#history
1 messages · Page 120 of 1
Well 122mm is indeed large
sorry but I'm gods greatest M48 Thud
The roadwheel arrangement isnt optimal either to my memory, hence the whole trial with IS-6 (and it ended up worse)
M48 did quite well in Vietnam, but M41 also did quite well
fuck your tank destroyers build more of these dipshit mobiles
M103 wasn't in Vietnam right
The suspension was also kinda bad on the is-2 if I recall
thank god no
M41 was unironically fit for nam
M41 was a brilliant tank
sheridans did nothing wrong besides have a shitty missile forced on them
made by ford
because ford always ruins everything
Yeah, the m103 was used during nam, not for long though if I remember correctly
Recoil makes it jump harder than Sprut
the M103 never made it to nam
Saw an M41 today as well
I mean the gun launcher had some other problems
But no
Im not sure how well a heavy would do in tropical weather
but Sheridan was a nice underrated tank
well the whole gun launcher thing was stupid(ly handled)
Especially with the amount of mud buildup
just use it as a big dumb howitzer
Huh, I remember seeing some pictures of what looked like an m103 in nam, must've mistaken it for an m48 or somethin
the M103 by Nam was out of Army service
My favorite M103 flaw was gunners ass starts to burn because his sitting location was just above the engine, they fixed it later
it's a tiny thing that can snap any mbt in the world in half with HE and instagib infantry too
Centurions already had to rip their skirts off
The best armored(ish) vehicle (in Vietnam and ever)
You dont really need big gun because tank fight barely haopened in Vietnam
YES
And when it actually did it like a bunch of paper armor PT76
So M41 was enough
For like 90% of the war
M41 even did surprisingly well against T-54
Yeah
I mean it did horribly in Battle of Loc Ninh
But it did quite well in Quang Tri
yeah
Another case of who shooting first tend to win
L3 was the best vehicle of WW2 fight me, yes no armor, yes n small gun, but it was fast, maneuverable(ish), and small enough for a reconnaissance vehicle and ammo tractor
I love the use of Soviet 37mm from ww2 by Vietnam especially on helicopters
I wonder if they took down more US crafts more than any other Soviet SAM
Yes
TKS was a better tankette
I have statistic for that
The 37mm is the best AA gun the communist had in nam
It better than 57mm and 14.5mm
What's funny is that every major army has been beaten at least once or twice by farmers with guns
But every army was farmer with gúnd
Who do u think they drafted the most ? Urban folks ?
No, it always your average farmer dudes from the countryside
In every single war pre urbanization
Even in ww1 and ww2
Yup
Fair
Most of the pop lived in countryside
Armies tend to reflect the countries they come from
Especially ww1 was farmer heavy
The US army in WW2 was mostly people from the cities
Because by that point most people lived in cities
In the US
Morale does play a role in how well its military perform
Vietnam was rough for the US to my knowledge
US was heavily industrialized + they didn't need immediate conscription.
I'm sure US army would look different if say, Japan was advancing from Florida to New York
Alright, time to go listen to WW1 German songs, because their songs are sad yet sound so good
Fragging was commonplace
It will pass Derp
Morale is made up of three things, confidence in the cause, confidence in one's leaders, and confidence in the prospect of ultimate victory
It will pass
All three were missing in the US military in Vietnam
Your average communist soldier will only go home when they win in nam
The US ? 1 year
So there the cause
One side had to win to go home
The other xould just finish the tour
And forget the war
Well also a lot of US soldiers didn't believe in fighting Vietnam
And most people also rightfully thought the war was unwinnable
And the credibility gap was massive
British war music: defending their Islands
American war music: going back to their girlfriend
Japanese war music: dying in honor
German war music: WAR IS HELL AND WE WILL NOT COME HOME
The morale story would likely be different if Vietnam actually shit on US territory
Like a certain nation did
Yeah but it doesnt happen so...
Aight I read through the whole thing during my off time at work
Although saying that
At least the US had no problem with homefront back in Korea
And they sorta "square" that war
Very interesting read
Eh, armies recruit from a country's population, if you need every soldier and 80% of your population is from the cities, 80% of your army would be from the cities
I wonder how much of the ideas went into the AbramsX concept
Lots of reasons cause a change
In Korea there was a sense that the cause was just, and that it was possible to win
"This isn't our war, we shouldnt meddle with it" is a good motivation
The baby boom ruined America gung ho i guess
obv ASB isn’t the army proper, but I imagine the army’s investigating much of the same stuff
No, it was just that the Vietnam war was really unpopular
People did not want to fight the Vietnamese
I believe there was a demographic that showed war support among US citizen only dwindle after 1968
Before that it was like 50/50
But it strange the red scare did not motivate the men further
When the cold war was still very hot in the 60s
I think war popularity is more about how good your country performs
Like a football match
Yeah that one was weird
@lime belfry my favorite Vietnam War picture. Vietnamese having same poses as Gremyashchy's 37mm AA crew in WW2
I believe this was actually the standard prepare pose for 37mm AA gun
I serve in 57mm AA battery but when i looled at the 37mm one
They posed like that in training

Following Poland, Romania will also buy 54 K9 Thunder self-propelled howitzers from South Koreea, several components will be manufactured in RO. No surprise here, it seems that Poland and Romania are building their military in a very similar way to increase interoperability.
