#history
1 messages · Page 118 of 1
WT has the 30mm one
Well I’d rather have a tank. Even if it’s one that can be taken out by a single panzerfaust
but the 20mm one can do this
@manic latch you know if you know
the Leopard 1A5 can fair off well against a T-72 because it has the leopard 2A4 FCS and thermals
Considering my country is modernizing T-55 to put them in independence tank brigade, the old gramp still have a lot of juice in them
it's literally reverse for you that's the problem
the standard Leopard 1 is a tank worse armored than most IFVs
I do love me T55am 
Eastern upgrade or actual upgrade?
what I see in my dreams
yeap
Slapping ERA on does not work as an upgrade...
Abrams Tusk: Ok
Well defense. Dig out a ditch for the tank to sit in suddenly you’re much more dangerous
Correct.
Do you know what she use
This just further proves none of you habe listened to a single word and just try to misunderstand it or see flaws in things that can be easily explained, then yell something in counter because you're out of counter arguements
your still in a lightly armored tank
guys stop arguing
we all know you would
totally
operate
wearing NATO body armor
while using an AS VAL
alright now we're bordering on just shitting on anything outside of the west as a rule
that's vulnerable to artillery
Literally a thing.
ERA is still an upgrade even if very cheap.
valid
Not entirely, I love me the Su-30 and T-64
huge turret made of cardboard
kremlin ignored my russian brunswick rifle...
T-55m3
Hes literally eastern
Josh
You and your friend is basically
Nato is amazing and only good
Rest is inferior, doesn't have positive
and?
But a very small target. Not great but improvement none the less. I’m sure everyone would love to have a hulldown Chally but there aren’t that many
I wouldn't call the modern Czech republic eastern anymore
T-55m3, perk of being neutral country is that you can make deal with Israeli
quacken is british and the most self-defeating wanker out there

I know... It´s just that the added weight is going to affect other characteristics so it´s more of a sidegrade y´know
Could be worse like idk sitting out in a ope field
also going hull down defeats the main benefit of the leopard 1
mobility
At least we're actually coming up with arguements and not just throwing accusations and strawmans
Define eastern then.
??????????
you're not coming up with arguments
BASELESS CLAIMS
You can try to run and gun but idk if that’s very safe
Hahahaha ok
you just say "lol they blew up tho" and putting your fingers in your ears
It has positives, I have been conceding to that. Iam just saying the west is better.
Rules and consequences
Casualties are cold hard facts.
And as for strawmans
challengers suck ass
Better than being killed by some shaped charge
?
but
I showed you russian brunswick rifle!
they're also my second favorite mbt
No this began by "hopelessly outmatched"
"oh so you also think leclerc is best because you said so"
and also i argue in favor of so
When no one said so of us
so much british shit
Which I then backed up with multiple arguments.
Shush i know
I’ll love them regardless
exactly
first of all
everything is possible through Leclerc
Literally strawman arguement
You implied it
K:D ratio and combat losses
I mean, from a certain current conflict, we see more tank get knock out by arty than by direct tank combat
And then I outargued you when you used your own.
i have a model of a challenger 2 lol as the first one i bought of a tank
..or well
i did, before it melted
Literally
Current arty tech isn’t 80s arty
if only I could mention certain conflict
and how it shows the benefits of western tanks
compared to eastern ones
but still shows how eastern ones are you know
Which do serve to paint a bigger picture along with a multitude of other things. You´ve only been saying words. I said flight characteristics and combat records.
viable/relevant
i still think chieftains would've been pretty good for their time if they bothered to re-engine it
i mean, for the russians it kinda is
I also said if it saw combat and had almost none to none losses and racked up plenty of kills then it's a testament of performance
hell i still argue if m60s are really all that better with vae a lot
they are way less focused on precision ammo
Not just blank stats
Yeah good gun and armour just god that engine
And now people understand why I love Pion
But you didn't care to listen
203mm is great yeah
just give it a normal diesel
the main difference is with drone spotting, artillery warfare is the same otherwise
everything else is good
Literally any engine
He doesn´t seem to want to.
I looked up M60A3 in gifs and it gave me a bunch of lesbians kissing
bar very limited used of fucked up shit like Excalibur, Bonus, smart and Vulcano
no dont give it a petrol engine i will shoot you
That doesn’t break down every 10 seconds
My point exactly
I don't think that's the right M60A3
and whatever the russian thing was i forgot the name
Interesting?
krasnopol?
They're just trying to missunderstand and misinterptet us on purpose
yup
I mean
Ignore all our arguements and only strawman
That´s like saying putting in nails is completely the same without a hammer
Which is correct.
It does count with 80s tech bc arty is king of battlefield and no strong point can hold out for long under heavy fire
And I atleast have said so.
I think if you do that it's clear you lost
my leopard 1....
standard
without a stabilizer
or thermals
or a laser range finder
@severe star What the fuck have you been telling these dudes while I was searching for things?
Ok EXPLAIN WHY, WITH STATS
1 on 1 in a plain field? No
But that isn’t how wars are fought. A hull down leopard 1 can still give a headache to whoever is in command
Literally just ignore everything we say and throw strawmans and misinterpret on purpose
what is
STOP REPEATING THIS
a leopard 1 standard
Nothin lmao
going to really do unless it gets lucky
Oh I see what happened. I meant the Leopard 1A5. I didn´t understand what he meant by standard at first lmao
Depends. War is very situational always
There is no arguement if you don't actually argue with actual arguements so yknow what no
In this situation any NATO tank will be shooting from a prepared position
Just either give in and accept when you were wrong or try to come up with actual arguements instead
I gonna throw it down. Your argument about which tank are better is pointless when I have a battery of Pion.
that is uhhhh
wishful thinking
and not what you know
what they actually planned on doing
Your battery is pointless if I own the skies.
Counter point, 152mm and 203mm
Good luck hitting a tank with 80s tech
Like all you've been repeating is leclerc this and oh durr you're wrong
yeah, the shooting from prepared positions only is defeatist 60s mentality
that is
Not a single actual counter arguement
doable actually

