Bomb size varied; half were smaller 250kg types and one (that pierced the armored deck) was 1000kg
https://www.armouredcarriers.com/battle-damage-to-hms-illustrious
1 messages · Page 139 of 1
Bomb size varied; half were smaller 250kg types and one (that pierced the armored deck) was 1000kg
https://www.armouredcarriers.com/battle-damage-to-hms-illustrious
Thank you
Play World of Warships here: https://wo.ws/3ZCAEeS
Thank you World of Warships for sponsoring this video. During registration use the promo code WARSHIPS to receive a huge starter pack including a bunch of Doubloons, Credits, Premium Account time, and a FREE ship after you complete 15 battles! The promo code is only for new players who register ...
This tree is fake. Like many others, it was planted by Allied soldiers in the dead of night. A hollow replica of the real tree that stood there before. But why did they do it? What are they made of? And how did these trees help to change the face of conflict forever?
During the FIrst World War, Allied soldiers needed a way to see without being ...
Are they paired 
that we are not sure of
Omg I was looking for this yesterday
on Operation room's channel
and just my fucking luck they make one the day after

There's something about WW2 damage control (successful damage control) that just really tickles my brain
like it just blows my mind
that this is possible
Like I've been reading/researching/watching all about it in the past few days, but it's still crazy to me that people can manage to save ships in situations like these
It really takes a strong understanding of the core factors of warship survivability to pull off, alongside good training and equipment
The USN got comparatively quite good at it by war's end through constant learning and disseminating lessons learned throughout the fleet
It is 2023, and there are still Panzer IVs getting knocked out in combat. Which is a wee bit mindblowing.
Shame to lose a probable museum piece, though
Peter Samsonov already looked it up, unfortunately it seems that's far more likely a fake or a prop build out of a BMP
I have to disagree with Samsonov, there's way too much inside for it to be a fake or prop.
What ship is that Bunker Hill?
USS Franklin
Oh
Watch me get a "God mode" in that Pz.4
against a T72
The turret seems to match, not sure about the gun, and the front part of the hull seems to elongated
what's up with the barrel?
It is using BMP tracks but that is probably just a bodge.
Some other surviving P4s have BMP tracks, they match the width and all that.
Weird
today I learned
Musashi took 18 bombs and 19 torpedoes in the battle of the Leyte gulf
and she was abandoned by her task force and her sister ship (Yamato), but she still refused to sink several hours after the battle
that's kinda sad
just a reminder that you don't have to worry too much about your worldbuilding sounding too contrived cause shit like this happens all the time https://x.com/krus_chiki/status/1713786920726134892?s=20
added context
The claims were somewhat exaggerated if I recall.
A major factor in sushi taking so much of a pounding before going under is that they were uncoordinated.
They were pretty evenly distributed, so there wasn't a (massive) list or tilt issue.
Yammy herself went down with far fewer hits because they actually made sure to attack from the same angle each time.
I just watched an 18 minute clip from the 2005 film "Yamato"
"The Sinking Of The Legendary Battleship Yamato | "Yamato" (2005)"
and man this is crazy
That’s one of my favorite history fun facts
there's a timeline out there where they insists on naming the line Balashnikov and there's memes about how you get to choose between the kalashnikov and the balashnikov on gun stores
Not just that his last name was Balashnikov
but that his first name is Yisrael
I just imagine mikhail rolling up to Israel in a yarmulke and fake mustache and going “you say you need a rifle?”
@wild tendon We won't know for sure until someone does a full wreck site tally of the damage, but it's probable that the actual hits Musashi received was much lower than what the US pilots claimed. I go over the postwar USN assessment of Japanese records here for the "high confidence" tally of hits
ic
Undoubtedly she was a tough ship, and her damcon equipment and crew kept her alive longer (as did the diffuse, in time and space, nature of US attacks), but I believe that still holds true without having to accept every US pilot claimed hit at face value like some sources do
yeah that much hits seems like a stretch
So she will be Spanish, Portugal, France, English, Italian,...
nahhh She is probably English because most famous pirate ships are Brit
And best pirate Hunters are Spanish 
the Spaniard
now that I think about it the tweet said it has been a hundred year since we met
could it be a WW1 merchant raider and not age of sail pirate ship ?
man I suck at this pirate guesssing game
Doubtful. The tweets hint at something of "treasures of the New world" - likely hinting at a Carribean operator, during the golden age of piracy.
I'd go further and say it might be related to the Spanish treasure fleets and the sole person that manage to capture a large portion of it over the decades it ran - Piet Hien, but I have zero faith that Manjuu digs that deep.
More likely than not, it's going to be a familiar name.
I'm keeping my treasure, see the pirate was actually me
How could you steal an entire nation's worth of hot dogs?
You're going to cause a famine
Extended and looped this awesome piece for your enjoyment.
I will trade treasure of the new world with my friends
I think she's clearly supposed to be genderbent Gold Roger
the hot dog, the hot dog is real
that's a real panzer 4
well, kinda
it's a czech modification post war
48 or 50 of them were made i think
and delivered to syria
well, more like ''sold later to''
Yeah it's Czech origin
#防衛装備庁 は、#海上自衛隊 との連携により艦艇に #レールガン を搭載し、世界初となるレールガンの洋上射撃試験を実施しました。従来の火砲を凌駕する高速度の弾丸で、空や海上の脅威から艦艇を守るため、レールガンの早期実用化を推進しています。
💖 24
Japan first country to fire rail gun from a ship
@tough quail
It is
Houston of Northampton to Houston of Cleveland
Thus II
“Heavy cruiser” 
Alright cool, historical accuracy pog
manjuu
historical accuracy
Dont look at Japanese light carriers then...
lmao
or northampton ii
The Japanese light carriers are fine
An internal order in 1943 basically compiles Ryuuhou, the Chitoses and Zuihou collectively into the Zuihou class for bureaucratic purposes
As the Navy, Air Force and Marines focus on expanding their capabilities in the Pacific, the Army is on a campaign to prove its regional relevance as service leaders made their case last week at AUSA 2023. U.S. Army Pacific (USARPAC) Commander Gen. Charles Flynn told reporters he was “tired” of answering questions about the […]
I heard Emo Enty is based on Late war Enterprise's (Cv-6) paint job
cause it had a more "dark" scheme to it
anybody got an image of early war and late war Enty?
These photos should illustrate Enterprise in her pre-war configuration, circa 1940.
her appearance changed significantly after the Eastern Solomons, including a new deckhouse in her 1943 overhaul and refit.
Nebula with 40% off annual subscription with my link: https://go.nebula.tv/realtimehistory
Watch Tipu Sultan: Tiger or Tyrant?: https://nebula.tv/videos/extra-history-tipu-sultan?ref=realtimehistory
The Anglo-Zulu War in 1879 is one of the most well known colonial wars of the British Empire. And while the British ultimately won and annexed ...
