#history
1 messages · Page 106 of 1
Bluecher was ferrying troops to capture Oslo
Operation Weserübung was well underway
https://youtu.be/5KgBJC4RXC4 Here's another video on the exact battle, albeit with its consequences highlighted
Download World of Warships Blitz now! (https://bit.ly/2HZdMjZ)
Reach LEVEL 3, and get a free ship - German Destroyer G101
which has the special ability to shoot torpedoes directly in front of it to get started!
Music used:
World of Warships OST
Narrated by Dan Boud - https://danboud.com
Many thanks to my generous Patreon supporters: Admiralw...
short is, the German troops had to land much further away from Oslo, so there was time for the gold reserve and the king to escape.
Oslo is the capital yes
This is also why Blücher's casualties are very high - the ship was crammed to the brim with invasion materials and equipment
I am not familiar with Norway
the shots from Oscarsborg basically knocked her telegraph equipment offline, and set a massive fire on board the ship in the hangar
said fire then reached the 10.5cm magazines, and there isn't much you can do to save the ship when magazines go off
So she's on fire then torped
the whitehead torpedoes hit the turbine and boiler rooms, would certainly harm the firefighting efforts
damn, basically the worst spot to hit
but up to that point, the crew was hopeful that the ship could be saved, and even ordered the ship to be anchored
was there ever a time a ship survived her magazines cooking off?
It was the out of control conflagration that basically killed her
....Mikasa?
59 votes and 95 comments so far on Reddit
as noted, Shaw, Marat survived
New Orleans is a bit of a (?) for me since the damage reports conclude that it was the bombs and mine magazines that exploded, not the main 8" powder magazines
(c) It is improbable that any explosion occurred in the 8" powder magazines, even after the mass detonation of bombs. Burning of smokeless powder in confined spaces will develop pressures of destructive magnitude after an interval of time, only under certain conditions of density of loading and degree of confinement. In the case of BOISE* about 3000 pounds of 6" powder burned without producing an explosion. In the case of NEW ORLEANS unburned 8" powder grains were reported to have been found on the upper decks. Some powder might have burned briefly in the magazines but if so it would have been quickly extinguished by the inrush of water. Further, if an explosion had occurred in the large powder magazines, A-408-M and A-411-M, between turrets I and II, the damage would have been even more severe than was actually the case. The bottom of the ship under these magazines was distorted but relatively intact as far forward as frame 30. The bomb magazines were just forward of this and the structure was bent sharply downward forward of frame 28, see photo 6. This alone is almost conclusive evidence that the bomb magazine was the center of the trouble.
another win for underwater powder magazines and another reason Hood's shell/powder room arrangement sucks dick 
They were above the Waterline?
They knew the problem
But never bother changing
Do you know how expensive it could be to fix the problem.
really damn expensive
Aren't you talking about ripping out everything on the way down
Actually, the rest of the Admiral-class battlecruisers planned to do that
and Nelson naturally had the proper arrangement
As for Hood, really, just a matter of time and money
Other ships are in more dire needs of refits, and once war broke out, any kind of capital refit except the most urgent ones (such as battle damage) are just "lol lmao no"
@chilly osprey next storia militare is on the Giussano and Cadornas 
While it sounds weird, there was a chance for a warship to literally just pass by a manned and alert fortress. During the same campaign Köln pulled a similar stunt, and sailed past a fortress actively shooting her while taking no casualties.
Several impacts in the water close to the bow " Köln ".
Several shots passed over the ship (signal deck). One between both funnels. Morse code in the direction of the battery "Stop firing, good friend, etc). Artillery fire stopped for a short time, searchlight continues to shine. By skillful behavior of the torpedo boats they succeed in advancing into the harbor at high speed without being hit. "Köln" follows, fired on again, and passes the Kwarven battery, but without being hit, likewise the torpedo battery (at the foot of the Kwarven), which is apparently not clear, in any case does not fire. Later, during the occupation, it is found that combat pistols are not inserted in the torpedoes.```
combat pistols?
Combat pistol do what?
The fuzes in the nose of the torpedo
Oh
That's the German text ran through deepl
Ah fuzes
So the terminology isn't 100% on point
But it gets enough context across without me doing all the work
Kruzt
I thought she was not moving to combat but towards a new port farther away from American Air raids
what blucher?
blucher was sunk in april of 1940
like a solid year and a half before the US joined the war
What do you mean? It is his nickname on this channel

Are you referring to her sister, Prinz Eugen?
Mcunter mhh
Shinano

Reminder that Hood’s strategy by Holland was to close the range with Bisko so that her deck wouldn’t be hit as much

Thus putting a lot of faith into her 12” sloped belt made with 1910’s British steel
Extremely unlikely
PoW was kept at distance for a reason
Taking advantage of her deck
hood was basically armored with sandpaper in comparison
The Navy will commission the 12th Freedom-class Littoral Combat Ship Saturday in New York City on Saturday, the Department of Defense announced today. The future USS Cooperstown (LCS-23), named for the hometown of the Baseball Hall of Fame, is one of the last Freedom-class Littoral Combat Ships that the Navy will commission. The Navy christened …
it sucks that they're so shit because they actually look really cool
the superstructure somehow made me think of a confederate ironclad
I like the look of the independence class better personally
It was a nice idea on paper but yeah sadly they are broken. Glad I am not going to those ships.
Going too fast
Hull crack
it makes me think of like
a goofy police speedboat you'd see in cp77
Considering they actually work, that’s fair.
I mean they aren't really much better, whereas the freedom class wont move, the independence class is literally falling apart
major corrosion and hull cracking issues
Braces are easier to install than new engines.
yeah I guess, at the end of the day both aren't very good ships
LCS should’ve gone to one design and just have both companies build it.
And they should’ve been built with some actual AAW capabilities, not just RAM and planned integration with guided 57mm.
Seriously. Just put a damn stanflex module or two on it.
on that note, the MMSC variant the Saudis are buying will have 8 VLS cells to carry SM-2 or ESSM
and presumably also fix the engine issues?
I mean it’s not hard to go up once you’ve hit rock bottom.
The worst of the corrosion issues are amusingly the USN's own fault. For whatever reason, most galvanic protection was stripped from the design by the program office for cost reasons.
(As to the hull joint cracking, well... Austal did just underestimate how much flexing there would be there. But that's also pretty simple to fix by just welding in more bracing.)
Any limitation to history discussion here?
The neat thing about an all-aluminum ship is that the braces you weld in, are also aluminum and so weigh very little.
Aka, which line not to cross
stay away from modern politics, but otherwise it's quite open.

