#history
1 messages · Page 150 of 1
a lot of stuff just throws on the FPP as a permanent part of the weight for some reason
Leo 2A7V is 66.5 tonnes for comparison
the most egregious Abrams weight numbers I've ever seen come from people citing the weight of an Abrams equipped with FPP, APS, and a mine roller
or randomly throwing on APS/NERA on versions that shouldn't have it anyways
classic
Chally 2 TES is widely cited as 75 tonnes
amusingly the ~73 ton figure comes from using long tons
which gives the smallest number
and almost no one uses them anymore
metric
Abrams SEPv3: 66.8
Leo 2A7V: 66.5
Chally 2 TES: 75
long tons
Abrams SEPv3: 65.75
Leo 2A7V: 65.5
Chally 2 TES: 73.82
short tons
Abrams SEPv3: 73.63
Leo 2A7V: 73.3
Chally 2 TES: 82.67
@tough quail fren

and TES's been around since the 1990s?
nvm wait I misread that
but that's 75T with or without APS?
bc I'm surprised that the brits aren't placing a big emphasis on weight saving like the US is
with chally 3
without
TES is just the mandatory ERA and composite packages to cover up things like the entire LFP
my big wtf moment with Chally 2 remains the way the driver's hole is arranged
is chally 3 just not intended to deploy APS?
it feels weird to have something heavier than a Sepv3 and not make weight shedding a priority
Chally cannot be lightened
Chieftain hull
The design is fundamentally heavy af
Until the UK gets the money to make a clean sheet hull, it's just going to be kinda shitty in terms of protection and needlessly heavy
yeah it's odd that they're just doing rebuilds, not new production
is it a money thing?
Yeah
Kinda
They would probably save money in the long run had they gone for a clean sheet design
Given they wouldn't have to try and rebuild it every 15 years
that time they had the option to just buy M1A2s
with the state of "spare parts doko?" for Challengers, the usual issues of "domestic means we can supply parts ourselves without needing to buy them from elsewhere" don't really apply
Chally 3 is supposed to get one
Chally 2 TES just basic bitch Chally 2 for actually doing anything
it's just the TES package isn't kept installed because ???
maybe because it lets them cite a lower weight for Chally 2
Blame lobbying for the fact the designed-in-Britain option won despite both GDLS and KMW promising to set up production there if either of them won
In 1985, Citroën got the approval of the French Navy to use the carrier Clemenceau, a Dassault Étendard IV and an Agosta-class submarine for this commercial promoting the Visa GTI. The car was filled with cement to prevent it from disintegrating on the catapult. #ThowbackThursday
THAMES NEWS. 13.8.87.ROYAL ORDNACE FACTORY in Enfield North London CLOSURE WITH LOSS OF 700 JOBS.FACTORY HAS MADE SMALL ARMS For British Armed forces.
WORLD WAR ONE - YPRES SOLDIERS.
EODH SA in cooperation with KMW and DUMA is offering an upgrade package for Greek Leopard 1A5 tanks.
proposal also involves replacing the engine with a new 1000hp engine (21.7hp per tonne at a combat weight of 46 tonnes) and reinforced suspension. In addition, the turret should house an RWS with a heavy machine gun, which should be integrated with the commander's Independent panoramic sight. The RWS may also be equipped with a C-UAS jammer
Is that an anti drone cage?
All the best firearms history channels streaming to all major devices:
weaponsandwar.tv
When Smith & Wesson introduced their Model 3566 pistol for USPSA use, the company shooting team needed six of them for use at the 1994 USPSA Nationals. The Performance Center made these six guns, and they are magnificent examples of custom gunsmithing. This ...
Also known as cope cage yes
Anti FPV drone cage
Support us and get 40% off Nebula: https://go.nebula.tv/the-great-war
Watch Red Atoms on Nebula: https://nebula.tv/redatoms
In fall 1914, the British and French armies on the First World Wadustr’s Western Front were wrestling with a problem: unseen German riflemen were picking off any man who showed himself above the trench. Something had to ...
Rest in peace FARA @shrewd pecan
HNLMS Tromp (F-803)
“second ship of the De Zeven Provinciën class Air-Defence and Command Frigate”
Modern Frigate
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HNLMS_Tromp_(F803)
HNLMS Tromp (F803) (Dutch: "Zr. Ms. Tromp") is the second De Zeven Provinciën-class frigate of the Royal Netherlands Navy. The ship was laid down in 1999, launched in 2001, and commissioned in 2003. The frigate is named after Dutch naval heroes Maarten Tromp (1598–1653) and Cornelis Tromp (1629–1691).As of 18 June 2010, Commander René Tas is HNL...

HNLMS De Ruyter (F-804)
“third ship of the De Zeven Provinciën class Air-Defence and Command Frigate”
Modern Frigate
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HNLMS_De_Ruyter_(F804)
HNLMS De Ruyter (Dutch: Zr. Ms. De Ruyter) is a De Zeven Provinciën-class frigate of the Royal Netherlands Navy. She was laid down in 2000, launched in 2002, and commissioned in 2004, the third ship of her class to enter service. The frigate is named after Dutch admiral Michiel de Ruyter (1607–1676).
@tough quail
Winter trials of the M4A2 tank in the USSR ended in 1943. T49 tracks with parallel bar grousers improved performance in winter compared to T41 rubber tracks, but grousers became packed with snow and the tank slid uncontrollably
help him
sleepy Sherman
So, I've gone and removed the FlaK guns on the forward and aft decks on the WoWs Prinz Eugen, just so nothing clutters it, and so I don't shoot myself while trying to texture it.
By Eric Wertheim
February 2024 Proceedings Vol. 150/2/1,452
I see a Cle, which Cle, me no sure 
I hope they do get turned into museum ships
Who payin
me 😎
How much