The weird thing is that even then Shoho is listed as her own class of ship, despite being the one most related to Zuiho
Uh who's that beside Enty
that's New York right?
*a New York
not very exciting I know
Teleosaurids are....not that impressive
they're only maxed at about 5 meters and is basically like modern gharials
but still, paleontology
Launched in 1948 and decommissioned in 1974, USS Newport News (CA-148) was the U.S. Navy's last active all-gun cruiser. Crews of Des Moines-class heavy cruisers could boast of having the world's fastest firing 8-inch, 55-caliber guns.
#WarshipWednesday
Is that the USS Texas beside her?
New York according to Navsource
neat
arming or disarming?
disarming
That is an awesome sound
I do it for a living
tho it's mostly HVAC equipment
Technically there are none flying right now
The CAF's Helldiver is undergoing major engine maintenance
here's the National WW2 Aviation Museum's helldiver that they are currently restoring yo flying condition
Saw it up close in 2021, a few photos
been some progress since then, saw some photos online where it had the spinner and a lot more cowling installed
Here we go, one from 5 days ago
even more complete then the photos from August
Very excited to see it on my next visit, dunno when though
vertical stabilizer looks to be installed now too
Two aye
oh
I heard the refit Enty was like black greyish in color (the deck)
Quick question: What specific variant of Zero did Akagi have? Like, were they A6M2s, A6M5s, etc.
Thanks. Trying to get the correct technical drawings before I wanna throw myself through a window four days later realizing I modeled the wrong one

Tf kinda emote name is satania
...it's a character?
Gabriel Dropout for the one they're from
Never heard of it
Seen that girl in shitty memes tho
Flight decks at the onset of war are stained with Deck Blue 20-B
Pre-war, original mahogany brown
@tough quail https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Mount_Whitney
USS Mount Whitney (LCC/JCC 20) is one of two Blue Ridge-class amphibious command ships of the United States Navy and is the flagship and command ship of the United States Sixth Fleet. USS Mount Whitney also serves as the Afloat Command Platform (ACP) of Naval Striking and Support Forces NATO (STRIKFORNATO). The ship had previously served for yea...
You know it's Nato when this ship is COMSTRIKFLTLANT and STRIKFORNATO
I LOVE ACRONYMS 
that's not even a fucking acronym that second one just removes three letters
what to heck
I feel like they just got lazy with the second name for that ship
So I found an exception to the naming rule for USN amphibious transport docks (LPD)
The LPD New York
Curious, so I looked it up
Apparently it was a symbolic renaming. A substantial amount of recycled steel from the September 11th attacks were used in her construction, and the then governor requested the ship be named after the state of New York after the attacks.
Also gotta say, that is a lovely looking ship
Kinda looks like a military cruise ship XD
Imagine if they bought a cruse ship and converted it
Not unheard of
Actually I could see that happening, converting a cruise ship into a transport including vics
Wait CRUISE ships, I just remembered that most ad-hoc transports were of the transatlantic variety
Yea
And before someone says it, the two types of ship are indeed built different
But still, having a cruise ship as a troop transport? Imagine how many people you could fit in a ship that size stripped down to essentails
Converting a cruise ship into a carrier
You could probably fit a whole army
Imagine not stripping it
I mean you'd logically strip it because all that unnecessary civilian stuff
The real brainy dea is converting a battleship into a cruise ship
As was proposed for the Mackensens
Try converting a battleship into a battle/carrier hybrid
That I could see, battlecruisers being faster than normal BBs made them particularly better suited for travel if anything
The Japanese did - and the Ises turned into a shittier ships than before
Ultimately ending up as either plane bait or literal armoured oil tankers
Is the world ready? Militarized civilian ships have been a thing since... WW1? Crimea?
In terms of cruise ships for modern military use they can be easily converted to transport large amounts of troops for amphibious operations
Not to mention, surprise armed merchant ships in ww2
A long time ago, truth be told
I got dishes to do
Going back further, you already have heavily armed Indiamen
Or, if not that, slavers
They fell out of favor with the construction of purpose built ships alongside air transport during the Cold War
though recently they’re re emerging as a new potential troop transport platform for the pacific
I mean whats a ship-of-the-line but an upscaled militarized YHACT
I spelled that wrong
trade triremes baby
actually no that's way too far
Galeasses
and Holks/Cogs
And then there is this stupidity https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMS_Mordaunt
Why spend more money when private companies build them for you? XD
"Privately built trade vessel for civilian use, just heavily armed to defend herself"
I mean that's what the British did when H&W built the olympics
the Hansa send their regards
(Has the firepower equivalent to a naval ship of the line)
Trust me bro, self defense only, its a civilian vessel
arguably Longships also falls into armed merchantmen category
The Brits were like "well finance your ships, but if we need them, we'll take them"
considering they triple as commerce, exploration, and warfare ships
Its still the same up to WW2 for Japan
Two cruise liners were funded by the Imperial Japanese government
On the condition that they can be seized and converted into a carrier easily and on a moment's notice
Titanic was in a twisted way lucky she sank before WW1, or else she wouldn't have been as famous... She would have probably died an inglorious death by mine... Like her little sister Britanic
Those two are the Izumo Maru and Kashiwara Maru
Or better known as Hiyou and Jun'you
In defense of earlier ships, the armament is easier to move around
Ballistas, men, or just a select few cannons that can be moved around easily with manpower alone
And now I'm comparing RMS Olympic to USN Enterprise... Two ships that lost their siblings
Compared to the fixtures on modern ships
and then the Byzantines with their funny napalm tubes
GREEK FIRE MY GUY
the Greeks loved that smell in the morning yah know?
And then some things are just up to "Captain's discretion"
"Install this long 9-pounder, with the specific purpose of sniping the enemy helmsman only"
(it worked)
Speaking of the New York apparently her sister ships are to be named after the places in which the other 9/11 crashes went down
So that whole line is just one big "never forget"
The Somerset apparently has the phrase "let's roll" painted above the rear deck.
The K3 Next Generation Tank is the ROK Army's next main battle tank that will be deployed in the 2030s. As the primary combat platform of the future mobile corps, it is a next-generation mobile system that has been dramatically improved in all aspects, including firepower, protection and mobility.
It's planned to be developed within the next 10 ...
Has USS Long Beach always looked this goofy?
Compared to the rest of the ship, the bridge is ginormous
It's the SCANFAR radar.
Scanfar
Play War Thunder now for free with my link , and get a massive bonus pack including vehicles, boosters, and more: https://playwt.link/historigraph
In the early hours of April 10th 1940, Commander Bernard Warbuton Lee led his flotilla of destroyers against a German force twice its size at Narvik, in the far north of Norway. Without waiting for r...