Until the later stages of the war
While the soviets used an tactic of meatgrinder, aka, mass assault doctrine
hoi4 moment
Uhhh no
Hm

It was this when possible
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_operation
Deep operation (Russian: Глубокая операция, glubokaya operatsiya), also known as Soviet Deep Battle, was a military theory developed by the Soviet Union for its armed forces during the 1920s and 1930s. It was a tenet that emphasized destroying, suppressing or disorganizing enemy forces not only at the line of contact but also throughout the dept...
Hm
I mean thats just wrong, while soviet battlefield tactics tended to be rudimentary early in the war because of C&C issues, their operational planning was generally not bad
Hmm.
Blitzkreig is an operational theory, not a tactical one
Okay
The more shitposty way of putting this is...
Like I mean firstly we have to clarify what we are talking about, is it unit tactics or operational thought
I once had a version photoshopped with Rokossovsky there instead - Bagration was his masterwork.
The Germans certainly did have better unit tactics than the Soviets through most of the war, because Soviet training was more rushed generally, with a greater emphasis on mass
this is not the same thing as just chucking troops into the meatgrinder, as the actual deployment of forces was generally intelligent, although mistakes were made from time to time (especially early in the war)
A good example would be in artillery: soviets generally stuck to pre-planned mass artillery salvoes. The battery already knows where the next barrage is going to go, and the whole thing keeps on rolling.
Great purge + surprise attack + lack of training + rushed production was the worst yeah
But good difference was between 1939-1941 Red Army got x2 larger
I mean the purge mostly affected their poor showing operationally, rather than their tactics
The Soviet way of war always accepted that mass at the battlefield was the ultimate decider of victory, and both their strategic and operational thought was centered around that
The other big issue in the early years was that the Soviets were in the middle of a rearmament and reorganization program. So you would see units running a total mixed bag of stuff, or units that just got their vehicles replaced but hadn't trained yet...
They built their armies so that they would have mass, and their operational doctrine was to apply as much mass to as small of a point, to achieve decisive breakthroughs
The doctrine pursued by the Soviets was offensively oriented. Tukhachevsky's neglect of defense pushed the Red Army toward the decisive battle and cult of the offensive mentality, which along with other events, caused enormous problems in 1941

There was at least one T-34 unit that had gotten their new tanks but not ammo or fuel.
I have to go see which one that was.
Supply was generally problematic for both sides
Hell T-34 was a prototype itself. Real desire was the much better T-34M which didn't happened also because of war
tbf the US logistics could wound up the same in 1941/42
The Soviets had a major issue with last mile until fairly late in the war, while the Germans just didn't have enough of many critical things
It would have, yes. Getting caught in the middle of a rebuild is always chaos.
US is damn lucky they aren't getting invaded or bombed by land however 
I mean the US fixed it a lot faster, because the core issue for both countries was mostly along the lines of not enough trucks for the army size
And the US just built a lot more trucks faster
There were several T-34Ms, and what amuses me is how they wanted the semi-coaxial flamethrower on so many of them.
People talk as if the Soviets and US were equals in their industrial capacity, but the US just flat out dwarfs them in reality
Some Shermans also got those for Japan campaign
Most Shermans with flamethrowers either had them replace the main gun or fire through the bow machine gun port
The US had the safety to set up their industry of scale. But in the early war when the transition was being made lend lease was often imcomplete
I mean the US military and government had also invested a lot in making sure industry could ramp up quickly, and the US just had a really large industrial base
and US war planners knew no one would actually be able to strike at said base
Yeah, the US has a preference for mounting flamers in a dummy main gun tube - or as a hull mount. Soviets were interesting in their use of semi-coaxial turret mounts.
Pretty much all soviet flame tanks had a working main gun.
But like unless you are counting before the US entered the war, US production ramped up incredibly quick in WW2
Here it is on TO-55, for example.
Like the US made more tanks in 1942 than in 1944
Main gun is fully functional, although less rounds are carried due to needing to carry flamer fuel.
US tank production peaked late '42/early '43 ('42 if going strictly by years)
As Sang said. US factories were also safe from bombings and didn't worry about relocating the whole foundations with people
The force that landed in Normandy was all manufactured by early-mid '43.
This is the reality of training time needs and the absurdly titanic supply line distance we had to manage.
It's basically the only major war in history with truly intercontinental supply chains.
Sure, but even after the Soviets got everything sorted out the US still dwarfed them in production of most war goods
What about number of soldiers. 
Omw to steal Zis-3s for Romanian tank development
(Yes, WW1 and some of the colonial wars were continents away from their home base - but a lot of stuff was still made locally instead. It just wasn't practical to ship all guns and ammo from say the UK to India.)
Soviets did put more boots on ground and did the bulk of the land fighting. Heck, the Brits had more soldiers than us in the US did.
The US actually mobilized a similar number of troops, but most didn't make it to the front line
The principle contribution of the US to the war, was in industry.
Doesn't British has less soldier deaths than US tho 
US pushed Japan
In total, no. In normandy, probably.
The US took training at a far more leisurely pace (because they could), and also US forces had a far lower tooth to tail ratio
And the active front we were in, Japan, as mentioned - wasn't one that needed huge numbers of ground infantry. It needed huge numbers of ships and planes.
AFV production was actually scaled back in the US to provide more steel for shipbuilding programs.
The problem with US production was not their end output but their startup. Their Bofors gun production for instance was numerous times at risk of serious setback simply because on piece of the enormous logistic train that had to be setup was not up to schedule.
I mean the US also did the lions share of beating Japan, as well as being a major player in the strategic bombing campaign against Germany, and its not like the North African campaign, Italy, and France were insignificant either
(The original plan was for ~120,000 Shermans)
Oh damn UK was 100k more than US
I mean we had plenty of production of other not as good AA guns in the interim
and even said not as good guns were still better than what most other countries were fielding
The big reason it took so long to get the bofors into service is the originals and british were basically hand made.
Lots of "file to fit" instructions.