1117
140

It was the Type 1 design that was ultimately chosen for the Alsace-class in the end, is that right?
Yesnt
9 380mm was the most likely option
Given how Jordan and Dumas said "40,000 ton BBs were ordered", extremely likely
Where did the other sources get the part about Type 3 design being the chosen one from anyways?
Garzke and Dulin
as well as McLaughlin
on the basis that the quadruple turrets do not require a redesign, and that they can simply be used immediately.
for the record, these I believe are what the two produced for the conjectural ship
the rationale is explained on the right side
a bit painful otherwise.

So, Flandre have triple gun turret, new BB gun?
I mean....yea
Not sure what's the point when the 406mm Schneider is already in game
unless they want to introduce the 100mm CAD mle.1945 
Pretty sure it’s triple 380
Probably not gonna change the META BB gun slots anyway
That particular 6in placement is one aspect I don't think would actually happen with Alsace IMO
Thinking about it, has any ship put double superfiring triple 6in other than Yamato? 
Or any 6in really, USN's double superfiring twin 5" is already goofy stability-wise
Gascogne, though unbuilt
Considering the specifications called for 9 x 152, no. This will bump it up to 12 x 152.
And I don't think Yamatos are superfiring 6", unless you refer to the A140 series.
What I meant was the forward 6in firing over two main batteries
As for the top stability issue, I think I raised this before; the counterpoint is that I believe Alsace has a deeper draft for the GM issue.
France is really the only ones I can think of, and maybe Germany?
Ah wait, I forgot, Kremlin's favourites
Stalingrad and Project 24
That isn't meaningfully deeper draft IMO. Could be easily explained by different arrangement of her torpedo defense being baked-in directly instead of actually caused by lower keel
Different in what way? Lower TDS?
Not having JB's bulge discontinuity
JB's bulge is added on after the fact. One would think a ship designed for the new beam from the get go will integrate the bulge into the design
In any case, the difference in draft is only what? like 10cm?
I see what you mean.
Jordan doesn't include it, for some reason.
If we take Richelieu as completed at 9.22 and Garzke's Alsace estimate at 9.25 That's basically rounding error
The alternate proposal for the MPF program was the BAE XM1302. Again, I walk around the vehicle with the MPF product manager LTC George, and pepper him with unexpected questions in order to shed a little more light on this platform as well, whilst also trying to figure out what it's like on the inside. Reminder, though I wasn't permitted to film...
#OTD in 1908, Ensign Chester Nimitz ran the destroyer USS Decatur (DD-5) aground in the Philippines. He was court-martialed, found guilty of neglect of duty and issued a letter of reprimand. It was a different era, so he was still able to make fleet admiral despite the incident.
1227
211
The f-35 can be a air superiority fighter, it can carry 4 AIM-120’s and the British are augmenting it to be equipped with MBDA meteors,
Being faster doesnt mean that you’re better,
I.E the MIG-25 and MIG-31
Tbf the MiG-25 has a pretty good service record for a Soviet fighter
but whos faster
Lybia and iraq
mig 25 never was fast
The mig-25 has a top speed of mach 3.31
its airframe couldnt handle the load the engine was giving, it never was truly fast
could consistently hit mach 3 for up to 15 minutes at a time
it onlt reaches that top speed in a straight line, cant turn or else goodbye airframe
It was an interceptor

It shot down some F-18s once
F18s are multirole tho
A single USN one, they apparently didn't realize until the MiG-25 was long gone
Ah
Only F/A-18 air-to-air loss to date iirc
what im saying is that F22 is better than F35 in dogfighting
Dogfighting is inherently outdated.
In a dogfight but a lot of air combat is long range
missile dogfight i mean
Can equip up to 8 missiles
Like over the horizon long range
Quit saying shit isnt good cause its multi role,
Apparently some testing squadron equipped it with 10 or 12 one time? I'll look up the image hold on
Yes with double AMRAAM racks
hilariously broken for that kind of fight
Here
That is a fucking nightmare right there
My WT loadouts
it's all fun and games until your opponent can cue an AMRAAM to fire over the shoulder with their IRST while also being able to data-link guide it into pitbull range without ever emitting from its radar
ever
10 AMRAAM’s + 2 AIM-9M
The f-35 isnt bad, its a multirole fighter
HypOps simulates a hypothetical clash between an American Carrier Strike Group and a Russian S-400 battalion located beside Khmeimim Air Base in Latakia, Syria after a Tomahawk cruise missile launch is intercepted by Russian air defences including an S-400 Triumf, Tor Missile System, Buk Missile System, Pantsirs and Sukhoi Su-34 and Su-35 aircra...
Nah man, I can't even get a lock without getting 20 locks on me in return

HARM moment
Have an AWACS?
Lol, I wish
I'm like a racoon in a flying garage, except the garage is a primitive ass f4 phantom
4 internal hardpoints 6 external on the F-35
At least I know how to use radar guided missiles on Xbox now sooooo
Theres no point to carry externally when you have 1000 F-35’s
Haha r-34s go WHFFFFFWWWWEEE
I do too
external carriage isn't some magic button which turns off stealth
Kind of because the radar cross section is really small
Speaking of, should I buy the mig-23 MLM? when I have a chance?
