#history
1 messages · Page 121 of 1
To get early access to Historigraph videos and to support their creation, please support us on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/historigraph
Part 1 of this series: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Obrv_GdvNf0
In the middle of 1942, the Allied navies in the Atlantic were facing a dire situation. For the last six months German U boats had unleas...
I know that IJN doctrine dictate that they carry additional torp to reload after firing, what about USN, RN and Kriegsmarine?
USN destroyers carried reloads
well some did
Benson had a limited reload
Tribals also had limited reloads
those circle bits are where they were kept
not sure about kreigsmarine but i dont believe they made a habit of it

some french cruisers had torp reloads

Join the Brigade to support us and get access to exclusive perks: https://www.patreon.com/battleorder
• Or make a one-time donation: https://www.paypal.com/donate/?hosted_button_id=QJ5G9WUCQW6TA
Check out our merch shop for new prints, apparel and other stuff!: https://battleorder.myshopify.com/
Other Platforms
• Website: https://www.battleord...
@_undefined_n#0000

We lost Undef @humble mulch
I think he nuked his discord account after Hindenburg incident
I shall post RM pictures to honor him
What happened?
Good ol Hindenburg is the new DR
Italy, Losing the chance of Capitani Romani class of being UR, and having few but barely known designs as possible UR chance, had only PR collabs to get a rainbow tier
Which was well, taken by Hindenburg
And Undef I guess just left the internet
Maybe a break or longer, nobody knows
You are our only Italian expert now Phon
now watch that the next dr is napoli
Let's not discuss about the Hindenberg reveal thing.
I think we've seen enough...
Good meme
I know someone who would lose their mind for that
he will be back, to once again lead the glorious murm

To the wrong shore, came the world war...
does anyone know what the historically accurate main gun is for battle monitors
Depends on the era and navy
Purple British 381mm is the closest, if you are referring to the ones we have.
We lost a real one.
KM destroyers carried a half reload, although there methods for reload were not as refined as IJN destroyers and it was generally more difficult to perform.
Japanese reloads take up to 30 minutes, per memory.
The position of the forward reload tubes were also unsatisfactory, and had to be relocated on the Asashio>Kagero transition.
And finally, just generally straight up hazardous because of obvious reasons. 
Depended on the ship. Eugen is well documented, and had 22 torpedoes on deck (12 in the tubes, 10 in boxes), and then a non specified amount of internally stored torpedoes
The Japanese also experimented with assisted torpedo reloading on the first two Hatsuharu-class. Iirc it significantly cut down the amount of time required for torpedo reloads. The system was removed after the substantial rebuild and subsequent Hatsuharu-class never had the system mounted.
uh
lemme climb on my roof and check
there is a fire in henderson
hard to say if it's Otama herself because I dont know exactly where she is on site
but i dont think theres much of her left anyway
ill let you know what comes of it later because i cant be assed driving all the way down there
its like an hour a way and im lazy
City of what
Ah ok
He also left the murm server

Thanks
Gorizia 
history people
analysis pls
1st is Roon gun but just 
2nd is the purple triple 406 we have
That's all I know

5th one is a Richelieu gun but in a triple turret
I'm guessing the third gun is this https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_5_15_cm_AA_gun
The Type 5 15 cm AA gun (五式十五糎高射砲, Go-shiki jyūgo-senchi Koshahō) was a large caliber anti-aircraft gun developed by the Imperial Japanese Army during the final days of World War II. The Type 5 number was designated for the year the gun was accepted, 2605 in the Japanese imperial year calendar, or 1945 in the Gregorian calendar. It was intended ...
Nah, that’s an army gun, the 150 here is a naval dp gun in a triple turret
Because the gun in WoWs is the army gun
there is not type 5 150mm naval gun
WoWs Shimanto uses that gun
Huh, alright
Yeah was gonna say
Very interesting idea to say the least
wonder if she'll hate Mogami
Ah yes let's ask the army for their gun to use in our ships. It's not like we just traded assassinations with them in the past few decades
Ignoring the fact that the Army also literally only made 2 of the guns
yeah but bro they can totally fit them on a cruiser totally a valid proposal that would have been seriously considered
I love that not only did they decide that the japanese navy could have somehow obtained weapons from the japanese army with their consent, but that they also would have made little to no effort to try and rework them into actually usable naval guns as opposed to just sticking them on a hull unmodified and seeing what came out of it
truly a wargaming moment
i mean as we all know, land based AA guns are well known for their capability as naval weapons
on par with suggesting a Soviet unbuilt cruiser design could somehow make its way into the Chinese navy
sea spray? salt water degredation? never heard of it
No its gold version
406mm mark 6 improved
Its likely for Kearsarge
Yeah I just said it's related to the purple 406mm we have
And yeah i know she uses the same guns as NC
And SD
Lastly Im pretty sure the 4th gun is just the 15cm German Cruiser gun in a twin turret

It's for the Felix
yeah, but Im pretty sure the guns Weegee used are literally just the cruiser guns
in new twin turrets
I think someone did the trans and said that Felix use TbtSK C/42T
So Felix have CL gun slot
They are
it is that
it says in the pic there that it's the UR gear
Oh, I didn't notice the "UR"
Man really wanted a Soviet cruiser
Maybe next year