Chicago Piano? 
(Note, this is also why the US didn't ask the soviets for a license to produce the ShVAK in '41 despite the autocannon troubles we were having)
As Chinn recounts, the US delegates were very impressed by it but were horrified at the manufacturing process.
Really worth choosing Hispano over?
What, the US made like 100,000 Oerlikons, mostly in 1942, and the Chicago Piano was also made in not insignificant numbers
And like a Chicago Piano is still an equal to the Japanese 25mm gun
The hispano could be quite well industrially made, and they were still optimistic about the ability to get it beaten into good shape.
Yes. That's what I'm saying. European industry was more craftsmanship focused and could produce anything decently. The US could master the production but they need serious effort to set up everything.
Obviously bofors blows either of those out of the water, but like US bofors + RPC and director control blows everything out of the water
I mean they had set up a lot of it before the war, the rampup time only looks bad if you count the time before the US entered ww2
The army did shitloads of familiarization contracts and the like
Oerlikons made in 1942 doesn't sound like an interim in 1941.
The US didn't enter the war until very late in 1941, so our production in most of 1941 was quite low
The chicago piano also wasn't as bad as commonly made out to be. The early issues were just teething problems, and they eventually proved pretty good (albeit not nearly as good as the Bofors or Pom-Pom stacks).
It would be an upgrade to replace the IJN 25x3 mount with the revised Chicago Piano.
The idea of file to fit parts when going into a war is like it’s own series of issues in manufacturing and output
The US was able to avoid large lead times for many crucial items by just paying companies to know how to make items in the event of war
So anything that was developed before like mid-1941 saw production ramp up immediately
Also, funny thing about the pompom. On of the reason the US didn't go for it was because the coordite was not easily produced in the US and they couldn't substitute it. So any plan to mass produce it fell in the water.
The pom-pom did however, did do well in the trials and was the second option in case bofors fell through.
Still amazes me how horrible 25mm was and how Ijn was bearing with it.
As Phoenix? Said before you have a gun with fire rate of bofors but hitting power closer to that of 20mm
And also worse traverse than either
They did end up building a truly excellent DP gun in the IJN, but couldn't make enough of them to make that much of a dent.
Plus only a few of the IJN 25s had director control
Yeah came far to late sadly
I mean I wouldn't say sadly
Duck guns were incredibly cool
I still haven't found a single positive source on the pompom in Dutch literature.
They also iirc only had AA rounds lol
no director control except on a few of the later triples
Yeah the triple 25mm mounts with the domes
Shame we never got the Dutch DP 12cms
Meanwhile the US has tachymetric FCS on the bofors guns
I mean what really made the 5"/38 so good at well everything was the quality of US gun directors and fire control computers
they were easily the best in the world
US and Netherlands, the only two countries exporting tachymetric fc.
Shame most of the early 5"/38 shells game with defective fuzes.
Weight*
Either the 1941 or models thereafter finaly fixed the problem
It was light enough to be put on most ships and being light make gun control much easier
the Dutch Hazemeyer mounts had advantages and disadvantages, the mount was incredibly advanced with tri axis stab and a self contained radar and FCS, but they were incredibly heavy for a dual bofors mount and were quite unreliable
"unreliable"
at the end of the day you are often better with centralized director control rather than each mount having its own local FCS
Also not all had self contained fcs. Thats only the Mk IV and No. 4
Im fairly certain the Dutch ones still had integral FCS, just not radar guided
@humble mulch When this girl has best AA Japan in paper could have offered
Guns: 127 mm/50 Type 5. Was planned to be DP guns for ships. Replacing the older 127mm. Only 1 gun was build
AA: 40 mm/60 Type 5. Reverse engineered model of a captured Bofors irrc
That's what I said. The No. 4 comes with the advanced independent fcs.
The No. 3 still was reliant on external direction for effective performance.
Lol yeah I’ve seen that one
I mean Japan only had single bofors mounts without RPC and director control AFAIK, and they also had real reliability issues
I think Soviet way was best
This gun was a navalized version of the Army 37 mm 61-K, which was derived from the 45 mm 49-K, which was itself derived from the Bofors 25 mm (1") Model 1933
They were designed with integral FCS, they just didn't have access to the radar tech for as high speed and quality rangefinding
They still had the analog computer
So they literally create their own 40mm Bofors by following legacy of 25mm
........
And used a stereoscopic rangefinder instead of a radar one
Like the rangefinding wasn't as good, but it had integral FCS
You're not listening at all are you.

The hazemeyer mounts aren't designed to receive external direction, the analog FCS is mounted directly on the gun
The brits just fitted the guns with better rangefinders
Do you have any idea what those rangefinders on De Ruyter and post refit Java are for.
Lol, I miss the whole US manufacturing thing bc of sleep

Modular concept is great, what bad about LCS is how overblown and suck the program is
True
Is that supposed to be 8in gun in lieu of VLS farm?
I think so.
What are the fixed wing aircraft in the concept art?
8in? Doesn't the Burke use 5in?
Back gun option is likely this 8 inch
Mighty F-14B is coming for WT so should talk about her
The F-14 received its first of many major upgrades in March 1987 with the F-14A Plus (or F-14A+). The F-14A's TF30 engine was replaced with the improved F110-GE-400 engine. The F-14A+ also received the state-of-the-art ALR-67 Radar Homing and Warning (RHAW) system. Many of the avionics components, as well as the AWG-9 radar, were retained. The F-14A+ was later redesignated F-14B on 1 May 1991. A total of 38 new aircraft were manufactured and 43 F-14A were upgraded into B variants
The F-14B Tomcat is sometimes called the “Bombcat” since it was the first fighter of the series, which could be equipped first with conventional, and then with other types of aircraft bombs.
F-14 sure got lots of reps for a bombtruck
Gods most expensive multirole bomb truck
Meanwhile me still waiting for the Aardvark