Gee I wonder why 2D thrust vectoring plane is better at dogfight than one without thrust vectoring
If you add missiles on that it makes it have a later cross section
I've test flown it a few times and I like it but idk if it's worth the price tag cuz I don't have the ability to get shot at while flying it
the radar cross section of a missile isn't exactly large, from any angle
and even some pretty basic Have Dashing would make the effects of external carriage negligible
What sucks is that I can't get any custom skins on the mig23 if I do get it
@tough quail gaze upon this and despair
At least the username is accurate
My fellow history enjoyers, edumacate me on the mig-23 because I'm dumb and don't feel like googling it
what is up with the influx of dumbass claims the last few days honestly
Funny soviet dart
The MiG-23's predecessor, the MiG-21, was fast and agile, but limited in its operational capabilities by its primitive radar, short range, and limited weapons load (restricted in some aircraft to a pair of short-range R-3/K-13 (AA-2 "Atoll") air-to-air missiles). Work began on a replacement for the MiG-21 in the early 1960s. The new aircraft was required to have better performance and range than the MiG-21, while carrying more capable avionics and weapons including beyond-visual-range (BVR) missiles. A major design consideration was take-off and landing performance. The VVS demanded the new aircraft have a much shorter take-off run. Low-level speed and handling was also to be improved over the MiG-21.
So the yak-141 was the jet that fulfilled the VTOL that they wanted in the new aircraft
Whilst the mig-23 gave them more of what they wanted and was chosen over the yak, correct?
Yak 141 was a good replacement of Yak 38M
Or would have been
Ah, okay
Soviet aviation has always been a bit confusing for me so that makes more sense now
Mig 23 and yak 141 has 20 years difference lol
Lol
I should probably look at the bios of vehicles more often than I do, it would probably help me to not be as dumb
There is a technicality here
F22 can thrust vector, F35 can't
The F-35B has a variable thrust nozzle, which can be taken as thrust vectoring.
It's operational usefulness is questionable but, y'know, that's why it's a technicality.
THRUST VECTORING IS A GIMMICK AND DOESN'T MATTER OUTSIDE OF APPLICATIONS LIKE VTOL FLIGHT ON THE F-35B
Agreed in full.
the first shelter over the catapult on the PLANS-18 „Fujian“ has been removed.
Yeah
Apparently Harriers used it in mock dogfights, I think the term was VIFF-ing? Short for "vectoring in forward flight". But then again with the secondary engine on the F-35B this might be redundant.
Redundancy is important
I'm not sure how much value you'll get out of thrust vectoring anyway considering the uh...
110 degree angle of attack possible while in controlled flight
normally limited to "only" 50 degrees
VIFF was a gimmick
VIFF works when you have funny RoE for exercises
Much like thrust vectoring on non-VTOLs itself.
like the helicopter vs jets one where the jets weren't allowed to engage except at stupidly close range
But thrust vectoring is kinda pointless nowadays with HOBS, assuming you get within close range anyways
It looks cool I guess
Yeah I have a family member who works at Pratt & Whitney. If I slander the F-135 he would probably kill me
Or F-119
135 deserves to be slandered
Or maybe it's not his fault actually
It's burning almost x2 hotter than it needs to be because of 35's systems
And will become worse with Blok 4 systems
Yeah he worked on It
So what he says about solution
Nowadays? Let's be real here. Modern Su-30s look cool, but they were originally given one of the first PESA radars for a damn reason.
He’s not here rn he’s out of state
Tomorrow he’ll be back and I’ll ask him for the answers
Noice
If it’s not classified that is
The 135 gives the F-35 a suprisingly powerful engine for a single engine aircraft. I mean, the planes slower than some people would like to admit but you gotta give the engine credit for what it is.
Problem isn't power
Problem is it can't handle the cooling of systems
So when it goes x2 hotter, it gets much shorter life
Or more chance of breaking down
I didn't mean that was the problem, I meant that the problem came with an otherwise pretty solid engine.
Yes you focused on the positive
I'm talking about the negative. That's bad enough to consider a new engine
But a new engine for all f35s would be too expensive
So either new engine or upgrades on f135 are only options
Well every US fleet of aircraft gets an engine upgrade one way or another in its service life.
please do not fuck it
It looks like an 80s action hero with sunglasses
What T-34 needs to become in 1939 to stop getting bullied
Wasn't this the april fools day render poking fun at Russian refurbishment culture?
Refurbishment culture= modifications?
If you can call slapping new sights on a T-62 that instead of "a joke". Yes.
Guess that joke was a foxbat if it flew over your head that quick
What joke
Anyway
Ac-130 was highly influenced from such modifications
Slapping gatling guns on Dc-47 to use it as gunship in Vietnam
I meant that the T-62M obr. 2021 modification might as well be called a joke, thus remotely funny, thus joke.
Ah you see modernization as a joke
The whole concept of upgrades
Then I have an image for your humour
No? Just that particular one.
Since it's obnoxious, 60s hardware being supposedly brought up to modern standards with some sights and a few ERA bricka.
This one, being also obnoxious, is funny in its own little way.
Uhh what's wrong with that?