On Tuesday the 6th of June, 1944, nearly 160,000 allied soldiers landed along a 50-mile stretch of coast in Normandy. One of the most famous events of the Second World War; D-Day marked the beginning of the end for the Nazi Occupation of western Europe. But at the time, German generals in charge of defending the beaches didn’t believe the full s...
This ship has always looked like it's in constant danger of capsizing itself. the superstructure doesn't help and my friend and I (we consistently talk about ships) have literally started calling it the Megamind
dumb humor, but we figured it made sense
I want to slap that head of its to plump it into water ngl
This is the exact photo behind the reasoning
I feel like I could kick the side of the hull and it would capsize
#OTD in 1987, the U.S. Navy destroyed two Iranian oil platforms during Operation Nimble Archer. The operation was in retaliation for Iran's missile attack on a reflagged Kuwaiti tanker. Iranian forces had been using the platforms as command-and-control posts to track shipping.
Yes. Look at that goofy bridge
Advark
Imagine if by the end of the 7days it's revealed that the new Pirate ship is something more obscure like Fancy or Whydah Gally instead of QAR
Whydah Gally (commonly known simply as the Whydah) was a fully rigged ship that was originally built as a passenger, cargo, and slave ship. On the return leg of her maiden voyage of the triangle trade, Whydah Gally was captured by the pirate Captain Samuel "Black Sam" Bellamy, beginning a new role in the Golden Age of Piracy.
Bellamy sailed Why...
OOH! or William Kidd's Quedagh Merchant
if there no Spanish sail ship I riot
Gimme a sec I gotta see if there's any notable Spanish pirate ship
Madre de Deus (Mother of God; also called Mãe de Deus and Madre de Dios) was a Portuguese ocean-going carrack, renowned for her capacious cargo and provisions for long voyages. She was returning from her second voyage East under Captain Fernão de Mendonça Furtado when she was captured by the English during the Battle of Flores in 1592 during the...
Maaaaybe this one? Not really a pirate ship but you could make a stretch
Also it's got a cool name
Madre de Dios Mother of God
Then there's the privateer ship Heroína
The Heroína (Spanish for "heroine") was a privately owned frigate that was operated as a privateer under a license issued by the United Provinces of the River Plate (later Argentina). It was under the command of American-born Colonel David Jewett and has become linked with the Argentine claim to sovereignty of the Falkland Islands.
There's quite a handful of ships AL could pull from... Given I had to pull all these up and didn't know them before hand, any pirate ship can be "on the table"
ehhh Tempesta doesnt necessarily have to be pirate
Golden Hind is more of a privateer, technically HMS for hire
We talking about privateers then? Cus that expands the roster quite a bit
And allows for the inclusion of more ships from 1800s, I'd love to see some American privateer ships
So does mean the Constitution, Victory, and Wasa will be a Temprest ships?
VARK VARK VARK VARK
mine layers
Can’t wait until I have to grind bomber line
(I have only bothered with getting the F-16s and F-14s)
eh
just found what squadron there using for the skin
"A left side view of an F-111A dropping 24 Mark 82 low-drag bombs in-flight over a range. The aircraft is assigned to the 391st Tactical Fighter Squadron, 366th Tactical Fighter Wing."
going by the tail markings its going to be a F-111A not a F-1111F sadly so no laser guided bombs or anything like that
"0091 to AMARC as FV0075 Jul 31, 1991. Held as spare for RAAF F-111s until they were all scrapped. To HVF West, Tucson, AZ Jan 3, 2013. Scrapped."
interesting
interesting to see that its apparently getting the bullpups as well
hopefully it will actually get GBU-15s
@here Does anyone know what, and how many ships participate in escorting president FDR to the Tehran conference?
and in what formation
Saturday, November 13th. (At sea in “lowa”)
12:06 a.m. The Iowa, in company with the destroyers U. S. S. Cogswell (DD651) (Commander Destroyer Division One Hundred embarked therein), the U. S. S. Young (DD580) and the U. S. S. William D. Porter (DD579), as Task Group 27.5 with Captain McCrea as Task Group Commander, departed Hampton Roads for Oran Algeria (French North Africa). The Iowa was piloted out of the Hampton Roads area by Lieutenant Commander L. T. Stallings, U. S. Coast Guard Reserve, proceeding at various speeds and on various courses conforming to the swept channel.
by November 15th, this screen was replaced with
The United States destroyers Hall (DD583), with Commander Destroyer Squadron Fifty-One embarked therein, McComb [Macomb] (DD458) and Halligan (DD584) were sighted standing toward our Task Group from the south.
More ships and escort carriers joined in over time to Task Group 27.5. The website should give you detailed information.
All the best firearms history channels streaming to all major devices:
weaponsandwar.tv
0:00 Introduction and Overview of the AFN 49
1:23 Detailed Insight into the AFN 49's Global Presence
3:01 Demonstration and Explanation of the AFN's Unique Features
5:05 Auto Trip Feature: A Deep Dive
7:27 Unique Characteristics of the AFN 49
8:48 The Journe...
The main hall of the Mission Control Center in Korolev. Observation of the of the Apollo-Soyuz experimental flight, July 1975
@shrewd pecan I did a deep dive on the specific F-111 they're adding in EN Lore
Definitely teasing F-111C with it
I’m still curious why it has bullpups
since I don’t recall the F-111 actually using them beyond testing
Italy has like
Most inefficient design
I have ever seen
Using Leopard 1 hull
For a single 40mm bofors
What in the absolute fuck
you sure theyre not AGM-69s?
Also learned only 2 pylons move with the wing
Other 2 doesn't move and can block swept wings
Last 2 is hidden inside Bombay with delay
still think it’s a shame we aren’t getting the late F-111F but at least the F-111As looking pretty decent load out wise
the F-111 was such an insane aircraft
one of very few to be nerfed by international treaty
I love how it's air break is also its landing gear bay
i hope the F-111C gets added to the UK tree
would give the UK tree some sorely needed capability
and some actual content before eurofighters get added
UK getting the only long barrel M109
Other nations getting short ones

Likely best historical camo of Mig-29
They probably should just smack both a F-111C and either a Canadian CF-18 or Aussie F-18 into the UK tree just to pad it out for a patch
CF-18s were entirely US spec though
and the Australian Hornet modifications were uh...
lets just say the Americans werent too happy about them
and they wouldnt really change anything in game
more software hacking than anything
just to give the Brits something to hold them over until eurofighter
Join the Brigade to support us and get access to exclusive perks: https://www.patreon.com/battleorder
• Or make a one-time donation: https://www.paypal.com/donate/?hosted_button_id=QJ5G9WUCQW6TA
Check out our merch shop for new prints, apparel and other stuff!: https://battleorder.myshopify.com/
Other Platforms
• Website: https://www.battleord...
Thanks to Call of War for sponsoring this video - Play Call of War for FREE on PC or Mobile: 💥 https://callofwar.onelink.me/q5L6/zu29nrrw Receive an Amazing New Player Pack, only available for the next 30 days!