Donskoi could be great
Super Steroid Chapayev/Sverdlov design with 12 180mm
Isn't Kursk supposed to be design "X"
She is
That's why she has light armor as heavy cruiser
And she launches 2 mini subs and Kor-2 spotter planes
Today we're looking at the Beriev Be-4, a flying boat that was built for the Soviet Navy as a naval reconnaissance and air-sea-rescue aircraft. It is notable for being the aircraft that rekindled Beriev's favor with the state, which led to many more successful designs in the future.
Model link: https://www.cgtrader.com/3d-models/aircraft/histor...
I remember that plane, Beriev basically bet his life and all of his bureau future on that plane and it somewhat succeed
@manic latch anything else to add?
Not possible to actually talk about how excited Edison and Roosevelt is for the monster. More focused on shitting on Carp and his fuckfest.
As it turns out, packing 10+ pages worth of info from 3 different books is hard. 
You can add this funny quote which is the main reason Kearsarge become this
Molotov's brother in law, Sam Carp, who set up a company in New York to buy US technology. Made contacts with suppliers
"Carp requested not only guns, armour and turbines BUT also drawings for and finished examples of 16 inch gun battleships. With NO LIMIT IN SIZE, that will be " More modern and up to date and better than anything now afloat, designed, or contemplated"
I'd add that, but Warship 1981 says slightly otherwise.
Does it say Soviets wanted 35k
Basically, 16-inch guns, 16-inch armour, at least above 35k, and at least 30 knots.
Since this quote does explain why design went over +70k
This was what was presented to Gibbs, versus the 35k given to the other two shipyards.
I genuinely wanted to add Carp has no idea what "14-inch" , "35,000 tons", or "fire control" means.
Either Carb forgot about 35k limit, or Gibbs ignored it then
But again, no space.
What irl hull closely resembles Kearsarge's hull
Ah
It's not a converted hull. It's entirely original.
Ah
See the right side caption.
"I will build a ship that basically ignores all your requirements because this is what the perfect battleship looks in my mind - even though I have never designed a battleship before!"
Real purpose of getting a 35k ish with 406mm gun BB from US was actually getting the know how and technology for construction of Soyuz, same reason they wanted best turbines for US build destroyer
Or 5/38s guns
at least Gibbs and Cox gave a good looking DD design
never went through, of course....
" Since it is now clear that we will not receive a universal gun (5 inch) from the Americans, create a special bureau for the design of a 130-mm universal guns (Udaloi's 130mm/55), based on the Design Bureau of the NKVD LO, with the participation of the NKVMF, NKV and NKSP...
Since in this respect we are far behind and this gun would automatically solve the problem of large-caliber anti-aircraft artillery for the Red Army and the VMF - set as a priority, by a special resolution of the CO"
So briefly what Soviets wanted most from Americans were
5/38
Boilers
Machinery
Since they believed US was much above that area compared to everyone else
While GIBS BB would give Armor and guns
Wait what did this BBVs armor scheme look like
We don't know
I am curious what the armor scheme would have been
Tell me about it
Aft quad
I am trying to understand the rationale behind that
It has 6 shafts
Designs by the utterly deranged
First Harbin (variant of MK-6) now Kearsarge (Project 1058),
Manjuu be teasing me by being so close to Soviets but not adding them directly at same time
At least there is Chkalov, Project71B 
Should have bought from French
If you guys weren't busy with your own

Couldn't finish those in time either

So Soviet Richie?
Look sensible
Fischer take the entire RN stock for his Large Light Cruiser
Large light cruiser with 457mm gun is beautiful
What is that?
Wait, is that Gangut class refit?
... I disagree.
It is Gangut, oh god
these take the cake from the RN.
Fisher doesn't have aviation to consider back then, to an extent.
With Brit, eccentric and madness have a very thin line
legendary
I want him
But the guns would likely be removed
Riche, do you have any info on the Belgian merchant navy during the war? (WWII) 
Not much
Just saying because we had a couple of Belgian ships around here in South america
For example
This tanker
Motorcarline
She was almost torpedoed by U-154
Prevented by a B-18 of our Air Force
IMO third one looks a bit worse than the rest
Would love to see VDV with 6B3 vest
Can be more once they make bays take 3 instead 2
the new pylons already out for 6 in the internal bays over 4
beyond that 12 AMRAAMs isn't really that crazy of a loadout
They still probably wont go for the wing pylons for AAMs
Especially with 6 internally coming out
The Boghammers have been real quiet since this one dropped.
Sorry for the very late reply, but the Gerat does appear to have been a real prototype naval weapon for once, shockingly http://www.navweaps.com/Weapons/WNGER_55_Gerat58.php
just realized nobody bothered to comment on it
Assumed everyone here knew it
Oh you didn't
Yeah! The legacy hornet could hack it!
Also that is the F-35C (judging from the fact that there´s CTOL literally written there) which means the wings are bigger. Which inturn means the aircraft has more space for missiles. Which inturn makes this slightly more realistic than on the A
you know what CTOL stands for right?
A conventional take-off and landing (CTOL), also known as horizontal take-off and landing (HTOL) is the process whereby conventional fixed-wing aircraft (such as passenger aircraft) take off and land, involving the use of runways.During takeoff, the aircraft will accelerate along the runway, resting on its wheels, until its takeoff speed is reac...
35C is CATOBAR
Wrong Term
Ah fuck me I should stop drinking before I go here
Well eitherway the loadout isn´t that outlandish
and the point about the C also stands
Freestyle correct?
Yak-41 yes
This was pretty much the inventor for the two engine design on the F-35B correct?
Something to have with a deal with lockheed
Lockheed used it for its testing data
but lift fan VTOL designs have existed forever
Sadly we don't really know just how much Yak influenced F-35
But I personally do feel Mig 1.44 had something alot to do with J-20
The chinese do enjoy making russian stuff better in their free time
They do have 11 year difference
I mean they also do enjoy plagiarizing western designs from time to time so we can´t be that unfair to them
Iam not saying any names here b t w
https://twitter.com/NavalInstitute/status/1678902165593636865
https://twitter.com/NavalInstitute/status/1678902167741030402
W crew
Now the problem was
First barrel exploded after 6 fires
Second barrel however, exploded after firing 101 shots
This is the shell
How do you even managed to explode a recoilless rifle barrel?
Just how thin they think they can get away?
It was a gas-dynamic dynamo-reactive weapon. The powder charge burned in a separate chamber at elevated pressures up to 2000 kg / cm2 (195 MPa), part of the gases through special holes in the diaphragm (front bottom) entered the barrel bore and imparted kinetic energy to the projectile, and the other part of the gases entered the forcamore and, flowing out back through the nozzle holes, created a reactive force that balances the recoil force, as a result of which the gun turned out to be recoilless
I mean, all barrels eventually break. No matter how good you clean and patch up the damn things after each shot, they will break. That's why soviet outlook of making replaceable, easy to maintain equipment is applauded so often.
And well this was a test gun
Oka has the much better 420mm
Problem is, it comes with a heavy recoil
Which really hurted the carrier
And reload was 5 minutes
So Soviets decided 203mm was best for highest level
Actually they had choice of
Army 180mm
Naval 180mm (Kirov's gun)
Army 210mm
But I think something went wrong with 210mm, so they reduced it to 203mm for Pion
Ok I know you're probably not gonna understand me so this is more for the others in the chat, but isn't this the inspiration behind the WH40k Basilisk? Same as in British WW1 tanks are the inspiration behind the Leman Russ?
Basilisk is only 132mm lol
The SU-14 was a prototype Soviet heavy self-propelled gun built on a T-35 chassis. The original prototype mounted a 152 mm gun M1935 (Br-2); the SU-14-1 variant of 1936 carried a 203 mm gun B-4 which could fire 48.9 kilogram shells at ranges up to 25 km. Its armour was 20 to 50 mm thick. It never entered serial production.
Su-14 is likely inspiration
Or S-51
Yeah but the Leman Russ does also have a turret so don't blame me for drawing the parallel lol
Planes: Why are you launching Harpoons
Apache: Idk
Bruh it's cursed af when you think about it
It's like Ka-52 launching a Kalibr
Personally that makes some sense to me
Have you seen the other versions?
Last one is chonky
She was fed to many Iraqi T-55s
the true naval apache
This looks like a yarnhub april fools joke
my dad found USS America in Brisbane
The Australian Army has shown off its military strength in Adelaide’s CBD. Soldiers from the 1st Armoured Regiment accompanied by two Abrams battle tanks marched along King William Road from the Torrens Parade Ground to St Peters Cathedral. 7NEWS Adelaide at 6pm. #7NEWS
955
177
people are complaining about this

its a ceremonial relocation of the regiments colours
but people are comparing it to north korea
fucking ridiculous
What do you expect from twitter?
Welcome to the free world, where symbolicism is mistaken for extremism
Looks cool but yeah sorry that people are dumb