Since the Swiss Hunter went in the German tree, the UK clearly deserves Australian F-111s
inb4 after a certain BR Australian kit ends up in the US tree
hard to say
its too similar to the LAV-25
and the LAV-III would probably be a better addition for the brits if they get to the LAVs
Military advertisements go hard
Watch live and replay coverage of the Massachusetts (SSN 798) christening ceremony at Newport News Shipbuilding on May 6, 2023. The U.S. Navy submarine is th...
you can slam my eagle
Oh hey she's one of the ones who had an unfortunate encounter with a Gabbiano
"Why do I hear sonar pings but no engines?"
camera moves up to the surface to show a Gabbiano-class corvette running silent on batteries
I believe that is the Grumman 698 VTOL concept, which was to give smaller ships a longer range jammer, point air-defense, and general utility aircraft.
Just looking at some Catholics.
Exactly like that 8inch. They wanted to put that thing on a lot of ships.
Welcome to the fleet, USS Cooperstown!
USS Cooperstown is a littoral combat ship capable of supporting forward presence, maritime security, sea control, and deterrence.
I like learning more about the pacific then Europe
There are many theatres of operation, if you meant WW2.
yeah name two of them then nerd
CBIO, ETO, PTO, MTO?
I guess it falls under the two primary theatres, but it feels distinct enough.
Did Mexico have any involvement navy wise in ww2
“So you like ww2? Name every battle”
They have a navy?
"You like ww2 US Navy? Name every US destroyer built during the war"
Dude...

Thanks Maka
the type of lists we enjoy
You should order them in hull number bruv
Name every German mine warfare vessel of WW2
oh feck
@delicate beacon
oh you like WW2? Name every single soldier who fought in it, their father's names, and their complete address
And their descendents
Now I'm not a history mod but.... Spam is spam
So please don't do that. Even if its a flex or whatever
So why did Truman's first Secretary of Defense hate the Navy and Marines so much
or rather why did Louis Johnson and Truman hate the Navy and Marines
Because it seems like the post-WW2 drawdown hit the Navy hard
Shifting strategic priorities
Navy already had a massive fleet with plenty of post WW2 hulls to work with vs the USAF which needed the new airframes and budget to keep pace with the rapid development of aircraft and nuclear weapons
Finland really be making both the best AK and best AR
beautiful
Sad Diego 
I don't speak dutch
skill issue
Let go of the faux Latin. Reduce the amount of French in your vocabulary and start pronouncing words and vowels correctly.
1984
Indeed. Good book. You should read it 
LOVELY SPAAAAAAAAAM, WONDERFUL SPAAAAM
San Diego had 15 battle stars, not 18
Grilled Spam for me
Hawaii
fun fact that monty python sketch is the reason why we call things such as the aforementioned example, 'spam'
actually 1970s Brits being nostalgic for 1940s Britain
I have to go to Spamarama once in my life time
Never have the chance but I love Spam
tfw too young to ever get to watch monty python live
spam truly my states worse export
spam is great
Why? It was awesome
unless its in a discord channel
missed the chance back in 2014
the last great reunion
i was 12 in 2014 and didnt really know who they were
Skill issue
IDK spam musubi was surprisingly good
Spoon is younger than me?
same here except I was like 10 lol
2002 baby
I thought Spoon was 30 something
Enjoy the 21 year, best year in a life time
No need to worry about anything and so full of hope
I wish it was.
Whar 
Navy historical center lists it as having 15 battle stars, and actually bothers to list each campaign it got a star for
San Diego museum claims 18, but I know who I trust more
Damn 
San Diego is actually like number 15 on most decorated US warships of WW2 list
I have actually never visited SD's NHHC site, dis quite the revelation 
How do you get these stars
Battle stars are awarded similarly to battle honours in the RN, basically for participating meaningfully in an action or campaign
US navy fans after I bite their ship
Munchy crunchy

k
Looks like a Forest Sherman
it is
What sinkex is it?
dunno
I can’t say I’d like to be that pilot
Seems a bit too suicidal
Here’s a couple with the KH-80

Chilled nose parrot shell krem
horrifying
smh
10 inch parrot shell
terrifying
they used these to make ironclads bugger off

Don’t want to deal with Kamikazes? Just say no.
Why does this bug only happens with hit
Sometimes i see maka with her account pfp instead of the server one but then it updates
Hit's just stays like this

my beloved
Hilarious how that pic is like over a year old and we still dont have an italian supership ingame

I wonder why we didn't get Alte Grau with DARDO for wows
what u laughin at 
Stupid theoretical "time travel" question but would a C-130, C-17 or C-5 be more impactful if we send 10 of one type to the Berlin Airlift
the fact that there are middle eastern countries on there
and then the UK, US etc
basically italy is selling arms to both parties
truly salesman attitude
Yadda yadda assume maintenance and whatever is taken care of
Logistical wise, which of those 3 would be more impactful
Is this better or worse than france selling their MBTs to the middle east