I wanna go back to the time they tried to raise funds to save USS Enterprise 
We go time travel, u go save Enty, I go preserve as much as I can of Cleveland's unrecorded history 
Maybe record the song "Take the Cleveland Back to Sydney"
somehow Viva La Vida just made me think of how the tragedy of scrapping Enty 💀
Tank are getting uglier by day
Need modern SMK 
relatively small for a titanosaur
Dubbed Inawentu oslatus, the animal was a type of titanosaur, a diverse group of long-necked sauropods that lived from the Late Jurassic (163.5-145 million years ago) to the end of the Cretaceous period (145-66 million years ago).
“The recovered skeletal remains were found articulated in a horizon of massive, reddish-colored, edaphized mudstones which are covered by a thin sandy layer (30 cm thick) linked to river overbank flooding deposits,” the researchers explained.
Inawentu oslatus shows remarkable convergent traits of its skull anatomy with rebbachisaurid sauropods, according to the authors.
“Inawentu oslatus belongs to a clade of square-jawed titanosaurian species that were restricted to the last stages of the Late Cretaceous in South America,” they said.
“Inawentu oslatus and probably other members of this clade, possess apparent trophic adaptations seen in the preceding rebbachisaurid sauropods, such as a broad snout and a relatively short neck.”
rebbachisaurid titanosaurian, how bout that
Nahhh I'd run
modern maus
That's just the pzh2k
real
Truu
The little known Breda 27 is the topic for today's video.
Want to support the channel? Become a patreon member here - https://patreon.com/rexshangar
Want to join the community? Visit our Discord - https://discord.gg/GMQkpeccjc
Recommended reading:
Italian Civil and Military Aircraft 1930-1945 - https://amzn.to/3w7P4sS
Mystery Ship: A History ...
U-995 still living at the Laboe Naval Memorial
I will forever be saddened at the fact that USS Philippines was supposed to exist but was cancelled 
What is Huan Ch'ang based on
A set of requirements 
from a 1913 naval expansion plan that was impossible to fulfil, it was only written to secure more funding for the navy
http://www.wenqujingdian.com/Public/editor/attached/file/20180318/20180318172652_77571.pdf
If 2 ships to be museum is will good. Is the last ww2 submarines still service by the navy long times I hope be museum
I swear, every damn time I see this image, my brain really just decides to think this bastard in the back is an Arleigh Burke
Wait really
HNLMS Evertsen (F-805)
“fourth ship of the De Zeven Provinciën class Air-Defence and Command Frigate”
Modern Frigate
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HNLMS_Evertsen_(F805)
HNLMS Evertsen (F805) (Dutch: Zr.Ms. Evertsen) is the fourth De Zeven Provinciën-class frigate of the Royal Netherlands Navy.
Yes, Chinese gov just give out a set of requirement for International shipbuilders to see whether anyone want to build for them a new fleet, nobody bother to build anything larger than a light cruiser bc everybody knew the Chinese can't pay for it.
I think it also depends which one this is
cuz the big ass 10 guns BC is a fever dream
but given her rigging ingame i think she's just the Pre-dread looking thing that couldve been built in AH
The Ateliers de Constructions Electriques de Charleroi Cobra was a series of AFVs based around a common diesel-electric power train. In the War Heritage Institute collection they have an APC and a de-armed light tank variant.
Belgian Linkies:
https://warheritage.be/en
https://belgiumbattlefield.be/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/TheChieft...
Quick question: The Germans had teak decks on their ships, right? Or was there another kind of wood they used? I just don't want to get it wrong
what is up with the turks
and getting the absolute best looking versions of foreign vehicles for their trials
then you know
never adopting any of them
above they have the Turkish leclerc proposal, here we have the T-84-120 also made for the Turks
they had the Diesel abrams as well
A very rare tank
Fr. Taiwan's tourism would go up a bit with those museum ships.
This will always be the peak tank design for me
Pain
this isnt a meme channel
Paleozoic skin impressions are, to put it mildly, very difficult to get so this is impressiver
can i touch it
The modernisation of the Chinese PLA has represented a dramatic shift in the balance of military power in Asia.
Over the course of several decades, the PLA has shifted from a primarily ground combat force with a large stock of outdated equipment, to one that is increasingly capable of projecting power and holding targets at risk over longer and...
But enlisted is fun
All the best firearms history channels streaming to all major devices:
weaponsandwar.tv
No blank-firing adapter? No money for practice ammo? What you need is a wooden clicky-clacky noisemaker that locks into your Suomi!
https://utreon.com/c/forgottenweapons/
http://www.patreon.com/ForgottenWeapons
http://www.floatplane.com/channel/ForgottenWe...
ARDU paint scheme Mirage III
Aircraft A3-2, one of 3 Australian Mirages built in France
Served with ARDU until 1988 where it was involved in the last pubic display of the Mirage in Australia at the Richmond Airshow
@spring briar
Other ships like same this ship from ww2 still in service 2024 too
This is last “Cannon class destroyer escort” in the world still in service by royal thailand navy 2024 (the only one destroyer escort from ww2 in service 2024)
“HTMS Pinklao (DE-413) [ex- USS Hemminger DE-746]”
Last cannon class destroyer escort only one ship in the world service by thai navy 2024
and that ship “she was is a Traning ship and Salute ship”
Any idea what this thing is on the KGV's mast?
Yes
February 1945 the Armoured and Mechanized Forces Council petitioned Beria to accept the Object 701 tank into service as the IS-4. Tanks minister Malyshev opposed this decision and convinced the government to accept the lighter IS-3 tank instead.
This decision turned out to be correct. Accepted into service in 1946, the IS-4 turned out to be much less reliable than the IS-3 tank that was built on tried and true automotive components of the IS-2 tank.
It was forgotten 😢
So true
I hope they turn her into a museum ship too
I think HTMS PInklao (ex- USS Hemminger) still service she was Salute ship only one of the Royal Thailand Navy maybe future to be museum.
Soon 
USS Hemminger (DE-746) was a Cannon-class destroyer escort in service with the United States Navy from 1944 to 1946 and from 1950 to 1958. In 1959, she was transferred to Thailand, where she serves as HTMS Pin Klao (Thai: เรือหลวงปิ่นเกล้า). She is the only Cannon-class destroyer escort still in service.
Btw, she's the sister ship of Eldridge right?
Yes “Pinklao (ex- Hemminger)” she is sister of Eldridge because the ship is same cannon class destroyer escort

This the photo of “Hemminger/Pinklao” before and after
I love how she barely changed
What's she armed with?
Little detail of her pinklao (ex- hemminger) upgrade “the bridge and middle ship has torpedo launcher for mark 46”
Oh damn I just noticed that
HTMS Pinklao (DE-413) [ex- USS Hemminger DE-746]
She was the traning ship and salute ship of the royal thai navy still service for sailors
Yes this little detail of the ship
Oh cook
*cool
She in commissioned 1944-now
By U.S. Navy 1944-1958 and to Thailand Navy 1959-now
and she is the Last Cannon class Destroyer Escort still service in the world
what were the Cannon Class armed with?
what da hell ☠️
This cannon class destroyer escort
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cannon-class_destroyer_escort
The Cannon class was a class of destroyer escorts built by the United States primarily for antisubmarine warfare and convoy escort service during World War II. The lead ship, USS Cannon, was commissioned on 26 September 1943 at Wilmington, Delaware. Of the 116 ships ordered, 44 were cancelled and six were commissioned directly into the Free Fr...
Congratulations I guess
Type 271 radar, dubbed as the "lantern" appropriately.
I can’t believe “Nazis are bad” is now something that needs to be explained to people.
we live in confusing times

🔥 🔥
Yeah, and I got called a Neo-Nazi a while back on Roblox, just for building Prinz Eugen
But then again, considering Roblox is mostly populated by little kids and uneducated middle schoolers, I wasn't exactly surprised
neo from the matrix????
I got called a Russian spy for being into Soviet tanks
I got call a comie just because wearing a Ushanka
this isnt a meme channel
On February 12, 1988, the Soviet patrol ship Bezzavetny (Project 1135) rammed the port side of the American missile cruiser USS Yorktown (CG-48).
Netherlands frigate: HNLMS De Ruyter (F-804)
[third ship of De Zeven Provinciën class ADCF-Frigate]
Lmao
All the best firearms history channels streaming to all major devices:
weaponsandwar.tv
Courtesy of CZ and their reference library, we are looking at a prototype model of the vz.70 pistol intended to use a suppressor. It has an extended and threaded (with interrupted threads for quick attach/detach) barrel, and a mechanism to allow for locking ...
Have you guys heard about the Alyosha tank?
Nickname for a Russian T-80BV tank that's crew became tank aces after destroying 8 Ukrainian armored vehicles
I think ukraine also has a tank ace if im not mistaken
Oh yeah I heard about them they received a t90 after that
And the T-80BV is currently on display in kubaka
Nah they all got fuck by t72b1, mi28 and ka50
Also the craziest thing is that one of the tankers has a grandfather who fought at kursk
One sec I think there was an article
Nvm
52* 50 was a single seat prototype thingy
52 is two seat
t72b1?
what
Ye it should be b3m 
Never liked 72 personally, she would be very fine if operated only in 70s and 80s
But she should have been replaced in 90s
Tho it's 90s 
Not good time for that either