The Vickers Main Battle tanks were an interesting series of vehicles in production from the middle of the 1950s all the way up to the e...
@shrewd pecan yeah F-111 has 4 AGM-12B Bullpup
A look at the S-Tank Stridsvagn 103, a very special Swedish tank, although some might call it an assault gun or casemate tank. In this video we look at the vehicle in general and then dive into it. We look at ergonomics, the drivers' and commander's position, how it compares to a T-72 and Leopard and many more aspects, for this I interview Tobia...
@spring briar so question, why did French shipbuilding in the early 20th century slowed down in comparison to British and German ones
I know they birthed some horrible predread abominations, so what relation does that has to the slowdown of ship productions
This accurately summarizes it
There quite simply was nowhere near the funding that the British or Germans were plowing into building
huh, surprised the French has far less to work with considering their extensive colonial empire
is this a sympton of their economic policies? After-effects of the Franco-Prussian?
Simply different economic policies
how different?
It's worth noting Germany had about 1.5x the population of France, and thus a similarly larger economy
Metropolitan France was just significantly smaller than the greater Germany if the late 1800s early 1900s
Britain also had a smaller population than Germany, but the combination of income from Britain's empire (which was of course significantly larger than even France's), a very mature industrial sector, and the fact that an outsize portion of British defense spending went to the navy allowed Britain to still handily outbuild Germany
Yes
Wait
Imagine if Germany and Britain teamed up
A combination of British shipbuilding and German engineering
What
Naval Group ceremonially launched the first mine countermeasure mothership for the Royal Netherlands Navy. HNLMS Vlissingen is the second of twelve mine countermeasure vessels in the Belgian-Dutch rMCM program.
=====================
The launching ceremony of the Vlissingen, second of the twelve mine countermeasure vessels of the Belgian-Dut...
aaah
Having a large and easy to exploit empire actually may play a hand. Unlike Britain where the merchant class and wealthy land owner who readily embrace industrial revolution, French society don't seem to adapt that quick, plus political instability. And it is cheaper and more profitable to exploit your colonies, give loan to other country than invest in domestic industry.
Plus, French budget have to balance between a huge land army and Navy, there is so much they can pour into dockyard without triggering another political crisis in French congress over budgetary bickering.
it's also
having no real fleet plans like germany
where it isn't flexible
and whatever is planned to be built is built
right, forgot they're right next door to Germany
@desert agate


this one of zachary taylor tho
true
Yeah indigenous people sent them to extinction quite quickly
The Australia, a County class heavy cruiser of the Royal Australian Navy, is today's subject.
Read more about the ship here:
https://www.awm.gov.au/collection/RCDIG1070207
https://www.awm.gov.au/collection/RCDIG1070208
https://www.amazon.co.uk/British-Cruisers-World-Wars-After/dp/1399097911
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Flagship-Cruiser-Australia-Pa...

Cool
a massive climate change was suspected to be responsible too
Australia used to be full of forests that suddenly disappeared
they scrapped the Hiddensee

fuk
The 12.5 inch Muzzle Loading Gun Mark I of 1885 fired a shell weighing 820 pounds (372 kg) to a range of 6,000 yards (5,586 M). It weighed 38 tons (38,610 Kg) and was generally used as a coastal defence cannon mounted in forts. The gun could fire 3 types of shell - a Palliser armour piercing shell against armoured warships, a common explosive ...
No
Noooo
They should have made her a museum ship
she was
Sorry kept her as museum ship
she was
Did you just send the same message twice?
Sad to see a piece of history good tho
Battleship cove didn't have the funds to keep her in shape
Sad
That’s Yanagi
She got turned into a breakwater
It’s possible to visit her; there’s a bit of historical information and plaques around the ship
(33.9300080, 130.8221490)
Other breakwaters in the area include Suzutsuki and Fuyutsuki, however neither are recognizable as warships
In a recent article/video we looked at the UK’s newly selected Alternative Individual Weapon system, the L403A1. One question which frequently appeared in the comments was “can it fit a bayonet?” In this video we answer that question!
Be sure to check out our accompanying article for this video here -
https://armourersbench.com/
Check us out ...
Amagi is the floating dock at Yokosuka 
Isn't that the US Army's new gun?
no
No that’s the British
iirc the Royal marines were already using an AR-patterned rifle, so this is continuing that trend
Both the US and the UK seem to want to make suppressors standard issue which is neat tho
Operation Carthage, on 21 March 1945, was a British air raid on Copenhagen, Denmark during the Second World War which caused significant collateral damage. The target of the raid was the Shellhus, used as Gestapo headquarters in the city centre. It was used for the storage of dossiers and the torture of Danish citizens during interrogations. The...

The pilots involved in the operation were only told after victory in Europe the true consequences of the raid.
The raid was requested by members of the Danish resistance movement to free imprisoned members and to destroy the records of the Gestapo, to disrupt their operations. The RAF initially turned down the request as too risky, due to the location in a crowded city centre and the need for low-level bombing but they approved the raid in early 1945 after repeated requests.
it was also the second time such a raid was conducted in Denmark, and at least the 4th time such a raid was conducted at all
@near raptor Huh, I didn’t know she ended up as a breakwater too. Wikipedia has her listed as being scrapped in 1947
So, if I understand this right, Amagi is the rectangle next to the destroyer? Or is she the part next to the carrier (I think Kaga)
Further research seems to suggest it’s the part next to the carrier
Ohnooooo
416 my beloved
Yeah was gonna say why is there a drum on that
I read about this. Apparently the natives learned that if they burned down the forests they´d have an easier time hunting game. They burnt down quite a lot of the forests and as a result left Australia as it is now.
it seems a lot of special forces units from across the globe are picking up higher capacity mags
Magpul makes nice drums for sure so makes sense if it's SF guys
Cause they can just do whatever
for both the Frenchie and Delta Force dude there running one higher capacity magazine so if there breaching a building or something similar they don't have to reload as often
it's only for the first mag
also reminder that the French 416s are using a generic gasblock because they specifically rejected the H&K one
because the H&K adjustable gasblock has been causing reliability problems


"If we're sailing from the Baltic to the Pacific than surely the Japanese are trying to do the same!"
Why would the Japanese navy be in the Baltic at the time anyway
The two countries were at war so the Russians probably figured there was a chance, however small, that Japan would launch an audacious attack on their fleet while it was in transit.
If anything the Japanese would've gone north from their island home
Also the Anglo-Japanese Alliance was in effect which made some Russian commanders delusionally paranoid of Britain providing anchorage and arms to the Japanese.
They literally fired on a bunch of Russian boats carrying consular documents before Dogger Bank too.
Geeesh
Like I cannot stress enough how much of an absolute circus the 2nd Pacific Squadron's journey was
You need to read it to (maybe) believe it.
Mmm
Also Russia's newest battleships had a problem with their design that prevented access to the Suez and had to go around Africa.