The Lee if a WW1 general made it
kinda answered your own question there

@lime belfry
Anti-communist propaganda leaflet from the Vietnam War (ca. 1965) comparing the mistreatment and poor equipment of the Vietcong with the well-equipped soldier of the South Vietnamese army.
surely right will win
one side has 1/3rd as many military dead
Never ask a man his salary, woman her age, or why hundreds of thousands of people fled North Vietnam during the partition, and Vietnam as a whole later
Pretty correct propaganda tho
Usually in both attack and defense the communists lacked heavy fire support
In a battalion vs battalion scenario, which was the most common in the VNW
The communist would not have the same amount of firepower as their free world counterpart
A typical VC battalion had no signaller so their ability to call support is little to none
They may have 1-3 heavy machine gun, 1-2 mortar and 1-2 recoiless rifle at best
While the other side have 105mm howitzer fire support, heavy mortar as well as air support attached to them depends on cases
Of course in 1975 the ARVN couldnt have that luxury anymore
But in 1974 they still could
"The VC/PAVN relied heavily on heavy machine guns and standard Soviet-designed anti-aircraft batteries like the ZPU-series for air defense functions. In the latter year of the conflict, field units of the VC/PAVN deployed Soviet SA-7 Man-portable air-defense system that presented a significant challenge to US air dominance, particularly helicopters. For strategic aerial defense, the North deployed one of the densest and most sophisticated air-defense systems in the world based on Soviet surface-to-air missile missiles and radar batteries"
The ZPU was actually unicorn in South Vietnam
And only seemed to be deployed commonly in the North
The only logical explaination was that ZPU logisitc kinda sucks
ZPU burned ammo way too fast
This was from my own experience seeing how my AA regiment and others

Always had a 57mm battalion, maybe 1-2 37mm battalion
But never a ZPU battalion
It also interesting that the most common damage caused to helicopter was actually 7.62mm
"It was only after the shift to conventional warfare in the 1972 Easter Offensive, and the final conventional campaign in 1975 (when US airpower had vacated the field) that tanks and heavy batteries were openly used in significant numbers. When using heavy artillery, the VC/PAVN relied on high quality Soviet-supplied heavy 122mm and 130mm guns that outranged American and ARVN opposition."
Statistic on effect of NVA/VC AA
Note that this was damaged, not desteoyed
So it may be survivor bias to say that what cause the most dmg to US aircraft was actually 7.62mm and not bigger caliber
Damn
Quite true
Although from account on both sides
Soviet arty sucks at long range
It wasnt as accurate as American counterpart
So shooting at max range tend to make the guns spread a bit too much
Fun fact this turret can also be mounted on T-72
I think turkey did it for export
I don't know why Soviets didn't valued precise accuracy.
For example for Msta, when her accuracy was around 150meter to target. Soviets went "good enough"
So I assume Soviets prefer artillery by numbers and it's better to have some spread?
Yes
So in battle of Quang Tri in 1972
The PAVN fired a total of 180561 120mm and 160mm mortar shells
383362 60mm and 82mm mortar shells
There was no statistic for the number of heavy shell use
But they did mention they had 170603 shells before and during the battle
So.... it can be assumed the communists relied alot more on the light and medium mortar
The 60mm and 82mm one
Because again, it the battalion level fire support
Communist units also employed mortars frequently, with the Soviet 82mm and its Chinese variants being the most common alongside 60mm Chinese Type 31 and Type 63, American M2 mortar, French Brandt Mle 1935 and 81mm Brandt Mle 27/31
A howitzer is a division fire support
Yeah the magic of 82mm mortar was that it can use American 81mm mortar shell
By simply duct taping the 81mm shell to increase caliber
Smart
Woah
They communist liked 60mm and 82mm mortar for that reasons
It shares ammo with American
The American uses 60mm and 81mm
Convenient if you captured ammo
If you dont that fine
I think it is kind of a bad doctrine by now
Or at least outdated
With drones and aircraft being the meta since WW2
Just lining up 10 guns to shoot your enemy is kinda impractical
When they had air supremacy
Or u know, drones
Because drones dont have to give a shit about its own life
i dont know what the full topic is but i heard mortars
Of course, Smart munitions were developed for Msta to reduce this problem, Krasnopol shells.
And new koalitsiya sv, Msta's replacement has almost x2 more range and likely better accuracy
nona posting time
Mortar is cool
So yeah I dont think volume of fire to make up for accuracy is a good thing
Because 1. You have to win the air war
- You cant provide close fire support to your infantry cus friendly fire
ACV with AMOS
also a cockerill 120 version, a 30mm and a 50cal for recon
oh thats fucking rad
related to these
https://twitter.com/ronkainen7k15/status/1677637200249491459
went nowhere but still


The Amphibious Combat Vehicle (ACV) is a program initiated by Marine Corps Systems Command to procure an amphibious assault vehicle for the United States Marine Corps to supplement and ultimately replace the aging Assault Amphibious Vehicle (AAV). The program replaces the Expeditionary Fighting Vehicle (EFV) program canceled in 2011. Originally...
you should get regiments because these are in it @spiral cedar
they're very fun
PLL-05
i havent dug too deep into more niche chinese afvs yet
The PLL-05 is a Chinese self-propelled gun-mortar in use by Chinese mechanised infantry formations. Conceptually it is similar to the Russian 2S23 "Nona-SVK" (the turret and weapon system of the 2S9 Nona mounted on a BTR-80 chassis) three of which China purchased for evaluation; at one time it was reported that China would purchase 100 of the Ru...