Oh yeah and a reaction meme
You forget about my air defense network 
Very mature
it was doable with 1910s artillery man
i cant believe optics exist
Well how many rounds for 1 tank?
and well the Soviets had a lot of artillery
Good luck stay alive and hunker down 
why does it matter?
Like I'm pretty much done here are we @warm finch ? Theres no use to argue with a wall
lots of very good artillery
Do you forget my ridiculous amount of pretty modern SEAD tech?
when I have a 9 gun battery firing at my target
While u charge at us
Where there´s a will. There´s a wall.
Less than you might be thinking actually, especially if your tank are static
A very sturdy wall ngl
If you’re shooting like 100 rounds for 1 tank I don’t think your supplies officer would be very happy
you should probably stop arguing nonsense with people who actually know better than you if you're not even going to put up a better argument then "well they jobbed in a proxy war"
You forget who you are fighting against 
it costs me less to shell it to death then it costs for a new tank
Oh please we barely got the change to said anything and they´re throwing bricks at us with no actual argument to them.
It actually a very good ratio
"who actually know better"
I havent seen a single counter arguement, just your leclerc strawman and "you're wrong read a book" "you're brainrot"
Fair but u need to spot them first. That means they’re probably already firing
then again thats not what really matters, what really matters is how much can 100 shells do to the enemy vs how much can an active tank do to you
in which case it still makes sense to shell the tank
but I digress
you're still waiting because you're willingfully turning your brain off to the ones that have been made. repeatedly.
yeah its almost like artillery units have had multiple ways of achieving that for decades
Yeah calling in arty will take minutes at least. How much can a leopard 2 do to a row of t72s?
do you mean 2s or 1s
also you don't necessarily have to directly hit a tank, the large numbers of leo 1s are vulnerable to fragments from the side from a not insignificant distance
again leopard 1s are lightly armored
If calling arty takes minutes, you are shit
the soviets were not shit
Well, even if it wasn’t a direct hit, fragmentation actually do nasty stuff to anything that isn’t in an armor box like early optic and it can even dmg the barrel
or you know just pen the sides of a leo 1
Well u tell me how long spotting given cords loading and delivering takes
And adjustments
Depends on priority of call
there's a lot of factors
Probably has a lot a variables
You really underestimate soviet artillerist, the leader maybe a bunch of pig but the men are very well trained
Great conscripts
depends on division probably
Yeah they are slow moving and need to be transported so arty can hit them every step of the way
again a tank can be spotted in multiple states of either mobility or combat
Scout and trained artillerist are not conscripts
a tank isn't always moving
Well 1) If Leo2 is attacker, she has more chance of going into minefield and artillery than tank engagement
- If it's tank vs tank, then even if Leo2 can handle a 72 1v1, can she really do much if there is 3 72 looking at her?
and a hull down tank is a vulnerable tank to artillery fires
tank on tank engagements aren't really the norm and for a cold war scenario the main anti tank threats are going to be artillery, mainfields, infantry and aircraft
Yeah tanks do more than fight tanks
I will point out that the T-72s are about as likely to die to minefields or artillery as the leopard 2 is
No MBT track can survive a anti tank mine or 150mm artillery yeah
Then you become sitting duck
If you survive
at that point you're just gonna abandon the tank
Fr
Yup
Arty go boom
like ~right now~
that being said T-72 is somewhat more vulnerable to artillery fragments than an Abrams or Leo 2, but significantly less so than Leo 1
somewhat worse side armor
I doubt a t72 can be taken out by shrapnel
...what
Roof armor also matters I think, what's the roof armor of Leo1
you underestimate 155 shrapnel
If it’s a direct hit your probably dead anyways
you can knock out a tank with shrapnel damage
tanks are boring post wheeled vehicles with big guns
If it’s a near miss it’ll still fuck up the tank but the crew can probably make it
leo2s and abrams have effectively cardboard for side armor
lemme find the South Korean MGS
whereas t-72s still have mid cold war style 70mm+ slabs
Hardly but the optic will be hurt quite bad, there is a reason for T-72B3M get a better armored box for it thermal optics.
By the late 80s western MBTs were getting composite skirts which boosted it above that of the T-72
The Jupiter fire support vehicle was developed by Rotem. It is armed with a 120 mm gun. This vehicle has the same firepower as the latest generation main battle tanks.
"composite skirts"
last year there was a scale model of the korean IFV with the centauro 2 turret
no they were not
Drive out or bail then. Crew isn’t dead that’s what’s important
this post made me pop a nerve for unrelated reasons (war thunder damage models)
Did they fixed Chal's issue of blinding the gunner if there is a mud on laser rangefinder
iirc even the horrifying chungus chally 2 boxes aren't actually composite
people just assumed they were because they're enormous
it's nera
Well, that’s the point of increasing crew survivability
but it's only good vs chemical
but yeah, in the 80s? lawd no nobody was carrying side kits that yuge
mostly
I though they fix it in mk3
Its "special armor"
That’s spaced armor is it not?
yeah its special alright
supposed to be like 2x as effective as the standard steel skirts at the back of the tank
Even highest Nato IFV protection standards find 10m 155mm HE greatest level
So yeah 155mm near 5m just disables you
yeah 155 fragments are hella lethal
Your fucking tracks
ah LAV-700 and Vextra my beloved