I have a lego T72
Not sure lol
That's why I check sources and use common sense
Nope im not making up the Russian update the t72 and was B something
Ok but what the fuck does that have to do with what you said
Well Russia decided to upgrade it so they can have a big tank force lol
the t72b3 exists but that doesnt mean shit
I know that the armor that Aloyosha destroyed was: 2 T72B, 1 M113, and 5 max pros
Alyosha itself is a T-80BV I think
I think there's a Leopard im not sure correct me if im wrong
There wasnt
Sorry to have to keep asking you guys for stuff, but does anyone have good quality images (preferably with transparent backgrounds) of the ship badges for Bismarck, Hood, Prinz Eugen, and Prince of Wales?
saying Ukraine doesnt have aces because "they all got fuck by t72b1, mi28 and ka50" is like me saying Russia doesnt have Aces because they all got fucked at Vuhledar and Aavdiivka
Sadly no I don't have those
The UAV screen shot was shit so couldn't see clearly
I think Ukraine does have tank aces
im just paraphrasing him
But I do think I'm just not 100% sure
I mean if we count APCs and even HMMVs to the count then probably there are several tank aces on both sides
And killer drones
I thought it was mines, and KA-52s
but that doesnt stop one side from getting fucked by vihkrs and the other by Javelins
both hit mines and were abandoned
I was about to say that
and later artilleryd
But the Ka gets destroyed by anti air
single 152mm near miss or hit just disables the tank
That's because it's 152mm
meanwhile in WT: "Hit!"

yellow track
Fuck the snail
Maybe it hit a bad angle?
Fuck you snail you tied me to this chair for 2 years
Or its too slow
Also the reason for this was because Ukraine didn't have any air support and the main AA was in the cities
Its depressing to be a Russian helicopter pilot in Ukraine
It was willingly I think
Since at extreme angles
Projectile will bounce
Abrams's frontal plate logic works this way
Bro was so close
Nah just
Close range helicopters are dead
I'm sure you heard the news
US's FARA helicopter program
US cancelled it because it's too dangerous for helis to do recon anymore
Drones will take that mission now
And Apache replacement will likely focus on very long range hitting. Beyond manpad range
Longbow radar Apache already does that in a,way
The mi24 and mi8 pilot having a good time 
If you are using Vikhr
It's good time since
Vikhr does have pretty good range
Point is you have to keep manpads far as possible as a heli
Only way to do that is long range missile
It's depressing to be IN Ukraine regardless of the side
Which every heli have
Vihkrs are fine but unlike in WT F&F missiles are better
I forgot if Longbow was fire and forgot for US
Especially ground troops every seconds a bomb from a drone drop on your head
radar guided but not true fnf
That radar on top is Longbow
True
and unlike in WT where you need missiles to full kill the tanks
irl you just need to hit it
Wat do you expect from a free to play game
this has nothing to do with the quality of the game
Woah
it's a gameplay function not a quality issue
My mental health have decreases for 2 years playing it
Holy shit
The whole idea of tank aces is stupid propaganda
Eh, a large part of it is that FARA wasn't really going to be better at recon than Apache either, nor would it have been cheaper
Tank ace only popular ww2 so yeah
WW2 tank aces are also mostly stupid propaganda
The government want to scare the enemy so they throw in tank ace
#OTD in 1988, USS Yorktown and USS Caron were attempting to exercise the right of innocent passage through Soviet territorial waters in the Black Sea when they were intentionally bumped by Soviet frigates. The ships experienced only minor damage from the collisions.
Like Michael Wittman Nazi propaganda tank ace
Netherlands navy frigate: HNLMS Evertsen (F-805) in Yokosuka, Japan 2021
Damn you EA
British Carrier Strike Group 2021 (CSG 21)
7 British Warships🇬🇧 and 1 American Warship🇺🇸 and
1 Netherlands Warship🇳🇱
I'm still waiting
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_26_frigate
The Type 26 frigate, also known as City-class frigate, is a class of frigates being built for the United Kingdom's Royal Navy, with variants also being built for the Australian and Canadian navies. The programme, known as the Global Combat Ship, was launched by the British Ministry of Defence to partially replace the navy's thirteen Type 23 frig...
I mean even in warthunder the F&F missiles are just better since the firing helicopter can actually evade
they just you know haven't added lima hellfires to actually make the longbow relevant
Same i wait for it https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_Zeven_Provinciën_class_frigate
The four De Zeven Provinciën-class frigates are air-defence and command frigates in service with the Royal Netherlands Navy (Koninklijke Marine). This class of ships is also known as "LCF" (Luchtverdedigings- en commandofregat, air defense and command frigate). The ships are similar to the German Sachsen-class frigates in role and mission.
Isn't that already in service?
Yes they in service 2002-now (every 4 ships)
Canada is supposed to get 15 type 26s but they haven't even laid one down
Mmm Canada want new frigates to be commissioned in future
and Netherlands and Belgium has project new frigate call: “Anti-Submarine Warfare Frigate (ASWF)”
The Anti-Submarine Warfare Frigate (ASWF) is a project of the Royal Netherlands Navy (RNLN, Dutch: Koninklijke Marine) and Belgian Navy to replace the existing Multipurpose- or M-frigates. The project shows similarities to the British Global Combat Ship (also formerly named FSC program) but development is fully separate.
First 2 ships laid down in 2029 for Netherlands navy
I was at the Frontiers in Flight museum in Dallas yesterday. It has a flying flapjack. Only 3 were ever made. The one in dallas carried six .50 machine guns and two 1000 lb bombs.
It's on loan from the Smithsonian since 2012
better than vihkrs? naaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah
extremely map reliant, garbage tracking, garbage pen and damage, also on platforms 2 BRs below while having half the missiles of the standard missile armed helis at 11.7
I mean to counter vikhrs all you really have to do is hide behind either terrain features or forests
Ka-50/52 still has to keep itself exposed to keep tracking
to counter fnf missiles you just have to exist
they are just garbage ingame
they lose lock randomly and in even remotely urban/foresty maps they are 100% unusable
you can quickly dump 1-2 spikes on a KA-50 and still have enough time to hide and likely still get a kill
Spikes can reliably kill helicopters I've seen them do it on my Vilika
they are great against helis but why even mention heli vs heli combat?
like you're useless as cas on 95% of the maps
I was mainly mentioning in the realm of helicopter v helicopter combat
if its just vs tanks then most of the issues hellfires had would be solved if gaijin made them direct attack instead of in their loft mode
hellfires are way better than fnf in ther current state
you can actually aim them
instead of praying for a lock and then praying for the lock to not get lost in the abyss
and you either get them at a lower BR or you get twice as many missiles compared to fnf platforms
but anyway enough WT, this isnt the place for that
Wasn’t she the first USA nuclear submarine or am I wrong
Funny moments in the Washington
waiting for what? the godawful UK shipbuilding industry to build a frigate in under a decade?
Waiting for Canada to build 15 of them
Im not sure if id prefer the RAN order be expanded to 16 or not
thats the present discussion in any case
this is cool
i still remember the chilean AMX-30B2
failure after failure in the gearboxes

The bell of the USS Jacob Jones (DD-61), the only American destroyer sunk during World War I, has been recovered by a special salvage unit with the United Kingdom’s Ministry of Defense at the request of the U.S. Naval History and Heritage Command. The command asked for assistance from the ministry’s Salvage and Marine Operations unit “due to the...