Like everyday life is still clearly going on in the background
@eternal veldt there is no description about Kearsarge yet?
I posted this already
He updated it with Kearsarge already
People take offense over military parade? 
Military parades do cause drama in Twitter alot
Jokes, analysis, comparison, hate etc
Yes they´re apparently seen as a militarist and/or nationalist ordeal
Both basically being a subject of pride, I fail to see the problem equally as you do
Yo it´s the half life 1 helicopter
Lmao
oh poor Comanche...
Invictus looks a bit better
Invictus gonna lose
I don't know about that
On one hand it makes sense from a DIB management PoV to pick Raider-X
And Raider X has the potential to be a better aircraft
Otoh Invictus is definitely more ready
And it remains to be seen if Sikorsky can get Raider X working, and if the Army wants to take that risk
Also Invictus just looks way better than Raider X IMO
Raider-X under construction
Oooooo history me like
F-86A SABREJET: The American F-86 Sabre is Americas First swept wing Subsonic Jet Fighter, made In in the 1950s it was the most produced Western jet with 9,860 being made the Sabre was used in the Korean War Fighting Against MIG 15s Over MIG Alley North Korea in the First Jet to Jet combat the F-86 Sabre was a Very Advanced jet with 6, 12.7mm Machine guns and a Radar Gunsight Unlike the MIG 15. the F-86 Sabre had a Top speed of 650MPH and with its Swept wing and design it was made for Dogfighting and Proved Better Against the Soviet MIG 15 the F-86 Sabre was also in Service with other Countries and was wanted by many Countries the F-86 Sabre was a Advancement in the Jet Age
I wouldn't exactly call the Sabre a dogfighter, no more than the MiG-15 anyway, it was statistically better tho. I believe the win ratio was almost totally in the Sabres favor
Hmm ok
Either you need to relearn grammar or at least put effort into put in coma
I tend to forget to use coma’s and Periods when typing
And rampant upper case 
I do agree that it’s statistically better but idk about not exactly calling it a dogfighter because it was made to fight the MiG 15 in dogfights
Not traditional turning fights mind you, the Americans learned their lesson from the Japanese in WW2.
Yeah I know that the A6M2/3/5 had a good turn rate
I see
So I guess I’m wrong in some areas about the F-86
Eh, even before the war primary tactics were energy fighting and BnZ
had been since like 1917 really
and those were the primary tactics for everyone
That being said F-86 was very much made for maneuverability
it especially had a great roll rate
that is a high speed handling trait...
yeah
it was aimed primarily at high speed maneuverability
nevertheless maneuverability took precedent in the design
While most nations opt for a modular grenade launcher on the underside of a rifle barrel, Russia is one of a select few nations that opted for a standalone design.
The GM-94 used both in a civil and military context has seen extensive use over the last 30 years, including most recently during the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Join Jonathan Ferg...
and stinky
Bis...chie?
380 of course
I mean it looked like she had all-forward setup
Ariel is drunk
I was thinking like that then realised that the actual layout looked better on Richie compared to the above Bisko you posted Krem.
More like a bit constipated and my current monitor setup is a bit ass so I can't see it clearly.
I finally found a photo of a Romanian AA train
General Gerstenberg had ordered the Caterpillar to be positioned north of Ploiesti in order to catch the bombers, which would have just come out of the target area by surprise. Instead it caught by surprise the 77 B-24Ds of the 93rd and 98th bomber Groups approaching Ploiesti from the north, as planned. "Killer" Kane, the CO of the 98th (CMO), estimated he lost 7 aircraft to the flak train and many other were damaged. A bomb took out the train's engine and it eventually derailed.
After 23 August 1944 the train retreated northwards from Ploiesti firing on the oil wells in its way. It was stopped by a 7 men team, which blew it up near Baicoi.``
Photos are shit quality cause forums be old but it's from Victor nitu/Dragos Pusca so semi credible I guess
Is the Iowa class the only BBs with an internal belt armor?
Several others do such as South Dakota and Richelieu

The ring I would offer those ladies in marriage (i made this from a piece of AA gun barrel)
Quick question: Does anyone know of any really good blueprint-like images of the Flight I Arleigh Burkes? Boutta make a model of the John Paul Jones

excellent
💍
Since these designs were designs but weren't built, we felt we had enough creative liscence to say, 'Look, even if they were intended to have these guns, it's entirely possible they would not have these guns'
Thanks, certain video game, for shitting on history harder
World of Warships?
naturally.
Who but?
[screaming]
Screeching sound intensifies
Weirdly this picture is deleted from internet as I know.
But I still have it, keep it safe Silver
What the?
L O N G B O T E
huwat in tarnaytion
Now I wonder what's the typical north atlantic wavelength. That's going to bow/sag real bad surely
Ok so I looked at Kearsarge in WoWS
How tf does she operate aircraft?
Is that flight deck longer than it looks?
Or am I underestimating how little length WW2 naval aircraft need to operate
Catapults on the flight deck
or, if you have Gibbs' level of brain damage, take the planes to the stern catapults and launch them there
'a matter of convenience, that you should be able to launch planes by catapult without changing course. And also
if the central part was damaged and the planes were not you could use the planes as a normal battleship would.'
Kearsearge’s designer was a big fan of carriers
in fact he really wanted to see what they looked like someday
Wait Gibbs as in William Francis Gibbs?
I love how any incomplete launch instantly becomes a massive hazard for the deck crew
Yes.