Too wide?
Ahhh
It worths noting that some of the accounts of the 2nd Pacific Squadron are intentionally embellished to make Rozhestvensky look like a clown
Because said writer is a communist and generally loathed the Imperials
that is likely to be part of the reason, alongside sudden climate changes, and the one two combo might have strained Australian megafauna's adaptive ability to its breaking point
The funny incident
Idk man those fishing boats look like Japanese torpedo boats
Hm why I'm not suprised? Like russians have so many friendly fire incidents
Can landing craft be kansens?
Found the katyusha of the sea
And they call that a battleship
No, they do not on both points
Then what is their battleship
well they have the Kirovs which some call battlecruisers
that there is a Slava, not a Kirov
this is a Kirov
personally I'm not a fan of calling it a battlecruiser but I can understand the argument
Mmm
If anything it's a missile cruiser
Only the super structure looks anything like a battlecruser/ship
They both would be more of a missile cruiser
in any case the Slavas aren't designed for shore bombardment like the MLRS LSTs of WW2/Korea, the massive missiles they carry are intended to penetrate American carrier groups and knock them out, not to say they can't be used to attack shore targets, but it's not the intended role
Mmm
Least there's actual battleships and cruisers that can be reactivated when needed
the Kirovs meanwhile are intended to protect the Soviets from constant attacks by F-14s so that the Slavas can make their missile attack
you mean the Iowas? reactivating them would be a ridiculous notion in this day and age
Well the US navy actually has a reactivation plan for when they do wanna bring em back
ignoring the fact that they're hopelessly obsolete, there is no one in the USN today who actually knows how to use their systems
Sure, big naval guns have fallen out of favour to missiles, but best part is there is no counter to shells unlike missiles
Well, harder to counter
the last Iowa left service over 30 years ago, even trying to reignite the engines is an exercise in futility
That's because their steam powered
Takes like...an hour at most to get up to steam
30mins to an hour
an Iowas maximum firing range is 47km
an AGM-158C LRASM has a maximum range of 926km
from a cold start an Iowa takes around a full day to build up steam and thats with a trained crew
again
Where'd you hear that
nobody in the USN today knows how to light an Iowas boilers
That's why they kept the documentation on board the ships
yeah except you now have to dig out all that documentation, learn what it means and train personnel on it
and thats of course the first hurdle
why would you bother reactivating a Iowa
when it would be easier to just smack the M1299's gun on a San Antonio
and we can't make more
there's far better options these days for naval gun fire support than the Iowa's
Yea infrastructure for ammo and gun barrels is a big issue
Missiles can be countered
And you can carry a lot more shells than you can missiles
Underway replenishment of shells is easier
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M1299_howitzer
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_Gun_System
https://www.leonardo.us/defense-systems-oto-vulcano
The M1299 is an American prototype 155 mm self-propelled howitzer developed by BAE Systems in 2019 under the Extended Range Cannon Artillery (ERCA) program. It is based on the M109A7 howitzer, and was primarily designed for the purpose of improving the M109's effective range.
The Advanced Gun System (AGS) is a naval artillery system developed and produced by BAE Systems Armaments & Services for the Zumwalt-class destroyer of the United States Navy. Designated the 155 mm/62 (6.1-inch) Mark 51 Advanced Gun System (AGS), it was designed to provide long-range naval gunfire support against shore-based targets. A total of ...
Unguided ballistic extended range (BER) and guided long range (GLR) ammunition for naval guns and land artillery systems.
yes that's all well and good but in what world are you getting in range to fire said guns
you can shoot down gun rounds
When the enemy runs out of missiles and you speed run towards the
how in gods name are you expecting to survive a missile bombardment in an Iowa
its not so much a "big issue" as it is absolutely crippling because that industry no longer exists to produce them
Armour of course
if your strategy requires the enemy to run out of ammo before killing you... Uh...
most modern missiles would just punch right through the belt
armour would not save an Iowa from a missile bombardment
~39 km
that also doesn't really change the fact any modern destroyer can just dump its anti ship missiles at a Iowa and just disengage before the Iowa can ever get in range itself
even if missiles couldn't penetrate the belt (they can), the sheer amount of damage done to the upper works of an Iowa would render the ship entirely mission killed
to my understanding most modern missiles would absolutely not get through the belt, because they're not really intended to breach targets like that anymore - but making missiles that could is incredibly simple
you just need someone to give a shit enough to do it again
You do realise it's called Countermeasures right?
There were a couple close calls with Missouri during Desert Storm, IIRC
what type of counter measures are you rocking that's making a Iowa successfully defend itself from a P-8000 swarm?
hopes and dreams
blind luck?
there is a missile, in service today, with a range of nearly 1000km, that is capable of detecting enemy radar pickets, avoiding them, finding the flag ship of a task force and then hitting it where it determines it will do the most damage, all without giving out any radar emissions, and is low radar observable, meaning effectively the only way of detecting and engaging it, is by picking it up on radar and shooting it down in the 20-30 seconds between it appearing on the horizon and ploughing throught the bridge
Iowa has...what? two CIWS per broadside?
Smoke, chaff, radar jamming, ciws
what is smoke going to do to radar...