Canada modernized their 12 halifax class frigates and the type 26 isn't phasing them out. So eventually Canada may have 27 frigates
the Halifax is not a viable surface combatant in this day and age
The CSC program intends to replace both the Halifax-class as well as do some air defense to make up for the three Tribal-class destroyers that were retired years ago
Also, where you going to find that manpower for all 27 ships? Pretty confident we're still having retention issues
Yep. I'm honestly questioning it all still
CSC looks like it has a pathetic armament suite for a 15 ship class
cut the order by 5 and buy a Burke equivalent
Yeah, but a Burke requires a lot of manpower
Also, good luck cancelling the program and then ending up having to deal with a lawsuit by both BAE Systems as well as Lockheed Martin
burke equivalent
Burkes main issue with manpower is that due to the age of the design it doesnt have a lot of the automation that a 2024 AWD design would bring
What's bad about it specifically?
24 sea ceptors and 24 Mk41 cells on an 8000t design intended as a principle surface combatant for the RCN
compared to the RAN which is currently looking to pursue an upgunned Hunter class with 96 cells on 8000t displacement
The tribal class is pre-ww2. The Algonquin class was retired in 2017
So Australia's is better?
Iroquois Class is also referred to as the Tribal class
depends who you ask
but i would argue that the upgunned Hunter has a vastly superior radar and armament suite to the CSC
Oh my bad I mixed up names
Also different navies have different requirements
alternatively we might just end up buying type 83
if CSC is intended as an air warfare platform its armament is pathetically minimal
In the early days of the program at least, they actually considered separate AAW and ASW ships, but ended up shoving both into a single ship class
Probably to make it multi role
the Hunters as designed are in a similar position to CSC
but thats as presently intended
we will see whether or not the upgunned version is chosen in the surface fleet review later this week or next
im hoping for type 83 though
RAN could feasibly build and commission type 83 before the RN does
and it would be a vastly superior platform to an upgunned Hunter
As for the other potential designs for the CSC program, others were considered, the Danes and Germans didn't bother competing, FREMM ended up being rejected due to dishonest tactics by the French, DZP and Navantia's options were apparently too AAW-focused for a ship they also wanted to use for ASW (need to double check this one)
lol what did France do
Navantia is a poor export partner
I mean it's france in a military competition so im not surprid but what happened
Attempted to bypass the regular procurement procedures by submitting directly to the defence minister

Hi
Hi

Canada is trying to rebuild its military
my beloved
lol
Cute

hot dog maker space hopefully
because we are keeping some Arietes so adding another caliber is dumb
plus the kf51 is dumb
True
Well in its drone operator scheme mostly
And I’m iffy about the actual armor
I think Hungary is interested in the kf51 ~~so im getting it in warthunder in the italian tree either way
~~
Too radical and low on number
And you need to start producing 130mm
How many leopard 2a8’s are there

Regardless of it being a leo2
How many times you hugged Richel
The Italian army isn’t as tank-centric as some other European forces right?
what with Italy’s geography and all that
🇮🇹 🤝 🇭🇺
That looks so wack
tbh using geography as excuse is a cope because like
they arent for self defense
they are for nato operations
you could maybe use that excuse back in the last century, before the fall of the iron courtain and Yugoslavia right next to us
but the major fear was in a possible landing operation from there, which is why they focused a lot on stuff like the Centauro
plus this is all plains
goofy ass clickbaity youtube thumbnail looking ass

This is incorrect. The Halifax-class is being replaced, not supplemented, by the CSC/Type 26.
🇳🇱


do it
Why did they go through the effort of modernizing them?
A lot of mountains
They're worth a visit
because the CSC at this rate wont be a thing for another decade
Because they need them to last into the 2040s.
The first CSC will not enter service until the early to mid 2030s, and the last of the fifteen not until the late 2040s.
The Halifax-class were all built in the late 80s to early-mid 90s
They won't last until the 2030s-40s without a lot of work to keep them going.
Wide
I hate bureaucracy
The refits they're going through now aren't really even much in the way of upgrades, versus just maintaining them in service.
My heart is cold (ballllls)
Over the past 12 months a major facility upgrade program was completed at the West end of Davie shipyard and in the historic Lorne drydock to provide a long-term maintenance home for Canada’s surface combat fleet and its supporting naval staff.
Davie Shipyard added in a statement that docking maintenance work periods are critical to ensure the RCN has at least 8 of its 12 patrol frigates ready for deployment at all times until the class is replaced by the Canadian Surface Combatants (CSC) in the early 2040s.
According to Timothy Choi, naval analyst at the University of Calgary in Canada, the mid-life refit work will focus on the hull, mechanical, and electrical works that were not included as part of the FELEX upgrades. “The only substantial new component that I’m aware of are the four .50cal remote weapons system” Choi added.```
Quebec-based shipbuilder Davie Shipyard welcomed on 11 August the Royal Canadian Navy Halifax-class frigate HMCS St. John for major refit and upgrade. The event marks the start of a long-term naval maintenance and upgrade program that will keep the Halifax-class frigates operational until the arrival of the Canadian Surface Combatant (CSC) in th...
Ruski wanted those boats badly
Fundamentally, it comes down to Canada wanting to be able to build and maintain the frigates in Canada.
Much of the reason the program costs so much is to build up the capability to build said modern frigates and then maintain them.
Which is an entirely reasonable desire - but it is an expensive one.
It's a major reason the Australian program is likewise as pricy as it is, though they started in a significantly better position than Canada did.
Canada also is constantly asked by NATO to hit the 2% mark