i was thinking of this at first tho
As Centauro testing showed, wheels aren't preffered for snow/mud
russia also has this funny looking replacement sitting in development hell apparently
only found out it was a thing today
Wonder if this is better Pantsir
i love mortars of all shapes and sizes
in everything vaguely rts shaped i touch i am an indirect fire psychopath
Did I ever tell you about a certain Soviet Navy project in 80s?
It's not a story English community would tell you
me waiting for any wargame type game to have Italy
its also getting france and the dutch soon!
it is however not getting italy on the current road map
because italy isnt allowed to be in games for some reason
Devs: Best I can do is China, Russia, America only
read: the devs cant be fucked to do all the new models italy would need ig
me looking at the danish otomatic and the korean fiat 6616 in wargame red dragon
correct
They're not
south africa won the last major dlc choice
then they were busy with warno
so no italy in either
that's...
Because clearly South Africa was very relevant to a Cold War scenario
for fucks sake

how the fuck is italy not in wgrd but france is already in warno
Eugen Systems is a French video game developer based in Paris, France.
Turkey vehicles be like
America 2
And people wonder why we get annoyed when the few games that include Italian things butcher them.
Because there's barely any games where there's a playable Italian faction or vehicles.

true and real
Soviet 406mm deck mortar from 80s
It had a smooth barrel of 406 mm caliber and a length of 6.5 meters. The system could fire guided projectiles at both coastal and sea targets, as well as air targets. In addition, it was possible to fire feathered shells and depth charges with both conventional and nuclear warheads. 406-mm turretless installation could be placed on all types of surface ships with a displacement of over 2000 tons
The main feature of the installation was the limitation of the minimum elevation angle to +30 degrees.
Any ship above 2000tons having a 406mm Mortar
I'm not screaming, you're screaming
my life degrades in quality the more i start to like italian stuff outside of cars
Tbh, if you want an Ariete stand in for most games using the Leo 2A4 is probably your best bet
yeah but here's the thing
but muh gen 2 thermals
german
looks not even 15% as dope as an ariete
Axis automatically wins after midgame because they get so many good things to unlock while the Allies only get comparatively minor buffs
city of heroes got wild it seems
Why Ariete with furries art appears when I'm looking through Ariete pics
also i love how smooth and round this thing is
would rub
This is true
Clearly your other searches are influencing your results :p
bruh
i knew about the vehicle but lol the choice of words
That's a pretty common expression in English
i dig the colors
this makes my soul frown
And it looks much better than what it’s replacing
Use the fact Argentina is buying Guarani to claim the entire country for Italy
Probably M109, if I had to guess?
Ze wespe
Most punchable face
Ah, yeah, they procured 570 M109's and replaced them with the PzH2000
I have an option
It was always my dream for navy and army to share same ammo for high caliber shells 
I wonder what happened to all the German M109's...
Nom
that's
i know who that is
but that's like
the most direct citation ive ever seen
for a pretty much random guy on twitter
Lmao
China will grow larger
Ammo stowage? FC unit?
and it's still an exposed belt
cut the tail
Hmm
japan?
Why this picture is hot
NGL, I haven't kept track of anything the Spanish army has done recently
Just navy and air force programs
The Spanish Army has commenced design studies for a new Tracked Support Vehicle (Vehículo de Apoyo de Cadenas: VAC) and intends to start manufacturing for the programme...
No king rules forever my son
Except if this project dies
it's ok we can still sell them 120mm turrets 
i will never forgive spain
anyway that's an ifv
It will also utilise the same mission systems and turrets used by the Spanish Army's 8×8 Wheeled Combat Vehicle (Vehículo de Combate sobre Ruedas: VCR) Dragón.
I love how
"Isolated" Spain is
You barely hear news from them
They just go "k we will develop this"
Then you don't hear about them for a while
look at medium nation 8x8 IFV
look inside
it's based on a mowag vehicle
why always
Spain has its hands in a quite a few lighter vehicle programs.
They've done decently with maritime exports too, for a country of their size (in terms of economic and military weight)
But overall they're still very dependent on foreign equipment, and foreign fittings for much of what they do build
Ex, the F100's are quite good AAW ships, but they also quite literally are also Aegis ships with all American weapons and sensors.
if the patria is even remotely related to anything mowag im gonna scream
ok it's not
which also makes the rosomak safe
Anyone post the new chieftain vid yet?
.
Prob the Hellcat not the Corsair
They need to give them kick ass name or at least spacing out like Soviet did. They have like 5-6 IFV with number designation so close to each other that sometimes get confusing
I generally do not understand how ANZAC made it yet Italy didn't into WGRD
like ANZAC is filled with glaring holes as a deck, is missing multiple units it should of had, and only really serves to complement commonwealth with AUG equipped infantry
Because it isnt a famous faction ?
"If a force is good in WW2 there a 99% chance there a game featuring them in any given time period, even if it doesnt make sense"
they added both the Netherlands and South Africa
does't wargame take place in europe too
Wargame used to be pog
Yup
wargame red dragon is primarily Asia yet they went "we want to primarily focus on European countries"
They fucked up after steel division
when it comes to a lot of the units
Because agai there not alot of Asian countries that can be an unique faction
There Korea japan and China India
What next ?