actually none of the Iraqi ones are tanks but still
recovery vehicle, Anti air, Artillery
C-17 would probably be best since it would be able to operate from Tempelhof with far less trouble than a C-5.
They’d be each be able to carry 77 tons.
From Wiesbaden to Berlin at cruise speed is about 30-40 minutes.
Unloading time takes 20 minutes
If you’re fast
Loading probably takes around 30 minutes.
Refueling is done at Wiesbaden (you might be able to use the tanks to transport extra fuel for the city) at the same time.
globemaster supremacy
Assuming other delays, checks, etc, total time for a round trip could be as little as 2-2.5 hours, assuming ground crews are up to it.
Using the plan for 6 hour blocks as seen in the Berlin airlift, each crew makes two trips then makes 1-2 hours for checks. Then the next crew takes over.
I’m seeing they got C-54 loading/unloading down to 10/5 minutes respectively. But that’s for 10 tons of equipment.
Assuming night vision equipment we’ll have four flights per aircraft in the day and three at night.
Seven flights per day/C-17
7•77•10 = 5390 tons of cargo each day.
Requirement was for ~5000 tons/day.
So it would be possible to do the Berlin airlift with 10 C-17s.
@thorn trail
Does that take into acct that most of the cargo is bulk cargo aka coal that's not that dense and hence you might not reach the 77 tons of the C-17
Just depends on how they load it.
Afaik the C-141 suffered from that as well. Where the cargo volume was filled out before the MTOW was reached
Coal is about 1 ton/m^3
A 463L pallet is 2.1x2.6 meters with an undetermined height but max weight capacity of 4500kg
So it wouldn’t be hard to do that.
C-17 carries 18 of them
So 81 tons max
But max takeoff is 77 tons so pallets aren’t the constraint.
Still think 77 tons is way too high since coal is more realistically 1.4tons per cubic meter
Wait hold on let me check again
Hmm
Sources say it varies from 700kg to 1400kg per cubic meter
Hmm actually it is possible
Bulk density drops to 0.8-0.9 ton/m^3
But volume really isn’t an issue as there’s lots of vertical space.
And pallets could be >1 meter high.
That would increase unloading times would it?
Maybe
It just depends
They’d have a lot of practice
And it could probably be very fast.
How about how many C-130s it would take
Would the C17 be realistically the largest plane that we could send back in time to the berlin airlift
Yeah
And even then it’s probably a close-run thing for operating out of Tempelhof.
Hmm. Wonder if the An-22 would work better
Afaik that should be slightly larger than the c17
Yeah 77 vs 80 tons
And the An-22 should be slightly better at short runway operations afaik
Yeah An-22 is notably better.
france literally seconds after the cold war ends: hello russia
would you like some of our everything
Truly?
ye
hell they even poked fun at france's arms dealing by giving the fake migs in top gun exocets lmfao
Have you seen Dutch arms dealings though.
Cold war: ends
Dutch: sells their entire tank force and most of their artillery.
same with Germany, like everyone got Leo 2s when the Great German Tank Fire Sale Happened
No. Germany still owns tanks. The Dutch dropped from 900+ to literally zero.
There's a binational tank unit, no?
C-17 require 8500 ft runway at MTOW
Idk about An-22 performance charts but I don't think it would be that much different. Still 6000+ ft for sure
I'm assuming Tempelhof to be the baseline performance needed
Largest STOL cargo plane that could realistically operate there would be about A400 or An-70 size
Unless we're resorting to water injection or something
Taking off from Tempelhof would be empty basically.
The dutch still have a few tanks in their joint German-Dutch tank unit
Yeah we're leasing 18 tanks for a joint unit. But we only started doing this after selling all our tanks.
C-17 landing at max payload with enough fuel for diversion is exactly 6000 ft 
Can be 3000 ft if you use that bonkers thurst reverser on short final maneuver
Full flap, 5 degree slope
You know what, An-124 can do that too if you use similarly noncredible maneuver.
It IS supposed to be STOL
Ah, well at least y'all are doing it now
Very cursed
That AR one is just fancy furnitures tho. The bolt action on the other hand...
Gun on the right is definitely from Mad Max
the AR guy was based enough to get rid of the forward assist, but not based enough to get a receiver without one by default
Italy wasnt that better before 2014 tbh
the Centauro trials fell through but even during current events we can see italian derived vehicles like the Lince
now on both sides
lol
that's more my point tbf
they both did it
isn't the US trying to dump the lcs' on Egypt too or am I remembering the wrong country
Currently, the Saudis are buying a customized, clean build version of the Freedoms.
It was a bold choice.
...
idk why i find this name funny
As Sarc said 4 special variant is under construction for Saudi
Fincantieri marinette marine be like
Horse it’s brilliant
USN suffers through the LCS program
China sees this andcopiesbegins their own program
the saudis spend money to get their own
cost imposition strategy successful
Also I love that the PLAN has a higher opinion of the LCS’ than the USN
(They really don't - that one thing shown in the presentation was just an export proposal at one of the conferences. It doesn't exist outside of the model.)
For littoral warfare, they have the very conventional 054A and upcoming 054B FFGs.
The Chinese military sees the Littoral Combat Ship armed with anti-ship missiles as a key element of a U.S. distributed maritime force in the Western Pacific, according to a translation of a 2020 Chinese government research paper on the U.S. Navy’s distributed lethality concept reviewed by USNI News. Chinese researchers “compared the littoral co...
Weird thing is there, they don't cite the paper they quote and I can't find it.
And doing searches for the supposed title gives nothing but links back to that piece.
they do say 'reviewed by USNI News' so I imagine they were given access to it
I'm not too surprised that a Chinese Government paper about assessing USN capabilities isn't on google
It's just without the original source it's hard to tell what's lost in translation, or the context. E.g. they could have been talking about the concept of the LCS armed with missiles and not the platforms as delivered.
I’m not gonna lie if they just brought back the dedicated ASROC launchers for the LCSs and actually made the god damn minewarfare module they’d probably be a actually useful asset
Gods greatest anti submarine platform
How good is Sub Brief as a source?
Very poor
He's wrong quite a lot, but uses his former service as a status of authority that he really does not have.
@spring briar Le Malin 
Le Malin will be presented in the latest configuration after the upgrade in Boston in 1943. The originally poor anti-aircraft armament, which they tried to strengthen in each of the five ship upgrades, finally turned out to be quite effective, including two twin-barreled and one quad mount of the 40mm Bofors autocannons and 10 20mm Oerlikons. During the same upgrade in Boston, the ship received two additional mortars for 100-kg depth charges, bringing their total number to four. But the torpedo armament had to be reduced, abandoning one of the three triple-tube launchers.
I hope it is good at killing DD’s in wt
Does anyone know if the US had any 20 inch naval guns or just experimented with them
afaik nobody actually had 20in guns
18in was the max someone ever used or even experimented with
for the US it would be the 457mm that we have in Azur Lane
Ok thx
Just find space for a tactical length VLS.
It would weigh less, be less resource intensive, and not need a complete redesign.
I know the Independences have space for a VLS unit in the bow aft of the 57mm that wasn’t used because of weight.
The US had no 20 inch guns, but they did bore out a 16” barrel to 610mm for firing tests with large projectiles for the atlas missile program
The Japanese built and tested 480mm guns and partially built but didn’t test 510 mm guns
Japan also had 18.1” guns on the yammys
Just wondering cuz a US 20 inch guns with there AP and there range finders and firing computer would be soo cracked
Irl in AL and in WOWs
A 20 inch gun would always be cracked
anything above a 18 inch doesn't really seem particularly worth it
Yeah handling and reloading seems way to much of a hassle
throw in weight and less overall ammo capacity
Now if they could find a way to autoload the 16” mk7…
USA USA USA
I’m pretty sure the crew of the Wisconsin were so good at reloading that they once did it under 30 seconds
Only Lion's late variants and Soviet Project 24 had autloader designs for their 16 inch irrc
Thats run of the mill average
i cant post my reaction or i would get warned