Tbh I like how og Centauro looks
not even tracks, it will straight go through the sides of most stuff
horse do you know what this is
if it lands close
Now I know why in Foxholes, my tank constantly got track when under arty fire
Yeah that too
yeah im gonna be real w/ you im gonna go ahead and take the tank with 3x as much side hull armor and a rubber skirt slathered in K1 instead
if we're talking about which is more vulnerable to artillery fragments
Well, the solution would be not to be spotted in the first place
Vs Mines, Abrams?
Vs Artillery, T-80?
abrams for either
oh yeah the west is better off vs mines for sure
K3 when
vs arty no
if I die in a tank I will die stylish in a K2 or Leclerc
unless we're talking about direct hits for.. some reason
in which case they both die
She has more side armor? 
no
also i didnt even know this existed thanks
to the list it goes
no I am just a abrams supremacist

So return to infantry?
pulling up to the motor pool in style
Is that South Africa?
no
UAE
discuss the cock and balls challenger instead
Never know that they make stuff
the MGS challenger
my love
what the FUCK is this
I’d probably kill myself if I saw that on the field
I am calling it that purely due to the turret layout
bmp turret on that horribad chassis
The hell
As in BMP3 turret from a perfectly fine BMP3?
did you know where else they put one?
Their patrol boat?
unless you know about it you will never guess
I don’t even want to know what they have have done to the hull
Tato what is that
Dayum
dude thats sick
they also got this shit
The KW1 Scorpion was developed as a private venture by Rotem, to meet the potential requirement of the South Korean army for a family of wheeled armored vehicles.
South Korean APC
Dudes got a whole gaming rig
do you know what that is
Based
They put it on a BMP1 
fucking command and conquer superweapon lookin shit
That thing would light up beautifully from counter battery
holy fuck
I want to know what went through the ROKETSAN engineer's heads when they were told to make a 240 tube MLRS
leo 1a6
Wait, the tank?