That's why I said chaff
No AEGIS systems on board either
this is navy man not air to air baby shit
And considering the us has lasers on a few destroyers how about those too
not that.. chaff even really works air to air anymore
like 80s/90s Iowa's had the benefit of carrying more anti ship missiles & cruise missiles than most other surface combatants
but she for now is both incredibly obsolete and in bad shape
New jersey is due for drydocking anyway
yeah, to clean her hull and make minor repairs, as all museum ships require
Exactly
HMAS Vampire just came out of drydock and we're hardly talking about reactivating her
the 16 inchers even for naval gun fire support are obsolete and the industry for maintaining them just doesn't exist anymore
at this point just build some fake superstructure and bow extensions on a burke and make it look vaguely like an iowa so people stop asking
begins drawing up plans while high on hot dog condiments
XD
Maka on that relish energy
that 40 inch RHA belt gonna go crazy
what if we put
a really big net around the ship to catch the missiles
there's really no circumstance in which an Iowa is relevant in the modern world
it would be easier to just
theyre museums, let them stay that way
build a entirely new ship
Coastal bombing New York city
than to reactive them
not only do you stop the missiles you can pick them up out of the net and now you have more missiles too
And I think that is a very useful thing
especially considering you'd have to gut the entire interior of the damn thing anyways to make it meet modern crew standards
and to you know
make it able to accommodate female crew
a spinning hula hoop around the superstructure with a depleted uranium chunk on a cable to deflect missiles away by crashing into them
advanced defenses
oh no not WOMEN
I’ll make sure not to hit the hot dog vendors
i think if we yell at the missiles loud enough they'll go away
maybe we should ask to see the missiles manager
modified ship horn to cause air-traveling sonar, kills all animals within 50 miles, but also fries missiles
crew to be restocked after ship autopilots to a base
how will an iowa cope with being intimidated by a P-800s weird missile foreskin
okay so
take an Iowa
remove the turrets
and all other armament
cover it in LRASM-SL
you now have a modern surface combatant
enjoy winning wars
just take the cool bridge of an iowa and put it on other stuff and there you go
Still gonna sink in the Atlantic
think New Jersey's museum released a video detailing a few 1990s retrofit proposals for the ship and how one of the main concerns was trying to fit both modern crew amenities alongside accommodations for female crew in a ship that was designed for neither of them in mind
upset i got nothing for missile foreskin honestly
tfw theres an armoured bulkhead between you and the ships onboard wifi router
My understanding is that the requirement to actually maintain them in “returnable to service” state was quietly dropped a few decades ago, and they’re now long past any hope of reactivation
an entire beef storage locker freezer big enough to walk in, what other accomodations do you need
they were kind of failing at that even before they were reactivated the first time
it was dropped in the mid 2000s
even if the cold war persisted the things weren't making it past the early 2000s anyways with half of class being devested from in the 90s regardless
remember the iowa turret explosion was caused by her failing her sea trials so many times dudes in the navy got bored enough to do really stupid firing trials on her while waiting for the next chance
reaganomics can only take you so far in the navy
As for their late Cold War reactivation, my understanding is that that was mostly done not for their guns, but because they were comparatively cheaper to convert into Tomahawk barges than building one from scratch
pretty much
yeah
their guns did end up being rather useful in Lebanon and the Gulf
but there's far better options for that now
what the fuck does that even mean
I mean, so are protective helmets. Doesn’t make them a bad idea
WW1 thinking is building battleships in the first place 
I find their lack of faith in bulkheads to be very civil war era thinking
🪖
I don’t think they meant it in a bad way
More in a “ww1 era thinking isn’t always obsolete” way
Which I agree
when why the knife
Since artillery is always a good idea
you're giving us mixed messages smh
What WWI battleships used armored turret bulkheads though…?
I agree
AAAAAAA
besides gun artillery had its peak and we failed to embrace it
I think they were just referring to Bayern’s 30mm behind the belt angled bulkhead

30mm not enough
Tho
Especially for a ship that is supposed to receive 15” shells
Those splinters will simply ignore that 30mm
But not BB fragments
155mm...that's cruiser calibre
and?
Reminder that we reached “modern” shell design in 1916
the M110 will always be in my heart
who the fuck uses 208s
wait fuck the long toms 155 too
Russians with their 220mms
rest in peace my sweet prince
but yes, 6" gang
M55?
M110
Well I was half correct
even if the B-4 is really funny
my favorite redfor infantry line nuker
Thought that was the AMX 13 F3 for a sec
Kek
it does look like that, yeah
I want to see what the biggest gun we can fit on one is
it's literally just a M115 howitzer on a tracked mount though
dont the French still put out upgrade packages for the AMX-13?
because theres still like half a dozen operators
likely
OH RIGHT
look at he
party wagon
remember folks
i kinda want to see a bunch of exocets strapped to an amx-13 now
wikipedias disrespect of the AMX-13 tho
Chain shot
did the French invent this as well?
I think the Germans did
f o r e s k i n
looks like 1916 to me
They experimented with 15cm ramjet shells at peenemunde iirc
Or something similar atleast
oh yes since our favourite plane game is adding the F-111
I have a need
to post my pdfs
thinking about it did anyone ever experiment with rocket assisted shells for naval guns?
Varkin time?
i love the pig
What do you mean exactly by rocket assisted
Doubt it
Self propelled shells
Because base bleed shells are technically rocket assisted
as in rocket assisted rounds you'd see in artillery rounds
We had those in our airforce
Plenty of times then
Since if its simply assisted and not propelled
Any base bleed shell applies
dont the modern 5in naval guns have base bleed
I'm not really thinking base bleed
though the WIkipedia article for base bleed does show the Swedish 12 CM as having base bleed shells
Your thinking of that experimental shell that had a rocket motor in its base aren't ya
No this is a actual thing
The M549 is a high-explosive rocket-assisted (HERA) 155 mm howitzer round developed for use by the US military in order to add additional range to standard howitzers, with a maximum range 30.1 km from a M198 howitzer. The projectile has two distinctive pre-assembled components—the high explosive (HE) warhead and the rocket motor, making it a for...
A rocket-assisted projectile (RAP) is a cannon, howitzer, mortar, or recoilless rifle round incorporating a rocket motor for independent propulsion. This gives the projectile greater speed and range than a non-assisted ballistic shell, which is propelled only by the gun's exploding charge. Some forms of rocket-assisted projectiles can be outfitt...
Yea
AGS had a rocket assisted projective
suppose LRLAP would count yeah
zumwaltcells stay seething
"The LRLAP would have used a rocket-assisted projectile with fin glide trajectory. The warhead effectiveness was considered comparable to that of the M795 artillery shell, and with the AGS it would have been capable of 6 round Multiple Rounds Simultaneous Impact (MRSI) in a span of 2 seconds.[2] It would have used a blast fragmentation type warhead.[3]"
the more I look at the AGS and LRLAP the more I believe the navy shouldn't be allowed to develop its own gun systems that aren't 127 MMs
HEY LOOK AGS BUT ACTUALLY AFFORDABLE AND FIELDABLE
"The M1299 is armed with a new 155 mm L/58 caliber long, a 9.1 m gun tube, XM907 gun, designed by Benét Laboratories that will fire the XM1113 rocket-assisted round. This will give a range of over 70 km – much greater than the 38 km (24 mi) of the M109A7 Paladin."
XM115 brings the maximum range up to over 110 KM as well
the Germans were onto to something here honestly
nope
I know it's a self propelled arty one but still
self propelled artillery
there's no real point in developing a entirely different gun
when you can just navalize the land systems
Yes
PZH-2000 specifically would of needed a entirely different turret/mount for the gun considering it wouldn't be practical to use the PZH-2000 turret itself considering it's using a semi autoloader over the full autoloaded guns ships use
but if you really need naval gun fire support and a 127 MM can't cut it there's really no reason why you shouldn't be looking at navalizing some of the land systems out there
Mmm
in terms of AGS to be fair most of the capability the navy was looking for didn't really exist yet when Zumwalt entered development
ehhhhhh
the navy's found a niche for them that only they can really do right now compared to the rest of the fleet
As a experimental platform for new tech I guess but in practice nahh
Once they get their retrofits for hypersonic missiles there basically gonna be the only platform capable of fielding hypersonics until DDG(X) and Block V Virginia start showing up
its a capability that lets you deep strike your opponent with a missile that is hard to intercept and to detect if you don't have the right detection infrastructure
Because you need very good all-around sensor networks to detect them in time to intercept (which very few nations have), and the time-to-target is low
there's a reason why the US is investing billions in expanding its early warning capabilities
Yeah
How old is their early warning system
It's not age its coverage
Missile nerdery aside at this stage it's most important to launch the right missiles at the right time, moreso than whether X missile is capable of killing Y missile
they can play peekaboo with SSNs
that alone would already make them worth it
I mean if you have enough reaction time really any ABM capable air defense system can down a hypersonic
"hypersonics" are moving slower than BMs at terminal interception ranges
the speeds make it difficult for the missile to maneuver and they have to maintain relatively high attitudes to maintain speed
BMs are just full sending yeeting themselves out of the sky at max speed
"hypersonics" are still trying to give lip service to manuevering
https://www.csis.org/analysis/complex-air-defense-countering-hypersonic-missile-threat
PDF in this link is a good place to start reading on the topic
Imagine someone putting a warhead on a falcon9
what do you think most of NASA's rockets were converted from pre space X?