Thai ????
oh there's not even Pakistan or India
Singapore I guess ?
there's 4 Asian countries + ANZAC
they didn't even bother giving ANZAC like a AMRAAM F-18 interceptor or anything
their top fighter is a F-4E
and their only ATGM planes are A-4 skyhawks
Tbf M113 tank variant is kinda pog tho
literally could of gotten the almost purchased New Zealander F-16s as the top end ATGM plane with AMRAAMs as the air to air missile
would of made up for the top end tank only being a Leopard 1
they could of also of just given ANZAC the North Korea treatment inlore
and just smacked them with the abrams a few other things
anyway enough about WGRD
In 1975, the U.S. Navy planned to take visiting Soviet sailors on a tour of cultural sites in the Boston area. After stopping for lunch, the Soviets refused to leave a Howard Johnson's restaurant because they were so amazed by all the food they could order.
#SeaStorySaturday
969
187
I bet Constantine XI shit himself when he saw the Ottomans drag one of these into the Golden Horn.
you know the weird LockMart NGAD shape kinda makes more sense if viewed from upside down
They will in a way, provided that the soviets were low at air power for some time.
What a millenium of invasions does to an mf
MOBILE NOO-
You might want to relearn Polish history, they aren't always victims
Even Vietnam have a tendency to downplay our conquest and expansion, as if it is something to hide
It must be a fun night
I didn't specify "getting invaded" or "invading" tho...
Then why even mention it
It works both ways, your hostility is entirely unnecessary
I always have a wierd love for the Intruder, it look cute af
Always been a weird aircraft to me with a rather fascinating history of service and modernization
Navy/marine work horse that served from 68 all the way to 2019
Personally the retirement of the KA-6D alongside the S-3 Vikings were probably the biggest mistakes the navy made entering the 21st century
Yeah, the A-6 look and really build to last
Could of also of just replaced everything with osprey variants
Not only the aircraft, they are basically retiring the role too 
Hawkeye only survives because they actually need loiter time
I mean, the Growler should be able to do ASW as well as EW? But even then there's not as many of them as S-3s or EA-6s
I don’t see where you’re putting ASW capability on a growler
I was also primarily pointing out the refueling variant of the A-6
The role the S-3 later took up as well
One of the primarily short comings of the navies current carrier strike groups is the lack of dedicated refueling aircraft leaving only super hornets to carry out the mission
To my knowledge the Hornets can refuel each other
Which greatly eats into the service life of the super hornet
See?
Yeah that’s bad for the long term service life of the aircraft
The term you're looking for is 'buddy tanking'
The current goal, at least for the USN, is to put the MQ-25 in service as an unmanned tanker for carrier aircraft
Airframe stress aside, you can only extend combat range by at most 40% by buddy tanking
Oh yeah sorry Iam on data so by the time you try to stop me I already continue on whatever tangent I was going on lol
COD, sure, already done
ME/CE, sure, but surely as an air ambulance only and not actually for rescue mission right?
AR, maybe, idk if potentially slowing down the whole flight is optimal here
C2ISR, lol
the C2 one is just funny
But generally I think the osprey could of made a half decent refueling and ASW platform
Some Marmon Herrington armored cars
Humber
BRDM with Malyutkas
Fox
Cascavel
EBR
Sdkfz 221 (maybe reconstruction)
Staghound
Greyhound
Modified Ratel
Eland 60
Saw them at the Royal Jordanian tank musem the other day
I think they're just emulating Crowsnest with that, not full AEWC capability
The fact the chinese are able to finish a fleet carrier, with no prior experience in making them, without any major expertise from the original builders AND having it not need a tugboat on every deployment is praiseworthy.
I love how you bait things willingly
"In good will" is important Mikoyan
China's situation is related to having high attention on surface navy combined with second larger military budget in the world
And being much younger by technology they applied of course
I have enough good will to expect you to take the comment for what it is, praising the chinese for doing it better than the Russians who built the damn thing.
Or rather started building
Yes Varyag was left in Ukraine when Union collapsed
China bought from them later, given its worn down state, people were mostly convinced it won't be finished as military vehicle
So was Kuznetsov actually, the whole problem with it is that Russia has no dry dock that can properly service her. The Kuznetsov was literally taken from the shipyard and brought to a Russian port to be announced as the Russian Federations flagship.
New drydock is build, and she was placed there just months ago
As far as I can tell it wasn't. Apparently it was finished as a familiarity training vehicle and then refitted for combat.
But yes she was build in Nikolayev shipyard like Kiev class before her
Soviets liked Nikolayev shipyard because it was an ice free port
Ooh. That explains the whole fire thing that happened at the end of 22. Got it, thanks.
Promise was it would become entrainment park
I mean Russias entire expansion since Peter the Great was centered around ice-free ports, can't really blame them for cashing in on that lol
Repairs during maintenance is common, because of all the welding work being down etc. Uss Bonhomme Richard also burned in 2020 during maintenance for same reason
No navy is free of maintenance fire chance
For Bonhomme For example, because of her maintenance "The resulting fire was fueled by paper, cloth, rags, or other materials, not fuel oil or other hazardous materials"
Ship maintenance gives you lot of open electric cables, welding equipment heat, lot of hazardous material side by side
So that's why most ships can burn during it or during construction
Especially if you've got nothing to fight it with like in the Bonhomme Richard
Hell this is latest example
June 30
Same case
"Construction or maintenance"
Yes, I mean we do agree that ships are susceptible to fires during dry dock times then?