South Korea’s new NATO ad

arietes look too cool to be called leopards
NGL, I want this
When you have to turn
Coke, lots of cokes
anyway back for more wheels
Are you implying leopards aren’t cool 
The UAE has a kinda absurd rocket artillery park
Look like a truck driver, they are surprisingly mobile if you have a experienced driver
Yay
Stop
Leo 2, yes. Leo 1 was never cool
the only big gun wheeled vehicle from the soviets
Cri
Does that track lower
maybe one day
not as cool looking im sorry
Wheeled heavy IFV based off of T-64
I love how this thing looks. Just very appealing
ah yes ukraine-made horros beeyond human comprehension
Now this just dumb
Looks like a fat crusader
70 tons with a 25 MM bushmaster btw
Kharkiv engineer are on par with UAE
"In November 2012, estimates of the GCV's weight, depending on armor packages, put the General Dynamics entry vehicle at 64–70 tons, and the BAE Systems entry vehicle at 70–84 tons. This made the planned infantry fighting vehicle designs heavier than the M1 Abrams tank."

If that heavy then I want at least 40mm bofors
bumerang is like
built in very small quantities
the only modern Russian vehicle I like the look of
Does 120mm mortar count
This still haunt my dream
Lol
oh i didnt know there were btr nonas
Ah, the Nona. No ideal why Vietnam didn't ask for this, they are perfectly suited for us.
How well do they turn?
PIHRANA 10x10 MY BELOVED
all my experience dicking around on regiments has taught me nonas are incredibly based
just having them exist kills everyone ded
BMPT-64
Patria hitfact my beloved
I fuck with that one
@humble mulch pin pls
tea dont fuck the exhaust it's not hygenic
lmfao
120mm mortar round is deadly 
BMPV-64
everyone needs more mortars

cv90 turret?
no idea
looks like the cv90 40mm
Perfect
Wanna see what happens when I put 76mm
want to know what did have a CV-90 turret on it?
Oh No

Rosomak with cockerill 120 vs Rosomak with Hitfact 120 who wins
MTLB

I mean, it could be worse
M10 Booker with wheels
so a 105 LAV
Perhaps
yes but this is supposed to be one of their primary SPAAGs
nevermind i love it
this is gods ultimate technical
MTLB with Turkish-made (ASELSAN) SARP-DUAL combat module is stronger
Wait, who use them?
Transnistria
it could be worse, then
Lmao
Ah, that's explain a lot, beggars can't be chooser
Yeah dude they have something cool so I’m proud of them
howitzer on wheels
the truth is out there
Imagine if all Abrams were actually MTLBs
Cool transnistrian homemade IFVs
anyone want to see muzzle loading rifles?
Yeah those are pretty cool looking
Nice to see indigenous designs
Krem, how hard is it for Russia to restart MTLB production line or they better off making something new?
Transnistrian tank destroyer unit rolling in
If you sent me into a modern war with a SPG9, I will.....
could be worse
considering unless Romania or Ukraine get weird ideas (which tbh i did see float around on the internet...) their only enemy would be Moldova which is like
could be the ones using the 100 MM anti tank guns
no, this is a lot worse
the 100mms can fire sabot and GLATGMs
Does Moldva just let them exist?
Russia has troops in Transistra
they only exist
That explains it
due to Russian meddling
They were originally Soviet minelaying vehicle
"Peacekeeping Forces"
Start something new, especially for future module upgrade potential
Good use for them then
My beloved lada technical
Tranistra have the majority of old Soviet armory so they got a leg up when they declare independence
Yes
@ivory ridge combine this
Woke up
Learned there's nuclear bomb deniers
Went back to bed
31113
2430
Shame, I quite the MTLB platform
It's from 60s. It's time to go
Yeah, I saw that too, pretty dumb ass
The old girl give all her best 
who can guess what vehicle this is based on
It was an airburst bruh
yeah its from Oryx
Kurganets-25 should be the main replacement for BMP, BMD, MTLB. It's a great fresh start
And like
Actually better
I don't think its replacing the BMDs
that's the T-15