because Canada doesn't want and doesn't need a Burke equivalent
the CSC is the all singing, all dancing general purpose combatant for the RCN going forward, we specifically went with one design of ship for the whole fleet to streamline logistics, interoperability and training
CSC is not as capable on a 1:1 basis as some other ships but having your entire fleet be a SPY-7 equipped, AEGIS/CEC capable multi-role frigate force makes sure that you always have an AAW/ASW capability available to deploy.
I'd rather have 15 CSC in this config compared to a handful of more capable AAW ships
?
"The CSC cost figures according to the Public Budget Office (PBO) are approximately $70B CAD for all 15 CSC frigates; that much we know. If we could turn back the clock to say 2018, we could have built 15 Arleigh Burkes (ABs) Flt IIIs for 5.1B USD each (fixed prices in 2018 as a contract to build the first 5 ABs FLT IIIs has already been struck). This works out to be $6.47B CAD per ship or just over $97B CAD for all 15 ships"
that $70B CAD figure is including a lot of program costs
it is not comparable to any figure you can find for a Burke pricetag
Ah
its something like 65% of that being for the production of the ships, 5/10% for design/project management costs, 10% for weaponry and infrastructure to support the ships in service (jetties, training facilities. test and integration facilities) and finally 15/20%(!) for contingency funds.
the Navy also actively disagrees with the PBO's figures and vice versa
going off the Navy estimates, CSC would have a per unit cost more around $2.6B CAD
or like $1.96B USD
it doesn't make much sense for Canada to buy Burke's due to the crew requirements to run them, the fact the designs do not fit our roles and Burke is still an old design at this point
the CSC's will likely be in service for another 30-40 years after they enter the fleet, I do not want to be operating Burke's until like 2080
I see
I would like to have 32 instead of 24 main VLS but the figure was cut down for one reason or another
weight, cost, etc
24 VLS is the bare minimum workable and future flights of the CSC very well could have additional cells or weapons systems to help deal with this
I don't think anybody here is able to argue about specifics between classified radar systems like SPY-7 or CEAFAR 2, especially not enough to make authoritative statements
Ship weight is not something I overly dwell on as steel is cheap and certain capabilities require tonnage to be implemented. Type 26 (and thus the variants) are so heavy in part due to the acoustic quieting measures worked basically all aspects of the hull. This is over and beyond what many older ASW ships had, to the point where you are dealing with not just rafting of machinery but sound proofing and testing basically everything. The fact that CSC will retain its mission bay for using future unmanned systems for various roles is also something key to its role as an ASW combatant.
AAW is not a primary role of the ship but something the design can do well enough if required considering it can provide a more than workable sensor node due to its SPY-7 system and interlace with US taskforces using its CEC links.
Being able to bring 24 CAMM alongside a loadout of like 8 cells of ESSM Block II (32 missiles) and 16 cells of SM-2 IIIC is a quantum leap over the Halifax class and even the previous Iroquois class given those ships were very limited in their overall number
this capability is fleet wide across every single ship
the Dutch and Spanish options were too AAW focused but they were both also dated and old
Future netherlands will has new frigate in 2029 is call: Anti-Submarine Warfare Frigate (ASWF)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Submarine_Warfare_Frigate_(Koninklijke_Marine)
The Anti-Submarine Warfare Frigate (ASWF) is a project of the Royal Netherlands Navy (RNLN, Dutch: Koninklijke Marine) and Belgian Navy to replace the existing Multipurpose- or M-frigates. The project shows similarities to the British Global Combat Ship (also formerly named FSC program) but development is fully separate.
De Zeven Provinciën and F100 were both designed back in the 1990 and laid down a few years later
that is not a great platform to build a ship on where you will get your first ships in the 2030's and run them for another 30-40 years after that
yeah that program came after we had already picked the winning design for the CSC program and wouldn't have been suitable anyway
De Zeven Provinciën class Air-Defence and Command Frigates ready in service in 2002-now
HNLMS De Zeven Provinciën (F-802) in commissioned 2002
HNLMS Tromp (F-803) in commissioned in 2003
HNLMS De Ruyter (F-804) in commissioned 2004
HNLMS Evertsen (F-805) in commissioned 2005
4 ships is ready service now first ship has upgrade new Modern weapons and new radar is “Evertsen” in 2025-2026 big upgrade and then next other ships ADCF-Frigate coming to upgrade
Yes I am not saying they are not capable ships, they are
but they are dated by their nature and it would not be smart to take a dated design as the basis for your entire fleet for the next three or four decades
the Dutch themselves are looking to replace those four ships in the 2030's
Yeah it’s ASW-Frigate
We wanted a frigate that can do ASW and AAW with a big radar, that means a fairly big ship
Mmmm Anti-Air Warfare Frigate former netherlands has this ship
Jacob van Heemskerck class Anti-Air Warfare Frigate this a AAW
HNLMS Jacob van Heemskerck (F-812)
HNLMS Witte de With (F-813)
But now netherlands has only “De Zeven Provinciën class ADCF-Frigates” better then Jacob van Heemskerck class
Teach boat
This De Zeven Provinciën class ADCF-Frigates (is 3 in 1 ship: anti-air and anti-ships/anti-submarine and anti-ground)
@ivory ridge Hungarian KF-51s are supposed to use the rh120
🤨
Considering they also plan to base the vehicle on the Bergepanzer 2 hull, it's clear that it's really just a Leo 2 with extra steps, probably to try and cut KMW out
lmao
- it's unlikely that rheinmetall would allow licensed production (i know they let the kf41 but that's a different thing)
- it's probably gonna take even longer than waiting for the 2a8
- ...if it even actually ends up in production, it's at an insanely early stage at this point
would rather wait for the mgcs to be finalized than dive into the panther
Oh yeah IMO KF-51 is just kind of a stupid tank
Hungary just got sweet talked by the RHM salesmen into buying their Leo 2 with extra steps
As part of its urgent campaign to save America’s Flagship – the SS United States – and transform the historic vessel into a dynamic, commercially viable destination, the SS United States Conservancy has reached out to President Joe Biden and key members of the U.S. Senate and House of Representative
Things ain't looking pretty for her..
This video covers the 88mm Pak 43/41 (trail mount) and Pak 43 (cross mount). This gun weighs almost 4.5 metric tons and served with the German Army during WW2. Although it had a high accuracy and penetration, the height and weight were particularly troublesome. In this video, we look at the gun and particularly at 4 experience reports, 2 from su...
Quick question: What program do you use to extract the models?
Kinda like the constellation class being planed and being built soon
Today 14 February 2024 (back time in 1939) the “Bismarck” launch ship in water is her brithday
Basedmarck's hull form always looked bizarre to me
Just today Valentine’s Day with Bismarck brithday
Fuck today is Valentine's day

Surely this is the world telling me to go out and get some [bleep]
🎵 disappointment of a nation, hulking waste of steel🎵
I love this paint job
https://www.instagram.com/reel/C3J3m8qrHFo/?igsh=MWFicGFvMGJuMWUzMQ==
2025 ☦️☦️☦️🇬🇷🇬🇷🇬🇷🇬🇷 #greekmilitary #orthodoxy #based #men #motivation #greece #bible #icons #jets
17534
Sorry I sent a link cuz I couldn't get a screenshot
that probably has something to do with the hullform being very poor in terms of seakeeping and iirc structural integrity in general
Gamesmodel3d has them all. Google it.
ill be honest i didnt realise CSC was running spy-7 which is my bad
I can argue that CEAFAR 2 is ridiculously top heavy tho
What did you believe it had before then?
Same radar as the future Spanish F-110 frigates and Japanese ASEVs
Happy bismarck launch day
Her sinking, 1941 (colorized)
she sinking in 1941
RIP bozo 

😂😂
Her sister Tirpitz in 1 April (Brithday - launch ship in water)

Kinda surprising BasedMarck's wreck is standing so straight up
She's literally Whitebeard fr
I don't know much about its structural integrity but
It's W I D E
The better to eat 13.5inch shells with
For all the overhyping Bismarck gets
It’s funny how much of a shitbox it actually was
The official Music Video for "Bismarck" by Sabaton. Get the Limited 7" Vinyl: https://sabat.one/Bismarck7Vinyl
➞ SUBSCRIBE for more Sabaton: https://www.youtube.com/c/Sabaton?sub_confirmation=1
➞ MERCHANDISE Official Store: https://sabat.one/ytdshop
► Spotify: This is Sabaton: https://open.spotify.com/playlist/37i9dQZF1DZ06evO1XTVWU?si=87805b...
Wonder what's causing the hype
Like imagine being a stranger to ships and you listen this song of Johnny Horton
So Bismarck is
biggest ship
biggest guns with shells big as trees
fastest ship that ever sailed
A stranger won't know
At the end of the day, it's a song - artistic liberty says whatever it wants.
It certainly isn't accurate.
“b-but its armor was so good it couldn’t be sunk”
our underwater archeological report found that to be a lie
"""""He""""""" was made to "rule the seven seas"
Sadly ye
But it's one of those factors that hyped the Bismarck
I mean just the story of it is just so insane
I'd dare say that most warships of WW2 that people talk about these days are overhyped
Because that's how internet culture works