Yes, and we also agree it's not special to Kuznetsov
Tcg Anadolu is weird one
Her fire wasn't reported at all almost
It's on her wiki page
Oh that wasn't the point, point was that I couldn't figure out why she would be burning when she's been in a port near/in Murmansk for months, the fact she was in a dry dock explained that
No you can still have fires while on sea
As said, Bonhomme wasn't on drydock as well if you remember
Since maintenance happen inside ships
Drydocks are for large maintenance, while normal docks are for well normal ones
But it had all the fire control systems removed which I presumed the Kuznetsov would still have if she wasn't being worked on until a dry dock had been constructed, but the dry dock was infact constructed with the Kuznetsov in it, rendering that assumption moot.
You disable fire control systems when I don't know, maybe to prevent watering when you are doing welding since it's hot and can activate things you don't want to
Or if you are changing the water pipes etc
Or you don't want to ruin your paint etc
Yes. That's what happened on the Bonhomme Richard. The fire control wasn't on and something caught fire, resulting in the ship being decommissioned.
Kuz's firefire broke out as welders were working during maintenance in the first power unit
I dont know of all ships disable damage control systems for water if they are doing welding
Since fire detectors can get triggered
Interesting enough however
Amphibious ships have the most fire news
Anadolu, Bonhomme, Type 75, Bougainville
Curious
My family member said 1 thing because the rest is classified
But he said there are different variants of the F-135
F-119 is also classified too
Can’t say anything about them
I mean that's for most warplanes engines
And F135 HAS to get a modified variants in future to cope with her heat problem
Future Soldier 2030 Initiative was a US Army program that was launched in 2009 with the mission to research and develop future soldiers' equipments, weapons and body armors. The program investigates various futuristic technologies, including mind boosting drugs, powered exoskeletons and artificially intelligent assistants.
Mind boosting drug 
based
They saw the pervitin results
zoobies
ADDITIONAL RAFALES
Great footage of BB-60 USS Alabama and BB-57 USS South Dakota during a practice exercises with the Royal Navy near Scapa Flow on June 24, 1943.
BB-60 closest to camera. Likely filmed from HMS Anson.
428-NPC-1905 #BB60 #USSAlabama #BB57 #USSSouthDakota #OTS #OverTheShoulder
367
See the problem here Horse?
Vikrant's elevator width is 10 meter
Rafale M width is 10.9meter
They gonna pull something weird
toggles noclip
Production of TEDBF is planned for 2031
@spring briar
I know that they supposed to be bad design but god, tumble home design was goofy and cute af
Neptune.
That is a nice house boat
I love these cute goobers 
Not bad design
Just has one huge drawback
They're rearranging some of the wingtip stuff
new super BB has 2 conning towers 
Dogshit design
I assure you sir, there is no structural integrity problem near the bow
based
14inch gun?
80-90k tons?
Redundant in case 1 got taken out
And the Germans had it on like... all of their ships with notable fire control
Heavy cruisers and larger
Maybe base on the studied of Eugen?
That's a cruiser, it shouldn't be applied to a BB
A conning tower also contributes to topweight, so its not something like an afterthought to add
The whole super-montana WG made is just many ??????s on multiple levels
What was the thickness on Iowa conning armor again?
Pretty heavy
Ew wtf is that 
Tbf WG does have a knack for adding things that never existed.
Not saying the other side of the barricade is any better but still. Structural integrity does not matter if it's as arcade-y as WoWs
I wouldn't mind if they demonstrated themselves to be capable of doing much better
@eternal veldt for kitakaze, you used the line drawings from 高角砲と防空艦 but didnt credit it in the reference list
Devastation, as fake as it is, falls in line with British battleship development
Must have deleted it on accident. Thank you.
no problem
i wanna ask, is there a pdf of it available online, or did you scan it by yourself?
It was found online, on a rather sketchy website that did not offer much detail. I wish I have a copy.
https://kknews.cc/game/3zm38ma.html If you can read Chinese, you can find the other scanned sections here.
alright, thanks for the help. i was hoping someone just straight-up scanned the entire thing.
Japanese books in general are quite difficult to come by.
Even less so on scanned copies.
the older ones, yea. best bet is to find them on jp yahoo auction and even then they cost a lot.
I am fortunate enough to have a few books by Fukui.
people really tried way too hard for the Future Soldier programs these days...
He came from nothing. He conquered everything. From acclaimed director Ridley Scott, #Napoleon is exclusively in movie theaters this Thanksgiving. Watch the official trailer now.
Visit our site: https://www.Napoleon.movie
Follow Us on Social:
https://www.facebook.com/NapoleonMovie
https://www.instagram.com/NapoleonMovie
https://www.twitter.co...
oh! oh no... pls don't Sony
Is this is a movie or a mini series?
Omg its Rich when he finally snapped from lack of France event
Hope it is a series
Honestly after the recent Alien movies, I rather have a dim view on Scott, really hope he doesn't fuck this up
Anf for real tho, what's with modern trailer and give away nearly everything in it
sigh... I really hate watching modern trailer cliches these days.
No thanks to Inception for the "gold standard" of movie trailers.
Like that ice battle scene, fucking hell give away the whole action plot
whoever made that Napoelon trailer should have been fired for the job.