Oi termi ain't IFV
the Kurganets-25 is the uhhhh
more sensible one there probably never gonna end up putting into service anyways
both T-15 and Kurganets are way to heavy to replace BMD
MTLB still make a better platform for supply unit, you don't always need an IFV chassis if your job is just carrying supply.
we have kinda gotten to the point where you can't make a good airborne IFV
T-15 is like Namer, it's so damn expensive for its production
just because they say it isnt it doesnt mean it isnt
I mean I think it would be better if the VDV were equipped like actual mech infantry and didn't hold onto some airborne doctrine Russia doesn't even have the strategic mobility to support
but one can only dream I susppose
yeah it would
I mean BMD-4M, by virtue of being better than the other BMDs
cuz nobody else makes airborne IFVs
yep
Then yeah BMD should just die
airborne is light infantry
Concept is dead
like generally
Russia does not have the air assets to deploy the VDV in considerable numbers with their vehicles
and even if they did it would still be very questionable
they would of been better off doing what either the Soviets did in Afghanistan and requipping them with BMPS and proper tanks
or what Ukraine did which is you know
Hard to change an org that are so proud of their tradition like VDV and do you really want to piss off a elite force that can overthrown you by making them normal like other infantry formation.
yeah, cuz they are one of the best infantry forces in the modern russian army
they just cancelled it
what in the goddamn did i just gind
making a light infantry airborne unit and converting the rest to proper mech infantry
despite the memes made about them
I mean they made it easy by sending both the active duty VDV and the Veterans organizations to their deaths

Feels more on hold but perhaps
anyway enough about that
Yeah, maybe after the war end, VDV will be downsized to a more reasonable force
no im pretty sure they 1:1 cancelled it to build draguns instead
because kurganets gives like, no extra benefit over them
while being a bigger pain in the ass to get moving
I mean, they could be equip along the line of Naval Infantry
Centauro 2 in brazilian camouflage colors
a big issue with the russian MoD is they got it in their head that everything soviet sucked ass and demanded a complete 100% break from anything using soviet era parts
leading to them developing a ton of redundant shit
and now the ultra attrition pain festival is making them realize "wait this is fucking stupid"
Who initiative was that? The guy before Shoigu?
a lot of people across the government in general
i think it was a whole optics circlejerk
look! its all brand new that means its better!
fund our bullshit!
is this a car for americans?
I mean, BTG and the new stuff are suited for a low level intensity and proxy war, not a full blown total war
Yeah it's was just a weird decision
A full clean slate
Replace everything Soviet
yeah
Well, considering how badly they perform in Georgia, a war that they won, it might affect some upper level leader thinking.
But it is weird that they talk about improving comm but never really invest in it
gaijin please make T series tanks actually spall
BMP WITHOUT HULL GUNNERS?!
A very dealy cat
which for some reason a lot of racists on twitter like to associate with
impossible
Centauro 2 in brazilian camouflage
Oh no
Wait what?
fat fingered?
Bruh he asking tea in threads
lmao
Lmao
M2A4 but cast hulled
Why? why cute cat mean racist?
look at how aesthetic this is
Kiss
It was a promising time
mockup
turbo science
I really don't want to know about how its deal with recoil
DRDO 
Arjun has such a goofy ERA layout
Arjun's history is goofy
I can already hear a certain eastern european youtuber talking about blowout panel
Boat IFV
I mean, it is quite reasonable and cheap
shame they never actually built the tank variant
The artist guy really need to relearn how tank turret and mast work 
lol yeah
undy is inside
It’s just supposed to look cool 
I remember when that idea first got announced tho, makes sense for them
Batmobile

Just the turret sounds french
the turret is french
A quintessential What is this Weapon, the Turret Pistol is a dead end of firearms design, developed under the misapprehension that conventional revolvers were all doing it wrong.
Join Jonathan as he investigates why you would want to revolve on a whole other plane of movement.
Buy tickets to our Medieval Tournament here https://royalarmouries...
@tough quail AMX VCI Ambulance
Bruh
HMS Surprise approaching her next victim. She's flying false colors hoping to get within range to bring her full broadside to bear. Captain Aubrey expects if all works well revealing her guns will intimidate the enemy into surrendering.
Lol
Doesn’t look at the server for 18 hours
1956 messages
Anyways have a diagram of beam-riding and SARH guidance for Terrier and RIM-67 Standard-ER respectively.
same
horrible horrible arguments
Yeah jeez. I didn’t see everything but goddamn.
insert Tempesta hopium mantra here
dont even have to be gone 18 hours, i think 8 wouldve been sufficient...
I have to ask. Does the abbreviation “kt” for a knot bother anyone else?
Every time I read it I automatically think “kiloton” as in nuclear weapon yield rather than “knots”.
@tough quail Tato and Krem today
wheeze
r/whoosh
Imagine Krem but without the knowledge and even worse attitude