and any failed landing fucks up one of the rear turrets
No, he designed multiple smaller vessels for the navy
You want to know the best part monarch?
What
Front turrets and anything and anyone on the bow are fucked lmao
Yeah
Design X was supposed to be an export design made at the request of the soviet navy
Quite literally the frontline leader
Oh okay then I take that back somewhat
God damn lmao
The main blame for this abomination other than Gibbs should be the person who made the order in the first place
Sam Carp
Yeah a lot of stuff I don’t know about Kearsarge that I am now learning because of AL
Prior to having an actual team of Soviet Technicians that arrived to help him, he doesn't know anything naval related
He doesn't know what "35,000 tons", "14-inch guns", and "fire control" meant
Looking at her carrier design from what I know of modern carriers, holy shit
and the requirements given to gibbs after that is basically just
"Make me a good ship with 16 inch guns, no limits whatsoever"
💀
For a first timer, of course he goes apeshit on it
His literal first response to the request was "I don't know if I can even make a BB"
I’d be impressed if there isn’t a single mishap in the first cyclic op on Kearsarge lmao
In fact, Kearsarge wasn't the only design he came up with that was offered to the Soviets
as posted yesterday, he made something quite normal looking
Thankfully
and even a smaller version just to placate the soviets
Did it have his usual over engineered safety precautions like with Malolo?
Being unbuilt, we don't know
and I'm fairly certain it needs to follow navy standards regardless
Good point
Because typically these things are not up to the designers' discretion
Not sure how they’d react with him doing his usual shenanigans with safety
For an amateur naval architect, Gibbs did incredibly well
If the design is sound, then it doesn't matter, the board will accept it and modify it
United States really was a masterpiece
If it doesn't, then it'll just simply get rejected like his designs
Design B was considered not suitable and generally a bunch of "why build this thing" when the Montanas are already in development
so, no point to bother with the aviation facilities, which basically just kills the whole selling point of the design
That said, Gibbs did develop a 60,000 ton BB that we have little information on
and was only described in a meeting with Admiral King, who described it as a "well-developed monster"
Not even blueprints?
no.
This is all we have thus far.
and Gearings basically get called as young cruisers.
(Not sure what's with the obsession of Frank Knox - always see her mentioned everywhere).
Trying to squeeze things into a smaller hull isn't necessarily good
cough Type 1937J
Tbf lot of mid-late 40s destroyers were basically small cruisers in all but name
There was very serious discussion of reclassifying the Daring class to light cruisers
Alright I’ve had this dumb question in my head for a little bit now
So in a modern fighter the radar is in the nose cone right
how uh
how does the radar project out if it’s enclosed in the nose
Radio waves lol
Just goes through the nose cone
Oh yeah
Radar can also move inside the nose cone, at least for the older fighters
Newer AESA radars have no moving parts
All digital now
Yeah I know that bit
I’d just assumed that if radar’s sensitive enough to detect even small flying objects
wouldn’t it bounce off the interior of the nose cone and cause interference
If it did, I’d assume it could be filtered out like all the other usual stuff radar picks up
Actually hold on
Let me see if I can find info on the material of fighter nosecones
@strong plank Alright so, from what limited time and resources I could gather, the nosecone of fighters are made out of a material that allows the radar to see through it
I could try asking a former F-14 RIO I’m friends with irl to be sure
Not sure if he’ll know though
Nah it’s good
turning to this one since its a good way of visualizing it
radar cone is made from materials radars can see through like fiberglass and quartz
A radome (a portmanteau of radar and dome) is a structural, weatherproof enclosure that protects a radar antenna. The radome is constructed of material transparent to radio waves. Radomes protect the antenna from weather and conceal antenna electronic equipment from view. They also protect nearby personnel from being accidentally struck by quic...
Yeah I was correct then
HMAS Melbourne showing off her distinct modifications, compared to her sister Sydney, who couldnt be fitted with an angled flight deck due to various metal fatigue issues, related to issues British steel manufacturing and shipbuilding towards the end of her construction
HMAS Yarra is also undergoing replenishment alongside HMAS Supply
I'm waiting for an Italian naval talker ...
Undef is on a break, there is Phoenix
He was in chat. He didn't come here to talk about why the Italian fleet stayed cooped up and what their value was to the British.
Undef cant handle kms bias
I think he nuked his acc
guys its really not appropriate to talk shit about someone behind their back like this
leave the poor man along he's got shit on
Do I know you?
From DPA?
Im no Phoenix, but what did you want to know?
I was waiting on a guy from general to take up the talk here. He didn't make it.
Were talking about the Italian navy sitting in port until Taranto took the majority of their power out in the Mediterranean. Reason being, neither side wanted a bad engagement. Not necessarily because the Italians were so strong or something
I mean the Italians didn't just sit in Port though
In 41 and 42 they sortied their battleships basically every opportunity they got
By 41-42 there was less threat of presence post Taranto.
I mean the Brits certainly didn't think so
The air attacks on Malta were the last reasonably dangerous offensive in the Mediterranean from the Axis. The Italian navy was resource starved by then if I recall.
The successive attacks on the convoys to Malta in early 42 nearly starved the Malta
It wasn't until Pedestal that the Italians started to lay off
After the Brits committed 4 carreirs to force a convoy through
and still got chewed up
Shortly afterwards you had Torch and that was that
But the Italians managed to successfully disrupt Vigorous, Harpoon, and Calendar
The Italian navy may not have performed well at 2nd Sirte as well, but they delayed the convoy long enough for airpower to finish the job
But the period between 1st Sirte and Pedestal was near disaster for the RN
Did the Italian ships even sink a ship in Pedestal? Most of the planes were German as well
Not Pedestal, they ran out of oil by Pedestal
the Italians made multiple, very large, very threatening sorties both before and after Taranto
Pedestal had multiple Italian ships sunk in action.....
Buddy Pedestal was the end of the crisis
It was only after the disasters of Vigorous, Harpoon, 2nd Sirte
the Italian Navy continuously posed a capable, and dangerous threat to the Royal Navy and the British position in the Mediterranean as a whole
Which was their value, it wasn't in actually engaging the vastly larger British world fleet.
The British had replacements. The Italians did not
Air cover.
that severely understates the critical shortage of capability that the RN faced prior to 1942
Which I give credit to.
The hell is DPA
The Italian Navy never managed to inflict the decisive losses it wanted to, but it was the focus of the Royal Navy for much of 1942
The Italian navy was strong, but not like a unicum nation of ability
Defense Political Asia
If you'd tell that to the spaghetti eater I was trying to tell that to earlier, then I wouldn't be here
Never heard of
He must have mistaken me with somebody with the same pfp
I mean you claimed they just sat in port, which is the opposite of what happened
Also defense political asia sounds like the most toxic place ever ngl. Balkan lvl of toxic @autumn sorrel
No Italian BB were involved in Pedestal.
Correct, because as mentioned they ran out of fuel by Pedestal
Pedestal was when the crisis finally ended
I would note that at the beginning of the conflict in the Mediterranean, the entire fleet consisted of a handful of cruisers
yeah cuz France was supposed to deal with the Italians
all of the RNs carriers, battleships and destroyers had relocated to the North Sea
but well that didn't exactly go as planned
Beat me, the channel is just daily update on that "special event". As far as I can see, neutral.
Weird how he said he saw me before
I guess because 70% of Vietnamese are Nguyen
Maybe
the first destroyers to arrive in the Med after the commencement of hostilities in Europe, was the 5 destroyers of the RAN who arrived in December 1939
If you really want to see real bias channel
https://www.youtube.com/@EurasiaNaval
Bruh, we are all Nguyễn Tộc
Yes but only if this counts as naval ship
Ah, so cute
Scrap Iron Flotilla?
the achievements and capabilities of the Italian fleet are very much understated, but so is the desperate position that the both sides found themselves in for much of the theatres naval combat
indeed
Thing is RAF was strong af in the Med
the 10th Destroyer Flotilla specifically
Arguably the Regia Aeronautica and Luftwaffe played a more significant role in naval combat in the med than the RAF
the entire sum defences of Malta, in terms of aircraft at least, consisted of 5 planes, of which there were only enough pilots to operate 3
Malta was doomed anyway
One of the most common major fleet actions by the RN was the club runs to Malta to reinforce the air group there
It was a sarcastic statement
The Italians also conducted multiple, mostly unopposed bombing raids against Alexandria and Cyprus
ah, yeah sarcasm is hard to see sometimes online, sorry
The idea was that had the RAF appearance been as numerous as they were like in German situation
The italians would be locked in port just like the Nazi
Even if yes, their fleet was bigger
RAF need to defend the Home Islands at the time iirc
I wouldn't say the RAF was what was keeping the German fleet locked in harbor
Although tbf their air raid on Italian fleets were quite devastating
the RAF was not only distracted, but it also didnt have the capability to oppose the Italian navy at any point in time
I would say so because tirp cant get out of dock without her ass being pounded by heavy bombers
The first of its kind and Italian does have a nasty tendency to get surprise attack while in port
Taranto wasn't the RAF 💀
I mean carrier fleet in this case
Air force in general locked German hard
with Malta entirely besieged and Cyprus out of the question, the RAF didnt have any aircraft capable of attacking the Italian fleet in port from Alexandria, being forced to use carriers for this in a surprise raid
The heavy bomber raids only started to get real success later in the war, and even then that wasn't what was keeping Tirpitz in the fjords
though it would be what killed Tirpitz
Tirpitz left her sheltered fjord repeatedly
it wasnt until the RN and USN parked 3 battleships outside the entrance on a 24/7 basis that she decided she was better off staying
Poor Derpitz, the moment she show her face, she will be gang on
Isn't there an op to lure her out?
I dunno because definitely RAF was significant in the battle of Atlantic @grave ravine
Oh yeah definitely
Pinning down the german fleet and acted pretry much like a beacon for the RN
I presumed you were talking the surface fleet
yeah because Coastal Command didnt have the factional issue of eating shit constantly like Fighter and Bomber commands did
Although tbf RAF did dome like 200 subs
Bomber command on their way to burn another city
Even then Coastal Command had a surprisingly large amount of trouble keeping track of German surface raiders
partially because of the weather
cough cough Operation Cerberus
Coastal Command, while having a very well established and functional command and control system (unlike the other two RAF commands), struggled in that bomber and fighter command both managed to effectively convince the British government that they were more important than Coastal Command, therefore were able to soak up resources that Coastal Command very well could have made use of
Simply put maritime patrol wasn't sexy
a big part of that is because unlike Fighter and Bomber commands, Coastal didn't have a bombastic, politically connected commander like Harris or Dowding
Harris for example, did not allow Coastal Command to have access to Lancasters for maritime patrol until well into 1943
Tbf, not until how much Brit need coastal command to patrol and perform ASW, they don't sound as important as Fighter and Bombers Command
Unironically terror bombing and shooting down Nazi sounded more fun than hunting for some crappy ships that your navy outclassed anyway
I am just jk but still
Lancasters which had the vital range to give British convoys the protection they required from u-boats
It actually more correct than you think it is
Coastal Command early in the war is really underfund and understaff
Coastal Command having access to Lancasters in 1941 (they did recieve a small number in 41, but nowhere near enough) would have gone a long way towards forcing the Germans into the mid Atlantic gap
And return to the Med, Coastal Command personel was also siphoned off to that theater 
U-Boat caught in a Leight Light
I always get the impression that Brit bombers didnt do as much dmg to the Nazi as US bombers
But that maybe was because I read primarily US source which overglorified the role of US bombers in disrupting German logistic
I once read that the American bombing in daylight was way more effective than Brit night raid
you would be wrong because the USAF was forced to stop bombing Europe on multiple occasions due to severe casualties, while the RAF was able to continue
But no statistic has yet been found on my end
Definitely the American tactic resulted in higher casualties
But logically speaking, day bombing sounds more precise than night raid
there was no method of conducting accurate high altitude bombing in 1943
Not really, "precision bombing" still very much inaccurate
I mean it way easier to see what you were bombing in daylight through the scope
Acquiring the target via landmark I mean
Or whatever the term was back than for skipper
Bombardier too
Their margin of error is 1000ft(300m), USAF achieve this during testing but under combat conditions, only 20% of the bomb achieve that rate
Iconic "cut the bomb early so we can get the shit out of here" moment
14 April 1941
HMAS Waterhen Tows the hospital ship Vita, after the latter had been left dead in the Water by a German Stuka, outside of Tobruk, photo likely taken from HMAS Vendetta who was circling the stricken vessel providing AA defences
Waterhen would prove unable to tow the ship however, and Waterhen would take on 432 wounded and medical staff and sail on to Alexandria
Vita would be towed back into Tobruk and a week later, with her engines repaired somewhat, would return to Alexandria
Tbf, you are under a lot of stress from Flak and German fighters, even the most composed bombardier will slip
Make me think of that footage of a bomber accidentally bombed the bomber beneath it
Brutal back then
Nowaday they just call 3 B-52 and that GG
USAF box formation, in theory with act like square formation to allow maximum cover against fighters and easier to navigate
It pretty hard for German to shoot down the bombers. Even Luftwaffe Ace said this
You still need to achieve air domination if you want to do carpet bombing which is very dangerous with the current tech.
Loitering munition and Cruise Missile are way more effective
Carpet bombing as we knew it in the past is quite different today since it became a war crime called "indiscriminate bombing"
It's also not a very effective use of resources when you have precise munitions.
Get Entered to WIN this original Artillery Luger rig!
https://go.getenteredtowin.com/forgottenweapons
DEADLINE to ENTER is 07/28/23 @ 11:59pm (PST).
The Lange Pistole 08 (long pistol), or Artillery Luger as it is commonly known today, has an interesting history. It was originally developed as a personal defense weapon for German field artillery...
Re; the conversation on Pedestal. I once ran into a person on a forum who basically described the entire operation as German - as such;
Over the course of six days from August 9th to the 15th, the fleet was harried endlessly by German E-Boats, minesweepers, subs, cruisers, DDs, and hundreds of planes, which whittled away at the merchants and their escorts one at a time. In the end, however, the Germans' efforts were in vain...
So I went though and decided to collate all the forces involved and what damage was done
Pedestal ended up being unfortunate for the Italian surface fleet as a whole.
The battleship force was not really in much of a condition to intervene as they had that June, however. Littorio was still in drydock from her torpedoing during the operation against the Vigorious convoy, and would be until 26 August. Roma had just completed, but still needed to work up and would not be considered operational until November 1942. She was still at Trieste at the time of Pedestal. This left only Vittorio Veneto ready for operations, as while the three older battleships were also at Taranto, they were at a reduced operational status for much of the summer, due to the need to concentrate resources (fuel, and escorting fleet destroyers) on the cruisers and most modern battleships. In any case, they were disposed at Taranto, to counter operations from the Eastern Mediterranean (if another double convoy were to happen, as in June) and thus not really in a position to act against Pedestal.
What with that said, the RM's intent for operations in the Western Mediterranean was to finish off any Allied convoy with a 2nd Battle of Pantelleria, this time to be fought by a stronger cruiser force than what had been available to Da Zara in June. Three heavy cruisers, three light cruisers, and eleven destroyers were supposed to intercept whatever managed to make it through the Straits of Sicily.
The British had likewise planned to re-fight Pantelleria, and the convoy's close escort - Force X - was likewise bulked up, consisting of four light cruisers (a Town & two Crown Colonies, plus a converted AA C-class cruiser), seven destroyers (a Tribal, two I-class, two F-class, and two P-class), and five destroyer escorts (Hunt's).
What with that said, the Axis managed to snatch defeat from the jaws of certain victory on this occasion. By the morning of 13 August - when the convoy made it past the Straits and was to make the final run to Malta, and when the Italian surface force was supposed to intercept them - Force X had been whittled down to two light cruisers (Kenya, which had been torpedoed, and Charybdis, a Dido sent to reinforce Force X) and five destroyers (two Tribal's, two I-class, one F-class) protecting merchant ships Rochester Castle, Waimamara, and Melbourne Star. Another merchant ship - Port Chalmers - was ten miles northwest, escorted by a P-class and a Hunt, while the other P-clas was standing by the sinking merchant ship Santa Elisa. The crical tanker Ohio, with a Hunt as escort, was five miles astern of the convoy, and two other merchant ships (Dorset and Brisbane Star) were seperated by moving to either rejoin or run to Malta by themselves.
Had this force been intercepted, chances are the bulk of the convoy's surviving ships (including the critcal Ohio) would have been destroyed. This was not to be, however. Shortly before midnight, the Italian surface force was recalled, which ultimately lead it to its unfortunate encounter with a British submarine.
Why was it recalled? Because a German reconnaissance aircraft had spotted the Dido-class cruiser Charybdis, and the two Tribal-class destroyers accompanying it (Somali and Eskimo), and identified them as a Nelson-class battleship with light cruiser escorts.
With the cruiser force unable to fight a battleship, Mussolini ordered them recalled, and the rest, of course, is history.
airmen and misidentifying targets, name a more iconic duo
Best not to ask Sheffield about that
Hitler and the Nazi party came to power in 1933. He soon crushed all political opposition and made himself dictator. Europe’s leaders were desperate to avoid war. But were attempts to appease Hitler the right thing to do?
Why not visit the Churchill War Rooms and glimpse what life would have been like for staff working there during the Second W...
The Gripen and the Swedish Air Force are symbolic of the readiness Sweden has maintained despite the end of the Cold War. Joining Chris is Prof. Justin Bronk from RUSI, to explain how different the Swedish operational approach is to NATO.
- Support -
Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/join/MilAvHistory
Channel Memberships: https://www.youtube.com...
Is there some historical reason for York2's crossfleet buffing FP and NJ's buffing AVI?
No lol. It's just skill balancing choice
ah okay, thought it was strange that they had the "wrong" stat
AH-1 the armament is for the Huey but this variant has basically the same stuff
Never mind there was just somebody with your Username
That poor ship
REDUCED TO ATOMS