Mega based
that would require admitting they know where it came from
i already got warned for a similar sentence
also considering my past couple of warnings its gonna arbitrary at best
still mad over the warning I got for posting a video describing the history of these people https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_Science
Christian Science is a set of beliefs and practices which are associated with members of the Church of Christ, Scientist. Adherents are commonly known as Christian Scientists or students of Christian Science, and the church is sometimes informally known as the Christian Science church. It was founded in 19th-century New England by Mary Baker Edd...
anyway I'll remove the comment
@delicate beacon Do you have the list of ships that are possible PR6 candidates
Thanks

Wait you're.... why?
you know when that mod joined the channel and complained about off topic
they didnt like my response


20in would be worth it in the hypothetical scenario where it has gotten to the point where everyone has 60-70k ton battleships armed and armored against 18in gunfire, but until then not really
Damn
I mean at that point assuming post WW2 scenario
you might as well just start flinging the nuclear shells
Bigga gun = more range and damage for nuke
I mean this is only really possible IMO in a no-WNT scenario
where everyone is building 16s in the 20s
and goes to 18s in the 30s
and then a couple people build 20in super battleships right before or during ww2
they would basically be Yamato equivalents, but up a notch
fair
tho even then I don't really think people would be going too insane with their designs considering post WW1 economic considerations
Also are these AMRAAMS
since basically everyone but the US would be broke
I have no idea
I mean yeah thats why WNT came around
I think there sparrows but I have no idea how that thing would be able to guide either sparrows or AMRAAMs
but you know if people really wanted to do it, they would find a way
OK I think you are right about them being sparrows
Which begs the question, what radar is guiding them
I don't think its a sparoair
tho I'm wondering if its some sparrow development being tested
Use RAPs
Early sparrows started delopment in late 1940s.
1950
What reddit had to say about it
they are claiming that it was just a mockup for show
Old beam riding version
The plane its mounted on isn't old enough to be part of sparrow development
They used Hellcats, Skyraiders, and eventually several jets for development.
ah
tho I suppose you could just develop a radar pod for guidance
similar to the AIM-152's proposal
Yeah. It was a beam-rider so pretty basic.
Earliest photo I’ve seen of a sidewinder.
I’ve seen it dated as 1949 but more reliable sources say 1950.
Test fired later that year.
Kinda.
A big part of the GD/W proposal was for the illuminator to also be rear-facing.
As the missile didn’t have an Active radar seeker while the H/R proposal did.
The IIR seeker was mainly a backup but did offer autonomous terminal homing.
This allows the F-14 (or other aircraft) to run away after volleying off their missiles.
surprised no one didn't attempt that concept before
even with active radar homing missile it seems like a pretty decent concept
It takes up a pylon and datalinking means that you can just use an aircraft further away to guide it.
Su-57 has those cheek mounted radars to similar effect and there were proposals for the F-22 to have similar ones installed.
But network-centric warfare kinda makes it unnecessary.
fair
You mean IRST?
No, the Su-57 has a pair of smaller Aesa radars in its cheeks.
Ah
X bands ye
listen..
Likely as counter to new F-14B
Hmm. Su-33= F-14, Mig-29K= F-18?
rotund
shitty export carrier flanker is a good way to put one in without basically annihilating top tier with another uber jump
That sounds way too smart for Gaijin
Im sure they will find some way to screw this up
I mean current state is
2 F-16, 2 F-14 vs Mig-29 and Mig-23ML 
so yeah its fine
the eu still fucking around with tornados when gaijin forgets to put in anything actually good
they'll add them like four updates late 
I like how
British puts its influence on European plane names
Just Eurofighter?
British: Nah slap Typhoon in its name since British
Europe: Just Next gen fighter?
British: Nah call it Tempest since British
Much better names than NGAD ngl
i assume it'll get an actual name later into development
Yup
Turkish MMU name become Kaan
Maybe Ngad will also be dinosaur like Raptor
Tyrannosaurus?
Too long
@tough quail
splendid
We aren’t getting the R-77 anytime soon
Same with the aim-120
Probably gonna end up with the active radar R-27s
It's already in the files. For the Yak-141.
There’s been a lot of things in the files for a long time
this was about the future of eagle/flanker variant spam anyway
fair
which is when the really funny leaks start inshallah
Lets actually be immune to drafts as war thunder players by being a national security risk