Not really?
Plenty of ships were sunk on their first deployment
I mean, there aren't a lot of BB last stands
Also that song by Sabaton
TO LEAD THE WAR MACHINE
A part of me thinks British ideas contributed a fair bit much like Rommel's story
The Desert Fox was in reality very outnumbered and mostly just trying not to die to everyone
But he had some success in Africa and thus the British needed an excuse... "our enemy was a fucking genius!"
Rommel was good at propaganda and blaming others
It's a bit of both - The British painted Bismarck a powerful image so Hood's loss doesn't look as that terrible
And in her defence, it's not every day you can claim that a battleship sank another (Please don't start the Hood is BC/BB argument) capital ship in WWII.
it's ironic how bismarck gets trumpeted out
while the scharns are relegated to "lol who" status
It has to do with Hood's status - Pride of the Royal Navy, and the one of the heaviest/mightiest capital ships launched at her time.
but yeah I just think it's comical how bismarck gets the "it had the mightiest guns!" mantra
looks at literally every other navy
406/407mm
Keep in mind that we are talking crowds that nearly crushed a woman and her child to death just to see her. She's a big deal, and losing her is....a bit of a news headline, like it or not.
I mean, I won't stop shilling Washington's....treatment to Kirishima.
Depress the guns from loading angles just to blast her right in the stern - and causing enough confusion that her escort DDs thought Kirishima got torpedoed
Doesn't get more based than that.
admiral lee the legend
But really, I feel some fame to her is at least credible, even though overblown as it is.
It's the same stuff with Texas.
don't get me wrong, the texas wank is annoying too
but at least with that they're not overhyping the ship out of proportion
Have a goober
thats a damn good weathering job
Eh, it has to do with her destroying one ship, I feel - and Sabaton assisting it.
Meanwhile, other kinds of fancy stories get drowned out unless you're really interested.
Very few people sing praises of Repulse's captain for dodging 19 torpedoes before getting nailed, for example.
As if you couldn’t get enough of the weird and whacky on this channel, this week Jonathan’s pulled out a firearm that looks less like a gun, and more like a musical instrument.
Get to know the harmonica pistol, designed by Pierre-Joseph Jarre. While this relatively rare weapon wasn’t widely successful, it gets extra points from us for its cool ...
All the best firearms history channels streaming to all major devices:
weaponsandwar.tv
The Patchett Machine Carbine Mk I is the predecessor to the Sterling SMG. It was developed by George William Patchett, who was an employee of the Sterling company. At the beginning of the wear, Sterling was making Lanchester SMGs, and Patchett began in 1942 ...
When it comes to Cleb all I see is just Augusta bay this, Augusta bay that like bru 
Like sure, it was part of her "most memorable 36 hours" but Tinian Isles exists 
Houston's also worth mentioning
Drinking 6k tons of water and still living - Close call.
Probably helpful that most of her crew came from Helena.
Really only the wehraboos are influenced by sabaton.
The damage was done by 80 years of propaganda and lies by both the British and the Germans.
Also historians picking up this propaganda and treating it as a fact.
The Bismarck wasn't a good ship.
Not really on par of any late generation of battleship.
It had many obsolete features, like turtleback armour, torpedo tubes and twin turrets.
Torpedo tubes?.... I think you might be mistaking her with Tirpitz.
And regardless, those are not underwater tubes much like the predecessing dreadnoughts.
That said, the H-39s did have those - all for disposing of merchant ships.
She also kinda overshadow some of her sisters, Montpelier also had 13 battlestars but e 
Yeah.
Tho it show how the Germans did use an obsolete feature on their battleship.
Also the Scharnhost had torpedo tubes.
If you are in a battleship and need to use torpedo tubes you already fucked up and you are dead.
and there's quite a few things iffy with Bismarck's armour scheme - not even just the citadel layout, just the weather deck itself last I checked is a pretty big mess - thanks to Sirene.
Denver's was funky, propulsion system problems here and there, makes it memorably comical 
That's a bit of a toss up - The Germans are intending to use them for surface raiding against merchant ships.
In that sense, it's better to use a torpedo rather than draining your magazine for encounters with other capital ships.
Yeah, but if you expect a battleship to use them you are using them wrong.
The us kinda dropped torpedo on ships larger that a destroyer completely during the war.
The H-39 was an upscaled Bismarck and had every defect the Bismarck had upscaled.
I mean, again, this pertains more to their doctrine of using heavy surface raiders rather than the ships themselves, in my opinion.
In a similar vein how the Japanese would retain torpedoes on their heavy cruisers - granted, it did blow Mikuma and Suzuya up, but Savo Island did show that they are effective when employed correctly.
They made it somewhat worse protection wise - a thicker deck IIRC, but a thinner belt.
...and that, according to jaba's calculations, results in an even worse vulnerability zone against the 16"/45. Good job.
The armour scheme is completely useless.
It doesn't incorporate all the postwar developments.
Kinda the Bismarck would be an exceptional ship if only was built in the '20s, in the '40s, not so much...
Well, it kinda works - against the older British 15" guns.
But, rather pointless since the ship is surrounded and smacked around at that point - and an invulnerable citadel is moot if your ship is reduced to a floating hulk.
It's the whole concept of using a battleship for convoy raiding that is wrong.
Matapan is what happens when you try to do that.
The Italians sent a whole battle fleet to do convoy raiding and fell in a trap of the English.
The point of using a battleship against a convoy is because other ships of the KM can't handle it, I believe.
Bar the Japanese, who had the long Lance, everybody considered torpedo for defense.
If you have to use them you are pretty much dead.
That's why the US navy stopped using them on anything bigger that a DD.
US focused on long range artillery doctrine so torps were useless
Graf Spee had early successes until getting cornered and intentionally fed misinformation. Scharnhorst and Gneisenau also did acceptably in Operation Berlin - that is, until the pair saw Ramillies and opted not to engage - and turned tail and fled as soon as Rodney appeared - because the CO knew they cannot engage the battleships escorting that convoy.
As for the US navy, it's not just that - the NWC did a series of wargames in 1930 that ruled torpedoes as useless against air power - and even more a hazard against planes. 50% of the time, the cruisers did not utilize it.
I'm not sure the citadel would have enough buoyancy by itself.
I read somewhere that the Scharnhost citadel wouldn't have enough buoyancy to float and their calculations were wrong.
Right, then the question is: Is the Japanese doctrine also inherently wrong?
Granted, the "nine phase battle" plan they have going is incredibly naive and optimistic.
The Kriegsmarine was a mess tbh.
And they were right.
If you want to use torps airplanes are more effective anyway.
I don't think it matters at that point - All of Bismarck's armament was knocked out and the ship's conning tower is turned into swiss cheese - My point is, on paper, it seems to fare well against the older British 15" guns.
Greatly not helping is Rodney's opening salvos knocking out Bismarck's gunnery director.
Yeah, the whole "kantai kessen" is so wrong and completely rooted in their failed culture that is astounding.
and honestly? The British are much more prudent after the destruction of Hood.
Also regarding torps, they were wrong
Renown was ordered explicitly by Tovey to hold distance in light of Hood's destruction.
The whole idea behind the Yamato was wrong
The QEs and Rs are "out of the question" in planning an operation against Tirpitz.
Less rooted culture, more an influence from the success of Tsushima, I feel.
I heard when they discovered her wreck they established the English didn't pen her citadel's armour.
Where the enemy sails right into your carefully laid out plans - That's just not happening with the US navy with the adoption of the Island Hopping Campaign.
The armour belt has no holes in it - but 2 406mm shells went right into her machinery anyway.
You say that but Bismarck got torpedoed by Rodney
In the Japanese coping dream of US sailing merilly to the Philippines and the entire Pacific Fleet sent to their doom - sure, it works.
But then they have the bright idea of crippling the fleet before it even makes to battle. We know where that goes.
It's an exceptional situation.
While fighting the Bismarck the RN was basically firing point blank on her.
But honestly, given KM's perception that convoy raiding is their best chance in assisting the war effort, at least it made sense for Bismarck to sortie.
It's also their complete nonsense honour culture.
Many problems of the Japanese track back to that.
Like the complete inflexibility of command structures.
It's not like the KM has the numbers of surface ships to challenge the Royal Navy in any decisive manner.
Also, even if they succeeded somehow in winning their decisive battle on which they based their entire doctrine, the US can simply build another fleet in six months.
Well, their idea is that the destruction of the fleet would demoralize the US into bargaining with the Japanese.
That idea is out of the window with the surprise attack on Pearl Harbor.
No not really
I dont recall the entire story anymore due to overblown and out of proportion story telling... What again 
They kinda wanted to do the same thing even with Pearl Harbor, they wanted the us to lift the oil embargo.
Depending on when this hypothetical battle happens, you’d have to look at what ships were already ordered and close to completion
Allegedly, Rodney closed in enough that the ship torpedoed Bismarck - I don't think there is currently conclusive evidence.
Right, but the problem is Pearl Harbor did the exact opposite and cemented the US determination to unconditional surrender.
Im forgor wher Rodknee's torpebos are located... was it fore?
One of the keys here being that war has not been declared at the time.
They could specialise in a dedicated raiding fleet.
Overweight ships like Bismarck and h-39 are just a magnet for bombs.
They should have continued to build small cruisers and pocket battleships.
Should be under the ship in their tubes.
Ah, but they wanted to do that - with the Handelzerstoerer and the P-class.
The P-class was enough of a shitshow, and convoy escorts proving to be tough enough that they needed to be uparmed. What you get is the O-class.
Then the disaster at Barents Sea happened and Mr.Moustache man shut down the entire surface fleet.
Sadge Raeder moment
And there is also the slight problem of the hypothetical enemy - the French.
Dunkerque basically slams on the Panzerschiffe in every single way through sheer size.
The Japanese where never going to outproduce the US.
I don't remember who said that the one who benefited the most from the Washington naval treaty were the Japanese because, otherwise they would make their economy explode.
I didn’t say they would
and any German ship is enough to get French blood boiling, so much so the French decided to shove a middle finger to the Scharnhorsts and beef up the Dunkerque - what you get is Strasbourg.
Yeah, completely miscalculated on their part.
They tough the US would get out of the war in six months and lift the embargo like nothing happened.
I’m saying the US can’t magic a capital ship into the sea in 6 months
Therefore, it also made sense to have a ship that could whack the Dunkerques and Richelieus - and I think Bismarck is also the answer for that.
the US technically did - with the battleships moored inwards.
Which fortunately were only damaged by bombs.
I think Maryland was ready again after.... 2~3 weeks ish?
If the whole fleet is lost and unsalvageable, then its a bit of a problem.
Case in point, the carrier situation around Guadalcanal.
No reinforcements forthcoming until 1943 with the Essexs and Independences.
Pearl Harbour was realistically the only option Japan had left
let Germans have their dreams
The O-class is already too big.
It would get sunk by the British really fast, I think.
They would need something fast and nimble for convoy raiding.
Something like a big destroyer.
But probably subs are better anyway.
It was either attack the democratic powers or leave China, the latter was a non starter thus the former had to happen
like silver what I’m trying to say is
if hypothetically, Japan got the decisive BB showdown at around the time midway happened
But that's the problem - the British found that convoys can get through unscathed by simply plopping an old battleship right in the middle of it.
They were kinda pumping an Essex class out every eight months.
And convoys that can get through are detrimental to the war effort.
Carriers are easier to build than BBs
Essex class construction took multiple years regardless
You dont need large armor construction
the Essexs are authorized in 1940 in the Carl-Vinson act
it took them 3 years to service
They were commissioned regularly by virtue of the massive order
If the ship is say, lost in 1941 december
Essex herself doesn't arrive in Pearl until late December 1942
They took 2-4 years to build
then at the earliest you are looking at a keel laying date of early 1942
Say the USN’s battleship fleet goes down in mid 1942
The U.S. then has, in terms of battleships
It's incredibly difficult to start construction of a ship, you need to assemble materials, draw up designs, retool shipyards and prepare subcontractors
1-2 sodaks, depending on if they pushed Massachusetts into the fleet
then the Iowas wouldn’t enter service until 1943
then whatever they commissioned right after the battle, which would enter service ‘44 at the earliest