Anniversary's comin' up too, bud
alright I'm curious about something
I keep seeing pictures and footage of Bradleys in unspecified current events, and the overwhelming majority seem to have had their turrets facing backwards in transit or just driving through the fields
what's the deal with that
like I understand why actual mbts do that but this is a teeny 25mm in an open field so I don't think it's to not whack into things
hitting bumps and stuff could shift the turret unintentionally which could be hazardous to crew and personnel
ahhh
afaik theres a turret lock to the rear
that makes sense then
Hell yeah, July 25th babeeee
"Chassepot to FAMAS: French Military Rifles 1866-2016" is in stock and shipping now:
https://www.headstamppublishing.com/purchase
The rarest pattern of factory-made Chassepot is the fusil modèle 1866 pour la cavalerie d'afrique - the Model 1866 rifle for African cavalry. Just 12,000 of these were made by St Etienne in the spring of 1869, as a w...
I'm curious how America repaired richelieu without the blueprints or original engineers available.
Did we just vibe fixing a battleship
Every ship will have their own copy of blueprint available to their engineering department on board
even still, france and the US really didn't operate the same weaponry at the time
It doesn't matter for something like shipbuilding in general. Every repair and modification is to be done in case by case basis with full engineering review regardless of familiarity or commonality due to their nature of each of them being slightly different
Familiarity only means there's pre-prepared calculations and designs available, i.e. less rubber stamp
Also even if you don't have the same weaponry you can still produce the ammunition for said weapons as long as you know the blueprints for said gun
I'd still imagine fixing a ship for a different nation, that you're unfamiliar with is harder than if said ship was back in the hands of it's original designers
Most of her modification was also done with drop-in modules too
There's not much engineering needed to ad 40mm mounts
It isn't that big deal for a shipyard tbf
It's not like a car shop repairing other brands than what they usually do
I actually have some stake in that example, I worked as a mechanic for a bit with my dad
when its a car you're familiar with you can get it done significantly faster than one you're not, since new cars you might have to dig through the manual for a while to figure out what's different and where everything's located
so maybe "harder" isn't the right word, but it'll take longer given the engineers probably need to familiarize themselves with anything that might be different
Well, great example since for shipbuilding each repair is basically equally alien to the shipyard
Truth be told, even if it isnt that big of a deal, the US wanted nothing similar again
IIRC the Brits wanted the Littorios to receive a similar treatment, but the US wanted nothing to do with them
wasn't richie taken to the US specifically because she's so damn big?
or was it purely a matter of "they're the only one with the money to fix this behemoth"
All British yards are busy
Anything that is not a small ocean escort or a WEP DD is not a priority
Shipyards still accepting all kind of 3rd party repairs/modification all the time
The difference is that there's usually design bid now. So the kind of "Ill pick the contract first, will look at it later" like what's going on with Richie isn't going to happen again
As for Richelieu, they just cannibalized as much as possible from Jean Bart
So the US isn't opposed to fixing someone else's ship
They just refuse to have it be thrown on them without any warning more or less?
There was one single spare 380mm left , so they sent it to Dahlgren, test it and manufacture new shells based on the US 14"
They did the same with Emile Bertin, stole a gun from Turret 2, sent it to Dahlgren, manufacture shell and charges for the 152mm
Hearing what JB went through in the war, it seems like a miracle it ever was able to be restored to full fighting capacity
Pretty sure the decision was made by a too higher up than the usual contract, so the actual engineering team was basically have to put up with it
She was repaired after Ranger slapped her around a bit
By 1943 she is cruising at a comfortable 23 knots
But being 75% and no chance of completing her for service quickly, its just a part machine for the 95% and damaged Richelieu
Ya know... it's kind of crazy how much money and resources france actually had and still has to a degree 
Richie's were huge, and Charles De Gaulle compared to every CV not operated by the US is just... huge
Vichy France actually managed to install radar on their ships, one of the earliest too IIRC
Like or not their policy of ensuring self sufficiecy is admirable
Even though it can be ridiculous at times
is CdG similar to the US carriers in more than just the launch system? or is the visual similarities just a result of both using CATOBAR and being designed around such
uhhh... looking at them now
Is Gerald R Ford really big, or does CdG just have a really big command deck for some reason
or is it the angle
or some combination of the above
Why is the island so far back on the GRF
I assume she's just really long
Ford's island is unusually small. It's so far back to allow two elevators and parking lot in front of it
how many F-18's do you need on the flight deck?
Fucken mall parking lot's worth, apparently
Oh yes
my favourite gun
oughw
I will additionally note that the GRD is twice the tonnage and 200 feet longer than CDG
arent' the frenchies in the middle of cookin up a new carrier replacement for Charles De Gaulle? (replacement probably isn't the right word here)
yes
not a replacement
just another carrier
that will eventually fully replace it
she will be phased out
its replacement isn't showing up until 2031
when the new cv is built
Hey, at least this time they actually entertaining the idea of building two of them
there probably will be some overlap of France operating both at the same time
but it will eventually replace the CDG
that would be nice
but then they better start a recruitment campaign for the navy
I sometimes wonder if france only built 1 CDG due to financial concerns or they just didn't see the need
but looking back... they probably could've afforded a 2nd one