You'll get your correct model but it'll be at br 5.0 with no good reason
Don't worry, I almost don't play WT Naval
Not like Malin is in her prime anyway, she's in her 1943 refit
Massive loads of AA dakka, but loses a torp toob
Is Helena still broken as fuck? 
Always has been
Good news is most Helenas are zombies
But a sentient Helena player that has a grudge for you is probably the most terrifying thing to exist
Where was hoods coat of arms placed on the ship, or is the coat of arms being displayed on a ship just something that WoWs does
Best girl as always. 
Most Royal Navy ships retain their coat of arms on their bridge throughout the war.
Huh wows does that but not on hood or I’m just missing it
Hood doesnt seem to carry it on the bridge like others.
WoWS' Hood isn't greatly modelled or coloured, tbh.
Yeap. Hood has it on the gun plug/tampions, but not the ship bridge itself.
Conversely, ships like Repulse have them right there.
It's in general not a standardized thing.
repulse has hers in game, I’ll check renown
Renown 44 should have it. Renown in the tech tree is an abomination and should be burnt to the keel.
Yeh renown 44 had hers, I just wish the tier 8 was a theoretical hood 42’ refit
Eh, just an Admiral will do, to be honest.
Designs like J3 are alright. Hawke is an invention, but looks alright.
Just stay away from Drach's "1944 Hood". Gives me a headache.
I wanna more American dreadnoughts refits too
Unfortunately I do believe that one is the most plausible, at least you’ve never seen his HMS hood all forwards turrets from ultimate admirals
At least I got hoods special flag from missions today
Just on top of my head:
-
133mm > 113mm, chronic shortage of 133mm mount
-
funnel caps, Vanguard's design is barely in wind tunnel testing
-
Hangar/Catapult, RN is busy pulverizing the entire section by 1943 and turning it into a boat deck so extra AA can be added
-
wrong antifouling/bottom colour, but I've talked about this so many times here I'm sure everyone hates me for it
Well hoods refit was most likely gonna happen in the US so just saying “extra AA” is understating it
Plus after the refit I do see hood mostly in the pacific
There are two issues with a "Hood refit"
I doubt that the US would dedicate the resources to do a refit on the QE/Renown's level, especially with King in command
Nor is the British going to do a refit to Hood for the forseeable future short of repairing her battle/wear and tear damage (like her stripped turbine while chasing after Strasbourg during Operation Catapult)
Mostly because British shipyards are in full capacity and everything is devoted to the construction of smaller craft and escorts
It's also why the slated R-class and the remaining two QE refits are told to piss off and they were relegated to second-line convoy escort duty.
So, while Hood 1942 does look appealing, don't think it's going to happen first and foremost, and if its going to be done, most certainly not a radical rebuild unless she's badly damaged to the point that a full reconstruction is required.
Italy will likely get the Tornado ADV this patch except with worse missiles than the british one
then again i think gaijin barely modelled the difference between Skyflash TEMP and SuperTEMP
so it will most likely be nearly the same
What was the reason behind Richelieu's US refit?
we will have an eagle and a flanker about four updates before anything close to a typhoon
I remember reading it was some sort of special request
but how'd they talk the US into that
Two massive reasons for the special request as I recall
stole the statue of liberty and held it hostage
For one, 3 of Turret II's guns are completely out of action, with Gun No.7's gun barrel completely destroyed
For two, Hermes did a funny with her swordfish in the opening stages of Operation Menace
Her stern near the shaft area was damaged, and subsequently was partially repaired with a cofferdam built around the area
ah so basically she really needed repairs
By 1942, honestly, I don't think Richelieu is combat worthy
and I assume the british shipyards couldn't have handled it
Nor are there enough propellent charges
So the US took over, looked at the shell and charges, and made shells and charges
Though IIRC the shell was a scaled up/down version of a US shell, but this is more @spring briar 's territory
guess that makes a degree of sense
(The US manufactured propellent charges were dogshit)
Also worth noting is that US also did the same thing with the 152mm guns
Except this time they ripped Emile Bertin's turret II open, stole her middle gun and sent it to Dahlgren
always thought it was a little funky that in the middle of the war, the US'd go
"yeah sure we'll do it, send her across the atlantic to us"
And tbh, ignoring the trust issues
The fire control radar US gave to Richelieu can only be described as an out of season April Fool's joke
"Yes Monsieur, you have a battleship fire control system"
they did the absolute bare minimum they could
"No sir, all we are giving you is a PT Boat radar because we don't trust you"
and yet wondered why france kept spiting them during the cold war
I'm guessing security concerns?
they barely considered the french allies
this is the same USN that would paint out parts of the Iowas' radars in photographs iirc
I think there were also a few US ships that would have stuff like that installed after setting off but I can't remember where my brain is pulling that tidbit from
Radar is sensitive technology
Cant have a spy disclosing your stuff now
At least it's not Shinano level secret
a grand total of four fucking photographs found so far, three of which are literal pixels
I love that Shinano was such a secret that Archerfish's crew didn't get credit for the kill for a while afterwards
Le Malin has quadruple bofors and a few 20mm oerlikon tubs after her US refit
Something close to an as built Fletcher, I think
The cost is naturally the last set of torpedoes behind the second funnel gets deleted
Now let's see if WT does the gamer move and classifies them as CL, as the US did to hasten their refit waiting times 
Don't expect them to hit 40+ knots either, as their max speed was reduced to IIRC ~37 knots with all the new things aboard
how good was the SAP tho
The powder bags were the same sort the USN used, the French just weren’t used to USN handling methods
Light battleship Bismarck
Specifically made to murder DD’s and lightly armoured CL’s
Jabo
Toob
Rich why uhh
Horrible turret traverse and unprotected on top
When expecting hunting stuff like these
Why no enclosed turret
because heavy
Candy
Tbf they are quite old designs when compared to other top tier DD’s in WT
Why no 3"
Like
The Fantasques are contemporary with the first modern class of US destroyers, the farraguts
Due to copyright restrictions, some music and scenes have been altered or removed in this upload. You can find the original unaltered documentary here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SCMCr2Kh1wI
Jeremy Clarkson tells the story of the audacious commando raid on the German occupied dry dock at St Nazaire in France on March 28th 1942. Made for t...
Hr Ms Middelburg
Ah
And the farraguts had issues just like the fantasques when first completed
Being fitted with the brand new 5”/38
Nice 240
Give the fantasques the same amount of time to evolve like the farragut -> fletcher lineage and we’d likely get something spectacular
Alabama needs work
The rust is starting to piss me off
Alabama has a mix of AA
Quite interesting for a ship thats called lucky A
Most of her AA is at the bow
And amidship
Mostly amidships
Bow is good place for AA
How
normally most ships ive been on all upgraded to 40 mm bofors
but to never loose a sailor to combat is a feat most ships earn
I like how everything there is from Turkish claims and not a single French one
They also captured the commanders too
a little bit of surface rust is nothing to be overly concerned about
its not like these ships didnt achieve considerably more rust while in active service
its just what metal does when it encounters oxygen
or water
both of which are quite prevalent on earth
many of these museums aren't going to perform extensive paint work unless it reaches a point where the expense is worth it, slightly damaging the aesthetic isn't that big of a deal
Rust isn't even really damage to aesthetic if ya ask me
Ships are something to be used, not showcase models to place behind glass under vacuum
I preserved ships for a living
A nice coat of haze grey is gonna look good for the public
Yorkie or any CV is the largest project a volunteer force is gonna deal with
Battleships and destroyers i can finish from bow to stern in a week
Just restoring and preserving a space for the public to get into
i should ask for volunteer work on midway and iowa plus the victory ship the only skill i know its preservation and restoration
Can you rescue Almirante Grau and restore her for me?
If its alfoat i can restore any ships hull and bulkheads
Just need the supplys
Which will run around 2k
Paint is also incredibly sticky and hard to get off the skin
Diamantina has unfortunately seen better days
shes pretty rusty thanks to covid and the like screwing over her maintenance period
Vampire is in drydock right now though
here she is in her 1981 drydocking
Just don't look at a ship after staying at sea for more than 3 months
stares at KGV after her 1940 cruise
Wish I had images of Scheer after her cruise
We have some of Spee. 
Vanguard looks like a piece of shit too after a one month extensive shakedown.
All bow paint basically flaked off, and wake areas are badly rusted.
I'm not entirely sure about this one, since Im not sure if "sacks of coal" is the feel of US propellent charges, but yes, poorly suited at the very least
Perhaps they wrongly stacked the propellant
Or forgot the strings holding it together
It’s definitely an oversight on their part, but it’s nothing that I haven’t experienced many times in my day to day working life
M60A1's frontal armor
Thin
According to Defense News, the U.S. Air Force is seeking to retire a total of 310 aircraft during fiscal year 2024 to free up funds for purchasing more modern replacements. That's more than double the 115 retirements that Congress approved in 2023. Among the 310 planes on the chopping block are 74 of the venerable F-15 type C and D fighters.