It so obvious like you said...
Honestly, just show him changing from a captain uniform, to general, to the coronation then his field dress as Emperor, nothing more
It give away the surprise and now I feel nothing when the scene happen
So... do you remember the Napoleon 2002 mini series?
I used to watch this back in my high school.
what do you think of it now? decent enough?
Canadian? I don't think Vietnam ever aired a Canadian tv series
I was more famaliar with Waterloo
right... Watertoo, we all know that movie
Man, that sonic boom moment
Shame that Soviet is no more, you can't have entire army corps as your extra anymore
I mean
CN can still technically do that but frankly, their idea of historical accurate is questionable
a lot of movie productions cooperate with the US military
but that cuts into what the movie can exactly show or discuss
even the New Zealand army is helping the production for the Lord of the Rings.
Something about the landmines safety
Michael Bay, I know. But unless they make a movie about war for Independence, I don't see a massive extra shot
also if its a movie set before the modern era its easy enough to just get a bunch of extras
or renactors
Civil wars, definitely. War for Independence, I know of some group. This one might need the French Army, they still have the equip from what I seen
Funny if that Square formation is actually composed of Brit reenactor group
British Squares...
Just film in Europe
They do reenactments and they are fuckinf huge
Think waterloo last year was absolutely funding massive
Is this the part you tell me that it will compose of Polish Uhlan?

Honestly, one of my fav military formation in history
Idk what the numbers was but I do wargaming and my napeolic pals were bragging about going
But yeah normal western trailer
This goes hard, but for zoomers you do need action
They've been feed marvel movie trailers for the past like 10 years
At least I stop watching recent Marvel Movies.
They are now but errrr....
Fucking Hollywood, corrupt everything with their cheap pop movie
I am so burn on Marvel that I don't even care talking about Fury anymore
Hopefully tho it's actually good tho
Heard it bad but frankly, I don't care
Fury was enjoyable
But yeah lmao
Stupid ass Germans and their tiger just throw the last fight
Producers forgot how ambushes worked irl
This reminds me of the fact that in the movie Waterloo, there are no miniatures/whatever primitive CGI they managed to make back then. All of the soldiers are actually real Red Army troops.
Yeah!
Lmao
Same with civil war movies
Not that Fury, the Secret Invasion show
They just get reenactors
But yeah, the Tiger fight is stupid
Oh yeah, Gettysburg was made to be historically accurate mostly because if it wssn't the reenactors could just kinda leave
It's cheap, like imagine you get to go dress up and larp a cool battle and they film it
So you watch History Buff
Would be so much fun
Well I do but I actually knew that fact before watching his video.
Yeah they keep you in check cause they love and know the history
Yeah, it sound fun hanging out doing what you like
*Cavill, yeah, it was bad
Watch only ep1, barely make it through
"Ring of Power"
We just need to connect Tolkien to a rotor and we will have infinite power
The history of Hollywood ruining my favorite things
All of season 1 is somewhat bearable if all you know about the witcher franchise is "cool blonde transhuman kill monster"
Lmao
Korean ironically make better war movie now, a bit cheesy but good
I've been looking at Chinese War films
I can't stand, play the game and read the books, can't stand it
Sure it's propaganda
But fuck it's cool and nice
makes the US looks so much fucking cooler too bro
Yeah, I think exposing yourself to both sides propaganda helps you stay in the middle
Yep that's what I try to do
I hope you mean the big budget one, they have literally a popcorn movie industry that churn out anti Japan movie each week with questionable quality
No no not the anti Japanese ones
So uhm... what's the ETA on the Top Gun bootleg again?
Those ones are bad. Yeah I stick to their big box off stuff

Zero idea but ngl I can't wait
Me reenacting with the boys and I hear a tank engine in the distance
Battlefield V 💀?
There is one where Japanese have Bulletproof vest with MP5
It was so bad even the Chinese hate it
Those straps give it away
Gun isn't the problem from what I know, they still have large number of old Arisaka
For Militia formation, tho they don't really train those formation like we do
Man, it feel weird. I just watch a anti JP drama just last month with my neighbors
She married a CN guy so their Cable have CN channel for reason
It is decent, still a bit over the top but gear is mostly right tho
Yeah they probably don't train or know squad shit over there
American reenactor groups are iffy on this too
Funny enough, I could probably get myself a gear, stand in the line and I will perform perfectly to the order given.
But yeah, kudo to those reenactor, they go as far as having NCO to lead each platoon and perform seemlessly
Yep, I do wargaming shit so I know a decent amount of ww2 squad tactics and I think I'd only be able to actually perform as an NCO/squad leader
Anything more like platoon wise and I check out mentally under pressure
I play Foxhole, only combat role I have is tank driver
That or my being the regiment quartermaster
Being a tank driver is actually decent, if you have a competent commander than he can pretty much guide you to position and told you when to fall back
It start being a problem is when me being the driver but also the most senior one in the crew so I have to drive and command at the same time
Yeah, leading like 3 groups of 3/4 men (2 rifle sections + lmg section) is manageable for me. One in cover firing while the others move and repeat the process
Problem is comm, it is easy when you only have 10 dudes in shouting range or a tank, when you have to coordinate multiple unit on the field than it will be problems
Rice and stew Pork?

