Most of em blew up if I remember
The LGM-118 Peacekeeper, originally known as the MX for "Missile, Experimental", was a MIRV-capable intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) produced and deployed by the United States from 1985 to 2005. The missile could carry up to twelve Mark 21 reentry vehicles (although treaties limited its actual payload to 10), each armed with a 300-kilot...
Minotaur IV, also known as Peacekeeper SLV and OSP-2 PK is an active expendable launch system derived from the LGM-118 Peacekeeper ICBM. It is operated by Northrop Grumman Innovation Systems, and made its maiden flight on 22 April 2010, carrying the HTV-2a Hypersonic Test Vehicle. The first orbital launch occurred on 26 September 2010 with the S...
The LGM-30 Minuteman is an American land-based intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) in service with the Air Force Global Strike Command. As of 2023, the LGM-30G Minuteman III version is the only land-based ICBM in service in the United States and represents the land leg of the U.S. nuclear triad, along with the Trident II submarine-launched...
This is actually something Soviet might actually does, if the ship is gonna be in limited operational range anyway, might as well turn it into an Arsenal ship
there are true hypersonic missiles coming
even an air launched one being developed by the RAAF
Mmm
Do we know if they will be used on the ghostbat?
not likely
from what i can gather its mainly intended for whatever will replace the Super Hornet
be that F-35 or a 6th gen plane
Eh, you have done something wrong if you need something beyond a normal DD 5" for NGFS
And there are a number of things you have to deal with when navalizing a gun
Plus ERCA probably won't have brilliant barrel life, which is something you want, and can afford usually afford, on a naval gun
To be honest the hornet is more of a fighter than the f35 at least to me, to me the F35 is a more advanced F117 and harrier in one (for B varient at least), plus the hornet can go supersonic at higher speeds and can maintain it for extended times than the F35 which can only go supersonic for like 60 seconds or so otherwise the paint will peel and burn off
I honestly don't see the F35 than more than a deep air penetrator
the Super Hornet has less thrust than the F-35 with a heavier and larger airframe
The engine for the F35 was designed for the original B varient which is a VTOL
the super hornet is heavier than the F-15C with half the thrust as well
even in a dog fight the F-35s gonna out turn the super hornet and out run it
The hornet has the top speed advantage don't forget
The f35 can't even go supersonic for long or else the paint will peel off as I stated before
the pilot is not gonna give a shit about the paint peeling if he's in the middle of combat
The military does
The next best stealth coating is on the F22
losing a plane is a much more expensive loss than replacing paint

you're parroting myths from 3 years ago
ive said enough on the F-35 the pros and the cons
get new material
especially for the RAAF
fact is the F-35 is good
it isnt perfect
not by any means
at both high speeds and low speeds the 35s gonna out turn and out accelerate the Super Hornet
but its still a highly capable platform
Need navalized F-111 
F-111B too fat for carriers
We do t even have a proper carrier
sometimes I wonder just how
Make one, skill issue 
All we have are amphibious assault carriers which would do well with a f35B
GDP and manpower idiot

- ‘When our envelope
was cleared to practise BFM we got
the opportunity to fight some fourthgeneration fighters. Remember, back
then the rumors were that the F-35
was a pig. The first time the opponents
showed up [in the training area] they
had wing tanks along with a bunch of
missiles. I guess they figured that being
in a dirty configuration wouldn’t really
matter and that they would still easily
outmaneuver us. By the end of the week,
though, they had dropped their wing
tanks, transitioned to a single centerline
fuel tank and were still doing everything
they could not to get gunned by us. A
week later they stripped the jets clean of
all external stores, which made the BFM
fights interesting, to say the least
why they decided to make the super hornet so obese and not give it new engines with actual thrust
also
Hornet's stop speed is while clean, no external loads of any kind
aka
useless
Bullshit
like the thing is heavier and as big as a F-15 with half the thrust....
F-35 could be a good replacement for it
If it weren't so expensive
but in my opinion, the 6th gen platforms currently in development are superior
a new super hornet is more expensive than a F-35A
get new jokes
F-35 is cheaper to buy, and cheaper to operate per hour of flight than Super Hornet
That's highly debatable as the 5th gen aircraft aren't even combat proven
have you been living under a rock for 6 years?
High-g maneuvering is fun, but having
high fuel capacity and the ability to carry
lots of stores is great too. During the weeks
when we were flying BFM we also needed
to drop a GBU-12 [laser-guided bomb] on
the China Lake weapons range. Back in our
F-16 days we’d have had to choose, since
there is no way you can BFM with a bomb
on your wing, let alone having the fuel to
fly both missions in a single sortie. With
the F-35, however, this isn’t much of an
issue. On one of the sorties, my colleague,
Maj Pascal ‘Smiley’ Smaal, decided he
would fly BFM and still have enough fuel
to go to the range afterwards and drop his
weapon. During the debrief, the adversary
pilot told us he was confused as to why
we went to the range after the fight. When
‘Smiley’ told him that he was carrying an inert GBU-12 the entire time and that he
then dropped it afterwards during a test
event, the silence on the other end of the
line was golden
well they are but thats besides the point
I would note that Ghost Bat is more or less specifically designed for 6th gen integration
please don't call anything 6th gen
Israels already scored air to air kills with their F-35s man
no one even knows what they want from "6th gen"
Emphasis on AI
Israeli would like to have a word about that 
What about tempest
the service life extension to 2032 for the Super Hornet is specifically so RAAF can evaluate F/A-XX
and decide whether they want it, or more F-35s
given the issues with the F-35 program for the RAAF, I've no doubt that they will go for F/A-XX
the issues RAAF has had with F-35 are nothing to do with what you've said already
A flying wing arrow?