Makes sense. F-15 is close to 40 years old now
F-15EX is last attempt to make her live longer
just throw them to Davis and reactive them during war
Like Ghost Fleet
fun fact, the holotype for Dilophosaurus didn't live the happiest life and had horribly fucked hands:
"On its left side, it had a fractured scapula and radius, and fibriscesses (like abscesses) in the ulna and the outer phalanx bone of the thumb. On the right side it had torsion of its humeral shaft, three bony tumors on its radius, a truncated articular surface of its third metacarpal bone, and deformities on the first phalanx bone of the third finger. This finger was permanently deformed and unable to flex."
tldr, one arm bent at the completely wrong direction due to joint issues and the other got completely crushed
Were there any cases of during WW2 ships defecting to other side?
Now that is what I wonder might be a good question. Cause I can't recall any case of such
SS Normandie, one of the most beautiful ocean liners ever built, entering New York, then leaving a burnt out shadow of her former self.
As for the defection thing, not any that I particularly remember. Plenty of ships that were salvaged and pressed into foreign/enemy service though.
Ghost Fleet is such a goddamn stupid book.
Entire Regia Marina after 43
Interesting... thank you
Technically, as long as Captain of a fleet lets the other side know that they're either going out of battle/joining their enemy that can be considered defecting
Didn't take a picture of the firing console for the Sea Sparrows, but I do have one of the console for the Harpoons (Peter Skram in Denmark)
Yeah, what the RM did definitely isn't defecting
I believe there are a few instances of ships defecting from Vichy France to join the Free French Navy
For them, their country signed an armistice with the Allies and surrendered. The Navy itself did not actually do so and was initially trying to figure out where it could find safe harbor while clashing with German forces.
Once they arrived at Allied ports, due to lacking any other options, they resisted British attempts to force their surrender (much to the amusement of the Americans) and in the end a long armistice was signed for the sake of co-belligerence against the Germans and RSI.
Though the two most powerful Italian battleships were interred at Suez, the rest of the fleet was able to operate, largely under its own authority (though, like every Allied navy, still under Allied Supreme command), for the rest of the war.
Hm.. interesting..
The F-15C and Ds are spent planes, they would need complete rebuilds to keep flying safely for more than a couple more years
If you want clear defections, your best bet would be to go and look back at WWI
There were a couple cases of Austro-Hungarian ships that defected and sailed to Italy
true true
The EX was supposed to replace the C and D in service with a plane with similar but better capabilities, but they are newbuild airframes
Thanks for a little history lesson

Project 56K destroyer Bravy is here Horse 
its a Kotlin class with Volna-M SAM system with an ammunition load of 18 missiles. SACLOS missiles are capable of acquiring targets at 16 kilometers and are excellent for destroying aircraft at long and medium distances. Moreover, Volna-M missiles are also capable of hitting lightly armored surface targets, dealing tremendous damage when their 30 kg warheads detonate inside the hull. The mount has launching rails for two missiles, and reloading takes a very long time.

You can see the 4R90 Yatagan fire control radar for those missiles near her second funnel 
The vismod abrams
You probably forgot cuz it was announced like
2 weeks before everything else
okay yeah I didn't register that as part of the same patch
Fren 
How much do you have to change if for example I want to use an Iowa class hull as a Trident SLBM carrier
It seems like gaijin wants to spam every variant of the Ariete amv as a different tank so we are probably getting the pt 2 next patch
Like say spared no expense
first we change your prescription because your meds aren't powerful enough