On the subject of carriers, has Kaga's conversion been completed yet?
France during the 90s was broke
and was going through multiple modernization campaigns
That one helicopter carrier Japan's got, I mean
how is there no good pictures of Fujian
I understand china is doing their best "iron curtain" impression for a while, but how the fuck do you hide an 80,000 ton Carrier...
additional deck space allows for multiple benefits over previous designs including the optimization of weapons handling, and improving overall traffic on both the flight deck and the hanger bay
they don't really exactly let civilians into the shipyard
I will remind you that the Japanese were able to keep Yamato underwraps for most of their construction
Wasn't that also the case with Bismarck, or am I wrong?
And then the Royal Navy said "Nah, your free trial of living just expired."
Germany was very public about stuff like the 109, like even letting British pilots fly them in the interwar period
Bis also had a pretty public launch
Did she not?
Yeah. Hitler was there.
I recall her being featured in German propaganda during her construction
Like this?
yeah
Just realized there appears to be four Bismarck-class ships in that image
For more efficient spotting of aircraft on deck
The island got in the way a lot on Nimitz so they moved it
GRF is effectively just a Nimitz with a lot of the kinks ironed out
Better placement of lifts, more efficient handling and parking practices, more reserve power for upgrades
CdG doesn't really have the space for things below deck since she's a lot smaller, also the French care a lot less about surge capacity for their carriers so they place less emphasis on sortie rates
Well, its only propaganda and I'm sure the germans would wanna build 2 more of them if they could
Aaaand those are triple gun turrets...
Bismarck's launch footage is literally captured on film
It very much is a public event
Mhm
Germany made their naval stuff as public as possible, the coronation of King George VI was attended by the most modern ship they could offer (Speeee)
What little they could show, they presented
You underestimate power secrets can do