I can assure you NATO forces in a cold war gone hot conventional war would totally take minimum losses and be able to wipe the Warsaw pact without any air losses
(the entire argument earlier was essentially NATO's technology edge somehow give them a gulf war scale victory against the Warsaw Pact)
Good training, good planning, and good leadership is more important than technological superiority (to a point, the Wehrmacht can’t beat 1991 Iraq).
True
you can have the best training in the world but old artillery guns can still knock you out
From what I’ve seen a lot of that has to do with good planning with mine warfare on the part of the Russians.
Yeah
breaching operations are the riskest type you can undertake
and there attempting it without air or fires supremacy
even the US Army thinks its gonna take at least 30% casualties in a breaching operation
artillery, mines and attack helicopters are a bad combo to go against no matter who you're
yup
let them cook
I have other live priority and Visegrad kinda busy with France at the moment
at the mommy?
Auto correct for some reason

Must be all those talk about fdg 
Why are you single sourcing
Poor girl
She’s getting repaired tho

The crew they have on the texas is... very dedicated to keeping her in shape.
Rawdoging it.
Très bien
Supériorité française

Alisa

The Marines really just went "fuck Saddam" didn't they?
Hopefully, youtube will approve of this video. Go to my Patreon for the uncensored copyrighted version
Discord: https://bit.ly/2ZO9bfX
My Twitch: https://bit.ly/3k0csQ9
My Tik Tok: https://bit.ly/3q0M902
Support me on Patreon: https://bit.ly/3nVO1om
Be a Youtube Member: https://bit.ly/3wbdo9o
#history #meme #kuwait
Literally this
The wiki page is just a goldmine
Inferior Uralvagonzavod drawing vs Superior Chrysler engineering
https://www.navy.gov.au/media-room/publications/wwii-damage-control There's a whole series on that. You can check the rest out here.
Royal Australian Navy

Hon hon hon
When you send the baltic fleet to the pacific to fight the japanese
What happened here
Fisher got to prove his concept of BC when Spee got absolutely mopped
Spee killed an admiral and Destroyed a small force
And the Brit’s decided enough was enough
And BC prove their worth as cruiser killer and hunting down German raiders
Yes
Ok
Which inturn foreshadowed their shortcomings at the battle of Jutland
More like the admiralty got into their head that BC is perfectly fine as screening force and participate in line of battle
What happens when you mess with the Gulf of Aden
Well, to be completely fair, a similar stunt worked for them during the Ottoman wars I believe this was during Katherine the Great
Jutland's BCs are mostly hampered by literal suicidal practices, with armour being secondary in their destruction
Which is what caused their downfall, foreshadowing it in its own way.
Pirates in their stupid little boat when a warship turns up
Tbf, they have to pick between firing faster or safety practice
To enhance their rate of fire, the battlecruisers removed flash protection doors from their magazines to the bulkheads and turrets
Or just straight up stored munitions in places where they shouldn't be
Yes, whoevers brilliant idea was that, good job
You might be surprised how common it is in military
Pirates in their skiff when an American Destroyer shows up
Coupled with absolute dogshit British shell design that is literally from 1870, and an admiral that can't communicate well
You have more than a big issue on hand
Honestly questioning why we don't just outright go out and sink all the pirates in their little skiffs at this point
Mogadishu
How do you know it is a pirate boat?
Iam not, going past safety precautions to improve combat effectiveness has been a thing since the literal actual fuckin romans
Damn, that guy is in a sampan, must be a pirate
The AKs and RPGs they're approaching freighters with
You can't neutralize the threat entirely though, other than the patrols that are happening
Even with bino, you can’t spot gun under fishing net
Somalia has a huge fucking coastline bro
Piracy has been and will be a problem
Somalia had no government for like 10 years
Yeah Somalia has big time issues
30 year civil war
The British kinda overcorrected themselves after Jutland
But I meant like always bothering to arrest, obviously not fixing it when shipping companies are already hiring PMCs to shoot these guys on approach
Partially why the KGV's 14" guns jammed quite a bit earlier in their operation
There's an incredible amount of flash protection measures in place to avoid another Jutland scenario
It is a risk. You can’t simply police or completely eradicate piracy
I mean, wasn't the death tally something like 3 survivors per every lost battlecruiser?
Well it's just a sad reality that just arresting them wont fix it or the issues that lead to them becoming pirates