The Dunkerque was in response to the Graf Spee, which in turn prompted the Italians to build the Littorio, which in turn prompted the french to build the Richelieu, which promts the Germans to build the overweight Bismarck.
Point is, if it is a total loss, 6 months is a bit of a stretch
Exactly. That's why it needed to be built, inefficient as it is.
Because it turns out taking tons of steel and making a warship of it takes a while
Increasing battleship orders after mid 42 assuming some catastrophic defeat of the USN surface fleet is a very tall order
I won't lie it's definitely one of the few situations where the US might take a negotiated settlement with Japan
Soviets would likely stick to 254mm Ansaldo cruisers if it wasn't for Scharnhorst appearance
Because the last thing you want is the Force de Raid going out and trashing your Panzerschiffe, which already has enough of a problem hunting down merchant ships as they are starting to form convoys.
actually no

same issues as KGV
Yeah, they wanted something to deal with the Graf Spee at the beginning. Later they decided for 12inch guns to counter the Scharnhost.
Is Toilet TDS one of them again
That's why Kursk aka Project X had 240mm guns, it was for Spees
depends
Mfw Germany builds Doitzlands and everybody shits their pants
for once, good job Germany
The Kronshtadt was also really overweight.
Also they could built it...
the Dlands are cute as well
and France just decides to train suplex them anyway with Dunkerque
shame about the war, though
it happens
Kronshtadt was heavy as Richelieu yes. That's why she has one of largest breasts in game
🤨
The British always had the Hood and repulse and renown, the Graf Spee would get annihilated by them.
Likely lack of weight saving knowledge. Or else Stats of Kronshtadt is very similar to Alaska
Well, what else can you really build with the Treaty of Versailles in place?
and in favour of your argument for more pocket BBs, finding a lone ship operating alone turns out to be very shippower-intensive.
What about them
Tbh the Soviets started things they could never complete.
Isn't also the Pr.23 as heavy as a Yamato, almost?
She has same armor tonnage as Yamato yes
That's... 8 caps?
Yeah, but you have to remember BC existed, while designing the Graf Spee the Germans kinda ignored them.
Let's be real, there's some insane thinking behind the protection scheme
Tank logic
Yup
9 caps
and my point is that finding that ship specifically with a BC is not an easy buisness. That's the gamble Germany went for and it somewhat paid off.
Even though River Plate ends with Graf Spee's destruction, we also see how badly mauled Exeter ends up.
Let's not talk about some proposals for the Pr.23 bis or Pr.24.
Like the one which had four triple turrets and was 70000 tons.
Oh yeah let me teach Nemo in why
"immunity against 406mm shells at all angles at a 20 degree zone"
@heady sail guess why Soyuz picked Second option for belt
- statement by the utterly deranged
how to destroy your timely build schedule
No, I meant like the design.
The Graf Spee was designed to be more armed that a cruiser but faster than a BB, but they kinda forgot about British BCs.
Actually, come to think of it - if the toxic gas is such a problem, then surely sealing the caps off would have problems after Dakar?
because it gives equal protection for whole belt against 406mm at this angle of approach allctimes
Sloped armor logic on a battleship
Yea, and I'm saying the design has only 10k tons - and it needs to work as a cruiser that is faster than a BB. Of course it cannot satisfy against a BC.
Renown and Repulse is twice that displacement - of course they can afford to have bigger guns and better protection at that.
It's the same story with Dunkerque annihilating Deutschland on every single aspect of the holy trinity - just by virtue of being beeeg.
but the 380's were never fitted with the capsules
But they designed the caps for the shells- so surely they anticipate a gas problem? 
~soviet steel mills couldn't make any cemented armour thicker than 230mm~
Do you know what you do when that happens
or actually, I don't think I've seen similar shell caps for other nations' shells.
You go Yamato option
Yamato wasn't cemented armor as well
Japan couldn't do those
She use face hardened
Remember, the real Japanese cope
is Diesel propulsion Yamato
On the verge of greatness, you were
Yeah, then they should have sticked to heavy cruisers at most, like every serious navy did.
You send the chief engineer to the gulag?
This
But how else can they do that when what's left of your navy is either a pile of scrap at the bottom of Scapa Flow or otherwise unmodernized?
I think only the face of the turrets, the rest was cemented armour.
Ngl I should modify wiki page of Yamato for armor, specify its not cemented steel
This is like saying the fledgling United States in 1790 should immediately build 74-gun ships like the Royal/French Navy rather than pioneering the six original frigates.
That's America lol