Without Satellites we wouldn't even know about Fujian until her launch date
Sue to popular demand, we have decided to bring down one of Jono's Grant Tanks from our storage facility and do a partial restoration on it! 🔥
This will consist mainly of a thorough clean, and reassembly of the parts we have for this vehicle. 💦🛠
We have many projects ahead of the queue but it is our hope to eventually repair and refurbish the ...
QEs and kuznetsovoids are bigger, but CDG is probably the more useful ship
There are some decent pics from her launch, as well as some pretty good satellite photos
wtf are the tents for
Soooo um... yeah, Hellfire Cessna.
don't hellfires need momentum to maximize their range, they're not spectacularly fast ATGMs

Tents? Nah man, those are entire ass warehouses
No? and a Cessna is still faster than any helicopter for that matter
Also at 11km it's basically ballistic
I have a serious question regarding the hellfires
Why doesn't america just swap them for SPIKE ER II's or NLOS

or use them in tandem
Hellfire is a surprisingly versatile platform
it's not a bad missile
but I find it odd that America isn't operating SPIKE in some capacity
it'd be a nice vehicle based ATGM at least
Kaga has finished the work on reshaping her bow and getting the deck treatment to operate F-35, and apparently now they are doing some hull strengthening and rebalancing
the TOW is slowly showing it's age on the modern battlefield, as weapons get smarter

and a lot of other nato partners are at least giving the SPIKE (or Akeron) a peek
Fucking Mach 1.3 knife missile
The US is currently replacing Hellfire
With JAGMs
Yeah
Nice to hear
is there any reason the US seems to either not be showing any public interest, or is just blatantly ignoring IFV advancements that just about every other major nato partner is dipping their feet into

The US is buying Spike in the interim for Apache though
like everyone is trying to upgrade their IFV capacity, but the US is still riding the bradley till it falls apart
But new hellfires/JAGM are probably better than Spike ER II
JAGM probably but current Hellfires it's more situational I'd assume
MICV XM-30 is underway
I'm curious if it's gonna keep operating TOWs
tbh my interest with the SPIKE missile (despite being a perfectly viable infantry/aircraft weapon) is it's use as a modern day IFV Anti-Tank weapon
the more traditional LOS missiles like TOW, HOT, Kornet (prolly butchered that) seem... obsolete on the modern battlefield
JAGM has the same body as Hellfire Romeo, it just gets a new seeker
I mean IFVs are mostly engaging LOS targets
If you want NLOS, you are probably better off with a dedicated carrier vehicle for it
with drones being utilized more and more in military use, the use of one to survey an area before advancing, then a NLOS missile to neutralize heavily armored threats
seems far safer option for a mobile fighting force
And for NLOS work by ground units, loitering munitions to me seem to be more useful, though a proliferation of C-UAS could make NLOS better

yeah TOWs/Kornets are nowhere near obsolete whatsoever
GDLS and Rheinmetall's designs are competing to be the Bradley replacement
I just question putting a heavy NLOS system on your IFV
CV90 Mk IV has had success with them in testing 
TOW kinda is but replacement for it is still way out
okay, good LOS ATGMs aren't obsolete kek
CV-90 Mk4 MLU doesn't use NLOS
It uses Spike-LR
Which is a normal line of sight ATGM, admittedly a very good one
they were testing NLOS systems on one
Also I thought the latest one started using the Akerons