Nearly full crew losses for the battlecruisers, if thats what you mean, yes
Which can happen to any ship that has a catastrophic magazine detonation
Well, you could try UN approach but it always a dumbass idea
Me trying to understand great war naval battles is hard
Not too well versed in Jutland but yeah, horrific losses on all sides
Well, you have to sortie out to find the enemy, bait him and make damn well sure hit him.
Didn't they literally forget about one of their units, Jagdotville?
All I can think of is the sabaton song
Bureaucrat and politicians, they only care if it make them look good 
Yup
Naval battles in general are long lulls of nothing
A short period of intense action, then lulls of nothing again
And not forgot, more like unwilling to commit
Found it, at Jutland Queen Mary had nine survivors, Invincible six and Indefatigable had two
Ammo det is apocalyptic and even if you manage to get under water, the chance of rescuing is slim when a battle is raging on
That is not the major issue
Catastrophic hull loss typically involves sudden structural collapse and water coming in to fill in that void inside the collasped structure
That's why regular battleships have them principally well protected. Just the luck of Beattys squadron that they had battlecruisers which kinda said "fuck that"
Meaning, water inrush typically blocks your route of escape, and even if you jump overboard, the water will suck you in hard
If you get caught in that, it's over
Physics is really scary sometimes
You get dragged below, your lungs then collapse from water pressure
And you drown
And if that is not enough, later oil fired ships just leak oil and set the seas ablaze
And if you're unlucky enough to have a ship armed with delth charges on board, you really have to try your damnedest to get away from the wreck
Because those things will go off when the wreck gets deep enough and the shockwave crushes your organs
Shipwrecks bad
(and then you also have cases of men dying from blood loss, hypothermia, dementia, dehydration, sharks, or a vicious enemy if you somehow survive the initial ordeal - see Samar and the loss of Indianapolis)
god the Loss of Indy is such a tragedy
British battlecruisers emphssize upon speed and firepower, and Germans rely a bit more on armour and speed, with sacrifices being a smaller gun caliber.
Did they ever find Indy’s wreck?
The major issue is that the British shells don't actully fucking work.
I know she kept chugging after she was intially hit
They did. Low oxygen environments preserved the ship in relatively decent condition.
it’s part of why she sank so fast
You can still see the writing on the ammo boxes of the wreck.
Yes I believe the thing being german battlecruisers are uparmoured cruisers while british battlecruisers are down armoured battleships
It isnt really the case. Invincible as built was classified as an armoured cruiser.
the Invincible and Indegefatigable had only like 4 inches of fore belt of armor
Its more of a different approach to the speed question.
Different philosophy when it come to BC, German favor battleline service for their BC more while Brit focus on anti raiders
I wish I had, but Last Stand of the Tin Can Sailors and some of the unsavoury shit done to civilian ships by a certain nation already has my stomach churning.
McKay got fucked so hard man
Lose your ship, no one answers your distress calls, then you take the blame for the Ships loss
Eeeh potatoe potatoh
Some suspect it was King's way of getting back at McVay's father, who snubbed King earlier.
And knowing King, he's...always angry.
huh
that makes that even worse
poor Indy was nearly blasted in half,
There wasn’t a whole lot to be done
Maybe not that petty but King definitely not gonna hear out any other explanation
Ok
so, I remember something about the US knew about subs being active in the area or something
Different needs, the germans needed to use their entire navy to actually be able to challenge the grand fleet. The British needed to make sure the germans don't do that unhindered
Well, you got most of the point
One of the most versatile and durable naval aircraft was the Douglas AD/A-1 Skyraider. It also was one of the first specialized electronic aircraft in the U.S. arsenal, as the Skyraider’s large payload capacity and carrier capability made it an ideal candidate for several electronic configurations.
Skyraider keeps winning.
thats rad

Inkerman was
yeah...
The French and British had rifles
the Russians had smoothbore muskets

friggin sad
"While the allies could have taken this opportunity to attack Sevastopol before Sevastopol could be put into a proper state of defence, the allied commanders, British general FitzRoy Somerset, 1st Baron Raglan and the French commander François Certain Canrobert could not agree on a plan of attack"
Classic

I'm simply researching rifle muskets Krem
you'll always end up at the Crimea war
and the ACW
Let's be real. The AI broke in the Crimean war.
Be it the thin red line incident ™️ or the war overall, its like somebody turned off that the AI will be making senseful decisions.
Damn
The 12.5 inch Muzzle Loading Gun Mark I of 1885 fired a shell weighing 820 pounds (372 kg) to a range of 6,000 yards (5,586 M). It weighed 38 tons (38,610 Kg) and was generally used as a coastal defence cannon mounted in forts. The gun could fire 3 types of shell - a Palliser armour piercing shell against armoured warships, a common explosive ...
@tough quail