Japan is literally non cemented steel for Yamato
"Armor plates in both the main belt and main turrets were made of Vickers Hardened steel, which was a face-hardened steel armor"
I think the Deutschlands are the best they could do out of the 10,000 ton restrictions they were imposed upon.
Unfortunately, just not so effective when your mission is to kill convoys, and said convoy has a BB in it.
they should've let me design the shells tho
Focus on coastal defense or something
But then again... that wasn't wat the Germanns wanted
Coastal defence is coastal defence - you have no real way to project your power as a nation.
Richel: Traitor
Tbh they kinda were the only one who had considerably powerful diesel engines in working order.
The Germans on the Spee put so many in case of failure.
Also the Italians were really looking into big diesel engines for their hypotetical fleet for the Indian Ocean.
Fiat nevertheless never managed to make them work.
The Costanzo Ciano, raiding cruisers for the Indian Ocean, in some iterations of the projects had diesel engines.

Yea
Sadly Germany would in any scenario want to do that 'expand into Eastern europe' thing again in the wake of WW1
doesn't even phase me
Of course
Diesel in general is just economic with a good cruising range.
Have you nuked Paris today?
It's a bit complicated - The German people felt that they have been backstabbed, as I'm sure you are aware with the Dolchstosslegende.
Doll schlong
The army/navy seemingly surrendered when all is going well - What exactly happened?
Yea
You kinda have to... defeat Germany more throughly in order to stop WW2
Then comes Versailles with the amount of sanctions on Germany - even more hard feelings.
Foch was right
Imagine a more competent Germany
Either you have a lot of naval bases for resupply, like the french or the British, or have impressive supply train like the Americans, the axis nations had none of this and had to put their hopes in diesel engines.
and she cute af
It actually also had to do with why German ships are so ridiculously overweight.
Though you might still have Japan starting some shit even without the Germans
Invade the Russians or something I'm sure that'll go better
Hipper, per my memory, has a fuck ton of redundant systems and workshops.
right
Silver
I got info on Suffren's involvement in Indochina
Now add "absurb cruising range" as a requirement - it bloats so much.

No
And, no offense, why also Littorio on paper also seems to work at 35~40k ton range - the cruising is limited to the Mediterranean.
wdym no
Fought against the Japanese, no?
No
Nein
well you're wrong
Yeah, they kinda used tonnes so freely.
Quite the contrary of the Japanese which made their ships of cardboard and paper.
Both had poor seaworthiness, though.
I remember some people very salty about Suffren in game because of Vietnam
Suffren was just supressing shore batteries
Well, the Japanese signed the WNT/LNT - so they have to comply until they don't.
Ryuujou was an attempt to exploit the WNT carrier loophole - it fucked up badly, safe to say
Yeah, they are almost 15000 tons.
The Zara, for example at 12000 tons, for a ship made ten years earlier, so much better.
On the island of Cat Ba, in the bay of Haiphong
Yea, but again, lots of redundant systems on board
Hipper's design is pure ape shit
They should have dismantled Germany at Versailles tbh.
They're certainly not tonnage efficient, but tonnage inefficient doesn't immediately translate to bad ship, in my opinion
granted, stupid shit like Bluecher happens
already bad for them patriots 😛
hehe
Suffren fired 69 shots at the shore batteries
Littorio isn't overweight tho.
She is fine. Bismarck is more than 50k tons and is a considerably inferior ships.
Here's the thing about stopping WW2
...we still have so many more points where something could have broken out
closer to 40k tons
Littorio technically did get out of the 35k ton requirement.
As mentioned, Littorio has one of worst ranges among BBs
Since she was designed that way
Clearly, submarines
sirene will give the more accurate number
Submarines
and there are some aspects that are otherwise not tolerable in other nations - the Ro.43s would like to have a word with you with the amount of bullying they received.
/s.
Wat, no
Fixed Hipper
Littorio was 40,500 tons standard, around that number
Turret 3 fires
Bismarck was 41,700 standard
RO.43 gets obliterated
there we go
closer to 40k
nowhere near 50k
which people love to say
hyperbole moment
nice subs you got there
BasedMarck just has a heavy full load due to the amount of fuel on that crazy thing
would be a shame if England literally says "I don't care about the R-class and its improvements" and literally shits out a fuck ton of Flower-class corvettes and WEP destroyers just to blow your U-boats out of the bottom
Unless we use full loads, but by then you will find all of the modern battleships in the late 40s/early 50s in tons
Oh wait looks at 70% attrition rate
Its soviet cruiser Tallinn?
Also the tomozuro incident and the whole incident with the fourth fleet showed how badly their ships were designed.
Yes Sang
Actually, wait, Sirene, I got a good idea
Or, we do the modern way, and use the newspaper figures for all ships but Bismarck, who gets full load, so SoDak is "35,000" tons and Bismarck 50,000
Ask France to go on an inspection of Surcoof
you're
not fooling anyone
I swear, totally legit comparisons
If only we got the preliminary design of the Zara with 200mm of belt armour at 15000 tons...
Bismarck did have an above average fuel capacity, so not entirely inaccurate
But also not the full story
Don't Germany's newspapers advertise Bismarck at 35k tons at the time?
Yep
Soyuz's fuel was pretty small 
Likely Italian influence
and dear fuck, pls no UP.41
that thing's armour scheme makes me want to gouge my eyes out

Or give the crown to the Wittelsbach.
No, but seriously, without Hitler you probably have either an Entente intervention in Russia or France starts some shits.
Both the Italians and the British feared France to start a war.
The British considered the Italians an ally in this hypothetical war.
deck protection: diejoubu
Lmao
Wdym, Littorio was designed to operate in the closed waters of the Mediterranean.
What Bismarck should have been
Exactly
No range for Atlantic or Pacific
There is the "breakout" fleet planned - which I'm sure nemo has more details than me.
The arado 196 is not a considerably better idroplane.
Also they were kinda looking for a replacement in the Re 2000.
Oh, I'm not saying the Ro.43 is bad.
I'm saying the hangar capacity for Littorio is not adequete - or, plainly, zero.
That, for example, is not acceptable in the Royal Navy.
Stalin said capitalism leads to wars and expected another great war to happen, so Soviets would wait while capitalist nations tear each other out and then attack at their weakest point.
or Germany for that regard, I think. Most Ar 196s have their own hangars.
and that is also an unfortunate scenario of the Ca.316 not actually going on board the Littorios as expected.
Ca-316 damn sexy













