatia got told by the Germans to chill out.
I mean I think Germans a proud of and should be proud of their technological innovations
The SS told the Ustache to tone it down
And German advisors saw what the Japanese were doing in China and were like "Bro what the hell?!"
Yeah, but it is not like it wasn't their navy flag already.
Everybody represents Japan during WWII with that flag, but that flag was the IJN flag and is still the IJN flag.
I still think that the 1914 Russian flag looks cool
Germans aren't patriotic... but when it comes to football-
Italians are proud of both world wars
Oh wow... that's actually sick.
Proud of getting carried in both 😭
Back when Russia was actually good
No not quite. They beat Austria Hungary so hard that the empire collapsed
In ww2 they also had notable success
Speaking ethically. But yeah
One of my favorite flags
They did pretty well for the cards they were delt
Oh damn. Plus points for uniqueness. Don't see a lot of that these days
True
Yes, the ustaša were partially funded by Italy even before the war.
I read one time an Italian journalist was interviewing Ante Pavelic and he showed the journalist a barrell full of Serbs eyes.
Truly wicked.
By the way, not just the ustaša, but even some proper Italian units got "carried away" and the Germans told them to calm down.
Civil ensign but also sometime used as the nation's flag
I misread it... I thought you were talking bout Russia. I am so blind 💀
Do you remember what he said to the journalist?
All good
Not really.
Unfortunately in Italy history isn't really valued anymore.
For example there was a fuss by the left when the government made again the fourth of November, the day of the armed forces and the victory over Austria a festive day.
Regarding WWII instead everybody prefers to forget it.
You also get stitches if you try to mention the Italians, and the non communist Croatians or Slovenes who got killed by in the foibes by Tito's partisan's.
But it's still a holiday
National unity day
And my birthday
The journalist was Curzio Malaparte, who interviewed Ante Pavelic in 1941, after the axis invasion of Yugoslavia.
At one point Ante Pavelic pointed at a wicker basket an said there were 20kg of eyes inside.
That's also the navy flag tbh, there wasn't really a unified flag for everything else.
Austria and Hungary were pretty separated.
In Hungary you would simply see the Hungarian flag, and in Austria the Austrian flag.
It was a holiday but you wouldn't get a day off, and so everyone sort of forgot, now I think they made so that you get a day off.
I know
He also asked "What if the Serbs rebel?" Pavelic responded "Then I will kill them" Malaparte then asked "Well what if all Serbs rebel?" "Pavelic then stated "Then I will kill all Serbs"
Yes, thanks, for the added parts.
I didn't properly read it, but I was told by a history professor at school some years ago.
I tried looking on the internet but the wicker basket with eyes was the only bit I found.
Nevertheless that shows how much they hated each other.
Things calmed down under Tito's iron fist, but after Tito's death, tensions exploded again and we got the terrible wars in Yugoslavia.
Honestly hope nothing bad happens in Bosnia Herzegovina, heard the Serbs are getting pretty restless again.
The serbs and baltics be like: 
Balkans
Yeah
It's already in war thunder
That one's apparently only the tech demonstrator and not the production vehicle
Interesting
The one to be added into War Thunder is the tech demonstrator I mean
Speaking of modern stuff I've been tallying International legion deaths
404 confirmed by name
You feel too obsessed with that event 
I'm keeping an eye on it
It's a current event of a large scale affecting millions of people daily
One of current events of large scale affecting millions of people daily*
True
I'm just interested is all
Now that I think about it there's a lot of Wars going on
Always has been
It's sad
https://youtu.be/BvymTFptgBw?si=EREggy3svyTRU9_Z
This video of “Air-Defence and Command Frigate: HNLMS De Zeven Provinciën (F802)”
first laid down in 1 September 1998
and launched to water in 8 April 2000 and test sail ship to the sea in 2001
and commissioned in 26 April 2002
LCF de zeven provincien bouw bij de Schelde te Vlissingen en in dienst bij de Koninklijke Marine

come on man
Funni thing is, the modern JMSDF still flies the old IJN war flag somehow... by changing the red hue
Barely anything changed 
The JGSDF gets the most of the flak of the history ye 
It's basically a generational trauma there so...
What's an approximate increase in penetration and velocity between APDS and APFSDS of the same caliber?
Too many variables to say
There are 115 and 125mm APFSDS rounds that perform worse than late model 105mm APDS due to design choices imposed by industrial knowledge base limitations
Or as I call them
Skill issues
The actual mechanics of penetration are also different
Depending on who you ask we might be nearing the end for peace in Europe so...
Mfw people still apply the "only western Europe is Europe" trope
Ye
While Soviets were looking into 152mm, West was looking into 140mm
Actually I don't know why 140mm
They assumed it would perform similar as a Soviet 152mm?
Or deemed it's good enough to penetrate future Soviet 152mm MBTs
Since smaller than 152mm meant less Weight and more ammo
It's the most based communist ideology
'Nuke the capitalists'
It was all this easy all along!
This tank should be on the Museum....
There are much older things around still kicking
The one on the right isna t-54 and on the left a t-55
Not the same tank
Just a coincidence in numbers
You know what's not a coincidence Undef
You living in same decade to know about Marco Polo

Here's a picture of a T-54. Could you compare it to the picture?
Yes. Their both T-55.
Not a T-54.
The Greatest Trick The Devil Ever Pulled Was Convincing The World He Doesn't Exist
The t-55 was barely a thing in 1956, and it definitely wasnt sent to Hungary
Wish Soyuz put a unit marker on me
I never liked T-54/55
Ugly hull
Or too small should I say
not really sure how to read Soviet/Eastern markings but in this case for this abrams it would be e troop 2nd platoon since its using Cav markings
from a forum post
"One version was for the first digit to represent the battalion number, the second the company, the third the vehicle number within the company. Ie 237 is 2nd battalion, third company, seventh vehicle."
"Another variant, apparently, was to number through the companies within a regiment. First digit being the company within the regiment, second and third identifying the vehicle with the battalion. Ie vehicle number 524 belongs to the fifth company and thus the second battalion ( three companies to each battalion, numbered sequentially through the regiment) and the twenty-fourth vehicle of that battalion"
The T-55s missing the T-54s ventilator on the turret roof,
which you can also see in the pictures from the Hungarian revolution T-54s
all T-54s have that dome shaped ventilator, the T-55 deleted it
pretty much the easiest detail I can seem to find for telling the two apart
in terms of T-54s in the conflict we aren't allowed to talk about, there's a chance that vehicles used during the Hungarian revolution are making their way over but at the same time just because two tanks have the same unit markers doesn't mean they're the same tank

pretty sure its down to being easy to convert back to 120 MMs
not sure though since that was only the XM291 that was able to convert between 120 and 140 MM with a barrel change
Nah, MT-LB still a better platform for Eastern European Mad Max
I heard that's the russian swiss army knife (as an expression because it's very versatile like a Swiss army knife)
It is a versatile chassis, the vehicle itself not that impressive nor complicated but it is rugged and reliable.
You can basically mount anything smaller than a full on Gun Howitzer and the thing will take it and run with it
Shame they don't manufacture them anymore and nothing similar will appear in near future
I need it
It is
It's basically tractor with an empty flat top