Akeron is weird, it's not really an equivalent to Spike NLOS
Its most equivalent to Javelin really, but a bit bigger
The data linking for Akeron is a bit more extensive than what is available for Javelin as well AFAIK
Akeron was just a test too, IDK if anyone is buying CV-90 with Akeron
Because they keep changing or killing Bradley replacement projects like M109 or Abrams one
Now OMFV is back again
MICV XM-30 is in a pretty good spot as far as programs go
No funny business, and a reasonable timeline with reasonable submissions so far
The spare of failed projects was in no small part because of GWOT
Thing is there really isn´t a need? I mean, shit on the Bradley all you want but it is a survivable platform. And according to globalsecurity.org it destroyed more AFVs than the Abrams in the Gulf War. Questionable but sort of makes sense I reckon.
There really is a need
The newer IFVs out there are just better
But also Bradley's electronics have been stretched totally to their limits, can't upgrade the platform anymore either
I don't know why you get so defensive when it's US vehicles but OMFV program wouldn't exist if Bradley was good enough
The changed the name from OMFV to MICV, easiest to just call it XM-30 though
I will prefer XM-30 over any of acronyms
Cuz they are now pretty sure they don't want it to be optionally manned
I get defensive about the Su-30 or more recently the T-64 too... but I guess you have to see people in your own simple minded picture, do you not?
Correct, but what I meant is that there is no real rush like with the Pershing for example
hellfire has F&F capability with the longbow variant
beyond that spike NLOS is being picked up to compliment hellfire on the apache
Yall are talking about the Bradley
It's not a vehicle you need to throw shit at each other for
UK fall from domestic vehicles is interesting study
Tho they ruined Warrior willingly
they let everything decay and all of their domestic companies either get merged into BAE or bought up by foreign competitors
Was there a recent study published on this? Or you just looking into it
Yes... sorry I get carried away when someone attacks my pride, I´ll work on it.
You two would probably get along pretty well if you tired. I get there's the whole don't talk about what's going on across the pond so addressing the Bradley as it sits right now is kinda banned but you guys are more then welcomed to share or address that type of information in dms or other servers
As mentioned by tato, the things basically reached the end of its lifeline, and while sure it's taken out the more IFVs then Abrams, remember the context for reason for that
Bradley is a extremely good, reliable and survivalable vehicle
it is underrated
at the same time it is reaching the end of its upgradability
Throwing stats and ratios around and just praying causes more drama and problems
and there are much better platforms out there now
Yeah weapon systems have gotten way to good
in terms of the IFV ATGM discussion
what is the point of smacking spikes on your IFVs meant to be carrying infantry to the frontline and fight alongside them
instead of just smacking spikes on a dedicated carrier that can be much lighter armored
and just sit beyond the frontline and fling Spike NLOS's at its target
or for the US's case
Switch blade 300 & 600s
Yeah
I love the camo
fifty switch blades on one unmanned platform
Yeah thats pretty incredible
anyway in terms of a TOW replacement for Bradley purposes
I'd argue you'd be better off going with a direct fired ATGM capable of being fired on the move with a optional F&F capability
or pretty much just smacking the Javelin sensor on the TOW itself
and giving it radio frequency guidance later TOWs have alongside the javelin seeker
You can see it visually as well. Lot of things British used to build their own is now US made or other
Latest being 120mm tank barrels
Oh yeah its definitely something I've noticed, coming from American I feel it's such a stark contrast
Cause like I grew up I knew majority of the US military companies
Sure not all of them, like barrel producing ones but there's a good amount here that are pretty much name brands as they make other stuff on the side for normal people, much like some of the Japanese companies or like Kalashnikov
Like
Bradley is tanky because M113 existed
You improve upon experience
M113 wasn't pleasant experince
That's why Bradley upped the armor
Yeah and now we're fighting with flying roombas
So probably time we actually do something with it
And replacement will make it better
considering Bradley's have been eating direct hits from grads with the crew & dismounts all surviving
I'd say the platform has been doing its job rather well
Yeah its 122mm rocket
Its +100mm artillery thats usually fatal for direct hits on Brad
What's the Nato protection level of Brad
Level 3?
4?
I'd delete that if I were you, let's just say it references a certain event that is not to be mentioned here in this server
Too relevant lad
sorry
Why does this look photoshopped?
because it likely is for increased clarity
NEWPORT NEWS, Va. – The U.S. Senate took a tangible step forward to supply the Royal Australian Navy with its own nuclear attack boats with a new AUKUS bill that sets a framework to transfer Virginia-class attack boats to Canberra by the 2030s, Sen Tim Kaine (D-Va.) told reporters on Friday. Standing in view of …
hey guys, does anyone here know what the actual designations were for the kriegsmarine torpedo tubes?
Lol what
vehicle that began development in the 1960s is looking to be replaced by 2030
”clearly it just isn’t good enough”
Bradley’s in the same boat as the Abrams
it’s still plenty good but it’s fast approaching the ceiling of how far it can be upgraded, assuming it hasn’t hit it already
Decisive Lethality Platform is the Abrams replacement, is it not?
Yeah it’s the tank component of that family of systems
You know I’m glad I finally sat down and read through the ASB tank design report
gives a lot of context to some of AbramsX’s design choices and features
stuff like silent mode or the unmanned turret
Bro
She is 40 years old
Her replacement should have been early 2000s as it used to be planned
XM1201 Reconnaissance and Surveillance Vehicle (RSV) and XM1206 Infantry Carrier Vehicle (ICV) was the planned replacement of Brads
When this project died in 2014 something new had to be made
9 years later we now have the OMFV program
So, drop pod?
ODST when?
@tough quail @spring briar @maiden citrus Happy Soyuz laid down day

So Krem? Soyuz for EN anni? 

🎂 
I would actually argue that Bradley is in more need of a replacement than Abrams
Soyuz not being UR will be absolutely hilarious
Due to the fact that it's tapped out for upgrades
The chassis is at its limit?
Mainly the electrical system
i wouldn't say IFVs really age as gracefully as MBTs in general
Weight and electronics
At a certain point you’re having to replace everything else but the hull and chassis
Think like Nimitz
in what regard
i feel as though it is necessary to remind the chat that CdG has without a doubt one of the worst sortie rates of any modern carrier
Oh yeah Gaulle does have one of least news among carriers
I don't remember when was the last time I heard her
shes useful within the framework and capabilities for which she was designed, that being supporting French expeditionary operations, primarily in West Africa, but also globally
shes not like a QE or Nimitz which is designed to launch a good chunk of the flight group for massed strikes in a matter of minutes
@tough quail