Still
also that "muh supersonic paint stripping" bullshit comes because testing with the F-35B/C airframes at Mach 1.6 for hours showed damage to skin coatings and antennae... which is a speed only the F-35A can pull off atm
but you'll note the F-35A, which is the majority of airframes, doesn't have that issue
the criticisms of the F-35 program are far too boring for clueless journalists to self-fellate about these days
and the old criticisms are well, old, and basically all resolved
As many as the US has on their carriers
USN isnt fond of F-35 in its current state
no anti ship weapon integration yet
I seriously doubt we'll see F-35C proliferating in the fleet until block 4 comes about
yeah
which yknow
leaves USN airpower at a bit of a weaker point in capability
especially with block 4 being delayed
but theyre still obscenely capable so im sure theyll make do
its a little more complicated than that but yes, block 4 should have been the first mass production airframe, or at least should have been ready well before 1000 block 3s were built
eh I think its more accurate to compare the F-35 blocks to phantom variants
since Block 3 and Block 4 are looking like the difference between a F-4C and a F-4E
Seriously? Comparing the F35 to the F4?
I'm talking in terms of capability leaps between variants
i mean
the programs surprisingly have a lot of common development goals
a universal airframe for use between the navy and air force for starters
and the use of as much cutting edge technology in the avionics to make flying the aircraft as easy as possible to allow pilots to focus far more on combat than wrestling the airframe
"
F-4C
Two-seat all-weather tactical fighter, ground-attack version for the United States Air Force; supported a wide spectrum of weapons including AIM-4 Falcon, AGM-12 Bullpup, and nuclear weapons; wider main wheel tires resulted in distinctive wing bulges; J79-GE-15 engines with provision for cartridge start; boom refueling instead of Navy's probe and drogue refueling; AN/APQ-100 radar; duplicated flight controls in the rear cockpit. The aircraft exceeded Mach 2 during its first flight on 27 May 1963; 583 built."
"F-4E
USAF version with an integral M61 Vulcan cannon in the elongated RF-4C nose, AN/APQ-120 radar with smaller cross-section to accommodate the cannon, J79-GE-17 engines with 17,900 lbf (79.379 kN) of afterburner thrust each. Late-series aircraft equipped with leading-edge slats to improve maneuverability at the expense of top speed under the Agile Eagle program. Starting with Block 53, aircraft added AGM-65 Maverick capability and smokeless J79-GE-17C or -17E engines. First flight 1 August 1965. The most numerous Phantom variant; 1,370 bui"
F-4E introduced multiple weapons integrations, targetting pods and other major improvements over the F-4C
if you say anything about the gun....
Too late
most kills in Vietnam were scored by air to air missiles
this goofy mfer bringing the gun up when it's the F-4E being mentioned

the issue was not the lack of a gun it was training and poor command & Control infrastructure
i hate the gun myth i hate the gun myth
anyway
even besides the gun myth
the F-4E... has an internal one

goofy aaaaaaaaa must just think it applies for all models
over the like... 3 decades of US service
Well i wasn't born in that era so how could I know
READ
even some basic thought
would do the job
"Would something stay the same for more than 30 years? Maybe I should check."
Iirc, VNAF actually regulate MiG-17/19 back to point defense where they rely of radar guidance and terrain to perform ambush on US aircraft later in the war while MiG-21 was use mostly with missile later on
of the planes that flew in Project Featherduster, iirc only the F-100 pilots said having a gun actually helped them in in the exercise, and 2/3 Phantom crews explicitly said having a gun would have put them at a further disadvantage
only the USN actually decided a gun would have helped and thats because the USN used their backseaters differently to USAF
MiG attacks became more frequent and more aggressive during the first month of Rolling Thunder. Then, on April 4th 1965 F-105s attacked the Dragons Jaw Bridge in North Vietnam. The second wave was ambushed by MiG-17s, which shot down two of the lumbering Thuds.
US planners who had initially assumed that the obsolete MiG-17 would pose little thr...
I would really reccomend this video on it
Noted
and ignore all other discourse about Featherduster especially when anyone mentions the F-104
Here's a good brain teaser for y'all, best interceptor fighter of its time
For me this would be my number 1 fighter, least for me
that the F-102 or F-106
F-106
Yeah, the NV aircraft got spanked in head-on fights, and switched to individual ambushes from behind that gave up on stopping strikes for achieving a less terrible loss ratio while still forcing many attackers to jettison bombs to deal with them
Just out of curiosity, what are you guys favourite jets
ah
"F-106C: Unbuilt version. Aircraft was intended to have the AN/ASG-18 radar and fire control system fitted originally developed for the North American XF-108 Rapier. For its time, it was the largest radar to ever be fitted to a fighter, actually requiring hydraulic actuators to turn the antenna. To accommodate this larger radar system, the nose cone was longer and of greater diameter. The design featured an improved raised canopy design featuring better visibility, canards and lengthened rectangular inlet ducts. The aircraft was to be capable of carrying one GAR-9/AIM-47A in its center bay and one AIM-26A in each side bay. At one time, the US Air Force had considered acquiring 350 of these advanced interceptors, but the F-106C/D project was cancelled on 23 September 1958."
Vietnamese ground control made US doctrine somewhat flawed
The Hughes AN/ASG-18 Fire Control System was a prototype airborne fire control radar system for the planned North American XF-108 Rapier interceptor aircraft, and the Lockheed YF-12 for the United States Air Force. It was the US's first Pulse-Doppler radar, giving it look-down/shoot-down capability, and was also the first track while scan radar ...
F-111
F-106 with look down capability
Ok not bad, mine is the tomcat
fake australian

punishment is exile in Tasmania
Bite me, I love the F14
The F14 calls to me
Cause I feel the need, the need for speed
Yesh
Something I’m curious about. It’s sometimes said that 1991 Baghdad’s air defense system was more sophisticated and advanced than even Hanoi at the height of the Vietnam War. What led Iraq to develop this air defense capability to such a degree?
ah here it is
What happened during that time
I mean they were under sustained Iranian air raids during the Iran-Iraq war
that additionally saw the Israeli Airforce performing both the bombing of the Iraqi nuclear program alongside Israeli deep recon flights into Iraq itself
I read somewhere the F14 could fire 8 missiles at once
I mean it can if its rocking the full pheonix load with the two AIM-9s
but if its that close in the Pheonix's likely aren't hitting anything
Mmm the phoenix were long range radar guided while sidewinder short range thermal
Phoenix's aren't all that good at hitting manuevering targets
additionally running 6 phoenix's put additional strain on the airframe
One thing bithers me
Some sources say it was a F14 that got its wing ripped off and still flew and landed safely others say it was a F15
Ok
That's right
The F14 I understand could do it cause of the fuselage shape but the f15...how?
the thing's engines don't suck unlike the tomcats
F-15 is basically a rocket with how powerful its engines are
Well...it did follow a rocket up as well as hit a satellite so I guess
Hooo
I know they fixed the conpressor stall with the B
Although the pilots were good at shutting down and restarting the A engines mid maneuver
pretty sure thats just a scene in top gun