Man hit the bullseye at 100 yards with what is basically artillery
Considering the trajectory
what an absolute hero
Fw58 "Weihe"
Aim-9X loading
They’re ready to shoot down another balloon
Cute
avrora? no, abpopa
splendid
Escort Carrier USS Thetis Bay taking PBY Catalinas, F6F Hellcats, and one J2F Duck from Hawaii to Alameda for repairs, 8 July 1944
@tough quail New Tu-160 modernization (Tu-160M) entered test flights 
#NEWS 📰: BAE Systems was awarded a $37 million U.S. Department of Defense Ordnance Technology Consortium (DOTC) contract to design the Next Generation Evolved SeaSparrow Missile Launch System (NGELS) for the @USNavy. Learn more: https://t.co/ZjSbHCGQ5r
The Golden Rivet
One trick old salts always try to pull on new sailors is to send them off to find the “golden rivet” in their ship or vessel since every ship or boat has one according to lore. However, there was one ship that had a golden rivet and it probably is not the one that you might expect. In 1917, two “post Jutland” battleships, designed with greater hull protection and fire control systems were being built at shipyards on opposite coasts, the USS California was being built by New York Naval Shipyard and the USS Tennessee was being built by Mare Island. The California legislature sent a golden rivet back to New York for the California. The rivet was installed in the bow of the ship and construction continued.
Shortly thereafter, someone decided it was rather foolish that the California was being built in New York, so it was decided they would simply exchange names – the California in New York became the Tennessee, and the Tennessee at Mare Island became the USS California. The California was launched at Mare Island on 20 November 1919. And which ended up with the golden rivet? The Tennessee, of course!
@maiden citrus
Upgrade electronic and ecm?
Does this one make the engines NOT blow out nitrogen oxide?
Cute
Lmao the USN is literally using gold in construction!! Worst navy ever!!!
- some youtube short youtuber
Please tell me thats from public documents
why in the hell would classified documents on a failed procurement proposal from 30+ years ago be on Twitter
Idk I don't want to end up on the CIA list like everyone on Thug Shaker central
no all of this was publicly available
and again why would any of this be classified in the first place
Phew
I swear some of you people have no idea what actual classified documents tend to look like
Since they’re not gonna be handing out promotional brochures with classified information on them
*magazine page from a military magazine
Is this classified document?
Reality has proven to very well be stranger than fiction.
@shrewd pecan Where can I find "Jane fighting ships"?
Buying actual copies of janes is beyond the means of my fed ex paycheck
That's like 2 month of my living expense alone 
That’s like one paycheck I’d rather spend on better things than furthering my autism
So how do I find the free copy then? I am not familiar with this
Keep in mind that Jane's Fighting Ships is actually a shitty reference in modern standards
a great reference back in contemporary times, but absolutely fucking terrible now.
Good thing I don't go after modern ship, I want to know the Dreadnought race
Janes fighting ships is perfectly accurate and balanced with no exploits
Digital?
Digital.
16 inch belt North Carolina is the way
well at a minimum janes let’s you read headlines
The Japan Ministry of Defense (MoD) will procure Thales Australia's Hawkei and General Dynamics Land Systems' Eagle protected mobility vehicles for trials as part of the...
Which year?
Yeah not taking any damn chances
It's happened like over 7 times over the past year
again
You do realize that classified material quite literally
Classified documents do not look like promotional brochures
has a classified stamp right over it?
Again, I'm just cautious
have a declassified document I got off of google images
Again classified documents tend to look like actual documents
Anything that is cleared will have something like this over it
He a little confused but he got the spirit, leave him.
Of course, this doesn't excuse some of the genuine shitheads like the Challenger 2 document leaker
Classified documents do not look like this
who personally scribed out the classified stamp
but declassified material will have a stamp over it
It's good to be cautious, but yea, these are brochures, so they really aren't going to be classified
i have in fact found documents which are in the public domain (70+ years old) but some dumbfuck forgot to remove the classified stamp from
Classified and certified cool
Some German documents aren't either from memory
still has DIENST GEHEIM written all over it, ask Sirene
ADF used to have some odd policies regarding declassification
Also, hit, fancy HMAS Stalwart and Torrens' plans?
ridiculouly and absolutely cromulent
@ivory ridge
HMAS Voyager (D31) sported a few Breda guns on her after some crewmen had a minor mutinty in protest of the ships lack of AA defences, leading to a very unofficial and very much out of regulation refit where she was fitted with a handful of captured guns
lol
HMAS Stuart also recieved them
HMAS Paramatta may have had one and HMAS Perth fitted two behind her bridge
its understandably, given the thin legality, hard to find pictures but its cool regardless
ayo











